Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the cosmic star - formation rate peaks between @xmath6 and @xmath7 and marks a critical period for galaxy assembly . in the classic model of galaxy formation , collisional baryons cool and dissipate into the center of dark matter halos while conserving primordial angular momentum , leading to the formation of a thin rotating disk galaxy @xcite . although this gas is expected to collapse to a disk in a few crossing times , external processes can disrupt or destroy disks on timescales shorter than the rotational period . in an emerging new picture , clumpy and smooth accretion from the cosmic web can efficiently carry external angular momentum inside the halo viral radius and directly onto the central galaxy @xcite , disrupting the velocity field @xcite . additionally , ordered disks can be disturbed or destroyed through major mergers @xcite , violent disk instabilities @xcite and stellar feedback @xcite . these processes are prominent at @xmath0 , coincident with the assembly of stellar mass in galaxies and may play a stronger role in the shallow potential wells that host low mass galaxies . in general , the formation and development of a galaxy depends strongly on its mass . massive galaxies tend to assemble their stellar mass first (  downsizing " , e.g. , @xcite ) and develop disks earlier ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in contrast , low mass ( @xmath8 ) galaxies tend to exhibit more disturbed and irregular morphologies at both low and high redshift ( e.g. , @xcite ) , indicating that they lack mature structure . recent evidence from imaging suggests that a significant fraction of low mass galaxies at @xmath91.5 appear to have elongated stellar distributions @xcite . a similar phenomenon has been seen in hydrodynamic simulations of galaxy formation @xcite which indicate that oblate ( stellar ) disks form at late times ( @xmath10 ) , when the central potential becomes baryon - dominated . the star - forming gas in these simulated galaxies starts off in a highly perturbed and triaxial state , eventually collapsing to form thick oblate disks @xcite . from @xmath11 to now , star - forming systems appear to have evolved through kinematic downsizing in a process known as  disk settling " @xcite . in this picture , galaxies hierarchically settle from turbulent systems with high dispersion to regularly rotating disks , with more massive galaxies forming disks earlier . locally : the majority of high mass galaxies are ordered rotating disks , with kinematically disordered galaxies appearing only below a stellar mass of @xmath12 @xmath13 @xmath14 9.5 @xcite . however , it is unclear whether the kinematic downsizing picture extends beyond @xmath11 and into the peak of cosmic star - formation .    with recent advancements in near infrared detectors and instrumental multiplexing capabilities , space and ground based instruments have provided a wealth of knowledge regarding the physical properties of galaxies during this period , the cosmic noon . ground based kinematic data for high redshift ( @xmath151 ) galaxies is rapidly growing , as reviewed in @xcite , with several recent and ongoing surveys : e.g. , sins @xcite , wigglez @xcite , massiv , mosdef @xcite , kmos3d @xcite and kross @xcite .    emerging from these surveys is the general picture that star - forming galaxies at @xmath0 are _ unlike _ the thin disk galaxies that make up the massive end up the local hubble sequence . high redshift galaxies tend to be thick and gas - rich with velocity dispersions that are factors of a few higher than local thin disks . the typical velocity dispersion tends to increase with increasing redshift ( e.g. , ) and may reflect a similar rise in gas fractions @xcite . even still , rotational support appears to be relatively common in the more massive galaxies ( @xmath16 ) at @xmath0 , with @xmath17 of the population exhibiting rotational motions comparable to or greater than their velocity dispersion @xcite . only very recently , kinematic data for low mass galaxies ( @xmath8 ) at high redshift is becoming available in gravitationally lensed systems ( e.g. , @xcite ) and in larger numbers in the ongoing surveys with multi - object single slits ( mosdef ; @xcite ) and integral field spectrographs ( kmos-3d ; @xcite ) . while the imaging data at this epoch indicates that massive galaxies tend to be disk - like and the low mass galaxies tend to be irregular , similar conclusions have not yet been drawn from kinematic measurements , and it is unclear whether kinematic downsizing is in effect at @xmath0 . in this paper we aim to take advantage of the multiplexing capabilities and the high sensitivity of keck / mosfire multi - object near - infrared spectrograph @xcite as well as the high resolution and sensitivity of hubble space telescope ( hst)/wfc3 h - band imaging to explore the kinematic state of star - forming galaxies at @xmath0 . this survey is named sigma , survey in the near - infrared of galaxies with multiple angles . the sample is morphologically diverse and is selected along the star - formation main sequence in two redshift bins from @xmath18 and @xmath19 .    in  2 we discuss the observations and sample selection . in  3 we describe measurements of the galaxy physical properties from multi - wavelength imaging . in  4 we detail the measurements of the gas - phase kinematics of our sample , and discuss multi - pa observations . in  5 we present the @xmath0 tully - fisher relation . in  6 we examine trends between the kinematics and physical properties , and in  7 we present a comparison of our galaxies with a model for marginally stable gas - rich disks . in  8 we present our conclusions and in the appendix we present simulations to determine the effects of spatial resolution on the measurement of kinematics . we adopt a @xmath20cdm cosmology defined with ( h , @xmath21 , @xmath22 ) = ( 0.7 , 0.3 , 0.7 ) . the sigma sample is drawn from three of the fields ( goods - s , goods - n and uds ) of the hst / wfc3 candels survey @xcite . all of the spectra in goods - n were taken as a part of the tkrs-2 survey @xcite and a subset of the spectra in goods - s and uds have been presented in previous papers @xcite . the sigma galaxy sample is shown in a star formation rate - stellar mass ( sfr - @xmath23 ) diagram in figure [ fig : m_sfr ] . this sample is a part of the well studied goods - n , goods - s , and uds extragalactic fields , and so extensive multi - wavelength imaging is available for all of the galaxies in this sample . galaxies in sigma are selected from the candels wfc3/f160w catalogs @xcite as follows . selection priority was given to galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts from hst / wfc3 grism observations @xcite , taken as a part of the 3d - hst ( @xcite , pi van dokkum ) and aghast ( pi weiner ) surveys . the majority of the tkrs-2 galaxies were selected on previous spectroscopically confirmed redshifts . photometric redshifts were derived from the broadband seds with eazy @xcite and were used to select the remaining galaxies in our sample . star - forming galaxies were selected down to a sfr of @xmath243 m@xmath25 yr@xmath26 at z @xmath24 1.5 and @xmath2410 m@xmath25 yr@xmath26 at z @xmath24 2.2 . there is no selection cut on morphology . as such , both regular and irregular galaxies are included in the sample . there is a priority weight on galaxy size , half - light v - band diameters of @xmath27 , in order to select galaxies with emission extents that are larger than the typical seeing .    the full sigma sample for which we have significant detections ( s / n @xmath28 3 ) in h@xmath29 and/or @xmath305007 contains 97 galaxies . a portion of these were observed at multiple slit position angles ( pa ) : 23 with 2 pas and 11 with 3 + pas . we select galaxies with at least one kinematic measurement coincident with the photometric major axis ( within 45@xmath31 ) , removing 35 of the 97 galaxies . we make a further cut on emission line extent for each spectrum of each galaxy , as described in  3.3 and the appendix , such that the effective radius of the emission extent is at least 0.8 times the size of the seeing fwhm . this selection is shown in figure [ fig : cont_size_em_size ] and removes an additional 9 galaxies from the sample . an additional 4 galaxies are removed due to the presence of a strong overlapping skyline . the final sample used in this paper contains 49 galaxies , 28 in the redshift range 1.3 @xmath14 z @xmath14 1.8 and 21 at 2.0 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.5 . the properties of the full sample are presented in table [ tab : table1 ] of the appendix .     