Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: one of the most important properties of complex systems is community structure . real - world complex systems are organized in a modular way , with clusters of units sharing similar dynamics or functionality . however , while the clusters are internally cohesive , they can maintain contrasting dynamics . the problem of resolving and identifying these mesoscopic structures , without any prior information , is extremely challenging . in financial markets , the mesoscopic scale corresponds to sets of stocks that share similar price dynamics . the knowledge of the market structure is highly valuable , and can assist in hedging risks and for better understanding of the market . consequently , over the past years , scientists have deployed and developed many time series techniques to retrieve qualitative information regarding the hierarchy and structure of financial markets @xcite . + a promising approach is that of employing community detection techniques , developed in network theory @xcite , on empirical correlation matrices ( resulted from multiple time series ) . however , the methods are originally constructed to detect dense clusters of nodes within graphs ( networks ) , and are not adapted to deal with correlation matrices . recently , a novel method was proposed , which has been specifically designed to detect communities from correlation matrices of multiple time series @xcite . when applied to financial time series , the method was able to capture the dynamical modularity of real markets . remarkably , the method identified clusters of stocks which are correlated internally , but are anti - correlated with each other . + traditionally , the main object of time series analysis is the characterization of patterns in the amplitude of the increments of the quantities of interest ( stock price in our case ) . the analysis requires a weighted description of the system , i.e. both the amplitude and the sign of the activity . indeed , a time series of increments enclose complete information about the amplitude of the fluctuations of the original signal . however , a significant part of this information is encoded in the purely ` binary ' projection of the time series , i.e. its sign . recent studies have shown various forms of statistical dependency between the sign and the absolute value of fluctuations @xcite . recently , a study has shown a robust empirical relationship between binary and non - binary properties of real financial time series @xcite . the research shows that binary signatures , which retain only the sign of fluctuations , encode significant information regarding the full behaviour of the stock ( both amplitude and direction ) . motivated by these recent results , here we further explore the higher - order relations between financial time series and their corresponding binary signatures , in a more complex setting . here we study whether the binary signatures of assets can reproduce the same complex community organization of financial markets , as the weighted information . +        to this end , we use the daily closing prices of the stocks of three indexes ( s@xmath0p500 , ftse100 and nikkei225 ) over the period 2001 - 2011 . for each index , we restrict our sample to the maximal group of stocks that are traded continuously throughout the selected period . this results in 445 stocks for the s@xmath0p500 , 78 stocks for the ftse100 and 193 stocks for the nikkei225 . given a stock price @xmath1 where @xmath2 denotes one of the @xmath3 stocks in the index , and @xmath4 denotes one of the @xmath5 observed temporal snapshots ( days ) , the log - return is defined as @xmath6.\ ] ] for each stock in the system we use the time series of it s log - returns for our analysis . this is the construct we refer to as the `` weighted time series '' throughout the rest of the paper . in contrast , the `` binary signatures '' only reveal the direction of the fluctuation ( sign ) in the price and are defined as @xmath7= \left\{\begin{array}{rr } + 1&r_i(t)>0\\ 0&r_i(t)=0\\ -1&r_i(t)<0 \end{array}\right .. \label{eq : sign}\ ] ] in fig . [ fig : binarize ] we show a simple example of a weighted time series , along with the corresponding binary projection . + the two types of information are in fact different descriptions of the same system , and are used to construct cross - correlation matrices . in turn , we deploy three popular community - detection algorithms @xcite specifically adapted , where necessary , for the correct use of cross - correlation matrices @xcite . we examine and quantify similarities and variations in the organization of the markets for these two representations . this approach reveals some interesting results . first , we can quantify the level of information encoded within the binary signatures , with respect to the full weighted time series . secondly , we observe that both the binary and weighted representations yield very similar structures , which indicates that most of the information regarding the structure of financial communities is already encoded within the sign of a stock . + is not shown in the plots , but the its value is reported in each panel . ]    in this section we analyse the eigenvalue density distribution of the cross - correlation matrices for the two representations of the data ( binary and weighted ) . when plotting the density distribution one can identify specific spectral properties that have structural implications . in other words , it is possible to identify distinct eigenvalues in the spectrum , which correspond to correlated clusters of stocks , and typically indicate a non - trivial structure . + to begin , we first need to discuss a filtering technique , based on random matrix theory ( rmt ) @xcite , which is used to identify non - random properties of empirical correlation matrices . the majority of the eigenvalues present in the spectrum of an empirical correlation matrix result from randomly induced correlations between the time series . in the generic case , where one measures the correlation between @xmath3 independent random time series for @xmath5 time steps ( the observed period ) , then the resulting correlation matrix would be an @xmath3 by @xmath3 wishart matrix , whose statistical properties are well known @xcite . in the limits where @xmath8 and @xmath9 the eigenvalues of the wishart matrix are distributed according to a marchenko - pastur distribution @xmath10 and @xmath11 otherwise . the boundaries @xmath12 and @xmath13 are dependent on the data size and given by @xmath14 ^ 2.\ ] ] this analytic curve represents the boundaries of the bulk eigenvalues , which predominantly represent noise , and so have little meaning assigned to them . the eigenvalues outside this range however have structural implications , and correspond to groups of correlated stocks @xcite . as a result , any empirical correlation matrix @xmath15 can be identified as a sum of of two matrices : + @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the random part aggregated from the eigenvalues in the random spectrum ( @xmath18 ) @xmath19 we refer to @xmath20 as the `` structured '' component , which is composed from those eigenvalues above the boundary of the bulk eigenvalues . @xmath21 . + moving forward , in financial markets it well established that stocks typically move up or down together , an effect known as the market mode . this effect is indicated by the presence of a very large eigenvalue @xmath22 , orders of magnitude larger than the rest . since this eigenvalue represents a common factor influencing all the stocks in a given market , from a structural perspective , the market mode eigenvalue signifies the presence of one single super - community , containing all the stocks in the market . + thus , the other eigenvalues ( not including the market mode ) , which deviate from the bulk , @xmath23 are the ones corresponding to mesoscopic clusters , i.e. groups of stocks with similar dynamics . this observation results in a further decomposition of the empirical correlation matrix @xmath24 where @xmath25 represents the market mode , and @xmath26 represents the remaining correlated groups . these sub - groups of correlated stocks comprise the mesoscopic structure of the market . they are also referred as `` group modes '' in some of the literature @xcite . + our focus here is to detect these eigenvalues in the spectrum of both the binary and weighted data . moreover , we want to explore the similarities and differences between the two spectra to inform us about the corresponding structures yielded by each type of data . +        in figure [ dist1 ] we plot the eigenvalue density distribution for the three different indices . the top row corresponds to the weighted representation ( log - returns ) , and the bottom row corresponds to the binary representation ( binary signatures ) . we can observe the known structure of the financial markets in the weighted data , however this complex structure also exists in the binary data . this result is non trivial . we can observe a market mode , and several deviating eigenvalues also in the `` simpler '' binary data ( with the same order of magnitude ) . + we also want to inspect whether both descriptions of the system function the same under randomization . the returns of each stock were separately permuted randomly , therefore preserving the total return of the stocks and destroying the daily correlation between the returns . once the time series entries are shuffled , both binary and weighted correlation matrices end up as elementary random matrices . as discussed before , the eigenvalues of such matrices will be distributed with a marchenko - pastur distribution .    