Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: anderson localization  @xcite of electronic states in a disordered system is a path breaking observation that has extended its realm well beyond the electronic properties of disordered solid materials , and has been found out to be ubiquitous in a wide variety of systems such as the photonic  @xcite , phononic  @xcite , polaronic  @xcite , or plasmonic lattices  @xcite to name a few . artificial , tailor made geometries developed using the improved fabrication and lithographic techniques have been instrumental in testing the validity of the basic theory of exciton localization in presence of disorder . examples include the direct observation of localization of matter waves in recent times  @xcite . localization is a result of quantum interference that has the strongest manifestation in one dimension where all the single particle states exhibit an exponential decay of amplitude as one moves away from a particular lattice point . for dimensions beyond one , the states retain their characteristic decay in amplitude , with the addition of a possibility of a metal - insulator transition in three dimensions . the results have been substantiated by calculations of the localization length  @xcite , density of states  @xcite and their multi - fractality  @xcite . extensive work has also revealed the intricacies of the single parameter scaling hypothesis  @xcite , its validity  @xcite or , variance  @xcite , and even violation  @xcite in low dimensional systems within a tight binding approximation . the studies have subsequently been consolidated by direct experimental measurements of conductance distribution in quasi - one dimensional gold wires  @xcite .    in the last couple of decades variations in the canonical cases of anderson localization have surfaced , particularly , within a tight binding description . resonant tunnelling of electronic states has been shown to arise even in a one dimensional disordered system as a consequence of certain special kinds of positional correlation  @xcite . discrete energy levels corresponding to _ extended eigenfunctions _ @xcite , appear within a typical point spectrum exhibited by the randomly disordered lattices rendering the two - terminal transport completely ballistic at special values of the fermi level . such results are common even to infinite quasicrystalline lattices in one dimension where , the self similar character of the chain really allows an infinite number of unscattered ( extended ) eigenfunctions despite the absence of any translational invariance  @xcite .    in this context , rather unusual , yet meaningful question could be , is it possible to engineer , in a controlled fashion , an _ absolutely continuous _ portion in the energy spectrum of non - translationally invariant systems with the help of some kind positional correlations ? the existence of real continuous bands are reported recently in quasi one dimensional or two dimensional systems only with diagonal disorder  @xcite . we thus have a partial answer to the question , and it remains to be seen whether such bands of extended eigenfunctions can be generated and controlled with off - diagonal disorder are well . we address this issue with respect to quasiperiodically ordered geometries . in this communication we show that , in quasi - one dimensional ladder networks with off - diagonal quasi - periodic order it is possible to engineer absolutely continuous bands of energy eigenvalues . we specifically work with the fibonacci quasiperiodic order , though the observation is by no means , restricted to them . ladder networks within the framework of tight binding model have already been exploited to gain insight into charge transport in dna  @xcite , to unravel interesting physics related to polymer structures and ployacene lattice topology  @xcite . comparatively speaking , controlled generation of absolutely continuous portions in the energy spectrum of the ladder networks , disordered or quasi - periodic , still remains to be explored . if it works then such an effort may open up new physics , or allow one to explore the possibility of devising novel low dimensional filter networks . the central result of this paper is that , one can _ create _ absolutely continuous subbands in the electronic spectrum of such quasi 1-d systems , by attaching a single quantum dot ( qd ) from one side to a selected set of lattice points in every strand of the ladder . we discuss the results explicitly in terms of fibonacci quasi - periodic two and three arm ladder network models using a tight binding hamiltonian and a real space renormalization group ( rsrg ) method . we also investigate whether a crossover in the fundamental character of the eigenfunctions , going from a typical _ critical _ nature to a bloch - like _ extended _ character can be engineered . as will be shown , this indeed turns out to be quite a possibility in the case of the quasi - periodic ladder network ( qpln ) , particularly when the number of strands ` @xmath0 ' in the transverse direction increases . the results hold even for an off - diagonally disordered ladder where a re - entrant insulator - metal - insulator transition becomes feasible . the system is described by a tight binding hamiltonian , and is depicted in fig . [ lattice1 ] . the on - site potential at every lattice point is kept constant , while the nearest neighbor hopping integral along the arms of the ladder assumes two values dictated by the growth rule of the desired quasi - periodic sequence . the electron can tunnel between the arms of the ladder by hopping from one site to its corresponding site on the other arm through the hopping integral @xmath1 ( see fig . [ lattice1 ] ) . the sites marked by @xmath2 in each arm of the ladder is coupled to a single level qd  @xcite attached from one side . the qd couples to every @xmath2-site via a hopping integral @xmath3 . there is no positional correlation , short range or long range in the conventional sense  @xcite . attachment of qd s from a side can quench the conductance of a linear chain  @xcite , but an array of qd s in a ladder can have reverse effect , as will be seen .    we will show in a completely analytical way that , for a particular relationship between the nearest neighbor hopping integrals along the ladder strand and the qd - strand coupling @xmath3 , and for a special value of the qd potential , we get _ absolutely continuous subbands _ in the spectrum . this immediately raises a non - trivial issue that , the nature of the electronic spectrum and the eigenstates over a _ continuous range of eigenvalues _ can become sensitive to the _ numerical values _ of the hamiltonian parameters  a fact that is not commonly observed in the conventional anderson localization problem . the full spectrum turns out to be an admixture of conventional _ critical eigenstates _ , characteristics of a fibonacci quasiperiodic chain , and absolutely continuous parts , giving rise to the possibility of a _ phase transition _ , particularly when the system grows in the transverse direction . our results are analytically exact .    in section  [ sec2 ] we describe the hamiltonian and the basic working principle for the two and three strand quasi - periodic ladders constructed following a fibonacci sequence . along with this , the real space renormalization scheme to obtain the energy spectrum and to judge the character of the single particle states is also presented . in section  [ sec3 ] we present a result for the two terminal transmission coefficient of a finite sized qpln , and in section  [ sec4 ] we draw our conclusion . in wannier basis the tight binding hamiltonian of a general @xmath0-arm ladder network reads  @xcite , @xmath4\ ] ] [ hamilton ] where , @xmath5 is , in general , an @xmath6 on - site potential matrix at the @xmath7-th vertical rung . we shall explicitly discuss the two - strand ladder at first . the cases @xmath8 can be trivially constructed . @xmath9 is the creation ( annihilation ) operator , represented by rows ( columns ) of appropriate dimension , and @xmath10 is the @xmath6 hopping matrix representing hopping along and in between strands of the ladder , @xmath0 being equal to @xmath11 , @xmath12 or any integer . the fibonacci ladder network is grown by attaching identical one dimensional fibonacci chains in the transverse direction . each individual chain grows along the horizontal direction following the binary fibonacci sequence of two letters @xmath13 and @xmath14 ( representing two bonds ) . the growth rule is , @xmath15 and @xmath16 , and the sequence begins with @xmath13 . the on - site potentials at the vertices in each strand are designated by three symbols viz . , @xmath17 , @xmath18 and @xmath19 for sites flanked by two @xmath13-bonds , @xmath13 on left and @xmath14 on right , and @xmath13 on right and @xmath14 on left respectively . the attached qd is shown as  @xmath20 " in fig . [ lattice1 ] , and the potential at the side coupled qd is designated by @xmath21 . the nearest neighbor hopping integral @xmath22 or @xmath23 along ladder - arms following the fibonacci sequence . @xmath24 is the inter - arm hopping , and @xmath25 designates the tunnel hopping between the qd and the @xmath2-sites of the ladder network . in our work , we shall assume @xmath26 , and @xmath27 . so , this is purely a _ transfer model _ @xcite in the standard language of one dimensional quasicrystals .    