at z @xmath24 1.5 and @xmath32 at z @xmath24 2.3 . the grey dots represent galaxies drawn from the h - band selected goods - s candels catalog in the same redshift range . a small amount of noise ( 0.05 dex ) was added to the grey points to remove striations due to the discreet grid structure searched by the model fits to @xmath23 and star - formation rate ( sfr ) . in the bottom panel , we compare the mass range of our sample , indicated by the red and blue arrows , with the blue galaxy stellar mass functions at the same redshifts , taken from @xcite . ]      the strong optical nebular emission lines ( e.g. , h@xmath29 , @xmath305007 ) from which we measure kinematics shift into the near infrared ( nir ) at z @xmath28 1.3 . the multi - object spectrograph , mosfire @xcite on keck - i , is one of the premiere instruments to study spectral features in the nir . the spectra in this sample were taken in the h - band ( 1.46 - 1.81 @xmath33 m ) and k - band ( 1.93 - 2.45 @xmath33 m ) . h@xmath29 can be detected in the h - band from 1.3 @xmath14 z @xmath14 1.8 and in the k - band from 2.1 @xmath14 @xmath34 @xmath14 2.8 . additionally , @xmath305007 falls in the h - band from 2.0 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.8 .    the mosfire slit width was set to 0.7@xmath35 and the instrumental spectral resolution is r@xmath363630 in both bands ( @xmath37 km s@xmath26 ) . the masks were dithered along the slit between symmetric sky positions around the initial pointing to facilitate sky and instrument noise subtraction . the on - source exposure times were between 90 and 120 minutes with individual exposure times of 120 seconds . the 2d spectra were sky - subtracted , wavelength - calibrated and rectified using the mosfiredrp reduction pipeline . spectroscopic redshifts were determined via specpro @xcite . observations were taken in natural seeing conditions and the size of the seeing is estimated from unresolved calibration stars , where available , and marginally resolved compact `` blue nugget '' galaxies @xcite that were observed on the same mask as the galaxies in our sample . the nir seeing ranged between 0.45 and 0.85@xmath35 . example cutouts of the 2d spectra around the h@xmath29 emission line are shown in figure [ fig : kin_example ] . throughout this paper we use two structural parameters measured from the hst / wfc3 images , namely the photometric position angle ( pa , i.e. , the direction of the photometric major axis ) and the photometric axis ratio ( b / a ) . for a well - behaved disk galaxy , the photometric pa will align with the kinematic pa ( the direction of the largest velocity gradient ) and the axis ratio can be used to correct the derived rotation velocity for the inclination of the galaxy to the line of sight . the photometric pa and axis ratio were measured with galfit @xcite by @xcite on the h - band ( f160w ) , j - band ( f125w ) and y - band ( f105w ) for all of the h - band selected candels galaxies in our fields . we refer to these papers for measurement details . for this paper , we adopt the h - band measurements ( rest i at @xmath38 , rest v at @xmath39 ) . the available broadband measurements span from the uv to the nir with ancillary spitzer / mips 24/70@xmath40 photometry and herschel far - ir photometry from the goods - herschel and pacs evolutionary probe surveys .    as described in @xcite , integrated stellar masses ( @xmath23 ) were derived from the broadband sed of each galaxy using the fast fitting code @xcite assuming a @xcite initial mass function , @xcite stellar population synthesis models and a @xcite extinction law . the errors on the stellar masses are @xmath410.3 dex @xcite . dust - corrected star - formation rates were derived following the sfr - ladder @xcite . for galaxies with spitzer and herschel far - ir detections , the sfr is calculated from both the obscured ( ir ) and unobscured ( uv ) components ( following ) . for non - detections in the mid - far ir , the star - formation rates are derived from the uv and are extinction - corrected following the best fit attenuation from the sed modeling . in figure [ fig : m_sfr ] we show the star - formation rate vs stellar mass diagrams for our sample , the  star - formation main sequence " ( e.g. @xcite ) . galaxies drawn from the full candels catalog in goods - s are shown by black dots in the background . our sample is generally representative of the sf main sequence down to a stellar mass @xmath42 in the 1.3 @xmath14 z @xmath14 1.8 redshift bin and 9.6 in the 1.8 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.8 bin . we make a comparison with the blue galaxy stellar mass functions at 1.5 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.0 and 2.0 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.5 @xcite and note that our sample spans close to the knee of the schechter function , @xmath43 , in both redshift intervals .    ) of the emission versus the continuum for each slit on every galaxy used in this paper . resolved observations are marked with red filled circles and the discarded unresolved observations are marked as black x s . the range of seeing conditions during the observations is shown as a grey shaded swath . emission line sizes are seeing corrected from the mosfire 1d emission profile . continuum sizes are measured from sersic fits to the h - band hubble images . as shown in the appendix , kinematic structure can be resolved down to a limiting resolution of d@xmath44 = 0.8@xmath45 seeing@xmath46 , where d@xmath44 is the 1d seeing - corrected emission line size . ] one of the main challenges to measuring rotation with ground based data comes from the effects of beam smearing @xcite . seeing smooths out velocity gradients and artificially boosts the velocity dispersion in the central parts of rotating galaxies . this effect can generally be modeled , except in the cases where the emission extent is comparable to or smaller than the seeing . galaxies with small emission extents can appear dispersion - dominated in seeing - limited data but reveal rotation at higher resolution @xcite .    in order to examine the effects of beam - smearing on our data , we produce a suite of simulated mosfire / sigma spectra in the appendix . we conclude that , for the typical signal to noise of the spectra in our sample , we can reliably recover intrinsic kinematics ( @xmath1 , @xmath2 ) down to d@xmath44 @xmath47 0.8 @xmath45 seeing@xmath46 , where d@xmath44 is the 1d half - light diameter measured from the emission lines and seeing@xmath46 is the full width at half maximum of the seeing . we make size selections using the emission rather than the continuum for a couple of reasons . first , the 2d half - light radii of the emission typically extend beyond the continua @xcite . secondly , seeing tends to blur emission that is not coincident with the slit placement into the slit @xcite . as such , an emission size determined from a projection of the slit onto the hst image may underestimate the extent of the emission measured with the slit . by measuring sizes directly from the seeing - corrected emission lines , we bypass both of these uncertainties .    in figure [ fig : cont_size_em_size ] we show the half - light diameter sizes , in both emission and continuum , for the galaxies in our sample . for each slit , the emission line size is measured directly from the spectrally - collapsed emission line . due to the convolution of the intrinsic profile with the seeing , the spatial profiles of the spectrally - collapsed emission lines are generally well described by a 1d gaussian . the seeing is subtracted from the observed profile in quadrature ( @xmath48 ) and the half - light size is measured from the recovered intrinsic profile . continuum radii are measured from the hst / wfc3 h - band image using the galfit software package in @xcite . for the galaxies in our sample , the half - light radii of the intrinsic emission profiles tend to be slightly larger than the continuum sizes . this could be the case for two reasons . first , the half - light radius that is measured by galfit is a 2d quantity measured on concentric ellipses while the emission size is being measured directly from the 1d emission lines , an along - the - slit measurement . since the 1d measurement essentially integrates the light across the slit , these two sizes will not directly scale to one another in general . the difference may also be physical , in the sense that the emission profile can extend beyond that of the continuum ( @xcite ) . kinematics are measured from strong nebular emission lines ( h@xmath29 , @xmath305007 ] ) in the spectra . these lines generally trace the hot ( t@xmath3610@xmath49 k ) ionized gas in hii regions surrounding ongoing star - formation . the kinematics are measured using the code rotcurve @xcite . the instrumental resolution of our spectra ( r@xmath363630 ) allow us to measure the velocity dispersion down to @xmath4120 km s@xmath26 and the rotation velocity uncorrected for inclination ( @xmath50 ) to @xmath4115 km s@xmath26 . the kinematic modeling performed by rotcurve has been described in detail in previous papers , so we will briefly outline it here and refer to @xcite for further details . rotcurve models the spatial profile of the emission line as a 1d gaussian . in each row along the slit , we recover a velocity and velocity dispersion using an uncertainty - weighted least squares fit to a 1d gaussian . nearby , but not overlapping , skylines are manually