Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: radial velocity surveys uncover large populations of exoplanets that allow models of planet formation and migration to be constrained . however , in order to study individual exoplanets , it is important to directly detect both their scattered optical flux and their thermal emission . while the spitzer space telescope has enabled exoplanetary thermal emission to be observed ( deming et al . 2005 ; harrington et al . 2006 , 2007 ; knutson et al . 2007 , 2009a , 2009b ) , scattered flux from only one exoplanet has been conclusively observed ( kalas et al . this is because the contrast ratio between star and exoplanet is at least an order of magnitude larger in the optical than in the infrared . thermal emission measurements allow exoplanetary temperature maps to be made ( knutson et al . 2007 ) , which constrain models regarding redistribution of stellar insolation by exoplanetary winds . in addition , detection of infrared emission allows molecules such as water vapor ( tinetti et al . 2007 ) and methane ( swain et al . 2008 ) to be identified in exoplanetary atmospheres . atomic species can be identified in these atmospheres by transmission spectroscopy in the optical , and it can also be used to identify the presence of cloud layers ( charbonneau et al . 2002 ; vidal - madjar et al . 2003 ; barman 2007 ; pont et al . 2008 ; redfield et al . if the exoplanetary radius can be estimated , detection of light scattered by an exoplanet allows its geometric albedo to be determined . geometric albedo is a measure of the scattering in the atmosphere of the exoplanet , which gives information about atmospheric cloud structure . + however , most thermal emission and transmission spectroscopy measurements of exoplanets are from transiting systems , where the orbital plane is seen edge - on . this is because thermal emission may be identified during secondary eclipse , when the exoplanet is occulted by the star , and transmission spectroscopy requires a primary eclipse by definition . transits allow baseline stellar emission ( both in the optical and infrared ) to be subtracted from the combined star / exoplanet signal , which greatly improves the signal to noise ratio for direct detection . unfortunately , transiting systems only comprise about 10% of massive , short period exoplanets ( so - called  hot jupiters " ) , so high signal to noise observations of the atmospheres of most known exoplanets are not accessible with these techniques . while advanced imaging instruments , such as the gemini planet imager ( macintosh et al . 2006 ; graham et al . 2007b ) , have the potential to observe thermal emission from long - period exoplanets , the majority of known exoplanets orbit too closely to their host stars in order to be accessible to imaging . + in addition to observing scattered and emitted flux from exoplanets , determining accurate exoplanetary masses is needed to characterize individual exoplanets . however , the dominant exoplanet - finding technique , radial velocity , is insensitive to stellar reflex motion in the plane of the sky . therefore , measured mass @xmath3 is only a lower limit to the true mass @xmath4 because @xmath5 . while one may infer the most probable exoplanetary mass by assuming an isotropic distribution of orbital inclination @xmath6 , an observational technique that constrains inclination is desired . + again , transiting systems are a boon to the characterization of individual exoplanets , because the shape of the transit lightcurve is indicative of both orbital inclination and exoplanetary radius . inclination estimates from transit observations can be coupled with radial velocity data to derive accurate masses . indeed , the mass of the transiting hot jupiter hd 209458b has been measured to within five earth masses ( torres et al . 2008 analysis of brown et al . 2001 ; naef et al . 2004 ; butler et al . the hot neptune gj 436b , with an m dwarf host , has an uncertainty of less than one earth mass ( torres et al . 2008 analysis of deming et al . 2007 ; gillon et al . 2007a , 2007b ; maness et al . knowledge of accurate exoplanetary radii enables bulk exoplanetary density to be determined . for example , the relatively large mass with respect to radius of the transiting exoplanet hd 149026b indicates the presence of a large , rocky core , which bolsters support for its formation via core accretion ( sato et al . 2005 ) . in order to determine accurate exoplanetary mass for non - transiting exoplanets , however , new observational techniques are necessary . polarimetric observations have the potential to determine orbital inclination , and therefore accurate mass , for exoplanets by isolating their scattered , optical flux . indeed , polarimetry has been utilized to study dust grains in debris disks because of its sensitivity to scattered light ( meyer et al . 2002 ; jensen et al . 2004 ; monin et al . 2006 ; perrin et al . 2006 ; graham et al . 2007a ; beckford et al . 2008 ) . the extra information content offered by polarimetry over photometry suggests that exoplanetary scattered flux can be detected even in non - transiting systems . that is , photometric detection of exoplanetary flux benefits greatly from chopping of exoplanetary flux between in - transit and out of transit observations due to the scalar nature of photometric observations . however , the vector nature of polarimetric observations may enable direct detection of exoplanetary flux even when system intensity is constant . + polarization of exoplanets arises by scattering of incident starlight by gas molecules , aerosols , and dust grains in the atmosphere of the exoplanet ( seager et al . 2000 ) . for a face - on , circular orbit ( figure [ 1figb]a ) , the exoplanet is always seen at quarter phase and always has half its disk illuminated . for a featureless exoplanetary atmosphere , the intensity of light scattered by the exoplanet is constant throughout the orbit and the degree of polarization is also constant . however , the position angle of polarization rotates through @xmath7 each orbit , because the scattering plane rotates as the exoplanet progresses in its orbit . + in contrast , an edge - on viewing geometry generates large , periodic variability in the degree of polarization because the amount of scattered light is variable ( figure [ 1figb]b ) . however , the scattering plane is always nearly coplanar with the orbital plane , so the position angle of net polarization does not vary significantly throughout the orbit . it should be noted that the polarimetric signature of an exoplanetary transit is discussed in carciofi & magalhes ( 2005 ) and in section 4.2 . in general , an exoplanet exhibits variability in the polarization vector that is indicative of orbital inclination , and the models of seager et al . ( 2000 ) and stam et al . ( 2004 ) demonstrate this effect . +    the simplest discussion of the modulation in system polarization due to an exoplanet exists for a lambertian phase function and a polarization dependence on scattering angle similar to rayleigh scattering . this is given by    @xmath8    here , @xmath9 is orbital phase pinned to stellar radial velocity phase ( @xmath10 represents superior conjunction of the exoplanet ) , @xmath11 is the fraction of stellar flux scattered by an exoplanet with radius @xmath12 and semimajor axis @xmath13 ( assuming a circular orbit ) , @xmath14 is its geometric albedo ( the fraction of exoplanetary scattered flux at full phase compared to that scattered by a lambertian disk ) , @xmath15 is the phase function ( the fraction of intercepted flux scattered toward the observer ) , and @xmath16 is the polarization of that scattered flux . the phase function is given in terms of the phase angle @xmath17 , which is the angle between the host star and observer as seen from the exoplanet . russell ( 1916 ) gives the lambertian phase function as the following :    @xmath18    given @xmath19 , @xmath15 can be determined . it is useful to decompose @xmath20 in terms of its normalized stokes parameters , where @xmath21 and    @xmath22    @xmath23    after shakhovskoi ( 1965 ) . the primed stokes parameters are measured in the orbital frame and @xmath24 is defined to be in the direction of the orbital angular momentum vector . converting polarization from the orbital frame to celestial coordinates requires knowledge of the longitude of the ascending node @xmath25 , where @xmath26 ( figure [ 3figr ] ) :    @xmath27    @xmath28    while terrestrial planets are expected to follow @xmath29 because of their solid scattering surfaces , multiple scattering reduces the polarization of light scattered by gas giant atmospheres with high albedos ( seager et al . 2000 ; stam et al . 2004 ; lucas et al . 2009 ) . thus , the form of polarization as a function of orbital phase from equations 1 through 4 is expected to approximate that of all exoplanets , but the amplitude of the signal will be strongly overestimated for gas giants . + from the monte carlo scattering simulations of lucas et al . ( 2009 ) , the polarization amplitude of a gas giant exoplanet is expected to be    @xmath30    @xmath31    equation [ eqd ] is the polarization amplitude for an edge - on orientation , while equation [ eqe ] relates to the general case where orbital inclination is unknown . the quadratic fit to @xmath32 as a function of @xmath14 reproduces the @xmath33 values in table 6 of lucas et al . ( 2009 ) to within 2% . + the strongest polarimetric modulation from a gas giant exoplanet will occur for a lambertian phase function with a polarization dependence on scattering angle similar to rayleigh scattering . here , @xmath34 at all wavelengths . since @xmath35 for hd 189733b ( torres et al . 