Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: in this note , we review the connection between ads / cft duality and quark - gluon plasma ( qgp ) experiments at rhic ( see ref . @xcite for a review of qgp physics ) . rhic stands for relativistic heavy ion collider at brookhaven national laboratory . heavy ion " comes from the fact that it collides heavy ions such as gold nuclei @xmath1au instead of usual @xmath2 , @xmath3 or @xmath4 . the goal of the experiment is to realize the deconfinement transition and form the quark - gluon plasma . in principle , it should be possible to form qgp if one has high enough temperature or high enough density . however , it is not an easy job to confirm qgp formation because of the following problems : first , what one observes is not qgp itself but only the by - products after hadoronization , and one has to infer what had happened from the by - products . second , those secondary particles are mostly strongly - interacting , and the perturbative qcd is not very reliable for the current and near - future experimental temperatures . to resolve these problems , many attempts are made to identify the generic signatures of qgp . some of the generic signatures discussed to date are as follows :    1 .   the elliptic flow which may be the consequence of very low viscosity of qgp 2 . the jet quenching 3 . @xmath5-suppression    all of these signatures have been discussed in the ads / cft duality , so i review recent developments focusing on these phenomena . d - branes represent a @xmath6 gauge theory . ] since this review is aimed at non - experts , i first give a short course on string theory , in particular emphasizing on how gauge theories and black holes are described in string theory . figure  [ fig : string ] shows main ingredients of string theory . there are two kinds of string : open strings with endpoints and closed strings with no endpoints . as i will show you shortly , an open string represents a gauge theory . a closed string represents a graviton . an open string propagates through spacetime just like a closed string , but an open string can also have its endpoints on an object , the so - called d - brane . the open string i consider in this lecture is always of this type . the easiest way to see that an open string represents a gauge theory is look at how the string oscillates . figure  [ fig : level1 ] shows the simplest open string oscillation ( in 4 dimensions ) . as you can see , the string can oscillate in two directions . so , the open string has two degrees of freedom at this level . these degrees of freedom represent the two polarizations of the photon . in this sense , the open string represents a gauge theory .    of course , our interest here is not qed , but rather qcd , so how can one describe a yang - mills theory ? an open string has endpoints on a d - brane , but if there are @xmath7 coincident d - branes , open strings can have endpoints in various ways ( fig .  [ fig : sym ] ) . these new degrees of freedom precisely correspond to @xmath6 degrees of freedom . since these open strings are constrained to have their endpoints on the d - brane , the gauge theory described by the d - brane is localized on the d - brane . the d - branes arise with various dimensionalities . a d - brane with a @xmath8-dimensional spatial extension is called the d@xmath8-brane . namely , the d0-brane is point - like , the d1-brane is string - like , the d2-brane is membrane - like , and so on . thus , the d@xmath8-brane describes a @xmath9-dimensional yang - mills theory . we are interested in 4-dimensional gauge theories , so consider the d3-brane in order to mimic qcd . on the other hand , a closed string represents a graviton . again , the easiest way to see this is to look at how the string oscillates ( fig . [ fig : closed ] ) . in general , the oscillations on a string have two modes : the left - moving modes and right - moving modes . for an open string , these modes mix each other at endpoints , but these modes become independent for a closed string . so , one can oscillate the right - moving mode in one direction and the left - moving mode in the other direction . in a sense , a closed string oscillates in two directions simultaneously . this property explains the spin-2 nature of the graviton . in fact , a graviton also oscillates in two directions simultaneously . strictly speaking , a closed string represents a graviton and two undiscovered scalar particles , the dilaton and the axion . since each mode has two degrees of freedom , a closed string has 4 degrees of freedom at this level ( in 4 dimensions ) . the graviton has only 2 degrees of freedom , and two scalar fields cover the remaining degrees of freedom . we have seen that we can get a gauge theory from the d - brane , but it is not clear if the d - brane is simply described by a gauge theory . this is because string theory is more than a gauge theory , namely it has gravitons . at this point , it is not clear if the effect of gravity can be neglected . according to general relativity , any energy - momentum tensor curves spacetime . the d - brane of course has some energy , so how the d - branes curve spacetime ? since gravity is described by the newton potential _ newton ~  , one can measure the effect of curvature by @xmath10 . according to string theory , the newton constant @xmath11 and the mass @xmath12 of the d - brane are given by g & ~ & g_s^2  , + m & ~ & n / g_s  , where @xmath13 is the string coupling constant which governs the strength of the interactions between strings . , which is consistent with the hypersurface picture of the d - brane , and the open strings attached represent the fluctuations of the d - brane . ] so , one gets @xmath14 . this means that as long as @xmath15 , one can neglect the effects of gravity and spacetime remains flat . in this case , the d - brane is simply described by a gauge theory . on the other hand , when @xmath16 , the d - brane starts to curve spacetime , and eventually it should become a black hole . so , in this case , the d - brane can be described by a black hole . the black hole here is not the usual schwarzschild - like black hole . we consider a d - brane , an object with infinite spatial extension . thus , the black hole formed from the d - brane has an horizon which extends indefinitely and is called the  black brane . "        to summarize , one can describe the d - brane both by a gauge theory and by a black hole ; which description is better depends on the value of @xmath17 . the string coupling and the yang - mills coupling @xmath18 are related by @xmath19 ( see sec .  [ sec : details ] ) , so @xmath17 is nothing but the standard  t  hooft coupling , @xmath20 . this suggests that the black hole is the large  t  hooft coupling limit of a gauge theory . since  t  hooft coupling is the effective coupling of a gauge theory , the black hole is the strong coupling limit of the gauge theory ( fig . [ fig : largen ] ) . thus , the strategy here is to use black holes in order to compute gauge theory observables in the strong coupling regime . our argument here is very rough , but more refined version of the argument is known as the ads / cft duality @xcite ( see ref . @xcite for a review ) . the precise correspondence is as follows : + & & _ 5 s^5 . [ eq : dual ] here , @xmath21 means that the theory has 4 supercharges which are the maximum number of supercharges for a 4-dimensional theory . also , @xmath22 stands for the five - dimensional anti - desitter space . desitter was a dutch astronomer who found a solution of einstein equation with a constant positive curvature in 1917 . the space @xmath22 instead has a constant negative curvature ; this explains the prefix  anti . " one can reach this correspondence by studying the d3-brane more carefully , but i will skip the argument . instead , i explain the correspondence from the symmetry point of view in appendix . we will use the finite temperature version of the duality and its cousins ; in this case , one needs to replace @xmath22 by a black hole in @xmath22 , which is known as the schwarzschild-@xmath22 black hole : + & & + & & _ 5 ) s^5 . according to the rhic experiment , qgp behaves like a liquid . the ads / cft then implies that a black hole also behaves like a liquid . then , plasma quantities should be calculable from black holes . in fact , black holes and hydrodynamic systems behave similarly . consider adding a perturbation to a black hole , _ e.g. _ , drop some object ( fig . [ fig : hydro ] ) . then , the shape of the black hole horizon becomes irregular , but such a perturbation decays quickly , and the black hole returns to the original symmetric shape . the no - hair theorem is one way to see this . according to the theorem , the stationary black hole is unique and symmetric . thus , the perturbed black hole can not be stable . if you regard this as a diffusion , the diffusion occurs since the perturbation is absorbed by the black hole . this behavior is very similar to a liquid . suppose that one drops a ball in a water pond . then , you generate surface waves , but they decay quickly , and the water pond returns to a state of stable equilibrium . in hydrodynamics , this is a consequence of viscosity . thus , one can consider the notion of viscosity for black holes as well . and the  viscosity " for black holes should be calculable by considering the above process . let me remind you of freshman physics of viscosity . as a simple example , consider a fluid between two plates and move the upper plate with velocity @xmath23 ( fig . [ fig : viscosity ] ) . as the fluid is dragged , the lower plate experiences a force . this force is the manifestation of the viscosity . in this case , the force @xmath24 the lower plate experiences per unit area is given by =  . the proportionality constant @xmath25 is called the ( shear ) viscosity . microscopically , the viscosity arises due to the momentum transfer between molecules . figure  [ fig : viscosity ] shows a close - up view of the fluid and i put an artificial boundary to divide the fluid into two parts . the molecules collide with each other and are exchanged randomly through the boundary . but in the situation where you move the upper plate , the molecules in the upper - half part , on average , have more momentum in the @xmath26-direction than the ones in the lower - half part . these molecules are exchanged , which means that momentum in the @xmath26-direction is transported through the boundary . going back to the black hole , how can one calculate the plasma viscosity ? i will first give a brief explanation and its implications and then i will justify the claim more in detail . there are many ways to compute the viscosity and i will explain one simple method . in the gravity side , the diffusion occurs by black hole absorption . so , it is natural to associate the shear viscosity with the absorption cross section by black holes . ( i explain this point more in detail later . the detailed argument suggests that this is the cross section for the graviton of particular polarization . ) now , there is a general theorem on black holes @xcite that states that the cross section @xmath27 is equal to the horizon area @xmath28 for a broad range of black holes . ] : _ 0_bh = a  . [ eq : absorption ] but the horizon area is the famous quantity , namely it represents the black hole entropy , so it must be the plasma entropy in this lecture . ] s_bh = k_b [ eq : entropy ] ( @xmath29 : boltzmann constant ) . then , the shear viscosity divided by the entropy becomes constant .. we consider black holes with infinite extension , so the entropy itself diverges . the area for the absorption cross section should be understood in a similar way . ] the constant can be determined from the argument later and the result is =  . [ eq : viscosity_bound ] this value is very small . in comparison , @xmath30 for water is about @xmath31 under normal circumstances . now , the point is that all the relations we used ( cross section versus horizon area , black hole entropy versus horizon area ) are generic , so the result must be universal as well . namely , it does not depend on the details of black holes nor the details of gauge theories . so , the claim is @xcite    _ gauge theory plasmas