Datasets:
to-be
/
epstein-emails

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
int64
1
6.58k
email_document_id
int64
1
1.95k
source_filename
stringlengths
26
26
subject
stringclasses
795 values
message_order
int64
0
18
from_address
stringclasses
676 values
to_address
stringclasses
440 values
other_recipients
stringclasses
129 values
timestamp_raw
stringlengths
0
45
timestamp_iso
stringlengths
14
14
message_html
stringlengths
0
10.4k
document_id
stringlengths
22
22
258
90
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
Ghislaine Maxwell
1
Mark Cohen
[]
Fri, 4 Mar 2011 11:14:35 -0500
20110304161435
FYI, following up on my email of this morning. Again, I have no intention of responding unless you direct otherwise.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022248
259
90
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
Ghislaine Maxwell
2
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:28 AM
20110304082800
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022248
260
90
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022247.txt
Ghislaine Maxwell
3
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Friday, March 4, 2011 4:38 PM
20110304163800
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022249
261
91
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt
Re: Results
0
Al seckel [[email protected]]
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/16/2010 1:20:06 PM
20101216132006
you can call as i am obviously up.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223
262
91
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt
Re: Results
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Al seckel <
[]
Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM
20101216050125
I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. .
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223
263
91
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022223.txt
Re: Results
2
Al seckel <11J>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
20101215123600
Jeffrey, The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.<br><br>Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed.<br><br>Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success.<br><br>We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search.<br><br>We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material.<br><br>And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc.<br><br>Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you.<br><br>As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers.<br><br>You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there.<br><br>This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022224
264
92
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
0
Darren lndyke
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
3/1/2012 3:54:12 AM
20120301035412
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348
265
92
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
1
Erika Kellerhals <LM>
<REDACTED>
[]
February 29, 2012 10:41:17 PM EST
20120229224117
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348
266
92
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
2
"William L. Blum"
Robert A. Solomon
["Erika Kellerhals", "Edward B. Reynolds, Jr."]
February 29, 2012 10:26:26 PM EST
20120229222626
Did you guys see this?<br>Bill
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348
267
92
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022348.txt
Fwd: front page of foxnews.com right now!! - Look at this!
3
Justin Blackhall
"William L. Blum" <EIMIIMI>, "Robert A. Solomon"
[]
February 29, 2012 10:06:39 PM EST
20120229220639
<a href='http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-Ts-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/'>http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/29/obama-bundler-works-Ts-virgin-islands-tax-adviser/</a>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022349
270
93
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022262.txt
Re: Oil options
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Vinit Sahni
[]
03/13/2014 11:39 PM AST
20140314033900
thanks 4 hours for a quote in a normally fast moving market ? confirms my voiced concerns
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022264
271
93
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022262.txt
Re: Oil options
3
Vinit Sahni
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
3/14/2014 4:41:47 AM
20140314044147
Agree will address, need to fix this. Back mid day tuesday from tokyo.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022262
272
94
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt
Re: off the record
0
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/9/2015 6:17:14 PM
20150109181714
Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes -- and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose? But you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656
273
94
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022656.txt
Re: off the record
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM
20150109130800
Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, " he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022657
277
96
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt
Re:
0
Michael Wolff
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM
20150109183309
Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as "reported fact." Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660
278
96
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM
20150109132000
the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and specifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, " he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never. it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022660
281
97
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346.txt
Re: Oil options [C]
2
Paul Morris
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
3/14/2014 10:27:39 PM
20140314222739
I do want to talk to u about this, they spent too much thinking about options here, let me know when u have couple minutes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022346
282
98
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt
Re: Results
0
Al seckel
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/16/2010 1:15:29 PM
20101216131529
My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wild page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down. Then, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites. I spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself. What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head... We were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably. I must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219
283
98
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt
Re: Results
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Al seckel
[]
Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM
20101216050125
I was never told never, that there was a 10k 'fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219
284
98
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022219.txt
Re: Results
2
Al seckel
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
20101215123600
Jeffrey, The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent. Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed. Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success. We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search. We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material. And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc. Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you. As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers. You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there. This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022220
285
99
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022770.txt
Help!
