Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: in recent years , several studies have been carried out on the radio spectral properties of extra - galactic high - frequency selected radio sources . sadler et al . ( 2006 ) presented the general properties of a sample of radio sources with flux densities above 100 mjy obtained as part of the pilot 20  ghz survey ( at20 g ) undertaken with the australia telescope compact array ( ricci et al . 2004 ) . with the use of a radio `` two - colour diagram '' , first used in the radio band by kesteven et al . ( 1977 ) , they characterized the spectral properties of the high - frequency radio sources and confirmed the diversity of the radio spectra and the difficulty of predicting high - frequency properties by extrapolating the results of surveys observed at lower frequencies ( see also tucci et al . 2008 and massardi et al . 2008 ) . considering the two classical radio source populations ( extended steep - spectrum and compact flat - spectrum sources ) , sadler et al . ( 2006 ) found that roughly 87 per cent of the high - frequency selected sources are flat - spectrum and 13 per cent are steep - spectrum . tucci et al . ( 2008 ) performed a multifrequency spectral analysis of a sample of radio sources observed with the very small array ( vsa ) at 33 ghz exploiting existing data at different frequencies down to 1.4 ghz . one of the most interesting results they found is that the majority of 33  ghz - selected sources show flatter spectra going to higher frequency ( about 50 per cent of the sample ) or become inverted ( about 19 per cent of the sample ) . this contradicts the standard models for high - frequency source spectra , which predict a spectral steepening due to the ageing of high - energy electrons . the result they found is completely consistent with the `` unified model '' for agn : the steep - spectrum component , which arises from extended radio lobes , rapidly decreases with frequency , while the compact emission starts to dominate at frequency @xmath2 1  ghz if the radio jet axis lies enough close to the line of sight . the difficulty of predicting high - frequency flux densities from the extrapolation of lower frequency data is testified by the significant number of sources found at high frequency that were not predicted . the percentage of these `` unexpected '' sources is observed to steadily increase with frequency : 10 per cent at 15  ghz ( taylor et al . 2001 ) , 18 per cent at 20  ghz ( sadler et al . 2006 ) and 32 per cent at 33 ghz ( tucci et al . 2008 ) . the analysis of the radio spectral properties of 320 bright extragalactic radio sources with flux density @xmath3500  mjy at 20  ghz extracted from the at20 g was discussed in massardi et al . in this sample , spectral steepening is a common feature that becomes more prominent at higher frequencies , even if flat and inverted spectrum objects still dominate the sample .    in a more recent paper , prandoni et al ( 2010 ) studied the radio properties of a faint sample ( s @xmath30.6 mjy ) , selected at lower frequency ( 5  ghz ) and associated with early - type galaxies , finding strong spectral similarities with the massardi et al . ( 2008 ) sample and suggesting that faint radio galaxies are mostly counterparts of the brighter ones , with no significant influence introduced by different flux limits and frequency selection . massardi et al . ( 2011a ) analysed the full sample release ( fsr , murphy et al . 2010 ) of the at20 g survey , which is 91 per cent complete above 100  mjy and 79 per cent complete above 50  mjy , and found that the high - frequency bright source sample is dominated by flat - spectrum sources , while the fraction of steep - spectrum sources increases with decreasing flux density . these results have also been confirmed by procopio et al . ( 2011 ) , who observed 263 sources , selected at 23  ghz in the wmap maps , at 5 , 8 and 22  ghz almost simultaneously to the observations performed between 30 and 857  ghz by the european space agency planck satellite ( tauber et al . the optical properties of the at20 g full sample presented in mahony et al . ( 2011 ) , who used supercosmos ( hambly et al . 2001 ) for optical identification and the 6df galaxy survey ( jones et al . 2009 ) or the literature for redshifts , showed that the sources which accrete cold gas have steeper radio spectral indices with respect to the sources that accrete hot gas . this behaviour suggests that the radio emission in sources with cold - mode accretion is dominated by the jets . interestingly , the fraction of flat- and steep - spectrum sources for the objects with no identification ( blank field ) is very different to that observed in the spectroscopic sample ; in fact the percentage of blank fields increases dramatically at steep spectral indices . the authors suggested that this increase could indicate a population of high - z ultra - steep - spectrum sources .    in recent papers , massardi et al . ( 2011b ) and bonavera et al . ( 2011 ) presented the planck australia telescope compact array co - eval observations ( paco ) , which provided two complete samples of flux density - selected sources : a bright sample ( @xmath4 500 mjy ) and a faint sample ( @xmath4 200 mjy ) with extensive multi - frequency coverage ( 540  ghz ) . the spectral analysis showed no significant differences between the two samples . the steepening of the sources at high frequencies is confirmed . the main difference is a larger fraction of steep - spectrum sources in the faint sample , mostly at the expense of peaked- and flat - spectrum sources . in a subsequent paper , bonaldi et al . ( 2013 ) presented a detailed analysis of a complete sample of 69 sources spectrally - selected from the at20 g sample as those having inverted or upturning spectra and observed in the framework of the paco project . most of the source spectra ( 85 per cent ) are smooth and well described by a double power - law , while the remaining sources have complex spectra . the majority of the radio sources are likely blazars probably caught during a bright phase at 20  ghz . gawroski et al . ( 2010 ) also investigated the dependence of spectral index distribution on flux density for a sample of 57 sources detected at 30  ghz with the ocra prototype receiver at the 32-m toru radio telescope above a flux density limit of 5 mjy . they found that the proportion of steep spectrum sources increases with decreasing flux density . they found no evidence for an unexpected population of sources above their completeness limit of 10 mjy whose spectra rise towards higher frequencies .    