which have gravity duals have a universal low value of @xmath30 at large t  hooft coupling . _    this is a rather indirect argument , but this claim has indeed been checked for many known gravity duals . this result is very important , so let me rephrase in a different way ( fig . [ fig : universality ] ) . gauge theories of which we can actually compute the shear viscosity are supersymmetric gauge theories , not the real qcd . we compute the shear viscosity from black holes , but the gravity dual of qcd is not known . so , one can not use ads / cft directly to compute qcd properties . however , as we saw , the quantity corresponding to the shear viscosity is universal on the black hole side , so one can immediately apply the @xmath21 result to the real qcd even though these two theories are completely different . in fact , rhic suggests that qgp has a very low viscosity and the estimated value @xcite ~o(0.1 ) ? is very close to the above ads / cft value . one important point is that the temperature in question is still order of @xmath32 . at this range of temperature , qcd is still strongly coupled and pqcd is not very reliable . in fact , the naive extrapolation of the weak coupling result gives a larger value for @xmath30 . thus , the ads / cft duality which predicts the strong coupling behavior may be useful to analyze qgp . i now describe the relation between the shear viscosity and the absorption cross section . to do so , one first has to understand the interactions of bulk and boundary fields . these fields can interact at the boundary . for example , the graviton produces the back - to - back scattering of gluons ( fig . [ fig : absorption ] ) . the relevant interactions are s_int ~d^4x f_^2 + h^ t_^ym + [ eq : interactions ] ( @xmath33 : dilaton , @xmath34 : graviton , @xmath35 and @xmath36 : the field strength and the energy - momentum tensor of the gauge theory ) . such interactions can be obtained by expanding the d - brane action around the expectation values of the bulk fields . the d - brane is described by the so - called dirac - born - infeld ( dbi ) action . the dbi - action with at most two derivatives contains the following term : ~e^- f_^2 +  . if @xmath33 is constant , one gets the standard gauge theory lagrangian with @xmath37 , where @xmath38 . if @xmath33 fluctuates , the action is expanded as ~e^- ( f_^2 + f_^2 )  , where @xmath39 . the second term is nothing but the first term in eq . ( [ eq : interactions ] ) .    this fact could be stated as    _ bulk field fluctuations act as sources of boundary fields _ i just rephrase the same statement , but this leads to the so - called  gkp - witten relation , " which is the definition of the ads / cft . given the interaction term , one can easily calculate the graviton decay rate ( with polarization @xmath40 , where @xmath26 and @xmath41 are directions along the brane ) from the standard field theory formula : _ qft & = & _ + & & ( 2)^4 ^4(p_f - p_i ) |m|^2 + & = & d^4 x e^it  . the first equality is just the fermi s golden rule with matrix element @xmath42 . the matrix element is proportional to @xmath43 , so the formula is written by a correlator of the energy - momentum tensor . ( this is an optical theorem . ) the factor @xmath44 is a statistical factor for identical particles in the final state .    in black hole description , it is natural to regard this decay rate as the absorption cross section of the graviton . this has been checked for the d3-brane at zero temperature @xcite , so ) is known to hold for the d3-brane at zero temperature but it is unclear if it also holds for generic ads black holes . the problem is that a black hole is the strong coupling limit of a gauge theory , so eq .  ( [ eq : correlator ] ) is the strong coupling statement . but , of course , it is not easy to compute the right - hand side in gauge theory . one can compute it in the weak coupling , but weak coupling results differ from strong coupling results in general as we will see in sec . [ sec : others ] . in the special case of the zero - temperature d3-brane , such a comparison actually makes sense due to the nonrenormalization theorem , and this is the case where eq . ( [ eq : correlator ] ) has been checked . but it is an open question if this is also true for generic ads black holes . here , we simply assume that the relation holds at strong coupling . ] _ bh= d^4 x e^it  . [ eq : correlator ] we can use this relation to compute the shear viscosity since the viscosity is given by a kubo formula microscopically : = _ 0 d^4 x e^it  . this formula has the same form as the absorption cross section , so one can immediately write the viscosity in terms of the cross section : =  . we have written plasma quantities in terms of black hole quantities . using eqs . ( [ eq : absorption ] ) and ( [ eq : entropy ] ) , one obtains = =  . this is the previous formula ( [ eq : viscosity_bound ] ) . we saw that in gauge theories at strong coupling the ratio of shear viscosity to entropy density is universal . how far has the universality been shown ? recently , the universality has been extended to a variety of situations which are not covered in the original proofs . the shear viscosity was first computed for the d3-brane @xcite . this corresponds to the @xmath21 sym which is a scale - invariant theory . ( actually , the theory has a larger symmetry , a conformal symmetry . see appendix . ) but the universality has been shown even for theories with scales , _ i.e. _ , nonconformal theories . examples include d@xmath8-branes for @xmath45 , the klebanov - tseytlin geometry , the maldacena - nunez geometry , and the @xmath46 system ( these theories also have a reduced number of supersymmetries ) . in fact , various universality arguments were demonstrated for these cases @xcite . however , these proofs did not cover the cases with a chemical potential . so , the natural question is what happens to the universality at finite chemical potential . actually , it is not easy to realize the realistic finite density in ads / cft , _ i.e. _ , baryon number density . but there is a simple alternative . namely , consider charged ads black holes instead of neutral black holes . a black hole is known to obey thermodynamic - like laws and its first law is written as dm = tds_bh+dq ( @xmath47 : black hole temperature , @xmath48 : electromagnetic potential , @xmath49 : black hole charge ) . as one can see , the electromagnetic field @xmath48 plays a role of a chemical potential . in ads / cft , such a charge arises as follows . as in eq . ( [ eq : dual ] ) , the full geometry involves @xmath50 . one can add an angular momentum along @xmath50 , which is known as the  spinning " d3-brane solutions @xcite . the angular momentum becomes a kaluza - klein charge after the @xmath50 reduction . what is the gauge theory interpretation of the charge ? the symmetry of @xmath50 corresponds to an internal symmetry of the sym , r - symmetry @xmath51 . this @xmath51 rotates adjoint scalars in the @xmath21 supermultiplet . ( see appendix . ) the r - symmetry group @xmath51 is rank 3 , so one can add at most three independent charges . the three - charge solution is known as the stu solution @xcite . when all charges are equal , the stu solution is the well - known reissner - nordstrm-@xmath22 black hole . thus , the charge in question is a @xmath52 charge .    because the charge corresponds to the @xmath52 charge , this is by no means realistic . however , the theory has interesting features which are common to the real qcd . for instance , the phase diagram is qualitatively similar to the qcd diagram @xcite . this system does not represent a realistic chemical potential , but it may mimic the realistic case and one may learn an interesting lesson for gauge theory plasmas at finite density . the shear viscosity for charged ads black holes was computed by 4 groups , and the result turns out to be @xmath53 again @xcite-@xcite . so , the universality seems to hold even at nonzero chemical potential . if this is true for generic chemical potential , @xmath53 may be true even at finite baryon number density . in fact , when there is a chemical potential associated with a global symmetry , the universality has been proven in more general settings as well @xcite-@xcite . the theories described so far all have matter in the adjoint representation and not in the fundamental representation such as quarks . however , the universality has been proven even in the presence of fundamental matter @xcite . one way to include fundamental matter is to include d7-branes in addition to d3-branes . i will describe one simple way to realize fundamental matter in the next section , and the d3-d7 system is an extension of the method . this d3-d7 system is known as karch - katz model @xcite . gauge theory plasmas described so far are stationary ones . the real plasma at rhic is of course a rapidly changing system , and it is desirable to study such a plasma as well . in the gravity side , this corresponds to a time - dependent black hole . the universality has been claimed even for such a case @xcite . we saw that @xmath53 , but this is in the strong coupling limit or in the large  t  hooft coupling limit @xmath54 . real qcd of course has finite coupling , so how about @xmath30 at finite coupling ? in general , the shear viscosity is given by ~|vl_mfp ( @xmath55 : mass density , @xmath56 : mean velocity , @xmath57 : mean free path ) . at weak coupling , the interaction becomes weaker , so the mean free path becomes larger . the viscosity arises due to the momentum transfer , and the transfer is more effective at weak coupling . so , at weak coupling , one expects @xmath58 . and @xmath7 ( or @xmath18 and @xmath59 ) , so there are two kinds of finite - coupling corrections . first is the finite-@xmath59 correction described here . this corresponds to the so - called @xmath60-corrections in the gravity side . the effective actions of string theory contain higher curvature terms in addition to the einstein - hilbert action ; _ e.g. _ , @xmath61 . the finite-@xmath59 correction comes from such higher curvature terms . on the other hand , the finite-@xmath18 correction comes from the so - called string loop corrections since the string coupling constant is proportional to @xmath62 . such a correction to @xmath25 has never been evaluated . ]    for the @xmath21 sym , the finite-@xmath59 correction can be computed , and the correction indeed raises the value of @xmath30 @xcite . the correction is about 9% if one uses @xmath63 ( or @xmath64 ) . thus , the strong coupling result seems a good approximation . the universality does not hold for finite-@xmath59 corrections though , so it is not clear how realistic the result is . figure  [ fig : finite_coupling ] shows both the weak coupling result and the strong coupling result . they both increase at weak coupling . however , there is a difference . the viscosity is proportional to the mean free path , so is inversely proportional to the coupling constant . thus , the naive extrapolation of the weak coupling result suggests the perfect - fluid - like behavior in the strong coupling limit . instead , ads / cft tells that @xmath30 can not be small indefinitely and is saturated . incidentally , our problem is the strong coupling problem , so one might wonder how useful lattice computations are . a lattice computation of the viscosity for the pure yang - mills theory has been done in ref . unfortunately , the result has very large error bars , so one can not make a definite statement , but it would be very interesting to make the errors smaller .     