masked to prevent noise peaks from driving the fit . the velocity structure of the line is modeled with two components : a rotation curve and a dispersion term . due to our limited spatial resolution , the velocity dispersion is kept constant with radius in the model . the rotation velocity is modeled with an arctan function :    @xmath51    where r@xmath52 is the knee radius for the turnover of the rotation curve and @xmath53 is the velocity of the flat part of the rotation curve . we note that the flat part of the rotation curve is not reached in a fraction of our galaxy sample ( see appendix ) and in these cases @xmath53 is driven by the scale of the velocity difference reached by the data and the modeled turnover radius . due to the seeing blur , r@xmath52 is not well constrained and so we fix the turnover radius in the model at a fiducial value of 0.2@xmath35 ( 1.7 kpc at @xmath0 ) and adjust to 0.3@xmath35 or 0.4@xmath35 for galaxies that are not well fit initially . the turnover radius and the rotation velocity are moderately covariant with a @xmath540.1change in r@xmath52 resulting in a @xmath540.1 dex change in @xmath53 . the model parameters of @xmath53 and @xmath2 are explored on a grid of 5 km s@xmath26 . the modeled emission line is then spatially convolved with a fixed seeing kernel ( 0.6 fwhm ) , which is the typical seeing of our observations in the nir . the best fit model is determined through a @xmath55 minimization with the data over this grid . the velocity dispersion term that we measure ( @xmath2 ) is unlike a pressure supported stellar velocity dispersion . the hot gas which @xmath2 is tracing can collisionally radiate and so a high dispersion system can not remain in equilibrium after a crossing time . due to the seeing blur , the velocity dispersion is a measure of the small scale velocity gradients below the seeing limit . the velocity dispersion measured from nebular emission lines will be a combination of : ( . ) thermal broadening of the gas ( @xmath2410 km s@xmath26 for h at 10@xmath56 k ) , ( . ) internal turbulence in hii regions ( @xmath24 20 km s@xmath26 for local hii regions ; ) , ( . ) relative motions between hii regions . the inclination is measured as @xmath57 , where @xmath29 is the correction for the thickness of the disk ( @xmath29 = 0.2 ) and b / a is the axis ratio of the galaxy , measured from the hst h - band image . the rotation velocity is then corrected as @xmath58 .    as indicated by @xcite , distinguishing late - stage mergers and rotating disks is difficult in low resolution kinematics observations . at high redshift , where galaxy mergers are expected to be common @xcite , disk classifications made from kinematic signatures alone may be biased high . in 2 galaxies in our sample ( i d : 21897 and 4476 ) we identify an interacting neighbor in both the hst image ( @xmath59 ) and the mosfire spectrum ( @xmath60 km s@xmath26 ) . we mask the emission line of the neighboring source in both of these cases . we note that late - stage interactions , for which two galaxies are identified as a single source , may be included in this sample . a joint analysis of the hst imaging and the kinematic data is necessary to disentangle disks from late - stage mergers in our sample . for all subsequent analyses , we interpret the measured velocity gradient of each galaxy as rotation .    in figure [ fig : kin_example ] , we show example kinematic fits for three galaxies in our sample : a strongly rotating galaxy , a galaxy with comparable velocity and velocity dispersion , and a dispersion dominated galaxy . even in the dispersion dominated case , we note the presence of a velocity gradient , although it is small compared to the observed dispersion . the rotationally supported system is a well - ordered disk galaxy , similar to disk galaxies today , with the presence of spiral structure and a bar in the hst image . in its spectrum , we find a strong rotation signature ( @xmath24 175 km s@xmath26 ) and a mild velocity dispersion ( @xmath24 35 km s@xmath26 ) .    beam smearing tends to blur together spatially separate regions of emission , leading to a flattening of nearby velocity gradients and an elevation in the local velocity dispersion . in the observed line , this effect leads to a classic peak in the velocity dispersion at the center of the galaxy , where the velocity gradient is the steepest . this can be seen in the example kinematic fits in figure [ fig : kin_example ] , particularly for the strongly rotating galaxy . rotcurve models the seeing and accounts for this artificial beam smearing when constructing its model . the best - fit kinematic parameters of the full sample are presented in table [ tab : table2 ] of the appendix . single - slit spectroscopy is a reliable method for recovering rotation velocity and velocity dispersion in observations where the position angle of the slit is aligned with the kinematic major axis of the galaxy . in ordered disk galaxies , the kinematic and photometric major axes are aligned and so the hst / wfc3 image can be used to determine the kinematic major axis . however , the morphologies of high redshift star - forming galaxies can be more severely disturbed than local or low redshift samples ( e.g. , @xcite ) , implying that the photometric and kinematic major axes might be misaligned . in a sample that combines galaxies at both @xmath61 and @xmath0 , @xcite report that kinematic and photometric axes are at least moderately misaligned ( @xmath62 ) in @xmath2440@xmath63 of galaxies and are largely misaligned ( @xmath64 ) in @xmath2420@xmath63 . this fraction declines to @xmath65 in local galaxies .    for seeing - limited observations of high redshift galaxies , slit placement is much less stringent than for local galaxies or for higher resolution observations . to recover rotation , the alignment between the slit and the kinematic major axis should be within 45@xmath31 ( see figure 13 of @xcite ) . a total of 26 galaxies in sigma have observations at multiple position angles ( @xmath66 , see figure [ fig : vel_map_combined ] ) . due to the non - uniform coverage of our maps , we do not simultaneously model all of the observed slits on a galaxy . instead we examine the kinematic measurements along each slit separately and adopt measurements for the slit with the highest rotational signature . we require that every galaxy in sigma have at least one slit that is aligned within 45@xmath31 of the photometric major axis ( @xmath67 ) . this requirement ensures that rotation will be recovered in disk galaxies , where the photometric and kinematic axes are aligned . of the 26 galaxies with kinematic measurements at more than one pa , 17 have at least one slit aligned and one slit misaligned with @xmath68 . of these systems , we find the largest velocity gradient in a misaligned slit in 23@xmath63 of the cases ( 4 galaxies ) and in an aligned slit in 77@xmath63 of the cases ( 13 galaxies ) . this result is consistent with @xcite . the 4 galaxies in our sample for which the strongest velocity shear is found in a misaligned slit all display complex morphology in both the hst / acs v - band and hst / wfc3 h - band images . for these 4 galaxies , we adopt the line of sight velocity shear ( @xmath69 ) for our analysis and do not correct the velocity for inclination . these galaxies are marked in all of the figures . as shown in an example in figure [ fig : vel_map_combined ] , these systems tend to have complex velocity profiles . in some of these cases , velocity shear is found in the aligned slit as well , implying that the velocity gradient ( either tracing global rotation or more complex motions ) may lie between both slits . the tully - fisher relation ( tf ; ) is an empirical scaling relating the dynamics and the luminosity , or more recently , stellar mass of galaxies . in the local universe , the relation is relatively tight for massive disk galaxies ( e.g. , @xcite ) but begins to show small residuals to low mass for gas - rich galaxies @xcite and large residuals to low rotation velocity for irregular low mass galaxies ( @xmath70)@xcite . numerous studies have extended the analysis of the tf relation to both intermediate , 0.1 @xmath14 z @xmath14 1.3 ( e.g. , ) , and high redshift , 1.3 @xmath14 z @xmath14 3.0 ( e.g. , @xcite ) .    