Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: interest in the gravitational @xmath1-matrix at transplanckian energies  @xcite has revived in the past few - years  @xcite , when explicit solutions of the so - called reduced - action model  @xcite have been found  @xcite . the model is a much simplified version of the acv eikonal approach  @xcite to transplanckian scattering in string - gravity , and is valid in the regime in which the gravitational radius @xmath2 is much larger than the string length @xmath3 , so that string - effects are supposed to be small .    the reduced - action model  ( sec . [ s : rcram ] ) was derived by justifying the eikonal form of the @xmath1-matrix at impact parameter @xmath4 on the basis of string dynamics and by then calculating the eikonal itself ( of order @xmath5 ) in the form of a 2-dimensional action , whose power series in @xmath0 corresponds to an infinite sum of proper irreducible diagrams ( the `` multi - h '' diagrams  @xcite ) , evaluated in the high - energy limit . the model admits a quantum generalization  @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix in the form of a path - integral  with definite boundary conditions  of the reduced - action exponential itself . the main feature of the model and of its boundary conditions is the existence of a critical impact parameter @xmath6 such that , for @xmath7 the @xmath1-matrix matches the perturbative series and is unitary , while for @xmath8 the field solutions are complex - valued and the elastic @xmath1-matrix is suppressed exponentially . the suppression exponent is of order @xmath9 ( @xmath10 being the planck length ) or , if we wish , of the same order as the entropy of a black - hole of radius @xmath11 . from various arguments we believe that in the region in which @xmath8 ( that is , @xmath4 is smaller than the gravitational radius ) , a classical gravitational collapse is taking place . a key issue related to the collapse region is the possible existence of information loss at quantum level , which in the acv model shows up as lack of @xmath1-matrix unitarity . according to  @xcite such unitarity loss is mostly related to a restrictive boundary condition , which is required for the solutions of the model be uv - safe . if such condition is relaxed , further solutions show up , which could contribute to unitarity , but are irregular  i.e. ,  dominated by planckian distances , region in which the model itself is inadequate . the main motivation of the present paper is to improve and complete some unsatisfactory aspects of the reduced - action model which might be crucial at planckian distances , but show up already at distances of order @xmath12 , the gravitational radius . the new model that we shall present here features two improvements . firstly , the eikonal representation itself is embedded in three dimensions , so as to be able to describe the motion of the breit - frame during the scattering process . by comparison , the usual two - dimensional representation is inadequate outside the regime of very small angle scattering , and in particular in the collapse region . in fact , the energy - momentum of the impinging particles is taken to be an external light - like source  without any deflection  which generates gravitational fields characterized by aichelburg - sexl - like shock waves  @xcite . however , the resulting action predicts the einstein deflection angle  @xcite and corrections to it  @xcite , at variance with the original assumption of frozen sources . instead , we know from the beginning  @xcite that in the classical limit the gravitational equations should predict both particle motion and fields in a self - consistent way . for that to be possible , the improved eikonal representation is needed . the additional important improvement of the present model is the treatment of rescattering corrections of the produced gravitons . such effects were argued in  @xcite to be of particular interest for the irregular solutions of the model , perhaps explaining their relationship to collapse and their contribution to unitarity . but , independently of such a feature , we shall argue here that even for regular ( uv - safe ) solutions , rescattering corrections are needed in order to achieve self - consistency of motion and metric at higher orders in the eikonal expansion .    to start with , we deal with the self - consistency problem at leading level , in which the eikonal refers to frozen undeflected sources , the metric contains two aichelburg - sexl ( as ) shock waves , while the action predicts the einstein deflection angle @xmath13 , as function of the impact parameter @xmath4 and of the gravitational radius @xmath14 ( @xmath15 being the invariant mass of the system ) . the problem in introducing the particle motion is that the kinematical corrections implementing it are of the same relative order ( @xmath16 or higher ) as the irreducible dynamical corrections to the einstein deflection . how to disentangle the former terms from the latter ones ? a hint about solving the question above was provided in ref . @xcite , where it was shown that  given the particular coulombic form of the leading eikonal  it is possible to take into account the motion of the breit - frame of the particles without affecting the @xmath1-matrix eigenvalue which is still provided by the naive two - dimensional fourier transform . such observation is the basis for our treatment of motion in sec . [ s : ilepp ] , which suggests writing a modified metric , which is self - consistent at leading level . the main difference with the previous one  @xcite lies in the introduction of two - body `` shifts '' of t  hooft type  @xcite , summarizing the action of the leading @xmath1-matrix at two - body level . that is not enough however . the reduced - action model contains the longitudinal fields @xmath17 ( @xmath18 ) characterized by as shock waves centered on the particles with profile functions @xmath19 ( @xmath20 ) ; furthermore , it generates a gravitational wave also with a field @xmath21 defined by the h - diagram . the longitudinal field is here calculated in the improved eikonal representation in sec . [ s : ssw ] and found to be consistent with as waves  @xcite which are delayed in time and rotated in space , as suggested in sec ..  [ s : ilepp ] . the transverse field , on the other hand , provides corrections to the leading eikonal profiles in @xmath22 and @xmath23 , and causes modifications of the metric inside the light - cone by providing important rescattering corrections . we then set up a perturbative procedure , in order to deal with the self - consistency problem at higher orders in the eikonal expansion . at next order we find the h - diagram deflection  @xcite which again appears as a feature of the action , but is not incorporated in the metric , which would require further modifications of the energy - momentum tensor . surprisingly , we find that the class of multi - h diagrams considered in  @xcite is not sufficient in order to provide a satisfactory metric at this level but we need to go one further step , and calculate rescattering corrections , which carry the information due to two - body shifts for the produced gravitons . such shifts occur in an approximate solution to the rescattering equations under consideration since a long time  @xcite , which is here worked out to completion in sec . [ s : rcram ] . the results so obtained complete the picture of the improved eikonal representation in sec . [ s : ssw ] for corrections of relative order @xmath0 .    finally , in sec . [ s : isrp ] we somewhat change subject , and we address the gross features of the ultraviolet - sensitive solutions of the model , whose importance lies in the fact that they could play a role for the recovery of unitarity and/or the related information loss . we then summarize the essential results of the paper and their consequences for action and metric in sec . [ s : conc ] , by discussing also some suggestions which arise from our preliminary analysis of singular solutions . acv  @xcite have shown that the leading contributions to the high - energy elastic scattering amplitude come from the @xmath24-channel iteration of soft - graviton exchanges , which can be represented by effective ladder diagrams as in fig . [ f : ladder ] . the purpose of the present section is to recall the method of resumming the effective ladder contributions to all orders so as to provide the so - called eikonal representation for the elastic @xmath1 matrix . this representation is here `` improved '' in the sense that we do not make a separation of longitudinal and transverse variables by neglecting the leading scattering angle . instead , by following  @xcite , we use the exact 3-dimensional phase - space of the on - shell particles at each gravitational eikonal exchange and we prove that  due to the coulombic form of the exchange  the @xmath1-matrix is nevertheless provided by a 2-dimensional transform . -matrix in the eikonal approximation . solid lines : on - shell external particles ; dashed lines : eikonal gravitational exchanges._,scaledwidth=70.0% ]    [ f : ladder ]    it is important to note that the exchanged gravitons ( dashed lines ) are associated to a propagator @xmath25 and are coupled to the colliding particles / strings ( solid lines ) with an interaction strength equal to @xmath26 for each pair of vertices . furthermore , the particles lines are on - shell along the effective ladder , as proved in ref  @xcite by the sum over inelastic excitations also . the generic ladder is thus built by iteration of the basic rung @xmath27    we start computing the 2-rung ladder ( fig .  [ f : ladder].b ) @xmath28 in the center - of - mass ( cm ) frame where @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , @xmath32 , the two mass - shell delta functions in eq . ( [ amp2 ] ) become @xmath33 and , for the same reason , the two external mass - shell deltas in eq . ( [ rung2 ] ) constrain @xmath34 , @xmath35 , @xmath36 . in this way , the 4d integration @xmath37 reduces to a 2d integral is a function of @xmath24 and @xmath38 . ] @xmath39 by taking into account the expression of @xmath40 and @xmath41 in terms of @xmath42 , @xmath43 and @xmath44 and using the identity @xmath45 it is easy to evaluate the azimuthal integral in eq . ( [ a2 ] ) and , more interestingly , to show that it can be rewritten as the azimuthal integral of a pure 2d propagator : @xmath46 where @xmath47 and @xmath48 are fictitious 2d vectors with the same modulus as @xmath49 and @xmath50 respectively , and @xmath51 is the angle between them . with this trick , @xmath52 can be rewritten as a 2d convolution : @xmath53({\boldsymbol{q } } ) \ ; , \quad ( { \boldsymbol{q}}^2=-q^2)\;.