2008 analysis of knutson et al . 2007 ) , equation [ eqd ] shows that the amplitude of polarimetric modulation due to the exoplanet can not be larger than @xmath36 for scattered light at all wavelengths . upper limits to geometric albedo from reflected light campaigns exist for the exoplanets around @xmath37 bo , hd 75289 , and hd 209458 from photometry ( leigh et al . 2003a , 2003b ; rowe et al . lucas et al . ( 2009 ) estimate an upper limit for @xmath37 bo b using planetpol , a polarimeter capable of part per million precision on bright stars ( hough et al . these albedo upper limits , along with the bandpass in which they were determined , are shown in table [ table4 ] . assuming a mean albedo upper limit of @xmath38 , the polarimetric modulation from hd 189733b is @xmath39 . since the albedo estimates in table [ table4 ] range from 400 to 920 nm , this expected upper limit to hd 189733b modulation is for scattered light at all optical wavelengths . +    c c c c c c c hd 75289 & @xmath40 & 99.9% & 406.5 & 522.0 & photometry & 1 + hd 209458 & @xmath41 & @xmath42 & 400 & 700 & photometry & 2 + @xmath37 bo & @xmath43 & @xmath44 & 590 & 920 & polarimetry & 3 + @xmath37 bo & @xmath45 & 99.9% & 407.4 & 649.0 & photometry & 4 + [ table4 ] the polish instrument ( polarimeter for inclination studies of high mass x - ray binaries / hot jupiters ) is a visible light polarimeter commissioned at the cassegrain focus of the hale 5-m telescope at palomar observatory , california . this instrument is described in wiktorowicz & matthews ( 2008 , hereafter wm08 ) . it utilizes a photoelastic modulator ( pem ) , a wollaston prism , lock - in amplifiers , and digital voltmeters to modulate and detect incident , polarized light at 100 khz . the wollaston prism feeds a pair of avalanche photodiodes ( apds ) or photomultiplier tubes ( pmts ) , depending on stellar intensity . the bandpass of the instrument is limited by the detectors and atmospheric transmission ; the lack of spectral filters increases throughput of the instrument and allows for high precision observations . the apd bandpass ranges from about 400 to 850 nm , while the pmt bandpass ranges from roughly 400 to 675 nm . atmospheric transmission sets the lower limit for spectral coverage for both detector types . the above components and large telescope aperture contribute to the high signal - to - noise observations with the instrument , where part per million precision is achieved on bright stars ( wm08 ) . on - source guiding is accomplished by use of a beamsplitter , which allows about @xmath46 of the flux to be sent to a ccd camera . + the voltage output from the detectors consists of a roughly sinusoidal waveform with a frequency of 100 khz and a dc offset . polarization of the input beam is proportional to the ratio of the ac amplitude ( polarized flux ) to the dc offset ( total flux ) . thus , atmospheric effects that operate on timescales longer than 10 @xmath47s are effectively removed . for example , non - birefringent cirrus clouds passing through the telescope beam will reduce both polarized and unpolarized flux equally : the ratio of ac to dc signals will remain constant . additionally , polarization imparted from such forward scattering by cloud particles will be zero . therefore , high precision , integrated light , polarimetric observations with polish are photon shot noise limited ( wm08 ) , eliminating the benefit from a similar , space - based polarimeter . + the amplitude of the 100 khz ac signal is sampled at 8 hz by the lock - in amplifiers , and the dc offset is sampled at 6 hz by the voltmeters . the fact that the sampling rates are different is not important because polarization is related to time - averaged ac and dc values . each on - source measurement consists of one , 30 second integration during which the ac amplitude and dc offset are sampled . ac and dc signals are then sky subtracted by chopping the secondary mirror to a sky field and initiating another 30 second integration . it should be noted that no less than 30 seconds elapse before the next chop throw . since sky background is low in both the ac amplitude and dc offset , asymmetric , 2:1 source / sky chops are used . that is , observing  triplets " consist of repeated sequences of source , sky , and source integrations every 90 seconds . + the cassegrain ring is rotated by @xmath48 roughly every 10 minutes , which causes a different linear stokes parameter to be sampled . this ensures that all @xmath49 and @xmath50 stokes parameters are sampled at least once for each star to minimize systematic effects . note that each star is observed for about one hour per night . nightly telescope polarization of @xmath51 is then subtracted . telescope polarization is the mean of the nightly measurements of the bright ( @xmath52 ) , unpolarized star hr 5854 weighted by the dc level of each measurement . dc level is proportional to the number of detected photons , and weighting by this quantity ensures that each photon is weighted equally . this is important in partly cloudy conditions , because observed stellar intensity varies throughout the night . + the equatorial mount of the hale 5-m inhibits traditional telescope polarization measurement , which involves allowing the field to rotate and determining the center of the @xmath53 locus for weakly polarized targets . however , hough et al . ( 2006 ) and lucas et al . ( 2009 ) performed this analysis and report a polarization of four parts per million for hr 5854 . lucas et al . ( 2009 ) report that the polarization of this star varies by seven parts per million over one year , but this lies at the @xmath54 level of significance . therefore , i assume that this star is indeed unpolarized , and i assume that it is non - variable over this seven - night observing run . since telescope polarization is a function of wavelength , it will be different for stars with different spectral types . in addition , i quickly measure telescope polarization to the part per million level with apds on a bright , unpolarized star , even though the science targets in this work are about five magnitudes fainter and are observed with the different bandpass of the pmts . therefore , an error of order one part in @xmath55 or less in the absolute calibration of telescope polarization may be present . however , such an offset is assumed to be non - variable and below the measurement noise for the targets in this work . systematic effects have been reduced to the part - per - million level for weakly polarized sources and to less than 1% of the measured polarization for significantly polarized sources ( wm08 ) . + nightly mean and run - averaged polarizations for each target are determined by taking the mean of the polarization measurements weighted by their dc levels . uncertainty in polarization is the square root of the weighted variance of the polarizations from these measurements divided by the square root of the number of measurements . each polarization measurement is photon shot noise limited , and uncertainty in run - averaged polarization scales with the square root of stellar polarization . the polarization noise floor of the instrument is about two parts per million ( wm08 ) . i calibrate absolute polarization measured with polish against the catalog of heiles ( 2000 ) . however , since my observed position angles of net polarization are generally consistent with those in the literature for strongly polarized targets , i do not calibrate position angle . it should be stressed that the unfiltered polarimetric observations of science targets in this work are taken over the wavelength range of roughly 400 to 675 nm . +    c c c c c c c c c hr 5854 & @xmath17 ser & @xmath56 & @xmath57 & @xmath58 & @xmath59 & 1 & 2.64 & k2iiib + hd 149026 & sao 65349 & @xmath60 & @xmath61 & ? & ? & @xmath59 & 8.16 & g0iv + hd 175541 & gj 736 & @xmath62 & @xmath63 & ? & ? & @xmath59 & 8.03 & g8v + cygnus x-1 & sao 69181 & @xmath64 & @xmath65 & 4.98(18 ) & 135.0(1.0 ) & 2 & 8.95 & o9.7iab + hd 189733 & v452 vul & @xmath66 & @xmath67 & 0.0212(30 ) & 99.6(4.1 ) & 3 & 7.68 & k1.5v + hr 8974 & @xmath68 cep & @xmath69 & @xmath70 & @xmath71 & @xmath59 & 1 & 3.23 & k1iv + [ 3tablea ]    the stars observed are listed in table [ 3tablea ] . polarimetric data are obtained from the catalogs of heiles ( 2000 ) , from berdyugina et al . ( 2008 , hereafter b08 ) , and from wm08 . all other non - polarimetric data are taken from the simbad database . the polarization and position angle values in parentheses represent the standard error of the mean , which assumes nonvariable target polarization . however , cygnus x-1 is known to be variable with a polarimetric amplitude of order @xmath72 ( nolt et al . 