Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: understanding the structure of the gaseous component of disk galaxies is an important step for unraveling their on - going evolution . in particular , extraplanar gas in galaxies is a potentially - important probe of the effects of kinetic and radiative feedback from massive stars to the gas in galaxies , as well as of the role that the accretion of metal - poor gas plays in the evolution of modern galaxies . most studies of extraplanar matter have focused on the gas content of the interstellar thick disks and halos of galaxies . however , the processes that transport matter from the thin disks of galaxies into the thick disks and extended halos will act on both gas and interstellar dust grains . the presence of extraplanar dust in galaxies can strongly affect the thermal balance of the gas , and it will definitely affect an observer s view of a galaxy through its impact on the transfer of radiation . the presence of extraplanar dust in the canonical edge - on galaxy ngc 891 was noted many years ago ( sandage 1961 ; dettmar 1990 ; keppel et al . however , an analysis of the implications of the extensive web of dusty extraplanar material in this galaxy did not occur until recently ( howk & savage 1997 , 2000 ) . in the last few years , extraplanar dust has been recognized and studied in many edge - on systems ( sofue , wakamatsu , & malin 1994 ; howk & savage 1999 ; alton et al . 2000 ; rossa & dettmar 2003 ; thompson , howk , & savage 2004 ) , and we now know that the presence of extraplanar dust and gas are indeed coupled .    in this contribution , i will concentrate on the physical interpretation of the observed extraplanar dust and its implications for the nature of the interstellar thick disks of spiral galaxies . in particular , i will summarize some of the evidence that material identified with extraplanar dust may represent a dense , cold medium in the thick disks of galaxies . it is now established that at least @xmath2 of spiral galaxies in the local universe show some form of extraplanar ( thick disk ) dust and , hence , gas ( rossa & dettmar 2003 ; howk & savage 1999 ) . the most common technique currently employed for identifying extraplanar dust is to image directly edge - on spiral galaxies in the optical , searching for obvious evidence of shadowing of the thick disk , halo , and bulge stars by optically - thick foreground dust . figure [ fig : n891 ] gives an example of this approach , showing two views of the v - band image of ngc 891 from howk & savage ( 2000 ) . the presence of dust in the thick disk of this galaxy is obvious from these images .    from the stand - point of total exposure time required , such broadband imaging is by far the most efficient manner of finding extraplanar material in galaxies ( although it does require high - resolution  @xmath3  imaging ) . the presence of extraplanar dust is likely a flag that a significant amount of extraplanar gas is present , as well . not only is there likely to be a significant amount of gas associated with the dust structures detected through direct optical imaging , but the surveys of rossa & dettmar ( 2003 ) and howk & savage ( 1999 ) have shown that @xmath4 of galaxies exhibiting extraplanar dust also have extraplanar diffuse ionized gas ( dig ) detectable through h@xmath0  emission .    while it is straightforward to note the presence of extraplanar dust from images such as that shown in figure [ fig : n891 ] , there are several biases inherent to this approach . as discussed in howk & savage ( 2000 ) and more recently in thompson et al . ( 2004 ) , we are only able to detect dusty regions through direct optical imaging because of they have significantly lower surface brightness than their surroundings . this implies that the dust - bearing clouds seen in our images must have a higher column density of dust ( and gas ) than their surroundings : a smooth distribution of dust would produce no contrast and would be undetectable in these images . in practice this likely implies the dusty clouds are more dense than their surroundings ( assuming the thick disk gas has a relatively uniform dust content ) . a number of other , less scientifically interesting , biases should be considered when looking at images such as those in figure [ fig : n891 ] . the requirement of large contrast tends to bias us toward detecting dust on the near side of galaxies , and , due to signal - to - noise constraints , we are more likely to detect high-@xmath5   dust in regions of intrinsically higher surface brightness ( e.g. , against the bright light of a galactic bulge or at lower heights above the midplane ) .    using estimates of the `` apparent extinctions '' produced by individual thick disk dust clouds , howk & savage ( 1997 , 1999 , 2000 ) and thompson et al . ( 2004 ) have estimated physical properties of these clouds , albeit crudely . because the apparent extinctions will always underestimate the true extinctions through the clouds ( see howk & savage 1997 ) , all of the physical quantities derived using the apparent extinctions are lower limits . assuming the dust - to - gas ratio in these clouds is similar to that found in the disk of the milky way ( which is probably not too bad an assumption ; thompson et al . 2004 ) , the dusty cloud complexes detected in our images must have @xmath6 @xmath7 . furthermore , the densities in these clouds must be quite high . examining the apparent extinctions and sizes of the smallest structures in the extraplanar cloud complexes in ngc 891 as seen in new images from the advanced camera for surveys on board the _ hubble space telescope _ suggests the densities in these clouds may be @xmath8 @xmath9 .    