Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: scale invariance is a well - known symmetry @xcite that has been studied in many physical contexts . a strong physical motivation for incorporating scale symmetry in fundamental physics @xcite@xcite@xcite comes from low energy particle physics . namely , the _ classical _ action of the standard model is already consistent with scale symmetry if the higgs mass term is dropped . this invites the idea , which many have considered , that the mass term may emerge from the vacuum expectation value of an additional scalar field @xmath0 in a fully scale invariant theory . another striking hint of scale symmetry occurs on cosmic scales : the ( nearly ) scale invariant spectrum of primordial fluctuations , as measured by wmap and the planck satellite @xcite . this amazing simplicity seems to cry out for an explanation in terms of a fundamental symmetry in nature , rather than as just the outcome of a scalar field evolving along some particular potential given some particular initial condition .    in this paper , we consider the incorporation into fundamental physics of _ local conformal symmetry _ ( or weyl - symmetry ) : that is , classical local scaling symmetry in an action that includes the standard model coupled to gravity . a new result of our approach @xcite-@xcite is that using conformal symmetry we are able to solve the classical frw equations across big crunch - big bang transitions , thus obtaining the _ full set of geodesically complete cosmological solutions _ of our conformal standard model given in eq.([action1 ] ) . this follows from the new properties of the standard theory whose couplings to gravity includes _ all patches of field space _ that are required for geodesic completeness of all cosmological solutions for all times and any set of initial conditions ) as described in section ( [ confcosm ] ) . ] . the models we describe contain no mass scales  no gravitational constant , no mass for the higgs field , no cosmological constant and no mass parameters for the quarks , leptons or gauge bosons . all of these are prevented by the local conformal symmetry combined with the su@xmath1su@xmath2u@xmath3 gauge symmetry of the standard model . there is only one source of mass which follows from gauge fixing ( in some sense spontaneously breaking ) the weyl symmetry through a scalar field which is a singlet under su@xmath1su@xmath4u@xmath3 or a combination of both su@xmath5su@xmath6u@xmath3 singlet and non - singlet fields , depending on the choice of gauge . this source , which is associated with the emergence of the planck scale , drives the spontaneous breakdown of the electroweak symmetry , which in turn generates the other known masses of elementary constituents , with ratios of masses related to dimensionless constants . our approach to conformal symmetry has new features with significant physical consequences that were not considered before . while we shall work in @xmath7 dimensions throughout , there is a close connection with field theories and gravity or supergravity in @xmath8 dimensions in the context of 2t - physics @xcite-@xcite as will be pointed out occasionally throughout this paper . stated directly in @xmath7 dimensions , some of the novel features and their consequences are as follows :    * in section ( [ general ] ) we provide the most general form of coupling gravity or supergravity with any number of scalar fields , fermions and gauge bosons , while maintaining local conformal symmetry . only a specialized form of our general formalism in section ( [ general ] ) coincides with previously known methods for local conformal symmetry . we find that in a gauge symmetric theory , if there is only one physical scalar field ( for example , the higgs field ) _ after all gauge choices are exhausted _ , then there is a unique gauge - invariant and weyl - invariant form for the lagrangian representing the geodesically complete coupling to gravity . * the minimal , realistic and locally conformal standard model coupled to gravity includes the higgs doublet @xmath9 and an additional su@xmath10su@xmath11u@xmath12 singlet @xmath0 . taking into account all of the local symmetry , there is a single physical scalar field identifiable with the observed higgs field . therefore , according to the statement above , this is a geodesically complete conformal standad model provided it utilizes our unique coupling to gravity as shown in eq.([action1 ] ) and as proven in section ( [ generalgrav ] ) . the relative minus sign between @xmath13 and @xmath14 that appears in this action is obligatory and is related to geodesic completeness as will be explained later . the unique structure of local scale symmetry has led to full analytic control of cosmological solutions and , in certain limits , enabled us to obtain the complete set of homogeneous cosmological solutions for all possible initial conditions of the relevant fields . this is discussed in section ( [ confcosm ] ) . * in a particular gauge of the spontaneously broken local scale symmetry ( called @xmath15-gauge ) we recover the usual renormalizable field theory of the standard model in the flat space limit , including a mass scale for the higgs . in this gauge , low energy physics of our model coincides with the familiar form of the standard model unless more fields are included beyond those already observed , such as right handed neutrinos and dark matter which can be accommodated consistently with conformal symmetry following our methods . thus , low energy physics at lhc scales is not sensitive to the conformal structures suggested in our approach . * on the other hand , physics at cosmological scales can be quite sensitive to the conformal structures discussed in this paper as becomes apparent in certain gauges . in section ( [ confcosm ] ) we outline some of the phenomena that follow from our unique conformal coupling . in the minimal conformal standard model of eq.([action1 ] ) , guided by our analytic solutions ( supplemented , where necessary , with numerical methods ) , we propose a _ cyclic conformal cosmology _ driven only by the higgs field with no recourse to other scalar fields such as an inflaton . the higgs - driven cosmological scenario we propose is strongly motivated by the metastability of the higgs vacuum as implied by the renormalization - group flow of the minimal standard model to large higgs vev , with its parameters fixed by the lhc measurements @xcite . the main discussion in this paper is at the classical field theory level , but it is worth commenting briefly on the important question of quantum corrections . there are two enormous hierarchies in the standard model coupled to gravity : the weak scale is around @xmath16 and the dark energy scale is around @xmath17 of the planck scale . it is hard to understand how such tiny numbers enter fundamental physics , and why quantum corrections would not spoil these fine tunings .    in both cases , conformal symmetry has been suggested as a solution . we will not explore this here in any detail , except to note that the stability of such hierarchies in the perturbative standard model , which is what attracted attention in the past for the higgs field , should not be in jeopardy from quantum corrections since dimensionless constants in a conformal theory are logarithmically divergent as opposed to the quadratic divergence of a bare higgs mass term . to fully grasp how this can work at the quantum level for fundamental scalars and in particular the higgs , requires a better understanding of how to perform regularization and renormalization consistent with local conformal symmetry in @xmath7 dimensions . elaborating on earlier suggestions @xcite@xcite@xcite , there has been recent progress @xcite in developing a renormalization theory consistent with weyl symmetry . according to this new work , local conformal symmetry remains as a valid symmetry at the quantum level as anticipated in @xcite . the local scale invariance survives quantization even though there is a trace anomaly in the stress tensor of the matter sector of the theory ; this point that caused confusion in the past is clarified by noting that the trace of the _ matter _ stress tensor is _ distinct _ from the generator of local scale transformations that includes the additional fields , such as @xmath18 that implement and establish the local conformal symmetry . in passing , we note that if @xmath7 dimensional conformal symmetry is treated consistently within 2t - physics in @xmath8 dimensions , then scale ( dilation ) symmetry is a part of a _ linearly realized _ so@xmath19 in the flat limit which is presumably not anomalous just as its lorentz subgroup so@xmath20 in @xmath7 dimensions can not be anomalous . this quantum aspect of 2t - physics is under investigation directly in @xmath8 dimensions and this is expected to shed additional light on these issues . a plan of this paper is as follows . in sec . ii , we will review and expand on the motivation for global and local symmetry and show how to recast ( or lift ) the standard model plus gravity into a locally gauge invariant , weyl- symmetric theory by adding new fields and , at the same time , introducing compensating gauge symmetries , in such a way that the theory is _ both weyl invariant and geodesically complete_. the gauge fixed version of this theory reverts back to the familiar minimal form of the standard model at low energies wherever gravity is negligible . however , in regions of spacetime where strong gravity effects are important , such as in cosmology , especially close to the singularity , the geodesically complete weyl lifted version plays a crucial role , as described in sec . in section iii , following @xcite we present a general form for a lagrangian consistent with weyl symmetry for any number of scalar fields . we argue that , if the weyl invariant theory is equivalent to having only a single physical scalar field after gauge fixing ( like the physical higgs ) , then by field redefinitions it is always possible to recast the theory into our version given in eq.