1975 ; kemp 1980 ; dolan & tapia 1989 ) . the amplitude of variability of cygnus x-1 is also variable and due to both stable and stochastic effects ( dolan & tapia 1989 , 1992 ) . this variability is roughly phase - locked to the orbital period of the binary , and cygnus x-1 is included in this work as a variable control source . + the long period exoplanet hosts hd 175541 and hr 8974 are included as non - variable control sources , as the exoplanets should only be detectable over an entire orbit and at the level of @xmath73 and @xmath74 , respectively ( equation [ eqe ] ) . the transiting hot saturn around hd 149026 is expected to generate a polarimetric signal of @xmath75 over its orbit ( equation [ eqd ] ) . orbital parameters and expected polarizations of these systems are given in table [ table3 ] . these amplitudes assume a geometric albedo upper limit of @xmath38 ( the mean of the upper limits in table [ table4 ] ) and a radius of @xmath76 @xmath77 for the non - transiting exoplanets . since these upper limits to polarimetric modulation range from 400 to 920 nm , the expected upper limits are for scattered light at all optical wavelengths . no polarimetric data for hd 149026 or hd 175541 were found in the literature . +    c c c c c c c hr 8974 & @xmath78 & @xmath79 & ? & 1 & @xmath80 & @xmath81 + hd 175541 & @xmath78 & @xmath82 & ? & 2 & @xmath83 & @xmath84 + hd 149026 & @xmath85 & @xmath86 & @xmath87 & 3 & @xmath88 & @xmath89 + hd 189733 & @xmath90 & @xmath91 & @xmath92 & 4 & @xmath93 & @xmath94 + cygnus x-1 & @xmath59 & @xmath95 & @xmath96 & 5 & @xmath97 & @xmath98 + [ table3 ] nightly mean and run - averaged polarizations for the observed targets are listed in table [ table2 ] after telescope polarization ( hereafter  tp " ) is subtracted . note that run - averaged polarization assumes non - variability of the source . this is apparent in the formal uncertainty in polarization for cygnus x-1 , @xmath99 , because this source is known to be variable on the order of @xmath72 . i refer the reader to table 4 of wm08 for nightly polarization measurements of the unpolarized standard star hr 8974 . the standard deviation of mean nightly polarizations is given as @xmath100 in table [ table3 ] . these represent measurement precision coupled with intrinsic source variability . +    c c c c c c 2008 jun 08 & tp & @xmath590.02645(29 ) & + 0.01637(40 ) & 0.03111(32 ) & 74.12(34 ) + 2008 jun 09 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02211(50 ) & + 0.01370(59 ) & 0.02601(53 ) & 74.10(63 ) + 2008 jun 10 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02630(41 ) & + 0.01624(50 ) & 0.03091(43 ) & 74.15(44 ) + 2008 jun 11 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02625(27 ) & + 0.01634(39 ) & 0.03092(31 ) & 74.05(33 ) + 2008 jun 12 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02597(29 ) & + 0.01622(43 ) & 0.03062(33 ) & 74.01(37 ) + 2008 jun 13 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02578(26 ) & + 0.01576(41 ) & 0.03022(31 ) & 74.29(36 ) + 2008 jun 14 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02599(27 ) & + 0.01657(36 ) & 0.03082(30 ) & 73.74(31 ) + overall & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02578(16 ) & + 0.01605(18 ) & 0.03037(16 ) & 74.05(16 ) + 2008 jun 08 & hd 149026 & @xmath590.0438(61 ) & + 0.0142(43 ) & 0.0460(59 ) & 81.0(2.8 ) + 2008 jun 09 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0445(19 ) & + 0.0053(35 ) & 0.0448(19 ) & 86.6(2.2 ) + 2008 jun 10 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0425(21 ) & + 0.0084(31 ) & 0.0433(21 ) & 84.4(2.0 ) + 2008 jun 11 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0402(20 ) & + 0.0045(32 ) & 0.0404(20 ) & 86.8(2.3 ) + 2008 jun 12 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0447(24 ) & + 0.0082(34 ) & 0.0454(24 ) & 84.8(2.1 ) + 2008 jun 13 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0434(18 ) & + 0.0042(30 ) & 0.0436(18 ) & 87.2(1.9 ) + 2008 jun 14 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0419(23 ) & + 0.0084(35 ) & 0.0427(24 ) & 84.3(2.3 ) + overall & @xmath101 & @xmath590.04547(87 ) & + 0.0083(13 ) & 0.04622(89 ) & 84.82(80 ) + 2008 jun 09 & hd 175541 & @xmath590.1040(25 ) & + 0.0425(23 ) & 0.1124(25 ) & 78.89(60 ) + 2008 jun 10 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.1045(26 ) & + 0.0438(28 ) & 0.1133(26 ) & 78.63(71 ) + 2008 jun 11 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.1027(28 ) & + 0.0494(23 ) & 0.1140(27 ) & 77.15(61 ) + 2008 jun 12 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.1009(25 ) & + 0.0453(21 ) & 0.1106(24 ) & 77.91(56 ) + 2008 jun 13 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0990(21 ) & + 0.0485(28 ) & 0.1103(23 ) & 76.94(71 ) + 2008 jun 14 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0973(27 ) & + 0.0485(28 ) & 0.1087(27 ) & 76.76(72 ) + overall & @xmath101 & @xmath590.1041(11 ) & + 0.0478(11 ) & 0.1146(11 ) & 77.66(26 ) + 2008 jun 08 & hd 189733 & @xmath590.0174(42 ) & + 0.0190(31 ) & 0.0258(37 ) & 66.3(4.2 ) + 2008 jun 09 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0255(12 ) & + 0.0172(17 ) & 0.0307(14 ) & 73.0(1.4 ) + 2008 jun 10 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0206(15 ) & + 0.0125(18 ) & 0.0241(16 ) & 74.4(2.1 ) + 2008 jun 11 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0209(17 ) & + 0.0176(17 ) & 0.0274(17 ) & 70.0(1.8 ) + 2008 jun 12 & @xmath101 & @xmath59 & @xmath59 & @xmath59 & @xmath59 + 2008 jun 13 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0242(12 ) & + 0.0163(16 ) & 0.0292(14 ) & 73.0(1.5 ) + 2008 jun 14 & @xmath101 & @xmath590.0209(13 ) & + 0.0140(13 ) & 0.0251(13 ) & 73.1(1.5 ) + overall & @xmath101 & @xmath590.02476(61 ) & + 0.01706(71 ) & 0.03007(64 ) & 72.72(64 ) + 2008 jun 08 & cygnus x-1 & + 0.6003(51 ) & @xmath594.8315(48 ) & 4.8687(48 ) & 138.541(30 ) + 2008 jun 09 & @xmath101 & + 0.7721(34 ) & @xmath595.0076(44 ) & 5.0668(43 ) & 139.382(20 ) + 2008 jun 10 & @xmath101 & + 0.5467(40 ) & @xmath594.9797(29 ) & 5.0096(29 ) & 138.132(23 ) + 2008 jun 11 & @xmath101 & + 0.6299(40 ) & @xmath594.9701(43 ) & 5.0099(43 ) & 138.612(23 ) + 2008 jun 12 & @xmath101 & + 0.6590(40 ) & @xmath595.0088(32 ) & 5.0519(33 ) & 138.747(23 ) + 2008 jun 13 & @xmath101 & + 0.5537(43 ) & @xmath594.9368(46 ) & 4.9677(46 ) & 138.200(25 ) + 2008 jun 14 & @xmath101 & + 0.6912(39 ) & @xmath594.9267(36 ) & 4.9749(36 ) & 138.993(22 ) + overall & @xmath101 & + 0.6360(51 ) & @xmath594.9579(34 ) & 4.9985(35 ) & 138.655(29 ) + [ table2 ]    to determine the unbiased significance of night - to - night variability of each target , i perform a kolmogorov - smirnov ( k - s ) test on the measurement distribution for each pair of nights . this test estimates the significance of variability without prior knowledge of its physical cause . this is because analysis of data from all pairs of nights samples all temporal frequencies available as opposed to focusing on the frequency of an expected signal . for instance , equations [ eqa ] through 4 indicate that polarization due to stellar flux scattered off an exoplanetary atmosphere will be strongest at quarter phases and will be zero at conjunctions . thus , the unbiased k - s test will underestimate the significance of variability caused by this process . however , this test is important in separating stochastic variability of the host star from exoplanetary modulation . + to claim variability from this test , i require a variability confidence level of @xmath102 . therefore , rejection of the null hypothesis with significance @xmath103 is required to claim variability of the source . this method is preferred over a @xmath104 analysis with a constant polarization model , because no assumptions are made about intra - night measurement distributions and number of measurements ( clarke & naghizadeh - khouei 1994 ) . k - s tests of my data show that such measurement distribution is consistent with a gaussian nature for all targets and for all nights . that is , neither systematic effects nor intra - night variability are significant for any targets . plotted in figure [ 3figs ] are the @xmath105 values for all pairs of nights from each star . the likelihood of variability decreases from figures [ 3figs]a through [ 3figs]e . +      from figure [ 3figs]b , it can be seen that significant variability of the system is not observed . in figure [ 3figq ] , i show nightly mean polarization of hd 189733 observed with polish and compared with the data from b08 . it should be noted that the bandpasses are different between b08 ( @xmath106 band ) and this work ( 400 to 675 nm ) , but the discrepancy in figure [ 3figq ] can not simply be due to this . a @xmath104 analysis shows that the model reported by b08 to fit their observations fails to accurately reproduce my observations to the @xmath0 confidence level ( @xmath107 , @xmath108 ) . figure [ 3fign ] isolates the polish data , and figure [ 3figk ] illustrates the non - variable control system hd 175541 for comparison . to find an upper limit to the polarization amplitude of hd 189733b , i perform monte carlo simulations for expected exoplanetary polarization using equations [ eqa ] through 4 . i set @xmath109 ( torres et al . 2008 analysis of knutson et al . 2007 ) , @xmath110 , and @xmath111 . there exists a reduced @xmath104 minimum of @xmath112 with a @xmath113 probability of a successful fit for @xmath114 and @xmath115 ( figures [ 3fign ] and [ 3figu ] ) . this amplitude is larger than the maximum @xmath36 allowed for @xmath34 ( section 2 ) , indicating that it can not be due to the planet . indeed , a constant fit to the data in figure [ 3fign ] produces a similar reduced @xmath104 of 1.79 , reinforcing the results of the k - s test that my observations of hd 189733 are consistent with noise . +    upper limits to the polarization amplitude can be determined from the cumulative distribution function of @xmath116 as a function of @xmath32 ( figure [ 3figu]b ) , which is shown in figure [ 3figt ] . the 68% , 95% , and 99% upper limits to exoplanetary polarimetric modulation are @xmath117 , @xmath118 , and @xmath119 , respectively . such large upper limits exist because i was unable to observe the system where exoplanetary polarization is maximized , which is near both quarter phases . indeed , the upper limits are based significantly on the single night of observations at phase 0.65 , which is near last quarter ( figure [ 3fign ] ) . since stellar activity inhibits albedo constraint from photometry ( rowe et al . 