Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: materials with correlated electrons exhibit some of the most intriguing quantum states in condensed matter physics @xcite . since the number of electric charge carriers essentially determines such states , external electric or light field can be applied for controllable manipulations . stability of electric field or light induced states has been demonstrated in some novel systems , where switching occurs between neighboring equilibrium thermodynamic states @xcite . this powerful characteristic can be applied in electric devices such as transistors and memories , which are of great importance to not only the fundamental physics research but also the information processing technology @xcite . correlated materials with a rich set of quantum states delicately balanced on a similar energy scale will be promising platforms to realize such devices . ( a ) crystal structure of @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . ( b ) top view of ta - ta plane of @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . the unit cells of conventional @xmath0 structure and low temperature ccdw structure are denoted with green solid and dashed lines , respectively . the black hexagrams are the so - called `` david star '' pattern in ccdw phase . ( c ) schematic diagrams of `` david star '' ( left ) , ccdw ( middle ) , and nccdw ( right ) in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . ]    the transition metal dichalcogenide ( tmd ) @xmath0-tas@xmath1 is one of the promising candidate due to the multiple competing ground states in it @xcite . as shown in fig . [ fig_1_structure ] ( a ) , @xmath0-tas@xmath1 shows a cdi@xmath1-type layered crystal structure with ta atoms octahedrally coordinated by s atoms . a unit layer consists of one ta layer sandwiched between two s layers . at low temperatures , strong @xmath4-dependent electron - phonon coupling induced periodic lattice distortion makes a @xmath5 superlattice @xcite , in which ta atoms displace to make `` david star '' clusters ( fig . [ fig_1_structure ] ( b ) ) . the outer twelve atoms within each star move slightly towards the atom at the center , leading to the commensurate charge - density - wave ( ccdw ) ground state . in particular , in ccdw state , the correlation effect of @xmath6 electrons of ta atoms turns the system into mott insulating state @xcite . upon heating to 225 k , it undergoes a sequence of first order phase transition to a nearly commensurate ( nc ) cdw . the nccdw phase is composed of metallic incommensurate ( ic ) network and mott insulating ccdw domains . the ccdw domains shrink upon heating and finally disappear at 355 k , while the system transforms to iccdw state . the standard metallic @xmath0 structure appears above 535 k. moreover , when ccdw state is suppressed , superconductivity emerges in this system @xcite . one can expect that the controllable switching between those states will be helpful for figuring out the mechanism of cdw and superconductivity , and realizing the high performance memory and transistor in future technology . to meet this goal , many groups performed investigations on this novel material . yu et al . reported a gate - controlled li ion intercalation can suppress ccdw and introduce superconducivity @xcite . tsen et al . @xcite , hollander et al . @xcite , yoshida et al . @xcite , and mihailovic et al . @xcite reported the in - plane electric field induced transition from ccdw state to nccdw or some metastable hidden state . cho et al . applied perpendicular electric pulse on @xmath0-tas@xmath1 and found positive electric pulse can introduce ic network to suppress mott state at low temperature @xcite . moreover , zhang et al . @xcite , mihailovic et al . @xcite , and han et al . @xcite suggested that light can introduce a transition from ccdw state to nccdw or hidden state as well . in all those manipulations , the transitions are considered to be determined by the charge carrier doping . however , the mechanisms of such transitions are not fully clear yet .    in this work , we simulated by first - principles calculations the charge carrier doping effect on cdw in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . we found that ccdw is stable upon electron doping , while hole doping significantly suppresses ccdw instability , implying different mechanisms of recently reported electric and photoelectric manipulations of cdw in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . we figured out such mechanism by analysis of carrier doping effects . furthermore , we show that superconductivity with @xmath2 about @xmath3 k can be introduced by hole doping in the system . the density functional theory ( dft ) calculations were carried out using quantum espresso package @xcite with ultrasoft pseudopotentials . the exchange - correlation interaction was treated with the generalized gradient approximation ( gga ) with pw91 parametrization @xcite . the energy cutoff for the plane - wave basis set was 35 ry . the marzari - vanderbilt fermi smearing method @xcite with a smearing parameter of @xmath7 ry was used for the calculations of the total energy and electron charge density . to simulate the monolayer , a vacuum layer more than 15 @xmath8 was introduced . for the bulk sample , brillouin zone sampling is performed on the monkhorst - pack ( mp ) mesh @xcite of @xmath9 , while a denser @xmath10 grid was used in the electron phonon coupling calculations . phonon dispersions were calculated using density functional perturbation theory ( dfpt ) @xcite with an @xmath11 mesh of @xmath12-points . for the monolayer sample , @xmath13-points grids of @xmath14 and @xmath15 and @xmath12-points grids of @xmath16 are used . since the frequency and stability of soft phonon modes were found to be very sensitive to the plane - wave cutoff for the charge density , a large cutoff of 1500 ry was used for the charge density in the phonon calculations @xcite . all the calculation parameters were well tested . in the investigation of carrier doping effects , the electron / hole doping was simulated by increasing / decreasing the total electron numbers of the system , together with a compensating uniform positive / negative background to maintain the charge neutrality . the crystal structure of each doped sample was optimized with respect to lattice parameters and atomic positions . for comparisons , we also calculated some doped samples by using the lattice parameters of pristine tas@xmath1 and relaxing the atomic positions , as described later . the low symmetry cdw structure is usually considered as the high symmetry phase with distortion introduced by some instability . therefore , we firstly investigated carrier doping effects in the bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . the electronic structures and phonon properties for the samples with different doping level were calculated . as examples , figure [ fig_2_bulk ] shows the calculated band structures and fermi surfaces of the pristine bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with the doping level of @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , and the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . as expected , electron doping increases the lattice parameters and hole doping shrinks the lattice ( figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( j ) and ( k ) ) . for the pristine tas@xmath1 , our results are of good agreement with the previous calculations @xcite . there is a gap of @xmath18 ev below fermi energy ( @xmath19 ) ( fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( b ) ) . in the @xmath20-@xmath21 direction , the two bands around the gap are nearly flat due to the quasi-2d nature of the layered structure . the band above the gap crosses fermi energy ( @xmath19 ) , forming a 2d electron pocket around @xmath22 point ( figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( b ) and ( e ) ) . such gap increases upon electron doping and decreases upon hole doping ( figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( a ) and ( c ) ) . electron doping increases @xmath19 . as shown in figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( a ) and ( d ) , for the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . the rise of @xmath19 expands and opens up the original electron pockets around @xmath22 , leaving hole pockets centered at @xmath23 point . besides the original band crossing @xmath19 , a band with higher energy starts to cross @xmath19 , forming a 2d cylinder - like electron pocket around the zone center . on the contrary , the hole doping enhances the dispersion in the @xmath20-@xmath21 direction and weakens the quasi-2d nature by shrinking the lattice and decreasing the interlayer distance . as shown in figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( c ) and ( f ) , for the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . , the bands close to @xmath19 are not flat anymore . hole doping reduces @xmath19 . the decrease of @xmath19 shrinks the original electron pockets around m point . moreover , a lower energy band starts to cross @xmath19 , forming a 3d hole pocket around @xmath20 point . the phonon instability of the high symmetry structure is considered to be directly related to the cdw distortion : at high temperatures , the phonon of the high symmetry structure softens at cdw vector ( @xmath24 ) . above the transition temperature the phonon frequency near @xmath24 