([action1 ] ) which includes all patches in field space so as to insure geodesic completeness .    as another example of our general formalism , we lift the bezrukov - shaposhnikov higgs inflation model @xcite to a fully scale invariant model , making it logically and physically consistent . based on our formalism for constructing general weyl - invariant actions , we show that the model is not unique . in fact , there are many single - field cosmological higgs models with the same properties , all consistent with conformal symmetry and producing the same inflationary outcome . however , this inflationary scenario is not geodesically complete , furthermore , in view of our complete set of solutions , it is extremely unlikely .    in sec . iv , we turn more generally to cosmology . we explain that a weyl - lifted theory can resolve the singularity and enable the geodesic completion of cosmological spacetimes , while also indicating the presence of new phenomena . our previous work in @xcite-@xcite elaborated in some detail on the properties of geodesically complete cosmological analytic solutions in the context of solvable examples of what was supposed to be toy models . however the same models now re - appear in our conformal standard model and hence our previous solutions are now the full set of cosmological solutions for all initial conditions of the familiar standard model . in particular , we point out a model independent attractor mechanism discovered in @xcite that may help to determine the likely initial conditions of our universe just after the big bang . the weyl - invariant formulation also provides a natural framework for incorporating cyclic cosmology @xcite driven only by the higgs field as introduced . in the case that the higgs field is metastable , the higgs inflation model is inoperable , but the minimal single - higgs model is naturally compatible with the cyclic picture @xcite . in general , the weyl - invariant approach also hints at the intriguing possibility that the minimal , electroweak higgs may have played a central role in cosmic evolution as explained in detail in @xcite . there is a deep connection between the ideas presented in this paper and theories in @xmath21-space and @xmath22-time dimensions . many of the ideas discussed here for a global or local conformally symmetric theory emerged progressively from developing the @xmath8 dimensional formalism since 1996 ( for a recent overview see @xcite ) , and then for the standard model as given in @xcite , for gravity in @xcite , for susy in @xcite and supergravity in @xcite . the formulation given in @xcite , with many scalars coupled to gravity and supergravity in @xmath8 and @xmath7 dimensions was the precursor of the general formalism presented in section iii , while the simplest specific models were analyzed cosmologically in some detail in @xcite-@xcite . there are some recent similar examples @xcite that overlap with our conformal symmetry vision in @xmath7 dimensions ; these seem to be oblivious to our previous publications that introduced at an earlier stage the crucial conformal structures with restrictions on scalars in @xmath7 dimensions as predictions from 2t - physics @xcite . the @xmath8 theory has more predictions of hidden symmetries and dualities in @xmath7 dimensions which are mainly understood in classical and quantum mechanical contexts @xcite and are also partially developed in field theory @xcite ; these go well beyond conformal symmetry in their implications for unification and the meaning of spacetime and are bound to play an interesting role in future progress . we emphasize that , despite the name , the physics content in the 2t - physics formalism in @xmath23 dimensions is same as the physics content in the standard 1t - physics formalism in @xmath24 dimensions except that 2 t physics provides a holographic perspective and , due to a much larger set of gauge symmetries , naturally makes predictions that are not anticipated in 1t - physics . these additional gauge symmetries are in phase space rather than position space , and can be realized only if the formalism is developed with two times . nevertheless , the gauge invariant sector of 2t - physics is equivalent to a causal 1-time spacetime without any ghosts .    in this paper , we will stick to @xmath7 dimensions , advocating a coherent overall picture of a conformally invariant formulation of fundamental physics and cosmology . however , we will occasionally remind the reader that these outcomes naturally follow from @xmath8 dimensions with appropriate ( but unusual ) gauge symmetries . in this section , we will describe the motivation for and construction of simple theories with global and local scale invariance . an important application is the lift of the standard model plus gravity into a weyl- invariant theory that is also geodesically complete . we begin by examining a scale invariant extension of the standard model of particles and forces . for example consider the usual standard model with all the usual fields , including the doublet higgs field @xmath9 coupled to gauge bosons and fermions , but add also an su@xmath25u@xmath3 singlet @xmath0 ( plus right handed neutrinos and dark matter candidates ) , and take the following purely quartic renormalizable potential involving only the minimal set of scalar fields@xmath26 this model , discussed at some length in section vi of @xcite , is the minimal extension of the standard model that is fully scale invariant at the classical level , globally . see also @xcite-@xcite that use a similar field , and the different approach that also adds a weyl vector field @xcite leading to different physical consequences . the field @xmath0 , which we call the dilaton , absorbs the scale transformations and is analogous to the dilaton in string theory . in the current context , it has a number of interesting features : due to su@xmath1su@xmath25u@xmath3 gauge symmetry , the singlet @xmath13 is prevented from coupling to all other fields of the standard model - except for the additional right handed singlet neutrinos or dark matter candidates . these features of @xmath18 that prevent it from interacting substantially with standard visible matter except via the higgs in eq.([potential ] ) , suggest naturally that @xmath13 itself could be a candidate for dark matter @xcite . the only parameters associated with @xmath18 that are relevant for our discussion , are @xmath27 and @xmath28 . for positive @xmath29 the minimum of this potential occurs at @xmath30 accordingly , the vacuum expectation value of the higgs may fluctuate throughout spacetime , depending on the dynamics of @xmath31 without breaking the scale symmetry . however , if for some reason ( e.g. driven by quantum fluctuations or gravitational interactions ) @xmath13 develops a vacuum expectation value @xmath32 which is constant in some region of spacetime , then the higgs is dominated by a constant vacuum expectation value @xmath33 with @xmath34 fixed by observation to be approximately @xmath35 the higgs vacuum @xmath36 provides the source of mass for all known elementary forms of matter , quarks , leptons , and gauge bosons ( while @xmath32 may be the source of majorana mass for neutrinos ) . the observation at the lhc of the higgs particle , which is just the small fluctuation on top of the vacuum value @xmath34 , has by now solidified the view that this is how nature works in our region of the universe , at least up to the energy scales of the lhc . fig .  1 illustrates how the higgs field slowly relaxes to the spontaneously broken symmetry vacuum described by eq . ( [ v - value ] ) beginning from large oscillations shortly after the big bang . here , as is the case throughout the paper , the solutions are in the limit of negligible gauge and top quark mass coupling so that the higgs evolution is described by classical equations of motion . this time - dependent behavior of the higgs is driven by the evolution of the field @xmath13 , as anticipated in @xcite for this simple model . in fact , it is realized as the generic solution for all homogeneous cosmological solutions if the higgs vacuum is stable . there are other interesting theoretical structures worth noting about this scale invariant setup . instead of supersymmetry , conformal symmetry may explain the stability of the hierarchy between the low mass scale of @xmath37 versus the planck scale of @xmath38 gev , as suggested in @xcite . the conformal protection of the hierarchy is not as clear - cut as susy s protection and requires better understanding of regularization and renormalization techniques consistent with conformal symmetry as outlined in the introduction . what about the dilaton ( fluctuations in @xmath13 ) that emerges in the broken scale invariance scenario above ? at least from the perspective of only the standard model , the dilaton is a massless goldstone boson due to the spontaneous breaking of the global scale invariance . as discussed in some detail in section vi of @xcite , the original doublet field @xmath14 is the only field coupled to known matter , while @xmath13 is decoupled . however , after the spontaneous breaking , @xmath14 must be rewritten as a mixture of the mass eigenstates of the model , which include the observed massive higgs particle and the massless dilaton ( or maybe low - mass dilaton if the scale symmetry is broken by some source ) . the mixing strength is controlled by the dimensionless parameter @xmath39 that appears in eq.