2008a ) , future observations of this system with polish are necessary in order to provide an albedo constraint . however , my observations have ruled out the @xmath120 amplitude of modulation reported by b08 with @xmath0 confidence . +    a potential cause of polarimetric variability in hot jupiter host stars is starspot activity . photometric observations with the most satellite suggest the existence of starspots on the short period @xmath37 bo that follow the rotation period of the star ( walker et al . there is also some evidence that ca ii h and k emission from the short period hd 179949 may follow the stellar rotation period ( shkolnik et al . 2005 , 2008 ) . hd 187933 itself is known to be active , with up to @xmath121 of its surface covered in spots at any time ( hbrard & lecavelier des etangs 2006 ; croll et al . 2007 ; pont et al . 2007 ; winn et al . 2007 ; moutou et al . 2008 ) . these spots appear to rotate with the roughly 11.8 day stellar rotation period ( henry & winn 2008 ; croll et al . the run - averaged polarization of hd 189733 , observed by both b08 as well as polish , is an order of magnitude larger than those seen in stars at comparable distances ( hough et al . 2006 ; lucas et al . this enhanced polarization may be due to starspots . + since optical depth of a stellar atmosphere decreases from center to limb , and since the scattering angle increases to @xmath122 at the limb , stellar polarization is dominated by the limb ( carciofi & magalhes 2005 , hereafter cm05 ) . spatially resolved polarimetry is possible for the sun , and this effect has been observed ( faurobert et al . 2001 ; faurobert & arnaud 2003 ) . just after a starspot appears above the limb and just before it disappears below the limb , the greatest asymmetry in limb polarization occurs . indeed , cm05 model the polarized signal from an exoplanetary transit to be strongest at ingress and egress , when part of the limb is occulted . the radial polarization profile of most stars is unknown , but the models of cm05 indicate that an exoplanet - sized starspot on hd 189733 may generate a polarimetric amplitude of @xmath123 to @xmath124 when near the stellar limb . the unknown stellar latitude and stability of these spots must generate complex variations in stellar polarimetry . while starspots on hd 189733 appear to be tied to the stellar rotation period , their effects may not average out even during long observing campaigns . unfortunately , b08 do not discuss the possibility of starspots causing their observed modulation . +      i verify the exceedingly large significance of polarimetric variability of this system in both stokes parameters ( figure [ 3figs]a ) as well as its roughly phase - locked amplitude of variability of @xmath72 ( table [ table2 ] ) . further analysis of the modulation of this system , including inclination estimation , will be left for a forthcoming paper . +      a short period , transiting exoplanet orbits this weakly polarized star ( sato et al . 2005 ) . significant variability of this system is not observed to a precision of @xmath125 ( figure [ 3figs]c and table [ table3 ] ) . unfortunately , my lack of observations near quarter phase inhibits constraint of the exoplanetary albedo . +      this weakly polarized star harbors a long - period exoplanet ( johnson et al . 2007 ) . since the expected polarimetric signal due to the exoplanet is @xmath73 over an entire orbit , any observed polarimetric variability from the system can not be due to the exoplanet . this conclusion is bolstered by the lack of significant variability of the system : i observe no significant variability above the level of @xmath126 ( figure [ 3figs]d and table [ table3 ] ) . the trend seen in stokes @xmath127 lies at low significance ( figures [ 3figs]d and [ 3figk ] ) . +      hatzes et al . ( 2003 ) discovered an exoplanetary companion to the primary component of this unpolarized binary system . i expect the amplitude of the exoplanetary polarimetric signal over an entire orbit to be @xmath74 and consequently undetectable . indeed , examination of figure [ 3figs]e and table [ table3 ] shows that this system is not significantly variable to a precision of @xmath128 . i do not detect the @xmath120 polarimetric modulation of the hot jupiter system hd 189733 reported by b08 with @xmath0 confidence . using the high precision polarimeter polish , i derive an upper limit to the polarimetric modulation of the exoplanet of @xmath129 with 99% confidence . i am unable to constrain the albedo of the exoplanet ; future observations of the system polarization near quarter phases ( phases 0.25 and 0.75 ) are required . + the amplitude of the signal reported by b08 is at least one order of magnitude larger than expected given upper limits to the albedos of three other hot jupiters ( leigh et al . 2003a , 2003b ; rowe et al . 2008b ; lucas et al . in addition , my significant non - detection shows the modulation reported by this group can not be caused by the exoplanet . starspot activity on hd 189733 has the potential to introduce polarimetric modulation with an amplitude of one part in @xmath2 to @xmath55 ( cf . while starspots on hd 189733 appear to share the stellar rotation period , their unknown latitudinal distribution and timescale of stability suggest that their effects may not simply average out over long observing campaigns . however , my data are acceptably explained by a constant polarization model , so polarimetric variability of the hd 189733 system is not statistically significant to the @xmath130 level . + my observations of the transiting hot saturn hd 149026b encompass neither first nor last quarter phases , so i can not constrain the geometric albedo of this exoplanet . i have observed no significant , polarimetric variability of the short period exoplanets hd 189733b and hd 149026b nor of the long period exoplanets hd 175541b and hr 8974b . however , polarimetric variability of the variable control source cygnus x-1 is detected with high confidence . gaussian distribution of nightly measurements shows that no observed target , even the famously variable cygnus x-1 , exhibits significant polarimetric variability during a single night . + high precision , polarimetric monitoring of both transiting and non - transiting , short and long period exoplanets is a new field that is poised for major discoveries . the first detection of exoplanetary optical , scattered light has been made , and it will soon be detected with polarimetry . the atmospheres and accurate masses of close - in exoplanets will be probed . the scattering properties of exoplanet host star atmospheres will be studied from polarized transit observations , which will be valuable to calibrate high precision , photometric observations . the atmosphere of the earth is effectively removed by high precision polarimetry ; therefore , such observations allow ground - based observatories to make important contributions to exoplanetary science that complement the ever - increasing stream of discoveries with space - based observatories . + i would like to thank shrinivas kulkarni and james graham for their support as well as bruce macintosh and lynne hillenbrand for suggestions on this manuscript . i would also like to acknowledge funding from the moore foundation as well as from the center for adaptive optics . this research has made use of the simbad database , operated at cds , strasbourg , france . + _ facilities : _ .
Abstract:

Answer: using the polish instrument , i am unable to reproduce the large - amplitude polarimetric observations of berdyugina et al . ( 2008 ) to the @xmath0 confidence level . i observe no significant polarimetric variability in the hd 189733 system , and the upper limit to variability from the exoplanet is @xmath1 with 99% confidence in the 400 nm to 675 nm wavelength range . berdyugina et al . ( 2008 ) report polarized , scattered light from the atmosphere of the hd 189733b hot jupiter with an amplitude of two parts in @xmath2 . such a large amplitude is over an order of magnitude larger than expected given a geometric albedo similar to other hot jupiters . however , my non - detection of polarimetric variability phase - locked to the orbital period of the exoplanet , and the lack of any significant variability , shows that the polarimetric modulation reported by berdyugina et al . ( 2008 ) can not be due to the exoplanet .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: quantum hall effect ( fqhe ) in multicomponent systems has attracted a lot of attention since the seminal work by halperin @xcite . these components could be the spins of electrons when the zeeman coupling is very small or layer indices in multi - layered system . in particular , spin - polarized bilayer quantum hall ( blqh ) systems at total filling factor @xmath5 have been under enormous experimental @xcite and theoretical @xcite investigations over the last decade . when the interlayer separation @xmath6 is sufficiently large , the bilayer system decouples into two separate compressible @xmath7 layers . however , when @xmath6 is sufficiently small , in the absence of interlayer tunneling , the system undergoes a quantum phase transition into a novel spontaneous interlayer coherent incompressible phase @xcite .    