drops but does not go to zero . just below the transition temperature the phonon frequency near @xmath24 is imaginary , meaning there is a restructuring of lattice with a superlattice vector of @xmath24 @xcite . therefore , phonon dispersion without imaginary frequency implies that the structure is stable compared to cdw structure . the phonon calculation is proved to be an effective method to simulate the cdw instability : the calculated phonon dispersions show instability just locating at @xmath24 of some tmds @xcite . more specially , for the present @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , experimental report showed cdw can be suppressed by pressure @xcite , which is correctly simulated by liu s phonon calculation @xcite . in this work we also performed the phonon calculations on each sample . for the pristine @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , our calculation is of good agreement with liu s calculation ( fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( h ) ) . the phonon dispersion show instability very close to the ccdw vector @xmath25 . this instability persists at all values of @xmath26 , as shown in inset of fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( h ) . for the electron doped sample , the acoustic branches become more unstable . as shown in fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( g ) , the unstable modes in the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . appear in @xmath23-@xmath22 and @xmath23-@xmath20 directions , indicating the area of instability are largely expanded . on the contrary , the hole doping significantly stabilizes lattice . as shown in fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( i ) , no unstable mode can be found in the phonon dispersion of the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . since the lowest mode in the pristine tas@xmath1 locates near @xmath27 , we used such mode as an indicator of doping effect on ccdw in tas@xmath1 . the frequency variation of such mode under doping is shown in fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( l ) . one can note that upon electron doping the mode is always unstable in bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , while hole doping significantly suppresses the instability . according to our calculation , the lattice becomes completely stable when the doping level is higher than @xmath28 electrons / f.u . since hole doping shrinks the lattice as the high pressure does , we should figure out the suppression of ccdw under hole doping is majorly attributed to whether the lattice compression or to the pure doping effect . we calculated a hypothetic doped @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with n=0.3 holes / f.u . , in which the lattice parameters are fixed to those of the undoped pristine @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . as shown in fig . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( l ) , ccdw can be suppressed by just doping holes into @xmath0-tas@xmath1 without changing its lattice volume . that demonstrates the suppression of ccdw in the present case is predominately by the hole doping effect . furthermore , we investigated the doping induced energy and the distortion variations in the ccdw state for the pristine tas@xmath1 , the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , and the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . we defined the ccdw formation energy @xmath29 as @xmath30 where @xmath31 and @xmath32 are the total energies of the relaxed ccdw structure and the @xmath0 structure . the distortion rations @xmath33 can be expressed as    @xmath34    and @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the in - plane lattice parameter of the undistorted @xmath0 structure , @xmath37 and @xmath37 are radius of the inner and outer circles of `` david star '' , as shown in fig . 3 ( b ) . for @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with ccdw structure , the layers stacking order is not clear yet . therefore , we simply construct the @xmath38 supercell with 39 atoms to simulate the ccdw structure . we relaxed the atomic positions using the lattice parameters @xmath39 and @xmath40 , where @xmath36 and @xmath40 are from figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( j ) and ( k ) , respectively . in the relaxed ccdw structures , we found that for the pristine tas@xmath1 and the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . [ fig_3_charge ] ( b ) and ( a ) ) , the distortion ratios are large , while the formation energies of those are negative . on the other hand , the distortion ratios of the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . are nearly zero ( fig . [ fig_3_charge ] ( c ) ) , and the energy difference between the relaxed supercell and the @xmath0 unit cell is very small ( @xmath41 mev ) , i.e. the ccdw structure relaxes to high symmetry @xmath0 structure . we also relaxed the atomic positions with @xmath36 and @xmath40 fixed to those in the pristine tas@xmath42 to prevent the volume variation . with the lattice parameters of the pristine tas@xmath42 , the doped tas@xmath42 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u can be seen as under pressure . however , the ccdw is still stable . on the other hand , without doping introduced volume shrinking , in the doped tas@xmath42 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . the ccdw is still not favorable in energy . such results of the ccdw supercell coincide well with our deductions based on the analysis of the phonon instabilities of the @xmath0 unit cell . if we simply consider that the roles of electron / hole doping on the electronic structures are to increase / decrease @xmath19 , we can estimate the population of the added / removed electrons when electron / hole doping and understand the calculated results more clearly . figure [ fig_3_charge ] ( d ) shows the density of states ( dos ) near @xmath19 of the pristine tas@xmath42 in the ccdw structure calculated directly by dft . based on the integrations of the dos upwards / downwards from @xmath19 , we can see that if one electron is doped into a `` david star '' ( the doping level is equal to @xmath43 electron / f.u . ) , it will be mainly added into the center of the `` david star '' . obviously , it will enhance the clustering of the charge density . therefore , ccdw is stable upon electron doping . on the contrary , doping one hole into a `` david star '' will notably decrease the charge density at the center and inner atoms of the `` david star '' , which will weaken the charge density clustering . therefore , ccdw is suppressed upon hole doping . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     the doping effects in the bulk tas@xmath1 investigated using the low symmetry ccdw structure . ( a ) , ( b ) , and ( c ) are the charge density in ta - ta plane of the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , pristine tas@xmath1 , and the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . , respectively . ( d ) dos of the pristine tas@xmath1 directly calculated in ccdw structure . the colored areas below and above @xmath19 denote the electron density which can be integrated to one electron . the related electron charge densities are plotted in the insets of ( d ) . ] the doping effects in monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . for the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , pristine tas@xmath1 , and the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . , ( a ) , ( b ) , and ( c ) are the band dispersions of those samples , ( d ) , ( e ) , and ( f ) are the fermi surfaces , and ( g ) , ( h ) , and ( i ) are the phonon dispersions , respectively . the red dashed lines show the phonon dispersion of undoped monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with tensile strain of 5% . ] schematic picture of suppression of ccdw by hole doping . ( a ) the situation of tas@xmath1 in the ccdw state when holes are doped locally . the solid orange `` david stars '' are the area under ccdw distortion . the hollow orange `` david stars '' are the area in which only one hole per a `` david star '' is doped , which are still under ccdw distortion . the dashed light orange `` david stars '' are the area with more doped holes , in which the ccdw distortion is fully suppressed . the black arrows denote the diffusion of the doped holes . ( b ) the schematic band structure of tas@xmath1 with ccdw distortion . ( c ) the schematic band structure of tas@xmath1 with ccdw distortion when one hole per `` david star '' is doped . ( d ) the schematic band structure of tas@xmath1 in @xmath0 structure . ]        we also investigate the doping effect in monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . as examples , fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] shows the calculated electronic structures and phonon properties of the monolayer pristine tas@xmath1 , the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , and the doped tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u in @xmath0 structure . for the undoped pristine monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , the band structure is similar to that of pristine bulk sample . one band crosses @xmath19 , forming a 2d electron pocket around @xmath22 point ( figs . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( b ) and ( e ) ) . there is a gap of  0.8 ev below the band crossing @xmath19 . in the electrons and holes doped monolayer samples , the gap slightly changes , which is different from the case of bulk samples . for the doped monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . , the band structure is slightly different from that of the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( a ) ) . although @xmath19 changes with electron doping , there is still only one band crossing @xmath19 . the 2d cylinder - like electron pocket in the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 electrons / f.u . does not appear in monolayer sample ( fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( d ) ) . for the doped monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath17 holes / f.u . , there is only one band crossing @xmath19 ( fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( c ) ) . similar to the case of bulk samples , the phonon calculation shows that the cdw instability in the monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 can not be suppressed by electron doping ( fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( g ) ) , while it can be suppressed under hole doping ( fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( i ) ) . the result indicates the suppression of ccdw in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 is not due to the hole doping enhanced band dispersion along @xmath20-@xmath21 direction ( figs . [ fig_2_bulk ] ( c ) and ( f ) ) . the suppression should be attributed to the weakening of the electron - phonon coupling at @xmath24 upon hole doping .    besides , one may note in the monolayer sample , a small instability near @xmath20 can be found in the phonon dispersion ( fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( h ) ) . in a very recent calculation of phonon dispersion of monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 by zhang et al . @xcite , there is a similar instability near @xmath20 . such instability is consistent with the instability against long - wavelength transversal waves @xcite . this instability is suggest to be fixed by defects , such as ripples or grain boundaries , which do not allow these waves by limiting the size @xcite . furthermore , we found tensile strain can suppress such instability near @xmath20 , which can be easily applied to monolayer materials @xcite . as an example , in fig . [ fig_4_monolayer ] ( h ) , the red dashed lines show the phonon dispersion of @xmath0-tas@xmath1 under a tensile strain of 5% , in which the instability near @xmath20 is suppressed . the observation indicates that the application of tensile strain is helpful for stabilizing the experimentally exfoliated monolayer or fewlayer @xmath0-tas@xmath42 . based on our calculations of phonon properties in @xmath0 structure , ccdw formation energies and distortion ratios in ccdw structure , we can conclude that when the doping level is above @xmath28 holes / f.u . ( 2.6 holes per a `` david stars '' ) , ccdw can be completely suppressed in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 for bulk and monolayer , i.e. all the `` david stars '' should be melted . experimentally , holes can directly be introduced by a positive electric field perpendicular to the sample @xcite , or by light @xcite . one can expect that in reality the doped holes will firstly distribute in a local area and gradually diffuse out , i.e. even the doping level might be much lower than 0.2 holes / f.u . , in the local area , the doping level could be high enough to melt the `` david stars '' in this area and destroy the long - range ccdw , as shown in fig . [ fig_5_hole_mechanism ] ( a ) . we describe the possible picture of such process here : in @xmath0 structure , the electronic structure near @xmath19 are formed predominantly from a single ta @xmath44 band , which splits into subbands by the formation of ccdw state . six of these subbands are fulfilled with 12 electrons per new ccdw unit cell , forming a manifold of occupied states . the 13th leftover electron is localized on the central ta atom of the `` david stars '' , forming a half - filled subband at @xmath19 . this half - filled subband further splits by the coulomb interaction into upper and lower hubbard bands ( uhb and lhb ) , as shown in fig . [ fig_5_hole_mechanism ] ( b ) . light or positive perpendicular electric filed can firstly excite one electron from lhb to uhb , and create one hole in lhb ( fig . [ fig_5_hole_mechanism ] ( c ) ) . in real space , the hole doped by light or positive perpendicular electric filed locates at the center of the `` david stars '' , leaving a polaron with an excess charge . the other 12 electrons in this polaron are still star - shaped around the central , thus screening the excess charge . when more holes are doped into the `` david stars '' , the ccdw distortion is suppressed locally , the structure transforms into @xmath0 in the doping area . the splitting subbands merge to a single band again ( fig . [ fig_5_hole_mechanism ] ( d ) ) . in this case , the `` david stars '' shaped clusters are annihilated and can not screen the holes any more . so the holes diffuse into neighboring `` david stars '' . therefore , upon hole doping in @xmath0-tas@xmath42 in ccdw phase , ccdw should firstly transform to a nccdw or metastable phase composed of ccdw domains and iccdw network . for example , cho et al . @xcite applied a very small positive perpendicular voltage pulse on @xmath0-tas@xmath1 single crystal sample within a typical scanning tunneling microscope ( stm ) set - up . since local hole concentration under the stm tip is largely enhanced , a pulse creates a textured cdw domain of a few tens of nanometers with an irregular domain wall network inside . they considered that such network is consistent with those in the thermally excited nccdw phase @xcite . besides , di / dv measured implies the weakening and broadening of the hubbard states together with the reduction of the mott gap inside the textured cdw domain induced by positive perpendicular electric filed @xcite . that is corresponding to our picture : holes diffuse from the domain wall into the neighboring area inside the domain . although the concentration of the diffused holes is not high enough to suppress ccdw distortion inside the domain , it can create the hole - electron pair in lhb and uhb to reduce the mott gap . moreover , the photoexcitation of electrons can be considered as directly doping holes into system . mihailovic s group found a laser pulse can introduce a transition from ccdw to a hidden state in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 thin flake @xcite . the raman spectrum of such hidden state is completely different from that in ccdw and nccdw phases @xcite . such hidden state is demonstrated to be a metastable phase , which is different from nccdw , but should be composed of ccdw domains and iccdw network as well @xcite . han et al . observed the electron diffraction spots varies from ccdw case to iccdw case when applying laser to tas@xmath1 in ccdw phase @xcite . very recently , zhang et al . showed laser can introduce a ccdw - nccdw transition in bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 single crystal @xcite . on the other hand , in experiments upon hole doping in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 in high temperature phase , the ccdw transition temperature is significantly lowered @xcite . both the two kinds of structural evidences can be well explained by our calculation . for the sake of illustration we draw , we drew a schematic diagram to describe the mechanism of the hole doping induced ccdw - nccdw / metastable phase transition , as shown in figs . [ fig_6_mechanism ] ( a ) , ( b ) and ( c ) . in the pristine @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , ccdw phase has the lowest energy ( fig . [ fig_6_mechanism ] ( a ) ) . the hole doping by perpendicular field or by light can stabilize lattice and largely increase the energy of ccdw phase . in this case , the system transforms to nccdw or other metastable phase ( figs . [ fig_6_mechanism ] ( b ) and ( c ) ) .    