Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: a growing body of evidence suggests that the stellar population of the galactic nucleus is distinct from that of the bulge . surface brightness measurements from the nir to the fir show that in contrast to the bulge , the central few hundred parsecs of the galaxy are dominated by a flat , disk - like distribution of stars , gas , and dust @xcite . this difference is also reflected in the kinematics : oh / ir stars in the central hundred parsecs show higher rotational velocities than expected for an inner single - component , bulge population @xcite . evidence for ongoing star formation also distinguishes the nucleus from the bulge . the galactic bulge is composed primarily of an old starburst - like population formed early , some 710 gyr ago @xcite . in contrast , the galactic nucleus harbors substantial young and intermediate - age stellar populations . intermediate - age populations have been most commonly inferred from broad - band photometry @xcite . star formation tracers have also been used to study intermediate - age populations , including young supergiants and luminous agbs , which trace 10 myr - 1 gyr populations @xcite , and oh / ir stars , which trace 1 - 3 gyr populations @xcite . the young stellar populations in the galactic nucleus have been the subject of much recent work . these populations are predominantly concentrated in three young , massive clusters : the arches and quintuplet clusters ( figer et al . 1999 , 2002 ; stolte et al . 2005 , and references therein ) , approximately 30 - 50 pc in projected distance from the galactic center , and the central cluster , located within the central parsec ( krabbe et al . 1991 , 1995 ; paumard et al . 2006 , and references therein ) . star formation in the nucleus is thought to be ultimately linked to the inward transport of gas induced by the galactic bar @xcite . however , precisely how gas is funneled from the outer galaxy to the nucleus and how this process affects the resultant star formation , remains poorly known . at present , there is a concentration of molecular gas 2 - 8 pc from the galctic center termed the circumnuclear disk @xcite . if such a structure routinely fuels star formation in the central parsec , the stars formed in this region may represent an entirely distinct population from the arches and quintpulet clusters or the intermediate age populations found throughout the @xmath5200 pc nucleus . dynamical effects due to the supermassive black hole ( genzel et al . 2003 , ghez et al . 2005 , and references therein ) and the large stellar and remnant density in the central parsec may also lead to population differences between the central cluster and that in the larger nucleus , either prior to star formation or afterwards . a number of investigators have attempted to address the nature of the central cluster and its relationship to the larger 100 - 300 pc nucleus . most recently , @xcite investigated the properties of the young stellar population in the central parsec , spectroscopically identifying nearly 100 ob and wolf - rayet stars . they find that the majority of the young stars reside in two , inclined and counter - rotating disks , suggesting in situ star formation in dense gas accretion disks . studies of the older stellar population in the central parsec have been primarily limited to broadband photometry . they have suggested that the fraction of low mass stars in the population increases with distance from the center , perhaps due to dynamical mass segregation @xcite . a detailed analysis , however , of the late - type giant population requires spectroscopy , owing to the large scatter in extinction near the galactic center and the intrinsic variations in giant star colors . @xcite pioneered work in this area , using spectroscopic and photometric observations of the most luminous giants and supergiants ( 50% complete at @xmath610 mag . ) to construct an h - r diagram for stars in the inner 5 pc . they report that the gc star formation rate in the central few parsecs is largely similar to that of the bulge . specifically , they find that the majority of stars formed more than 5 gyr ago , though they also find evidence that significant star formation also occurred during the past 100 myr . however , their conclusions are limited by their bright magnitude limit , which samples only short - lived evolutionary stages , for which theoretical models are uncertain .    in this paper , we build on the work of @xcite in an effort to better characterize the late - type giant population within the central parsec . we report deep photometric and spectroscopic observations of 329 late - type giants in the gc , complete to 50% at @xmath615.5 mag . our observations for the first time include the helium - burning red clump , as well as the red giant branch and asymptotic giant branch . this improved magnitude limit allows for the most robust picture of the galactic center star formation history to date , as these stars are much better understood than the supergiants and luminous agb stars studied by @xcite . in  2 , we present our observations and the techniques used to construct the hertzsprung - russell ( h - r ) diagram . section 3 discusses the resulting h - r diagram and implications for the gc star - formation history . we discuss our results in  4 and conclude with  5 . we observed eight galactc center fields between march and september 2006 using the integral field spectrometer spiffi @xcite in conjunction with the macao adaptive optics module @xcite mounted on the sinfoni eso vlt facility . we observed these fields for the dual purpose of identifiying main sequence b stars outside the central parsec ( martins et al . 2007b , in prep ) and gathering spectroscopic observations for a large number of late - type giants . we chose fields with a radial distance from sgr a@xmath8 of less than @xmath9 arcsec , selecting regions outside the minispiral to avoid nebular contamination in brackett @xmath10 , and choosing fields north of sgr a@xmath8 to minimize separation from the ao guide star . we also avoided regions with extremely bright stars ( @xmath11 ) . as stars this bright are relatively rare , the selection bias in avoiding these stars is negligible . if the fields had instead been chosen at random , we expect no more than a few @xmath11 stars would be selected . we observed each selected sinfoni field in 50 @xmath12 100 mas pixel mode , resulting in 0.2 arcsec resolution and a @xmath13 field of view . we simultaneously observed all fields in @xmath2 and @xmath14 band , leading to a spectral resolution of r @xmath15 1500 . figure [ mos ] displays the location of the observed fields . the total exposure time for all fields was 4200 s , except for the fields at ( 17@xmath16 , 17@xmath16 ) , ( 5@xmath16 , 11@xmath16 ) , and ( -8@xmath16 , 8@xmath16 ) , which had total exposure times of 6600 s , 7200 s , and 2400 s , respectively . the fields span a range in projected distance from sgr a * of 4 arcsec to 26 arcsec . a histogram of the observed stellar positions is shown in figure [ dist_hist ] . we reduced the raw data using a standard procedure to perform flat - fielding , sky subtraction , and wavelength calibration @xcite . following extraction , we removed the stellar continua by dividing by a second degree polynomial fitted to the line - free regions of the stellar spectra . the normalized spectra allow us to directly compare the vlt spectra to the normalized catalog spectra in @xcite and @xcite . a typical resultant gc @xmath14 band spectrum following normalization is shown in figure [ spectrum ] . three template spectra from the @xcite spectral library are also shown for comparison .        to classify the stars in our sample , we used the @xmath17co 2.2935 @xmath18 m , @xmath19 rovibrational band head , the strongest feature in our spectra and a well - known @xmath7 indicator , for a given luminosity class @xcite . we use only this feature , as it is largely free of nebular and telluric lines , making it more reliable than other @xmath20 and @xmath21band signatures in our spectra . we note that in contrast to the work of @xcite , we do not need the h+k band h@xmath22o feature to reliably predict effective temperatures , as our sample consists only of giants with @xmath2310.3 ( see  2.2 ) . due to their rarity , stars sufficiently bright to be supergiant or long period variable candidates are not contained in our sample . m co index ( see text for definition ) as a function of temperature for the comparison stars taken from the @xcite and @xcite catalogs . the solid line is a least - squares fit to both data sets for stars with 17 @xmath24 co @xmath25 3 . ]    to define a @xmath7 - @xmath17co index relation , we computed the co index defined by @xcite . although not as well - known as other co indices ( e.g. equivalent width , photometric indices of @xcite ) , @xcite showed that this index correlates well with other co indices . furthermore , it has the advantage of being insensitive to small variations in the nearby continuum because it does not require a fit to the continuum . the index is defined as co % = [ ( 1 @xmath26 f@xmath27 f@xmath28 ) @xmath12 100 ) ] , where both bands are 0.015 @xmath18 m wide and the continuum and co band centers are defined as 2.284 @xmath18 m and 2.302 @xmath18 m , respectively . we note that although we adopt the same definition for the co index as @xcite , our spectra are normalized while theirs are not , and thus , our computed indices are not directly comparable to theirs . we calculated uncertainties in the computed indices , assuming the noise is dominated by photon statistics of the source and background and that the uncertainty in the band is approximately equal to that of the nearby continuum . following @xcite , we used co strength to estimate effective temperatures for the cool giants in our gc sample . to define a co index versus @xmath7 relation , we used a set of archival comparison star spectra taken from @xcite and @xcite with well - determined effective temperatures given in the literature . in an effort to avoid systematic errors in our derived index@xmath26@xmath7 relation , we used a large number of references , assuming temperatures derived from a wide variety of methods . a summary of the comparison star data is given in table [ comp_table ] , and the resulting relationship between co index and @xmath7 is shown in figure [ comp_relation ] . the @xcite and @xcite relationships are in very good agreement with each other ( for stars in common , @xmath29co @xmath30 ) , suggesting that the co index is largely independent of resolution or observing system . the relation is tightest for co @xmath31 . as no stars in our gc sample have computed indicies exceding this value , we did not include comparison stars with co @xmath32 in our fit . the resulting index-@xmath7 relation using both empirical data sets is : @xmath33 @xmath7 = 3.7351 @xmath26 0.0060 @xmath12 co @xmath26 0.00040 @xmath12 co@xmath34 , for all stars with measured indices @xmath35 co @xmath25 3 . the errors in the derived coefficients are 0.0092 , 0.0022 , and 1.2@xmath36 , respectively . llllllll hr 7001 & a0 va & wh & 1.760 & 0.004 & 9420 & 60 & @xcite + hr 4295 & a1 v & wh & 1.434 & 0.003 & 9600 & 25 & @xcite + hr 5054 & a1 vp & wh & 1.823 & 0.004 & 8760 & 260 & @xcite + hr 6378 & a2 v & wh & 1.953 & 0.004 & 8690 & 78 & @xcite + hr 4534 & a3 v & wh & 1.695 & 0.005 & 8857 & 185 & @xcite + hr 4357 & a4 v & wh & 1.516 & 0.007 & 8243 & 150 & @xcite + hr 7557 & a7 v & wh & 1.147 & 0.004 & 7500 & 200 & @xcite + hr 2943 & f5 iv - v & wh & 1.176 & 0.014 & 6532 & 39 & @xcite + hr 6927 & f7 v & wh & 1.219 & 0.014 & 6087 & 22 & @xcite + hr 4375 & f8.5 v & wh & 1.540 & 0.015 & 5676 & 66 & @xcite + hr 21 & f2 iii & wh & 1.563 & 0.011 & 6847 & 137 & @xcite + hr 403 & a5 iii - iv & wh & 1.828 & 0.008 & 8420 & 360 & @xcite + hr 1412 & a7 iii & wh & 1.554 & 0.007 & 7690 & 320 & @xcite + hr 1457 & k5@xmath37 iii & wh & 12.633 & 0.023 & 3866 & 35 & @xcite + hr 2985 & g8 iii & wh & 5.540 & 0.018 & 5001 & 56 & @xcite + hr 3003 & k4 iii & wh & 13.944 & 0.023 & 3961 & 99 & @xcite + hr 3323 & g5 iiia & wh & 3.045 & 0.017 & 5136 & 88 & @xcite + & & kh & 3.039 & 0.007 & & + hr 4031 & f0 iii & wh & 2.145 & 0.011 & 6880 & 150 & @xcite + hr 4069 & m0 iii & wh & 14.143 & 0.021 & 3730 & 149 & @xcite + hr 4517 & m1 iii & wh & 13.894 & 0.019 & 3828 & 53 & @xcite + hr 4883 & g0 iiip & wh & 1.819 & 0.014 & 5747 & 54 & @xcite + & & kh & 1.377 & 0.007 & & + hr 5017 & f3 iii & wh & 1.395 & 0.017 & 7141 & 181 & @xcite + hr 5340 & k1.5 iiip & wh & 10.997 & 0.021 & 4233 & 55 & @xcite + hr 6299 & k2 iii & wh & 8.653 & 0.020 & 4571 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 8.530 & 0.009 & & + hr 6703 & g8.5 iii & wh & 4.426 & 0.020 & 5011 & 35 & @xcite + hr 6705 & k5 iii & wh & 12.859 & 0.023 & 3934 & 42 & @xcite + & & kh & 12.569 & 0.010 & & + hr 7635 & m0@xmath26 iii & wh & 13.035 & 0.025 & 3867 & 50 & @xcite + & & kh & 12.869 & 0.010 & & + hr 7806 & k2.5 iii & wh & 9.993 & 0.022 & 4286 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 9.785 & 0.010 & & + hr 7886 & m6 iii & wh & 16.722 & 0.025 & 3243 & 79 & @xcite + hr 8317 & k0.5 iii & wh & 7.319 & 0.024 & 4658 & 19 & @xcite + hr 8694 & k0@xmath26 iii & wh & 6.691 & 0.021 & 4830 & 100 & @xcite + & & kh & 6.463 & 0.010 & & + hr 8905 & f8 iii & wh & 1.265 & 0.014 & 5942 & 42 & @xcite + & & kh & 0.797 & 0.007 & & + swvir & m7 iii & wh & 18.350 & 0.024 & 2966 & 36 & @xcite + & & kh & 18.033 & 0.008 & & + bkvir & m7@xmath26 iii & wh & 20.449 & 0.022 & 2944 & 34 & @xcite + & & kh & 20.730 & 0.006 & & + rxboo & m7.5 - 8 iii & wh & 18.262 & 0.024 & 2786 & 46 & @xcite + [ comp_table ]    in order to separate cool giants from warmer giants and main sequence stars , warm stars with co @xmath38 3 are removed from the sample . of the 355 detected stars in our spectroscopy , 329 were categorized as co - absorbers , and we assigned effective temperatures to these stars using the above index@xmath26@xmath7 relation . prior to temperature calculation , we cross - correlated all co - absorbing stars with a co - template in order to remove radial velocities . errors in temperatures were estimated based on the noise in each spectrum and the intrinsic dispersion in our index@xmath26@xmath7 relation ( @xmath39 = 0.0050 ) . as noted by @xcite , errors determined in this way are strictly only lower limits . the spectral classification and analysis of the remaining early - type ( non - co - absorbing ) stars in our sample is less straight - forward @xcite , and we defer analysis of these stars to a later paper ( martins et al . 2007b , in prep ) . we made photometric observations using the imaging system naos / conica ( naco ) , consisting of the adaptive optics system naos @xcite and the nir camera conica @xcite at the 8.2-m ut4 ( yepun ) of the eso vlt . in april 2006 , we collected several ao - corrected images in each of @xmath2 and @xmath3 band with a pixel size of @xmath40 27 mas . the total exposure time was 64 s for each band , broken into thirty - two dithered images , in which every fourth image was separated from the previous exposure by 16 arcsec . we used our standard reduction pipeline to perform sky subtraction , bad pixel corrections , flat field corrections , and stacking of images to create final mosaics . in figure [ mos ] , we display a sub - section of the final @xmath3 band mosaic , containing all stars analyzed in this paper . photometry was extracted for only this region to help ensure psf constancy across the image . we used the crowded field photometry package starfinder @xcite to establish relative photometry and source detection . an empirical psf for the central core ( fwhm @xmath41 0.10 arcsec ) was extracted from each image using seven bright , isolated stars . the full radial extent of the extracted psf was r @xmath41 0.19 arcsec . to derive the photometric curve of growth needed to place these results on an absolute scale , we adopted the mtf - fitting technique of @xcite . this technique fits the power spectrum of the image using a combination of the source spatial distribution function determined by starfinder and a parameterized description of the modulation transfer functions ( mtf ) of the atmosphere , telescope , ao system , and science camera . the advantage of this technique is that it derives the psf encircled energy curve of growth , including the extended , seeing - limited halo , and thus provides the aperture correction required for absolute photometric calibration . in deriving the curve of growth from the data themselves , we avoid systematic calibration errors introduced from using a psf standard acquired at a different time and under different observing conditions than the target data . given the rapid variations in ao performance @xcite , this technique is crucial for deriving accurate absolute photometry . the mtf - fitting technique has so far only been applied to data obtained for the keck observatory lgsao system @xcite . to apply this technique to the vlt images , we used the @xcite software with appropriate input parameters for the vlt telescope pupil size and geometry , the camera platescale and pixel size , and the deformable mirror actuator spacing . the software uses the idl procedure mpfit to perform a levenberg - marquardt least - squares fit of the parameterized model mtf to the data . the best fits to the @xmath2 and @xmath3 band image power spectra are shown in figure [ pspec ] . the spatial frequency , @xmath42 , is normalized relative to the telescope cutoff frequency in the image plane ( d@xmath43 ) . band data are aliased , and we therefore , fit only the power spectrum for @xmath44 ( see  2.2 ) . the spatial frequency , @xmath42 , is normalized relative to the cutoff frequency in the image plane ( d@xmath43 ) . the strehl ratios implied by these fits are 10@xmath45% and 19@xmath46% , for @xmath2 and @xmath3 band , respectively . ] all images , even seeing - limited images , contain power up to the spatial frequency cutoff , which is @xmath47 for a circular pupil . to faithfully record all spatial information allowed by the telescope aperture , the pixel sampling frequency must therefore satisfy @xmath48 ( see @xcite for a detailed discussion ) . the @xmath3 band data are nyquist - sampled : @xmath49 = 1 . however , the h - band data are undersampled : @xmath50 . this aliasing causes power at frequencies @xmath51 to corrupt frequencies @xmath52 . the contamination of frequencies between 0.52 and @xmath50.7 is negligible , as the power aliased to these frequencies consists only of detector and background noise . this power is orders of magnitude less than the non - aliased power at these spatial frequencies , and thus , has very little effect on the total power spectrum . on the other hand , the aliased power for contaminated spatial frequencies @xmath53 is of the same order - of - magnitude as the non - aliased power , so the power spectrum at these frequencies is heavily influenced by the aliasing . we , therefore , chose only to fit the power spectrum for all spatial frequencies @xmath54 . as only detector and background noise contribute to the power spectrum for spatial frequencies @xmath55 , we are excluding very little information about the psf . the relatively minor discrepency in figure [ pspec ] between the model and data power spectra in @xmath3 band is likely due to uncertainties in the deformable mirror influence function , as an explicit description of the vlt cilas mirror influence function was not available . we , therefore , used the approximate influence function for the keck xinetics mirror from @xcite . the overall power spectra fits are satisfactory , and we do not expect that the photometric accuracy of our technique is significantly affected by this choice . the strehl ratios implied by the psfs reconstructed from the fits in figure [ pspec ] are 10% and 19% , for @xmath2 and @xmath3 band , respectively . to test the integrity of these fits , we divided the images into nine subimages and fit the power spectrum of each subimage . this process yielded fairly consistent results for all subimages , implying an error in the @xmath2 and @xmath3 band strehl ratios of 0.5% and 1.0% , respectively . this agreement between subimages suggests that psf variations due to variable distance from the guide star and variable exposure time in the final mosaic are only present at a low level . we determined the photometric zero point from observations of the near - ir standard star 9178 @xcite , obtained on the same night . the measured atmospheric extinction coefficients used to correct for the difference in airmass between our standard stars and science targets were 0.06 mag . airmass@xmath56 for @xmath2 and 0.07 mag . airmass@xmath56 for @xmath3 . we derived photometric errors and completeness using the standard technique of inserting and recovering artificial stars of specified magnitude . completeness is not uniform , so we calculated errors and completeness separately for each spectral field . to avoid artificially crowding our images , we inserted only fifty stars at a time to each spectral subimage and repeated this procedure five times for each magnitude bin . we computed the photometric error at each magnitude using a gaussian fit to the difference between the input and recovered magnitudes . figure [ comp_err ] shows the average photometric errors and completeness at each magnitude bin . also shown is the spectroscopic completeness , estimated by comparing the number of stars detected in the @xmath2 and @xmath57 band photometry to the number detected in the sinfoni data . the incompleteness in the sinfoni data at @xmath613 - 15 mag . is caused by crowding and confusion with nearby bright stars in the field of view .     and @xmath3 band photometric errors and completeness based on the artificial star tests described in  2 . the spectroscopic completeness is estimated based on the number of co - stars for which we could extract spectra , compared to the total number of stars detected in the photometry . ] using the derived photometry and effective temperatures presented in the preceding section , we are able to place our gc sample on the hertzsprung - russell ( h - r ) diagram . to convert the measured photometric magnitudes to luminosity , we use models that assume the @xmath14 band magnitudes are measured in the johnson - cousins - glass system @xcite . therefore , we first transformed the measured @xmath3 magnitudes to the johnson - cousins - glass system , using the approximate transformations given in @xcite , assuming the naco and 2mass @xmath58 color systems are identical , as in @xcite . we next adopted empirical bolometric corrections of @xcite for m stars and theoretical corrections of girardi 2005 ( http://pleiadi / pd.astro.it ) for hotter stars . for the theoretical corrections , we assumed a solar metallicity and a surface gravity of @xmath59 , though the results are largely independent of these assumptions . for all temperatures in the galactic center sample , we found systematic differences @xmath60 mag . in bc@xmath61 for @xmath62=1.0 $ ] dex and @xmath63 dex , leading to systematic differences in the luminosity of @xmath64 . additionally , we assumed a distance to the galactic center of 8.0 kpc @xcite . there has been much recent debate concerning the precise distance to the galactic center . however , the choice of distance has only a small systematic effect on our derived luminosities ; a change in distance of @xmath65 kpc induces a change in luminosity of @xmath66 . finally , we corrected each star s luminosity individually for extinction using the photometric color , the derived @xmath7 , and the interstellar extinction law of @xcite , derived from nicmos observations of galactic center stars . all results are tabulated in table [ gc_table ] . lccccccccccccc 1 & 6.26 & 6.24 & 15.275 & 0.042 & 17.419 & 0.072 & 8.28 & 3.658 & 0.006 & 2.99 & 0.15 & 1.88 & 0.06 + 2 & 6.32 & 6.05 & 15.259 & 0.042 & 17.316 & 0.072 & 8.30 & 3.658 & 0.007 & 2.86 & 0.15 & 1.83 & 0.07 + 3 & 5.67 & 5.91 & 14.898 & 0.031 & 17.051 & 0.056 & 6.93 & 3.674 & 0.004 & 3.03 & 0.11 & 2.09 & 0.05 + 4 & 5.67 & 6.13 & 14.239 & 0.013 & 16.344 & 0.049 & 8.61 & 3.654 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.09 & 2.25 & 0.04 + 5 & 5.51 & 6.24 & 15.304 & 0.042 & 17.438 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.15 & 1.91 & 0.06 + 6 & 5.02 & 6.48 & 15.531 & 0.042 & 17.826 & 0.204 & 7.15 & 3.672 & 0.008 & 3.23 & 0.37 & 1.91 & 0.15 + 7 & 4.86 & 6.29 & 15.131 & 0.031 & 