the combination of these estimated column densities and the projected sizes of the cloud complexes in our images imply total masses of @xmath10 to @xmath11 m@xmath12 or higher _ in each complex_. such masses are consistent with those of the individual giant molecular clouds in the milky way . in galaxies with detectable extraplanar dust , we typically find hundreds of absorbing structures at @xmath13 kpc all along the central regions of the disk ( within @xmath14 kpc , similar to the radial extent of detectable dig ) . howk & savage ( 1997 ) estimated the total mass of the ensemble of clouds in ngc 891 to be @xmath15 m@xmath12 , comparable to the total mass of extraplanar dig material ( dettmar 1990 ) . morphologically , the extraplanar dust structures seen in direct optical images are quite complex and varied . much of the complexity is likely due to the observed clouds residing at different depths through a galaxy . the identification of cloud complexes which may represent coherent structures is extremely difficult at heights @xmath16 kpc from the midplanes of spirals , particularly toward the centers of galaxies where more structures may be present along a given sight line . in fact , we believe that sight lines through an edge - on galaxy with extraplanar dust are typically optically thick for heights @xmath16 kpc . at such heights , every sight line intercepts at least one dust - bearing cloud , each of which we believe to have @xmath17 . at larger heights , where the confusion is significantly lessened , it is possible to identify what appear to be individual , sometimes isolated clouds or structures . as an example of this , figure [ fig : n4217 ] shows a portion of our _ hst _ image of ngc 4217 ( thompson et al . thompson et al . note the presence of a structure that appears to be a large loop ( marked in figure [ fig : n4217 ] ) with diameter @xmath18 pc centered at @xmath19 pc from the midplane of this galaxy . such a structure would be confused at lower heights from this or other galaxies . even at the height of this structure , though , one worries that what appears to be a loop may be caused by several overlapping , but unrelated , cloud complexes . we have argued that the dust - laden clouds identified in the thick disks of spiral galaxies through direct optical imaging represent a cold , dense phase of the thick disk ism ( howk & savage 1999 , 2000 ) . the derived column densities and particle densities are consistent with this picture . the high column densities we derive for many individual structures are high enough that they would have molecular fractions of @xmath20 if the physical conditions ( i.e. , dust content and radiation fields ) are similar to those found in the disk of the milky way . there are other observational indications that , sometimes indirectly , lead us to believe the thick disks of galaxies contain a cnm that is traceable through its extinction . first , it is clear that the interstellar thick disks of spiral galaxies are multiphase media . the observations of gas at temperatures that span several orders of magnitude ( e.g. , through observations of h@xmath0  and x - ray emission ) in the thick disks of galaxies imply the presence of distinct interstellar phases . howk & savage ( 2000 ) have compared high resolution ( sub - arcsecond ) imaging of h@xmath0  from the extraplanar dig and of absorption due to the extraplanar dust in ngc 891 . this comparison revealed not only that the structures seen in dust and h@xmath0  are not physically related , but that the wim is much more smoothly distributed than the material traced by dust extinction . this almost certainly implies the volume filling factor of the material traced by extraplanar dust is much smaller than that of the dig . rossa and collaborators ( this proceedings ; rossa et al . 2004 ) have recently presented even higher - resolution images of ngc 891 acquired with _ hst _ that lead to the same conclusion : the dust and the ionized gas occupy separate regions of space with very little correspondence and , therefore , represent _ distinct phases _ of the multiphase thick disk in this galaxy . there is also some evidence for co emission , a direct tracer of cnm material , in the thick disks of spiral galaxies . garca - burillo et al . ( 1999 ) have presented co observations of the edge - on galaxy ngc 4013 . their interferometric maps reveal the presence of co - bearing extraplanar filaments , some of which are coincident with extraplanar dust seen by howk & savage ( 1999 ) . this is a direct indication of the presence of a cnm in the thick disk of this galaxy . unfortunately , few galaxies have been observed with the sensitivity and resolution required to detect these structures . ngc 891 has been mapped in co , although the picture in this galaxy is far from clear : single - dish ( garca - burillo et al . 1992 ) and interferometric ( scoville et al . 1993 ) observations give conflicting results . we are pursuing deep interferometric co mapping of this galaxy to limit the amount of co in the thick disk of this system .    perhaps the least direct , but most interesting , indicator for the presence of a cnm in the thick disks of galaxies is the recent evidence for thick disk star formation in spiral galaxies . several authors have noted the presence of extraplanar h@xmath1ii  regions in the thick disks of galaxies ( walterbos 1991 ; ferguson , wyse , & gallagher 1996 ; howk & savage 1997 , 2000 ) . these regions are too far from the midplanes of the host galaxies for the ob associations required to ionize the gas to have been born in the disk and subsequently ejected . the study of the abundances and stellar content of such regions has just begun ( tllman et al . 