([v - value ] ) . therefore , through this mixing , the ( pseudo- ) goldstone dilaton must couple to all matter , just like the higgs does , namely with a coupling given by the mixing angle @xmath40 times the mass of the particle divided by @xmath34 . the largest coupling is to the top quark . if @xmath32 is much larger than @xmath41 gev@xmath42 it is possible for the dilaton to hide from accelerator experiments due to the weak coupling of @xmath27 in eq.([alpha ] ) . such a ( pseudo ) goldstone boson has many other observable consequences , including a long range force that competes with gravity and contributions to quantum effects as a virtual particle in feynman loop diagrams . if such an additional massless ( or low mass scalar ) is observed in experiments , it would be strong evidence in favor of the scale invariant scenario . however , if it is not observed , this could be interpreted merely as setting a lower limit on the scale @xmath43    eventually it must be understood what sets the scale @xmath32 . the model as presented above has no mechanism at the classical level to set the scale @xmath32 ; its equations of motion are self consistent at the minimum of the potential , @xmath44 only if @xmath45 @xcite ; then @xmath32 remains undetermined due to a flat direction in the remaining term in the potential ( [ potential ] ) . the value for @xmath32 would then be obtained phenomenologically from experiment , without a theoretical explanation . quantum corrections , such as those discussed in @xcite , may alleviate this problem by removing the flat direction . however , if the quantum corrections are small , there is the danger that @xmath32 would be so low that it is not possible to obtain the small value of @xmath27 in eq.([alpha ] ) required to protect the dilaton from current experimental limits . since at present there is no sign of the dilaton in low energy physics , suppose it does not exist at all as a degree of freedom . is this incompatible with the idea that conformal symmetry underlies fundamental physics ? not at all , because any possible phenomenological problems associated with a goldstone boson fluctuation of @xmath13 can be overcome if the scaling symmetry is a _ local _ gauge symmetry , known as the weyl symmetry . then the massless fluctuations of the dilaton can be eliminated by fixing a unitary gaugeu@xmath3 scalar field as part of the general theory that we will discuss in section ( [ generalgrav ] ) . but for simplicity in this section we will first concentrate on the minimal model that contains only the confirmed observed degrees of freedom up to now , thus allowing the fluctuations of a single @xmath13 to be eliminated by a gauge symmetry in this minimal model . ] . the standard model decoupled from gravity has no local scale symmetry that could remove a goldstone dilaton . but such a gauge symmetry can in fact be successfully incorporated as part of the standard model provided it is coupled to gravity in the right way . coupling the standard model to einstein gravity in the conventional way makes no sense because the dimensionful newton constant explicitly breaks scale invariance . if scale invariance is already broken in one sector of the theory , then there is no rationale for requiring that it be a good symmetry in another part of the theory . at best , it would occur as an accidental symmetry of low energy physics and only when gravity is negligible . this is not the scenario we have in mind ; we argue for a fully scale invariant approach to all physics , a natural outcome of the larger gauge symmetries in @xmath8 dimensions , as formulated in 2t - physics . happily , the idea of an underlying @xmath8 dimensions with appropriate extra gauge symmetry fits all known physics in @xmath7 dimensions , from dynamics of particles and field theory @xcite-@xcite all the way to supergravity @xcite . so , consistency with this larger underlying structure is well motivated . in fact , there is a locally scale invariant field theory in @xmath7 dimensions , compatible with 2t - physics in @xmath8 dimensions , that couples the standard model and gravity with no dimensionful constants . we do not mean conformal gravity which has ghost problems , but rather the non - minimal conformal coupling of the curvature @xmath46 to scalar fields @xcite which is invariant under weyl transformations as a gauge symmetry . in the next section we will discuss a generalized weyl invariant coupling with many scalar fields also predicted by 2t - physics , but in this section we begin with the well known method of conformally coupled scalars , as follows @xcite@xcite,@xmath47 these two terms form an invariant unit ( up to a total derivative ) under _ local _ scale transformations , @xmath48 , with a local parameter @xmath49 when there are more scalar fields , the most general way of achieving local conformal symmetry is discussed in section ( [ genweyl ] ) . however , when there is only one additional scalar field beyond @xmath18 which is in a single representation of a yang - mills gauge group , there is a unique way to also achieve geodesic completeness as explained in more detail in sections ( [ generalgrav],[confcosm ] ) . hence , _ for geodesic completeness _ we require that not only the field @xmath18 but also the doublet higgs field be a set of conformally coupled scalars consistent with su@xmath2u@xmath3 . namely using the unit @xmath50 which is also locally invariant ( up to a total derivative ) , we can lift the globally scale invariant standard model of the last section into a locally invariant one , while also being coupled to gravity in a gedesically complete theory . all other terms present in the usual standard model , namely all fermion , gauge boson and yukawa terms , when minimally coupled to gravity are already automatically invariant under the local weyl symmetry . hence a _ weyl invariant _ action @xmath51 that describes the coupling of gravity and the standard model is given by @xmath52{c}\frac{1}{12}\left (   \phi^{2}-2h^{\dagger}h\right )   r\left (   g\right )   \\ + g^{\mu\nu}\left (   \frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi - d_{\mu } h^{\dagger}d_{\nu}h\right )   \\ -\left (   \frac{\lambda}{4}\left (   h^{\dagger}h-\alpha^{2}\phi^{2}\right ) ^{2}+\frac{\lambda^{\prime}}{4}\phi^{4}\right )   \\ + l_{\text{sm}}\left ( \begin{array } [ c]{c}\text{{\small quarks , leptons , gauge bosons,}}\\ \text{{\small yukawa~couplings to~}}{\small h\&\phi,~}\text{{\small dark~matter.}}\end{array } \right ) \end{array } \right ]   \label{action1}\ ] ] the only yukawa couplings of @xmath13 allowed by su@xmath5su@xmath6u@xmath3 are to the right handed neutrinos for which it becomes a source of mass . note the relative minus sign between @xmath13 and @xmath14 terms , which is required , as explained below . here @xmath53 is the well known standard model lagrangian minimally coupled to gravity , except for the higgs kinetic and potential terms , which are now modified and explicitly written out in the first three lines . this action is invariant under weyl rescaling with an arbitrary local parameter @xmath54 as follows@xmath55{c}g_{\mu\nu}\rightarrow\omega^{-2}g_{\mu\nu},~\phi\rightarrow\omega \phi,\;h\rightarrow\omega h,\;\\ \psi_{q , l}\rightarrow\omega^{3/2}\psi_{q , l},\;a_{\mu}^{\gamma , w , z , g}\rightarrow\omega^{0}a_{\mu}^{\gamma , w , z , g } , \end{array } \label{weylrescaling}\ ] ] where @xmath56 are the fermionic fields for quarks or leptons , and @xmath57 are the gauge fields for the photon , gluons , @xmath58 and @xmath59 note that the gauge bosons do not change under the weyl rescaling . we note that the lagrangian ( [ action1 ] ) is the one obtained in the second reference in @xcite from the @xmath8 version of the standard model @xcite@xcite coupled to 2t- gravity @xcite , by a method of gauge fixing and solving some kinematical equations associated with constraints related to the underlying gauge symmetries . in that approach we learned that the weyl symmetry is not an option in @xmath7 dimensions , it is a prediction of 2t - physics : the @xmath8 dimensional theory is not weyl invariant , but yet the local weyl symmetry in @xmath7 dimensions emerges as a remnant gauge symmetry associated with the general coordinate transformations as they act in the extra @xmath60 dimensions . so the weyl symmetry is a required symmetry in @xmath7 dimensions as predicted in the @xmath8 dimensional approach ; this symmetry carries information and imposes properties related to the extra @xmath60 space and time dimensions @xcite . the weyl gauge symmetry of the action in ( [ action1 ] ) does not allow any dimensionful constants : no mass term in the higgs potential , no einstein - hilbert term with its dimensionful newton constant , or any other mass terms . this is a very appealing starting point because it leads to the emergence of all dimensionful parameters from a single source . that source is the field @xmath0 that motivated this discussion in the previous section , and the only scale is then generated by gauge fixing @xmath13 to a constant for all spacetime @xmath61 in the gauge fixed version of the lagrangian where @xmath62 we can express the physically important dimensionful parameters , namely , the newton constant @xmath63 , the cosmological constant @xmath64 associated with dark energy , and the electro - weak scale @xmath34 , in terms of @xmath32 : @xmath65    since the field @xmath0 in this gauge ceases to be a degree of freedom altogether , the massless dilaton is absent and the potential problem with global scaling symmetry is avoided . nevertheless , there still is an underlying hidden conformal symmetry for the full theory . we can explain now why it is necessary to have the opposite signs for @xmath13 and @xmath14 in the first two lines of the action in eq.