\ ] ]    it is now straightforward to generalize that procedure to the @xmath54-rung ladder , by deriving the recursion formula @xmath55 \;.   \label{ampn}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it should be noted that such simplification is due to the peculiar form of the graviton interaction from which eq . ( [ azimuthal ] ) follows . finally , the eikonal @xmath1 matrix ( with overall momentum conservation factored out ) is given by the sum of the ladder diagrams with the usual combinatorial factor @xmath56 and with the final - state mass - shell deltas removed :    [ seik ] @xmath57 \;.\ ] ] by applying a 2d fourier transform to eq . ( [ ssum ] ) , convolutions become standard products and the r.h.s .  of eq . ( [ ssum ] ) reduces to an exponential series : @xmath58    where we interpret the 2d fourier transform of the one - graviton amplitude @xmath59 as _ eikonal action _ @xmath60 . actually , the definition of @xmath60 ( and of all convolutions involved in this calculation ) requires the introduction of an infrared cutoff @xmath61 in order to regularize the `` coulomb '' divergence typical of long - range interactions @xmath62 : @xmath63 where @xmath64 and @xmath65 . a couple of remarks are in order :    * the `` position '' variable @xmath66 , being conjugate to @xmath47 , is usually interpreted as impact parameter of the collision , and @xmath67 as the associated phase shift . however , @xmath47 is a fictitious 2d vector whose polar angle is actually undefined , therefore @xmath66 can not be thought of as a purely transverse ( to @xmath68 ) vector . * the dependence of @xmath69 on @xmath70 amounts to a @xmath4-independent phase , and therefore it is unimportant in the determination of the scattering angle . however such a phase depends on the total energy @xmath71 . this may cause a cutoff - dependent time evolution of the scattered particles , hopefully without physical consequences . both issues will be discussed in detail in the next section . the purpose of this section is to derive the motion of two quantum particles subject to a scattering amplitude given by the leading eikonal result of  @xcite and recalled in sec . [ s : ersa ] . suppose we prepare a state of two well separated light - like free particles in the past . in a first - quantization description the wave function is given by @xmath73 in the far future the wave function is expressed in terms of the @xmath1-matrix as follows : @xmath74    it is convenient to perform the calculation in the cm frame . as usual , we define the cm coordinate @xmath75 and relative coordinate @xmath76    [ cmcoordinates ] @xmath77    for simplicity , we limit ourselves to states which have zero total momentum , by setting    [ wavefunc ] @xmath78 with this restriction the cm coordinate is completely delocalized , but we can build a state representing a localized wave packet in the relative coordinate : @xmath79    where @xmath80 is the relative momentum , @xmath81 is its mean value and @xmath82 a measure of its broadening , @xmath83 is a normalization factor , @xmath84 is the total cm energy , while @xmath85 is the relative position at time @xmath86 . in fact , by inserting eqs . ( [ wavefunc ] ) into eq . ( [ d : psiin ] ) we are left with an integral in @xmath87 whose phase @xmath88 is stationary for @xmath89 since the shape of @xmath90 forces @xmath91 . going back to particles coordinates , we confirm that in the past each particle moved at the speed of light in the direction of @xmath92 : @xmath93    on the other hand , by substituting eqs . ( [ wavefunc ] ) in the outgoing wave  ( [ d : psiout ] ) together with the energy - momentum conserving eikonal @xmath1-matrix  ( [ seik ] ) @xmath94 we find @xmath95 where @xmath47 and @xmath66 are auxiliary 2d vectors , the former being determined by the condition @xmath96 . in this case , the stationarity of @xmath97 with respect to independent variations of @xmath87 , @xmath98 and @xmath66 yields the asymptotic motion in the future , as follows . in the plane of scattering @xmath99 we introduce the polar angles @xmath100 of momenta and coordinates , and write @xmath101 where we used the notation @xmath102 , @xmath64 , @xmath103 and the relations @xmath104 , @xmath105 . we can now determine the five unknowns @xmath106 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 and @xmath66 by finding the stationarity point of the phase with respect to variations of the five integration variables @xmath109 , @xmath107 , @xmath108 and @xmath66 , while @xmath86 and @xmath85 are known parameters . we have @xmath110 where @xmath111 denotes the sign of @xmath112 . the first equation causes @xmath66 to be aligned with @xmath49 ( @xmath113 ) and to have modulus @xmath114 the second equation yields a further relation involving the physical impact parameter @xmath115 : @xmath116 allowing us to determine the ( attractive ) scattering angle @xmath117 @xmath118 the third equation identifies the outgoing trajectory to be the straight line @xmath119 with the same impact parameter of the incoming one , thus implying angular momentum conservation . note that this trajectory intersects the incoming one at the point @xmath120 , as is apparent from fig . [ f : deflection ] . [ f : deflection ]    the fourth equation provides the motion of the outgoing relative coordinate @xmath121 meaning that each particle keeps on moving at the speed of light . a very peculiar behaviour of our result is that the motion of the outgoing particles suffers a time delay given by the energy - derivative of the action @xmath122 with respect to a motion with the same deflection but at constant speed . this is easily seen by projecting the incoming trajectory  ( [ xin ] ) on @xmath87 @xmath123 and by choosing the origin of time @xmath124 when @xmath125 is ( or would be ) at the intersection point @xmath126 of the trajectories  ( [ outtraj],[inmotion ] ) , i.e.@xmath127 , so that eqs .  ( [ inmotion],[motion ] ) become @xmath128 showing that @xmath129 at @xmath130 . let us stress that this time delay is peculiar of gravity , since the energy dependence of the amplitude stems from the gravitational coupling @xmath131 . in other theories , like electrodynamics , the coupling is independent of the particles energies , and one obtains analogous equations with @xmath132 . we have seen that the leading eikonal @xmath1-matrix provides a definite scattering angle and wave - packet motion . it also provides a gravitational metric , associated to the gravitaional fields @xmath133 , whose longitudinal terms are expressed in terms of the eikonal amplitude @xmath134 as follows  @xcite    [ hfields ] @xmath135    where @xmath136 and we actually deal with the situation before collision ( @xmath137 ) .    the collision process , according to the reduced action model to be described in sec . [ s : rcram ] , introduces further ( transverse ) components of the metric field , and modifies the expressions ( [ hfields ] ) by corrections of relative order @xmath0 and higher . nevertheless , at leading level , starting from the ( improved ) eikonal representation only , it should be possible to describe the scattering on the basis of an associated metric . here we suggest a simple way to do it , which is based on t  hooft s understanding  @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix as a coordinate shift . the starting point is to write the leading order metric before collision , provided by the expressions  ( [ hfields ] ) as follows : @xmath138 \;.\ ] ] we see that it consists of two aichelburg - sexl ( as ) shock waves  @xcite travelling against each other . if only one is present  the one at @xmath139 , say  , a test particle impinging on it will acquire a shift in the @xmath140 direction : @xmath141 as a consequence , after the shift , the test particle will be deflected . in particular , if the particle was moving at fixed @xmath140 and @xmath142 , the scattering angle @xmath143 is given by @xmath144 , see fig . [ f : deflection ] . the scattering angle formula is derived by either calculating the action @xmath145 of eq . ( [ amp1b ] ) from the shift  ( [ vshift ] ) as in ref . @xcite and then using eq . ( [ angle ] ) , or by computing the geodesics by standard methods . denote the transverse direction starting from the center of mass ( cm ) of the two colliding particles . at the point @xmath146 ( @xmath147 ) the test particle leaves the first ( second ) wave front._,scaledwidth=60.0% ]    [ f : doppioshift ]    the next question is : what happens when both as waves are present ? in order to understand that , consider a test particle at @xmath148 , travelling along with particle 1 ( @xmath149 ) shortly before it . then , at @xmath139 ( @xmath150 ) the test particle will collide with particle 2 and will acquire the shift  ( [ vshift ] ) , while the location of particle 1 will be forced to do the same with @xmath151 , evaluated at the `` on shell '' point @xmath152 ( @xmath153 ) , see fig . [ f : doppioshift ] . next , the test particle trajectory is deflected on a trajectory @xmath154 , @xmath155 , therefore , due to the @xmath40 factor , it will be shortly hit by particle 1 , travelling at @xmath156 , and thus will acquire the shift @xmath157 to sum up , the test particle acquires two shifts @xmath158 separated by a short time interval @xmath159 , which vanishes in the @xmath160 limit . as a consequence , it is natural to assume that particle 1 acquires two shifts also : @xmath161 where @xmath162 is actually a possibly singular parameter describing the scattering of particle 1 on itself , which is here taken to be a @xmath115-independent constant , @xmath163 . taking into account both shifts , particle 1 goes from @xmath164 to @xmath165 at time @xmath166 and is then deflected by an angle @xmath167 on the trajectory means `` rotated '' ; see also eqs . ( [ rotation ] ) . ]    [ coor ] @xmath168    where we recall that @xmath169 . the total collision time  from @xmath164 to @xmath170  is therefore @xmath171 from the stationarity condition of the collision time with respect to @xmath172 , we obtain the scattering angle @xmath173 where @xmath174 is `` on - shell '' . since @xmath175 , eq . ( [ scatang ] ) is consistent with the action determination , at leading level : @xmath176    besides providing the scattering angle , the double - shift picture has a strict analogy with the wave packet motion in sec . [ s : wpm ] . the former can be summarized in 3 steps :    * the `` come - back '' motion from @xmath164 back to @xmath177 , taking the time @xmath178 which is just the retardation time with respect to travel at the speed of light ; * the motion along the residual shift @xmath179 , taking time @xmath180 = \xi\tan\frac{\bar\theta}{2}\;,\ ] ] where we have defined the angular shift @xmath181 as in fig . [ f : doppioshift ] ; * the motion along the deflected trajectory , taking time @xmath182    by comparison , in the wave packet motion the delay time is just the same , while steps ( b ) ( travel to point @xmath183 joining incoming and outgoing trajectories ) and ( c ) ( travel to @xmath184 ) both take time @xmath185 .    