and @xcite were the first to note that intermediate redshift galaxies with perturbed / complex kinematics and irregular morphologies tend to exhibit large scatter from the tf relation , with subsequent studies confirming such findings ( e.g. , ) . recent lensing work at high redshift has also found evidence for scatter to low rotation velocity from the tf relation for a handful of low mass galaxies @xcite . however , due to a combination of sensitivity limitations and survey selection , the low mass regime of the high - redshift tf relation has not been explored with large numbers of galaxies . we will now explore the low mass tf relation at @xmath0 with sigma galaxies . in the top panel of figure [ fig : kinematics ] we plot the stellar mass tully - fisher relation for the galaxies in sigma . the points are color coded to indicate the ratio of ordered ( @xmath1 ) to disordered ( @xmath2 ) motions in each galaxy , which we will refer to as  kinematic order " . only one pa , the pa with the strongest velocity gradient , is shown for each galaxy . as described in  4.1 , we do not apply an inclination correction for the 4 galaxies whose largest velocity gradients are measured at a @xmath71 pa @xmath28 45@xmath31 . a few galaxies have a best - fit rotation velocity which is below the nominal resolution limit of our spectra , shown by the dashed line . we set these galaxies at an upper limit of @xmath1 @xmath45 @xmath72 @xmath14 15 km s@xmath26 in subsequent figures . the most massive galaxies in sigma ( @xmath73 ) lie on or above the tf ridge line , which we define using the local relation from @xcite . these galaxies exhibit values of @xmath74 , factors of a few lower than local galaxies at the same mass . we perform a simple linear regression to the stellar mass tf relation for these 12 massive ( @xmath73 ) rotationally - supported galaxies ( @xmath75 ) . we fix the slope to the value from local relation and report an offset to lower @xmath23 of @xmath76 @xmath77 . if these systems are gas - rich , then the baryonic ( @xmath23+@xmath78 ) tf relation is the more applicable scaling relation . although measurements of gas mass are unavailable for the galaxies in our sample , we note that an offset in mass of @xmath79 implies that we may be missing @xmath80 of the baryonic mass . this is consistent with estimates of the molecular gas reservoirs in massive galaxies at high redshift ( e.g. , @xcite ) . as sigma includes both rotationally - supported and dispersion - dominated galaxies , we make no further attempt to characterize an evolution in the slope , scatter or intercept of the stellar mass tf relation for disks , which would require morphological pruning . at low stellar stellar mass ( @xmath81 ) we find significant scatter from the ridge line to low rotation velocity . a large fraction of these galaxies show marginal rotation support , with values of @xmath82 .    in the middle panel of figure [ fig : kinematics ] we show the velocity dispersion as a function of stellar mass . as discussed in  3 , the velocity dispersion that we measure is corrected for seeing and modeled as a constant term across the galaxy . due to the finite width of the slit ( 0.7@xmath35 ) and the effects of seeing ( @xmath24 0.6@xmath35 ) , @xmath2 is an integration of small scale velocity gradients , thermal broadening and internal turbulence . the velocity dispersion is only mildly correlated with stellar mass , with more massive galaxies displaying marginally higher velocity dispersions . the mean and rms scatter of @xmath2 for the low mass ( @xmath83 ) and high mass ( @xmath84 ) samples are 57@xmath8519 km s@xmath26 and 64@xmath8529 km s@xmath26 , respectively . the galaxies which fall from the tf ridgeline to low @xmath1 display characteristically higher @xmath2 at fixed stellar mass . in other words , the lower @xmath1/@xmath2 in these galaxies is due to both lower rotation velocity and higher velocity dispersion . star - forming galaxies at z @xmath24 2 tend to have much stronger kinematic contributions from @xmath2 than their local counterparts . for the bulk of our sample there appears to be a floor in velocity dispersion of @xmath2 = 30 km s@xmath26 . this floor is slightly higher than the typical gas velocity dispersion in local disk galaxies , @xmath86 km s@xmath26 @xcite , and higher than the spectral resolution limit of our observations , @xmath24 20 km s@xmath26 .    to combine the quantities @xmath1 and @xmath2 into a more fundamental quantity , many authors ( e.g. , ) adopt a joint kinematic parameter , @xmath87 @xcite . a common choice is made for @xmath88 , motivated by virial arguments for a spherically symmetric tracer distribution ( see @xcite ) . the @xmath89 quantity more reliably traces the overall potential of a galaxy system , independent of morphology , recent disturbance or kinematic state @xcite . in the bottom panel of figure [ fig : kinematics ] we show the @xmath90 relation for our sample , which re - establishes the tf relation for all galaxies . this has been found previously at @xmath0 @xcite . we note that our low mass galaxies are relatively consistent with the @xmath91 relation found by @xcite , while the high mass galaxies tend to be offset to higher @xmath89 . @xcite report a similar offset in the @xmath0 @xmath89 relation over their full mass range ( @xmath92 ) . @xcite have argued that it is necessary for the @xmath93 to evolve to higher @xmath89 at fixed mass in order to correctly predict the cosmic stellar mass density . as discussed before , this offset might reflect a rise in @xmath94 at higher redshift .     from the local tf ridge line , defined by @xcite . the largest scatter is found at low stellar mass ( @xmath95 ) . middle : the relation between integrated gas velocity dispersion ( @xmath2 ) and @xmath23 is shown . the slowly rotating galaxies that fall from the tf relation have elevated velocity dispersions . bottom : the s@xmath96 tf relation is shown along with the fit and scatter from the @xmath91 deep2 sample @xcite and the local faber - jackson relation , defined by @xcite . the handful of galaxies in which the largest velocity gradient was measured in an off - axis slit are not inclination corrected and are shown as open circles . the resolution limits for measuring rotation and dispersion in sigma is given by the horizontal dashed lines in the top and middle plots . ] we perform a least - squares linear fit to the @xmath89 tf relation , @xmath12 @xmath89 @xmath97 km s@xmath98 = @xmath99 , for the full sample . we report coefficients of @xmath100 and @xmath101 with an rms scatter @xmath102 = 0.19 . even with the apparent dichotomy between the low mass and high mass regions noted above , we find that the slope , amplitude and scatter of the full sample is relatively consistent with the @xmath91 relation ( @xmath103 , @xmath104 , @xmath102 = 0.14 ) found in @xcite and the local faber - jackson relation ( @xmath29 = 0.286 , @xmath105 = 1.965)@xcite . as discussed in  5 , the low mass galaxies in our sample show the strongest residuals from the tf ridge line and the lowest values of @xmath4 . in the settling of disk galaxies , massive galaxies are expected to form ordered disks first , followed later by lower mass galaxies (  kinematic downsizing " ; @xcite ) . to probe the drivers of kinematic disturbance at @xmath0 , we examine the relation between the kinematic order of sigma galaxies ( @xmath1/@xmath2 ) and three of their physical properties : star - formation rate , effective radius and stellar mass . to separate out the dependance of size and sfr on stellar mass , we examine deviations from the size - mass and sfr - mass relations at @xmath0 . we find that , at fixed stellar mass , @xmath1/@xmath2 is only weakly correlated with sfr and mildly correlated with half - light radius . the strongest correlation is found to be with stellar mass , wherein more massive galaxies tend to be the most rotationally supported . we describe these relations in more detail below . we perform a ranked spearman correlation test to quantify the association in each relation . the spearman coefficient ( @xmath106 ) measures the strength of a correlation and we use the common interpretation : @xmath107 ( very weak correlation ) , @xmath108 ( weak / moderate correlation ) , @xmath109 ( moderate / strong correlation ) . the p - value ( @xmath110 ) indicates the probability of uncorrelated data producing the given spearman coefficient .    in the left panel of figure [ fig : vsig_others ] we examine the correlation of @xmath4 with stellar mass following k12 for @xmath1111.2 . we note that the trend is the strongest of the three we investigate , with an increasing trend of @xmath1/@xmath2 with stellar mass and a spearman coefficient , @xmath112 ( @xmath113 ) . if we only include the galaxies with detected rotation and inclination corrections ( i.e. , filled circles ) , the trend with stellar mass strengthens to @xmath114 ( @xmath115 ) . next , we examine the departure of our galaxies from the size - mass relation at @xmath0 , as parameterized for late type galaxies in table 1 of @xcite . we use the @xmath116 and @xmath117 size - mass relations for our low and high redshift bins , respectively . the half - light size used for these relations is calibrated to rest - frame 5000 (1.5 @xmath33 m at z@xmath1182 ) and so we adopt the h - band half - light radii for comparison . in the middle panel of figure [ fig : vsig_others ] , we present the differences between the half - light radii of our galaxies and the size - mass relation ( @xmath119r@xmath120 = r@xmath121 - r@xmath122 . ) . the intrinsic scatter of the relation is 0.18 and 0.19 dex for both the low and high redshift bins , respectively , consistent with the rms scatter in our sample of 0.19 . we note that there is a weak / mild correlation between @xmath1/@xmath2 and @xmath71 r@xmath120 , as quantified by the spearman coefficient @xmath123 ( @xmath124 ) . finally , in the right panel of figure [ fig : vsig_others ] , we examine the correlation of kinematic order with a galaxy s departure from the 1.5 @xmath14 z @xmath14 2.6 star - formation main sequence ( @xmath125 ) . if the dispersion - dominated galaxies are being disrupted by internal processes associated with star - formation , we would expect a correlation between @xmath4 and the position of a galaxy on the star - formation main sequence . we adopt the main sequence fit of @xcite as parameterized in @xcite and adjust to a chabrier imf to match with our sample . this relation is valid over @xmath126 , spanning our full mass interval . we find no strong trend with @xmath127 sfr ( defined as @xmath12 sfr@xmath128 - @xmath12 sfr@xmath129 ) and @xmath1/@xmath2 . in other words , at fixed stellar mass the position of a galaxy above or below the star - formation main sequence is not related to its internal gas kinematics . the spearman coefficient between these two values confirms the lack of a trend , @xmath130 ( with @xmath131 ) .        