0
<REDACTED>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:39 PM
20160119233900
Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. I have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for this.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022770
286
100
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt
Re: thoughts
0
Michael Wolff
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Friday, January 16, 2015 2:54 PM
20150116145400
I don't think I would put her out there. It probably seems too self-serving. But let's discuss. I have an idea about how to best use. Do you have time to continue our conversation post-3:00 today or tomorrow?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667
287
100
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667.txt
Re: thoughts
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM
20150116043600
Out of respect and love for my former girlfriend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpoenaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire _ time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that Mi=claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She would acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022667
288
101
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt
Re: off the record
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM
20150109130800
Landon. the story teller , crafted much of it out of whole cloth. . part of her story, is that she was at multiple orgies with clinton and speciifically, the minute details of a dinner had on the island with him, " he sat on my left. came by black. heli. flown by ghislaine. clinton was NEVER EVER there, never, it punches a hole in the dershowitz , andrew allegation. making it all apparent that it was fantasy. and delusional. thoughts. who should break the story.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658
289
101
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt
Re: off the record
1
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:17 PM
20150109141700
Lets have a chat -- you do need to fight back some how. Present evidence that she is lying AND show the world that you are no longer that guy. You have made changes __and that this is the past. My sense is that its TV type thing where you just talk honestly about this/present evidence that its not true/ and focus on what you have been doing for past five years. Charlie Rose? But you cant just sit there taking punches like this -- especially wen the British tabs are driving this. Maybe you go on British TV.... Call me any time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022659
290
101
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658.txt
Re: off the record
2
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/9/2015 6:24:30 PM
20150109182430
on phone now -- will call when i am done
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022658
291
102
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661.txt
Re: off the record
0
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/9/2015 6:57:01 PM
20150109185701
<p>can talk now.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661
292
102
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661.txt
Re: off the record
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:20 PM
20150109132000
<p>number?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022661
295
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
0
Kathy Ruemmler <101111111>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 10:50 AM
20180823105000
Here's a story from The New York Times that I thought you'd find interesting:<br><br>The principled case for impeachment is clear. What's missing is the courage.<br><br><a href="Read More...">Read More...</a><br><br><a href="Get The New York Times on your mobile device">Get The New York Times on your mobile device</a>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
296
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Kathy Ruemmler
[]
Aug 23, 2018, at 11:03 AM
20180823110300
I think he makes the argument that it was his , trumps money , making it not illegal. though he also said he only found out afterwards? and the fact according to the indicment was billed as services rendered and grossed up. im sure his acct has flipped anyway. . I did talk in detail to starr yesterday re indicments how trump can make a deal ( special counsel) . clintons trash can yes starr gave me more. YECHHHH!
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
297
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
2
Kathy Ruemmler <111111111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:13 AM
20180823111300
It makes no difference whether it was his money. Issue is failure to disclose. Plus, fact that he has lied his ass off about it makes clear that he knew it was illegal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
298
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Kathy Ruemmler
[]
Aug 23, 2018, at 11:30 AM
20180823113000
id, Morris concedes that American Dharma could be an uncomfortable experience for those still wrestling with the realities of [stpithe Trump era in America: "It's a kind of horror movie," says Morris. "I don't know how better to describe it."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
299
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
4
Kathy Ruemmler <111>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 11:55 AM
20180823115500
Rich person problem
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
300
103
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275.txt
Re: NYTimes: Donald Trump's High Crimes and Misdemeanors
5
Jeffrey Epstein
Kathy Ruemmler f
[]
8/23/2018 4:01:11 PM
20180823160111
ill call you from new york
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022275
301
104
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815.txt
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS/NO PRIVILEGE WAIVER/PER YOUR REQUEST
0
Brad Edwards
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
4/6/2018 3:49:11 PM
20180406154911
I expect a crisp, new bill. Your personalized message can say whatever you would like but it should include, "you win!"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022815
302
105
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt
Re: Results
0
Al seckel [111111111111111.11111111111111111]
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/16/2010 1:31:21 PM
20101216133121
Conshita is very media savy, as you are probably well aware. She knows exactly what we are doing, and is taking her own counter-measures, but it is constant wack-a-mole with her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230
303
105
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt
Re: Results
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Al seckel
[]
Thu, December 16, 2010 5:20:13 AM
20101216052013
over the weekend.<br><br>My initial estimate, given to me by Pablos, was 25, and that was based solely on his quick look at the situation, and not knowing what was really out there. In fact, as I have repeated many times, the job was far far worse that originally expected, you have a dedicated group of people trying to undo and damage you, including now, they have started up in the last week full force again, as it is obvious that they can't fux with your wiki page any more as we blocked that.. The woman from the Daily Beast. We have programs that track this stuff, and so, for the past few days, Mike has been having a cyber war with her minions, who are actively trying to undo what we are doing, as she is trying to push her Daily beast and other articles back up. So, we have to go back and push them back down.<br><br>Then, there was the issue of trying to create additionally on you a positive web presence, with the science and org sites.<br><br>I spend literally four months of non-stop work, creativity, and my own political capital to getyou this so far, which saved you not only time, but countless dollars, and isn't something that can be readily bought. I had people working also for free. I gained access to information that standard seo companies don't have. In addition, I wasted a lot of time talking to people who promise to help, but end up providing nothing, and so, I end up having to do it myself What do I get in return, constant back slapping to my head...<br><br>We were trying to fix up your mess. I didn't create it. Just thought it would be something to help. This was NEVER about trying to pull money out of you, and fact, we have don't everything possible to keep the costs down considerably.<br><br>I must talk to you about the island thing asap. When can we do that?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230
304
105
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt
Re: Results
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Al seckel <=MIM.>
[]
Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM
20101216050125
I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. .