both from the weak coupling result and the strong coupling result . the red line represents the weak coupling result , _ i.e. _ , a naive extrapolation of the perturbative @xmath21 sym result ( based on ref . the blue line represents the strong coupling result , _ i.e. _ , the @xmath21 ads / cft result with the first order correction in @xmath59 ( based on ref . @xcite ) . ] recently , there has been much discussion on heavy quark dynamics in plasma medium . two applications have been discussed : issues related to @xmath0 suppression and issues related to jet quenching . in this section , i quickly summarize the discussion . since @xmath5 is heavy , charm pair production occurs only at the early stages of the nuclear collision . however , if the production occurs in the plasma medium , charmonium formation is suppressed due to the debye screening . one technical difficulty is that the @xmath65 pair is not produced at rest relative to the plasma . therefore , the screening length is expected to be velocity - dependent . such a computation has been done only for the abelian plasma @xcite . pair , the left configuration is not the lowest energy configuration . instead , the right configuration is energetically favorable . the energy difference is interpreted as a @xmath66 potential . at finite temperature , this is no longer true . for large enough separation of the pair , the left configuration becomes favorable . this phenomenon is the ads / cft description of the debye screening . ] first , one has to understand how to realize a heavy quark in ads / cft . to do so , let us go back to fig . [ fig : sym ] . when there are multiple number of d - branes , an open string can have endpoints in various ways ; there are @xmath67 possibilities . this means that the string transforms as the adjoint representation of @xmath6 gauge theory . now , consider an infinitely long string ( fig . [ fig : quark ] ) . in this case , the string can have endpoints in @xmath7 different ways . this means that the string transforms as the fundamental representation of @xmath6 gauge theory . in this sense , such a long string represents a  quark . " such a string has an extension and tension , so the string has a large mass , which means that the long string represents a heavy quark . this kind of string has been widely studied in the past to measure the heavy quark potential @xcite . for a @xmath66 pair , two individual strings extending to the boundary is not the lowest energy configuration . instead , it is energetically favorable to have a single string that connects the pair ( fig . [ fig : wilson ] ) . the energy difference is interpreted as a @xmath66 potential , and one gets a coulomb - like potential for @xmath21 .    at finite temperature @xcite , it is no longer true that a string connecting the @xmath66 pair is always the lowest energy configuration ; for large enough separation of the pair ( @xmath68 ) , isolated strings are favorable energetically . this phenomenon is the ads / cft description of the debye screening and @xmath68 may be interpreted as the screening length . references  @xcite proposed how to compute the velocity dependence of the screening length . they computed the screening length in the @xmath66 rest frame , _ i.e. _ , they considered the plasma flowing at a velocity @xmath23 . such a  plasma wind " is obtained by boosting a black hole .    at the leading order in @xmath23 , the screening length is obtained as + & & ( 1-v^2)^1/4 + & ~ & ( ) ^-1/4 for the @xmath21 sym , where @xmath69 is the unboosted energy density . thus , the screening effect becomes stronger than the @xmath70 case . one can also compute the screening length for the other gauge theories @xcite . the leading behavior in @xmath23 seems universal . namely , if one writes the screening length as ( ) ( 1-v^2)^  , the exponent @xmath71 is determined by the speed of sound @xmath72 : 4= 1 - ( 1 - 3c_s^2 ) + [ eq : mu_vs_cs ] when the theory is nearly conformal , _ i.e. _ , @xmath73 . one can make a simple estimate of the exponent for qcd . according to the lattice results cited in ref . @xcite , all groups roughly predict @xmath74 around @xmath75 . bearing in mind that our results are valid to large-@xmath7 theories and not to qcd , eq . ( [ eq : mu_vs_cs ] ) gives @xmath76 . it would be interesting to compare this number with lattice calculations and experimental results . one can also study the screening length at finite chemical potential @xcite . at the leading order , the screening length at finite chemical potential is the same as the one at zero potential for a given energy density . another interesting qgp phenomenon is jet quenching . in the parton hard - scattering , jets are formed , but the jets have to travel in the qgp medium , so the jets are strongly suppressed . this phenomenon is known as jet quenching . so , the interesting quantity is the energy loss rate of partons . the ads / cft descriptions of jet quenching have been proposed recently @xcite-@xcite . the proposals have been quickly extended to the other gauge theories @xcite-@xcite . to discuss jet quenching , one now moves the fundamental string with a velocity @xmath23 along a brane direction . then , the momentum carried by the string flows towards the horizon and one interprets the flow as the energy loss rate . for example , the energy loss rate for the @xmath21 sym becomes = - t^2  . unfortunately , the result obtained in this way has some drawbacks . first , the result is not universal and is model - dependent . second , the black hole results become exact only in the @xmath54 limit , but the result does not have a finite large-@xmath59 limit . these two drawbacks are in contrast to the @xmath30 case . this may suggest that one has to be careful to apply ads / cft to qgp . namely , one should not always take ads / cft results at face value . hydrodynamic description of gauge theory plasmas using ads / cft is very powerful due to the universality . the ads / cft may be useful to analyze experiments . conversely , experiments or the other theoretical approaches ( such as lattice gauge theory ) may be useful to confirm ads / cft . this approach is also important since currently there are many loose ends on the ads / cft derivation . one has to clear up these loose ends , but it may be hard to make further progress within string theory alone . so , the inputs from the other areas may be useful to increase confidence in the ads / cft derivation . on the other hand , one has to be careful to apply ads / cft to qgp if the universality does not hold ( _ e.g. _ , jet quenching ) . in this talk , i emphasized the universality approach , but of course finding the gravity dual of qcd is desirable . the biggest assumption of the universality argument is that such a dual indeed exists , so finding the dual is necessary for the universality approach as well . one well - known model of qcd is the sakai - sugimoto model @xcite . this was a successful model in the confining phase , but unfortunately it is not a good model in the plasma phase . the sakai - sugimoto model involves the d4-brane compactified on a circle . above the deconfinement temperature , the model looks as a true five - dimensional theory . another problem of the current approach concerns the large-@xmath59 limit ; ads / cft and qgp are actually different limits . the large-@xmath59 limit of the ads / cft is @xmath77 and @xmath78 . but of course qgp has a large-@xmath59 since @xmath79 and @xmath80 . we are not taking the same limits , so it is not clear why both give such close results . i would like to thank elena cceres , kengo maeda , and takashi okamura for collaboration and for their comments on the manuscript . it is a pleasure to thank testuo hatsuda , tetsufumi hirano , kazunori itakura , tetsuo matsui , osamu morimatsu , berndt mller , and tadakatsu sakai for useful conversations . i would also like to thank the organizers of various workshops for the opportunity to give this lecture . the research of m.n .  was supported in part by the grant - in - aid for scientific research ( 13135224 ) from the ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology , japan . the precise correspondence between gauge theory and gravity is as follows : + & & _ 5 s^5 . [ eq : dual2 ] one can reach this correspondence by studying the d3-brane more carefully , but instead i explain the correspondence from the symmetry point of view in this appendix .      to understand why the @xmath21 sym appears , let us go back to the open string oscillations on the d3-brane . superstring theory actually requires 10-dimensional spacetime for consistency . the open strings on a d - brane are bounded on the d - brane , so the d3-brane represents a 4-dimensional gauge theory , but these open strings still oscillate in the full 10-dimensional spacetime . thus , the simplest open string oscillations have 8 degrees of freedom instead of 2 discussed in the text . what are these degrees of freedom ? in other words , what kind of gauge theory the d3-brane represents ?    to see this , note that there are two types of string oscillations . first are the oscillations in the brane and the other are the oscillations out of the brane . from the 4-dimensional point of view ( in terms of @xmath81 representations ) , the former represent a gauge field . the latter represent scalars . the spatial dimension is 9 and the brane dimension is 3 , so there are 6 scalar fields . thus , the gauge theory represented by the d3-brane inevitably comes with scalar fields . the @xmath21 sym is such a theory . the field contents of the @xmath21 sym include the gauge field @xmath82 and the scalars @xmath83 . ( the color indices are suppressed for simplicity . we will also suppress the spinor indices . ) in addition , there are 4 fermions @xmath84 due to supersymmetry ( which comes from the supersymmetry in superstring . ) the lorentz transformation properties are different , but they come from similar string oscillations , which means that all these fields transform as the adjoint representation . namely , the theory has no fundamental representation such as quarks . also , if we have only d3-branes , as in the present case , the directions transverse to the brane are all isotropic . these directions correspond to the scalar fields , so the isotropy means that there is a global @xmath51 symmetry for @xmath83 . such a global symmetry is known as r - symmetry . the action for the @xmath21 sym is given by & = & \ { - f_^2 - ( d__i)^2 - |_i ^d_^i + & & + o(^4 ) + o ( ) }  . first 3 terms are standard kinetic terms for the gauge field , the scalar fields , and the fermions . in addition , the action contains interaction terms which are written only schematically ; @xmath85 interactions and yukawa - like interactions .    the gauge field and the scalars have mass dimension 1 and the fermions have mass dimension @xmath86 , so all terms in the action have mass dimension 4 , which means that the theory has no dimensionful parameter and the theory is scale invariant . actually , it is often the case in a relativistic field theory that the scale invariance and poincar symmetry @xmath81 combine into a larger symmetry , the conformal symmetry @xmath87 . thus , the @xmath21 sym has the global @xmath88 symmetry . the @xmath22 space is a spacetime with constant negative curvature . we are familiar with spaces with positive curvature , like the sphere , and have no problem visualizing them , but it is more difficult to visualize a space with negative curvature . a space with constant negative curvature is known as a hyperbolic space . one way to visualize a hyperbolic space is illustrated in famous woodcuts by escher ( _ e.g. _ ,  circle limit iii " ) . it is not easy to visualize @xmath22 , but one can represent @xmath22 as a hypersurface in a flat spacetime , which is useful for our purpose . the @xmath22 space is described by x_0 ^ 2 + x_5 ^ 2 - x_1 ^ 2 - - x_4 ^ 2 = l^2 [ eq : embedding ] in a six - dimensional flat spaceds_6 ^ 2 = -dx_0 ^ 2 - dx_5 ^ 2 + dx_1 ^ 2 + + dx_4 ^ 2  . [ eq : flat ] here , @xmath90 gives the characteristic length scale of the @xmath22 space and it is related to the  t  hooft coupling from the discussion in the text . note that if all signs are positive in eq . ( [ eq : embedding ] ) , eq . ( [ eq : embedding ] ) defines a sphere . also , eq .  ( [ eq : embedding ] ) is a higher dimensional generalization of the standard hyperbola @xmath91 . in this form , it is clear that @xmath22 has a @xmath87 symmetry just like the @xmath21 conformal symmetry ; to say that theories are dual to each other , they should have the same symmetries . in addition , the full geometry in eq . ( [ eq : dual2 ] ) involves @xmath50 which has a @xmath51 symmetry . this is the same symmetry as the @xmath21 r - symmetry . so , the gravity side also has the global @xmath92 symmetry . k.  yagi , t.  hatsuda and y.  miake , _ quark - gluon plasma : from big bang to little bang _ ( cambridge univ . press , 2005 ) . a.  strominger and c.  vafa , `` microscopic origin of the bekenstein - hawking entropy , '' phys . b * 379 * ( 1996 ) 99 [ arxiv : hep - th/9601029 ] . j.  m.  maldacena , `` the large n limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , '' adv . * 2 * ( 1998 ) 231 [ int .  