Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: inflation offers a simple solution to the shortcomings of the standard hot big bang model . in addition , its predictions about the initial density perturbations , leading to the observed structure formation , are in a remarkable agreement with measurements of the cosmic microwave background ( cmb ) temperature anisotropies . among the various inflationary models , one should select the ones which lead to a better agreement with data , with the additional requirement that such models should be naturally built within a fundamental theoretical framework . in spite of its enormous success , inflation remains still a paradigm in search of a model .    despite the elegance of chaotic inflation  @xcite , this simple model faces a fine tuning problem . consistency , between predictions for the amplitude of cmb temperature anisotropies and measurements , requires a tiny coupling constant . to avoid this problem , linde  @xcite has proposed hybrid inflation , a model of inflation based on einstein gravity , but driven by a false vacuum . in this model , the inflaton field rolls while another scalar field remains trapped in a false vacuum state . the false vacuum becomes unstable when the magnitude of the inflaton field falls below some critical value , leading to a phase transition to the true vacuum . the energy density is dominated by the false vacuum energy density so that the phase transition signals the end of hybrid inflation . the phase transition at the end of inflation leads to topological defect formation  @xcite . theoretically motivated inflationary models can be built in a context of supersymmetry ( susy ) and supergravity ( sugra ) theories . @xmath1 supersymmetric models contain complex scalar fields , which often have flat directions in their potential , thus offering natural candidates for inflationary models . in this framework , hybrid inflation ( driven by the f - terms or the d - terms ) are the most standard models . such inflationary models lead generically to cosmic string formation at the end of the inflationary era . cosmic strings in supersymmetric theories may have new properties , as compared to their non - supersymmetric counterparts ; we do not address this issue here . a gauge symmetry can be broken spontaneously in @xmath1 globally supersymmetric theories , either by adding f - terms to the superpotential or , in the abelian case , by introducing fayet - iliopoulos ( fi ) d - terms . the higgs mechanism leads generically  @xcite to abrikosov - nielsen - olesen ( ano ) strings . depending whether they were formed at the end of f- or d - term inflation they are called f - term or d - term strings , respectively . f - term inflation is potentially plagued with the @xmath0-problem , while d - term inflation avoids it . this problem arises from the presence of large corrections ( of the order of the hubble parameter during inflation ) to the inflaton mass , which spoil the required flatness of the inflaton potential . d - term inflation can be successfully implemented in the framework of sugra , while in addition , it can be easily accommodated within string theory models .    in the simplest models of d - term inflation within sugra , in which the constant fi term gets compensated by a single complex scalar field at the end of the inflationary era , the d - term strings formed at the end of inflation are topologically stable , since @xmath2 , with @xmath3 the vacuum manifold of the broken u(1 ) symmetry . our study concerns such models . however , they have been proposed  @xcite models where d - term strings can become unstable . for example , one can introduce additional matter multiplets so as to obtain a non - trivial global symmetry such as su(2 ) , leading to a simply connected vacuum manifold and the production of semi - local strings . alternatively , it has been suggested  @xcite that the waterfall higgs fields are non - trivially charged under some other gauge symmetries @xmath4 , such that the vacuum manifold , @xmath5/ u(1)$ ] , is simply connected , leading to the formation of semi - local strings . d - term inflation requires the existence of a non - zero constant fi term , which can be added to the lagrangian only in the presence of a u(1 ) gauge symmetry . this extra u(1 ) symmetry can be of a different origin . some models have been suggested for field - dependent fi terms , arising in the presence of a chiral superfield @xmath6 shifting under u(1 ) . the imaginary part of the scalar part of the chiral superfield plays the rle of an axion , and cancels the chiral anomaly by shifting under the u(1 ) symmetry . such a u(1 ) symmetry is called _ anomalous _ , or _ pseudo - anomalous _ since the total anomaly vanishes . here the fi term depends on the real part of the chiral superfield . in supersymmetry , models with anomalous fi terms have been developed  @xcite within heterotic string theory . in a cosmological setup one has first to assume the stabilisation of the chiral superfield @xmath6 ; the rle of @xmath6 may be played by any modulus ( a dilaton or any volume modulus ) . only if this assumption holds the dilaton - dependent d - term can be considered as a constant fi term . however , the issue of dilaton and moduli stabilisation in the heterotic string theory is far from being resolved . it is still not clear how to derive constant fi terms from string or m - theory and only field - dependent d - terms have been identified . as we will discuss , in absence of constant fi terms , local supersymmetry requires the superpotential to be invariant under the u(1)-gauged symmetry .    in the context of theories with large extra dimensions , brane inflation occurs in a similar way as hybrid inflation within supergravity , leading to cosmic string - like objects . in string theories , d - brane @xmath7-anti - brane annihilation leads generically to the production of lower dimensional d - branes , with d3- and d1-branes , which are d - strings , being predominant  @xcite in iib string theories . to illustrate brane inflation let us consider  @xcite a d@xmath8-@xmath9 system in iib string theory . six of the spatial dimensions are compactified on a torus , while the branes move relatively to each other in some directions . as the two branes approach , the open string modes between the branes develop a tachyon , thus an instability . brane inflation  @xcite ends by a phase transition mediated by open string tachyons . since the tachyonic vacuum has a non - trivial @xmath10 homotopy group , one concludes that there must exist stable tachyonic string solutions with @xmath11 co - dimensions ; they are stable bps ( bogomolnyi - prasad - sommerfield ) d@xmath12-branes . since all dimensions are compact these daughter branes are seen as one - dimensional objects for a four - dimensional observer ; they are the d - strings . the d - strings ( d1-branes ) have been identified  @xcite in the low - energy supergravity with the d - term strings . the justification for this conjecture is that only d - term strings remain bps states in @xmath13 supergravity . in supergravity , f - term strings break all the supersymmetries , whereas the d - term strings preserve half of it . an interesting and successful brane inflationary model is the d3/d7 one  @xcite , which has also an effective description as a d - term inflationary model . the flat direction of the inflaton potential is associated with the shift symmetry , which protects the inflaton field from acquiring a large mass that would spoil the required flatness of the potential . in its original version this model leads to the formation of topologically stable ano bps strings . in a later developed version  @xcite of the d3/d7 model , where in terms of an effective gauge theory the model has a local u(1 ) gauge symmetry and a global su(2 ) symmetry , semi - local strings are formed . such strings can unwind without any cost of potential energy . in what follows we concentrate on inflationary models leading to the formation of topologically stable strings . strings formed at the end of an inflationary era , contribute  @xcite in the spectrum of temperature anisotropies ; their contribution is heavily constrained from cmb data . compatibility between cmb measurements and theoretical predictions constrain  @xcite the parameters space ( mass scales and couplings ) of the inflationary models . these constraints have been obtained  @xcite for d - term inflation within minimal sugra . here , we would like to investigate whether the constraints on the parameters space are a result of our choice of minimal supergravity , or whether they are a generic outcome of d - term hybrid inflation . we will therefore examine d - term inflation originated by different choices of the khler potential . the main motivation being that a minimal khler potential can be considered as a peculiar and unmotivated choice  @xcite . we base our study in a formulation of supergravity constructed from superconformal theory , since the standard formulation may be insufficient in the presence of constant fayet - iliopoulos terms  @xcite .    to be able to constrain the parameters space of the models we should know the power spectrum of a cosmic strings network and the allowed upper limit on the cosmic string contribution to the measured temperature anisotropy spectrum . the upper limit imposed on the cosmic string contribution to the cmb data depends on the numerical simulation employed in order to calculate the cosmic string power spectrum . the upper limit found in the literature  @xcite is @xmath14 or @xmath15 , depending on the simulation , with @xmath16 confidence level . there are some uncertainties in these results due to the cosmic string evolution codes they are based on was found using the results of ref . @xcite , based on the velocity - dependent one - scale model for the string evolution . this approach is certainly not the best . the upper limit of @xmath15 was found using the results of ref . @xcite ; however recently the authors have corrected  @xcite a mistake in their code , which has not been taken into account in ref . note however that the corrected version of the code @xcite seems to give similar results . we believe that the recent publication given in ref . @xcite is the best , at present , approach . ] and therefore in our calculations we use an average value for the upper bound equal to @xmath17 . note that none of the existing simulations take into account a non trivial microstructure of the cosmic strings formed : however they have been shown to be superconducting in supersymmetric abelian symmetry breaking through f- or d - terms  @xcite . we plan the rest of the paper as follows : in section ii we address hybrid d - term inflation , first within the standard formulation of supergravity , and subsequently within the effective supergravity theory built upon superconformal field theory . in the rest of the paper we focus on the second approach . we briefly review the effective supergravity formulation because of its consequences for d - term inflation , often not taken into consideration . in section iii we review d - term inflation in minimal supergravity . in section iv we discuss inflation in a supergravity theory with shift symmetry . in section v we consider d - term inflation in supergravity models with higher order terms , including all corrections up to order @xmath18 . we round up our conclusions in section vi . we first review hybrid d - term inflation model in its standard supergravity formulation .      following the standard formulation of supergravity  @xcite , the general sugra lagrangian for chiral superfields @xmath19 , and a vector superfield , depends on three generic functions : the khler potential @xmath20 , the superpotential @xmath21 , and the kinetic function @xmath22 for the vector multiplets . it can be expressed as an integral over the grassmann variables @xmath23 and @xmath24 ( over superspace ) , as  @xcite : @xmath25\nonumber\\ & & + \int { \mathrm{d}}^2\theta [ f_{ab}(\phi_i)w_a^{\ \alpha } w_{\alpha b } + { \rm h.c.