on the other hand , according to our calculation , ccdw lattice distortion is stable upon electron doping . according to the report by cho et al . , negative perpendicular voltage pulses could not make change in ccdw state @xcite , which is consistent with our estimation . however , some recent experimental works suggest the opposite results . doped electron into @xmath0-tas@xmath1 by intercalation of li ions and found ccdw can be suppressed @xcite . the intercalated ions can not only carry electrons , but also strongly influence the lattice structures and induce disorder , which can suppress cdw in tmds @xcite . therefore , one can not simply attribute the suppression to the electron doping . to demonstrate the pure electron doping effect on cdw , more direct doping experiments by negative perpendicular electric field or liquid - gated method should perform . some works reported the suppression of ccdw by in - plane electric field @xcite . by measuring the temperature dependence of resistivity ( @xmath45 ) , yoshida et al . found the in - plane field can not affect the nccdw / iccdw transition in @xmath45 curve , but can introduce a metastable state with very low resistivity at low temperatures @xcite . if we consider that the @xmath45 in ccdw , nccdw , and iccdw reflects the related structural characteristics , one can infer that the in - plane field induced the metastable state with different structural characteristics , i.e. the in - plane field can suppress ccdw distortion as well . the suppressions of ccdw by the in - plane field are usually explained as electron injection effect @xcite . however , according to our calculation , ccdw could be stable upon electron doping . therefore , the effect of in - plane field should be more complex . we consider some potential mechanisms of the suppressions by in - plane field : besides the pure charge carrier injection , one can expect that the in - plane electric field can also force the electrons in the `` david star '' to be delocalized . moreover , the in - plane electric field might depinning the cdw , which is suggested in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 bulk single crystals @xcite . the suppression of ccdw by in - plane electric field might also be due to the thermal activation by local joule heating as current flows through the material . the real mechanism of the suppression of ccdw by in - plane field needs to be figured out by more experimental and theoretical works . here we only offer a general description of such process : although ccdw state might still have the lower energy , the in - plane electric field can drive the system to cross over the energy barrier from ccdw to nccdw or other metastable phase , as shown in the schematic diagram in fig . [ fig_6_mechanism ] ( d ) . eliashberg function ( left ) and the integrated electron - phonon coupling strength ( right ) for ( a ) the doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath46 holes / f.u . and ( b ) the doped monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath47 holes / f.u . under a tensile strain of 2.5% , respectively . ]    as described above , once long range ccdw is suppressed , the transition between mott insulating state to metallic state can be observed : when ccdw is suppressed , domain walls show up , which can be seen as conducting channels to induce metallic state @xcite . in the ccdw area near the domain walls , the hubbard states are weakening and broadening and the mott gap is reduced . @xcite . furthermore , superconductivity can emerge in percolated metallic ic network @xcite . while we are not able to directly model the textured ic phase , we can still estimate the superconductivity using @xmath0 structure qualitatively . approximately using the high symmetry doped bulk @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath46 holes / f.u . and the doped monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 with @xmath47 holes / f.u . under a tensile strain of 2.5% , for which all the phonon instabilities are just suppressed , we estimated the potential carrier doping induced superconductivity by the electron - phonon coupling calculation . figure [ fig_7_a2f ] shows the calculated eliashberg spectral function @xmath48 where @xmath49 is the density of states at @xmath19 , @xmath50 is phonon frequency , @xmath51 is electronic energy , and @xmath52 is electron - phonon coupling matrix element . the total electron - phonon coupling strength is then @xmath53 the calculated @xmath54 for the two samples are 0.81 and 0.96 , respectively . we estimated @xmath2 based on the modified mcmillan formula @xcite : @xmath55 where the coulomb pseudopotential @xmath56 is set to a typical value of @xmath57 . the logarithmically averaged characteristic phonon frequency @xmath58 is defined as @xmath59 the calculated @xmath58 for the two samples are 136.7 and 98.4 k , respectively . using those parameters , we can estimate that the superconductivity with @xmath2 of @xmath3 k can emerge in the hole doped @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . to observe the superconductivity we predicted , the doping induced metallic network between ccdw domain in nccdw or other metastable phase must be percolated , which requires experimental devices with ability to dope more holes . recently , suda et al . suggested a high level hole doping technique using photoactive electric double layer @xcite , which might be applied to verify our prediction . in conclusion , based on the first - principles calculation , we simulated the carrier doping effect in the bulk and monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . we found that ccdw is stable upon electron doping , while hole doping can notably suppress the ccdw . according to our analysis , the different mechanisms of the reported electric and photoelectric manipulations of ccdw in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 are figured out : light or positive perpendicular electric field induced hole doping significantly increases the energy of ccdw , so that the system transforms to nccdw or similar metastable state . although the ccdw distortion is more stable upon the in - plane electric field induced electron injection , some accompanied effects can drive the system to cross over the energy barrier from ccdw to nccdw or similar metastable state . we also estimated that a potential superconductivity with @xmath2 of @xmath3 k can be introduced by hole doping in the system . by tuning the carrier density , controllable switching of different states such as ccdw / mott insulating state , metallic state , and even the superconducting state can be realized in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , which makes the novel material have a very promising application in the future electronic devices . we thank prof . z. g. sheng and dr . y. z. zhang for helpful discussion . this work was supported by the national key research and development program under contract no . 2016yfa0300404 , the national nature science foundation of china ( grant no . 11674326 , 11304320 , 11274311 , 11404340 , 1408085ma11 , and u1232139 ) . 10 m. imada , a. fujimori , and y. tokura , rev . 70 , 1039 ( 1998 ) . e. dagotto , rev . 66 , 763 ( 1994 ) . p. a. lee , n. nagaosa , and x. -g . wen , rev . 78 , 17 ( 2006 ) . h. ohno , d. chiba , f. matsukura , t. omiya , e. abe , t. dietl , y. ohno , and k. ohtani , nature 408 , 944 ( 2000 ) . y. yamada , k. ueno , t. fukumura , h. t. yuan , h. shimotani , y. iwasa , l. gu , s. tsukimoto , y. ikuhara , and m. kawasaki , science 332 , 1065 ( 2011 ) . r. e. glover , iii and m. d. sherrill , phys . lett . 5 , 248 ( 1960 ) . n. takubo , y. ogimoto , m. nakamura , h. tamaru , m. izumi , and k. miyano , phys . 95 , 017404 ( 2005 ) . a. zakery , s. r. elliott , optical nonlinearities in chalcogenide glasses and their applications ( springer , new york , 2007 ) . m. nakano , k. shibuya , d. okuyama , t. hatano , s. ono , m. kawasaki , y. iwasa , and y. tokura , nature 487 , 459 ( 2012 ) . j. a. wilson , f. j. di salvo , and s. mahajan , adv . 24 , 117 ( 1975 ) . a. y. liu , phy . b 79 , 220515(r ) ( 2009 ) . y. ge and amy y. liu , phy . rev . 155133 ( 2010 ) . y. liu , d. f. shao , l. j. li , w. j. lu , x. d. zhu , p. tong , r. c. xiao , l. s. ling , c. y. xi , l. pi , h. f. tian , h. x. yang , j. q. li , w. h. song , x. b. zhu , y. p. sun , phys . b 94 , 045131 ( 2016 ) . p. darancet , a. j. millis , and c.a . marianetti , phys . b 90 , 045134 ( 2014 ) . r. ang , y. tanaka , e. ieki , k. nakayama , t. sato , l. j. li , w. j. lu , y. p. sun , and t. takahashi , phys . 109 , 176403 ( 2012 ) . r. ang , y. miyata , e. ieki , k. nakayama , t. sato , y. liu , w. j. lu , y. p. sun , and t. takahashi , phys . b 88 , 115145 ( 2013 ) . b. sipos , a. f. kusmartseva , a. akrap , h. berger , l. forr , and e. tuti , nature mater . 7 , 960 ( 2008 ) . y. liu , r. ang , w. j. lu , w. h. song , l. j. li , and y. p. sun , appl . 102 , 192602 ( 2013 ) . l. j. li , w. j. lu , x. d. zhu , l. s. ling , z. qu , and y. p. sun , europhys . 97 , 67005 ( 2012 ) . y. yu , f. yang , x. f. lu , y. j. yan , y. -h . cho , l. ma , x. niu , s. kim , y. -w . son , d. feng , s. li , s. -w . cheong , x. h. chen , and y. zhang , nat . 10 , 270 ( 2015 ) . a. w. tsen , r. hovden , d. wang , y. d. kim , j. okamoto , k. a. spoth , y. liu , w. j. lu , y. p. sun , j. hone , l. f. kourkoutis , p. kim , and a. n. pasupathy , pnas 8 , 15054(2015 ) . m. j. hollander , y. liu , w. j. lu , l. j. li , y. p. sun , j. a. robinson , and s. datta , nano lett . 15 , 1861 ( 2015 ) . masaro yoshida , ryuji suzuki , yijin zhang , masaki nakano , and yoshihiro iwasa , sci . adv . 1 , e1500606 ( 2015 ) . i. vaskivskyi , i. a. mihailovic , s. brazovskii , j. gospodaric , t. mertelj , d. svetin , p. sutar and d. mihailovic , arxiv:1409,3794 ( 2014 ) . i. vaskivskyi , j. gospodaric , s. brazovskii , d. svetin , p , sutar , e. goreshnik , i. a. mihailovic , t. mertelj , and d. mihailovic , sci . adv . 1 , e1500168 ( 2015 ) . d. cho , s. cheon , k. -s . kim , s. -h . lee , y. -h . cho , s. -w . cheong , and h. w. yeom , nature comm . 7 , 10453 ( 2016 ) . y. z. zhang , z. g. sheng , et al . , private communication . l. stojchevska , i. vaskivskyi , t. mertelj , p. kusar , d. svetin , s. brazovskii , and d. mihailovic , science 344 , 177 ( 2014 ) . t. -r . t. han , f.zhou , c. d. malliakas , p. m. duxbury , s. d. mahanti , m. g. kanatzidis , and c. -y . ruan , sci . adv . 1 , e1400173 ( 2015 ) . p. giannozzi , et al . , j. phys . : condens . matter 21 , 395502 ( 2009 ) . j. p. perdew , j. a. chevary , s. h. vosko , k. a. jackson , m. r. pederson , d. j. singh , and c. fiolhais , phys . rev . b 46 , 6671 ( 1992 ) . n. marzari , d. vanderbilt , a. de vita , and m. c. payne , phys . 