Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: since the discovery of superconductivity in the copper oxide ceramics ( cuprates )  @xcite , both theoretical and experimental efforts have been made to investigate the physical mechanism responsible for superconductivity with an unprecedented high transition temperature @xmath0 ( for recent reviews see refs . @xcite ) . despite this , an understanding of the superconducting pairing of the high - temperature superconductors is still lacking . + very soon after the discovery of the high temperature superconductors , it was realized  @xcite that superconductivity were intimately related to the square planar @xmath1 lattice . moreover , the physics of the @xmath1 planes were well described by the nearly half - filled hubbard model with moderately on - site coulomb repulsion . + the microscopic model for the description of electrons in the @xmath1 layers is believed to be the effective single - band hubbard model :   @xmath2 \ , + \ , u    \ ,   \sum_{i }    \hat{n}_{i,\uparrow }   \ , \hat{n}_{i,\downarrow }   \ ; \ ; , \ ; \ ;    \hat{n}_{i,\sigma } \ , = \ ,   \hat{c}^{\dagger}_{i,\sigma }   \ , \hat{c}_{i,\sigma }   \ ; , % \ ] ] where @xmath3 and @xmath4 are creation and annihilation operators for electrons with spin @xmath5 , @xmath6 is the onsite coulomb repulsion for electrons of opposite spin at the same atomic orbital , and @xmath7 is the hopping parameter . as is well known  @xcite , the superexchange mechanism yields a heisenberg antiferromagnetic exchange interaction with @xmath8 between spins on the @xmath9 atoms . since @xmath10 , at half - filling the onsite coulomb repulsion gives an insulator where the electron spins are antiferromagnetically ordered . + the phase diagram resulting from tuning the doping of @xmath1 planes with holes is shown schematically in fig . [ fig-1 ] . at half - filling , corresponding to @xmath11 , we have a mott insulator with long range antiferromagnetic order which disappears for temperatures above the critical nel temperature @xmath12 ( not shown in fig .  [ fig-1 ] ) . schematic phase diagram of hole - doped cuprate high - temperature superconductors . carrier concentrations @xmath13 near to the maximum critical temperature @xmath14 locate the optimal doped region . regions with lower and larger hole concentration are called underdoped and overdoped , respectively . the temperature @xmath15 is the pseudogap temperature . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    by adding holes into the @xmath1 planes ( @xmath16 ) the long range antiferromagnetic order is rapidly destroyed . superconductivity occurs beyond a minimal hole content @xmath17 where there is no long - range antiferromagnetic order . nevertheless , signs of magnetism persist  @xcite in the hole - doped materials with @xmath18 as local order on a short length scale @xmath19 , as observed in muon spin relaxation  @xcite and neutron scattering  @xcite measurements . + the superconducting critical temperature @xmath0 rises with increasing hole doping through the underdoped region ( @xmath20 ) , reaches a peak at optimal doping @xmath21 , falls away at higher doping @xmath22 ( overdoped region ) , and then vanishes at the maximal doping @xmath23 . this peculiar doping dependence of the critical temperature @xmath0 is a generic feature of the hole - doped copper oxides . another generic feature of the high - temperature cuprate superconductors is the presence of a pseudogap @xmath24 ( @xmath25 being the boltzmann s constant ) in the underdoped region @xmath26 . the pseudogap was first detected in the temperature dependence of the spin - lattice relaxation , knight shift , and magnetic susceptibility studies  . the pseudogap temperature @xmath15 is much larger than the superconducting critical temperature @xmath0 in the underdoped region . moreover , @xmath27 decreases upon increasing the doping and seems to merge with @xmath28 for @xmath21 . in the overdoped region , however , the coexistence of the superconducting gap with the pseudogap is still subject to an intense debate . + the challenge is to find a theory that is rooted in the microscopic physics of the copper oxides which is able to account for the physics of the pseudogap and the superconductivity . one of the problem in constructing a satisfactory microscopic theory of the high - temperature superconductivity is to isolate that part of the interaction which is responsible for both the pseudogap and the superconductivity in cuprates . the purpose of this paper is to present an approach which , according to the spirit of the conventional superconductivity theory of bardeen , cooper , and schrieffer  @xcite ( bcs ) , allows to isolate an effective hamiltonian governing the dynamics of the electrons or holes injected into the undoped copper - oxide planes . we shall assume that the superconductivity originates into the @xmath1 planes , and thereby we shall neglect the motion along the direction perpendicular to the planes . we further assume that electron dynamics in the @xmath1 planes is described by the single - band effective hubbard model with hamiltonian given by eq . ( [ 1.1 ] ) . since the majority of high - temperature cuprate superconductors are hole - doped , we shall focus mainly on hole - doped cuprates . nevertheless , in section  [ 6 ] we briefly discuss also the electron - doped cuprates ( for a recent review , see ref .  @xcite ) . + the plan of the paper is as follows . in sect . [ 2 ] we set up the effective interaction between two holes in an antiferromagnetic background and we discuss the main assumptions of the paper . section  [ 3 ] is devoted to a general discussion of the physical structure of the superconducting ground state . in sect . [ 3 - 1 ] we discuss the real - space d - wave bound states of two holes ; in sect . [ 3 - 2 ] we address the problem of the superconductivity and pseudogap in the underdoped region . in sect . [ 3 - 3 ] we discuss the d - wave bcs ground state and argue that it is relevant in the overdoped region . in sect . [ 3 - 4 ] we present our understanding of the phase diagram of hole - doped cuprates . the physics of the underdoped region is presented in sect . [ 4 ] where we discuss the real - space bound states in an external magnetic field ( sect . [ 4 - 1 ] ) , the upper critical magnetic field ( sect .  [ 4 - 2 ] ) , the vortex region ( sect . [ 4 - 3 ] ) , the physics of fermi arcs and quantum oscillations ( sect . [ 4 - 4 ] ) . section  [ 5 ] is devoted to the discussion of the physics in the overdoped and optimal doped regions together with the crossover between the underdoped region and the overdoped region . in sect . [ 6 ] we briefly address the problem of superconductivity and pseudogap in the electron - doped cuprates . finally , in section  [ 7 ] we summarize the main achievements of the paper and we draw our conclusions in this section we set up our effective hamiltonian for the dynamics of holes in the nearly half - filled single - band hubbard model . as discussed in the introduction , we are assuming that the superconductivity in cuprates is related to the square planar @xmath1 lattice . the single - band hamiltonian is given by eq . ( [ 1.1 ] ) , where @xmath29 denotes a pair of nearest - neighbor sites of a square lattice with lattice constant @xmath30 ( see fig . [ fig-2 ] ) . let @xmath31 be the number of sites of the copper lattice and @xmath32 the number of electrons . in the half filled lattice @xmath33 , i.e. there is exactly one electron per site . in the underfilled case @xmath34 there are holes with doping fraction ( number of holes per site ) : @xmath35 in the subspace of the state space of avoided double occupancies of @xmath9 sites , the one - band hubbard model may be canonically transformed into the so - called @xmath36 hamiltonian : @xmath37 \ , + \ , j    \ ,   \sum_{<i , j > }    \left [   { \vec{s}}_i    \cdot   { \vec{s}}_j   \ ; - \ ; \frac{1}{4 } \ ; \hat{n}_{i }   \ , \hat{n}_{j }   \right ] \ ; \ ; ,   % \ ] ] where @xmath38 and @xmath39 is the spin-@xmath40 operator at site @xmath41 .      the idealized square copper plane with lattice spacing @xmath30 . the dashed ellipses represent two holes in an antiferromagnetic background . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    since at half - filling @xmath42 , the @xmath36 hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.2 ] ) reduces to the square lattice heisenberg hamiltonian : @xmath43 the ground state of the latter hamiltonian is known to be the antiferromagnetic nel state . when the system is doped with holes away from half filling ( @xmath16 ) , the dynamics is no longer described by the heisenberg hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.4 ] ) , but one must use the @xmath36 hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.2 ] ) with the supplementary constraint of no double occupied lattice sites . it is easy to see that the motion of dilute holes in the antiferromagnetic nel background is strongly frustrate . indeed , when a hole hops from one site to its nearest neighbor , a spin is also moved onto one lattice site with the wrong spin orientation with respect to the antiferromagnetic background . on the other hand , a pair of holes with nearest - neighbor distance ( see fig .  [ fig-2 ] ) can move almost freely without destroying the antiferromagnetic background . the effective hamiltonian for the propagation of the holes in the antiferromagnetic background can be written as  @xcite : @xmath44 where @xmath45 , @xmath46 are creation and annihilation operators for holes at the lattice site @xmath47 and the sum over the direction vectors @xmath48 and @xmath49 is restricted to next - nearest neighbor lattice sites . note that in the effective hamiltonian @xmath50 we do not display the spin of the holes since the antiferromagnetic background forces the two holes to have antiparallel spins . in other words , the motion of a hole must not disturb the antiferromagnetic background . moreover , in this antiferromagnetic background approximation , it turns out that there is an effective attractive two - body potential between nearest - neighbor holes  @xcite . however , it has been pointed out  @xcite that the motion of a pair of holes , which naively should be mobile , is frustrated due to fermionic nature of the background spins . indeed , for states with two holes as nearest neighbors in an antiferromagnetic background it is easy to see  @xcite that there are configurations that differ by the exchange of two electrons . the destructive interference of these configurations leads to holes with very large effective mass . this problem can be avoided if we consider pairs of hole with distance much greater than the lattice spacing . accordingly , we shall suppose that two holes with distance @xmath51 , where @xmath52 is the antiferromagnetic local order length scale , are subject to an effective attractive two - body potential . our proposal is quite similar to the spin - bag theory  @xcite where the pairing is due to a local reduction of the antiferromagnetic order ( bag ) shared by two holes . + thus , we are lead to consider the following reduced interaction hamiltonian : @xmath53 the simplest choice for the two - body potential @xmath54 is : @xmath55 where the hard - core at the origin is imposed to avoid configurations where two holes are on the same site . moreover , since we are considering the limit of low carriers , @xmath56 , the hard - core potential does not allow two holes to come too close , thereby implementing the no - double occupation constraint . as concern the range of our potential @xmath57 , it is natural to choice @xmath57 of the order of the coherence length @xmath58 . so that we assume : @xmath59 the peculiar dependence on the doping fraction @xmath13 arises as follows . the attractive two - body potential originates from the interaction of two holes in the antiferromagnetic background which extends over a distance of order @xmath52 . since the injected holes tend to destruct the antiferromagnetic order , the area of the antiferromagnetic islands should decrease with increasing @xmath13 . in addition , as discussed in the introduction ( see fig .  [ fig-1 ] ) , the superconducting instability disappears at the maximal doping @xmath60 . the simplest parameterization which takes care of these effects leads to our eq . ( [ 2.8 ] ) . regarding the parameter @xmath61 in eq . ( [ 2.7 ] ) , we have fixed this parameter such that there is at least one real space d - wave bound state . to this end it suffices to assume : @xmath62 in the following we will use the numerical values : @xmath63 that are appropriate for a typical cuprate . note that the resulting nel temperature : @xmath64 is of the order of the observed nel temperatures in cuprates . + before concluding this section , we would like to rewrite the hamiltonian @xmath50 eq . ( [ 2.5 ] ) in the limit of low - lying excitations . observing that @xmath50 can be diagonalized by writing : @xmath65 so that : @xmath66 we get : @xmath67 where : @xmath68 \ ; .\ ] ] we now take the small - k limit : @xmath69 with : @xmath70 so that we may write for the effective hamiltonian : @xmath71 where we make explicit the spin degrees of freedom . using the numerical values of the parameters we obtain : @xmath72 where @xmath73 is the electron mass . to summarize , our effective hamiltonian for low - lying excitations may be described by : @xmath74 with @xmath50 and @xmath75 given by eqs . ( [ 2.18 ] ) and ( [ 2.6 ] ) respectively . it is worthwhile to stress that the arguments developed in this section can not be considered as a truly microscopic derivation of the effective hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.20 ] ) . for later convenience it is useful to think about the wave function of the superconducting ground state within the bcs theory . let @xmath76 be the wavefunction of a cooper pair  @xcite , thus the superconducting ground state may be expressed as an antisymmetrized product of identical pair functions : @xmath77 in which the sum is over all permutations p of the n particles . the expression eq . ( [ 3.1 ] ) may be used to point out the analogies and differences between the superconducting ground state and that of a bose - einstein condensation of pairs  @xcite . indeed , a bose - einstein condensate of pairs would also be given as a product of identical pair wavefunctions . the process of antisymmetrizing would not change the character of the state very much if the size of the pair wavefunction , @xmath78 , were small compared with the average spacing between pairs . in this case , wavefunctions in the sum differing by the exchange of single members of two or more pairs would not overlap very much , and the system would behave qualitatively like a condensed bose - einstein gas . however , antisymmetrization makes a major difference if the size of the pair wavefunction is large compared with the spacing between pairs . in this case , it is convenient to rewrite the superconducting ground - state wavefunction eq . ( [ 3.1 ] ) in the second quantization formalism . to this end , we introduce the creation operator of a pair at rest : @xmath79 then , the wavefunction eq .  ( [ 3.1 ] ) can be written as : @xmath80 where @xmath81 is the vacuum , and @xmath82 is the number of pairs . now , from the identity  @xcite : @xmath83 }   \ ; | 0 >   \ ; , \ ] ] we argue that the state : @xmath84 }   \ ; | 0 > \ ] ] is the superconducting ground state for a system with varying number of particles . obviously , in that case the relevant hamiltonian is @xmath85 , where @xmath86 is the chemical potential . from eq . ( [ 3.2 ] ) we obtain : @xmath87 where : @xmath88 }    \ ;   \varphi(\vec{q } ) \ ; .\ ] ] using eq . ( [ 3.6 ] ) it is easy to find : @xmath89\ ;   |0 >   \ ; , \ ] ] with the normalization factor @xmath90 . indeed , eq . ( [ 3.8 ] ) agrees with the well - known bcs variational ground state : @xmath91\ ;   |0 >   \ ; , \ ] ] with the normalization : @xmath92 as we discuss later on , the superconducting ground - state wave function in the form of eq . ( [ 3.1 ] ) will be of relevance in the underdoped region , while in the overdoped region the bcs variational ground state eq . ( [ 3.9 ] ) would be more appropriate . [ [ 3 - 1 ] ]    we are interested in the problem of two holes in interaction with the effective two - body potential eq . ( [ 2.7 ] ) . the resulting schrdinger equation is : @xmath93 \ ; \phi ( \vec{r}_1   - \vec{r}_2 ) = \ ; e \ ;    \phi ( \vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2 )     \ ; .\ ] ] according to the reduced interaction hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.6 ] ) the holes have antiparallel spins , so that the wavefunction @xmath94 must be symmetric under hole interchange . introducing : we rewrite eq . ( [ 3.11 ] ) as : @xmath96 \ ; \phi ( \vec{r } ,     \vec{r } ) = \ ; e \ ;    \phi ( \vec{r } ,   \vec{r } )     \ ; , \ ] ] whereupon : @xmath97 @xmath98 @xmath99 \ ; \varphi ( \vec{r }   ) = - \ ; \delta   \ ;    \varphi ( \vec{r }   )     \ ; .\ ] ] without loss in generality , we may assume that the center of mass of the pair is at rest , @xmath100 . since the potential is central we may adopt polar coordinates . we have : @xmath101 inserting into eq . ( [ 3.16 ] ) and using eq .  ( [ 2.7 ] ) we get : @xmath102 @xmath103 \ ;    \varphi_m ( r )   =   \ ;   0     \ ; \ ;   , \ ; \ ;   0 \ ; < \ ; r \ ; < \ ; r_0(\delta ) \ ; , \ ] ] @xmath104 \ ;    \varphi_m ( r )   =   \ ;   0      \ ; \ ;   , \ ; \ ; r_0(\delta ) \ ; < \ ; r \ ;   \ ; .\ ] ] since @xmath105 is even and must satisfy eq . ( [ 3.18 ] ) , we have @xmath106 . with our choice of the parameters , ( [ 2.8 ] ) , ( [ 2.9 ] ) and ( [ 2.10 ] ) , it is straightforward to check that there are bound states ( @xmath107 ) only for @xmath108 ( d - wave ) . in this case we get : @xmath109 where @xmath110 and @xmath111 are bessel functions , @xmath112 and @xmath113 with the further definitions : @xmath114 one can rewrite eq . ( [ 3.23 ] ) as : @xmath115 it is not too hard to see that eq . ( [ 3.25 ] ) allows non trivial solutions if the _ effective _ wall - depth @xmath116 satisfies : @xmath117 where @xmath118 is the solution of : @xmath119     the gap @xmath120 versus the hole doping fraction @xmath13 . according to eq . ( [ 3.28 ] ) @xmath121 . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    from eq  ( [ 3.26 ] ) it follows that there are non trivial solutions for hole doping such that : @xmath122 in fact , in fig  [ fig-3 ] we display @xmath120 versus the hole doping fraction @xmath13 . we see that the gap @xmath120 decreases rapidly with @xmath13 and vanishes at @xmath123 according to eq . ( [ 3.28 ] ) . note that , with our parameters , we have @xmath124 which should be compared with @xmath125 .     the normalized d - wave wavefunction @xmath126 for @xmath127 . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    from figure  [ fig-4 ] , where we display the normalized wavefunction @xmath128 , eq . ( [ 3.21 ] ) , for a typical value of @xmath13 , we see that our bound - state wavefunction extends up to distance @xmath129 . + since the eigenvalue equations eqs .  ( [ 3.19 ] ) and ( [ 3.20 ] ) depend on @xmath130 , the general d - wave wavefunction is a linear combination of @xmath128 and @xmath131 . from the geometry of the @xmath1 planes we are lead to assume : @xmath132 where the coordinate axis are directed along the @xmath133 bond directions as in fig . [ fig-2 ] . this is the most natural choice since the wavefunction is sizable along the @xmath133 bonds and vanishes at @xmath134 . for later convenience , we need to evaluate the fourier transform of the wavefunction eq . ( [ 3.29 ] ) . we have : @xmath135 assuming that the @xmath136 , @xmath137 axis are oriented along the copper - oxygen bond directions , and using the expansion : @xmath138 }    \ ; j_m ( kr )    \ ; , \ ] ] we readily obtain : @xmath139 where : @xmath140 remarkably , we see that the fourier transform of the wavefunction vanishes along the _ nodal _ directions : @xmath141 while it is sizable along the _ antinodal _ directions : @xmath142 these features are reminiscent of the observed pseudogap in the underdoped region . therefore , we are lead to identify @xmath120 with the pseudogap and to introduce the pseudogap temperature according to : @xmath143    [ [ 3 - 2 ] ]    we have shown in the previous section that , as long as @xmath144 , it is energetically favored to pair two holes into a d - wave bound state with wavefunction given by eq . ( [ 3.29 ] ) . then , we may construct the superconducting ground state according to eq . ( [ 3.1 ] ) with @xmath145 . however , although the formation of cooper pairs is essential in forming the superconducting state , its remarkable properties , i.e. zero resistance and perfect diamagnetism , require phase coherence among the pairs . in the underdoped region @xmath146 we infer from fig . [ fig-4 ] that the size of the pair is small with respect to the average distance between holes . so that the ground state wavefunction eq . ( [ 3.1 ] ) reduces to the ground state of a bose - einstein gas of paired holes . in this case the required phase coherence is established by the condensation of pairs . however , in two spatial dimensions it is well known that there is no bose - einstein condensation . thus we are lead to conclude that in the extremely underdoped region @xmath146 there is a pseudogap @xmath120 but not superconductivity . however , by increasing @xmath13 it will be a certain minimal value of the hole doping fraction @xmath147 where the pairs become to overlap . to estimate @xmath147 , we observe that the pair wavefunction @xmath148 extends up to distance @xmath149 . thus , to have overlap between different hole pairs we need at least two holes in a square of size @xmath150 . thereby we estimate : @xmath151 which agrees , remarkably , with the observed value @xmath17 for the onset of the superconductivity in the hole - doped cuprates . once the pairs begin to overlap , the phases of the pairs are locked to a constant value . indeed , it is well known   that a condensate with varying phase @xmath152 contribute to the ground state energy with : @xmath153 where @xmath154 is the so - called phase stiffness . in our case we have : @xmath155 with the superfluid density given by : @xmath156     the pseudogap and berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless temperatures ( in kelvin ) versus @xmath157 . we assume @xmath158.,scaledwidth=80.0% ]    as is well known  @xcite , the phase coherence of the condensate survives up to the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless ( b - k - t ) critical temperature : @xmath159 for temperatures above @xmath160 the phase coherence and the superconductivity is lost due to the thermal activation of vortex excitations . if we neglect the temperature dependence of the phase stiffness , we obtain : @xmath161 using our numerical values for @xmath7 and @xmath6 we get : @xmath162 in figure  [ fig-5 ] we display the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless critical temperature together with the pseudogap temperature @xmath15 versus the hole doping fraction by assuming @xmath158 . we see that in our approach the superconductivity transition in the underdoped region is described by the @xmath163 transition at @xmath164 , which coexists with the much higher pseudogap temperature @xmath15 . this picture is supported by a large amounts of observational data which , however , will be discussed in details in sect .  [ 4 ] . [ [ 3 - 3 ] ]    to complete the phase diagram of the hole - doped cuprate superconductors we must address the problem of the ground state for @xmath165 . since the pseudogap @xmath120 vanishes at @xmath166 , we do not have real - space paired holes and , whence , the @xmath163 critical temperature can not be defined . on the other hand , as long as @xmath167 , the attractive two - body potential eq . ( [ 2.7 ] ) is short - range and can be considered as a small perturbation . as a consequence , in the overdoped region @xmath165 the normal state is described by the hamiltonian @xmath50 , eq . ( [ 2.18 ] ) . in other words , the normal state properties are those of ordinary fermi liquid metals that is characterized by hole quasiparticles with effective mass given by eq . ( [ 2.17 ] ) and density : @xmath168 in fact , in the overdoped side of the superconducting phase diagram , experiments strongly suggest that above the critical temperature the full fermi surface is restored with well - defined quasiparticles . thereby this confirms the applicability of a fermi liquid picture . moreover , quantum oscillation experiments  @xcite in an overdoped high - temperature superconductor are consistent with hole quasiparticles with density given by eq . ( [ 3.44 ] ) and effective mass : @xmath169 in fair agreement with our estimate , eq .  ( [ 2.19 ] ) . + the superconductive instability is driven by the short - range attractive interaction between the quasiparticles . we see , then , that the pairing is in momentum space , so that the relevant superconducting ground state is the bcs variational ground state eq . ( [ 3.9 ] ) with hamiltonian @xmath170 , where the chemical potential is essentially the fermi energy : @xmath171 the relevant gap equation has been discussed since long time  @xcite : @xmath172 where : @xmath173 and @xmath174 } \ ; v(r ) \ ; .\ ] ] using the expansion eq .  ( [ 3.31 ] ) we may recast eq . ( [ 3.47 ] ) into : @xmath175 with : @xmath176 equation  ( [ 3.50 ] ) suggests that : @xmath177 in the weak coupling limit one expects that the mixing of different partial wave @xmath178 will be small  @xcite . therefore eq . ( [ 3.50 ] ) reduces to : @xmath179 since the bcs gap in the limit of localized pairs is proportional to the bound - state wave function in momentum space , we conclude that eq . ( [ 3.53 ] ) admits non trivial solutions for the d - wave gap ( @xmath180 ) . moreover , from eq . ( [ 3.32 ] ) we infer that : @xmath181 thus , we obtain the following gap equation : @xmath182 ^ 2 } \ ;    \ ; \frac { v_2(k , k ' )   \delta_{bcs}(k ' ) } { \sqrt { \xi^2_{\vec{k } ' } + [   \delta_{bcs}(k ' ) \cos{(2 \theta_{k'})}]^2 } }   \ ; .\ ] ] since the gap is sizable on the fermi surface , we may further simplify eq . ( [ 3.55 ] ) as : @xmath183 ^ 2 } { \sqrt { \xi^2_{\vec{k } ' } + [   \delta_{bcs } \cos{(2 \theta_{k'})}]^2 } } \ ] ] where @xmath184 and @xmath185 . a standard calculation gives : @xmath186 ^ 2 } { \sqrt { \xi^2 + [   \delta_{bcs } \cos{(2 \theta)}]^2 } } \ ] ] where @xmath187 is an energy cut - off much smaller than the fermi energy . performing the integrals and using the approximation : @xmath188   \ ;    \simeq   \ ;      \ln {   \left   [   \frac{2 \varepsilon_c } {   \delta_{bcs } |\cos{(2 \theta)| } } \right ] } \ ; , \ ] ] we get : @xmath189 }   \ ; , \ ] ] where : @xmath190 ^ 2 \ ; .\ ] ]     the pseudogap and bcs critical temperatures ( in kelvin ) versus the hole doping fraction . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    to obtain the critical temperature , we note that  @xcite : @xmath191 @xmath192 being the euler s constant . as concern the high - energy cut - off , it is natural to identify @xmath187 with @xmath193 which , indeed , is much smaller than the fermi energy in the range of hole doping fraction of interest . in summary , we obtain for the critical temperature @xmath194 : @xmath195 }   \ ; .\ ] ] equation  ( [ 3.62 ] ) shows that the bcs critical temperature depends on the hole doping fraction . in fact , in fig . [ fig-6 ] we compare @xmath196 with the pseudogap temperature @xmath27 . it is evident that for @xmath197 we have a non - zero bcs d - wave gap . note that the undulations on the critical temperature curve is an artifact of the sharp cut - off of the effective interaction potential at @xmath198 . [ [ 3 - 4 ] ]    we are , now , in position of discuss the phase diagram of the hole - doped cuprates . in fig .  [ fig-7 ] we display the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless ( @xmath160 ) , the pseudogap ( @xmath15 ) , and the bcs ( @xmath199 ) temperatures versus the hole doping fraction @xmath13 . the pseudogap , berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless , and bcs critical temperatures ( in kelvin ) versus the hole doping fraction @xmath157 . the region enclosed by the ellipse where the three temperatures are comparable is the optimal doped region . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    in our approach the superconducting dome - shaped region of the phase diagram of oxide cuprates is determined by the region enclosed by the two critical temperatures @xmath160 and @xmath199 . the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless temperature increases with the doping @xmath13 , while the bcs critical temperature decreases with increasing hole doping . these temperatures are comparable for @xmath200 . accordingly , we individuate three regions in the phase diagram :    * the underdoped region @xmath201 ; * the optimal doped region @xmath202 ; * the overdoped region @xmath203 .    in fig . [ fig-7 ] we have also displayed the pseudogap temperature @xmath27 which decreases rapidly with increasing doping , meets the superconducting dome in the optimal doped region , and vanishes beyond a critical doping level @xmath204 within the optimal doped region . in the following sections we shall discuss the physical properties which characterize the three regions and compare with selected experimental observations supporting our proposal the underdoped region in all hole - doped high - temperature superconductors is characterized by the presence of the pseudogap  . in general it is assumed that the pseudogap has a d - wave structure . moreover , there is a general agreement on the doping dependence of the pseudogap . for instance , recently the authors of ref . @xcite used angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy to probe the electronic excitations in underdoped @xmath205 . these authors find evidence of a nodal liquid whose excitation gap vanishes only at points in momentum space which are consistent with the gap structure of a d - wave superconductors . in particular , these authors show that the measured gap in momentum space is consistent with : @xmath206 where @xmath207 monotonically increase with underdoping . in fact , eq .  ( [ 4.1 ] ) is consistent with our eq . ( [ 3.32 ] ) and the doping dependence of the pseudogap ( see fig . [ fig-3 ] ) . however , it should be stressed that many experiments report a gap that deviates from the simple relation in eq . ( [ 4.1 ] )  @xcite . in fact , several experimental studies are consistent with the presence of two gaps , namely the pseudogap and a peculiar nodal gap . we believe that this nodal gap is related to the dynamics of the nodal fermi liquid discussed in sect . [ 4 - 4 ] . then , we see that the nodal gap has naturally a d - wave symmetry with gapless nodes . on the other hand , the pseudogap being defined as the energy needed to break the real - space two - hole bound state , does not need to depend on the geometry of the fermi surface . however , a full account on this subject lies beyond the aim of the present paper . we plan to present a detailed discussion of this point in a separate paper . + as concern the pseudogap temperature , in fig .  [ fig-8 ] , where we plot @xmath208 versus @xmath209 for various cuprates  @xcite , we compare the experimental data with our relation eq . ( [ 3.36 ] ) which can be rewritten as : @xmath210     @xmath208 versus @xmath211 for various cuprates compared to our relation @xmath212 ( dashed line ) and the d - wave bcs relation @xmath213 ( dotted line ) . the data have been extracted from fig .  5 of ref . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    indeed , we see that the data are consistent with eq . ( [ 4.2 ] ) . we also plot in fig . [ fig-8 ] the d - wave bcs relation  . ] : @xmath214 since eq . ( [ 4.3 ] ) is quite close to our eq . ( [ 4.2 ] ) , the data are consistent with both relations . in our opinion , this unfortunate circumstance is the origin of confusion and several misinterpretations in the literature . + in conclusion , according to our previous discussion , the observed gap opening in the density of states ( the pseudogap ) marks the onset of the hole pairing at rather high temperatures @xmath215 , but the critical temperature is set by the onset of phase coherence at lower temperatures @xmath216 . the above point of view is supported by several experiments . we believe that the most convincing evidence comes from ref . in fact , by using ultrathin films of ca - substituted @xmath217 , the authors of ref . @xcite found a clear evidence of the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless transition . in particular , they observe a remarkable scaling of the critical temperature with @xmath218 in accordance with eqs . ( [ 3.39 ] ) and ( [ 3.41 ] ) . further support on this picture comes from measurements of the high - frequency conductivity reported in ref . + to summarize , we may conclude that the key features of the underdoped side of the phase diagram are controlled by very strong hole pairing that is phase - disordered by fluctuations  @xcite . in the following subsections , from a wealth of possible material , we have chosen to discuss some selected topics that we think well illustrate the physics of the underdoped region of hole - doped high - temperature superconductors . [ [ 4 - 1 ] ]    we are interested in the dynamics of hole pairs in presence of an external magnetic field perpendicular to the copper - oxide plane : @xmath219 in this case the schrdinger equation eq . ( [ 3.11 ] ) becomes : @xmath220      \phi ( \vec{r}_1 , \vec{r}_2 )   %       \nonumber \\ %      + \ ; v(\vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2 )   \ ;    \phi ( \vec{r}_1 , \vec{r}_2 ) \ ;   =    \ ;   e   \phi ( \vec{r}_1 , \vec{r}_2 )   \ ;    \ ; .   \end{aligned}\ ] ] it is useful to work in the symmetric gauge : @xmath221 where the angular momentum is conserved . using eq . ( [ 3.12 ] ) we recast eq . ( [ 4.5 ] ) into : @xmath222      \phi ( \vec{r } , \vec{r } )   %       \nonumber \\ %      + \ ; v(\vec{r } )   \ ;   \phi ( \vec{r } , \vec{r } ) \ ;   =    \ ;   e   \phi ( \vec{r } , \vec{r } )   \ ;    \ ; .   \end{aligned}\ ] ] thus , we can write : @xmath223 and @xmath224 such that : @xmath225 ^ 2    \psi ( \vec{r } )    %   \ ;   =    \ ;   e_{cond } \ ;   \psi ( \vec{r } )   \ ;   , \ ] ] @xmath226     \varphi ( \vec{r } ) %   \ ;   =    \ ; - \ ; \delta   \ ;   \varphi ( \vec{r } ) \ ;   .\ ] ] the wavefunction @xmath227 describes the condensate . in fact , @xmath228 is obtained from @xmath229 after averaging over the internal degree of freedom . moreover , if we write : @xmath230 }   \ ; , \ ] ] we see that in presence of an external magnetic field the condensate acquires a non - uniform phase . for an almost uniform condensate we have : @xmath231 and @xmath152 is a slowly varying function . in this case we obtain : @xmath232 where the supercurrent velocity is given by the well - known relation  @xcite : @xmath233 let us , now , consider eq . ( [ 4.11 ] ) in polar coordinates : @xmath234     \varphi(r,\theta )    =    -   \delta     \varphi(r,\theta )   \ ;   .\ ] ] again , after writing : @xmath235 we have : @xmath236     \varphi_m(r )     =     -   ( \delta_m(h )    +    \frac { e \hbar m h}{2   m^*_h c } ) \ ;   \varphi_m(r ) % \ ] ] this last equation shows that , as expected , the external magnetic field lifts the degeneracy @xmath237 .    [ [ 4 - 2 ] ]    we have already seen that for @xmath238 two holes give rise to a d - wave bound state . in presence of an external magnetic field the d - wave bound states are the solutions of our pervious eq . ( [ 4.18 ] ) specialized to @xmath239 : @xmath240     \varphi_{\pm 2}(r )     =     -   ( \delta_{\pm 2}(h )    \pm    \frac { e \hbar   h } {   m^*_h c } ) \ ;   \varphi_{\pm 2}(r ) \ ; . % \ ] ] we may , now , introduce the pair - breaking critical filed @xmath241 such that : @xmath242 to estimate the pair - breaking critical magnetic field we note that : @xmath243 where the pseudogap @xmath244 , already discussed in sect . [ 3 - 1 ] , can be approximated quite accurately by : @xmath245     \ ; \ ; , \ ; \ ;   \delta _ { 2}(0 ) \ ; \simeq \ ; 41.91 \ ; mev \ ; .\ ] ] moreover , it is easy to see that the zeeman term can be neglected . in fact , using eq . ( [ 2.19 ] ) we find : @xmath246 where @xmath247 means that the strength of the magnetic field is measured in tesla  . even though we are using cgs units , it is customary in the literature to express the applied magnetic field in tesla . ] . accordingly , we get from eq . ( [ 4.19 ] ) : @xmath248 since @xmath249 , we obtain : @xmath250 which leads to : @xmath251     the upper critical field @xmath252 versus the hole doping fraction @xmath13 according to eq . ( [ 4.31 ] ) assuming @xmath253 . the data have been extracted from fig . 18 of ref . @xcite ( full squares ) and fig .  4 of ref . @xcite ( full circles ) . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    equation ( [ 4.26 ] ) shows that the pair - breaking critical field is very high . this means that the pseudogap is not affected by applied magnetic fields @xmath254 in accordance with several experimental observations . + in conventional superconductors the pair - breaking critical filed is of the same order of the depairing critical field . in our case , it turns out that the depairing critical field is much smaller than the pair - breaking critical field . as a consequence , the upper critical field @xmath255 is determined by the depairing field . it is worthwhile to recall that in type - ii superconductors in the mixed state ( schubnikov phase ) between the lower critical field @xmath256 and the upper critical field @xmath255 , the magnetic flux penetrates in a regular array of flux tubes , each carrying a quantum flux : @xmath257 within each unit cell of the array there is a vortex of supercurrent concentrating the flux toward the vortex center . to estimate the critical velocity @xmath258 we use eqs . ( [ 4.9 ] ) and ( [ 4.14 ] ) to get : @xmath259 accordingly , the critical supercurrent is : @xmath260 from the maxwell equation @xmath261 we easily get the following estimate : @xmath262 since the magnetic field can be considered almost uniform over distance of order of the london penetration length @xmath263 , and considering that there are @xmath264 vortices in a region of area @xmath265 , we obtain our final estimate of the upper critical field : @xmath266 in fig . [ fig-9 ] we display our estimate of the upper critical field eq . ( [ 4.31 ] ) in the underdoped region @xmath144 . we see that in the deep underdoped region the upper critical field decreases with underdoping in accordance with recent measurements  @xcite . in fig . [ fig-9 ] we also display the depairing critical field as determined from the nernst signal in refs . it is known that the cuprate superconductors have a large ginzburg - landau parameter @xmath267 and are , therefore , extreme type - ii superconductors . in fact , to compare quantitatively eq . ( [ 4.31 ] ) with experimental data we choose @xmath268 . it is gratifying to see that the doping dependence of our critical magnetic field as implied by eq . ( [ 4.31 ] ) seems to follows quite closely the experimental data . [ [ 4 - 3 ] ]    in the underdoped region of the high - temperature cuprate superconductors there is convincing evidence for vortices at temperatures significantly above the critical temperature  @xcite . indeed , our previous determination of the upper critical magnetic field shows that @xmath269 is different from zero even for @xmath270 , i.e. outside the superconducting dome in the phase diagram . to strengthen this point , following ref . @xcite , we define a critical vortex temperature @xmath271 by the phenomenological relation : @xmath272 where @xmath273 is the bohr magneton . the meaning of @xmath271 is that vortices are absent for @xmath274 .     the pseudogap , berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless , and vortex temperatures ( in kelvin ) versus @xmath157 . the vortex region lies in between @xmath275 and @xmath160.,scaledwidth=80.0% ]    in fig . [ fig-10 ] we compare the vortex temperature to the critical berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless and pseudogap temperatures . for temperatures @xmath276 ( the so - called nernst region ) one should observe a large nernst signal well above the superconducting critical temperature , in accordance with observations . + we would like to conclude this section by addressing the puzzling observations of discrete core bound states in isolated vortices . in a classical paper  @xcite , it was predicted the existence of electronic states bound to the core of an isolated vortex at energies below the superconducting gap in the case of s - wave bcs superconductors . since the spacing of the discrete spectrum turns out to be very small , these bound states lead to a continuum which manifests itself as a zero - bias conductance peak in scanning tunneling spectroscopy measurements . in high - temperature superconductors the scanning tunneling spectroscopy of isolated vortices revealed striking electronic signatures which can not be understood within the conventional bcs s - wave or d - wave theory  . indeed , the vortex cores give evidence of a pair of states with energy which scales with the superconducting gap and do not depend on the applied magnetic field . if we denote with @xmath277 the energy of the vortex core states measured with respect to the zero - bias voltage , then there is a simple relation between the state energy and the superconducting gap  @xcite : @xmath278 where the slope were obtained by a linear fit to all data points , and @xmath279 is the superconducting gap . we have already noted that the data are consistent with the relation ( see fig .  [ fig-8 ] ) : @xmath280 so that , using eq . ( [ 4.2 ] ) , we may rewrite eq . ( [ 4.33 ] ) in terms of the pseudogap : @xmath281 to interpret this last remarkable relation , we refer to the schrdinger equation for the d - wave hole bound states in presence of an external magnetic field , eq .  ( [ 4.18 ] ) with @xmath239 . we have shown that , neglecting the zeeman splitting , @xmath282 . thus , we infer that the pseudogap without the external magnetic field fixes the zero - bias voltage in the core of an isolated vortex . moreover , from eq . ( [ 4.18 ] ) it follows that there are two states whose energies measured with respect to the pseudogap are given by : @xmath283 where @xmath284 is the magnetic field inside the vortex core . to estimate @xmath284 , we note that the size of the isolated vortex can be determined by : @xmath285 where @xmath286 is the hole reduced mass . thus , the magnetic field in the vortex core can be obtained from : @xmath287 i.e. @xmath288 inserting eqs . ( [ 4.39 ] ) and eq .  ( [ 4.37 ] ) into eq .  ( [ 4.36 ] ) , we get : @xmath289 which is in satisfying agreement with eq . ( [ 4.35 ] ) .    [ [ 4 - 4 ] ]    the normal - state properties in the underdoped region of high - temperature cuprates are highly anomalous . it is now well - established by many angle - resolved photoemission studies   that low - energy excitations are characterized by fermi arcs , namely truncate segments of a fermi surface . the resistivity obeys @xmath290 over a wide range of temperatures in striking contrast to a fermi - liquid law @xmath291 , expected for a conventional metals . moreover , several recent studies  @xcite report unambiguous identification of quantum oscillations in high magnetic fields . interestingly enough , the measured low oscillation frequencies reveals a fermi surface made of small pockets . in fact , from the luttinger s theorem and the onsanger relation  @xcite between the frequency and the cross - sectional area of the orbit , it turns out that the area of the pocket correspond to about @xmath292 of the first brillouin zone area in sharp contrast to that of overdoped cuprates where the frequency corresponds to a large hole fermi surface  @xcite . in addition , the authors of ref . @xcite reported the observation of a negative hall resistance in the magnetic - field -induced normal state , which reveals that these pockets are electron - like rather than hole - like . more recently  @xcite , experiments on the second harmonic quantum oscillations in underdoped high - temperature cuprates lead to the conclusion that there exists only a single underlying quasi - two dimensional fermi surface pocket . moreover , it turns out that the pocket is most likely associated with states near the nodal region of the brillouin zone . this nodal pocket comprises quasielectron carrier to explain both the high field quantum oscillations with negative hall and seebeck  @xcite effect . finally , the recent studies of @xmath293 at very high magnetic fields indicate that the specific heat exhibits the conventional temperature dependence and quantum oscillations expected for a fermi liquid . moreover , the magnetic field dependence of the quasiparticle density of states follows the @xmath294 behavior pointing to a d - wave superconducting gap . thus , the specific heat data demonstrate the surprising coexistence of the signature of a fermi liquid and a d - wave superconducting gap over the entire magnetic field range measured . + in the present section we show that in our approach these features can be accounted for as a consequence of the pseudogap @xmath120 . we have already seen that , in the underdoped region @xmath144 , the holes are bound into pairs with k - space wavefunction given by eq . ( [ 3.32 ] ) . even though the pair wavefunction vanishes along the nodal directions @xmath295 ( @xmath296 ) , there are not nodal low - lying hole excitations . this is due to the fact that the pairing of the holes is in the real space and not in momentum space . on the other hand , due to the rotational symmetry , we may freely perform rigid rotations of the pairs without spending energy . the rigid rotations of pairs is equivalent to hopping of electrons according to the hopping term in the hamiltonian eq . ( [ 1.1 ] ) : @xmath297   \ ; . % \ ] ] we may diagonalize this hamiltonian by writing : @xmath298 to get : @xmath299 @xmath300 \ ; .\ ] ] in the small - k limit we have : @xmath301 where : @xmath302 since there are @xmath303 electrons per @xmath9 atoms , from the hamiltonian eq .  ( [ 4.45 ] ) we may determine the electron fermi energy : @xmath304 at first glance , one expects that the quasielectrons fill in momentum space the circle with radius @xmath305 ( the electron fermi circle ) . however , one should keep in mind that the hopping of electrons is possible thanks to the paired holes . since in momentum space the wavefunction of a given pair is spread over a region around @xmath306 , we see that the wavefunction of quasielectrons is likewise localized on a region in k - space around @xmath307 . thus , the quasielectrons do not have the needed coherence to propagate over large distances with a well defined momentum . however , this argument does not apply along the nodal directions where the momentum space hole - pair wavefunction vanishes . therefore we are led to the conclusions that there are coherent quasielectrons that fill small circular sectors of the electron fermi circle around the nodal directions @xmath295 . thanks to the rotational symmetry , we have four circular sectors with the same area . since the number of coherent quasielectrons is determined by the doping fraction of holes ( assuming that all the holes are paired ) , we obtain ( see fig .  [ fig-11 ] ) : @xmath308 i.e. @xmath309     the fermi sector and fermi arc in the first quadrant of the brillouin zone.,scaledwidth=80.0% ]    we see , thus , that the fermi surface is made by four fermi arcs in agreement with the angle - resolved photoemission data . moreover , the area of the fermi sector with respect to the area of the fermi circle in overdoped region turns out to be : @xmath310 for the typical value of hole doping fraction @xmath311 , we infer from eq . ( [ 4.50 ] ) that @xmath312 is about @xmath313 of the first brillouin zone area in the overdoped region , in satisfying agreement with quantum oscillation experimental results . note that the effective quasielectron mass measured in quantum oscillation experiments lies in the range @xmath314 , in agreement with our estimate eq . ( [ 4.46 ] ) . + the drastic reduction of the available states in momentum space leads to a peculiar quasielectron conductivity . to see this , we may employ the simple drude model  @xcite for the frequency - dependent conductivity : @xmath315 where , according to eq . ( [ 4.48 ] ) , @xmath316 . since the nodal quasielectrons suffer almost unidimensional scatterings , we get for the relaxation time the quite general estimate : @xmath317 and eq . ( [ 4.51 ] ) becomes : @xmath318 for @xmath319 we obtain the conductivity : @xmath320 on the other hand , if @xmath321 we get : @xmath322 these relations are in qualitative agreement with several observations . in particular eq . ( [ 4.54 ] ) should be valid up to temperatures of the order of the pseudogap temperature @xmath15 . + let us conclude this section by discussing the peculiar dependence of the specific heat on the applied magnetic field reported in ref .  @xcite . firstly , we evaluate the sommerfeld coefficient for @xmath238 . a standard calculation gives : @xmath323 where @xmath324 is the avogadro s number . the authors of ref . @xcite found that at very high magnetic fields the specific heat in an underdoped high - temperature superconductors exhibits both the conventional temperature dependence and quantum oscillations expected for a fermi liquid . the oscillatory component of the specific heat is given by the lifshitz - kosevich formula  @xcite . on the other hand , for the sommerfeld coefficient they report : @xmath325 with @xmath326 to compare our eq . ( [ 4.56 ] ) with eq .  ( [ 4.58 ] ) one should keep in mind that there are two @xmath1 planes per formula unit in @xmath327 . moreover , the planar @xmath1 densities in high - temperature cuprates are difficult to estimate . assuming @xmath311 and using the effective electron mass eq . ( [ 4.46 ] ) , we find ( in mks units ) : @xmath328 which differs from measured value in eq . ( [ 4.58 ] ) by about a factor of @xmath329 . as far as field - induced sommerfeld coefficient is concerned , the behavior @xmath330 is interpreted as evidence of the presence of a d - wave superconducting gap . in fact , it was pointed out  @xcite that the increase of the sommerfeld coefficient with the external magnetic field is due to the line nodes of the superconducting gap . the evidence of quantum oscillations and field - induced sommerfeld coefficient in the electronic specific heat points to the surprising coexistence of a fermi liquid and a d - wave superconductor . in our approach , we now show that the quasielectron nodal fermi liquid leads naturally to the observed sommerfeld coefficient @xmath330 . in the mixed state , according to ref . @xcite the energies of the low - lying excitations circulating around a vortex are shifted by doppler effect . since it results that @xmath331 , we may employ the semiclassical approach which considers the momentum and position of quasiparticles as commuting variables . the effects of the supercurrent circulating around a vortex is accounted for by a doppler shift of the quasiparticle energy . thus , for the quasielectrons we have : @xmath332 where @xmath333 is the supervelocity that , according to eq . ( [ 4.15 ] ) , is given by : @xmath334 the doppler shift eq . ( [ 4.60 ] ) has a sizable effect on the density of state . to see this , we need to evaluate the density of state at the fermi surface averaged over the vortex : @xmath335 \ ;   \frac{1}{\pi r^2 }   \ ; , \ ] ] where @xmath336 is the average distance between vortices . we obtain : @xmath337\ ] ] where the angular integration on @xmath338 is performed over the four fermi arcs ( @xmath339 ) . the integration over @xmath340 can be done easily . one obtains : @xmath341 finally the angular integrations give : @xmath342 or , using eqs . ( [ 4.63 ] ) and ( [ 4.49 ] ) : @xmath343 since the high - temperature superconductors are extreme type - ii superconductors , one should average the density of state over the vortex distribution . however , from eq . ( [ 4.67 ] ) it is evident that the quasiparticle energy doppler shift induced by vortices leads to the expected field - induced sommerfeld coefficient @xmath330 . in the overdoped region we have already stressed that the normal state properties can be described reasonably well by the fermi liquid picture , although still with some electronic correlations , with a hole density corresponding to @xmath344 holes per @xmath9 atom . indeed , as long as @xmath165 , the effective two - body potential eq . ( [ 2.7 ] ) can be dealt with as a small perturbation . therefore , the dynamics of the copper - oxide layers is governed essentially by our effective hamiltonian @xmath50 , eq . ( [ 2.18 ] ) . note that the correlation effects due to the on - site repulsion @xmath6 are built into @xmath50 by means of the effective hole mass @xmath345 . it is interesting to note that : @xmath346 in fact , several quantum oscillation experiments give consistently an effective quasiparticle mass of carrier in the overdoped region which is approximately twice the effective quasiparticle mass of carriers in the underdoped region . + it is interesting to compare the low - temperature linear term in the electronic specific heat of the quasiholes with the one of the nodal quasielectrons evaluated in sect . [ 4 - 4 ] . since the quasiholes behave like a two - dimensional normal fermi liquid , we obtain instead of eq . ( [ 4.56 ] ) : @xmath347 in fact , it is easy to check that the sommerfeld coefficient given by eq . ( [ 5.2 ] ) exceeds by about an order of magnitude the quasielectron sommerfeld coefficient . using our hole effective mass we obtain ( mks units ) : @xmath348 our determination of @xmath349 compares quite well with the observed value : @xmath350 as obtained from direct measurements in polycrystalline @xmath351  @xcite , independently on @xmath13 , and also from indirect determination through the effective hole mass @xmath352 in ref . + concerning the superconducting phase in the overdoped region , we already argued that this can be described within the conventional bcs framework . in fact , there is a large body of evidence that the weak - coupling d - wave bcs approach accounts for many of the low - energy and low - temperature properties of overdoped copper oxides . here , we restrict ourself to the discussion of a clear signature of d - wave bcs pairing in momentum space , namely the ratio of the bcs gap to the critical temperature anticipated in eq . ( [ 3.61 ] ) : @xmath353 to derive eq .  ( [ 5.5 ] ) , we observe that the gap equation eq . ( [ 3.47 ] ) at finite temperature reads : @xmath354 } \ ; .\ ] ] thus , instead of eq . ( [ 3.56 ] ) we have : @xmath355 ^ 2 } { \sqrt { \xi^2_{\vec{k } ' } + [   \delta_{bcs } \cos{(2 \theta_{k'})}]^2 } }     \tanh { \left [ \frac{\sqrt { \xi^2_{\vec{k } ' } + [   \delta_{bcs } \cos{(2 \theta_{k'})}]^2 } } { 2 \ ; k_b \ ; t } \right ] } \ ; .\ ] ] since the critical temperature is defined by @xmath356 , we obtain : @xmath357 ^ 2 } {   | \xi | }   \ ;    \tanh { \left [ \frac { | \xi | } { 2 \ ; k_b \ ; t_c } \right ] }   \ ; , \ ] ] i.e. @xmath358 }   \ ; .\ ] ] upon using eq . ( [ 3.60 ] ) we may rewrite eq . ( [ 5.9 ] ) as : @xmath359 }   \ ;   \simeq \ ; \lambda_2 \ ; \left [ \ln{(\frac{\varepsilon_c}{2k_bt_c } ) } \ ; - \ ; \ln{(\frac{\pi}{4 } ) } \ ; +   \ ; \gamma \right ] \ ; , % \ ] ] which leads to : @xmath360 }   \ ; .\ ] ] combining eq . ( [ 5.11 ] ) with eq .  ( [ 3.59 ] ) one obtains eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) . doping dependence of the ratio of superconducting gap @xmath361 over the critical temperature @xmath0 . the data has been extracted from fig .  4 of ref . the dashed line is the weak coupling d - wave bcs value @xmath362 . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    in figure  [ fig-12 ] we display the doping dependence of the ratio eq . ( [ 5.5 ] ) using the data reported in fig .  