Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the behavior of scattering in the limit of high energy and fixed momentum transfer is described in qcd , at least for situations in which perturbation theory applies , by the balitskii - fadin - kuraev - lipatov ( bfkl ) pomeron  @xcite ( or short distance pomeron ) . attempts to test experimentally this sector of qcd have started in the last few years , mainly based on measurements of deeply inelastic events at low values of the bjorken variable @xmath1 in lepton - hadron scattering  @xcite and jet production at large rapidity separations in hadron - hadron collisions  @xcite . in this paper we study the possibilities for investigating qcd pomeron effects in a different context , namely in photon - photon scattering at @xmath2 colliders , where the photons are produced from the lepton beams by bremsstrahlung . the results of this paper also apply to @xmath3 or @xmath4 colliders . some aspects of this study have been presented in refs . @xcite . the quantity we consider is the total cross section for off - shell photon scattering at high energy . this can be measured in @xmath5 collisions in which both the outgoing leptons are tagged . this cross section presents some theoretical advantages as a probe of qcd pomeron dynamics compared to the structure functions for deeply inelastic scattering off a proton ( see for instance the discussion in ref . @xcite ) or a ( quasi)-real photon ( see for example ref . @xcite ) , essentially because it does not involve a non - perturbative target . unlike protons or quasi - real photons , virtual photon states can be described through perturbative wave functions . in some respects the off - shell photon cross section presents analogies with the process of scattering of two quarkonia ( or `` onia '' ) , which has been proposed as a gedanken experiment to investigate the high energy regime in qcd  @xcite . in this case , non - perturbative effects are suppressed by the smallness of the onium radius . in the case of virtual photons the size of the wave function is controlled by the photon virtuality instead of the heavy quark mass . it is an interesting feature of investigations at @xmath6 colliders that this size can be tuned by measuring the momenta of the outgoing leptons . on the other hand , such experimental studies may prove to be difficult due to the smallness of the available rates . as we shall see , for large photon virtualities @xmath7 the cross section falls off like @xmath8 . an estimate of the number of events that one may expect to be available for such studies at lep200 and a future linear @xmath9 collider will be provided later in the paper . there have recently been other investigations of the high energy regime in the context of photon - photon scattering . balitskii  @xcite has proposed an expansion of the scattering amplitude in the high energy limit in terms of wilson line operators . this method provides an elegant reformulation of the bfkl problem , and may prove to be useful to get beyond the leading logarithm approximation . bartels , de roeck and lotter  @xcite have evaluated the photon - photon cross section at present and future @xmath6 colliders . their results are similar to those in refs . @xcite . in ref . @xcite detailed studies have been carried out for diffractive meson production and photon structure functions at lep200 .    to describe the electron - positron scattering process ( fig .  [ fee ] ) , we will parametrize the five - fold differential cross section as @xmath10 \hspace*{0.8 cm } . % \ ] ] here we denote by @xmath11 the fractions of the longitudinal momenta of the leptons a and b that are carried by the photons , by @xmath12 the photon virtualities , and by @xmath13 the angle between the lepton scattering planes in a frame in which the photons are aligned with the @xmath14 axis . the overall factor in the right hand side gives the distribution averaged over the angle @xmath13 , while @xmath15 , @xmath16 are the asymmetries . ( figee.eps width 8 cm )    we will start by considering the @xmath13-averaged cross section , and we will express it in the equivalent photon approximation  @xcite by folding the @xmath17 cross section with the flux of photons from each lepton . this flux is proportional to the probability density for the splitting @xmath18 , and depends on the photon polarization . we will thus write @xmath19 where the transverse and longitudinal photon flux factors @xmath20 , @xmath21 are given by @xmath22 and @xmath23 , with @xmath24 , is the cross section for the scattering of two photons with polarizations @xmath25 and @xmath26 . we will proceed in the following way . in sec . [ sec : notations ] we set our notations and describe the born approximation to the photon - photon cross section at high energy . in this section we concentrate on the case of transversely polarized photons , that is , the cross section @xmath27 in eq . ( [ epaave ] ) above . in sec . [ sec : polarization ] we extend these results to include the full polarization dependence and we discuss the associated asymmetries . in sec . [ sec : summation ] we consider the summation of the leading logarithmic corrections to the photon - photon cross section due to bfkl pomeron exchange , and emphasize how the perturbative results depend on the total energy and the photon virtualities . [ sec : scales ] and [ sec : limitations ] are devoted to discussing some of the limitations of the treatment based on the bfkl equation . in sec . [ sec : scales ] we focus on the dependence of the cross section on two mass scales ( in the running coupling and in the high energy logarithms ) , which are left undetermined in a leading log analysis . in sec . [ sec : limitations ] we consider the limitations of using the bfkl approach that follow from the behavior at very large @xmath28 . [ sec : virtuality ] illustrates how to relate the summed result for the photon - photon cross section to the small-@xmath1 behavior of the photon deeply inelastic structure function . in sec . [ sec : regge ] we compare the qcd result with expectations based on traditional regge theory . in sec . [ sec : softandhard ] we consider the limit of low photon virtualities and discuss the region of transition between hard and soft scattering . the rates at the level of the @xmath29 cross section are examined in sec . [ sec : numerical ] . some concluding remarks are given in sec . [ sec : conclusions ] . we collect in appendix  [ app : born ] the details of the born order calculation , and in appendix  [ app : quark ] some formulas which are useful for comparing the gluon - exchange and quark - exchange contributions to the photon - photon cross section . we consider the total cross section for the scattering of two transversely polarized virtual ( space - like ) photons @xmath30 and @xmath31 , with virtualities @xmath32 and @xmath33 , in the high energy region where the center - of - mass energy @xmath34 is much larger than @xmath35 , @xmath36 . we also suppose that the photon virtualities are in turn large with respect to the qcd scale @xmath37 , so that the process occurs at short distances ( much smaller than @xmath38 ) and qcd perturbation theory applies . we work in a reference frame in which the incoming photons have zero transverse momenta , and are boosted along the positive and negative light - cone directions . for a four - momentum @xmath39 , we define the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' momentum components @xmath42 , @xmath43 as @xmath44 the incoming photon momenta are parametrized as follows in a notation where @xmath45 : @xmath46 here the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' components @xmath47 approximately build up the total energy @xmath28 , and are much larger than the initial virtualities @xmath48 the born contribution to this cross section is given by the high energy approximation to the reaction @xmath49 in lowest order perturbation theory . the corresponding diagrams involve the exchange of two gluons between the two quark - antiquark pairs  @xcite , and are exemplified in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . we parametrize the outgoing quark momenta as @xmath50 and denote by @xmath51 the exchanged gluon momentum .    in the high energy limit defined by eq . ( [ qaplusqbminus ] ) , the kinematic region which dominates the integrations is the one in which the transverse momenta flowing in the loops are of the order of the initial virtualities , and the light - cone components of the exchanged gluon are suppressed with respect to the transverse momenta by a quantity of order @xmath52 or @xmath53 , so that @xmath54 .    ( figtwoglu.eps width 7 cm )    the squared amplitude for the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] , integrated over the final quark and antiquark phase space , for fixed transverse photon polarizations @xmath55 , @xmath56 , is given by @xmath57 } \over { \left ( ( p_a + k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_a - q_a)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \ , \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \ , { { { \rm tr}\bigl [   { \rlap / p}_b   ( i g_s t^r \gamma^\alpha)\ ,   i\ ,   ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , ( i \ , e_b \ , e   { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b ) \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k )   ( - i   g_s t^s \gamma^\beta )   ( - i )   ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b )   ( - i e_b   e   { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b ) \bigr ] } \over { \left ( ( p_b - k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_b - q_b)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \;\;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath58 , @xmath59 are the electric charges of the quarks in units of @xmath60 , and the indices @xmath61 run over the light quark flavors , @xmath62 . ( the flavors @xmath63 need a separate treatment . ) in the high energy approximation this amplitude takes the form @xmath64 } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + ( { { \bf p}}_a + { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] \ , } } \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \ , { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) - { { \bf p}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + ( { { \bf p}}_b - { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] \ , } } \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] see appendix a for details of this calculation . the amplitudes for the other graphs , in which the gluons are connected to different fermion lines , can be derived from eq . ( [ m3 ] ) by using the replacements @xmath65 \to { { 1-z_a } \over { z_a } } \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] \ , % \ ] ] in the denominator , and @xmath66 in the numerator . ( analogous replacements hold for the momentum components of the quark @xmath67 ) . in addition , the contribution from the graphs in which the quark and antiquark lines are interchanged can be obtained by symmetrizing the above expressions with respect to @xmath68 ( and , analogously , @xmath69 ) . we add the graphs , and divide by @xmath70 to form the @xmath71 cross section @xmath72 we find @xmath73 the factors @xmath74 in this formula come from the gluon propagators . these factors multiply functions @xmath75 , which describe the coupling of the exchanged gluon to the quark - antiquark system created by the virtual photon with virtuality @xmath7 and transverse polarization @xmath76 . the explicit expression for @xmath77 is @xmath78 } \over { \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } - { { \left [ { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) - 4 z ( 1 - z ) { \bf{\varepsilon } } \cdot { { \bf p } } \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right\ } \;\;\;\;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the functions @xmath77 can be thought of as `` color functions '' of the virtual photon since they describe the color flow in the @xmath79 states . from the point of view of light - cone perturbation theory  @xcite , they correspond to the coupling of the null - plane photon wave function to gluons .    