in figure [ dist2 ] we plot the density distribution of the shuffled data for the three different indices . the top row corresponds to the weighted representation ( log - returns ) , and the bottom row corresponds to the binary representation ( binary signatures ) . as expected , in both cases we observed the known characteristics of a random matrix . the spectra of both representations collapsed to the known analytic curve . + to sum up this section , we identified a sub - group structure both in the weighted and the binary representation of the three indices . each of the binary spectra we studied retain all the known properties of a `` regular '' ( weighted ) spectrum ( random bulk , market mode and group modes ) . this result propels us to do a more refined analysis , and to further explore ( and compare ) the sub - group structure of the different indices . in the next section we will apply community detection algorithms to extract a more detailed structure for both representations , so that we can better quantify the similarities and the variations . .the 10 industry sectors in the global industry classification standard ( gics ) , with the color representation used to highlight the sectors in the following figures . [ cols="<,^,<,^ " , ]     once we obtain the community structure using the different algorithms , our goal is to quantify the dissimilarities ( or similarities ) between the different partitions ( binary and weighted ) . for this task we apply the variation of information ( vi ) measurement @xcite . the variation of information is an information - theoretic measure of the distance between two partitions . the different partitions @xmath27 and @xmath28 represent @xmath3-dimensional vectors where the @xmath2-th component @xmath29 denotes the set in which node @xmath2 is placed by that particular partition . the variation of information involves the mutual information @xmath30 which is defined as @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the joint probability distribution , and @xmath33 the marginal distribution of @xmath34 . the mutual information measures the overlap between the two partitions , however it is not a metric ( does not obeys the triangle inequality ) nor is it normalized . thus , for this study we use the ( normalized ) variation of information which is defined as @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the joint entropy and is defined as @xmath37        the variation of information ranges from @xmath38 to @xmath39 , where @xmath38 indicates two identical partitions , and @xmath39 a complete dissimilarity between the partitions . first , we measure the variation of information between two partition vectors , generated by the weighted and binary time series . respectively , this approach enables us to quantify the difference in group structure ( for 2001 - 2011 ) , and compare the performances of the different algorithms .    in table [ tab : varinfo ] we plot the measured vi between the different partitions , which resulted from the binary and weighted data . these measurements are for the community structures resulting from 10 years ( 2500 time steps ) of data , for each of the three different indices . we run the algorithms 1000 times ( for louvain and potts , while the spectral is deterministic ) and extract the partitions that maximize the modularity . we measure the vi between two different partitions : the most frequent one , and the one that minimizes the vi ( the most similar ones ) . one can consider this to be the best result ( subject to the best partition ) . again we should note that all the partitions maximize the modularity , and therefore are optimal . since the vi is not linear ( and not intuitive ) , we also included a simpler measurement of the percentage of stocks that are not occupying the same community in the different partitions . + we can observe that both the potts and louvain algorithms consistently perform better then the spectral method , i.e. they yield partitions with higher modularity . we should note that , one can only compare the value of the modularity for the same representation ( binary or weighted ) , while there is no meaning in comparing modularity between the different representations . generally , we can observe that the binary information and the weighted information result in very similar structures , as we showed in the previous section . the exception to this is the ftse index , where the binary information consistently yields a greater number of communities . it is interesting to note that the binary information always results in either the same or a greater number of communities over the weighted time series . next , we will explore the evolution in time of the vi between the different types of information . we considered a sub - period of 600 time steps ( about two and a half years ) , and apply the same procedure as before . however , here we use a sliding window technique , where in each step we input a new day and ignore the previous information . this results in 1900 time steps ( from the original 2500 ) , where each point is the frequent vi calculated from the correlation matrix using the given 600 time step . in figure [ fig : vislide ] we plot the different measurements for the different algorithms . the potts and the louvain methods present a more stable dynamics , while the spectral method yield higher vi . furthermore , there is no systematic effects of the financial crisis on the similarity between the binary and the weighted representations . over the last few years community detection methods have revealed themselves as useful tools to study the structure of complex systems . in this context , we have introduced a new approach aiming at analysing structural dependencies , which result form different descriptions ( weighted and binary activity ) of a complex system . our approach enables us to quantify the level of `` structural information '' encoded within the binary projection of weighted time series , and measure variations and similarities between the different partitions . + the analysis reveals that in financial markets both the binary and weighted information yield very similar structures , which also manifest themselves in similar spectral properties . the algorithms find complex mesoscopic structure of internally correlated clusters , which are residually anti - correlated with each other @xcite . moreover , the clusters are populated by stocks from various sectors . remarkably , we show that the simple knowledge of the direction of increments of each stock can reproduce this complex structure very successfully . + our findings suggest that the binary signatures of financial time series carry significant structural information . these results are far from trivial , as one might expect that the full knowledge of the amplitudes of price fluctuations is a key component in clustering the markets into correlated groups . however , here we explicitly showed that purely binary information can replicate the main features obtained from complete information . thus , we conclude that the majority of the market structure induced by the binary dynamics of the stocks . even when the two representations differ by some extent , the binary description provides very sensible information ( as exemplified by the financials sector in the ftse ) . in any case , binary projections are much more robust to noise then the original fluctuations , by definition . we adopt modularity - based community detection methods , which are adapted to correlation matrices . respectively , this restrict us to undirected networks , as a result of sharing by definition the same symmetry property as correlation matrices . let us consider a network with @xmath3 nodes , one can introduce a number of partitions of the @xmath3 nodes into non - overlapping sets . the different partitions will be represented by an @xmath3-dimensional vector @xmath40 where the @xmath2-th component @xmath29 denotes the set in which node @xmath2 is placed by that particular partition . now , we introduce the modularity measure @xmath41 which indicates the quality of a specific choice of partition @xmath40 measured by high degree of inter community connectivity and a low degree of intra community connectivity . the modularity optimization algorithms look for the specific partition that maximizes the value of @xmath41 , the objective function . it is defined as @xmath42\delta(\sigma_i , \sigma_j)\ ] ] where @xmath43 is a delta function ensuring that only when @xmath44 ( nodes within the same community ) does it contribute to the sum , and @xmath45 is the adjacency matrix that indicates whether a link exists between the nodes , @xmath46 or not , @xmath47 ( in the binary representation ) . the pre - factor @xmath48 serves to normalize the value of @xmath41 between @xmath49 and @xmath39 , where @xmath50 is twice the number of total links in the network . the term @xmath51 is vital to the outcome of the community detection process . it represents