although different , the expressions  ( [ timeb ] ) and ( [ timec ] ) correspond to the total time @xmath186\ ] ] whose difference with the former is of relative order @xmath0 , because both @xmath187 and @xmath181 are of order @xmath188 . therefore the two pictures coincide at leading order . similarly , the outgoing impact parameter is @xmath189\ ] ] which differs from the incoming one by relative order @xmath0 also . furthermore both differences vanish in the limit @xmath190 , which is obtained by setting @xmath191 this model , that we could call the `` linear model '' , could be described by the scattering of extended sources , in which the energy of each source inside a disk of radius @xmath106 increases like @xmath106 . we conclude that the double - shift picture provides us with some understanding of the evolution of the metric at collision and after , which is satisfactory at leading level , even if a full account of the collision process is lacking . the basic features argued so far are :    * the existence of a delay time @xmath192 which causes a shift of either shock wave around @xmath193 in the form @xmath194 around particle 1 , with a similar one for particle 2 ; * the deflection of the particle trajectories , causing a rotation by the scattering angle @xmath187 for @xmath195 and reaching @xmath184 at the collision time @xmath196 @xmath197 where the rotated coordinates are @xmath198    therefore , the particle motion occurs explicitly in the expression of the metric , that we could call at this point , a self - consistent leading metric . field ( red cross ) . the parametrization of momenta is choosen so as to simplify the the calculations._,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    [ f : simpleinsertion ]    we have seen before how the improved eikonal model is able to describe particle motion at leading level  ( sec . [ s : wpm ] ) , and how this feature can be incorporated by trajectory shifts in the corresponding shock - waves ( sec . [ s : sdts ] ) . we want now to show how the shock - wave fields can be explicitly derived from the sum of diagrams describing eikonal scattering , as defined in sec . [ s : ersa ] . we confirm in this way the delay shifts introduced previously , leading eventually to the scattered energy - momentum .    in order to calculate the fields @xmath199 and @xmath200 we should consider the eikonal diagrams ( fig . [ f : ladder ] ) in presence of a linearly coupled external source ( @xmath201 , @xmath202 ) which generates the fields by a functional derivative of the corresponding semiclassical @xmath1-matrix or , in other words , of the corresponding action . we can write @xmath203 and compute the result by inserting the @xmath202 source on the eikonal diagrams , in all possible ways . since the external current diagrams generate insertions of momentum @xmath204 and thus generally do not conserve energy - momentum , we should restore time - ordered integrations in order to evaluate them properly . since @xmath200 is coupled to @xmath205 only , the @xmath206 conservation is not affected , and it is sufficient to consider @xmath207-ordered diagrams as depicted in fig .  [ f : simpleinsertion ] . let us first consider the small scattering angle kinematics @xmath208 , in which the longitudinal dynamics is separated from the transverse one . in order to understand the issue , let us start from the simplest diagrams in fig . [ f : simpleinsertion ] . we notice that , while the @xmath209-exchange in the eikonal line has negligible @xmath210 because of two mass - shell conditions @xmath211 , the @xmath204-exchange has only one , @xmath212 , so that some @xmath213 is still allowed , provided @xmath214 . therefore @xmath215 is still negligible , but the @xmath216 leakage should be considered in the @xmath217 evolution .    in the example of fig . [ f : simpleinsertion ] we choose to couple the @xmath202 current to initial and final particles of type 1 symmetrically , ) with a wave function having energy centered around @xmath218 , which amounts to setting @xmath219 and @xmath220 . ] so that a @xmath216-independent factor of @xmath221 is factored out . in this way , the lowest - order diagram in fig . [ f : simpleinsertion].a yields the born - level field @xmath222 where @xmath223 is the leading profile function of the shock - wave . on the other hand , the @xmath209-exchange yields the leading eikonal @xmath224 coupled to the charge @xmath225 , where @xmath226 according to eq . ( [ h0++ ] ) . therefore , diagram  [ f : simpleinsertion].b predicts a ( subleading ) contribution to @xmath200    [ h1bc ] @xmath227\ ] ] while diagram  [ f : simpleinsertion].c yields @xmath228\ ] ]    because of the opposite sign in @xmath216 and @xmath207 . we shall interpret the results  ( [ h1bc ] ) as the first order expansion in @xmath229 of a shifted field @xmath230 which is retarded ( advanced ) for @xmath231 ( @xmath232 ) . therefore , the result  ( [ h++sh ] ) confirms the delay - shift of sec . [ s : sdts ] , in a form which is appropriate for the calculation of the real part of the action @xmath233 , or to the principal - value prescription of the @xmath234 propagator . ( red cross ) . the blobs represent ladders of eikonal exchanges._,scaledwidth=65.0% ]    [ f:2bolle ]     ( red cross)._,scaledwidth=36.0% ]    [ f:2prop1x ]    the higher - order contributions to the shifted field are computed from their definition in fig . [ f:2bolle ] . in order to do the explicit calculation , we have to explain in more detail how the @xmath207-ordering just mentioned is generated from the usual @xmath235-ordering in perturbation theory . we shall work off energy - shell , but on mass - shell for the intermediate particles so that , in the example of fig .  [ f:2prop1x ] , @xmath236 , @xmath237 ,  , @xmath238 . therefore , to each eikonal exchange , we assign the energy differences in the center of mass frame @xmath239 , e.g. , @xmath240 and so on.s occurring in the last equation s line is sufficient to our purposes , because we shall need it around @xmath241 . the argument is therefore valid for the finite - angle kinematics too . ] the ordered time integrations , up to time @xmath235 of the field , yield therefore the factor @xmath242}{[{\varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}(\delta_1+\delta_2)]\ ,    [ { \varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_1 ] } \to \frac{\exp[{\mathrm{i}}(\delta_1+\delta_2)t]}{2    ( { \varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_2)({\varepsilon}+{\mathrm{i}}\delta_1 ) } \;,\ ] ] where the last expression is obtained after @xmath243 symmetrization , because of the integrations on @xmath244 , @xmath245 induced by @xmath246 , @xmath247 , with a factor which is symmetrical under @xmath248 permutations . finally the factorized @xmath249 integrations induced by the angular ones on the @xmath248 s are done separately , by using the identity @xmath250 in which the integration contour is closed in the upper ( lower ) half - plane for @xmath251 ( @xmath137 ) by noting that corrections due to the large @xmath252 contour are exponentially small in @xmath253 in our finite angle kinematics . similarly , the time and @xmath252 integrations can be done after the insertion , and yield @xmath254 this means that eikonal echanges occurring both before and after the insertion are suppressed , in the @xmath255-functions so that overlap of subsequent contributions is allowed for a limited time . the uncertainty so introduced in the time of shift is expected to be larger than @xmath256 because of the number of coherent reinteractions , but in any case smaller than @xmath11 , which would correspond to the maximal number @xmath257 of leading eikonal scatterings . ] because of @xmath258 , so that the whole sum reduces to the diagrams in fig . [ f:1bolla1x ] . ._,scaledwidth=80.0% ]    [ f:1bolla1x ]    in order to compute them we first diagonalize the scattering amplitude in impact parameter @xmath66 space and we then compute the inserted field by fourier transform in the @xmath259 variables , in order to yield its @xmath260 dependence . the non - trivial point about impact parameter transform is that it is 2-dimensional , while the integration variables @xmath261 and @xmath262 ( in , say fig .  [ f:2prop1x ] ) are 3-dimensional in the finite angle kinematics . fortunately , the conditions @xmath263 fix the 3-components of both @xmath261 and @xmath49 , by determining the directions of the respective breit frames . we thus have the bessel transform @xmath264 which , by the clever identity  ( [ azimuthal ] ) yields the same result as the 2-dimensional azimuthal average @xmath265 which is a 2-dimensional convolution diagonalized in @xmath66-space . we thus obtain that the amplitude in front of the field insertion resums to the exponentiated result @xmath266 and cancels out with the factor @xmath267 in eq . ( [ derfunz ] ) . we are left with the calculation of the @xmath200 field itself . notice that in fig . [ f:1bolla1x].b the insertion is on the incoming leg @xmath87 , while in fig . [ f:1bolla1x].a it occurs on the final leg @xmath268 . since @xmath269 because of the mass - shell plus energy - conservation constraints , the difference is just a rotation @xmath270 by the angle @xmath271 . when inserted in the field propagator it leads to a rotated variable projection should be rotated also with the @xmath272-axis in the direction of the deflected longitudinal direction . ] @xmath273 with a mass - shell condition^{-1}$ ] . however , for @xmath274 the contour can be closed on the pole , with the same result , while for @xmath275 it vanishes . this remark confirms the ordering @xmath276 ( see app . [ a : hdi ] ) . ] @xmath277 , and we get @xmath278 where we have neglected the exponent dependence on @xmath279 , when @xmath280 is a very small variable if we make the natural assumption @xmath281 , insuring that the field insertion does not modify the scattering angle . ( @xmath199 ) generated by particle 1 ( 2 ) , here represented by the blue ( red ) line . _ ]    [ f : shiftedshocks ]    finally , by taking the value @xmath282 of the initial energy as we did in the beginning , we get for the field a factorized value proportional to @xmath283 which translates @xmath284 into @xmath276 . the complete resummation