17.274 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.007 & 3.01 & 0.14 & 1.98 & 0.06 + 8 & 4.99 & 6.16 & 15.327 & 0.042 & 17.406 & 0.072 & 7.34 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.91 & 0.15 & 1.86 & 0.06 + 9 & 4.75 & 6.13 & 15.503 & 0.042 & 17.678 & 0.072 & 8.76 & 3.652 & 0.006 & 3.03 & 0.15 & 1.78 & 0.06 + 10 & 4.35 & 6.34 & 15.474 & 0.042 & 17.135 & 0.056 & 6.82 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.30 & 0.12 & 1.57 & 0.05 + 11 & 4.35 & 6.51 & 15.240 & 0.031 & 17.387 & 0.072 & 6.69 & 3.677 & 0.004 & 3.02 & 0.14 & 1.96 & 0.06 + 12 & 3.54 & 6.56 & 14.318 & 0.017 & 16.427 & 0.049 & 7.73 & 3.665 & 0.005 & 2.95 & 0.09 & 2.26 & 0.04 + 13 & 3.56 & 6.40 & 13.803 & 0.013 & 15.707 & 0.012 & 9.40 & 3.643 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 14 & 3.48 & 6.13 & 14.969 & 0.031 & 16.899 & 0.056 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.70 & 0.11 & 1.93 & 0.05 + 15 & 3.08 & 6.13 & 12.132 & 0.003 & 14.305 & 0.006 & 11.62 & 3.611 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.02 & 2.99 & 0.01 + 16 & 3.05 & 5.83 & 14.123 & 0.013 & 16.226 & 0.042 & 8.65 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.08 & 2.30 & 0.04 + 17 & 2.81 & 5.86 & 15.867 & 0.078 & 17.802 & 0.204 & 8.77 & 3.652 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.39 & 1.49 & 0.16 + 18 & 3.27 & 5.62 & 15.596 & 0.042 & 17.751 & 0.204 & 9.25 & 3.645 & 0.007 & 2.99 & 0.37 & 1.71 & 0.15 + 19 & 2.78 & 5.32 & 15.115 & 0.031 & 17.234 & 0.056 & 9.20 & 3.646 & 0.007 & 2.94 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 20 & 4.35 & 5.18 & 11.399 & 0.002 & 13.519 & 0.003 & 12.10 & 3.604 & 0.005 & 2.87 & 0.01 & 3.23 & 0.01 + 21 & 4.78 & 5.37 & 14.438 & 0.017 & 16.735 & 0.049 & 9.71 & 3.639 & 0.004 & 3.19 & 0.09 & 2.24 & 0.04 + 22 & 5.13 & 5.51 & 15.436 & 0.042 & 17.641 & 0.072 & 8.55 & 3.655 & 0.004 & 3.08 & 0.15 & 1.84 & 0.06 + 23 & 4.97 & 5.10 & 15.341 & 0.042 & 17.335 & 0.072 & 10.09 & 3.634 & 0.005 & 2.74 & 0.15 & 1.68 & 0.06 + 24 & 5.53 & 4.54 & 14.770 & 0.031 & 17.054 & 0.056 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 3.22 & 0.11 & 2.22 & 0.05 + 25 & 5.10 & 3.46 & 14.078 & 0.013 & 15.666 & 0.012 & 8.31 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.17 & 0.03 & 2.02 & 0.02 + 26 & 5.16 & 3.67 & 15.087 & 0.031 & 17.025 & 0.056 & 9.92 & 3.636 & 0.011 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 27 & 5.45 & 3.91 & 15.316 & 0.042 & 17.369 & 0.072 & 10.07 & 3.634 & 0.007 & 2.82 & 0.15 & 1.73 & 0.06 + 28 & 5.08 & 4.18 & 13.152 & 0.005 & 15.121 & 0.006 & 10.32 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.69 & 0.02 & 2.53 & 0.02 + 29 & 5.13 & 4.51 & 13.238 & 0.005 & 15.345 & 0.012 & 10.91 & 3.622 & 0.005 & 2.88 & 0.02 & 2.55 & 0.02 + 30 & 5.05 & 4.70 & 13.980 & 0.013 & 16.298 & 0.049 & 12.37 & 3.600 & 0.007 & 3.16 & 0.09 & 2.30 & 0.04 + 31 & 4.56 & 4.56 & 13.382 & 0.009 & 15.542 & 0.012 & 8.63 & 3.653 & 0.004 & 3.01 & 0.03 & 2.63 & 0.02 + 32 & 4.29 & 4.29 & 15.536 & 0.042 & 17.606 & 0.072 & 7.99 & 3.662 & 0.004 & 2.89 & 0.15 & 1.74 & 0.06 + 33 & 4.59 & 4.13 & 16.137 & 0.078 & 18.223 & 0.204 & 5.27 & 3.692 & 0.003 & 2.95 & 0.39 & 1.61 & 0.16 + 34 & 4.40 & 3.48 & 13.845 & 0.013 & 15.739 & 0.012 & 8.65 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.62 & 0.03 & 2.28 & 0.02 + 35 & 4.24 & 3.70 & 13.676 & 0.009 & 15.619 & 0.012 & 7.61 & 3.666 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.03 & 2.42 & 0.02 + 36 & 4.32 & 3.02 & 13.194 & 0.005 & 15.295 & 0.012 & 9.46 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.91 & 0.02 & 2.63 & 0.02 + 37 & 3.00 & 3.32 & 12.562 & 0.003 & 14.834 & 0.006 & 3.70 & 3.707 & 0.004 & 3.24 & 0.01 & 3.20 & 0.01 + 38 & 3.11 & 3.83 & 15.976 & 0.078 & 18.227 & 0.204 & 9.31 & 3.645 & 0.008 & 3.13 & 0.39 & 1.61 & 0.16 + 39 & 3.62 & 3.56 & 15.106 & 0.031 & 17.234 & 0.056 & 5.89 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 3.00 & 0.11 & 2.03 & 0.05 + 40 & 4.02 & 3.97 & 15.532 & 0.042 & 17.603 & 0.072 & 7.97 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.89 & 0.15 & 1.74 & 0.06 + 41 & 3.62 & 4.05 & 15.160 & 0.031 & 17.431 & 0.072 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.005 & 3.17 & 0.14 & 1.96 & 0.06 + 42 & 2.92 & 4.13 & 12.738 & 0.003 & 15.117 & 0.006 & 12.73 & 3.594 & 0.005 & 3.23 & 0.02 & 2.82 & 0.02 + 43 & -6.97 & 10.15 & 15.030 & 0.026 & 16.988 & 0.058 & 8.98 & 3.649 & 0.008 & 2.71 & 0.11 & 1.83 & 0.05 + 44 & -7.24 & 10.31 & 14.751 & 0.026 & 16.765 & 0.058 & 7.28 & 3.670 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 2.05 & 0.05 + 45 & -7.10 & 9.85 & 15.112 & 0.026 & 17.048 & 0.058 & 5.96 & 3.685 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.11 & 1.91 & 0.05 + 46 & -7.32 & 9.88 & 15.075 & 0.026 & 17.022 & 0.058 & 6.46 & 3.680 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.91 & 0.05 + 47 & -7.94 & 9.88 & 15.494 & 0.040 & 17.295 & 0.060 & 4.70 & 3.698 & 0.006 & 2.53 & 0.13 & 1.72 & 0.06 + 48 & -8.99 & 10.12 & 13.124 & 0.005 & 15.144 & 0.008 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.008 & 2.77 & 0.02 & 2.57 & 0.02 + 49 & -8.80 & 9.67 & 15.374 & 0.040 & 17.408 & 0.060 & 7.61 & 3.666 & 0.009 & 2.84 & 0.13 & 1.80 & 0.06 + 50 & -9.29 & 9.37 & 15.199 & 0.026 & 17.210 & 0.058 & 8.72 & 3.652 & 0.007 & 2.79 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 51 & -8.69 & 9.21 & 15.156 & 0.026 & 17.093 & 0.058 & 6.25 & 3.682 & 0.006 & 2.71 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 52 & -7.45 & 9.37 & 11.937 & 0.003 & 13.686 & 0.002 & 5.88 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 2.44 & 0.01 & 3.07 & 0.01 + 53 & -5.59 & 9.21 & 10.319 & 0.002 & 12.222 & 0.002 & 11.08 & 3.619 & 0.008 & 2.58 & 0.02 & 3.59 & 0.02 + 54 & -6.75 & 8.80 & 15.448 & 0.040 & 17.392 & 0.060 & 6.35 & 3.681 & 0.005 & 2.72 & 0.13 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 55 & -6.75 & 8.56 & 15.948 & 0.090 & 18.090 & 0.245 & 6.47 & 3.679 & 0.008 & 3.02 & 0.46 & 1.68 & 0.19 + 56 & -6.18 & 8.18 & 15.273 & 0.040 & 17.416 & 0.060 & 8.85 & 3.651 & 0.009 & 2.98 & 0.13 & 1.85 & 0.06 + 57 & -6.29 & 8.07 & 15.706 & 0.040 & 17.964 & 0.245 & 8.91 & 3.650 & 0.007 & 3.15 & 0.44 & 1.74 & 0.18 + 58 & -6.10 & 7.86 & 15.506 & 0.040 & 17.688 & 0.060 & 4.64 & 3.699 & 0.005 & 3.10 & 0.13 & 1.94 & 0.06 + 59 & -5.97 & 7.29 & 15.037 & 0.026 & 17.188 & 0.058 & 4.32 & 3.702 & 0.008 & 3.05 & 0.11 & 2.12 & 0.05 + 60 & -6.16 & 6.43 & 13.182 & 0.005 & 15.300 & 0.009 & 7.56 & 3.667 & 0.008 & 2.97 & 0.02 & 2.73 & 0.02 + 61 & -6.51 & 6.64 & 15.628 & 0.040 & 17.772 & 0.245 & 9.21 & 3.646 & 0.008 & 2.98 & 0.44 & 1.69 & 0.18 + 62 & -6.80 & 6.86 & 14.604 & 0.022 & 16.766 & 0.058 & 7.46 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 3.03 & 0.11 & 2.19 & 0.05 + 63 & -7.32 & 7.78 & 13.190 & 0.005 & 15.195 & 0.008 & 8.64 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.78 & 0.02 & 2.61 & 0.02 + 64 & -7.45 & 8.29 & 15.413 & 0.040 & 17.374 & 0.060 & 6.44 & 3.680 & 0.005 & 2.75 & 0.13 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 65 & -7.64 & 8.56 & 15.467 & 0.040 & 17.477 & 0.060 & 6.86 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.13 & 1.78 & 0.06 + 66 & -7.48 & 8.99 & 12.976 & 0.005 & 14.980 & 0.008 & 12.14 & 3.603 & 0.009 & 2.70 & 0.03 & 2.53 & 0.02 + 67 & -8.23 & 8.88 & 15.498 & 0.040 & 17.511 & 0.060 & 5.75 & 3.687 & 0.008 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.81 & 0.06 + 68 & -8.91 & 8.64 & 15.444 & 0.040 & 17.651 & 0.060 & 9.59 & 3.641 & 0.008 & 3.06 & 0.13 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 69 & -8.59 & 8.18 & 12.292 & 0.004 & 14.300 & 0.005 & 8.80 & 3.651 & 0.005 & 2.78 & 0.01 & 2.97 & 0.02 + 70 & -8.13 & 8.13 & 14.233 & 0.010 & 16.282 & 0.047 & 8.98 & 3.649 & 0.009 & 2.84 & 0.09 & 2.21 & 0.04 + 71 & -8.18 & 8.32 & 15.497 & 0.040 & 17.501 & 0.060 & 7.83 & 3.664 & 0.007 & 2.79 & 0.13 & 1.72 & 0.06 + 72 & -7.94 & 8.45 & 15.375 & 0.040 & 17.420 & 0.060 & 9.34 & 3.644 & 0.007 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.73 & 0.06 + 73 & -7.75 & 8.26 & 15.616 & 0.040 & 17.814 & 0.245 & 6.29 & 3.682 & 0.006 & 3.10 & 0.44 & 1.85 & 0.18 + 74 & -7.97 & 7.51 & 12.569 & 0.004 & 14.867 & 0.008 & 10.02 & 3.635 & 0.009 & 3.19 & 0.02 & 2.97 & 0.02 + 75 & -7.61 & 7.21 & 14.774 & 0.026 & 16.954 & 0.058 & 5.67 & 3.688 & 0.007 & 3.08 & 0.11 & 2.20 & 0.05 + 76 & -8.45 & 6.99 & 10.843 & 0.002 & 13.278 & 0.002 & 12.81 & 3.593 & 0.013 & 3.32 & 0.03 & 3.60 & 0.03 + 77 & -9.21 & 6.53 & 12.543 & 0.004 & 14.852 & 0.008 & 10.86 & 3.623 & 0.008 & 3.18 & 0.02 & 2.95 & 0.02 + 78 & -8.64 & 7.34 & 15.402 & 0.040 & 17.464 & 0.060 & 8.56 & 3.654 & 0.007 & 2.87 & 0.13 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 79 & 2.94 & 12.93 & 15.314 & 0.049 & 16.938 & 0.055 & 5.66 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.26 & 0.13 & 1.65 & 0.06 + 80 & 2.67 & 12.74 & 14.953 & 0.027 & 16.828 & 0.055 & 7.95 & 3.662 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 81 & 2.54 & 12.45 & 15.140 & 0.027 & 16.947 & 0.055 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.006 & 2.50 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 82 & 2.59 & 12.04 & 15.189 & 0.027 & 16.632 & 0.046 & 4.90 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 2.00 & 0.09 & 1.62 & 0.04 + 83 & 3.21 & 12.69 & 16.003 & 0.075 & 17.874 & 0.210 & 7.56 & 3.667 & 0.007 & 2.60 & 0.40 & 1.45 & 0.16 + 84 & 3.00 & 12.64 & 15.868 & 0.075 & 17.752 & 0.210 & 6.33 & 3.681 & 0.006 & 2.64 & 0.40 & 1.56 & 0.16 + 85 & 5.62 & 11.88 & 15.501 & 0.049 & 17.546 & 0.080 & 9.55 & 3.641 & 0.006 & 2.82 & 0.17 & 1.67 & 0.07 + 86 & 5.83 & 11.42 & 11.834 & 0.003 & 14.160 & 0.003 & 13.30 & 3.585 & 0.007 & 3.14 & 0.02 & 3.11 & 0.02 + 87 & 5.94 & 11.12 & 13.811 & 0.011 & 16.328 & 0.046 & 10.99 & 3.621 & 0.008 & 3.49 & 0.09 & 2.56 & 0.04 + 88 & 5.48 & 11.45 & 13.479 & 0.008 & 16.289 & 0.046 & 11.75 & 3.609 & 0.007 & 3.90 & 0.08 & 2.83 & 0.04 + 89 & 5.18 & 11.53 & 15.624 & 0.049 & 17.880 & 0.210 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 3.18 & 0.38 & 1.86 & 0.16 + 90 & 4.83 & 11.74 & 15.531 & 0.049 & 17.641 & 0.080 & 7.38 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.17 & 1.79 & 0.07 + 91 & 4.78 & 11.53 & 15.510 & 0.049 & 17.643 & 0.080 & 4.91 & 3.696 & 0.006 & 3.02 & 0.17 & 1.90 & 0.07 + 92 & 4.35 & 11.69 & 14.863 & 0.027 & 16.784 & 0.055 & 8.03 & 3.661 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.11 & 1.92 & 0.05 + 93 & 3.70 & 11.42 & 12.593 & 0.003 & 14.495 & 0.006 & 5.95 & 3.685 & 0.003 & 2.67 & 0.01 & 2.90 & 0.01 + 94 & 3.43 & 11.39 & 13.861 & 0.011 & 15.757 & 0.042 & 8.13 & 3.660 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.08 & 2.30 & 0.03 + 95 & 2.38 & 10.96 & 12.391 & 0.003 & 14.350 & 0.006 & 11.31 & 3.616 & 0.004 & 2.66 & 0.01 & 2.78 & 0.01 + 96 & 2.59 & 10.77 & 13.164 & 0.005 & 14.799 & 0.006 & 6.53 & 3.679 & 0.004 & 2.26 & 0.01 & 2.49 & 0.01 + 97 & 3.16 & 10.69 & 14.694 & 0.019 & 16.701 & 0.046 & 5.54 & 3.690 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.09 & 2.13 & 0.04 + 98 & 3.73 & 10.53 & 12.842 & 0.005 & 14.355 & 0.006 & 8.50 & 3.655 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 2.47 & 0.01 + 99 & 4.51 & 10.85 & 11.905 & 0.003 & 13.794 & 0.003 & 5.57 & 3.689 & 0.003 & 2.65 & 0.01 & 3.18 & 0.01 + 100 & 5.10 & 10.66 & 13.593 & 0.008 & 15.708 & 0.008 & 9.17 & 3.646 & 0.007 & 2.93 & 0.02 & 2.49 & 0.02 + 101 & 5.67 & 10.80 & 15.151 & 0.027 & 17.216 & 0.055 & 8.89 & 3.650 & 0.005 & 2.86 & 0.11 & 1.85 & 0.05 + 102 & 5.40 & 9.96 & 15.114 & 0.027 & 17.121 & 0.055 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 2.81 & 0.11 & 1.92 & 0.05 + 103 & 5.16 & 9.88 & 15.134 & 0.027 & 17.133 & 0.055 & 8.75 & 3.652 & 0.007 & 2.77 & 0.11 & 1.83 & 0.05 + 104 & 5.91 & 9.45 & 15.730 & 0.049 & 17.717 & 0.080 & 6.20 & 3.682 & 0.009 & 2.79 & 0.17 & 1.68 & 0.07 + 105 & 5.08 & 10.18 & 13.307 & 0.008 & 15.413 & 0.008 & 11.02 & 3.620 & 0.007 & 2.88 & 0.02 & 2.51 & 0.02 + 106 & 3.59 & 9.45 & 13.281 & 0.008 & 15.303 & 0.008 & 11.49 & 3.613 & 0.006 & 2.74 & 0.02 & 2.45 & 0.02 + 107 & 3.29 & 9.40 & 15.212 & 0.027 & 17.153 & 0.055 & 7.64 & 3.666 & 0.009 & 2.70 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 108 & 3.13 & 9.53 & 15.129 & 0.027 & 16.961 & 0.055 & 6.68 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 2.55 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 109 & 3.08 & 9.83 & 13.819 & 0.011 & 15.715 & 0.008 & 9.31 & 3.644 & 0.006 & 2.61 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 