([action1 ] ) . the positive sign for @xmath13 is necessary in order to obtain a positive gravitational constant in ( [ dimensionfulconstants ] ) . however , conformal symmetry then forces the kinetic term for @xmath13 to have the wrong sign , so @xmath13 is a ghost . this can be seen to be a gauge artifact , though , since in a unitary gauge the ghost @xmath13 is fixed to a constant or expressed in terms of other degrees of freedom . this also explains why @xmath14 must have the opposite sign , since otherwise @xmath14 would be a real ghost . this relative sign has important consequences in cosmology as follows .    in flat space @xmath66 where experiments such as those at the lhc are conducted , the lagrangian above becomes precisely the usual standard model , including the familiar tachyonic mass term for the higgs . furthermore , in weak gravitational fields , at low energies , the gravitational effect of the higgs field coupling to the curvature , @xmath67 is ignorable since @xmath14 ( order of @xmath68 gev ) is tiny compared to the planck scale ( @xmath6910@xmath70 gev ) . actually , the gravitational constant measured at low energies is corrected by the electroweak scale , namely @xmath71 @xmath72 instead of ( [ dimensionfulconstants ] ) , but in practice this is a negligible correction since @xmath73 so , at low energies there is no discernible difference between our weyl - lifted theory and the usual standard model . the practically isolated standard model appears as a renormalizable theory decoupled from gravity . however , in the cosmological context , the conformally coupled @xmath14 can and will be large at some stages in the evolution of the universe . working out the dynamics of cosmological evolution , it turns out that , for generic initial conditions , @xmath74 typically grows to large scales over cosmological times , hitting @xmath75 in the vicinity of a big bang or big crunch singularity . this behavior plays an essential role in cosmological evolution , as well as in the resolution of the singularity via geodesic completeness . in our conformal theory , the standard model is not isolated from gravity , and we posit that the higgs field can play a bigger role in nature than originally anticipated . we may take the higgs doublet in the unitary gauge of the su@xmath25u@xmath3 gauge symmetry @xmath76{c}0\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}s\left (   x\right ) \end{array } \right )   . \label{unitary}\ ] ] the field @xmath77 , where @xmath78 is the higgs field fluctuation on top of the electroweak vacuum , is then identified with the generic field @xmath79 that appeared in our cosmological papers @xcite-@xcite . the action for @xmath80 has the exact same form in those papers as here . thus , our previous analytical cosmological solutions can now be applied to investigate the cosmological properties of the higgs field . when the parameter @xmath27 vanishes , our previous work provides the full set of geodesically complete analytic cosmological solutions for all initial conditions of the relevant fields in the standard model coupled to gravity . the non - zero @xmath27 is then easily taken into account with numerical methods . this much analytic control over cosmological properties of a realistic theory is unprecedented . this became a very valuable tool that led us into a new cosmological scenario driven only by the higgs field , as outlined in section ( [ confcosm ] ) and completed in @xcite . the gauge symmetries derived from 2t - gravity and 2t - supergravity in @xmath8 dimensions lead to the general weyl invariant coupling described below for any number of scalar fields in @xmath7 dimensions @xcite . this generalizes the possible forms of conformally coupled scalar theories beyond those encompassed by eq.([confscalar ] ) and allows for richer possibilities for model building consistent with local scale invariance . we ignore the spinors and gauge bosons whose minimal couplings to gravity are already automatically weyl symmetric . we begin with gravity without supersymmetry . in the next subsection we will indicate the additional constraints that emerge in supergravity . we assume any number of _ real _ scalar fields @xmath81 labeled by the index @xmath82 if there are complex fields , we can extract their real and imaginary parts and treat those as part of the @xmath83 we introduce a weyl factor @xmath84 a sigma - model - type metric in field space @xmath85 and a potential @xmath86 the general lagrangian takes the form @xmath87 the results given in @xcite are the following constraints on these functions . * @xmath88 must be homogeneous of degree two , @xmath89 and @xmath90 must be homogeneous of degree four@xmath91 and @xmath92 must be homogeneous of degree zero@xmath93 * the following differential constraints must also be satisfied . these may be interpreted as homothety conditions on the geometry in field space@xmath94 the second and third equations follow from the first one and the homogeneity requirements . * physics requirements also include that @xmath95 can not have more than one negative eigenvalue because the local scale symmetry is just enough to remove only one negative norm ghost . however , if more gauge symmetry that can remove more ghosts is incorporated , then the number of negative eigenvalues can increase accordingly . the gauged r - symmetry in supergravity ( which is automatic in the @xmath8 approach ) is such an example .    in @xcite these rules emerged from gauge symmetries in 2t- gravity . since weyl symmetry is an automatic outcome from @xmath8 dimensions , we can check that these same requirements follow directly in @xmath7 dimensions by imposing weyl symmetry on the general form in eq.([genweyl ] ) .    as an example , it is easy to check that all these conditions are automatically satisfied by the action given in eq.([action1 ] ) , with one @xmath13 and four real fields in the doublet @xmath96 using the symbol @xmath97 as @xmath98 we write it in the form @xmath99 where @xmath100 is a flat minkowski metric in the 5-dimensional field space with a single negative eigenvalue - this reduces to a 2-dimensional @xmath101 in the unitary gauge of eq.([unitary ] ) since indeed there is only a single physical field @xmath102 . in our work @xcite-@xcite generally we let the potential @xmath103 to be an arbitrary function of its argument @xmath104 as allowed by the weyl symmetry conditions above . in eq.(1 ) we have a purely quartic renormalizable potential , @xmath105 . when quantum corrections are included , @xmath103 contains logarithmic corrections , but by re - examining the underlying symmetry , the effective quantum potential can again be rewritten in the form @xmath106 consistent with the local conformal symmetry . we use the quantum corrected potential in our discussion of higgs cosmology . next we give the general solution of the requirements above in a convenient parametrization for @xmath107 fields labelled with @xmath108 namely , @xmath109 where @xmath110 is distinguished , while @xmath111 with @xmath112 are all the other scalar fields . then the general solution to the conditions above for weyl gauge symmetry takes the following form @xmath113 where the ratio @xmath114 is gauge invariant . thus , after using the chain rule , @xmath115 the general weyl invariant action becomes @xmath116{c}\frac{1}{12}u\left (   \phi , s\right )   r\left (   g\right )   -v\left (   \phi , s\right ) \\ + \frac{1}{2}\left (   u - s^{i}\frac{\partial u}{\partial s^{i}}-s^{k}s^{l}g_{kl}\right )   \left (   \partial^{\mu}\ln\phi\right )   \left (   \partial_{\mu}\ln\phi\right ) \\ -\frac{1}{2}g_{ij}\left (   \partial^{\mu}s^{i}\partial_{\mu}s^{j}\right ) + \left (   2g_{ij}s^{j}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial s^{i}}\right )   \partial^{\mu } s^{i}\partial_{\mu}\ln\phi \end{array } \right )   \label{weylgrav}\ ] ] with the @xmath117 in eqs.([sol - u]-[solg ] ) . it should be noted that @xmath118 are not determined by weyl symmetry alone . various other symmetries in a given model could restrict them . any choice consistent with additional symmetries is permitted in the construction of physical models . for example , the model in eq.([action1 ] ) has the su@xmath1su@xmath25u@xmath3 symmetry . in particular , local superconformal symmetry gives more severe restrictions by relating @xmath95 and @xmath119 from the beginning , as discussed below . as the number of scalar fields increases , the restrictions imposed by weyl symmetry become less severe . for example , an additional su@xmath120su@xmath6u@xmath3 gauge singlet field beyond @xmath13 that would be needed to reproduce the phenomenology of the dilaton - like singlet discussed in section ( [ gscaleinv ] ) can be included with slightly more freedom on its coupling parameters . keeping such possibilities in mind for more general phenomenological considerations , we the define the minimal model to include only the standard higgs doublet and the singlet @xmath13 as in the previous section . hence , for clarity we will write out the general weyl invariant lagrangian for the case of only the higgs doublet field @xmath14 plus @xmath121 this generalizes eq.