j.  theor .  phys . * 38 * ( 1999 ) 1113 ] [ arxiv : hep - th/9711200 ] . e.  witten , `` anti - de sitter space and holography , '' adv . theor .  math . * 2 * ( 1998 ) 253 [ arxiv : hep - th/9802150 ] . e.  witten , `` anti - de sitter space , thermal phase transition , and confinement in gauge theories , '' adv . * 2 * ( 1998 ) 505 [ arxiv : hep - th/9803131 ] . s.  s.  gubser , i.  r.  klebanov and a.  m.  polyakov , `` gauge theory correlators from non - critical string theory , '' phys . b * 428 * ( 1998 ) 105 [ arxiv : hep - th/9802109 ] . o.  aharony , s.  s.  gubser , j.  m.  maldacena , h.  ooguri and y.  oz , `` large n field theories , string theory and gravity , '' phys .  rept .   * 323 * ( 2000 ) 183 [ arxiv : hep - th/9905111 ] . s.  r.  das , g.  w.  gibbons and s.  d.  mathur , `` universality of low energy absorption cross sections for black holes , '' phys . * 78 * ( 1997 ) 417 [ arxiv : hep - th/9609052 ] . p.  kovtun , d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` viscosity in strongly interacting quantum field theories from black hole physics , '' phys .  rev .  lett . * 94 * ( 2005 ) 111601 [ arxiv : hep - th/0405231 ] . d.  teaney , `` effect of shear viscosity on spectra , elliptic flow , and hanbury brown - twiss radii , '' phys . c * 68 * ( 2003 ) 034913 [ arxiv : nucl - th/0301099 ] . t.  hirano and m.  gyulassy , `` perfect fluidity of the quark gluon plasma core as seen through its dissipative hadronic corona , '' nucl . a * 769 * ( 2006 ) 71 [ arxiv : nucl - th/0506049 ] . s.  gavin and m.  abdel - aziz , `` measuring shear viscosity using transverse momentum correlations in relativistic nuclear collisions , '' phys . * 97 * ( 2006 ) 162302 [ arxiv : nucl - th/0606061 ] . a.  adare [ phenix collaboration ] , `` energy loss and flow of heavy quarks in au + au collisions at s(nn)**(1/2 ) = 200-gev , '' arxiv : nucl - ex/0611018 . i.  r.  klebanov , `` world - volume approach to absorption by non - dilatonic branes , '' nucl . b * 496 * ( 1997 ) 231 [ arxiv : hep - th/9702076 ] . g.  policastro , d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` the shear viscosity of strongly coupled n = 4 supersymmetric yang - mills plasma , '' phys . * 87 * ( 2001 ) 081601 [ arxiv : hep - th/0104066 ] . kovtun , d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` holography and hydrodynamics : diffusion on stretched horizons , '' jhep * 0310 * ( 2003 ) 064 [ arxiv : hep - th/0309213 ] . a.  buchel and j.  t.  liu , `` universality of the shear viscosity in supergravity , '' phys . * 93 * ( 2004 ) 090602 [ arxiv : hep - th/0311175 ] . a.  buchel , `` on universality of stress - energy tensor correlation functions in supergravity , '' phys . b * 609 * ( 2005 ) 392 [ arxiv : hep - th/0408095 ] . p.  kraus , f.  larsen and s.  p.  trivedi , `` the coulomb branch of gauge theory from rotating branes , '' jhep * 9903 * ( 1999 ) 003 [ arxiv : hep - th/9811120 ] . m.  cvetic _ et al . _ , `` embedding ads black holes in ten and eleven dimensions , '' nucl . b * 558 * ( 1999 ) 96 [ arxiv : hep - th/9903214 ] . k.  behrndt , m.  cvetic and w.  a.  sabra , `` non - extreme black holes of five dimensional n = 2 ads supergravity , '' nucl . b * 553 * ( 1999 ) 317 [ arxiv : hep - th/9810227 ] . a.  chamblin , r.  emparan , c.  v.  johnson and r.  c.  myers , `` charged ads black holes and catastrophic holography , '' phys . d * 60 * ( 1999 ) 064018 [ arxiv : hep - th/9902170 ] . m.  cvetic and s.  s.  gubser , `` phases of r - charged black holes , spinning branes and strongly coupled gauge theories , '' jhep * 9904 * ( 1999 ) 024 [ arxiv : hep - th/9902195 ] . j.  mas , `` shear viscosity from r - charged ads black holes , '' jhep * 0603 * ( 2006 ) 016 [ arxiv : hep - th/0601144 ] . d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` hydrodynamics of r - charged black holes , '' jhep * 0603 * ( 2006 ) 052 [ arxiv : hep - th/0601157 ] . o.  saremi , `` the viscosity bound conjecture and hydrodynamics of m2-brane theory at finite chemical potential , '' arxiv : hep - th/0601159 . k.  maeda , m.  natsuume and t.  okamura , `` viscosity of gauge theory plasma with a chemical potential from ads / cft correspondence , '' phys . d * 73 * ( 2006 ) 066013 [ arxiv : hep - th/0602010 ] . a.  buchel and j.  t.  liu , `` gauged supergravity from type iib string theory on y(p , q ) manifolds , '' arxiv : hep - th/0608002 . p.  benincasa , a.  buchel and r.  naryshkin , `` the shear viscosity of gauge theory plasma with chemical potentials , '' arxiv : hep - th/0610145 . j.  p.  gauntlett , e.  o colgain and o.  varela , `` properties of some conformal field theories with m - theory duals , '' arxiv : hep - th/0611219 . d.  mateos , r.  c.  myers and r.  m.  thomson , `` holographic viscosity of fundamental matter , '' arxiv : hep - th/0610184 . a.  karch and e.  katz , jhep * 0206 * ( 2002 ) 043 [ arxiv : hep - th/0205236 ] .    r.  a.  janik , `` viscosity from nonsingularity , '' arxiv : hep - th/0610144 . d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` minkowski - space correlators in ads / cft correspondence : recipe and applications , '' jhep * 0209 * ( 2002 ) 042 [ arxiv : hep - th/0205051 ] . g.  policastro , d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` from ads / cft correspondence to hydrodynamics , '' jhep * 0209 * ( 2002 ) 043 [ arxiv : hep - th/0205052 ] . c.  p.  herzog , `` the hydrodynamics of m - theory , '' jhep * 0212 * ( 2002 ) 026 [ arxiv : hep - th/0210126 ] . g.  policastro , d.  t.  son and a.  o.  starinets , `` from ads / cft correspondence to hydrodynamics . ii : sound waves , '' jhep * 0212 * ( 2002 ) 054 [ arxiv : hep - th/0210220 ] . a.  nunez and a.  o.  starinets , `` ads / cft correspondence , quasinormal modes , and thermal correlators in n = 4 sym , '' phys . d * 67 * ( 2003 ) 124013 [ arxiv : hep - th/0302026 ] . c.  p.  herzog , `` the sound of m - theory , '' phys . d * 68 * ( 2003 ) 024013 [ arxiv : hep - th/0302086 ] . a.  buchel , `` n = 2 * hydrodynamics , '' nucl .  phys . b * 708 * ( 2005 ) 451 [ arxiv : hep - th/0406200 ] . k.  kovtun and a.  o.  starinets , `` quasinormal modes and holography , '' phys .  rev . d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 086009 [ arxiv : hep - th/0506184 ] . p.  benincasa , a.  buchel and a.  o.  starinets , `` sound waves in strongly coupled non - conformal gauge theory plasma , '' nucl . b * 733 * ( 2006 ) 160 [ arxiv : hep - th/0507026 ] . a.  buchel , `` transport properties of cascading gauge theories , '' phys . d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 106002 [ arxiv : hep - th/0509083 ] . a.  buchel , j.  t.  liu and a.  o.  starinets , `` coupling constant dependence of the shear viscosity in n = 4 supersymmetric yang - mills theory , '' nucl . b * 707 * ( 2005 ) 56 [ arxiv : hep - th/0406264 ] . s.  c.  huot , s.  jeon and g.  d.  moore , `` shear viscosity in weakly coupled n = 4 super yang - mills theory compared to qcd , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0608062 . a.  nakamura and s.  sakai , `` transport coefficients of gluon plasma , '' phys . lett .   * 94 * ( 2005 ) 072305 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0406009 ] . m.  c.  chu and t.  matsui , `` dynamic debye screening for a heavy quark - antiquark pair traversing a quark - gluon plasma , '' phys . d * 39 * ( 1989 ) 1892 . j.  m.  maldacena , `` wilson loops in large n field theories , '' phys . * 80 * ( 1998 ) 4859 [ arxiv : hep - th/9803002 ] . s.  j.  rey and j.  t.  yee , `` macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large n gauge theory and anti - de sitter supergravity , '' eur . j.  c * 22 * ( 2001 ) 379 [ arxiv : hep - th/9803001 ] . s.  j.  rey , s.  theisen and j.  t.  yee , `` wilson - polyakov loop at finite temperature in large n gauge theory and anti - de sitter supergravity , '' nucl . b * 527 * ( 1998 ) 171 [ arxiv : hep - th/9803135 ] . a.  brandhuber , n.  itzhaki , j.  sonnenschein and s.  yankielowicz , `` wilson loops in the large n limit at finite temperature , '' phys . b * 434 * ( 1998 ) 36 [ arxiv : hep - th/9803137 ] . h.  liu , k.  rajagopal and u.  a.  wiedemann , `` an ads / cft calculation of screening in a hot wind , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0607062 . m.  chernicoff , j.  a.  garcia and a.  guijosa , `` the energy of a moving quark - antiquark pair in an n=4 sym plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0607089 . k.  peeters , j.  sonnenschein and m.  zamaklar , `` holographic melting and related properties of mesons in a quark gluon plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0606195 . e.  caceres , m.  natsuume and t.  okamura , `` screening length in plasma winds , '' arxiv : hep - th/0607233 . s.  d.  avramis , k.  sfetsos and d.  zoakos , `` on the velocity and chemical - potential dependence of the heavy - quark interaction in n = 4 sym plasmas , '' arxiv : hep - th/0609079 . h.  liu , k.  rajagopal and u.  a.  wiedemann , `` wilson loops in heavy ion collisions and their calculation in ads / cft , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0612168 . m.  chernicoff and a.  guijosa , `` energy loss of gluons , baryons and k - quarks in an n = 4 sym plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0611155 . c.  hoyos , k.  landsteiner and s.  montero , `` holographic meson melting , '' arxiv : hep - th/0612169 . f.  karsch , `` lattice qcd at high temperature and the qgp , '' arxiv : hep - lat/0601013 . h.  liu , k.  rajagopal and u.  a.  wiedemann , `` calculating the jet quenching parameter from ads / cft , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0605178 . c.  p.  herzog , a.  karch , p.  kovtun , c.  kozcaz and l.  g.  yaffe , `` energy loss of a heavy quark moving through n = 4 supersymmetric yang - mills plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605158 . j.  casalderrey - solana and d.  teaney , `` heavy quark diffusion in strongly coupled n = 4 yang mills , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0605199 . s.  s.  gubser , `` drag force in ads / cft , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605182 . a.  buchel , `` on jet quenching parameters in strongly coupled non - conformal gauge theories , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605178 . c.  p.  herzog , `` energy loss of heavy quarks from asymptotically ads geometries , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605191 . e.  caceres and a.  guijosa , `` drag force in charged n=4 sym plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605235 . j.  f.  vazquez - poritz , `` enhancing the jet quenching parameter from marginal deformations , '' arxiv : hep - th/0605296 . e.  caceres and a.  guijosa , `` on drag forces and jet quenching in strongly coupled plasmas , '' arxiv : hep - th/0606134 . f.  l.  lin and t.  matsuo , `` jet quenching parameter in medium with chemical potential from ads / cft , '' arxiv : hep - th/0606136 . s.  d.  avramis and k.  sfetsos , `` supergravity and the jet quenching parameter in the presence of r - charge densities , '' arxiv : hep - th/0606190 . n.  armesto , j.  d.  edelstein and j.  mas ,  jet quenching at finite ` t hooft coupling and chemical potential from ads / cft,' arxiv : hep - ph/0606245 . e.  nakano , s.  teraguchi and w.  y.  wen , `` drag force , jet quenching , and ads / qcd , '' arxiv : hep - ph/0608274 . j.  j.  friess , s.  s.  gubser and g.  michalogiorgakis , `` dissipation from a heavy quark moving through n = 4 super - yang - mills plasma , '' jhep * 0609 * ( 2006 ) 072 [ arxiv : hep - th/0605292 ] . j.  j.  friess , s.  s.  gubser , g.  michalogiorgakis and s.  s.  pufu , `` the stress tensor of a quark moving through n = 4 thermal plasma , '' arxiv : hep - th/0607022 . j.  j.  friess , s.  s.  gubser , g.  michalogiorgakis and s.  s.  pufu , `` stability of strings binding heavy - quark mesons , '' arxiv : hep - th/0609137 . s.  s.  gubser , `` comparing the drag force on heavy quarks in n=4 super - yang - mills theory and qcd , '' arxiv : hep - th/0611272 . s.  s.  gubser , `` jet - quenching and momentum correlators from the gauge - string duality , '' arxiv : hep - th/0612143 . p.  c.  argyres , m.  edalati and j.  f.  vazquez - poritz , `` no - drag string configurations for steadily moving quark - antiquark pairs in a thermal bath , '' arxiv : hep - th/0608118 . p.  c.  argyres , m.  edalati and j.  f.  vazquez - poritz , `` spacelike strings and jet quenching from a wilson loop , '' arxiv : hep - th/0612157 . s.  j.  sin and i.  zahed , `` holography of radiation and jet quenching , '' phys . b * 608 * ( 2005 ) 265 [ arxiv : hep - th/0407215 ] . t.  sakai and s.  sugimoto , `` low energy hadron physics in holographic qcd , '' prog . * 113 * ( 2005 ) 843 [ arxiv : hep - th/0412141 ] .