2003 ) and may give us important information on the circulation of metals within the thick disks of galaxies . indirectly , the presence of newly - formed hot stars in the thick disks implies the presence of a cnm , since the latter is a crucial ingredient for star formation . we consider it likely that the young stars have formed from clouds similar to those seen in our images . the presence of dust in the thick disks of galaxies has important implications for understanding the nature of extraplanar gas in spiral galaxies . perhaps the most fundamental implication of significant amounts of dust in the thick disks of spiral galaxies is that much of the interstellar material in the thick disk in these systems has been expelled from the underlying thin disk rather than accreted from a reservoir of primordial material . this is strongly suggested by the large amounts of dust directly visible in our images . furthermore , while not generally true , there are indeed structures connecting the extraplanar dust to the underlying thin disk ( figure [ fig : diskhalo ] ) . the precise mechanism for expelling gas and dust from the thin disk is not constrained , but some aspect of feedback from massive stars likely drives the expulsion .    the statement that much of the thick disk ism must have been expelled from the thin disk does not necessarily constrain the nature of `` halo '' gas , material at very large distances from the plane . the maximum extent of dusty material observable through its optical absorption against background starlight is @xmath21 kpc . this varies slightly among the observed galaxies and potentially with position in an individual galaxy . however , in the best studied case of ngc 891 , there is sufficient light from the stellar bulge and thick disk that clumpy dust structures could have been seen to much larger heights in the central regions ( howk & savage 2000 ) . the lack of detectable dust at larger heights has a few potential causes . having argued the strongly - clumped dust at @xmath13 kpc is associated with a cnm , we have suggested that the interstellar pressures at larger heights may be insufficient to support a cnm ( howk & savage 1999 , 2000 ) . in which case , the dust at these heights is associated with a diffuse medium with little in the way of small scale , high column density structures that would be detectable via direct optical imaging . alternatively , there could simply be a lack of dust at high-@xmath5 , either due to the smaller amount of gas at such heights or a changing gas - to - dust ratio .    while the current observations do not allow us to determine which of these scenarios is more likely , up - coming observations with the _ spitzer space telescope _ and the _ galaxy evolution explorer _ may help by revealing a smooth component of dust at @xmath22 kpc in galaxies . the distinction is potentially important , as it could bear on the amount of gas contributed to modern galaxy halos by on - going infall of primordial material and on the possibility that dust ( and potentially gas ) may escape a galaxy s potential altogether . it is worth noting , also , that the presence of dust grains in the thick disks of galaxies implies that the mechanisms that transport material from the thin to thick disks are not sufficiently violent to completely destroy the dust . thus , if feedback processes are responsible for expelling the dust and gas into the thick disks of galaxies , the characteristic velocities with which much of the present thick disk matter is expelled was likely too small to produce much dust destruction . this suggests that much of the extraplanar material may be simply displaced disk gas rather than material that started as shock - heated gas and metal - enriched supernova ejecta . the lifting of material through magnetically - driven mechanisms ( e.g , . the parker instability ) or other more quiescent mechanisms may be important , although they are not necessary .
Abstract:

Answer: the interstellar thick disks of galaxies contain not only gas , but significant quantities of dust . most of our knowledge of extraplanar dust in disk galaxies comes from direct broadband optical imaging of these systems , wherein the dust is identified due to the irregular extinction it produces against the thick disk and bulge stars . this observational technique is sensitive to only the most dense material , and we argue much of the material identified in this way traces a cold phase of the interstellar thick disks in galaxies . the presence of a cold , dense phase likely implies the interstellar pressures in the thick disks of spiral galaxies can be quite high . this dense phase of the interstellar medium may also fueling thick disk star formation , and h@xmath0  observations are now revealing h@xmath1ii  regions around newly - formed ob stars associations in several galaxies . we argue that the large quantities of dust and the morphologies of the structures traced by the dust imply that much of the extraplanar material in disk galaxies must have been expelled from the underlying thin disk .