([action1 ] ) , but we suppress the other fields in our discussion . furthermore , we will work directly with the gauge fixed version of the higgs field in eq.([unitary ] ) , so the higgs doublet is reduced to a single field @xmath79 as in ( [ unitary ] ) . in that case , from eqs.([sol - u]-[sol - g00 ] ) we obtain @xmath52{c}\frac{1}{12}\phi^{2}u\left (   s/\phi\right )   r\left (   g\right )   -\phi ^{4}f\left (   s/\phi\right ) \\ + g^{\mu\nu}\left ( \begin{array } [ c]{c}\frac{1}{2}\left (   u-\frac{s}{\phi}u^{\prime}-\frac{s^{2}}{\phi^{2}}\bar { g}\right )   \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi\\ -\frac{1}{2}\bar{g}\partial_{\mu}s\partial_{\nu}s+\left (   u^{\prime}+2\frac { s}{\phi}\bar{g}\right )   \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}s \end{array } \right ) \end{array } \right ]   \label{action2}\ ] ] where @xmath122 reduces to @xmath123 for the single field . generally , @xmath124 in eq.([action2 ] ) are three arbitrary functions of the higgs field , @xmath125 which may be used for model building . as an example , if we take @xmath126 and @xmath127 we obtain a relatively simple kinetic term with an arbitrary potential@xmath52{c}\frac{1}{12}\left (   \phi^{2}+\xi s^{2}\right )   r\left (   g\right )   -\phi ^{4}f\left (   s/\phi\right ) \\ + \left ( \begin{array } [ c]{c}\frac{1}{2}\left (   1-\frac{s^{2}}{\phi^{2}}\left (   1+\xi\right )   \right ) \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}\phi\\ -\frac{1}{2}\partial_{\mu}s\partial_{\nu}s+2\frac{s}{\phi}\left ( 1+\xi\right )   \partial_{\mu}\phi\partial^{\mu}s \end{array } \right ) \end{array } \right ]   \label{xi}\ ] ] this lagrangian is weyl invariant for any value of the constant parameter @xmath128 but we see now a simple generalization of the special simplifying role played by @xmath129 that corresponds to the conformally coupled scalars of eq.(1 ) .    in the general single-@xmath102 lagrangian ( [ action2 ] ) , field redefinitions of the gauge invariant variable @xmath130 ( or @xmath131 ) may be used to map one of these three functions , @xmath132 to any desired function of @xmath133 without changing the form of the lagrangian in ( [ action2 ] ) . for example it may be convenient to take @xmath127 and still obtain all single-@xmath102 weyl - symmetric models by using all possible @xmath134 . another option is to take all possible @xmath135 with a fixed @xmath136 as in eq.([action1 ] ) , which has certain advantages for understanding geodesic completeness @xcite of all the fields @xmath137 in cosmological spacetimes , as discussed in sec . if we choose @xmath138 and demand renormalizability of the action in the limit of @xmath139 ( where gravity effectively decouples , as seen in the gauge @xmath140 with @xmath141 , we are forced to @xmath142 and @xmath143 being a quartic polynomial . the last form is actually quite unique . we now give a proof that the general model of eq.([action2 ] ) with a single @xmath102 ( which corresponds to our minimal realistic model ) can always be written in the geodesically complete form that we advocated in our previous work @xcite-@xcite and implemented in proposing the action in eq.([action1 ] ) . we begin in the notation of eq.([genweyl ] ) with only two fields @xmath144 labelled by @xmath145 using well known results of geometry in 2 dimensions , the metric in field space @xmath146 can always be diagonalized by general field reparametrizations ( as in general relativity ) and put into the conformally flat form @xmath147 where @xmath100 is the flat metric in 2 dimensions . using further field reparametrizations with an overall rescaling consistent with weyl transformations , the factor @xmath148 can also be set equal to the constant @xmath149 having arrived at @xmath150 as still the most general metric in field space , the only possible form of @xmath88 that is consistent with the local weyl symmetry is @xmath151 this completes the general proof that the action in eq.([action1 ] ) is the most general weyl invariant theory without losing generality . then the complete analysis of homogeneous cosmological solutions provided in our previous work @xcite-@xcite shows that this form is the general geodesically complete version of the theory . certain other forms for @xmath88 arrived at by field reparametrizations , in particular purely positive forms of @xmath152 always end up putting restrictions in field space inadvertently , and such specialized restrictions on fields is what leads to geodesic incompleteness . hence , the a class of well motivated models that we used in many of our studies amounts to @xmath153 @xmath154 and the low energy renormalizable quartic potential @xmath155 @xmath156 with @xmath157 this is the model that now is identical to the conformally symmetric standard model we proposed . its homogeneous cosmological equations have been solved analytically exactly in @xcite for all possible initial conditions of the fields , including radiation and curvature , and all possible values of the parameters @xmath158 but with @xmath159 . after this much analytic control , a small @xmath27 is easily handled with numerical methods and still have a full understanding of all the cosmological solutions of the standard model . this forms the basis of our further work in cosmology that is discussed in the following sections .    for further discussion , a useful gauge choice is @xmath160 for all spacetime as in eq.([c - gauge ] ) . this is the gauge called the @xmath15-gauge in our previous work . because we use also other gauges , we attach the letter @xmath15 to each field in this gauge , thus @xmath161 will remind us that we are in the @xmath15-gauge , where @xmath162 in @xmath15-gauge we rename @xmath163 to recall that in this gauge we obtain the simplest connection to the higgs field @xmath164 at low energy , in nearly flat spacetime , @xmath165 as discussed in the paragraphs before eq.([unitary ] ) . the lagrangian in eq.([action2 ] ) with general @xmath166 takes the following greatly simplified form in the @xmath15-gauge @xmath167   . \label{action3}\ ] ] if we apply a weyl transformation to go to the einstein frame after an integration by parts of the last term ( or by dropping a total derivative ) we obtain the given result . ] , @xmath168 then we obtain@xmath169   \label{e - frame}\ ] ] without loss of generality , a particularly simplifying choice for @xmath170 , namely @xmath171 is the one that yields a canonically normalized higgs field . in this form , the theory can be interpreted directly as an einstein frame formulation of the standard model with a canonically normalized higgs field it is possible to do a field redefinition such that @xmath172 is written in terms of a canonically normalized field @xmath173 where the relation between @xmath174 and @xmath175 is given by the first order differential equation @xmath176=u\left (   h/\phi_{0}\right )   .$ ] then the lagrangian rewritten in terms of the canonically normalized @xmath174 is again of standard form with the same potential @xmath177 as eq.([veff ] ) , except for expressing @xmath172 in terms of @xmath178 this complicated procedure is avoided by the simple choice of @xmath63 in eq.([gchosen ] ) . [ fieldredef ] ] and an effective higgs potential @xmath179 given by @xmath180 this potential can be crafted by various choices of @xmath103 and @xmath181 to fit cosmological observations , while still being consistent with an underlying local conformal symmetry . however , since this gauge led to an overall positive coefficient in front of the ricci scalar , it could not recover all field configurations that are demanded in the geodesically complete theory ; inevitably the _ generic _ solutions in this gauge are geodesically incomplete as we have learned in our previous work . for example , the best fit inflaton potentials based on recent planck satellite data @xcite are plateau " models  @xcite . using the geodesically incomplete form of the theory in ( [ e - frame ] ) it is possible to construct examples with plateaus at large @xmath182 , by choosing @xmath183 and @xmath184 such that the potential @xmath185 is very slowly varying and approaches a constant at large @xmath172 and by requiring @xmath179 becomes approximately the familiar higgs potential needed to fit low energy physics for @xmath186 . the bezrukov - shaposhnikov ( bs ) model for higgs inflation @xcite is a special case of our more general form in eq.([action3 ] ) , namely their proposal@xmath187   , \label{shoposh}\ ] ] follows from eq.([action3 ] ) by taking @xmath188and @xmath189 this leads to an effective potential @xmath190 of the type above in eq.([veff ] ) , @xmath191 in the bs model , because @xmath63 is chosen as @xmath192 , the field @xmath172 is not canonically normalized , so @xmath172 must be replaced through a field redefinition @xcite to obtain a canonically normalized higgs , @xmath173 as described more generally in footnote ( [ fieldredef ] ) .    