in fig . [ f:2bolle ] is thus summarized in the exponentiated form @xmath285 \times \nonumber \\   & \qquad\left\{2\pi r\left[\theta(-x^+)\delta(x^-)a_0({\boldsymbol{x}})+\theta(x^+)\delta(x^-_r)a_0({\boldsymbol{x}}_r )   \right]\right\ } \nonumber \\[1 mm ]   & = 2\pi r \left [ \delta\big(x^-_r-\pi r a_0(b)\big ) a_0({\boldsymbol{x}}_r)\theta(x^+ )    + \delta\big(x^- + \pi r a_0(b)\big ) a_0({\boldsymbol{x}})\theta(-x^+)\right]\;. \label{hppr}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    an identical calculation with the exchange @xmath286 yields an analogous result for the field @xmath287 . the overall situation is depicted in fig . [ f : shiftedshocks ] , where we show the shifted ( and slightly rotated ) shock waves , on which the source particles lie before and after the collision ( solid lines ) . the evolution of the particles during the collision actually depends on the reference frame used to describe their motion . for instance , a time - like observer that crosses first shock 2 ( the one on the bottom - right ) describes the scattering in two steps : firstly the shock 2 drags shock 1 and particle 1 by an amount @xmath288 in the @xmath140 direction ; then shock 1 drags shock 2 and particle 2 in the @xmath207 direction . in this frame particle 1 travels along the dashed blue line in fig . [ f : shiftedshocks ] . a symmetric description is given by an observer crossing first shock 1 , which `` sees '' particle 2 moving along the dashed red line . the transplanckian field equations in the acv proposal  @xcite were based on two main groups of results . firstly , the acv investigation of string - gravity showed that at transplanckian energies @xmath289 ( @xmath290 ) the eikonal representation  with an eikonal operator which is calculable in principle by expanding in @xmath291 and @xmath188  yields a good representation of the scattering amplitude , and incorporates both string- and strong - gravity effects . secondly , in the regime @xmath292 in which string effects are supposed to be small , the irreducible eikonal diagrams are much in correspondence with the effective action of lipatov and co - workers  @xcite , who calculated a regge - graviton emission vertex  @xcite which is the building block of the effective lagrangian used in  @xcite . finally , the equations of motion of the latter  by neglecting rescattering terms  were shown to yield a shock - wave solution for the fields which is the basis for the reduced - action model investigated in detail in later years  @xcite .    here , we have considered so far only the leading graviton - exchange kernel in the eikonal , and we have improved the amplitude representation based on it , so as to include a motion of the breit - frame on which the exchange is defined . next , we want to reconsider the field equations in 4-dimensions  including rescattering  and we shall provide a solution for the fields which fits very well in our understanding of scattering developed so far , by adding corrections which are of relative order @xmath0 and higher .    in the effective action framework , the elastic @xmath1-matrix of the tree diagrams in fig . [ f : subldiagrams ] is given in terms of the classical solutions of the lagrangian equation of motion as @xmath293 where @xmath294 and @xmath295 are just rescaled versions of the longitudinal fields considered so far , @xmath296 is related to the transverse field which is proportional to @xmath297 , and @xmath298 represents ( up to an unconventional but convenient factor of @xmath299 ) the energy - momentum tensor of the colliding particles . the usual metric components are given by  @xcite @xmath300    + \frac{\kappa}{4 } \left [ \epsilon_{\mu\nu}^{tt } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\re\phi    - \epsilon_{\mu\nu}^{lt } { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\im\phi\right ] { \mathrm{d}}x^\mu { \mathrm{d}}x^\nu \ ; ,   \label{hmunudxdx}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath301 denotes the transverse laplacian and the @xmath302 s denote graviton polarizations to be specified below . the lagrangian is conveniently written in terms of real light - cone variables @xmath303 , @xmath304 and a complex transverse variable @xmath305 , @xmath306 . it consists of a kinetic term @xmath307 where the longitudinal fields have a mostly transverse propagator and the ( complex ) @xmath296 field a mostly longitudinal one , of a graviton emission term @xmath308 incorporating lipatov s vertex  @xcite , and finally , of a rescattering term @xmath309 which is supposed to take into account the rescattering diagrams of fig . [ f : subldiagrams].c , d . this term is quadratic in @xmath296 , and is likely to play a role when the latter is large .    ; _ ( b ) _ a `` multi - h '' diagram of order @xmath310 involving only lipatov s vertices ( red disks ) ; _ ( c ) _ the first diagram with a rescattering vertex ( green triangle ) is of order @xmath311 , but actually vanishes on - shell ; _ ( d ) _ the first nonvanishing rescattering diagram is of order @xmath310._,scaledwidth=95.0% ]    [ f : subldiagrams ]    notice in particular in eq . ( [ emissionterm ] ) the current @xmath312 , which describes transverse graviton emission  @xcite in the so - called h - diagram  @xcite and is non - local because of the inverse laplacian needed to find it . for this reason it has been convenient to introduce the complex field @xmath296 , which corresponds to two graviton polarizations . the detailed computation shows that @xmath313 and , more generally , using a notation with real - valued indices , that @xmath314 where @xmath315 so that we have the polarizations @xmath316    the resulting equations of motion are given by    [ eqs ] @xmath317 +      \frac12\kappa\sqrt{s}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x}})\delta(x^- ) \nonumber \\      & \qquad = -\kappa\left({\partial^2}\phi^*{\partial^2}_-{\partial^{*2}}\phi        \;+\;(\partial\leftrightarrow\partial^ * ) \right )      \label{eqh } \\      & 4\partial_+\partial_- |\partial|^4\phi -\kappa \left [        { \partial^{*2}}{\tilde{h}}^{++}{\partial^2}{\tilde{h}}^{-- } - { |\partial|^2}{\tilde{h}}^{++}{|\partial|^2}{\tilde{h}}^{--}\right ] \nonumber \\      & \qquad= \kappa   \left [ { \partial^{*2}}\left({\tilde{h}}^{++}{\partial^2}_+{\partial^2}\phi\right ) +        { \partial^2}\left({\tilde{h}}^{--}{\partial^2}_-{\partial^{*2}}\phi\right )        \;+\;(\partial\leftrightarrow\partial^*)\right ] \ ; ,      \label{eqphi }    \end{aligned}\ ] ]    where the rescattering terms are set on the r.h.s . , with similar equations for @xmath318 and @xmath319 . notice that in eqs . ( [ eqs ] ) the impinging particles are represented by the frozen external sources @xmath201 and @xmath202 written in eq . ( [ enmomtens ] ) , which pertain to the collinear kinematics used before . according to this small - angle approach , scattering comes out because of a non - trivial action , but is not taken into account in the energy - momentum of the particles . shortly , we shall take a somewhat different attitude . we start recalling  @xcite that , if the rescattering terms are dropped , eqs . ( [ eqs ] ) admit a shock - wave solution of the form    [ separation ] @xmath320    where the metric component @xmath321 are of as type  @xcite while the transverse field @xmath296 has support inside the whole _ light - wedges _ @xmath322 . the latter propagation , of retarded plus advanced type , corresponds to the principal value part of the feynman propagators , as is appropriate for the real part of the amplitude . the field equations ( [ eqs ] ) induce a set of differential equations on @xmath22 , @xmath23 and @xmath323 , which can be solved on the basis of proper boundary conditions which make them regular , i.e. , ultraviolet safe . furthermore , by replacing the expressions  ( [ separation ] ) into  ( [ eqs ] ) and omitting the rescattering term , we obtain the acv equations of motion and the corresponding reduced action @xmath324 \big\ } \ ; , \label{reda}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have freely performed some integration by parts , assuming a smooth enough ultraviolet behaviour of the solutions , and we have replaced the current @xmath312 by its reduced counterpart @xmath325 : @xmath326 we state below some of the properties of the ram solutions  @xcite in the particularly simple case of axisymmetric sources like particle - ring scattering  which is relevant for the azimuthal averaged particle - particle case .    by assuming the real fields @xmath327 , @xmath328 and the complex field @xmath329 to be functions of @xmath330 only , and by calling @xmath331 , @xmath332 the axisymmetric sources , we soon realize that the action @xmath333 can be recast in one - dimensional form . this is because the current @xmath325 defined by eq . ( [ defhc ] ) is simply obtained in this case by setting @xmath334  where the dot denotes the @xmath335-derivative  and is therefore real and axisymmetric also . as a consequence , the interaction term involves @xmath336 only and is proportional to the @xmath337 kinetic term as follows @xmath338    \qquad \left(\cdot \equiv \frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2 } \right ) \;.\ ] ] here we have replaced @xmath323 by the auxiliary field @xmath339  a sort of renormalized squared distance  defined by @xmath340 \ ; , \qquad    h \equiv { \boldsymbol{\nabla}}^2\phi = 4\frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2}(r^2\dot\phi )    = \frac{1}{(\pi r)^2}(1-\dot\rho ) \;,\ ] ] which incorporates the @xmath323-@xmath22-@xmath23 interaction . furthermore , the field @xmath323 is now taken to be real - valued , describing the @xmath341 polarization only . the external axisymmetric sources @xmath24 and @xmath342 are able to approximately describe the particle - particle case by setting @xmath343 , @xmath344 , where the azimuthal acv averaging procedure is assumed . the equations of motion , derived from the reduced - action  ( [ 1dimaction ] ) and specialized to the case of particles at impact parameter @xmath4 ( with the axisymmetric sources just quoted ) , provide the profile functions @xmath345 from the analogue of eq . ( [ eqh ] ) , and the @xmath346-field ( or @xmath323-field ) @xmath347 from the analogue of eq .  ( [ eqphi ] ) . ( [ eomrho ] ) shows a `` coulomb '' potential in @xmath346-space , which is repulsive for @xmath348 , acts for @xmath349 and plays an important role in the tunneling phenomenon  @xcite . by replacing the equation of motion  ( [ eoma ] ) into eq . ( [ 1dimaction ] ) , the reduced action can be expressed in terms of the @xmath346 field only , and takes the simple form @xmath350    \equiv -\int_0^\infty { \mathrm{d}}r^2 \ ; { \mathcal{l}}(\rho,\dot\rho , r^2 ) \;,\ ] ] which is the one we shall consider at quantum level in the following . the effective metric generated by the axisymmetric fields @xmath346 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 was calculated  @xcite on the basis of the complete form of the shock - wave  ( [ separation ] ) and is given by @xmath351   \nonumber \\   & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^+)^2 \delta(x^{+ } ) \left [     2\pi r \bar{a}(r^2 ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{-}|   \right ]   \nonumber \\   & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^-)^2 \delta(x^{- } ) \left [     2\pi r a(r^2 ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{+}|   \right ]   \nonumber \\   & + { \mathrm{d}}r^2\left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\theta(x^{+}x^{-})\dot{\phi } \right ]   + { \mathrm{d}}\theta^2\,r^2 \left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\theta(x^{+}x^{-})(\dot{\phi }    + 2r^2\ddot{\phi})\right ] \;.   \label{metr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] this metric is dynamically generated and may be regular or singular at short distances , depending on the behaviour of the field solutions themselves . it is not fully consistent , however , since it does not take into account the longitudinal shifts that the fields cause to each other . in the following sections we shall compute such shifts at subleading level and we shall present the improved expression of the self - consistent metric .      the first nontrivial use of the reduced action  ( [ reda ] ) is the calculation of the first order correction to the einstein deflection  @xcite which is due to the h - diagram contribution to the action ( fig . [ f : subldiagrams].a ) . the latter is obtained by expanding the action  ( [ reda ] ) and the corresponding equations of motion ( quoted in eqs . ( [ eoma],[eomrho ] ) for the axisymmetric case ) in the parameter @xmath0 where @xmath352 is the gravitational radius and @xmath4 is the impact parameter conjugated to the transverse momentum @xmath209 ( and related to the true impact parameter @xmath115 by eq . ( [ b0 ] ) ) .    by expanding the equations of motion we obtain first order corrections to the profile function @xmath353 and to the transverse field @xmath354 as consequence of the lipatov s vertex @xmath312 in eq . ( [ emissionterm ] ) . it is then straighforward to obtain for the action  @xcite @xmath355 \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath356 and the h - diagram contribution is @xmath357    in the following , we specialize the expression  ( [ hdiagram ] ) to the axisymmetric case ) ) which is due to the @xmath358 polarization  and is to be subtracted out by the exponentiation procedure of ref  @xcite . ] in which , according to eq . ( [ rho ] ) , @xmath359 and  by the equations of motion  ( [ eomrho ] )  we obtain the result @xmath360 as contribution of the @xmath341 polarization only . here we have used the regular solution of eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) @xmath361 where @xmath362 and @xmath363 is the largest real solution of eq . ( [ tbcond ] ) .    the complete result , including the @xmath364 polarization would be  @xcite @xmath365 and provides  by stationarity of the eikonal phase  the scattering angle @xmath366 \;.\ ] ]    the recollection above suggests to generalize the calculation of the shifted field @xmath200 in sec .  [ s : ssw ] to the next order in the @xmath188 expansion , by including the h - diagram in the eikonal . in so doing we find 3 kinds of insertions of the @xmath200 source , illustrated in fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions ] : _ ( a ) _ insertions on the on - shell propagators , which can be done in a similar way as we did the leading one ; _ ( b ) _ insertions on the particle propagators of the h - dagram itself , and _ ( c ) _ insertions on the emitted transverse field @xmath367 . the latter are new and involve the rescattering vertex , which is omitted in the ram calculation and will be included in the next subsection . ( red cross ) on the h - diagram._,scaledwidth=90.0% ]    [ f : hdiagraminsertions ]    insertions of type _ ( a ) _ above add up to the leading shift @xmath368 and are done by replacing @xmath217 with @xmath369 in the corresponding energy charge . between past and future . note that in the acv equations framework the profile function @xmath134 and the shift @xmath370 occur together in the product @xmath371 ( eq .  ( [ eqd ] ) ) , while in the insertion formalism @xmath372 is probed by the leading profile @xmath373 only , which dominates for @xmath374 . ] however , @xmath375 contains two @xmath217 factors and thus acquires a factor of 2 , as follows @xmath376 \nonumber \\   & = 2\pi gs ( a_0 + a_h ) + 2\pi r(a_0 + 2 a_h){\mathrm{i}}\frac{\partial}{\partial x^- }   + \cdots \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the outcome is that the overall shift @xmath377 is proportional to @xmath378 , as given by the perturbative formula  ( [ h++sh ] ) : @xmath379 and thus it extends to the h - diagram the relationship between shift and energy - derivative of the action suggested in sec . [ s : ilepp ] . consider now the full field equations , starting from  ( [ eqh ] ) . while , by replacing in the l.h.s . the shock - wave  ( [ separation ] ) , we generate terms proportional to @xmath380 , the rescattering term in the r.h.s .  yields instead the structure @xmath381 which suggests an @xmath140 translation , i.e. , a shift similar to those just found at leading and h - diagram level with the eikonal insertions . therefore , we make the ansatz    [ shifts ] @xmath382      \ ; ,      \label{phishift }    \end{aligned}\ ] ]    where @xmath383 are shift variables to be determined . we take a similar ansatz for energy - momentum too , because we know from last section the latter is really shifted at leading level . by then formally expanding the @xmath384-function  ( [ hppshift ] ) in @xmath229 , we get two equations from the zeros of the @xmath384 and @xmath385 contributions . the first equation is simply the reduced - action model ( ram ) equation for @xmath22 , which reads @xmath386 + { { \textstyle\frac{1}{2}}}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x } } ) = 0\ ] ] and reduces , in the axisymmetric case and for real - valued @xmath323 , to @xmath387    = \frac{{\mathrm{d}}}{{\mathrm{d}}r^2}\big[\dot a\rho ] = -\frac1{2\pi}\delta(r^2 ) \;.\ ] ] the latter is equivalent to eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) and yields the solution @xmath388 where we have introduced the infrared cutoff parameter @xmath70 by setting @xmath389 . since by eqs . ( [ regsol ] ) above  @xcite @xmath390 @xmath327 approaches the leading value for @xmath391 @xmath392 and diverges logarithmically for @xmath393 . the second equation ( from the vanishing of the @xmath385-coefficient ) involves the rescattering terms and is supposed to determine the shift parameter @xmath252 , which occurs in the combination @xmath394 , as follows @xmath395   = -\frac{\delta_0}{2}\delta^2({\boldsymbol{x}})+(2\pi r)^2 |{\partial^{*2}}\phi|^2 \;,\ ] ] where we have set the rescattering terms on the r.h.s . and we notice in particular the energy - momentum shift which , according to sec . [ s : ssw ] , has the contribution @xmath396 emerging from the eikonal insertions up to @xmath0 accuracy . in the axisymmetric limit , ( [ eqd ] ) takes the simplified form @xmath397 where we note that the rescattering source @xmath398 vanishes for @xmath399 , as a consequence of the equations of motion  ( [ rhoasy ] ) . it is then straightforward to find a solution for @xmath400 which is regular everywhere , in the form @xmath401 \displaystyle      \delta_0 - \frac1{a(r^2)}\left[2\pi a(b ) \int_{b^2}^\infty        { \mathrm{d}}r'{}^2\,{{j_\textsc{r}}}(r'{}^2 ) - \int_{b^2}^{l^2}\frac{{\mathrm{d}}r'{}^2}{\rho(r'{}^2 ) }      \int_{r'{}^2}^\infty{\mathrm{d}}r''{}^2{{j_\textsc{r}}}(r''{}^2 ) \right ] & ( r^2\leq b^2 )    \end{cases}\ ] ] where @xmath402 in other words , the shift parameter of the longitudinal field takes over the ( constant ) leading value @xmath403 from the energy - momentum tensor and adds an @xmath335-dependent term of relative order @xmath0 which , for @xmath404 , is related to the kinetic term of the ram action @xmath405    \equiv 2\pi gs \ , { \mathcal{a}}(b ) \;.\ ] ] this means that , while the ram action is sufficient in order to describe the scattering parameters at relative order @xmath0 ( h diagram ) , the rescattering terms are needed in order to describe the form of the fields , like shock - wave shifts , and thus the metric properties at a comparable level of accuracy . it is amusing to check the result ( [ soldelta ] )  which is based on the rescattering equations and on the energy momentum shift in eq . ( [ eqd ] )  by using the direct insertions _ ( b ) _ and _ ( c ) _ on the h - diagram mentioned before , and depicted in fig .  [ f : hdiagraminsertions ] . by keeping track of the flow of energy charges we calculate the above insertions on the imaginary parts ( app . [ a : hdi ] ) and we find that diagram _ ( b ) _ is already counted by lipatov s vertices , while diagram _ ( c ) _ contributes the absorptive part @xmath406    the @xmath216-dependent part , by dividing out the rapidity factor @xmath407 ( as requested in order to obtain the real part of the diagram from the dispersion relations ) and the leading field @xmath408 fits with the displacement form @xmath409 , by thus providing the shift @xmath410 from past to future , where @xmath411 we recognize here the 2-dimensional laplacian green function @xmath412 applied to the h - diagram density . by translating it to the azimuthal - averaged formalism we can use the one - dimensional form @xmath413 and apply it to the rescattering current @xmath398 . the result is just identical to the r.h.s .  of eq . ( [ soldelta ] ) with the @xmath414 contribution subtracted out . in particular , for @xmath415 eq . ( [ deltahb ] ) factorizes and yields @xmath416 , thus recovering the form  ( [ akin ] ) of the total shift . our overall interpretation of the present findings is that a large - distance observer will see the particle shock - waves to suffer a total time delay @xmath417 , directly related to the action and thus to the scattering angle @xmath418 because of the contribution of the rescattering shift . on the other hand , a test particle parallel to particle 2 , traveling at transverse distance @xmath419 from particle 1 at deflection time , corresponding to the perpendicular distance ( impact parameter ) @xmath420 , according to the discussion of sec . [ s : wpm ] . ] will see a profile function @xmath421 related to its own scattering angle @xmath422 which turns out to be the same in the limit @xmath423.