the expectation of whether a link exists or not , according to the specific null model that you consider . so far the majority of the methods use null models ( hypotheses ) , which are suited only for networks . for example the configuration model , that preserves the degree sequence ( or strength sequence ) of the network . it has been shown that such null models can introduce biases when applied to correlation matrices @xcite . instead , a recent method proposed a redefinition of the modularity , which takes into account the existence of known spectral properties in correlation matrices ( see section [ sa ] ) . + now , instead of the previous adjacency matrix @xmath45 , we input the empirical correlation matrix @xmath52 . the first is the global mode @xmath53(market mode in a financial setting ) , which represents the common movement of the market . in other words , in order to clearly differentiate between the mesoscopic groups , one must subtract out the main drift of the market . the second is the random bulk @xmath17 @xmath54 which corresponds to random correlation between the different time series . in order to filter this noise , one must use random matrix theory ( rmt ) @xcite , to identify the random properties of empirical correlation matrices . the method define the modularity as @xmath55 constituted from the eigenvalues @xmath56 less than or equal to @xmath57 ( usually , the eigenvalues smaller than @xmath58 are included as well ) and their corresponding eigenvectors @xmath59 . the new method modified three popular community detection algorithms , customizing where necessary to be effective with correlation matrices @xcite . the three algorithms we use in this paper are known as the potts ( or spin glass ) method @xcite , the louvain method @xcite and the spectral method @xcite    99 s. sinha , a. chatterjee , a. chakraborti , and b.k.chakrabarti . _ econophysics _ ( wiley - vch , 2011 ) . bouchaud and m.potters . _ theory of financial risk and derivative pricing_(cambridge university press 2003 ) , 2nd ed . mantegna , and h.e . _ introduction to econophysics : correlations and complexity in finance _ ( cambridge university press 1999 ) . mantegna , r. hierarchical structure in financial markets . j. b _ * 11 * , 193 ( 1999 ) . fortunato , s. community detection in graphs . rep . _ * 486 * , 75 ( 2010 ) . _ networks , an introduction _ , ( oxford university press 2010 ) . macmahon , m. and garlaschelli , d. community detection for correlation matrices . r. x _ * ? * , ? ( 2015 ) . la spada , g. , farmer , j . , and lillo , f. the non - random walk of stock prices : the long - term correlation between signs and sizes . _ j. b _ * 64 * , 607 - 614 , ( 2008 ) . alexander m. petersen , fengzhong wang , shlomo havlin , and h. eugene stanley . quantitative law describing market dynamics before and after interest rate change . e _ * 81 * , 066121 , ( 2010 ) . m. boguna , m. a. serrano . generalized percolation in random directed networks . e _ * 72 * , 016106 , ( 2005 ) . a. almog and d. garalaschelli . binary versus non - binary information in real time series : empirical results and maximum - entropy matrix models . _ new j. phys _ * 16 * , 093015 ( 2014 ) . j. reichardt and s. bornholdt . detecting fuzzy community structures in complex networks with a potts model . lett . _ * 93 * , 218701 ( 2004 ) . j. reichardt and s. bornholdt . ntatistical mechanics of community detection e. _ * 74 * , 016110 ( 2006 ) . blondel , j. guillaume , r. lambiotte and e. lefebvre . fast unfolding of communities in large networks _ journal of statistical mechanics : theory and experiment . _ , 10008 ( 2008 ) . modularity and community structure in networks _ proc . natl . acad . * 103 * , 8577 ( 2006 ) . v. plerou , p. gopikrishnan , b. rosenow , l.a.n . amaral , t . guhr and h.e . . random matrix approach to cross correlations in financial data . * 65 * , 066126 ( 2002 ) . wigner , characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions . _ the annals of mathematics _ * 62 * , 548 ( 1955 ) . _ random matrices_. ( elsevier 2004 ) . v. plerou , p. gopikrishnan , b. rosenow , l.a.n . amaral and h.e . universal and nonuniversal properties of cross correlations in financial time series . _ phys.rev . lett . _ * 83 * , 1471 ( 1999 ) . l. laloux , p. cizeau , j.p . bouchaud and m. potters . noise dressing of financial correlation matrices . lett . _ * 83 * , 1467 ( 1999 ) . t. heimo , j.m . kumpula , k. kaski and j. saramaki . noise dressing of financial correlation matrices . lett . _ * 83 * , 1467 ( 1999 ) . t. heimo , j.m . kumpula , k. kaski and j. saramki . detecting modules in dense weighted networks with the potts method . _ journal of statistical mechanics : theory and experiment . _ * 08 * , p08007 ( 2008 ) . fenn , m.a . porter , p.j . mucha , m. mcdonald , s. williams , n.f . johnson and n.s . dynamical clustering of exchange rates . _ quantitative finance . _ * 10 * , 1493 ( 2012 ) . t. isogai . clustering of japanese stock returns by recursive modularity optimization for efficient portfolio diversification . _ j. complex networks_. * 2 * , 557 ( 2014 ) . c. piccardi , l. calatroni , and f. bertoni . clustering financial time series by network community analysis._int . j. mod . phys_. * 22 * , 35 ( 2011 ) . utsugi , a. ino , k. and oshikawa , m. random matrix theory analysis of cross correlations in financial markets . e _ * 70 * , 026110 ( 2004 ) . potters , m. bouchaud , j.p . and laloux , l. financial applications of random matrix theory : old laces and new pieces . _ acta physica polonica b _ * 36 * , 2767 ( 2005 ) . m. meila . comparing clusterings , an information based distance,_journal of multivariate analysis . _ * 98 * , 873 ( 2007 ) . m. meila . comparing clusterings by the variation of information , _ learning theory and kernel machines . _ * 2777 * , 173 ( 2003 ) . aa and dg acknowledge support from the dutch econophysics foundation ( stichting econophysics , leiden , the netherlands ) with funds from beneficiaries of duyfken trading knowledge bv , amsterdam , the netherlands . this work was also supported by the eu project multiplex ( contract 317532 ) and the netherlands organization for scientific research ( nwo / ocw ) . a.a . and f.b . analyzed the data and prepared the figures . wrote the paper . m.m . wrote the code and created figures 3 - 5 . d.g . planned the research and supervised the project . all authors reviewed the manuscript . the authors declare no competing financial interests .
Abstract:

Answer: the mesoscopic organization of complex systems , from financial markets to the brain , is an intermediate between the microscopic dynamics of individual units ( stocks or neurons , in the mentioned cases ) , and the macroscopic dynamics of the system as a whole . the organization is determined by `` communities '' of units whose dynamics , represented by time series of activity , is more strongly correlated internally than with the rest of the system . recent studies have shown that the binary projections of various financial and neural time series exhibit nontrivial dynamical features that resemble those of the original data . this implies that a significant piece of information is encoded into the binary projection ( i.e. the sign ) of such increments . here , we explore whether the binary signatures of multiple time series can replicate the same complex community organization of the financial market , as the original weighted time series . we adopt a method that has been specifically designed to detect communities from cross - correlation matrices of time series data . our analysis shows that the simpler binary representation leads to a community structure that is almost identical with that obtained using the full weighted representation . these results confirm that binary projections of financial time series contain significant structural information .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: nonlinearity of field equations can have pronounced manifestations in physical predictions from the theory . examples are ubiquitous and well - known : multiple ground states , static solitons , solitary waves , long lived oscillons , blow - up of solutions at a finite time , and many more . another important effect due to the nonlinearity is that the field can react to the presence of external charges in a rather nontrivial way . in consequence , the force between the charges essentially differs from naive expectations based on free field models . very old , yet still interesting example of this phenomenon is provided by classical non - abelian gauge fields in the presence of static external charges , see , e.g. , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite . recently , we have studied such this aspect of the nonlinearity using the signum - gordon model , @xcite , @xcite . the remarkable simplicity of the field equation in this model enables us to present exact nonperturbative results , in contradistinction to the case of yang - mills field . the most striking findings are as follows : there are no yukawa or coulomb tails of the field in the region far away from charges ; the charges are totally screened by the field ; the force between them exactly vanishes when they are separated by a distance that exceeds a certain finite value . in the present paper we corroborate these results by solving the two dimensional case . let us briefly remind that the signum - gordon model involves a single real scalar field @xmath0 that evolves according to the signum - gordon equation @xmath1 where @xmath2 is the self - coupling constant . the @xmath3 function takes the values @xmath4 , in particular @xmath5 . the lagrangian has the form @xmath6 the field potential @xmath7 is v - shaped ( @xmath8 denotes the modulus ) . the model has been studied in several aspects , such as self - similar solutions @xcite , oscillons ( or rather breathers ) @xcite , and @xmath9-balls or boson stars in the version with a complex scalar field @xcite . let us add that recently the signum - gordon equation has been discussed in a much wider mathematical framework of the theory of partial differential equations with compressed solutions @xcite . in general , the model together with its extensions has turned out to be very useful theoretical laboratory in which we can study various above mentioned aspects of nonlinear fields .    