in the remainder of this section we discuss the case of the average over the two transverse photon polarizations . the detailed polarization dependence of the color functions @xmath77 and the associated polarization asymmetry in the cross section are treated in sec . [ sec : polarization ] . by taking the polarization average @xmath80 we define the function @xmath81 @xmath82 we find @xmath83 \ , \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , \left [ { { { { \bf p}}^2 } \over { \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } - { { { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] each one of the two @xmath84-dependent terms in the integrand of eq . ( [ gi1funct ] ) would lead to an ultraviolet divergent integral , but the divergence cancels in the sum , illustrating that the gluon does not couple to the color singlet @xmath85 system in the limit @xmath86 . the photon virtuality @xmath7 regularizes the denominators in the infrared region , @xmath87 . in the limit of small @xmath7 , the probability density @xmath88 / 2 $ ] for the splitting of a transversely polarized photon into a quark - antiquark pair @xmath89 correctly factors out in front of the logarithmic singularity @xmath90 associated with the region of strong ordering @xmath91 .    by introducing the feynman parametrization @xmath92 \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right]^2 } } \nonumber \\ & & \hspace*{2 cm } \ , = \int^1_0 \ , d \lambda \ , { { 2 \,(1 - \lambda ) } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + \lambda \ , { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 + \lambda \ , ( 1 - \lambda ) { { \bf k}}^2 \right]^3 } } % \end{aligned}\ ] ] and carrying out the integration over the shifted transverse momentum variable @xmath93 in eq . ( [ gi1funct ] ) , one can obtain the following useful representation of the function @xmath94 as an integral over two dimensionless variables : @xmath95 \ , \left [ z^2 + ( 1 - z)^2 \right ] } \over { \lambda \ , ( 1 - \lambda ) \,{{\bf k}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \ ] ] this representation explicitly shows that the distribution @xmath96 is symmetric under interchange of the space - like boson virtualities @xmath97 and @xmath7 . in the configurations in which one of the virtualities is much smaller than the other one , this distribution is logarithmically enhanced . more precisely , we find @xmath98 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } { { \bf k}}^2 \ll q^2   \hspace*{0.5 cm } , % \ ] ] @xmath99   \hspace*{0.5 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } { { \bf k}}^2 \gg q^2 \hspace*{0.5 cm } , % \ ] ] where the coefficient in front of the logarithm is given by the first moment of the splitting density @xmath100 = { 2 \over 3 } \hspace*{1 cm } . % \ ] ] the logarithmic behavior at small @xmath97 comes from the region @xmath101 . here the quark transverse momentum is much smaller than the photon virtuality , and the quark longitudinal momentum fraction is very small , @xmath102 ( or @xmath103 ) . this region is sometimes referred to as the aligned - jet region , and corresponds to configurations in which the @xmath85 system fluctuates to large sizes  @xcite . note that while for the case at hand of the @xmath104 total cross section this region contributes only a logarithmic enhancement , for the case of non - inclusive processes , such as processes involving rapidity gaps , this is expected to become the dominant contribution  @xcite . the integration over the parameter @xmath105 in eq . ( [ twodimintg ] ) can be explicitly performed . this yields @xmath106 \ , , % \ ] ] where we have introduced the variables @xmath107 in fig . [ glin ] , we report the result of the numerical evaluation of the integral ( [ etaxig ] ) by plotting the function @xmath81 versus @xmath108 . ( figglin.eps width 13 cm )    the unpolarized @xmath109 cross section to born order , @xmath110 , can be obtained by inserting the result for the function @xmath81 in the general formula ( [ convsigma ] ) . it is convenient to use the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) of @xmath81 . by substituting this representation in eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) , and carrying out the integration over the gluon transverse momentum @xmath111 , we obtain @xmath112 \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , \lambda_a } \left [ \lambda_a^2 + ( 1 - \lambda_a)^2 \right ] \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , z_b } \left [ z_b^2 + ( 1 - z_b)^2 \right ] \int_0 ^ 1 \ , { d \ , \lambda_b } \left [ \lambda_b^2 + ( 1 - \lambda_b)^2 \right ] \ , \nonumber \\ & & \times { { \ln \left [ { q_a^2 \ , z_a \ , ( 1 - z_a ) \ , \lambda_b \ , ( 1 - \lambda_b ) } / \left ( { q_b^2 \ , z_b \ , ( 1 - z_b ) \ , \lambda_a \ , ( 1 - \lambda_a ) } \right ) \right ] } \over { q_a^2 \ , z_a \ , ( 1 - z_a ) \ , \lambda_b \ , ( 1 - \lambda_b ) - q_b^2 \ , z_b \ , ( 1 - z_b ) \ , \lambda_a \ , ( 1 - \lambda_a ) } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this formula provides an expression for the cross section in the large @xmath28 limit in terms of dimensionless integrals , which allows us to study the dependence on the energy and mass scales . to this order in perturbation theory the cross section has a constant behavior with the energy @xmath28 . the cross section depends on the mass scales @xmath113 and @xmath114 only . factoring out an overall scale factor @xmath115 in eq . ( [ sigmarepr ] ) , we are left with a function @xmath116 of the ratio @xmath117 : @xmath118 the function @xmath116 can be computed by performing numerically the integrations over the dimensionless variables @xmath14 s and @xmath105 s . the result is plotted in fig .  [ s0 ] . ( figs0.eps width 13 cm )    notice that the dependence of @xmath116 on @xmath119 is rather mild when @xmath119 is near 1 . thus , in this region , @xmath116 in eq . ( [ tildesigmadef ] ) could be treated as a constant , so that @xmath120 when , in contrast , the two virtualities are widely disparate from each other , either @xmath121 or @xmath122 , the function @xmath116 has a strong dependence on @xmath119 , vanishing linearly ( modulo logarithmic enhancements ) with either @xmath123 or @xmath119 , respectively . this provides the overall change of scale in the cross section @xmath124 @xmath125 we will come back to this later on and examine the details of these behaviors numerically ( see sec . [ sec : virtuality ] ) . we now study the dependence of the color functions @xmath77 and of the photon - photon cross section on the polarization of the virtual photon . working in the frame defined by eq . ( [ qaqb ] ) , and denoting by @xmath126 , @xmath127 the lightlike unit vectors @xmath128 we introduce the following decomposition of the polarization tensor for the photon @xmath129 : @xmath130 the index @xmath131 in the first term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) runs over the transverse polarizations . we describe these polarizations by using the linear basis @xmath132 from the second term in the right hand side of eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) , we define the longitudinal polarization vector as @xmath133 the last term in eq . ( [ gmunu ] ) does not contribute because of current conservation . we thus have @xmath134 formulas analogous to eqs . ( [ gmunu])-([gmunubis ] ) , but with @xmath135 replaced by @xmath136 , hold for the photon @xmath137 . let us first consider the case of transverse polarizations . it is convenient to introduce the tensor amplitude @xmath138 by rewriting eq . ( [ capitalg ] ) in the form @xmath139 the explicit expression for @xmath138 can be found in appendix a. for polarization indices @xmath140 we also introduce the notation @xmath141 we can parametrize the transverse components of the tensor @xmath142 in terms of two scalar functions @xmath143 and @xmath144 : @xmath145 the function @xmath81 represents the unpolarized color function , which we have discussed in the previous section ( eqs . ( [ avg ] ) , ( [ gi1funct ] ) ) . the function @xmath144 carries the information on the polarization dependence . its explicit expression is @xmath146 ^ 2 } } + { { { { \bf p } } \cdot ( { { \bf p } } + { \bf k } ) - 2 \ , ( { { \bf p } }   + { \bf k } ) \cdot { \bf k } \ ; { { \bf p } } \cdot { \bf k } / { { \bf k}}^2 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the integrals in eq . ( [ g21 ] ) can be handled using the same procedure as in the unpolarized case : @xmath147 \ , , \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used the variables defined in eq . ( [ etaxi ] ) . correspondingly , the cross section for scattering transversely polarized photons , eq.([convsigma ] ) , can be decomposed as @xmath148 \hspace*{0.6 cm } . % \ ] ] the polarization average @xmath149 has been given to order @xmath150 in the previous section ( eq .  ( [ sigmarepr ] ) ) , and the asymmetry @xmath151 to the same order @xmath150 is given in terms of the color function @xmath152 as @xmath153 numerical results are reported in figs . [ glin ] and [ s0 ] , where we plot @xmath152 versus @xmath154 , and show the dependence of @xmath151 on the incoming photon virtualities . unlike @xmath81 , @xmath152 is not logarithmically enhanced in the regions @xmath155 , @xmath156 . this is related to the fact that the splitting function associated with @xmath152 has zeros at the endpoints of the spectrum in the longitudinal momentum fraction , @xmath157 and @xmath158 ( see eq . ( [ g22 ] ) ) , whereas the unpolarized splitting function goes to a finite constant . the asymmetry @xmath151 associated with the photon - photon scattering process , calculated here in the born approximation , contributes to the asymmetry @xmath16 in eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) at the level of the @xmath159 scattering . numerical results for the @xmath159 process will be given in sec . [ sec : numerical ] . we now move on to the case of the longitudinal polarization . let us consider the longitudinal - longitudinal color function : @xmath160 following the lines of the calculation described in detail for the case of transverse photons , we find @xmath161 ^ 2 } } - { { q^2 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } \right ] \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this contribution equals the color function @xmath152 given above . this can be seen by introducing an integral over a feynman parameter @xmath105 , then integrating over the transverse momentum @xmath162 in eq . ( [ gll1 ] ) . we get @xmath163 as noted above , @xmath152 has no logarithms at small @xmath164 . this corresponds to the absence of aligned - jet terms for longitudinally polarized photons  @xcite . contributions from longitudinally polarized photons enter the @xmath159 cross section ( [ epaave ] ) . they will be included in the numerical estimates that we give in sec . [ sec : numerical ] .    finally , we consider the interference contribution between longitudinal and transverse polarizations : @xmath165 in the high energy approximation in which we are working , this contribution vanishes . this can be seen explicitly by writing the color function in the general form @xmath166 and computing the invariant function @xmath167 . we get @xmath168 interference terms of the kind in eq . ( [ gtl ] ) would give rise to the asymmetry @xmath15 ( see eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) ) at the level of the @xmath169 scattering process . we thus see that this asymmetry vanishes in the high energy approximation . we have seen that the two - gluon exchange mechanism gives rise to a constant @xmath170 total cross section at large @xmath28 , @xmath171 . to higher orders in perturbation theory , the iteration of gluon ladders in the @xmath172-channel promotes this constant to logarithms , and the perturbative expansion of the cross section at high energy has the form @xmath173 \hspace*{0.6 cm } , \hspace*{0.8 cm } l = \ln ( s / q^2 ) \hspace*{0.6 cm } , % \ ] ] where @xmath7 is a scale of the order of the initial photon virtualities , the sum represents the series of the leading logarithms to all orders in the strong coupling @xmath174 , and the dots stand for non - leading terms .    to study the high energy behavior , it is convenient to analyze the cross section in its mellin - fourier moments , defined by @xmath175 where the @xmath176-integral goes along a contour parallel to the imaginary axis and to the right of any singularities in @xmath177 . we see from this definition that a constant behavior of the cross section with the energy @xmath28 is generated by a simple pole in the moments @xmath177 at @xmath178 , while powers of logarithms are generated by multiple poles at @xmath178 . the inverse of ( [ mellin ] ) is @xmath179 to sum the leading logarithmic terms , the basic observation of bfkl  @xcite is that the logarithms arise when multiple soft gluons are emitted into the final state . these gluons have transverse momenta @xmath180 of the same order as @xmath35 and @xmath36 and have strongly ordered rapidities , lying between the rapidities of the quarks in photon @xmath181 and the quarks in photon @xmath182 . along with emission of real gluons , one also includes the exchange of corresponding virtual gluons . [ fac ] illustrates how the two gluon exchange graph of fig . [ ftwoglu ] is generalized to allow for multiple gluon emission . the quarks comprising photon @xmath181 couple to a gluon with momentum @xmath183 , while the quarks comprising photon @xmath182 couple to a gluon with momentum @xmath184 . gluons can be exchanged or emitted into the final state inside the subgraph labeled @xmath185 . in fact , the gluons that carry momenta @xmath183 and @xmath184 are , in general , combinations of soft gluons that carry a net color octet charge , that is , reggeized gluons  @xcite . from a kinematic viewpoint , we can treat these as being equivalent to ordinary perturbative gluons . we consider the unpolarized @xmath186 cross section and adopt the following notation for the diagram in fig . [ fac ] : @xmath187 here @xmath188 represents the four - point green function for gluons @xmath189 and @xmath190 , while the functions @xmath191 represent the quark loops . we have made the following approximation . we note that the quark loop for photon @xmath181 depends sensitively on the minus component , @xmath192 , of the momentum that enters the quark loop via gluon @xmath181 . on the other hand , the quarks in photon @xmath182 have very large minus components of momenta . furthermore , because of strong rapidity ordering , all the other gluons inside of @xmath185 have minus components of momenta that are much larger than @xmath192 . thus we can neglect @xmath192 everywhere except in the quark loop for photon @xmath181 . then we include the integration over @xmath192 in the definition of @xmath193 . similarly we neglect @xmath194 everywhere except in the quark loop for photon @xmath182 and we include the integration over @xmath194 in the definition of @xmath195 . ( figfac.eps width 8 cm )    consider eq . ( [ genfig ] ) specialized to the case of two gluon exchange . the approximate gluon four - point function @xmath196 is trivial in this case : @xmath197 we identify @xmath198 then we recover the earlier result ( [ convsigma ] ) . for a generic term in @xmath199 , the transverse momenta @xmath200 and @xmath201 are independent variables , while the factor @xmath202 turns into @xmath203 . taking moments with respect to @xmath28 and changing integration variables to @xmath204 , @xmath205 and @xmath206 gives the structure @xmath207 having evaluated @xmath208 at some fixed perturbative order , we are interested in the poles of @xmath177 at @xmath178 . there are poles from the small @xmath209 and @xmath210 ends of the integrations over @xmath209 and @xmath210 . to evaluate @xmath177 without losing any powers of @xmath211 , we approximate @xmath212 the pole associated with the integration over @xmath209 can be thought of as arising from the integration over the rapidity of the final state gluon with the largest rapidity . almost all of the momentum fraction @xmath209 is taken by this gluon . since , in the leading logarithmic approximation , this gluon has a rapidity that is much less than that of the quarks in photon @xmath181 , the momentum fraction @xmath209 is negligible compared to 1 . similarly , the pole associated with the integration over @xmath210 can be thought of as arising from the integration over the rapidity of the final state gluon with the most negative rapidity . the poles from the large @xmath105 end of the integration over the function @xmath208 can be thought of as arising from integrations over final state gluons with intermediate rapidities . the leading logarithmic result can thus be written in the form @xmath213 where @xmath214 is the bfkl function that describes the interaction of gluons with fast moving colored systems moving in opposite directions and obeys the bfkl equation  @xcite . it is normalized so that at order @xmath215 we have @xmath216 the solution to the bfkl equation can be written to all orders in @xmath174 in the form @xmath217 where @xmath218 the function @xmath219 is determined by solving the eigenvalue problem for the bfkl kernel and is given by @xmath220 with @xmath221 being the euler @xmath221-function . the bfkl function ( [ gareprf ] ) has poles at @xmath178 order by order in perturbation theory . ( [ ktfac ] ) shows that the poles in the @xmath104 cross section are generated from the ones in @xmath222 by integrating the color functions over @xmath180 . while these functions are specific to the off - shell photon probe , the function @xmath223 is universal . the same function contributes to the small @xmath1 behavior of the cross sections in hadron - initiated processes  @xcite via the high energy factorization formulas .    by inserting the representation ( [ gareprf ] ) in eq . ( [ ktfac ] ) , and scaling out the dependence on the photon virtualities , we get @xmath224 where @xmath225 is defined as the following @xmath226-transform of the photon color function @xmath227 @xmath228 the explicit expression of the function @xmath229 can be determined by using the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) and performing the integral transform . the result reads @xmath230 eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) , together with the explicit formulas ( [ chi ] ) , ( [ viexp ] ) , gives the leading logarithmic result for the moments of the @xmath231 total cross section . it sums the @xmath211 poles to the accuracy @xmath232 , for any @xmath233 . the lowest order perturbative contribution , @xmath234 , can be recovered from the summed formula ( [ gareprsi ] ) by expanding the denominator @xmath235 to the zeroth order in @xmath174 . the simple pole @xmath236 is the mellin transform of unity , and one can check numerically that the @xmath237-integral @xmath238 agrees with eq . ( [ sigmarepr ] ) and fig . [ s0 ] .    in general , multiple pole contributions @xmath239 to the cross section are obtained by retaining higher orders in the @xmath174-expansion of eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) . we see that the general structure of the coefficients of the leading logarithmic series comes from both @xmath219 and @xmath240 : the former is a universal function associated with the bfkl pomeron , while the latter describes the coupling of the pomeron to a specific physical source . the total cross section is obtained from eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) by taking the inverse mellin - fourier transform ( [ mellin ] ) . by evaluating the @xmath176-integral from the residue at the pole @xmath241 , one gets @xmath242 note that this result depends on two mass scales , the scale @xmath243 in @xmath174 and the scale @xmath7 in the high energy corrections , whose reliable determination would require a next - to - leading analysis . we discuss the uncertainties in the leading log result associated with these scales in secs . [ sec : scales ] and [ sec : numerical ] .    