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230
305
105
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022230.txt
Re: Results
3
Al seckel <=1.1111>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
20101215123600
Jeffrey,<br><br>The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.<br><br>Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed.<br><br>Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success.<br><br>We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search.<br><br>We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material.<br><br>And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc.<br><br>Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you.<br><br>As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthrophy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers.<br><br>You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there.<br><br>This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022231
306
106
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt
Re:
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM
20171107054200
<p><a href="http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/">http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/</a> the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.</p><p>boies is going to be in the firing line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG, his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805
307
106
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805.txt
Re:
1
Thomas Jr., Landon [[email protected]]
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
11/7/2017 2:26:43 PM
20171107142643
<p>i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022805
308
107
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022771.txt
Help!
0
JEE
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3:46 AM
20160120034600
Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the "people" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022771
309
107
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022771.txt
Help!
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tuesday, January 19, 2016
20160119000000
i appreciate it. I should be back feb 14,
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022772
311
108
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022234.txt
Re:
0
MOMMINNEMUMMIN
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tuesday, March 8, 2011 8:32 PM
20110308203200
<p>? Good for you. And ghislaine. congrats</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022234
312
108
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022234.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
MOMMINNEMUMMIN
[]
Tue, March 8, 2011 3:27:58 PM
20110308152758
<p>Jeffrey and Ghislaine: Notes on New York's Oddest Alliance <a href='http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html'>http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2011/03/notes-on-new-yorks-oddest-couple-jeffrey-epstein-and-ghislaine-maxwell.html</a> by Vicky Ward <a href='http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward'>http://www.vanityfair.com/contributors/vicky-ward</a></p><p>&quot;I've got a story idea for you. The rebuilding of Indonesia. Or New Orleans. Or both. Go there. I've just been. You will never think the same way about anything again.&quot;</p><p>So spoke not Bill or Melinda Gates, but Ghislaine Maxwell, the 48-year-old woman being written up everywhere at the moment as the alleged &quot;procurer&quot; of young women for billionaire Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein, 57, is the financier who spent a year in jail on charges of soliciting prostitutes—and now there is talk of another investigation because various women, now in their twenties and thirties, have come forward with allegations that he molested them when they were under-age. The allegations first surfaced in British newspapers, which have zeroed in on Epstein's friendship with Prince Andrew, who has recently tried to publicly disassociate himself from his old pal.</p><p>I wrote a piece for Vanity Fair in 2003 called &quot;The Talented Mr. Epstein.&quot; It was largely a business piece that focused on his mysterious exit from Bear Stearns in 1981, his close relationships with Jimmy Cayne, Les Wexner, the chairman of Limited Brands, and above all, the man who claimed to be his mentor, Steven Jude Hoffenberg, who is currently serving a 20-year-jail sentence for bilking investors in Towers Financial out of $450 million.</p><p>The piece alluded to Epstein's great friendship with Maxwell, and how she introduced him to young women with whom he had sexual relationships. But, in the end, the story didn't really go there, focusing instead on the issue that remains a mystery—how Jeffrey made his money, and how Ghislaine made hers.</p><p>This is not to say I didn't hear stories about the girls. I did. But, not knowing quite who to believe, I concentrated on the intriguing financial mystery instead. But now the women have come back. Not the same ones, different ones. And their stories are bone-chilling. Journalists from England have phoned—and, in one case, flown—to ask me about Epstein and Maxwell. Who is he? And the British, especially, want to know: Who is she? At this point, I am so bored of repeating myself to others—it was, after all, my 2003 Vanity Fairstory that really brought him into the limelight—that I have decided to write about this myself.</p><p>Bizarrely, perhaps, I have gotten to know Jeffrey and Ghislaine far better after my piece than before it. I kept running into both of them, separately, at parties. Jeffrey is not a social animal so he usually has a couple of young women with him who stand two feet behind him, as if serving a monarch. &quot;Do they speak?&quot; I remember asking him once, nodding at his lookalike blondes. He laughed. &quot;Not like you,Vicky,&quot; was his riposte.</p><p>I remembered that when we'd once discussed math—in particular, an isosceles triangle—and I revealed I hadn't studied math since I was 14 (such is, or was, the way of the British educational system), I received a package at home via messenger. It was a book: &quot;Math for idiots.&quot;</p><p>So he is not without humor, even though he doesn't drink or smoke, and hates restaurants.