110 & 3.46 & 10.12 & 13.302 & 0.008 & 15.255 & 0.008 & 14.05 & 3.572 & 0.007 & 2.56 & 0.03 & 2.27 & 0.02 + 111 & 2.94 & 10.07 & 14.905 & 0.027 & 16.849 & 0.055 & 8.69 & 3.653 & 0.005 & 2.69 & 0.11 & 1.89 & 0.05 + 112 & 2.51 & 10.23 & 14.381 & 0.019 & 15.823 & 0.042 & 5.62 & 3.689 & 0.005 & 1.99 & 0.08 & 1.92 & 0.04 + 113 & 2.67 & 9.53 & 15.518 & 0.049 & 17.613 & 0.080 & 7.98 & 3.662 & 0.007 & 2.92 & 0.17 & 1.76 & 0.07 + 114 & -4.86 & 12.72 & 15.647 & 0.042 & 17.899 & 0.224 & 7.68 & 3.665 & 0.007 & 3.16 & 0.41 & 1.82 & 0.16 + 115 & -5.40 & 12.39 & 14.498 & 0.019 & 16.366 & 0.048 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.09 & 2.07 & 0.04 + 116 & -6.18 & 12.69 & 15.679 & 0.042 & 17.406 & 0.072 & 6.76 & 3.676 & 0.005 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.53 & 0.06 + 117 & -6.59 & 12.77 & 16.205 & 0.068 & 18.072 & 0.224 & 5.31 & 3.692 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.42 & 1.45 & 0.17 + 118 & -6.78 & 12.66 & 16.404 & 0.119 & 18.180 & 0.224 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.008 & 2.48 & 0.45 & 1.28 & 0.19 + 119 & -7.48 & 12.26 & 15.019 & 0.033 & 16.737 & 0.048 & 7.69 & 3.665 & 0.005 & 2.37 & 0.10 & 1.75 & 0.05 + 120 & -7.70 & 12.45 & 15.224 & 0.033 & 16.988 & 0.053 & 6.94 & 3.674 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.11 & 1.73 & 0.05 + 121 & -7.07 & 11.93 & 15.166 & 0.033 & 16.674 & 0.048 & 5.40 & 3.691 & 0.004 & 2.09 & 0.10 & 1.65 & 0.04 + 122 & -6.86 & 11.85 & 15.556 & 0.042 & 17.281 & 0.072 & 6.11 & 3.683 & 0.004 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.60 & 0.06 + 123 & -6.56 & 11.99 & 15.669 & 0.042 & 17.310 & 0.072 & 5.47 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.29 & 0.15 & 1.53 & 0.06 + 124 & -6.21 & 12.10 & 15.638 & 0.042 & 17.358 & 0.072 & 6.14 & 3.683 & 0.006 & 2.40 & 0.15 & 1.56 & 0.06 + 125 & -5.16 & 12.20 & 17.135 & 0.131 & 19.005 & 0.252 & 6.87 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.61 & 0.51 & 1.03 & 0.21 + 126 & -4.89 & 12.12 & 15.325 & 0.042 & 17.257 & 0.072 & 5.98 & 3.685 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.15 & 1.82 & 0.06 + 127 & -5.18 & 11.85 & 15.313 & 0.042 & 17.172 & 0.053 & 5.02 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.62 & 0.12 & 1.82 & 0.05 + 128 & -5.83 & 11.56 & 14.756 & 0.033 & 16.508 & 0.048 & 7.64 & 3.666 & 0.004 & 2.42 & 0.10 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 129 & -6.56 & 11.45 & 14.853 & 0.033 & 16.636 & 0.048 & 8.90 & 3.650 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.10 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 130 & -7.21 & 11.53 & 13.517 & 0.008 & 15.305 & 0.010 & 9.99 & 3.635 & 0.005 & 2.43 & 0.02 & 2.29 & 0.02 + 131 & -7.51 & 11.74 & 14.319 & 0.019 & 16.096 & 0.045 & 7.41 & 3.669 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.09 & 2.08 & 0.04 + 132 & -7.75 & 11.58 & 15.081 & 0.033 & 16.952 & 0.053 & 8.21 & 3.659 & 0.007 & 2.59 & 0.11 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 133 & -8.23 & 11.45 & 15.838 & 0.068 & 17.605 & 0.072 & 7.01 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.18 & 1.48 & 0.08 + 134 & -8.29 & 11.12 & 15.889 & 0.068 & 17.677 & 0.072 & 6.84 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.49 & 0.18 & 1.48 & 0.08 + 135 & -7.80 & 11.18 & 14.080 & 0.011 & 15.992 & 0.045 & 10.11 & 3.634 & 0.005 & 2.62 & 0.08 & 2.14 & 0.04 + 136 & -7.70 & 10.83 & 15.377 & 0.042 & 17.235 & 0.053 & 6.32 & 3.681 & 0.005 & 2.60 & 0.12 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 137 & -7.32 & 11.29 & 14.858 & 0.033 & 16.667 & 0.048 & 7.69 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.51 & 0.10 & 1.87 & 0.05 + 138 & -7.07 & 10.85 & 15.836 & 0.068 & 17.186 & 0.053 & 5.97 & 3.685 & 0.006 & 1.85 & 0.15 & 1.27 & 0.07 + 139 & -6.83 & 10.88 & 14.494 & 0.019 & 16.366 & 0.048 & 10.31 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.55 & 0.09 & 1.94 & 0.04 + 140 & -7.02 & 10.53 & 14.002 & 0.011 & 16.085 & 0.045 & 9.61 & 3.641 & 0.005 & 2.88 & 0.08 & 2.29 & 0.04 + 141 & -7.26 & 10.50 & 14.588 & 0.019 & 16.339 & 0.048 & 7.36 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.43 & 0.09 & 1.96 & 0.04 + 142 & -5.99 & 11.18 & 11.861 & 0.003 & 13.400 & 0.002 & 10.47 & 3.628 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 2.79 & 0.01 + 143 & -5.89 & 10.66 & 13.946 & 0.011 & 15.939 & 0.045 & 8.36 & 3.657 & 0.005 & 2.77 & 0.08 & 2.31 & 0.04 + 144 & -5.45 & 10.31 & 15.461 & 0.042 & 17.386 & 0.072 & 5.11 & 3.694 & 0.004 & 2.71 & 0.15 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 145 & -5.26 & 10.18 & 14.684 & 0.019 & 16.372 & 0.048 & 7.67 & 3.666 & 0.004 & 2.33 & 0.09 & 1.87 & 0.04 + 146 & -4.86 & 9.85 & 12.872 & 0.004 & 14.806 & 0.007 & 10.37 & 3.630 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.02 & 2.62 & 0.01 + 147 & 4.94 & 16.85 & 15.552 & 0.033 & 17.771 & 0.193 & 8.39 & 3.657 & 0.007 & 3.10 & 0.35 & 1.80 & 0.14 + 148 & 4.18 & 16.82 & 14.313 & 0.014 & 16.510 & 0.043 & 9.01 & 3.649 & 0.006 & 3.06 & 0.08 & 2.26 & 0.04 + 149 & 3.51 & 16.69 & 15.608 & 0.033 & 17.420 & 0.058 & 7.22 & 3.671 & 0.005 & 2.52 & 0.12 & 1.59 & 0.05 + 150 & 5.94 & 16.58 & 15.878 & 0.073 & 18.001 & 0.193 & 5.31 & 3.692 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.37 & 1.74 & 0.15 + 151 & 5.83 & 16.28 & 15.617 & 0.033 & 17.657 & 0.058 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.006 & 2.86 & 0.12 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 152 & 5.59 & 16.09 & 15.837 & 0.073 & 17.933 & 0.193 & 6.11 & 3.683 & 0.005 & 2.95 & 0.37 & 1.71 & 0.15 + 153 & 4.97 & 16.42 & 12.691 & 0.003 & 15.117 & 0.005 & 14.50 & 3.564 & 0.006 & 3.24 & 0.02 & 2.76 & 0.02 + 154 & 4.32 & 16.28 & 16.030 & 0.073 & 18.088 & 0.193 & 6.94 & 3.674 & 0.008 & 2.89 & 0.37 & 1.58 & 0.15 + 155 & 2.73 & 16.60 & 15.914 & 0.073 & 17.716 & 0.058 & 5.83 & 3.686 & 0.008 & 2.52 & 0.17 & 1.51 & 0.08 + 156 & 2.84 & 16.25 & 13.465 & 0.007 & 15.255 & 0.007 & 8.70 & 3.653 & 0.006 & 2.46 & 0.02 & 2.37 & 0.02 + 157 & 3.00 & 15.98 & 15.508 & 0.033 & 17.399 & 0.058 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.006 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 158 & 3.35 & 15.90 & 15.638 & 0.033 & 17.629 & 0.058 & 7.04 & 3.673 & 0.005 & 2.79 & 0.12 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 159 & 3.73 & 15.96 & 15.501 & 0.033 & 17.434 & 0.058 & 6.61 & 3.678 & 0.006 & 2.71 & 0.12 & 1.73 & 0.05 + 160 & 4.67 & 15.93 & 15.194 & 0.026 & 17.162 & 0.046 & 6.63 & 3.678 & 0.004 & 2.76 & 0.09 & 1.87 & 0.04 + 161 & 5.32 & 15.77 & 15.439 & 0.033 & 17.512 & 0.058 & 7.90 & 3.663 & 0.005 & 2.89 & 0.12 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 162 & 5.43 & 15.88 & 15.235 & 0.026 & 17.402 & 0.058 & 9.64 & 3.640 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.11 & 1.85 & 0.05 + 163 & 5.78 & 15.80 & 15.236 & 0.026 & 17.399 & 0.058 & 8.57 & 3.654 & 0.007 & 3.01 & 0.11 & 1.89 & 0.05 + 164 & 5.83 & 15.52 & 15.698 & 0.033 & 18.004 & 0.193 & 8.79 & 3.651 & 0.006 & 3.22 & 0.35 & 1.78 & 0.14 + 165 & 5.99 & 15.58 & 16.165 & 0.073 & 18.239 & 0.193 & 6.62 & 3.678 & 0.008 & 2.91 & 0.37 & 1.54 & 0.15 + 166 & 5.08 & 15.50 & 16.363 & 0.076 & 18.561 & 0.216 & 8.51 & 3.655 & 0.006 & 3.07 & 0.41 & 1.46 & 0.17 + 167 & 4.99 & 15.15 & 15.308 & 0.033 & 17.408 & 0.058 & 10.85 & 3.623 & 0.007 & 2.88 & 0.12 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 168 & 3.81 & 15.31 & 12.615 & 0.003 & 14.638 & 0.005 & 13.49 & 3.581 & 0.007 & 2.68 & 0.02 & 2.61 & 0.02 + 169 & 3.38 & 15.31 & 15.383 & 0.033 & 17.319 & 0.058 & 8.35 & 3.657 & 0.006 & 2.68 & 0.12 & 1.71 & 0.05 + 170 & 3.16 & 15.15 & 14.040 & 0.008 & 16.061 & 0.043 & 9.34 & 3.644 & 0.006 & 2.79 & 0.08 & 2.25 & 0.04 + 171 & 2.92 & 15.66 & 15.052 & 0.026 & 16.976 & 0.046 & 8.92 & 3.650 & 0.008 & 2.66 & 0.09 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 172 & 2.78 & 15.34 & 14.778 & 0.026 & 16.934 & 0.046 & 9.07 & 3.648 & 0.005 & 3.00 & 0.09 & 2.05 & 0.04 + 173 & 2.54 & 14.80 & 13.166 & 0.004 & 14.934 & 0.005 & 5.00 & 3.695 & 0.005 & 2.48 & 0.01 & 2.62 & 0.01 + 174 & 3.21 & 14.42 & 15.317 & 0.033 & 17.176 & 0.046 & 6.99 & 3.674 & 0.006 & 2.59 & 0.10 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 175 & 3.24 & 14.66 & 15.590 & 0.033 & 17.545 & 0.058 & 7.46 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.12 & 1.67 & 0.05 + 176 & 3.62 & 14.80 & 15.449 & 0.033 & 17.362 & 0.058 & 9.52 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.12 & 1.61 & 0.05 + 177 & 4.10 & 14.88 & 15.905 & 0.073 & 18.090 & 0.193 & 7.66 & 3.666 & 0.005 & 3.06 & 0.37 & 1.67 & 0.15 + 178 & 6.10 & 15.07 & 15.197 & 0.026 & 17.898 & 0.193 & 10.05 & 3.634 & 0.006 & 3.78 & 0.35 & 2.16 & 0.14 + 179 & 5.75 & 14.50 & 10.803 & 0.002 & 13.327 & 0.002 & 16.04 & 3.536 & 0.007 & 3.31 & 0.02 & 3.49 & 0.02 + 180 & 4.56 & 14.23 & 12.404 & 0.003 & 15.485 & 0.007 & 14.27 & 3.568 & 0.007 & 4.22 & 0.02 & 3.28 & 0.02 + 181 & 4.00 & 14.28 & 15.637 & 0.033 & 17.484 & 0.058 & 4.80 & 3.697 & 0.003 & 2.60 & 0.12 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 182 & 3.89 & 13.77 & 12.332 & 0.003 & 14.286 & 0.005 & 12.22 & 3.602 & 0.007 & 2.62 & 0.02 & 2.75 & 0.02 + 183 & 3.67 & 14.09 & 15.154 & 0.026 & 17.022 & 0.046 & 9.60 & 3.641 & 0.005 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.70 & 0.04 + 184 & 3.21 & 13.47 & 13.180 & 0.004 & 15.232 & 0.005 & 11.63 & 3.611 & 0.007 & 2.78 & 0.02 & 2.50 & 0.02 + 185 & 3.00 & 14.09 & 15.071 & 0.026 & 17.010 & 0.046 & 7.33 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.88 & 0.04 + 186 & 2.46 & 13.45 & 15.667 & 0.033 & 17.564 & 0.058 & 7.33 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.12 & 1.61 & 0.05 + 187 & 4.75 & 13.82 & 15.838 & 0.073 & 17.896 & 0.193 & 7.32 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.88 & 0.37 & 1.64 & 0.15 + 188 & 5.35 & 13.53 & 15.493 & 0.033 & 18.000 & 0.193 & 9.48 & 3.642 & 0.009 & 3.51 & 0.35 & 1.95 & 0.14 + 189 & 5.21 & 13.01 & 13.400 & 0.007 & 15.575 & 0.007 & 11.59 & 3.612 & 0.006 & 2.97 & 0.02 & 2.49 & 0.02 + 190 & 4.86 & 13.04 & 15.419 & 0.033 & 17.675 & 0.058 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 3.20 & 0.12 & 2.01 & 0.05 + 191 & 4.62 & 13.28 & 15.571 & 0.033 & 17.613 & 0.058 & 7.31 & 3.670 & 0.005 & 2.86 & 0.12 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 192 & 4.29 & 13.42 & 15.229 & 0.026 & 17.173 & 0.046 & 7.96 & 3.662 & 0.007 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 193 & 4.13 & 13.18 & 15.177 & 0.026 & 17.135 & 0.046 & 5.54 & 3.690 & 0.006 & 2.76 & 0.09 & 1.91 & 0.04 + 194 & 3.81 & 12.96 & 14.855 & 0.026 & 17.095 & 0.046 & 7.21 & 3.671 & 0.005 & 3.15 & 0.09 & 2.14 & 0.04 + 195 & 3.75 & 12.82 & 14.958 & 0.026 & 16.816 & 0.046 & 6.62 & 3.678 & 0.006 & 2.59 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 196 & 3.46 & 12.18 & 14.986 & 0.026 & 16.925 & 0.046 & 7.58 & 3.667 & 0.007 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 197 & 4.62 & 12.31 & 14.028 & 0.008 & 16.714 & 0.043 & 11.82 & 3.608 & 0.007 & 3.72 & 0.08 & 2.53 & 0.04 + 198 & 4.67 & 11.96 & 15.444 & 0.033 & 17.517 & 0.058 & 8.54 & 3.655 & 0.011 & 2.88 & 0.12 & 1.76 & 0.06 + 199 & 5.48 & 12.34 & 14.066 & 0.008 & 16.048 & 0.043 & 9.55 & 3.641 & 0.009 & 2.73 & 0.08 & 2.21 & 0.04 + 200 & 5.75 & 11.96 & 15.084 & 0.026 & 18.396 & 0.216 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.010 & 4.68 & 0.39 & 2.55 & 0.16 + 201 & 5.83 & 12.50 & 15.007 & 0.026 & 16.824 & 0.046 & 7.83 & 3.664 & 0.007 & 2.52 & 0.09 & 1.81 & 0.04 + 202 & 5.56 & 12.80 & 15.206 & 0.026 & 17.276 & 0.058 & 7.35 & 3.669 & 0.009 & 2.90 & 0.11 & 1.90 & 0.05 + 203 & 5.32 & 12.64 & 15.004 & 0.026 & 16.793 & 0.046 & 7.93 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.47 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 204 & 17.98 & 18.79 & 13.875 & 0.008 & 15.987 & 0.041 & 12.13 & 3.603 & 0.006 & 2.86 & 0.08 & 2.23 & 0.03 + 205 & 17.42 & 18.66 & 12.761 & 0.005 & 14.750 & 0.005 & 7.67 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.77 & 0.01 & 2.82 & 0.01 + 206 & 16.96 & 18.36 & 15.226 & 0.021 & 17.257 & 0.058 & 8.52 & 3.655 & 0.005 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 1.82 & 0.05 + 207 & 16.63 & 18.68 & 14.970 & 0.021 & 16.876 & 0.048 & 8.24 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.64 & 0.09 & 1.86 & 0.04 + 208 & 16.42 & 18.63 & 15.582 & 0.027 & 17.474 & 0.058 & 6.17 & 3.683 & 0.004 & 2.65 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 209 & 16.42 & 18.39 & 15.578 & 0.027 & 17.470 & 0.058 & 8.39 & 3.657 & 0.007 & 2.62 & 0.11 & 1.60 & 0.05 + 210 & 15.55 & 18.36 & 15.736 & 0.027 & 17.868 & 0.202 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.006 & 3.00 & 0.36 & 1.76 & 0.15 + 211 & 15.47 & 18.68 & 16.367 & 0.083 & 18.105 & 0.202 & 5.70 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.43 & 0.39 & 1.30 & 0.16 + 212 & 15.39 & 19.06 & 16.023 & 0.061 & 17.959 & 0.202 & 3.62 & 3.708 & 0.004 & 2.74 & 0.38 & 1.62 & 0.15 + 213 & 15.15 & 18.58 & 14.538 & 0.015 & 16.357 & 0.047 & 7.22 & 3.671 & 0.004 & 2.53 & 0.09 & 2.02 & 0.04 + 214 & 14.61 & 18.50 & 15.400 & 0.027 & 17.426 & 0.058 & 7.51 & 3.667 & 0.008 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 215 & 14.61 & 18.04 & 12.841 & 0.005 & 14.809 & 0.006 & 5.63 & 3.689 & 0.003 & 2.77 & 0.01 & 2.85 & 0.01 + 216 & 15.07 & 18.09 & 15.299 & 0.027 & 17.248 & 0.048 & 6.82 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.10 & 1.81 & 0.04 + 217 & 15.61 & 17.90 & 15.055 & 0.021 & 16.851 & 0.048 & 4.29 & 3.702 & 0.003 & 2.53 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 218 & 15.82 & 17.93 & 15.329 & 0.027 & 17.293 & 0.058 & 5.46 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.76 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 219 & 16.09 & 18.01 & 15.249 & 0.021 & 17.087 & 0.048 & 7.03 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.76 & 0.04 + 220 & 16.36 & 17.82 & 16.300 & 0.083 & 18.281 & 0.204 & 8.44 & 3.656 & 0.006 & 2.75 & 0.39 & 1.36 & 0.16 + 221 & 16.96 & 17.98 & 13.942 & 0.008 & 15.841 & 0.041 & 9.37 & 3.644 & 0.004 & 2.61 & 0.07 & 2.22 & 0.03 + 222 & 17.60 & 18.09 & 15.513 & 0.027 & 17.565 & 0.058 & 9.45 & 3.643 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.67 & 0.05 + 223 & 17.12 & 17.74 & 14.996 & 0.021 & 16.761 & 0.048 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.004 & 2.44 & 0.09 & 1.78 & 0.04 + 224 & 16.98 & 17.58 & 13.668 & 0.005 & 15.518 & 0.007 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.004 & 2.54 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.01 + 225 & 16.52 & 17.55 & 15.812 & 0.061 & 18.124 & 0.202 & 5.87 & 3.686 & 0.004 & 3.28 & 0.38 & 1.85 & 0.15 + 226 & 16.31 & 17.28 & 14.495 & 0.015 & 16.480 & 0.047 & 9.03 & 3.648 & 0.004 & 2.74 & 0.09 & 2.06 & 0.04 + 227 & 15.74 & 17.39 & 15.275 & 0.027 & 17.219 & 0.048 & 6.77 & 3.676 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.10 & 1.82 & 0.04 + 228 & 15.34 & 17.39 & 15.470 & 0.027 & 17.529 & 0.058 & 6.90 & 3.675 & 0.005 & 2.89 & 0.11 & 1.80 & 0.05 + 229 & 15.42 & 16.98 & 16.262 & 0.083 & 18.066 & 0.202 & 6.45 & 3.680 & 0.007 & 2.52 & 0.39 & 1.35 & 0.16 + 230 & 15.34 & 16.71 & 15.123 & 0.021 & 17.461 & 0.058 & 6.69 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 3.30 & 0.11 & 2.12 & 0.05 + 231 & 15.93 & 16.71 & 13.527 & 0.005 & 15.422 & 0.007 & 10.90 & 3.622 & 0.006 & 2.57 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.02 + 232 & 16.44 & 17.15 & 13.639 & 0.005 & 15.636 & 0.007 & 10.57 & 3.627 & 0.005 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.34 & 0.02 + 233 & 16.98 & 17.17 & 14.927 & 0.021 & 16.440 & 0.047 & 7.26 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.07 & 0.09 & 1.68 & 0.04 + 234 & 17.25 & 17.04 & 15.273 & 0.027 & 17.212 & 0.048 & 8.20 & 3.659 & 0.006 & 2.69 & 0.10 & 1.76 & 0.04 + 235 & 17.39 & 17.20 & 14.481 & 0.015 & 16.331 & 0.047 & 8.79 & 3.651 & 0.005 & 2.55 & 0.09 & 2.00 & 0.04 + 236 & 17.77 & 16.69 & 14.440 & 0.015 & 16.309 & 0.047 & 7.90 & 3.663 & 0.007 & 2.59 & 0.09 & 2.06 & 0.04 + 237 & 17.31 & 16.69 & 15.226 & 0.021 & 16.971 & 0.048 & 4.79 & 3.697 & 0.004 & 2.45 & 0.09 & 1.79 & 0.04 + 238 & 16.98 & 16.77 & 16.383 & 0.083 & 18.381 & 0.204 & 6.51 & 3.679 & 0.008 & 2.80 & 0.39 & 1.42 & 0.16 + 239 & 17.52 & 16.07 & 15.026 & 0.021 & 16.916 & 0.048 & 10.57 & 3.627 & 0.009 & 2.57 & 0.09 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 240 & 17.31 & 15.71 & 13.073 & 0.005 & 15.095 & 0.006 & 10.61 & 3.626 & 0.005 & 2.77 & 0.02 & 2.58 & 0.02 + 241 & 16.39 & 15.63 & 15.333 & 0.027 & 17.192 & 0.048 & 6.66 & 3.677 & 0.005 & 2.59 & 0.10 & 1.75 & 0.04 + 242 & 16.12 & 15.42 & 14.285 & 0.015 & 16.163 & 0.041 & 8.51 & 3.655 & 0.008 & 2.59 & 0.08 & 2.10 & 0.04 + 243 & 16.04 & 15.77 & 15.011 & 0.021 & 16.470 & 0.047 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.004 & 2.02 & 0.09 & 1.70 & 0.04 + 244 & 15.28 & 15.47 & 15.066 & 0.021 & 16.950 & 0.048 & 6.97 & 3.674 & 0.005 & 2.63 & 0.09 & 1.86 & 0.04 + 245 & 15.31 & 16.09 & 15.352 & 0.027 & 17.243 & 0.048 & 6.55 & 3.679 & 0.007 & 2.64 & 0.10 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 246 & 15.50 & 16.42 & 15.382 & 0.027 & 17.339 & 0.058 & 7.03 & 3.673 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.77 & 0.05 + 247 & 15.12 & 16.36 & 14.726 & 0.015 & 16.606 & 0.047 & 10.30 & 3.631 & 0.006 & 2.56 & 0.09 & 1.85 & 0.04 + 248 & 18.71 & 13.90 & 14.621 & 0.016 & 17.520 & 0.065 & 11.38 & 3.615 & 0.005 & 4.04 & 0.12 & 2.44 & 0.05 + 249 & 18.58 & 13.80 & 13.958 & 0.009 & 15.403 & 0.009 & 6.33 & 3.681 & 0.004 & 1.99 & 0.02 & 2.07 & 0.02 + 250 & 17.87 & 13.93 & 14.910 & 0.027 & 16.616 & 0.044 & 4.50 & 3.700 & 0.004 & 2.39 & 0.09 & 1.90 & 0.04 + 251 & 16.98 & 13.61 & 14.856 & 0.027 & 17.116 & 0.055 & 8.54 & 3.655 & 0.004 & 3.16 & 0.11 & 2.10 & 0.05 + 252 & 16.17 & 13.66 & 16.296 & 0.100 & 18.025 & 0.198 & 5.75 & 3.687 & 0.006 & 2.41 & 0.39 & 1.32 & 0.16 + 253 & 15.93 & 13.45 & 15.774 & 0.064 & 17.581 & 0.065 & 5.53 & 3.690 & 0.007 & 2.53 & 0.16 & 1.58 & 0.07 + 254 & 16.33 & 13.23 & 14.934 & 0.027 & 16.765 & 0.055 & 6.30 & 3.681 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.11 & 1.90 & 0.05 + 255 & 16.60 & 13.45 & 16.083 & 0.064 & 18.269 & 0.233 & 4.92 & 3.696 & 0.003 & 3.10 & 0.43 & 1.70 & 0.17 + 256 & 16.90 & 13.45 & 15.023 & 0.027 & 16.766 & 0.055 & 6.39 & 3.680 & 0.004 & 2.43 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 257 & 17.09 & 13.18 & 15.868 & 0.064 & 17.650 & 0.065 & 5.28 & 3.692 & 0.006 & 2.50 & 0.16 & 1.54 & 0.07 + 258 & 17.28 & 13.18 & 14.923 & 0.027 & 16.713 & 0.044 & 6.56 & 3.678 & 0.004 & 2.49 & 0.09 & 1.88 & 0.04 + 259 & 17.55 & 13.31 & 15.131 & 0.027 & 16.904 & 0.055 & 7.08 & 3.672 & 0.005 & 2.46 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 260 & 18.14 & 13.58 & 15.066 & 0.027 & 16.834 & 0.055 & 7.71 & 3.665 & 0.004 & 2.45 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 261 & 18.31 & 13.50 & 15.182 & 0.027 & 16.984 & 0.055 & 7.14 & 3.672 & 0.004 & 2.50 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 262 & 18.90 & 13.20 & 11.054 & 0.002 & 12.618 & 0.002 & 11.69 & 3.610 & 0.005 & 2.06 & 0.01 & 3.06 & 0.01 + 263 & 18.50 & 12.58 & 14.975 & 0.027 & 16.649 & 0.044 & 7.40 & 3.669 & 0.005 & 2.31 & 0.09 & 1.75 & 0.04 + 264 & 18.31 & 12.28 & 12.522 & 0.003 & 14.414 & 0.005 & 10.74 & 3.624 & 0.004 & 2.57 & 0.01 & 2.72 & 0.01 + 265 & 18.71 & 12.26 & 15.774 & 0.064 & 17.527 & 0.065 & 5.80 & 3.687 & 0.005 & 2.45 & 0.16 & 1.54 & 0.07 + 266 & 19.17 & 12.18 & 12.940 & 0.005 & 14.683 & 0.005 & 11.04 & 3.620 & 0.007 & 2.34 & 0.02 & 2.45 & 0.02 + 267 & 17.87 & 12.64 & 15.189 & 0.027 & 17.110 & 0.055 & 7.94 & 3.662 & 0.005 & 2.67 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 268 & 17.74 & 12.26 & 13.417 & 0.008 & 15.210 & 0.006 & 9.23 & 3.646 & 0.004 & 2.46 & 0.02 & 2.37 & 0.01 + 269 & 17.15 & 12.18 & 16.087 & 0.064 & 18.519 & 0.233 & 6.83 & 3.675 & 0.006 & 3.44 & 0.43 & 1.78 & 0.17 + 270 & 16.98 & 12.31 & 15.043 & 0.027 & 16.845 & 0.055 & 8.59 & 3.654 & 0.003 & 2.48 & 0.11 & 1.75 & 0.05 + 271 & 16.69 & 12.18 & 12.248 & 0.003 & 14.120 & 0.003 & 12.93 & 3.591 & 0.006 & 2.48 & 0.02 & 2.70 & 0.02 + 272 & 16.77 & 12.99 & 14.951 & 0.027 & 16.704 & 0.044 & 6.96 & 3.674 & 0.003 & 2.43 & 0.09 & 1.83 & 0.04 + 273 & 16.39 & 12.61 & 12.552 & 0.003 & 14.315 & 0.005 & 4.08 & 3.704 & 0.002 & 2.48 & 0.01 & 2.89 & 0.01 + 274 & 15.55 & 13.10 & 15.324 & 0.039 & 17.308 & 0.065 & 4.81 & 3.697 & 0.003 & 2.80 & 0.13 & 1.89 & 0.06 + 275 & 15.42 & 12.50 & 14.718 & 0.016 & 16.613 & 0.044 & 6.34 & 3.681 & 0.003 & 2.65 & 0.08 & 2.03 & 0.03 + 276 & 15.96 & 12.23 & 13.624 & 0.008 & 15.550 & 0.009 & 8.26 & 3.658 & 0.004 & 2.67 & 0.02 & 2.41 & 0.01 + 277 & 15.47 & 11.77 & 15.327 & 0.039 & 17.333 & 0.065 & 4.94 & 3.696 & 0.005 & 2.83 & 0.13 & 1.90 & 0.06 + 278 & 15.50 & 11.56 & 15.479 & 0.039 & 17.545 & 0.065 & 6.01 & 3.684 & 0.008 & 2.91 & 0.14 & 1.84 & 0.06 + 279 & 15.85 & 11.34 & 13.934 & 0.009 & 15.885 & 0.045 & 7.63 & 3.666 & 0.006 & 2.72 & 0.08 & 2.32 & 0.04 + 280 & 16.01 & 11.15 & 15.087 & 0.027 & 17.174 & 0.055 & 9.49 & 3.642 & 0.008 & 2.89 & 0.11 & 1.86 & 0.05 + 281 & 15.82 & 11.10 & 15.398 & 0.039 & 17.480 & 0.065 & 6.14 & 3.683 & 0.005 & 2.93 & 0.13 & 1.87 & 0.06 + 282 & 16.50 & 11.58 & 15.047 & 0.027 & 16.877 & 0.055 & 8.00 & 3.661 & 0.010 & 2.53 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 283 & 16.74 & 11.58 & 14.931 & 0.027 & 16.922 & 0.055 & 8.07 & 3.661 & 0.009 & 2.77 & 0.11 & 1.93 & 0.05 + 284 & 16.71 & 11.31 & 15.040 & 0.027 & 17.024 & 0.055 & 9.80 & 3.638 & 0.005 & 2.73 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 285 & 16.71 & 10.99 & 15.251 & 0.039 & 17.147 & 0.055 & 10.42 & 3.629 & 0.009 & 2.58 & 0.12 & 1.64 & 0.06 + 286 & 16.96 & 10.66 & 16.019 & 0.064 & 17.658 & 0.065 & 5.89 & 3.686 & 0.006 & 2.28 & 0.16 & 1.37 & 0.07 + 287 & 17.17 & 11.20 & 15.337 & 0.039 & 17.459 & 0.065 & 8.96 & 3.649 & 0.007 & 2.95 & 0.14 & 1.81 & 0.06 + 288 & 17.20 & 11.58 & 15.334 & 0.039 & 17.229 & 0.055 & 5.43 & 3.691 & 0.005 & 2.66 & 0.12 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 289 & 17.58 & 11.29 & 15.161 & 0.027 & 17.013 & 0.055 & 4.87 & 3.696 & 0.002 & 2.61 & 0.11 & 1.88 & 0.05 + 290 & 18.28 & 11.50 & 15.082 & 0.027 & 16.835 & 0.055 & 6.09 & 3.684 & 0.005 & 2.44 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 291 & 18.33 & 11.69 & 15.143 & 0.027 & 16.849 & 0.055 & 5.51 & 3.690 & 0.004 & 2.38 & 0.11 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 292 & 18.06 & 10.77 & 14.916 & 0.027 & 16.814 & 0.055 & 10.69 & 3.625 & 0.008 & 2.58 & 0.11 & 1.76 & 0.05 + 293 & 17.77 & 10.75 & 14.598 & 0.016 & 16.558 & 0.044 & 11.05 & 3.620 & 0.005 & 2.66 & 0.08 & 1.91 & 0.04 + 294 & 17.63 & 10.34 & 15.301 & 0.039 & 17.319 & 0.065 & 8.23 & 3.659 & 0.007 & 2.81 & 0.14 & 1.79 & 0.06 + 295 & -6.67 & 18.85 & 14.814 & 0.014 & 16.883 & 0.042 & 10.09 & 3.634 & 0.007 & 2.85 & 0.08 & 1.93 & 0.04 + 296 & -7.51 & 19.31 & 15.600 & 0.029 & 17.609 & 0.051 & 4.45 & 3.700 & 0.004 & 2.84 & 0.11 & 1.81 & 0.05 + 297 & -7.70 & 19.12 & 15.219 & 0.014 & 17.213 & 0.042 & 5.71 & 3.688 & 0.004 & 2.81 & 0.08 & 1.91 & 0.03 + 298 & -8.29 & 19.01 & 14.783 & 0.014 & 16.753 & 0.042 & 8.22 & 3.659 & 0.005 & 2.74 & 0.08 & 1.97 & 0.03 + 299 & -8.37 & 18.82 & 15.067 & 0.014 & 16.961 & 0.042 & 5.94 & 3.685 & 0.003 & 2.66 & 0.08 & 1.90 & 0.03 + 300 & -9.15 & 18.74 & 11.437 & 0.002 & 13.493 & 0.002 & 8.46 & 3.656 & 0.003 & 2.86 & 0.01 & 3.35 & 0.01 + 301 & -8.26 & 18.23 & 14.468 & 0.011 & 16.434 & 0.044 & 9.28 & 3.645 & 0.004 & 2.71 & 0.08 & 2.05 & 0.03 + 302 & -6.72 & 18.14 & 13.651 & 0.005 & 15.524 & 0.007 & 9.17 & 3.646 & 0.004 & 2.58 & 0.02 & 2.33 & 0.01 + 303 & -7.07 & 17.77 & 15.142 & 0.014 & 17.064 & 0.042 & 7.86 & 3.663 & 0.007 & 2.67 & 0.08 & 1.82 & 0.04 + 304 & -8.13 & 17.63 & 15.598 & 0.029 & 17.594 & 0.051 & 5.03 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.82 & 0.11 & 1.78 & 0.05 + 305 & -8.48 & 17.74 & 15.391 & 0.029 & 17.322 & 0.051 & 7.87 & 3.663 & 0.005 & 2.68 & 0.11 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 306 & -8.72 & 17.63 & 15.467 & 0.029 & 17.360 & 0.051 & 7.25 & 3.670 & 0.004 & 2.64 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 307 & -9.94 & 17.90 & 15.508 & 0.029 & 17.631 & 0.051 & 10.16 & 3.633 & 0.006 & 2.93 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 308 & -10.07 & 17.28 & 15.566 & 0.029 & 17.617 & 0.051 & 7.43 & 3.668 & 0.006 & 2.87 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 309 & -10.12 & 17.50 & 15.794 & 0.060 & 17.879 & 0.196 & 5.97 & 3.685 & 0.007 & 2.94 & 0.36 & 1.72 & 0.15 + 310 & -8.88 & 17.28 & 15.160 & 0.014 & 17.095 & 0.042 & 8.64 & 3.653 & 0.005 & 2.68 & 0.08 & 1.78 & 0.03 + 311 & -8.80 & 17.15 & 15.482 & 0.029 & 17.506 & 0.051 & 9.00 & 3.649 & 0.007 & 2.80 & 0.11 & 1.69 & 0.05 + 312 & -8.56 & 17.31 & 15.606 & 0.029 & 17.457 & 0.051 & 8.29 & 3.658 & 0.004 & 2.56 & 0.11 & 1.57 & 0.05 + 313 & -8.05 & 16.98 & 15.477 & 0.029 & 17.505 & 0.051 & 