in the limit @xmath244 the integral ( [ energy ] ) is dominated by the region near @xmath245 , where the function @xmath246 has a saddle point . in the saddle point approximation one obtains @xmath247 with @xmath248 eq . ( [ saddle ] ) shows the asymptotic power behavior characteristic of the qcd pomeron , @xmath249 with @xmath250 . the pre - factor that determines the normalization of the asymptotic cross section , on the other hand , depends on the off - shell photon probe , and is controlled by the value of the function @xmath251 at @xmath252 .    if the two photon virtualities are significantly far apart , corrections of order @xmath253 need to be taken into account when one calculates the large @xmath28 limit . in this case , one finds that the position of the saddle point is shifted to @xmath254 . apart from corrections in the pre - factor , the net effect of evaluating the integral ( [ energy ] ) around the shifted saddle point is to multiply the expression in the right hand side of eq . ( [ saddle ] ) by the factor @xmath255 \;\;\ ; . % \ ] ] the cross section acquires a gaussian modulation in @xmath256 with a width that grows like @xmath257 . ( figxsect.eps width 13 cm )    in the general case , the integral ( [ energy ] ) can be performed numerically . in fig . [ xsect ] we show the result as a function of @xmath258 for a given choice of the values of the photon virtualities and the strong coupling . for comparison we also plot the saddle point formula . as the energy increases the two curves get closer . however , in the range considered , the sub - asymptotic contributions are still significant ( about @xmath259 at @xmath260 , @xmath261 at @xmath262 ) . the large size of the corrections to the saddle point approximation can be mainly traced back to the fact that the function @xmath263 itself is rather sharply peaked around @xmath264 . this is illustrated in fig . [ chi05 ] , where we see that , for instance , for @xmath265 and @xmath266 , the width of the pomeron factor is still not small compared to the width of the factor associated with the off - shell photon color function . this effect accounts for most of the shift in the normalization of the cross section between the asymptotic and exact evaluation of the leading logarithmic sum . ( figchi05.eps width 13 cm )      using the same method described above for the cross section averaged over the two transverse photon polarizations , one can derive summed results for each photon polarization @xmath267 and for the polarization asymmetry @xmath151 . denoting by @xmath25 , @xmath268 and @xmath26 , @xmath269 the polarization indices for photons @xmath129 and @xmath137 , we write the factorization formula for the moments of the polarized cross section @xmath270 as @xmath271 the color functions @xmath77 have been discussed in sec .  [ sec : polarization ] . the full solution for the green s function @xmath272 of the bfkl pomeron reads @xcite @xmath273 with @xmath274 the function @xmath223 in eq . ( [ gareprf ] ) , relevant to the case of the unpolarized cross section , is given by the term @xmath275 in eq . ( [ gareprfm ] ) . consider the product @xmath276 of the asymmetry times the averaged cross section , with the asymmetry @xmath151 defined in eq . ( [ unplusass ] ) . due to the azimuthal integration only the terms with @xmath277 in eq . ( [ gareprfm ] ) contribute . substituting the color function @xmath152 ( see eq . ( [ gij ] ) ) in eq . ( [ ktfacpol ] ) , one finds for the @xmath176 moments @xmath278 where @xmath279 is defined from the @xmath226-transform of the function @xmath280 analogous to ( [ videf ] ) , and has the expression @xmath281 by inverse mellin - fourier transformation , one obtains the summed formula for the asymmetry in the energy space : @xmath282 where @xmath149 is given by eq . ( [ energy ] ) .    as in the case of the unpolarized cross section , the asymptotic behavior in the limit @xmath244 is determined by the saddle point approximation to the integral in eq . ( [ energyasy ] ) . in this case we observe a negative power law with the energy @xmath28 , controlled by the value of @xmath283 at the saddle point , @xmath284 , indicating that the angular correlations between the two photons tend to be washed out when bfkl pomeron exchange dominates . the contributions to the photon - photon cross section from longitudinally polarized photons are given by formulas analogous to eq . ( [ energy ] ) in terms of different combinations of the functions @xmath285 and @xmath286 , and the same function @xmath246 : @xmath287 unlike @xmath288 in eq . ( [ viexp ] ) , @xmath289 has simple poles at @xmath290 ( instead of double poles ) , corresponding to the non - logarithmic behavior of the color function @xmath152 at @xmath291 , @xmath156 noted in sec .  [ sec : polarization ] . replacing functions @xmath285 by functions @xmath286 accounts for the different size of the longitudinal cross sections with respect to the purely transverse one . roughly , one finds @xmath292 the result ( [ energy ] ) for the @xmath104 cross section depends on two mass scales which can not be determined in a leading logarithmic analysis : the mass @xmath243 at which the running coupling @xmath174 is evaluated , and the mass @xmath7 that provides the scale for the high energy logarithms . the former can be thought of as being associated with the integrations over the transverse momenta in the loops contributing to higher order diagrams , while the latter stems from the longitudinal integrations . a reliable determination of these scales would require a next - to - leading order calculation . lacking this , we provide here qualitative arguments to relate these scales with the physical hard scales of the problem . in sec . [ sec : numerical ] we will use these relations to examine numerically the dependence of the cross section on the scale choices .    a possible choice of the scale @xmath243 in the strong coupling is based on the prescription of ref . @xcite . to apply this prescription , we consider the lowest order gluon exchange contribution , which we have discussed in sec .  [ sec : notations ] . this is given ( see eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) ) by the integral in @xmath293 of two @xmath77 factors , each of which is proportional to @xmath174 , @xmath294 . we first compute the quark loop contribution to the gluon propagator , renormalized in the @xmath295 scheme : @xmath296 \;\;\;\ ; , % \ ] ] where @xmath297 is the contribution to @xmath298 from one quark loop , and @xmath299 . inserting a quark loop into the gluon propagator in the lowest order diagram amounts to replacing @xmath300 by @xmath301 % \ ] ] ( as in @xcite this can be regarded as a contribution to an effective coupling @xmath302 ) . now , following @xcite we choose the scale @xmath243 so that the quark loop contribution vanishes after integrating over @xmath97 : @xmath303 this is the same procedure that applies in the case of the abelian theory . using the representation ( [ twodimintg ] ) for @xmath77 , we are led to calculate an integral of the form @xmath304 exploiting the symmetry of the integrand under the transformation @xmath305 and interchange of the variables @xmath306 , @xmath307 , one can show that the condition ( [ vanish ] ) is satisfied by @xmath308 note that , when the two photon virtualities @xmath113 and @xmath114 are far apart from each other , the prescription @xcite picks out a scale for @xmath174 which is neither of the order of the big virtuality nor of the order of the small one , but rather is proportional to the geometric mean @xmath309 . the value of the proportionality coefficient @xmath310 in eq . ( [ cmu ] ) is specific to the subtraction scheme ( @xmath295 ) chosen to define the quark loop insertion . the argument given above applies to the factors of @xmath174 that appear in the born approximation to the high energy cross section . the result ( [ energy ] ) , however , also contains a dependence on the running coupling through the higher order factor @xmath311 associated with the solution of the bfkl equation . for the scale in @xmath174 in this case one does not have such a simple argument as the one described above . for the numerical estimates in sec . [ sec : numerical ] we will make the assumption that the same value of @xmath243 also controls the running coupling in the bfkl factor . in sec .  [ sec : numerical ] we will check the numerical effect of varying this scale . we now consider the mass @xmath7 that provides the scale for the large energy logarithms @xmath312 ( see eq . ( [ expansion ] ) ) . to estimate this scale , we observe that the rapidity of gluons exchanged in the rungs of the bfkl ladders should lie between the rapidity @xmath313 of the quark @xmath314 ( produced by the photon @xmath129 ) and the rapidity @xmath315 of the quark @xmath67 ( produced by the photon @xmath137 ) . this gives rise to integrations over the rapidity intervals @xmath316 the logarithms of the energy @xmath28 are generated precisely by these integrals . estimating the size of the rapidity intervals thus allows us to estimate the scale @xmath7 .    expressing the `` @xmath40 '' and `` @xmath41 '' momentum components of the quark @xmath314 as @xmath317 we write its rapidity as @xmath318 similarly , for the quark @xmath67 we have @xmath319 taking the difference between these rapidities gives @xmath320 the average transverse momenta @xmath321 , @xmath322 carried by the quarks are of the order of the photon virtualities @xmath35 , @xmath36 . for the longitudinal momentum fractions @xmath323 , @xmath324 , we assume a typical maximum value of the order @xmath325 in the high energy region . using these estimates , we obtain @xmath326 we thus identify the scale @xmath327 the transverse - momentum integrations in the factorization formula ( [ ktfac ] ) are dominated by values of @xmath328 of the order of the photon virtualities . ( for the purpose of this section we will take the photon virtualities to be equal , @xmath329 . ) as a result , for sufficiently off shell photons the dominant contribution to the cross section comes from short distances , and the evaluation of eq . ( [ ktfac ] ) gives rise to a finite result in perturbation theory . however , there are limitations on the perturbative treatment that are intrinsic to the bfkl equation . these limitations come from the region of very high @xmath28 . although an accurate understanding of these effects is an open problem  @xcite that goes beyond the scope of this work , one can nevertheless make some rough estimates . we discuss them in this section . in order to keep the notation simple , we do not distinguish here between the scales @xmath330 , @xmath331 , and @xmath332 , calling all of these simply @xmath7 . it is known from the structure of the bfkl equation that , even if the incoming @xmath333 , @xmath334 are large , say , @xmath335 , the