Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: in the course of a nova eruption , a significant amount of material ( @xmath2  m@xmath3 ) is ejected , which can form a visible shell around the system . observation of this shell can lead to accurate distances to the novae via the expansion parallax method . for this reason , searches for nova shells have been undertaken by various groups ( e.g. @xcite , @xcite ) . with the distance in hand , one can then determine the luminosity of the system at maximum light , which can be used to calibrate the maximum magnitude - rate of decline relation . use of this relation can allow for determinations of the distance to objects such as the virgo cluster @xcite . when we embarked on a survey of nova remnants with small telescopes to measure nova shell line fluxes , we did not expect to make a contribution to the study of nova shell morphology and the nova luminosity calibration . nevertheless , the results ( including the discovery of 4 previously undetected shells ) , combined with data collected at larger earthbound telescopes and with _ hubble space telescope _ , encouraged us to attempt a derivation of nova distances and luminosities at maximum and minimum . we constructed maximum magnitude - rate of decline relations , based on the standard light curve parameters @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 , and also studied the distribution of minimum magnitudes .    the use of novae as distance indicators poses more problems than that of other methods based on variable stars . while novae are brighter than pulsating variables , their light curve characteristics require a monitoring with high time resolution ( a day or better ) , and the determination of the decline rate requires close monitoring until a given object declines by two or three magnitudes . the nova luminosity calibration might be done on a purely photometric basis , using ( unreddened ) novae in extragalactic systems ( m31 , magellanic clouds ) . however , we would need to tie the novae into the distance ladder by pulsating variables or binaries , thus introducing possible systematic errors of the distance scale . the other approach is the expansion parallax method , which combines the angular expansion rate ( observed several years or decades after outburst ) with radial velocity observations during outburst or at later stages . this approach is also open to systematic errors . well - observed novae give evidence that mass ejection is not spherical , and inclination effects play an important role . furthermore , the radial velocity of the shell of a given nova is often variable with time , even if we restrict ourselves to the observation of the `` principal system '' . high and low velocity material is present , the slower material sometimes shows signs of acceleration . similar problems arise in the determination of angular expansion rates , since the bright nebular structures are often immersed in a more extended fuzz . the more rapidly expanding shell becomes increasingly fainter ( a phenomenon which is also seen in the ` sharpening ' of the nebular emission line profiles in nova spectra in the course of the outburst ) , making the measurement of the shell size more difficult . if we restrict ourselves to the spectral emission line maxima and brightest features in the resolved shells , we still encounter a major problem , since these condensations are often arranged in an inclined `` equatorial ring '' . a combination of both methods is the derivation of the form of the maximum magnitude - rate of decline ( mmrd ) calibration from an extragalactic sample , while determining its zero point calibration using galactic novae . additional problems are the determination of the proper light maximum ( sometimes it is uncertain whether the observed maximum is the true maximum , especially when spectral observations in early stages are lacking ) and the amount of interstellar absorption ( most galactic novae are concentrated towards the galactic plane ) .    galactic novae with a well - covered maximum ( to obtain the rate of decline ) , uv observations at the nebular or minimum stage ( to derive the reddening from line ratios or the 2200   band ) , and a well - resolved shell ( to derive the kinematic characteristics ) , are extremely rare . only a handful of novae fulfill these criteria , and a luminosity calibration based on small number statistics may suffer from systematic effects , such as the effect of white dwarf masses or chemical composition on the luminosity . thus we tried to use all novae for which expansion parallax data are available , by making at some points `` educated guesses '' or using `` brute averaging '' . this certainly puts a lot of arbitrariness in the calibration , but we hope that this fairly extensive data base , which will not be augmented considerably for a long time , gives a reasonable insight in the present state of the art of novae as distance calibrators , if one deals with available , and not ideal , samples . the observations were obtained on 1998  march  21 - 23 with dutch 0.9 m telescope at the eso la silla observatory , using a tek tk512cb chip ( @xmath7 pixels ) with a scale of @xmath8/pixel . further observations were obtained at the kitt peak national observatory on 1998  may  28 - june  1 with the 2.1 m telescope using the tek `` t1ka '' chip ( @xmath9 pixels with a scale of @xmath10/pixel ) and on 1998  june  30 with the 0.9 m telescope using the tek `` t2ka '' chip ( @xmath11 pixels with a scale of @xmath12/pixel ) . the data were obtained with narrow band filters centered at h@xmath0 ( 80  fwhm at eso , 36  at kpno ) and [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 ( 55  at eso , 31  at kpno ) , as well as off - band and _ ubvr _ filters ; see table  [ tbl-1 ] for details . the data were reduced in the standard manner . the search for shells was performed using two different techniques . first , a psf was generated for each image ( with the routines in daophot ) using , whenever possible , stars of comparable brightness to the nova . the psf was then subtracted from each star in the image , and the resultant image examined for evidence of extended emission ( i.e. residual flux ) around both the nova and nearby stars ( as a control sample ) . in almost every case , this technique was definitive . the second method was to perform a radial profile fit of the nova and several stars of comparable magnitude . the fits were compared to determine if the nova had a broader profile . when a shell was detected , a contour plot was generated from which the size of the shell was measured by determining the edge of the shell ( i.e. where the shell merged into the sky ) .    for shell sizes obtained from the literature , we note in table  [ tbl-2 ] the measurement technique ( direct image or radial profile ) used . radial profiles were quoted for only four objects . in two cases ( rw  umi and v351  pup ) , the two techniques yielded consistent answers , while in the remaining two cases ( pw  vul and qu  vul ) , the radial profile values were considerably smaller than the direct image values . to maintain as consistent a dataset as possible , these discrepant radial profile values were not used in our analysis . we have detected shells around 10 objects , and in table  [ tbl-2 ] we present the measured diameters from our data , as well as summarize the previous measurements from the literature . we have obtained data on another 5 objects in which we fail to detect a shell , but for which a shell has been reported in the literature or can be seen in wfpc2 data . since different measurement techniques can produce different results , we include in the table a code indicating the measurement technique used ( radial profile fit or direct image ) ; @xmath13 of the measurements are from direct images where the shell is clearly resolved . for the radial profile fits , a correction for the psf has been made , while for the direct images , not such correction was made . we have not corrected our measurements of direct images for geometric effects caused by the ellipticity of the shell ( see below ) .    in the following sections 4 and 5 , we present the results of our new observations ( shell sizes , expansion rates ) , and derive distances and luminosities ; we include the supporting data necessary for these derivations ( i.e. interstellar extinction , light curve parameters ) . nebular expansion parallaxes are a fundamental method for determining the distances to novae if the three basic parameters  age , expansion velocity , and size  can be properly determined . while age can ( usually ) be determined accurately , size ( geometry ) and expansion velocity are less certain , and will dominate the uncertainty in the derived distance . to derive a luminosity furthermore requires an accurate light curve and a trustworthy reddening estimate . projected nova shells sometimes appear spherically symmetric , but in many cases are oval . furthermore , the densest gas clouds are often concentrated in a ring , which is inclined to the line of sight of the observer . thus , projection effects should be taken into account ( see @xcite ) . there is general agreement that if nova shells are non - spherical , they are prolate ellipsoids . from the shells of the slow novae t aur , dq her , bt mon , rr pic , and fh ser , whose inclinations can be estimated with some confidence , an average ellipticity @xmath14 is deduced ; if major diameters , or some average diameters are used ( as in our diameter and radial profile data ) , errors should on the average be within 10% of the true distance . other novae like gk per or v603 aql tend to have more spherical shells , or at least ` condensations ' arranged in a circular pattern . radial velocities show a very large dispersion , not only in the different `` spectral systems '' ( see , e.g. @xcite ) , but also for a given system . if a p cygni line profile is observed soon after outburst , the radial velocity of the absorption line is strongly influenced by the superimposed emission , but such radial velocities are the only information available for some objects . in the nebular stage , `` castellated '' emission line profiles are observed . they have broad wings that generally disappear at later phases . direct images of nova shells often show the associated condensations ( rings or blobs ) , surrounded by a faint fuzz , which originates in faster moving material ( as seen , e.g , deep images of nova shells in @xcite ) . for several objects in our survey , bright condensations are still close to the star and are easily resolved on hst images , while more extended faint fuzz shows up on images taken with earthbound telescopes . ideally , one should be able to associate maxima of emission lines with given condensations in the shell , i.e. one should have a clear idea about the geometry of the shell . however , the clumps most easily seen on direct images are those moving at right angles to the line of sight , and do not contribute to the width or `` castellation '' of the emission line . in most cases , spatial information of shell spectra , which is essential for reconstructing the shell geometry , is missing . if there was no deceleration of the expanding shell , then measurements at any age would suffice for an accurate distance measurement . however , depending on the neighboring environment , nova shells could suffer from deceleration . @xcite presented a method to approximate the temporal variation of the shell radius , which can be applied if observations at many epochs are available . as only hr  del and v603  aql have sufficient data for a deceleration determination , we have derived distances to all objects assuming no deceleration . our estimates are given in table  [ tbl-3 ] . the information needed to determine the absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath15 or 15 days after maximum @xmath16 , which is essential for the use of a nova as a `` standard candle '' , is :    \1 . a trustworthy apparent magnitude at maximum ( either a photoelectric @xmath17 , @xmath18 , visual ( @xmath19 ) or photographic ( pg ) magnitude ) , as well as a well - defined light curve . in all cases , original sources have been re - examined , and light curve parameters have been re - determined , rather than taken from data collections like @xcite . we prefer photoelectric @xmath18 magnitudes over visual @xmath19 magnitudes , and only quote photographic ( pg ) magnitudes if no other ones are available . the value of the interstellar reddening can be derived with sufficient accuracy from multi - wavelength observations of objects in decline ( e.g. from emission line ratios or the strength of the 2200     band ) , or from uv observations of old novae ( strength of the 2200    band ) . in cases where no such information was available , @xmath20 was determined by the help of the galactic extinction program of @xcite , which interpolates and averages data based on various studies of galactic extinction .    