}]~ , \label{lagrsugra}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where _ h.c . _ stands for hermitian conjugate . it turns out that the effective lagrangian obtained from eq . ( [ lagrsugra ] ) depends only on one combination of the khler potential @xmath20 and the superpotential @xmath21 , the following : @xmath26 a priori , the only restriction for the choice of the khler potential @xmath27 and the superpotential @xmath28 is that @xmath27 must be a real function and @xmath28 must be a holomorphic function . however , there exists a degeneracy in the choices of @xmath27 and @xmath28 , while the lagrangian is invariant under the _ khler transformation _ @xmath29 assuming that the lagrangian must be invariant also under a gauge symmetry , @xmath28 and @xmath27 must be invariant , at least up to a khler transformation . the gauge kinetic function @xmath22 must be holomorphic and covariant under gauge symmetry . choosing for example the _ minimal khler potential _ @xmath30 the kinetic terms for the scalar parts of the @xmath19 s are simply @xmath31 in minimal sugra , we also set the gauge kinetic function @xmath32 equal to @xmath33 .    within this framework of supergravity , and assuming that there is a gauge symmetry , the scalar potential @xmath34 for the scalar components @xmath35 of the superfields @xmath19 reads @xmath36 + \frac{1}{2}\left[{\rm re } f_{ab}(\phi_i)\right]^{-1}\sum_a g^2_a d^2_a~;\ ] ] the first term in the _ r.h.s _ of eq . ( [ formpotenscal ] ) is called _ f - term _ and the second one _ d - term_. while the f - term has in general positive and negative contributions , the d - term is positive definite . @xmath37 is given by @xmath38 where the fayet - iliopoulos term , @xmath39 , is non - zero only if the gauge symmetry is abelian ; @xmath40 is the gauge coupling of the symmetry generated by @xmath41 . assuming a constant fi term , d - term potential may lead to de sitter type of solutions , which is particularly interested for building an inflationary model within supergravity . the standard d - term hybrid inflation model is based on the superpotential  @xcite @xmath42 where @xmath43 are three chiral superfields and @xmath44 is the superpotential coupling . this model assumes an invariance under an abelian gauge group @xmath45 , under which the three superfields , @xmath43 , have charges @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 , respectively . this model also assumes the existence of a constant fi term .    however , the above summarised supergravity formulation ( called hereafter _ standard _ ) is inappropriate to describe d - term inflation  @xcite . indeed , in d - term inflation the superpotential vanishes at the unstable de sitter vacuum , as it also vanishes in the absolute minkowski vacuum ; anywhere else the superpotential is non - zero . thus , the standard formulation of supergravity , where the lagrangian depends on @xmath27 and @xmath28 only through the combination given in eq . ( [ kwcomb ] ) is inappropriate , since the theory is ill defined at @xmath49 . in conclusion , d - term inflation in supergravity must be described with a non - singular formulation of sugra when the superpotential vanishes . various formulations of effective supergravity can be constructed from the superconformal field theory ( see , ref . @xcite for a recent review ) . the main idea is , in a first stage , to build a lagrangian with full superconformal theory . in a second stage , the gauge symmetries that are absent in poincar supergravity ( e.g. , local dilatations , local chiral u(1)-symmetry and local s - supersymmetry ) are gauge fixed . starting from this framework in order to derive the effective supergravity theory , one can construct a non - singular theory at @xmath49 , where the action depends on all three functions , @xmath50 and @xmath32 .    the superconformal field theory ( scft ) is based on the @xmath51 symmetry . the superconformal lagrangian contains three parts , each of them being separately conformally invariant . for @xmath52 chiral multiplets @xmath53 ( with @xmath54 and some vector multiplets @xmath55 superconformally coupled to supergravity , the superconformal lagrangian reads  @xcite @xmath56_d + \left[{\mathcal{w}}(x ) \right]_f + \left[f_{\alpha\beta}(x ) \bar{\lambda}^\alpha \lambda^\beta\right]_f~.\ ] ] the homogeneous function @xmath57 and the holomorphic functions @xmath58 , @xmath59 encode the khler potential , the superpotential and gauge kinetic function , respectively , once the extra gauge symmetries have been gauge - fixed .    after constructing the lagrangian , we fix the extra symmetries . fixing local dilatation , the number of chiral scalars is decreased by one : there will be only @xmath60 physical scalar fields in supergravity . fixing s - supersymmetry makes a free fermion field to be removed . one thus makes a transformation from the @xmath52 variables @xmath53 to the _ conformon _ scalar @xmath61 and @xmath60 physical scalars @xmath62 , the @xmath60 chiral superfields of standard supergravity . more precisely , @xmath63 where @xmath64 are a set of holomorphic functions . the khler potential @xmath65 is related to the function @xmath57 , appearing in the superconformal lagrangian , and the conformon superfield @xmath61 through @xmath66 chiral and dilatation symmetry imply that the holomorphic function @xmath67 is @xmath68    apart the local @xmath51 symmetry , the lagrangian may also have some yang - mills gauge symmetries , which commute with local superconformal symmetries . the superconformal functions @xmath69 are invariant , while the superconformal function @xmath32 is covariant under the yang - mills gauge symmetries . the yang - mills transformations of all chiral superfields in the superconformal action are @xmath70 @xmath71 and @xmath72 are @xmath52 holomorphic functions for every symmetry . note that the splitting given in eq . ( [ splitting]a ) is not unique ; the action invariance under khler transformation , eq . ( [ defkahltransf ] ) , has its origin exactly in this remark . the meaning of the value of @xmath73 is the transformation of the conformon field @xmath61 . the invariance of @xmath74 leads to  @xcite @xmath75\right\}~,\ ] ] implying that @xmath71 describes the non - invariance of the khler potential @xmath76 given by @xmath77 . note that derivatives @xmath78 ( and @xmath79 ) stand for derivatives w.r.t . @xmath62 ( and @xmath80 , respectively ) . assuming that the transformation of the conformon superfield @xmath61 is given by imaginary constants , then @xmath81 @xmath82 is the gauge coupling constant . if @xmath83 , the conformon superfield @xmath61 transforms under a @xmath84 . only if @xmath85 the symmetry is preserved without corrections of the superconformal u(1 ) . equation ( [ transfofi]a ) shows the superconformal origin of fi terms via the gauge transformations of the conformon field . equation ( [ ralpha ] ) implies that the khler potential is invariant  @xcite @xmath86 the function @xmath67 should be invariant under yang - mills transformations , @xmath87 implying @xmath88 since the _ r.h.s . _ of the above equation , eq . ( [ noninv ] ) , is non - zero when fi terms are present , one concludes that the superpotential @xmath28 can not be gauge invariant , if the conformon multiplet @xmath61 transforms under gauge transformations . assuming that @xmath73 is given by eq . ( [ transfofi]a ) , which corresponds to a constant fi term in supergravity , one gets  @xcite @xmath89    to construct a formulation of supergravity with constant fi terms from superconformal theory , one finds  @xcite that under u(1 ) gauge transformations in the directions in which there are constant fi terms @xmath90 , the superpotential @xmath28 must transform as in eq . ( [ transfow ] ) . as a consequence , we can not keep any longer the charge assignment described in the case of standard supergravity .      as it was explicitly shown in ref . @xcite , the gauge fixing of the local dilatational invariance introduces the mass scale @xmath91 , which we set @xmath92 , and fixes the value of the conformon superfield in terms of the khler potential @xmath76 , which depends only on the physical scalars @xmath93 and @xmath94 , namely @xmath95 the value @xmath96 being fixed , we then fix the phase of @xmath61 . the superconformal lagrangian , eq . ( [ lagrangsuperconf ] ) , is invariant under the redefinition @xmath97 for an arbitrary holomorphic function @xmath98 , since this redefinition can be absorbed in a redefinition of @xmath62 . we can check that the effect of this redefinition on @xmath65 and @xmath28 is precisely the khler transformation introduced in eq . ( [ defkahltransf ] ) . two choices have been proposed  @xcite in order to fix the phase of @xmath61 . either @xmath99 leading to the standard formulation of sugra , described previously , or alternatively @xmath100 the first choice , eq . ( [ choice1 ] ) , makes sense only for @xmath101 , while the second one , eq .  ( [ choice2 ] ) , is appropriate for cases where @xmath67 can become zero . since in what follows we focus on d - term inflation , where the superpotential vanishes during inflation as well as at the end of the inflationary era , we adopt the second choice of gauge fixing . in this case , the form of the lagrangian is explicitly given in refs . we give below several quantities which are of interest for the purpose of our study . to switch to dimensional khler potential and fields , we redefine @xmath62 and @xmath65 , as  @xcite @xmath102 @xmath103 is regular at @xmath104 . we denote the scalar part of the superfield @xmath19 by @xmath35 . from now on derivatives @xmath78 stand for derivatives w.r.t . @xmath35 ; we thus use the fields @xmath35 and their complex conjugates @xmath105 to indicate scalar fields . the previous choice of conformon transformation , eq .  ( [ transfofi ] ) , now reads @xmath106 . the supergravity lagrangian depends on @xmath107 and @xmath108 . constant fi terms can be introduced for some of the u(1 ) gauge groups . we write below the bosonic and fermionic parts of the lagrangian for the scalar fields @xmath35 , which are relevant for d - term inflation in the context of supergravity formulated using superconformal theory . the part of the bosonic sector which interests us , is @xmath109 with @xmath110\nonumber\\ v_d&=&\frac{1}{2}\left[({\rm re}f)^{-1}\right]^{\alpha\beta } { \mathcal{p}}_\alpha { \mathcal{p}}_\beta~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath111~,\ ] ] and @xmath112    the fermionic mass terms for fermions @xmath113 of chiral supermultiplets @xmath35 are given by the fermionic sector of the lagrangian , namely  @xcite @xmath114 -m^{ij}\bar{\chi}_i\chi_j - m_{ij}\bar{\chi}^i\chi^j + e^{-1}{\mathcal{l}}_{\rm mix}~,\ ] ] where @xmath115 and @xmath116 and where the khler metric and khler connection are defined by @xmath117 in addition to the standard mass terms proportional to @xmath118 , some mixing mass terms between the chiral fermions @xmath113 and the gaugino or the gravitino are contained in @xmath119 . they can potentially contribute to the fermionic mass matrix  @xcite : @xmath120~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath121\nonumber\\ v_l^1&=&\frac{1}{2}i{\mathcal{p}}_\alpha\lambda_l^\alpha+m^i\chi_i~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the case of non vanishing @xmath119 , the masses of are obtained by diagonalising the fermionic mass matrix . let us investigate the consequences of a formulation of supergravity constructed from superconformal theory for d - term inflation . first , the transformation of the sugra superpotential given by the eq . ( [ transfow ] ) imposes a modification of the charge assignment of section  [ sec : stdsugraformul ] . this charge assignment holds for the global supersymmetric limit . since the charge of the superpotential is given by the sum of the charges of the fields @xmath122 , @xmath123 , we must impose  @xcite @xmath124 note that as a consequence , we can relate the fi amplitude to the anomaly of the symmetry u(1 ) @xmath125 similarly to the generation of fi terms with anomalous u(1 ) symmetry within weakly coupled string theories .    