</p><p>&quot;Jeffrey knows a good deal about most subjects,&quot; newspaper publisher Mort Zuckerman told me last week. He was certainly preaching to the converted. The truth is, Epstein does know a lot about a lot of things. Just a few moments in his company and you know this to be true.</p><p>When I saw pictures of Prince Andrew walking in Central Park with Jeffrey, my immediate thought was that &quot;Andy&quot;—as Jeffrey calls him—is probably asking for help with his role as British trade envoy, or whatever his strange title is. Because if one thing's for sure: When it comes to international business, Jeffrey knows what he's talking about far more than &quot;Andy&quot; does. Which is why Leon Black, Mort Zuckerman and a few other financiers hang out with him.</p><p>And Ghislaine?</p><p>Full disclosure: I like her. Most people in New York do. It's almost impossible not to.</p><p>She is always the most interesting, the most vivacious, the most unusual person in any room. I've spent hours talking to her about the third world at a bar until 2am. She is as passionate as she is knowledgeable. She is curious. She has spent weeks at the bottom of the ocean, literally going deeper than anyone else. She has sent me a DVD of the fish there. Her rolodex would blow away almost anyone else's I can think of—probably even Rupert Murdochs'. She is very well-read and can talk about most things for hours. She is passionate about Bill Clinton with whom she is close friends.</p><p>Yet, touchingly, when she had to give a speech at the 40th birthday party of her best friend, Ariadne Calvo-Platero, (known fondly to her close friends as &quot;the Tennis Goddess&quot;) Ghislaine shook a little with nerves. When it comes down to things she really cares about—and Ariadne is one of them—Ghislaine shows her vulnerability. And that vulnerability is key to understanding her friendship with Jeffrey.</p><p>&quot;He saved her,&quot; I remember a close friend of mine telling me. &quot;When her father died, she was a wreck; inconsolable. And then Jeffrey took her in. She's never forgotten that—and never will.&quot;</p><p>In many ways, the socially awkward Epstein with his big house, plane, island and ranch was the perfect replacement for her father, the late Robert Maxwell, newspaper tycoon and criminal. Sure, Jeffrey had his sexual pecadillos, but then Ghislaine's father was not without his oddities. After all, it was he who died leaving a massive &quot;black hole&quot; he'd fraudulently created. To Ghislaine, Jeffrey's habits may not have seemed that strange.</p><p>In fact, she probably figured, rather like I have, after years of writing about he very rich, that most successful people in the end either have some weird habit (the late Bruce Wasserstein had the weight issues, the girl issues, and moved countries to avoid paying tax), or they break the law (Sam Waksal, Martha Stewart.) You don't tend to get to the top by being the world's most balanced human being. Even the folksy Warren Buffett didn't quite manage a normal life—whatever that is. He had a second &quot;wife&quot; for many years whose existence he has been open about.</p><p>So what to make of the current fuss over Ghislaine? I haven't spoken to her or to Jeffrey, but I suspect that her loyalty to friends like Bill Clinton will keep her in good stead, in the end, she'll be out and about as always. Look at Waksal and Stewart. No one sees them and thinks: criminal. Au contraire. In this city, money makes up for all sorts of blemishes.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022235
313
109
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt
Re:
0
Michael Wolff
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/10/2015 2:22:04 PM
20150110142204
Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663
314
109
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 1:44 PM
20150109134400
anytime tomorw ok
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022663
320
110
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022665.txt
Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM
20150110102200
now good?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022666
321
110
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022665.txt
Re:
4
Michael Wolff
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/10/2015 4:43:39 PM
20150110164339
Need 15
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022666
322
111
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
0
Thomas Jr., Landon <>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Friday, January 16, 2015 7:45 PM
20150116194500
I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with M. And M worked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.<br><br>Does franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now...
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668
323
111
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM
20150116143500
very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and position that Out of respect and love for my former girlfriend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpoenaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire Mitime she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that =PM claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She would acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668
324
111
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022668.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
2
Thomas Jr., Landon <>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM
20150116153200
Landon Thomas, Jr.<br>Financial Reporter<br>New York Times<br><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html">http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html</a>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022669
326
113
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022226.txt
Re: Results
0
Al seckel
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/16/2010 1:27:48 PM
20101216132748
ok. Just FYI, your detractors are on a rampage against you this past week.... Mike is trying to take care of it (NO! there is no extra charge) it comes with the territory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022226
328
113
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022226.txt
Re: Results
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Al seckel <[email protected]>
[]
Thu, December 16, 2010 5:01:25 AM
20101216050125
I was never told never, that there was a 10k fee per month„ you inittaly said the project would take 20.. then another 10. then another 10. .