Abstract:

Answer: we review the ads / cft description of gauge theory plasmas for non - experts . we discuss the low shear viscosity , jet quenching , and @xmath0-suppression , which are three major signatures for the quark - gluon plasma observed at rhic experiments . based on invited talks presented at  frontiers in the physics of quark - gluon plasma " ( july 7 - 8 2006 , riken ) ,  string theory and quantum field theory " ( sep . 12 - 16 2006 , yitp ) , the fall meeting 2006 of the physical society of japan ( sep . 20 - 22 2006 , nara women s univ . ) ,  ads / cft and strongly coupled quark matter " ( nov . 21 - 22 2006 , ccast ) , ykis2006 ( nov . 20 - 28 2006 , yitp ) , a string theory workshop at rikkyo univ . ( dec . 26 - 27 2006 ) .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the berry phase  @xcite remains a fascinating subject with many consequences in a variety of physical systems  @xcite . some time ago we proposed  @xcite a number of scenarios in condensed matter settings where the berry phase manifests itself in the phase - coherent quantum dynamics of a particle carrying a spin and moving through orientationally inhomogeneous magnetic fields @xmath0 . such manifestations of the berry phase can occur , e.g. , in semiconductors or metals in the form of persistent currents  @xcite or oscillations of the magnetoconductance or universal conductance fluctuations  @xcite . as recognized early on@xcite , all these effects share the common feature that the orbital motion of the particle is modified by the berry phase in very much the same way as it is in well - known phase - coherent phenomena based on the aharonov - bohm effect . the first experimental evidence for such a berry phase effect has been recently found in semiconductors  @xcite , in which a local effective magnetic field is produced via the rashba effect .    however , whereas aharonov - bohm effects occur regardless of the strength @xmath1 of the field , berry phase effects appear only in the adiabatic limit , i.e. , for sufficiently large magnetic fields . this limit requires that  roughly speaking  the typical orbital frequency of the particle carrying the spin through the field is much smaller than the precession frequency of the spin around the local field direction . in this limit , the spin will remain in its instantaneous eigenstate , i.e. , will continuously align itself along the _ local _ field direction @xmath0 as it moves through the magnetic field texture . if , in addition , the particle trajectory is closed , the spin will acquire a berry phase , which is purely geometric in character . as spin and orbital motion couple via the inhomogeneity of the field , the berry phase can ultimately enter the orbital part of the effective hamiltonian in the same way that the aharonov - bohm phase does . there seems to be general agreement that once the adiabatic limit is reached the results found previously  @xcite are correct . the central question then is : what is the proper criterion for the adiabatic regime ? again , there is no issue of contention in ballistic rings , e.g. , for which adiabaticity is reached when @xmath2 , where @xmath3 is the bohr frequency ( to be defined below ) , and @xmath4 is the typical time it takes the particle to go around the ring once . this situation occurs , e.g. , in clean semiconductors . but what about diffusive systems , such as normal metal rings ? it is this question that we have previously addressed in great detail  @xcite and that has been recently reconsidered by van langen et al . @xcite , who claim to reach a rather pessimistic conclusion about the observability of the berry phase effect  in stark contrast to our findings  @xcite . it is the purpose of the present paper to show that the claim of van langen et al . @xcite is not correct . to this end , we first state the problem of adiabaticity in this section again and then provide in the following sections a general discussion on the issue of dephasing induced by inhomogeneous magnetic fields . this discussion is then followed by explicit examples that unambiguously demonstrate the observability of berry phase effects in diffusive systems of immediate experimental interest .    now , in the context of weak localization physics we have advanced detailed physical and technical arguments  @xcite that adiabaticity is reached more easily in diffusive than in ballistic systems ( all other parameters being equal ) . the physical explanation for this is simple : in diffusive motion around , say , a ring , the particle spends on the average much more time in a given region of field direction than it would do in purely ballistic motion . thus , there is more time for the spin to execute precessions around a given field direction , and thus the spin will have a higher probability of aligning itself along the local field direction than it would in purely ballistic motion . translating this picture into more concrete terms for an electron diffusing around a @xmath5-dimensional ring of circumference @xmath6 with static random disorder , adiabaticity is reached if the zeeman energy , @xmath7 , exceeds the thouless energy , @xmath8 . here @xmath9 is the electron g - factor , @xmath10 is the bohr magneton , @xmath11 is the diffusion constant with @xmath12 being fermi velocity , @xmath13 is the elastic mean free time , and @xmath14 is the elastic mean free path . more generally , we can also allow for the case in which the field reorients @xmath15 times as the particle goes around once the ring . whereas the case of @xmath16 is physically realizable  @xcite , it seems very difficult to implement cases with @xmath17 experimentally . still , as the conclusions reached by van  langen et al . @xcite are crucially based on the case @xmath18 , we shall include this possibility , and the criterion for adiabaticity as found in ref . @xcite then reads @xmath19 here , the texture  dependent vector @xmath20 is some average of the direction of the magnetic field  @xcite . the factor @xmath21 accounts for non - uniformity in the direction of the magnetic field , and encodes the fact that the adiabatic approximation becomes exact , regardless of @xmath3 , in the limit of a homogeneous field , for which @xmath22 . in the following discussion , however , we shall  for the sake of simplicity  omit this factor , noting that its inclusion would render the criterion even less stringent )  @xcite . as in metals one typically has @xmath23 of the order of @xmath24 , @xmath25 and @xmath26 , we should have , for a ring of circumference @xmath27 , magnetic fields at least of the order of @xmath28  gauss to be within the adiabatic regime . note that without the diffusive factor , @xmath29 , the required fields would be too large to be attainable experimentally ( i.e. , on the order of @xmath30 ) . the regime of adiabaticity defined in eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) follows from a detailed derivation of the cooperon and diffuson propagator based on weak localization techniques and an adiabatic approximation scheme  @xcite . this adiabatic approximation is performed in the path intgral representation for the cooperon ( diffuson ) . as emphasized in an analogous discussion of the imaginary - time propagator in the context of persistent currents  @xcite , the adiabatic approximation can contain additional angle - dependent terms that are different from the berry phase , and these terms can mask the berry phase in certain physical observables . ( for an explicit example of such a case , see sec . vi  f of ref . the origin of this additonal term can be traced back to quantum fluctuations of the particle trajectory , which induce non - smooth variations of the magnetic field ( and thereby violate the smooth variation  assumption that underlies the adiabatic approximation)@xcite . an alternative way to express this point is to say that in certain cases the berry phase can be masked by dephasing effects  in very much the same way that the aharonov - bohm phase can become unobservable if dephasing influences become too large . such dephasing effects are difficult to calculate for a general texture , but can sometimes be obtained in special cases for which an exact solution is available ( see ref . @xcite and below ) . as suggested in ref . , it is possible to extend the exact solution for a propagator containing a single spin-1/2 particle  @xcite to the one containing two spin-1/2 particels . indeed , by following this suggestion van  langen et al . @xcite re - calculate the magnetoconductance for a cylindrically symmetrical texture , and claim to find deviations from our adiabatic solution  @xcite . ( as we shall show , these deviations are only apparent.)van  langen et al . conclude from this observation that the exact solution does not contain the berry phase effect , and thus that the regime of adiabaticity , given in eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) , is invalid . instead , adopting a suggestion made first by stern  @xcite , van  langen et al.@xcite claim that it is necessary for the much more stringent conditon , @xmath31 to be satisfied in diffusive systems before adiabaticity is reached , and thus before the berry phase effect can become observable in the magnetoconductance . it is specifically this claim that is incorrect . on the contrary , we will show that precisely our adiabaticity criterion , eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) , is appropriate for diffusive systems , and that the observability or non - observability of the berry phase crucially depends on the choice of physical parameters [ in the adiabatic regime given by eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) ] . indeed , van  langen et al.@xcite concentrate on the rather unphysical choice that the field winds five times around the ring ( i.e. , @xmath32 ) , and as dephasing effects grow strongly with @xmath15 ( as @xmath33 ; see below ) , it comes as little surprise that berry phase oscillations are not discernible in this extreme case . however , upon choosing @xmath16the physically most relevant case  not only do berry phase effects show up in the exact solution , but also they agree well with our previously - obtained adiabatic predictions . van langen et al.@xcite have studied the issue of adiabaticity also in terms of boltzmann equations . due to the coupling of the magnetic field to the orbital motion of the charged electron these boltzmann equations are valid in the diffusive regime defined by @xmath34 , where @xmath35 is the cyclotron frequency . as @xmath35 and @xmath3 are typically of the same order of magnitude in metals , the regime @xmath36 studied by van  langen et al . lies _ outside _ the physical regime to which their boltzmann equations can legitimately be applied . still , even if we adopt their academic point of view and ignore such orbital effects ( i.e. set the electron charge to zero ) , the regime @xmath36 is problematic for an additional reason  @xcite . if @xmath36 , the zeeman rate @xmath3 is large compared to the elastic collision rate @xmath37 . in this case we expect the zeeman interaction to have a strong dephasing influence on the orbital motion ( for inhomogeneous fields ) , especially when @xmath38 , and the system lies outside the semiclassical regime in the sense of weak localization theory ( see , e.g. , secs .  4 and 10 of ref .   and this issue has not been discussed by van  langen et al .  in the context of their boltzmann equations .    