hence , the bs model has a fully weyl symmetric formulation which was not noticed before . its presentation in the literature has included various ambiguities and inconsistencies , with clashing ideas on scaling symmetries at the classical level and quantum corrections . for example , in some cases , the coupling to gravity has a dimensionful newton constant that is inconsistent with the scaling symmetry of the rest of the theory ; a massless dilaton is said to exist in cases where global scaling symmetry is explicitly broken at low energies ; unimodular gravity has been introduced but this is inconsistent with scale symmetry ; and there is ambiguity about which renormalization scheme is appropriate for computing quantum corrections . these issues are fully resolved with the underlying weyl symmetric formulation discussed here . also , now that we have recast the bs model into a fully conformally invariant form , we can see in the gauge fixed einstein frame ( [ e - frame]-[veff ] ) that it is not unique . rather , it is just a special case of a larger set of conformally invariant models including a range that have similar plateau properties . furthermore , since @xmath193 is purely positive , it means the fields in the bs model form a basis that is geodesically incomplete , and hence its generic solutions can describe only a subsector of the available field space . we make further comments in sec . ( [ confcosm ] ) including the effects of geodesic incompleteness . we do not know if supersymmetry ( susy ) is a property of nature , but theoretically it is an attractive possibility . therefore , it is of interest to investigate whether it is compatible with an underlying local conformal symmetry . as a superconformal local symmetry , the generalization of the weyl invariant formalism of the previous section produces stronger constraints on scalar fields . this was derived in @xcite from the gauge symmetry formalism in @xmath8 dimensions . it is possible to arrive at the results given below directly in @xmath7 dimensions by requiring supergravity with a local superconformal symmetry , but provided the usual einstein - hilbert term is dropped ( which is unusual in the supergravity literature ) , and instead a weyl symmetric formulation like the previous sections is implemented . in the @xmath8 dimensional approach of 2t - physics there is no option : it is a prediction that the emergent @xmath7 dimensional theory is automatically invariant under a local symmetry su@xmath194 where su@xmath195so@xmath19 is the connection to @xmath8 dimensions , the subgroup so@xmath196so@xmath197so@xmath198so@xmath199 is the weyl subgroup that acts on the extra @xmath60 dimensions , and the supersymmetrization in @xmath8 dimensions promotes su@xmath200 to su@xmath201 for @xmath202 supersymmetries @xcite , with @xmath203 in the present case @xcite .    the scalar - field sector of the emergent @xmath7 dimensional locally superconformal theory is presented here briefly in a streamlined fashion , including some simplifications and extensions . first note that a scalar field in a chiral supermultiplet must be complex . thus susy requires the singlet @xmath13 to be complexified so that it is a member of a supermultiplet . then to describe all the scalar fields we use a complex basis @xmath204 and denote their complex conjugates as @xmath205 with the barred index @xmath206 the notation is reminiscent of standard supergravity as reviewed in @xcite . however now there is no einstein - hilbert term ; instead there is a weyl plus an additional @xmath207 gauge symmetry that can gauge fix a complex scalar @xmath13 into a dimensionful real constant @xmath32 that plays the role of the planck scale .    recalling the discussion about removing the ( real ) ghost scalar field @xmath13 in sec . iib , it should be noticed that the complex @xmath13 amounts to two real ghosts , and therefore two gauge symmetries are needed to remove them . this role is played by the weyl symmetry so@xmath208 that acts on the extra 1 + 1 dimensions and the local r - symmetry u@xmath3 , both of which are included in the local su@xmath209 outlined above . the local u@xmath3 is a crucial ingredient as a partner of the weyl symmetry to remove the additional ghost from a complexified dilaton field @xmath13 that is demanded by susy . like before , we have @xmath210 but susy requires that the metric @xmath211 be derived from the derivatives of @xmath212 like a khler metric@xmath213 the metric must be non - singular and @xmath214 can not contain any more than one negative eigenvalue ( because no more than one complex ghost can be removed ) . we denote its inverse formally as @xmath215 a simple quadratic example similar to eq.([action1 ] ) is @xmath216 in this example , all scalars in the theory are conformally coupled , and u and g are automatically invariant under a global su(1,n ) symmetry . this global symmetry , which will continue to be a hidden symmetry in some gauges , may be broken explicitly by some terms in the potential @xmath217 , depending on the model considered . nevertheless , keeping track of this ( broken ) symmetry in physical applications can be useful . the scalar field sector of the supergravity theory with local weyl symmetry is given as follows . @xmath218   .\ ] ] the khler metric and khler potential structure is reminiscent of general supergravity @xcite , however the absence of the einstein - hilbert term , and the corresponding scale invariance is the important difference . here , @xmath219 is homogeneous of degree two and satisfies homothety constraints similar to eq.([homothety]),@xmath220    the potential energy has two parts @xmath221 the potential @xmath222 must be derived from an analytic superpotential @xmath223 that depends only on @xmath204 and not on @xmath205 , and is homogeneous of degree three so that @xmath224 is homogeneous of degree four @xmath225 the potential @xmath226 is derived from another independent analytic function @xmath227 with adjoint group indices @xmath228 that appears in yang - mills terms as , @xmath229 . this @xmath227 should be homogeneous of degree zero @xmath230 then @xmath231 takes the form @xmath232 where @xmath233 is the matrix representation of the yang - mills group as it acts on the scalars @xmath234 the fermionic terms are added consistently with the usual rules of supergravity @xcite . this is the general setup for the weyl invariant matter coupled to weyl invariant supergravity as derived from the @xmath8 dimensional theory . the simplest example that corresponds to the supersymmetric generalization of eq.([action1 ] ) would be the minimal supersymmetric standard model extended with an additional singlet supermultiplet , whose scalar component is the complex field @xmath121 then @xmath119 takes the quadratic form suggested in @xcite @xmath235 where @xmath236 are the two higgs doublets needed in the supersymmetric version of the standard model . the superpotential @xmath237 and the matrix @xmath238 are chosen to fit the usual practice of supersymmetric model building @xcite . an example is @xmath239 , and @xmath240 where @xmath241 is the only su@xmath6u@xmath3 invariant which is analytic in both @xmath242 and @xmath243 . in an effective ( rather than renormalizable ) low energy theory , these can be modified by replacing the dimensionless coupling constants @xmath244 by an arbitrary function of the ratio @xmath245 and similarly for @xmath246 when the complex @xmath0 is gauge fixed to the real constant @xmath247 this approach generates all the dimensionful parameters from the same source @xmath32 which is of order of the planck scale . then we see that the modification of @xmath244 and @xmath248 by arbitrary functions of @xmath249 is negligible at low energies . more general scale invariant models with more fields ( such as generalizations of the minimal susy model ) are easily constructed by using the rules on scalar fields given in this section . with special forms of the superpotential @xmath223 , it is possible to construct so called no - scale  models @xcite-@xcite in which the cosmological constant is guaranteed to be zero at the classical level even after spontaneous breakdown of symmetries . simple examples of no - scale models , that are lifted to be fully weyl invariant , are given in @xcite . in this paper we will not explore any further the general superconformal structures discussed above although this could be of interest in some future applications . some of our examples that are very similar to the weyl invariant supersymmetric cases previously discovered in @xcite were later explored in a cosmological context in @xcite . however their discussion , which is focussed on very specialized initial conditions that are so non - generic , is difficult to be convincing especially in the face of the complete set of solutions that we now understand much better . in this paper we have emphasized the geodesically complete nature of our conformal standard model . in this section we first describe what we mean by geodesic completeness and the related notion of completeness in field space , and then discuss some applications of our conformal standard model in cosmology . there are two required properties for geodesic completeness : the first is smooth local geodesic continuation through singularities across all space - time patches ; the second is infinite action for geodesics that reach arbitrarily far into the past so that unnatural initial conditions are avoided . both properties are satisfied in our theory which is insured to also be complete in field space . geodesics @xmath250 are computed by extremizing the particle action @xmath251 where @xmath252 is the mass and @xmath253 is a gravitational field . in our weyl invariant standard model ( [ action1 ] ) all particle masses are generated by the