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022228
329
113
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022226.txt
Re: Results
3
Al seckel <[email protected]>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM
20101215123600
Jeffrey,<br><br>The bots did the sweep. Here are the new results taken as of a minute ago. You have only one negative article left on front page of google, which is the Huffington Post article. The Huffington Post is extremely hard to move, because it is so powerful, has millions of links to it, and uploads massive new and original content it on a daily basis with posting from out side readers. We managed to push it down the page, as it used to be at the top. If we were able to post original content to both the science and the org site (absolutely not a single word to this day by Jessica, just talk), we would have been able to push it down even further, and off the page. WE did manage to get rid of the daily beast article, which is now far removed, inspite of their own efforts to keep it prominent.<br><br>Toxic suggested search engine terms that popped up automatically when you typed in your name are also now removed.<br><br>Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. ow the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile. Instead, Philanthrophic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists. We have stopped the hacking on your wiki site, and that was a major effor. Your wiki entry now is pretty tame, and bad stuff has been muted, bowlerized, and pused to the bottom. Careful editing and wording has muted the effect immensely. We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success.<br><br>We pushed the Edge all the way up to the front page, where it was previously buried on page 5 of google search.<br><br>We have promoted the other jeffrey epsteins, and other pages are also filled with your material.<br><br>And, while the sites are up, and in the direction we hoped, they are still new, and subject to volitility, especially if new original content is not added on a minimum of a weekly basis. I have been forbideen to add new content to the philanthrophic site as well as the science site, and therefore, as a result our rating slipped down (still on the first page, but would have liked them (and some of the articles to been able to push Huffington off page). We also helped with you images, and the first images that come of you on a google search are not of your mug shot, etc.<br><br>Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you.<br><br>As far as this site is concerned, and the continuation of this, I do not know what you wish to do. Clearly, you have no interest in my continuing. And, I am not sure if you want to continue the project at all. If the latter, and you stop, eventually it will just go into the way of entropy, and it will return to the old form. The major work has been done, but it needs to be maintained. For it to get better results, it needs to have constant input and supervision, and that means generating proper content, not just editing and grammatical fixes. Writers need to know what to write. THe philanthropy site is at the bottom of the page precisely because you have not allowed us to add any content to it, and as a result it suffers.<br><br>You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue. Please let me know what you want to do. I need to inform him, and if you are not going to use him, he needs to take on his other clients and devote his time there.<br><br>This needs to be contrasted with what we started with, which was a search on your name, which had nine/10 very toxic prominent stories, and toxic Wiki article and headline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022229
330
114
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
0
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Friday, January 16, 2015 7:56 PM
20150116195600
<p>that is old news -- buy dollar and take a nap? Kind of like buying Apple?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670
331
114
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:52 PM
20150116145200
<p>it is the beginning world currencies are out of balance. brazil, etc</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670
332
114
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
2
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:45 PM
20150116154500
<p>I think the big issue is separating yourself from Andrew. I mean I can see why a statement might help in some way -- but its Andrew (not clinton and the rest) that is keeping the story alive. Until you are able to come forward and address that the story lives on. I mean in the end he had consensual sex with• AndMworked for you. The rest is atmospherics. You have moved on! People don't know that and cant accept that unless you say as much.</p><p>Does franc drama worry you? Am writing on it now...</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670
333
114
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:35 PM
20150116143500
<p>very well, my reputation has admittedly taken a hit. however, again, more calls re currency than i can handle. in addition I am considering a statement and positon that Out of respect and love for my former girlfriend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpoenaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2, were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8. answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670
334
114
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022670.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
4
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM
20150116153200
<p>Landon Thomas, Jr.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022671
335
115
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
Help!
0
CLL
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thursday, January 21, 2016 12:19 AM
20160121001900
Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories! The problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773
336
115
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
Help!
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
20160120000000
i appreciate your support is what i meant. has anything happened recently? it is my birthday today
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022774
337
115
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
Help!
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:46 PM
20160119224600
Appreciate what? I'm not sure you do. Be back for what? Where? I don't need to be photographed. I am trying to avoid that, hence the reason why I moved out here. I don't need people coming here looking for me to give them information about you or the "people" I was documented with... It's not my property. I don't think you get it.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022774
339
115
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022773.txt
Help!
4
CLL
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:39 PM
20160119183900
Because you were not available to meet me in person last year and at this point I don't need to be seen. I can not have press, media, private investigators, film companies, etc. contacting me or my parents and sisters at home or on cell/texts and or by mail. I realize you don't have much control over this, but you can at least help me to move. I can't just get up and go like you. I left the city to escape, make a better life and I am devastated these people found me and brought to light an association of that I would rather them never to know. People think I was involved with something really bad and I lost a boyfriend of great potential over this shit. I am still in debt over all these years, been working my ass off trying to get ahead, which you could never understand I was even surviving off the pay I was getting. Well, its not any better. I dropped out of college because of you (and GM's) advice. Started working for a company you wanted me to and basically my life has has become hell since then. I have been your supporter for 16 years, the media explosion with Clinton, Trump and Cosby is affecting me. I'm not prepared for this.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022775
342
116
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022825.txt
Re: off the record
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
1/9/2015 6:20:08 PM
20150109182008
number?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022826
343
117
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
Re:
0
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
11/7/2017 3:00:15 PM
20171107150015
Did your Saudi friends survive the purge?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806
344
117
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM
20171107095500
As they are both bulkshitters
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806
345
117
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
Re:
2
Thomas Jr., Landon <11.>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM
20171107102600
i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022807
346
117
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022806.txt
Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:42 AM
20171107054200
http ://p cop le . com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-ac cusers-ro se-mcgowan/ the same boies that represents who makes totally fabricated claims re gore and clinton - boies clients, he refuses to ask them their version of events. They were never on the island and though she gave details of a dinner. I have never ever met al gore or his wife.<br>boies is going to be in the firing line, from the biz view he represented Hank Greenburg AIG„ his fees were never paid as the appeals court overturned the win. but AIG as an insurance co. -- ... phone only
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022807
347
118
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022834.txt
thoughts?