in ref . @xcite the authors suggest a way to solve the anomalous u(1 ) symmetry . more precisely , the authors introduce new matter superfields , which are not involved in inflation , with appropriate charge assignments so that the anomaly gets cancelled four - dimensional supergravity with fayet - iliopoulos couplings has been recently addressed in refs . @xcite . ] . in order to avoid an @xmath126problem we set @xmath127 . this modification of the charge assignment induces a modification of the d - terms of the scalar potential . since the function @xmath27 is real and @xmath28 is holomorphic , we can check that the expression of the f - terms , eq . ( [ potenfterms ] ) , is identical to the standard formulation of supergravity . concerning the radiative corrections , the modification of the charges induces a modification of the mass terms for the scalar components of the chiral superfields , since part of their mass terms comes from the d - terms . the fermionic lagrangian , eq . ( [ lagrangfermio ] ) , is identical to the expression obtained in the context of standard supergravity given in  @xcite . note that in the case of interest , there are no additional contributions to the chiral fermion mass terms from @xmath119 given in eq . ( [ lagrangfermiomix ] ) . the last consequence of the superconformal origin of supergravity concerns the form of the superpotential . we first remark that the transformation of the superpotential , eq . ( [ transfow ] ) , combined with the requirement that the inflaton field should remain uncharged in order to avoid the @xmath0-problem , protect the form of the superpotential @xmath128 all non - renormalisable terms of the form @xmath129 are forbidden . secondly , if we assume in addition that the superfields and the superpotential transform under an r - symmetry as @xmath130 then all terms proportional to @xmath131 , with @xmath132 , and all terms of the form @xmath133 or @xmath134 are forbidden . we end up with a d - term inflation that is precisely described by the minimal superpotential , eq . ( [ superpot ] ) , even if in supergravity non - renormalisable terms can be present . this motivates our choice to consider in this work , the standard form of superpotential . the minimal supergravity description is based on the minimal khler potential @xmath135 and the minimal structure for @xmath22 , namely @xmath136 . the tree level scalar potential reads  @xcite @xmath137\nonumber \\ & & + \frac{g^2}{2}\left(q_+|\phi_+|^2+q_-|\phi_-|^2+\xi\right)^2~.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    the next step is the calculation of the masses of the components of the superfields @xmath123 . the scalar mass squared can be read directly from the scalar potential  @xcite , namely @xmath138 strictly speaking , one must use the charge assignment given by eq . ( [ chargassign ] ) , for example , @xmath139 hereafter we assume @xmath140 and therefore the expression for the scalar masses , eq . ( [ scalmass ] ) , can be approximated as @xmath141 in the inflationary valley , where @xmath142 , the associated dirac fermions have a mass squared @xmath143 unchanged compared to the case of standard minimal supergravity  @xcite .    using the coleman - weinberg formula , we can then compute the effective inflationary potential , taking into account the tree - level and the one - loop radiative corrections due to the mass splitting between components of the chiral superfields @xmath123 . the effective potential reads  @xcite @xmath144 \right\ } ~,\ ] ] where @xmath145 and @xmath146    d - term inflation leads to cosmic strings formation at the end of the inflationary era . consistency between cmb measurements and theoretical predictions constrain the parameters space . the constrains are imposed on the couplings and mass scales . they are shown in fig . [ fig : dtermstandard ] and can be summarised as  @xcite @xmath147 the above constraints , eq . ( [ constrdmin ] ) , can be expressed  @xcite as a single constraint on the fayet - iliopoulos term @xmath148 , namely , @xmath149 we can therefore see that our assumption that @xmath150 in eq . ( [ approxmass ] ) is justified  @xcite , which implies that for the purpose of our study and for minimal d - term inflation , we can neglect the corrections introduced by the superconformal origin of supergravity . moreover , since the tree level potential is given by @xmath151 , the limit @xmath152 should hold since otherwise the energy density would become transplankian and the quantum gravity corrections , which have been so far neglected  @xcite , would become important  @xcite . +    , as a function of the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 . ]    in what follows we address whether the restrictions found in the framework of minimal sugra , are still qualitatively valid for a non - minimal sugra theory . we will thus study d - term hybrid inflation with a superpotential @xmath28 defined by eq . ( [ superpoteninflad ] ) and different choices for the form of the khler potential . we first study hybrid inflation in the context of supergravity , with a khler potential obeying a shift symmetry . this symmetry can be used for model building in the framework of supergravity , while it is also motivated from string theory  @xcite . more precisely , the shift symmetry , @xmath153 with @xmath154 a real constant , has been used in order to obtain flat potentials from f - terms in sugra , so that the @xmath0-problem is cured , or to make compatible chaotic inflation , which requires an inflaton field larger than the planck scale , and supergravity  @xcite . thus , we consider the following form for the khler potential @xmath155 and minimal structure for the kinetic function . we note that compared to the minimal khler potential , eq . ( [ kmin ] ) , @xmath156 has two additional terms , , @xmath157 and @xmath158 , which do not affect the kinetic terms . comparing with the scalar potential obtained in minimal sugra , we can identify two differences . the first one is that there are several new terms proportional to @xmath164 . these terms will not affect the effective mass terms of the @xmath123 fields , thus they will not affect the inflationary potential , even when one - loop radiative corrections have been taken into account . the second one is that the exponential factor @xmath165 in minimal sugra , has been here replaced by @xmath166 . writing @xmath167 , we get @xmath168 . if we identify the inflaton field with the real part of @xmath122 , then we obtain exactly the same potential as in the minimal case . however , with the present choice for the khler potential , @xmath156 , it would be more logical to identify the inflaton field with the imaginary part of @xmath122 , namely @xmath169 . the reason being that with this choice the exponential term is constant during inflation , thus it can not spoil the slow roll conditions . then we can check that the inflationary potential we get is identical to the usual d - term inflation within the global susy framework . this model has been studied in ref . the result obtained in ref . @xcite is reminded in fig . [ dtermsusy ] .    , in the case of the d - term inflation model in the framework of global susy . figure taken from ref . @xcite . ]    clearly , in such a model the cosmic string contribution to the cmb anisotropies is dominant , in contradiction with the cmb measurements , unless the superpotential coupling is constrained to be @xmath170 concluding , we state that simply imposing a shift symmetry to the khler potential is not enough to _ escape _ the _ cosmic string problem _ of d - term inflation . in this section , we consider another choice of khler potential that contains non renormalisable terms . more precisely , we consider the following form @xmath171 where @xmath172 are arbitrary functions of @xmath173 . contrary to the previous section , this new form should modify the kinetic terms . the motivation for this choice is that it contains the next - to - minimal khler potential , with all terms up to order @xmath174 . we consider in a first place a reduced version of this potential and then we proceed with the full expression . we remind to the reader that our primary goal is not to build a new model for d - term inflation in the context of supergravity , but to study the robustness of our prediction that there is a dominant contribution of cosmic strings to the cmb temperature anisotropies , unless we fine tune the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 . we first consider the case of the previous khler potential , eq . ( [ gen ] ) , setting @xmath175 , implying latexmath:[\[k_3=|s|^2+|\phi_+|^2+|\phi_-|^2+f_+\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg)|\phi_+|^2+f_-\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg )    arbitrary functions of @xmath173 , while the superpotential is given in eq . ( [ superpoteninflad ] ) . one can argue that the khler potential given in eq . ( [ kahlerseto1 ] ) is quite general , since during inflation the higgs fields are small . however , one can also criticise this choice for the following reason : even though @xmath177-terms are indeed negligible as compared to the @xmath178-ones ( the @xmath179-terms are small during the inflationary era ) there is no reason for neglecting @xmath180-terms . they will be taken into account in next section . note that the expression for the effective scalar potential is identical to that of minimal supergravity , except for the expression of @xmath93 . the first derivative of the potential is equal to @xmath194 where @xmath195 @xmath196 ~;\ ] ] @xmath197 denote the first derivative of @xmath172 with respect to @xmath198 . a choice which we will later consider for @xmath199 is @xmath200 in the large @xmath201-limit the effective potential and its first derivative with respect to @xmath201 reduce to @xmath202 \label{limitz1}\ ] ] and @xmath203 respectively .    at this point , we would like to note that d - term inflation can be realised with the last 60 e - folds being very close to the critical value @xmath204 , implying that the above reduced formulae , eqs . ( [ limitz1 ] ) , ( [ limitz2 ] ) , _ can not _ be used to compute the predictions of the model regarding the cmb temperature anisotropies . therefore , we disagree with the approach of ref . @xcite , where the authors have used the reduced formulae for the effective potential and its first derivative , to compute the inflaton contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies .    to illustrate the above remark , we represent in fig . [ fig : error ] the error made by this assumption . the cosmic string contribution is drawn as a function of the superpotential coupling constant @xmath44 , considering either the partial or the full scalar potential . one can realise that the error on the cosmic string contribution can reach @xmath205 , leading to a considerable error in the induced constraints on the parameters space .     with partial ( dashed line ) or full ( continuous line ) scalar potential . ]    the number of e - foldings of inflation between the initial and final value of the inflaton field is @xmath206 f_{v'}(z)}~,\ ] ] where we note that the index @xmath207 denotes the scale responsible for the quadrupole anisotropy in the cmb . for the integral appearing in the above expression for @xmath208 to be correctly defined , one must assume that the function @xmath209 can be inverted . since it is a monotonic and increasing function , one can verify , at least numerically , that the function @xmath210 can be inverted . we denote the inverted function by @xmath211 .    the above expression for @xmath208 , eq . ( [ efoldings ] ) , will enable us to write a relation between @xmath148 and @xmath212 . setting @xmath213 , we can fix the value of the inflaton field @xmath214 , responsible for the quadrupole anisotropy of the cmb . d - term inflation leads generically to cosmic strings formation , which also contribute to the cmb temperature anisotropies . the total contribution , from the inflaton field as well as from the cosmic strings , has to be normalised to the value measured by the cobe - dmr experiment . this normalisation will fix the mass scale @xmath215 as a function of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 and the gauge coupling @xmath82 , which are considered here as parameters . thus , we have to calculate both , the cosmic strings contribution and the inflaton field one , and normalise their _ sum _ to cobe - dmr . here we emphasise that different approaches can be found in the literature where the authors do not normalise the sum of the two contributions to the data . clearly not to normalise the sum to the data is a simplification , which may lead to an important error for the result . normalising only the inflationary contribution to the quadrupole absolute value can be considered as an assumption where the cosmic string contribution is neglected . this assumption could be _ allowed _ only if one wants to argue that the cosmic strings are sub - dominant . however , since we already know that cosmic strings are indeed sub - dominant and our aim is to constrain the parameters space and calculate exactly how sub - dominant the strings are , this simplification in the normalisation implies important errors in the calculated cosmic string contribution .    