typical transverse momenta in the gluon ladders contributing to the function @xmath336 ( see eq . ( [ gareprf ] ) ) may diffuse away from @xmath7 as the energy becomes very large . the diffusion coefficient in @xmath337 can be read directly from the asymptotic solution to the bfkl equation ( or , equivalently , from the exponential term ( [ incldiff ] ) in the @xmath104 cross section ) and is given by @xmath338 as a result , the distribution of the transverse momenta in the bfkl ladders is a gaussian in @xmath337 centered around @xmath7 with a width proportional to @xmath339  @xcite . with increasing @xmath28 the distribution broadens , and one becomes sensitive to the region of small transverse momenta . a self - consistency check of the perturbative treatment requires that the contribution from transverse momenta of the order of @xmath340 be suppressed . in order to keep away from momenta of this order one has to have @xmath341 identifying @xmath174 with the strong coupling evaluated at the scale @xmath7 , @xmath342 , one gets @xmath343 for any given @xmath7 , this can be read as an upper bound on the domain of energies @xmath28 in which we expect the perturbative approach based on the bfkl pomeron to be reliable . observe that , for small values of @xmath174 , this is not so stringent a constraint . however , because the bfkl function @xmath246 has a large second derivative at the saddle point , the numerical value of the coefficient @xmath344 is small . therefore , the limit ( [ difflimit1 ] ) may become relevant unless @xmath7 is very large . the bfkl equation is also known to give rise to violation of the unitarity bound at asymptotically large energies . the growth of the cross section predicted by the bfkl equation can not continue indefinitely , and unitarity corrections must arise to slow it down . roughly , these effects are expected to become important when the calculated cross section is bigger than the naive geometrical cross section @xmath345 . a careful discussion may be found in ref . the simplest estimate , @xmath346 , yields , using eq . ( [ saddle ] ) , @xmath347 where we have neglected factors from the term in @xmath348 in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) . assuming , as we did before , @xmath174 to be evaluated at the scale @xmath7 , we can write @xmath349 in the term @xmath181 we collect contributions arising from the factor in the square root in eq . ( [ unitlimit ] ) as well as from the factor @xmath285 in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) . the different functional dependence on @xmath174 in the right hand sides of the inequalities ( [ difflimit1 ] ) and ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) implies that , for small enough values of @xmath174 , the unitarity limit ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) is more stringent than the diffusion limit ( [ difflimit1 ] ) . this suggests that for sufficiently high @xmath7 it should be possible to study unitarization in a purely perturbative context  @xcite .    on the other hand , the coefficients @xmath344 and @xmath350 are significantly different in size this may make the two bounds ( [ difflimit1 ] ) and ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) rather comparable for moderate values of @xmath7 . in addition , inspection of eqs . ( [ saddle ] ) , ( [ unitlimit ] ) suggests that the term @xmath181 in eq . ( [ unitlimit1 ] ) is not necessarily negligible , and may contribute to push the onset of unitarity corrections further away .    as to the impact on experimental studies at future @xmath29 colliders , we observe that unitarity corrections should set in when the cross section has grown to be much larger than the born value @xmath351 . at a future @xmath29 collider one may thus expect to see the rise of the cross section with @xmath258 . possibly , one may see this rise slow as unitarity corrections become important  @xcite . if we let @xmath113 be much larger than @xmath114 in eq . ( [ energy ] ) , we obtain a result that describes small @xmath1 deeply inelastic scattering from a transversely polarized photon  @xcite whose virtuality @xmath114 is sufficiently large to allow the use of perturbation theory to analyze its decomposition into quarks . the structure function @xmath352 ( which is the same as @xmath353 ) is related to the virtual photon - photon cross section by @xmath354 with @xmath355 thus eq . ( [ energy ] ) gives a leading logarithmic summation for @xmath356 at small @xmath1 : @xmath357 the scale @xmath7 is not fixed by a leading logarithmic calculation . a sensible choice for @xmath7 based on a qualitative argument has been discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] . for the purpose of the present section we simply leave it undetermined . consider the perturbative expansion of eq . ( [ f1 ] ) , @xmath358 \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \hspace*{0.1 cm } . % \ ] ] the functions @xmath263 , @xmath359 and @xmath219 have poles at integer values of @xmath237 . thus this expression contains contributions proportional to @xmath360 times logarithms , @xmath361 times logarithms , and so forth . we extract the leading twist contribution , the part proportional to @xmath360 times logarithms , by rewriting the integral as an integral over a contour @xmath362 that encircles the singularity at @xmath363 plus an integral over a contour from @xmath364 to @xmath365 . the integral over the contour @xmath362 is the leading twist contribution . we discard the integration over the contour from @xmath366 to @xmath365 , which contains the higher twist contributions . thus the leading twist contribution to @xmath356 is @xmath367 \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \nonumber\\ & = & { 1 \over ( 2 \pi)^3 \alpha } \ { \lower 6 pt \hbox{\vbox{\hbox{$\rm res$ } \kern -6 pt \hbox{$\scriptstyle \,\gamma = 0 $ } } } } \ , \left ( { { { q}^2_a } \over { { q}^2_b } } \right)^{\gamma } \left [ 1 + { \bar \alpha_s } \ , \chi ( \gamma ) \ln\left(q_a^2 \over x\ , q^2 \right ) + \cdots \right ] \ , v_1 ( \gamma ) \ , v_1 ( 1 - \gamma ) \hspace*{0.1 cm } . % \end{aligned}\ ] ] it is straightforward to determine the perturbative coefficients . the function @xmath368 has a double pole at @xmath363 , as does the function @xmath369 . thus there are three powers of @xmath370 at leading order in @xmath174 , which is @xmath150 since @xmath371 . we find @xmath372 \hspace*{0.2 cm } , \hspace*{0.4 cm } \zeta ( 2 ) \simeq 1.64 \hspace*{0.2 cm}. % \end{aligned}\ ] ]    if we restore the summation of the leading logs of @xmath373 , we obtain @xmath374 this is not a simple function . however , one can easily perform the integration numerically . one interesting result is that we observe what used to be called `` precocious bjorken scaling '' . that is , the leading twist approximation begins to be accurate at values of @xmath113 that are not really very large compared to the only other scale in the problem , @xmath114 . we illustrate this in fig .  [ twist ] , working at order @xmath150 . we compare the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath375 , the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath376 , and the full result . first we define @xmath377 and plot @xmath378 versus @xmath379 . then we define @xmath380 and plot @xmath381 finally , we plot @xmath382 at the leading order in @xmath174 without approximation . we see that the leading twist approximation for @xmath375 is quite good down to @xmath383 , while the leading twist approximation that applies for @xmath384 is quite good down to @xmath385 . in fact , at @xmath386 , both approximations are quite good . a similar behavior is observed if we include higher orders in @xmath174 . ( figtwist.eps width 13 cm ) the qcd result for @xmath387 scattering can be compared with expectations for the structure of the high energy cross section based on traditional regge theory  @xcite . in regge theory , to analyze the elastic scattering of particles @xmath181 and @xmath182 one considers the singularity structure of the amplitude @xmath388 in the complex angular momentum plane . the simplest case is a pole in the angular momentum @xmath389 plane located at a position dependent on @xmath172 , @xmath390 . one then obtains the asymptotic behavior @xmath391 for @xmath244 and @xmath172 fixed , and the amplitude takes the factorized form @xmath392 here @xmath393 , @xmath394 are functions of the transferred momentum , associated respectively with the couplings of particles @xmath181 and @xmath182 to the reggeon whose trajectory is @xmath395 .    for the case of the @xmath104 total cross section , this would correspond to the structure @xmath396 where we have used the optical theorem to relate the total cross section to the imaginary part of the forward elastic amplitude , and we have let @xmath397 and @xmath398 depend on the photon virtualities in the case of off - shell photons . however , it has been long known , from various phenomenological and theoretical considerations  @xcite , that this structure can not be exactly true , and strong - interaction scattering at high energy has to have a more complicated singularity structure than a pole , such as moving or fixed cuts . in this case , one does not expect the factorized form for the cross section to hold . if we now turn to the qcd result ( see eq . ( [ gareprsi ] ) ) , we may ask what kind of singularities the amplitude has in the angular momentum plane . the bfkl pomeron is known to give rise to a ( fixed ) branch point singularity  @xcite . to see this , let us consider the moments of the @xmath387 cross section . at leading level , we are allowed to identify the moment @xmath176 with the complex angular momentum @xmath389 ( [ gareprsi ] ) is written in terms of an integral in the complex @xmath237-plane . the integrand has the pole @xmath399 and one factor of @xmath400 for the coupling of the gluon system to the quarks in each photon . thus the integrand has a factorized structure . to understand the angular - momentum singularity structure , one should see what becomes of the pole @xmath401 after @xmath237-integration .    