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Mortimer Zuckerman
[]
Friday, January 16, 2015 9:37 AM
20150116093700
Out of respect and love for my former girlfriend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpoenaed. her name never surfaced. Marie never contacted her. I though it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers MI= She never saw anything that She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained , not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time. . 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She woudl acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex J. . they certainly looked over age. nevr heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8. Min answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022834
348
119
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
Re: Viceland
0
Martin Weinberg
Matt Williams
[]
11 August 2018 at 11:08
20180811110800
Mr Williams, I am in receipt of your emails to Jackie Percyzk. If you first agree that any communications between you and me are off the record, I would be agreeable to receiving your questions or a clip of the episode that relates to Mr Epstein. Thanks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022823
349
119
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
Re: Viceland
1
Matt Williams
Martin Weinberg
[]
Saturday, August 11, 2018 12:41 PM
20180811124100
Hello Martin,<br><br>Thank you for getting back to me. We would be looking for on record comments or a "no comment" to our questions. But I am certainly happy to have an off record conversation with yourself as well. Perhaps we could set up a time to chat briefly off record on Monday before I send you our questions for Mr Epstein?<br><br>Kind regards,<br>Matt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022823
350
119
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
Re: Viceland
2
Martin Weinberg
Matt Williams
[]
13 August 2018 at 14:52
20180813145200
If you still want, send the questions. I would talk with you off the record after reviewing them (reserving the right at my option to make an on the record statement), hope that works for you. Marty
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822
351
119
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
Re: Viceland
3
Matt Williams
Martin Weinberg
["Tracie Morrissey"]
Friday, August 17, 2018 10:29 AM
20180817102900
Hello Marty,<br><br>Just following up on the email I sent you earlier this week requesting comment from Mr Epstein, or a representative of his, in regards a number of questions we had. I'm also cc-ing my colleague Tracie, as going forward she will be a better point of contact should you or Mr Epstein wish to respond.<br><br>Kind regards,<br>Matt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822
352
119
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822.txt
Re: Viceland
4
Martin Weinberg
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
8/17/2018 2:48:49 PM
20180817144849
FYI
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022822
353
120
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
Help!
0
<REDACTED>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Monday, February 15, 2016 3:25 PM
20160215152500
Still have Zorro ♥️ pjs... Perfect for my lonely Valentine's Day. 😊<br><br>So, what do you think about my suggestion to help?<br><br>How are you holding up?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801
354
120
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
Help!
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
20160120000000
what do you suggest?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801
355
120
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801.txt
Help!
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:19 PM
20160120191900
Happy birthday, I remember the few I had spent with you, good memories!<br><br>The problem is that you may appreciate my support but that doesn't help me. Yes, I told you I can't have people coming here to ask about you and ex pals.... My landlord may shoot them. He is pissed. I need your help. Out of all the people you should be helping is someone who actually genuinely cared about you.i realize you're living the good life and I'm not your concern, but if you really appreciated my support then you'd help me otherwise I don't know what I'll do.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022801
366
121
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022776.txt
Help!
6
JEE
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Friday, January 22, 2016 2:28 PM
20160122142800
Since I need and at this point want to move off this breathtaking property, I want to be able to buy a home in NJ, with $0 savings, = impossible. With salary and cost of living, I don't get ahead. Also my luck with men and relying on a man for support is the worst idea. Average homes in NJ are $400-$500K ugh I also still have to pay off student loan, ($9,809.74).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022779
367
122
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
0
Martin Weinberg
Jeffrey Epstein
["Kathy Ruemmler"]
4/22/2015 7:03:52 PM
20150422190352
<p>As just received.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766
368
122
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
1
Hill, James E.
