AbstractPhil commited on
Commit
6464229
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 56afbef

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +27 -0
README.md CHANGED
@@ -10,6 +10,33 @@ tags:
10
  - spectral-attention
11
  - companion-model
12
  ---
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13
 
14
  # geolip-svae-transformer
15
 
 
10
  - spectral-attention
11
  - companion-model
12
  ---
13
+ # Reimagining the geolip-svae-transformer
14
+
15
+ Yes I know, again. When the formulas don't work, we must adapt. I'm not here to say this will work yet either,
16
+ yet I'm learning from all the elemental pieces that faulted in the last, and including what I consider to be
17
+ the best possible continuation to where the model requires to go.
18
+
19
+ ## Likely Faulty Experiment; Aleph Omega Logits
20
+
21
+ The conceptualization of an aleph logit is, a pipe dream. If this works, and the experiments show it's worth a try,
22
+ this will be the first attenuation logit that I'll be converging towards the necessary goal.
23
+
24
+ This will allow something that the model has been missing and the codebook only hints at, the direct adjudication
25
+ processing of logit routes.
26
+
27
+ There are many formats of logits. There are many losses to cultivate them. Yet they all have one specific rigidity that
28
+ these models cannot support, and that's being dragged away from their actual task towards SOMETHING ELSE in relation
29
+ to a task using SOME FORM of entropy over time measurement.
30
+
31
+ IF THE ALEPH LOGIT WORKS, this will essentially be a unique and different format of logit that - I believe when correctly tuned -
32
+ will form a direct internal mapping of the model to the very recurrent structure of the omegas themselves.
33
+
34
+ There are WAYS to do this now, and you can MAP what is normally, but I hypothesize - loosely - that this process here,
35
+ the Aleph Omega Logits will allow teaching the very nature of fractal implicit alignment TO models.
36
+
37
+ I've been dancing around this topic for some time until my mind snapped to the idea. Now I'm dug in like a tick, and I don't think
38
+ there's an easy way to explain it through formula yet.
39
+
40
 
41
  # geolip-svae-transformer
42