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the occurence of a transition between hadronic phase and ( deconfined ) quark phase in dense matter is an unsettled issue . from the experimental side , observing the formation of a quark - gluon plasma is one of the main objectives of cern - sps and rhic experiments . this state of matter is also expected to take place in the interior of neutron stars , due to the high pressures typical of the stellar core . however , the phase transition in energetic heavy - ion experiments typically involves low densities and high temperatures , whereas high density cold matter constitutes the interior of stable neutron stars . thus , there is some uncertainty as to whether laboratory observations of the quark - gluon plasma can be helpful in considerations of neutron star structure . on the other hand , there are also indications @xcite that the deconfined phase occurs at a nearly constant value of the energy density , regardless the thermodynamical status of the system . a value of approximately 1 gev @xmath2 for the energy density has been reported from cern - sps experiments @xcite , which we will take as a reasonable estimate of the transition energy density . quark matter is a fermi gas of 3@xmath3 quarks which , together , constitute a single color - singlet baryon with baryon number @xmath3 . strange matter is quark matter where flavor equilibrium has been established by the weak interaction . deconfined matter is typically handled within bag models , such as the mit bag model @xcite . the energy density of quark matter contains the bag parameter @xmath4 , which represents the difference between the perturbative vacuum and the true vacuum . physically , @xmath4 is a pressure which maintains the quarks at finite density and chemical potential @xcite . the purpose of this paper is to explore the characteristics and the model dependence of the quark - hadron phase transition in weakly isospin - asymmetric nuclear matter . the paper is organized as follows : in the next section , we review the main steps in the calculation of the energy density of quark matter within the mit bag model . in section iii , the phase transition is approached as resulting from energetic heavy - ion collisions of @xmath5pb nuclei and subsequent expansion of the plasma , namely , it is a quark to hadron transition , where the hadronic phase consists of nearly symmetric nuclear matter . assuming ( approximate ) knowledge of the transition density , we discuss possible values of @xmath4 and a simple parametrization for its density dependence , based on the condition that the energy densities of the quark phase and the hadronic phase are equal at the transition . often we will follow the procedure of ref . @xcite closely , with the specific intent of comparing findings . in that study , both the equation of state ( eos ) based on the brueckner - hartree - fock ( bhf ) approach implemented with three - body forces ( tbf ) @xcite and the one based on relativistic mean field models ( rmf ) @xcite are considered . on the other hand , our nucleonic equation of state is obtained within the dirac - brueckner - hartree - fock model ( dbhf ) @xcite . a recent discussion on differences / similarities ( with respect to effective or explicit inclusion of tbf ) between the dbhf scheme and the bhf + tbf one can be found in ref . it is the purpose of this note to detect differences ( in the predicted features of the phase transition ) which may originate from the nucleonic eos . this is an important point , in view of the large model dependence still existing among predictions of the latter , in particular the details of its slope . once the bag pressure is  determined " ( or , rather , constrained to be within some reasonable range of values ) , one can go back to the formalism we outline in section ii and calculate , for instance , the energy density of @xmath6-stable strange quark matter for the purpose of stellar structure calculations . our conclusions are summarized in the last section . we consider a degenerate fermi gas of @xmath0 , @xmath1 , and @xmath7 quarks and electrons in chemical equilibrium maintained by the weak processes : @xmath8 @xmath9 @xmath10 @xmath11 @xmath12 the neutrinos are ignored as they are expected to have no impact on the dynamics , being an extremely diluted gas ( although massive neutrinos could be found in strange matter @xcite ) . in chemical equilibrium , we have @xmath13 @xmath14 also , charge neutrality and baryon number conservation require @xmath15 and @xmath16 where @xmath17 is the total ( fixed ) baryon density . exploiting the relation between the density of each species and the corresponding thermodynamic potential , @xmath18 equations  ( 6 - 9 ) can be solved for the chemical potentials of each species ( and thus their densities or fractions ) . to first order in @xmath19 ( the qcd coupling constant ) , the thermodynamic potentials are @xcite @xmath20 @xmath21    @xmath22    the total energy density is then @xmath23 where @xmath4 is a positive energy per unit volume carried by the vacuum , that is , the vacuum pressure . its value is an open question , and will be confronted in the next section . quark masses are taken to be equal to their current - algebra values , which amounts to ignoring effects from chiral symmetry breaking ( i.  e. dynamical masses ) in the quark gas . in particular , @xmath0 and @xmath1 quarks can be assumed to be massless , whereas a mass between 100 and 200 mev is typically assigned to the @xmath7 quark . if lead nuclei are accelerated at cern - sps energies , during the early stages of the collision the so - called  fireball " is formed , which is a hot and dense plasma of deconfined quarks and gluons . as the plasma cools down , it becomes more diluted until hadronization takes place . thus , in the phase diagram one is moving from higher to lower densities , and from the quark to the hadronic phase . weak processes are not expected to play a role due to the short expansion times , and thus