7.95 & 3.662 & 0.006 & 2.83 & 0.11 & 1.74 & 0.05 + 314 & -6.94 & 17.12 & 15.234 & 0.014 & 17.284 & 0.051 & 9.04 & 3.648 & 0.007 & 2.84 & 0.10 & 1.80 & 0.04 + 315 & -6.59 & 16.98 & 15.524 & 0.029 & 17.516 & 0.051 & 5.68 & 3.688 & 0.005 & 2.80 & 0.11 & 1.79 & 0.05 + 316 & -6.86 & 16.71 & 15.647 & 0.029 & 17.546 & 0.051 & 6.88 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.65 & 0.11 & 1.64 & 0.05 + 317 & -6.94 & 16.58 & 15.254 & 0.029 & 17.181 & 0.042 & 6.51 & 3.679 & 0.003 & 2.70 & 0.09 & 1.83 & 0.04 + 318 & -7.64 & 16.39 & 15.395 & 0.029 & 17.375 & 0.051 & 8.66 & 3.653 & 0.007 & 2.74 & 0.11 & 1.72 & 0.05 + 319 & -6.61 & 15.77 & 14.757 & 0.014 & 16.307 & 0.044 & 10.12 & 3.633 & 0.006 & 2.08 & 0.08 & 1.65 & 0.04 + 320 & -7.48 & 15.36 & 15.453 & 0.029 & 17.392 & 0.051 & 8.26 & 3.658 & 0.005 & 2.69 & 0.11 & 1.68 & 0.05 + 321 & -7.75 & 15.55 & 13.625 & 0.005 & 15.630 & 0.007 & 10.90 & 3.622 & 0.007 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.33 & 0.02 + 322 & -8.34 & 16.52 & 13.477 & 0.005 & 15.438 & 0.007 & 8.02 & 3.661 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.50 & 0.01 + 323 & -8.96 & 16.96 & 14.418 & 0.011 & 16.562 & 0.044 & 9.48 & 3.642 & 0.005 & 2.97 & 0.08 & 2.17 & 0.04 + 324 & -9.10 & 16.79 & 13.835 & 0.008 & 15.898 & 0.039 & 10.18 & 3.633 & 0.005 & 2.84 & 0.07 & 2.32 & 0.03 + 325 & -8.53 & 15.66 & 12.615 & 0.003 & 14.755 & 0.006 & 9.82 & 3.638 & 0.005 & 2.96 & 0.01 & 2.87 & 0.02 + 326 & -8.59 & 15.34 & 13.698 & 0.005 & 15.683 & 0.007 & 10.55 & 3.627 & 0.005 & 2.71 & 0.02 & 2.31 & 0.01 + 327 & -9.05 & 15.28 & 12.764 & 0.004 & 14.750 & 0.005 & 9.86 & 3.637 & 0.006 & 2.73 & 0.02 & 2.72 & 0.02 + 328 & -9.18 & 15.85 & 15.145 & 0.014 & 17.151 & 0.042 & 6.83 & 3.675 & 0.004 & 2.81 & 0.08 & 1.90 & 0.03 + 329 & -9.99 & 15.98 & 14.581 & 0.011 & 16.522 & 0.044 & 5.01 & 3.695 & 0.004 & 2.73 & 0.08 & 2.16 & 0.03 + [ gc_table ]      the gc h - r diagram is shown in figure [ hr ] . our data clearly show the red clump at @xmath67 , as well as the upper red giant branch / early asymptotic giant branch . there is an indication of the agb bump at @xmath68 , and we also detect some lower red giant branch stars at lower luminosities , though the observations are highly incomplete in this region . the data set in figure [ hr ] allows for a more robust analysis of the galactic center star formation history than any other previously published data set . photometric studies are limited to the modeling of luminosities alone @xcite , due to intrinsic variations in late - type giant colors and the large variation in galactic center extinction . this point is illustrated in figure [ cmd ] , which compares the observed h - r diagram to a color - magnitude diagram ( cmd ) for the same gc stars . the rgb / agb and rc populations are more clearly distinguished in the h - r diagram than in the cmd , and there is less scatter in @xmath7 than @xmath69 , due to variations in gc extinction . as a result , only the k - band luminosity function can reliably be modeled with broadband photometry alone . the observed h - r diagram in this study is also an improvement with respect to previous spectroscopic work @xcite , due to our improved magnitude limit ( @xmath55 mag . deeper ) , which allows for the analysis of well - populated regions in the h - r diagram , in which the evolutionary models are fairly well understood .         than @xmath70 , due to variations in gc extinction . ] the errors in temperature and luminosity are shown with the data in grey in figure [ hr ] . average errors in temperature and luminosity for stars with luminosities @xmath71 ( the red clump region ) are shown at right . the temperature limit for the minimum co index and the 50% completeness limit for the average extinction correction ( @xmath72 mag . ) are also shown . solar metallicity ( in red , left ) and metal - poor ( z=0.008 , in blue , right ) isochrones from @xcite are overplotted . the isochrones show the wide range of ages spanned by the galactic center population . figure [ hr ] also demonstrates the age - metallicity degeneracy inherent in this part of the diagram . stars in the same part of the h - r diagram may represent a metal - rich , intermediate - age ( @xmath73 a few gyr ) population or a metal - poor , old ( @xmath74 5 gyr ) population . for stars younger than @xmath55 gyr , the galactic center stellar population is known to be approximately solar @xcite . for older stars , the galactic center metallicity distribution is not well - known . we will address this uncertainty later in the paper .      to investigate the star formation history implied by our sample , we begin with a qualitative discussion , followed by quantitative analysis in  3.4 - 3.5 . we start by considering three models based on candidate star formation histories presented in the literature . the first scenario consists of an ancient burst of star formation 7.5 - 8.5 gyr ago , similar to the single stellar population of the bulge . @xcite compared this scenario to the k band luminosity function ( klf ) of the inner parsec . the second model consists of constant star formation between 10 myr and 10 gyr ago . this model is based on the best - fit model of @xcite , who considered the galactic center klf within 40 pc of the center . the third model corresponds to the best - fit star formation history of @xcite , who fit the h - r diagram of asymptotic giant branch and cool supergiant stars within the central 5 pc , using four specified age bins . all models are summarized in table [ sf_models ] . llccccccccc 1 & bulge - like & 7.50 - 8.50 & 0.015 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 3228.8 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 2 & continuous & 0.01 - 10.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 404.9 & 3.76 & 1.00 & - + 3 & blum et al . & 0.01 - 0.10 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 678.8 & 0.01 & 0.65 & - + & & 0.10 - 1.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.06 & - + & & 1.00 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.09 & - + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.21 & - + 4 & two - bin , solar & 0.01 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 384.5 & 3.03 & 0.82 & 0.04 + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.18 & 0.07 + 5 & two - bin , solar & 0.01 - 7.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 270.0 & 16.66 & 0.90 & 0.04 + & & 7.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.10 & 0.09 + 6 & two - bin , poor & 0.01 - 5.00 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 450.0 & 0.68 & 0.91 & 0.05 + & & 5.00 - 12.0 & 0.008 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.09 & 0.08 + 7 & closed - box & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.004 - 0.019 & 2.35 & 0.7 & 120 & 1035.6 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 8 & flat imf & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & 242.8 & 39.70 & 1.00 & - + 9 & high @xmath75 & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 2.5 & 120 & 4201.8 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 10 & high @xmath75 & 0.01 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 2.35 & 1.5 & 120 & 551.4 & 0.00 & 1.00 & - + 11 & model 5 + 8 hybrid & 0.01 - 7.00 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & 257.0 & 26.3 & 0.48 & 0.02 + & & 7.00 - 12.0 & 0.019 & 0.85 & 0.7 & 120 & & & 0.51 & 0.20 + [ sf_models ]    for each scenario , we generated model h - r diagrams using the synthetic color - magnitude diagram computation algorithm iac - star @xcite . the algorithm uses a monte carlo approach to compute composite stellar populations on a star - by - star basis , using a specified set of evolutionary tracks . the code accommodates several additional inputs , including the initial mass function , star formation rate function , and chemical enrichment law . to compare the generated models to the data , we added gaussian noise based on the average observed errors in luminosity and temperature . we also randomly removed stars from the models according to our estimated spectroscopic completeness ( fig [ comp_err ] ) . the models are shown against our galactic center sample in figure [ sf_models_lit ] . a qualitative comparison suggests that the ancient burst model is insufficient to fully describe the observed data set . the continuous star formation model and the @xcite model span the full range in temperature and luminosity of the observed data set but seem to have relatively too many stars at cool temperatures . it is unlikely this observed effect is caused by systematic errors or a selection bias . a systematic underestimate of the gc co indices would shift the pattern to hotter temperatures . however , the red edge of the hertzsprung gap ( log @xmath7 @xmath76 ) is well matched by the models , making such a systematic effect unlikely . in addition , some cool rgb / agb stars are present in the data , while a systematic shift to warmer temperatures would allow none . finally , the brightness and co strength of cool rgb / agb stars compared to warmer , dimmer red clump stars means that cool rgb / agb stars are relatively easy to detect and classify . there is no obvious way of selectively removing these stars from the sample .    motivated by the comparison in figure [ sf_models_lit ] , we consider three alternative scenarios that could potentially explain the relative paucity of stars at low temperatures :    1 . the first and simplest possibility is that the star formation rate was low at early times ( @xmath77 gyr ) . to test this hypothesis , we generated two models consisting of linear combinations of constant star formation in two specified age bins ( models 4 and 5 in table [ sf_models ] ) . model 4 assumes bins of 0.01 - 5 gyr and 5 - 12 gyr . model 5 assumes bins of 0.01 - 7 gyr and 7 - 12 gyr . a second possibility is that the oldest stars are metal poor . the previously described models assume a solar metallicity for all times . this assumption is motivated by the work of @xcite , who found the stellar [ fe / h ] abundance to be approximately solar for stars younger than @xmath55 gyr . for older stars , the galactic center metallicity distribution has not been determined . however , the bulge , which formed 7 - 12 gyr ago , is known to have a nearly solar distribution @xcite . an extremely metal poor ancient population would , therefore , represent a completely separate population from the bulge . given the current observed differences between the bulge and the nucleus discussed in  1 , we can not exclude this possibility . we , therefore , generated two models to represent this scenario . the first model , model 6 , consists of a linear combination of constant star formation in two age bins with solar metallicity for 0.01 - 5 gyr and a metallicity of 0.008 for 5 - 12 gyr . the second model , model 7 , is a simple closed box model assuming constant star formation for 0.01 - 12 gyr , a starting metallicity of 0.004 and an ending metallicity of solar . 3 .   a final way to explain the relative lack of stars at cool temperatures invokes a non - standard initial mass function ( imf ) . in all above models , we assume a salpeter imf with an upper mass limit of 120 @xmath78 and a lower mass limit of 0.7 @xmath78 . as stars less massive than @xmath79 have main sequence lifetimes comparable to the age of the universe , we are not sensitive to stars below this mass limit . recent results indicate that the current initial mass function of the galactic center is flatter than a salpeter function or has an unusally high lower mass cut - off @xcite . such a mass function could explain the relative lack of low mass stars in the observed old stellar population . to test this hypothesis , we consider three models , all assuming continuous star formation at solar metallicity for 0.01 - 12 gyr . the first model , model 8 , assumes a flat single power - law slope ( @xmath80 ) , chosen to match the results of @xcite . models 9 and 10 both assume a standard salpeter slope ( @xmath81 ) , but with lower mass limits of 2.5 @xmath78 and 1.5 @xmath78 , respectively . results stemming from these three hypotheses are tested in  3.5 . to quantitatively compare the models described above to the data , we adopted the numerical techniques described in @xcite . we first binned the observed and model h - r diagrams in temperature and luminosity for stars above our 50% completeness threshold , using uniform bins with size three times our average errors ( @xmath82 , @xmath83 ) . the choice of bins in this technique is somewhat subjective . however , tests using different bins sizes showed that while the binning scheme does change the fit quality , it does not significantly affect the derived star formation rates . this finding is in agreement with @xcite .    