we shall analyze the problem using a method described earlier  @xcite in which an ` @xmath0'-strand ladder ( @xmath28 in the first phase of our discussion ) is decoupled , making a change of basis , into a system of @xmath0 independent linear chains . the complete spectrum of the quasi @xmath29-d system of @xmath0 strands is then obtained by convolving the spectra of the individual linear chains . in addition , we perform an rsrg analysis , which does not need any decoupling and yields a density of states spectrum that is in conformity with our results obtained using the decoupling scheme . the two terminal transmission spectrum is also computed using the rsrg decimation scheme to highlight the effect of the side coupled qd s . the analysis will be carried over to the three strand ladder , and a generalization to the @xmath0 strand case will be discussed using arguments .        at first , we renormalize the potential at the @xmath2-sites by decimating the side coupled qd . this leads to a _ renormalized _ value of the on - site potential at the @xmath2-vertex , given by , @xmath30 .    , @xmath31 and @xmath32 are colored differently to distinguish between the nearest neighbor bond - environments . the qd s @xmath20 are coupled to the @xmath2-sites in each case . the coupling between @xmath20 and @xmath2-site is denoted by @xmath3 and the inter - strand coupling is denoted by @xmath1.,width=302 ]    the schrdinger equation for the two - arm ladder can now be written equivalently in the form of the difference equations involving @xmath33 matrices : @xmath34 where , @xmath35 and , @xmath36 and , @xmath37 is the @xmath33 unit matrix . written explicitly , the matrix equation reads ,    @xmath38 \left ( \begin{array}{c } \psi_{i , a } \\ \psi_{i , b }    \end{array } \right ) =   \left ( \begin{array}{cccc } t_{i , i+1}^a & 0 \\   0 & t_{i , i+1}^b \end{array } \right ) \left ( \begin{array}{c } \psi_{i+1,a } \\ \psi_{i+1,b }    \end{array } \right )   + \left ( \begin{array}{cccc } t_{i , i-1}^a & 0 \\   0 & t_{i , i-1}^b \end{array } \right ) \left ( \begin{array}{c } \psi_{i-1,a } \\ \psi_{i-1,b }    \end{array } \right ) \label{differenceeq}\ ] ]    in eq . , the potential @xmath39 takes on values @xmath40 corresponding to a renormalized @xmath2-site in each arm , while it is equal to @xmath41 for both the @xmath31 and @xmath32-sites in each arm . the nearest neighbor hopping integrals @xmath42 are @xmath43 or @xmath23 depending on the local environment of the corresponding site in the arm @xmath44 . a look at the fig . [ lattice1 ] will make it obvious that there are three such equations corresponding to the three different kinds of vertices viz . , @xmath2 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 respectively . the potential matrix @xmath5    corresponding to the renormalized @xmath2-sites is , @xmath45 and that for the @xmath31 and @xmath32 sites are @xmath46 we now diagonalize the @xmath47 matrix using a matrix @xmath48 . the matrix @xmath48 makes a change over to a new basis defined by , @xmath49 . as shown elsewhere  @xcite , such a change of basis leads to a decoupling of the set of eq .   into two independent equations , one corresponding to the @xmath50-arm alone , and the other , to the arm @xmath51 . written explicitly , the equations read , @xmath52 \phi_{i , a }   =   t_{l } \phi_{i+1,a } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,a } \nonumber \\ & \left [ e - ( \epsilon_{0}+\xi ) \right ] \phi_{i , a }   =    t_{s } \phi_{i+1,a } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,a } \nonumber \\ & \left [ e - ( \epsilon_{0}+\xi ) \right ] \phi_{i , a }   =   t_{l } \phi_{i+1,a } + t_{s } \phi_{i-1,a }   \label{arm1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the sites @xmath2 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 sequentially in arm @xmath50 . similar set of equations for @xmath2 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 sites in arm @xmath51 will be , @xmath53 \phi_{i , b }   =    t_{l } \phi_{i+1,b } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,b } \nonumber \\ & \left [ e - ( \epsilon_{0}-\xi ) \right ] \phi_{i , b }   =    t_{s } \phi_{i+1,b } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,b } \nonumber \\ & \left [ e - ( \epsilon_{0}-\xi ) \right ] \phi_{i , b }   =    t_{l } \phi_{i+1,b } + t_{s } \phi_{i-1,b }   \label{arm2}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    needless to say , each of the sets eq . and eq .   separately represents an independent fibonacci chain . the spectrum of each chain bears the usual singular continuous character . the spectrum of the original ladder network can be obtained by convolution of the density of states of the individual decoupled fibonacci chains . however , an analysis of these decoupled sub - systems yields rich spectral insight that would otherwise be difficult to obtain . we are now in a position to throw some light on this issue . first , we need to appreciate that , in the new basis each decoupled fibonacci chain is described by a set of three _ transfer matrices _ , viz . , @xmath54 , @xmath55 and @xmath56  @xcite . for the @xmath50-arm decoupled fibonacci chain , the explicit expressions of these matrices are , @xmath57/t_{l } & -1 \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \nonumber \\ \mbox{\boldmath $ m_{\beta , a}$ } & = & \left ( \def\arraystretch{1.5}\begin{array}{cccc } [ e-(\epsilon_{0}+\xi)]/t_{s } & -t_{l}/t_{s } \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \nonumber \\ \mbox{\boldmath $ m_{\gamma , a}$ } & = & \left ( \def\arraystretch{1.5}\begin{array}{cccc } [ e-(\epsilon_{0}+\xi)]/t_{l } & -t_{s}/t_{l } \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \label{arma}\end{aligned}\ ] ] respectively . a similar set of transfer matrices for the decoupled @xmath51-arm reads , @xmath58/t_{l } & -1 \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \nonumber \\ \mbox{\boldmath $ m_{\beta , b}$ } & = & \left ( \def\arraystretch{1.5}\begin{array}{cccc } [ e-(\epsilon_{0}-\xi)]/t_{s } & -t_{l}/t_{s } \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \nonumber \\   \mbox{\boldmath $ m_{\gamma , b}$ } & = & \left ( \def\arraystretch{1.5}\begin{array}{cccc } [ e-(\epsilon_{0}-\xi)]/t_{l } & -t_{s}/t_{l } \\   1 & 0   \end{array } \right ) \label{armb}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath54 and @xmath59 follow an arrangement in the fibonacci sequence  @xcite .    speaking in terms of the individual decoupled fibonacci chains @xmath50 and @xmath51 , we already know that each such chain offers a singular continuous spectrum . if we set @xmath60 , then each chain describes a separate fibonacci lattice with @xmath61 , and @xmath27 . the total transfer matrix for any @xmath62-th generation of such a chain is related to its predecessors at the @xmath63th and @xmath64th generations by the matrix map @xmath65 , which will exhibit a _ six cycle _  @xcite at @xmath66 for the decoupled @xmath50 and @xmath51 chains respectively . the existence of a six cycle of the matrix map implies that the above energy values are indeed eigenvalues of the infinite decoupled chains , and hence , the infinite ladder network as well . thus , the first fruit of the decoupling scheme is that , with @xmath67 we obtain at least two eigenvalues which definitely belong to the spectrum of the infinite ladder . extending this idea to an @xmath0-strand fibonacci ladder we can easily identify @xmath0 different energy eigenvalues of the full quasi @xmath29-d fibonacci network in the absence of @xmath3 ( i.e. detaching the qd s ) in a completely analytical way . the task becomes non - trivial when one consider the qpln as a whole , without decoupling . now let us look at the more serious effect when we include the qd by making @xmath3 non - zero . let us choose eq .  . we set @xmath69 . it can easily be verified that , with this potential , the commutator @xmath70 = 0 $ ] for the decoupled @xmath50-arm , _ irrespective of the energy @xmath71 _ of the electron , if @xmath72 . this implies that , with these conditions the individual @xmath2-sites and the @xmath73 dimers in the decoupled @xmath50-arm can be arranged in any desired pattern , for example , in a perfectly periodic pattern . the spectrum offered by the decoupled @xmath50-arm fibonacci chain will thus , under this choice of the qd potential @xmath21 and the tunnel hopping @xmath3 , will turn out to be _ indistinguishable _ from that of a perfectly periodic sequence of the @xmath2-site ( the ` renormalized ' @xmath2-site , to be precise ) and the @xmath73 doublet . however , this argument needs to go through an acid test which we discuss below . + qd chain , and its renormalized version . ( b ) the @xmath73 binary ordered chain . the ldgf is found at the site on the horizontal line in each case . the qd is renormalized to produce an effective one dimensional periodic chain of @xmath74 sites , as already discussed in the text.,width=264 ]    owing to the commutation of @xmath54 and @xmath75 , the decoupled @xmath50-arm can be thought to be composed of two infinite periodic chains , one with @xmath2-sites coupled to the qd s , and the other , a periodic array of @xmath73 clusters . the two chains are shown in fig .  [ chains ] . each such infinite sublattice will have its own energy bands . it is important to verify whether , under the special condition imposed on the strand - dot coupling @xmath3 , the periodic @xmath2-lattice and the periodic @xmath73 lattice share the same eigenvalue spectrum . if yes , then we conclusively prove the existence of an absolutely continuous part in the energy spectrum of the original ladder network .    