strangeness , which is conserved in strong interactions , can be ignored . the bulk of nuclear matter resulting after hadronization can be described by the eos of cold matter with an average isospin asymmetry , @xmath24 , equal to 0.2 ( @xmath24 is defined as @xmath25 , and 0.2 is its value in lead ) ) . for the hadronic phase , we then have , for the energy density , @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the energy per particle from ref . @xcite and @xmath28 ( @xmath29 ) are the proton ( neutron ) fractions . taking the transition energy density , @xmath30 , to be known , we can immediately determine the baryonic density , @xmath31 , which corresponds to it in our model of the nucleonic eos . for instance , for @xmath32 , the transition baryon number density is 0.74 @xmath2 from our eos . notice that the stiffness of the nucleonic eos determines the _ baryonic _ density at which the appropriate transition energy density is achieved , a point worth underlining . the bag pressure is essentially a free parameter . it has a value of 55 mev @xmath2 according to the original mit bag model , whereas lattice calculations estimate it to be about 200 mev @xmath2 @xcite . first , we consider ( constant ) values of @xmath4 within this ( rather large ) range and calculate the energy density of @xmath0 and @xmath1 quark matter . in fig .  1 , we show the quark energy density for @xmath4 equal to 55 , 100 , and 200 mev @xmath2 , and the nucleonic energy density from eq . the two panels refer to @xmath19 equal to 0 and 0.2 , respectively . referring to the first panel , we see that , for @xmath4 equal to 55 mev @xmath2 , the crossing density is too low to be realistic ( about normal nuclear matter density ) , whereas with values of 100 and 200 mev @xmath2 transition densities equal to 0.93 and 1.2 @xmath2 are predicted , respectively . the corresponding energy densities are not inconsistent with present experimental constraints . when @xmath19 is non - zero , the transition density shifts to higher values , see second frame of fig .  1 , but the difference is minor . a better way to proceed is to fit the value of @xmath4 imposing equality of the quark and hadron energy densities at the appropriate baryon number density ( as determined from the nucleonic eos ) . that is : @xmath33 where the right - hand side is the energy density of @xmath0 and @xmath1 quarks , which depend linearly on @xmath4 , see eq . ( 14 ) . with the left - hand side known from the nucleonic eos , it is elementary to determine @xmath4 . it has been argued , though , that @xmath4 should be density dependent @xcite , as a large reduction of its value in nuclear matter appears to be consistent with the description of phenomena such as the emc effect @xcite . in fact , allowing the mit bag constant to depend on the local density leads to the recovery of relativistic phenomenology @xcite like large cancelations between lorentz scalar and vector potentials in nuclear matter .    adopting an even simpler parametrization than those considered in ref . @xcite , we assume that @xmath34 has a constant value up to densities around the transition point and then drops sharply to its asymptotic value ( basically , a very sharp woods - saxon distribution approximated by a step function ) . that is : @xmath35 obviously , high - density predictions will be mostly sensitive to the asymptotic value of @xmath34 , thus the value of @xmath36 is not very relevant . we follow ref . @xcite and choose a value between 200 and 400 mev @xmath2 . @xmath37 can then be fixed by imposing the condition eq .  ( for @xmath19=0 , fitted values of @xmath37 are shown in table i for some acceptable values of the transition energy density . our values of @xmath37 are directly comparable with those of the constant @xmath38 of ref . @xcite , where a gaussian or woods - saxon parametrizations are chosen for @xmath34 , with its asymptotic value , @xmath38 , fitted at the transition point . that is the parameter displayed in table i for the second and third models . first , we notice that , within a given model , @xmath37 spans a rather large range ( for relatively small changes in the transition density ) . furthermore , the values of @xmath4 are quite sensitive to the details of the density dependence of the nucleonic eos . clearly , some ( pre - established ) value of the energy density is obtained at a lower or higher value of the number density depending on the stiffness of the original eos . this becomes particularly clear looking at the last model considered in table i , which is based on the  bhf + tbf " approach , but is considerably more repulsive . this eos is the one labeled as  bob " in ref.@xcite . it is obtained with bhf calculations together with tbf . the parameters of the tbf are chosen to be , as far as possible , consistent with those of the meson - exchange two - body potential , which is bonn b @xcite . .values of @xmath37 ( or @xmath38 ) predicted by various hadronic models for fixed transition energy density . the  bhf + tbf " and  rmf " entries are taken from ref .  @xcite . ( for those cases , the given values refer to the parameter labeled as @xmath38 in ref . the  bhf + tbf@xmath39 " is the eos model labeled as  bob " in ref . @xcite , see text for . [ cols="^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     the quark and hadron energy densities with the sharp density dependence of @xmath34 from eq . ( 17 ) are shown in fig .  