82 , 3296 ( 1999 ) . h. j. monkhorst and j. d. pack , phys . b 13 , 5188 ( 1976 ) . s. baroni , s. de gironcoli , a. dal corso , and p. giannozi , rev . 73 , 515 ( 2001 ) . m. d. johannes , i. i. mazin , and c. a. howells , phys . rev . b 73 , 205102 ( 2006 ) . c. battaglia , h. cercellier , f. clerc , l. despont , m. g. garnier , c. koitzsch , p. aebi , h. berger , l. forr , and c. ambrosch - draxl , phys . b 72 , 195114 ( 2005 ) . r. bianco , m. calandra and f. mauri , phys . b 92 , 094107 ( 2015 ) . q. zhang , l. -y . gan , y. cheng , and u. schwingenschlcgl , phys . b 90 , 081103(r ) ( 2014 ) . s. cahangirov , m. topsakal , e. aktrk , h. ahin , and s. ciraci , phys . 102 , 236804 ( 2009 ) . h.ahin , s. cahangirov , m. topsakal , e. bekaroglu , e. akturk , r. t. senger , and s. ciraci , phys . b 80 , 155453 ( 2009 ) . a. j. mannix , x. -f . zhou , b. kiraly , j. d. wood , d. alducin , b. d. myers , x. liu , b. l. fisher , u. santiago , j. r. guest , m. jose yacaman , a. ponce , a. r. oganov , m. c. hersam , and n. p. guisinger , science 350 , 1513 ( 2015 ) . m. a. bissett , s. konabe , s. okada , m. tsuji , and h. ago , acs nano 7 , 10335 ( 2013 ) . s. -i . park , j. -h . ahn , x. feng , s. wang , y. huang , and j. a. rogers , adv . 18 , 2673 ( 2008 ) . e. morosan , h. w. zandbergen , b. s. dennis , j. w. g. bos , y. onose , t. klimczuk , a. p. ramirez , n. p. ong and r. j. cava , nature phys . 2 , 544 ( 2006 ) . k. e. wagner , e. morosan , y. s. hor , j. tao , y. zhu , t. sanders , t. m. mcqueen , h. w. zandbergen , a. j. williams , d. v. west , and r. j. cava , phys . b 78 , 104520 ( 2008 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the transition metal dichalcogenide ( tmd ) @xmath0-tas@xmath1 exhibits a rich set of charge density wave ( cdw ) orders . recent investigations suggested that using light or electric field can manipulate the commensurate ( c ) cdw ground state . such manipulations are considered to be determined by the charge carrier doping . here we simulate by first - principles calculations the carrier doping effect on ccdw in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 . we investigate the charge doping effects on the electronic structures and phonon instabilities of @xmath0 structure and analyze the doping induced energy and distortion ratio variations in ccdw structure . we found that both in bulk and monolayer @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , ccdw is stable upon electron doping , while hole doping can significantly suppress the ccdw , implying different mechanisms of such reported manipulations . light or positive perpendicular electric field induced hole doping increases the energy of ccdw , so that the system transforms to nccdw or similar metastable state . on the other hand , even the ccdw distortion is more stable upon in - plain electric field induced electron injection , some accompanied effects can drive the system to cross over the energy barrier from ccdw to nearly commensurate ( nc ) cdw or similar metastable state . we also estimate that hole doping can introduce potential superconductivity with @xmath2 of @xmath3 k. controllable switching of different states such as ccdw / mott insulating state , metallic state , and even the superconducting state can be realized in @xmath0-tas@xmath1 , which makes the novel material have very promising applications in the future electronic devices .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: a wide variety of cosmological observations , which include the highly precise measurements of the cosmic microwave background @xcite , galactic rotation curves @xcite , the weak gravitational lensing of distant galaxies by foreground structure @xcite , and the weak modulation of strong lensing around individual massive elliptical galaxies @xcite , all indicate that about 22@xmath11 of our universe consists of non - baryonic , non - luminous dark matter ( dm ) . the nature of dm , on the other hand , still remains a mystery . the first direct detection experiment that provided strong evidence for dark matter is the dama collaboration , which announced an 8.3 @xmath12 discovery @xcite in the annual modulations of nuclear recoil rate . in the simplest dm models , such an event rate is excluded by two orders of magnitude in other low - background nuclear experiments . a widely invoked resolution of this controversy is the inelastic dark matter ( idm ) model @xcite , which introduces a transition to an excited state in the dark matter nucleus scattering . if the mass splitting @xmath13 is roughly 100 kev , which is close to the kinetic energy of a dm in the halo , the kinematics is significantly modified and the controversy can be settled . very recently , the cryogenic dark matter search ( cdms ii ) announced the observation of two signal events with a 77@xmath11 confidence level and additional two events just outside the signal region border @xcite . statistically this is not significant to claim a discovery , nevertheless , it is very suggestive if one believe such signals are coming from dm nuclei scattering . in particular , these two events with small recoil energies suggest that the mass of dark matter is smaller than 100 gev with si cross section @xmath14 o(10@xmath15 ) pb which could escape other experimental constraints . many models have been proposed since then @xcite . in addition , limits on the dark matter nucleus cross section are obtained from the data . in the inelastic spin - independent ( isi ) dm models , only a very narrow region of parameter space is allowed @xcite , but the constraint can be large relaxed if one consider the inelastic spin - dependent ( isd ) dm models @xcite .    other experiments that give a strong constraint on the dm - nucleon cross section besides the direct detection experiments are the neutrino telescopes which are detecting the neutrino flux from dm captured and annihilated in the sun or earth . for example , ref . @xcite and ref . @xcite give the neutrino constraints to the light elastic dm ( edm ) and isi dm which could account for dama results respectively . when the dm nucleus scattering is isd , the constraints by the neutrino flux from the sun can be dramatically different . the reason is that the kinetic energy requirement for a dm ( @xmath16 ) scattering inelastically with a nucleus ( @xmath17 ) is [ eq : econdition ] e _ > ( 1 + )  . for light elements like hydrogen , only very energetic dm particles can scatter with them and get captured in the sun if @xmath13 is not very small . then the overall capture rate with their dominant contributions from light elements in the sun will be significantly reduced . the modified kinematics for inelastic scattering in eq . ( [ eq : econdition ] ) also largely reduced the kinetic phase space of dm captured in the earth because of the small escape velocity of the earth . therefore , it is of importance to preform a detailed analysis regarding the above issues motivated by the recent dama , cdms results . the paper is organized as follows . in section [ sec : crsun ] , we calculate the capture rate for both isi and isd dm in the sun and we discuss the possible uncertainties in the calculation . in section [ sec : limnt ] , we obtain the constraint on the dm - nucleon inelastic cross section for different annihilation channels from super - kamiokande ( super - k ) and the expected event number from the on - going large volume neutrino telescope , icecube . in section [ sec : limearth ] , we will discuss the neutrino constraint from idm captured in the earth . finally we conclude and discuss our studies in section [ sec : con ] . when dm particles travel through the sun system , they may get trapped by the gravitational potential and continue to lose energy with every collision against nucleus and captured in the sun . the time evolution of the dm population in the sun is given by the differential equation @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the capture rate of the dms in the sun and annihilation rate is @xmath20 with @xmath21 , @xmath22 is the inverse time for dm to escape via evaporation which will be neglected below since our dm is not very light . for typical dm we have considered , the time scale required to reach equilibrium between capture and annihilation , @xmath23 , is much smaller than the age of the solar system so the annihilation rate is saturated at half of the capture rate @xmath24 . therefore , calculating the dm capture rate in the sun is crucial to estimate the final neutrino flux from the sun @xcite . suppose a dm particle has a velocity @xmath25 very far away from the sun , at some point the escape velocity in a shell is @xmath26 , the dm velocity @xmath27 will be @xmath28 in the dm - nucleus center of mass frame , it is easy to see that in order to have a dm - nucleus inelastic scattering , the following condition is required @xmath29 where @xmath30 is the dm - nucleus reduced mass , @xmath13 is the mass split between two dm states . the escape velocity @xmath26 is approximated as @xcite @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the mass of the sun and @xmath33 km / s and @xmath34 km / s . @xmath35 is the mass profile of the sun which can be obtained by the sun density profile @xcite @xmath36 where @xmath37 g/@xmath38 and @xmath39 . the dm capture rate in the sun is given by @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the dm velocity distribution at infinity , @xmath42 is the rate per unit time that a dm with velocity @xmath27 scatter to a velocity less than @xmath43 . we assume the dm velocity distribution far from the sun follows a maxwell - boltzmann distribution in the sun rest frame @xmath44 where the dimensionless variables are defined as @xmath45 and @xmath46 , @xmath47220 km / s is the average local circular velocity which is related to dm velocity dispersion @xmath48 as @xmath49 .    