from the scalar potential given in eq . ( [ dpotensugranonmin ] ) , one can see that the spontaneous symmetry breaking is generated when @xmath216 takes a vacuum expectation value @xmath215 . thus , the quadrupole contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies from the cosmic strings formed at the end of hybrid inflation , which is @xmath217 where @xmath218 is the vacuum expectation value of the higgs field responsible for the formation of cosmic strings , is approximately equal to @xmath219    for the contribution from the inflaton field , we evaluate the sachs - wolfe term splitted into the scalar and tensor parts , using @xmath220 and @xmath221 from eqs . ( [ treelevelsc ] ) , ( [ veff ] ) , ( [ inflsc ] ) and ( [ inflsctens ] ) we get @xmath222 and @xmath223 we note that the ratio of the tensor part of the inflaton field contribution to the cosmic strings one is constant , and that the tensor part contribution can be neglected . the tensor over scalar ratio , @xmath224 , is less straightforward and it is given by @xmath225    we then proceed with the cosmic string contribution to the quadruple cmb temperature anisotropy . this contribution in computed as a function of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 , for various values of @xmath82 and @xmath226 , which are considered as parameters . the results are plotted in fig . [ csdelambda ] .     from the top to the bottom , respectively . this is for @xmath227 . ]    to show the dependence of the cosmic string contribution on the gauge coupling @xmath82 , we draw in fig . [ csdelambdag1 ] the cosmic string contribution for @xmath228 and @xmath229 . clearly , this case ( @xmath228 ) is excluded since the cosmic string contribution is above the allowed one . we note that we do not take @xmath230 higher than 5 , since positivity condition @xmath231 requires @xmath232  @xcite .     from the top to the bottom , respectively . this is for @xmath228 . ] we quantify below the constraints on the parameters space imposed from the three - year wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe ( wmap )  @xcite measurements . we want to set precise constraints on the free parameters since this can be of importance for concluding of whether d - term inflation remains in agreement with cmb data once we also include constraints imposed from the allowed value of the spectral index  @xcite .    for @xmath233 , there is no parameters space in agreement with measurements . in the range @xmath234 $ ] , the parameters space is extremely small , around @xmath235 ; the presence of @xmath230 enlarges slightly the allowed window . for @xmath227 , the @xmath17 upper limit on the allowed cosmic string contribution to the cmb imposes , at @xmath236 of confidence level , the following constraints : @xmath237 or , equivalently , @xmath238 clearly the new degree of freedom , namely @xmath226 , allows a slightly higher upper bound on the coupling , which is however at best higher by only a factor of 2 , thus concluding that fine tuning is still required . all constraints are equivalent to a single constraint on @xmath239 , or @xmath240 , as already stated in refs . therefore , there is a bijection between the cosmic string contribution and the mass scale of inflation , which nevertheless does not mean that one can normalise only the inflaton contribution to the cmb data . clearly , the error made by this assumption is big when cosmic strings have an important weight , while it is small if the cosmic string contribution is small , of the order the one found here . with the current upper limit of @xmath17 on the allowed cosmic string contribution to the temperature anisotropies , the relative error made on the string contribution , by not normalising the sum , is of the order of @xmath241 . as one can see from figs . [ csdelambda ] , [ csdelambdag1 ] the curve which showing the cosmic string contribution becomes singular at its minimum , for large values of @xmath242 . the reason for this behaviour is that the function @xmath243 , denoting the sum of the cosmic strings and inflaton contributions as a function of @xmath148 becomes non - bijective for certain values of @xmath44 . this implies that there are more than one solutions for the function @xmath244 normalised to the cobe data , for a tiny window of the parameter @xmath44 around the value @xmath245 . we illustrate this in fig . [ multval ] .    . in terms of the cosmic string contributions these solutions correspond to @xmath246 and @xmath247 from left to right , equivalently . ] we have checked that this _ degeneracy _ does not influence the validity of our results since the different solutions for the normalisation to cobe are of the same order of magnitude and this behaviour is observed for a tiny parameters space .    as a final remark , we would like to note that there is also another point where we disagree with ref .  @xcite . in their model specified by the choice of the khler potential and with the simplifications made for the scalar potential , the authors obtain  @xcite a value for @xmath239 , required to generate the appropriate magnitude of density perturbations . the authors argue that this value is consistent with the upper limit imposed on @xmath148 so that the cosmic string contribution is within the allowed window , following the results of ref . @xcite . however , the analysis of ref . @xcite was done employing the curvaton mechanism ; a contribution which the authors of ref . @xcite have not considered at all . we proceed with the general case , namely we include all terms of the next to leading order latexmath:[\[k_2=|s|^2+|\phi_+|^2+|\phi_-|^2+f_+\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg)|\phi_+|^2+f_-\bigg(\frac{|s|^2}{m_{\rm pl}^2}\bigg )    @xmath172 is just @xmath249    the motivation for such a choice is that beyond the minimal supergravity part of the khler potential , the leading order is @xmath174 , implying that one should consider all corrections up to this order . during inflation , the charged fields @xmath123 vanish , meaning that terms of the form @xmath250 or @xmath251 can be neglected compared to @xmath252-terms , which are in @xmath253 . thus , the next - to - minimal d - term inflationary model should be constructed with khler potential @xmath254 . we again consider the superpotential @xmath255 involving the superfields @xmath122 and @xmath123 with charges @xmath46 and @xmath256 , respectively , under the @xmath45 symmetry of the lagrangian . the charges @xmath256 must satisfy the constraint induced by the superconformal origin of the fi term , as discussed in section  [ csqforsugra ] . the d - term part of the scalar potential is thus unchanged as compared the previous section and given by eq . ( [ vdnonmin ] ) . equation ( [ fnew ] ) implies that during inflation @xmath182 is minimised for @xmath267 , thus @xmath268 and inflation is driven by the d - term . the total scalar potential @xmath34 is constant at tree level and equal to @xmath269 . having the scalar potential we calculate the masses of the canonically normalised scalar components of the superfields @xmath123 : @xmath270 whereas from eq . ( [ lagrangfermio ] ) we get the mass squared for their fermionic partners : @xmath271 following the same procedure as in the previous sections , we obtain the effective potential @xmath190 \right\ } ~,\ ] ] where @xmath272 is the same as in section  [ secpotenseto ] , eq . ( [ deffv ] ) ; the only difference is the expression for @xmath93 , namely here @xmath273 the first derivative of the scalar potential with respect to @xmath201 reads @xmath274 where @xmath275 is the same as in section  [ secpotenseto ] , eq . ( [ deffv ] ) , but @xmath276 is in this case given by @xmath277~. \label{newfz}\ ] ] the number of e - folds and the inflationary contribution to the cmb quadrupole anisotropy are still calculated using eqs . ( [ efoldings ] ) and ( [ dtsurt ] ) , respectively , with @xmath276 given by eq . ( [ newfz ] ) above . the cosmic strings contribution to the cmb temperature anisotropies is the same as in the minimal d - term sugra case . the contribution of cosmic strings to the cmb anisotropies in the whole parameters space is represented in figs . [ csdelambdanonminextc0g2 ] , [ csdelambdanonminextc0b1 ] , [ csdelambdanonminextb1c1 ] .    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflationary model . the value of the gauge coupling constant is fixed and equal to @xmath227 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , i.e. , @xmath278 . the minimal sugra for @xmath175 is represented by the dashed line , while the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath279 , going from the bottom to the top . a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still required , in order to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings . ]    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflation model . the parameter @xmath280 is set equal to @xmath281 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , ie @xmath278 . the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath282 , going from the bottom to the top . a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still is required to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings . ]    , in the next - to - minimal d - term inflation model . the parameter @xmath280 is set equal to @xmath281 ; there are no cross terms between @xmath122 and @xmath123 , i.e. , @xmath278 . the different plain lines are calculated for @xmath282 , going from the bottom to the top . a fine tuning of the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is still required , in order to avoid a dominant contribution of cosmic strings . ] studying the above figures one easily concludes that considering a more general form for the khler potential does not solve the fine tuning problem of d - term inflation . the new term in the khler potential , whose weight is given by the parameter @xmath280 , induces an enhancement of the cosmic string contribution at low @xmath44 . we still observe a dominant contribution of cosmic strings if the superpotential coupling @xmath44 is close to unity . therefore , the constraints on @xmath44 found on the previous section remain unchanged as given in eq . ( [ contraintelambdanonmin ] ) . d - term hybrid inflation is a successful and interesting model . in the context of supergravity , d - term inflation avoids the _ hubble - induced mass _ problem , which plagues f - term hybrid inflation , while it can easily be implemented in string theory . in a standard formulation of d - term inflation , where the constant fi term gets compensated by a single complex scalar field , we do not add an additional discrete symmetry , and do not consider non - renormalisable terms in the potential , d - term strings are formed at the end of the phase transitions which signals the end of inflation . these strings are analogous to the d - strings formed at the end of brane inflation , which is the result of brane collisions . d - term inflation can not be studied in the standard formulation of supergravity , which is ill - defined whenever the superpotential vanishes and there are present constant fayet iliopoulos terms . following an effective supergravity formulation based on superconformal theory , the superpotential transforms under the u(1 ) symmetry along the directions where the fi terms are constant . this transformation defines the charge assignments of the superfields . d - term inflation has to be studied within this new formulation of supergravity , which is well defined when the superpotential vanishes . cosmic strings contribute to the cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropies . all current measurements put severe constraints on the allowed cosmic string contribution . to achieve a compatibility between measurements and theoretical predictions one should fine tune the couplings . this was already found in the case of minimal supergravity . it was therefore natural to ask the question of whether this result still holds in non - minimal supergravity . it was previously claimed in the literature that higher order khler potentials suppress the cosmic strings contribution . studying a case of non - minimal supergravity , where we include higher order corrections in the khler potential , as well as supergravity with shift symmetry we conclude that cosmic string contribution will be dominant unless the couplings are fine - tuned . we also find that , as in the minimal case  @xcite , the @xmath17 constraint on the cosmic string contribution is equivalent to the constraint @xmath283 we would also like to emphasise that if @xmath215 is higher by a factor of 2 , the cosmic string contributison is of the order of @xmath284 , as show in fig .  