2 , for transition energy density equal to 800 and 1100 mev @xmath40 . a smoother density dependence of @xmath34 would have impact only at the lower densities . constructing one is straightforward but besides the point of this paper , where we want to perform a pedagogical demonstration of the uncertainty involved in determining the features of the phase transition ( and the eos thereafter ) , particularly as it relates to the underlying hadronic model . we explored the quark - hadron phase transition in weakly isospin - asymmetric matter as it could take place during the expansion phase of energetic collisions of lead nuclei . we used either a constant bag pressure , @xmath4 , or the simplest parametrization of its density dependence to demonstrate the role of the nucleonic eos in determining the features of the transition . the parameter which determines the asymptotic behavior of @xmath34 is very sensitive to the details of the density dependence of the nucleonic eos . thus , independent information on the density dependence of @xmath4 in the medium would be very helpful . those could come , for instance , from considerations of emc effects @xcite . in turn , such information would help constrain the density dependence of the _ nucleonic _ eos at the phase transition . support from the u.s . department of energy under grant no . de - fg02 - 03er41270 is acknowledged . j. cleymans , r.v . gavai , and e. suhonen , phys . rep . * 130 * , 217 ( 1986 ) . u. heinz and m. jacobs , nucl - th/0002042 ; u. heinz , hep - ph/0009170 . edward farhi and r.l . jaffe , phys . d * 30 * , 2379 ( 1984 ) . burgio , m. baldo , p.k . sahu , and h .- j . schulze , phys . c * 66 * , 025802 ( 2002 ) . m. baldo , g.f . burgio , and h .- j . schulze , phys . c * 58 * , 3688 ( 1998 ) ; * 61 * , 055801 ( 200 ) . ghosh , s.c . phatak , and p.k . sahu , z. phys . a * 352 * , 457 ( 1995 ) . n.k . glendenning , j. * 293 * , 470 ( 1985 ) . kapusta and k.a . olive , phys . lett . * 64 * , 13 ( 1990 ) ; j. ellis , j.i . kapusta , and k.a . olive , nucl . b348 * , 345 ( 1991 ) . h. satz , phys . rep . * 89 * , 349 ( 1982 ) . xuemin jin and b.k . jennings , phys . c * 55 * , 1567 ( 1997 ) . f. sammarruca , international journal of modern physics e * 19 * , 1259 ( 2010 ) . z.h . li and h .- j schulze , phys . c * 78 * , 028801 ( 2008 ) . r. machleidt , adv . * 19 * , 189 ( 1989 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we consider the transition from quark to hadronic matter which may result during the cooling / expansion of the quark - gluon plasma formed in energetic collisions of weakly asymmetric ions . this transition involves the energy density of @xmath0 and @xmath1 quark matter and the one of nearly isospin - symmetric nuclear matter . within bag models , the former entails knowledge of the bag pressure , a poorly constrained quantity . the bag pressure at high - density can be fixed imposing equality of quark and nucleonic energy densities at the ( assumed known ) transition point . we find this value to be very model dependent .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: all particle species , including neutrinos , must have been produced during the big bang . should neutrinos be stable and sufficiently massive , their combined gravitational attraction would be sufficient to collapse the universe . our existence therefore allows one to infer properties of invisible but gravitationally interacting matter . this argument was originally advanced by gershtein and zeldovich@xcite in 1966 and was used by cowsik and mcclelland@xcite to devise a limit on the order of @xmath0 for the sum of the masses of stable neutrino species , where h is the scaled hubble constant . this argument also supplies a lower bound on extremely heavy neutrinos at the gev scale . details of these limits can change substantially if neutrinos decay . the change depends on the equation of state of its decay products - a massive neutrino decaying to massless particles will effect the evolution of the universe differently than one with massive decay products . the effect also depends on the time scale of the neutrino decay relative to other time scales in the universe , such as that of big bang nucleosynthesis . the contribution of decaying neutrinos to supernovae energetics can also be used to derive limits on @xmath1 lifetime and mass @xcite .    shown in figure [ fig : cosmo ] are a set of allowed and excluded regions of mass and lifetime , as supplied by aleph @xcite . in addition to these cosmological bounds , the figure also shows the limits imposed by the lack of observation of neutrino - less decays such as @xmath2 - these decays could have massive neutrinos inside of loops and would therefore be sensitive to neutrino properties . in addition , the stringent limit claimed by aleph@xcite is also plotted in the figure . note that on such a scale , the difference in mass limits from different experiments would be barely visible . of interest is that at the mev mass scale , where accelerators are currently sensitive , many lines cross - this indicates that this could be a region rich with ( mis)understanding , where many different approximations might break down .    it would be interesting to review what effect recent indications of a non - zero cosmological constant might have on all these limits . the overlap of the supernova and boomerang data released this year indicate that the gravitational energy density of the universe is to within a factor of a few equal to that used to derive the cowsik - mcclelland limit and that the ensuing argument is still qualitatively valid . one can also recast the argument in terms of the stability of clusters , and this still yields a comparable limit @xcite . the donut collaboration has recently announced that it has made the first observation of tau neutrino appearance . although their results ( reported elsewhere in these proceedings ) do not tell us very much about the mass of this neutrino , they do tell us that it does exist .    