finally , none of the effects discussed by van  langen et al . in terms of their boltzmann equation have been shown explicitly to be related to the berry phase . without such information at hand it is not possible to tell whether the effects they find are of dynamical ( non - phase - coherent ) or geometrical ( berry phase ) origin , as both of them can occur in an adiabatic approximation to the quantum dynamics . as we are interested in the berry phase effect associated with phase - coherence and occurring in physical observables , we shall not comment any further on the boltzmann equation approach of van  langen et al . , and instead shall concentrate on the magnetoconductance expressed in terms of the cooperon propagator  @xcite .    still , we do wish to point out that although we do not agree with the final conclusions reached by van  langen et al . , we have found their work stimulating , inasmuch as it has motivated us to clarify the issue of dephasing which , in turn , has allowed us to establish more concrete predictions about the range of observability of the berry phase in the magnetoconductance of diffusive metallic systems . we consider a quasi - one - dimensional ring of circumference @xmath6 , embedded in a magnetic field texture given by @xmath39 , where @xmath40 is the location on the ring , @xmath41 is the tilt angle of the magnetic field , and @xmath42 is the winding of the magnetic field along the propagation direction . the magnitude @xmath1 and , in particular , the tilt angle @xmath41 are assumed to be constant . it is this special case that can be solved exactly ( as pointed out in ref .  ) along the same lines as discussed in ref .   for a single - spin propagator . van  langen et al . @xcite were the first to write down this solution explicitly for a two - spin propagator . the magnetoconductance resulting from weak localization corrections and in the presence of the field texture @xmath43 has been derived in ref . @xcite and reads , @xmath44 where the effective ( non - hermitian ) hamiltonian @xmath45 is given by @xmath46 where @xmath47 ( with @xmath48 ) are spin-1/2 pauli matrices , and where @xmath49 is the dimensionless adiabaticity parameter [ see eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) ] . the factor @xmath50 is a damping constant expressed in terms of the dephasing length @xmath51 ( which is specified in more detail below ) . note that @xmath52 is introduced here in a phenomenological way with the particular _ ad hoc _ choice that it be a c - number and diagonal in spin space . we now evaluate @xmath53 explicitly , but instead of using the exact eigenstates , as was done by van  langen et al . @xcite , we use an alternative approach in terms of unitary gauge transformations , which has the virtue of making the emergence of the berry phase immediately transparent . for this purpose we define unitary transformations @xmath54 and @xmath55 of the form @xmath56 with the property that @xmath57 by noting that @xmath58 , we find @xmath59)^2 + i\kappa\ , ( \sigma_{1z}-\sigma_{2z } ) . \label{uhu}\ ] ] next , we rewrite the matrix elements occurring in @xmath53 : @xmath60 where @xmath61 and @xmath62 is now diagonal in the angular momentum eigenstates @xmath63 , with @xmath64 ( imposing periodic boundary conditions ) , and we find , @xmath65 where @xmath66 is the trace in spin space and @xmath67 here , we have absorbed the integer @xmath68 into @xmath69 . note that two of the eigenvalues of @xmath70 are given by the ( geometric ) berry phase @xmath71 for an effectively integral spin @xcite . the term @xmath72 provides a source of dephasing that can mask the berry phase  and more generally the aharonov - bohm effect ( see , sec . [ dephasing ] below ) . all the other off - diagonal terms turn out to be irrelevant in the adiabatic limit ( see sec . [ physical ] ) . to proceed , we express the above operators in the @xmath73-basis @xmath74 where @xmath75 , and @xmath76 . finding the inverse of @xmath77 is then straightforward , and we finally obtain for the magnetoconductance @xmath78   [ \gamma+(m+f)^2]\ , ( \gamma+m^2)^2   \\ \nonumber & + & 4\kappa^2 \{[\gamma+(m - f\cos\eta)^2][\gamma+(m+f\cos\eta)^2]+f^2\sin^2{\eta } ( \gamma + m^2 + f^2\cos^2{\eta})\ } \}^{-1}\,\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath79 , i.e. , we have allowed for an aharonov - bohm flux @xmath80 , with @xmath81 being the flux quantum . the foregoing result is exact and is seen to be identical to the one obtained by van  langen et al . @xcite ( for their choice @xmath82 ) . however , our alternative derivation has led us to a form in which the berry phase contribution is made manifest in the terms of the form @xmath83 . next we go over to the adiabatic limit , defined here by @xmath84 , which , for @xmath16 , is equivalent to @xmath85 [ see eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) ] . ( below , in sec .  [ observability ] , we give explicit numerical values of @xmath86 for which adiabaticity is reached . )   in this limit we may drop the terms independent of @xmath86 in eq . ( [ moscexact ] ) ( this is justified as terms with large @xmath69 give a negligible contribution to @xmath53 ) . thus , in the adiabatic limit we finally get @xmath87 + ( f^2/2)\sin^2{\eta } \over [ \gamma+(m-\alpha f\cos\eta)^2][\gamma+(m+\alpha f\cos\eta)^2]+ ( \gamma + m^2 + f^2\cos^2{\eta})f^2\sin^2{\eta}}\,\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the sum over @xmath88 has been introduced artificially for later convenience . note that the berry phase @xmath89 couples to the momentum like the aharonov - bohm phase does , i.e. , via @xmath90 . we note that the remaining @xmath41-dependence can not be accounted for by this type of coupling to the momentum . we particularly emphasize that ( apart from the flux appearing in @xmath79 ) the adiabatic limit of the magnetoconductance @xmath91 is independent of the field amplitude @xmath1 ; thus , increasing the field further , say up to @xmath92 ( cf . ( [ schrott ] ) ) , has no effect . it is now instructive to compare eq . ( [ moscadiabatic ] ) with the one previously derived  @xcite for arbitrary textures and in the adiabatic approximation scheme for the berry phase . the latter result reads @xmath93[\gamma'+(m+\alpha f\cos\eta)^2]}\,\ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where , again , @xmath79 , and @xmath94 , and where we have used some identities to facilitate comparison . note that in general @xmath95 ( see below ) . the virtue of @xmath96 is that it is valid for arbitrary field textures ( with the appropriate berry phase  @xcite ) . it is thus important to understand its relation to the special but exactly solvable case . now , by comparing @xmath96 with @xmath91 we see that the two expressions have the same structure with respect to the berry phase , @xmath97 , but differ in additional @xmath41- and @xmath15-dependent terms . ( from now on we put the aharonov - bohm flux @xmath98 to zero but shall return to nonzero flux later . )   particularly important is the additional term in the denominator of @xmath91 , i.e. , @xmath99 ( the physical origin of such additional terms is discussed below in sec.[physical ] ) . it is this term that acts as a _ dephasing source _ for certain tilt angles and windings @xmath15 by suppressing the  resonance peaks " that would occur at integral values of the berry phase @xmath89 ( for small enough @xmath100 ) . for @xmath17 the suppression due to this term is so strong that all resonances except the ones at @xmath101 become masked , i.e. , these resonances due to the berry phase are no longer visible in graphs of @xmath91 versus @xmath41 , whereas they do show up in @xmath96 _ provided _ one chooses @xmath100 to be independent of the tilt angle @xmath41 ( and sufficiently small ) . it is this _ ad hoc _ choice for @xmath15 and @xmath100 that has been adopted by van  langen et al . in particular , they choose @xmath18 and a constant @xmath102 . as in this case @xmath96 and @xmath91 behave differently for @xmath103 ( see fig .  3 of ref . @xcite ) , van  langen et al.@xcite conclude that @xmath91 is not showing adiabatic behavior and , thus , that our criterion for adiabaticity , eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) , is not correct . however , this conclusion of van  langen et al .  is premature . there are two main reasons for this : first , they have ignored the issue of dephasing induced by the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field , and connected to this , second , the issue of the self - consistency of the semiclassical approximation on which the derivation of the cooperon propagator rests . we now discuss these issues in turn , and then present physical examples to illustrate the general discussion . the _ ad hoc _ choice by van  langen et al . @xcite of putting @xmath103 and choosing them to be independent of @xmath41 means that @xmath91 and @xmath96 do _ not _ describe the same physical situation . this is so for the following reason . first we note again that the dephasing parameters @xmath104 are  put in by hand " into the cooperon to account for dephasing in a phenomenological way ( this is just dictated by the complexity of the involved many - body problem and by our inability to address this issue in a more systematic way in general ) . in the derivation of @xmath96 dephasing due to the field is only taken into account _ a posteriori _ in terms of a phenomenological parameter @xmath100 , while the exact solution , eq .  ( [ moscexact ] ) , not only includes the berry phase but simultaneously also those dephasing effects that are caused by the field through the zeeman coupling . the remaining dephasing effects in @xmath53 or @xmath91 are then included via the phenomenological parameter @xmath52 . obviously , @xmath52 and @xmath100 are in general different for the same physical situation . next , it is a well - known fact in the context of weak - localization phenomena  @xcite that dephasing in general depends on the magnetic field @xmath43 penetrating the sample ( as we must allow for there to be any zeeman interaction at all ) . most importantly , @xmath100 not only depends , in general , on the magnitude @xmath1 of the field but also on its tilt angle @xmath41 that the field makes with the @xmath105-axis perpendicular to the ring plane . ( this is already so even without zeeman terms , see , e.g. , sec .  2 of ref . there can be little surprise that the angle dependence becomes even more pronounced in the presence of our inhomogeneous zeeman interaction ) . the various dephasing effects are accounted for phenomenologically in terms of dephasing lengths  @xcite , @xmath106 , where the dephasing length @xmath107 contains all field - independent contributions , such as the one coming from inelastic collisons of the diffusing electron with , say , phonons , @xmath108 , where the dephasing time @xmath109 is some inelastic scattering time . the magnetic length @xmath110 contains all effects coming from the field penetrating the sample . if now @xmath111 for some field configurations , we no longer expect to see phase - coherence in general . as a matter of fact , in sec . iv of ref . we have estimated the upper bound of the dephasing length ( due to the inhomogeneous zeeman interaction ) in metallic films to be given by the characteristic field - reorientation length @xmath112 . this estimate follows from the observation that quantum corrections begin to be eliminated when the largest phase - coherent paths enclose roughly one quantum of berry flux . for the symmetric texture considered here we find @xmath113 . obviously , for certain tilt - angles and for @xmath38 this upper bound on the dephasing length quickly becomes smaller than @xmath6 . translated into a dephasing parameter @xmath114 , this estimate reads @xmath115 i.e. , we see that the dephasing becomes explicitly @xmath41-dependent and grows like @xmath33 .    