combining kinematic measurements at @xmath0 from both the kmos-3d @xcite and mosdef surveys @xcite , @xcite investigated the trend of v/@xmath2 with specific star formation rate ( @xmath132 ) and stellar mass , finding a declining and weakly increasing trend respectively . we find that , when we fix for stellar mass , there is no dependance on sfr . instead , the strongest correlation in the sigma sample is with stellar mass alone . if we consider that the gas mass scales with sfr @xcite , these results would indicate that the kinematic order of a galaxy is more strongly linked with its mass than its gas fraction . in this section we compare our measurements of @xmath1/@xmath2 with a model for gas rich marginally stable disks using the refined toomre analysis given in @xcite . we find that high mass galaxies in our sample are in general agreement with this model , indicating that they have already assembled primitive disks . galaxies which have already settled to become disks by @xmath0 are gas rich ( e.g. , @xcite ) and are expected to be in a marginally stable ( to collapse ) equilibrium ( e.g. , @xcite ) , regulated by ubiquitous inflows , outflows and star - formation @xcite . this regulator model successfully describes the elevated velocity dispersions in high redshift gas - rich disks @xcite . following the work of @xcite and @xcite , @xmath4 of the ionized gas in a marginally stable disk can be estimated from the toomre criterion :    @xmath133    where @xmath134 is a constant which is set to @xmath135 for a flat rotation curve , as discussed in @xcite . the quantity @xmath136 is the critical toomre parameter which , considering the range of realistic disks , can vary between 0.67 ( single - component thick disk ; @xcite ) and 2.0 ( two - component thin disk ; @xcite ) . the gas fraction ( @xmath137 ) can be estimated from the gas depletion timescale ( @xmath138 ) and the specific star - formation rate ( @xmath139 ) as @xmath140 . the gas depletion timescale is relatively constant with stellar mass at @xmath0 and we fix it to @xmath141 yr ( @xcite ) . for our analysis we adopt the ssfr - m@xmath142 relation at z = 2 from @xcite using the fit in @xcite . equation 2 is derived assuming that the gravitational force exerted by @xmath143 is supported by rotation , which is not generally true for our dispersion dominated systems . this stability analysis would not directly apply to these galaxies , but we can still compare @xmath4 in these systems with our disk model .      in figure [ fig : vsig_m ] we show @xmath1/@xmath2 as a function of stellar mass for the galaxies in our sample and additional publicly available measurements for the following surveys : sins @xcite , massiv , and lensed galaxies from @xcite and @xcite . the sins sample is the high signal - to - noise adaptive optics assisted subset and is representative of the most massive and star - forming galaxies at @xmath0 . the lensed sample and massiv sample are more generally representative of star - forming galaxies at these epochs . we use these samples to extend our mass baseline to @xmath144 and to illustrate the consistency of our measurements with those in the literature . the expected distribution of @xmath1/@xmath2 for marginally stable disks at @xmath0 is shown in figure [ fig : vsig_m ] and follows from the model described above . this range includes a characteristic break above @xmath145 , due to a kink in the @xmath0 stellar mass ssfr relation . we find that high mass galaxies ( @xmath146 ) are in general agreement with the marginally stable disk model , i.e. , high mass galaxies have already assembled their disks by @xmath0 . in general these disks are expected to contain large gas reservoirs which drive violent disk instabilities and maintain elevated velocity dispersions . these galaxies are unlike local disks of the same mass , which have values of @xmath147 as opposed to @xmath148 . as their gas reservoirs deplete , they are expected to stabilize and form well - ordered disks @xcite .    below a stellar mass of @xmath149 we find the common occurrence of systems which are dispersion dominated and/or marginally rotationally supported ( @xmath1/@xmath2 @xmath150 1 ) . for comparison , the most dispersion dominated system expected from the disk model is @xmath1/@xmath2 = 0.7 ( f@xmath151 = 1 , q@xmath152 = 2 in eq 2 ) . galaxies with lower @xmath1/@xmath2 would be considered globally stable to gas collapse ( q @xmath28 q@xmath152 ) , even as they are obviously forming stars . although gas - rich disks with high velocity dispersion are expected at @xmath0 , a large fraction of our low mass sample can not be described by this simple model for marginally stable disks . we present the first results of sigma ( survey in the near - infrared of galaxies with multiple position angles ) , a kinematic survey of 49 star - forming galaxies over 1.3 @xmath14 z @xmath14 3.0 in three of the candels fields . sigma is representative of the @xmath0 star - formation main sequence to @xmath153 = 9.2 at @xmath154 and @xmath153 = 9.6 at @xmath155 , and includes galaxies with both disk and irregular morphologies . internal kinematics ( rotation velocity @xmath1 and gas velocity dispersion @xmath2 ) are measured from resolved rest - optical nebular emission lines ( h@xmath29 , @xmath30 5007 ) in keck / mosfire nir spectra . we find that high mass galaxies ( @xmath156 ) at @xmath0 are generally rotationally supported , fall on the tf relation , and have formed primitive disks with high @xmath2 . these marginally stable disks are expected to decline in @xmath2 with time as they deplete their gas supply @xcite . in contrast , a large fraction of low mass galaxies ( @xmath157 ) at this epoch are in the early phases of assembling their disks . they have much lower  kinematic order " ( @xmath158 ) and tend to fall to low @xmath1 from the tully - fisher relation . for perspective , these results imply that a milky - way progenitor at @xmath0 ( @xmath159 ; @xcite ) is likely still in the process of forming a disk . combining both @xmath1 and @xmath2 in @xmath89 , all of the galaxies in sigma fall on the @xmath89 tully - fisher relation , indicating that many galaxies at low mass have strong contributions of kinematic support in the form of @xmath2 . following @xcite at @xmath1111 , the tendency for high mass galaxies to develop disks first is referred to as  kinematic downsizing " , and these results imply that it is in place at @xmath0 .    to gain insight into the underlying drivers of kinematic disruption , we explore the dependance of @xmath1/@xmath2 on three physical parameters of galaxies : size , star - formation rate and stellar mass . we find that the strongest trend is with stellar mass , wherein high mass galaxies have the strongest rotational support ( i.e. , highest values of @xmath4 ) . we examine the relation between @xmath4 and residuals from the star - formation main sequence and we find no correlation , to within the uncertainties of our measurements . given that the star - formation rate is likely tracing the available gas mass @xcite , our results imply that mass may be more fundamental than gas fraction in determining kinematic order . finally , we find a moderate correlation between @xmath4 and size , likely associated with the increased angular momentum of the rotationally supported systems . the strong trend between @xmath4 and mass and the lack of a correlation with sfr at fixed mass implies that the processes that maintain @xmath2 in galaxies should be most efficient at low stellar mass and should be independent on gas fraction . several processes which disrupt disk galaxies are active at @xmath0 , associated with elevated star - formation and rising merger rates @xcite . several of these mechanisms may play a role in preferentially stalling disk formation in low mass galaxies . feedback through stellar winds and supernovae can effectively blow out gas and dynamically heat stars in low mass dwarf galaxies ( @xmath160 ; e.g , @xcite ) . we note that we find no trend between @xmath4 and @xmath161 at fixed mass among the galaxies studied in this sample ( @xmath162 ) , indicating that such feedback mechanisms may only assume a secondary role in disturbing the gas kinematics in these galaxies . mergers play a complicated role in shaping the angular momentum content of disk galaxies . models ( e.g. , @xcite ) and observations ( e.g. , ) indicate that gas - rich disks can survive major mergers , albeit with thick disks and perturbed kinematics . examining mock observations from a suite of simulated galaxy mergers , @xcite find that merger remnants tend to scatter to low @xmath1 from the tfr , similar to the low mass galaxies in our sample . although several channels exist for stalling ( and promoting ) disk formation , it is as of yet unclear what the dominate processes are in maintaining the elevated kinematic disturbance we observe in low mass galaxies at this epoch .    