the karmen collaboration , which had previously reported an anomaly consistent with a weakly interacting neutral particle emitted in pion decays with a mass of 33.9 mev @xcite , no longer sees this anomaly in a larger dataset . their new results are reported elsewhere in these proceedings . possibly the most talked about recent results are those coming from the superkamiokande collaboration , also reported elsewhere in these proceedings . they report that their data is consistent with the mixing of muon type neutrinos into a different state , most probably @xmath3 neutrinos . should these results hold up , they are a strong argument against a massive neutrino in the allowed mev mass range . unfortunately , superkamiokande has yet to take into account the possibility that neutrinos are massive and can decay . given that all other known particles that oscillate also decay , one might legitimately ask whether this is also the case in the neutrino sector . one could hope that low mass , long lived electron type neutrinos , medium lived muon neutrinos and short lived massive tau neutrinos might help explain the solar and atmospheric neutrino puzzles . until such possibilities are ruled out it might be premature to assume that mixing has been proven and that the mev mass scale for the tau neutrino is no longer interesting . simply showing consistency with a given model does not necessarily rule out other models . at electron - positron colliders , it is possible to produce mono - energetic tau pairs . when these decay to hadrons and exactly one neutrino each , the tau flight direction on each side must have been along a cone around the direction of the hadronic decay products . the size of this cone depends on the tau and neutrino mass . requiring that the common @xmath3 flight direction is on the overlap of the two cones allows one to measure @xmath4 . this method was used by cleo@xcite , resulting in the mass distribution shown in figure  [ fig : twocone ] .    the sharp drop near 1.8 gev provides the required mass . combining this result with the bes result for the @xmath3 mass@xcite , cleo derives an upper limit of 60 mev on the neutrino mass at 95% c.l . if the tau neutrino were more massive than the tau , the tau could not decay : the mass of the neutrino restricts the allowed phase space and decay rate . one can set a limit on the neutrino mass by carefully measuring branching ratios of the tau . the theoretically best predicted decays are the fully leptonic decays @xmath5 where @xmath6 , with the main uncertainties coming from the tau mass and lifetime . these are measured at the per cent level . knowing the pion and kaon form factors , once can also use the single body hadronic decays of the tau . using the particle data group best fit values for all these parameters , swain and taylor@xcite derives a 95 % confidence level upper limit on the tau neutrino mass at 68 mev . the method that has given the most stringent limits on the tau neutrino mass attempts to fit the two dimensional spectrum of hadronic decay product mass and energy for @xmath3 s produced at electron - positron colliders . as shown in figure  [ fig : evsm ] , near the endpoint , the kinematically allowed contour depends very strongly on the neutrino mass . not only does the contour depend on the neutrino mass , but for any fixed energy , the hadronic mass spectrum shape also depends on the neutrino mass : points away from the limit contain some information on the neutrino mass . however , for a fixed hadronic mass , the derivative of the hadronic energy with respect to the neutrino mass is effectively flat except for a delta function at the contour limit . finite smearing dilutes further the neutrino mass sensitivity , as do initial and final state radiation . note that isr / fsr cause points to drop along the energy axis in the figure , but do not smear them along the mass direction . these effects are calculable however . one can distinguish two different types of decays used for this kind of analysis with different sensitivities to systematic errors . decays to many pions ( e.g. @xmath7 ) tend to produce events near the sensitive endpoint but suffer from small branching ratios and low reconstruction efficiencies . decays with few particles in the final state ( e.g. @xmath8 ) tend to produce events far away from the endpoint , but have efficiencies and branching ratios that are large - one hopes that the efficiencies are large enough that a rare event near the endpoint will be reconstructed . the most general likelihood function is of the form : @xmath9 the first term , used only by @xcite and @xcite , is a poisson term relating the number of events near the endpoint as a function of the number of events far from the endpoint and the neutrino mass . one uses this term as a compromise to avoid fitting over many points which do not have much neutrino mass information , and also lessen the dependence on the explicit form of the physics function in the low mass region . the product term is taken over all accepted data events , and is composed of a signal term @xmath10 and a background term @xmath11 . the signal term is composed of a convolution of the expected detector smearing , efficiency and the differential decay width . the neutrino mass enters only through the decay width and the limits of integration for the convolution - again , the energy dependence on neutrino mass in this term comes in only as an integration limit , and not