in the present paper , similarly as in @xcite , @xcite , we regard the signum - gordon field as the mediating field , which generates a force between two point charges coupled to it . in @xcite , the field generated by the two charges , as well as the force , are exactly calculated in one spatial dimension , while in three dimensions approximate formulas are given under the assumption that the point charges are close to each other . in @xcite we study three - body forces in the one dimensional case . because the signum - gordon equation is nonlinear one , finding its solutions is generally a nontrivial task , especially in dimensions larger than one . in the present paper we investigate the two dimensional case . using a formal mathematical connection with the planar electrostatics we show that also in this case the point charges can be totally screened by a cloud of the scalar field . this screening is easily seen for a single charge . the case of two or more charges situated not too far from each other is much more difficult . the main problem is the determination of the shape of the screening cloud . we have found this shape , as well as an integral formula for the scalar field forming the cloud . these results are used in order to derive the exact formula for the force between the two identical charges . the force completely vanishes when the distance between the charges exceeds certain critical value ( equal to @xmath10 , see formula ( 4 ) below ) that non - analytically depends on the strength @xmath11 of the charges and the self - coupling constant @xmath12 . the plan of our paper is as follows . in section 2 we establish the presence of the total screening in the case of two identical charges in two spatial dimensions . we find the exact shape of the screening cloud formed by the scalar field , and we obtain the integral formula for the field . section 3 is devoted to the calculation of the force between the charges . section 4 contains a summary and remarks . let us begin from the simple case of a single point - like charge of strength @xmath13 located at the origin in the two dimensional space . the field equation for the static field has the form @xmath14 where @xmath15 is the two dimensional laplacian . the fundamental solution of the linear poisson equation @xmath16 has the form @xmath17 where @xmath18 is a constant . we expect that close to the charge the solution @xmath0 is well approximated by @xmath19 , and therefore it is positive . then the term @xmath20 in ( 1 ) has the constant value @xmath12 , and the exact solution of eq . ( 1 ) has the form @xmath21 here @xmath22 is another constant . because it can be included into the constant @xmath18 , we put @xmath23 . the constant @xmath18 is determined from the requirement that our @xmath24 matches the vacuum solution @xmath25 at a certain radius @xmath26 . the matching conditions have the standard form , @xmath27 on the circle @xmath28 . here @xmath29 stands for the derivative with respect to @xmath30 . the final form of solution ( 2 ) reads @xmath31 where @xmath32 the field @xmath0 given by formula ( 3 ) has positive values in the circle @xmath33 , hence the assumption that @xmath34 is fulfilled . to summarize , the scalar field in the presence of the single charge has the form @xmath35    the field @xmath36 is quite interesting for the following reasons . first , note that its dependence on the coupling constant @xmath12 , as well as on the charge @xmath11 , is nonanalytic at @xmath37 . thus the solution is non perturbative in these parameters . second , the charge @xmath11 is completely screened by the circular cloud of the field , because outside the circle @xmath38 the field attains the vacuum value @xmath25 exactly . the cloud has the constant charge density @xmath39 of the opposite sign than @xmath11 . formula ( 4 ) for the radius @xmath40 is equivalent to the statement that the total absolute charge of the circular cloud is equal to @xmath11 , namely @xmath41 .    now let us turn to less trivial case of two identical point charges of strengths @xmath11 located at the points @xmath42 on the @xmath43 axis in the two dimensional space . the distance between charges is given by @xmath44 . instead of eq . ( 1 ) we now have @xmath45 because of the nonlinear @xmath46 term , the pertinent solution of this equation is not just the sum of appropriately shifted in space solutions ( 3 ) , unless the distance @xmath47 between the charges exceeds @xmath48 , in which case the two circular screening clouds surrounding the charges do not intersect each other . if the charges are close to each other , i.e. , @xmath49 , it is not clear whether the total screening is still present , and if present , what is the shape of the screening cloud of the field . we address these questions in the remaining part of this section . our findings are utilized in the next section , where we calculate the force exerted on the charge located at @xmath50 . it is clear that when @xmath51 we again have a single point charge , screened by the circular cloud of the field as discussed above , except that now the strength of the charge equals @xmath52 instead @xmath11 . let us assume for a moment that the total screening persists also when @xmath53 , that is that there exists a region @xmath54 surrounding the two charges such that @xmath55 for points @xmath56 lying outside @xmath54 , or on the boundary @xmath57 , and that @xmath58 if @xmath56 lies inside @xmath54 . inside @xmath54 , the term @xmath59 in eq . ( 5 ) provides the constant charge density that screens the two point charges . this cloud of charge contributes to @xmath60 the term @xmath61 the two point charges contribute @xmath62 note that @xmath63 is the solution of ( 5 ) when @xmath64 . the shape of the region @xmath54 can be found from the requirement that we have the total screening , i.e. , @xmath65 for all points @xmath56 outside @xmath54 .    as already noticed , eq . ( 5 ) is similar to poisson equation of ordinary electrostatics . standard reasoning known from the electrostatics gives the boundary conditions for @xmath0 at @xmath57 : @xmath66 for all @xmath67 , where @xmath68 denotes the derivative in the direction perpendicular to @xmath57 . these conditions are checked numerically after we determine the region @xmath54 .    the condition ( 8) is utilized as follows . first , we rewrite the formulas for @xmath69 using the rescaled polar coordinates , introduced as follows : @xmath70 in particular , @xmath71 and @xmath72 . thus , @xmath73,\ ] ] @xmath74 where @xmath75 the function @xmath76 gives the radial coordinate of the boundary of @xmath54 at the azimuthal angle @xmath77 . the considered set of two point charges is symmetric with respect to reflections in the both axises , as well as in the origin . we expect that the shape of @xmath54 reflects these symmetries . therefore , @xmath78    our present task is to determine the function @xmath76 . to this end , we first notice that @xmath79 ) + \ln(1 - \frac{\rho}{r}\exp[-i(\theta-\alpha)]).\ ] ] expanding the two logarithms on the r.h.s with respect to @xmath80 , integrating over @xmath81 , and using the symmetry of @xmath76 we obtain @xmath82 this formula is to be compared with the fourier series in @xmath83 for @xmath84 , which can be obtained by expanding the logarithms similarly as above , and reads @xmath85 condition ( 8) is satisfied if @xmath86 and @xmath87 where @xmath88 . because @xmath89 , conditions ( 12 ) are satisfied automatically for odd values of @xmath90 . for even values of @xmath90 , we put @xmath91 in ( 10 ) and rewrite ( 11 ) and ( 12 ) as the following set of conditions for @xmath76 @xmath92 where @xmath93 . because the r.h.s.s of conditions ( 13 ) depend on @xmath94 , we expect that @xmath95 contains only even powers of @xmath47 , @xmath96 the functions @xmath97 , @xmath98 , have fourier representation of the general form @xmath99 in compliance with the symmetries of @xmath76 . the first function , @xmath100 , gives @xmath101 when @xmath102 . thus , we put @xmath102 and @xmath103 in conditions ( 13 ) ; @xmath104 has the fourier form ( 14 ) . simple analysis based on the formulas @xmath105 and @xmath106 shows that the conditions for @xmath104 are satisfied only if this function is constant , @xmath107 . this result is in agreement with the fact that for @xmath108 we actually have the single point charge of the strength @xmath52 , which has the circular screening cloud of the radius @xmath109 , i.e. , @xmath110 for our rescaled radial coordinate .    