for models with two age bins , we used the numerical recipes procedure amoeba @xcite to search for the linear combination of models that minimized the poisson maximum likelihood parameter : @xmath84 @xcite . here , @xmath85 is the number of observed stars and @xmath86 is the number of model stars in bin @xmath87 . for models with fixed relative star formation rates , we scaled the model distribution to minimize @xmath88 . to estimate the errors in the derived star formation history , we implemented the technique described in @xcite . we built a set of 100 h - r diagrams consisting of a random sampling of 329 stars drawn from the observed h - r diagram , allowing each observed star to be selected any number of times . we then re - derived the star formation history for each h - r diagram and given model . the resulting standard deviation in the derived star formation rate was taken as the 1@xmath39 uncertainty . we measured the fit quality through a second set of monte carlo simulations . in this set , we generated 10,000 synthetic data sets drawn from the fitted models , selecting 329 stars randomly for each trial and re - deriving the star formation history for the selected subset . for a model that is an accurate representation of the true star formation history , @xmath88 derived from the actual data set should be comparable to @xmath88 derived from a typical synthetic data set . therefore , to establish the goodness of fit , we calculated the percentage of trials , @xmath89 , in which @xmath88 was larger when fitting the synthetic data sets to the models than when fitting the true data sample to the models . if the model is a good representation of the true star formation history , @xmath89 should be approximately 50% . the results of all model fits are listed in table [ sf_models ] . hess diagrams showing the difference between the observed data histogram and the best - fit model histograms are shown in figure [ hess ] . white indicates regions where the model produces too many stars relative to the observed data set , and black indicates regions where the model produces too few stars relative to the observed data set . examination of the @xmath89 values in table [ sf_models ] confirms the qualitative result discussed in  3.3 that no literature model ( models 1 - 3 ) is a likely description of the observed data set . this result is also reflected in the first three panels in figure [ hess ] , which show white diagonal streaks , corresponding to the overdensity of cool stars in the models relative to the data . table [ sf_models ] also suggests that the early - history low star formation rate models ( models 4 and 5 ) are unlikely representations of the data , though model 5 returns a considerably better fit , and we are unable to completely exclude this model . however , examination of the fourth and fifth panels in figure [ hess ] show that both models systematically overpredict the number of cool stars , as in models 1 - 3 . the early - history low metallicity models ( models 6 and 7 ) also show systematic deficiencies when compared to the data . both models predict a red clump / horizontal branch morphology that is too blue compared to the observed distribution . similar discrepencies between the models and data are present in the high imf mass limit models ( models 9 and 10 ) . each predicts a hotter and more luminous red clump than is observed . however , while models 9 and 10 predict no old , cool stars , the flat imf model ( model 8) predicts few old , cool stars , in good agreement with the observations . model 8 also gives a satisfactory goodness of fit ( @xmath89 = 40% ) suggesting that this model is a likely representation of the observed distribution .    using the models listed in table [ sf_models ] , we tested for population differences as a function of distance from the cluster center . such differences within the central 1 - 2 pc are expected due to mass segregation , and several broadband photometry studies have found indications of such an effect @xcite . to test for this effect in our data , we separated the data into two sets containing the four innermost ( @xmath90 , @xmath91 median ) and outermost ( @xmath92 , @xmath93 median ) spectral regions shown in figure [ mos ] . we then refit the two best - fit models ( models 5 and 8) to each subset , applying the average errors and completeness specific to that subset . this process returned fits for each subset that are consistent with those obtained for the entire data set . in particular , the subset @xmath89 values were within 10% of that obtained for the entire data set , and the relative star formation rates returned by both subsets for model 5 were within 1@xmath39 of the rates returned by the entire data set . we therefore , find no significant evidence in our data for a population gradient . this result is not that surprising , as the broadband photometry results of @xcite suggest that variations in the cool , low - mass stellar population within the central parsec should be most evident 3 - 7 arcsec from sgr a@xmath0 . our sample is outside of the region expected to exhibit the largest population differences ( see figure [ mos ] ) . in the future , the technique we describe could be applied to regions closer to sgr a@xmath0 , although limited spectroscopic completeness due to increased stellar density would complicate such a study . still , a thorough spectroscopic study of the red - clump and rgb / agb populations as a function of distance from sgr a@xmath0 could provide the first definitive test of mass segregation within the central parsec @xcite .    with the restriction to simple models , the top - heavy imf model appears to be superior to the remaining three model families we consider ( low star formation rate ( sfr ) at early times , low metallicity at early times , imf with high lower mass limit ) . the low - sfr , low - z , and high @xmath75 families all show consistent systematic deficiencies when compared to the data . it is , therefore , unlikely one could slightly change the chosen parameters ( i.e. precise metallicity , age bin cut - offs , mass ranges , etc . ) within these families to produce a model that is an adequate description of the data . of the models considered in table [ sf_models ] , model 8 ( continuous star formation at solar metallicity with a top - heavy imf ) fits the observations best , and our monte carlo tests show that it is a reasonable description of the data . based on the goodness of fit , we can not completely exclude model 5 . however , as discussed in the previous section , this model shows systematic deviations from the data ; we , therefore , favor model 8 . we note that model 8 is probably not the only possible description of the data with this degree of likelihood . all models so far discussed assume a simplistic description of the gc star formation history , and there are likely more complicated scenarios that also adequately describe the data . for instance , an additional model with age bins identical to model 5 and an imf slope identical to model 8 yields a reasonable fit ( @xmath94 , @xmath95 ) . however , we do not feel that increasing the number of free parameters is justified , given the limits , uncertainties , and size of our data set .    in the context of our current knowledge about the galactic center , continuous star formation with a top - heavy imf is reasonable . at present , there is substantial evidence for stars in the galactic nucleus spanning a wide range of ages , based on results from broadband photometry , and several distinct age tracers , including supergiants , agb stars , and oh / ir stars ( see  1 ) . the present distribution and kinematics of gas in the inner galaxy is also consistent with continuous star formation @xcite . in addition , the most recent epoch of star formation in the galactic center is likely represented by a top - heavy initial mass function @xcite . if this recent epoch of star formation is not anomolous and periodic bursts of gc star formation have occurred throughout the history of the galaxy , there is no a priori reason to believe the gc imf would change with time . the present data set appears to support this picture . we note that the mass traced by giants in the central cluster is primarily set by the initial mass formed , rather than dynamical effects , since mass segregation is expected to only strongly affect the central @xmath50.01 pc of the galactic center @xcite . on the 1 - 2 pc scale studied in this paper , the efficiency of mass segregation is thought to be much lower , in agreement with observational photometry results @xcite . though our findings are broadly consistent with several stellar population studies of the galactic center and the nucleus at large , there remains some disagreement . in particular , our results are somewhat different from those presented in @xcite , who probed the central 5 pc and used supergiants and bright agb stars to quantify the star formation history in a method very similar to that employed here . using their observed h - r diagram , @xcite argued for variable star formation over a wide range of ages , with the majority of stars formed more than 5 gyr ago at solar metallicity . we find a much smaller fraction of our sample is represented by solar - metallicity low - mass stars with ages @xmath74 5 gyr .    the present work and the work of @xcite study different regions in the h - r diagram . each regime has relative advantages and disadvantages for studying the gc star formation history , and we discuss each in turn :    1 .   _ field of view _ : due to the rarity of supergiants and bright agb stars in the galactic center , @xcite probed all late - type stars above their magnitude limit for the entire central cluster ( r @xmath96 pc ) . they , therefore , derived absolute star formation rates and were able to compare the cluster mass implied to estimates from dynamical studies . in contrast , our study probes a relatively small region on the sky ( @xmath50.2 pc@xmath34 within r @xmath97 pc ) . as such , our results are somewhat susceptible to population inhomogeneities in the central cluster , and we are able to derive only relative star formation rates . stellar crowding _ : spectral extraction from our sinfoni fields is complicated by stellar crowding . while we took care to ensure that our derived co indices are largely independent of exact pixel and background selection , contamination by neighboring stellar spectra remains a source of uncertainty for many of the dim stars . the stars studied by @xcite , on the other hand , are well separated from each other . in addition , the gc agbs and supergiants are much brighter than neighboring stars , so there is negligible uncertainty in the @xcite spectra due to crowding . spectral classification _ : the spectral classification method presented by @xcite is very similar to that presented here . our depper study has the advantage that only giants are observed , and thus , a separate luminosity class determination is not required . additionally , the stars we study are warmer than those studied by @xcite , and thus , our co-@xmath7 relationship is tighter than theirs , due to reduced uncertainties in model atmosphere spectra at warmer temperatures @xcite . we further note that the derived temperatures for the red supergiants in the work of @xcite are likely systematically too cool , as @xcite recently showed that red supergiants are @xmath5400 k warmer than previously thought . adequacy of stellar evolution models _ : the evolutionary models in the part of the h - r diagram probed by our study ( red clump , red giant branch , early agb ) are much less uncertain than the part of the h - r diagram studied by @xcite ( supergiants , tp - agbs ) . @xcite review the adequacy of agb stellar evolution models