7 of ref .  @xcite .    in conclusion , we definitely disagree with the statement that non - minimal khler potentials avoid the cosmic strings problem , which should imply that fine tuning is not necessary . even though we have not studied a large number of khler potentials , our current findings indicate that the problem of fine tuning is unavoidable unless one considers a more complicated model , for example where strings become topologically unstable , namely semi - local strings . we have not yet studied  @xcite the spectral index in our models to check the consistency with the limits imposed by the recent three - year wmap data , which however have been given only for purely adiabatic models . if the spectral index is higher than the one preferred from the measurements and since , in addition , the requirement for very small couplings seems more difficult to be satisfied in string theory , one should then look for mechanisms to suppress the rle of strings , for example by making them unstable , along the lines of refs . @xcite , by adding new terms in the superpotential  @xcite , or by considering the curvaton mechanism  @xcite . as we were completing this work , ref . @xcite came to our attention . in that study , the authors find , in the context of minimal supergravity , slightly higher upper bounds for the parameters @xmath44 and @xmath82 , whereas the obtain the same with us upper bound on the fi term . this small discrepancy originates from the different analysis followed in ref . @xcite ; the authors perform a full markov - chain - monte - carlo analysis and consider one more parameter , namely the spectral index . it is a pleasure to thank n.  chatillon , r.  kallosh , p.  greene , j.  gray , j.  martin , a.  van proeyen and j.  yokoyama for stimulating discussions . jr acknowledges support by the national science foundation under grant no . phy-0455649 and by the university of texas at san antonio , texas 78249 , usa . 10 a.  linde , phys . b * 129 * , 177 ( 1983 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: d - term inflation is one of the most interesting and versatile models of inflation . it is possible to implement naturally d - term inflation within high energy physics , as for example susy guts , sugra , or string theories . d - term inflation avoids the @xmath0-problem , while in its standard form it always ends with the formation of cosmic strings . given the recent three - year wmap data on the cosmic microwave background temperature anisotropies , we examine whether d - term inflation can be successfully implemented in non - minimal supergravity theories . we show that for all our choices of khler potential , there exists a parameter space for which the predictions of d - term inflation are in agreement with the measurements . the cosmic string contribution on the measured temperature anisotropies is always dominant , unless the superpotential coupling constant is fine tuned ; a result already obtained for d - term inflation within minimal supergravity . in conclusion , cosmic strings and their rle in the angular power spectrum can not be easily hidden by just considering a non - flat khler geometry .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the chemical composition of extremely metal - poor stars is expected to reflect the yields from a quite small number of nucleosynthesis processes . recent abundance analyses for extremely metal - poor stars have provided quite valuable information on the origin of the elements , ( in particular when combined with galactic chemical evolution studies , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and the individual nucleosynthesis processes involved .    the rapid neutron capture process ( r - process ) is known to be responsible for about half of the abundances of elements heavier than the iron - group in solar system material . although observational data have been rapidly increasing in the past decade , the astrophysical site of the r - process is still unclear . previous nucleosynthesis studies suggest several possibilities , e.g. , neutrino - driven winds @xcite or prompt explosions @xcite of core - collapse ( type  ii / ibc ) supernovae , neutron star mergers @xcite , jets from gamma - ray burst accretion discs @xcite . all the scenarios proposed above involve , however , severe problems that remain to be solved , and no consensus has yet been achieved . models of the r - process nucleosynthesis are usually examined by comparison with the abundance pattern of the r - process component in solar - system material . recent measurements for abundances of neutron - capture elements in very metal - poor stars have been providing useful constraints on these models . @xcite have studied the chemical abundances of the extremely metal - poor star cs  22892052 , the first example of a small but growing class of metal - poor stars that exhibit very large excesses of r - process elements relative to iron ( [ r - process / fe ] @xmath0 ) . an important result of their work is that the relative abundance pattern of the neutron - capture elements from the 2nd to the 3rd peak ( 56 @xmath1 _ z _ @xmath1 76 ) in this star is identical , within observational errors , to that of the ( inferred ) solar system r - process component . this phenomenon is sometimes referred to as `` universality '' of the r - process , having a large impact on the studies of the nature of the r - process , and its astrophysical site .    however , the abundance patterns of light neutron - capture elements ( 38 @xmath1 z @xmath1 48 ) in r - process enhanced stars exhibit clear deviations from that of the solar system r - process component @xcite . this suggests the existence of another r - process site which has contributed to the light r - process elements in solar - system material . this process is sometimes called as `` weak r - process '' , while the process that is responsible for heavy neutron - capture elements ( ba @xmath2 u ) is referred to `` main r - process '' .    following the previous studies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , @xcite and @xcite have investigated the correlation of sr and ba abundances in very metal - poor stars ( [ fe / h ] @xmath3 ) in some detail . they showed that the dispersion of the sr abundances clearly decreases with increasing ba abundance . this correlation indicates the existence of ( at least ) two processes : one enriches both heavy and light neutron - capture elements , while the other yields light neutron - capture elements with only small production of heavy ones . @xcite discuss the contribution of a primary process which has produced light neutron - capture elements in our galaxy . the abundance patterns produced by the main r - process have been studied previously based on high resolution spectroscopy of metal - poor stars ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) as mentioned above . by way of contrast , the abundance pattern of neutron - capture elements produced by the weak r - process is still unclear . since the abundances of heavy neutron - capture elements yielded by this process are very low , it is quite difficult to accurately measure their abundances in metal - poor stars . in addition , most spectral lines of light neutron - capture elements , in particular those with @xmath4 exist in the near - uv region , in which atmospheric extinction makes the observation with ground - based telescopes difficult . we have been investigating light neutron - capture elements in very metal - deficient stars from near - uv spectroscopy with the 8.2  m subaru telescope . ishimaru et al . ( 2006 , in preparation ) studied the abundances of pd and ag , which exist between the first and second abundance peaks produced by neutron - capture processes , for several metal - poor stars . one of the targets is hd  122563 , a well - studied bright metal - poor ( [ fe / h ] @xmath5 ) giant . this object has very low abundances of heavy neutron - capture elements ( e.g. [ ba / fe ] @xmath6 * ? ? ? * ) , while light neutron - capture elements show large excesses relative to heavy ones ( e.g. [ sr / ba ] @xmath7 ) . therefore , the abundance pattern of neutron - capture elements in this star might well represent the yields of the process producing light neutron - capture elements at low metallicity . in this paper we report the abundance pattern of light and heavy neutron - capture elements in hd  122563 . in  2 we present our near - uv spectroscopy with subaru / hds , while we describe in detail the abundance analysis of neutron - capture elements in  3 . our results are compared with the previous studies in  4 . we discuss the derived abundances of hd  122563 , and the source of neutron - capture elements in  5 . finally , our conclusions are presented in  6 . high dispersion spectroscopy of hd  122563 was carried out with the subaru telescope high dispersion spectrograph ( hds : * ? ? ? * ) in 30 april , 2004 . our spectrum covers the wavelength range from 3070 to 4780  with a resolving power of @xmath8 = 90,000 . the total exposure time is 5400 seconds ( one 600  s exposure plus four 1200  s ones ) . the reduction was carried out in a standard manner using the iraf echelle package . the signal to noise ratio ( s / n ) of the spectrum ( per 0.9 km s@xmath9 pixel ) estimated from the photon counts is 140 at 3100  ; 480 at 3500  ; 860 at 3900  ; 1080 at 4200  and 1340 at 4500  .    in order to measure ba lines at 5853   and 6141   , a spectrum obtained during the hds commissioning covering 5090  6410 was used . the s / n ratio of this spectrum is 350 at 6000   . we adopted the line list used in previous studies for line identifications and analyses of neutron - capture elements ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? in addition , the recent measurements of transition probabilities and hyperfine splitting reported for some elements ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) are incorporated . the line list used in the analysis is given in table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] . + equivalent widths of clean , isolated lines are measured by fitting gaussian profile . the results are given in table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] . for our quantitative abundance measurements , we used the analysis program sptool developed by y. takeda , based on kurucz s atlas9/width9 @xcite . sptool calculates synthetic spectra and equivalent widths of lines on the basis of the given model atmosphere , line data , and chemical composition , under the assumption of lte . we adopted the model atmosphere parameters ( effective temperature : @xmath10 , gravity : @xmath11 , micro - turbulent velocity : @xmath12 , and metallicity : [ fe / h ] ) derived by @xcite : @xmath10 = 4570 k , @xmath13 = 1.1 , @xmath12 = 2.2 km s@xmath9 , and [ fe / h ] @xmath14 . the estimated uncertainties are @xmath15 = 100 k , @xmath16 = 0.3 dex , @xmath17 = 0.5 km s@xmath9 , and @xmath18[fe / h ] = 0.19 dex ( honda et al . 