in order to determine the function @xmath111 , we differentiate conditions ( 13 ) with respect to @xmath94 , and we put @xmath102 , @xmath112 . this gives the conditions @xmath113where @xmath114 it follows that @xmath115 . taking higher derivatives of ( 13 ) with respect to @xmath94 and performing similar calculations as above , we have found that @xmath116 with such partial results , we have made the educated guess that @xmath117 for all @xmath118 , i.e. , that @xmath119.\ ] ] it turns out that indeed , @xmath95 given by this formula satisfies all conditions ( 13 ) . the pertinent integration on the l.h.s . of ( 13 ) is elementary . the form of formula ( 15 ) implies that it holds only if @xmath120 , because @xmath121 . in the case @xmath122 , i.e. , @xmath123 , this formula gives two circles which touch each other at the origin , and have the point charges at their centers . for @xmath124 each charge has its own circular screening cloud , separated from the other . it remains to check whether all values of the total field @xmath125 are strictly positive inside the region @xmath54 , as it has been assumed . we can do this only numerically . it is a rather straightforward computation since the integral ( 6 ) giving @xmath126 has the already known compact domain @xmath54 . moreover , the two dimensional integral can be reduced to one - dimensional one over the boundary of @xmath54 , see formula ( 19 ) below . the numerical results corroborate our assumption . they also show that @xmath0 and @xmath127 are continuous on @xmath128 . thus , we conclude that the pertinent solution of eq . ( 5 ) , denoted below as @xmath129 , has the following form @xmath130 where the compact region @xmath54 has the boundary with the rescaled radial coordinate @xmath76 given by formula ( 15 ) . example plots of levels of @xmath129 are presented in figs . 1 and 2 .     for @xmath131 . the outermost contour corresponds to @xmath25 and it is given by @xmath76 , formula ( 15 ) . this contour encircles the compact domain @xmath54 . the horizontal and vertical axises correspond to @xmath132 , @xmath133 , respectively . , width=359,height=302 ]     for @xmath134 . the meaning of the lines is the same as in fig . 1 . the picture shows the deformation of outer contours in vicinity of the vertical line @xmath135 , that ultimately leads to the breakup of the cloud into two non overlapping circular clouds when @xmath122 . , width=415,height=226 ] the method of calculating the force exerted on an external charge coupled to a field is discussed in detail in @xcite . adapting it to the case at hand , we extract from the field @xmath137 the logarithmically divergent proper field of the charge located at @xmath136 , @xmath138 here @xmath139 is smooth at the point @xmath136 . next , we calculate the time rate of the transfer of momentum from the field to the charge located at @xmath136 . it is equal to the force @xmath140 exerted on that charge , see @xcite for details and examples . it turns out that @xmath141 where @xmath142 . we see that the proper field of the charge does not contribute to the force exerted on that charge , as expected . the symmetry of the set of charges implies that @xmath143 . the formula for the non vanishing component @xmath144 can be rewritten in the polar coordinates as @xmath145    computation of the force from formula ( 18 ) is significantly simplified when we rewrite @xmath126 inside the region @xmath54 as a line integral over the boundary @xmath57 . first , we write @xmath146 in the form @xmath147 where @xmath148 @xmath149 and @xmath150 is the antisymmetric symbol , @xmath151 . next we apply stokes theorem , @xmath152 the curve @xmath153 , defined by @xmath154 represents @xmath57 . using the contour representation ( 19 ) we obtain @xmath155,\ ] ] where @xmath156 @xmath157 @xmath158 -1,\ ] ] @xmath159 @xmath76 is given by formula ( 15 ) , @xmath160 . in spite of their appearance , the integrals in ( 20 ) are elementary . first , notice that @xmath161 . therefore , in the second integral in ( 20 ) we may use integration by parts in order to eliminate the logarithm function . second , we write the @xmath162 and @xmath163 functions in terms of @xmath164 and observe that @xmath165 for any integer @xmath90 except @xmath166 . this eliminates many terms , in particular all terms proportional to @xmath167 . this last function is thought of as the taylor series with respect to @xmath168 , obviously it contains only even powers of @xmath164 . finally , we use the integral @xmath169 and formula ( 4 ) for @xmath40 . we obtain @xmath170    the non vanishing component of the force exerted on the charge located at the point @xmath171 is computed from formula ( 18 ) , @xmath172 here we have returned to the original coordinate @xmath173 . the force is attractive one , as expected from the scalar field . formula ( 22 ) holds for @xmath174 , outside this range of @xmath175 the force vanishes . vanishes in the limit @xmath176 . therefore , the force also vanishes in this limit , in spite of the fact that the r.h.s . of formula ( 22 ) gives @xmath177 . the point is that in that limit formula ( 22 ) is not valid for any @xmath178  the force vanishes for all @xmath179 . ] the factor @xmath180 in formula ( 22 ) represents the standard two dimensional coulomb force characteristic for the free field ( @xmath64 ) . this force dominates at short distances , @xmath181 , also in the case of self - interacting field . here @xmath182 is the distance between the charges , and @xmath183 is the critical distance between them . at distances @xmath184 the force becomes weaker , and it exactly vanishes for @xmath185 . when the distance @xmath186 reaches @xmath18 , the screening cloud splits into two non - overlapping circular clouds that screen each charge separately . formula ( 22 ) for the force can easily be generalized to the case one particle is located at the point @xmath56 and the other one at @xmath187 . it is sufficient to substitute @xmath188 , where @xmath189 , and to include the unit vector @xmath190 directed from @xmath187 to @xmath56 . thus , the force exerted on the particle located at @xmath56 is given by formula @xmath191 if @xmath192 , otherwise @xmath193 . this force possesses the potential @xmath194 such that @xmath195 , namely @xmath196\ ] ] if @xmath197 , otherwise @xmath198 . \1 . as the most valuable result of our work we regard the exact formula ( 23 ) for the force exerted by one point charge on the other . this force vanishes quadratically when the distance @xmath186 between the charges approaches ( from below ) the critical value @xmath199 . in the one dimensional case investigated in @xcite , the force vanishes linearly , @xmath200 , where @xmath201 is the distance between the charges , and the critical distance @xmath202 is given by the formula @xmath203 ( we keep the same form of the field equation in all dimensions ) the situation in three dimensional case remains to be investigated because in @xcite we have been able to compute the force only approximately , under the assumption that the charges are close to each other . the field @xmath0 is the sum of @xmath126 , given by the exact integral formula ( 19 ) , and of the two logarithmic coulomb terms . in the one dimensional case the pertinent field is known analytically @xcite , while in three dimensions we only have an approximate formula for it . note that formula ( 19 ) provides quite convenient starting point for numerical computations of the field . the total screening of the charges coupled to the signum - gordon scalar field may resemble the phenomenon of total screening of external color charges interacting with a classical yang - mills field @xcite , @xcite . one should however note that there are several differences : in the yang - mills case the total screening is proven for external charges that are spatially extended ; the screening field is time - dependent ; the complete screening appears only in a certain limit . moreover , the analytic form of the screening field is not known . it is not clear to us whether the two cases of the total screening are interrelated in some way . \3 . in paper @xcite it is shown that a classical scalar field in the presence of point - like external charges can be utilized in order to unravel certain essential features of the corresponding quantum theory , like asymptotic freedom or triviality , depending on the sign of coupling constant . the main role is played by a classical perturbative solution that has the form of a formal series in powers of the coupling constant . the field studied there is the real , massless scalar field with the self - interaction of the form @xmath204 . similar investigations in the cases of a massive scalar field and yang - mills field are presented in @xcite , @xcite , respectively . we think it would be interesting to employ such a method to the signum - gordon model , in particular because very little is known about the properties of the quantum version of this model . 