in summary , we find that kinematic downsizing is active as far back in time as @xmath0 . while massive star - forming galaxies ( @xmath163 ) appear to have assembled primitive rotating disks by this time ( consistent with e.g. , @xcite ) , low mass galaxies tend to be more kinematically disordered and still in the early process of assembling their disks . the peak of cosmic star - formation is coincident with the epoch of disk assembly for low mass galaxies and the settling of primitive disks in high mass galaxies . the authors would like to thank the anonymous referee who provided useful suggestions that improved this paper . rcs would like to thank sandra faber , joel primack , avishai dekel and the candels - baltimore group for useful comments and discussions which have also improved the paper . rcs and sak gratefully acknowledge the support from a grant through the stsci jdf . we thank g. wirth and the tkrs-2 team for their enormous effort observing , reducing and releasing the mosfire spectra which are used for the sigma galaxies in goods - n . we wish to extend thanks to those of hawaiian ancestry on whose sacred mountain we are privileged guests . this work has made use of the rainbow cosmological surveys database , which is operated by the universidad complutense de madrid ( ucm ) , partnered with the university of california observatories at santa cruz ( uco / lick , ucsc ) . jrt acknowledges support from nasa through hubble fellowship grant @xmath16451330 awarded by the space telescope science institute , which is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . , for nasa under contract nas 5 - 26555 . cp is supported by an appointment to the nasa postdoctoral program at nasa s goddard space flight center . agertz , o. , & kravtsov , a.  v.  2015 , arxiv:1509.00853    aumer , m. , burkert , a. , johansson , p.  h. , & genzel , r.  2010 , , 719 , 1230    barnes , j.  e. , & hernquist , l.  1996 , , 471 , 115    barrera - ballesteros , j.  k. , garca - lorenzo , b. , falcn - barroso , j. , et al . 2015 , , 582 , a21    barro , g. , trump , j.  r. , koo , d.  c. , et al . 2014 , , 795 , 145    begeman , k.  g.  1987 , ph.d . thesis ,    bell , e.  f. , & de jong , r.  s.  2001 , , 550 , 212    bouch , n. , dekel , a. , genzel , r. , et al . 2010 , , 718 , 1001    bradford , j.  d. , geha , m.  c. , & van den bosch , f.  c.  2016 , arxiv:1602.02757    brammer , g.  b. , van dokkum , p.  g. , & coppi , p.  2008 , , 686 , 1503    brammer , g.  b. , van dokkum , p.  g. , franx , m. , et al . 2012 , , 200 , 13    brinchmann , j. , & ellis , r.  s.  2000 , , 536 , l77    brooks , a.  m. , governato , f. , quinn , t. , brook , c.  b. , & wadsley , j.  2009 , , 694 , 396    bruzual , g. , & charlot , s.  2003 , , 344 , 1000    calzetti , d. , armus , l. , bohlin , r.  c. , et al . 2000 , , 533 , 682    ceverino , d. , dekel , a. , & bournaud , f.  2010 , , 404 , 2151    ceverino , d. , primack , j. , & dekel , a.  2015 , , 453 , 408    chabrier , g.  2003 , , 115 , 763    conselice , c.  j. , bundy , k. , ellis , r.  s. , et al . 2005 , , 628 , 160    contini , t. , garilli , b. , le fvre , o. , et al . 2012 , , 539 , a91    contini , t. , epinat , b. , bouch , n. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1512.00246    cowie , l.  l. , songaila , a. , hu , e.  m. , & cohen , j.  g.  1996 , , 112 , 839    courteau , s. , dutton , a.  a. , van den bosch , f.  c. , et al . 2007 , , 671 , 203    covington , m.  d. , kassin , s.  a. , dutton , a.  a. , et al . 2010 , , 710 , 279    cresci , g. , hicks , e.  k.  s. , genzel , r. , et al . 2009 , , 697 , 115    daddi , e. , elbaz , d. , walter , f. , et al . 2010 , , 714 , l118    daddi , e. , bournaud , f. , walter , f. , et al . 2010 , , 713 , 686    dahlen , t. , mobasher , b. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2013 , , 775 , 93    danovich , m. , dekel , a. , hahn , o. , ceverino , d. , & primack , j.  2015 , , 449 , 2087    dav , r. , finlator , k. , & oppenheimer , b.  d.  2012 , , 421 , 98    dekel , a. , sari , r. , & ceverino , d.  2009 , , 703 , 785    el - badry , k. , wetzel , a. , geha , m. , et al . 2016 , , 820 , 131    elbaz , d. , dickinson , m. , hwang , h.  s. , et al . 2011 , , 533 , a119    elmegreen , b.  g. , & burkert , a.  2010 , , 712 , 294    epinat , b. , amram , p. , balkowski , c. , & marcelin , m.  2010 , , 401 , 2113    fall , s.  m. , & efstathiou , g.  1980 , , 193 , 189    flores , h. , hammer , f. , puech , m. , amram , p. , & balkowski , c.  2006 , , 455 , 107    frster schreiber , n.  m. , genzel , r. , lehnert , m.  d. , et al . 2006 , , 645 , 1062    frster schreiber , n.  m. , genzel , r. , bouch , n. , et al . 2009 , , 706 , 1364    galametz , a. , grazian , a. , fontana , a. , et al . 2013 , , 206 , 10    gallazzi , a. , charlot , s. , brinchmann , j. , & white , s.  d.  m.  2006 , , 370 , 1106    genel , s. , dekel , a. , & cacciato , m.  2012 , , 425 , 788    genzel , r. , tacconi , l.  j. , eisenhauer , f. , et al . 2006 , , 442 , 786    genzel , r. , burkert , a. , bouch , n. , et al . 2008 , , 687 , 59    genzel , r. , newman , s. , jones , t. , et al . 2011 , , 733 , 101    genzel , r. , tacconi , l.  j. , lutz , d. , et al . 2015 , , 800 , 20    glazebrook , k.  2013 , pasa , 30 , e056    grogin , n.  a. , kocevski , d.  d. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2011 , , 197 , 35    governato , f. , brook , c.  b. , brooks , a.  m. , et al . 2009 , , 398 , 312    guo , y. , ferguson , h.  c. , giavalisco , m. , et al . 2013 , , 207 , 24    hammer , f. , flores , h. , elbaz , d. , et al .  2005 , , 430 , 115    hammer , f. , flores , h. , puech , m. , et al .  2009 , , 507 , 1313    hopkins , p.  f. , cox , t.  j. , younger , j.  d. , & hernquist , l.  2009 , , 691 , 1168    hung , c .- l . , rich , j.  a. , yuan , t. , et al . 2015 , , 803 , 62    hung , c .- hayward , c.  c. , smith , h.  a. , et al . 2016 , , 816 , 99    inoue , s. , dekel , a. , mandelker , n. , et al . 2016 , , 456 , 2052    jones , t.  a. , swinbank , a.  m. , ellis , r.  s. , richard , j. , & stark , d.  p.  2010 , , 404 , 1247    juneau , s. , glazebrook , k. , crampton , d. , et al .  2005 , , 619 , l135    kassin , s.  a. , de jong , r.  s. , & weiner , b.  j.  2006 , , 643 , 804    kassin , s.  a. , weiner , b.  j. , faber , s.  m. , et al .  2007 , , 660 , l35    kassin , s.  a. , weiner , b.  j. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2012 , , 758 , 106    kennicutt , r.  c. , jr . 1998 , , 36 , 189    kennicutt , r.  c. , jr . 1998 , , 498 , 541    kimm , t. , devriendt , j. , slyz , a. , et al . 2011 , arxiv:1106.0538    koekemoer , a.  m. , faber , s.  m. , ferguson , h.  c. , et al . 2011 , , 197 , 36    kriek , m. , van dokkum , p.  g. , labb , i. , et al . 2009 , , 700 , 221    kriek , m. , shapley , a.  e. , reddy , n.  a. , et al . 2015 , , 218 , 15    law , d.  r. , shapley , a.  e. , steidel , c.  c. , et al . 2012 , , 487 , 338    lehnert , m.  d. , nesvadba , n.  p.  h. , le tiran , l. , et al . 2009 , , 699 , 1660    livermore , r.  c. , jones , t.  a. , richard , j. , et al . 2015 , , 450 , 1812    madau , p. , & dickinson , m.  2014 , , 52 , 415    mac low , m .- m . , & ferrara , a.  1999 , , 513 , 142    magnelli , b. , popesso , p. , berta , s. , et al . 2013 , , 553 , a132    mandelker , n. , dekel , a. , ceverino , d. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1512.08791    masters , k.  l. , springob , c.  m. , & huchra , j.  p.  2008 , , 135 , 1738    masters , d. , & capak , p.  2011 , , 123 , 638    mcgaugh , s.  s.  2005 , , 632 , 859    mclean , i.  s. , steidel , c.  c. , epps , h.  w. , et al . 2012 , , 8446 , 84460j    miller , s.  h. , bundy , k. , sullivan , m. , ellis , r.  s. , & treu , t.  2011 , , 741 , 115    miller , s.  h. , ellis , r.  s. , sullivan , m. , et al . 2012 , , 753 , 74    miller , s.  h. , ellis , r.  s. , newman , a.  b. , & benson , a.  2014 , , 782 , 115    mobasher , b. , dahlen , t. , ferguson , h.  c. , et al . 2015 , , 808 , 101    mo , h.  j. , mao , s. , & white , s.  d.  m.  1998 , , 295 , 319    momcheva , i.  g. , brammer , g.  b. , van dokkum , p.  g. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1510.02106    morris , a.  m. , kocevski , d.  d. , trump , j.  r. , et al . 2015 , , 149 , 178    mortlock , a. , conselice , c.  j. , hartley , w.  g. , et al . 2013 , , 433 , 1185    mortlock , a. , conselice , c.  j. , hartley , w.  g. , et al . 2015 , , 447 , 2    nelson , e.  j. , van dokkum , p.  g. , frster schreiber , n.  m. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1507.03999    newman , s.  f. , genzel , r. , frster schreiber , n.  m. , et al . 2013 , , 767 , 104    noeske , k.  g. , weiner , b.  j. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2007 , , 660 , l43    papovich , c. , labb , i. , quadri , r. , et al . 2015 , , 803 , 26    peng , c.  y. , ho , l.  c. , impey , c.  d. , & rix , h .- w . 2010 , , 139 , 2097    pizagno , j. , prada , f. , weinberg , d.  h. , et al . 2005 , , 633 , 844    price , s.  h. , kriek , m. , shapley , a.  e. , et al . 2016 , , 819 , 80    puech , m. , flores , h. , hammer , f. , et al . 2008 , , 484 , 173    reddy , n.  a. , pettini , m. , steidel , c.  c. , et al . 2012 , , 754 , 25    reyes , r. , mandelbaum , r. , gunn , j.  e. , pizagno , j. , & lackner , c.  n.  2011 , , 417 , 2347    rodriguez - gomez , v. , genel , s. , vogelsberger , m. , et al . 2015 , , 449 , 49    rodriguez - puebla , a. , behroozi , p. , primack , j. , et al . 2016 , arxiv:1602.04813    shapiro , k.  l. , genzel , r. , frster schreiber , n.  m. , et al . 2008 , , 682 , 231    shields , g.  a.  1990 , , 28 , 525    simons , r.  c. , kassin , s.  a. , weiner , b.  j. , et al . 2015 , , 452 , 986    speagle , j.  s. , steinhardt , c.  l. , capak , p.  l. , & silverman , j.  d.  2014 , , 214 , 15    stewart , k.  r. , brooks , a.  m. , bullock , j.  s. , et al . 2013 , , 769 , 74    stott , j.  p. , swinbank , a.  m. , johnson , h.  l. , et al . 2016 , , 457 , 1888    swinbank , a.  m. , papadopoulos , p.  p. , cox , p. , et al . 2011 , , 742 , 11    swinbank , a.  m. , sobral , d. , smail , i. , et al . 2012 , , 426 , 935    tacconi , l.  j. , neri , r. , genzel , r. , et al . 2013 , , 768 , 74    tomassetti , m. , dekel , a. , mandelker , n. , et al . 2016 , , 458 , 4477    torres - flores , s. , epinat , b. , amram , p. , plana , h. , & mendes de oliveira , c.  2011 , , 416 , 1936    trump , j.  r. , konidaris , n.  p. , barro , g. , et al .  2013 , , 763 , l6    tully , r.  b. , & fisher , j.  r.  1977 , , 54 , 661    van der wel , a. , bell , e.  f. , hussler , b. , et al . 2012 , , 203 , 24    van der wel , a. , franx , m. , van dokkum , p.  g. , et al . 2014 , , 788 , 28    van der wel , a. , chang , y .- y . , bell , e.  f. , et al . 2014 , , 792 , l6    vergani , d. , epinat , b. , contini , t. , et al . 2012 , , 546 , a118    verheijen , m.  a.  w.  2001 , , 563 , 694    weiner , b.  j. , willmer , c.  n.  a. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2006 , , 653 , 1027    weiner , b.  j. , willmer , c.  n.  a. , faber , s.  m. , et al . 2006 , , 653 , 1049    wheeler , c. , pace , a.  b. , bullock , j.  s. , et al . 2015 , arxiv:1511.01095    whitaker , k.  e. , franx , m. , leja , j. , et al . 2014 , , 795 , 104    wirth , g.  d. , trump , j.  r. , barro , g. , et al . 2015 , , 150 , 153    wisnioski , e. , glazebrook , k. , blake , c. , et al . 2011 , , 417 , 2601    wisnioski , e. , frster schreiber , n.  m. , wuyts , s. , et al . 2015 , , 799 , 209    wuyts , s. , frster schreiber , n.  m. , lutz , d. , et al . 2011 , , 738 , 106    zolotov , a. , dekel , a. , mandelker , n. , et al . 2015 , , 450 , 2327 in this appendix , we perform mock observations of simulated sigma spectra in order to determine the limiting spatial scale from which we can recover rotation velocity , if present , in our observations . we find that we can recover kinematics down to a limit of d@xmath44/seeing@xmath46 = 0.8 . in  2 , we apply this limit to our data set . the spectra presented in this paper were observed in seeing limited conditions , and as such the effects of beam smearing @xcite are important to understand . seeing tends to blur together spatially distinct velocities , leading to a decreased rotation signature and an elevated velocity dispersion . to explore the effective resolution set by beam smearing in sigma , we create a set of model spectra with various sizes and fixed kinematic parameters . as described below , we perform mock observations of the kinematics for these spectra and explore how the results vary with size . our model for a single mock sigma / mosfire spectrum consists of first creating a 1d emission line with a sersic intensity profile :      where r@xmath120 is the half - light radius , @xmath166 is the intensity at the half - light radius , @xmath167 is the sersic index and @xmath168 is a numerical constant that depends on @xmath167 ( @xmath169 ) . we set @xmath170 , characteristic of the emission line intensity profile for galaxies at this redshift @xcite . we then draw from an appropriate error spectrum to set the central signal - to - noise per pixel to 15 , typical of sigma spectra . the final integrated s / n of these simulated spectra are well - matched to our sample . next , we apply an arctan velocity profile ( see eq 1 ) and a constant velocity dispersion to the emission line . we fix the rotation velocity to 100 km s@xmath26 and the velocity dispersion to 50 km s@xmath26 , characteristic of @xmath0 disk galaxies . we then apply a seeing kernel of 0.7 " in the spatial direction and mosfire instrumental broadening ( @xmath171 = 40 km s@xmath26 ) in the spectral direction . following the seeing convolution , the emission profile is well described by a gaussian ( @xmath172 ) . we repeat this process 100 times , redrawing from the error spectrum each time to create independent realizations with the same fixed parameters . we then vary the effective radius of the emission line from 0.1 - 0.7 @xmath35 in 30 even steps of 0.02@xmath35/step . at each step we again simulate 100 realizations with the same fixed properties . the final dataset contains 3000 simulated sigma spectra .    to measure the kinematics from the mock spectra , we run the same fitting technique used for our observations ( rotcurve ) for each spatial scale modeled , we measure 100 values of @xmath1 and @xmath2 and examine their mean and variance . the results of this study are shown in figure [ fig : model_size ] . the rotation velocity is well recovered with an intrinsic error of @xmath24 15 km s@xmath26 . for simulated spectra with effective diameter at or greater than the seeing , we accurately recover the input rotation and dispersion . below a value of d@xmath44/seeing@xmath46 = 0.8 , the limiting spatial resolution drastically affects the recovered values of @xmath1 and @xmath2 . there is both a larger uncertainty in the measurements and a systematic decline in the measured rotation velocity . based on the results of these models , we determine that the spatial scale for recovering kinematics in our observations is diameter d@xmath44 @xmath28 0.8 @xmath45 seeing@xmath46 . above this value we can reliably recover rotational motion , if present . ccllccccc 5492 & & 03 32 41.78 & @xmath17327 51 35.28 & 1.67 & 22.51 & 10.39 & 1.95 & 0.57 + 14602 & & 03 32 14.66 & @xmath17327 47 02.70 & 1.73 & 22.37 & 10.18 & 1.44 & 0.91 + 16209 & & 03 32 15.82 & @xmath17327 46 22.36 & 1.33 & 23.47 & 9.36 & 0.23 & 0.34 + 16600 & & 03 32 30.71 & @xmath17327 46 17.17 & 1.31 & 21.20 & 10.51 & 1.59 & 0.70 + 16905 & & 03 32 15.75 & @xmath17327 46 04.32 & 1.54 & 22.15 & 10.13 & 2.05 & 0.32 + 17488 & & 03 32 20.18 & @xmath17327 45 49.31 & 1.61 & 23.16 & 9.46 & 1.15 & 0.41 + 17673 & & 03 32 33.86 & @xmath17327 45 42.65 & 1.62 & 22.69 & 10.05 & 1.68 & 0.85 + 18177 & & 03 32 12.48 & @xmath17327 45 30.42 & 1.38 & 22.03 & 10.19 & 1.57 & 0.41 + 19818 & & 03 32 18.07 & @xmath17327 44 33.44 & 1.38 & 22.43 & 9.23 & 1.31 & 0.81 + 20495 & & 03 32 11.86 & @xmath17327 44 13.38 & 1.33 & 21.30 & 10.43 & 1.69 & 0.78 + 20569 & & 03 32 29.19 & @xmath17327 44 13.21 & 1.47 & 23.89 & 9.24 & 1.44 & 0.49 + 20593 & & 03 32 12.77 & @xmath17327 44 07.77 & 1.61 & 23.13 & 10.26 & 1.49 & 0.29 + 20883 & & 03 32 26.77 & @xmath17327 43 58.22 & 1.61 & 23.43 & 9.88 & 1.14 & 0.51 + 21007 & & 03 32 31.83 & @xmath17327 43 56.26 & 1.55 & 21.80 & 10.67 & 1.55 & 0.81 + 21162 & & 03 32 23.95 & @xmath17327 43 49.09 & 1.31 & 22.16 & 9.79 & 1.02 & 0.87 + 21258 & & 03 32 30.75 & @xmath17327 43 45.34 & 1.43 & 23.17 & 9.37 & 0.93 & 0.33 + 21737 & & 03 32 30.14 & @xmath17327 43 35.44 & 1.60 & 22.55 & 10.20 & 1.08 & 0.69 + 21897 & & 03 32 34.08 & @xmath17327 43 28.43 & 1.60 & 22.44 & 9.82 & 1.51 & 0.42 + 22236 & & 03 32 26.19 & @xmath17327 43 17.38 & 1.61 & 23.09 & 9.61 & 1.03 & 0.49 + 22354 & & 03 32 13.66 & @xmath17327 43 13.08 & 1.47 & 22.45 & 9.67 & 1.28 & 0.91 + 22783 & & 03 32 26.30 & @xmath17327 43 01.89 & 1.55 & 23.11 & 9.83 & 0.71 & 0.46 + 23095 & & 03 32 38.50 & @xmath17327 42 27.89 & 1.61 & 21.93 & 10.39 & 1.65 & 0.76 + 23632 & & 03 32 28.13 & @xmath17327 42 48.27 & 1.61 & 23.35 & 9.45 & 1.01 & 0.33 + 25715 & & 03 32 22.72 & @xmath17327 