4 of ref . it is evident that in the overdoped region @xmath363 the gap values approach closely onto the theoretical prediction of the weak - coupling d - wave bcs superconductivity . + let us now discuss the optimal doped region @xmath200 . according to our picture , the low - doping region is characterized by a large pseudogap @xmath120 which decreases rapidly with increasing doping , while the superconductivity is driven by the finite - temperature berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless transition with a critical temperature that increases with doping . on the other hand , in the overdoped region the superconducting transition is well described by the conventional weak - coupling d - wave bcs pairing in momentum space . the decrease of the critical temperature with increasing doping level originates from the underlying reduction in the pairing strength due to the disturbing of the antiferromagnetic correlations with overdoping . from our fig . [ fig-7 ] we see that the two critical temperatures meet in the optimal doped region @xmath200 , explaining in a natural way why the critical superconducting temperature reaches here the maximum value . since the berezinskii - kosterlitz - thouless temperature is comparable to the bcs critical temperature , this makes fluctuations much more important . even more , fig . [ fig-7 ] suggests that also the pseudogap temperature @xmath15 becomes comparable to both @xmath160 and @xmath199 . we conclude , thus , that in this region of the phase diagram there are competing phases and it is quite difficult to precisely pin down the underlying physics . on the other hand , as our fig . [ fig-7 ] is suggesting , there is a large body of evidence that pseudogap energy scale does not extend into the heavily overdoped region of the phase diagram , but rather collapse at a well defined critical concentration around @xmath364 . we would like to stress that the presence of an expanded phase - fluctuation regime in the optimal doped region may explain why certain spectroscopic probes , like angle - resolved photoemissions , tend to advocate scenarios in which the pseudogap temperature tracks the superconducting dome rather than vanishing inside it . the scenario advanced in this paper is supported by the results presented in ref . @xcite . by means of a systematic electronic raman scattering study of a mercury - based single layer cuprate as a function of doping level , the authors of ref . @xcite revealed the existence of a breakpoint close to optimal doping , below which the antinodal gap ( the pseudogap ) is gradually disconnected from superconductivity . the nature of both the superconducting and normal state is distinctly different on each site of this breakpoint . this is consistent also with electronic specific heat measurements . in fact , it turns out that  @xcite in optimally and overdoped samples the sommerfeld coefficient is almost constant for @xmath365 , in accord with our eq . ( [ 5.2 ] ) , while for underdoped samples there is considerable drop in the sommerfeld coefficient for @xmath366 ( see our eq . ( [ 4.56 ] ) ) . moreover , there is evidence for carrier density which decreases smoothly from @xmath367 in the overdoped phase to @xmath368 in the underdoped phase . in fact , in refs .  @xcite it is shown that it exists a critical point @xmath204 where the pseudogap temperature @xmath15 goes to zero and which lies in the superconducting dome . just below @xmath204 there is a crossover from a metal with large hole - like fermi surface , consistent with @xmath369 , to a metal with low density of charge carrier , which from hall and seebeck effect measurements are quasielectrons , with @xmath316 . + before concluding this section , we would like to remark that the optimal doped region of hole - doped cuprates is the most difficult to precisely characterize . in fact , according to our current theoretical understanding , in this region there is competition between the bcs gap and the pseudogap , and the presence of sizable phase fluctuations strongly limit our mean - field treatment . nevertheless , it is worthwhile to disciss the dependentce of the maximum critical temperature @xmath370 on the microscopic parameters of the model . as already discussed we have : @xmath371 now , from eqs . ( [ 2.5 ] ) , ( [ 2.9 ] ) , ( [ 2.17 ] ) , ( [ 3.46 ] ) and ( [ 3.60 ] ) we obtain : @xmath372}\ ] ] where we recall that @xmath204 is the hole doping fraction where the pseudogap @xmath373 vanishes . apparently eq . ( [ 5.13 ] ) suggests that one can increase @xmath370 by increasing @xmath374 and/or decreasing @xmath204 . however , it turns out that the increase of @xmath374 leads also to an increase of @xmath204 and vice versa , such that the two effects compensate in eq . ( [ 5.13 ] ) . this explains why the optimal hole doping fraction is very close to @xmath204 and attains the universal value : @xmath375 in the whole family of cuprates . the vast majority of high - temperature superconductors are hole - doped . nevertheless , in this section we will touch upon high - temperature electron - doped cuprates ( see ref . @xcite for a review ) . the most evident difference between electron and hole doped cuprates is that the antiferromagnetic phase at @xmath376 is much more robust in the electron - doped material and it persists to much higher doping levels . if we adopt the effective single - band hubbard model of sect . [ 1 ] for the microscopic description of the @xmath1 layers , then we see that the electrons injected into the copper - oxide plane would behave like the holes in the overdoped region of the hole - doped cuprates . however , due to the stronger antiferromagnetic correlations in the ground state for @xmath16 , the electron carrier density is : @xmath377 since one electron of the @xmath378 electrons per cu atom is frozen in the half - filled hubbard band antiferromagnetic configuration . in our approach the effective hamiltonian for the injected electrons should be given by eqs . ( [ 2.18 ] ) and ( [ 2.6 ] ) . in particular , the electron effective mass agrees with eq . ( [ 2.17 ] ) : @xmath379 with the previously stated values of the model parameters . however , due to the increased role played by the fermion correlations in the antiferromagnetic background , we expect that the effective two - body potential in the interaction hamiltonian eq . ( [ 2.6 ] ) is reduced to some extent . to take into account this effect , we shall assume that the effective potential @xmath380 has the same form as in eq . ( [ 2.7 ] ) but with a somewhat reduced interaction length : @xmath381 we now show that this small variation in the range of the effective two - body interaction potential leads to a dramatic change in the phase diagram of the electron - doped cuprates . in fact , by solving the real - space d - wave bound state schrdinger equation eq . ( [ 3.11 ] ) we find a drastically reduced pseudogap ( see fig .  [ fig-13 ] ) : @xmath382     the pseudogap and bcs critical temperatures ( in kelvin ) versus the doping fraction for the electron - doped cuprates . , scaledwidth=80.0% ]    this means that , according to the discussion in sect . [ 3 - 2 ] , the pseudogap superconducting phase of the underdoped region of hole - doped cuprates is absent . therefore , the superconducting transition in electron - doped cuprates is driven by the weak - coupling d - wave bcs pairing in momentum space . in this case the critical bcs temperature is given by eq . ( [ 3.62 ] ) : @xmath383}\ ] ] with @xmath384 given by eq .  ( [ 6.4 ] ) , @xmath385 ^ 2 \ ; , \ ] ] and @xmath386 the bcs critical temperature eq . ( [ 6.5 ] ) as a function of the electron doping level is displayed in fig . [ fig-13 ] . from the schematic phase diagram we infer that the maximal critical temperature is strongly reduced with respect to the hole - doped cuprates . moreover , the superconducting phase manifests itself in a rather narrow interval of doping around @xmath387 . these general aspects of our phase diagram seem to be in qualitative agreement with observations . however , a thorough understanding of the superconductivity in electron doped cuprates must await more detailed experimental informations . the driving principle of the approach presented in this paper has been that the high - temperature superconductivity can be understood within some framework along the line of the microscopic theory of bardeen , cooper , and schrieffer . the results presented in this paper summarize our attempts over the last years to construct a comprehensive model that gives all aspects of the unusual behavior seen in the various regions of the phase diagram of the cuprates . it is obvious that we must rely heavily on some assumptions . first , we assumed that the physics of the high - temperature cuprates is deeply rooted in the copper - oxide planes . this allowed us to completely neglect the motion along the direction perpendicular to the @xmath1 planes . our second main assumption has been that the single - band effective hubbard model is sufficient to account for all the essential physics of the copper - oxide planes . both assumptions are well accepted and superbly illustrated in the anderson s book  @xcite . accordingly , we have proposed an effective hamiltonian that is able to govern the dynamics of the electrons or holes injected into the undoped copper - oxide planes . we arrived at our effective hamiltonian by using arguments well - known in the literature on the motion of charge carriers in an antiferromagnetic background . notwithstanding , we were unable to offer a truly microscopic derivation of the effective hamiltonian . so that our arguments to determine the effective hamiltonian , albeit suggestive , can not be considered a first principle derivation . in spite of that , we showed that the effective hamiltonian offers us a consistent picture of the high transition temperature cuprate superconductors . due to the reduced dimensionality the two - body attractive potential