thus , it is by no means surprising that the exact solution confirms this general expectation , in the sense that explicit dephasing terms are present in @xmath53 that are field - dependent and which can become so large , for _ particular _ field inhomogeneities , that they completely suppress the resonances in the magnetoconductance , eq . ( [ moscexact ] ) , with respect to the berry phase  @xcite , no matter how large @xmath116 is . of course , as implied by above discussion leading to eq . ( [ estimate ] ) , such a dephasing effect must also be accounted for explicitly in @xmath96 , eq . ( [ mosclsg ] ) , by an appropriate choice for the phenomenological damping parameter @xmath100 . in particular , in view of the estimate given in eq .  ( [ estimate ] ) , it is reasonable to make the ansatz @xmath117  @xcite . then , choosing the dephasing parameter of @xmath91 to be constant ( i.e. @xmath41-independent ) and much smaller than unity , say @xmath118 , we see that the qualitative discrepancy between @xmath96 and @xmath91 disappears : both expressions show no resonances ( away from @xmath119 ) . ( we note that as @xmath52 and @xmath100 are introduced phenomenologically anyway , there is no need to get quantitative agreement , and it suffices to find the same qualitative suppression of the resonances for @xmath17 in both @xmath96 and @xmath91 . we shall not be making any further use of this ansatz for @xmath100 . ) the suppression of the cooperon due to homogeneous fields is standard  @xcite ; the discussion above shows that additional dephasing is induced by the field inhomogeneity . the advantage of having the exact solution for @xmath53 , eq . ( [ moscexact ] ) , at hand is that we can now calculate the field - dependence of such dephasing terms explicitly ; this allows us to make more precise statements than before  @xcite about the regime in which one can expect to observe consequences of the berry phase ( see sec . [ observability ] below ) . the magnetoconductance correction @xmath53 is expressed in terms of the cooperon propagator . the derivation of the cooperon is , in turn , performed within the _ semiclassical limit_. in particular , this means that  back - reaction effects " , i.e. , non - phase - coherent dynamical effects of the field - dependent zeeman term on the _ orbital motion _ are assumed to be negligibly small throughout . this is a fundamental assumption in weak - localization theory  @xcite , and it was explicitly adopted in our derivation of the cooperon and of @xmath96 , too . ( this is emphasized , e.g. , in app . a of ref .  . )   evidently , dephasing effects such as the ones discussed in the previous subsection are nothing but such back - reaction effects . thus , if dephasing becomes so large ( as turns out to be the case in the adiabatic limit and for @xmath17 ) that phase - coherence is completely suppressed in the orbital part , the semiclassical approximation breaks down and the self - consistency of the entire treatment is lost  @xcite . consequently , the expressions for the magnetoconductance are no longer reliable in the case of complete dephasing , and no weight should be put on conclusions drawn under such circumstances . obviously , semiclassical and adiabatic approximations are interconnected issues , in the sense that the semiclassical approximation might break down in the adiabatic limit and for certain field configurations . in other words , adiabaticity alone is not a sufficient criterion for the observability of berry phase effects , in addition the system must be in the mesoscopic regime characterized by phase - coherence .    to summarize our conclusions so far , we have seen that our adiabaticity criterion , eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) , is sufficient for reaching the adiabatic limit involving the berry phase [ cf . ( [ moscadiabatic ] ) and ( [ mosclsg ] ) ] . however , the criterion does not guarantee ( and this was never claimed ) that the berry phase will be observable under all circumstances . as a matter of fact , it can happen that the phase - coherence , which is necessary for observing such quantum phase phenomena , can be destroyed by a variety of dephasing sources , in particular also by magnetic fields penetrating the sample . if dephasing becomes so strong in the adiabatic regime that quantum phase effects of the orbital motion get completely washed out , the semiclassical approximation underlying the derivation of the cooperon breaks down and results based on it ( such as @xmath53 ) are no longer reliable . it is precisely the issues discussed in the last two subsections that have not been taken into consideration by van  langen et al . @xcite . in the light of our discussion it should now be clear that the only conclusion one can draw from the observation made by van  langen et al . ( namely the non - observability of berry phase effects for @xmath18 within our semiclassical theory ) is that field textures with @xmath17 suppress phase - coherence very efficiently , and thus such extreme textures can not serve as a general test case for the existence of the berry phase and the associated adiabaticity regime  at least not within the semiclassical regime to which our results , eqs . ( [ moscexact])-([mosclsg ] ) , are confined .      up to now we have mainly concentrated on regimes where @xmath17 . such regimes , however , are of little experimental interest ( quite apart from the difficulty of how to produce them ) since the berry phase effect would be masked by the strong dephasing effect of the field . the situation , however , is entirely different for the case where the magnetic field winds only once around the ring , i.e. when @xmath16 ( such field textures can be produced experimentally  @xcite ) . indeed , we shall see now that for @xmath16 the dephasing is sufficiently small and the berry phase has observable consequences within an experimentally accessible regime . we shall illustrate this with two specific examples : first we discuss resonances in the magnetoconductance due to the berry phase ( for vanishing aharonov - bohm flux @xmath98 ) ; then we discuss phase shifts in the aharonov - bohm oscillations induced by the berry phase . we consider first the magnetoconductance as function of the berry phase in the absence of an aharonov - bohm flux , i.e. @xmath120 . we make the realistic assumption that the dephasing length independent of the tilt - angle can be made to exceed @xmath6 , say , @xmath121 , giving @xmath122 ( this value for @xmath52 is 100 times smaller than the one chosen in sec . [ exactsolution ] ) . in fig .  1 , we plot the magnetoconductance @xmath53 , eq . ( ) , as function of the tilt angle @xmath41 in the adiabatic regime , @xmath123 , and find pronounced resonance peaks at the berry phase values @xmath119 in very good qualitative agreement with the general result @xmath96 , given in eq . ( [ mosclsg ] ) , even if we simply choose @xmath124 . for comparison , we also plot ( see fig . 1 ) the magnetoconductance @xmath53 outside the adiabatic regime , i.e. , for @xmath125 , where the resonances are ( nearly ) absent demonstrating that adiabaticity is needed for the emergence of the berry phase . we note that above choice for the adiabatic parameter ( i.e. , @xmath126 ) corresponds to @xmath127 . in particular , if we follow van  langen et al .  and choose @xmath128 ( i.e. , a typical ratio for a mesoscopic metal ring ) we see that @xmath126 is equivalent to @xmath129 . note that we are orders of magnitude below the regime of eq . ( [ schrott ] ) , where @xmath92 . translated into magnetic fields , @xmath126 corresponds to @xmath130 which , for @xmath25 and @xmath131  @xcite , gives @xmath132 = 4.5 \times 10^{-6 } { d\over l^2 } [ gs ] \ , .\ ] ] to illustrate this with concrete numbers we assume the fermi velocity @xmath133 and the ring circumference @xmath134 , and again @xmath128 . we then find that the field corresponding to @xmath123 is about @xmath135 . the resonance structure due to the berry phase starts to emerge for @xmath86 at around @xmath136 , i.e. , for fields of the order of @xmath137 . finally , we note that when the tilt angle @xmath41 is varied , then typically there will be a concommittant change of the aharonov - bohm flux @xmath98 . this flux , however , can be easily compensated by applying a field perpendicular to the ring such that @xmath98 again becomes an integral multiple of the flux quantum . note that the maximal fields required for this compensation are about ten gauss , or so , for a ring of @xmath134 . thus , such fields would have a negligible effect on the inhomogeneous field required for adiabaticity , except if @xmath41 is very close to @xmath138 . a further experimentally interesting scenario is that of the _ phase shift _ in the aharonov - bohm oscillation induced by the berry phase . in particular , this effect is most pronounced for half - integral berry phases , @xmath139 ( i.e. , @xmath140 or @xmath141 ) , for which we expect [ see eqs . ( [ moscadiabatic ] ) and ( [ mosclsg ] ) ] to get a phase shift in the aharonov - bohm oscillation of the magnetoconductance by the flux value @xmath142 ( i.e. , by one quarter of the flux quantum @xmath143 ) . note that in this case the sign of the oscillation slope ( e.g. at @xmath120 ) gets reversed with respect to the case without berry phase . this sign - reversal is reminiscent of similar effects induced by spin - orbit scattering  @xcite ; it is actually not unexpected , as the zeeman term induces an effective spin - orbit coupling due to the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field @xcite . this phase shift is shown in figs . 2a and 2b , which show @xmath144 as function of the aharonov - bohm flux @xmath98 for berry phases @xmath145 and @xmath142 , both in the adiabatic limit ( i.e. , @xmath123 ) and with the choice @xmath146 ( i.e. , @xmath147 ) . for the sake of comparison , in fig . 2d we also show a non - adiabatic case , @xmath148 , for which the phase shift is absent . the phase shift remains discernible down to about @xmath149 before disappearing . the adiabatic limit is fully reached at about @xmath150 , by which not only the phase shift ( which is the important feature ) but also the amplitude becomes identical to @xmath91 given in eq . ( [ moscadiabatic ] ) . the amplitude at @xmath123 increases about by 20  percent upon increasing the field to @xmath150 .    to obtain realistic estimates for some physical parameters we now concentrate on a au ring and use the material parameters recently determined by mohanty et al.@xcite ( see sample au-@xmath151 in their table  i ) . the relevant values are : @xmath152 and @xmath153 ( at a temperature of @xmath154 ) , which give for the dephasing length @xmath155 . thus , the above choice @xmath156 requires a ring of circumference @xmath157 . in this case , the field corresponding to @xmath126 becomes @xmath158 , and the limiting case , @xmath149 , at which the phase shift emerges , corresponds to @xmath159  @xcite . precisely the same phase shift occurs in @xmath96 , eq . ( [ mosclsg ] ) , as shown in fig .  2 . to get roughly the same amplitudes as in @xmath53 we must account for the @xmath41dependent dephasing in @xmath160 . to this end we choose an effective @xmath161 ( for @xmath162 ) and @xmath163 ( for @xmath140 . this phenomenological choice is not vital for the qualitative behavior of @xmath160 , but it does allow us to estimate an effective dephasing length @xmath164 , as we now explain . first we note that the ( peak - to - peak ) amplitude of the magnetoconductance @xmath53 for @xmath165 is considerably reduced ( by about a factor of @xmath166 ) with respect to that for @xmath145 . as is clear by now , this is due to the @xmath41dependent dephasing terms . now , without such dephasing the aharonov - bohm amplitudes for @xmath145 and @xmath165 would be equal [ see , e.g. , eq .  ( [ mosclsg ] ) with a @xmath100 that is @xmath41-independent ] . thus , the reduction of the aharonov - bohm amplitude at @xmath140 ( relative to that at @xmath167 ) serves as a quantitative measure of the @xmath41-dependent dephasing . expressed in terms of an effective dephasing length , @xmath168 , we find @xmath169 m , for the particular values chosen above ( i.e. , @xmath170 , and @xmath157 ) . this dephasing length should be compared with above value @xmath171 ( corresponding to @xmath146 and @xmath157 ) .    