in addition , the determination of the absolute magnitude of postnovae requires a reliable magnitude in the minimum stage . we took @xmath18-magnitudes from our survey , as well as from @xcite and a forthcoming statistical study of postnova luminosities @xcite . in the following , absolute magnitudes of novae at maximum light are usually given only with an accuracy of @xmath21 , and at minimum with an accuracy of @xmath22 . calculations were often done with higher accuracy , and when corrections ( photographic to visual magnitudes , effects of accretion disc inclination ) were applied , the result was rounded to the same accuracy . cp  pup was a fast nova that reached a maximum of @xmath23 in november  1942 . visual and photographic light curves were published by @xcite and @xcite , from which we derive @xmath4 = 6 , @xmath24 days ( averaged over the visual and photographic curves ) , and @xmath25 , where @xmath4 is the time for a nova to decline 2 magnitudes from maximum , @xmath5 is the time to decline by 3 magnitudes , and @xmath6 is the magnitude 15 days after maximum .    the first reported detection of a shell was by zwicky ( see @xcite ) , who noted a diameter of @xmath26 in 1955 in red light . @xcite observed the shell in 1980 ( h@xmath0/[n  ii ] ) and found a diameter of 14 , while @xcite found the same shell size ( h@xmath0/[n  ii ] ) in 1981 . more recently , @xcite found a diameter of 20  ( h@xmath0/[n  ii ] ) in 1995 . a _ hubble space telescope _ image , obtained with the wfpc2 and f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter in 1995 ( program 6060 ) , shows the stellar remnant surrounded by a circle of bright knots of diameter @xmath27 ; the average surface brightness in the shell is @xmath28 . our h@xmath0 image ( figure  [ fig1 ] ) reveals about 11 blobs arranged in a circular shell @xmath29  in diameter ( average surface brightness is @xmath30 ) . the same arrangement is seen in our [ o  iii ] data ( average surface brightness of @xmath31 ) . the clumpiness seen in the 1980 and 1995 frames is still present . the expansion velocity ( @xmath32 ) for cp  pup has been determined by @xcite and @xcite , who derived a value of 1500  km / s shortly after outburst . spectra in the nebular stage @xcite show a profile consisting of 11 emission components , with a velocity spread between @xmath33 and + 570  km / s . similar results were obtained by @xcite ( @xmath34 and + 590  km / s ) . spectroscopy of the resolved blobs in the shell seen in the ground - based images yields a similar range in velocities @xcite . we have assumed a @xmath35 km / s , based on gratton s result . previous distances estimates ( @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) place cp  pup at distances of 1.5 , 1.6 and @xmath36  kpc , respectively , while @xcite give 0.85  kpc , by neglecting the shell geometry and assuming a much smaller expansion velocity . since this is a well - observed object , we will illustrate the uncertainties in the expansion rate that directly enters into the distance determination . we compare the ground - based deep h@xmath0 frame , obtained with the eso / mpia 2.2 m telescope in 1987 @xcite , the snapshot hst image of 1995 , and our h@xmath0 frame , obtained 1998 with the eso / dutch 0.92 m telescope . the expansion rate derived from the centers of the blobs that are arranged in the circular shell is 0.151 , 0.153 and 0.151 arcsec / year , respectively . in spite of the fact that the limiting magnitude and the seeing effects are very different for the three frames , the results are in good agreement . if the size outlined by the outer edges of the blobs is used , the expansion rates are 0.193 , 0.187 , and 0.178 ; furthermore , the 1987 image reaches to fainter surface magnitudes , and the extent of the `` faint fuzz '' leads to an expansion rate of @xmath37/yr . the hst exposure reveals that instead of eleven blobs , the shell consists of about 30 blobs with typical diameters of @xmath38 ( some are more extended and show special shapes ) the image also shows a symmetry axis that goes through several blobs which may be interpreted as `` polar blobs '' , while the remainder form an ring that is fragmented into @xmath39 20 single clouds . if the ring is circular , its ellipticity indicates an inclination of @xmath40 , and the blob - ring structure would form a prolate ellipsoid with @xmath41 . correspondingly , the radial velocities observed in high - resolution spectra a few years after outburst , assumed to form principally in the fragments of the ring , must be corrected for inclination . thus , while the measured radial velocity is @xmath42 km / s , the true @xmath43 km / s , and the distance , derived form the expansion rate of the blob centers ( along the major axis ) , is 1140 pc . if this distance and the expansion rate of the faint fuzz are used to calculate the radial velocity of the `` fast material '' , a value of 1415 km / s is derived , which is similar to that observed in the absorption lines in the spectrum of the nova observed shortly after maximum . such a dichotomy of fast and slow moving material , forming shells of different diameters , also occurs in pw vul , qu vul , v842 cen and v1974 cyg ( see below ) . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath45 . thus , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath46 , @xmath47 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath48 .    summing up , if the true expansion velocity is known , the use of `` outer edges '' would decrease the distance by 20% , the neglect of the inclination angle would decrease the distance by 32% , and a `` wrong '' expansion velocity of 1400 - 1500 km / s would increase the distance by @xmath49 . if these errors are taken to be typical ones , luminosities of objects for which details on shell structure and extent , inclination and radial velocity are not known , may suffer errors of up to @xmath50 . ct  ser was discovered well past maximum light in early 1948 , and was monitored intensely during decline . the nova was observed again by @xcite , who report a typical cv spectrum containing balmer and he  ii  @xmath14686 emission . there have been no reports of a detection of a shell for this object . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig2 ] , clearly reveals a nearly circular shell in the psf - subtracted image with a diameter of @xmath51  in both directions ( with an average surface brightness of @xmath52 ) . the shell does not appear in the [ o  iii ] data ( with a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath54 ) . although they do not report on the existence of a shell , @xcite do provide @xmath55  km / s for ct ser . there are no previous distances estimates for ct  ser . based on the above expansion velocity , we derive a distance of 1.4  kpc . according to the galactic extinction model of @xcite , the extinction is low ( @xmath56 ) , and is neglected here . the observed apparent maximum magnitude , @xmath57 , is likely @xmath58 below the true maximum . the observed absolute magnitude at maximum , @xmath59 , supports the assumption that ct ser was a slow nova discovered long after maximum . the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath60 . rw  umi was a slow nova at high galactic latitude with a large outburst amplitude . the photographic light curve by @xcite yields @xmath61 at maximum , @xmath62 days , @xmath63 days , and @xmath64 , although it is not certain that the true maximum was observed , since there is a gap of 16 days before the first positive observation , and there is no spectroscopic data taken during outburst . a marginally resolved shell was originally detected by @xcite with a diameter of @xmath65 . more recently , @xcite observed a diffuse shell with a diameter of @xmath66 , as well as two regions of nebulous emission unconnected to the shell . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig3 ] , fails to detect either the diffuse shell nor the two unconnected regions seen by @xcite ; the @xmath53 limiting surface brightness is @xmath67 . the shell is also not visible in our [ o  iii ] data to a limiting surface brightness of @xmath68 . a wfpc2 h@xmath0 image obtained about five months prior to our observations ( for details see @xcite  program 7386 ) also failed to detect the shell to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath69 . in the five years between the observations , it appears the shell has faded below the detection limit . @xcite estimated @xmath70  km / s . previous distance estimates place rw  umi at a distance of @xmath71  kpc ( @xcite estimated 5.6 kpc , @xcite @xmath72 kpc and @xcite @xmath73  kpc ) . we adopt the latter result . a value of @xmath74 is derived from the program of @xcite . with an apparent maximum magnitude @xmath75 ( which may not correspond to true outburst maximum ) , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath76 ( error from distance ) , @xmath77 , and the absolute magnitude at postoutburst minimum is @xmath78 . hr  del was an unusually slow nova with a well - observed outburst . the @xmath18 light curve compiled by @xcite yields @xmath79 , @xmath80 days , @xmath81 days , and @xmath82 . @xcite first obtained spatially resolved spectroscopy of the nebular shell , followed by a more detailed study by @xcite . @xcite obtained the first photograph of the resolved shell in [ o  iii ] , finding a oval remnant @xmath83 in size in 1981 . @xcite obtained ccd imaging in both [ o  iii ] and h@xmath0/[n  ii ] in 1992 , which revealed a ring - like structure of diameter @xmath84 in h@xmath0/[n  ii ] , and a bipolar structure of similar diameter in [ o  iii ] . the h@xmath0/[n  ii ] also revealed enhancements that lie at the same positions as the [ o  iii ] components , although whether this implies emission from the same material , or a simple line - of - sight alignment , is not clear . in 1993 , @xcite re - observed hr  del , revealing more extended emission ( @xmath85 ) than previously seen . a _ hubble space telescope _ image , obtained with the wfpc2 and f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter ( program 6770 ) , does not show the enhancements seen by @xcite , and has a smaller extent ( @xmath86 ) ; the average surface brightness is @xmath87 . our images , shown in figure  [ fig4 ] , are similar to that in @xcite , with h@xmath0 having a complete shell ( @xmath88 ) , and a surface brightness ranging from @xmath89 in the outer region to @xmath90 in the inner region . the [ o  iii ] image shows a bi - polar structure , with an average surface brightness of @xmath91 . the enhancements seen by @xcite in the h@xmath0/[n  ii ] image are not present in our image , and the emission in the 2 lines appear to be growing at slightly different rates ( i.e. the major axis in [ o  iii ] is @xmath92 ) .    