for @xmath402 , the @xmath237-integral is well approximated by the residue at the rightmost pole @xmath403 to the left of the integration contour . as we have seen in the previous section , numerically this approximation turns out to be fairly good down to values of @xmath404 just above @xmath405 . in this approximation one gets @xmath406 \;\ ; , \;\;\ ; c_n = - { { v_1 ( { \bar \gamma}_n ) \ ,   v_1 ( 1- { \bar \gamma}_n ) } \over { { \bar \alpha}_s \ , \chi^{\prime } ( { \bar \gamma}_n ) } } \;\;\;. % \ ] ] the leading pole @xmath407 is determined by the equation @xmath408 . at @xmath409 it has a square - root branch point singularity : @xmath410 correspondingly , the residue @xmath411 is also singular : @xmath412 therefore , the qcd result implies a branch point rather than a simple pole in the angular momentum plane . as a consequence , we do not obtain a regge - factorized form for @xmath413 . it is of interest , however , to see by how much this factorization is violated . we first consider the asymptotic formula ( [ saddle ] ) , obtained by using the saddle point approximation around @xmath414 . in this case , provided the scale @xmath7 is fixed by @xmath415 , as discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] , and the qcd coupling @xmath174 is fixed , an approximate form of regge factorization is recovered . the piece which violates this factorization in eq . ( [ saddle ] ) is proportional to the square root of a logarithm , and is therefore a slowly varying function . a more substantial source of factorization breaking comes in when one takes into account the correction due to the position of the saddle point drifting away from @xmath416 , see eq.([incldiff ] ) .    for the exact leading log result ( [ energy ] ) , a possible way to quantify the deviation from the regge - factorized behavior is to look at the ratio @xmath417 ^ 2 } \over { \sigma_{\gamma^ * \ , \gamma^ * } ( s , q^2_a , q^2_a ) \ , \sigma_{\gamma^ * \ , \gamma^ * } ( s , q^2_b , q^2_b ) } } \hspace*{0.5 cm } . % \ ] ] if regge factorization holds , this quantity should be equal to @xmath405 . on the other hand , from eq . ( [ energy ] ) we see that @xmath418 goes like @xmath419 for @xmath375 , and @xmath420 for @xmath376 . that is , for @xmath35 and @xmath36 sufficiently far apart the regge - factorized form breaks down . ( figratio.eps width 13 cm )    in fig . [ fratio ] , we plot @xmath418 as a function of the ratio of the photon virtualities @xmath421 for different values of the energy . it is interesting to observe that , for typical parameter values , @xmath418 varies by not more than 40% when @xmath421 varies from 0.1 to 10 . we take this as an indication that an approximate regge factorization holds numerically for the exact integral ( [ energy ] ) if @xmath421 is not too large or too small . the calculation of the high energy photon - photon cross section discussed so far is a perturbative calculation , based on the dominance of short distances for large photon virtualities . when the photon virtualities decrease , one goes out of the region of validity of the perturbative approach . as the photons go near the mass shell , the high energy scattering process is expected to become dominated by soft interactions . in this regime one is not able to calculate in qcd , and in order to have a ( phenomenological ) description of the cross section , one rather has to rely on models for strong - interaction scattering based on regge theory .    for on - shell photons , the regge factorization hypothesis allows us to relate the photon - photon total cross section to the photon - proton and proton - proton cross sections , as follows @xmath422 assuming the values @xmath423 , @xmath424 , one gets @xmath425 . for virtual photons with small @xmath35 and @xmath36 , the fall - off of the cross section can be estimated from vector meson dominance : @xmath426 as the photon virtualities increase , the cross section , instead of continuing to fall like @xmath427 , should begin to fall more slowly . at large photon virtualities ( of the order of a few @xmath428 , or bigger ) , it should go over to the perturbative scaling behavior in eq . ( [ energy ] ) , @xmath429 at fixed @xmath258 . note that the @xmath430 behavior could not be obtained in the framework of the regge factorization ( [ ppgap ] ) even if one assumed perturbative scaling in each one of the photon cross section factors , that is , even if one assumed @xmath431 . this is the counterpart ( at the level of hadronic cross sections ) of the effect of the deviation from unity observed for the ratio @xmath418 in the previous section ( see eq . ( [ reggeratio ] ) ) . in fact , experimental data on the @xmath432 cross section for large photon virtuality are now available in the region of high energies from the measurements of small-@xmath1 deeply inelastic scattering at hera . the above observation amounts to saying that , even if one used the data for @xmath433 , the relation ( [ ppgap ] ) would not lead to the correct perturbative qcd result for the @xmath104 cross section .    in fig . [ loglog ] we show a log - log plot of the curves corresponding to the soft and perturbative formulas for the @xmath7-behavior of the cross section  @xcite . for the former , we use eqs . ( [ ppgap])-([vmd ] ) , and for the latter we take the born approximation to eq.([energy ] ) . in this plot we are interested in emphasizing the dependence of the cross section on @xmath7 at fixed @xmath258 . for this reason we limit ourselves to the lowest order formulas , and do not include the higher order summation of the @xmath434 terms that give an enhancement at large energies . it is understood that such high - energy corrections affect both the soft and perturbative curves , giving rise to `` soft - pomeron '' and `` hard - pomeron '' effects in the two cases . ( figloglog.eps width 13 cm )    the region of intermediate values of @xmath7 in fig . [ loglog ] ( @xmath435 of the order of @xmath436 ) is where the transition from the soft - scattering regime to the hard - scattering regime is expected to occur . the mechanism through which this happens is not theoretically under control at present , and one may consider trying to estimate the cross section in this region by interpolating between the two curves .    in the next section we will study the prospects for investigating high energy @xmath170 scattering at @xmath2 colliders , and we will discuss which regions in @xmath7 in fig . [ loglog ] can likely be accessed experimentally at lep200 and a future @xmath29 collider . the cross section for high energy virtual photon scattering can be measured in @xmath437 collisions in which the outgoing leptons are tagged . the cross section for the electron - positron scattering process is obtained by folding the @xmath109 cross section with the flux of photons from each lepton . consider the four - fold differential @xmath437 cross section averaged over the angle between the lepton scattering planes , eq . ( [ epaave ] ) . to get an estimate of the rates available to study bfkl effects in virtual photon scattering at @xmath437 colliders of the present and next generation , we integrate this cross section over a region @xmath438 determined by cuts that we discuss below : @xmath439 we choose    \i ) @xmath440 , @xmath441 , where @xmath442 is a few gev , in order that the coupling @xmath174 be small , and that the process be dominated by the perturbative contribution ;    \ii ) @xmath443 , in order that the high energy approximation be valid . we discuss the parameter @xmath444 below .    note that , with these criteria , the photon virtualities @xmath7 lie in a range @xmath445 in which the equivalent photon approximation ( eq .  ( [ epaave ] ) ) is expected to work fairly well . on one hand , kinematical corrections of order @xmath446 are suppressed in this range . on the other hand , contributions of order @xmath447 to the @xmath448 splitting process can be neglected .    to choose a value for the parameter @xmath444 , we compare the gluon exchange contribution with contributions that are suppressed by a power of @xmath28 @xcite . we consider first the two gluon exchange graph , for which @xmath449 for large @xmath28 . taking the case @xmath450 , we have from fig .  [ s0 ] @xmath451 next , we consider the leading order ( electromagnetic ) contribution to @xmath452 , occurring via quark exchange , for which @xmath453 . in appendix [ app : quark ] we report results for this subprocess . for @xmath454 and large enough @xmath28 , the corresponding cross section is well approximated by the formula : @xmath455 demanding that the gluon exchange graph give a larger contribution than the quark exchange graph leads to the requirement @xmath456 for typical perturbative values , @xmath457 , we get @xmath458 . we will therefore use @xmath459 as a standard value for @xmath444 . we note that for @xmath460 , one is surely entitled to drop terms in the gluon exchange graphs that are suppressed by powers of @xmath461 , as we have done . we thus compute the integrated rate @xmath462 in eq . ( [ intrate ] ) using the results given in sec . [ sec : summation ] for the photon - photon cross section , and setting the scales in the running coupling and in the high energy logarithms according to the prescriptions discussed in sec . [ sec : scales ] . the dependence of @xmath462 on the lower bound @xmath463 on the photon virtualities is shown by the `` summed '' curve in fig . [ f500 ] for the energy of a future @xmath29 collider . [ f200 ] shows the cross section for the lep collider at cern operating at @xmath464 . ( fig500.eps width 13 cm )    ( fig200.eps width 13 cm )    the dashed and solid lines in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] correspond to the result of using , respectively , the born and the summed expressions for the photon - photon cross section . at the values of @xmath465 considered in the figures , summation effects enhance the rates significantly in the range of @xmath442 of a few @xmath466 . as @xmath442 increases , lowest order perturbation theory gets closer and closer to the fully summed prediction , as a result of both @xmath174 becoming small and the phase space closing up for the high energy logarithms .    in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] , we also plot separately the contribution to the cross section from purely transverse photons , that is , the contribution from the term in @xmath467 in eq . ( [ epaave ] ) . we see that this contribution accounts for about three quarters of the full cross section .    for values of the cuts @xmath468 , @xmath469 , we find @xmath470 at lep200 energies , and @xmath471 at the energy of a future collider . these cross sections would give rise to about @xmath472 events at lep200 for a value of the luminosity @xmath473 , and about @xmath474 events at @xmath475 for @xmath476 . the choice of the cuts that can realistically be implemented is affected by experimental constraints . in particular , the lowest photon virtualities that can be reached are limited by the angular acceptance of the detector , according to the relation @xmath477 , where @xmath478 is the beam energy , @xmath479 the angle of the tagged lepton , and @xmath1 is the momentum fraction of the emitted photon . in this situation , the value @xmath480 , for which the rates ( [ vallep ] ) , ( [ valnlc ] ) are given , implies detecting leptons scattered through angles down to about @xmath481 at lep200 , which is close to the range of the current luminosity monitors at the lep experiments  @xcite . for a future 500 gev collider , @xmath482 corresponds to a minimum angle of about @xmath483 . it appears that working down to such an angle will be difficult but not impossible  @xcite . if instead we take @xmath484 , the minimum angle is @xmath485 . then the cross section is about @xmath486 , corresponding to about @xmath487 events .    