by treating the two layer indices as two pseudo - spin indices , girvin , macdonald and collaborators @xcite mapped the bilayer system into a easy plane quantum ferromagnet ( epqfm ) . they achieved the mapping by projecting the hamiltonian of the blqh onto the lowest landau level ( lll ) and then using subsequent hartree - fock ( hf ) approximation and gradient expansion ( called lll+hf in the following ) . they explored many rich and interesting physical phenomena in this system . the low energy excitations above the ground state is given by an effective @xmath8 dimensional @xmath9 model . in addition to the goldstone mode , there are also 4 flavors of topological defects called `` merons '' which carry fractional charges @xmath10 and also have @xmath11 vorticity . they have logarithmic divergent self energies and are bound into pairs at low temperature . the lowest energy excitations carry charge @xmath12 which are a meron pair with opposite vorticity and the same charge . there is a finite temperature kosterlize - thouless ( kt ) phase transition at @xmath13 where bound states of the 4 flavors of merons are broken into free merons . unfortunately , this transition has not been observed so far . the epqfm approach is a microscopic one which takes care of lll projection from the very beginning . however , the charge sector was explicitly projected out , the connection and coupling between the charge sector which displays fractional quantum hall effect and the spin sector which displays interlayer phase coherence was not obvious in the epqfm approach .    in @xcite , i used and extended both mutual composite fermion ( mcf ) and composite boson ( cb ) approaches to study both balanced and imbalanced blqh and made critical comparisons between the two approaches . i identified several serious problems with the mcf approach and then developed a simple cb approach which naturally avoids all these problems suffered in the mcf approach . i found the cb approach is superior to mcf approach in the blqh with broken symmetry . the functional form of the spin sector of the cb theory is the same as the epqfm . it also has the advantage to treat charged excitations and the collective order parameter fluctuations in the pseudo - spin sector on the same footing , therefore can spell out the spin - charge connections explicitly . from this spin - charge connection , we are able to classify all the possible excitations in the blqh in a systematic way . the cb theory may also be applied to study the incoherent disordered insulating side and the quantum phase transitions between different ground states @xcite . using the cb approach , i also studied several interesting phenomena specific to im - balanced blqh . just like any chern - simon theory , the cb theory in blqh has its own limitations : it is hard to incorporate the lll projection ( see however @xcite ) , some parameters can only be taken as phenomilogical parameters to be fitted into the microscopic lll+hf calculations or experimental data . it is an effective low energy theory , so special care is needed to capture some physics at microscopic length scales    in this paper , we use both mcf approach and the cb approach developed in @xcite to study spin polarized trilayer quantum hall ( tlqh ) systems at total filling factor @xmath14 . we also supplement the two approaches by wavefunction approach . tlqh is interesting from both experimental and theoretical sides . on the experimental side , tlqh systems have been fabricated in high mobility electron systems in the experimental group led by shayegan @xcite . on the theory side , because the three layers play the roles of three flavors . the excitons in blqh is the pairing of particle in one layer and the hole in the other . this pairing structure in blqh is similar to the cooper pairing in bcs superconductors up to a particle - hole transformation . while the excitons in tlqh is not obvious , because so far there is no analog of three flavors superconductors yet . it would be interesting to understand the structures of the excitons and all the possible excitations in tlqh . as shown in this paper , due to the particular structure pattern of the excitons , there are two _ coupled _ goldstone modes in the tlqh ( see eqn.[tun3 ] ) . in the presence of interlayer tunnelings ( with or without in - plane magnetic field ) , the interference between the two gapless modes may also lead to many new phenomena which can not be seen in blqh . there are at least two well defined regimes for tlqh . ( i ) interlayer coherent regime : when the distance @xmath6 bewteen the two adjcent layers is sufficiently small , then all the three layers are strongly correlated . ( ii ) weakly - coupled regime : when @xmath6 is sufficiently large , then all the three layers are are weakly coupled . depending on the distance @xmath6 , there could be many other possible regimes . in this paper , we focus on regime ( i ) which is the interlayer coherent regime . the system in the interlayer coherent regime ( i ) was discussed in @xcite in lll+ hf approach , two goldstone modes are found . here , we study the regime ( i ) in detail from both mcf and cb approaches and also stress the broken symmetry state in terms of @xmath4 algebra . consider a tri - layer system with @xmath15 electrons in layer 1 ( the bottom layer ) , layer 2 ( the middle layer ) and layer 3 ( the top layer ) respectively in the presence of magnetic field @xmath16 . we assume equal interlayer distance @xmath6 between adjacent layers , the total filling factor is @xmath5 and the spin is completely polarized . the hamiltonian @xmath17 is @xmath18 where electrons have bare mass @xmath19 and carry charge @xmath20 ; @xmath21 are electron operators and normal ordered electron densities on the three layers . the intralayer interactions are @xmath22 , while interlayer interaction is @xmath23 where @xmath24 is the dielectric constant . the rest of the paper is organized as follows . in section ii , we discuss mcf approach to tlqh and point out its weakness . in section iii , we discuss cb approach and derive an effective action involving the charge and the two goldstone modes . we also derive a dual action of the cb approach and make critical comparisons between this dual action and the mcf action . we classify all the possible excitations and discuss possible 2-body and 3-body bound states and associated kosterlize - thouless transitions . in section iv , we will outline several salient features of correlated interlayer tunnelings with or without in - plane magnetic field in tlqh . we reach conclusions in the final section . at appropriate places in the paper , we point out the limitations of the cb approach . we can extend the single - valued singular gauge transformation in @xcite to tri - layer system : @xmath25 where the @xmath26 symmetric matrix @xmath27 and its inverse is given by : @xmath28    the hamiltonian eqn.[first ] is transformed into : @xmath29 where the transformed fermion @xmath30 is given by : @xmath31 \rho_{\beta } ( \vec{x}^{\prime } ) } c_{\alpha}(\vec{x})\ ] ] and the three chern - simon ( cs ) gauge fields @xmath32 in eqn.[second ] satisfies : @xmath33   $ ] where @xmath34 is the total density of the system .    in the following , we put @xmath35 . at total filling factor @xmath0 , @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the total average electron density . by absorbing the average values of cs gauge fields @xmath38 into the external gauge potential @xmath39 , we have : @xmath40 where @xmath41 and @xmath42 $ ] are the deviations from the corresponding average density .    when @xmath43 , the strong intra- and inter - layer interactions renormalize the bare mass into two different effective masses @xmath44 @xcite . mcf in each layer feel effective magnetic field @xmath45 , therefore fill exactly one mcf landau level . the energy gaps are simply the cyclotron gaps of the mcf landau levels @xmath46 . adding three different source gauge potentials @xmath47 to the three layers in eqn.[original ] , integrating out the mcf @xmath48 first , then the mutual cs gauge fields , we can calculate the resistivity tensor by kubo formula . we find that both hall resistivity and two hall drag resistivities are @xmath1 . this means if one drives current in one layer , the hall resistivities in all the three layers are quantized at @xmath1 , while the longitudinal resistivities in all the three layers vanish . this is the hallmark of interlayer coherent quantum hall states .    in the following , we confine to balanced case @xmath49 , imbalanced case can be discussed along the similar line developed in @xcite . let s look at the charge of quasi - particles created by mcf field operators @xmath50 . if we insert one electron at one of the layers , say layer 1 , from the singular gauge transformation in eqn.[sing ] , we can see this is equivalent to insert one mcf in layer 1 , at the same time , insert one flux quantum at layer 2 and another one at layer 3 directly above the position where we inserted the electron . the inserted flux quantum at layer 2 and layer 3 are in the opposite direction to the external magnetic field , therefore promote one mcf in layer 2 and one in layer 3 to the second mcf landau level in layer 2 and layer 3 respectively . because inserting one electron leads to three mcfs in each layer , we conclude the charge of each mcf is -1/3 . the above argument gives the correct _ total _ fractional charges of mcf , but it can not determine the _ relative _ charge distributions among the three layers . at mean field level , the energies of all the possible relative charge differences are degenerate . the lowest energy configuration can only be determined by fluctuations . @xmath51 can be expressed in terms of the cs gauge fields @xmath52_{\alpha \beta }     \frac { \delta \vec { a } _ { \beta } } { 2 \pi } $ ] where @xmath53 is given in eqn.