2004 ) . the abundance analyses were attempted for 24 neutron - capture elements from sr to th . the effects of hyperfine and isotopic splitting are taken into account in the analysis of ba , la , eu , and yb ( see references in table 1 ) . the derived abundances are given in table [ tab : table2 ] . the abundances determined from individual lines are given in table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] . we used the solar system abundances obtained by @xcite to derive [ x / fe ] values . the size of the random errors are estimated from the standard deviation ( 1@xmath19 ) of the abundances derived from individual lines for elements that have three or more lines available for the abundance analysis . for the abundances of elements based only on one or two lines , we employ the mean of the random errors estimated from those elements with three or more lines available . the uncertainties of model atmosphere parameters result in systematic errors in the abundances of neutron - capture elements . the effects of these uncertainties on the abundance measurements are given in table [ tab : error ] . the behavior of the errors is slightly different for abundances derived from neutral species and those from ionized ones . this should be borne in mind in the discussion on the abundances of light neutron - capture elements , some of which were determined using lines of neutral species . by contrast , such differences do not significantly affect our discussion of the abundance ratios of heavy neutron - capture elements , which were all measured from ionized species . the details of the analysis for individual neutron - capture elements are presented below . for comparison purposes , the abundances of cu and zn were also determined . in addition to the cu 5105  and zn 4810  lines , the uv lines ( 3250 - 3350  ) are also used in the abundance analyses ( table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] ) .      although the abundances of sr , y , and zr have been determined by a number of previous studies for hd  122563 , measurements for other light neutron - capture elements are quite limited so far . we have newly detected 5 elements ( nb , mo , ru , pd , and ag ) in our spectrum , and derived an upper limit for a sixth element ( rh ) .    two strong lines of ( 4077 and 4215 ) and the weak line of ( 4607 ) were measured . the two resonance lines are so strong that the abundance derived from these lines is sensitive to the microturbulent velocity and treatment of damping . however , the agreement of the abundances derived from and ( see table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] ) suggests the reliability of our measurements .    two ( @xmath21 ) lines are detected . the detection of the 3163 line is reported only for canopus by @xcite and for the sun . this line would be useful for abundance analyses because of its strength ( figure [ fig : spectra ] ) . we note , however , that the abundance determined from this line is slightly higher ( by 0.25 dex ) than that from the 3215   line , possibly suggesting a small contamination by other spectral features . however , here we simply adopt the mean of the abundances derived from the two lines .    the ( @xmath22 ) 3864  line is detected in cs  22892 - 052 by @xcite . although a blend of a cn line is reported by these authors , that is not severe in hd  122563 , because the carbon abundance of this star is more than 1  dex lower than that of cs  22892052 . we have detected two lines of ( @xmath23 ) . the equivalent width of the 3498   line is measurable due to there being no ( apparent ) blend with other lines . since a strong line exists in the bluer region of the other line at 3728   , we applied the spectrum synthesis technique to the analysis of that line . the ( @xmath24 ) 3692   line exists in the wing of h i line , but is not detected in our spectrum . we determined only an upper limit on the abundance of this element . we have detected two lines of pd . the 3242   line blends with oh lines . the contamination was estimated using the oh line list of @xcite , adjusting the oxygen abundance to match the strengths of neighboring oh lines ( [ o / fe ] @xmath250.4 ) . the 3404   line is clearly detected with no severe blend ( figure [ fig : spectra ] ) . two lines have been measured in some metal - poor stars . the 3280   line is detected , while the 3383   line is not . since nh lines blend with the 3280   line @xcite , we included the nh lines adopted from @xcite in the spectrum synthesis , calibrating the n abundance to reproduce the nh features around the line ( [ n / fe]@xmath26 ) . we note that the n abundance adopted is much lower than those derived by previous works ( e.g.,[n / fe]@xmath7 * ? ? ? this discrepancy is partially due to the inaccurate gf - values used in our analysis . recent studies of n abundances based on nh lines applied corrections of gf - values to the kurucz s list ( e.g. , * ? ? ? in addition to the nh lines , some unidentified feature appears in the red part of this line ( figure [ fig : spectra ] ) . if such unknown lines also affect the line , the values derived from this line must be regarded as an upper limit on the ag abundance . the abundances of ba , la , eu , and yb were derived by a spectrum synthesis technique , taking into account hyperfine splitting . the abundances of other elements were determined by applying a single line approximation , which is justified by the fact that the absorption lines are quite weak in general . in addition to the two resonance lines at 4554 and 4934   , two ba lines in the red region were measured . the line data of @xcite were used for the analysis of ba lines , assuming the isotope ratios of r - process component in solar - system material . there is a small discrepancy between the ba abundances from the two resonance lines and others . a possible reason for this discrepancy is the non - lte effect ( e.g. , * ? ? ? however , we here simply adopt the average of the ba abundances from the four lines . we detected three lines at 3819   , 4129   and 4205   . however , the 4205   line blends with a line , while the 3819   one is affected by a wing component of a strong fe line at 3820   . since these eu lines are quite weak in the spectrum of hd  122563 , in contrast to those in r - process enhanced stars , the effect of the blending is significant . hence , we adopt the result from the 4129   . we note that the eu abundances derived from the excluded lines , within their relatively large errors , agree with the value from the 4129   line . the effect of isotope shift for gd lines was included in the analysis by @xcite for the s - process enhanced star cs  31062 - 050 . this effect is , however , neglected in the present analysis , because the gd lines of hd  122563 are very weak . we have detected three gd lines ( table [ tab : table1 - 4 ] ) . the gd abundance derived from the 3481  line is significantly higher than those from the other two , and an upper limit estimated from another line ( 3331   ) . we regard this as a result of contamination of the 3481   line by some unidentified lines , and exclude this line in the determination of the final gd abundance . yb is the heaviest element detected in our spectrum . we measured two yb lines at 3220 and 3694 . a spectrum synthesis technique was applied to the analysis including the effect of hyperfine splitting for these lines ( sneden et al . 2003 , private communication ) . agreement of the results from the two lines is fairly good . the upper limits of ir and th abundances are obtained from the analyses of 3800   and 4019   line . the line of 4019   is affected by contamination by other lines ( figure [ fig : th ] ) . we analyzed this line using the line list of @xcite for this wavelength region . we adopted @xmath28c/@xmath29c = 5 to estimated the blending of @xmath29ch lines . since the blends of fe and co lines are severe , no clear th feature is identified , although the quality of the spectrum is very high ( s / n = 950 at 4020   ) . we derived the upper limit of the th abundance ( log @xmath30 ( th ) @xmath31 ) from the fitting of synthetic spectra by eye . neutron - capture elements have been studied for this object by many authors . recently , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite performed detailed abundance analyses based on high resolution spectroscopy ( @xmath32 ) for this object . @xcite also determined the abundances of eight neutron - capture elements , though their resolving power ( @xmath33 ) is not as high as those in the above studies . recently , @xcite derived the abundances of ge , zr , la and eu from the uv region ( 2410 @xmath2 3070   ) of this object using hubble space telescope , and also uv - blue region ( 3150 @xmath2  4600   ) with keck i hires . figure [ fig : comp ] shows comparisons of the abundances of neutron - capture elements derived by the present analysis with those of previous work . our results are in good agreement with @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . however , the abundances of neutron - capture elements determined by the present analysis are systematically lower than those by @xcite and @xcite . here we inspect the discrepancy between the results of @xcite and ours in some detail , because their work determined abundances of a larger number of elements than @xcite , and they reported the equivalent widths used in the abundance analysis for some lines ( unfortunately , the equivalent widths were not given for the lines for which spectrum synthesis technique was applied ) . the atmospheric parameters adopted in our analysis are in good agreement with theirs : the differences ( our results minus those of @xcite ) of @xmath10 , @xmath13 , [ fe / h ] and @xmath12 are + 70  k , 0.2  dex , 0.07  dex and 0.3  km  s@xmath9 , respectively . these differences results in differences of abundances smaller than 0.1 dex for heavy neutron - capture elements ( see table [ tab : error ] ) . therefore , the difference of the adopted atmospheric parameters is not a reason for the abundance discrepancy . we also found good agreements in the equivalent widths of the lines reported by both works . however , the @xmath34 value of the nd 4061   line used by @xcite is lower by 0.25  dex than ours . though the @xmath34 values of la adopted by the two works are quite similar , no information on the treatment of the hyperfine splitting was given by @xcite , while the effect is fully included in our analysis . we adopted recent line data for @xcite and @xcite , which should be more accurate than those used by @xcite . thus , the discrepancy between the results of the two work might be partially explained by the difference of the adopted line data . however , there seems to exist small ( @xmath20.2  dex ) systematic differences , for which no clear reason is identified . we investigated a high quality uv - blue spectrum of hd  122563 , and have detected 19 neutron - capture elements including nb , mo , ru , pd , ag , pr , and sm , which are detected for the first time by our study for this object , and upper - limits for 5 elements including th . the derived abundances are given in table [ tab : table2 ] . in this section , we discuss the abundance pattern of the neutron - capture elements , along with cu and zn , to investigate the origin of neutron - capture elements in this object . the abundance ratio between ba ( or la ) and eu is used as an indicator of the origin of neutron - capture elements . the value of [ ba / eu ] of the solar system r - process component is 0.81 , while that of the s - process component is + 1.45 @xcite . the value of the [ ba / eu ] is 0.50 in hd  122563 . in addition , the value of [ la / eu ] of the solar system r - process component is 0.59 , while that in hd  122563 is 0.50 . these results indicate that the heavy ( @xmath35 @xmath36 56 ) neutron - capture elements of this object are principally associated with the r - process , and the contribution of the ( main ) s - process is small if any . we recall that this object is very metal - poor ( [ fe / h]@xmath37 ) with no excess of carbon ( [ c / fe]=@xmath38 ) . figure [ fig : r ] shows the abundance pattern of hd  122563 , comparing with that of the solar - system r - process component . the solar system r - process abundance pattern is scaled to the eu abundance of hd  122563 . this figure clearly shows that the abundances of light neutron - capture elements ( 38 @xmath1 z @xmath1 47 ) are much higher than those of heavy ones in hd  122563 , compared to the solar - system r - process pattern . this behavior is very different from that found in r - process enhanced stars ( e.g. cs  22892 - 052 , cs 31082 - 001 : * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although we indicated above that the heavy neutron - capture elements are principally associated with the r - process , figure [ fig : r ] indicates that even in the range 56 @xmath39 @xmath35 @xmath39 59 the abundances in hd  122563 exceed those of the scaled solar r - process , with only la falling on the eu - normalised curve . this suggests that the tendency for the light neutron - capture elements ( 38 @xmath1 @xmath35 @xmath1 47 ) to fall above the scaled solar r - process curve is part of a general , atomic - number dependent , trend .    