higgs field , so @xmath252 is proportional to the higgs field @xmath172 , @xmath254 where @xmath255 is the dimensionless coupling constant for the corresponding particle as prescribed by the standard model . then this particle action is locally invariant under weyl transformations @xmath256 and @xmath257 for our cosmological discussion , geodesics @xmath258 in a spatially homogeneous space are computed when both homogeneous fields that appear in the particle action @xmath259 , @xmath260 and @xmath261 where @xmath262 is the conformal time , correspond to consistent solutions of the field equations of our conformal standard model in ( [ action1 ] ) . the full solution to the geodesic equation ( neglecting curvature and anisotropy for simplicity ) is @xmath263 where @xmath264 is the conserved spatial component of the particle momentum vector , @xmath265 while @xmath266 , and @xmath267 is the initial position . these expressions are invariant under reparametrizations of the affine parameter @xmath268 since they depend only on the physical spacetime variables @xmath269 then , the local continuation property of a geodesic @xmath270 in a homogeneous space is satisfied automatically when one insures that all the fields , including @xmath271 and @xmath272 are given in all the patches of homogeneous field space and that the fields are smoothly continued through singularities . in @xcite@xcite , we showed how local weyl invariance , in the special weyl frame displayed in eq.([action1 ] ) that covers all the patches , are essential ingredients to insure that all homogeneous cosmological solutions of our conformal standard model ( [ action1 ] ) have this continuation property .    the global action for a geodesic ( [ geodesicx ] ) is given by @xmath273 the combination @xmath274 that appears in @xmath275 is invariant under weyl transformations , so it can be computed in any convenient gauge ( see e.g. eqs.([egaugeu]-[detxu ] ) ) . in particular in the @xmath276-gauge used in the solutions in @xcite@xcite , where @xmath277 we have shown that in all cyclic solutions in @xcite , @xmath278 oscillates with a fixed maximum amplitude many times within a cycle , and for an infinite number of times over an infinite number of cycles , leading to an infinite action , since @xmath279 receives the same positive finite contribution in each cycle . for these solutions the average magnitude of @xmath280@xmath281@xmath280 in the @xmath282-gauge ( usual einstein frame , see eq.([egaugeu ] ) ) is the same in each cycle . recently , we have also constructed @xcite solutions with increasing entropy in each future cycle such that the average @xmath280@xmath281@xmath280 in the @xmath282-gauge increases in each future cycle . for these solutions , @xmath275 diverges to the past @xcite even faster as compared to our solutions in @xcite . hence , unlike inflation scenarios @xcite , we may expect that the universe described by our conformal standard model has no unnatural initial conditions . next , we discuss various potential applications of weyl invariant theories to cosmology . early universe cosmology near the singularity is a natural place to look for uses because the interactions imposed by weyl invariance ( more profoundly @xmath8 dimensional gauge symmetries ) produce their most significant changes relative to conventional physics in the limit of strong gravity , as noted in some of the examples above . black hole phenomena is another interesting arena for study , but we will not discuss them here . the first important application was to use weyl invariance to construct geodesically complete cosmological solutions . conventional cosmological analysis is usually confined to theories coupled to einstein gravity with a dimensionful newton s constant . in this framework , all cosmological solutions of interest are geodesically incomplete . however , we have observed that a weyl - invariant theory can be cast in einstein frame , as illustrated by eq.([e - frame ] ) , and in other frames . the observation made in @xcite-@xcite is that geodesically incompleteness is an artifact of an unsuitable frame choice : geodesically incomplete solutions in einstein frame may be completed in other frames , even though the theories are entirely equivalent away from the singularity . the einstein frame can always be reached directly from a weyl invariant theory in ( [ action2 ] ) by making the einstein - gauge choice @xmath283 we label this the @xmath282-gauge and mark the fields in this gauge with the subscript @xmath282 ( as in @xmath284 ) to distinguish them from the @xmath15- gauge fields @xmath285 note that the @xmath282-gauge can be valid only in a patch in field space since restrictions must be imposed on the fields to require that @xmath286 is positive . the same theory can easily be transformed to other gauges . for example , the relations between the @xmath282- and @xmath15-gauge fields can be easily derived by considering the weyl gauge invariants such as @xmath287 and @xmath288 @xmath289 etc . , for example we deduce @xmath290 from these , we can express @xmath291 and @xmath292 in terms of the single field @xmath293 so that the gauge condition ( [ egaugeu ] ) is satisfied . inserting these expressions into the gauge invariant action ( [ action2 ] ) we arrive at the same @xmath282-frame action as eq.([e - frame ] ) . as argued in our work @xcite-@xcite , classically geodesically complete solutions can be obtained for all single - scalar theories that can be cast in the form of eq.([action2 ] ) . but , for all patches of field space @xmath294 to be included , as demanded by the geodesics derived from @xmath179 in the einstein frame , @xmath295 must be brought to an appropriate form by using the field redefinitions discussed below eq.([xi ] ) . the patches of field space @xmath294 that are missing in the einstein frame can then be added in order to obtain a geodesically complete space . we have argued in @xcite , and provided a proof in section ( [ generalgrav ] ) , that geodesic completeness is accomplished when we bring @xmath119 to the form @xmath296 where @xmath297 is the sum of all scalars other than @xmath121    geodesics remain incomplete when they hit the singularity in all frames in which @xmath119 is always positive , or the equivalent einstein frame , such as the one in eq.([shoposh ] ) . when we rewrite those , by field redefinitions , in terms of new fields in which @xmath296 then the patches of field space @xmath298 are equivalent to the einstein frame , or to the other frames with positive @xmath119 . geodesic completion is achieved by allowing all regions of field space in the parametrization that has @xmath299 for this form , @xmath119 is allowed to smoothly go negative . in these coordinates the gauge invariant vanishing point of @xmath300 given by the gauge invariant expression @xmath301 has a special significance ; it corresponds to the singularity of the scale factor of the universe in the einstein gauge . this is seen by equating the gauge invariant @xmath302 in the einstein gauge , in which @xmath303 and the unimodular gauge ( labelled with @xmath276 ) , in which @xmath304 as follows @xmath305 at spacetime points or regions where @xmath306 which is where the gauge invariant quantity @xmath307 hits unity in all gauges , @xmath308 @xmath309 the geometry in the einstein gauge fails completely since @xmath310 , and this is how the cosmological singularity occurs at some point in time @xcite . then , as we can see in the @xmath15-gauge , the region @xmath311 ( higgs of planck size ) is the region of the big crunch or big bang singularity , where @xmath312 in any gauge . the behavior of the universe in this region is governed by a universal attractor mechanism that is independent of the scalar potential , therefore independent of the details of the model @xcite . although in the classical theory , cosmological singularities of frw - type are typically resolved in the weyl - lifted theory with @xmath313 in suitable weyl gauges , one should still worry about quantum gravity corrections . when @xmath119 vanishes , the coefficient of the ricci scalar in the gravitational action vanishes so there is no suppression of metric fluctuations and quantum gravity corrections should become large . however , it is notable that for certain types of cosmic singularities , including realistic ones , the metric and fields possess a unique continuation around the singularity in the complex time plane . a complex time path can be chosen to remain far from the singularity so that @xmath119 is always large and gravity remains weak . thus , we are able to find an analytic continuation of our classical solutions connecting big crunches to big bangs along which quantum gravity corrections are small . this issue is under active investigation and we defer further discussion to future work .    a particularly interesting application of weyl - invariance is to higgs cosmology , which the geodesically complete solutions show can be much more interesting than conventionally assumed . in fact , there is the possibility that the higgs field alone may be sufficient to explain the large - scale features of the universe , as suggested by the bezrukov - shaposhnikov higgs inflation model @xcite and our recent work on the higgs in cyclic cosmology @xcite@xcite .    