to check this , we first of all construct an effective one dimensional chain composed of renormalized @xmath2-atoms , obtained by decimating the side coupled dot . the resulting chain is illustrated in fig . [ chains](a ) with encircled lattice points . each such lattice point has the renormalized on - site potential equal to @xmath76 . each atom in the @xmath73 chain has the potential @xmath77 . we now evaluate the local density of states ( ldos ) at any site of the renormalized ( encircled ) @xmath2-chain ( let s call it the @xmath74 chain ) and any site in the periodic @xmath73 chain ( fig . [ chains](b ) ) . the local densities of states are given , for these two infinite periodic lattices , and for a given set values of @xmath78 , @xmath1 , @xmath43 and @xmath23 , by @xmath79^{-1/2}$ ] and @xmath80^{-1/2}$ ] , where , @xmath81 and , @xmath82    if we now set @xmath83 , then a simple algebra yields that , the difference @xmath84 is given by , @xmath85 ( \lambda^2 + t_{l}^2 - t_{s}^2 ) } { ( e - \epsilon_{0 } - \xi ) ^2 } \label{den}\ ] ] which clearly vanishes for any value of the energy of the electron the moment we tune @xmath72 . thus the ldos s of the two basic constituent periodic chains become identical _ independent of energy _ , resulting in a complete overlap of the spectra of these individual chains under the above resonance condition . as each of the @xmath2 and the @xmath73 sublattices provide a two subband continuum in their energy spectra ( an obvious effect of the binary periodic lattice ) , it is obvious that these two spectral continua will retain their positions in the full spectrum of the fibonacci qpln when the qd potential and the qd - strand tunnel coupling are tuned to the above special values . it should be appreciated that once we fix @xmath86 , the set of eq .   corresponding to the decoupled @xmath51 strand , represents a mixed model linear fibonacci chain . its contribution to the full energy spectrum is the usual fragmented , multi - fractal one . as the full spectrum of the two - arm ladder will be a convolution of both , we expect it to have absolutely continuous parts decorated with a spiky envelope , and a mixture of _ extended _ bloch - like states and the _ critical _ eigenfunctions which are characteristic of a quasi - periodic fibonacci sequence of potentials . this is precisely what we observe in fig . [ 2stranddos](a ) . at this point one must be careful to interpret fig . [ 2stranddos](a ) . in the full energy spectrum , critical and extended eigenstates can never coexist . so , even in the full spectrum of the un - decoupled qpln the entire range shown in fig . [ 2stranddos](a ) by grey shade corresponds to extended bloch - like states only . beyond it , every wave function will be critical in nature . the contributions coming from each decoupled strand are only shown separately in this figure . the above arguments are confirmed by an exact real space renormalization group ( rsrg ) calculation of the local density of states , first of each individual decoupled strands and then of the full two - arm fibonacci ladder without decoupling it . the first task is already discussed in literature  @xcite , and need not be talked about again in here . we instead , provide the details of the rsrg scheme of the full ladder network . we renormalize the full two - strand ladder by decimating the @xmath31-vertices . this generates _ new _ hopping integrals across the diagonals of the fundamental rectangular plaquettes of renormalized ladder denoted by @xmath87 and @xmath88 in the equations to follow . to implement the decimation we need to assign three different symbols to the inter - arm hopping @xmath1 , viz . , @xmath89 , @xmath90 and @xmath91 connecting the @xmath2 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 vertices of the two strands . of course , we begin with @xmath92 , and @xmath93 . the recursion relations arising out of this decimation procedure are given by , @xmath94 where @xmath95 a small imaginary part is added to the energy @xmath71 , and the ldos at an @xmath2 , @xmath31 or @xmath32 site is obtained by calculating the respective local green s function @xmath96 , where @xmath97 or @xmath32 . @xmath98 represents the fixed point of the respective on - site potential as the hopping integrals flow to zero under the rsrg iterations . the ldos is given by , @xmath99\ ] ]    the results are presented in fig .  [ 2stranddos ] . in panel ( a ) the spectra of the decoupled @xmath50- and @xmath51-arms are shown separately , while panel ( b ) illustrates the spectrum of the full two - arm ladder as obtained from the rsrg study . the existence of the absolutely continuous portions in the energy spectrum is obvious . the character of the eigenfunctions belonging to the spectrum is checked from an observation of the flow of the the hopping integrals @xmath43 , @xmath23 and the diagonal hopping amplitude under rsrg iterations . for any energy eigenvalue , chosen from any portion of the absolutely continuous sub - bands ( grey shaded portion in fig .  [ 2stranddos](a ) ) all the hopping integrals , as obtained from eq . , remain non - zero for an arbitrarily large number of iterations confirming the extended character of the wave functions . beyond the extended regime , the hopping integrals flow to zero under iteration indicating that the eigenfunctions are not extended . in fig .  [ 2stranddos](b ) we see the full ldos spectrum from the coupled two - strand qpln obtained from the rsrg method ( using the set of eq .  ) . the light blue shade in the spectrum is just to highlight the region of non - zero ldos . the extended eigenstates occupy the precise positions as depicted by the grey shaded part in fig .  [ 2stranddos](a ) . the eigenstates form a mixed spectrum of critical and extended states , as one traverses the energy axis from the left . -vertex for a two - strand ladder network . the upper panel shows the ldos spectra of the decoupled individual linear chains , one chain satisfying resonance condition . the lower panel shows the ldos spectrum of the composite ladder network as obtained from the rsrg scheme , under resonance condition . the values of the parameters chosen are @xmath100 , @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 , @xmath104 , and @xmath105 , measured in unit of @xmath43.,width=264 ]    an additional support in regard of the continuous subbands and the extended eigenstates is also obtained from an observation of the flow pattern of the entire parameter space of the decoupled strands that satisfies the condition @xmath106 and @xmath107 . for such a choice , under successive rsrg step , we always get @xmath108 and @xmath109 for the decoupled @xmath50-strand . this is a typical flow in the parameter space that corresponds to the extended eigenstates in quasiperiodic fibonacci chains  @xcite . in the present case it confirms the extended bloch - like character of the wave function for the entire energy regime ( given by the grey color in fig .  [ 2stranddos](a ) ) . the motivation behind extending the above analysis to a three - arm fibonacci ladder stems    .,width=302 ]    from the curiosity to know whether , as one extends the ladder network in the transverse direction , any possibility of a re - entrant transition ( or , crossover ) from a singular continuous to an absolutely continuous energy spectrum becomes apparent . for disordered ladders comprising the same @xmath2 and @xmath73 clusters this would imply the possibility of an _ insulator - metal _ transition that can be triggered by an appropriate choice of the numerical values of the qd potential @xmath21 and the tunnel hopping integral @xmath3 .    to check such a possibility we decouple a three - arm fibonacci ladder ( fig .  [ lattice2 ] ) . we follow the same prescription for decoupling as outlined in the case of a two - strand ladder . diagonalization of the potential matrix @xmath5 now yields three eigenvalues , viz . , @xmath41 and @xmath110 , and the effective potential at the @xmath2-site in each decoupled arm will be @xmath111 ( for arm @xmath50 , say ) , @xmath112 ( for arm @xmath51 , say ) and @xmath113 ( for arm @xmath114 ) . we now end up having three sets of equations , one for each decoupled strand . for example , @xmath115   \phi_{i , a } = t_{l } \phi_{i+1,a } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,a } \nonumber \\ & ( e - \epsilon_{0 } ) \phi_{i , a } = t_{s } \phi_{i+1,a } + t_{l } \phi_{i-1,a } \nonumber \\ & ( e - \epsilon_{0 } ) \phi_{i , a } = t_{l } \phi_{i+1,a } +   t_{s } \phi_{i-1,a }   \label{3decouple1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] corresponding to the @xmath2 , @xmath31 and @xmath32 sites respectively in the decoupled @xmath50-strand . two sets of similar equations are also obtained for the decoupled @xmath51- and @xmath114-strands , with the effective potential at the @xmath2-site being equal to @xmath116 and @xmath117 respectively . the effective potentials at the @xmath31 and @xmath32 sites in the @xmath51 and @xmath114 strand are @xmath110 as there is no side coupling to these sites .    if , as before , we set @xmath118 in eq .  , then @xmath70=0 $ ] for the decoupled @xmath50-strand . the contribution to the full spectrum coming from this separate chain will be two absolutely continuous sub - bands . with the potential of the qd set at @xmath118 , the two other decoupled strands represent two different fibonacci chains in the mixed model . the spectrum resulting from each of them will remain fragmented cantor type . the overall spectrum , as we now have known , will be a convolution of the three . the absolutely continuous portions will still hold their positions in the main spectrum , and will be flanked by the spiky , fragmented parts characteristics of critical eigenstates of a fibonacci lattice ( fig  [ 3stranddos ] ) . the eigenfunctions belonging to the continuous sub - bands will , needless to say , be of extended character . .,width=264 ]    one needs to appreciate that each spectrum offered separately by the decoupled @xmath51- and @xmath114-strands will have different  band - centres " around which the singular continuous spectra of the individual decoupled fibonacci chain will spread out . with an @xmath0-strand ladder model , there will be @xmath119 such centers from the @xmath119 decoupled strands around which cantor set energy eigenvalues will be distributed , the remaining strand contributing the absolutely continuous sub - bands . the centres will be densely populated around the outer edge of the continuous sub - bands as @xmath120 . thus , with increasing number of strands there is a possibility of observing a smooth critical to extended state crossover in the spectrum of such quasi @xmath29-d aperiodic ladder models . clearly , the argument prevails even if we have an @xmath0-strand off diagonally disordered ladder network . the side coupled qd s with appropriately tuned potential one can then expect a re - entrant _ insulator - metal _ transition .    before leaving this discussion , it is pertinent to mention that , the commutaion of transfer matrices leading to a complete , energy independent delocalization of electronic states have been reported recently in certain special examples of quasi - one dimensional lattices  @xcite . but , those systems do not open up any possibility of an insulator - metal transition , in the current spirit of the work . at the same time , it is useful to note that , the commutivity of transfer matrices has been used in the past to unravel discrete unscattered eigenstates in an array of quantum wells  @xcite or a disordered distribution of pschl - teller potential  @xcite . the difference with the present communication and these two latter references lies in the energy - independent character of the matrix - commutation that plays the key role . we now present partial results ( to save space ) for the two terminal transmission coefficient of a finite two strand ladder without decoupling it . no change of basis is made , and the full finite qpln is treated within the rsrg scheme . the basic working formula is already elaborated in the existing literature  @xcite . the ladder is clamped between two semi - infinite perfectly ordered leads ( viz . , the source and the drain ) at any two extremities ( fig .  [ lattice3 ] ) . the leads are characterized by uniform on - site potential @xmath121 and nearest neighbor hopping integral @xmath122 . the portion of the ladder clamped between the leads is renormalized to bring it down to a _ diatomic molecule _ , and the transmission coefficient is easily obtained  @xcite . the procedure is standard and to save space again , we do not provide the details .    it should be appreciated that , the precise details of the transmission coefficient definitely depends on which points in the ladder the leads are attached to . only one result is shown here in which the two semi - infinite ordered leads are connected to the extreme points of the upper strand of a @xmath123-th generation fibonacci ladder having @xmath124 bonds in each arm . -th generation two - strand fibonacci ladder network under resonance condition . both the incoming and outgoing leads , viz . , the source and the drain are connected in the upper strand . system parameters chosen are @xmath100 , @xmath101 , @xmath102 , @xmath103 , @xmath104 , and @xmath105 , and the lead parameters are @xmath121 and @xmath122.,width=264 ]    one needs to appreciate that , even in the absence of any attached qd , a two strand finite qpln can exhibit high transmission spikes with @xmath125 close to unity . this normally results from the finite size of the system , as well as from the fact that a ladder network consists of loops that brings in a flavor of long range connection , and may well be responsible for quantum interference leading to high transmittivity at selected values of electron - energy . also , the attachment to the leads , and the difference between the hopping integral in the lead and that in the bulk of the system give rise to strong scattering effects at the contacts , affecting the overall transmission of the qpln system . therefore , the results obtained from a finite size analysis should be carefully compared with the predictions which come from the anatomy of an infinite system .    nevertheless , the existence of the continuous parts in the energy spectrum of the infinite system is already showing up in the enhanced value of the transmission coefficient at appropriate values of the electron energy as can be seen in fig .  [ transport ] . the apparent drop to close to zero value at certain regions even within the continuous zone is due to the scale at which the transmission coefficient is shown here . however , the transmission coefficient exhibits wide fluctuations owing to the quasiperiodic nature of network . the effect of quantum interference is manifestly observed here . the finite value of the transmission coefficient even beyond the absolutely continuous part of the spectrum is due to the finite size of the system , and gets lower and lower , and the spectrum gets more spiky with increasing system size . also , one can anticipate eigenstates with their ` localization length ' much larger compared to the size of the system as considered in the present calculation . we have shown that fibonacci quasi - periodic ladder networks , where quasi - periodic order is introduced in the distribution of bonds , keeping the potential at every vertex same , are capable of producing absolutely continuous portions in their energy spectra . this requires the attachment of quantum dots from one side to a special set of sites in each arm of the ladder . a suitable adjustment of the dot potential , together with the dot - backbone coupling can generate absolutely continuous energy sub - bands , decorated at the flanks by the usual critical states  a characteristic of quasi - periodic lattices . apart from opening up the possibility of engineering the transport of excitons in such multi - strand systems , a very basic issue of anderson localization is reviewed . it seems that , the existence of localized eigenstates in similar disordered ladder networks may strongly depend on the numerical values of the parameters in the hamiltonian . the analysis is carried over to other quasi - periodically ordered systems , such as the copper mean chain , the aperiodic thue morse chain and even to the disordered ladder networks with locally and non - locally coupled dots . the conditions for the existence of a continuum in the energy spectrum becomes much more non - trivial in such systems . these issues will be reported in a forthcoming article . is grateful to dst , india for an inspire fellowship . a.c . acknowledges financial support from dst , india through a purse grant , and the abdus salam international centre for theoretical physics , trieste , italy for its hospitality and financial support . 60 p. w. anderson , phys . * 109 * , 1492 ( 1958 ) . b. kramer and a. mackinnon , rep . * 56 * , 1469 ( 1993 ) . e. abrahams , p. w. anderson , d. c. liciardello , and t. v. ramakrishnan , phys . * 42 * , 673 ( 1979 ) . e. yablonovitch , phys . * 58 * , 2059 ( 1987 ) . s. john , phys . lett . * 58 * , 2486 ( 1987 ) . f. r. montero de espinosa , e. jimnez , and m. torres , phys . 80 * , 1208 ( 1998 ) . j. o. vasseur , p. a. deymier , g. frantziskonis , g. hong , b. djafari - rouhani , and l. dobrzynski , j. phys . : condens . matter * 10 * , 6051 ( 1998 ) . i. o. barinov , a. p. alodzhants , and s. m. arakelyan , quantum electron . * 39 * , 685 ( 2009 ) . m. grochol and c. piermarocchi , phys . b * 78 * , 035323 ( 2008 ) . a. tao , p. sinsermsuksaul , and p. yang , nature nanotechnol . * 2 * , 435 ( 2007 ) . a. christ , y. ekinci , h. h. solak , n. a. gippus , s. g. tikhodeev , and o. j. f. martin , phys . b * 76 * , 201405 ( 2007 ) . b. damski _ lett . * 91 * , 080403 ( 2003 ) . et al . _ , nature ( london ) * 453 * , 891 ( 2008 ) . et al . _ , nature ( london ) * 453 * , 895 ( 2008 ) . r. a. rmer and h. schulz - baldes , europhys . lett . * 68 * , 247 ( 2004 ) . a. eilmes , r. a. rmer , and m. schreiber , physica b * 296 * , 46 ( 2001 ) . a. rodrguez , j. phys . a : math . gen . * 39 * , 14303 ( 2006 ) . a. rodriguez , l. j. vasquez , and r. a. rmer , phys . b * 78 * , 195107 ( 2008 ) . a. rodriguez , l. j. vasquez , k. slevin , and r. a. rmer , phys . rev . b * 84 * , 134209 ( 2011 ) . s. d. pinski , w. schirmacher , and r. a. rmer , europhys . lett . * 97 * , 16007 ( 2012 ) . lev i. deych , a. a. lisyanski , and b. l. alshuler , phys . lett . * 84 * , 2678 ( 2000 ) . m. titov and h. schomerus , phys . lett . * 95 * , 126603 ( 2005 ) . j. w. kantelhardt and a. bunde , phys . b * 66 * , 035118 ( 2002 ) . v. e. kravtsov and v. i. yudson , phys . b * 82 * , 195120 ( 2010 ) . p. mohanty and r. a. webb , phys . lett . * 88 * , 146601 ( 2002 ) . d. h. dunlap , h .- wu , and p. phillips , phys . lett . * 65 * , 88 ( 1990 ) . f. a. b. f. de moura and m. lyra , phys . 