-derivative of @xmath424 has implicit contributions which vanish by the equation of motion . ] furthermore , the test - particle will suffer a time delay that , due to the double - shift picture of sec . [ s : sdts ] , is @xmath425 , close to the short - distance value @xmath426 coming from the eikonal insertions of sec . [ s : ssw ]    finally , while the rescattering contribution is needed for the large distance shifts , its contribution to the action starts at order @xmath310 because the diagram in fig . [ f : subldiagrams].c ( formally of order @xmath311 ) vanishes by the property @xmath427 . therefore it does not affect the consistency of the metric and action descriptions at order @xmath428 . was argued  @xcite to vanish for light - particle scattering by analiticity and relativity arguments . ] of course , a symmetrical calculation yields the shift @xmath429 for the field @xmath199 , provided one exchanges light - cone indices @xmath430 and the profile functions and shifts @xmath431 , @xmath432 . we now go over to the second basic equation  ( [ eqphi ] ) which essentially describes rescattering properties ( fig .  [ f : subldiagrams].c , d ) of the transverse field @xmath21 , once emitted by the longitudinal fields . we note that , by replacing the ram fields  ( [ shifts ] ) in the r.h.s .  of eq . ( [ eqphi ] ) , we obtain the structure @xmath433    \times   \label{eqphistr } \\ \nonumber    & \left\ {    -\frac{\partial}{\partial\delta}\frac12\big [     \delta(x^- -\pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ -\pi r\bar\delta_\phi )    + \delta(x^- + \pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ + \pi r\bar\delta_\phi)\big]\right\ } \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    let us recall that , according to eqs . ( [ delta0],[soldelta ] ) , the longitudinal rescattering predicts a shift @xmath434 . we then decide to expand the shift @xmath435 of the transverse field around the constant value @xmath436 , which gives the leading order of the longitudinal shift . by this method , it is easy to evaluate a ( formally ) first order modification @xmath437 of the transverse - field shift , which however is also of leading order in the @xmath188 expansion . by expanding the first term in the l.h.s .  of eq . ( [ eqphi ] ) we obtain @xmath438   \times \nonumber\\ & \frac12\big [    \delta(x^- -\pi r\delta ) \delta(x^+ -\pi r\bar\delta )    + \delta(x^- + \pi r\delta)\delta(x^+ + \pi r\bar\delta ) \big]\label{expphi}\end{aligned}\ ] ] so that we can easily match the left and the r.h.s .  to get the equation , in the axisymmetric limit , @xmath439 where we work in the regime @xmath440 with @xmath441 . the expression of @xmath323 is found by the ram equation @xmath442 which was provided before  ( [ eomrho ] ) . by inserting proper boundary conditions , in our regime @xmath415 we can set @xmath443 ^ 2 $ ] and tentatively look for a solution @xmath444 , where @xmath445 and @xmath446 are constants . a simple calculation shows that @xmath447 + \frac1{2\pi } \;,\ ] ] so that @xmath435 is @xmath335-dependent and of leading order , while the correction @xmath448 is sizeable . furthermore , @xmath435 becomes cutoff independent , and pretty small at @xmath423 . the above conclusion may be unpalatable from a calculational standpoint , but is natural on physical grounds because rescattering occurs for the @xmath323 field at relatively leading level and at all distances , so that the parameter @xmath403 has no particular role and a sizeable difference @xmath449 is expected . one might ask , at this point , whether the ram hierarchy for the action is really satisfied or not . fortunately it remains , because the integral over @xmath207 , @xmath140 of the rescattering vertex with the longitudinal field just vanishes ( @xmath450 ) or , in other words , there is no @xmath451 contribution to the action from diagram  [ f : subldiagrams].c . furthermore , the shift does not change the @xmath452 integration in the h - diagram and therefore rescattering contributions .    on the other hand , the location of the shock - wave and the evolution of particle trajectories and geodesics does change from the point of view of the metric , so that rescattering is needed in order to have self - consistent calculations even at relative order @xmath0 . all preceding arguments hold for the uv - safe solutions of the ram model in eqs . ( [ eoma],[eomrho ] ) which , by definition satisfy the condition @xmath453 . due to the form of @xmath339 in eq . ( [ rho ] ) , @xmath454 would imply that @xmath455 has a short - distance singularity , @xmath456 has an outgoing flux @xmath457 and therefore @xmath458 has a singular @xmath384-function contribution . the latter behaviour would call for large short - distance effects  possibly regularized by the string  which are expected , but not considered , in the ram model .    restricting the solutions by @xmath453 is possible only if the impact parameter is larger than some critical value @xmath6 which signals a possible classical collapse . in fact , the regular solution  ( [ regsol ] ) of eq . ( [ eomrho ] ) has continuous derivative at @xmath459 provided @xmath460 a condition which has real - valued solutions only for @xmath461 . on the other hand , the complex solutions for @xmath8 lead to an exponential damping  @xcite of the @xmath1-matrix of type @xmath462  with exponent of the order of a black - hole entropy @xmath463  which leads , eventually , to a violation of unitarity of the ram model  @xcite .    from the above discussion , some questions arise : what happens to the rescattering solutions for @xmath8 , when they are irregular ? do we see any sign of a possible collapse in the latter , perhaps in relation with the unitarity problem and to a `` fall in the center '' mechanism  @xcite ? let us then consider a class of real - valued ram solutions with @xmath454 for @xmath8 , as follows . we start from the general solution for @xmath454 @xmath464 \theta(b^2-\tau)+r^2\cosh^2\chi(\tau)\theta(\tau - b^2)\ ] ] where @xmath465 is now a free parameter which @xmath466 depends on . then we choose @xmath467 so as to minimize @xmath468 , i.e. , @xmath469 . the parameters of this `` minimal '' solution @xmath470 are given by @xmath471 the corresponding rescattering current is @xmath472 the above current is now non - vanishing for @xmath473 , and , in addition , has a non - integrable behaviour for @xmath474 . this means that large rescattering amplitudes are built in the short - distance region @xmath475 and , as a consequence , that exchange and emission of ( massive ) string states can no longer be neglected . nevertheless , we find it instructive to provide here a preliminary analysis of irregular solutions in our effective - theory framework in which only graviton intermediate states are considered . basic string effects  like graviton reggeization and ensuing string production at @xmath476  @xcite , as well as diffractive and central string emission induced by tidal forces  @xcite - derivatives of phaseshifts  @xcite and are thus possibly important in the whole subcritical region @xmath475 where ( [ irrjr ] ) is large , so that unitarity defect  @xcite and energy balance  @xcite could be sizeably affected . ] should certainly be estimated in the near future in order to see how they affect the picture , but we feel that our effective approach may still provide suggestions and questions to be answered , and is anyway needed as a ground for the estimates just mentioned .    in order to get a better insight on the evolution of irregular solutions , we cut - off the current ( [ irrjr ] ) below @xmath477 , and we compute the total charge , related in sec . [ s : rcram ] to the h - diagram action @xmath478 and to the shift @xmath479 as follows : @xmath480\rho(0 ) + \frac{\rho^2(0)}{\lambda_s^2 }    + { \mathcal{o}\left(\lambda_s^2\right)}\right ] \ ; , \label{ahirr}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the singular integration has been performed by a careful integration by parts and in the last equality we have introduced the @xmath384-function singularity in the @xmath346-derivative : @xmath481 this means that we think of @xmath482 for @xmath483 ( a region which is felt by the two - dimensional model through the outgoing flux ) and that the @xmath384-function occurs because of the @xmath484-discontinuity . thus , strictly speaking , we discover that the singular solutions are not _ bona fide _ solutions of the equations of motion up to @xmath485 unless we introduce a singular `` external force '' @xmath486 at @xmath487 . we can do that by starting from the action  @xcite @xmath488\ ] ] and by supplementing the lipatov s current @xmath325 of eq . ( [ defhc ] ) with a singular external current @xmath489 by then replacing such expression into eq . ( [ 2dimaction ] ) , i.e. , @xmath490\left (      2\dot{a}\dot{\bar{a}}+\frac{\rho_m(0)\delta'(\tau)}{(\pi r)^2}\right ) \;,\ ] ] we find that the action enforces eq . ( [ irrdrho ] ) and becomes , on the equation of motion , @xmath491{\mathrm{d}}\tau-\frac12\int_{0^+}^\infty      \left(\frac{1-\dot\rho}{\pi r}\right)^2{\mathrm{d}}\tau      + \frac12\left(\frac{\rho_m(0)}{\pi r}\right)^2\delta(0 ) \right\ } \nonumber\\    & = a(b ) - \int_{0^+}^\infty \frac{(1-\dot\rho)^2}{2\pi r^2}\;{\mathrm{d}}\tau    + \frac{\rho_m^2(0)}{2\pi r^2\lambda_s^2 } \ ; , \label{irract}\end{aligned}\ ] ] thus determining the singular term in the action . as a step - function located around @xmath487 with width @xmath492 and height @xmath493 , hence the identification @xmath494 . ] we are now able to look at the scattering and shift properties of the irregular solutions , by keeping in mind that we need in this case the external current  ( [ deltahc ] ) , that we think generated by the short - distance string dynamics and/or by possibly collapsed matter . compared to the complex solutions  which have a quantum - tunneling interpretation and cause a probability suppression  the irregular ones may provide a probability source or alternatively may carry away the information loss .    by thus using the eikonal representation of the @xmath1-matrix with the action  ( [ irract ] ) and by carefully computing @xmath4- and @xmath71-derivatives , we get the scattering angle @xmath495 and the time delay @xmath496    \equiv 2\pi r\delta_0 \;,\ ] ] where , by eqs . ( [ irrsol],[deltahc ] ) @xmath497 \;.\ ] ] such results can be further specified by using @xmath498 and the outcomes are plotted in fig . [ f : irraction ] .     