Please assess the completion status of the following clinical trial:

Trial Title: Models of Auditory Hallucination

Study Design Characteristics:
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Intervention Model: PARALLEL
- Observational Model: None
- Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
- Time Perspective: None
- Masking: DOUBLE
- Phase: None
- Number of Arms: 2.0

Eligibility Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:~* Aged 18 - 45 years~* Voice hearing patients~* Meet diagnostic criteria for DSM-V schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder~* Report hearing voices at least once a day~* Score \> 3 on PANSS P3 (hallucinations item)~Exclusion Criteria:~* DSM-V substance use disorder within the past 6 months~* Previous head injury with neurological symptoms and/or unconsciousness~* Intellectual disability (IQ \< 70)~* Non-English speaker~* Contraindications for TMS, including:~  * History of seizures~ * Metallic implants~ * Pacemaker~ * Pregnancy~* Less than 6 weeks of a stable dose of psychotropic medication(s)~* Comorbid mood or anxiety diagnosis~* Clinically/behaviorally instability and unable to cooperate with TMS procedures~* Clinically significant medical condition(s)~* Unstable medical condition(s) based on EKG, medical history, physical examination, and routine lab work~* Personal history of stroke~* Family history of seizures

- Gender: ALL
- Minimum Age: 18 Years
- Maximum Age: 45 Years
- Healthy Volunteers: f

Study Arms:
- TMS to insula (Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR): This study will recruit 30 clinical voice hearers (P+H+). They will complete two parallel forms of the conditioned hallucinations task (with different visual and auditory stimuli) on two occasions, separated by a week.~TMS and sham will be delivered in a randomized counterbalanced order. Hypothesis: Inhibiting the insula will decrease prior over-weighting. If this computational perturbation is responsible for conditioned hallucinations, then ameliorating it with TMS that increases insula engagement will decrease conditioned hallucination responses. Furthermore, the prior weighting parameter will be reduced following active TMS compared with sham.
- TMS to cerebellum (Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR): This study will recruit a further 70 clinical voice hearers. Again, they will complete parallel forms of the conditioned hallucinations task on two occasions, separated by a week. They will receive excitatory TMS over the cerebellum (and sham on the other occasion, in a randomized counterbalanced order). Hypotheses: Exciting the cerebellum will increase belief-updating. If poor belief-updating contributes to conditioned hallucinations, increasing cerebellum engagement should decrease conditioned hallucinations and alter the belief-updating model parameter compared with sham TMS.

Based on this trial design, predict the completion outcome and termination type (if applicable).