Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: van der waals forces play a dominant role in the interaction of atoms and molecules with carbon nanostructures at separations larger than about one nanometer . these forces are of fluctuation nature and are described in second order perturbation theory as a dipole - dipole interaction . theoretical description of the van der waals forces as a quantum phenomenon was pioneered by london . the general theory of the van der waals forces in the framework of quantum statistical physics was developed by lifshitz @xcite using the concept of a frequency - dependent dielectric permittivity . lifshitz s theory describes both the interaction between two semispaces or plates of finite thickness separated by a gap and between a microparticle ( an atom or a molecule ) and a flat surface of a macrobody . in the latter case it is commonly referred to as the casimir - polder force @xcite . an understanding of the underlying mechanisms of microparticle  nanostructure interaction is of importance for many applications including the problem of hydrogen storage in carbon nanostructures @xcite . however , the application of the lifshitz theory to the latter case encounters serious problems because the boundary surface of carbon nanotubes is not flat and single - wall nanotubes are not characterized by the macroscopic concept of a frequency - dependent dielectric permittivity . because of this , most theoretical work on the van der waals interaction in layered structures and between hydrogen atoms ( molecules ) and a graphite sheet or carbon nanotubes was done using the phenomenological density functional theory ( see , e.g. , refs .  @xcite ) . some other approximate approaches were also used , e.g. , the nonrelativistic perturbation theory for degenerate levels of a two - level atomic system @xcite . it is known , however , that in some cases the approximate and phenomenological approaches do not provide a precise description of the van der waals interaction @xcite . this is true @xcite , for instance , when one uses the density functional theory ( especially with linear - density approximation ) . recently , the scope of the lifshitz theory of the van der waals forces was much widened by successful application to the interpretation of precision measurements of the casimir force @xcite ( i.e. , the van der waals force at larger separations where the relativistic retardation becomes essential ) and to atom - wall interaction in connection with bose - einstein condensation @xcite . what is more , in refs . @xcite the lifshitz theory was extended for the case of an atom ( molecule ) interacting with a plane surface of a uniaxial crystal or with a multi - wall carbon nanotube . the generalization to nanotubes was achieved by using the proximity force theorem @xcite and the idealization of graphite dielectric permittivities which is applicable to multi - wall nanotubes with sufficiently large number of walls . in ref . @xcite the lifshitz - type formulas were obtained for the van der waals interaction between a single layer of graphite ( hereafter , graphene ) and a material plate , graphene and an atom or a molecule , and between a single - wall carbon nanotube and a plate . to achieve this goal , graphene was considered in terms of a two - dimensional free electron gas @xcite . the reflection properties of electromagnetic oscillations on graphene were described by the specific boundary conditions imposed on the infinitely thin positively charged plasma sheet , carrying a continuous fluid with some mass and negative charge density @xcite .    in the present paper we use the same model of graphene as in ref . @xcite and obtain lifshitz - type formulas for the van der waals interaction between a microparticle ( an atom or a molecule ) and a single - wall carbon nanotube . both the free energy and interaction force at arbitrary temperature are considered . as an example , we have calculated the van der waals free energy and force as functions of separation in the configuration of a hydrogen atom and a molecule in close proximity to a single - wall carbon nanotube . specifically , the values of the van der waals coefficient are determined at different separations . comparison studies of the van der waals interaction of a microparticle with multi- and single - wall carbon nanotubes are performed . if we consider the van der waals interaction of an atom or a molecule with a nanotube having only two or three walls , the idealization of the dielectric permittivity of graphite is demonstrated to be already applicable if separation distance between a microparticle and a nanotube is sufficiently large . the paper is organized as follows . in sec . ii we derive the lifshitz - type formulas for the van der waals free energy and force acting between a microparticle and a single - wall carbon nanotube . iii is devoted to the numerical computations of the van der waals interaction between a hydrogen atom or a molecule and a single - wall nanotube . in sec .  iv the comparison between the cases of single- and multi - wall nanotubes is performed . v contains our conclusions and discussion . we begin with the van der waals interaction of a graphene occupying the @xmath0-plane , @xmath1 , or of a graphite plate of thickness @xmath2 , with a semispace made of isotropic material . the separation distance between the graphene or the boundary plane of a graphite plate ( labeled by the upper index 1 ) and the boundary plane of a semispace ( labeled by 2 ) is @xmath3 . as was shown in refs . @xcite , in both cases the free energy of the van der waals interaction per unit area at temperature @xmath4 in thermal equilibrium is given by the lifshitz - type formula with the properly defined reflection coefficients @xmath5 : @xmath6\right . \label{eq1 } \\ & & \phantom{aaaa}+\left . \ln\left[1-r_{\rm te}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot } ) r_{\rm te}^{(2)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot})e^{-2aq_l}\right]\right\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath7 is the boltzmann constant , @xmath8 with @xmath9 are the matsubara frequencies along the imaginary frequency axis ( @xmath10 ) , @xmath11 is the magnitude of the wave vector component perpendicular to the @xmath12-axis , transverse electric ( te ) and transverse magnetic ( tm ) modes are the two independent polarizations of electromagnetic field , and @xmath13 .    from eq . ( [ eq1 ] ) , the van derwaals force acting between a graphene or a graphite plate of thickness @xmath2 and a semispace made of isotropic material is : @xmath14 . \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ]    now we specify the reflection coefficients . for a semispace made of isotropic material ( labeled by the upper index 2 ) they are commonly known @xcite @xmath15 where @xmath16 and @xmath17 is the dielectric permittivity of a semispace material . if the first body is a graphite plate of thickness @xmath2 , the reflection coefficients were found in ref . @xcite : @xmath18 here , @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the dielectric permittivities of graphite in the @xmath21 and @xmath12 directions , respectively , and @xmath22    if the first body is graphene , the idealization of the frequency - dependent dielectric permittivity can not be used . in this case the reflection coefficients can be found @xcite by modeling graphene as a two - dimensional plasma sheet carrying a negatively charged fluid of @xmath23-electrons . for the hexagonal structure of carbon layers there is one @xmath23-electron per atom @xcite resulting in two @xmath23-electrons per one hexagonal cell . this leads to the following values for the density of @xmath23-electrons and the wave number of the sheet : @xmath24 where @xmath25 is the side length of a hexagon , @xmath26 and @xmath27 are the electron charge and mass , respectively . now we are solving the maxwell equations with the following matching conditions on the tangential and normal components of the fields : @xmath28 here @xmath29 is the unit vector pointing in @xmath12-direction , and all fields depend on time through a common factor exp@xmath30 . as a result , we arrive to one - dimensional scattering problem in the @xmath12-direction @xcite . the solution of this problem leads to the following reflection coefficients on a graphene sheet @xcite : @xmath31    now we use eqs . ( [ eq1 ] ) and ( [ eq2 ] ) with the reflection coefficients ( [ eq3 ] ) and ( [ eq9 ] ) to obtain the free energy of van der waals interaction and force acting between an atom ( molecule ) and a single - wall carbon nanotube . for this purpose let us consider an infinite space filled with an isotropic substance having a dielectric permittivity @xmath17 containing an empty cylindrical cavity of radius @xmath32 . we introduce the single - wall carbon nanotube of radius @xmath33 inside this cavity ( see fig .  1 ) . in so doing the nanotube is modeled by a cylindrical graphene sheet . then there is a gap of thickness @xmath3 between the nanotube and the boundary surface of the cylindrical cavity . each element of the nanotube experiences an attractive van der waals force on the source side of this boundary surface . by using the proximity force approximation ( see ref . @xcite in the case of ideal metals ) , the free energy of the van der waals interaction between these two co - axial cylinders can be approximately represented in the form @xmath34 here @xmath35 is the free energy per unit area in the configuration of a graphene interacting with a plane boundary of an isotropic semispace determined in eq . ( [ eq1 ] ) , and @xmath36 is the length of the nanotube , which is supposed to be much larger than @xmath33 .    the accuracy of eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) is rather high . recently the accuracy of the proximity force approximation was investigated on the basis of first principles by comparing the approximate results with the exact ones for the configurations of a cylinder or a sphere above plate . it was shown @xcite that corrections to the results obtained using the proximity force approximation are less than @xmath37 where @xmath33 is a cylinder or sphere radius . for the configuration of two co - axial cylinders the accuracy of the proximity force approximation is even much higher . for example , within the separation region @xmath38 , the results calculated using eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) coincide with the exact ones up to 1% for cylinders made of ideal metal @xcite ( for real materials the accuracy may be different for only a fraction of a percent ) .    