taking into account the form factor suppression , the scattering function @xmath50 is given by @xmath51 where @xmath52 denotes each species of nuclei in the sun and we will omit it below , @xmath53 is the number density of the nuclei , @xmath54 is the energy transfer in the scattering , @xmath55 denotes the possible maximum(minimum ) energy transfer and @xmath56 is the minimal energy transfer which requires dm could be captured only with a velocity less than @xmath43 , and we define lower limit of integration as @xmath57 . these energy transfer functions are given by @xcite @xmath58 and one has to impose the condition q_max > q_cap [ c2 ] for the capture to happen . @xmath59 is the inelastic si ( sd ) cross section and @xmath60 is the si form factor . the term @xmath61 will be decomposed into sd cross sections and sd form factors for different spin @xmath62 later . the inelastic si ( sd ) cross section is given by @xmath63 where @xmath64 is the atomic mass number , @xmath65 is the charge of the nucleus , @xmath66 is the dm - nucleon reduced mass , @xmath67 is the si dm coupling to protons ( neutrons ) and we normalize it to @xmath68 , @xmath69 is the dm - nucleon si scattering cross section . we can see that if @xmath70 , the dm - nuclei si cross section is proportional to @xmath71 . moreover , if @xmath72 , the reduced mass @xmath73 will provide another enhancement factor of @xmath71 . we can expect heavy nuclei with large abundance in the sun , such as fe , to play a more important role in the capture process . for the si form factor , we use the helm form factor as , f(q ) = 3 e^- k^2 s^2/2  , with nuclear skin thickness @xmath74 fm , effective nuclear radius @xmath75 , @xmath76 fm , and momentum transfer @xmath77 .    the sd cross section with form factor for spin - non - zero nuclei is @xmath78 where @xmath79 and @xmath80 are isoscalar spin and isovector spin couplings , @xmath81 and @xmath82 are the effective spin dm - proton and dm - neutron couplings which we assume @xmath831 and @xmath840 in the below , @xmath85 are nuclear structure functions . in many nuclei models , the nuclear spin is carried by the unpaired nucleons . therefore we focus on the nuclei with an odd nucleon number in the sd scattering process . in the calculation we use the nuclear structure functions provided by ref . @xcite . 10@xmath2pb as a function of the mass splitting @xmath13 due to different species of nuclei in the sun . we choose @xmath86 gev @xmath87 , @xmath88 km / s and @xmath89 km / s in the maxwell - boltzmann distribution . ]     10 pb as a function of the mass splitting @xmath13 due to different species of nuclei in the sun . ] the capture rate of 50 gev dm due to different species of nuclei in the sun as a function of the mass splitting @xmath13 is calculated for both isi and isd dm . the results depend on some astrophysical parameters and as a reference point , we choose @xmath86 gev @xmath87 , @xmath88 km / s and @xmath89 km / s in the maxwell - boltzmann distribution . the element abundances are given by ref . @xcite in the form of @xmath90 and the mass fraction of hydrogen ( helium ) is 0.7381 ( 0.2485 ) . in the calculation for si capture , we pick out the species with @xmath91 . for sd capture , we calculate @xmath92h , @xmath93f , @xmath94na , @xmath95al , @xmath96si and @xmath97k . as we can see in fig . [ fig : cap_isi_50 ] and [ fig : cap_isd_50 ] , fe and al provide most contributions to the isi and isd scattering processes respectively and one can safely neglect the hydrogen contribution in the isd scattering for @xmath98 kev . the capture rate is always sensitive to the abundance of heavy nuclei .    finally , we give some short comments on the possible uncertainty in the calculation for solar dm capture rate . the input astrophysics parameters are the local dm mass density @xmath99 , velocity of the sun @xmath100 , average local circular velocity @xmath101 , and solar elemental abundances @xmath102 . the capture rate is proportional to @xmath99 and the results will increase if a larger local dm mass density is available @xcite or the solar system is passing through dm substructure @xcite . we also assume the dm infinity velocity distribution is a maxwell - boltzmann distribution which depends on parameters @xmath100 and @xmath101 . as discussed in ref . @xcite , if these two parameters vary in the region of 200 km / s @xmath103 300 km / s , the capture rate will be changed by a factor less than two . one should also notice that , if the velocity distribution deviates from an ordinary maxwell - boltzmann distribution , the result will also be changed . in our discussions , for simplicity , we assume the solar chemical composition does not change in the sun . the capture rate is sensitive to the abundance of heavy nuclei and increasing the number density of heavy nuclei in the center of the sun will increase the overall capture rate by a few @xcite . there are also uncertainties arising from the nuclear form factor . for the si scattering , the helm form factor we used in the calculation is less accurate at large momentum transfers and might be improved by using some more precise form factors @xcite . for the sd scattering , the nuclear structure functions in ref . @xcite are only considered for direct dm search on the earth , so the @xmath104 used in the finite momentum transfer approximation may not be large enough for dm - nucleus scattering in the sun if our dm is heavy . if the dm capture and annihilation processes reach equilibrium , we can simply get the dm annihilation rate @xmath105    the different dm annihilation channels give different initial neutrino spectra @xcite . if the dm annihilates to @xmath106 or @xmath107 , they will not contribute to neutrino signals . this is because for muons , they always lose most of their energy before decaying in the center of the sun . for annihilation channel to @xmath108 , the neutrinos are induced by @xmath109 leptonic decays @xmath110 , @xmath111 , and hadronic decays such as @xmath112 , @xmath113 , @xmath114 et al . for the heavy final annihilation states @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath115 , they produce neutrinos via cascade decays and the neutrino spectra for such channels are hard . for quark channels , the hadronization process produces mesons and baryons , and then induces neutrinos via hadron decays . the neutrino spectra for such channels are soft . notice that the light mesons easily lose their energy before decays , so the contributions to the neutrino signals from light quarks are usually small . the neutrinos produced at the solar center will interact with the matter in the sun . these effects include the neutral current ( nc ) interaction , the charged current ( cc ) interaction , and tau neutrino @xmath116 reinjection from secondary tau decays . the neutrino oscillations including the vacuum mixing and the msw matter effects are also important . here we use the results given by ref . @xcite to take into account the above effects during the neutrinos propagation . the differential neutrino flux at the earth is @xmath117 where @xmath52 runs over the different dm annihilation channels with branching ratios @xmath118 , @xmath119 is the neutrino spectrum at the earth after propagation , and @xmath120 is the sun - earth distance .    we can calculate the muon rate at the detector as @xmath121r(e_{\mu } ) + ( \nu\rightarrow\bar{\nu})\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath122 ( @xmath123 ) is the number density of protons ( neutrons ) in matter around the detector , the muon range @xmath124 is the distance that a muon could travel in matter before its energy drops below the detector s threshold energy @xmath125 which is given by @xmath126 with @xmath127 the parameters describing the energy loss of muons in matter . the cross sections of deep inelastic neutrino - nucleon scattering processes are given by @xcite @xmath128 where @xmath129 . we can see that the neutrino detector is more powerful to observe neutrino signals in the high energy region . because the neutrino - nucleon cross section and muon range increase as @xmath130 , while the atmospheric neutrino background decrease as @xmath131 .    