81 * , 3735 ( 1998 ) . s. sil , s. k. maiti , and a. chakrabarti , phys . b * 78 * , 113103 ( 2008 ) . a. rodriguez , a. chakrabarti , and r. a. rmer , phys . b * 86 * , 085119 ( 2012 ) . a. chakrabarti , s. n. karmakar , and r. k. moitra , phys . b * 50 * , 13276 ( 1994 ) . e. maci , phys . b * 74 * , 245105 ( 2006 ) ; phys . rev . b * 80 * , 125102 ( 2009 ) . m. bravi , r. farchioni , g. grosso , and g. p. parravicini , phys . b * 87 * , 035105 ( 2013 ) . r. farchioni , g. grosso , and g. p. parravicini , eur . j. b * 84 * , 227 ( 2011 ) . b. kubala and j. knig , phys . b * 67 * , 205303 ( 2003 ) . r. farchioni , g. grosso , and g. p. parravicini , phys . b * 85 * , 165115 ( 2012 ) . m. kohmoto , b. sutherland , and c. tang , phys . b * 35 * , 1020 ( 1987 ) . j. a. ashraff and r. b. stinchcombe , phys . rev . b * 37 * , 5723 ( 1988 ) . a. chakrabarti , s. n. karmakar , and r. k. moitra , phys . b * 39 * , 9730 ( 1989 ) . a. chakrabarti , s. n. karmakar , and r. k. moitra , phys . lett . a * 168 * , 301 ( 1992 ) . b. pal , s. k. maiti , and a. chakrabarti , europhys . lett . * 102 * , 17004 ( 2013 ) . i. gmez , f. dminguez - adame , and e. diez , physica b * 324 * , 235 ( 2002 ) . a. rodrguez and j. m. cerver , phys . b * 74 * , 104201 ( 2006 ) . a. d. stone , j. d. joannopoulos , and d. j. chadi , phys . b * 24 * , 5583 ( 1981 ) . a. chakrabarti , phys . b * 74 * , 205315 ( 2006 ) . b. pal and a. chakrabarti , eur . j. b * 85 * , 307 ( 2012 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the energy spectra of quasi - one dimensional quasiperiodic ladder networks are analyzed within a tight binding description . in particular , we show that if a selected set of sites in each strand of a ladder is tunnel - coupled to quantum dots attached from a side , absolutely continuous subbands can be generated in the spectrum if one tunes the dot potential and the dot - strand coupling appropriately . typical cases with two and three strand fibonacci ladders in the off diagonal model are discussed in details . we also discuss the possibility of re - entrant insulator - metal transition for a general @xmath0-strand ladder network when @xmath0 becomes large . the observations remain valid even in the case of a disordered ladder network with the same constituents . the results are analytically exact .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: entanglement and nonlocality are two manifestations of quantum correlations , both are essential ingredients of quantum theory . they also play an important role in the field of quantum information @xcite . for instance , entanglement is in the heart of quantum teleportation and plays a crucial role in quantum algorithms @xcite . nonlocality , on the other hand , witnessed by the violation of bell inequalities  @xcite , reduces communication complexity @xcite and enables device - independent quantum information protocols  @xcite . these protocols do not rely on a detailed knowledge of the internal working of the experimental devices used , thereby allowing secure cryptography involving untrusted devices  @xcite or expansion of secure random numbers  @xcite . the quantification of entanglement and nonlocality in the bipartite case ( i.e. , the case when two parties share an entangled state ) is relatively well understood . however , the multipartite case is much less explored . this is mainly due to the rapidly growing complexity of the problem with the number of parties . for instance , for bipartite pure states , there is a unique measure of entanglement , however , for three or more parties , this is not true any more ( see e.g. , refs . concerning nonlocality , there is a single tight bell inequality for two binary settings per party , the clauser - horne - shimony - holt ( chsh ) one @xcite . however , moving to three parties , the number of tight bell inequalities already becomes 42 @xcite . in fact , determining all bell inequalities for growing number parties is an np - hard problem @xcite . bipartite and tripartite quantum nonlocality are different from a fundamental point of view as well . while gleason s theorem can be extended to the bipartite scenario , however , there remains a gap between the quantum and gleason s correlations in the tripartite scenario @xcite . one of the most famous multipartite quantum states is the w state @xcite playing a crucial role in the physics of the interaction between light and matter . up to now , w states have been prepared in lots of experiments , e.g. , photonic experiments can generate and characterize six qubit entangled states  @xcite . more recently , genuine 28-particle entanglement was detected in a dicke - like state ( a generalization of the w state ) in a bose - einstein condensate  @xcite . w states are very robust to losses , hence suited to quantum information applications such as quantum memories @xcite . for instance , by tracing out all but two parties from an @xmath0-party w state , the remaining two - qubit state is still entangled , no matter how big @xmath0 is . hence , the w state shows a high persistency of entanglement against particle loss ( actually , the highest possible persistency among @xmath0 qubit states  @xcite ) .    on the other hand , one may wonder how robust the nonlocality of the w state is with respect to particle loss . in order to quantify this , ref . @xcite introduces the persistency of nonlocality of @xmath0-party quantum states @xmath3 , @xmath4 , which is the minimal number of particles to be removed for nonlocal quantum correlations to vanish . @xcite investigates this measure for various classes of multipartite states including w states up to @xmath5 with two settings per site . in this paper , we bound this value both from above and from below for any @xmath0-qubit w states . to do this , we refine the definition of @xmath4 to account for bell nonlocality involving @xmath6 settings per party . this quantity will be called @xmath7 . clearly , in the limit of large @xmath6 , @xmath7 tends to @xmath4 . our main result concerns the case of @xmath8 and we prove the bounds of @xmath9 for @xmath0 large , featuring a relatively small gap between the upper and lower bounds . the lower bound is based on an explicit construction of a class of bell inequalities . we also give a numerical framework to put reliable lower bounds on @xmath10 beyond two settings ( up to @xmath11 ) and a tractable number of @xmath0 parties . this numerical study supports that our analytical lower bounds for @xmath12 are tight . there are recent papers which discuss the robustness of dicke states @xcite ( and in particular the w state ) to various types of noises @xcite . lower bounds also follow from these papers for the value of @xmath12 . in particular , we obtain considerable improvement over the lower bounds presented in ref .  @xcite . notably , the persistency of nonlocality also gives a device - independent bound on the persistency of entanglement introduced in ref . @xcite . other device - independent approaches to quantify multipartite entanglement including w states appeared in refs . @xcite . on the other hand , multipartite w states are promising candidates to close the detection loophole  @xcite in multipartite bell tests  @xcite . such bell violations would complement the experimental loophole - free violations obtained recently in the bipartite case  @xcite . the structure of the paper is as follows . section  [ setup ] introduces notation . section  [ ub ] proves a simple upper bound on the persistency of nonlocality @xmath13 for w states and in general for any permutationally symmetric state with two settings per party ( case @xmath8 ) . on the other hand , section  [ lb ] presents lower bound values based on numerical investigations . to this end , we first outline the numerical method , then show results for @xmath8 and also beyond @xmath8 up to @xmath11 . in section [ family ] , a family of bell inequalities is presented ( valid for any number of parties @xmath0 ) , which allows us to obtain good lower bounds for @xmath12 . the paper ends with a discussion in section  [ disc ] . let us imagine the following bell setup  @xcite . a quantum state @xmath3 is shared between @xmath14 spatially separated systems , on which the local observers can conduct measurements . we focus on binary outcome measurements in which case we may define the joint correlators by the following set of expectation values : @xmath15 with @xmath16 and @xmath17 . we identify @xmath18 and @xmath19 refers to the @xmath20th @xmath21-valued observable of party @xmath22 . the corresponding real vector of correlators defines a point in the @xmath23 dimensional space of probabilities . each member of the set  ( [ correlators ] ) has an order , which is given by the amount of parties @xmath24 involving a non - trivial observable ( i.e. not involving @xmath18 ) . in particular , those with @xmath25 are usually called full - correlators , while those with @xmath26 are called one - body correlators or marginal terms .    a multipartite ( 2-outcome ) bell inequality  @xcite is a linear function of the above correlators  ( [ correlators ] ) , @xmath27    where we denote by @xmath28 the bound which holds for any local hidden variable model . these are the correlations which the parties can simulate by merely using local strategies and some shared classical information . the local correlations attainable this way forms a polytope , the so - called bell polytope , whose extremal points consist of those vectors in ( [ bellineq ] ) in which all correlators factorize , that is , @xmath29 and the mean value of each single party @xmath30 , @xmath31 equals either @xmath32 or @xmath33 . let us define the persistency of nonlocality of a multipartite state @xmath3 according to ref . @xcite as follows . let us take the partial trace over @xmath34 systems @xmath35 , and denote the @xmath36-party reduced state by @xmath37 . the persistency of nonlocality of @xmath3 , @xmath4 , is defined as the minimal @xmath38 such that the reduced state @xmath39 becomes local for at least one set of subsystems @xmath40 . in other words , the correlators  ( [ correlators ] ) obtained from local measurements @xmath19 on @xmath37 do not violate any bell inequality .    