finally , there is also the usual ( spin - independent ) dephasing arising from the field @xmath172 penetrating a ring of finite width @xmath173 . on the one hand , we need a sufficiently large field so as to reach adiabaticity , and on the other hand such a field can induce dephasing . thus , to satisfy these conflicting requirements in an optimal way we should consider rings with a width @xmath173 as small as possible . to get a rough estimate for such a width , we take for the field @xmath174 and insert this into the standard formula  @xcite , @xmath175 . we now require that this dephasing length should not become ( much ) smaller than @xmath107 , so we choose @xmath176 . on the other hand , the field required for adiabaticity is about @xmath177 , and together with @xmath178 and @xmath140 this corresponds to a ring width @xmath173 of the order of @xmath179 . note that as the effective dephasing length is obtained via @xmath180 , the dephasing effect due to @xmath172 penetrating the sample increases @xmath52 by a factor of two ( i.e. , @xmath181 ) . as is seen from fig .  2 , the cases @xmath146 and @xmath181 behave in the same way , i.e. , with phase shift , but the amplitude of @xmath53 for @xmath140 and @xmath181 is now reduced by a factor of @xmath182 compared with @xmath53 for @xmath167 and @xmath146 . ( note that for @xmath167 the magnetic field for the aharonov - bohm oscillations can be chosen to be very small , so that @xmath183 dominates over @xmath184 and thus @xmath146 . )   finally , we note that the field component @xmath174 gives rise to an aharonov - bohm phase @xmath185 that is , in general , not equal to @xmath186 ( with @xmath187 integral ) . therefore , this offset flux @xmath188 must be accounted for in order to assign the above phase shift unambiguously to the berry phase @xmath165 . for instance , for @xmath157 , we need @xmath189 in order to generate one flux quantum @xmath81 through the ring . now consider @xmath140 , and , say , @xmath177 , i.e. , @xmath190 . to compensate the off - set @xmath188 , we need to increase @xmath172 by , say , @xmath191 to @xmath192 , in which case @xmath193 becomes an integer ( @xmath194 ) .    the amplitude - reduction mentioned above demands sufficient experimental resolution , which we now estimate . for the parameter values given above for an au ring and for @xmath140 , we find ( cf .  fig . 2c ) that the peak - to - peak amplitude of @xmath53 is about @xmath195 for an effective @xmath181 . the relative ratio , @xmath196 , thus becomes of the order of @xmath197 for a ring resistance @xmath198 of the order of @xmath199 m ) ohms  @xcite , and @xmath200 m . such sensitivity , as well as all the parameters estimated above , appear to be within present - day experimental reach . further scenarios for the berry phases in transport can be easily worked out ( see also ref .  ) . it should be obvious by now that the explicit agreement between @xmath53 in the adiabatic limit and @xmath96 unambiguously demonstrates ( and reinforces the general points made in the previous subsections ) that the adiabaticity criterion , eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) , is sufficient for the existence of the berry phase and that , moreover , there exist physical regimes where this berry phase can be observed in magnetoconductance oscillations ( and other quantities ) . by contrast , the far more stringent criterion eq . ( [ schrott ] ) is certainly not necessary , and therefore sets unwarranted demands on experimental searches for berry phase effects . we now briefly return to the issue of the source of dephasing in the hamiltonian @xmath201 given in eq . ( [ hfinal ] ) , as well as its physical interpretation . for this purpose we assume from the outset that we are in the adiabatic regime , @xmath202 , and simply retain the leading contributions when finding the inverse of @xmath203 . this allows us to identify those terms in the hamiltonian @xmath45 that are responsible for the dephasing .    from the matrix representation  ( [ matrixh ] ) of @xmath201 it is straightforward to see that only those matrix elements are important in the adiabatic limit that are simultaneously either diagonal or off - diagonal in both spin subspaces . no other matrix elements contribute at the leading order , @xmath204 , for the determinant or sub - determinants of @xmath203 that are necessary to calculate the inverse . thus we can replace @xmath201 by the matrix @xmath205 and we see that it is only the term @xmath206 in @xmath201 that causes dephasing and leads to those @xmath41-dependent terms in @xmath91 that are absent in @xmath96 ( apart from the differences in @xmath52 and @xmath100 ) . now , the first term , @xmath207 , has already been identified in the discussion of the exact solution ( for @xmath16 ) for a propagator containing only a single spin-1/2  @xcite . in a general path - integral approach , this term has been interpreted as a consequence of quantum fluctuations : the particle trajectory fluctuates around its classical path and these fluctuations in turn lead to a fluctuating local magnetic field . such fluctuations , however , violate the standard assumption underlying the adiabatic approximation that the field should vary smoothly as a function of its parameters ( in the present case the parameter is given by the position @xmath208 of the particle on the ring ) . we have pointed out previously ( see sec . vi  f in ref .  ) that this term might lead to deviations from the adiabatic approximation , which is valid only for smooth variations . the second term , @xmath209 , is new , and describes an effective spin - spin interaction induced by the inhomogeneity of the magnetic field ( i.e. , in the cooperon , the path and its time - reversed partner are interacting with each other via their respective spins ) . this interaction between spin 1 and spin 2 is transmitted via the orbital motion , and in this sense involves a back - reaction of the zeeman term on the orbital motion . however , as pointed out in sec . [ semiclassical ] , such back reactions that act to suppress the phase - coherence are consistently assumed to be negligible in our semiclassical treatment . thus , in ref .   we have performed the adiabatic approximation on the propagators for the path and for its time - reversed partner separately and independently , and all possible dephasing effects are included phenomenologically in terms of @xmath100 at the end . this finally explains the apparent discrepancy between @xmath96 and @xmath91 . however , as shown in previous sections , this discrepancy vanishes when allowing for @xmath41-dependent dephasing terms @xmath100 in @xmath96 . by using the exact solution for the cooperon we have shown that the berry phase leads to observable effects in the magnetoconductance oscillation within the adiabatic regime defined by eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) . this is in full agreement with our previous findings  @xcite , and in contrast to the claim made by van  langen et al . we have pointed out the role of dephasing and emphasized its angle- and winding - dependence . we have illustrated the general discussion with explicit examples which reinforce our optimistic outlook for the experimental search of the berry phase in diffusive metallic samples . we wish to acknowledge discussions with s.  van  langen and y.  lyanda - geller . this work was supported by the swiss national science foundation ( dl and hs ) , the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft as part of sfb 195 ( hs ) , and by the u.s . department of energy , division of materials science , under award no . defg02 - 96er45439 through the university of illinois materials research laboratory ( pg ) .                        strictly speaking , we should also allow for the possibility that higher orbital momentum states @xmath69 will contribute to adiabatic behavior ( on the scale given by the thouless energy ) by multiplying the right - hand side of eq . ( [ adiabaticity ] ) by some momentum average @xmath210 ( see the analogous discussion in  @xcite ) . note that @xmath210 can be quite complicated , as it depends in principle on all parameters occurring in the hamiltonian describing the physical situation at hand . however , typically it turns out that only the lowest few momentum states contribute to physical quantities ( provided the damping is sufficiently small ) ; thus , we will ignore such refinements here and simply put @xmath211 . we have checked the validity of this approximation ( i.e. @xmath211 ) with the exact solution for the magnetoconductance by testing out when the adiabatic limit is fully reached in the various parameter regimes , and found it to be a reasonable approximation in the present situation ( and for @xmath52 not exceeding @xmath212 ) . note that the complete berry phase is usually defined as @xmath213 , with @xmath214 the spin value and for constant tilt angle ( cf . ref .  ) . for two spin-1/2 particles the total spin @xmath214 is integral . the berry phase is then equivalent to @xmath215 ( with @xmath216 ) [ see , e.g. , eq .  ( [ mosclsg ] ) ] and we shall simply refer to @xmath89 as the berry phase . in particular , @xmath145 and @xmath217 are equivalent in their effect , but they belong to different field configurations .      note that the aharonov - bohm resonances in @xmath53 are also suppressed by the @xmath41-dependent dephasing terms , in general , but more gradually than the berry phase resonances , some of which disappear entirely as soon as @xmath17 . this is related to the fact that the berry phase itself depends on @xmath41 whereas the aharonov - bohm phase does not . the additional factor of @xmath218 in @xmath219 is intended to provide a phenomenological account of the smaller period with respect to the berry phase in the cooperon resulting from the interference of the path with its time - reversed partner . for instance , when @xmath162 , one can easily convince oneself that the fluctuations in the individual berry fluxes of spin 1 and spin 2 must exactly cancel each other as the trajectories that the spins describe on the unit sphere in spin space are related by time reversal symmetry . thus , the dephasing must be reduced at @xmath162 . while certainly plausible , this argument is only of suggestive value , as it ignores the effective interaction between the paths ( see sec .  ) . also , we ignore for the moment the fact that for @xmath17 such large @xmath52 s actually violate the self - consistency of the semiclassical approximation ( see sec . [ semiclassical ] ) . note that if the suppression of phase coherence is only _ partial _ , the treatment is of course still self - consistent within the semiclassical regime . this is , e.g. , the case for @xmath16 and @xmath140 , for which the berry phase is still visible albeit with a reduced amplitude ( see sec .  ) . we mention that the presence of magnetic impurities can help bring the adiabatic limit to lower fields . without going into a detailed analysis , it seems plausible to assume that even for small fields ( say , on the order of tens of gauss ) the magnetic moments of typical impurities will align along the local magnetic field direction ( temperatures should be smaller than the zeeman splitting energy , typically in the sub - kelvin range ) after some relaxation time ( typically on the order of @xmath220 ) . these magnetic impurities will produce short - ranged local fields that couples via the exchange interaction to the electrons passing by , and thus impart information about the field inhomogeneity on to the electron spin .
Abstract:

Answer: in a recent preprint ( cond - mat/9803170 ) , van  langen , knops , paasschens and beenakker attempt to re - analyze the proposal of loss , schoeller and goldbart ( lsg ) [ phys . rev . b  * 48 * , 15218 ( 1993 ) ] concerning berry phase effects in the magnetoconductance of diffusive systems . van langen et al . claim that the adiabatic approximation for the cooperon previously derived by lsg is not valid in the adiabatic regime identified by lsg . it is shown that the claim of van  langen et al . is not correct , and that , on the contrary , the magnetoconductance does exhibit the berry phase effect within the lsg regime of adiabaticity . the conclusion reached by van  langen et al .  is based on a misinterpretation of field - induced dephasing effects , which can mask the berry phase ( and any other phase coherent phenomena ) for certain parameter values . = 0 epsf.sty