[inv ] . this constraint can be imposed by lagrangian multipliers @xmath54 which plays the role of time components of cs gauge fields . integrating out mcf @xmath55 to one - loop and carefully expanding the interlayer coulomb interaction to the necessary order in the long - wavelength limit leads to an effective action for the three gauge fields . @xmath56 ( a^{t}_{c } ) ^{2 }                           \nonumber   \\           & +   & \frac { \epsilon_{l } } { 4 }   q^{2 } ( a^{0}_{l } ) ^{2 }            + \frac{1}{4 } [ \epsilon_{l } \omega^{2 } + ( \chi_{l } +            \frac { d } { \pi } ) q^{2 } ] ( a^{t}_{l } ) ^{2 }                           \nonumber   \\           & +   & \frac { \epsilon_{r } } { 12 }   q^{2 } ( a^{0}_{r } ) ^{2 }            + \frac{1}{12 } [ \epsilon_{r } \omega^{2 } +        ( \chi_{r } + \frac { d } { 3 \pi } ) q^{2 } ] ( a^{t}_{r } ) ^{2 }                           \nonumber   \\           & +   & \frac { \delta \epsilon } { 9 } q^{2 }   a^{0}_{c } a^{0}_{r }             + \frac{1}{9 } [ \delta \epsilon \omega^{2 } + ( \delta \chi                + \frac{d}{4 \pi } ) q^{2 } ] a^{t}_{c } a^{t}_{r } + \cdots   \label{ngm}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath57 which stand for center of mass , left and right channels respectively @xcite . @xmath58 . the dielectric constants @xmath59 and the susceptibilities @xmath60 were calculated in single layer system in @xcite . @xmath61 are higher gradient terms and @xmath62 is the transverse component of gauge fields in coulomb gauge @xmath63 . the system is invariant under the @xmath64 symmetry which exchanges layer 1 and 3 , namely @xmath65 . this symmetry dictates that only @xmath66 can appear in the maxwell terms . the last two terms in eqn . [ ngm ] which is the coupling between @xmath67 and @xmath68 can be shown to be irrelevant in the low energy limit . more intuitive choices are @xmath69 which is related to @xmath70 by @xmath71 . but @xmath72 and @xmath73 are coupled , the two normal modes are @xmath70 instead of @xmath74 . as expected , there is a chern - simon term for the center of mass gauge field @xmath75 , while there are two maxwell terms for the left and right channel gauge fields @xmath76 which are gapless . the two gapless modes stand for the relative charge density fluctuations among the three layers . after putting back @xmath77 , we find the two spin - wave velocities in terms of experimentally measurable parameters : @xmath78 where we set @xmath79 and @xmath80 is the total density , @xmath81 is the magnetic length , @xmath82 is the ratio of the two effective masses @xmath83 and @xmath84 is the fine structure constant .    as in blqh @xcite , we expect the second term dominates the first , then @xmath85 . namely , the ratio of the two velocities is determined by the ratio of the two effective masses . if we take the effective masses to be the band mass , then @xmath86 .    as discussed in the previous paragraph , the mcf carries charge @xmath87 , but their relative charge distributions among the three layers are undetermined . they can be characterized by their @xmath88 charges @xmath89 with @xmath90 . exchanging @xmath67 leads to @xmath91 interaction between two mcf , while exchanging @xmath70 leads to logarithmic interactions which may lead to a 2-body bound state between two mcf with opposite @xmath92 . the energy of this bound state with length @xmath93 is @xmath94 where @xmath95 are the core energies of qh and qp respectively . there are also possible 3-body bound states of three mcf with @xmath96 . unfortunately , the gluing conditions ( or selection rules ) of @xmath97 for realizable physical excitations are not clear . this charge @xmath98 and two spin @xmath92 connections can only be easily established from cb approach presented in the next section . so we defer the discussion on the classification of all the possible excitations to the next section . all the criticisms on mcf approach to blqh also hold to tlqh . in the following , we list just ones which are the most relevant to this paper . \(a ) it is easy to see that the spin wave dispersion in eqn.[v ] remains linear @xmath99 even in the @xmath100 limit . this contradicts with the well established fact that in the @xmath100 limit , the linear dispersion relation will be replaced by quadratic @xmath4 ferromagnetic spin - wave dispersion relation @xmath101 due to the enlarged @xmath4 symmetry at @xmath100 . \(b ) the broken symmetry in the ground state is not obvious without resorting to the @xmath102 wavefunction eqn.[ground ] . the origin of the gapless mode is not clear . \(c ) the physical meaning of @xmath103 is not clear . that they have to be integers was put in by hand in an ad hoc way . \(d ) the spin - charge connections in @xmath104 can not be extracted . \(e ) even in the balanced case , there are two mcf cyclotron gaps @xmath105 at mean field theory . however , there is only one charge gap in the system . it is not known how to reconcile this discrepancy within mcf approach . \(f ) in the presence of interlayer tunneling , it is not known how to derive the tunneling term in a straightforward way ( see section iv ) .    in the following , we will show that the alternative cb approach not only achieve all the results , but also can get rid of all these drawbacks . composite boson approach was found to be much more effective than the mcf approach in blqh . we expect it remains true in tlqh . in this section , we apply cb approach to study tlqh and find that it indeed avoids all the problems suffered in mcf approach listed in the last section . instead of integrating out the charge degree of freedoms which was done in the previous cb approach , we keep one charge sector and two spin sectors on the same footing and explicitly stress the spin and charge connections . we classify all the possible excitations , bound states and associated kt transitions .    by defining the center of mass , left and right channels densities as : @xmath106 we can rewrite @xmath107 in eqn.[first ] as : @xmath108 where @xmath109 and @xmath110 . the stability of the system dictates @xmath111 . in the long wavelength limit @xmath112 , we only keep the leading terms : @xmath113 .    performing a singular gauge transformation : @xmath114 where @xmath115 is the total density of the tri - layer system .    after absorbing the external gauge potential @xmath116 into the chern - simon gauge potential @xmath117 , we can transform the hamiltonian eqn.[first ] into the lagrangian in the coulomb gauge : @xmath118    in the coulomb gauge , integrating out @xmath119 leads to the constraint : @xmath120 . it can be shown that @xmath121 satisfies all the boson commutation relations . we write the three bosons in terms of magnitude and phase @xmath122 the boson commutation relations imply that @xmath123 =       i \hbar \delta_{ab } \delta ( \vec{x}-\vec{x}^{\prime } ) $ ] . for simplicity , in this paper , we only consider the balanced case , so we set @xmath124 . the imbalanced case can be discussed along similar lines developed in @xcite . we define the center of mass , left - moving and right - moving angles which are conjugate angle variables to the three densities defined in eqn.[3d ] @xmath125 which satisfy the commutation relations @xmath126 =      a_{\alpha } i \hbar \delta_{\alpha \beta } \delta ( \vec{x}-\vec{x}^{\prime } ) $ ] where @xmath127 for @xmath128 .    substituting eqn[mag ] into eqn.[boson ] , neglecting the magnitude fluctuations in the spatial gradient term which were shown to be irrelevant in blqh in @xcite and rewriting the spatial gradient term in terms of the three angles in eqn.[an ] , we find : @xmath129^{2 }       +   \frac{1}{2 } \delta \rho_{c } v_{c } ( \vec{q } )   \delta \rho_{c }                         \nonumber    \\      & + & \frac{i}{2 } \delta \rho_{l }   \partial_{\tau } \theta_{l } +             \frac { \bar{\rho } } { 12 m } ( \nabla \theta_{l } ) ^{2 }            + \frac{1}{2 } \delta \rho_{l } v_{l } ( \vec{q } )   \delta \rho_{l }                        \nonumber   \\      & + & \frac{i}{6 } \delta \rho_{r }   \partial_{\tau } \theta_{r } +             \frac { \bar{\rho } } { 36 m } ( \nabla \theta_{r } ) ^{2 }            + \frac{1}{2 } \delta \rho_{r } v_{r } ( \vec{q } )   \delta \rho_{r }                          \nonumber   \\            & + & \delta \rho_{c } v_{cr } ( \vec{q } )   \delta \rho_{r }            - \frac { i } { 2 \pi } a_{0 } ( \nabla \times \vec{a } )   \label{main}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    in the balanced case , the symmetry is @xmath130 where the first is a local gauge symmetry , the second and the third are global symmetries and the global @xmath64 symmetry is the exchange symmetry between layer 1 and layer 3 .    _ ( a ) off - diagonal algebraic order in the charge sector : _    at temperatures much lower than the vortex excitation energy , we can neglect vortex configurations in eqn.[main ] and only consider the low energy spin - wave excitation . the charge sector ( @xmath131 mode ) and the two spin sectors ( @xmath132 modes ) are essentially decoupled . it can be shown that the second to the last term @xmath133 in eqn.[main ] which is the coupling between the charge sector and right - moving sector is irrelevant in the long wave - length limit . therefore , the charge sector is essentially the same as the csgl action in blqh . using the constraint @xmath134 , neglecting vortex excitations in the ground state and integrating out @xmath135 leads to the effective action of @xmath131 : @xmath136 \theta_{c } ( \vec{q } ,   \omega ) \label{cy}\ ] ] where @xmath137 and @xmath138 is the cyclotron frequency .    from eqn.