in order to demonstrate this behavior more clearly , figure [ fig : f7 ] shows the logarithmic difference of the abundances of this object from the solar system r - process pattern as a function of atomic number . we also show that of the r - process enhanced star cs  22892 - 052 @xcite in the same way . we find good agreement between the abundance pattern of cs  22892 - 052 and the solar - system r - process one , at least for elements with 56@xmath40 . by way of contrast , our new measurements for hd  122563 clearly demonstrate a quite different abundance pattern from that of the solar - system r - process component and of cs  22892052 . the excess of light neutron - capture elements ( e.g. sr ) with respect to the heavy ones ( e.g. ba ) was known for hd  122563 by previous studies ( see section 1 ) . however , the abundances of elements having intermediate mass ( e.g. mo , pd ) were measured in detail for the first time by the present work . the abundances of these elements are intermediate , and , hence , the abundances of neutron - capture elements gradually and continuously decrease with increasing atomic number from @xmath41 to @xmath42 . this trend is a key to investigating the nucleosynthesis process that is responsible for neutron - capture elements in this object .    for comparison purposes , we also attempted to compare the abundances of hd  122563 with the solar system s - process distribution ( figure [ fig : s ] ) . in this case , ba , la , ce , and eu show large deviations from the solar system s - process curve , although the overall abundance pattern from sr to yb seems to be similar . since the s - process abundance pattern in the solar - system is a result of a combination of some individual processes ( at least the weak and main components of the s - process ) , we presume this apparent `` agreement '' is physically not important . we also have detected four neutron - capture elements heavier than eu ( gd , dy , er , yb : @xmath43 64 ) . the abundances of these elements also show a decreasing trend as a function of atomic number , with respect to the solar - system r - process pattern . this also has an impact on the understanding of the origin of neutron - capture elements in this object . th is a radioactive element and is synthesized only by the r - process . the upper limit of the th abundance determined by the present work indicated that this object does not show an excess of th with respect to eu ( and other heavy neutron - capture elements ) , compared to most r - process enhanced stars . the cu and zn abundances of hd  122563 are typical values found in very metal - poor stars ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? that is , no clear difference is found in the abundances of these elements between the stars having high and low abundances of light neutron - capture elements . this result may give a hint for the origins of cu and zn , as well as of light neutron - capture elements , which are still unclear . here we consider the origin of neutron - capture elements in this object based on the abundance pattern determined by the present work . the abundance ratios between light and heavy neutron - capture elements ( e.g. , sr / ba ) in hd  122563 are clearly different from those in r - process enhanced stars , as already mentioned in  1 . therefore , the r - process responsible for the heavy neutron - capture elements in the solar system ( the so - called `` main '' r - process ) is not an important source of , at least , light neutron - capture elements in hd  122563 . the main s - process is also excluded from the possible source of light neutron - capture elements , because that yields even lower abundance ratios between light and heavy neutron - capture elements at low metallicity ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the weak component of the s - process was introduced to interpret the light s - process nuclei in the solar system . however , the gradually decreasing trend of elemental abundances from sr to ba found in hd  122563 does not resemble that of the weak s - process , which predicts a rapid drop of abundances at @xmath44 ( i.e. y or zr ) . it should be noted in addition that the weak s - process is expected to be inefficient at low metallicity , because of the lack of the neutron source @xmath45ne ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) in addition to the lack of iron seeds . thus , another process that has efficiently yielded light neutron - capture elements at low metallicity is required to explain the abundance pattern of neutron - capture elements in hd  122563 . the presence of such a process has been indicated by recent observational studies of metal - deficient stars with no excess of heavy neutron - capture elements ( * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . this process was called the `` light element primary process '' ( lepp ) by @xcite , who estimated its contribution to the solar abundances . @xcite have shown that such light r - process nuclei ( up to @xmath46 ) are produced in neutrino winds as a result of  weak " ( or failed ) r - processing ( see also * ? ? ? it is likely , therefore , that these light neutron - capture elements originate from the core - collapse supernovae , although a contribution from other sources can not be excluded . the abundance pattern of light to heavy neutron - capture elements measured for hd  122563 provides a unique constraint on such model calculations . the abundance pattern of heavy neutron - capture elements of hd  122563 shows a significant departure from the r - process component in solar - system material , though the departure is not as large as that found for light neutron - capture elements ( figure [ fig : r ] ) . figure [ fig : r+s ] shows a comparison between the abundances of elements with @xmath47 measured for hd  122563 ( filled circles ) and the solar - system r - process abundance pattern @xcite , which is scaled to achieve the best fit to the observed data ( the solid line ) . ( recall that the scaling in figure  [ fig : r ] was to eu . ) significant disagreements are found for ce and pr , as well as for dy , er and yb . given the fact that the abundance patterns of heavy elements measured for r - process enhanced stars show excellent agreement with that of the solar - system , the different abundance pattern of hd  122563 must be significant . some process that produces a different abundance pattern of heavy neutron - capture elements from that of the main r - process is at least required to explain the abundance pattern of this star . one possibility is to assume a small contribution of the ( main ) s - process . in order to examine this possibility , we adopted the r - process and s - process abundance patterns in the solar - system as determined by @xcite , and searched for the combination that gives the best fit to the abundance pattern of hd  122563 . the result is shown by the dashed line in figure [ fig : r+s ] . in this case , the contributions of the s - process to ba , la , and ce are significant ( @xmath2 70% ) , while those to elements heavier than nd are small ( @xmath48 10% ) . it should be noted that such a small contribution of the main s - process does not affect the abundance pattern of light neutron - capture elements discussed in the previous subsection . the root - mean - square ( rms ) of the logarithmic abundance difference between the observed and calculated abundance patterns is 0.29  dex for the case that a contribution from the s - process is introduced , compared with 0.34  dex if only the r - process is assumed . thus , the fit is slightly better if an s - process contribution is introduced . however , the improved fit comes at the cost of an additional free parameter ( the relative contribution of the s- and r - processes ) , and it is not clear that assuming an s - process contribution is justifiable from the point of view of the star s nucleosynthetic history . in particular , the discrepancy found in the abundance pattern of elements heavier than sm can not be explained by this approach , because the production of such heavy elements by the s - process is very small . this discrepancy leads us to consider an alternative possibility that the heavy neutron - capture elements of this star are also a result of the unidentified ( single ) process that is responsible for the large enhancement of the light neutron - capture elements discussed in   5.2.1 . @xcite have suggested that the small ( but non - negligible ) amount of heavy r - process nuclei ( @xmath49 ) with non solar r - process abundance pattern can be produced in neutrino winds if the entropy of the neutrino - heated matter is enough high ( but smaller than that required for the main r - process ) , in addition to the light r - process nuclei . if this is true , the abundance pattern of heavy neutron - capture elements in this object may give another hint for , or constraint on , the modeling of this process . the differences between the abundance patterns of heavy neutron - capture elements in hd  122563 and the solar - system r - process abundance pattern are not large . further observational data are clearly required to derive definitive conclusions . however , it would be very difficult to improve the measurement of abundances for hd  122563 , because the quality of the spectrum used in the present work is extremely high . one possibility is to reconsider the atomic line data to reduce the uncertainties in abundance measurements . another important observational study is to apply similar analysis to other metal - poor stars having high abundance ratios of light to heavy neutron - capture elements . in particular , measurements for stars with lower metallicity than hd  122563 are important , because no s - process contribution is expected for such stars . we obtained a high resolution , high s / n uv - blue spectrum of the very metal - poor star hd  122563 with subaru / hds . the abundances were measured for 19 neutron - capture elements , among which seven elements are detected for the first time in this star . our new measurements for hd  122563 clearly demonstrate that the elemental abundances gradually decrease relative to the scaled solar r - process abundances with increasing atomic number , at least from sr to yb . we have considered whether the higher abundances of lighter elements can be explained by contributions from the weak s- or main s - processes , and find these not to provide satisfactory explanations . the abundance pattern of elements with @xmath50 does not agree with any prediction of neutron - capture process models known . the abundance pattern of a wide range of neutron - capture elements determined for hd  122563 therefore provides new strong constraints on models of nucleosynthesis for very metal - poor stars , in particular those with excesses of light neutron - capture elements but without enhancement of heavy ones . this work was supported in part by a grant - in - aid for the japan - france integrated action program ( sakura ) , awarded by the japan society for the promotion of science , and scientific research ( 17740108 ) from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science , and technology of japan . most of the data reduction was carried out at the astronomical data analysis center ( adac ) of the national astronomical observatory of japan . aoki , w. , et al . 2002 , apj , 580 , 1149 aoki , w. , et al . 2005 , apj , 632 , 611 asplund , m. , grevesse , n. , & sauval , a. j. 2005 , in asp conf . 336 , cosmic abundances as records of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis , ed . t. g. barnes iii & f. n. bash ( san francisco : asp ) , 25 asplund , m. 2005 , ara&a , 43 , 481 burris , d. l. , pilachowski , c. a. , armandroff , t. e. , sneden , c. , cowan , j. j. , & roe , h 2000 , apj , 544 , 302 busso , m. , gallino , r. , & wasserburg , g. j. 1999 , ara&a , 37 , 239 cameron , a. g. w. 2001 , apj , 562 , 456 cayrel , r , et al . 