to come to the case of an atom ( or molecule ) near a nanotube , we suppose that the isotropic substance filling the infinite space is rarefied with some small number @xmath39 of atoms ( molecules ) per unit volume . we expand the quantity @xmath40 on the left - hand side of eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) in powers of @xmath39 and using the additivity of the first - order term arrive at : @xmath41 here , @xmath42 is ( yet not found ) the free energy of the van der waals interaction of a single atom ( molecule ) belonging to an isotropic substance with a single - wall carbon nanotube ( @xmath12 is measured from the external surface of nanotube in the direction perpendicular to it ) . differentiation of both ( negative ) sides of eq . ( [ eq11 ] ) with respect to @xmath3 leads to : @xmath43    this negative derivative can be found also by the differentiation of both sides of eq . ( [ eq10 ] ) : @xmath44 , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the force @xmath45 acting between a graphene and a semispace was defined in eq . ( [ eq2 ] ) with the reflection coefficients ( [ eq3 ] ) and ( [ eq9 ] ) . we expand the dielectric permittivity of a rarefied substance in powers of @xmath39 @xcite @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the dynamic polarizability of an atom or a molecule of this substance . using eq . ( [ eq14 ] ) , we expand also the reflection coefficients @xmath48 in eq . ( [ eq3 ] ) in powers of @xmath39 and substitute the obtained expressions in eqs . ( [ eq1 ] ) and ( [ eq2 ] ) . thereafter , with the help of eqs . ( [ eq13 ] ) and ( [ eq12 ] ) in the limit @xmath49 , the desired expression for the van der waals free energy in the configuration of a microparticle interacting with a single - wall carbon nanotube is obtained ( see ref . @xcite devoted to multi - wall nanotubes for the details of perturbation expansion and limiting procedure ) : @xmath50 \label{eq15 } \\ & & \phantom{aaaaa } \times\left\{2r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot})+ \frac{\xi_l^2}{q_l^2c^2}\left[r_{{\rm te},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot } ) -r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot})\right]\right\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the limiting case @xmath51 , eq .  ( [ eq15 ] ) coincides with a known result for the free energy of a microparticle near a plane surface of graphene @xcite . if , instead of graphene , the cylindrical graphite shell of thickness @xmath2 is considered , eq . ( [ eq15 ] ) describes @xcite the interaction of a microparticle with such a shell if the reflection coefficients @xmath52 are replaced with @xmath53 defined in eq . ( [ eq5 ] ) . the van der waals force acting between a microparticle and a single - wall carbon nanotube is obtained as a minus derivative of eq . ( [ eq15 ] ) with respect to separation distance @xmath54 \label{eq16 } \\ & & \phantom{aaaaa } \times\left\{2r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot})+ \frac{\xi_l^2}{q_l^2c^2}\left[r_{{\rm te},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot } ) -r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\xi_l , k_{\bot})\right]\right\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] by replacing the reflection coefficients @xmath52 with @xmath53 we return to the expression for the force between a microparticle and a graphite cylindrical shell of thickness @xmath2 @xcite . for the purpose of numerical computations it is convenient to introduce the nondimensional variables under the integrals @xmath55 and present the free energy ( [ eq15 ] ) and force ( [ eq16 ] ) in the form @xmath56 where @xmath57 \label{eq19 } \\ & & \phantom{aaaaa } \times\left . \vphantom{\frac{4r+3a}{2(r+a ) } } \left[2r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y)+ \frac{\zeta_l^2}{y^2}\left(r_{{\rm te},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y ) -r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y)\right)\right]\right\ } , \nonumber \\ & & c_f(a , t)=\frac{k_bt}{8}\sqrt{\frac{r}{r+a}}\left\ { \frac{3(2r+3a)(2r+a)}{2(r+a)^2}\alpha(0)\right . \nonumber \\ & & \phantom{aaa } + \sum\limits_{l=1}^{\infty}\alpha(i\xi_l ) \int_{\zeta_l}^{\infty}dy\,ye^{-y}\left[y^2- \frac{3a^2}{4(r+a)^2}\right ] \label{eq20 } \\ & & \phantom{aaaaa } \times\left . \vphantom{\frac{3(2r+3a)(2r+a)}{2(r+a)^2 } } \left[2r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y)+ \frac{\zeta_l^2}{y^2}\left(r_{{\rm te},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y ) -r_{{\rm tm},g}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y)\right)\right]\right\}. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] in terms of new variables ( [ eq17 ] ) the reflection coefficients ( [ eq9 ] ) take the form @xmath58    to perform computations using eqs . ( [ eq19 ] ) and ( [ eq20 ] ) one needs some expressions for the atomic and molecular dynamic polarizabilities of hydrogen . as was shown in refs . @xcite , for the calculation of van der waals interaction the polarizabilities can be represented with sufficient precision in the framework of the single - oscillator model , @xmath59 for a hydrogen atom and a molecule , respectively . here , @xmath60 with the static atomic polarizability of hydrogen equal to @xmath61a.u . and the characteristic frequency @xmath62ev @xcite . for a hydrogen molecule it holds @xmath63 with @xmath64a.u . and @xmath65ev @xcite . note that when substituting polarizabilities in eqs . ( [ eq19 ] ) , ( [ eq20 ] ) , they should be expressed in cubic meters ( 1a.u . of polarizability is equal to @xmath66 ) . the computations were performed for single - wall carbon nanotubes with radia @xmath67 and 5 nm at @xmath68k . as an example , in fig .  2 we plot the van der waals coefficient ( [ eq19 ] ) as a function of separation in the region from 1 to 3 nm for the nanotube with @xmath69 nm . solid line 1 labels a nanotube interaction with a hydrogen atom and solid line 2 with a hydrogen molecule . for comparison , in the same figure the previously computed @xcite van der waals coefficients for the interaction of a hydrogen atom ( the dashed line 1 ) and molecule ( the dashed line 2 ) with a plane graphene sheet are included . as is seen in fig .  2 ( the solid lines 1 and 2 ) , at all separations the van der waals coefficient of a molecule - nanotube interaction is larger than of an atom - nanotube interaction . at the same time , the van der waals coefficients for the interaction of a hydrogen atom or a molecule with graphene ( the dashed lines 1 and 2 , respectively ) are larger than the respective coefficients for the interaction with a single - wall carbon nanotube . this excess is of about 30% . note that the obtained results practically do not depend on temperature in the temperature region from 0 to 300k .    in table i we present a few computational results for the van der waals coefficient @xmath70 in the case of hydrogen atom ( columns 25 ) and molecule ( columns 69 ) interacting with single - wall carbon nanotubes of different radia . from table i it is seen that the van der waals coefficient @xmath70 is monotonously increasing with the increase of nanotube radius . as in fig .  2 , the separation distance between an atom ( molecule ) and a nanotube varies from 1 to 3 nm ( recall that at shorter separations some additional forces of chemical and exchange nature should be taken into account ; at larger separations the accuracy of the obtained theoretical expressions may decrease ) .    in fig . 3 we plot the coefficient @xmath71 for the van der waals force defined in eq . ( [ eq20 ] ) acting between a hydrogen atom ( the solid line 1 ) or a molecule ( the solid line 2 ) interacting with the single - wall carbon nanotube of @xmath69 nm radius . as it holds for the coefficient @xmath70 , the values of the coefficient @xmath71 for a molecule are larger than for an atom at all separations under consideration . dotted lines in fig . 3 ( labeled 1 for an atom and 2 for a molecule ) represent the results obtained on the assumption that @xmath72 , i.e. , on the assumption that the van der waals coefficient @xmath73const and does not depend on separation distance . as is seen in fig .  3 , the differences between solid and dotted lines are of about 1520% . thus , the dependence of the van der waals coefficients on separation in atom ( molecule)nanotube interaction is essential for obtaining the computational results of high precision .    in table  ii the computational results for the van der waals force coefficient @xmath71 are presented . columns 25 are related to the case of hydrogen atom and columns 69 to hydrogen molecule interacting with single - wall carbon nanotubes of radia @xmath67 and 5 nm . as in table i , the separation distance varies from 1 to 3 nm . from table ii it is seen that the magnitudes of the coefficient @xmath71 increase with the increase of a nanotube radius and decrease with the increase of separation distance . the respective magnitudes of @xmath71 for a hydrogen molecule are larger than for an atom for nanotubes of different radia . in this section we compare the van der waals coefficients for the interaction of hydrogen atom or molecule with single - wall and multi - wall carbon nanotubes . this permits us to determine how thick should be a multi - wall nanotube in order the idealization of the dielectric permittivities of graphite be applicable . we will also quantitatively compare the cases of multi - wall and single - wall carbon nanotubes depending on the separation distance between a nanotube and a microparticle . the van der waals coefficient of the interaction between a single - wall nanotube and a microparticle is given by eq . ( [ eq19 ] ) with reflection coefficients ( [ eq21 ] ) . to obtain the van der waals coefficient of the interaction with a multi - wall nanotube , one should replace the reflection coefficients @xmath74 in eq . ( [ eq19 ] ) with the coefficients @xmath75 defined in eq . ( [ eq5 ] ) @xcite . in terms of dimensionless variables ( [ eq17 ] ) the latter take the form @xmath76 } , \nonumber \\ & & r_{{\rm te},d}^{(1)}(\zeta_l , y)= \frac{f_x^2(y,\zeta_l)-y^2}{y^2 + f_x^2(y,\zeta_l)+2 yf_x(y,\zeta_l)\coth\left[f_x(y,\zeta_l)d/(2a)\right ] } , \label{eq23}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the following notations are introduced @xmath77    the computational results for the van der waals coefficient @xmath70 of atom - nanotube interaction are presented in fig .  4 by the solid dots 1,2,3 ( the single - wall carbon nanotube of 5 nm radius at separations @xmath78 and 3 nm to a hydrogen atom , respectively ) and by the solid dots connected with solid lines for the multi - wall carbon nanotubes of 5 nm external radius with @xmath79 and 5 walls , respectively . for a single - wall nanotube computations were performed using eqs . ( [ eq19 ] ) , ( [ eq21 ] ) and for a multi - wall nanotubes using eqs . ( [ eq19 ] ) , ( [ eq23 ] ) . in both cases the dynamic atomic polarizability @xmath80 is taken in eq . ( [ eq22 ] ) and for a multi - wall nanotube @xmath81 . as is seen in fig .  4 , the van der waals coefficient computed by the formula for a multi - wall nanotube with only one wall does not coincide with the coefficient computed by the formula for a single - wall nanotube . this is expected result because the reflection coefficients in eq . ( [ eq23 ] ) approach zero when the nanotube thickness @xmath2 vanishes . at the same time , as fig . 