to obtain limits on the cross section per nucleon times the branching ratio @xmath132 , we use the upper bound on high energy up - going muon flux in the direction of sun given by super - k group @xcite . the super - k detector is located in a mine with 1000 m rock overburden which contains 50,000 ton water . the detector can detect up - going muons with measured path length of at least 7 m which is equivalent to the detector energy threshold 1.6 gev . so the super - k detector has a wide detecting range for high energy neutrino . super - k group analyzed the data in 1679.6 days of detector live time , and no events induced by dm annihilation / decay are confirmed in the directions of the sun , the center of earth , and the galactic center . a stringent limit for up - going muon flux @xmath133 @xmath134 s@xmath135 constrains the dm model . here we use the constraint in ref . @xcite for all annihilation channels . the super - k limits on @xmath132 to different annihilation channels for isi and isd dm with different mass splitting @xmath13 are presented in fig . [ sklisi ] , and [ sklisd ] respectively . for a typical dm annihilation cross section of @xmath136 pb ( or higher ) that explains dama in the isi dm case , the limits are quite constraining on hard channels ( @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , @xmath6 ) , are lessened in softer channels like @xmath8 and @xmath137 and are quite loose in the light quark channels . in the isd dm case , the typical dm annihilation cross section ( or higher ) to explain dama is enhanced to @xmath138 pb @xcite . interestingly , even though the cross section is @xmath139 times higher than the isi dm case , we reach a similar conclusion that the limits are quite constraining on hard channels , are lessened in softer channels like @xmath8 and @xmath137 and are quite loose in the light quark channels . in order to see how the inelastic property of dm nucleus scattering changes the limits , we also calculate the super - k limits on @xmath132 to different annihilation channels for edm . in the si case , making the scattering inelastic changes the results at most an order of magnitude for reasonable @xmath13 . in the sd case , however , the limit is loosened by 3 orders of magnitude when hydrogen no longer contributes to the dark matter capture in the sun . the on - going large volume neutrino telescopes , such as icecube and km3net , are more powerful to probe high energy neutrinos . icecube located between depth of 1.45 km and 2.45 km in the south pole will have an effective detecting area of 1 km@xmath140 . in 2007 , icecube consisted of 22 strings has provided a more stringent upper limit to muon flux from the sun @xcite . the main shortcoming of icecube 22-strings is its high energy threshold . so the experimental results are only useful to constrain the heavy dm . and @xmath3 channels , the constraints are available for dm heavier than 250 gev and 500 gev respectively . for the constraints to idm , one can see the ref . @xcite . ] the complete detector consisted of 80 strings might reduce the energy threshold to 50 gev . we need to notice that the effective detecting area of icecube decreases rapidly in the low energy region . in addition , the angular resolution becomes worse in such energy region . so the capability of icecube to search for light dm is weaker than that for heavy dm . but it is worth remarking , additional icecube 6 special strings named deepcore , are powerful to improve the capability of the detector and reduce the detection threshold down to 10 gev @xcite . in the fig . [ icemunum ] , we show the total number of events at the icecube plus deepcore . here we use the effective neutrino detection area of icecube plus deepcore given by ref . @xcite to calculate the event rate at the detector . the number of background events from atmospheric neutrinos within a 3@xmath141 window is estimated @xmath1450 in the energy range @xmath142 gev . for heavy idm @xmath143100 gev , the icecube plus deepcore is very powerful to test most of the idm annihilation channels , which include all hard channels and soft channels to @xmath137 and @xmath8 . for the idm lighter than 100 gev , comparing with fig . [ sklisi ] and [ sklisd ] based on the super - k 90@xmath11 c.l . exclusion limit , we can see that the icecube plus deepcore also has capability to test or further constrain the idm model with soft annihilation channels to @xmath137 and @xmath8 . [ sec : limearth ] unlike the sun , the main constituents of the earth are heavy nuclei , such as o , al , si , mg , fe and ni . since the abundances of fe and al are 31.9% and 1.59% respectively , we expect that the abundance of such heavy elements helps the capture process . nevertheless , probing neutrino signals from terrestrial idm annihilations is more difficult than probing them from solar idm annihilations . there are two main reasons for this . first , as a gravitational system , the earth is far smaller than the sun with a rather small escape velocity , so it is more difficult to trap dm in the center of the earth . in the idm scenario , the situation becomes even worse due to the kinetic suppression induced by inelastic capture condition . second , it is well known that terrestrial dm capture and annihilation processes can not reach equilibrium in the ordinary dm scenario , so the annihilation rate of dm trapped in the earth is even smaller than half of the capture rate . now we turn to eq . ( [ c1 ] ) and ( [ c2 ] ) and see the first reason of suppression explicitly . we can rewrite eq . ( [ c2 ] ) as @xmath144 where we use a similar notation as ref . @xcite @xmath145 and @xmath146 the escape velocity of the earth @xmath147 10 km / s is very small compared to the escape velocity of the sun @xmath148 10@xmath149 km / s and the velocity dispersion of local dm @xmath150 270 km / s , so the right hand side of the capture condition eq . ( [ c3 ] ) is a large value . when the mass of dm is comparable to or larger than that of a nucleus , such as fe or al , the left hand side of eq . ( [ c3 ] ) is suppressed by @xmath151 so it is difficult to satisfy the capture condition . if the dm is much lighter than the nuclei , the condition eq . ( [ c3 ] ) is still not easy to satisfy . moreover it is difficult to satisfy the inelastic scattering condition eq . ( [ c1 ] ) simultaneously . so the most promising situation is that dm and nuclei have similar masses and @xmath13 must not be large . the terrestrial idm capture and annihilation do not reach equilibrium in ordinary dm scenario.10@xmath152 @xmath38/s due to some enhancements such as sommerfeld effect , the terrestrial dm capture and annihilation could reach equilibrium @xcite . ] following from eq . ( [ eq : carate ] ) , the dm annihilation rate is @xmath153 where @xmath154 is the age of earth , @xmath155 is the capture rate of the dms in the earth . the equilibrium time , effective annihilation rate is defined as @xmath156 , @xmath157 respectively . it is also useful to define a critical capture rate for the earth as @xmath158 . if @xmath159 , the dm capture and annihilation in the earth could reach equilibrium . it is straightforward to get numerical results by using the method in sec ii . here we use the mass density profile and the composition of the earth provided by ref . @xcite and @xcite respectively . for simplicity , we assume the earth is in free space @xcite . if the gravitational interaction of the sun is taken into account , there is a correction factor of o(1 ) @xcite to the capture rate . in fig . [ capea ] , we show the results of terrestrial idm capture rate for si and sd scattering processes . we find that for very heavy or light dm , the capture process is highly suppressed . so we only give the capture rate for the idm with typical mass in the range of ( 10 , 50 ) gev which is similar to the mass of nuclei of interest . it is interesting to notice that there are surges as @xmath13 is varying . the peaks of these surges ( @xmath160 ) are quite similar to the  resonant enhancement " in the edm case when dm mass reaches to the nuclei s mass as discussed in ref . @xcite and is absent if the dm is not light enough . for the idm scenario , we need to notice that for the n species of nuclei of interest here , there are 2n inelastic capture conditions to be satisfied or obeyed . so if the mass of dm is similar to that of the nuclei , the terrestrial capture rate is very sensitive to the parameters of @xmath161 , @xmath151 and @xmath13 . here we use the upper limit for up - going muon flux from the center of the earth provided by super - k @xcite to constrain the idm model . we only show the most stringent constraints assuming all the dm annihilation products are @xmath6 . we can see the results in fig . [ sklea ] and we find that the constraints from earth - born neutrinos are weaker than those from the sun . the most stringent constraints arise from small @xmath13 and @xmath162 ( 10 , 50 ) gev . inelastic dark matter ( idm ) is an excellent candidate to explain the dama annual modulation result . recently , the cdms ii announced the observation of two signal events and set a more stringent constraint to the idm model to account for dama results . the mass of the idm is not heavier than 100 gev and the dm - nucleon cross section is typically 10@xmath2 pb ( or higher ) for isi case and is 10 pb ( or higher ) for isd case .    