without the @xmath468 contribution ; _ ( b ) _ scattering angle as derived by eq . ( [ irrtheta ] ) . in both plots @xmath499 ; lengths are measured in units of @xmath500._,title="fig : " ]   without the @xmath468 contribution ; _ ( b ) _ scattering angle as derived by eq . ( [ irrtheta ] ) . in both plots @xmath499 ; lengths are measured in units of @xmath500._,title="fig : " ]    [ f : irraction ]    we note the strong increase of the action in the region @xmath501 due to the positive singular contribution  implying in particular a motion with many turns in the region @xmath502 . actually , large scattering angles are reached pretty soon around @xmath503 as solutions of the equation @xmath504 \;,\ ] ] but , due to the strong increase of the action derivative ( fig . [ f : irraction ] ) , the saddle - points are confined to either the critical region @xmath505 or to the small-@xmath4 region @xmath506 , for all real values of @xmath507 . finite @xmath4-values , in the region @xmath508 are strongly suppressed like @xmath509 . the above observation suggests that the singular solutions under study do not actually yield back all the initial information in the physical scattering region , but may carry it away in the small-@xmath4 , string - dominated region . another piece of information comes from the study of the shifts and the corresponding time delay . we first notice , by eq . ( [ irrdelay ] ) , that the short - distance shift of @xmath510\frac{2\rho(b^2)}{2\pi r^2}\ ] ] has a positive singular term  meaning a lot of time spent in the interaction region  which is essentially twice the singular contribution to @xmath511 in eq . ( [ ahirr ] ) . the factor of 2 comes from @xmath468 scaling like @xmath512  similar to what happens for the h - diagram itself . furthermore , we already know from sec .  [ s : rcram ] that the large - distance shift takes contributions from rescattering insertions and produces the additional ( negative ) shift @xmath479 , the one we started with in eq . ( [ deltah ] ) . we thus have @xmath513 we note that the singular term remains positive after subtraction of @xmath479 and of the same order as that of the action  apart for the addition of a term proportional to @xmath514 . the very large time delay is thus confirmed at all distances . that means that the singular solutions , wherever they are , spend a long time in the interaction region , before exiting , either around @xmath503 , or at @xmath515 . therefore , they are connected with long - lived states in that region . finally , let us look at the associated metric  ( [ metr ] ) , whose geodesics  in the `` regular '' case @xmath453  were argued to provide a complementary picture of particle scattering . for the irregular solutions of eqs . ( [ irrsol],[minpar ] ) , the relevant metric coefficients ( inside the light - wedges @xmath516 ) have the form    [ gmunu ] @xmath517    where the arrows label the simplified expressions obtained in the @xmath518 limit , which will be used for the purpose of the qualitative discussion below . we note that , for @xmath454 , @xmath519 shows a puzzling zero at @xmath520 , which causes a change of signature of the @xmath106-dimension for @xmath521  a feature to be taken with great caution because our perturbative identification of the metric coefficient is probably invalid in the strong - coupling region we are interested in . nevertheless , let us take the expressions  ( [ gmunu ] ) at face - value , and discuss the ensuing geodetic flow , in the transverse plane , which is strongly affected by the @xmath323-field singularity @xmath522 .    in order to do that , we shall introduce the test - particle lagrangian ( per unit mass ) @xmath523 with corresponding momenta and hamiltonian ( per unit mass )    [ momenta ] @xmath524    it is convenient to define the momenta per unit energy @xmath525 , so as to allow the treatment of the massless case too . by evaluating the constants of motion in the asymptotic region @xmath526 one finds that @xmath527 , @xmath528 and @xmath529 , where @xmath530 , @xmath531 and @xmath532 are the longitudinal , transverse and total ( asymptotic ) velocity , while @xmath533 is the impact parameter of the test particle w.r.t .  the @xmath272 axis . the test - particle motion is eventually described by the constants of motion @xmath534 , @xmath535 , @xmath536 and by the radial `` effective potential '' @xmath537    \longrightarrow -\left(1-\frac{r^*{}^2}{r^2}\right ) v_\perp^2\left(1     -\frac{\beta^2}{r^2+r^*{}^2}\right ) \;,\end{aligned}\ ] ] since @xmath538 . ( solid blue ) , @xmath539 ( dashed red ) , @xmath540 ( dotted green ) , @xmath541 ( dash - dotted brown ) . _ ]    [ f : potential ]    the @xmath542 geodesics are characterized by the fact that the transverse velocity @xmath531 ( if present ) is purely radial and the potential  ( [ potential ] ) is purely repulsive ( fig . [ f : potential ] ) , and would be typical of an angular momentum barrier with @xmath543 that  by lack of other explanations  we should attribute to the external source @xmath544 in eq . ( [ deltahc ] ) that we have put in at @xmath545 in order to justify the irregular solutions themselves . for @xmath546 the repulsive potential is absent , and the geodesics ( at @xmath547 , say ) will reach the shock - wave ( at @xmath548 , say ) at the initial distance @xmath106 , but will thereby acquire a shift and will be deflected according to the formula @xmath549 which takes into account the `` refraction index '' of the @xmath323-field . once again @xmath550 is unreachable : if initially we try to approach it , the geodesic scattering angle approaches @xmath551 , and the test particle is reflected backwards . we note at this point that the situation does change  unexpectedly  when @xmath552 increases and overcomes the threshold @xmath553 : in this case , according to eq .  ( [ potential ] ) , the centrifugal factor at the origin changes sign , so that the potential becomes partly attractive , close to the origin and above @xmath553 ( fig . [ f : potential ] ) . in particular , for @xmath540 the potential is everywhere attractive !    this somewhat surprising feature opens up the possibility that test particles may reach the small-@xmath106 region , at least at quantum level , because the small barrier has a transmission coefficient of order unity around the value @xmath540 , and is thus able to populate the small-@xmath106 region around @xmath476 in an efficient way . that feature is the counterpart of the selection of possible issues of the particles themselves , which was argued before to have sizeable probability for a small-@xmath4 exit on the basis of the action stationarity condition . furthermore , the test - particle action variable @xmath554 develops a logarithmic behaviour in the small-@xmath106 region with frequency @xmath555 : is that perhaps a possible interpretation of the time nature of the variable @xmath106 in that region ?    on the whole , we think , the above discussion shows  at a sort of `` phenomenological '' level  that the irregular solutions may indeed vehicle the particles information from distances of order @xmath11 down to the string size , thus suggesting that the unitarity loss of the @xmath453 model is due to the opening up of the gate to other worlds . however , due to the lack of the theoretical ingredients from string theory mentioned in the beginning , in the present formulation we have been unable to really assess the reliability of the above suggestion and to discuss the physical interpretation of the state(s ) , living at @xmath476 , which could be responsible for the singular contributions to the action investigated here and for their intriguing consequences . to sum up , in our study of the improved eikonal model with subleading correction we have found that :    * the source particles , after the interaction , besides being deflected , suffer a time delay which can be interpreted as a shift in the light - cone variables  ( sec . [ s : ilepp ] ) ; * the shock - wave metric fields @xmath556 generated by the source particles are also shifted in an analogous way , after the interaction described by the eikonal amplitude  ( sec . [ s : ssw ] ) ; * the subleading contributions to the eikonal , represented by the ( multi ) h - diagram and by the rescattering terms , provide corrections to the scattering angle of the particles and to the shifts of the metric fields @xmath556 and @xmath296  ( sec.[s : rcram ] ) . due to rescattering , the large - distance shift of the particle fields agrees with the scattering - angle description based on the action .    in order to find an adequate form for the self - consistent metric which embodies all these features , we have to modify the acv expression  ( [ metr ] ) . as far as the shock waves are concerned , the improved expressions are obtained from eq . ( [ hppr ] ) by replacing the leading profile function @xmath373 with the full profile function @xmath134 derived in sec . [ s : hd ] and by accordingly shifting the location of the shock waves of the amount @xmath557 as explained in sec . [ s : rssf ] .    in turn , the support @xmath558 of the transverse field @xmath296 is also shifted from the region @xmath516 to the two ( past and future ) disconnected regions @xmath559 where in the region @xmath560 after the interaction we have used the rotated coordinates of eq . ( [ rotation ] ) . equivalently , the characteristic function of @xmath561 reads @xmath562    the ensuing improved metric we propose is thus @xmath563   \nonumber \\   & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^+)^2 \delta\big(x^{+}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^-)\bar\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})\big ) \left [     2\pi r \bar{a}({\boldsymbol{x } } ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{-}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^+)\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})|   \right ]   \nonumber \\   & + ( { \mathrm{d}}x^-)^2 \delta(x^{-}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^+)\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})\big ) \left [     2\pi r a({\boldsymbol{x } } ) -{{\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}}(1-\dot\rho ) |x^{+}-\pi r { \epsilon}(x^-)\bar\delta({\boldsymbol{x}})|   \right ]   \nonumber \\   & + { \mathrm{d}}r^2\left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\chi({\sigma})\dot{\phi } \right ]   + { \mathrm{d}}\theta^2\,r^2 \left[1 + 2(\pi r)^2\chi({\sigma})(\dot{\phi }    + 2r^2\ddot{\phi})\right ] \;.   \label{metrica}\end{aligned}\ ] ] it takes into account all the physics results following the analysis of the improved eikonal model and the acv effective action , and is self - consistent , in the sense that the trajectory shifts caused by the shock - wave metric are felt by the metric itself .     