peel et al . ( 2011 ) measured the 30  ghz flux densities of 605 radio sources from the combined radio all - sky target eight - ghz survey ( crates ) with the same instrumentation as gawroski et al . they studied the radio spectra between 1.4 and 30  ghz and found that 75 per cent have steepened at @xmath5 compared with @xmath6 , 6 per cent of the sources show a ghz - peaked spectrum shape with a peak between 4.8 and 8.4  ghz , 10 per cent of the sources are flat or rising and another 10 per cent are inverted . kurinsky et al . ( 2013 ) reported the multi - frequency observations ( 4.843.3 ghz ) of 89 sources with 37  ghz flux density @xmath3 1 jy carried out with the vla / jvla . the sample contains a much higher fraction ( 42 per cent ) of flat - spectrum sources compared to 510 per cent of sources found in other samples selected at lower frequency . this sample extends the radio spectral energy distribution of the radio sources in the 5857  ghz regime .    in this paper we present the results of the multi - frequency follow - up observations of the k - band northern wide survey ( knows ) pilot project ( righini et al . 2012 , hereafter paper  i ) in a comprehensive way . in section [ sez : bright ] a brief summary of the pilot survey is provided ; while in section  [ sez : lowfol ] the results of the 5/8  ghz follow - up observations are presented . in section  [ sez : ocra ] we report on the 30  ghz follow - up observations and data reduction . in section  [ sez : spec ] we show the radio spectra between 1.4 and 30  ghz and the optical identifications . in section  [ sez : res ] we present the results of the analysis of radio spectra , and we compare them with the results from other high - frequency selected samples . in section  [ sez : sum ] we summarize our conclusions . throughout this paper we use the following cosmological parameters : @xmath771 km s@xmath8 mpc@xmath8 , @xmath90.27 and @xmath100.73 ( larson et al . 2011 ) . during the years 20102011 , the medicina 32-m dish hosted the seven - feed 1826.5  ghz receiver built for the sardinia radio telescope , with the aim of performing its commissioning . this opportunity was exploited to carry out a pilot survey at 20  ghz over the sky region north of @xmath11 . this survey produced a catalogue of 73 confirmed sources down to a flux density limit of 115 mjy , which can be considered complete above 200 mjy . the 73 confirmed sources come from a selected list of 151 candidates chosen from the brighter and more reliable targets for the 20  ghz follow - up . for this reason the sample analysed in this paper is referred to as the knows 20  ghz bright sample . a more detailed description is provided in paper  i.    precise 20  ghz flux densities and position measurements were derived for all sources through 20  ghz follow - up observations , carried out at the 32-m medicina telescope , in the framework of the multi - frequency ( 5 , 8 , 20 , 30  ghz ) study of the sample . the medicina 20  ghz follow - up observations are described in detail in paper  i. here we focus on the 5/8  ghz medicina observations and on the 30  ghz observations carried out at the toru telescope . follow - up observations of the knows bright sample were performed with the 32-m medicina telescope on dec 11@xmath12 , 12@xmath12 and 13@xmath12 2010 in the frequency ranges 55.15  ghz and 8.188.33  ghz . the target list of 73 sources was scheduled to be observed at 5 and 8  ghz in blocks of pointings based on ra range . a list of flux density calibrators ( 3c286 , 3c295 , 3c48 , 3c123 and ngc7027 ) were observed twice a day interspersed with blocks of target sources . both calibrators and target sources were observed in multiple ra and dec cross - scans centred on the positions obtained from the knows 20  ghz bright sample . the cross - scans were 6@xmath13hpbw wide ( where the half power beam width is 7.5 arcmin at 5  ghz and 4.8 arcmin at 8.3  ghz ) at the scanning speed of 3@xmath14/min and 2@xmath14/min at 5 and 8  ghz respectively . for comparison , the angular resolution at 20  ghz is 1.7 arcmin . data were recorded into fits files . they were then flagged in order to discard scans clearly affected by radio frequency interference and/or severe atmospheric disturbances . the data were flux - calibrated according to the absolute flux density scale by ott et al . the ra and dec cross - scans were then stacked for each target source in order to improve the s / n ratio of the detections by decreasing the rms noise . the stacked cross - scan was gaussian - fitted in order to obtain flux density and positional offsets in ra and dec . the positional offsets were then used to correct the flux density for the signal attenuation caused by the primary beam profile . a thorough description of the aforementioned calibration and fitting procedures ( performed with the data reduction package oscar , procopio et al . 