4 suggests , the van der waals coefficients for a multi - wall nanotube with @xmath82 walls at 1 nm from an atom and for a multi - wall nanotube with @xmath83 walls at a separation 2 or 3 nm from an atom are in the proper proportion to the coefficients computed for a single - wall nanotube using the reflection coefficients ( [ eq21 ] ) ( the analogical result was obtained in ref . @xcite for the interaction of a graphene and a graphite plate with an au semispace ) . this permits us to conclude that the macroscopic concept of graphite dielectric permittivity used in ref . @xcite to describe multi - wall carbon nanotubes is already applicable for nanotubes containing only two or three walls depending on separation distance between a nanotube and an atom . 5 contains the same information , as in fig .  4 , but for a hydrogen molecule . it is seen that the approximation of graphite dielectric permittivities is also well applicable for multi - wall nanotube with 3 walls spaced 1 nm apart from a molecule and for two - wall nanotube at a separation of 2 or 3 nm from a molecule . the values of the van der waals coefficient for a molecule are , however , larger than for an atom in accordance to sec . the single - wall nanotube can not be described using the macroscopic concept of dielectric permittivity but as a cylindrical plasma sheet with appropriate boundary conditions . in the foregoing , we have obtained the lifshitz - type formulas describing the free energy and force of the van der waals interaction of a hydrogen atom or a molecule with a single - wall carbon nanotube . the nanotube is represented using the description of a cylindrical graphene sheet in terms of two - dimensional plasma carrying free @xmath23-electrons with appropriate boundary conditions imposed on the electromagnetic field . recently this approach was used to describe the interaction of a flat graphene sheet with a material plate or a microparticle , and a material plate with a single - wall carbon nanotube @xcite . the formulas obtained here were applied to calculate the van der waals free energy and force in the configuration of a hydrogen atom or a molecule interacting with single - wall carbon nanotubes of different radia . the comparison with the previously developed lifshitz - type formalism applicable to multi - wall carbon nanotubes @xcite have allowed to determine the application limits of the macroscopic concept of graphite dielectric permittivity . the latter was shown to be applicable even to two- or three - wall nanotubes depending on the separation distance between a nanotube and an atom ( molecule ) . the developed formalism suggests some advantages in comparison to phenomenological and semi - phenomenological approaches used to calculate the van der waals interaction . as was recently noted in ref . @xcite , the phenomenological method of pairwise summation of the intermolecular van der waals potentials can lead to even qualitatively wrong results for the nonretarded van der waals interaction between metallic nanotubes and nanowires ( in ref . @xcite it was emphasized that the pairwise summation of intermolecular potentials leads to correct dependence of the van der waals potential and force on separation distance only for bulk three - dimensional bodies ) . the possibility to use the lifshitz theory of dispersion forces for the investigation of the van der waals interaction between hydrogen atoms ( molecules ) and single - wall carbon nanotubes demonstrated in the paper may be helpful for the problem of hydrogen storage . according to recent review on the subject @xcite , there are conceptual possibilities to create carbon nanostructures capable of absorbing more than 10 mass % of hydrogen . the resolution of this fundamental problem requires a detailed investigation of the microscopic mechanisms of the interaction between hydrogen and graphite . to attain these ends the above approach should be extended to distances below 1 nm . at so small separations there may be attractive chemical forces and short - range repulsive forces of exchange nature . these forces depend on atomic structure and can not be taken into account by means of the boundary conditions . some approximate description is possible by combining the energy of van der waals attraction with phenomenological potentials @xcite . this work was supported by the russian foundation for basic research ( grant no . 050818119a ) . g.l.k . and v.m.m . were also partially supported by deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft ( grant no . 436rus113/789/03 ) .    99 e.  m.  lifshitz , zh . . fiz . * 29 * , 94 ( 1956 ) [ sov . jetp * 2 * , 73 ( 1956 ) ] . e.  m.  lifshitz and l.  p.  pitaevskii , _ statistical physics _ ( pergamon press , oxford , 1980 ) , pt . h.  b.  g.  casimir and d.  polder , phys . rev . * 73 * , 360 ( 1948 ) . a.  c.  dillon , k.  m.  jones , t.  a.  bekkedahl , c.  h.  kiang , d.  s.  bethune , and m.  j.  heben , nature * 386 * , 377 ( 1997 ) . w.  a.  dio , h.  nakanishi , and h.  kasai , e - j . surf . . nanotech . * 2 * , 77 ( 2004 ) . a.  bogicevic , s.  ovesson , p.  hyldgaard , b.  i.  lundqvist , h.  brune , and d.  r.  jennison , phys . lett . * 85 * , 1910 ( 2000 ) . e.  hult , p.  hyldgaard , and b.  i.  lundqvist , phys . b * 64 * , 195414 ( 2001 ) . h.  rydberg , m.  dion , n.  jacobson , e.  schrder , p.  hyldgaard , s.  i.  simak , d.  c.  landreth , and b.  i.  lundqvist , phys . 91 * , 126402 ( 2003 ) . j.  jung , p.  garca - gonzlez , j.  f.  dobson , and r.  w.  godby , phys . b * 70 * , 205107 ( 2004 ) . j.  kleis , p.  hyldgaard , and e.  schrder , comp . mat . sci . * 33 * , 192 ( 2005 ) . j.  f.  dobson , a.  white , and a.  rubio , phys . . lett . * 96 * , 073201 ( 2006 ) . i.  v.  bondarev and ph . lambin , solid state commun . * 132 * , 203 ( 2004 ) . i.  v.  bondarev and ph . lambin , phys . b * 72 * , 035451 ( 2005 ) . j.  mahanty and b.  w.  ninham , _ dispersion forces _ ( academic press , new york , 1976 ) . v.  a.  parsegian , _ van der waals forces : a handbook for biologists , chemists , engineers , and physicists _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 2005 ) . l.  a.  girifalco and m.  hodak , phys . b * 65 * , 125404 ( 2002 ) . g.  l.  klimchitskaya , a.  roy , u.  mohideen , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . a * 60 * , 3487 ( 1999 ) . m.  bordag , u.  mohideen , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . rep . * 353 * , 1 ( 2001 ) . f.  chen , u.  mohideen , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . lett . * 88 * , 101801 ( 2002 ) ; phys . a * 66 * , 032113 ( 2002 ) . r. s. decca , e. fischbach , g. l. klimchitskaya , d. e. krause , d. lpez , and v. m. mostepanenko , phys . d * 68 * , 116003 ( 2003 ) ; ann . * 318 * , 37 ( 2005 ) . f.  chen , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , u.  mohideen , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . rev . a * 69 * , 022117 ( 2004 ) . f.  chen , u.  mohideen , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . a * 72 * , 020101(r ) ( 2005 ) ; * 74 * , 022103 ( 2006 ) . f.  chen , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , v.  m.  mostepanenko , and u.  mohideen , phys . lett . * 97 * , 170402 ( 2006 ) . j.  f.  babb , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . a * 70 * , 042901 ( 2004 ) . m.  antezza , l.  p.  pitaevskii , and s.  stringari , phys . a * 70 * , 053619 ( 2004 ) . e.  v.  blagov , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . b * 71 * , 235401 ( 2005 ) . g.  l.  klimchitskaya , e.  v.  blagov , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , j. phys . a : math 39 * , 6481 ( 2006 ) . j.  blocki , j.  randrup , w.  j.  swiatecki , and c.  f.  tsang , ann . * 105 * , 427 ( 1977 ) . m.  bordag , b.  geyer , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , and v.  m.  mostepanenko , phys . b * 74 * , 205431 ( 2006 ) . a.  l.  fetter , ann . phys . ( n.y . ) * 81 * , 367 ( 1973 ) . g.  barton , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 37 * , 1011 ( 2004 ) ; * 38 * , 2997 ( 2005 ) . m.  bordag , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 39 * , 6173 ( 2006 ) . g.  a.  gallup , chem . . lett . * 187 * , 187 ( 1991 ) . f.  d.  mazzitelli , in : quantum field theory under the influence of external conditions , ed . k.  a.  milton ( rinton press , princeton , 2004 ) . t.  emig , r.  l.  jaffe , m.  kardar , and a.  scardicchio , phys . lett . * 96 * , 080403 ( 2006 ) . a.  bulgac , p.  magierski , and a.  wirzba , phys . d * 73 * , 025007 ( 2006 ) . m.  bordag , phys . d * 73 * , 125018 ( 2006 ) . h.  gies and k.  klingmller , phys . lett . * 96 * , 220401 ( 2006 ) ; phys . d * 74 * , 045002 ( 2006 ) . f.  d.  mazzitelli , m.  j.  sancher , n.  scoccola , and j.  von stecher , phys . a * 67 * , 013807 ( 2003 ) . l.  d.  landau , e.  m.  lifshitz , and l.  p.  pitaevskii , _ electrodynamics of continuous media _ ( pergamon press , oxford , 1984 ) . a.  o.  caride , g.  l.  klimchitskaya , v.  m.  mostepanenko , and s.  i.  zanette , phys . rev . a * 71 * , 042901 ( 2005 ) . a.  rauber , j.  r.  klein , m.  w.  cole , and l.  w.  bruch , surf . sci . * 123 * , 173 ( 1982 ) . v. m.  mostepanenko and n.  n.  trunov , _ the casimir effect and its applications _ ( clarendon press , oxford , 1997 ) . s.  nechaev , physics  uspekhi * 49 * , 563 ( 2006 ) . j.  israelachvili , _ intermolecular and surface forces _ ( academic press , new york , 1992 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the lifshitz - type formulas describing the free energy and the force of the van der waals interaction between an atom ( molecule ) and a single - wall carbon nanotube are obtained . the single - wall nanotube is considered as a cylindrical sheet carrying a two - dimensional free electron gas with appropriate boundary conditions on the electromagnetic field . the obtained formulas are used to calculate the van der waals free energy and force between a hydrogen atom ( molecule ) and single - wall carbon nanotubes of different radia . comparison studies of the van der waals interaction of hydrogen atoms with single- and multi - wall carbon nanotubes show that depending on atom - nanotube separation distance the idealization of graphite dielectric permittivity is already applicable to nanotubes with only two or three walls .