of the metric field @xmath296 ( yellow ) . the ( pink ) rectangle @xmath564 actually corresponds to two different regions of space - time , which are accessed either from the left or from the right . _ ]    [ f : wedgeslice ]    a word of caution has to be spent concerning the form of the metric in eq . ( [ metrica ] ) in the region between the forward and past light - wedges . in fact , the set @xmath565 , @xmath566 enclosed by the continuation of the shock waves  represented by a rectangle @xmath564 for each longitudinal section at fixed @xmath142 as depicted in fig . [ f : wedgeslice ]  actually represents two distinct physical regions in our coordinate system . each region is unambiguously described by continuing the metric either from the left or from the right . for instance , by continuing the metric from the left across the boundary @xmath567 , we enter the region at the left of both shocks , where shock 1 travels from @xmath44 to @xmath568 , collides with shock 2 in @xmath568 , and after that shock 2 moves from @xmath568 to @xmath536 and goes on in the @xmath140 direction , as shown . on the other hand , either continuation leads to the same form of the metric inside the future light - wedge @xmath560 . we have also investigated here the scattering features of uv - sensitive solutions of the model in the subcritical range @xmath569 , without making a real attempt to restore the string degrees of freedom  which are nevertheless called for by the singular short - distance behaviour of the rescattering current . this preliminary analysis leads to the suggestion that such solutions may indeed carry the information from distances of order @xmath11 to distances of order @xmath476 , but a dynamical analysis in the string - dominated region is needed to find out about their fate . it is a pleasure to thank gabriele veneziano for various exchanges on the topics presented here , and domenico seminara for useful discussions . we start noticing that the field - insertions we shall consider are basically either _ ( a ) _ external ( fig .  [ f : hdiagraminsertions].a ) or _ ( b ) _ internal ( fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].b , c ) . here we shall concentrate on the final external insertion kinematics which  in the frame characterized by initial particle s momenta @xmath570 and final momenta @xmath571  is able to provide the full shift @xmath572 from past to future . the field @xmath573 is coupled to the charge @xmath574 and thus the insertion factor in front of the amplitude @xmath575 is @xmath576       \left(q^- - \frac{{\boldsymbol{q}}^2-{\mathrm{i}}{\varepsilon}}{q^+}\right ) q^+ }   \frac{{\mathrm{d}}^2{\boldsymbol{q}}}{(2\pi)^2 } { \mathrm{e}^{{\mathrm{i}}{\boldsymbol{q}}\cdot{\boldsymbol{x}}}}\ ] ] where @xmath577 and @xmath578 are both taken to the positive and larger than @xmath579 . the value of @xmath580 is fixed by the mass - shell and the @xmath581-integration is done in the lower half - plane because @xmath582 picking up the pole at @xmath583 . the result is @xmath584 { \mathrm{e}^{{\mathrm{i}}{\boldsymbol{q}}\cdot{\boldsymbol{x } } } } \label{htpp2}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    here we have kept for completeness the soft - emission contribution at @xmath585 also which is however suppressed by the phase factor exponent @xmath586 in the fast - emitting particle kinematics we are using . the dominant contribution , due to the @xmath587 pole , has a small phase factor @xmath588 , and thus it provides the @xmath276 result that we have anticipated in the text . limit the whole contribution  ( [ htpp ] ) vanishes for @xmath589 , because the @xmath581-integrand has both poles in the same half - plane . ] note also that the @xmath204-translation in the @xmath590 denominator is due to the scattering angle implied by the @xmath591 momentum transfer , which in a single - hit process is small , @xmath592 and is thus negligible . on the other hand , in the full scattering process we have that @xmath593 is sizeable , and the shock - wave is correspondingly rotated , as in eqs . ( [ hr],[hppr ] ) of the text .    therefore , for insertion on the eikonal lines in which @xmath594 and the amplitude factor is @xmath595 , we recover the insertion factor @xmath596 that we have repeatedly used in the text . here @xmath597 is the leading profile function of eq . ( [ a0 ] ) and the possible rotation along the scattered beams is understood .    in the case of the h - diagram , besides the insertion _ ( a ) _ on external lines ( already computed in the text ) we have in principle two insertions , one of which is on the internal ( eikonal ) propagators . we think that this one ( fig . [ f : hdiagraminsertions].b ) is already included by the lipatov s vertices , which by definition count the external particles emissions also . therefore , in order to avoid double - counting we only estimate here the insertion on the rescattering graviton propagator of momentum @xmath598 in fig .  [ f : hdiagraminsertions].c , as emitted by lipatov s vertices .      by going through the same steps as before , we perform the @xmath581-integration first ( by keeping the leading @xmath587 contribution only ) and we have , in addition , a weighted @xmath600-integration , as follows : @xmath601    in the strong ordering region @xmath602 we estimate the effect of the ( small ) @xmath204-translation ( or @xmath591-dependent rotation ) by redefining @xmath603 and neglecting the translation in the matrix element @xmath604 . the integral in @xmath605 becomes @xmath606 by thus factorizing the exponential @xmath607 which modifies the subsequent @xmath578 and @xmath216 integrations . by performing the latter in the phase - space @xmath608 , we obtain in turn the factor @xmath609 \nonumber \\    & \simeq \log(\sqrt{s}b ) \;{\mathrm{i}}\partial_- \delta(x^- ) \times    \left[1+{\mathcal{o}\left(\frac1{\sqrt{s}b}\right)}\right ] \;.\end{aligned}\ ] ] we can see here the small shock - wave rotation @xmath610 which has been neglected in front of the logarithmic phase space . by then collecting the various factors we obtain the result @xmath611 \;,\ ] ] where we have defined @xmath612({\boldsymbol{x } } ) & \equiv \pi r^2 y\int{\mathrm{d}}^2 { \boldsymbol{x}}'\;|{\tilde{h}}({\boldsymbol{x}}')|^2 g_0({\boldsymbol{x}}-{\boldsymbol{x } } ' )    \stackrel{r\gg b}{\simeq } a_0(r)\cdot\im a_h(b ) \ ; , \\    \im a_h & = \frac{2y}{\pi}\re a_h \;. \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] this shift of the imaginary part and the corresponding one for the real part add up to the total shift @xmath613 of both real and imaginary parts due to the external line insertion @xmath614 and thus occurs at large distances only with a relative minus sign , as emphasized in the text . 99 d.  amati , m.  ciafaloni and g.  veneziano , `` superstring collisions at planckian energies , '' phys . b * 197 * ( 1987 ) 81 ; `` classical and quantum gravity effects from planckian energy superstring collisions , '' int . j.  mod . phys .   a * 3 * ( 1988 ) 1615 ; `` can space - time be probed below the string size ? , '' phys . b * 216 * ( 1989 ) 41 . d.  j.  gross and p.  f.  mende , `` the high - energy behavior of string scattering amplitudes , '' phys . b * 197 * ( 1987 ) 129 ; `` string theory beyond the planck scale , '' nucl . b * 303 * ( 1988 ) 407 . d.  amati , m.  ciafaloni and g.  veneziano , `` higher order gravitational deflection and soft bremsstrahlung in planckian energy superstring collisions , '' nucl . b * 347 * ( 1990 ) 550 . d.  amati , m.  ciafaloni and g.  veneziano , `` effective action and all order gravitational eikonal at planckian energies , '' nucl . b * 403 * , 707 ( 1993 ) . d.  amati , m.  ciafaloni and g.  veneziano , `` towards an @xmath1-matrix description of gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0802 * ( 2008 ) 049 [ arxiv:0712.1209 [ hep - th ] ] . m.  ciafaloni and d.  colferai , `` s - matrix and quantum tunneling in gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0811 * ( 2008 ) 047 [ arxiv:0807.2117 [ hep - th ] ] . m.  ciafaloni and d.  colferai , `` quantum tunneling and unitarity features of an @xmath1-matrix for gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 0912 * ( 2009 ) 062 [ arxiv:0909.4523 [ hep - th ] ] . p.  c.  aichelburg and r.  u.  sexl , `` on the gravitational field of a massless particle , '' gen . rel .  grav . * 2 * ( 1971 ) 303 . a.  einstein , l.  infeld and b.  hoffmann , `` the gravitational equations and the problem of motion , '' annals math . * 39 * ( 1938 ) 65 . + a.  einstein and l.  infeld , `` the gravitational equations and the problem of motion . 2 . , '' annals math . * 41 * ( 1940 ) 455 . m.  ciafaloni , d.  colferai and g.  falcioni , `` unitarity alternatives in the reduced - action model for gravitational collapse , '' jhep * 1109 * ( 2011 ) 044 [ arxiv:1106.5628 [ hep - th ] ] . g.  t hooft , `` graviton dominance in ultrahigh - energy scattering , '' phys . b * 198 * ( 1987 ) 61 . d.  amati , m.  ciafaloni and g.  veneziano , private communication . l.  n.  lipatov , `` high - energy scattering in qcd and in quantum gravity and two - dimensional field theories , '' nucl .  phys . b * 365 * ( 1991 ) 614 . r.  kirschner and l.  szymanowski , `` effective action for high - energy scattering in gravity , '' phys .  rev . d * 52 * ( 1995 ) 2333 [ arxiv : hep - th/9412087 ] . l.  n.  lipatov , `` multi - regge processes in gravitation , '' sov . jetp * 55 * ( 1982 ) 582 [ zh . * 82 * ( 1982 ) 991 ] . g.  dappollonio , p.  di vecchia , r.  russo and g.  veneziano , `` high - energy string - brane scattering : leading eikonal and beyond , '' jhep * 1011 * ( 2010 ) 100 [ arxiv:1008.4773 [ hep - th ] ] . s.  b.  giddings , d.  j.  gross and a.  maharana , `` gravitational effects in ultrahigh - energy string scattering , '' phys .  rev . d * 77 * ( 2008 ) 046001 [ arxiv:0705.1816 [ hep - th ] ] . v.  s.  rychkov , private communication .
Abstract:

Answer: starting from the acv approach to transplanckian scattering , we present a development of the reduced - action model in which the ( improved ) eikonal representation is able to describe particles motion at large scattering angle and , furthermore , uv - safe ( regular ) rescattering solutions are found and incorporated in the metric . the resulting particles shock - waves undergo calculable trajectory shifts and time delays during the scattering process  which turns out to be consistently described by both action and metric , up to relative order @xmath0 in the gravitational radius over impact parameter expansion . some suggestions about the role and the ( re)scattering properties of irregular solutions  not fully investigated here  are also presented .