if we allow at most @xmath6 different measurement settings in the bell expression  ( [ bellineq ] ) , we arrive at @xmath41 which provides a lower bound to @xmath4 and for @xmath42 recovers @xmath4 .    in this paper , we focus on computing @xmath41 for the noiseless @xmath0-qubit w state @xcite , @xmath43 , where @xmath44    we may consider this state as a state of an atomic ensemble , and we assume that @xmath38 particles are lost from this ensemble . in that case , the reduced state contains @xmath36 particles , and the density matrix reads @xmath45 since the w state is permutationally symmetric , the reduced state @xmath46 does not depend on the particular set of subsystems removed , which simplifies considerably the analysis of @xmath10 . in the next section we provide an upper bound of @xmath2 for @xmath47 in case of arbitrary even @xmath0 number of parties , whereas in sec . [ lb ] we bound this quantity by @xmath1 from below . we first prove the following lemma :    [ lbound ] let us have a @xmath48-qudit permutationally invariant state , @xmath49 , where @xmath50 and @xmath51 . by tracing out any @xmath14 qudits , the remaining @xmath14-qudit system @xmath52 can not violate any two - setting @xmath14-party bell inequality with arbitrary number of outcomes . we take @xmath53 and denote the @xmath14-qudit reduced state of an @xmath0-qudit permutationally invariant state @xmath3 by @xmath37 and the two measurements conducted on station @xmath54 by @xmath55 , where @xmath56 . by permutationally invariance we mean that the exchange of any two qudits of the @xmath0-qudit state @xmath3 does not change the state itself . then , the @xmath14-particle joint probability distribution reads @xmath57 it is not difficult to see that the same probability distribution can be achieved in the following way : let us redistribute the permutationally invariant state @xmath3 between @xmath14 parties such that the @xmath22th qudit pair @xmath58 belongs to party @xmath54 ( so that each party owns two qudits ) . then party @xmath22 performs measurement @xmath59 on the first qudit and measurement @xmath60 on the second qudit of the @xmath22th pair . this generates the same distribution as of eq . ( [ half ] ) . since for any @xmath22 these two measurements act on different subspaces , they are commuting . however , bell inequality violation is not possible ( with any number of outcomes ) if the two alternative measurements for each party are pairwise commuting @xcite . since the w state is a permutationally invariant multiqubit state ( with local dimension @xmath61 ) , lemma  1 above directly applies to our situation , hence we get the upper bound @xmath62 for @xmath8 with @xmath53 . in other words , @xmath63 for even @xmath0 . some notes are in order . ( i ) it is straightforward to extend lemma  1 to more than two settings as well . for multiple settings , we get the general upper bound @xmath64 with @xmath65 . however , we conjecture that these upper bounds are not tight in general . for @xmath8 , a gap between the lower and upper bound values for the @xmath66-qubit w states are supported by a numerical study performed in sec . for @xmath6 infinite , the trivial upper bound @xmath67 follows by plugging @xmath68 in the above formula . if this bound happened to be tight , it would imply that the two - qubit reduced state @xmath69 of the @xmath70 state was bell nonlocal . for large @xmath0 this is very unlikely , since the weight of the entangled part @xmath71 goes to zero . in fact , a recent computer study in ref . @xcite suggests that the state @xmath72 is local for @xmath73 . similarly , a. amirtham conjectures in ref . @xcite that the state @xmath74 is local for @xmath75 . \(ii ) the permutational invariance property of the state is crucial in the above state . if the multipartite state does not possess this high symmetry , e.g. it only obeys translational invariance , the above theorem does not hold true any more . let us illustrate this with a simple example . we consider a 4-qubit translationally invariant state @xmath76 , where @xmath77 . let us trace out particles @xmath78 and @xmath79 ( constituting half of the 4 particles ) , and as a result we get a maximally entangled pair of qubits , which violates maximally the bipartite chsh - bell inequality  @xcite . nevertheless , translationally invariant systems also impose certain restrictions which can be exploited in bell scenarios as studied in ref .  @xcite . we now give a numerical procedure which allows us to get useful ( and often tight ) lower bounds to @xmath10 . we note that this procedure with some modification can also be applied to generic permutationally invariant multiqubit states . we consider the bell violation of the following one - parameter family of states : @xmath80 notice that the state  ( [ rhonp ] ) reproduces ( [ rhonk ] ) with @xmath81 . hence , given an @xmath14-party @xmath6-setting bell inequality which is violated by state  ( [ rhonp ] ) with a given critical value , @xmath82 , we get the following lower bound on the persistency : @xmath83 where @xmath84 , where @xmath85 maps a real number @xmath86 to the largest previous integer . hence , in order to get good lower bounds to @xmath10 our task reduces to get good upper bounds to @xmath82 . to this end , we introduce the following linear programming based numerical method . let us stick to @xmath8 settings ( generalization to more settings is straightforward ) . for simplicity we assume that all parties measure the same qubit observables , that is , @xmath87 for @xmath88 . moreover , due to symmetry of the states , we assume these observables are coplanar , lying on the @xmath89 equatorial plane . other works ( e.g. , refs . @xcite ) maximizing bell functionals using the w state rely on the same symmetry considerations . with this simplification , we have two optimization parameters . hence , for the state @xmath90 and the above measurements , the @xmath91-dimensional correlation point @xmath92 given by the set of correlators  ( [ correlators ] ) is defined by two angles . likewise , we define the correlation point @xmath93 generated by the same measurements and the state @xmath94 in eq . ( [ correlators ] ) . geometrically , the correlations accessible in a local hidden variables theory form a polytope , the so - called bell polytope , with vertices defined by deterministic classical strategies for a fixed scenario of @xmath14 parties and @xmath6 settings ( see ref . @xcite for a review ) . the two correlation points @xmath93 and @xmath92 are situated within this space . since the product state @xmath95 is local , point @xmath93 sits inside the bell polytope , whereas point @xmath92 depends on the two measurement angles and may well fall outside the bell polytope ( see fig . [ bellpolytope ] ) . for a given @xmath96 in ( [ rhonp ] ) , the corresponding correlation point is @xmath97 , and @xmath82 is given by the intersection of the line joining points @xmath93 and @xmath92 with the boundary of the polytope ( see figure  [ bellpolytope ] ) . given the two measurement angles , standard linear programming allows us to compute @xmath82 and the underlying facet , which corresponds to a bell inequality . [ figgeom ]   corresponding to the @xmath70 state is outside the bell polytope , whereas the point @xmath93 corresponding to the product state falls inside the bell polytope . @xmath82 is fully determined by points @xmath98 and the facets of the polytope.,title="fig : " ]    clearly , the above described procedure works for @xmath99 as well . in particular , we have chosen a given bell scenario ( @xmath14 parties , @xmath6 settings ) and by varying the @xmath6 angles , we maximized the value of @xmath82 . we note that this search is a heuristic one and as such it is not guaranteed to terminate in a global maximum of @xmath82 . however , the obtained value still defines a lower bound to @xmath13 in ( [ p_nl ] ) . the critical @xmath96 values obtained in function of @xmath14 and @xmath6 are displayed in fig . we may observe that , as @xmath6 increases , the affordable number of parties @xmath14 decreases . for the simplest case of @xmath8 , numerically we could afford @xmath100 . in addition , we had to resort to a symmetrization procedure of the bell polytope introduced in @xcite which considerably reduces the complexity of the problem in order to attain @xmath100 .    plugging the @xmath82 values shown in fig . [ wm6 ] into formula  ( [ p_nl ] ) , we get table  [ tabla ] , where the computed persistencies @xmath101 are shown for @xmath102 . this way we get entries in the table only for @xmath0 satisfying @xmath103 , but a slight modification allows us to obtain numbers for any @xmath0 parties : fix @xmath0 , and choose the largest @xmath38 integer such that @xmath104 , where @xmath105 stands for @xmath82 evaluated by the number of parties @xmath106 . then a lower bound on the persistency @xmath101 for the @xmath0-qubit w state is given by @xmath107 . .[tabla ] lower bound values for persistency of nonlocality @xmath101 for the @xmath70 state with @xmath108 binary - outcome measurement settings per party . the results are based on the numerical method described in the text . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     in table  [ tabla ] , for @xmath8 , the first entries @xmath109 match the numbers from previous study @xcite . however , by fixing @xmath0 and going to higher number of settings @xmath6 sometimes we get a higher persistency of nonlocality . for instance , in case of @xmath110 parties , @xmath111 , which is to be compared to @xmath112 . for @xmath8 , we extracted the optimal bell inequalities corresponding to @xmath82 for various @xmath14 values . for @xmath14 even , a common structure has been found . in fact , they turned out to be members of a family of bell inequalities valid for any @xmath14 even . details of this class of inequalities are presented in sec . [ family ] . we optimized the quantum value of these inequalities in function of the two measurement angles . [ wm2 ] shows results for @xmath82 up to @xmath113 of this family . we also show results using the ansatz that the two measurement settings are @xmath114 and @xmath115 , in which case @xmath116 for @xmath14 even . according to the figure , for larger @xmath14 the @xmath117 pair of settings become close to optimal . the @xmath82 values have been also studied in ref . @xcite for specific families of known bell inequalities from the literature , with the best lower bound values coming from the wwwzb inequalities  @xcite . for comparison , these @xmath82 values are displayed . for @xmath113 , @xmath118 , which is suboptimal with respect to our @xmath119 .    finally , fig . [ wm2persistency ] shows the upper bound values due to section  [ ub ] and the lower bound values for @xmath120 up to @xmath121 due to our bell family . we conjecture that the exact value for @xmath120 is defined by the lower curve ( that is , no better bell inequalities than our family in section  [ family ] exist in this respect ) . for instance , the best lower bound for @xmath120 so far comes from the wwwzb inequalities analyzed in ref . @xcite , which lies below our curve for the lower bound , and according to the conjecture in ref . @xcite it goes to @xmath122 in the limit of large @xmath0 . on the other hand , our asymptotic lower bound value of @xmath1 is considerable higher . it is also worth noting that the upper bound value on @xmath123 shown in the figure holds true for any permutationally invariant @xmath0-qubit state . hence , dicke states with more than one excitation , as a notable subset of permutationally invariant states , can not perform significantly better than @xmath124 states in the two - setting case .    in ref . @xcite , the dicke states ( including the @xmath70 state ) were analyzed in terms of two decoherence models : loss of particles and loss of excitations . the first one relates to the measure @xmath125 discussed in this paper , whereas the latter one is related to @xmath82 in formula  ( [ rhonp ] ) . indeed , if we start from an @xmath14-qubit w state which is effected by a decoherence where in each mode an excitation has a probability @xmath96 of being lost , it brings the w state into ( [ rhonp ] ) . appendix  a shows a derivation of this result . next section gives all the details , including the quantum and local bounds , of our particular family of two - setting bell inequalities providing @xmath116 for even @xmath14 . in case of large @xmath14 , this goes to @xmath126 which we conjecture to be the largest achievable critical value among all two - setting bell inequalities . _ standard form of permutationally symmetric bell inequalities. _ the bell inequality to be considered consists of correlators  ( [ correlators ] ) which are invariant under any permutation of the parties . by imposing the permutational symmetry , one requires that the expectation values @xmath127 and @xmath128 are the same , where @xmath129 is an arbitrary permutation of the set @xmath130 . let us denote by @xmath131 all permutations of the set @xmath130 . then , it will be useful to define @xmath132    where the sum ranges over all permutations of the set @xmath130 . in @xmath133 above , @xmath24 is the order of correlators and @xmath134 is the number of @xmath135 s occurring in the list @xmath136 . let us now define the symmetrized correlation vector by the above ordered real vectors as follows @xmath137    in a similar way , we define the vector of coefficients associated with @xmath138 as @xmath139    as a result , we arrive at the general form of a permutationally symmetric bell inequality : @xmath140 where @xmath28 is the local maximum , which holds for any local hidden variable model . it is worth noting that the wwwzb class  @xcite contains only full - correlator terms ( @xmath25 ) , whereas our construction of bell inequalities turns out to contain all different orders , starting from marginal terms ( @xmath26 ) up to full - correlation terms ( @xmath25 ) . there also exist permutationally symmetric @xmath14-party bell inequalities involving only first and second order terms ( @xmath141 )  @xcite . the usefulness of these kind of inequalities in the particle loss model is an open and interesting question in our view .    as an illustrative example , let us discuss the case of 4 particles ( @xmath142 ) . in this case , @xmath138 looks as follows @xmath143 where we used semicolon ( ;) in order to separate components with different order @xmath24 . by identifying @xmath144 , @xmath145 and @xmath146 , @xmath147 , @xmath148 , @xmath149 for @xmath88 in eq . ( [ sor ] ) , we have the following mean values displayed for some particular cases ( neglecting the mean value signs ) : @xmath150    where we recall that @xmath24 denotes the order in the superindex of @xmath133 , whereas @xmath134 is the number of occurrences of subindex 1 in @xmath133 . for instance , @xmath151 above consists of all length-3 sequences from @xmath152 and @xmath153 letters with the occurrence of a single subindex 1 . _ the specific class of bell inequalities. _ let us now give the explicit form of a bell inequality @xmath154 defined by the vector of coefficients @xmath155 in eq . ( [ symbi ] ) . this family has been extracted from the numerical method of sec . [ lb ] . in particular , we introduce a family of bell inequalities @xmath156 valid for any even number of particles @xmath14 as follows @xmath157    the vector of coefficients @xmath158 reads as    @xmath159    where @xmath160 is the kronecker delta ( 1 if @xmath161 , 0 otherwise ) , and the functions entering eq . ( [ nalpha ] ) above are @xmath162    especially for @xmath142 , our 4-party bell inequality looks as follows : @xmath163 where the middle terms appear explicitly in  ( [ sexample ] ) and the local bound is due to formula  ( [ betacn ] ) given in the next subsection for the general @xmath14-party case .    _ local bound. _ the local maximum , which is the maximum value one obtains using local resources only , is given by @xmath164 in case of any even number of particles @xmath14 , where @xmath165    we have checked the validity of the above local bound @xmath166 for @xmath167 ( @xmath14 even ) by listing all possible deterministic strategies ( i.e. , vertices of the bell polytope ) . these are the strategies for which all correlators factorize ( see eq .  [ factor ] ) and each single party marginal @xmath30 , @xmath168 equals either @xmath32 or @xmath33 . one of the above deterministic strategies , due to linearity of the bell functional , will provide the local maximum . notice that @xmath169 , ( @xmath17 ) equals @xmath33 by definition . below we provide an analytical proof of formula  ( [ betacn ] ) for any even @xmath14 . we checked with brute - force computations that for smaller values of @xmath14 the inequalities are far from tightness , that is , they do not define a facet of the bell polytope . we conjecture that they are not tight for larger @xmath14 as well . here follows the proof of the local limit  ( [ betacn ] ) for even @xmath14 . first let us fix notation . for a given local deterministic strategy let us define a four - tuple ( @xmath170,@xmath171,@xmath172,@xmath173 ) which counts the number of parties whose marginal expectations @xmath174 are the respective pairs ( @xmath175 , @xmath176 , @xmath177 , @xmath178 ) . by definition we have @xmath179 . in case of permutationally invariance under party exchange , a four - tuple ( @xmath180 ) represents uniquely a deterministic strategy . hence , our task is to calculate the bell value @xmath181 for all possible integer - valued four - tuples @xmath182 fulfilling @xmath179 , and then pick the maximum value out of this set . this defines the local maximum @xmath166 attainable using classical resources . in the proof below , all positive integer four - tuples @xmath180 are understood to sum up to @xmath14 , where @xmath14 is even . let us introduce the permanent of an @xmath183 matrix @xmath184 , @xmath185 . it is defined as @xmath186 where @xmath187 is a permutation over the set @xmath130 . using the above definition for the permanent , @xmath188 ( @xmath189 , @xmath190 ) is given by the components @xmath191 for a given deterministic strategy @xmath180 , where @xmath192 is an @xmath183 , @xmath21-valued matrix whose components @xmath193 are defined as follows    @xmath194    @xmath195    however , for @xmath196 , @xmath189 , there exists a closed form expression as well ( which we will make use of later ) : @xmath197    this expression comes from an expansion of matrix @xmath198 in terms of row @xmath199 . let us now define two auxiliary functions @xmath200 which later will prove to be useful : @xmath201 and @xmath202 recall that @xmath179 . let us also recall that the bell expression for a particular deterministic strategy looks as follows @xmath203 where @xmath155 defines the bell coefficients through eq . ( [ nalpha ] ) . let us divide the terms appearing in  ( [ nalpha ] ) into three distinct cases @xmath204 as follows :    @xmath205    @xmath206    @xmath207    using the above formulas , one can show ( after tedious but straightforward