99 p. sikivie , n. weiss , phys . d * 18 * , 3809 ( 1978 ) . j. kiskis , phys . d * 21 * , 421 ( 1980 ) . h. arod , acta phys . b * 14 * , 825 ( 1983 ) . h. arod , j. karkowski , z. wierczyski , phys . d * 87 * , 125004 ( 2013 ) . h. arod , j. karkowski , z. wierczyski , acta phys . b * 44 * , 1991 ( 2013 ) . h. arod , p. klimas , t. tyranowski , phys . e * 73 * , 046609 ( 2006 ) . h. arod , z. wierczyski , phys . d * 84 * , 067701 ( 2011 ) . h. arod , j. karkowski , z. wierczyski , phys . d * 80 * , 067702 ( 2009 ) ; b. kleihaus , j. kunz , c. lmmerzahl , m. list , phys . b * 675 * , 102 ( 2009 ) ; phys . d * 82 * , 104050 ( 2010 ) ; wang hua - wen , cheng hong - bo , chin . phys . * * 2**8 , 121101 ( 2011 ) ; sanjeev kumar , usha kulshreshtha , daya shankar kulshreshtha , class . quantum grav . * 31 * , 167001 ( 2014 ) ; b. hartmann , b. kleihus , j. kunz , i. schaffer , phys . b * 714 * , 120 ( 2012 ) ; phys . d * 88 * , 124033 ( 2013 ) . r. e. caflisch , s. j. osher , h. schaeffer , giang tran , _ pdes with compressed solutions _ , arxiv:1311.5850v2 [ math.ap ] ( 2014 ) . g. dvali , c. gomez , s. mukhanov , jhep * 12 * , 103 ( 2011 ) . hiroshi yoda , shinichi nojiri , phys . b , * 718 * , 683 ( 2012 ) . zeng ding - fang , commun . . phys . * 60 * , 465 ( 2013 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: exact formula for the force between two identical static point charges coupled to the nonlinear scalar field of two - dimensional signum - gordon model is obtained . pertinent solution of the field equation is found in the form of one dimensional integral . the force exactly vanishes when the distance between charges exceeds certain critical value . pacs : 11.27.+d , 11.10.lm , 03.50.kk +


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: one of the most rarer processes of the nature , the double beta decay has unambiguous importance in explicitly linking nuclear structure aspects with neutrino physics @xcite . nuclear double beta decay is a second order process which involved electroweak decay of two nucleons simultaneously . the two neutrino mode of double beta decay is a second order process and allowed in standard model . it has been detected for nearly a dozen of nuclei @xcite . the correct theoretical description of these observations serves as a test of various nuclear models and also a necessary step to understand the neutrinoless mode . the extraction of information is essentially dependent upon the prediction of nuclear transition matrix elements ( ntmes ) involved in these processes . the difference in the configurations of the nucleons between initial and final states is a major ingredient of the matrix elements . the ntmes contain the wave function of the initial even - even nucleus in its @xmath2 ground state and the wave function of the final nucleus ( usually @xmath2 ground state but some time also excited @xmath3 and @xmath2 states ) . these wave functions are connected by proper operators . in case of two neutrino mode the summation over all @xmath4 states of the intermediate odd - odd nuclei is required where as for neutrinoless decay the summation over the complete set of the states of intermediate nucleus is needed . therefore it will be necessary to evaluate the structure of the initial , final and intermediate nuclei explicitly .    the most of the nuclei undergoing double beta decay are medium or heavy mass region and all of them are even even type , in which pairing degrees of freedom play an important role . moreover it has been conjectured that the deformation plays a crucial role in double beta transitions . hence it is desirable to have a model in which pairing and deformation degrees of freedom treated on equal footing in its formalism . the shell model , which attempts to solve the nuclear many - body problems as exactly as possible , is always being the best choice for model calculations . however , for most of the double beta decaying nuclei the full scale shell model calculations are not feasible and the reliability of theoretical predictions has been hampered by unstabilities in case of bcs+rpa type treatment . for this purpose the angular momentum projected deformed hartree - fock ( dhf ) model is one of the most convenient choices . the dhf formalism , the pairing interaction is taken into account by mixing particle - hole excitations ( 2p-2h,4p-4h etc ) of @xmath5 type across the fermi surfaces over the hf ground state and deformation effects are included in a self - consistent way . moreover it has been shown @xcite that it is possible to get shell model results with angular momentum projected dhf calculation by mixing only a few intrinsic configurations built by suitable particle - hole excitations across proton and neutron fermi surfaces . here we have used microscopic many - body self consistent model based on deformed hartree - fock procedure and subsequent angular momentum projection technique for a reliable description of the nuclear structure of some medium as well heavy nuclei participating in double beta decay processes in the mass range @xmath0 to @xmath6 . since our aim is to study the low - lying spectroscopic properties of the nuclei , we have not incorporated the coulomb effect in our calculations . the inclusion of coulomb effect will not change the energy spectra and electromagnetic matrix elements of individual nucleus rather it will change the energy difference between two nuclei .    in the present article we briefly discuss about the theoretical formalism in section 2 . section 3 contains the discussion about the results obtained from this paper . the conclusions are finally given in section 4 . in this section we present briefly the model used for the microscopic calculations . more details can be found in refs . our model consists of self - consistent deformed hartree - fock mean field obtained with a surface delta residual interaction and subsequent angular momentum projection to obtain states with good angular momentum . the axially deformed states @xmath7 are expanded in the spherical basis states as follows : @xmath8 where j is the angular momentum of the spherical single particle state and m its projection on symmetry axis . the mixing amplitude @xmath9 are obtained by solving deformed hartree - fock equations in an iterative process . when the convergence in the hf solutions is obtained we get deformed single particle orbits . the residual interaction is also included self - consistently and it causes the mixing of single - particle orbits of nucleons .    because of mixing in single particle orbits , the hf configurations @xmath10 are superposition of states of good angular momentum . the states of good angular momentum can be extracted by means of projection operator @xcite    @xmath11    here @xmath12 is the rotation operator @xmath13 and @xmath14 represents the euler angles @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 . the hamiltonian overlap between two states of angular momentum j projected from intrinsic states @xmath18 and @xmath19 is given by : @xmath20 with @xmath21    reduced matrix elements of tensor operator t@xmath22 between projected states @xmath23 and @xmath24 are given by @xmath25 where the tensor operator @xmath26 denotes electromagnetic operators of multipolarity l.    in general , two states @xmath27 and @xmath28 projected from two intrinsic configurations @xmath29 and @xmath30 are not orthogonal to each other even if the intrinsic states @xmath29 and @xmath30 are orthogonal . we orthonormalise them using following equation @xmath31 here @xmath32 are amplitude overlap and @xmath33 are the orthonormalised amplitudes , which can be identified as band - mixing amplitudes . the orthonormalised states are given by @xmath34 with these orthonormalised states we can calculate matrix elements of various tensor operators . the spectroscopic quadrupole moment of a state with angular momentum j is given by    @xmath35    where the summation is for quadrupole moment operators of protons and neutrons .    the gyromagnetic factor ( g - factor ) of state j is defined as @xmath36 where @xmath37 is the magnetic moment of state j. the magnetic dipole moment ( @xmath38 ) of a state with angular momentum j can be expressed as @xmath39 where i = p and n for protons and neutrons respectively . where @xmath40 and @xmath41 are orbital and spin g - factor respectively . the g - factors of @xmath42 and @xmath43 for protons and @xmath44 and @xmath45 for neutrons are used for the calculations . the quenching of spin g - factors by 0.75 is taken in account to consider the core polarization effect @xcite . the deformed hf orbits are calculated with a spherical core of @xmath46ni , the model space spans the 1@xmath47 , 0@xmath48 , 1@xmath49 , 0@xmath50 , 0@xmath51 , 0@xmath52 , 0@xmath53 , 2@xmath54 and 0@xmath55 orbits both for protons neutrons with single particle energies 0.0 , 0.78 , 1.88 , 4.44 , 8.88 , 11.47 , 10.73 , 12.21 and 13.69 mev respectively . we use a surface delta interaction @xcite ( with interaction strength @xmath560.36 for @xmath57 , @xmath58 and @xmath59 interactions ) as the residual interaction among the active nucleons in these orbits . deformed hartree - fock and angular momentum projection calculations are performed for some medium - heavy nuclei with mass number @xmath0 to @xmath1 . in our model we can calculate the energy spectra and other electromagnetic moments for even - even parents and daughter as well as odd - odd intermediate nuclei . this is an interesting feature of our model . in contrast to psm where a large number of configurations is needed to understand low - lying yrast spectra , it is found that angular momentum projection ( amp ) from a few low - lying configurations can reasonably reproduces the yrast - spectra . sometimes the amp from single k configuration gives fairly good description of yrast structure . this is due to fact that the residual interaction is included self - consistently in the hf calculations , so that the hf configurations and various particle - hole configurations built on hf solutions are already closer to the solutions obtained from full many body schrdinger equations . the hartree - fock solutions for the parent , intermediate and daughter nuclei are given in table  [ tab : tab_hf - sol ] . the values of intrinsic quadrupole moments(q@xmath60 ) are given both for proton and neutron in unit of harmonic oscillator length parameter , b ( @xmath61fm ) . llllll     + nucleus & shape & e@xmath62 & & + & & & & proton & neutron +   + nucleus & shape & e@xmath62 & & + & & & & proton & neutron +   +    @xmath63ge & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath63as & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath63se & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath64kr & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath64br & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath64se & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath65se & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath65br & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath65kr & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath66mo & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath66tc & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath66ru & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath67mo & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath67tc & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath67ru & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath68cd & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath68ag & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath68pd & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath69pd & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath69ag & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath69cd & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath70cd & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath70 in & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath70sn & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath71sn & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath71sb & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath71te & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath72te & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath72i & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + @xmath72xe & prolate & & & & + & oblate & & & & + [ tab : tab_hf - sol ]      in fig . [ fig : spec_ge - se ] we have shown the low - lying spectra for the nuclei participating in the double beta decay processes of @xmath63ge . in case of the odd - odd intermediate nucleus @xmath63as , the experimental energy spectra is not known therefore we are also not showing the theoretical spectra for these nuclei . for the nuclei @xmath63ge and @xmath63se we have considered the prolate solutions as the prolate solutions are energetically lower than oblate solutions . the angular momentum projected results in comparison with the available experimental data are shown in figure  [ fig : spec_ge - se ] . +     +    the energy spectra of @xmath65se , @xmath65br and @xmath65kr are shown in fig . [ fig : spec_se - kr ] . the angular momentum projection results considering the prolate solutions of @xmath65se and @xmath65br are shown in fig . [ fig : spec_se - kr](a ) and fig . [ fig : spec_se - kr](b ) . in case of @xmath65kr , the prolate and oblate solutions are degenerate . so for this nucleus we have performed the shape - mixing calculation by mixing the prolate and oblate configurations . the shape - mixing calculation reasonably reproduces the low lying spectra for @xmath65kr as can be seen in fig . [ fig : spec_se - kr](c ) . +    the comparison of calculated and experimental results for nuclei @xmath67mo , @xmath67tc , @xmath67ru , @xmath69pd and @xmath69cd are shown in fig .  [ fig : spec_mo - pd - cd ] . a fairly good agreement between theoretical and experimental spectra is obtained for them . + the nucleus @xmath70cd exhibits a complex structure as it has active protons near @xmath73 shell closure and active neutrons near the neutron midshell . our self - consistent calculations reproduce the band structure quit well . the compression in the ground band near @xmath74 is occurring due to the crossing of 2-proton excitation bands across @xmath75 shell . apart from the ground band we have calculated two excited @xmath76 bands compared with experimental results in fig . [ fig : spec_cd - sn](a ) . similarly we have calculated the ground band for the daughter nucleus @xmath70sn and shown in fig . [ fig : spec_cd - sn](b ) . + in fig . [ fig : spec_sn - te](a ) we have plotted the ground state spectra for @xmath71sn . the te isotopes are 2 protons above the tin shell closure . the ground band spectra for @xmath71te are shown in figs . [ fig : spec_sn - te](b ) . in fig . [ fig : spec_te - xe](a ) , the energy spectra of @xmath72te are given . we have used the oblate solutions for @xmath77te as they are lower in energy in these two nuclei . the @xmath72xe isotope shows interesting feature . the interplay between prolate and oblate shapes are observed in our calculations . the band spectra for @xmath72xe are shown in fig  [ fig : spec_te - xe](b ) . the low spin states of this isotope are of prolate shape but for the states above @xmath78 the calculations with oblate shapes are more closer to the experimental levels . +    the nuclei @xmath64kr , @xmath66ru and @xmath68cd are the most promising nuclei among six which can decay through all three possible channels of positron double beta decay . in our present study we have considered these double beta decay nuclei to study the low - lying spectroscopy properties . +    for @xmath64kr , the energy spectra are shown in fig . [ fig : spec_kr78](a ) . apart from the ground band we have shown the excited @xmath79 band . the signature effect is observed in this band due to the rotational alignment of @xmath80g@xmath81 . similarly for @xmath64se nucleus , the ground and excited @xmath79 bands are shown in fig . [ fig : spec_kr78](b ) . for the @xmath79 band the signature inversion is observed as a result of band crossing between @xmath80f@xmath82@xmath80g@xmath81 decoupled band with @xmath79 and @xmath83 . in these nuclei the rotational behaviour of the ground band reproduces quite well except the @xmath84 separation . this is probably due to the fact that in our formalism the pairing is not included explicitly which may be important in these nuclei . +    in figs . [ fig : spec_ru96 ] and [ fig : spec_cd106 ] we have shown the calculated ground band in comparison with experimentally available results for the nuclei @xmath66ru,@xmath66mo , @xmath68cd , @xmath68ag and @xmath68pd . our theoretically calculated results are in reasonably good agreement with the experimentally known values . we have calculated the reduced transition moments , quadrupole moments and magnetic dipole moments . these values are presented in tables  [ tab : tab - be2 ] and [ tab : tab - qsmu ] .    in table [ tab : tab - be2 ] we have shown the calculated @xmath85 for the ground band of the even - even parent and daughter nuclei . the values are calculated for the effective charges @xmath86 and @xmath87 for protons and neutrons respectively where @xmath88 varies for three different values 0.4 , 0.5 and 0.6 . comparison between theoretical and experimental values are also made in this table and we obtained a reasonable agreement for all the nuclei studied here except for @xmath70cd , @xmath70sn and @xmath71te . but still our calculated results are much better reproduced than the values predicted by some other models e. g. woods  saxon model and hartree  fock + bcs calculations with the skyrme siii force ( see ref . @xcite for the values calculated with these model ) for these isotopes . the nuclei upto @xmath89 , the values are better reproduced by taking @xmath90 where as for the nuclei above this mass range the values those are calculated with @xmath91 are more close to the experimental results . the calculated quadrupole moments are given in columns 3 - 5 of table  [ tab : tab - qsmu ] . the values are calculated with the same effective charges as in case of b(e2 ) . experimental values are not available for @xmath64kr , @xmath64br , @xmath65kr , @xmath66tc , @xmath67tc , @xmath68ag , @xmath72i and @xmath72xe . in the last two columns of table  [ tab : tab - qsmu ] presents the theoretically calculated and experimental results for magnetic dipole moments respectively . the spin and parity of the corresponding states are given in table  [ tab : tab - qsmu ] . our calculations correctly reproduce the sign and the values are reasonably agree with that of experimentally observed for most of the nuclei . for @xmath65kr and @xmath68pd the calculated values are different from experimental data by 0.6 and 0.8 respectively . llllllllll     + parent & & daughter & + nucleus & & experiment@xcite & nucleus & & experiment@xcite + & & & & & + & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & & & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & +   + parent & & daughter & + nucleus & & experiment@xcite & nucleus & & experiment@xcite + & & & & & + & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & & & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & +   +    @xmath63ge & 0.195 & 0.242 & 0.295 & 0.268@xmath92 & @xmath63se & 0.311 & 0.400 & 0.501 & + & & & & 0.230@xmath93 & & & & & + & & & & 0.290@xmath94 & & & & & + @xmath64kr & 0.521 & 0.650 & 0.793 & 0.633@xmath95 & @xmath64se & 0.200 & 0.254 & 0.314 & + & & & & 0.54@xmath96 & & & & & + & & & & 0.686@xmath94 & & & & & + @xmath65se & 0.161 & 0.197 & 0.237 & 0.185@xmath97 & @xmath65kr & 0.155 & 0.192 & 0.232 & + & & & & 0.213@xmath98 & & & & & + & & & & 0.179@xmath98 & & & & & + @xmath66mo & 0.138 & 0.175 & 0.216 & 0.271@xmath990.005@xmath100 & @xmath66ru & 0.143 & 0.176 & 0.212 & + & & & & 0.310@xmath990.047 & & & & & + & & & & 0.302@xmath990.039 & & & & & + @xmath67mo & 0.306 & 0.394 & 0.493 & 0.516@xmath990.010@xmath100 & @xmath67ru & 0.306 & 0.390 & 0.484 & + & & & & 0.511@xmath990.009 & & & & & + & & & & 0.526@xmath990.026 & & & & & + @xmath68cd & 0.464 & 0.598 & 0.749 & 0.410@xmath990.020@xmath100 & @xmath68pd & 0.439 & 0.552 & 0.679 & + & & & & 0.47@xmath990.05 & & & & & + & & & & 0.384@xmath990.005 & & & & & + @xmath69pd & 0.498 & 0.617 & 0.750 & 0.870@xmath990.040@xmath100 & @xmath69cd & 0.484 & 0.617 & 0.767 & + & & & & 0.78@xmath990.12 & & & & & + & & & & 0.820@xmath990.080 & & & & & + @xmath70cd & 0.197 & 0.237 & 0.281 & 0.560@xmath101 & @xmath70sn & 0.064 & 0.084 & 0.106 & + & & & & 0.501@xmath102 & & & & & + & & & & 0.608@xmath94 & & & & & + @xmath71sn & 0.0875 & 0.102 & 0.125 & 0.1160@xmath103 & @xmath71te & 0.107 & 0.132 & 0.160 & + & & & & 0.140@xmath94 & & & & & + & & & & 0.188@xmath104 & & & & & + @xmath72te & 0.149 & 0.189 & 0.229 & 0.295@xmath990.007@xmath100 & @xmath72xe & 0.297 & 0.377 & 0.465 & + & & & & 0.290@xmath990.011 & & & & & + & & & & 0.260@xmath990.050 & & & & & + [ tab : tab - be2 ]    llllllcll     + nucleus & @xmath105 & & & + & & & experiment@xcite & & theory & experiment@xcite + & & & & & & + & & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & & & & +   + nucleus & @xmath105 & & & + & & & experiment@xcite & & theory & experiment@xcite + & & & & & & + & & 0.40 & 0.50 & 0.60 & & & & +   +    @xmath63ge & 2@xmath106 & -0.166 & -0.167 & -0.168 & -0.19@xmath107 & & 0.582 & 0.84@xmath108 + & & & & & & & & 0.67@xmath109 + & & & & & & & & 0.56@xmath110 + @xmath63as & 2@xmath111 & 0.249 & 0.278 & 0.307 & 7@xmath112 & & -0.775 & -0.906@xmath113 + & & & & & & & & ( -)0.9028@xmath114 + @xmath63se & 2@xmath106 & -0.423 & -0.479 & -0.563 & -0.34@xmath115 & & 0.637 & 0.81@xmath108 + & & & & & & & & + 0.8@xmath116 + @xmath64kr & 2@xmath106 & -0.654 & -0.730 & -0.806 & & & 0.998 & + 0.86@xmath117 + & & & & & & & & + 1.08@xmath118 + @xmath64br & 1@xmath106 & 0.217 & 0.243 & 0.268 & & & 0.255 & 0.13@xmath119 + @xmath64se & 2@xmath106 & -0.405 & -0.456 & -0.508 & -0.26@xmath120 & & 0.541 & 0.77@xmath108 + & & & & & & & & + 0.8@xmath116 + @xmath65se & 2@xmath106 & -0.365 & -0.405 & -0.444 & -0.22@xmath115 & & 0.937 & 0.99@xmath107 + & & & & & & & & 0.9@xmath121 + @xmath65br & 5@xmath111 & 0.659 & 0.735 & 0.812 & 0.69@xmath117 & & 1.216 & + 1.6270@xmath122 + & & & & & 0.748@xmath118 & & & + @xmath65kr & 2@xmath106 & -0.706 & -0.796 & -0.866 & & & 0.202 & 0.80@xmath119 + @xmath66mo & 2@xmath106 & -0.334 & -0.376 & -0.418 & -0.20@xmath109 & & + 0.91 & + 0.79@xmath107 + & & & & & or + 0.04@xmath109 & & & + @xmath66tc & 7@xmath106 & 0.534 & 0.605 & 0.676 & - & & 4.618 & 5.09@xmath108 + & & & & & & & & + 5.04@xmath109 + @xmath66ru & 2@xmath106 & -0.338 & -0.375 & -0.412 & -0.13@xmath120 & & 1.482 & - + & & & & & -0.1@xmath116 & & & + & & & & & -0.2@xmath121 & & & + @xmath67mo & 2@xmath106 & -0.598 & -0.665 & -0.738 & -0.42@xmath990.09 & & + 1.05 & + 0.94@xmath115 + & & & & & -0.39@xmath990.08 & & & + 0.7@xmath123 + @xmath67tc & 1@xmath106 & 0.214 & 0.237 & 0.260 & - & & -1.688 & - + @xmath67ru & 2@xmath106 & -0.486 & -0.55 & -0.614 & -0.54@xmath990.07 & & 0.98 & + 1.02@xmath96 + & & & & & -0.40@xmath990.12 & & & + & & & & & -0.43@xmath990.07 & & & + @xmath68cd & 2@xmath106 & -0.575 & -0.584 & -0.654 & -0.28@xmath109 & & 0.749 & + 0.8@xmath116 + @xmath68ag & 1@xmath106 & 0.189 & 0.213 & 0.238 & - & & + 2.348 & + 2.9@xmath116 + @xmath68pd & 2@xmath106 & -0.599 & -0.672 & -0.745 & -0.56@xmath109 & & 0.711 & + 0.80@xmath124 + & & & & & -0.51@xmath115 & & & + @xmath69pd & 2@xmath106 & -0.536 & -0.597 & -0.658 & -0.62@xmath990.06 & & 1.122 & -0.47@xmath119 + & & & & & -0.70@xmath990.06 & & & -0.55@xmath109 + & & & & & 0.74@xmath990.06 & & & + @xmath69ag & 1@xmath106 & 0.193 & 0.219 & 0.244 & 0.24@xmath110 & & 2.715 & 2.7271@xmath125 + @xmath69cd & 2@xmath106 & -0.515 & -0.549 & -0.654 & -0.40@xmath990.04 & & 0.637 & + 0.57@xmath126 + & & & & & -0.39@xmath990.05 & & & + 0.56@xmath118 + & & & & & -0.36@xmath990.08 & & & 0.62@xmath127 + @xmath70cd & 2@xmath106 & -0.334 & -0.365 & -0.396 & -0.42@xmath124 & & + 1.416 & + 0.60@xmath127 + & & & & & -0.42@xmath109 & & & + & & & & & -0.64@xmath110 & & & + @xmath70 in & 1@xmath106 & 0.300 & 0.335 & 0.370 & 0.11@xmath128 & & 2.7645 & 2.7876 + @xmath70sn & 2@xmath106 & -0.203 & -0.230 & -0.258 & -0.17@xmath124 & & 0.358 & -0.3@xmath116 + @xmath71sn & 2@xmath106 & -0.246 & -0.276 & -0.305 & 0.0@xmath116 & & -0.246 & -0.3@xmath116 + @xmath71sb & 3@xmath111 & 0.580 & 0.653 & 0.725 & 1.20@xmath117 & & 1.624 & + 1.9@xmath123 + @xmath71te & 2@xmath106 & 0.286 & 0.318 & 0.350 & -0.45@xmath108 & & 0.649 & + 0.56@xmath107 + & & & & & & & & + 0.66@xmath107 + & & & & & & & & + 0.62@xmath109 + @xmath72te & 2@xmath106 & -0.345 & -0386 & -0.428 & -0.15@xmath990.10 & & 0.420 & + 0.58@xmath118 + & & & & & & & & + 0.66@xmath129 + @xmath72i & 5@xmath106 & 0.967 & 1.085 & 1.202 & - & & 3.708 & 3.349@xmath130 + @xmath72xe & 2@xmath106 & -0.491 & -0.552 & -0.614 & - & & 0.611 & + 0.67@xmath117 + & & & & & & & & + 0.76@xmath127 + & & & & & & & & + 0.62@xmath109 + [ tab : tab - qsmu ] to summarize , we have quantified the calculated deformed hartree - fock wave functions by comparing the calculated values with experimental data for a number of nuclear properties like band spectra , reduced e2 transition matrix elements , quadrupole moments and magnetic dipole moments of nuclei involved in double beta decay processes . a reasonable agreement between calculated and experimentally observed quantities make us confident about the reliability of the deformed few body wave functions obtained in our microscopic self - consistent calculations . these wave functions will further be employed for nuclear transition matrix elements calculations of double beta decay transitions . 99 f. bohm and p. vogel , physics of massive neutrinos , cambridge university press , 2nd edition , cambridge , ( 1992 ) . w. c. haxton and g. j. stephenson jr . * 12 * , 409 ( 1984 ) . m. moe and p. vogel , ann . rev . of nucl . , * 44 * , 247 ( 1994 ) . j. d. vergados , phys . , * 361 * , 1 ( 2002 ) . g.ripka , advances in nuclear physics , * vol . 1 * ( 1966 ) ed . m.baranger and e.vogt ( plenum ) . praharaj , in structure of atomic nuclei , ed . l. satpathy ( narosa publication house , new delhi ) , p-108 ( 1999 ) . praharaj , j. physics * g14 * ( 1988)843 ; phy . lett . * b119 * 17(1982 ) . s. k. ghorui _ et al . _ , arxiv : nucl - th/1106.3152v1 ( submitted to phys . rev . * c * )    r.e . peierls , y. yoccoz , proc . a70 * , 381 ( 1957 ) . s. g. nilsson and o. prior , mat . * 29 * , no . 16 z. bochnacki and s. ogaza , nucl . phys . * 69 * , 186 ( 1965 ) . a. faessler , p. plastino and s.a . moszkowski , phys . rev . * 156 * , 1064 ( 1967 ) . b. singh , d.a . viggars , nucl . data sheets * 42 * , 233 - 368 ( 1984 ) . j. k. tuli , nucl . data sheets * 98 * , 209 - 334 ( 2003 ) . balraj singh , nucl . data sheets * 81 * , 1 - 182 ( 1997 ) . d. de frenne , e. jacobs , nucl . data sheets * 89 * , 481 - 640 ( 2000 ) . jean blachot , nucl . data sheets * 92 * , 455 - 622 ( 2001 ) . j. katakura , z.d . wu , nucl . data sheets * 109 * , 1655 - 1877 ( 2008 ) . balraj singh , nucl . data sheets * 93 * , 33 - 242 ( 2001 ) . ameenah r. farhan and balraj singh , nucl . data sheets * 110 * , 19172080 ( 2009 ) . d. abriola , a.a . sonzogni , nucl . data sheets * 109 * , 2501 - 2655 ( 2008 ) . d. de frenne , a. negret , nucl . data sheets * 109 * , 943 - 1102 ( 2008 ) . et al . _ , at . data nucl . data tables * 78 * , 1 ( 2001 ) . n. j. stone , at . data nucl . data tables * 90 * , 75 ( 2005 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: spectroscopy of nuclei in the mass range @xmath0 to @xmath1 , participating in double beta decay processes are studied in the framework of the self - consistent deformed hartree - fock ( hf ) and angular momentum ( j ) projection model . spectra of ground bands have been studied and compared with available experimental results for even - even parent and daughter as well as for intermediate odd - odd nuclei . to test the reliability of the wave functions we have also calculated the reduced e2 transition matrix elements , electric quadrupole moments and magnetic dipole moments for these nuclei . the calculated results are compared with the experimental findings and substantial agreement is achieved .