2011 ) , together with the error analysis for the flux density measurements are provided in paper  i.    of the 73 sources , 60 ( 82 per cent ) and 57 ( 78 per cent ) were detected at 5 and 8  ghz respectively . non - detections at 5/8  ghz were mainly due to the limited sensitivity of the receivers , which were not properly cooled down at the time of observations . the @xmath15 flux density limit was 63 mjy / beam at 5 ghz and 85 mjy / beam at 8 ghz . the 5/8  ghz flux densities of the sources are listed in table  [ tab : flux ] . the 30  ghz follow - up observations were carried out with the ocra - p receiver at the toru 32-m telescope ( poland ) . ocra - p is the prototype of the ocra - f ( one centimeter radio array - faraday ) multi - feed 30  ghz receiver developed in the framework of the ocra program ( browne et al . the nominal sensitivity of the receiver considering an overall system temperature of 40  k and a bandwidth of 6  ghz , is 6 mjy s@xmath16 . the fwhm of the antenna beam is 72 arcsec at 30  ghz . the 30 ghz observations were carried out on september 9@xmath17 , november 15@xmath17 and december 3@xmath18 2010 . the targets were observed using cross - scans or on / off measurements depending on the source flux density ( lowe et al . 2007 ; gawroski et al . the planetary nebula ngc  7027 was used as primary flux density calibrator . ngc  7027 was observed 610 times for each observing session . hafez et al . ( 2008 ) report a flux density of 5.39@xmath190.04  jy at 33  ghz at an epoch of 2003.0 with a secular decrease of @xmath20 per cent per year ( ott et al . 1994 ) . by extrapolating the flux density to 2010.0 a value of 5.32@xmath190.04  jy was obtained , which was then scaled to 30 ghz using the ngc  7027 spectral index of @xmath21 . the 30  ghz flux density of ngc  7027 thus obtained is 5.38@xmath190.04 jy . secondary flux density calibration was performed using the signal generated from a noise diode after each source observation . the flux density of ngc  7027 was measured at different elevations in order to obtain elevation - dependent gain corrections . the correction for atmospheric absorption was obtained by calculating the opacity from the system temperature measurements at zenith and at 30@xmath14 of elevation . the data reduction was performed using a custom software package described in peel et al . ( 2011 ) and in greater detail in peel ( 2009 ) . in total 295 measurements were obtained on the full list of 73 sources . data affected by poor weather conditions were discarded , as well as cross - scans in which the peak amplitude measured by the ocra - p beams was offset by more than 20 per cent . 52 targets were detected at 30  ghz corresponding to 71 per cent of the total . the 30  ghz flux densities of the detected sources are listed in table  [ tab : flux ] . [ fig : ocra ] shows the scatter plot between the 30  ghz planck early release compact source catalogue ( ercsc ; planck collaboration 2011 ) flux densities and the 30  ghz ocra flux densities of the 16 targets present in both data sets . planck and ocra flux densities are in reasonable agreement especially at the bright end , indicating that our flux densities are not affected by significant systematic effects . source variability might account for a scatter that is larger than the flux density error bars for the fainter objects . it might also be useful to compare in terms of variability the planck - ocra scatter plot with the one in figure 6 of gawroski et al . ( 2010 ) where 42 ocra - p 30  ghz flux densities are matched with those from the very small array source subtractor at 33  ghz . 10 out of the 42 sources show variations greater than 2@xmath22 ( combined error ) . the radio spectra of the knows sources are shown in fig . [ fig : sed ] . integrated flux densities at 1.4  ghz were added from the nrao - vla sky survey ( nvss , condon et al . 1998 ) to extend the frequency baseline . the nvss flux densities were extracted from the nvss online catalogue from a cross - match with the knows 20  ghz follow - up positions within a search radius of 50  arcsec . in order to assess the reliability of these cross - matches , all the 1.4  ghz nvss images were retrieved from the nvss online postage - stamp server and visually inspected . all 73 sources in our sample appear to have nvss counterparts , with three sources ( knows  080817 + 731514 , knows  144830 + 760137 , knows  184218 + 794540 ) showing two nvss components and three sources ( knows  160731 + 850159 , knows  211402 + 820437 , knows  220549 + 743632 ) showing three nvss components in the nvss images . for these six sources the nvss components were summed to provide the integrated 1.4  ghz flux densities reported in table  [ tab : flux ] . when available , the 30  ghz , 44  ghz and 70  ghz planck ercsc ( planck collaboration 2011 ) flux densities were also added to the radio spectra . however such measurements are not included in table  [ tab : flux ] due to the sparsity of this information . we note that flux density measurements used to derive the radio spectra are not coeval . in particular the high - frequency ones ( @xmath23 5  ghz ) were taken within a time range of 1.5 years : between august 2009 and june 2010 for the planck flux density measurements ; in november 2010 for the ocra - p 30  ghz knows follow - up ; in december 2010 for the 5/8  ghz follow - up and in april 2011 for the knows 20  ghz follow - up measurements . the 1.4 ghz nvss observations were done between september 1993 and october 1996 with additional patching observations carried out during the fourth quarter of 1997 . this means that our radio spectra might be affected by variability . massardi et al . ( 2010 ) found a 56 per cent median variability on a 6 months timescale in the range 518 ghz , and up to a @xmath24 per cent variability over 9 months , so we do not expect variability to significantly affect the spectral analysis discussed in the following sections . the long time lag between the 1.4 ghz observations and the higher frequency ones ( 17 years ) is not troublesome because at lower frequencies most of the emission comes from radio lobes which are more stable than radio cores .    