admits real - space d - wave bound states . the binding energy of these bound states , which plays the role of the pseudogap , decreases with increasing doping until it vanishes at a certain critical doping @xmath166 . this allows us to reach the conclusion that the key features of the underdoped side of the phase diagram are controlled by very strong pairing that is phase - disordered by thermal fluctuations . we also were able to estimate the upper critical magnetic field whose strength and doping dependence are in good agreement with observations . we obtain a clear explanation for the so - called vortex region and for the puzzling discrete states bounded to the core of isolated vortices . we have discussed how the presence of the pseudogap is responsible for the formation of the quasielectron nodal fermi liquid which , in turn , leads to the fermi arcs observed in angle - resolved photoemission studies and to the fermi pockets in quantum oscillation experiments . we have found a natural explanation for the peculiar dependence of the specific heat on the applied magnetic field observed in underdoped cuprates . however , we would like to stress that we did not attempt a complete discussion of the strange behavior of the cuprates in this region . in particular , as already pointed out in sect . [ 4 ] , we did not discuss the so - called nodal gap . in fact , we plan to present in a separate paper a detailed discussion on the origin and temperature dependence of the nodal gap , on the thermal conductivity , on the departure from the wiedemann - franz law and on the london penetration depth . + in our model the overdoped region is realized for hole doping in excess of the critical doping @xmath204 where the pseudogap vanishes . in this region the conventional d - wave bcs framework account for many of the low - energy and low - temperature properties of the copper oxides , in agreement with several observations . finally , we explain naturally why the superconducting critical temperature reaches its maximum in the optimal doped region . we pointed out that in this region the competition between the pseudogap and the d - wave bcs gap together with the enhanced role of the phase fluctuations makes questionable the usually adopted mean - field approximation . we have also briefly discussed the comparatively less - studied electron - doped cuprates . we suggest that the dome - shaped superconducting region in electron - doped copper - oxides can be described by the conventional weak - coupling d - wave pairing in momentum space . + in conclusion , the fact that a relatively simple model for the effective hamiltonian allowed to recover several observational features of the high - temperature copper oxides , suggests that the approach presented in this paper could be considered a significative step toward a microscopic explanation of the high - temperature superconductivity in cuprates . 99 j.  g. bednorz and k.  a. mller , z. phys . b * 64 * ( 1986 ) 189 a. damascelli , z. hussain and z.  x. shen , rev . * 75 * ( 2003 ) 473 g. deutscher , rev . * 77 * ( 2005 ) 109 d.  n. besov and t. timusk , , rev . phys . * 77 * ( 2005 ) 721 p.  a. lee , n. nagaosa , and x.  -g . wen , rev . * 78 * ( 2006 ) 17  . fischer , h. kugler , i. maggio - aprile and c. berthod , rev . * 79 * ( 2007 ) 353 p.  a. lee , rep . * 71 * ( 2008 ) 012501 s. hfner , m.  a. hossain , a. damascelli and g.  a. sarvatzky , rep . * 71 * ( 2008 ) 062501 s. e. sebastian , n. harrison and g.  g. lonzarich , rep . * 75 * ( 2012 ) 102501 p.  w. anderson , science * 235 * ( 1987 ) 1196 p.  w. anderson , _ the theory of superconductivity in the high-@xmath0 cuprates _ , princeton university press , princeton , new jersey ( 1997 ) p.  w. anderson , phys . rev . * 115 * ( 1959 ) 2 d.  a. bonn , nature physics * 2 * ( 2006 ) 159 ch . * 80 * ( 1998 ) 3843 s.  -w . et al . _ , * 67 * ( 1991 ) 1791 t.  e. mason , g. aeppli and h.  a. mook , phys . * 68 * ( 1982 ) 1414 a.  n. lavrov , l.  p. kozeeva , m.  r. trunin and v.  n. zverev , phys . b * 79 * ( 2009 ) 214523 j. bardeen , l.  n. cooper and j.  r. schrieffer , phys . rev . * 106 * ( 1957 ) 162 ; phys . rev . * 108 * ( 1957 ) 1175 n.  p. armitage , p. fournier and r.  l. greene , rev . * 82 * ( 2010 ) 2421 a.  p. balachandran , e. ercolessi , and g. morandi , _ hubbard model and anyon superconductivity _ , world scientific publishing co. inc . ( 1990 ) k. huang and e. manousakis , phys . b * 36 * ( 1987 ) 8302 j.  e. hirsch , phys . rev . * 59 * ( 1987 ) 228 s.  a. trugman , phys . b * 37 * ( 1988 ) 1597 e.  w. carlson , v.  j. emery , s.  a. kivelson and d. orgad , _ concepts in high temperature superconductivity _ , cond - mat/0206217 j.  r. schrieffer , x.  -g . wen , and s.  -c . zhang , phys . lett . * 60 * ( 1988 ) 944 ; phys . b * 39 * ( 1989 ) 11663 l.  n. cooper , phys . rev . * 104 * ( 1956 ) 1189 m.  r. schafroth , phys * 100 * ( 1955 ) 463 j.  m. blatt and s.  t. butler , phys * 100 * ( 1955 ) 476 p.  w. anderson , rev . * 38 * ( 1966 ) 298 a.  j. legget , _ quantum liquids _ , oxford university press , oxford , uk ( 2008 ) v.  l. berezinskii , sov . jetp * 32 * ( 1971 ) 493 ; sov . jetp * 34 * ( 1972 ) 610 j.  m. kosterlitz and d.  j. thouless , j. phys . c * 6 * ( 1973 ) 1181 b. vignolle _ et al . _ , nature * 455 * ( 2008 ) 952 p.  w. anderson and p. morel , phys . * 123 * ( 1961 ) 1911 h. won and k. maki , phys b * 49 * ( 1994 ) 1397 t. timusk and b. statt , rep . * 62 * ( 1999 ) 61 j.  l. tallon and j.  w. loran , physica c * 349 * ( 2001 ) 53 u. chatterjee _ et al . _ , nature physics * 6 * ( 2010 ) 99 k. tanaka _ et al . _ , science * 314 * ( 2006 ) 1910 r .- h . _ , nature physics * 5 * ( 2009 ) 119 a. pushp _ et al . _ , science * 324 * ( 2009 ) 1689 m. hashimoto _ et al . _ , nature physics * 6 * ( 2010 ) 414 t. j. reber _ et al . _ , nature physics * 8 * ( 2012 ) 606 s. sakai _ _ , _ exploring the dark side of cuprate superconductors : s - wave symmetry of the pseudogap _ , arxiv:1207.5070 t. yoshida _ _ , _ coexisting pseudo - gap and superconducting gap in the high - t@xmath388 superconductor la@xmath389sr@xmath390cuo@xmath391 _ , arxiv:1208.2903 m. hashimoto _ et al . _ , b * 86 * ( 2012 ) 094504 m. kugler _ et al . * 86 * ( 2001 ) 4911 i. hetel , t.  r. lemberger and m. randeira , nature physics * 3 * ( 2007 ) 700 j. corson _ _ , nature * 398 * ( 1999 ) 221 v.  j. emery and s.  a. kilvelson , nature * 374 * ( 1985 ) 434 m. tinkham , _ introduction to superconductivity _ , second edition , mc graw - hill , inc . , new york ( 1996 ) y.   wang , l.  li and n.  p.  ong , phys . b * 73 * ( 2006 ) 024510 l.  li _ et al . _ , nature physics * 3 * ( 2007 ) 311 j.  chang _ et al . _ , nature physics * 8 * ( 2012 ) 751 z.  a. xu _ et al . _ , nature * 406 * ( 2000 ) 486 c. capan _ et al . _ , * 88 * ( 2002 ) 056601 l.  li , y. wang , j.  g. checkelsky and m.  j. naughton , physica c * 460 - 462 * ( 2007 ) 48 c. caroli , p.  g. de gennes and j. matricon , phys . lett . * 9 * ( 1964 ) 307 n. doiron - leyrand _ et al . _ , nature * 447 * ( 2007 ) 565 e.  a. yelland _ et al . _ , * 100 * ( 2008 ) 047003 a.  f. bangura _ et al . _ , * 100 * ( 2008 ) 047004 c. jaudet _ et al . _ , physica b * 404 * ( 2009 ) 354 a.  f. bangura _ _ , phys . rev . b * 82 * ( 2010 ) 140501 a.  a. abrikosov , _ introduction to theory of normal metal _ , academic press , new york and london ( 1972 ) d. shoenberg , _ magnetic oscillations in metals _ , cambridge university press , cambridge ( 1984 ) d. le boeuf _ et al . _ , nature * 450 * ( 2007 ) 533 s. sebastian _ et al . _ , nature communications * 2 * ( 2011 ) 471 f. laliberte _ et al . _ , nature communications * 2 * ( 2011 ) 432 s.  c. riggs _ et al . _ , nature physics * 7 * ( 2011 ) 332 n.  w. ashcroft and n.  d. mermin , _ solid state physics _ , harcourt college publishers ( 1976 ) g.  e. volovik , sov . jetp * 58 * ( 1993 ) 469 j.  m. wade _ et al . _ , j. supercond . * 7 * ( 1994 ) 261 y.   wang _ et al . b * 76 * ( 2007 ) 064512 w. guyard _ et al . _ , b * 77 * ( 2008 ) 024524 j.  w. loram , k.  a. mirza , j.  r. cooper and j.  l. tallon , physica c * 282 - 287 * ( 1997 ) 1405 j.  w. loram , j. luo , j.  r. cooper and j.  l. tallon , j. phys . * 62 * ( 2001 ) 59 r. daou _ et al . _ , nature physics * 5 * ( 2009 ) 31 r. daou _ et al . _ , phys . rev . b * 79 * ( 2009 ) 180505
Abstract:

Answer: we discuss the high - temperature superconductivity in copper oxide ceramics . we propose an effective hamiltonian to describe the dynamics of electrons or holes injected into the copper oxide layers . we show that our approach is able to account for both the pseudogap and the superconductivity gap . for the hole - doped cuprates we discuss in details the underdoped , optimal doped , and overdoped regions of the phase diagram . in the underdoped region we determine the doping dependence of the upper critical magnetic field , the vortex region , and the discrete states bounded to the core of isolated vortices . we explain the origin of the fermi arcs and fermi pockets . moreover , we discuss the recently reported peculiar dependence of the specific heat on the applied magnetic field . we determine the critical doping where the pseudogap vanishes . we find that in the overdoped region the superconducting transition is described by the conventional d - wave bcs theory . we discuss the optimal doping region and the crossover between the underdoped region and the overdoped region . we also discuss briefly the electron - doped cuprate superconductors .