in considering higgs cosmology or other models of the early universe , we believe that the cosmological solutions found for geodesically complete theories provide some important new insights on the question of the likely initial conditions just after the big bang . for example , the _ generic _ behavior of the higgs after the bang when @xmath314 is dramatically different than the contrived initial conditions that are commonly assumed in higgs inflation scenarios . this is easily seen by examining the analytic work in @xcite@xcite , where for the simple model in eq.([action1 ] ) with @xmath315 all homogeneous solutions including curvature and radiation are obtained and the effects of anisotropy are determined @xcite . emphasizing that this is not only the contrived solutions , but all solutions , it serves as an example of the richness of the phenomena that occur in a model even with a simple potential . the results make clear a point that is obvious , but often forgotten : for a given scalar potential , there is an enormous range of cosmological solutions . by comparison , it is clear that the slow - roll initial conditions frequently assumed in the analysis of cosmic inflation are very special and unlikely . for example , by transforming the inflationary solution in the bezrukov - shaposhnikov higgs inflation model @xcite to a field basis in which @xmath313 , it may be possible to trace cosmic evolution right back to the singularity and to judge whether the inflation is likely in the space of geodesically complete cosmological solutions . fig.(1 ) is an illustration of our solution for the _ generic _ cosmological behavior of the higgs field just after the big bang if the higgs potential has a stable non - trivial minimum , as in eq.([action1 ] ) , as usually assumed and as required for the bezrukov - shaposhnikov higgs inflation model @xcite . this figure describes the generic cosmological evolution of the higgs field , that must start with fluctuations of planck size and energy ( due to the universal attractor near the singularity @xcite ) , and quickly reduce its amplitude by losing energy to the gravitational field ; then after a phase transition , settle down to an almost constant value at the electroweak scale @xmath34 determined by the dimensionless parameter @xmath27 in eq.([alpha ] ) .    cosmohiggs-stable.eps + fig.(1 ) - after the big bang the higgs field oscillates initially around zero with a large amplitude of the order of the planck scale . it slowly loses energy to the gravitational field , causing its amplitude to diminish . as it approaches the time or energies of the electroweak scale , it undergoes the phase transition seen in the figure , and then slowly settles to a constant vacuum value @xmath34 at a stable minimum of the potential . [ cosmohiggs-stable.eps ]    the solution of fig.(1 ) changes drastically if the vacuum is metastable after including quantum corrections , which is a possibility suggested by the most recent lhc data for the higgs and the top quark masses @xcite , and assuming no new physics up to the planck scale . metastability is incompatible with higgs inflation and generally causes problems for inflation because the higgs will typically escape from the metastable phase right after the big bang and roll to a state of negative energy density that can prevent inflation of any sort from occurring . the exact solutions of the weyl - invariant theory suggest an alternative cosmology in this case . the generic solution at first behaves as in fig.(1 ) after the big bang , all the way through the electroweak phase transition . but after some time ( order of the lifetime of the universe ) the higgs oscillations in the electroweak vacuum grow larger and larger , like the mirror image of fig.(1 ) , taking away energy from the gravitational field and eventually causing a collapse of the universe to a big crunch , while the higgs does a quantum tunneling to a lower state of the potential . at that stage our exact analysis near the singularity given in @xcite takes over to describe interesting new phenomena that occur just after the crunch and before another rebirth of the universe with a big bang . the result is a regularly repeating sequence in which the higgs field is trapped in its metastable state after a big bang , remains there for a long period of expansion followed by contraction , escapes as the universe approaches the big crunch , passes through to a big bang and becomes trapped again . the evolution can be considered a higgs - driven cyclic theory of the universe . the details are presented in a separate paper @xcite . this research was partially supported by the u.s . department of energy under grant number de - fg03 - 84er40168 ( ib ) and under grant number de - fg02- 91er40671 ( pjs ) . research at perimeter institute is supported by the government of canada through industry canada and by the province of ontario through the ministry of research and innovation . the work of nt is supported in part by a grant from the john templeton foundation . the opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the john templeton foundation . ib thanks cern and pjs thanks perimeter institute for hospitality while this research was completed . f. englert , e. gunzig , c. truffin , p. windey , conformal invariant general relativity with dynamical symmetry breakdown ,  phys.lett . b57 ( 1975 ) 73 ; f. englert , c. truffin and r. gastmans , conformal invariance in quantum gravity , nuclear physics * b117 * ( 1976 ) 407 . i.  bars , s .- h .  chen , p.  j.  steinhardt and n.  turok , complete set of homogeneous isotropic analytic solutions in scalar - tensor cosmology with radiation and curvature , phys . * d86 * ( 2012 ) 083542 [ arxiv:1207.1940 ] . i.  bars , traversing cosmological singularities , complete journeys through spacetime including antigravity , arxiv:1209.1068 , in _ beyond the big bang , competing scenarios for an eternal universe _ , ed . rudy vaas , springer [ 2013 ] , isbn 978 - 3 - 540 - 71422 - 4 . i. bars , gravity in 2t - physics , phys . * d77 * ( 2008 ) 125027 [ arxiv:0804.1585 ] ; i. bars , s. h. chen geometry and symmetry structures in 2 t gravity , phys . rev . * d79 * ( 2009 ) 085021 [ arxiv:0811.2510v2 ] . i. bars and y - c kuo , field theory in 2t - physics with @xmath202=1 supersymmetry , phys . * 99 * ( 2007 ) 041801 [ hep - th/0702089 ] ; supersymmetric field theory in 2t - physics , phys . rev . * d76 * ( 2007 ) 105028 [ hep - th/0703002 ] ; @xmath202=2,4 supersymmetric gauge field theory in 2t - physics , phys . rev . * d79 * ( 2009 ) 025001 [ arxiv:0808.0537 ] ; super yang - mills theory in 10 + 2 dimensions , the 2t - physics source for n=4 sym and m(atrix ) theory , arxiv:1008.4761 .          k. meissner and h. nicolai , conformal symmetry and the standard model , phys . lett . * b648 * ( 2007 ) 312 , [ arxiv : hep - th/0612165 ] . effective action , conformal anomaly and the issue of quadratic divergences , phys.lett . * b660 * ( 2008 ) 260 [ arxiv:0710.2840 ] . itzhak bars , at conference on conformal nature of the universe , perimeter institute , may 2012 ; neil turok , cern colloquium , july 2012 ; t.w.b . kibble 80th birthday conference , imperial college , march 2013 ; yale physics department colloquium , april 2013 ; paul steinhardt , at davis conference , may 2013 . s. ferrara , r. kallosh , a. linde , a. marrani and a. van proeyen , superconformal symmetry , nmssm , and inflation , phys . * d83 * ( 2011 ) 025008 [ arxiv:1008.2942 ] ; r. kallosh and a. linde superconformal generalization of the chaotic inflation model  arxiv:1306.3211 and superconformal generalizations of the starobinsky model , arxiv:1306.3214 . i. bars , s - h chen and g. quelin , dual field theories in @xmath316 emergent spacetimes from a unifying field theory in d+2 spacetime , phys . rev . * d76 * ( 2007 ) 065016 [ arxiv:0705.2834 ] ; i. bars and g. quelin , dualities among one - time field theories with spin , emerging from a unifying two- time field theory , phys . rev . * d77 * ( 2008 ) 125019 [ arxiv:0802.1947 ] . r. foot , a. kobakhidze and r. r. volkas , electroweak higgs as a pseudo - goldstone boson of broken scale invariance ,  phys . lett . * b655 * ( 2007 ) 156 [ arxiv:0704.1165 ] . r. foot , a. kobakhidze , k. mcdonald , r.volkas ,    r. foot , a. kobakhidze , k. mcdonald , r.volkas , neutrino mass in radiatively - broken scale - invariant models , arxiv:0706.1829 ; a solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory , arxiv:0709.2750 . h. cheng , the possible existence of weyl s vector meson ,  phys . rev . lett . * 61 * ( 1988 ) 2182 ; h. nishino and s. rajpoot , broken scale invariance in the standard model , hep - th/0403039 ; _ ibid . _ class . & gr . * 28 * ( 2011 ) 145014 ; aip conf . proc . * 881 * ( 2007 ) p. 82
Abstract:

Answer: we show how to lift a generic non - scale invariant action in einstein frame into a locally conformally - invariant ( or weyl - invariant ) theory and present a new general form for lagrangians consistent with weyl symmetry . advantages of such a conformally invariant formulation of particle physics and gravity include the possibility of constructing geodesically complete cosmologies . we present a conformal - invariant version of the standard model coupled to gravity , and show how weyl symmetry may be used to obtain unprecedented analytic control over its cosmological solutions . within this new framework , generic frw cosmologies are geodesically complete through a series of big crunch - big bang transitions . we discuss a new scenario of cosmic evolution driven by the higgs field in a minimal  conformal standard model , in which there is no new physics beyond the standard model at low energies , and the current higgs vacuum is metastable as indicated by the latest lhc data .