in this work , we discuss the constraints by neutrino signals from solar and terrestrial idm annihilations motivated after dama and cdms ii results . the neutrino flux from the sun or earth depends on the capture rate and the constraint on dm - nucleon cross section is quite different from the edm case . for isi / isd scattering , the main contribution to the capture rate in the sun is from fe / al and in the latter case , the capture from h is highly kinematically suppressed . although the types of nuclei that contribute to the capture rate are quite different in isi and isd dm models , the constraints for the idm annihilation channels for the typical dm - nucleon cross section are actually similar . the super - k null results set very stringent constraints to the hard dm annihilation channels such as @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 . for the soft channels such as @xmath137 and @xmath8 , the limits are loose . with the icecube 80-strings plus deepcore , it can discover or exclude such channels . if the dm annihilation products are light charged leptons @xmath106 , @xmath163 , light mesons or some new light bosons , there are no constraints from the neutrino detection . for neutrinos from dm annihilation in the earth , the constraint is weaker than the one in the sun . this is mainly due to the fact that earth being a small gravitational system that captures the dm . moreover , the terrestrial idm capture rate is suppressed due to the inelastic capture condition . furthermore , the terrestrial idm capture and annihilation do not reach equilibrium in most of its parameter space . the constraint is available only for small @xmath13 and idm with mass of several tens of gev where similar behaviors as the  resonance enhancement " in the edm case occur . if the dama and cdms ii results are really induced by dm , we could expect the xenon 100 @xcite or other direct detection experiments to give the similar observations in the immediate future . nevertheless , the constraints and future detection prospects we have obtained from neutrino telescope should be considered in any explanations based on idm . other on - going indirect detection experiments and the large hadron collider also have the capability to detect the dm signals . it is exciting and useful to think about all these experiments and achieve a complete picture of dm . [ sec : con ] we would like to thank paul h. frampton , sourav mandal and matthew sudano for useful discussions . the work of j.s . was supported by the world premier international research center initiative ( wpi initiative ) mext , japan and grant - in - aid for scientific research ( young scientists ( b ) 21740169 ) from japan society for promotion of science ( jsps ) . the work of p.f.y . and s.h.z was supported by the natural sciences foundation of china ( nos . 10775001 , 10635030 ) . p.f.y . would like to acknowledge the hospitality of institute for physics and mathematics of the universe ( ipmu ) while the work was initiated . e.  komatsu _ et al . _ [ wmap collaboration ] , astrophys .  j.  suppl .   * 180 * , 330 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0803.0547 [ astro - ph ] ] . a.  borriello and p.  salucci , mon .  not . soc .   * 323 * , 285 ( 2001 ) . h.  hoekstra , h.  yee and m.  gladders , new astron . rev .   * 46 * , 767 ( 2002 ) . r.  b.  metcalf , l.  a.  moustakas , a.  j.  bunker and i.  r.  parry , astrophys . j.   * 607 * , 43 ( 2004 ) ; l.  a.  moustakas and r.  b.  metcalf , mon .  not . * 339 * , 607 ( 2003 ) r.  bernabei _ et al . _ [ dama collaboration ] , eur . j.   c * 56 * , 333 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0804.2741 [ astro - ph ] ] . d.  tucker - smith and n.  weiner , phys . d * 64 * , 043502 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0101138 ] . s.  chang , g.  d.  kribs , d.  tucker - smith and n.  weiner , phys . d * 79 * , 043513 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0807.2250 [ hep - ph ] ] . z.  ahmed _ et al . _ [ the cdms - ii collaboration and cdms - ii collaboration ] , arxiv:0912.3592 [ astro-ph.co ] . m.  kadastik , k.  kannike , a.  racioppi and m.  raidal , arxiv:0912.3797 [ hep - ph ] ; n.  bernal and a.  goudelis , arxiv:0912.3905 [ hep - ph ] ; a.  bottino , f.  donato , n.  fornengo and s.  scopel , arxiv:0912.4025 [ hep - ph ] . d.  feldman , z.  liu and p.  nath , arxiv:0912.4217 [ hep - ph ] ; m.  ibe and t.  t.  yanagida , arxiv:0912.4221 [ hep - ph ] ; r.  allahverdi , b.  dutta and y.  santoso , arxiv:0912.4329 [ hep - ph ] ; m.  endo , s.  shirai and k.  yonekura , arxiv:0912.4484 [ hep - ph ] ; q.  h.  cao , i.  low and g.  shaughnessy , arxiv:0912.4510 [ hep - ph ] ; q.  h.  cao , c.  r.  chen , c.  s.  li and h.  zhang , arxiv:0912.4511 [ hep - ph ] ; k.  cheung and t.  c.  yuan , arxiv:0912.4599 [ hep - ph ] ; j.  hisano , k.  nakayama and m.  yamanaka , arxiv:0912.4701 [ hep - ph ] ; x.  g.  he , t.  li , x.  q.  li , j.  tandean and h.  c.  tsai , arxiv:0912.4722 [ hep - ph ] ; i.  gogoladze , r.  khalid , s.  raza and q.  shafi , arxiv:0912.5411 [ hep - ph ] ; m.  aoki , s.  kanemura and o.  seto , arxiv:0912.5536 [ hep - ph ] ; r.  foot , arxiv:1001.0096 [ hep - ph ] . m.  asano and r.  kitano , arxiv:1001.0486 [ hep - ph ] . w.  s.  cho , j.  h.  huh , i.  w.  kim , j.  e.  kim and b.  kyae , arxiv:1001.0579 [ hep - ph ] . j.  angle _ et al . _ [ xenon collaboration ] , phys . * 100 * , 021303 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0706.0039 [ astro - ph ] ] . k.  schmidt - hoberg and m.  w.  winkler , jcap * 0909 * , 010 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0907.3940 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . j.  kopp , t.  schwetz and j.  zupan , arxiv:0912.4264 [ hep - ph ] . d.  hooper , f.  petriello , k.  m.  zurek and m.  kamionkowski , phys .  rev . d * 79 * , 015010 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0808.2464 [ hep - ph ] ] . s.  nussinov , l.  t.  wang and i.  yavin , jcap * 0908 * , 037 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0905.1333 [ hep - ph ] ] . a.  menon , r.  morris , a.  pierce and n.  weiner , arxiv:0905.1847 [ hep - ph ] . a.  gould , astrophys .  j.   * 321 * , 571 ( 1987 ) . g.  jungman , m.  kamionkowski and k.  griest , phys . * 267 * , 195 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9506380 ] . g.  wikstrom and j.  edsjo , jcap * 0904 * , 009 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0903.2986 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . a.  gould , astrophys . j.   * 388 * , 338 ( 1992 ) . r.  gandhi , c.  quigg , m.  h.  reno and i.  sarcevic , astropart . phys .   * 5 * , 81 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9512364 ] . v.  a.  bednyakov and f.  simkovic , phys .  part . nucl .   * 37 * , s106 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0608097 ] . m.  asplund , n.  grevesse , a.  j.  sauval and p.  scott , ann . astrophys .   * 47 * , 481 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0909.0948 [ astro-ph.sr ] ] . t.  bruch , a.  h.  g.  peter , j.  read , l.  baudis and g.  lake , phys . b * 674 * , 250 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0902.4001 [ astro-ph.he ] ] . s.  m.  koushiappas and m.  kamionkowski , phys . lett .   * 103 * , 121301 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0907.4778 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . g.  duda , a.  kemper and p.  gondolo , jcap * 0704 * , 012 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0608035 ] . m.  cirelli , n.  fornengo , t.  montaruli , i.  sokalski , a.  strumia and f.  vissani , nucl . b * 727 * , 99 ( 2005 ) [ erratum - ibid . b * 790 * , 338 ( 2008 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - ph/0506298 ] . + web pages : + www.to.infn.it/@xmath14fornengo/dmnu.html , + www.cern.ch/astrumia/dmnu.html , + www.marcocirelli.net/dmnu.html . a.  e.  erkoca , m.  h.  reno and i.  sarcevic , phys . d * 80 * , 043514 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0906.4364 [ hep - ph ] ] . v.  barger , w.  y.  keung , g.  shaughnessy and a.  tregre , phys . d * 76 * ( 2007 ) 095008 [ arxiv:0708.1325 [ hep - ph ] ] . s.  desai _ et al . _ [ super - kamiokande collaboration ] , phys .  rev . d * 70 * , 083523 ( 2004 ) [ erratum - ibid . d * 70 * , 109901 ( 2004 ) ] [ arxiv : hep - ex/0404025 ] . r.  abbasi _ et al . _ [ icecube collaboration ] , phys . lett .   * 102 * , 201302 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0902.2460 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . e.  resconi and f.  t.  i.  collaboration , nucl . instrum . a * 602 * , 7 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0807.3891 [ astro - ph ] ] .    c.  wiebusch and f.  t.  i.  collaboration , arxiv:0907.2263 [ astro-ph.im ] . w.  f.  mcdonough , the composition of the earth ( http://quake.mit.edu/ hilstgroup/ coremantle/ earthcompo.pdf ) , chapter 1 in : earthquake thermodynamics and phase transformations in earth s interior ( r. teisseyre and e. majewski , eds . ) , academic press , 2000 .    c.  delaunay , p.  j.  fox and g.  perez , jhep * 0905 * , 099 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0812.3331 [ hep - ph ] ] . a.  gould , astrophys . j.   * 328 * , 919 ( 1988 ) . e.  aprile , l.  baudis and f.  t.  x.  collaboration , arxiv:0902.4253 [ astro-ph.im ] .
Abstract:

Answer: we discuss the neutrino constraints from solar and terrestrial dark matter ( dm ) annihilations in the inelastic dark matter ( idm ) scenario after the recent cdms ii results . to reconcile the dama / libra data with constraints from all other direct experiments , the idm needs to be light ( @xmath0 gev ) and have a large dm - nucleon cross section ( @xmath1 10@xmath2 pb in the spin - independent ( si ) scattering and @xmath1 10 pb in the spin - dependent ( sd ) scattering ) . the dominant contribution to the idm capture in the sun is from scattering off fe / al in the si / sd case . current bounds from super - kamiokande exclude the hard dm annihilation channels , such as @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 . for soft channels such as @xmath7 and @xmath8 , the limits are loose , but could be tested or further constrained by future icecube plus deepcore . for neutrino constraints from the dm annihilation in the earth , due to the weaker gravitational effect of the earth and inelastic capture condition , the constraint exists only for small mass splitting @xmath9 40 kev and @xmath10 gev even in the @xmath6 channel .