Martin Weinberg
[]
Wednesday, April 22, 2015, 1:57 PM
20150422135700
<p>Marty: With the understanding that we have not yet made determinations about what will or will not be included in our broadcast, here are the bullet points of the principal allegations Ms. 11111.11111•11111111111 raised in the ABC interview regarding Mr. Epstein. I'm available on cell if you wish to discuss.</p><p>We'd ask for your response as soon as possible - best if by close of business Friday. Thanks. And I'm always available to talk to you if you wish to communicate with us.</p><ul><li>She says in summer of 1999 when she was 15 - Ghislaine Maxwell approached and asked her if she was interested in a job as a masseuse.</li><li>She says she was later (that same day) driven by her father to Epstein's Palm Beach residence, where she massaged Epstein with Maxwell's guidance, and then she says she was made to have sex, to include intercourse, with Epstein. At conclusion she says was paid $200 and driven home by a butler.</li><li>She says she quit her job and went to work for Epstein within a couple of weeks encounter.</li><li>She says Epstein always knew how old she was and specifically that she, Epstein and celebrated 16th b-day together.</li><li>She says Epstein paid her for the encounters and for her apartment and car.</li><li>She says she would be expected to have sexual relations with Epstein up to several times a day.</li><li>She says there was an uncountable number of other girls in similar situation to her, some as young as 12.</li><li>She says she was given money by Epstein to go out and recruit other young girls for him.</li><li>She says that while she was free to come and go - she felt like she was under his control and she didn't want to disappoint Epstein.</li><li>She says Epstein required her, and paid her, to have sex with many of his friends.</li><li>She says these people included politicians, royalty, educators.</li><li>She says she had sex -or sexual activities - with Prince Andrew on three occasions - at the instruction of Epstein.</li><li>She says Epstein paid her $15,000 after the 1st of the three alleged encounters with Prince Andrew.</li><li>She says that Epstein showed her a video room in his NY home which had monitors showing cameras in many locations in the home.</li><li>She suggests Epstein made videos of underage girls with other people for purposes of potential blackmail.</li><li>She says that Epstein liked her to dress up in outfits, including bondage and schoolgirl outfits.</li><li>She says she met Bill Clinton on Epstein's island in the USVI. She does not specify a date but says she is 100% sure it was Clinton and it was on the island. She says she ate dinner with Epstein and Clinton but alleges nothing further regarding Clinton.</li><li>She says one person - who she wouldn't name - that Epstein loaned her out to - physically assaulted and raped her. She says this happened on Epstein's island, and that she had been sent by Epstein - alone -to meet this person. She says she screamed but no one came to her aid. She says she feared for her life. She says she told Epstein about the alleged beating and rape afterwards and she said he didn't care.</li><li>She says Epstein and Maxwell asked her to have a child for them and to sign a document signing away the rights to the child in the event that she and Epstein had a falling out. She says she refused this request.</li><li>She says Epstein has a sick problem, is a pedophile, a dangerous man who should not be walking free</li></ul>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022767
369
122
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
2
Martin Weinberg
Hill, James E.
["Martin Weinberg"]
Wednesday, April 22, 2015 1:44 PM
20150422134400
<p>James, just confirming that you are sending me the bulletpoints from the interview you are asking about, thanksMarty</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022768
370
122
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022766.txt
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
3
Hill, James E.
Martin Weinberg
[]
Tuesday, April 21, 2015, 4:36 PM
20150421163600
<p>Greetings. This is James Hill of ABC News. I write to you regarding Jeffrey Epstein - and your representation of him in the CVRA case in which he is an intervener. ABC News has recently conducted an on-camera interview with (formerly known as Jane Doe #3), portions of which are very likely to be airing on Good Morning America and other ABC programs this week. We would like to offer you an opportunity to respond to the allegations she has raised about Mr. Epstein. Can you tell me who among you I should be in contact with? Should you wish to make a statement or respond in any other manner - I will need it by close-of-business Wednesday. Thanks kindly,</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022769
372
123
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
Re:
1
Michael Wolff <:MM11>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 2:33 PM
20150109143300
<p>Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as "reported fact." Problem with Mi=story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827
374
123
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
Re:
3
Michael Wolff <______________________________>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 10:22 AM
20150110102200
<p>Can you talk at noon? Probably need about 30 minutes. What is best number?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827
375
123
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022827.txt
Re:
4
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
1/10/2015 2:57:45 PM
20150110145745
<p>talk then</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022828
376
124
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835.txt
Re: thoughts
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
1/16/2015 6:23:52 PM
20150116182352
<p>today ok.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835
378
124
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022835.txt
Re: thoughts
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:36 AM
20150116043600
<p>Out of respect and love for my former girlfriend I have tried to keep her out of my mess. she was never questioned, or subpoenaed. her name never surfaced.. I thought it right as a friend to protect her name. however during the entire time she was my serious girlfriend. She traveled with me almost everywhere, each house, she is on the plane many many times. she knew and remembers</p><p>She never saw anything that claims. She can confirm 1. I was never alone at the house. staff, friends etc. , no girl ever complained, not once. 2. jane doe 1 and 2 , were local strippers, that would call all the time asking if they could do massages. . . they left message after message. 3. We had a serious love relationship, I had promised her not to involve her in my story as it was so sordid. . she was 22 - 24 at the time.. 4 she has photos after photos showing we were together. . 5 she knows clinton was never on the island. 6 she knows no sex with steven hawking, she knows no sex with ehud as he was also never on the island. 6 she is 38 years old now and presentable. . 7 She would acknowledge that these girls asked to bring their friends . many of their best friends sat in the kitchen while they gave massages outside on the terrace. ( no sex ). . they certainly looked over age. never heard anyone say otherwise. , Jeffrey never asked for underage, that is crazy, . . 8 . answered the phones. served coffee. . there were many massage people , men women, aged up to 60.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022836
379
125
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837.txt
Re: How are you holding up?