the expansion velocity for hr  del was measured by @xcite ( 470  km / s ) , @xcite ( 540  km / s ) , @xcite ( 520  km / s ) , and @xcite ( 560  km / s ) . previous expansion parallax measurements ( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) yield a distance for hr  del of @xmath93  pc . distances based on other techniques ( e.g. interstellar lines , reddening , light curve decline ) yield comparable values of @xmath94  pc @xcite . based on an expansion velocity of 525  km / s ( similar to that used by the papers cited above ) , we derive a distance of 750  pc . note that we attempted to fit the hr  del data to derive the deceleration , but the best fit resulted in an acceleration of the shell . an acceleration is possible if there is a fast wind from the stellar remnant , and p  cygni profiles ( indicative of outflow ) have been detected in the spectrum of hr  del @xcite . the expansion rates for hr  del show significant variations , with the measurement of @xcite being the most discrepant . that observation was obtained with a similar filter and exposure time to our data , but with a telescope twice as large , and therefore goes much fainter . this can be seen by overlaying our data on the @xcite h@xmath0 image , which shows that our shell is slightly larger than the main emission in their image , and that we fail to detect their lowest ( @xmath95 ) contour . we adopt a distance of @xmath96  kpc . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath97 , and with an apparent maximum magnitude @xmath98 , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath99 , @xmath100 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath101 . v3888  sgr was discovered in late 1974 during its decline from observed maximum , which was rapid ( @xmath102 days according to @xcite ) . while some photometric @xcite and spectroscopic @xcite observations were obtained during decline , there have been no published observations of the object in quiescence . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig5 ] , shows a nearly complete shell of size @xmath103 ( with a surface brightness of @xmath104 ) ; the object is too faint to yield a reliable profile fit . radial velocity measurements made shortly after discovery gave an average @xmath32 of @xmath105  km / s @xcite . previous estimates place v3888  sgr at a distance of 3.5  kpc @xcite to @xmath106  kpc @xcite , based on photometric and spectroscopic evidence . our derived distance , based on a @xmath32 of 1300  km / s , is 2.5  kpc . the galactic extinction program of @xcite yields a value @xmath107 , however , @xcite argue for a value @xmath108 . the observed apparent maximum magnitude , @xmath109 , is likely @xmath110 below the true maximum , as indicated from the spectroscopic appearance of the nova . if @xmath111 is used , the observed absolute magnitude , @xmath112 would point at a slow nova with @xmath113 . in this case , the absolute magnitude at minimum , @xmath114 , appears to be unusually faint . if the second value , @xmath108 is used , the observed absolute magnitude , @xmath115 , yields an extrapolated maximum luminosity which assigns v3888 sgr to the group of fast novae ( an assumption that also entered the derivation of the reddening value of @xcite ) . the absolute magnitude at minimum , @xmath116 , would be in better agreement with other novae ( this result was also used in table  [ tbl-6 ] ) . thus , either the galactic extinction program underestimates the reddening value , or the exnova is indeed unusually faint ( e.g. the exnova lies in the period gap ) . nq  vul was a moderately fast nova that has been well - studied . the light curve is somewhat peculiar ( see the compilation by @xcite ) ; the delayed maximum of @xmath117 ( with a scatter of 0.25 ) is followed by a short , deep minimum , so that a derived @xmath4-time of 2.5 days is of no significance : if one disregards this fluctuation , @xmath118 days , @xmath119 days , and @xmath120 . observations by @xcite , obtained in 1993 , revealed a circular shell with an average diameter of @xmath121 , a knot at the northern end , and an inner shell with a diameter of @xmath122 . there is also evidence of a bar - like feature extending across the stellar remnant at a position angle of @xmath123 . a wfpc2 h@xmath0 image obtained in 1997 ( program 7386 ) did not detect the shell to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath124 . however , due to its extremely high resolution , wfpc2 is not efficient at detecting extended , diffuse objects , so the lack of detection is not unexpected . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig6 ] , reveals an almost circular shell of size @xmath125 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath126 . the northern extension seen by @xcite is detected , and while a bar - like structure is seen , comparison with field stars shows that it is an artifact of the psf subtraction . the shell does not appear in the [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 data to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath127 . the absorption lines of nq  vul were measured soon after outburst ( @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite ) , and a wide range of expansion velocities are given by these authors . @xcite noted the conspicuous high - velocity systems ; they derived for the principal spectrum an average value @xmath128 , for the diffuse enhanced @xmath129 , and for the orion spectrum @xmath130  km / s . the total half - width at zero intensity of the strong [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 and balmer lines is 1150 and 900 km / s , respectively . one year after outburst , @xcite observed a four - peaked structure with components at @xmath131 and @xmath132  km / s , and @xcite derived a @xmath32 of 705  km / s 5 - 6 years after outburst . as usual , the absorption lines have higher velocities than the emission lines , which may indicate a noticeable inclination of the principal part of the shell . the expansion velocity of @xcite may be an acceptable compromise between the absorption and emission velocities measured by @xcite . previous distances estimates place nq  vul at a distance of 1.7 kpc @xcite , 1.2  kpc @xcite and @xmath133  kpc @xcite . if we associate the inner shell of @xcite with the slowly expanding material observed by @xcite ( average @xmath32 of the fast components = @xmath134 km / s ) , and the larger shell , as well as our observation , with the material that is evident in the total width of the nebular and balmer lines ( @xmath135 km / s ) , we derive an average distance @xmath136  kpc . the nova polarization @xcite indicates 1.8 kpc .    in the following , we adopt the distance of 1.16  kpc . a value of @xmath137 was derived from @xcite , while @xcite find a value of 2.79 from interstellar polarization . we have used @xmath138 in the following . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath139 , @xmath140 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath141 . pw  vul was a moderately fast nova @xcite with a well - studied outburst . the light curve is very structured , so that the derivation of reliable decline times is difficult , as noted by @xcite ; we adopt a maximum magnitude @xmath142 , @xmath143 days , @xmath144 days , and @xmath145 . a spectrum of the object , obtained in 1991 by @xcite , shows strong h@xmath0 and [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 emission . the shell of pw  vul was first detected by @xcite in 1993 , who found a diameter of @xmath146 by examining the radial profile of the object . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig7 ] , reveals a clearly resolved , circular shell of size @xmath147 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath148 . the shell does not appear in the [ o  iii ] data to a @xmath53 limiting surface brightness of @xmath149 . however , a wfpc2 exposure ( program 7386 ) obtained shortly after our observations reveals a faint , diffuse shell of size @xmath150 , considerably smaller than our ground - based observations , with an average surface brightness of @xmath151 . the wfpc2 data is detecting emission `` hidden '' in the ground - based psf , while the ground - based data shows diffuse emission which wfpc2 can not detect .    in order to investigate the large difference in shell sizes between the @xcite data and our data , the former authors kindly provided us with a copy of their data . we were able to confirm their radial profile measurement , however a contour plot reveals a shell of size @xmath152 . while this measurement has not been corrected for the intrinsic psf , it does illustrate the difference in determining the shell size from radial profiles ( fwhm ) and from contour plots ( fwzi ) . the expansion velocity was measured by @xcite shortly after outburst to be 1200  km / s . @xcite measured the velocity 9 years after outburst from the structure of the h@xmath0/[n  ii ]  @xmath16584 profile , and found a much lower value of @xmath153  km / s . we associate the shell found by hst with the material expanding with 470 km / s , and the more extended shell with the `` fuzz '' that expands with 1200 km / s , and obtain a consistent distance of @xmath154  kpc . previous distances estimates ( @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite ) place pw  vul at a distance of 1.2 , 1.5 - 3.0 , 1.3 , and 1.6  kpc . the first three determinations use techniques other than expansion parallax ( e.g. interstellar reddening measurements ) , while @xcite adopted a small expansion velocity , in combination with an underestimated shell size , to derive a result which is , nevertheless , in agreement with the others . we adopt a distance of @xmath154  kpc , and an interstellar extinction @xmath155 @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath156 , @xmath157 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 .      qu  vul was a moderately fast nova of the onemg group , which was well studied from the x - ray to the radio . from the visual light curve from the afoev archive , we derive a maximum magnitude @xmath159 , decline times @xmath160 and @xmath161 days , and @xmath162 . radio observations by @xcite first detected the shell about one year after outburst , and yielded a diameter of @xmath163 at an age of 497 days . the first reports of an optical shell were presented by @xcite , who detected a larger radial profile for the nova than for field stars in h@xmath0 , while a continuum image showed no differences . those authors derived a diameter for the shell of @xmath164 in 1994 . @xcite obtained infrared images of the object in 1996 , and found a shell diameter of @xmath165 at @xmath166 , again by comparing the radial profile of the nova with field stars . data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( for details see @xcite  program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath167 at @xmath166 and @xmath168 ( a bright , filled - in ring with an average surface brightness of @xmath169 ) at h@xmath0 . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig8 ] , reveals a clearly resolved , circular shell of size @xmath26 and an average surface brightness of @xmath170 . the shell may be weakly seen in the [ o  iii ] data , with an average surface brightness of @xmath171 ; the radial profile plot clearly shows the presence of the shell . the gross discrepancies in the expansion rates between our data ( based on a resolved shell ) and previous data ( based on radial profiles ) may indicate an over - correction for the intrinsic psf ( hence an underestimation of the shell size ) when determining shell sizes based on profiles . as noted by @xcite , the measurement technique of @xcite is adequate for demonstrating the existence of a shell , but it is not appropriate for determining the shell size , as the technique incorrectly assumes a gaussian profile for the shell , and fails to account for light from the central star . the large discrepancy between the ground - based and hst data may be caused by the fact that the first method traces extended , rapidly moving , low - surface brightness material , while the second one traces dense , clumpy , slowly moving material near the central object . the expansion velocity was measured shortly after outburst to be 790  km / s @xcite and 1200  km / s @xcite . a study of the profiles of the [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 and h@xmath0 emission lines in early july , 1985 , by @xcite yielded fwhm values of 1700 and 1360  km / s , respectively ( his fwzi is @xmath172  km / s , the width of the flat - topped section of the [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 line 1140 km / s ) . @xcite derived a fwzi value of @xmath173  km / s in 1994 . previous distances estimates , based on expansion parallaxes , place qu  vul at distances of 3.6 and 2.6  kpc , respectively , @xcite , while photometric and reddening techniques yield distances of 3.0  kpc @xcite , 1.2  kpc @xcite , and 1.6  kpc @xcite . based on an expansion velocity of 1500  km / s ( the fastest - moving material ) , we derive a distance , based on our observations only , of 1.5  kpc . if the shell - structure of the hst observations is associated with the material that formed the flat - topped structure in the lines observed by @xcite , a distance of 2.0 kpc is derived . averaging these results leads to @xmath174  kpc , in reasonable agreement with estimates based on other methods ( @xmath175  kpc ) .    with a distance of 1.75  kpc , and interstellar extinction @xmath176 @xcite , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath177 , @xmath178 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath179 . v1819  cyg was a slow nova that has been little studied ; see @xcite for observations of the nova in the first two years after outburst . the light curve has been constructed by @xcite , who give @xmath180 ; their @xmath181 value appears to be not reliable . they derived times @xmath182  days and @xmath183  days , respectively , although other authors give different values . we have evaluated the afoev visual light curve , and derive @xmath184 at maximum , @xmath185 and @xmath186 days , and @xmath187 . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , a wfpc2 observation ( program 7386 ) in the f658n ( [ n  ii]@xmath188 ) filter reveals a marginally resolved shell with a diameter of @xmath189 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . @xcite has published a finding chart for the object , but our images ( see figure  [ fig9 ] ) have resolved the szkody object into two stars , with the nova being the southeastern object .    from low - resolution spectral scans , @xcite derived `` velocity widths '' of @xmath190  km / s . @xcite made spectroscopic observations at moderate dispersion one month after maximum and observed wide emission lines with a `` half - width '' of 1400  km / s ( which we interpret as `` full width at half maximum '' ) , with the principal and diffuse - enhanced absorption components at @xmath191 and @xmath192  km / s . @xcite find a reddening @xmath193 , and an absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath194 from various relationships between maximum magnitude and speed of decline , and derive a distance of @xmath195  kpc . if we assume , in agreement with @xcite , a @xmath196  km / s for the bulk of material , we derive a distance of 7.4  kpc , in good agreement with the above result . this yields an absolute magnitude @xmath197 , @xmath198 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath199 , with the error based on the uncertainty of the extinction only . the much larger value @xmath200 from the galaxy extinction model of @xcite would increase the brightness by @xmath201 . v842  cen was a moderately fast nova ( @xmath202 days , @xmath203 days , @xcite ) , which showed a dust - forming event . observations by @xcite revealed a shell of diameter @xmath204  ( h@xmath0/[n  ii ] ) in 1995 . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig10 ] , reveals an incomplete , circular shell of size @xmath205 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath206 . the shell is also seen in the [ o  iii ] data with an average surface brightness of @xmath207 . the expansion velocity was measured by @xcite after recovery from the dust - forming event in may 1988 . the h lines showed a saddle - shaped structure , with the two peaks at @xmath208 and @xmath209  km / s . the line profiles showed broad wings which extended to @xmath210  km / s ( hwzi ) . a study of the emission lines of [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 , [ n  ii ]  @xmath16584 and h@xmath0 by @xcite over the years 19881991 yielded a ` castellated ' profile , whose initially broad wings faded , while two maxima at about @xmath211 and @xmath212  km / s sharpened over that time interval . a high - resolution spectrum of [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 , obtained on 1988 july 17 , is shown in @xcite . its maxima are at @xmath213 and @xmath214 . the expansion velocity of the dense regions of the shell is thus @xmath215  km / s , while low - density material with @xmath216  km / s is also present . based on an expansion velocity of 525  km / s , @xcite derived a distance of @xmath217  kpc . the size of the shell in our data is inconsistent with the size in @xcite , and our distance of 0.42  kpc falls way below their value . the reddening - based distances of 0.9  kpc @xcite and 1.0  kpc @xcite tend to favor the larger distance . if we assume that the value of @xcite is correct , the expansion velocity of the shell observed by us is 1600 km / s , in reasonable agreement with the velocity of the material that caused the broad wings observed in the first years following the outburst . @xcite gave a light curve with a maximum magnitude @xmath218 , and @xmath219 ; @xmath220 is @xmath221 . a somewhat revised expansion rate and velocity of the shell observed by @xcite leads to a distance of 1.15  kpc , and the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath222 ( using the error estimate of the above authors ) , and @xmath223 , with the same error bars . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . qv  vul was a moderately fast nova , which was studied spectroscopically by @xcite . the afoev visual light curve yields @xmath224 at maximum , @xmath225 days , @xmath226 days , and @xmath227 . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath228 at @xmath166 , and @xmath229 at [ n  ii]@xmath188 ( with an average surface brightness of @xmath230 ) . we failed to detect a shell in our ground - based images ( to @xmath53 limiting surface brightnesses of @xmath231 at h@xmath0 and @xmath232 at [ o  iii ] ) . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure  [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova .    an analysis of the shapes of [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 and [ n  ii ]  @xmath16584 , observed in 1989 by @xcite , yields expansion ( hwhm ) velocities of @xmath233 and @xmath234 , respectively . based on an averaged hwhm velocity of the [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 and [ n  ii ]  @xmath16584 lines , @xmath235  km / s , we derive a distance to qv vul of 2.7  kpc . @xcite gave a value of @xmath236 . for a distance of 2.7  kpc , the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath237 , @xmath238 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath179 . v351  pup was a moderately fast nova which reached a maximum of at least @xmath239 , with @xmath240 days , @xmath241 days , and @xmath242 , as based on the aavso visual light curve @xcite . its outburst was studied in detail as part of the tololo nova survey @xcite . a marginal ground - based detection of a shell ( diameter @xmath243 ) was reported by @xcite . data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and our measurement of that data reveals a h@xmath0 shell @xmath244 in diameter , and an average surface brightness of @xmath245 . our ground - based observations , shown in figure  [ fig11 ] , do not show any indication of a shell in the psf - subtracted images . however , in the radial profile , the h@xmath0 data does show that the nova ( fhwm = 4.37  pixels ) is broader than field stars ( @xmath246  pixels ) , while the off - band image does not show any broadening of the nova profile .    the expansion velocity quoted by @xcite , 2000  km / s , is based on iue spectra . a detailed analysis of the mg  ii  2800 line , based on high - resolution iue spectra , resulted in an expansion velocity of 1200  km / s @xcite . the expansion rate is about @xmath247/yr , based on the ground - based and hst observations . if the expansion velocity of the mg  ii  2800 line is assumed to be representative for the shell , a distance of @xmath248  kpc is derived ; the higher velocities quoted by @xcite would lead to a distance around 4  kpc .    maximum light is poorly covered by observations . @xcite derived a reddening @xmath249 from recombination lines . the distance of 2.7  kpc leads to @xmath250 , while the distance of 4  kpc @xcite results in @xmath251 ; the values of @xmath252 are @xmath253 and @xmath254 , respectively . we will accept the average values as uncertain , but reasonable , estimates . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . v1974  cyg was a moderately fast nova , which has been extensively studied . the afoev visual light curve yields @xmath255 at maximum , @xmath256 days , @xmath257 days , and @xmath258 . the first report of a visible shell was by @xcite , who used the faint object camera ( foc ) on _ hubble space telescope _ 467 days after outburst to detect a circular , inhomogeneous ring of diameter @xmath37 in the f278 m ( mg  ii ) filter ; this observation was further analyzed by @xcite and they found the shell to be @xmath259 in size . further foc observations @xcite at [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 ( f501n ) were obtained at 690 and 818 days after outburst , and revealed shells sizes of @xmath260 and @xmath261 , respectively . @xcite detected extended h@xmath0 emission around the object ( 3 - 4 ) in 1994 - 1995 , which they attribute to excitation of the interstellar medium by uv photons from the outburst . our h@xmath0 image , shown in figure  [ fig12 ] , reveals a complete , circular shell of size @xmath262 , with an average surface brightness of @xmath263 . the shell is also seen in the [ o  iii ] data , with an average surface brightness of @xmath264 . further _ hubble space telescope _ observations were obtained in 1998 using both the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) and nicmos ( program 7381 ) . our measurements of that data reveal shell sizes of @xmath265 at @xmath166 , and @xmath266 ( a bright ring with an average surface brightness of @xmath267 ) at h@xmath0 . the expansion velocity for v1974  cyg was determined by several authors to be 1100  km / s @xcite , 1500  km / s @xcite , 830 - 895  km / s @xcite , and 700 - 950  km / s @xcite . previous distances estimates , based on expansion parallaxes from early radio @xcite and _ hubble space telescope _ observations ( @xcite , @xcite ) , place v1974  cyg at a distance of @xmath268  kpc . these observations were re - analyzed by @xcite , who revised the distance estimates downward to @xmath269  kpc , using expansion parallaxes based on hst and radio data , and making them more compatible with a distance of 1.8  kpc derived from other techniques ( @xcite , @xcite ) . based on an expansion velocity of 1070  km / s ( which is the average value of the expansion velocities given in the previous paragraph ) , we derive a distance for the _ hubble space telescope _ data of 2.0  kpc . however , if we use our ground - based observations , where we see a clearly resolved shell , we derive a distance of only 310  pc . this discrepancy can be removed in the same way as in the case of v842 cen and other objects . the ground - based observations record faint , fast - moving material , while the hst frames record the bulk of dense clouds that also show up as maxima in the emission lines . if we assume a distance of 1.8  kpc , the extended shell corresponds to an expansion velocity of 5700  km / s . the maximum expansion velocity seen in early p cygni lines of mg ii was 4500 km / s @xcite . the experimentum crucis would be to carry out spatially resolved spectroscopy of the extended optical shell to see the velocity splitting . we will adopt a distance of @xmath270  kpc , based on chochol s detailed study , and an @xmath271 @xcite , so that @xmath272 , and @xmath273 . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . hy  lup was discovered as a star of magnitude @xmath274 by @xcite , and has been little studied since . a spectrum taken by the discoverer indicated that the nova was already some days after maximum . photometry from the aavso archives @xcite reveals @xmath275 days . while no ground - based observations have been reported since shortly after outburst , a wfpc2 observation ( program 7386 ) in the f656n ( h@xmath0 ) filter reveals a marginally resolved shell with a diameter of @xmath189 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure  [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova .    the expansion velocity for hy  lup was measured immediately after discovery by @xcite to be 2700  km / s . a spectrum taken three years after outburst shows the object in the nebular stage ; the emission lines of h@xmath276 , [ o i ] and [ o iii ] appear double - peaked , with a separation of @xmath277  km / s and a fwhm of 340  km / s of the single components @xcite . there are no previous distances estimates for hy  lup . based on an expansion velocity of 400  km / s , we derive a distance of 1.8  kpc . this estimate is based solely on _ hubble space telescope _ data , under the assumption that it shows slow - moving material . if the _ hubble space telescope _ data also images fainter , faster material , a larger velocity ( up to 2700  km / s ) would result in a much larger distance . the galactic extinction model yields a value @xmath278 . the resulting absolute magnitude is @xmath279 , but the expansion velocity and the apparent magnitude may both be lower limits , so that the absolute magnitude is likely some magnitudes brighter . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . it can not be used for maximum or minimum luminosity determinations , unless additional observations become available . cp  cru was a fast nova ( @xmath280 days , based on data from vsnet ) , which showed strong he  ii emission @xcite , making it a member of the he / n class @xcite . its maximum observed magnitude was @xmath281 , but true maximum may easily have been missed . while no ground - based imaging observations have been reported , data was obtained in 1998 with the _ hubble space telescope _ using the wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and our measurement of that data reveals a h@xmath0 shell with a size @xmath282 . our ground - based observations are unable to resolve a shell of that size . there is no published finding chart of the quiescent object , so we show , in figure  [ fig9 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the nova .    the expansion velocity for cp  cru has measured shortly after outburst by @xcite to be @xmath283  km / s there are no previous distances estimate for cp  cru . based on the expansion velocity of 2000  km / s , a distance of 3.2  kpc is derived . as with hy  lup ( also with only _ hubble space telescope _ data ) , this distance may be an overestimate to the true value . the galactic extinction model yields a value @xmath284 . the resulting absolute magnitude is @xmath285 , which is also an indication that the true maximum was missed . the nova has not yet returned to minimum light . it can not be used for maximum or minimum luminosity determinations , unless additional observations become available . we failed to detect a shell around 15 objects , which are listed in table  [ tbl-4 ] . three of the objects ( gq  mus , v827  her , and v838  her ) were also observed with wfpc2 ( program 7386 ) , and no shell was detected . a shell around gq  mus was also not detected in ground - based data by @xcite . four objects  v868  cen , by  cir , v4361  sgr , and n  sco  97  do not have published finding charts , and we show , in figure  [ fig13 ] , our h@xmath0 on - band and off - band images , which clearly identify the quiescent object . @xcite have identified a new candidate for v2104  oph based on positional coincidence ( the field in the atlas of @xcite is blank ) , and our image ( figure  [ fig13 ] ) shows a faint ( @xmath286 ) object , slightly h@xmath0 bright , at the nominal position ( which is identical to the @xcite candidate ) ; the coordinates of our candidate are @xmath287 and @xmath288 as measured from our image . v888  cen does not have a published chart , while @xcite identifies candidates for v3645  sgr and n  car  1972 . our observations of v888  cen reveal that the marked object ( the southern object of a close pair ) is h@xmath0 bright , while for the latter two objects , there are no h@xmath0 -bright candidates ( see figure  [ fig13 ] ) . our observations of n  car  1971 ( not shown ) show a blank field at the nominal position of the object . however , examination of archival material @xcite shows that the object was not detected on a direct plate obtained 2  days after the discovery spectrum . thus , this object is likely an emulsion defect , and also calls into question the reality of n  car  1972 , which was found in a similar manner to n  car  1971 . @xcite noted a correlation ( at the @xmath289 confidence level ) between speed class ( @xmath5 ) and the axial ratio of nova shells . such a correlation is not unexpected , as the effects of common - envelope evolution thought to occur during outbursts can remove varying amounts of angular momentum from the system depending on the length of time spent in this phase . we have added our dataset to that of @xcite ( for the three objects in common , we have averaged our ratio with theirs ) , and show , in figure  [ fig14 ] , the merged plot . we have fit a second - order polynomial to the data , and find that the data is correlated at the @xmath290 level . however , the fit is driven by 3 objects ( dq  her , t  aur , and rr  pic ) , so the reality of the correlation is still quite speculative . in the previous section , distances to several well - investigated and new novae , and their absolute magnitudes , were derived . we can use these absolute magnitudes , in conjunction with the @xmath4 and @xmath5 times , to investigate a maximum magnitude - rate of decline ( mmrd ) relationship . there is no generally accepted light curve decline parameter ; some authors prefer @xmath4 , to extend the mmrd to faint , extragalactic novae , but the fluctuations of the light curve at maximum can easily reach @xmath291 . the value of @xmath5 is much more stable in this respect . nevertheless , we will derive mmrd relations for both parameters . another difference is the use of the @xmath18 ( or visual ) or the @xmath17 ( or photographic ) light curve to derive the value of @xmath292 . since novae are reddest at maximum , @xmath293 should be larger than @xmath294 . this is generally the case , but the general uncertainty of pinning down the time and magnitude of maximum is so large that errors in using the `` wrong '' color band are almost negligible . since visual or @xmath18 magnitudes are nowadays more common than blue magnitudes ( which were in the past often derived from photographic sky surveys ) , we will restrict our analysis on @xmath18 magnitudes ( see also section  5.3 ) . we have enhanced our sample of objects by adding expansion parallax results from other authors . for these objects , a critical evaluation on assumed light curve data , expansion velocities and extinction values was made . the most complete light curve of t aur is based on harvard photographs , which show @xmath295 at maximum , @xmath296 days , @xmath297 days , and @xmath298 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath299  kpc , and @xcite derived an @xmath20 value of @xmath300 . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath301 , @xmath302 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . the visual light curve was compiled by @xcite : @xmath303 at maximum , @xmath304 days , @xmath305 days , and @xmath306 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath307  kpc , and @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath308 . the absolute magnitude is @xmath309 @xmath310 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath311 . the brightest nova of the 20th century reached @xmath312 at maximum . a detailed visual light curve @xcite gives single data , and different averaged data points . these yield different decline rates , and we adopt here @xmath313 at maximum , @xmath314 days , @xmath315 days , and @xmath316 . a value of @xmath44 of @xmath317 was derived by @xcite . the expansion rate was determined by @xcite to be @xmath318/yr , with an indication that the rate decreases with time . with an expansion velocity between @xmath319  km / s , a distance of @xmath320  kpc is derived . the absolute magnitude is @xmath321 , @xmath322 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath48 . the nova reached at maximum @xmath323 . a light curve by @xcite yields @xmath324 days , @xmath325 days , and @xmath326 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath327 kpc , and a value of @xmath328 was calculated from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath329 , @xmath330 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath331 . the visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath332 , and has @xmath333 days , @xmath334 days , and @xmath335 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath336  kpc from the ring geometry and projection effects of the velocities . they assume an inclination angle of @xmath337 , and from the projected velocity of @xmath338 km , they arrive at an intrinsic velocity of 850 km / s .    we derived a projected velocity of 405 km / s , an expansion rate of @xmath339/yr , and at a distance of 0.58  kpc , in good agreement with @xcite . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath340 . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath341 , @xmath342 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath343 .      the photographic light curve , based on harvard photographs , reached @xmath344 , and has @xmath345 days , @xmath346 days , and @xmath347 . @xcite derived an expansion rate of @xmath348/yr , and estimated an expansion velocity of 650  km / s , which yield a distance of 3.5  kpc . a value of @xmath349 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath350 , and @xmath351 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath352 . a visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath353 , and has @xmath354 days , @xmath355 days , and @xmath356 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath357  kpc . a careful study of @xcite , based on nebular slit spectra taken in the 1970s , yields a distance of @xmath358 kpc , while other recent determinations , as quoted by @xcite , yield values near @xmath359  kpc . we adopt the result of @xcite . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath360 , which is based on the strength of the 2200 band and is a good average of other determinations . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath361 , @xmath362 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath141 . a visual light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath363 , and has @xmath364 days , @xmath365 days , and @xmath366 . @xcite derived a distance of 1.35  kpc , while @xcite derived an @xmath20 value of @xmath300 . the galactic extinction model of @xcite yields a value which is three times higher . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath367 , @xmath368 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . all these values might be brighter by more than @xmath369 if the extinction value based on uv spectroscopy is in error . maximum light was missed for this object . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath370  kpc , in perfect agreement with an earlier result by @xcite . @xcite derived a value of @xmath371 . the observed maximum magnitude is @xmath372 , confirming the fact that the nova was discovered long after maximum light . the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath373 . a photographic light curve is based on observations of ahnert , which are scattered over various issues of the beobachtungs - zirkular of the astronomische nachrichten . it reached @xmath374 , and has @xmath375 days , @xmath376 days , and @xmath377 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath378  kpc , and a value of @xmath379 is based on the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath380 , @xmath381 . the magnitude at minimum is uncertain ( @xmath382 ) , and the absolute magnitude is about @xmath383 . a photographic light curve , based on sonneberg and harvard plates , peaks at @xmath384 , and has @xmath385 , @xmath386 days , and @xmath387 . the nebular expansion parallax of @xcite yields a distance of 5.9 kpc , and a value @xmath388 is based on the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath389 , @xmath390 . @xcite derived @xmath391 as minimum magnitude , the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath158 . this nova fits nicely into the mmrd relations ( see below ) . @xcite had assumed an @xmath20 of @xmath392 , which is unlikely because of the fairly blue color of the postnova . her result , @xmath393 , was taken by @xcite as evidence for including it in a hypothetical class of super - bright novae . a photographic light curve is based on observations by @xcite . maximum is poorly covered : an observation of @xmath394 belongs to the rising branch of the light curve . two days later , a poor observation gave @xmath395 : , and in the following days , the nova declined smoothly by @xmath396/day . fitting the light curve of a fast nova through the points leads to a maximum magnitude @xmath397 . the light curve has @xmath398 days , @xmath399 days , and @xmath400 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath401  kpc , in good agreement with @xcite , and a value of @xmath402 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath403 , @xmath404 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath405 . the nova reached a maximum of about @xmath406 . a photographic light curve , compiled by @xcite , reached @xmath407 on 1960 march 4 . outburst maximum is poorly covered by observations ; according to @xcite , spectroscopic evidence indicates that the real maximum of @xmath408 was reached on march 1 . this assumption yields @xmath304 days , @xmath409 days , and @xmath410 . @xcite derived a distance of 1.35  kpc , and a value of @xmath411 was derived by @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath412 , @xmath413 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath331 ( quiescent light is superimposed by dwarf - nova like outbursts ) . a photographic observation near maximum has @xmath414 . follow - on observations were compiled by @xcite , and we derive @xmath415 days , @xmath416 days , and @xmath417 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath418  kpc , based on a @xmath419  km / s as given by @xcite . @xcite , using @xmath420  km / s , as determined from outburst spectra , derived a distance of 1.32  kpc . since nebular expansion velocities may suffer inclination effects ( see our discussion for cp pup ) , the latter value appears more likely . indeed recent observations by @xcite found a present - day @xmath421  km / s and a new distance estimate of @xmath422 kpc . @xcite derived an @xmath44 value of @xmath423 , and @xcite a value @xmath424 . the new results lead to an absolute magnitude at maximum @xmath425 , @xmath47 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath352 .      a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath426 , and has @xmath427 days , @xmath346 days , and @xmath428 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath429  kpc , and a value of @xmath430 was derived from the galactic extinction model of @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath431 , @xmath432 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath433 . a light curve was published by @xcite . maximum was approximately @xmath434 , @xmath435 days , @xmath436 : days , and @xmath437 for the photographic v light curve . @xcite analyzed the stellar profile and the structure of the h@xmath0 + [ n  ii ]  @xmath16584 -blend , and derived an annual expansion rate of @xmath438/yr , an expansion velocity of 750  km / s , an average @xmath44 value of @xmath439 , and a distance of @xmath440  kpc . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath441 , @xmath442 . since the postnova is a close optical triple star , no accurate absolute magnitude at minimum can be given . a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath426 , and has @xmath443 days , @xmath444 days , and @xmath445 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath446  kpc , in good agreement with determinations of @xmath447  kpc ( @xcite ) and @xmath448  kpc ( @xcite ) . new hst and ground - based observations @xcite yield a distance of @xmath449  kpc . adopting this result and the @xmath450 of @xcite , we arrive at an absolute magnitude at maximum of @xmath451 , @xmath452 , and the absolute magnitude at minimum is @xmath453 . a photoelectric light curve was compiled by @xcite . the nova reached @xmath454 , and has @xmath455 days , @xmath456 days , and @xmath457 . @xcite derived a distance of @xmath458  kpc , which is in good agreement with a previous estimate by @xcite . the @xmath459 was taken from @xcite . the absolute magnitude at maximum is @xmath460 , @xmath461 , and the absolute magnitude at postoutburst minimum is @xmath462 . the results of the preceding sections are summarized in table  [ tbl-5 ] . some novae are only well - observed photographically , and the @xmath463 and @xmath464 need to be transformed into the @xmath18 system . @xcite find that novae at maximum have an intrinsic @xmath465 . a sample of nine objects with trustworthy reddening indicates a similar value , @xmath466 . the very fast nova v1500 cyg is much bluer at maximum ( @xmath467 ) , but the objects considered here are all fairly slow , and were corrected using the value @xmath468 . since novae become bluer in later stages , we have assumed @xmath469 . table  [ tbl-5 ] also give the spectroscopic types of novae according to the classification of @xcite ( he / n , fe ii , and `` hybrid '' objects marked as fe / he / n ) , the light curve types ( a , ao , b , c , d ) , as defined by @xcite , and mentions , for some recent objects , whether an object is a onemg nova .    the mmrd relations are shown in figures  [ fig15 ] , [ fig16 ] , and [ fig17 ] . most of the fast , bright objects with smooth `` a - type '' light curves are he / n novae or hybrid objects , i.e. fe ii novae that evolve into he / n novae . the three fastest pure fe ii novae are v476 cyg , dk lac and v351 pup ; they also show type a light curves , but their @xmath5 times are between 15 and 30 days , larger than those of he / n or hybrid novae ( @xmath470 days ) . there appears to be no luminosity difference between the he / n novae and the fe ii novae , the only possible feature seems to be the relative faintness of the ` hybrid ' objects relative to the ` pure ' ones . all novae with structured light curves ( types b , c , d ) have @xmath471 days , and they are , likely without exception , fe ii novae . the onemg novae are thought to originate on massive white dwarfs , although their luminosities appear to be consistent than the other novae of a comparable rate of decline . the three objects in our diagram show light curve types a or b , and their @xmath5 times lie between 25 and 50 days . if one sticks to the `` classical '' mmrd relations which hold for the ensemble of points , the following statements can be made :    using the @xmath5 time as the lightcurve parameter , the relation appears almost linear , @xmath472 a similar relation results when using the @xmath4 time as the lightcurve parameter : @xmath473 in both cases , the residual for a single object is about @xmath474 , and a linear equation appears to be a good fit to the data . the most recent fit of this type is by @xcite : @xmath475 who , after selecting a `` high quality sample '' and correcting the other novae accordingly , was able to reduce the dispersion to @xmath476 . it should be noted that a restriction on a near , less reddened sample , or a correction of absolute magnitudes at maximum by assuming that @xmath477 for all objects , as done by cohen , does not lead to a decisive improvement of the scatter in our data set , and thus we refrain from any correction which may introduce systematic effects . at an average @xmath478 days , cohen s calibration is @xmath479 fainter than ours . another classical relation uses a specific stretched s - shaped curve , which is apparent in samples of extragalactic novae . it was first suggested by @xcite , and was recently revised by @xcite . we have adopted their turn - over point , but have re - determined the zero - point and the amplitude : @xmath480 our zero - point is almost identical to that of @xcite , but the `` contrast '' between bright and faint novae has increased from @xmath481 to @xmath482 . a possible explanation is that in the extragalactic sample of @xcite , very bright and fast novae of the v1500 cyg and cp pup - type appear fainter because of insufficient sampling time , and the faintest among the slow novae are missed ( malmquist bias ) . finally , it was shown by @xcite that the absolute ( pg ) magnitude 15 days after outburst is similar for novae of all speed classes . @xcite derived for 11 objects @xmath483 , while we obtain for 28 objects : @xmath484 indicating a similar zero - point difference ( @xmath485 ) between cohen s and our sample . a regression shows that there is absolutely no trend in @xmath252 versus , e.g. , @xmath5-time , however , the standard deviation ( @xmath486 ) is quite large . there is one more way to look at the mmrd relation , if one takes the light curve type as a second parameter . the dichotomy between the a / ao `` super - eddington '' and bcd `` eddington '' groups , introduced in the investigation by @xcite , appears well expressed . the ( @xmath487 ) diagram can be divided in two fields : the a / ao group has @xmath488 and @xmath489 , the bcd group has @xmath490 and @xmath491 ( two poorly investigated objects , v500 aql and xx tau , may have poorly determined luminosities and/or decline times , and are not considered in the following discussion ) . in the ( @xmath492 ) diagram , the two groups are separated as well ; the dividing line in time is now at @xmath493 . if one examines the `` super - eddington '' and `` eddington '' groups separately , mmrd relations are quite weakly expressed ; in the @xmath492 diagram , the a / ao group follows the relation @xmath494 with a correlation coefficient of 0.61 . the bcd group shows only a weak correlation