in this paper we are interested only to the statistical behaviour of spectral indices in the sample . in this case positive and negative variations caused by short - term variability tend to cancel out . however , it must be born in mind , when using our data to interpret individual source spectra , that some sources may experience large variability also in relatively short periods . some long - term flux density monitoring projects carried out at high frequencies at ovro , metsahovi and umrao ( richards et al . 2011 , ciaramella et al . 2004 , pyatunina et al . 2005 , hovatta et al . 2007 ) show plenty of such examples . the nasa extragalactic database ( ned ; _ http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/_ ) was then used to identify the radio source optical counterparts , to find redshifts and to obtain optical types within a search radius of 1 arcmin to the 20  ghz knows follow - up positions . in cases of multiple counterparts we chose the one which matched the nvss flux density and position information . we also extracted the information on the optical class , b@xmath25 and r@xmath26 magnitude from the supercosmos sky surveys database ( sss ; _ http://www-wfau.roe.ac.uk/sss/index.html_ ) . we again allowed for a 1-arcmin wide search box and in cases of multiple counterparts we chose the entry with the minimum distance from the follow - up 20  ghz radio position . the optical and redshift information of the knows sample is summarized in table  [ tab : optid ] .    according to ned we have 36 qsos ( 49 per cent ) , 17 galaxies ( 23 per cent ) and one planetary nebula , while 19 objects ( 36 per cent ) have no optical types . in supercosmos , 18 objects ( 25 per cent ) show galaxy appearance ( class 1 ) , 51 ( 70 per cent ) a stellar appearance ( class 2 ) , one ( the planetary nebula ) is noisy ( class=4 ) and 3 objects ( 4 per cent ) have no supercosmos identification . for the 19 sources that have no optical type in ned we use the supercosmos classification , when available . putting together the ned and supercosmos classifications , sources in the knows bright sample can be divided as follows : 20 ( 27 per cent ) are galaxies or with galaxy appearance and 50 ( 68 per cent ) are qsos or with stellar appearance , in agreement with the results of previous works ( see e.g. sadler et al . 2006 ) . two have no optical classification and one is a planetary nebula . 42 out of the 72 ( 58 per cent ) extragalactic objects ( we exclude here the planetary nebula ) in the knows bright sample have a redshift measurement . 30 of them are qsos and 12 are radiogalaxies according to the combined ned / supercosmos optical classification . for 34 objects ( 24 qsos and 10 radiogalaxies ) we computed the radio and optical luminosities using the scheme described in mahony et al . ( 2011 ) . to compute luminosities across a wide range of redshifts it is essential to shift the observed frequencies into the rest frame using a @xmath27correction . as qsos and galaxies have very different seds in the optical regime each optical class needs to be @xmath27corrected in a different manner . the @xmath27correction formula by de propris et al . ( 2004 ) , making use of the b@xmath28r@xmath26 colour , was applied to the radiogalaxies . for qsos a power law was instead used with a spectral index @xmath29 . the redshift and luminosity statistics for the qsos and radiogalaxies in the knows sample are summarized in table  [ tab : lumz ] . as expected , qsos are found on average at higher redshifts than radiogalaxies and are intrinsically brighter both in the radio and the optical band . lrrrrrrrrrr     +   + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) + name & s30 & @xmath30 & s20 & @xmath31 & s8 & @xmath32 & s5 & @xmath33 & s1.4 & @xmath34 + & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) +     + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) + name & s30 & @xmath30 & s20 & @xmath31 & s8 & @xmath32 & s5 & @xmath33 & s1.4 & @xmath34 + & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) & ( mjy ) +    knows 001302@xmath35723123 & 167 & 5 & 325 & 18 &  &  & 559 & 14 & 509.1 & 11.2 + knows 001312@xmath35774854 &  &  & 208 & 19 & 548 & 11 & 718 & 16 & 2101.3 & 63.0 + knows 001633@xmath35791641 &  &  & 247 & 12 & 738 & 31 & 1123 & 14 & 3651.0 & 88.6 + knows 001716@xmath35813441 & 480 & 20 & 745 & 38 & 1362 & 19 & 1471 & 16 & 692.8 & 20.8 + knows 001948@xmath35732725 & 870 & 31 & 1283 & 64 & 1068 & 25 & 858 & 14 & 1251.8 & 37.6 + knows 020313@xmath35810622 & 546 & 17 & 174 & 9 & 277 & 12 & 172 & 3 & 211.0 & 6.3 + knows 020336@xmath35723253 & 420 & 22 & 594 & 34 & 549 & 21 &  &  & 229.9 & 6.9 + knows 020649@xmath35841102 & 189 & 14 & 120 & 12 &  &  & 244 & 9 & 100.0 & 3.0 + knows 020954@xmath35722920 & 488 & 21 & 488 & 42 & 454 & 14 & 398 & 8 & 669.9 & 20.1 + knows 021733@xmath35734923 & 2739 & 96 & 2894 & 145 & 3760 & 32 & 3829 & 22 & 2271.6 & 68.1 + knows 022459@xmath35765544 &  &  & 130 & 11 & 330 & 9 & 554 & 12 & 1927.2 & 57.8 + knows 035447@xmath35800918 & 313 & 13 & 294 & 21 &  &  & 406 & 11 & 643.7 & 19.3 + knows 041050@xmath35765649 & 962 & 36 & 1342 & 67 & 2122 & 38 & 2984 & 19 & 5620.1 & 168.6 + knows 041318@xmath35745107 & 152 & 11 & 297 & 25 & 900 & 22 & 1094 & 18 & 2847.6 & 80.0 + knows 042132@xmath35835837 & 188 & 16 & 205 & 10 &  &  &  &  & 5.2 & 0.6 + knows 050844@xmath35843202 & 140 & 12 & 301 & 15 & 315 & 13 & 359 & 19 & 294.8 & 8.9 + knows 061048@xmath35724843 & 228 & 16 & 360 & 25 & 484 & 12 & 683 & 18 & 1041.6 & 31.3 + knows 062555@xmath35820228 & 528 & 19 & 628 & 45 & 755 & 17 & 1016 & 14 & 681.0 & 20.4 + knows 063921@xmath35732454 & 1254 & 48 & 1467 & 73 & 1026 & 22 &  &  & 903.6 & 27.1 + knows 064132@xmath35881200 &  &  & 204 & 14 &  &  & 235 & 5 & 126.2 & 3.8 + knows 072608@xmath35791135 & 405 & 17 & 498 & 25 & 836 & 18 & 914 & 14 & 501.0 & 15.0 + knows 074713@xmath35763918 & 373 & 17 & 498 & 25 & 688 & 17 & 657 & 11 & 133.1 & 4.0 + knows 074922@xmath35742038 & 231 & 19 & 416 & 21 & 461 & 19 & 563 & 11 & 510.3 & 15.3 + knows 075039@xmath35790914 & 339 & 16 & 240 & 12 & 268 & 12 & 361 & 6 & 181.5 & 5.5 + knows 075052@xmath35824200 & 336 & 26 & 475 & 24 & 644 & 16 & 846 & 11 & 1845.1 & 55.4 + knows 080817@xmath35731514 & 74 & 3 & 320 & 16 & 378 & 13 & 431 & 12 & 376.8 & 9.3 + knows 092934@xmath35861236 &  &  & 187 & 9 & 255 & 11 & 483 & 10 & 142.7 & 4.3 + knows 093056@xmath35742017 &  &  & 240 & 15 & 400 & 11 & 369 & 10 & 211.0 & 6.3 + knows 101009@xmath35825020 & 283 & 13 & 353 & 18 & 420 & 13 &  &  & 503.7 & 15.1 + knows 104421@xmath35805447 & 577 & 30 & 1188 & 56 & 706 & 17 & 658 & 7 & 828.3 & 24.9 + knows 105359@xmath35863004 &  &  & 126 & 9 &  &  & 265 & 4 & 230.6 & 6.9 + knows 105812@xmath35811438 & 756 & 27 & 795 & 44 & 756 & 17 & 764 & 13 & 240.3 & 7.2 + knows 110149@xmath35722544 & 904 & 31 & 912 & 46 & 980 & 20 & 954 & 12 & 1245.6 & 37.4 + knows 110410@xmath35765859 & 189 & 9 & 278 & 14 & 545 & 13 & 773 & 15 & 2340.6 & 58.8 + knows 115311@xmath35805837 & 689 & 28 & 880 & 44 & 1215 & 23 & 1429 & 14 & 1343.4 & 40.3 + knows 120019@xmath35730054 & 507 & 23 & 750 & 38 & 1666 & 30 & 2572 & 14 & 5564.7 & 166.9 + knows 122340@xmath35804016 & 429 & 18 & 479 & 24 & 508 & 19 & 847 & 11 & 705.1 & 21.2 + knows 132143@xmath35831623 & 96 & 3 & 395 & 28 & 417 & 17 & 318 & 18 & 565.4 & 17.0 + knows 132351@xmath35794258 &  &  & 378 & 19 & 453 & 22 &  &  & 599.4 & 18.0 + knows 135324@xmath35753307 & 387 & 16 & 341 & 17 & 524 & 17 &  &  & 132.6 & 4.0 + knows 135756@xmath35764330 & 441 & 23 & 458 & 23 & 551 & 14 &  &  & 647.2 & 19.4 + knows 140638@xmath35782816 &  &  & 115 & 6 & 199 & 10 &  &  & 396.8 & 11.1 + knows 144830@xmath35760137 & 639 & 28 & 1225 & 61 & 747 & 17 & 507 & 13 & 280.8 & 6.2 + knows 152107@xmath35785837 &  &  & 178 & 9 &  &  &  &  & 124.9 & 3.8 + knows 155608@xmath35742107 &  &  & 190 & 11 &  &  &  &  & 179.9 & 5.4 + knows 160731@xmath35850159 &  &  & 265 & 13 &  &  & 320 & 8 & 819.8 & 18.0 + knows 160922@xmath35794023 &  &  & 287 & 22 & 408 & 12 & 522 & 15 & 1238.9 & 37.2 + knows 163235@xmath35823228 & 908 & 40 & 798 & 40 & 928 & 15 & 1109 & 13 & 801.8 & 14.8 + knows 172404@xmath35765328 & 621 & 29 & 730 & 37 &  &  &  &  & 424.0 & 12.7 + knows 180044@xmath35782812 & 2376 & 81 & 2660 & 133 & 2482 & 44 & 2180 & 15 & 2223.5 & 66.7 + knows 182316@xmath35793856 & 56 & 2 & 279 & 14 & 556 & 9 & 611 & 11 & 296.9 & 8.4 + knows 183659@xmath35750741 & 85 & 3 & 257 & 14 & 299 & 6 & 244 & 5 & 133.9 & 4.0 + knows 184218@xmath35794540 & 607 & 34 & 941 & 47 & 2773 & 48 & 3927 & 18 & 11555.9 & 280.6 + knows 185458@xmath35735129 & 266 & 13 & 263 & 14 & 331 & 13 & 419 & 13 & 465.1 & 11.7 + knows 192754@xmath35735816 & 4347 & 160 & 5165 & 258 & 4133 & 51 & 3289 & 23 & 3950.9 & 118.5 + knows 193526@xmath35813022 &  &  & 193 & 10 & 423 & 13 & 452 & 12 & 278.1 & 8.4 + knows 193706@xmath35744102 &  &  & 420 & 21 & 242 & 10 & 156 & 6 & 205.5 & 6.2 + knows 200422@xmath35735505 &  &  & 308 & 15 & 230 & 9 & 209 & 8 & 108.0 & 3.1 + knows 200539@xmath35775252 & 662 & 28 & 809 & 60 & 1128 & 23 & 993 & 20 & 1060.7 & 29.8 + knows 200955@xmath35722920 & 597 & 22 & 737 & 37 & 752 & 16 & 855 & 12 & 953.6 & 28.6 + knows 201716@xmath35744059 & 369 & 18 & 464 & 34 & 455 & 18 & 386 & 7 & 473.7 & 14.2 + knows 202242@xmath35761131 & 784 & 29 & 1471 & 101 & 942 & 19 & 898 & 17 & 428.9 & 12.9 + knows 204240@xmath35750802 &  &  & 229 & 12 &  &  & 424 & 9 & 208.3 & 5.8 + knows 211402@xmath35820437 & 157 & 19 & 235 & 12 & 287 & 12 & 347 & 13 & 474.9 & 11.2 + knows 213345@xmath35823904 & 167 & 17 & 302 & 15 &  &  & 479 & 17 & 915.1 & 27.5 + knows 220039@xmath35805844 &  &  & 166 & 12 &  &  & 145 & 9 & 176.3 & 5.3 + knows 220549@xmath35743632 &  &  & 201 & 10 &  &  & 363 & 9 & 430.5 & 8.9 + knows 230524@xmath35824232 & 107 & 4 & 243 & 17 &  &  &  &  & 116.7 & 3.5 + knows 231226@xmath35724055 & 143 & 3 & 310 & 23 & 225 & 12 & 229 & 6 & 270.6 & 8.1 + knows 231556@xmath35863130 &  &  & 280 & 19 & 344 & 13 & 299 & 8 & 170.5 & 4.7 + knows 232713@xmath35801236 & 176 & 13 & 213 & 16 &  &  &  &  & 138.4 & 4.2 + knows 234405@xmath35822638 &  &  & 309 & 15 & 755 & 16 & 1251 & 16 & 3777.4 & 113.3 + knows 235626@xmath35815255 & 715 & 35 & 664 & 34 & 652 & 17 & 531 & 9 & 520.9 & 15.6 +    llllllcl     +   + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) + name & radio spectrum & ned i d & z & b@xmath36 & r@xmath37 & class & alt . name +     + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) + name & radio spectrum & ned i d & z & b@xmath36 & r@xmath37 & class & alt . name +    knows 001302@xmath35723123 & flat & pn & ... & 12.744 & 12.741 & 4 & ngc0040 + knows 001312@xmath35774854 & steep & gal & 0.326 & 22.351 &  & 1 & nvssj001311@xmath35774846 + knows 001633@xmath35791641 & steep & gal & 0.8404 & 21.707 & 19.731 & 2 & 3c 006.1 + knows 001716@xmath35813441 & peaked & qso & 3.366 & 19.013 & 17.432 & 2 & 0014@xmath35813 + knows 001948@xmath35732725 & flat & qso & 1.718 & 19.284 & 18.364 & 2 & 0016@xmath35731 + knows 020313@xmath35810622 & steep & no & ... & 19.952 & 18.621 & 2 & nvssj020307@xmath35810612 + knows 020336@xmath35723253 & inverted & qso & ... & 20.185 & 19.528 & 1 & nvssj020333@xmath35723254 + knows 020649@xmath35841102 & peaked & no & ... & 21.837 &  & 1 & nvssj020713@xmath35841119 + knows 020954@xmath35722920 & flat & gal & 0.895 & 19.557 & 18.085 & 2 & s5 0205@xmath3572 + knows 021733@xmath35734923 & flat & qso & 2.367 & 17.090 & 15.298 & 2 & 0212@xmath35735 + knows 022459@xmath35765544 & steep & gal & ... & 20.534 & 19.086 & 2 & 4c@xmath3576.01 + knows 035447@xmath35800918 & flat & no & ... & 19.831 &  & 2 & 0345@xmath357958 + knows 041050@xmath35765649 & steep & gal & 0.5985 & 21.678 &  & 2 & 4c@xmath3576.03 + knows 041318@xmath35745107 & steep & gal & 0.373 & 20.811 & 18.782 & 1 & 4c@xmath3574.08 + knows 042132@xmath35835837 &  & no & ... & 21.580 & 19.171 & 2 & nvssj042140@xmath35835842 + knows 050844@xmath35843202 & flat & qso & 1.340 & 20.134 & 19.116 & 2 & 0454@xmath35844 + knows 061048@xmath35724843 & flat & qso & 3.53 & 22.337 &  & 2 & 4c@xmath3572.10 + knows 062555@xmath35820228 & flat & qso & 0.710 & 21.368 & 18.946 & 1 & 0615@xmath35820 + knows 063921@xmath35732454 & flat & qso & 1.85 & 18.592 & 18.172 & 2 & nvssj063921@xmath35732458 + knows 064132@xmath35881200 & flat & no & ... & 20.291 &  & 1 & nvssj064206@xmath35881154 + knows 072608@xmath35791135 & peaked & no & ... & 21.908 &  & 2 & s5 0718@xmath3579 + knows 074713@xmath35763918 & peaked & no & ... & 12.224 & 10.830 & 2 & s5 0740@xmath3576 + knows 074922@xmath35742038 & flat & qso & 1.629 & 19.282 & 18.990 & 2 & s5 0743@xmath3574 + knows 075039@xmath35790914 & peaked & no & ... & 21.917 &  & 2 & nvssj075043@xmath35790917 + knows 075052@xmath35824200 & steep & qso & 1.991 &  &  & - & 0740@xmath358249 + knows 080817@xmath35731514 & flat & qso & 0.496 & 21.208 & 19.286 & 2 & s5 0802@xmath3573 + knows 092934@xmath35861236 & peaked & qso & ... & 21.563 &  & 1 & s5 0916@xmath3586 + knows 093056@xmath35742017 & peaked & no & ... & 21.792 &  & 2 & s5 0925@xmath3574 + knows 101009@xmath35825020 & flat & gal & 0.322 & 20.792 & 19.672 & 1 & s5 1003@xmath3583 + knows 104421@xmath35805447 & upturn & qso & 1.26 & 18.685 & 17.978 & 2 & 1039@xmath35811 + knows 105359@xmath35863004 & peaked & gal & ... & 21.253 &  & 1 & nvssj105421@xmath35862936 + knows 105812@xmath35811438 & inverted & gal & 0.706 & 19.470 & 19.036 & 2 & s5 1053@xmath3581 + knows 110149@xmath35722544 & flat & qso & 1.46 & 17.612 & 17.122 & 2 & 1058@xmath35726 + knows 110410@xmath35765859 & steep & qso & 0.3115 & 15.330 & 14.978 & 2 & pg1100@xmath35772 + knows 115311@xmath35805837 & flat & qso & 1.25 & 18.787 & 18.173 & 2 & 1150@xmath35812 + knows 120019@xmath35730054 & steep & gal & 0.97 & 20.133 & 18.369 & 1 & 3c268.1 + knows 122340@xmath35804016 & flat & qso & ... & 21.975 &  & 2 & s5 1221@xmath3580 + knows 132143@xmath35831623 & flat & no & 1.024 & 20.508 & 18.712 & 2 & nvssj132145@xmath35831614 + knows 132351@xmath35794258 & flat & qso & 1.970 & 21.501 &  & 1 & s5 1323@xmath3579 + knows 135324@xmath35753307 & peaked & qso & 1.619 & 18.386 & 17.995 & 2 & nvssj135323@xmath35753258 + knows 135756@xmath35764330 & flat & qso & ... & 22.535 &  & 2 & s5 1357@xmath3576 + knows 140638@xmath35782816 & steep & gal & ... & 20.338 & 18.655 & 2 & nvss j140636@xmath35782810 + knows 144830@xmath35760137 & inverted & qso & 0.899 & 21.996 &  & 1 & s5 1448@xmath3576 + knows 152107@xmath35785837 &  & no & ... & 18.996 & 18.382 & 2 & nvss j152102@xmath35785830 + knows 155608@xmath35742107 &  & qso & 1.667 & 20.435 & 19.641 & 2 & nvss j155603@xmath35742057 + knows 160731@xmath35850159 & steep & gal & 0.183 & 18.072 & 16.660 & 1 & s5 1616@xmath3585 + knows 160922@xmath35794023 & steep & no & ... &  &  & - & 4c@xmath3579.15 + knows 163235@xmath35823228 & flat & gal & 0.02471 & 14.531 & 7.384 & 1 & ngc6251 + knows 172404@xmath35765328 &  & qso & 0.680 & 18.901 & 18.428 & 2 & 1725@xmath357655 + knows 180044@xmath35782812 & flat & qso & 0.68 & 18.186 & 16.632 & 2 & 1803@xmath35784 + knows 182316@xmath35793856 & peaked & qso & 0.224 & 19.269 & 17.415 & 1 & s5 1826@xmath3579 + knows 183659@xmath35750741 & flat & no & ... & 19.798 & 20.297 & 2 & 1838@xmath357504 + knows 184218@xmath35794540 & steep & gal & 0.0561 & 12.582 & 11.015 & 2 & 3c390.3 + knows 185458@xmath35735129 & flat & qso & 0.461 & 16.521 & 16.411 & 2 & s5 1856@xmath3573 + knows 192754@xmath35735816 & flat & qso & 0.3021 & 7.445 & 16.557 & 2 & 4c @xmath3573.18 + knows 193526@xmath35813022 & peaked & gal & ... & 19.060 & 17.912 & 2 & s5 1939@xmath3581 + knows 193706@xmath35744102 & upturn & no & ... & 22.221 &  & 1 & nvss j193702@xmath35744054 + knows 200422@xmath35735505 & inverted & no & ... &  &  & - & nvss j200417@xmath35735505 + knows 200539@xmath35775252 & flat & qso & 0.342 & 14.039 & 13.372 & 2 & 2007@xmath35777 + knows 200955@xmath35722920 & flat & qso & ... & 20.623 & 19.475 & 2 & 4c@xmath3572.28 + knows 201716@xmath35744059 & flat & qso & 2.187 & 18.464 & 18.165 & 2 & 4c@xmath3574.25 + knows 202242@xmath35761131 & inverted & qso & ... & 20.265 & 19.087 & 2 & s5 2023@xmath3576 + knows 204240@xmath35750802 & peaked & qso & 0.104 & 17.132 & 16.152 & 1 & 4c@xmath3574.26 + knows 211402@xmath35820437 & flat & gal & 0.084 & 17.137 & 15.832 & 1 & s5 2116@xmath3581 + knows 213345@xmath35823904 & steep & qso & 2.357 & 21.414 & 19.450 & 2 & s5 2136@xmath3582 + knows 220039@xmath35805844 & flat & no & ... & 21.534 & 20.664 & 2 & 2201@xmath358043 + knows 220549@xmath35743632 & flat & gal & ... & 21.532 & 20.585 & 2 & s5 2205@xmath3574 + knows 230524@xmath35824232 &  & qso & ... & 18.390 & 17.336 & 2 & s5 2304@xmath3582 + knows 231226@xmath35724055 & flat & no & ... & 18.827 & 17.855 & 2 & nvssj231219@xmath35724127 + knows 231556@xmath35863130 & flat & no & ... & 20.992 & 18.721 & 2 & nvssj231549@xmath35863143 + knows 232713@xmath35801236 &  & no & ... & 22.170 & 20.618 & 2 & nvssj232706@xmath35801259 + knows 234405@xmath35822638 & steep & qso & 0.735 & 21.769 & 20.233 & 2 & 2342@xmath35821 + knows 235626@xmath35815255 & flat & qso & 1.344 & 21.155 & 18.584 & 2 & s5 2353@xmath3581 +    .redshift and luminosity statistics for the knows sources with redshift information . [ cols="<,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     to better characterize the flat - spectrum source population , massardi et al . ( 2011a ) divided the sources of the at20 g fsr with flux densities measured at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz into five classes based on the place they occupy in a @xmath38 vs @xmath39 colour - colour plot , according to the following scheme :    * flat : @xmath40 and @xmath41 * inverted : @xmath42 and @xmath43 minus flat region * peaked : @xmath42 and @xmath44 minus flat region * upturn : @xmath45 and @xmath43 minus flat region * steep : @xmath45 and @xmath44 minus flat region    in fig . [ fig:3flux ] we show the colour - colour plot divided according to this five - population scheme for the 50 sources in our sample with flux density measurements at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz .     vs @xmath39 ) with the five - population scheme described in the paper . the spectral index error bars have the size of the symbols . the central square confines the region of flat - spectrum sources and the diagonal dotted line corresponds to sources with single power - law radio spectra . qsos are indicated by crosses , radiogalaxies by stars and sources without classification by diamonds.,height=302 ]    in table  [ tab : at20 g ] we show the comparison between the statistics of our sample and the ones in the at20 g fsr catalog ( massardi et al . 2011a ) and the paco bright sample ( massardi et al . 2011b ) for which the same scheme was adopted . it is apparent that the flat - spectrum and steep - spectrum sources are the most represented in both our sample and the at20 g sample with the full sample ( s@xmath46 mjy ) providing the best match with our statistics . the comparison with the paco bright sample ( massardi et al . 2011b ) , estimated with the source selection applied here to the spectral indices calculated on their best epoch fit of the sed between 4.5 and 40 ghz , clearly shows the higher fraction of flat spectrum sources dominating the population of sources selected above 200 mjy , while at our flux density limit the steep spectrum objects become more significant . the fractions in the remaining sub - populations are comparable . it is also worth noticing that all the remaining sources in the up - turn quadrant are classified as flat in table  [ tab : at20 g ] . in this paper we presented the results of the multi - frequency follow - up observations of the k - band northern wide survey ( knows ) pilot project . 73 objects were observed at 5 , 8 and 20 ghz with the 32-m medicina radio telescope and 30 ghz with the toru radio telescope . 16 objects have a counterpart in the 30 ghz planck ercsc . planck and toru 30 ghz flux densities are in reasonable agreement , indicating that our flux densities are not systematically biased . the objects were identified through ned and supercosmos as radiogalaxies ( 27 per cent ) and qsos ( 68 per cent ) in agreement with previous works ( e.g. sadler et al . two objects have no optical i d and one is a planetary nebula .    42 ( 58 per cent ) out of the 72 extragalactic objects have a redshift measurement : 30 are qsos and 12 are radiogalaxies . for 34 objects ( 24 qsos and 10 radiogalaxies ) we computed the optical and radio luminosity . as expected , qsos are found on average at higher redshift than radiogalaxies and are intrinsically brighter both in the radio and the optical band . four spectral indices in four contiguous frequency ranges were calculated : @xmath47 ; @xmath39 ; @xmath38 and @xmath48 . a clear steepening trend is visible both in the mean and median of the spectral indices when moving from lower to higher frequency ranges , a behaviour that is in agreement with what was found by massardi et al . ( 2011a ) for the at20 g full sample release . we used radio colour - colour plots to compare the radio spectral properties of radio sources of different populations with the ones found in other high - frequency selected catalogues . radiogalaxies mostly appear in the two lower quadrants ( corresponding to the steep - spectrum and gps - like classes ) while qsos are more scattered around the centre of the diagram indicating a prevalent flat radio spectrum : qsos are therefore more easily singled out in high frequency selected surveys . our sample appears to be in substantial agreement with the at20 g fsr source population statistics when the latter sample is cut to the same flux density limit ( 100 mjy ) . conversely , both our sample and the at20 g fsr statistics differ from the one of the sadler et al . ( 2006 ) sample for the up - turn , peaked and inverted spectral types even if all the samples have the same flux density threshold . this work is based on observations performed with the medicina telescope , operated by inaf  istituto di radioastronomia . we gratefully thank the staff of the medicina radio telescope for the valuable support provided . rv used a grant of the estrela ( early - stage training site for european long - wavelength astronomy ) network during her phd . rv thanks the staff of the toru observatory ( poland ) for their kind help with the 30  ghz follow - up observations and data reduction . we gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the royal society paul instrument fund which allowed us to construct the 30 ghz ocra - p receiver . we are also grateful to the polish ministry of science and higher education ( grant number n n203 390434 ) . we acknowledge the fundamental support provided by the european community through the framework program fp5 ( faraday ) and the contribution of radionet in the technological development of the italian k - band multifeed receiver . this research has made use of the nasa / ipac extragalactic database ( ned ) which is operated by the jet propulsion laboratory , california institute of technology , under contract with the national aeronautics and space administration . this research has made use of data obtained from the supercosmos science archive , prepared and hosted by the wide field astronomy unit , institute for astronomy , university of edinburgh , which is funded by the uk science and technology facilities