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: solar flares and coronal mass ejections occur in active regions in the solar corona ; however these magnetic structures are anchored in the solar photosphere . as magnetic flux emerges and is shuffled around the photosphere , the magnetic structure of the coronal field is stressed into non - potential configurations . energy released in solar eruptive events must be present in the coronal field prior to the onset of the solar flare and/or coronal mass ejection , probably built up over hours to days as the active region either grows ( by flux emergence ) or as footpoints are shuffled to result in sheared configurations . one of the key challenges in solar information processing is to use data of the photospheric magnetic field to infer the non - potential magnetic energy inherent in the coronal magnetic structure . the precise coronal conditions required to create these energetic events are as yet unknown , as coronal magnetography remains in its infancy . as we lack the ultimate dataset of 3d velocity and magnetic - field information throughout an active region , the prediction of solar flares remains a statistical problem    one approach to this statistical problem is to use the photospheric magnetic - field measurement as the boundary for a 3d extrapolation of coronal structure @xcite . this yields important insights into our knowledge of coronal magnetic fields , one of which is that the final extrapolation is very sensitive to the boundary conditions ( _ i.e. _ the spatial resolution , noise levels , image size , and type of magnetic - field data ) . as the field structure required to store enough energy to power a solar flare must be non - potential , there is often no unique coronal solution . further the extrapolation is computationally expensive , the required vector data ( even in the photosphere ) are historically rare , and the chromospheric - field data ( where the field may be force - free ) remains tantalizingly out of reach . the best datasets in terms of sample size and homogeneity are full disk ( _ i.e. _ low spatial resolution ) and low - cadence longitudinal field data . the main source of these data are the _ global oscillations network group _ ( gong ) and the _ michelson doppler imager _ ( mdi ) onboard the _ solar and heliospheric observatory _ ( soho ) . because of this data availability , a lot of research has focused on searching these data for a statistical measure of the coronal free energy from photospheric proxies @xcite by correlating these proxies with solar flares as observed by goes . this approach has displayed some potential in terms of a statistical solar - flare prediction , but often these proxies are not well physically motivated and are not well connected to theory . as such , it is difficult to realize the precise conditions under which these proxies fail ( _ i.e. _ where they predict a flare that does not occur , and where they fail to predict a flare ) and what size scale is most appropriate @xcite .    the multifractal spectra may provide a useful proxy of the build - up of magnetic energy for in solar active regions . the proposition often advanced for this connection is that the scaling of magnetic structures is associated with the regime of fully developed turbulence at high reynolds number . it is also based on the close analytical connection between fractal geometry and turbulence in magnetized plasmas @xcite . empirical studies have used fractals on a large mdi dataset @xcite , multifractals on a smaller mdi dataset @xcite , the multiscale fourier index on a small mdi dataset @xcite , the standard fourier scaling index on a large dataset @xcite , and the structure function approach on a small dataset @xcite . however recent studies by @xcite and @xcite reach a contrary conclusion that studies in multifractals do not provide a predictive ability for the onset of solar flares . one potential reason for this discrepancy is that multifractal scaling can also be produced by simple statistical similarity in data of insufficient spatial resolution , and so is not necessarily an indication of increased complexity @xcite . this article seeks to close the gap between these contradictory findings by providing a complete analytical connection between multifractal formalism and the set of 3d equations that govern the small - scale and large - scale magnetic structure on the sun . in section  [ mrn ] the background on the appropriate use of multifractals is provided with respect to the frozen - in field structure , arising from the large magnetic reynolds number in the solar photosphere . section  [ mfs ] introduces the concept of multifractals and discusses the wavelet - transform modulus maxima approach of determining this spectrum from 2d images . the multifractal spectra is then connected to the magnetic structure as described by ampre s law in section  [ amp ] . finally section  [ conc ] summarizes this approach , discusses why previous results are contradictory , and makes specific predictions of this theory that can be tested empirically in order to make future advances in our understanding of how magnetic energy is stored in the solar corona . it seems that the magnetic - field structure in active regions is the only viable means of storing and releasing sufficient energy to power solar eruptive events . a simple discussion of the equations used to describe this magnetic field leads to a couple of possible choices of characterizing the field . from first principles , the induction equation is given by eliminating the electric field between faraday s law and ohm s law @xmath0 which further reduces by ampre s law to @xmath1 where @xmath2 is the magnetic diffusivity . by gauss law , and by means of a simple vector identity ( and assuming constant @xmath3 ) , this further reduces to the familiar form of the induction equation , @xmath4 this states that any local change in the magnetic field is due to a combination of a convection term and a diffusion term . the battle between these two terms defines whether an active region will grow or shrink with time . the diffusion occurs by buffeting from supergranular flows , and the advection occurs by smaller - scale shuffling ( granulation ) or flux emergence . the ratio of these two terms is described by the magnetic reynolds number , @xmath5 which acts as an indication of the coupling between the plasma flow field and the magnetic field . for typical photospheric values in solar active regions ( @xmath6 mm , @xmath7 ms@xmath8 , @xmath9 m@xmath10 s@xmath8 ) , the magnetic reynolds number is much greater than one . in this @xmath11 regime , magnetic - field flux is advected with the plasma flow , until such time that gradients are concentrated into short enough length scales that diffusion can balance convection ( @xmath12 m ) , ohmic dissipation becomes important , and magnetic reconnection can occur . essentially the large @xmath13 allows for the build - up of energy , followed by a sudden release . physical system with large @xmath13 are fully turbulent magnetic systems , and this naturally leads to studies of _ turbulence _ and _ complexity _ as potential key parameters to developing a deeper understanding of the physics behind active region evolution and energy storage required for solar eruptive events . the ( mono- ) fractal dimension of any object is a measure of the self - similarity across all size scales , or the scaling index of any length to area measure , [ @xmath14 , where @xmath15 is the capacity dimension , often just called the `` fractal '' dimension . in the more general case , a multifractal system will contain a spectrum of fractal indices of different powers [ @xmath16 ( although strictly this is only true in the asymptotic limit , @xcite ) , and takes account of the fractal measure at each point in space . the @xmath17 ) curve is equivalent to the @xmath18 multifractal spectrum , where @xmath19 is the haussdorff dimension ( or filling dimension ) of each hlder exponent in the data . if the system only has one hlder exponent ( _ i.e. _ is a true monofractal ) then this @xmath18 `` spectrum '' will be just one point . if a system contains a large number of sets of structures with differing hlder exponents ( _ i.e. _ is a multifractal ) , then this will be a concave curve . @xcite showed that flare - productive active regions have a multifractal spectrum peaking at large _ d _ ( @xmath20 ) , agreeing with the monofractal study of @xcite , and high _ h _ ( @xmath21 ) . @xcite showed that it is possible to use this to separate quiet - sun gradients from active - region gradients using the wavelet - transform modulus maxima ( wtmm ) . the wtmm method @xcite provides a novel means to calculate the multifractal spectrum of any dataset . a full description of the method as applied in 1d is available in @xcite and @xcite , as applied to solar flare hard x - ray data , and as applied in 2d by @xcite and @xcite . briefly , this is achieved by initially computing the 2d continuous wavelet transform [ t ] of an image [ @xmath22 : @xmath23 ( { \bf b } , a ) = \nabla \left ( t_\theta [ f ] ( { \bf b } , a ) \right ) = \nabla \left ( \theta_{b , a } \ast f   \right ) \ , \label{t_psi}\ ] ] at each location [ * b * ] and where @xmath24 is a smoothing kernel given separably into @xmath25 this amounts to smoothing the data by a gaussian kernel and applying a gradient filter to the smoothed image to obtain t. the image is then smoothed by a larger gaussian kernel and the operation is repeated . figure  [ f1 ] shows gradients at three scales overplotted on magnetic - field data . note that both quiet - sun and active - region gradients are detected , as are the `` fake '' gradients at the center of the large negative spot ( where the field incorrectly goes to 0 in the center of the largest spot ) . the largest gradients are at the mixed polarity `` delta '' components at the smallest scale . at the larger scales , the gradients tend to blend together into larger structures over the large - scale polarity - inversion lines evident in the active region . at the largest scale , edge effects creep in as vertical and horizontal streaks . at each scale , edges are extracted as maxima chains where the wavelet - transform modulus [ @xmath26({\bf b } , a ) = | t_\psi [ f ] ( { \bf b } , a)| $ ] ] is _ locally _ maximum in the direction of @xmath27({\bf b } , a)$ ] . at each scale , the local maximum is then detected along each chain . a set of maxima lines , [ @xmath28 is formed by connecting these points across scale . statistically , these lines contain all of the information about the local hlder exponents [ @xmath29 in the image . along any one maxima line that connects down to any maxima x0 in the limit at the smallest scale , the wavelet - transform modulus behaves as a power law with exponent @xmath30 : @xmath31 [ l_{\bf x0 } ( a ) ] \sim a^{h({\bf x0 } ) } \ . } \label{hold1}\ ] ] by tracking each gradient up through scale , from each location [ x0 ] ( where some gradient occurs at the smallest size scale ) , each of these locations can be characterized by its own hlder exponent that prescribes how that gradient varies across scale . the data can then be characterized as a histogram of these @xmath32-values . a partition - function technique is then used to convert this histogram to the full @xmath18 multifractal spectrum @xcite and provide appropriate error bars . the source of magnetic structure in the solar atmosphere is provided by ampre s law , @xmath33 where the constant is neglected , this breaks down to a combination of spatial gradients , @xmath34 where we are limited to measurements of @xmath35 ( _ i.e. _ longitudinal - field measurements near disk center ) , we neglect the other spatial gradients involving @xmath36 and @xmath37 . this is a good approximation near active regions with strong gradients . assuming flux [ @xmath38 is conserved , then as density falls off exponentially with height , a flux tube will expand in area and so decrease in field strength . hence @xmath39 will fall off rapidly , with the same exponential form as density . neglecting spatial gradients involving @xmath36 and @xmath37 may not turn out to be a viable assumption in some cases ( something to be accounted for in handling full magnetic vector data ) . proceeding with @xmath35 only , equations  ( [ eqn : amp ] ) and ( [ eqn : curl ] ) become @xmath40 and hence @xmath41 calculating magnetic spatial gradients is a non - trivial issue . gradients may occur in any direction , and are not limited to the pixel resolution of the data . the most appropriate way to measure gradients is to do so for every angle and every spatial size scale , and then to study how these vary over size scale , [ s ] , _ i.e. _ @xmath42 by adopting a derivative of gaussian as the mother wavelet in the analysis of wtmm in equations  ( [ t_psi ] ) and ( [ mother ] ) , the local hlder exponent , @xmath43 in equation  ( [ hold1 ] ) is the rate of change of the gradient of the magnetic field with size scale , _ i.e. _ in the asymptotic limit , @xmath44 for the gradients identified in figure  [ f1 ] , the modulus maxima are identified along each ridge , and then tracked up through scale as described in section  [ mfs ] . figure  [ f2 ] shows the result of this tracking procedure . each gradient is tracked to progressively larger and larger spatial size scales . according to equation  ( [ hold1 ] ) the slope of each of these lines is the hlder exponent of each gradient tracked . according to equation  ( [ eqn : holder ] ) , this value is also the spatial rate of change of current density . the lines in figure  [ f2 ] are color - coded according to the @xmath32 value . clearly some gradients exhibit a negative or near - zero @xmath32 . positive , near - zero hlder exponents are `` dust - like '' @xcite , meaning they are sparse and only exist at small scales ( _ i.e. _ the power drops off quickly with increasing scale ) . by definition in equation  ( [ hold1 ] ) , the hlder exponent is positive , however recent work @xcite has extended this analysis into a negative regime via a secondary component . in equation  ( [ eqn : holder ] ) , both negative and near - zero exponents correspond to locations where some current density may be present at small scales , but not at large scales . it is clear from figure  [ f3 ] that these locations are in the quiet sun . when tracked over time , these features will not persist and hence they can not build up the magnetic energy required to be the source of solar flares .    the positive hlder exponents ( blue ) are large positive @xmath32 . these are `` strong '' , meaning they exist at small scales and are larger at larger scales . in equation  ( [ eqn : holder ] ) , these are locations where current density increases at large scale . it is clear from figure  [ f3 ] that exponents are preferentially located in and around strong magnetic fields . in particular , there are groups of strong @xmath32 ( blue ) to the north and south of the active region between the strong negative spot and the positive regions . there is another group of strong @xmath32 ( blue ) to the west ( right ) at the negative polarity plage . all the real active - region gradients present an hlder exponent greater than 0.7 . the expectation is that when tracked over time , these are the gradients that persist to provide magnetic structure for strong current densities that can exist up to larger spatial scales . it is expected that these are the locations where magnetic energy can therefore build up over time and these will be the locations of energy release . figure  [ f4 ] ( left ) shows the value of each hlder exponent plotted against the gradient at the smallest size scale . interestingly , a large gradient at small size scale is not necessarily an indicator of a large hlder exponent . this shows the need to consider gradients across scale , rather than just gradients on a pixel - by - pixel basis . the frequency histogram of these hlder exponents ( over plotted ) is distinctly bimodal . there is a small negative-@xmath32 distribution and a larger , long - tailed positive-@xmath32 distribution . figure  [ f4 ] ( right ) shows the same plot of @xmath32-values , but this time overplotted with the multifractal spectrum preselected only for positive @xmath32-values that show a large gradient at small size scale , _ i.e. _ this multifractal spectrum is formed from only those data in figure  [ f2 ] that are blue and show a gradient larger than 200 g px@xmath8 at the smallest size scale . the multifractal spectrum is calculated using a partition function algorithm applied to the gradients of figure  [ f2 ] and described in detail by @xcite and @xcite . this technique of preselecting hlder exponents is justified as the quiet sun presents its own individual multifractal spectrum ; therefore if all the hlder exponents are used , the resulting ( averaged ) multifractal spectrum would be incorrectly broad and would incorrectly peak around @xmath45 . by preselecting on both gradient size and hlder exponent it is possible to by remove quiet - sun contamination and therefore extract the active - region multifractal spectra from any dataset . the multifractal spectrum exhibits much potential in providing a suitable , and physically motivated , proxy for the complexity ( and hence non - potentiality ) of active regions . @xcite showed that a multiscale neutral - line detector could be useful for studying solar flares . together with the fact that the magnetic reynold s number is very large , the application of the multifractal spectrum is appropriate . as ampre s law breaks down into a collection of magnetic spatial gradients , the route to obtaining the multifractal spectrum through using these gradients is optimum . by comparing equation  ( [ eqn : bgrad ] ) for the horizontal components of the current density with equation  ( [ hold1 ] ) that defines the hlder exponents it is shown that the hlder exponent explicitly defines the rate of change of current density with spatial size . the histogram of these hlder exponents then explicitly defines the overall magnetic complexity of the image . it is important to realize that the histogram in figure  [ f4 ] is distinctly bimodal . this bimodality also agrees with previous work on solar magnetic fields @xcite and this bimodality is hard to capture in the usual legendre - transform approach to the multifractal spectrum . it only becomes evident when each gradient is tracked and studied separately . it can represent a phase transition between two distinct measures . clearly this bimodality must be studied further across a larger sample of magnetic - field data . this bimodality explains why recent research @xcite failed to repeat earlier findings of @xcite and @xcite . if the entire histogram is incorrectly fitted with a single distribution , the resulting incorrect multifractal spectrum will be wide and will peak at lower @xmath19 and lower @xmath32 . this is a direct result of the influence of the quiet - sun gradients influencing the overall result . further , as quiet - sun gradients are the weakest , it is easy to lose these from image to image , or from instrument to instrument  hence a cross comparison or study of any time sequence of data that incorrectly includes these quiet - sun gradients will result in inconsistent , fluctuating , multifractal spectra . it is important to note that the measurement that is taken from the data is that of how the gradient changes with size scale  this forms the first prediction that the same solution will be determined irrespective of the data type . future work must test this prediction by comparing the multifractal spectrum on co - temporal and co - spatial regions across datasets from multiple instruments . it is this potential to provide a link between the large mdi dataset , the large gong dataset , and all future datasets that makes this prediction so intriguing for statistical solar - flare prediction . a second prediction arising from the work presented here is that those gradients defined as quiet sun - those red and green points in figure  [ f2 ] and figure  [ f3 ] - should not persist with time . these gradients can provide some direct heating to the solar atmosphere , but they can not persist , and hence energy can not build up to large values of current density . this prediction can be tested by tracking these from image to image  the gradients defined as quiet sun will persist for much less time than those gradients defined as active region . a separate study of negative exponents in the quiet sun may provide insight into these small - scale magnetic flux densities ( see discussion by @xcite ) . the third prediction is that the energy required to power solar eruptive events comes from those large gradients with large hlder exponents . larger solar flares should result from the largest gradients that persist for the longest time  indeed it may be possible to calibrate the actual free energy stored in the magnetic field by comparing the size and persistence of both the overall multifractal spectra and the individual gradients with the resulting energy releases . if it can be shown that the devil of the largest scale structures is provided by the detail of the smallest scale gradients , it will then be possible to combine large - scale magnetic proxy studies with smaller - scale extrapolation work to provide future insight into coronal structure , a study that can then be further tested when coronal magnetic - field data become readily available . this work was supported by national science foundation career award nss ags-1255024 and nasa contract nnh12cg10c . the author thanks the referee for useful insight and several very useful references . the author declares he has no conflict of interest                    abramenko , v.i . : 2005 , multifractal analysis of solar magnetograms . phys . _ * 228 * , 29 . abramenko , v.i . , yurchyshyn , v.b . : 2010 , intermittency and multifractality spectra of the magnetic field in solar active regions . _ astrophys . j. _ , * 722 * , 122 . bloomfield , d.s . , higgins , p.a . , mcateer , r.t.j . gallagher , p.t . : 2010 , toward reliable benchmarking of solar flare forecasting methods , _ astrophys . j. lett _ , * 747 * , l41 . conlon , p. a. , gallagher , p.t . , mcateer , r.t.j . , ireland , j. , young , c.a . , kestener , p. , et al : 2008 , multifractal properties of evolving active regions , _ solar . _ , * 248 * , 297 . conlon , p.a . , mcateer , r.t.j . , gallagher , p.t . , fennell , l. : 2010 , quantifying the evolving magnetic structure of active regions , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 722 * , 577 . charon , n. , trouv , a. : 2013 , a new mathematical tool to model and analyse functional shapes , j. math . imaging and vision , * 48 * , 413 . de rosa , m.l . , schrijver , c.j . , graham , g. , leka , k.d . , lites , b. , aschwanden , m.j . : 2009 , a critical assessment of nonlinear force - free field modeling of the solar corona for active region 10953 . _ astrophys . j. _ , * 696 * , 1780 . georgoulis , m.k . , rust , d.m . , bernasconi , p.n . , schmieder , b.:2002 , statistics , morphology , and energetics of ellerman bombs , _ astrophys . j. _ * 575 * , 506 . georgoulis , m.k . : 2013 , toward an efficient prediction of solar flares : which parameters , and how ? , _ entropy _ , * 15 * , 5022 . hewett , r.j . , gallagher , p.t . , mcateer , r.t.j . : 2008,multiscale analysis of active region evolution , _ solar . _ , * 248 * , 311 . ireland , j. , young , c.a . , mcateer , r.t.j . , whelan , c. , hewett , r.j . , gallagher , p.t . : 2008 , multiresolution analysis of active region magnetic structure and its correlation with the mount wilson classification and flaring activity , _ solar phys . _ , * 252 * , 121 . kestener , p. , conlon , p.a . , khalil , a. , fennell , l. , mcateer , r.t.j . , gallagher , p.t . , arneodo , a. : 2010 , characterizing complexity in solar magnetogram data using a wavelet - based segmentation method , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 717 * , 995 . leka , k.d . , barnes , g. : 2007 , photospheric magnetic field properties of flaring versus flare - quiet active regions . iv . a statistically significant sample , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 656 * , 1173 . leka , k.d . , barnes , g. : 2008 , evaluating the performance of solar flare forecasting methods , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 688 * , l107 . leonarduzzi r. , wendt h. , jaffard , s. , roux , s.g . , torres , m.e . , abry , p. : 2014 , extending multifractal analysis to negative regularity : p - exponents and p - leaders , in acoustics , speech and signal processing ( icassp ) , 2014 ieee international conference on , 305 makarenko n.g . , karimovab , l.m . , kozelovc , b.v . , novakd , m.m . : 2012 , multifractal analysis on choquet capacity : application to solar magnetograms , _ physica a. _ * 391 * , 4290 . mcateer , r.tj . : 2013 , soc and fractal geometry , in self organized criticality systems , aschwanden m.a . , ( ed . ) , 73 mcateer , r.t.j . , bloomfield , d.s . : 2013 , the bursty nature of solar flare x - ray emission . ii . the neupert effect , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 776 * , 66 . mcateer , r.t.j . , gallagher , p.t . , conlon , p.a . : 2010 , turbulence , complexity , and solar flares , _ adv . res _ , * 45 * , 1067 . mcateer , r.t.j . , gallagher , p.t . , ireland , j. : 2005 , statistics of active region complexity : a large - scale fractal dimension survey , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 631 * , 628 . mcateer , r.t.j . , young , c.a . , ireland , j. , gallagher , p.t . : 2007 , the bursty nature of solar flare x - ray emission , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 662 * , 691 . mcateer , r.t.j . , kestener . p. , arneodo , a. , khalil , a. : 2010 , automated detection of coronal loops using a wavelet transform modulus maxima method , _ solar . _ , * 262 * , 387 . mcateer , r.tj . , aschwanden , m.j . , dimitropoulou , m. georgoulis , m.k . , pruessner , g. , morales , l. et al . : 2015 , _ sp . sci . rev _ , 25 years of self - organized criticality : numerical detection methods , in press , doi : 10.1007/s11214 - 015 - 0158 - 7 muzy , j.f . , bacry , e. , arneodo , a. : 1991 , wavelets and multifractal formalism for singular signals , _ phys . lett _ , * 67 * , 3515 . schrijver , c.j . : 2007 , a characteristic magnetic field pattern associated with all major solar flares and its use in flare forecasting , _ astrophys . j. _ , * 655 * , l117 . turiel a. , yahia h. , prez - vicente c.j . : 2008 , microcanonical multifractal formalizm : a geometrical approach to multifractal systems.p.1 . singularity analysis , _ j.physica a. _ * 41 * , 015501 .
Abstract:

Answer: the large - scale structure of the magnetic field in the solar corona provides the energy to power large - scale solar eruptive events . our physical understanding of this structure , and hence our ability to predict these events , is limited by the type of data currently available . it is shown that the multifractal spectrum is a powerful tool to study this structure , by providing a physical connection between the details of photospheric magnetic gradients and current density at all size scales . this uses concepts associated with geometric measure theory and the theory of weakly differentiable functions to compare ampre s law to the wavelet - transform modulus maximum method . the hlder exponent provides a direct measure of the rate of change of current density across spatial size scales . as this measure is independent of many features of the data ( pixel resolution , data size , data type , presence of quiet - sun data ) , it provides a unique approach to studying magnetic - field complexity and hence a potentially powerful tool for a statistical prediction of solar - flare activity . three specific predictions are provided to test this theory : the multifractal spectra will not be dependent on the data type or quality ; quiet - sun gradients will not persist with time ; structures with large current densities at large size scale will be the source of energy storage for solar eruptive events .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the picture of structure formation through gravitational instability now appears to be well established . initial fluctuations grow through gravitational instability to form the structures which we observe today , and leave their imprint at redshift @xmath0 in the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) radiation anisotropy . within this framework any theory which purports to explain the large - scale structures we observe today , must simultaneously fit the increasing amount of data on cmb anisotropies . the combination of these two constraints is especially powerful , since they probe a large lever arm both in scale ( @xmath1 to @xmath2 ) and time ( @xmath3 to @xmath4 ) . calculations of both cmb anisotropy spectra and matter power spectra are now well developed for inflationary models , with the former approaching 1% precision @xcite . ( in fig . [ fig : cl_ref ] we show the anisotropy power spectrum for the `` standard '' cdm model , see @xcite for a discussion of the physics behind these anisotropies ) . this kind of precision in theoretical predictions is necessary to interpret the results envisioned from a future satellite cmb mission , which could accurately measure the power spectrum over a broad range of scales , allowing one to measure most of the standard cosmological parameters with unprecedented accuracy @xcite . however such a measurement is still ( optimistically ) several years away , and in the meantime the data on cmb anisotropies continues to be amassed at a steady rate . for the interpretation of current data , such a high level of precision is not necessary , and semi - analytic techniques exist which can give spectra accurate to @xmath5 @xcite . an important constraint on structure formation models can be obtained without even this amount of effort however . it has been pointed out @xcite that for measurements of the spectrum constrained to scales of @xmath6 or above , the anisotropy power spectra exhibit a degeneracy in parameter space , which can be both a hindrance and a boon . this degeneracy has been dubbed `` cosmic confusion '' @xcite as it provides a limit to how well cosmological parameters can be extracted from measures of the cmb power spectra on scales larger than @xmath7 . notice the promise this degeneracy has in simplifying the interpretation of degree scale cmb data . as noted by dodelson & kosowsky @xcite , if this degeneracy holds it is possible to characterize the constraints on a wide range of models in terms of two parameters : an overall amplitude and the value of the degenerate combination of parameters @xmath8 ( see  [ sec : confusion ] for details . a part of this approximate degeneracy was implicitly used in @xcite to constrain the spectral slope and ionization history from the peak height ) . the amplitude of the _ potential _ fluctuations , measured on the largest scales by _ cobe _ , has become the preferred method for normalizing theories of large - scale structure @xcite . ( we show an example of this in fig . [ fig : deltah ] , where the dimensionless amplitude of the matter power spectrum at horizon crossing , @xmath9 , is shown vs.  @xmath10 and spectral tilt @xmath11 . ) the value of @xmath8 will constrain other parameters on which the predictions of the theory depend . furthermore , to the extent that cosmic confusion holds , generating spectra for a wide range of parameters can be reduced to simple modifications of a standard spectrum ( however with the advent of semi - analytic techniques for quickly generating spectra over the entire angular range , this may be of limited utility ) . an obvious application of this is a fitting formula for the height of the peak in the power spectra at @xmath12 . the current data provide limits on the height of the peak ( see e.g.  @xcite ) , which are becoming stronger . a quick method of estimating the height of the peak in the cmb spectrum can allow one to estimate the constraints from degree - scale measurements quickly and efficiently over a broad range of parameter space . the outline of this paper is as follows . in  [ sec : confusion ] we discuss how well cosmic confusion works , and slightly modify the original formulation @xcite .  [ sec : reion ] discusses the special case of late reionization in processing the spectra . in  [ sec : fit ] we use a compilation of cmb data to provide a limit on the peak height and discuss implications for models of structure formation .  [ sec : conclusions ] presents the conclusions . in this section we would like to make some comments about , and minor improvements upon , the degeneracy of cmb spectra with respect to certain parameters which has been dubbed `` cosmic confusion '' @xcite . specifically , it is claimed that for a range of parameters the cmb anisotropy spectra are degenerate in @xmath13 where @xmath11 is the ( scalar ) spectral index , @xmath14 is the ratio of tensors to scalars ( see below ) , @xmath15 is the hubble constant in units of @xmath16 and @xmath17 is the reionization redshift ( see  [ sec : reion ] ) . the degeneracy is supposed to hold up to the first peak in the power spectrum , @xmath18 , though some spectra can be degenerate over an even larger range of @xmath19 @xcite . to start let us take as our guiding principle the following conjecture :    * for reasonable input parameters all cmb anisotropy spectra with the same peak - to - plateau ratio will be approximately degenerate . the interpretation of this statement clearly depends upon what range of cosmological models are adopted , over what range of scales the degeneracy is required to hold ( not beyond the first peak ) , and the precise meaning of `` approximately '' . we will discuss all of these issues below . inflation in its most generic form predicts a flat universe , so in this paper we will restrict ourselves to models with vanishing spatial curvature . several questions relating to open inflation are still unresolved , for example the predictions for super - curvature modes , spectral tilt and tensor modes to be very close to ( or greater than ) 1 . ] . while for any given model the calculations of the power spectrum are straightforward @xcite , we feel that these uncertainties make fitting to spectra premature for these models . the simplest implementation of cosmic confusion is in terms of an apparent spectral index , which we shall call @xmath8 ( this is related to the @xmath20 of @xcite by @xmath21 ) . as our base model we shall adopt ` standard ' cdm ( @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 , @xmath26 ) for which we define @xmath27 . this spectrum is shown in fig . [ fig : cl_ref ] and tabulated in table  [ tab : scdm ] . the spectrum for a model whose parameters combine to give @xmath8 is then related to that of standard cdm by the simple formula @xmath28 where @xmath29 for notational convenience . we have chosen to pivot around @xmath30 as this is approximately the pivot point of the _ cobe _ data @xcite . alternatively one could use @xmath31 @xcite , which turns out to be almost the same for the range of spectra under consideration .    