41 40.74 & 1.61 & 22.12 & 10.34 & 1.60 & 0.96 + 25973 & & 03 32 26.08 & @xmath17327 41 38.49 & 1.54 & 22.74 & 9.84 & 0.92 & 0.62 + 26050 & & 03 32 13.89 & @xmath17327 41 58.29 & 1.32 & 22.57 & 9.64 & 1.78 & 0.24 + 26177 & & 03 32 27.28 & @xmath17327 42 05.20 & 1.61 & 21.11 & 10.65 & 1.73 & 0.91 + 26736 & & 03 32 26.41 & @xmath17327 42 28.30 & 1.61 & 22.21 & 10.18 & 2.09 & 0.49 + 1826 & & 12 36 18.78 & @xmath17462 08 39.70 & 2.30 & 23.03 & 9.79 & 1.12 & 0.32 + 2815 & & 12 36 35.56 & @xmath17462 09 20.33 & 2.36 & 23.26 & 9.71 & 1.11 & 0.66 + 4106 & & 12 36 39.37 & @xmath17462 10 06.60 & 2.35 & 22.40 & 10.65 & 1.58 & 0.31 + 4476 & & 12 36 13.13 & @xmath17462 10 21.11 & 2.24 & 23.50 & 9.89 & 0.95 & 0.27 + 4714 & & 12 36 36.08 & @xmath17462 10 29.90 & 2.31 & 23.01 & 10.17 & 1.03 & 0.83 + 4925 & & 12 36 11.51 & @xmath17462 10 33.72 & 2.25 & 22.52 & 10.92 & 1.73 & 0.72 + 4962 & & 12 36 18.77 & @xmath17462 10 37.28 & 2.27 & 23.56 & 9.68 & 1.12 & 0.59 + 9157 & & 12 36 13.56 & @xmath17462 12 21.58 & 2.44 & 23.13 & 9.90 & 1.75 & 0.48 + 9190 & & 12 36 18.27 & @xmath17462 12 22.18 & 2.44 & 23.38 & 9.85 & 1.13 & 0.89 + 10230 & & 12 37 06.71 & @xmath17462 12 44.61 & 2.21 & 23.23 & 10.21 & 0.94 & 0.17 + 11525 & & 12 36 26.94 & @xmath17462 13 17.86 & 2.40 & 23.91 & 9.48 & 2.11 & 0.42 + 13230 & & 12 36 09.05 & @xmath17462 13 59.03 & 2.05 & 24.83 & 9.96 & 1.19 & 0.37 + 13678 & & 12 36 44.08 & @xmath17462 14 10.10 & 2.27 & 26.53 & 9.66 & 0.82 & 0.41 + 14428 & & 12 36 35.59 & @xmath17462 14 24.01 & 2.02 & 25.47 & 11.79 & 3.61 & 0.86 + 15497 & & 12 36 21.74 & @xmath17462 14 52.85 & 2.21 & 26.28 & 10.06 & 1.14 & 0.76 + 16028 & & 12 36 51.82 & @xmath17462 15 04.72 & 2.19 & 26.38 & 10.76 & 1.00 & 0.76 + 16260 & & 12 37 00.46 & @xmath17462 15 08.86 & 2.33 & 24.82 & 10.92 & 1.14 & 0.77 + 10404 & & 02 17 35.93 & @xmath17305 13 05.20 & 2.31 & 22.92 & 10.04 & 1.55 & 0.51 + 12138 & & 02 17 48.89 & @xmath17305 12 30.38 & 2.25 & 23.26 & 9.98 & 1.24 & 0.28 + 14004 & & 02 17 30.72 & @xmath17305 11 56.22 & 2.39 & 23.25 & 10.46 & 1.54 & 0.57 + 14042 & & 02 17 32.78 & @xmath17305 11 55.93 & 2.15 & 22.65 & 9.97 & 1.52 & 0.27 + [ tab : table1 ]    ccccccccc 5492 & 1 & 65.0 @xmath175 0.7 & 34.5 & 30.5 & 0.2 & 10 @xmath175 30 & 11 @xmath175 35 & 45 @xmath175 14 + 14602 & 1 & @xmath17311.7 @xmath175 0.7 & 19.0 & 30.7 & 0.2 & 25 @xmath175 37 & 59 @xmath175 87 & 85 @xmath175 23 + 16209 & 2 & 9.4 @xmath175 1.3 & 19.0 & 9.6 & 0.2 & 65 @xmath175 28 & 67 @xmath175 29 & 86 @xmath175 22 + 16600 & 2 & 7.0 @xmath175 0.2 & 10.0 & 3.0 & 0.2 & 171 @xmath175 23 & 234 @xmath175 31 & 35 @xmath175 35 + 16905 & 3 & @xmath17387.0 @xmath175 0.3 & -56.0 & 31.0 & 0.4 & 131 @xmath175 63 & 135 @xmath175 65 & 80 @xmath175 24 + 17488 & 2 & 17.4 @xmath175 1.8 & 19.0 & 1.6 & 0.2 & 5 @xmath175 14 & 5 @xmath175 15 & 45 @xmath175 5 + 17673 & 1 & @xmath1732.8 @xmath175 0.6 & 8.0 & 10.8 & 0.2 & 44 @xmath175 20 & 81 @xmath175 37 & 35 @xmath175 15 + 18177 & 2 & 83.1 @xmath175 0.4 & 56.0 & 27.1 & 0.4 & 161 @xmath175 50 & 172 @xmath175 53 & 90 @xmath175 26 + 19818 & 2 & @xmath17386.6 @xmath175 1.4 & 56.0 & 37.4 & 0.3 & 24 @xmath175 21 & 40 @xmath175 35 & 80 @xmath175 13 + 20495 & 3 & 74.1 @xmath175 0.3 & 56.0 & 18.1 & 0.4 & 120 @xmath175 27 & 187 @xmath175 42 & 65 @xmath175 22 + 20569 & 1 & 22.5 @xmath175 1.8 & 8.0 & 14.5 & 0.2 & 31 @xmath175 27 & 34 @xmath175 30 & 36 @xmath175 15 + 20593 & 2 & 34.1 @xmath175 0.9 & 19.0 & 15.1 & 0.4 & 130 @xmath175 44 & 133 @xmath175 45 & 49 @xmath175 26 + 20883 & 1 & 29.8 @xmath175 2.1 & 8.0 & 21.8 & 0.2 & 51 @xmath175 36 & 58 @xmath175 41 & 89 @xmath175 14 + 21007 & 5 & @xmath17359.5 @xmath175 0.4 & 117.0 & 3.5 & 0.2 & 136 @xmath175 24 & 227 @xmath175 40 & 39 @xmath175 40 + 21162 & 3 & @xmath17382.7 @xmath175 0.7 & 19.0 & 78.3 & 0.2 & 52 @xmath175 19 &  & 80 @xmath175 6 + 21258 & 3 & @xmath17352.7 @xmath175 1.4 & 117.0 & 10.3 & 0.4 & 101 @xmath175 78 & 104 @xmath175 80 & 55 @xmath175 38 + 21737 & 1 & @xmath17319.6 @xmath175 0.6 & 8.0 & 27.6 & 0.2 & 157 @xmath175 29 & 212 @xmath175 39 & 30 @xmath175 31 + 21897 & 2 & @xmath17324.5 @xmath175 0.7 & 120.5 & 35.0 & 0.2 & 136 @xmath175 20 & 146 @xmath175 21 & 55 @xmath175 17 + 22236 & 2 & @xmath17315.7 @xmath175 1.5 & 19.0 & 34.7 & 0.2 & 110 @xmath175 32 & 123 @xmath175 35 & 50 @xmath175 23 + 22354 & 2 & 36.0 @xmath175 0.7 & 19.0 & 17.0 & 0.2 & 56 @xmath175 20 & 132 @xmath175 47 & 30 @xmath175 20 + 22783 & 1 & 32.1 @xmath175 1.5 & 10.0 & 22.1 & 0.2 & 5 @xmath175 38 & 5 @xmath175 41 & 40 @xmath175 16 + 23095 & 2 & @xmath17370.9 @xmath175 0.5 & 120.5 & 11.4 & 0.2 & 200 @xmath175 42 & 301 @xmath175 63 & 34 @xmath175 36 + 23632 & 2 & 88.3 @xmath175 1.2 & 78.5 & 9.8 & 0.2 & 34 @xmath175 18 & 35 @xmath175 18 & 39 @xmath175 8 + 25715 & 1 & @xmath17339.7 @xmath175 0.9 & 120.5 & 19.8 & 0.2 & 75 @xmath175 43 & 262 @xmath175 150 & 109 @xmath175 23 + 25973 & 3 & 33.0 @xmath175 0.8 & 19.0 & 14.0 & 0.2 & 79 @xmath175 21 & 98 @xmath175 26 & 40 @xmath175 15 + 26050 & 1 & @xmath17353.0 @xmath175 0.6 & 117.0 & 10.0 & 0.3 & 222 @xmath175 33 & 224 @xmath175 33 & 50 @xmath175 24 + 26177 & 2 & @xmath17320.1 @xmath175 0.2 & 120.5 & 39.4 & 0.2 & 74 @xmath175 18 & 174 @xmath175 42 & 45 @xmath175 13 + 26736 & 2 & @xmath17335.2 @xmath175 0.5 & -10.0 & 25.2 & 0.2 & 242 @xmath175 35 & 272 @xmath175 39 & 75 @xmath175 42 + 1826 & 1 & @xmath17311.7 @xmath175 1.2 & 32.0 & 43.7 & 0.3 & 30 @xmath175 30 & 31 @xmath175 31 & 49 @xmath175 12 + 2815 & 2 & @xmath17312.8 @xmath175 3.4 & 32.0 & 44.8 & 0.3 & 29 @xmath175 40 & 37 @xmath175 52 & 64 @xmath175 12 + 4106 & 2 & @xmath17329.5 @xmath175 0.4 & 32.0 & 61.5 & 0.3 & 82 @xmath175 64 &  & 129 @xmath175 25 + 4476 & 1 & 68.0 @xmath175 2.4 & 106.9 & 38.9 & 0.3 & 90 @xmath175 37 & 91 @xmath175 37 & 60 @xmath175 25 + 4714 & 1 & @xmath17347.9 @xmath175 1.2 & 106.9 & 25.2 & 0.3 & 68 @xmath175 38 & 119 @xmath175 66 & 84 @xmath175 30 + 4925 & 3 & @xmath17329.0 @xmath175 1.2 & -21.5 & 7.5 & 0.2 & 318 @xmath175 35 & 448 @xmath175 49 & 25 @xmath175 61 + 4962 & 3 & 24.9 @xmath175 3.9 & 32.0 & 7.1 & 0.2 & 124 @xmath175 25 & 150 @xmath175 30 & 55 @xmath175 20 + 9157 & 3 & 14.6 @xmath175 0.8 & 106.9 & 87.7 & 0.3 & 64 @xmath175 22 &  & 85 @xmath175 15 + 9190 & 3 & @xmath17384.2 @xmath175 1.6 & 32.0 & 63.8 & 0.2 & 21 @xmath175 28 &  & 36 @xmath175 18 + 10230 & 1 & @xmath1738.3 @xmath175 7.7 & -53.0 & 44.7 & 0.3 & 50 @xmath175 26 & 50 @xmath175 26 & 45 @xmath175 20 + 11525 & 2 & 44.7 @xmath175 2.7 & 32.0 & 12.7 & 0.2 & 256 @xmath175 32 & 276 @xmath175 34 & 10 @xmath175 52 + 13230 & 1 & 22.1 @xmath175 18.5 & -21.5 & 43.6 & 0.3 & 10 @xmath175 22 & 10 @xmath175 23 & 75 @xmath175 7 + 13678 & 1 & @xmath17334.9 @xmath175 0.2 & -53.0 & 18.1 & 0.3 & 60 @xmath175 25 & 64 @xmath175 26 & 61 @xmath175 8 + 14428 & 1 & @xmath17368.3 @xmath175 5.6 & -53.0 & 15.3 & 0.2 & 82 @xmath175 24 & 157 @xmath175 46 & 71 @xmath175 14 + 15497 & 1 & 7.9 @xmath175 21.9 & 32.0 & 24.1 & 0.2 & 49 @xmath175 31 & 73 @xmath175 46 & 54 @xmath175 20 + 16028 & 1 & @xmath17371.4 @xmath175 5.8 & -53.0 & 18.4 & 0.2 & 203 @xmath175 36 & 306 @xmath175 54 & 110 @xmath175 36 + 16260 & 1 & @xmath17363.0 @xmath175 10.3 & -53.0 & 10.0 & 0.2 & 200 @xmath175 48 & 307 @xmath175 73 & 85 @xmath175 51 + 10404 & 1 & 52.2 @xmath175 1.8 & -297.0 & 10.8 & 0.2 & 100 @xmath175 33 & 114 @xmath175 37 & 74 @xmath175 14 + 12138 & 1 & 67.3 @xmath175 1.9 & -297.0 & 4.3 & 0.1 & 46 @xmath175 17 & 46 @xmath175 17 & 55 @xmath175 10 + 14004 & 1 & 40.6 @xmath175 1.3 & -297.0 & 22.4 & 0.2 & 248 @xmath175 68 & 296 @xmath175 81 & 15 @xmath175 83 + 14042 & 1 & 34.9 @xmath175 0.9 & -297.0 & 28.1 & 0.3 & 50 @xmath175 26 & 50 @xmath175 26 & 70 @xmath175 8 + [ tab : table2 ]
Abstract:

Answer: we present results from a survey of the internal kinematics of 49 star - forming galaxies at @xmath0 in the candels fields with the keck / mosfire spectrograph ( sigma , survey in the near - infrared of galaxies with multiple position angles ) . kinematics ( rotation velocity @xmath1 and integrated gas velocity dispersion @xmath2 ) are measured from nebular emission lines which trace the hot ionized gas surrounding star - forming regions . we find that by @xmath0 , massive star - forming galaxies ( @xmath3 ) have assembled primitive disks : their kinematics are dominated by rotation , they are consistent with a marginally stable disk model , and they form a tully - fisher relation . these massive galaxies have values of @xmath4 which are factors of 25 lower than local well - ordered galaxies at similar masses . such results are consistent with findings by other studies . we find that low mass galaxies ( @xmath5 ) at this epoch are still in the early stages of disk assembly : their kinematics are often supported by gas velocity dispersion and they fall from the tully - fisher relation to significantly low values of @xmath1 . this kinematic downsizing " implies that the process(es ) responsible for disrupting disks at @xmath0 have a stronger effect and/or are more active in low mass systems . in conclusion , we find that the period of rapid stellar mass growth at @xmath0 is coincident with the nascent assembly of low mass disks and the assembly and settling of high mass disks .