council . the authors thank the referee merja tornikoski for the useful comments . bonaldi a. , bonavera l. , massardi m. , de zotti g. , 2013 , mnras , 428 , 1845 bonavera l. , massardi m. , bonaldi a. , gonzlez - nuevo j. , de zotti g. ; ekers r.d . , 2011 , mnras , 416 , 559 browne i.w . , mao s. , wilkinson p.n . , kus a.j . , marecki , a. , birkinshaw m. , 2000 , in `` _ ocra : a one - centimeter receiver array _ '' , proc . spie , 4015 , 299 chhetri r. , ekers r.d . , mahony e.k . , jones p.a . , massardi m. , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , 2012 , mnras , 422 , 2274 ciaramella a. , bongardo c. , aller h.d . , aller m.f . , de zotti g. , lhteenmaki a. , longo g. , milano l. , et al . , 2004 , a&a , 419 , 485 condon j.j . , cotton w.d . , greisen e.w . , yin q.f . , perley r.a . , taylor g.b . , broderick j.j . , 1998 , aj , 115 , 1693 de propris r. , colless m. , peacock j.a . , couch w.j . , driver s.p . , balogh m.l . , baldry i.k . , baugh c.m . , et al . , 2004 , mnras , 351 , 125 gawronski m.p . , peel m.w . , lancaster k. , battye r.a . , birkinshaw m. , browne i.w.a . , davies m.l . , davis r.j . , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 406 , 1853 hambly n.c . , macgillivray h.t . , read m.a . , tritton s.b . , thomson e.b . , kelly b.d . , morgan d.h . , smith r.e . , et al . , 2001 , mnras , 326 , 1279 hafez y.a . , davies r.d . , davis r.j . , dickinson c. , battistelli e.s . , blanco f. , cleary k. , franzen t. , et al . , 2008 , mnras , 388 , 1775 hovatta t. , tornikoski m. , lainela m. , lehto h. j. , valtaoja e. , torniainen i. , aller m.f . , aller h.d . , 2007 , a&a , 469 , 899 jones , d.h . , read m.a . , saunders w. , colless m. , jarrett t. , parker q.a . , fairall a.p . , mauch t. , et al . , 2009 , mnras , 399 , 683 kesteven m.j . , bridle a.h . , brandie g.w . , 1977 , aj , 82 , 541 kurinsky n. , sajina a. , partridge b. , myers s. , chen x. , lpez - caniego m. , 2013 , a&a , 549a , 133 larson d. , dunkley j. , hinshaw g. , komatsu e. , nolta m.r . , bennett c.l . , gold b. , halpern m. , et al . , 2011 , apjs , 192 , 16 lowe s.r . , gawroski m.p . , wilkinson p.n . , , browne i.w.a . , pazderski e. , feiler r. , kettle d. , 2007 , a&a , 474 , 1093 mahony e.k . , sadler e.m . , croom s.m . , ekers r.d . , bannister k.w . , chhetri r. , hancock p.j . , johnston h.m . , et al . , 2011 , mnras , 417 , 2651 massardi m. , ekers r.d . , murphy t. , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , burke s. , de zotti g. , edwards p.g . , et al . , 2008 , mnras , 384 , 775 massardi m. , bonaldi a. , negrello m. , ricciardi s. , roccanelli a. , de zotti g. , 2010 , mnras , 404 , 532 massardi m. , ekers r.d . , murphy t. , mahony e.k . , hancock p.j . , chhetri r. , de zotti g. , sadler e.m . , 2011a , mnras , 412 , 318 massardi m. , bonaldi a. , bonavera l. , lpez - caniego m. , de zotti g. , ekers r.d . , 2011b , mnras , 415 , 1597 murphy t. , sadler e.m . , ekers r.d . , massardi m. , hancock p.j . , mahony e.k . , ricci r. , burke - spolaor s. , et al . , 2010 , mnras , 402 , 2403 jorstad s.g . , aller m.f . , aller h.d . , terasranta h. , 2005 , asp conf . , 340 , 113 odea , c.p . , 1998 , pasp , 110 , 493 ott m. , witzel a. , quirrenbach a. , krichbaum t.p . , standke k.j . , schalinski c.j . , hummel c.a . , 1994 , a&a , 284 , 331 peel m.w . , 2009 , phd thesis , university of manchester ( _ http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.2760 _ ) peel m.w . , gawronski m.p . , battye r.a . , birkinshaw m. , browne i.w.a . , davis r.j . , feiler r. , kus a.j . , et al . 2011 , mnras , 410 , 2960 planck collaboration , 2011 , a&a , 536 , 7 prandoni , i. , de ruiter h.r . , ricci r. , parma p. , gregorini l. , ekers r.d . , 2010 , a&a , 510 , a42 procopio p. , massardi m. , righini s. , zanichelli a. , ricciardi s. , libardi p. , burigana c. , cuttaia f. , et al . , 2011 , mnras , 417 , 1123 pyatunina t.b . , kudryatseva d.c . , gabuzda d.c . , ricci r. , sadler e.m . , ekers r.d . , staveley - smith l. , wilson w.e . , kesteven m.j . , subrahmanyan r. , walker m.a . et al . , 2004 , mnras , 354 , 305 richards j.l . , max - moerbeck w. , pavlidu v. , pearson t.j . , readhead a.c.s . , stevenson m.a . , healey s.e . , romani r.w . et al . , 2011 , apjs , 194 , 29 righini s. , carretti e. , ricci r. , zanichelli a. , mack k .- h . , massardi m. , prandoni i. , procopio p. , et al . , 2012 , mnras , 426 , 210 sadler e.m . , ricci r. , ekers r.d . , ekers j.a . , hancock p.j . , jackson c.a . , kesteven m.j . , murphy t. , et al . , 2006 , mnras , 371 , 898 tauber j.a . , mandolesi n. , puget j .- , banos t. , bersanelli m. , bouchet f.r . , butler r.c . , charra j. , et al . , 2010 , a&a , 520 , 1 taylor a.c . , grainge k. , jones m.e . , pooley g.g . , saunders r.d.e . , waldram e.m . , 2001 , mnras , 327 , l1 tucci m. , rubio - martin j.a . , rebolo r. , genova - santos r. , watson r.a . , battye r.a . , cleary k.a . , davies r.d . , et al . , 2008 , mnras , 386 , 1729
Abstract:

Answer: we present follow - up observations at 5 , 8 and 30 ghz of the k - band northern wide survey ( knows ) 20 ghz bright sample , performed with the 32-m medicina radio telescope and the 32-m toru radio telescope . the knows sources were selected in the northern polar cap ( @xmath0 ) and have a flux density limit s@xmath1 115 mjy . we include nvss 1.4 ghz measurements to derive the source radio spectra between 1.4 and 30 ghz . based on optical identifications , 68 per cent of the sources are qsos and 27 per cent are radio galaxies . a redshift measurement is available for 58 per cent of the sources . the radio spectral properties of the different source populations are found to be in agreement with those of other high - frequency selected samples . [ firstpage ]    galaxies : active  radio continuum : galaxies  radio continuum : general .