calculations ) that    @xmath208    furthermore , summing up the above three equations  ( [ threebi ] ) , we arrive at    @xmath209    now we separate the above expression into four different cases according to the numbers @xmath180 occurring in the auxiliary functions @xmath210 and @xmath211 in eqs . ( [ f1],[f2 ] ) . after a bit of manipulation , we arrive at    @xmath212    where @xmath213 let us subtract the conjectured @xmath166  ( [ betacn ] ) from @xmath214 in formula  ( [ bix ] ) . notice that we end the proof once we find that @xmath215 for all possible positive integers @xmath180 with @xmath179 . dividing by @xmath216 and after some lengthy manipulation , we get    @xmath217    with @xmath218 it is straightforward to check that in each above case the maximum allowed value of @xmath219 is 4 . substituting this value back into  ( [ simple ] ) , we obtain that inequality  ( [ simple ] ) is never violated . this completes the proof of the local bound @xmath166 expressed by formula  ( [ betacn ] ) . _ quantum violation. _ hereby we give a closed form of the vector @xmath138 in case of qubit observables and an @xmath14-qubit quantum state . in quantum theory , we have the expectation value defined by eq . ( [ correlators ] ) . we specify the @xmath14-qubit state @xmath3 to be the one - parameter family of states given by @xmath220 in eq . ( [ rhonp ] ) . the qubit observables , on the other hand , are chosen as @xmath221 and @xmath222 for all @xmath17 , where @xmath223 and @xmath224 are the @xmath225 pauli matrices . also , @xmath18 for all @xmath17 , by definition . borrowing formulas from ref . @xcite , we find a closed form expression for @xmath226 ( @xmath189 , @xmath190 ) . let us write @xmath227 where we have @xmath228 where @xmath160 stands for the kronecker delta . _ critical value of @xmath96. _ our next task is to compute the critical value @xmath82 in function of @xmath14 for which we have @xmath229 , where the components of @xmath138 in eq . ( [ vecs ] ) contain @xmath96 as a parameter . note that @xmath155 and @xmath166 are defined through eq . ( [ nalpha ] ) and eq . ( [ betacn ] ) , respectively . by substitution we arrive at @xmath230    next , applying the criterion @xmath231 , we have the critical value for @xmath96 as follows , @xmath232 where we used formulas  ( [ pq ] ) above .    note that the formula for the critical value of @xmath233 above goes to @xmath234 as the number of particles @xmath14 goes to infinity . the multipartite w state is an important state relevant to the interaction between light and matter . we addressed the persistency of the nonlocality @xmath125 of this state both by numerical and analytical means . in case of two - setting measurements ( @xmath8 ) we could pin down the value of @xmath101 such that there remains only a relatively small gap between the upper and lower bound values for any number of parties @xmath0 . for @xmath0 large , this value tends to be within the range @xmath235 $ ] . moreover , based on a numerical investigation regarding the lower bound value , we conjecture that @xmath1 is the exact value for large @xmath0 . in this respect , it would be interesting to improve further the upper bound value . note that the proof for the upper bound of @xmath236 in section  [ ub ] relies merely on the permutationally symmetry of the state and does not exploit the full structure of the w state . on the other hand , our numerical study indicates that for a fixed but small @xmath0 , @xmath10 increases by increasing @xmath6 . this suggests that for @xmath0 large the lower bound @xmath1 on @xmath47 increases as well in case of @xmath99 . finding a general @xmath0-party @xmath6-setting family of bell inequalities to lowerbound @xmath101 of which the present one is a special @xmath8 member would be most welcome . let us mention some possible ways to generalize the persistency of nonlocality of multipartite states . the concept of epr steering  @xcite lies between entanglement and nonlocality , and epr steering of multipartite quantum states has been investigated recently  @xcite . similarly to the persistency of nonlocality , it would be interesting to study the behavior of persistency of steering for the w state or other permutationally invariant states such as dicke states . finally , the question of genuine nonlocality  @xcite of the w state has also been left open . indeed , instead of studying the persistency of standard nonlocality @xmath125 of the w state , we may ask as well what is the minimal number of parties @xmath38 to trace out from an @xmath0-qubit w state , such that the reduced @xmath237-party state lacks genuinely multipartite nonlocality . we acknowledge financial support from the hungarian national research fund otka ( k111734 ) . suppose that a source emits an @xmath14-qubit state @xmath3 , which can be effected by some losses , e.g. , noise due to a lossy channel . we treat channel losses in the following noise model , which is called amplitude damping . in each mode ( out of @xmath14 modes ) , there is a probability @xmath96 of losing an excitation . the operator sum formalism ( see e.g. , ref . @xcite ) describes the transformation between the initial state @xmath3 and the final state @xmath238 in the following way @xmath239 where @xmath240 denotes the tensor product of certain combinations of the following two kraus operators corresponding to the amplitude damping noise model @xmath241 where @xmath96 stands for the probability that an excitation is lost . with these , @xmath240 is defined by @xmath242 , where @xmath14 is the number of qubits and @xmath243 can take 0 or 1 .    using the w state , @xmath244 as the initial state @xmath3 in  ( [ rho_noisy ] ) , the following relations turn out to hold true : @xmath245 further , if we permute the index @xmath246 in all the @xmath14 different ways , we get the same state as that on the right hand side of the second line of  ( [ kperm ] ) , i.e. , the @xmath14-partite vacuum state multiplied by @xmath247 . on the other hand , if the number of @xmath135 s in @xmath248 are at least two , we have @xmath249 . substituting into ( [ rho_noisy ] ) , we arrive at @xmath250 which is the same state as ( [ rhonp ] ) . m. a. nielsen and i. l. chuang , _ quantum computation and quantum information _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 2000 ) . r. horodecki , p. horodecki , m. horodecki , k. horodecki , rev . phys . * 81 * , 865 ( 2009 ) . o. ghne and g. tth , physics reports * 474 * , 1 ( 2009 ) . h. buhrman , r. cleve , s. massar , r. de wolf , rev . * 82 * , 665 ( 2010 ) . h. buhrman , l. czekaj , a. grudka , m. horodecki , p. horodecki , m. markiewicz , f. speelman , s. strelchuk , proc . natl . usa * 113 * , 3191 ( 2016 ) . a. acn , n. brunner , n. gisin , s. massar , s. pironio and v. scarani , phys . lett . * 98 * , 230501 ( 2007 ) ; s. pironio , a. acn , n. brunner , n. gisin , s. massar , and v. scarani , new j. phys . * 11 * , 045021 ( 2009 ) ; ll . masanes , s. pironio and a. acn , nat . * 2 * , 238 ( 2011 ) ; e. hnggi and r. renner , arxiv:1009.1833 ( 2010 ) ; s. pironio , ll . masanes , a. leverrier and a. acn , phys . x * 3 * , 031007 ( 2013 ) . r. colbeck , a. kent , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 44 * , 095305 ( 2011 ) . s. pironio , a. acn , s. massar , a.b . de la giroday , d.n . matsukevich , p. maunz , s. olmschenk , d. hayes , l. luo , t.a . manning and c. monroe , nature * 464 * , 1021 ( 2010 ) . w. wieczorek , r. krischek , n. kiesel , p. michelberger , g. tth , and h. weinfurter , phys . lett . * 103 * , 020504 ( 2009 ) ; g. tth , w. wieczorek , d. gross , r. krischek , c. schwemmer , and h. weinfurter , phys . rev . lett . * 105 * , 250403 ( 2010 ) . g. toth , t. moroder , o. ghne , phys . lett * 114 * , 160501 ( 2015 ) ; t. moroder , j .- d . bancal , y .- c . liang , m. hofmann , o. ghne , phys . lett * 111 * , 030501 ( 2013 ) ; y .- c . liang , d. rosset , j .- d . bancal , g. ptz , t.j . barnea , n. gisin , phys . rev . lett . * 114 * , 190401 ( 2015 ) ; j .- bancal , n. gisin , y .- c . liang , s. pironio , phys . 106 * , 250404 ( 2011 ) ;      w. laskowski , t. paterek , c. brukner , m. zukowski , phys . a * 81 * , 042101 ( 2010 ) ; j. gruca , w. laskowski , m. zukowski , n. kiesel , w. wieczorek , c. schmid , and h. weinfurter , phys . rev . a * 82 * , 012118 ( 2010 ) ; w. laskowski , t. vertesi , m. wiesniak , j. phys . a : math . theor . * 48 * , 465301 ( 2015 ) . j. tura , r. augusiak , a. b. sainz , t. vertesi , m. lewenstein , a. acin , science * 344 * , 1256 ( 2014 ) ; j. tura , a. b. sainz , t. grass , r. augusiak , a. acin , and m. lewenstein , arxiv:1501.02733 ( 2015 ) ; j. tura , r. augusiak , a.b . sainz , b. lcke , c. klempt , m. lewenstein , and a. acn , annals of physics * 362 * , 370 ( 2015 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the nonlocal properties of the w states are investigated under particle loss . by removing all but two particles from an @xmath0-qubit w state , the resulting two - qubit state is still entangled . hence , the w state has high persistency of entanglement . we ask an analogous question regarding the persistency of nonlocality introduced in [ phys . rev . a 86 , 042113 ] . namely , we inquire what is the minimal number of particles that must be removed from the w state so that the resulting state becomes local . we bound this value in function of @xmath0 qubits by considering bell nonlocality tests with two alternative settings per site . in particular , we find that this value is between @xmath1 and @xmath2 for large @xmath0 . we also develop a framework to establish bounds for more than two settings per site .