to understand the expression for @xmath8 in terms of the parameters of the model , we need only consider the effect of changing each parameter on the peak height of the model . we will now consider each of these effects in turn , concentrating first on those parameters for which the conjecture works well and then turning to those for which the deviations are larger .    as discussed in @xcite changing the spectral index , @xmath11 , of the primordial spectrum ( @xmath32 ) is equivalent to multiplying the anisotropy spectrum by @xmath33 as in eq . [ eqn : tiltapp ] . for @xmath34 the worst deviations induced by this approximation occur around @xmath3550 , and are @xmath36 . hence tilting the model away from scale invariance changes @xmath8 by @xmath37 . associated with tilt is the possibility that some of the cmb anisotropy comes from long - wavelength , inflation - produced gravitational waves ( tensor fluctuations ) . the fraction , @xmath14 , of tensors is usually quoted in terms of the contribution to the quadrupole : @xmath38 . unfortunately due to the decaying potentials in a @xmath39 model the scalar quadrupole is very sensitive to @xmath40 @xcite for a fixed `` initial '' power spectrum . the tensor quadrupole is much less sensitive @xcite and hence the ratio has a strong ( artificial ) @xmath39 dependence @xcite . we choose instead to write @xmath41 , where the prefactor has been chosen to make the definitions agree for @xmath42 . the @xmath30 mode is not as strongly affected by the decaying potentials @xcite making this a more robust measure of the underlying tensor / scalar ratio . since the tensor spectrum damps rapidly on scales smaller than the horizon at last scattering @xcite the effect of introducing a tensor component is to increase the plateau by @xmath43 while leaving the peak unchanged . [ the factor 0.76 is roughly @xmath44 for a scale - invariant spectrum with @xmath23 . ] an equivalent reduction in the peak height relative to the plateau can be accomplished by reducing the spectral index ( from @xmath30 to @xmath12 ) by , @xmath45    in the semi - analytic , two - fluid models of cmb anisotropies @xcite , the height of the first peak depends primarily on the combinations @xmath46 ( which sets the speed of sound in the coupled baryon - photon fluid ) and the redshift of matter - radiation equality . the latter scales with @xmath47 , where @xmath48 is the fraction of the radiation made up of photons , scaled to be 1 in the standard model with 3 massless neutrino species . in models in which more relativistic species are included , such as decaying neutrino models @xcite , @xmath49 can be reduced leading to a larger peak height , just as if @xmath50 were lowered . as a warning we point out that this ` degeneracy ' is not exact , due to the effect of @xmath40 at low redshift ( which is included implicitly in the formulation of the semi - analytic models @xcite ) . in fig .  [ fig : cl_compare ] we show spectra for two models with the same ( reasonable ) values of @xmath51 and @xmath46 , which differ even up to the first peak by 510% . specifically the models have @xmath52 and @xmath53 , the first with ( @xmath50,@xmath54)=(0.4,0.25 ) and the second with ( 1,0.1 ) . as one can see from the figure , the exact height and position of the first peak are complicated functions of the cosmological parameters ! the reason for the breaking of the degeneracy in this particular case is that the large - angle temperature fluctuations ( from decaying potentials at @xmath39 domination ) and the projection of physical scales to @xmath19 both depend on @xmath40 , not just @xmath55 . the original statement of cosmic confusion was meant to hold for models with @xmath53 , meaning that models with equal @xmath51 would be degenerate , and furthermore that they would coincide with models with some @xmath56 . for models with scale invariant initial perturbations , @xmath23 , @xmath53 and @xmath57 to 0.75 , we find that the height of the peak ( relative to @xmath58 ) is very well fit by @xmath59 we note that @xmath60 ranges from 260 to 200 over this range of @xmath15 , since a changing sound speed causes the sound horizon at last scattering to subtend a varying angular scale @xcite . this small movement of the peak should not matter if we redefine `` cosmic confusion '' to hold when averaged over a reasonably broad window in @xmath19 , as is the case in most experiments to date . under the `` confusion '' assumption then we predict that @xmath61 which is roughly equivalent to the original statement given in @xcite . both this approximation , and the original statement @xcite , give @xmath36 deviations in @xmath62 for @xmath63 and @xmath64 . [ the percentage deviations for @xmath65 can be larger than 10% , but here cosmic variance is also larger . ]    similarly we find that the variation with @xmath10 at fixed @xmath46 and @xmath15 works at the @xmath5 level in power for @xmath66 and @xmath67 , with @xmath68 this is not exactly what we would have expected based on a degeneracy in @xmath69 : the scaling with @xmath50 is slightly weaker , and that with @xmath49 weaker still . [ this can be traced to the same non - degeneracy mentioned above and illustrated in fig . [ fig : cl_compare ] . ]    note that at present @xmath46 as determined by big bang nucleosynthesis ( bbn ) is uncertain to a factor of @xmath70 ( c.f . the hubble constant ! ) @xcite . thus we are compelled to study the variation of the peak height with the sound speed , or @xmath46 , which was not included in the original statement of cosmic confusion @xcite . for @xmath23 and @xmath71 the height of the peak is relatively well fit by an exponential in @xmath72 for @xmath22 and less well fit by an exponential for @xmath73 . unfortunately the slopes of the fits for these two cases ( which have different @xmath74 ) disagree : @xmath75 as a compromise then we take the average of the two coefficients to arrive at our dependence of @xmath8 on @xmath46 @xmath76 which holds relatively well over the range preferred by bbn : @xmath77 @xcite .    in summary then we can define a `` spectral tilt '' @xmath8 through @xmath78 for a large range of @xmath79 cdm models , we find with this @xmath8 that `` cosmic confusion '' holds at the @xmath5 level in power ( 5% in temperature ) up to @xmath80 for those models with @xmath67 , @xmath81 and @xmath77 ( we discuss @xmath82 in  [ sec : reion ] ) . this deviation usually occurs at @xmath8350 and some of it can be attributed to the approximation for tilt of the primordial spectrum that we are using ( eq .  [ eqn : tiltapp ] ) . for low-@xmath50 or @xmath15 models the shape of the rise into the peak and the position of the peak are sufficiently different that a tilted model is not a good fit ( though our fit is a good approximation to the height of the peak even for @xmath84 ) . on the other hand for some models in the range mentioned the degeneracy is good to 1% in power for @xmath85 . the logarithmic dependence of @xmath8 on @xmath51 differs from the linear dependence of @xmath20 on the same quantity found by @xcite . both approximations give similar `` worst fit '' @xmath62 , but the logarithm is a better fit to the height of the peak ( @xmath86 relative to @xmath58 ) over the range of models considered ; it works to better than 5% .    with the rapid progress being made in measurements of the cmb anisotropy , it is likely that we will need to do better than 10% in the very near future . a more complicated fit or a better treatment of spectral tilt could alleviate matters slightly . however , bearing in mind that the position of the peak also changes with the input parameters and that the degeneracies ( e.g.  @xmath87 ) built into `` confusion '' themselves only hold at the 510% level , one is lead to conclude that `` one number '' summaries of the cmb data are becoming a thing of the past . of course , eq .  [ eqn : nudef ] is still useful as a quick - and - dirty method of estimating the height of the peak ( to 5% ) in the power spectrum for quite a wide range of parameters . this can be useful for narrowing the large parameter space down to a smaller region which can be searched more carefully ( as one often uses linear theory estimates in large - scale structure work ) . if the experiments are chosen to probe scales for which `` confusion '' works well , then constraints on @xmath8 will still encode much of the information that the cmb has for large - scale structure .    as more experiments probe scales `` beyond the first peak '' ( @xmath88 ) , the utility of cosmic confusion as a summary of _ all _ cmb constraints will decrease . in these cases one must search a multi - dimensional parameter space and compute the full cmb spectrum either by numerical evolution of the coupled boltzmann equations or fast semi - analytic methods which can be accurate to @xmath36 ( e.g.  @xcite ) . moving beyond this degeneracy will allow us to obtain more information about the cosmological parameters from study of the detailed structure of the power spectrum . in the original statement of cosmic confusion @xcite , there was a term for the reionization redshift . reionization in the adiabatic models of interest is likely to occur very rapidly @xcite and at relatively low redshift , @xmath17 . since @xmath17 the universe has probably been fully ionized . we show in table  [ tab : zr ] a `` reasonable '' estimate of the reionization redshift for some models by way of example . these determinations rely on several assumptions and so should only be taken as illustrative . the results are also very sensitive to the value of @xmath46 and @xmath89 chosen .    in such a scenario , the amplitude of the fluctuations on small scales is reduced by @xmath90 @xcite , where @xmath91\ ] ] ( for @xmath92 ) is the optical depth to thomson scattering from @xmath93 to @xmath17 ( also shown in table  [ tab : zr ] ) . note that @xmath94 depends not only on @xmath17 but also on @xmath72 and @xmath15 , which was neglected in the original treatment of cosmic confusion @xcite . ( for the accuracy to which the spectrum depends on and scales with @xmath94 see @xcite . ) in addition new fluctuations are generated on larger angular scales for @xmath95 @xcite . reionized spectra are _ not _ well described by a simple tilting of the scdm spectrum . an approximation which has the correct asymptotic forms @xcite is to multiply the spectrum by @xmath96 $ ] , where @xmath97 is the optical depth from @xmath93 to redshift @xmath98 and @xmath99 defines a mapping from angles to redshift ( e.g.  the redshift at which the horizon subtends an angle @xmath100 ) . while this approximation has the right asymptotic form , it fails to be a good approximation to a reionized spectrum for @xmath95 since it does not take into account the fluctuations generated on the new last scattering surface . these fluctuations typically do not extend to @xmath101 , so if one is interested only in scales near the peak of the spectrum a reduction of @xmath102 $ ] is appropriate .    