coefficient of 0.21 between magnitude and decline time ; @xmath495 . a linear relation for these objects is : @xmath496    in the @xmath487 diagram , the a / ao group follows the relation @xmath497 with a correlation coefficient of 0.45 , and the bcd group yields @xmath498 with a correlation coefficient of 0.46 ( of course , the @xmath499 is the same ) . such a type of fit in two separate regions mimics the stretched s - shaped curve used for a fit of the complete sample , but in the present case we have a criterion ( the light curve form ) to separate two regions , and to use different linear relations ( or simple averages ) in them . the overall scatter in the mmrd relation  which is of the order of @xmath500 in all these relations  may indicate the presence of hidden second order parameters ( spectroscopic type , light curve type , mass of underlying white dwarf  ) which should influence the luminosity . however , the individual errors are too large , so the sample is not able to indicate which parameter is most decisive . thus , the mmrd relation can be used as a reliable distance indicator only in a statistical way ; for a single object , the absolute magnitude can be off by @xmath501 . if samples are taken from different stellar populations , systematic luminosity differences may be present . this does not devaluate the use of novae as distance indicators , it simply means that caution must be used when such relations are applied ( similar problems occur in other distance indicators like supernovae , cepheids , and rr lyrae stars ) . a better understanding of the mmrd relation is also the basis of a better understanding of the physics of nova eruptions . another result of our study is the derivation of absolute magnitudes of classical novae after eruption . table [ tbl-6 ] lists the absolute visual magnitudes of novae , which have settled to a more or less constant minimum brightness . some of the objects have known orbital periods and inclination angles ; relevant data were taken from the catalog of @xcite , and these magnitudes @xmath502 were corrected for inclination effects , using the formula given by @xcite ; the corrected magnitudes @xmath503 are also listed . all novae for which no inclination information was available , were corrected by assuming an average inclination @xmath504 . recent results on orbital periods are available for v500 aql @xcite and v446  her and v533  her @xcite . in addition to the nova data , absolute magnitudes of dwarf novae at maximum , based on hst fgs parallaxes , and of novalike stars , mainly based on hipparcos parallaxes , were derived ( the absolute magnitudes supersede those given by @xcite ) . results are summarized in fig . [ fig18 ] . if one discards novae in or below the period gap ( cp pup , rw umi , qu vul ) and the long - period system gk per , as well as the peculiar novalike ae aqr , the remaining systems ( with @xmath505 < -0.4 $ ] ) indicate a dependence of absolute magnitude on period : @xmath506\ ] ] ( correlation coefficient 0.47 ) . if the period ( in hours ) is used , the relation is @xmath507\ ] ] which , at @xmath508 hours , yields absolute magnitudes which are @xmath509 brighter than those predicted @xcite s formula for dwarf novae at maximum .    summing up , no obvious separation of absolute magnitudes of objects belonging to different groups ( novae at minimum , dwarf novae at outburst , and novalike systems at normal light ) can be seen . this again shows the intimate connection of these groups , which is also obvious from space density considerations , and the hibernation scenario , which indicates that only by including novalike stars and dwarf novae to the space densities of novae , realistic recurrence times of novae can be obtained @xcite . we have obtained optical imaging of 30 recent novae , and have detected shells , in combination with _ hubble space telescope _ data , for 14 objects . we fail to detect the previously observed shell around rw  umi , while pw  vul , v1974  cyg , and v842  cen appear to show two distinct shells . expansion parallaxes for the novae have been derived , and combined with revised distances for other novae , have been used to derive absolute magnitudes . a study of various maximum magnitude - rate of decline relations is in general agreement with previous `` linear '' determinations . however , a relation making use of the light curve type may yield a somewhat better fit to the data . it clearly shows the existence of two types of novae : ( 1 ) the fast ( @xmath510 days ) super - eddington novae , which may be he / n , `` hybrid '' fe ii novae , and , if their evolution is somewhat slower , fe ii novae . they all show smooth light curves with well - defined maxima ( a ) , and some of them may show quasi - periodic light oscillations in their later evolution ( ao ) . ( 2 ) the slow @xmath511 days ) eddington - novae with structured light curves ( ba ) , double maxima ( bb ) , standstills at maximum ( ca ) , dust formations at later stages ( ca , cb ) , and long premaximum stages ( d ) , seem to belong exclusively to the fe ii spectroscopic type . the merging of both groups leads to a well - expressed mmrd ; if both groups are considered separately , their mmrds show smaller slopes , and a jump of @xmath512 occurs at @xmath513 days and @xmath514 days . at minimum , most novae have similar magnitudes as those of dwarf novae at maximum light and novalike stars . we wish to thank the aavso for providing data from their international database , which is based on observations submitted to the aavso by variable star observers worldwide , and the afoev for providing data from their internet database . we also thank tim naylor and fred ringwald for providing a copy of their pw  vul data , jeff robertson for providing a copy of his v2014  oph data , jack macconnell for investigating the reality of nova  car  1971 and 1972 , and pierluigi selvelli for information on interstellar extinction data . hwd also gratefully acknowledges the hospitality and support of space telescope science institute , where he could carry out part of the work on which this investigation is based . we wish to thank an anonymous referee for many useful comments on this manuscript . almr , i. , ills - almr , e. 1966 , mitt . budapest 60 andre , j. 1991 , phd thesis , erlangen - nrnberg university andre , j. , drechsel , h. , snijders , m.a.j . , and cassatella , a. 1991 , , 244 , 111 andre , j. , drechsel , h. , and starrfield , s. 1994 , , 291 , 869 andrillat , y. and houziaux , l. 1989 , , 238 , 29p belle , k.e . , woodward , c. e. , evans , a. , eyres , s. , gehrz , r. d. , schuster , m. , greenhouse , m. a. , krautter , j. , starrfield , s. g. , truran , j. 1999 , , 31 , 977 bergner , y.k . , bondarenko , s.i . , miroshnichenko , a.s . , yudin , r.v . , yutanov , n.y . , kuratov , k.s . , and mukanov , d.b . 1985 , astron . , 1374 bertaud , c. 1945 , ann . paris obs . 9 , fasc . 1 bertaud , c. 1962 , j.  obs . , 45 , 321 bowen , i.s . 1956 , , 61 , 336 buscombe , w. , de vaucouleurs , g. 1955 , observatory , 75 , 170 campbell , l. 1903 , harvard  ann . , 48 , 39 campbell , l. 1919 , harvard  ann . , 81 , 113 ciatti , f. and rosino , l. 1974 , , 16 , 305 chochol , d. , grygar , j. , pribulla , t. , komk , r. , hric , l. , and elkin , v. 1997 , , 318 , 908 chochol , d. , hric , l. , urban , z. , komk , r. , grygar , j. , and papousek , j. 1993 , , 277 , 103 chochol , d. , komk , r. , hric , l. , and grygar , j. 1995 , in cataclysmic variables , ed . a. bianchini et al . , ( dordrecht , kluwer academic publishers ) , p. 153 cohen , j.g . 1985 , , 292 , 90 cohen , j.g . and rosenthal , a.j . 1983 , , 268 , 689 cottrell , m.j . and smith , s.e . 1978 , , 90 , 441 della valle , m. 1991 , , 252 , l9 della valle , m. 1993 , , 5870 della valle , m. and benetti , s. 1996 , , 6532 della valle , m. and duerbeck , h.w . 1993 , , 275 , 239 della valle , m. and livio , m. 1995 , , 452 , 704 della valle , m. , gilmozzi , r. , bianchini , a. , and esenoglu , h. 1997 , , 325 , 1151 drechsel , h. , rahe , j. , duerbeck , h.w . , kohoutek , l. , and seitter , w. 1977 , , 30 , 323 duerbeck , h.w . 1981 , , 93 , 165 duerbeck , h.w . 1987a , , 131 , 461 duerbeck , h.w . 1987b , , 45 , 1 duerbeck , h.w . 1987c , the messenger ( eso ) , 50 , 8 duerbeck , h.w . 1992 , acta  astron . , 42 , 85 duerbeck , h.w . 1996 , in light curves of variable stars  a pictorial atlas , ed . c. sterken and c. jaschek , ( cambridge , cambridge university press ) , p. 134 duerbeck , h.w . 1999 , ibvs , 4731 duerbeck , h.w . and covarrubias , r. 1995 , in iau coll . 151 , flares and flashes , eds . j. greiner et al . , ( berlin , springer ) , p. 264 duerbeck , h.w . and zwitter , t. 2000 , in preparation duerbeck , h.w . , geffert , m. , nelles , b. , dmmler , r. , and nolte , m. 1984 , ibvs , 2641 duerbeck , h.w . , shara , m.m . , leibowitz , e.m . , and seitter , w.c . 2000 , in preparation gaposchkin , s. 1946 , harvard  bull . , 918 gehrz , r.d . , grasdalen , g.l . , and hackwell , j.a . 1985 , , 298 , l47 gill , c.d . and obrien , t.j . 1998 , , 300 , 221 gill , c.d . and obrien , t.j . 2000 , , 314 , 175 gilmozzi , r. , selvelli , p. , cassatella , a. 1994 , , 65 , 199 gratton , l. 1953 , , 118 , 568 haefner , r. 1999 , ibvs , 4706 hakkila , j. , myers , j.m . , stidham , b.j . , hartmann , d.h . 1997 , , 114 , 2043 herbig , g.h . and smak , j.i . 1992 , acta  astron . , 42 , 17 hjellming . r.m . 1994 , talk presented at the 184th aas meeting kaluzny , j. and chlebowski , t. 1989 , acta  astron . , 39 , 35 kenyon , s.j . and wade , r.a . 1986 , , 98 , 935 klare , g. and wolf , b. 1978 , , 33 , 327 kohoutek , l. 1981 , , 196 , 87p krautter , j. , klare , g. , wolf , b. , duerbeck , h.w . , rahe , j. , vogt , n. , and wargau , w. 1981 , , 102 , 337 kukarkin , b.w . and gitz , h.k . 1937 , astr . su 14 , 220 lance , c.m . , mccall , m.l . and uomoto , a.k . 1988 , , 66 , 151 larsson - leander , g. 1954 , an . stockholm obs . 18 , no . 3 leibowitz , e.m . , wyckoff , s. , and vidal , n.v . 1976 , , 88 , 750 liller , w. 1993 , , 5867 macconnell , d.j . 1999 , private communication malakpur , i. 1975 , , 48 , 403 marsh , t.r . , oke , j.b . , and wade , r.a . 1983 , , 205 , 33p mattei , j. a. , 1999 , observations from the aavso international database , private communication mclaughlin , d.b . 1943 , pub . aas 10 , 310 mclaughlin , d.b . 1960 , in stellar atmospheres , ed . greenstein , ( chicago , university of chicago press ) , p. 585 orio , m. , balman , s. , della valle , m. , gallagher , j. and gelman , h. 1996 , , 466 , 410 pachoulakis , i. and saizar , p. 1995 , in cataclysmic variables , ed . a. bianchini et al . , ( dordrecht , kluwer academic publishers ) , p. 153 paresce , f. 1994 , , 282 , l13 paresce , f. , livio , m. , hack , w. , and korista , k. 1995 , , 299 , 823 pettit , e. 1949 , , 61,41 ringwald , f.a . and naylor , t. 1996 , , 278 , 808 ringwald , f.a . naylor , t. and mukai . k. 1996 , , 281 , 192 ringwald , f.a . , wade , r.a . , orosz , j.a . , and ciardullo , r.b . 1998 , , 30 , 893 ritter , h. and kolb , u. 1998 , , 129 , 83 robb , r.m . and scarfe , c.d . 1995 , , 273 , 347 robertson , j.w . , honeycutt , r.k . , and henden , a.h . 1999 , , 31 , 1247 rosino , l. and iijima , t. 1987 , , 130 , 157 rosino , l. , iijima , t. , rafanelli , p. , radovich , m. , esenoglu , h. and della valle 1996 , , 315 , 463 saizar , p. , starrfield , s. , ferland , g. j. , wagner , r. m. , truran , j. w. , kenyon , s. j. , sparks , w. m. , williams , r. e. , stryker , l. l. 1991 , , 367 , 310 saizar , p. , pachoulakis , i. , shore , s.n . , starrfield , s. , williams , r.e . , rothschild , e. and sonneborn , g. , 1996 , , 279 , 280 sanford , r.f . 1945 , , 102 , 357 satyvaldiev , v. 1963 , byull . an  tadj . ssr ( dushanbe ) 36 , 37 seitter , w.c . 1990 , in iau coll . 