as stated earlier , the numerical results given above depend on the choice of the scales in @xmath174 and in the high energy logarithms that enter the photon - photon cross section . for the calculations described above , we have used the prescriptions given in sec . [ sec : scales ] . different scale choices are possible , and they would affect the predictions at the next - to - leading logarithmic order , which is beyond the present theoretical accuracy . we can use the variation of the results with the scale choices to get an estimate of the uncertainties associated with unknown sub - leading corrections . we can vary the two scales @xmath243 and @xmath7 ( see eqs . ( [ cmu ] ) , ( [ cqu ] ) ) independently . an illustration of this is reported in fig . here we compare the result of fig . [ f500 ] with the curve obtained by multiplying the scale in @xmath174 by a factor of @xmath488 , @xmath489 , and the curve obtained by reducing the scale in the high energy logarithms by a factor of @xmath488 , @xmath490 . the band between these two curves indicates that the uncertainty on the leading logarithmic result is fairly large , and emphasizes the need for improving the accuracy of the calculations at high energy . ( figband.eps width 13 cm )    the plots of the cross section versus @xmath463 shown in figs . [ f500 ] and [ f200 ] illustrate the expected dependence of the photon - photon cross section on the photon virtualities . if we fix @xmath442 we can look at the dependence on the photon - photon c.m . energy @xmath491 . it is useful to use @xmath492 and the photon - photon rapidity @xmath493 as variables instead of @xmath494 and @xmath495 . then we define @xmath496 using eq . ( [ epaave ] ) , we can write @xmath497 as @xmath498 where we omit three similar terms . we see that @xmath499 is very directly related to the @xmath500 cross section . we plot @xmath501 at @xmath502 in fig . [ hats200 ] for @xmath503 and in fig . [ hats500 ] for @xmath504 . here we choose @xmath505 and @xmath506 . in each case , we show a curve for the born level cross section and another for the full bfkl cross section . we also show the cross section arising from the scattering of ( transversely polarized ) photons via quark exchange instead of gluon exchange . we see that , with our choice of cuts , quark exchange scattering is suppressed . ( eeshat2.eps width 13 cm )    ( eeshat5.eps width 13 cm )    for @xmath507 the cross section shows a strong dependence on the cut @xmath508 . with our choice of @xmath509 and with @xmath510 , the cross section is forced to vanish for @xmath511 . as @xmath512 increases , the effect of this cut on the @xmath35 and @xmath36 integrations becomes less and less important . since @xmath513 is independent of @xmath514 at born level , the cross section begins to flatten out as @xmath512 increases to about @xmath515 . for larger values of @xmath512 , the born cross section decreases because of the influence of the photon flux factor @xmath516^{1/2})^2 $ ] . for the summed bfkl curve , the growth of @xmath517 overcomes the effect of the photon flux factor , so that the cross section rises with @xmath512 . the curves for @xmath503 and @xmath518 are similar . the main difference is that at @xmath519 there is more available range for @xmath512 . our plots are for @xmath502 . the available range of @xmath520 is @xmath521 . thus the cross section integrated over @xmath520 goes to zero as @xmath522 . we see from the results presented above that at a future @xmath29 collider it should be possible to probe the effects of pomeron exchange in a range of @xmath7 where summed perturbation theory applies . one should be able to investigate this region in detail by varying @xmath35 , @xmath36 and @xmath523 independently . at lep200 such studies appear to be more problematic mainly because of limitations in luminosity . even with a modest luminosity , however , one can access the region of relatively low @xmath7 in the graph of fig . [ loglog ] if one can get down to small enough angles . this would allow one to examine experimentally the transition between soft and hard scattering . we now move on to the angular distribution for the @xmath159 scattering cross section , and consider the asymmetries @xmath15 , @xmath16 introduced in eq . ( [ dsdphi ] ) . as pointed out in sec . [ sec : polarization ] , @xmath15 is zero at leading order . on the other hand , @xmath16 is given by an equivalent - photon formula in terms of the asymmetry @xmath151 for the @xmath104 scattering process discussed in sec . [ subsec : asym ] . this reads @xmath524 with @xmath151 and @xmath149 being given in eqs . ( [ energyasy ] ) , ( [ energy ] ) . we can use the same cuts discussed earlier in this section to integrate eq . ( [ epaasy ] ) , and thus define @xmath525 where @xmath462 is the integrated rate in eq . ( [ intrate ] ) . performing the integral numerically , we find that the asymmetry @xmath526 is very small . as noted in sec . [ sec : summation ] , the role of the summed bfkl terms is that of reducing the magnitude of the asymmetry with respect to the born order result . at a 500 gev collider , in the range of the angular and energy cuts previously described , we find @xmath527 . we observe that spin effects in photon - photon scattering at high energies are interesting , but the predicted asymmetries are either zero or small . understanding the behavior of high energy hadron reactions from a fundamental perspective within qcd is an important goal of particle physics . as we have shown in this paper , virtual photon scattering @xmath528 at high energies , @xmath529 , provides a remarkable window into pomeron physics . the total cross section can be studied as a function of the space - like mass of each incident projectile . most importantly , the process can be investigated in the regime where the photons both have large virtuality , so that one can use the framework of perturbative qcd . compared to tests of the qcd pomeron behavior based on deeply inelastic structure functions , the measurement of the total cross section for sufficiently off - shell photons is free from the long - distance ambiguities related to the structure of the hadronic target . on the other hand , unlike tests based on associated jet production in lepton - hadron or hadron - hadron collisions , the @xmath530 measurement is fully inclusive and therefore it does not depend on specifying the details of the final state . the scattering of highly virtual photons can be described as the interaction of two incident color singlet @xmath79 pairs of small transverse size interacting through multiple gluon exchange . we have studied this reaction both in the born approximation ( corresponding to two - gluon exchange ) and also with the inclusion of the higher - order summation encompassed by the bfkl equation . the cross section at high energies and large virtuality takes a factorized form in transverse coordinates . however , it does not factorize simply into separate functions of @xmath113 and @xmath114 , which reflects the cut structure of the bfkl pomeron in the complex angular momentum plane . we have also examined the background contribution from quark exchange , a process which is power - law suppressed at high energy .    according to this analysis , the @xmath531 cross section falls off at high virtuality only as @xmath532 , where @xmath533 . the rate for sensitive tagged - lepton experiments at high energy @xmath534 or @xmath535 colliders is thus not negligible . in particular it appears that the main features of the perturbative qcd predictions , such as the energy dependence , the factorization properties of the cross section , the scaling laws in @xmath113 , @xmath114 , as well as the polarization and azimuthal correlations can be tested in detail at a high - energy and high - luminosity next linear collider . we have also found that an interesting first look at virtual photon scattering can be obtained from the tagged lepton events measured in the luminosity monitors of present experiments at lep200 . more precisely , we estimate that , in the region of photon virtualities where summed perturbation theory is expected to apply , there should be several hundred events at lep200 , and about @xmath536 events at a future 500 gev collider with an integrated luminosity of @xmath537 . we also find that the enhancement due to bfkl pomeron terms over the born cross section is sizable , and should be visible particularly in the @xmath538-distribution of the cross section , with @xmath523 . the dependence of the cross section on the photon virtualities @xmath35 and @xmath36 is perturbative , and can be predicted in the framework of the bfkl equation . these predictions can be tested by measuring the angles of the recoil leptons . both the case in which the two photon virtualities are varied together ( @xmath539 ) and the case in which they are kept far apart ( @xmath540 ) are of interest . in the second case one gets to observe the structure function of a virtual photon at small bjorken-@xmath1 . the spin structure is rich , but hard to observe . most of the observable cross section comes from the scattering of two transversely polarized photons . for this part of the cross section , there is an asymmetry in the angular distribution of the outgoing leptons , but this asymmetry is less than @xmath541 .    