[cy ] , we can find the equal time correlator of @xmath131 : @xmath139 which leads to the algebraic order : @xmath140    we could define @xmath141 , then the exponent will be @xmath87 . but when we consider topological vortex excitations , then @xmath142 may not be single valued . therefore , @xmath131 is more fundamental than @xmath143 . _ ( b ) spin wave excitations : _    while in the spin sector , there are two neutral gapless modes : left - moving mode and right - moving mode @xcite . integrating out @xmath144 leads to @xmath145 where the dispersion relation of spin wave can be extracted : @xmath146 q^{2 } = v^{2}_{l }   q^{2}\ ] ] in the long wave - length limit @xmath147 , the bare spin wave velocity is : @xmath148    integrating out @xmath149 leads to @xmath150 where the dispersion relation of spin wave can be extracted : @xmath151 q^{2 } = v^{2}_{r }   q^{2 } \label{r2}\ ] ] in the long wave - length limit @xmath147 , the bare spin wave velocity is : @xmath152    both spin wave velocities should increase as the square root of the separation @xmath6 when @xmath43 , their ratio @xmath86 . at @xmath153 , @xmath154 . this is expected , because at @xmath153 the @xmath155 symmetry is enlarged to @xmath156 , the spin wave of @xmath157 isotropic ferromagnet @xmath158 . we have also treated the coupling term between the charge and right - moving sector @xmath159 in eqn.[main ] exactly and found that in the @xmath160 limit , the mixed propagator takes the form : @xmath161 which is dictated by @xmath162 instead of @xmath163 . because of the @xmath164 prefactor , we can ignore @xmath165 in the low energy limit . we also found that eqns.[cy ] , [ eq ] , [ exp ] and eqns.[r1],[r2],[vr ] remain true in the long - wavelength and low energy limit , therefore confirm that @xmath133 is indeed irrelevant in the limit . as shown in blqh in @xcite , the functional form of the spin sector in the cb theory is the same as epqfm . although there are no detailed microscopic calculations in tlqh yet except the preliminary work in @xcite , from the insights gained in blqh , we can claim that the functional form of the spin sector in eqn.[main ] ( or eqn.[tun3 ] ) achieved in the cb theory is correct . again , it is hard to incorporate the lll projection in this cb approach , so some parameters can not be evaluated within this approach . for example , the two spin stiffnesses for the left and right - moving sectors in eqn.[main ] ( or or eqn.[tun3 ] ) should be completely determined by the coulomb interactions instead of being dependent of the band mass , they may be estimated by the microscopic lll+ hf approach . however , the ratio of the two velocities in eqn.[vr ] is independent of the band mass , it is interesting to see if this ratio @xmath2 remains correct in the microscopic lll+hf estimation . just like in blqh , we can simply take @xmath166 and @xmath167 in eqn.[main ] as phenomilogical parameters to be fitted into the lll + hf estimations . however , just like in blqh @xcite , because the qualitative correct ground state wavefunction in tlqh is still unknown , it is still difficult to estimate these parameters with controlled accuracy even in the lll+hf approach . we can simply fit these parameters into experimental data .    _ ( c ) dual action : _    just like in blqh discussed in @xcite , we can perform a duality transformation on eqn.[main ] to obtain a dual action in terms of three vortex currents @xmath168 and three dual gauge fields @xmath169 : @xmath170 where the three source gauge fields are @xmath171 . we can compare this dual action derived from cb approach with eqn.[ngm ] derived in mcf approach . just like in blqh , the three topological vortex currents are missing in eqn.[ngm ] , while @xmath172 terms are extra spurious terms which break @xmath4 symmetry even in the @xmath100 limit . if we drop all the @xmath173 terms , use bare mass and add the three vortex currents terms in eqn.[ngm ] , the resulting effective action will be identical to the dual action eqn.[dual ] . neglecting the vortex currents , we can identify the two spin wave velocities easily from the dual action which are the same as found previously from eqn.[main ] . it is also easy to show that the last term in eqn.[dual ] which is the coupling between the charge and right - moving sector is irrelevant in the low energy limit . we conclude that eqns.[main ] and its dual action eqn . [ dual ] are the correct and complete effective actions .    _ ( d ) topological excitations : _ any topological excitations are characterized by three winding numbers @xmath174 , or equivalently , @xmath175 . it is important to stress that the three fundamental angles are @xmath176 instead of @xmath177 . therefore , @xmath178 are three independent integers , while @xmath179 are not .    there are following 6 kinds of fundamental topological excitations : @xmath180 or @xmath181 or @xmath182 , namely @xmath183 . they correspond to inserting one flux quantum in layer 1 or 2 or 3 in the same or opposite direction as the external magnetic field . let s classify the topological excitations in terms of @xmath184 where @xmath185 is the fractional charge of the topological excitations in the following table . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     the fractional charges in the table were determined from the constraint @xmath186 and the finiteness of the energy in the charge sector : @xmath187    there are the following two possible bound states :    \(1 ) three charge neutral two - body bound states :    * layer 1 : @xmath188 with energy @xmath189 when @xmath190 . * layer 2 : @xmath191 with energy @xmath192 . * layer 3 : @xmath193 with energy @xmath194 which is dictated by @xmath64 symmetry . the corresponding 2-body kosterlize - thouless ( kt ) transitions are @xmath195 which is dictated by @xmath64 symmetry and @xmath196 above which the qp and qh pairs are liberated into free ones . if setting @xmath197 , then there is only one 2-body kt temperature @xmath198 . as explained previously , microscopic calculations in the lll @xcite are needed to estimate the two spin stiffnesses @xmath199 and @xmath200 . in general , there should be two 2-body kt transition temperatures @xmath201 . the spin wave excitations will turn into these charge neutral two - body bound states at large wavevector ( or short distance ) . the two - body bound state behaves as a boson . \(1 ) two charge @xmath202 three - body bound states :    the three - body bound states consists of three quasi - particles @xmath203 located at the three corners of a triangle ( fig.1 ) . the lowest energy charged excitation is a three - body bound state of three @xmath204 charged quasi - particles sitting on the three corners of a triangle with @xmath205 dictated by the @xmath64 symmetry . the three quantum numbers @xmath206 are enclosed in the parenthesis    its energy @xmath207   $ ] when @xmath190 . minimizing @xmath208 with respect to @xmath209 leads to two optimal separations : @xmath210 which is dictated by the @xmath64 symmetry and @xmath211 . if setting @xmath197 , then the three quasi - particles are located on the corners of a isosceles with length @xmath212 , the corresponding 3-body kosterlize - thouless ( kt ) transition is the same as the two - body bound state @xmath213 . these charged excitations behave as fermions and are the main sources of dissipations in transport experiments . in general , @xmath214 should be different from the two 2-body kt transition temperatures . again , microscopic calculations of the two spin stiffnesses @xmath199 and @xmath200 in the lll @xcite are needed to determine the three kt transition temperatures . let s look at the interesting possibility of deconfined ( or free ) @xmath215 charged excitations . because any excitations with non - vanishing @xmath216 or @xmath217 will be confined , so any deconfined excitations must have @xmath218 which implies @xmath219 and @xmath220 . eqn.[charge ] implies the charge @xmath221 must be an integer . this proof rigorously rules out the possibility of the existence of deconfined fractional charges . we conclude that _ any deconfined charge must have an integral charge_. @xmath222 corresponds to inserting one flux quantum through all the three layers which is conventional charge 1 excitation . splitting the whole flux quantum into three fluxes penetrating the three layers at three different positions will turn into the three - body bound state with the same charge shown in fig.1 . it is still not known if the energy of this conventional charge @xmath223 excitation is lower than the three body bound state . the broken symmetry and associated goldstone modes can be easily seen from wavefunction approach . in the first quantization , in the @xmath100 limit , the ground state trial wavefunction is the @xmath102 state : @xmath224 where @xmath225 are the coordinates in layer 1 , 2 and 3 respectively .    in the second quantization , a trial wavefunction was written in @xcite : @xmath226 where @xmath227 and @xmath228 is the angular momentum quantum number corresponding to the edge . we can interpret @xmath229 mode in eqn.[2nd ] as a `` up '' pairing between an electron in layer 1 and a hole in layer 2 which leads to a @xmath229 molecule , similarly , @xmath230 mode as a `` down '' pairing between an electron in layer 3 and a hole in layer 2 which leads to a @xmath231 molecule ( fig . 2 ) .     two pairing modes of tlqh . solid dots are electrons , open dots are holes . note that when @xmath232 , @xmath233 is the ground state @xmath234 , it can be shown @xcite that its projection on @xmath235 sector is @xmath102 wavefunction in eqn.[ground ] . note that eqn.[ground ] is correct only in @xmath100 limit where the symmetry is enlarged to @xmath4 . in the @xmath4 symmetric case , the pairing between any two layers of the three layers is equally likely . however , at any finite @xmath6 , eqn.[ground ] and eqn.