2004 , a&a , 416 , 1117 cowan , j. j. , et al . 2002 , apj , 572 , 861 cowan , j. j. , et al . 2005 , apj , 627 , 238 den hartog , e. a. , lawler , j. e. , sneden , c. & cowan , j. j. 2003 , apjs , 148 , 543 ecuvillon , a. , israelian , g. , santos , n. c. , mayor , m. , garcia lopez , r. j. , & randich , s. 2004 , a&a , 418 , 703 freiburghaus , c. , rosswog , s. , & thielemann , f. -k . 1999 , , 525 , l121 hill , v. , et al . 2002 , a&a , 387 , 560 honda , s. , et al . 2004 , apj , 607 , 474 ishimaru , y. & wanajo , s. 1999 , , 511 , l33 ishimaru , y. , wanajo , s. , aoki , w. , & ryan , s. g. 2004 , , 600 , l47 johnson , j. a. & bolte , m. 2001 , apj , 554 , 888 johnson , j. a. 2002 , apjs , 139 , 219 johnson , j. a. & bolte , m. 2002 , apj , 579 , 616 johnson , j. a. & bolte , m. 2004 , apj , 605 , 462 kurucz , r. l. , & bell . b 1995 , kurucz cd - rom , no.23 ( harvard - smithsonian center for astrophysics ) kurucz , r. l. 1993 , kurucz cd - rom , no.13 ( harvard - smithsonian center for astrophysics ) lawler , j. e. , sneden , c. , & cowan , j. j. , 2004 , apj , 604 , 850 lawler , j. e. , bonvallet , g. , & sneden , c. 2001a , apj , 556 , 452 lawler , j. e. , wickliffe , m. e. , den hartog , e. a. , & sneden , c. 2001b , apj , 563 , 1075 mcwilliam , a , preston , g. w. , sneden , c , & searle , l 1995 , aj , 109 , 27 mcwilliam , a 1998 , aj , 115 , 1640 noguchi , k.,et al . 2002 , pasj , 54 , 855 prantzos , n. , hashimoto , m. , & nomoto , k. 1990 , a&a , 234 , 211 sneden , c. , mcwilliam , a. , preston , g. w. , cowan , j. j. , burris , d. l. , & armosky , b. j. 1996 , apj , 467 , 819 sneden , c , cowan , j. j. , ivans , i. i. , fuller , g. m. , burles , s , beers , t. c. , & lawler , j. e. 2000 , apj , 533l , 139 sneden , c. , et al . 2003 , apj , 591 , 936 sumiyoshi , k. , et al . 2001 , apj , 562 , 880 surman , r. , mclaughlin , g. c. , & hix , w. r. 2005 , submitted to ( astro - ph/0509365 ) raiteri , c. m. , gallino , r. , busso , m. , neuberger , d. , & kappeler , f. 1993 , apj , 419 , 207 reynolds , s. e. , hearnshaw , j. b. , & cottrell , p. l. 1988 , mnras , 235 , 1423 rosswog , s. , liebendorfer , m. , thielemann , f .- k . , davies , m. b. , benz , w. , & piran , t. 1999 , a&a , 341 , 499 travaglio et al . 2004 , apj , 114 , 1293 truran , j. w. , cowan , j. j. , pilachowski , c. a. , & sneden , c. 2002 , pasp , 114 , 1293 wanajo , s. , kajino , t. , mathews , g. j. , & otsuki , k. 2001 , , 554 , 578 wanajo , s. , tamamura , m. , itoh , n. , nomoto , k. , ishimaru , y. , beers , t. c. , & nozawa , s. 2003 , apj , 593,968 wanajo , s. & ishimaru , i. 2005 , , in press westin , j. , sneden , c. , gustafsson , b. , & cowan , j. j. 2000 , apj , 530 , 783 woosley , s. e. , wilson , j. r. , mathews , g. j. , hoffman , r. d. , & meyer , b. s. 1994 , , 433 , 229    lcccccc wavelength & l.e.p.(ev ) & log@xmath34 & log@xmath30 & _ w_(m ) & ref + , @xmath51 & & & & & + 3247.53 & 0.000 & 0.060 & 1.04 & 115.1 * & 8 + 3273.95 & 0.000 & 0.360 & 1.24 & 112.3 & 8 + 5105.55 & 1.390 & 1.520 & 0.66 & 3.3 & 2 + , @xmath52 & & & & & + 3302.98 & 4.030 & 0.057 & 2.07 & 20.3 * & 1 + 3345.02 & 4.078 & 0.246 & 1.78 & 19.5 * & 1 + 4722.15 & 4.030 & 0.390 & 2.09 & 14.5 & 5 + 4810.54 & 4.080 & 0.170 & 2.10 & 20.5 & 5 + , @xmath41 & & & & & + 4607.33 & 0.000 & 0.280 & 0.14 & 2.4 & 7 + , @xmath41 & & & & & + 4077.71 & 0.000 & 0.170 & 0.18 & 163.3 & 6 + 4215.52 & 0.000 & 0.170 & 0.03 & 155.6 & 6 + , @xmath53 & & & & & + 3327.88 & 0.410 & 0.130 & 0.98 & 49.3 * & 8 + 3549.01 & 0.130 & 0.280 & 0.97 & 49.0 & 7 + 3584.52 & 0.100 & 0.410 & 0.98 & 44.1 * & 10 + 3600.74 & 0.180 & 0.280 & 1.06 & 68.2 & 7 + 3611.04 & 0.130 & 0.010 & 1.06 & 59.0 & 7 + 3628.70 & 0.130 & 0.710 & 0.90 & 31.8 & 10 + 3710.29 & 0.180 & 0.460 & 0.98 & 82.3 & 10 + 3747.55 & 0.100 & 0.910 & 0.98 & 22.8 & 7 + 3774.33 & 0.130 & 0.210 & 0.91 & 79.0 & 6 + 3788.70 & 0.100 & 0.070 & 0.95 & 66.6 & 6 + 3818.34 & 0.130 & 0.980 & 0.74 & 29.4 & 6 + 3950.36 & 0.100 & 0.490 & 0.94 & 47.4 & 6 + 4398.01 & 0.130 & 1.000 & 0.82 & 28.0 & 6 + 4883.69 & 1.080 & 0.070 & 0.82 & 25.0 & 6 + 5087.43 & 1.080 & 0.170 & 0.91 & 13.8 & 6 + , @xmath54 & & & & & + 3438.23 & 0.090 & 0.420 & 0.57 & 76.8 * & 7 + 3457.56 & 0.560 & 0.530 & 0.17 & 27.3 & 7 + 3479.02 & 0.530 & 0.690 & 0.34 & 16.7 & 7 + 3479.39 & 0.710 & 0.170 & 0.40 & 40.2 * & 7 + 3499.58 & 0.410 & 0.810 & 0.48 & 13.6 * & 7 + 3505.67 & 0.160 & 0.360 & 0.42 & 47.0 * & 7 + 3536.94 & 0.360 & 1.310 & 0.33 & 7.6 * & 7 + 3551.96 & 0.090 & 0.310 & 0.35 & 57.3 * & 8 + 3573.08 & 0.320 & 1.040 & 0.26 & 16.4 & 7 + 3578.23 & 1.220 & 0.610 & 0.29 & 3.8 * & 7 + 3630.02 & 0.360 & 1.110 & 0.28 & 12.8 & 7 + 3714.78 & 0.530 & 0.930 & 0.25 & 13.6 & 7 + 3836.77 & 0.560 & 0.060 & 0.31 & 47.3 & 6 + 3998.97 & 0.560 & 0.670 & 0.07 & 36.1 & 7 + 4050.33 & 0.710 & 1.000 & 0.09 & 11.0 & 7 + 4208.98 & 0.710 & 0.460 & 0.16 & 27.1 & 6 + 4317.32 & 0.710 & 1.380 & 0.08 & 5.3 & 6 + , @xmath21 & & & & & + 3163.40 & 0.376 & 0.260 & 1.30 & 24.2 * & 1 + 3215.59 & 0.440 & 0.190 & 1.65 & 4.5 * & 6 + , @xmath22 & & & & & + 3864.10 & 0.000 & 0.010 & 0.87 & 3.3 & 8 + , @xmath23 & & & & & + 3498.94 & 0.000 & 0.310 & 0.90 & 4.1 & 6 + 3728.03 & 0.000 & 0.270 & 0.82 & 4.7 * & 6 + , @xmath24 & & & & & + 3692.36 & 0.000 & 0.174 & @xmath48 - 1.20 & syn & 6 + , @xmath55 & & & & & + 3404.58 & 0.810 & 0.320 & 1.31 & 6.7 * & 6 + , @xmath56 & & & & & + 3280.68 & 0.000 & 0.050 & 1.88 & 6.5 * & 6 + , @xmath42 & & & & & + 4554.04 & 0.000 & 0.170 & 1.76 & 95.4 * & 6 + 4934.10 & 0.000 & 0.150 & 1.76 & 82.2 * & 6 + 5853.70 & 0.604 & 1.010 & 1.54 & 8.5 * & 6 + 6141.70 & 0.704 & 0.070 & 1.55 & 40.6 * & 6 + @xmath57 & & & & & + 3794.77 & 0.240 & 0.210 & 2.35 & 5.9 * & 7 + 3988.52 & 0.400 & 0.210 & 2.75 & 1.7 * & 4 + 3995.75 & 0.170 & 0.060 & 2.65 & 2.1 * & 4 + 4086.71 & 0.000 & 0.070 & 2.53 & 4.6 * & 4 + 4123.23 & 0.320 & 0.130 & 2.70 & 2.0 * & 4 + @xmath58 & & & & & + 4222.60 & 0.120 & 0.180 & 1.90 & 2.0 * & 6 + 4523.08 & 0.520 & 0.080 & 1.62 & 1.6 * & 10 + 4539.78 & 0.330 & 0.080 & 2.03 & 1.1 & 10 + 4562.37 & 0.480 & 0.190 & 2.01 & 1.4 & 10 + 4572.28 & 0.680 & 0.290 & 1.98 & 1.1 * & 8 + @xmath59 & & & & & + 4179.40 & 0.200 & 0.480 & 2.15 & 7.8 * & 7 + 4189.48 & 0.370 & 0.380 & @xmath48 - 2.15 & & 8 + @xmath60 & & & & & + 3784.25 & 0.380 & 0.150 & 2.14 & 2.0 & 9 + 3826.42 & 0.064 & 0.410 & 2.00 & 2.0 * & 9 + 4061.08 & 0.471 & 0.550 & 2.00 & 5.5 & 9 + 4232.38 & 0.064 & 0.470 & 1.89 & 2.3 * & 9 + @xmath61 & & & & & + 4318.94 & 0.280 & 0.270 & 2.16 & 1.8 * & 7 + 4642.23 & 0.380 & 0.520 & 2.16 & 0.8 & 7 + @xmath62 & & & & & + 3819.67 & 0.000 & 0.510 & 2.95 & syn & 5 + 4129.70 & 0.000 & 0.220 & 2.77 & 9.0 * & 5 + 4205.05 & 0.000 & 0.210 & 2.92 & syn & 5 + @xmath63 & & & & & + 3331.40 & 0.000 & 0.140 & @xmath48 - 2.15 & syn & 7 + 3481.80 & 0.490 & 0.230 & 1.79 & 4.0 * & 7 + 3549.37 & 0.240 & 0.260 & 2.40 & 2.1 & 7 + 3768.40 & 0.080 & 0.360 & 2.48 & 3.8 * & 7 + @xmath64 & & & & & + 3460.97 & 0.000 & 0.070 & 2.42 & 3.2 * & 7 + 3531.71 & 0.000 & 0.770 & 2.81 & 8.3 * & 8 + @xmath65 & & & & & + 3398.94 & 0.000 & 0.410 & @xmath48 - 2.00 & syn & 11 + @xmath66 & & & & & + 3499.10 & 0.060 & 0.136 & 2.75 & 2.7 & 10 + 3692.65 & 0.050 & 0.138 & 2.57 & 4.5 * & 6 + @xmath67 & & & & & + 3701.36 & 0.000 & 0.540 & @xmath483.00 & syn & 8 + @xmath68 & & & & & + 3289.37 & 0.000 & 0.020 & 2.70 & 27.5 * & 8 + 3694.19 & 0.000 & 0.300 & 2.86 & 13.3 * & 8 + @xmath69 & & & & & + 3220.76 & 0.350 & 0.510 & @xmath48 - 1.12 & syn & 7 + 3800.12 & 0.000 & 1.450 & @xmath48 - 1.60 & syn & 7 + @xmath70 & & & & & + 4019.12 & 0.000 & 0.270 & @xmath483.05 & syn & 7 +    lccccc species & _ z _ & log@xmath30 & @xmath19 & [ x / fe ] & n + cu & 29 & 0.98 & 0.29 & 1.15 & 3 + zn & 30 & 2.01 & 0.16 & + 0.18 & 4 + sr & 38 & 0.11 & 0.08 & 0.26 & 3 + y & 39 & 0.93 & 0.09 & 0.37 & 15 + zr & 40 & 0.28 & 0.16 & 0.10 & 17 + nb & 41 & 1.48 & 0.17 & 0.13 & 2 + mo & 42 & 0.87 & 0.17 & 0.02 & 1 + ru & 44 & 0.86 & 0.17 & + 0.07 & 2 + rh & 45 & @xmath481.20 & & @xmath48 + 0.45 & 1 + pd & 46 & 1.36 & 0.17 & 0.28 & 2 + ag & 47 & 1.88 & 0.17 & 0.05 & 1 + ba & 56 & 1.62 & 0.12 & 1.02 & 4 + la & 57 & 2.66 & 0.10 & 1.02 & 5 + ce & 58 & 1.83 & 0.18 & 0.64 & 6 + pr & 59 & 2.15 & 0.17 & 0.09 & 1 + nd & 60 & 2.01 & 0.10 & 0.69 & 4 + sm & 62 & 2.16 & 0.17 & 0.40 & 2 + eu & 63 & 2.77 & 0.17 & 0.52 & 1 + gd & 64 & 2.44 & 0.17 & 0.76 & 2 + dy & 66 & 2.62 & 0.17 & 0.99 & 2 + ho & 67 & @xmath482.00 & & @xmath48 + 0.26 & 1 + er & 68 & 2.66 & 0.17 & 0.82 & 2 + tm & 69 & @xmath483.00 & & @xmath480.23 & 1 + yb & 70 & 2.78 & 0.17 & 1.09 & 2 + ir & 77 & @xmath481.60 & & @xmath480.21 & 2 + th & 90 & @xmath483.05 & & @xmath480.34 & 1 +    lccccccccccc species & & & & & & & + & @xmath71 & @xmath72 & & @xmath73 & @xmath74 & & @xmath75 & @xmath76 & & @xmath76 & @xmath75 + & @xmath770.22 & @xmath780.17 & & @xmath780.06 & @xmath770.07 & & @xmath770.15 & @xmath780.06 & & @xmath780.23 & @xmath770.26 + & @xmath770.05 & @xmath780.04 & & @xmath770.05 & @xmath780.04 & & 0.00 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 + & @xmath770.13 & @xmath780.12 & & @xmath780.02 & @xmath770.03 & & @xmath770.04 & 0.00 & & @xmath780.01 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.12 & @xmath780.11 & & @xmath770.05 & @xmath780.03 & & @xmath770.03 & @xmath780.05 & & @xmath780.31 & @xmath770.39 + & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath780.02 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath780.16 & @xmath770.09 + & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.08 & @xmath770.05 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath780.04 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 + & @xmath770.19 & @xmath780.17 & & @xmath780.02 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath770.03 & @xmath780.00 & & @xmath780.00 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.20 & @xmath780.17 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath770.04 & @xmath780.00 & & @xmath780.01 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.20 & @xmath780.17 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.03 & & @xmath770.04 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.01 + & @xmath770.21 & @xmath780.17 & & @xmath780.00 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath770.04 & @xmath780.00 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.01 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.01 & & @xmath780.08 & @xmath770.06 + & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & @xmath770.00 + & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath780.02 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.01 + & @xmath770.08 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath780.04 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.07 & & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & @xmath780.00 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath780.04 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & @xmath770.00 + & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath770.11 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.00 & 0.00 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath780.05 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.01 & @xmath770.01 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.09 & & @xmath780.04 & @xmath770.03 & & @xmath780.00 & @xmath780.00 + & @xmath770.09 & @xmath780.08 & & @xmath770.10 & @xmath780.10 & & @xmath780.04 & @xmath770.02 & & @xmath780.03 & @xmath770.02 +
Abstract:

Answer: we obtained high resolution , high s / n spectroscopy for the very metal - poor star hd  122563 with the subaru telescope high dispersion spectrograph . previous studies have shown that this object has excesses of light neutron - capture elements , while its abundances of heavy ones are very low . in our spectrum covering 3070  4780    of this object , 19 neutron - capture elements have been detected , including seven for the first time in this star ( nb , mo , ru , pd , ag , pr , and sm ) . upper limits are given for five other elements including th . the abundance pattern shows a gradually decreasing trend , as a function of atomic number , from sr to yb , which is quite different from those in stars with excesses of r - process elements . this abundance pattern of neutron - capture elements provides new strong constraints on the models of nucleosynthesis responsible for the very metal - poor stars with excesses of light neutron - capture elements but without enhancement of heavy ones .