122 , physics of classical novae , ed . a. cassatella and r. viotti , ( berlin , springer - verlag ) , p. 79 sekiguchi , k. feast , m.w . , fairall , a.p . , winkler , h. 1989 , , 241 , 311 shin , j .- y . , gehrz , r.d . , jones , t.j . , krautter , j. , heidt , j. , and hjellming , r.m . 1998 , , 116 , 1966 shore , s.n . , sonneborn , g. , starrfield , s. , gonzalez - riestra , r. and ake , t.b . 1993 , , 106 , 2408 slavin , a.j . , obrien , t.j . and dunlop , j.s . 1994 , , 266 , l55 slavin , a.j . , obrien , t.j . and dunlop , j.s . 1995 , 276 , 353 soderblom , d. 1976 , , 88 , 517 solf , j. 1983 , , 273 , 647 spencer jones , h. 1931 , ann . 10 szkody , p. 1994 , , 108 , 639 szkody , p. and howell , s.b . 1992 , , 78 , 537 taylor , a.r . , seaquist , e.r . , hollis , j.m . , and pottasch , s.r . 1987 , , 183 , 38 thorstensen , j.r . , and taylor , c.j . 2000 , , 312 , 629 van den bergh , s. and pritchet , c.j . 1986 , , 98 , 110 van den bergh , s. and younger p.f . 1987 , , 70 , 125 verbunt , f. 1987 , , 71 , 339 vogt , n. and maitzen , h.m . 1977 , , 61 , 601 wade , r.a . , ciardullo , r. , jacoby , g.h . , and sharp , n.a . 1991 , , 102 , 1738 wade , r.a . , harlow , j.j.b . , and ciardullo , r. 2000 , , 112 , 614 warner , b. 1987 , , 227,83 warner , b. 1995 , cataclysmic variable stars , ( cambridge , cambridge university press ) , p. 146 williams , r.e . 1982 , , 261 , 170 williams , r.e . 1992 , , 104 , 725 williams , r.e . , phillips , m.m . , and hamuy , m. 1994 , , 90 , 297 whitney , b.a . and clayton , g.c . 1989 , , 98 , 297 wu , c .- c . , panek , r.j . , holm , a.v . , raymond , j.c . , hartmann , l.w . , and swank , j.h . 1989 , , 339 , 443 younger , j.w . 1980 , , 85 , 1233 zakharov , g.p . 1953 , perem . zvezdy , 9 , 175      gq mus & eso dutch-0.9 m & 21 march 1998 & 900s & 1200s & 18.37 + v351 pup & & & 600s & 1200s & 19.55 + hy lup & & & 600s & 1200s & 18.86 + cp cru & & & 600s & 1200s & 19.48 + n car 72 & & & 1200s & & unident . + v365 car & & 22 march 1998 & 600s & & 18.47 + v868 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 19.88 + v888 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 16.38 + cp pup & & & 600s & & 14.99 + v842 cen & & 23 march 1998 & 450s & 600s & 15.82 + v812 cen & & & 600s & 900s & 20.44 + by cir & & & 450s & 600s & 15.86 + v4361 sgr & & & 180s & 180s & 16.85 + n sco 97 & & & 180s & 180s & 17.58 + cp pup & & & & 1200s & + n car 71 & & & 900s & & unident . +   + rw umi & kpno-2.1 m & 28 may 1998 & 1050s & 1050s & 18.95 + v827 her & & & 720s & 600s & 18.08 + hr del & & & 60s & 60s & 12.16 + v1819 cyg & & & & 600s & 20.33 +   + ct ser & & 29 may 1998 & 1050s & 1050s & - + v794 oph & & & 1050s & 1050s & - + v838 her & & & 660s & 900s & 19.07 + qv vul & & & 660s & 900s & 18.61 + v1819 cyg & & & 660s & & + v1974 cyg & & 31 may 1998 & 660s & 660s & 16.06 + pw vul & & & & 360s & 17.51 + v2104 oph & & & 3600s & 2700s & 20.50 + v3888 sgr & & 01 june 1998 & 3600s & & 20.96 + v3645 sgr & & & 150s & & unident . + nq vul & & & 660s & 600s & 17.70 + pw vul & & & 360s & & +   + qu vul & kpno-0.9 m & 30 june 1998 & 1550s & 1800s & 18.31 +      cp pup ( 1942.86 ) & d & 16.9 & 1998.23 & 0 & 815 & 12 + & d & 16.0 & 1995.75 & 1 & + & d & 13.4 & 1987.20 & 24 & + ct ser ( 1948.27 ) & d & @xmath515 & 1998.23 & 0 & 535 & 8 + rw umi ( 1956.73 ) & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & 950 & 11 + & & not seen & 1997.98 & 1 & + & d & 3.0 & 1993.69 & 27 & + & r & 2.0 & 1983.5 & 11 & + hr del ( 1967.52 ) & d & @xmath516 & 1998.41 & 0 & 470,540 & 32,34 + & d & @xmath517 & 1997.40 & 1 & 520,560 & 8,35 + & d & @xmath518 & 1993.69 & 27 & + & d & 5.5 & 1992.58 & 7 & + & d & @xmath519 & 1981.33 & 13 & + v3888 sgr ( 1974.76 ) & d & @xmath520 & 1998.41 & 0 & 1300 & 22 + nq vul ( 1976.81 ) & d & @xmath521 & 1998.41 & 0 & 1300,1700 & 15,16 + & & not seen & 1997.92 & 1 & 950,705 & 14,8 + & d & 8 & 1993.69 & 27 & + pw vul ( 1984.57 ) & d & @xmath522 & 1998.79 & 1 & 1200,470 & 17,3 + & d & @xmath523 & 1998.41 & 0 & + & r & 1.1 & 1993.64 & 3 & + qu vul ( 1984.99 ) & d & @xmath524 & 1998.71 & 1,6 & 790,1200 & 19,26 + & d & @xmath525 & 1998.50 & 0 & 570,1190 & 37,4 + & d & @xmath526 & 1998.18 & 2 + & r & 0.8 & 1996.35 & 5 + & r & 1.9 & 1994.52 & 4 & + & d & @xmath527 & 1986.34 & 26 & + v1819 cyg ( 1986.57 ) & d & @xmath528 & 1999.18 & 1 & 600 & 38 + & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & 700 & 39 + v842 cen ( 1986.89 ) & d & @xmath529 & 1998.23 & 0 & 535 & 23 + & d & 1.6 & 1995.15 & 10 & 525 & 33 + qv vul ( 1987.87 ) & d & @xmath530 & 1998.95 & 1 & 515 & 37 + & & visible & 1998.95 & 1 & + & d & @xmath531 & 1998.62 & 2 + & & not seen & 1998.41 & 0 & + v351 pup ( 1991.99 )   & d & 1.3 & 1998.23 & 1,6 & 2000 & 36 + & & visible & 1998.12 & 0 & 1200 & 40 + & r & 0.58 & 1995.17 & 36 & + v1974 cyg ( 1992.14 ) & d & @xmath532 & 1998.41 & 0 & 825,1100 & 9,20 + & d & @xmath533 & 1998.12 & 1 & 1500,860 & 21,28 + & d & @xmath534 & 1998.11 & 2 + & d & @xmath535 & 1994.38 & 30 + & d & @xmath536 & 1994.03 & 30 + & d & @xmath537 & 1993.41 & 31 + hy lup ( 1993.71 )   & d & @xmath528 & 1999.12 & 1 & 2700,400 & 25,18 + & & not seen & 1998.23 & 0 + cp cru ( 1996.65 ) & d & @xmath538 & 1998.91 & 1,6 & 2000 & 29 + & & not seen & 1998.23 & 0 +      cp pup & 55.37 & 815 & 0.153 & 1120 + & 52.89 & & 0.151 & 1140 + & 44.34 & & 0.151 & 1140 + ct ser & 49.96 & 535 & 0.079 & 1430 + rw umi & 36.96 & 950 & 0.037 & 4900 + & 26.8 & & 0.041 & 5400 + hr del & 30.89 & 525 & 0.149 & 750 + & 29.88 & & 0.146 & 760 + & 26.17 & & 0.220 & 505 + & 25.06 & & 0.110 & 1010 + & 13.81 & & 0.134 & 825 + v3888 sgr & 23.65 & 1300 & 0.110 & 2495 + nq vul & 21.60 & 1025 & 0.169 & 1280 + & 16.88 & 1025 & 0.237 & 910 + & 16.88 & 545 & 0.090 & 1280 + pw vul & 14.22 & 470 & 0.053 & 1880 + & 13.84 & 1200 & 0.145 & 1750 + & 9.07 & 470 & 0.061 & 1635 + qu vul & 13.72 & 570 & 0.060 & 2005 + & 13.51 & 1500 & 0.207 & 1530 + v1819 cyg & 12.61 & 700 & 0.020 & 7385 + v842 cen & 11.34 & ( 1600 ) & 0.255 & ( 1325 ) + & 8.26 & 525 & 0.097 & 1140 + qv vul & 11.08 & 515 & 0.041 & 2675 + v351 pup & 6.24 & 1200 & 0.100 & 2530 + & 3.18 & & 0.091 & 2775 + v1974 cyg & 6.27 & ( 4500 ) & 0.718 & ( 1320 ) + & 2.24 & 1060 & 0.112 & 2000 + & 1.89 & & 0.106 & 2115 + & 1.30 & & 0.115 & 1940 + hy lup & 5.41 & 400 & 0.046 & 1800 + cp cru & 2.26 & 2000 & 0.133 & 3180 +      v794 oph & 1939.45 & 58.78 &  4.95 + v365 car & 1948.74 & 49.49 &  52.2 + v812 cen & 1973.25 & 24.98 &  69.0 + v2104 oph & 1976.76 & 21.68 &  0.44 + gq mus & 1983.05 & 15.18 &  26.4  2.57 + v827 her & 1987.05 & 12.41 &  0.86  1.32 + v838 her & 1991.23 & 7.18 &  2.05  1.17 + v868 cen & 1991.25 & 6.98 &  32.1 + by cir & 1995.07 & 3.16 &   + v888 cen & 1995.15 & 3.08 &   + v4361 sgr & 1996.53 & 1.70 &   + n sco 1997 & 1997.43 & 0.80 &   +      v500 aql & he ? & ao & 17 & 42 & 0.118 & @xmath539 & @xmath540 & pg + v603 aql & hy & ao & 4 & 9 & 0.500 & @xmath541 & @xmath542 & + v1229 aql & fe & b ? & 20 & 38 & 0.100 & @xmath543 & @xmath542 & + t aur & fe & ca & 45 & 50 & 0.044 & @xmath544 & @xmath545 & pg + v842 cen & fe & cb & 35 & 48 & 0.057 & @xmath546 & @xmath547 & + v450 cyg & fe & ca & 88 & 108 & 0.023 & @xmath548 & @xmath549 & + v476 cyg & fe & a & 6 & 15 & 0.333 & @xmath550 & @xmath551 & + v1500 cyg & hy & a & 2.4 & 3.7 & 1.111 & @xmath552 & @xmath553 & + v1819 cyg & fe & bb & 37 & 89 & 0.054 & @xmath544 & @xmath554 & + v1974 cyg & fe & ba & 17 & 37 & 0.125 & @xmath555 & @xmath556 & onemg + hr del & fe & d & 172 & 230 & 0.012 & @xmath557 & @xmath558 & + dq her & fe & ca & 39 & 86 & 0.051 & @xmath559 & @xmath560 & + v446 her & he & a & 7 & 11.5 & 0.426 & @xmath561 & @xmath254 & pg + v533 her & fe & ba & 22 & 46 & 0.091 & @xmath562 & @xmath563 & + cp lac & hy & a & 5.3 & 9.8 & 0.377 & @xmath564 & @xmath565 & + dk lac & fe & ao ? & 11 & 24 & 0.182 & @xmath566 & @xmath567 & + gk per & he & ao & 7 & 13 & 0.286 & @xmath568 & @xmath549 & + rr pic & fe & d & 20 & 127 & 0.100 & @xmath569 & @xmath570 & + cp pup & he & a & 6 & 8 & 0.333 & @xmath552 & @xmath563 & + v351 pup & fe & a & 10 & 26 & 0.200 & @xmath571 & @xmath563 & onemg + fh ser & fe & cb & 42 & 59 & 0.048 & @xmath572 & @xmath573 & + xx tau & fe & cb & 24 & 43 & 0.083 & @xmath574 & @xmath575 & pg + rw umi & ? & ba & 48 & 88 & 0.042 & @xmath576 & @xmath577 & pg + lv vul & fe & ba & 21 & 43 & 0.095 & @xmath578 & @xmath579 & + nq vul & fe & bb & 23 & 53 & 0.087 & @xmath580 & @xmath581 & + pw vul & fe & bb & 82 & 126 & 0.024 & @xmath582 & @xmath583 & + qu vul & fe & ba & 22 & 49 & 0.091 & @xmath584 & @xmath585 & onemg + qv vul & fe & cb & 50 & 53 & 0.040 & @xmath586 & @xmath587 & +      v500 aql & 0.1452 & 19.25 & 5.9 & @xmath588 & 4.50 & & 4.85 & novae + v603 aql & 0.1381 & 11.70 & 0.33 & @xmath589 & 3.90 & 17 . & 4.80 & at minimum + v1229 aql & & & 2.1 & @xmath590 & & & & + t aur & 0.2044 & 15.03 & 0.96 & @xmath591 & 4.50 & 57 . & 4.45 & + v842 cen & & 15.82 & 1.15 & @xmath592 & & & & + v450 cyg & & 19 . & 3.5 & @xmath593 & 5 . : & & 5.4 & + v476 cyg & & 17.70 & 1.62 & @xmath594 & 5.85 & & 6.20 & + v1500 cyg & 0.1396 & 17.42 & 1.5 & @xmath595 & 4.95 & ? & 5.35 & + v1819 cyg & & 20.33 & 7.4 & @xmath596 & 4.90 & & 5.25 & + hr del & 0.2142 & 12.16 & 0.76 & @xmath597 & 2.30 & 40 . & 2.80 & + dq her & 0.1936 & 14.38 & 0.48 & @xmath598 & 5.30 & 86.5 & 2.70 & + v446 her & 0.2071 & 17.61 & 1.35 & @xmath599 & 5.85 & & 6.20 & + v533 her & 0.1471 & 15.06 & 1.25 & @xmath600 & 4.60 & ? & 4.95 & + cp lac & & 15.80 & 1.35 & @xmath591 & 4.50 & & 4.90 & + dk lac & & 16.75 & 3.9 & @xmath601 & 2.40 & & 2.75 & + bt mon & 0.3338 & 15.59 & 1.8 & @xmath602 & 3.85 & 82 & 1.90 & + gk per & 1.9968 & 13.01 & 0.455 & @xmath603 & 3.75 & @xmath604&4.15 & + rr pic & 0.1450 & 12.50 & 0.58 & @xmath605 & 3.55 & 65 & 3.45 & + cp pup & 0.0614 & 14.99 & 1.7 & @xmath606 & 3.90 & 40 : & 4.45 & + v351 pup & & 19.55 & & @xmath607 & & & & + v3888 sgr & & 20.96 & 2.5 & @xmath608 & 5.75 & & 6.15 & + ct ser & 0.1950 & 16.14 & 1.4 & @xmath609 & 5.40 & & 5.75 & + fh ser & & 16.97 & 0.95 & @xmath610 & 5.05 & & 5.45 & + xx tau & & 18.58 & 3.5 & @xmath611 & 4.60 & & 4.95 & + rw umi & 0.079 & 18.95 & 5 & @xmath612 & 5.15 & & 5.55 & + lv vul & & 15.90 & 0.92 & @xmath613 & 4.35 & & 4.70 & + nq vul & & 17.70 & 1.16 & @xmath614 & 5.30 & & 5.65 & + pw vul & 0.2137 & 17.51 & 1.8 & @xmath615 & 4.50 & & 4.85 & + qu vul & 0.1118 & 18.31 & 1.75 & @xmath616 & 5.20 & & 5.55 & + qv vul & & 18.61 & 2.7 & @xmath617 & 5.20 & & 5.55 & +   + ss aur & 0.1828 & 10.5 & 0.20 & @xmath618 & 3.80 & 38 & 4.40 & dwarf novae + ss cyg & 0.2751 & 8.7 & 0.166 & @xmath619 & 2.47 & 38 & 3.05 & at maximum + u gem & 0.1729 & 9.8 & 0.096 & @xmath620 & 4.62 & 70 & 3.90 & +   + ae aqr & 0.4117 & 11.5 & 0.102 & @xmath621 & 6.26 & 58 & 6.20 & novalike + v3885 sgr & 0.2163 & 10.3 & 0.11 & @xmath622 & 5.01 & @xmath623 & 5.40&variables + rw sex & 0.2451 & 10.6 & 0.29 & @xmath624 & 3.24 & 34 & 3.90 & + ix vel & 0.1939 & 9.6 & 0.096 & @xmath625 & 4.40 & 60 & 4.25 & +
Abstract:

Answer: an optical imaging study of recent 30 novae has been undertaken using both ground - based and space - based observations . resolved shells have been detected around 9 objects in the ground - based data , while another four objects have shells detected by _ hubble space telescope _ observations ; for rw  umi , we fail to detect a shell which was observed five years earlier . images in h@xmath0 , and when appropriate [ o  iii ]  @xmath15007 , are shown , and finding charts for novae without shells are given if no published chart is available . expansion parallaxes for all systems with shells are derived , and absolute magnitudes for a total of 28 objects are presented , along with a discussion of the maximum magnitude - rate of decline relation . we find that separate linear fits for fast and slow novae may be a better representation of the data than a single , global fit . at minimum , most novae have similar magnitudes as those of dwarf novae at maximum and novalike stars .