for deriving star formation histories , concluding that the observed bright agb populations are often more sensitive to poorly known modeling parameters than the star formation history . the input physics for the late agb stages is not well determined ( e.g. mass loss , convection , efficiency of the third dredge - up ) , and currently , only the padova libraries include these stages @xcite . while uncertainties in mass loss and convection are also present for the red clump , rgb , and early agb , the input physics for these stages is much better understood , and a number of stellar evolution models including these phases have been compared and tested against observations . for this reason , we believe our star formation history fit is more reliable than that presented in @xcite . finally , our data set also has the benefit that it contains several evolutionary features ( red clump , agb bump ) that are cleraly distinguishable from surrounding regions in the h - r diagram . the diagram morphology assures us that no large systematic effects are present in the data and allows us to construct physically motivated models . the region of the h - r diagram studied by @xcite has no such morphological features . while we believe that our results are more robust than those presented in @xcite , we also note that the findings are not necessarily in conflict . the region probed by @xcite extends to @xmath52.5 pc from the center , whereas we probe only the central parsec . furthermore , we note that there are some similarities in our findings . both studies find evidence for star formation throughout the history of the galaxy , and both studies suggest that purely solar metallicity models are needed to produce the observed data . still , further work is needed to resolve the remaining discrepencies ( i.e. , variable versus continuous star formation , salpeter versus flat imf ) . specifically , a sample tracing a large region on the sky and containing thousands of stars would represent a significant step forward in this field . the planned flamingos-2 gc survey on gemini @xcite will obtain 4000 late - type giant spectra out to one degree in galacto - centric radius ( @xmath5140 pc ) and with a spectral resolution of r@xmath520,000 . it will , therefore , provide unprecedented information on the galactic center chemical enrichment and star formation history . we observed 329 late - type giants @xmath98 north of sgr a@xmath0 with the integral field spectrometer sinfoni on the vlt . combining spectral classifications with naco photometry , we derived luminosities and effective temperatures for these stars . due to the improved magnitude limit of our sample relative to previous work , our derived h - r diagram clearly shows the red clump , as well as the red giant branch and asymptotic giant branch . using a maximum likelihood analysis , we compared the observed distribution to models representing ten possible star formation histories . the best - fit model corresponds to continuous star formation over the last 12 gyr with a top - heavy imf . the similarity of this result to the imf observed for the most recent epoch of star formation is intriguing and perhaps suggests a connection between recent star formation and the stars formed throughout the history of the galactic center . the upcoming flamingos-2 gc survey on gemini will provide important information needed to further understand this suggestive result . the authors thank amiel sternberg for his helpful discussions and insights . is grateful to the graduate research fellowship program at nsf and the graduate opportunity program fellowship at uc berkeley for funding this research . acknowleges support from the alexander von humboldt foundation . t.a . is supported by minerva grant 8563 and a new faculty grant by sir h. djangoly , cbe , of london , uk . this work has been supported by the national science foundation science through ast 0205999 and the center for adaptive optics , managed by the university of california at santa cruz under cooperative agreement no . ast 9876783 . this work has made use of the iac - star synthetic cmd computation code . iac - star is suported and maintained by the computer division of the instituto de astrofisica de canarias . adelman , s.  j. , pintado , o.  i. , nieva , f. , rayle , k.  e. , & sanders , s.  e.  2002 , , 392 , 1031 alexander , t. , & sternberg , a.  1999 , , 520 , 137 alexander , t.  2005 , , 419 , 65 alonso , a. , arribas , s. , & martnez - roger , c.  1999 , , 139 , 335 aparicio , a. , & gallart , c.  2004 , , 128 , 1465 ballero , s.  k. , matteucci , f. , origlia , l. , & rich , r.  m.  2007 , , 467 , 123 bell , r.  a. , & gustafsson , b.  1989 , , 236 , 653 bessell , m.  s. , & brett , j.  m.  1988 , , 100 , 1134 blackwell , d.  e. , & lynas - gray , a.  e.  1994 , , 282 , 899 blackwell , d.  e. , & lynas - gray , a.  e.  1998 , , 129 , 505 blum , r.  d. , sellgren , k. , & depoy , d.  l.  1996a , , 470 , 864 blum , r.  d. , sellgren , k. , & depoy , d.  l.  1996b , , 112 , 1988 blum , r.  d. , ramrez , s.  v. , sellgren , k. , & olsen , k.  2003 , , 597 , 323 bonnet , h. , et al . 2003 , , 4839 , 329 carpenter , j.  m.  2001 , , 121 , 2851 carr , j.  s. , sellgren , k. , & balachandran , s.  c.  2000 , , 530 , 307 davidge , t.  j. , simons , d.  a. , rigaut , f. , doyon , r. , & crampton , d.  1997 , , 114 , 2586 diolaiti , e. , bendinelli , o. , bonaccini , d. , close , l. , currie , d. , & parmeggiani , g.   2000 , , 147 , 335 dolphin , a.  1997 , new astronomy , 2 , 397 dolphin , a.  e.  2002 , , 332 , 91 dyck , h.  m. , benson , j.  a. , van belle , g.  t. , & ridgway , s.  t.  1996 , , 111 , 1705 eikenberry , s. , et al .  2006 , , 6269 , eisenhauer , f. , et al .  2003a , the messenger , 113 , 17 eisenhauer , f. , et al . 2003b , , 4841 , 1548 eisenhauer , f. , schdel , r. , genzel , r. , ott , t. , tecza , m. , abuter , r. , eckart , a. , & alexander , t.  2003c , , 597 , l121 engelke , c.  w.  1992 , , 104 , 1248 feast , m.  w.  1996 , , 278 , 11 figer , d.  f. , mclean , i.  s. , & morris , m.  1999 , , 514 , 202 figer , d.  f. , et al . 2002 , , 581 , 258 figer , d.  f. , rich , r.  m. , kim , s.  s. , morris , m. , & serabyn , e.  2004 , , 601 , 319 freitag , m. , amaro - seoane , p. , & kalogera , v.  2006 , , 649 , 91 frogel , j.  a. , persson , s.  e. , matthews , k. , & aaronson , m.  1978 , , 220 , 75 fitzgerald , m.  p. , & graham , j.  r.  2006 , , 637 , 541 fluks , m.  a. , plez , b. , the , p.  s. , de winter , d. , westerlund , b.  e. , & steenman , h.  c.  1994 , , 105 , 311 gallart , c. , zoccali , m. , & aparicio , a.  2005 , , 43 , 387 genzel , r. , et al . 2003 , , 594 , 812 ghez , a.  m. , salim , s. , hornstein , s.  d. , tanner , a. , lu , j.  r. , morris , m. , becklin , e.  e. , & duchne , g.  2005 , , 620 , 744 girardi , l. , bressan , a. , bertelli , g. , & chiosi , c.  2000 , , 141 , 371 gray , d.  f. , & brown , k.  2001 , , 113 , 723 guesten , r. , genzel , r. , wright , m.  c.  h. , jaffe , d.  t. , stutzki , j. , & harris , a.  i.  1987 , , 318 , 124 hartung , m. , et al.2003 , , 4841 , 425 hopman , c. , & alexander , t.  2006 , , 645 , l133 jackson , j.  m. , geis , n. , genzel , r. , harris , a.  i. , madden , s. , poglitsch , a. , stacey , g.  j. , & townes , c.  h.  1993 , , 402 , 173 kent , s.  m.  1992 , , 387 , 181 kleinmann , s.  g. , & hall , d.  n.  b.  1986 , , 62 , 501 kormendy , j. , & kennicutt , r.  c. , jr . 2004 , , 42 , 603 krabbe , a. , genzel , r. , drapatz , s. , & rotaciuc , v.  1991 , , 382 , l19 krabbe , a. , et al . 1995 , , 447 , l95 launhardt , r. , zylka , r. , & mezger , p.  g.  2002 , , 384 , 112 levesque , e.  m. , massey , p. , olsen , k.  a.  g. , plez , b. , josselin , e. , maeder , a. , & meynet , g.  2005 , , 628 , 973 lindqvist , m. , habing , h.  j. , & winnberg , a.  1992 , , 259 , 118 malagnini , m.  l. , & morossi , c.  1990 , , 85 , 1015 malagnini , m.  l. , & morossi , c.  1997 , , 326 , 736 martins , f. , genzel , r. , hillier , d.  j. , eisenhauer , f. , paumard , t. , gillessen , s. , ott , t. , & trippe , s.  2007 , , 468 , 233 mccaughrean , m.  j. , close , l.  m. , scholz , r .- d . , lenzen , r. , biller , b. , brandner , w. , hartung , m. , & lodieu , n.  2004 , , 413 , 1029 morris , m. , & serabyn , e.  1996 , , 34 , 645 narayanan , v.  k. , gould , a. , & depoy , d.  l.  1996 , , 472 , 183 nayakshin , s. , & sunyaev , r.  2005 , , 364 , l23 paumard , t. , et al .   2006 , , 643 , 1011 perrin , g. , coude du foresto , v. , ridgway , s.  t. , mariotti , j .- m . , traub , w.  a. , carleton , n.  p. , & lacasse , m.  g.  1998 , , 331 , 619 persson , s.  e. , murphy , d.  c. , krzeminski , w. , roth , m. , & rieke , m.  j.  1998 , , 116 , 2475 philipp , s. , zylka , r. , mezger , p.  g. , duschl , w.  j. , herbst , t. , & tuffs , r.  j.  1999 , , 348 , 768 press , w.  h. , teukolsky , s.  a. , vetterling , w.  t. , & flannery , b.  p.  1992 , cambridge : university press , |c1992 , 2nd ed . , ramirez , s.  v. , depoy , d.  l. , frogel , j.  a. , sellgren , k. , & blum , r.  d.  1997 , , 113 , 1411 ramrez , s.  v. , sellgren , k. , carr , j.  s. , balachandran , s.  c. , blum , r. , terndrup , d.  m. , & steed , a.  2000 , , 537 , 205 ramrez , i. , & melndez , j.  2005 , , 626 , 446 reid , m.  j.  1993 , , 31 , 345 reid , n.  & hawley , s.  l.  2000 , new light on dark stars : red dwarfs , low mass stars , brown dwarfs / neill reid and suzanne l.  hawley . new york : springer , 2000 . ( springer - praxis series in astronomy and astrophysics ) rieke , m.  j.  1987 , nearly normal galaxies .  from the planck time to the present , 90 rieke , m.  j.  1999 , asp conf . ser .  186 : the central parsecs of the galaxy , 186 , 32 rousset , g. , et al .   2003 , , 4839 , 140 sadler , e.  m. , rich , r.  m. , & terndrup , d.  m.  1996 , , 112 , 171 schoedel , r. , et al .   2007 , arxiv astrophysics e - prints , arxiv : astro - ph/0703178 schreiber , j. , thatte , n. , eisenhauer , f. , tecza , m. , abuter , r. , & horrobin , m.  2004 , asp conf .  ser .  314 : astronomical data analysis software and systems ( adass ) xiii , 314 , 380 sellgren , k. , hall , d.  n.  b. , kleinmann , s.  g. , & scoville , n.  z.  1987 , , 317 , 881 serabyn , e. , keene , j. , lis , d.  c. , & phillips , t.  g.  1994 , , 424 , l95 sheehy , c.  d. , mccrady , n. , & graham , j.  r.  2006 , , 647 , 1517 sjouwerman , l.  o. , habing , h.  j. , lindqvist , m. , van langevelde , h.  j. , & winnberg , a.  1999 , asp conf . ser .  186 : the central parsecs of the galaxy , 186 , 379 smalley , b.  1993 , , 265 , 1035 sokolov , n.  a.  1998 , , 130 , 215 stolte , a. , brandner , w. , grebel , e.  k. , lenzen , r. , & lagrange , a .- m . 2005 , , 628 , l113 taylor , b.  j.  2003 , , 398 , 721 theodossiou , e. , & danezis , e.  1991 , , 183 , 91 vacca , w.  d. , sheehy , c.  d. , & graham , j.  r.  2007 , arxiv astrophysics e - prints , arxiv : astro - ph/0701628 van dam , m.  a. , le mignant , d. , & maccintosh , b. a. 2004 , appl opt . , 43 , 5458 van loon , j.  t. , et al . 2003 , , 338 , 857 wallace , l. , & hinkle , k.  1997 , , 111 , 445 wood , p.  r. , habing , h.  j. , & mcgregor , p.  j.  1998 , , 336 , 925 zoccali , m. , et al . 2003 , , 399 , 931 zoccali , m. , et al . 2006 , , 457 , l1
Abstract:

Answer: we classify 329 late - type giants within 1 parsec of sgr a@xmath0 , using the adaptive optics integral field spectrometer sinfoni on the vlt . these observations represent the deepest spectroscopic data set so far obtained for the galactic center , reaching a 50% completeness threshold at the approximate magnitude of the helium - burning red clump ( @xmath1 mag . ) . combining our spectroscopic results with naco @xmath2 and @xmath3 photometry , we construct an observed hertzsprung - russell diagram , which we quantitatively compare to theoretical distributions of various star formation histories of the inner galaxy , using a @xmath4 analysis . our best - fit model corresponds to continuous star formation over the last 12 gyr with a top - heavy initial mass function ( imf ) . the similarity of this imf to the imf observed for the most recent epoch of star formation is intriguing and perhaps suggests a connection between recent star formation and the stars formed throughout the history of the galactic center .