because reionization is such an important part of interpreting cmb anisotropy measurements in the context of cosmological models , we will defer a more detailed discussion of reionization to a future paper @xcite . in this section we discuss what we can infer about @xmath8 from current observations of cmb anisotropy . we shall use the data tabulated in @xcite since the newer data is ( mostly ) not yet available . as discussed in @xcite and below , the constraints even without including the new data are very interesting for large - scale structure modelling . several issues regarding foreground contamination and possible systematic errors intrude in the analysis of current cmb data . it was shown in @xcite that for the experiments dominating the fit near the peak , removing the foregrounds does not increase the error bars by more than @xmath5 . to account for foreground removal we have ( conservatively ) multiplied the errors in @xcite by 10% ( except for _ cobe _ ) . note that since @xcite , several experiments have reproduced earlier observations , indicating that systematic errors are not as severe as might have been thought . in one case however , that of the msam experiment @xcite , one of the two channels ( the `` single - difference '' ) showed a discrepancy . to be very conservative we have dropped this point from our analysis ( shown in fig . [ fig : the_data ] as the solid square at @xmath103 ) and updated the `` double - difference '' point to include the new data ( which is slightly lower than the older data ) . also we do not include the new data from the python experiment ( though we show it in fig . [ fig : the_data ] as the solid triangles with the small error bars @xcite ) since the points are correlated in an unknown way . as it is not the purpose of this paper to revisit the data analysis , especially without access to the latest data , we shall use the data set as tabulated in @xcite , with the simple modifications discussed above . one point deserves special mention . in @xcite we used symmetric error bars on all of the points . this is a conservative method if the inference is the presence of a peak , since most of the observations have skew positive error bars . however this leads to a slightly stronger than warranted _ upper _ limit on the height of the peak , and a slightly weaker lower limit . as most of the skewed likelihood functions have not been published in tabular or graphical form we have not tried to correct for this bias . since for most of the models under consideration ( especially the models with high @xmath40 ) the large - scale structure data is best fit with a tilt ( @xmath104 ) , this treatment remains the most conservative . a fit to the data as in @xcite , but with spectra generated from eq . [ eqn : tiltapp ] , gives a likelihood function for @xmath8 shown in fig . [ fig : nulik ] . here we have integrated , or marginalized , over the normalization @xmath105 , which is well fixed by _ cobe _ the mean and standard deviation are @xmath106 . the absolute goodness of fit to both the _ cobe _ data alone @xcite and the other data @xcite show no indications that the fit should be suspect for purely _ statistical _ reasons . notice that this result has several immediate implications for structure formation models . that the preferred peak height is near that of a cdm model with scale invariant initial conditions puts a _ lower _ limit on the amount of tilt which can be accommodated @xcite . the lower limit clearly depends on the values of @xmath50 , @xmath15 and @xmath46 assumed , with lower @xmath50 and @xmath15 acting to loosen the constraint and lower @xmath46 acting to strengthen it . the probability of early reionization @xcite in these models will only tighten the lower limit on @xmath11 .    the increased height of the peak in low-@xmath50 models or models with @xmath107 can cause conflict with the _ upper _ limit on @xmath8 , unless the models are tilted , the baryon fraction is lowered or there is some reionization . we note in passing that for @xmath39cdm , some tilt is probably necessary to provide a good fit with the large scale structure data in any case @xcite . in general , while the degree scale data provide a strong constraint on models with high @xmath50 , the possibility of early reionization ( the degree scale power is exponentially sensitive to the very uncertain @xmath17 ) and the large uncertainty in @xmath46 from bbn significantly weaken the constraints from this data for low @xmath50 or @xmath49 models . in this paper we have compared the accuracy of spectra generated using the `` cosmic confusion '' @xcite assumption to those calculated using numerical evolution of the boltzmann hierarchy . for a range of parameters of current interest the spectra are found to agree to @xmath5 for all multipoles up to the first peak ( @xmath12 ) . over the same range the height of the peak is reproduced to @xmath108 . as pointed out by dodelson & kosowsky @xcite , the presence of this degeneracy for scales greater than @xmath7 allows a simple statement of the parameter constraints arising from cmb data . given current data we find that @xmath8 ( see eq . [ eqn : nudef ] ) is constrained to be @xmath106 . by limiting the amount of spectral tilt , this result in combination with large - scale structure measurements ( on somewhat smaller scales ) strongly constrains models of structure formation ( see e.g.  @xcite and  [ sec : fit ] ) . n. sugiyama , astrophys . j. supp . * 100 * 281 ( 1995 ) . w. hu , d. scott , n. sugiyama , m. white , phys . rev . * d52 * 5498 ( 1995 ) . u. seljak , astrophys . j. * 435 * , l87 ( 1994 ) . d. scott , m. white , general relativity & gravitation * 27 * , 1023 ( 1995 ) . d. scott , j. silk , m. white , science * 268 * , 829 ( 1995 ) ; d. scott , m. white , in _ cmb anisotropies two years after cobe _ , ed . krauss , world scientific , new york , p.214 w. hu , n. sugiyama , astrophys . j. * 444 * , 489 ( 1995 ) . g. jungman , m. kamionkowski , a. kosowsky , d.n . spergel , preprint , astro - ph/9507080 j.r . bond , r. crittenden , r.l . davis , g. efstathiou , p.j . steinhardt , phys . lett . * 72 * , 13 ( 1994 ) . s. dodelson , a. kosowsky , phys . lett . * 75 * , 604 ( 1995 ) . e. bunn , d. scott , m. white , astrophys . j. * 441 * , l9 ( 1995 ) ; e. bunn , n. sugiyama , astrophys . j. * 446 * , 49 ( 1995 ) ; k. gorski , g. hinshaw , a.j . banday , c.l . bennett , e.l . wright , a. kogut , g.f . smoot , p. lubin , astrophys . j. * 430 * , l89 ( 1994 ) ; m. white , e. bunn , astrophys . j. * 450 * , 477 ( 1995 ) ; k.m . gorksi , b. ratra , n. sugiyama , a. banday , astrophys . j. * 446 * , l67 ( 1995 ) ; r. stompor , k. gorski , a.j . banday , to appear in mnras ; m. white , d. scott , to appear in comments on astrophysics . l. cayon , e. martinez - gonzalez , j.l . sanz , n. sugiyama , s. torres , to appear in astrophys . j. ; k. yamamoto , e. bunn , to appear in astrophys . j. p. steinhardt , `` cosmology at the crossroads '' , in _ proceedings of the 1994 snowmass workshop_. m.l . wilson , astrophys . j. * 273 * , 2 ( 1983 ) ; n. gouda , n. sugiayama , m. sasaki , prog . 85 * , 1023 ( 1991 ) ; m. kamionkowski , d. spergel , n. sugiyama , astrophys . j. * 426 * , l57 ( 1994 ) ; m. kamionkowski , b. ratra , d.n . spergel , n. sugiyama , astrophys . j. * 434 * , l1 ( 1994 ) ; k.m . gorksi , b. ratra , n. sugiyama , a. banday , astrophys . j. * 446 * , l67 ( 1995 ) ; m. white , d. scott , to appear in astrophys . j. ; k. gorski , g. hinshaw , a.j . banday , c.l . bennett , e.l . wright , a. kogut , g.f . smoot , p. lubin , astrophys . j. * 430 * , l89 ( 1994 ) . sachs , a.m. wolfe , astrophys . j. * 147 * , 73 ( 1967 ) . l. kofman , a. starobinsky , sov . . lett . * 11 * , 271 ( 1985 ) . turner , m. white , j.e . lidsey , phys . rev . * d48 * , 4613 ( 1993 ) . l. knox , phys . rev . * d52 * , 4307 ( 1995 ) . m. white , e. bunn , astrophys . j. * 450 * , 477 ( 1995 ) ; ( erratum in press ) . r. crittenden , j.r . bond , r.l . davis , g. efstathiou , p.j . steinhardt , phys . lett . * 71 * , 324 ( 1993 ) . doroshkevich , ya.b . zeldovich , r.a . sunyaev , sov . astron . * 22 * , 523 ( 1978 ) . jorgensen , e. kotok , p.d . naselskii , i.d . novikov , astr . astrophys . * 294 * , 639 ( 1995 ) m. white , d. scott , j. silk , ann . rev . astron . & astrophys . * 32 * , 319 ( 1994 ) . j. bardeen , j.r . bond , g. efstathiou , astrophys . j. * 321 * , 28 ( 1987 ) ; s. dodelson , g. gyuk , m. turner , phys . rev . * 72 * , 3754 ( 1994 ) ; phys . rev . * d49 * , 5068 ( 1994 ) ; m. white , g. gelmini , j. silk , phys . rev . * d51 * , 2669 ( 1995 ) ; s.j . mcnally , j.a . peacock , mnras 277 , 143 ( 1995 ) . c. copi , d.n . schramm , m.s . turner , science * 267 * , 192 ( 1995 ) . couchman , mnras * 214 * , 137 ( 1985 ) . couchman , m.j . rees , mnras * 221 * , 53 ( 1986 ) ; m. fukugita , m. kawasaki , mnras * 269 * , 563 ( 1994 ) ; s. sasaki , f. takahara , y. suto , prog . * 90 * , 85 ( 1993 ) ; m. tegmark , j. silk , blanchard , astrophys . j. * 420 * , 484 ( 1993 ) ( erratum * 434 * , 395 ) ; a. liddle , d.h . lyth , mnras * 273 * , 1177 ( 1995 ) . w. hu , d. scott , j. silk , phys . rev . * d49 * , 648 ( 1994 ) . w. hu , m. white , to appear in astron . & astrophys . n. sugiyama , n. vittorio , j. silk , astrophys . j. * 419 * l1 ( 1993 ) . w. hu , m. white , to appear in astrophys . j. m. white , d. scott , j. silk , m. davis , mnras , * 276 * , l69 ( 1995 ) . s. dodelson , a. stebbins , astrophys . j. * 433 * , 440 ( 1994 ) . cheng , et al . , to appear in astrophys . j. m. dragovan , private communication a. klypin , j. primack , j. holtzman , preprint , astro - ph/9510042 . m. white , d. scott , to appear in comments on astrophysics . e. bunn , ph.d . thesis , university of california , berkeley ( 1995 ) . .the multipole moments , @xmath29 , for the `` standard '' cold dark matter model with @xmath23 , @xmath109 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 . the moments have been normalized to have @xmath110 . enough moments have been given to interpolate the behaviour of the curve . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]
Abstract:

Answer: we present a re - analysis of the cosmic confusion hypothesis , elucidating the degree to which `` confusion '' can be expected to hold in a class of flat , adiabatic models . this allows us to devise a simple and accurate fitting function for the height of the first peak in the radiation power spectrum in a wide range of inflationary inspired models . the range preferred by current data is given , together with a discussion of the impact of measurements of the peak height on constraining models of structure formation . -.2 in -.6 in 8.5 in    epsf    # 1to 0pt#1