0
Thomas Jr., Landon <______________________>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:32 PM
20150116153200
Landon Thomas, Jr.<br>Financial Reporter<br>New York Times<br><a href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html">http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html</a>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022837
381
126
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943.txt
boies
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Michael Wolff
[]
11/7/2017 10:35:08 AM
20171107103508
<p><a href="http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/">http://people.com/movies/harvey-weinstein-hired-intelligence-agencies-to-spy-on-accusers-rose-mcgowan/</a></p><p>right on time, i didnt know. boies is his co counsel. . represents that claims that al gore, and clinton were both on the island. he knows its not true, or could clearly ask hif former clients.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022943
387
128
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt
Re: Viceland
0
Martin Weinberg
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
8/13/2018 7:30:44 PM
20180813193044
Fyi<br><br>Sent from my iPhone
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817
388
128
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817.txt
Re: Viceland
1
Matt Williams
Martin Weinberg
[]
August 13, 2018 at 3:15:32 PM EDT
20180813151532
Thank you Marty,<br><br>The questions we wanted to reach out to Mr Epstein for comment are listed below. Feel free to contact me on fter reviewing. Kind regards - Matt<br><br>A former employee has told us that Donald Trump attended Mr Epstein's Palm Beach estate on at least two occasions. Does Mr Epstein recall hosting Donald Trump at that residence?<br><br>On one such occasion, it has been suggested to us that Mr Epstein and Donald Trump watched "young girls try on bikinis" while making comments on the their bodies." Does Mr Epstein have any comment?<br><br>How does Mr Epstein respond to claims that women - some under the legal age of sexual consent - were used as "sex slaves" at his properties?<br><br>A former employee of Mr Epstein has alleged to us that Mr Epstein sexually assaulted her on numerous occasions. Does Mr Epstein have a comment?<br><br>Did or does Mr Epstein have cameras inside rooms at his Palm Beach residence?<br><br>Did Mr Epstein remove those cameras before police raided the property as part of the investigation into alleged crimes? Did Mr Epstein ever hand over any recordings from any cameras at his properties to the authorities as part of his non-prosecution agreement?<br><br>Does Mr Epstein have in his possession any video recordings of Donald Trump taken from inside his Palm Beach estate or any other residence?<br><br>Did Mr Epstein hold sex parties at his residences involving girls under the age of sexual consent? Was Donald Trump ever present at any of these parties?<br><br>Has Mr Epstein upheld the conditions of his sentencing and registered as a sex offender in all jurisdictions in which he is due to do so?<br><br>Does Mr Epstein have any comment regarding allegations made by a woman named in the media as Virginia Giuffre/Roberts relating to her being sexually abused by Mr Epstein or used as a "sex slave"?<br><br>ENDS
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022817
392
129
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819.txt
Re: Viceland
0
Martin Weinberg <M1.1>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 3:30 PM
20180813153000
Fyi<br><br>Sent from my iPhone
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022819
397
130
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt
Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Matthew Hiltzik
[]
5/24/2017 11:04:43 PM
20170524230443
<p>Privileged - Redacted</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941
398
130
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt
Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement
1
Martin Weinberg
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, May 24, 2017 at 6:53 PM
20170524185300
<p>Privileged - Redacted</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022942
399
130
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022941.txt
Fwd: Fw: inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement
2
Hill, James E.
Martin Weinberg
[]
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:33 PM
20170524183300
<p>Good afternoon, Marty:<br>This is James Hill at ABC News.<br>Do you have any statement you wish to share on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the settlement reached in the defamation suit filed by Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell?<br>I know from the court filings and hearing transcripts, that Mr. Epstein was deposed in this action, but was not expected to be called as a live trial witness.<br>According to the transcripts - it was represented by plaintiff's counsel during pre-trial hearings, that Mr. Epstein invoked his 5<sup>th</sup> amendment rights and declined to answer substantive questions during the deposition. It also appears that Judge Sweet had not yet made a final determination as to whether Mr. Epstein's depo, or selected portions thereof, would be admitted at trial (which is obviously a moot point, now).<br>If you believe any of that to be in error, and/or if you wish to provide a statement about the settlement or in response to Giuffre's allegations about your client, please give me a call or reply to this email.<br>If you have no comment, I'd appreciate you letting me know that.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022942
400
131
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt
Re:
0
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
11/8/2017 1:48:26 PM
20171108134826
Re Boies, Voila. <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html">https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/07/business/weinstein-lawyer-david-boies.html</a>. Unclear to me why he is getting involved with you....
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808
401
131
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:10 AM
20171107101000
All. With gods help:)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808
403
131
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt
Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:55 AM
20171107095500
As they are both bulkshitters
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808
404
131
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808.txt
Re:
4
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 10:26 AM
20171107102600
i am more interested in al-waleed/saudi purge/Jared axis. al-waleed and prez go back a ways don't they?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022808