[2nd ] may even not be qualitatively correct @xcite , because the @xmath4 symmetry is reduced to @xmath236 symmetry ( where the three @xmath237 symmetry correspond to @xmath238 ) the pairings between any two layers out of the three layers are not equivalent any more . the two lowest energy pairing modes are shown in fig . @xmath4 has @xmath239 generators which can be written in terms of @xmath240 : @xmath241 where @xmath242 are the two ( left and right ) generators in cartan subalgebra ( note that the algebra is _ not _ @xmath243 in spin @xmath244 representation which is also 3 dimensional as used in @xcite ) . in the balanced case @xmath245 , we have @xmath246 . the ground state in eqn.[ground ] _ breaks _ two of the three @xmath237 symmetries , therefore there are two goldstone modes in the corresponding two order parameters @xmath247 . when @xmath229 molecule and @xmath231 molecule in fig.2 move in the opposite direction , the currents in layer 2 cancel each other , it leads to the left - moving superfluid channel @xmath248 ( fig . 3a ) . while when @xmath229 molecule and @xmath231 molecule move in the same direction , the currents in layer 2 add and flow in the opposite direction to the currents in layer 1 and layer 3 , it leads to the right - moving superfluid channel @xmath249 ( fig . 3b ) . in blqh , there is only one superfluid channel which is the counter - flow channel @xcite . in tlqh , there are two superfluid channels which are left - moving and right - moving channels , the left - moving channel corresponds to the counter - flow channel @xcite . obviously , it is easier to perform transport experiments in the counter - flow channel than in the right - moving channel . ( 3a ) left - moving superfluid channel which is the counter - flow channel ( 3b ) right - moving superfluid channel @xcite so far , we assume that the tunnelings are tuned to be zero . in this section , we will outline several salient features in the tunnelings of tlqh . we assume the tunneling amplitude from layer 1 to layer 2 is the same as that of from layer 2 to layer 3 . the tunneling term is : @xmath250 where @xmath251    integrating out the gapped charge sector @xmath131 leads to the effective tunneling action : @xmath252 + \frac { 1 } { 2 } [ \chi_{r } ( \partial_{\tau } \theta_{r } ) ^{2 } +        \rho_{sr } (   \nabla \theta_{r } ) ^{2 } ]    \nonumber   \\       & + & 2 t \bar{\rho } \cos \frac { \theta_{l } } { 2 } \cos \frac { \theta_{r } } { 2 } \label{dep}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , as noted previously , the two spin susceptibilities @xmath253 and the two spin - stiffnesses @xmath254 are phenomilogical parameters to be fitted into the lll+hf calculations or experimental data .    unfortunately , the above action is not very useful for any practical calculations , because the two angles @xmath255 are not independent angles when considering the vortex excitations . we can see this fact by noting that @xmath256 or @xmath257 has to be twice an angle which is a constraint between @xmath258 and @xmath229 . while @xmath229 and @xmath231 are two independent angles . so it is much more useful to write the above tunneling action in terms of the two independent angles @xmath259 : @xmath260 where there is a @xmath64 symmetry under @xmath261 . the tunneling currents in three layers can be expressed in terms of the two independent angles : @xmath262 . they satisfy the current conservation @xmath263 .    from eqn.[tun3 ] , we can see there is a coupling between @xmath264 and @xmath265 . if there were not this coupling , we would have two independent blqh tunneling actions . it is this coupling which lead to the _ correlated _ tunnelings of tlqh . for example , the current out of layer 1 @xmath266 only depends on @xmath229 explicitly , while @xmath229 couples to @xmath231 . it was shown that the single gapless mode in blqh leads to a sharp zero - bias peak in the interlayer tunneling of blqh , the experimentally observed dissipations can only come from external sources such as disorder @xcite . if the coupling in tlqh even in the absence of external sources will lead to a broad zero - bias tunneling peak in tlqh will be investigated in @xcite .    in the presence of in - plane magnetic field @xmath267 , the gauge invariance dictates the tunneling term : @xmath268 where @xmath269 .    in blqh , it was found that the in - plane field will split the zero - bias peak , the splitting gives a direct measurement of the spin - wave velocity of the single goldstone mode in blqh @xcite . however , in tlqh , there are two coupled goldstone modes with two different velocities @xmath270 . in @xcite , we will study how the zero - bias peak shifts and how to relate the shift to the two spin wave velocities or their ratio in the presence of in - plane magnetic field . we can also see that if there were not the coupling between @xmath264 and @xmath265 , we would have two independent pokrovsky - talapov ( pt ) models . in blqh which is described by a single pt model , it was found that when the applied in - plane magnetic field is larger than a critical field @xmath271 , there is a phase transition from a commensurate state to an incommensurate state ( c - ic ) with broken translational symmetry . when @xmath271 , there is a finite temperature kt transition which restores the translation symmetry by means of dislocations in the domain wall structure in the incommensurate phase @xcite . in tlqh which is described by the above two coupled pt model @xcite , several kinds of c - ic transitions and associated several kinds of kt transitions are expected and will be studied in a separate publication @xcite . in this paper , we study the interlayer coherent incompressible phase in spin polarized trilayer quantum hall systems at total filling factor @xmath0 from three approaches : mcf , cb and wavefunction approach . just like in tlqh , cb approach is superior than mcf approach . the hall and hall drag resistivities are found to be quantized at @xmath1 . two neutral gapless modes which are left and right moving modes with linear dispersion relations @xmath272 are identified and the ratio of the two velocities is close to @xmath2 . the novel excitation spectra are classified into two classes : ( 1 ) charge neutral bosonic two - body bound states . ( 3 ) charge @xmath3 fermionic three - body bound states . in general , there are two 2-body kt transition temperatures and one 3-body kt transition temperature . microscopic calculations in the lll @xcite are needed to roughly estimate the three kt transition temperatures . the charge @xmath3 three - body bound states shown in fig . 1 may be the main dissipation source of the interlayer tunneling . the broken symmetry in terms of @xmath4 algebra is studied . the effective action of the two coupled goldstone modes are derived . the excitonic structure in tlqh was shown in fig . 2 . in blqh , there is only one superfluid channel which is the counter - flow channel @xcite . in tlqh , there are two superfluid channels which are left - moving and right - moving channels ( fig.3 ) , the left - moving channel corresponds to the counter - flow channel ( fig . 3a ) . obviously , it is easier to perform transport experiments in the counter - flow channel than in the right - moving channel . in the presence of interlayer tunnelings , the coupling between the two goldstone modes may lead to the broadening of the zero - bias tunneling peak , in contrast to the zero - bias peak in blqh . the precise nature of the broadening and several other possible new phenomena unique to the tlqh in the presence of in - plane magnetic field will be studied in a forthcoming publication . we expect that the effective action of the two coupled goldstone modes and the qualitative physical pictures of tlqh achieved from cb approach in this paper are correct . however , the parameters in the effective action need to be estimated from microscopic calculations in the lll @xcite . it is interesting to see if the ratio @xmath273 still holds in the microscopic calculations . as stressed in @xcite for blqh , the trial wavefunction eqn.[ground ] and eqn.[2nd ] may not even be qualitatively correct in tlqh , so it is still difficult to estimate the ratio with controlled accuracy even in the lll+hf approach . eventually , the ratio need to be measured by experiments .
Abstract:

Answer: we study the interlayer coherent incompressible phase in trilayer quantum hall systems ( tlqh ) at total filling factor @xmath0 from three approaches : mutual composite fermion ( mcf ) , composite boson ( cb ) and wavefunction approach . just like in bilayer quantum hall system , cb approach is superior than mcf approach in studying tlqh with broken symmetry . the hall and hall drag resistivities are found to be quantized at @xmath1 . two neutral gapless modes with linear dispersion relations are identified and the ratio of the two velocities is close to @xmath2 . the novel excitation spectra are classified into two classes : charge neutral bosonic 2-body bound states and charge @xmath3 fermionic 3-body bound states . in general , there are two 2-body kosterlize - thouless ( kt ) transition temperatures and one 3-body kt transition . the charge @xmath3 3-body fermionic bound states may be the main dissipation source of transport measurements . the broken symmetry in terms of @xmath4 algebra is studied . the structure of excitons and their flowing patterns are given . the coupling between the two goldstone modes may lead to the broadening in the zero - bias peak in the interlayer correlated tunnelings of the tlqh . several interesting features unique to tlqh are outlined . limitations of the cb approach are also pointed out .    2