in the region of low photon virtualities ( @xmath542 smaller than a few @xmath466 ) , the photon - photon cross section becomes dominated by soft interactions . here one can not use a perturbative analysis . on the other hand , one may explore experimentally at what scales the breakdown of the perturbative result occurs , and how this is connected to the onset of the phenomenological `` soft - pomeron '' behavior . the theory that is available at present is leading logarithmic and therefore is affected by rather large uncertainties . these uncertainties can be parametrized in terms of two mass scales , the transverse scale that controls the running coupling and the longitudinal scale associated with the high energy logarithms . a next - to - leading logarithmic calculation would help determine these scales . such a calculation could make the theoretical predictions much more precise . at the largest values of @xmath514 , new effects related to unitarity and diffusion may become important . if so , an improved theory that deals with these effects would be testable at a future @xmath29 collider . we are grateful to j.  bjorken and a.  mueller for discussions and for their interest in this work . we thank d.  strom for useful advice . this work was supported in part by the united states department of energy grants de - ac03 - 76sf00515 and de - fg03 - 96er40969 . we start with the expression ( [ m1 ] ) for the amplitude corresponding to the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . the overall charge factor in eq . ( [ m1 ] ) is @xmath543 where we have used the color trace @xmath544 . we use the mass shell constraints on the final quarks , @xmath314 and @xmath67 , to eliminate the integrals over their `` @xmath41 '' and `` @xmath40 '' components , respectively , thus obtaining @xmath545 @xmath546 we use the mass shell constraints on the antiquarks to eliminate the integrals over the `` @xmath41 '' and `` @xmath40 '' components of the exchanged momentum @xmath233 , as follows : @xmath547 @xmath548 note that in eqs . ( [ kminus ] ) , ( [ kplus ] ) we have neglected terms of order @xmath549 and @xmath550 with respect to unity , consistently with the high energy approximation . ( [ m1 ] ) can then be rewritten as @xmath551 } \over { \left ( ( p_a + k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_a - q_a)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \ , \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , { { { \mbox { \rm tr } } \left [ \ , { \rlap / p}_b \ , \gamma^\alpha \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k ) \ , \gamma^\beta \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \right ] } \over { \left ( ( p_b - k)^2 + i \ , \varepsilon \right ) \left ( ( p_b - q_b)^2 - i \ , \varepsilon \right ) } } \;\;. % \end{aligned}\ ] ] we now re - express the denominators and numerators of the amplitude ( [ m1 ] ) in the high energy limit . with the neglect of terms of order @xmath549 and @xmath550 , the denominators take the form @xmath552 @xmath553 and analogously @xmath554 @xmath555 in the numerator , light - cone gluon polarizations are dominant at high energy , and therefore we are led to calculate the product of traces @xmath556 \ ; \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , { \mbox { \rm tr } } \left [ \ , { \rlap / p}_b \ , \gamma^{- } \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - \rlap / k ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \ , ( { \rlap / q}_b - { \rlap / p}_b + \rlap / k ) \ , \gamma^{- } \ , ( { \rlap / p}_b - { \rlap / q}_b ) \ , { \rlap/\varepsilon}_b \right ] \;. \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] the result reads @xmath557 substituting eqs . ( [ denoa1])-([denob2 ] ) and ( [ trres ] ) in eq . ( [ m2 ] ) , we obtain the expression ( [ m3 ] ) for the amplitude corresponding to the graph in fig . [ ftwoglu ] . the total cross section is arrived at by adding the contributions from the other graphs according to the replacements described in the text below eq . ( [ m3 ] ) , and dividing by @xmath70 . the result reads @xmath558 } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + ( { { \bf p}}_a + { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] } } \right . \nonumber \\&&\hspace*{1 cm } \left . - { { \left [ 4 z_a ( 1 - z_a ) ( { \bf{\varepsilon}}_a \cdot { { \bf p}}_a ) ^2\ ; - { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right ] } \over { \left [ z_a \ , ( 1-z_a ) \ , q^2_a + { { \bf p}}_a^2 \right]^2 } } \right\ } \nonumber \\ & ~ & \times \ , \left\ { { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b \ ; { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) - { { \bf p}}_b \cdot ( { { \bf p}}_b - { \bf k } ) \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + ( { { \bf p}}_b - { { \bf k}})^2 \right ] \ , \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] } } \right . \nonumber \\&&\hspace*{1 cm } \left . - { { \left [ 4 z_b ( 1 - z_b ) ( { \bf{\varepsilon}}_b \cdot { { \bf p}}_b ) ^2\ ; - { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right ] } \over { \left [ z_b \ , ( 1-z_b ) \ , q^2_b + { { \bf p}}_b^2 \right]^2 } } \right\ } . \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] this coincides with eq . ( [ convsigma ] ) in the text once the explicit expression ( [ capitalg ] ) for @xmath77 is used .    using eqs . ( [ m2])-([trplusminus ] ) , the tensor @xmath559 introduced in eq . ( [ curlyg ] ) takes the form @xmath560 } \over { \left [ ( { { \bf p } } + { { \bf k}})^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] \ , \left [ { { \bf p}}^2 + z \ , ( 1-z ) \ , q^2 \right ] } } + \ , symm . \ , \right\ } \;\;\ ; , \nonumber % \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the additive symmetric terms are obtained from the replacements given in sec . [ sec : notations ] . the gluon exchange diagrams discussed in the text provide the dominant contribution to the photon - photon cross section in the high energy limit . they give rise to constant ( in born order ) or logarithmic ( in higher orders ) terms at large @xmath28 in the cross section . this appendix is concerned with quark exchange contributions , which vanish in the large energy limit . we examine quark exchange in order to estimate the energy at which gluon exchange becomes dominant . the leading - order term of quark - exchange type comes from the purely electromagnetic process @xmath561 this contribution is suppressed by a power of @xmath28 at high energies , @xmath562 . to express the cross section for this process , we parametrize the incoming photon momenta as in eq . ( [ qaqb ] ) , and introduce the variables @xmath563 in terms of which the total energy @xmath28 has the expression @xmath564 in the high energy region one has @xmath565 , and @xmath566 as in eq . ( [ qaplusqbminus ] ) . the cross section for the process ( [ qexreac ] ) to order @xmath567 , averaged over the transverse photon polarizations , has the form @xmath568 \hspace*{0.8 cm } , % \ ] ] where @xmath569 and @xmath570 are rational functions of @xmath571 , and are plotted in fig . [ qfun ] versus the variable @xmath572 for different values of the ratio @xmath573 . the @xmath574-dependence of the cross section ( [ sqexunpol ] ) is reported in fig . [ qsig ] for the case of equal virtualities . the cross section vanishes at the kinematic threshold @xmath575 , it has a maximum around @xmath576 , then it falls off and vanishes for @xmath577 ( corresponding to high energy ) like @xmath578 , according to the asymptotic formula @xmath579 the power suppression with @xmath574 at small @xmath574 is the one expected from the exchange of a spin-@xmath416 line in the @xmath172-channel . the logarithmic enhancement is associated with the integration over the region of small angles at the splitting vertex @xmath580 in the limit of small photon virtuality . the behavior of the cross section is qualitatively the same in the case of unequal virtualities . lipatov , sov . j.  nucl . * 23 * , 338 ( 1976 ) ; e.a . kuraev , l.n . lipatov and v.s . fadin , sov . jetp * 45 * , 199 ( 1977 ) ; i.  balitskii and l.n . lipatov , sov . j.  nucl . * 28 * , 822 ( 1978 ) . h.  abramowicz , plenary talk at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z.  ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.53 . d0 collaboration , phys . * 77 * , 595 ( 1996 ) . brodsky , talk at workshop on high energy @xmath29 colliders , brookhaven national laboratory , may 1996 . f.  hautmann , talk at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) , preprint oits 613/96 , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z.  ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.705 . brodsky , f.  hautmann and d.e . soper , phys . lett .   * 78 * , 803 ( 1997 ) . p.  aurenche , g.a . schuler et al . , report on  @xmath581 physics " in proceedings of the workshop  physics at lep2 " , eds . g.  altarelli , t.  sj " ostrand and f.  zwirner , cern 1996 - 01 , vol.1 , p.291 . mueller , nucl . * b415 * , 373 ( 1994 ) ; a.h .  mueller and b.  patel , _ ibid . _ * b425 * , 471 ( 1994 ) . i.  balitskii , nucl . phys .  * b463 * , 99 ( 1996 ) . j.  bartels , a.  de roeck and h.  lotter , phys .  lett . b * 389 * , 742 ( 1996 ) . v.m . budnev , i.f . ginzburg , g.v . meledin and v.g . serbo , phys .  rep . * 15 c * , 181 ( 1975 ) . low , phys . d * 12 * , 163 ( 1975 ) ; s.  nussinov , phys . lett .  * 34 * , 1286 ( 1975 ) , phys . d * 14 * , 246 ( 1976 ) ; j.f . gunion and d.e . soper , _ ibid . _ * 15 * , 2617(1977 ) . bjorken , j.  kogut and d.e . soper , phys . d * 3 * , 1382 ( 1971 ) . bjorken and j.  kogut , phys . d * 8 * , 1341 ( 1973 ) . frankfurt and m.  strikman , phys . * 160 * , 235 ( 1988 ) . s.  catani , m.  ciafaloni and f.  hautmann , phys . b * 242 * , 97 ( 1990 ) , nucl . * b366 * , 135 ( 1991 ) ; j.c . collins and r.k . ellis , _ ibid . _ * b360 * , 3 ( 1991 ) . lepage and p.b . mackenzie , phys . d * 48 * , 2250 ( 1993 ) ; s.j . brodsky , g.p . lepage and p.b . mackenzie , _ ibid . _ * 28 * , 228 ( 1983 ) . bjorken , preprint slac - pub-7341 , presented at snowmass 1996 summer study on new directions for high energy physics , e - print archive hep - ph/9610516 . j.  bartels and h.  lotter , phys . b * 309 * , 400 ( 1993 ) . mueller , nucl . * b437 * , 107 ( 1995 ) . schuler and t.  sj " ostrand , zeit . c * 68 * , 607 ( 1995 ) , phys . b * 376 * , 193 ( 1996 ) ; m.  gl " uck , e.  reya and m.  stratmann , phys . d * 51 * , 3220 ( 1995 ) . collins , _ an introduction to regge theory and high energy physics _ , cambridge university press , cambridge , 1977 . opal collaboration , contributed paper pa03 - 007 at ichep96 ( warsaw , july 1996 ) ; j.a . lauber ( opal ) , in proceedings of the xxviii international conference on high energy physics , eds . z.  ajduk and a.k . wroblewski , world scientific , p.725 . s.  kuhlman et al . , physics and technology of the next linear collider , snowmass 1996 report , e - print archive hep - ex/9605011 .
Abstract:

Answer: perturbative qcd predicts the behavior of scattering at high energies and fixed ( sufficiently large ) transferred momenta in terms of the bfkl pomeron ( or short distance pomeron ) . we study the prospects for testing these predictions in two - photon processes at lep200 and a possible future @xmath0 collider . we argue that the total cross section for scattering two photons sufficiently far off shell provides a clean probe of bfkl dynamics . the photons act as color dipoles with small transverse size , so that the qcd interactions can be treated perturbatively . we analyze the properties of the qcd result and the possibility of testing them experimentally . we give an estimate of the rates expected and discuss the uncertainties of these results associated with the accuracy of the present theoretical calculations . epsf.tex ( # 1 width # 2)=#2