a slope . the differential decay width depends on the v - a nature of the weak interaction , the underlying physics of the event and the radiative corrections , including isr and fsr . the background term is a parameterization of events which are not signal , whether originating from ( mis - reconstructed ) tau decays or other physics . these terms in general do not depend on the neutrino mass - this is true to a high degree even for the mis - reconstructed @xmath3 events since they tend to be highly smeared over the plot . this lack of dependence on neutrino mass makes this type of likelihood divergent when all neutrino masses are considered so one introduces a prior distribution , cutting off neutrino masses greater than say 100 mev . the background shape is generally determined either from monte carlo or directly from non - tau decay data . the relative weight of signal and background , @xmath12 , is usually determined by fitting for the number of events above the endpoint region . the likelihood is then used to determine an upper limit on the mass of the neutrino . this is generally done by integrating the likelihood to a 95th percentile above 0 mev or by finding where the log of the likelihood drops by 1.92 from its peak . neither method is more correct than the other , rather each expresses a different philosophy on the meaning of the upper limit . in all cases published so far the application of either method gives a consistent answer to within @xmath13 . since only one new result has been published since the last conference , readers desiring a full review of previous results should refer to r. mcnulty s review in the previous set of proceedings @xcite . these results are briefly summarized in table  [ table : summary ] . the new result is from cleo@xcite which has examined the neutrino mass using the decay @xmath14 for the first time . this sample is composed of 29,000 decay events , as shown in figure  [ fig:4pimasscleo2000 ] . the fit includes an explicit term accounting function for mis - identified tau decays , corresponding to 7% of the event sample . some 3% of the sample is accounted for by a non - tau background term . the spectral function in this decay was fit below the neutrino mass sensitive region to a combination of non - resonant , rho and omega subcomponents . this fit was then extended into the endpoint region . the resulting likelihood distribution is shown in figure  [ fig : likelicleo2000 ] . the 95th percentile above 0 mev is at 22 mev for the raw data , and the total systematic error , added in linearly to conform with the standard set by previous studies , sets the final limit at 28 mev . the main systematic error comes in through the spectral function dependence , the @xmath15 energy scale , as well as the charged track momentum reconstruction . a glance at table  [ table : summary ] summarizing all published results shows that all limits are generally within the same range , in spite of a very large range of event sample sizes .    [ cols="<,<,<,<,<,<",options="header " , ]      + the values here are calculated using the cleo monte carlo and detector simulation for @xmath16 decays . exact values will vary from experiment to experiment , and decay mode to decay mode . in light of the observations made above , i would like to counsel future limit setters to heed the following advice :    * restrict your fit region and use a poisson term : since most events far from the endpoint have little neutrino mass information apart from helping to normalize the expected number of events near the endpoint , it is not worth cpu time to fit these events in detail . * use a background function : if one wishes to avoid using a background function , one must use tighter and tighter cuts as the accepted luminosity increases . this can result in the paradoxical situation in which an experiment ends up with less sensitivity as its sample size grows . the inclusion of a background function remedies this strange state of affairs . * publish the expected reach @xmath17 ( and its variance ) for a massless neutrino hypothesis . this will help establish whether the limit from data is meaningful or a dangerous fluctuation . * publish the discriminatory power of your experiment : how often does your data derived limit occur for a large ( say 50 mev ) neutrino mass ? * compare the limit derived from mass information only to the limit derived from the energy vs mass distribution : if the two dimensional limit is substantially different from the one dimensional one , then the limit is being driven by a small number of events or a very unlikely event distribution . * carefully examine large smearing tails : comments given in the text point out that the sharp cut - off in reconstructed energy as determined by the neutrino mass make the properties of the neutrino mass estimator unclear . at the very least , one should carefully examine the effects of systematic error along the energy axis . ultimately , as samples grow and the relevant fit region shrinks , fluctuations due to the unknown tails of the smearing functions in both mass and energy must dominate the fits . in light of the suspicious properties of the maximum likelihood estimator raised in this review , it would be very useful if experimenters would calibrate their estimators using a monte carlo method . the method proposed herein answers the question of `` what masses are ruled out by my data ? ''    * generate a large number of monte carlo samples with sizes comparable to those obtained in data for different input neutrino masses ( @xmath18 ) * for each of these samples , form the likelihood , and find the neutrino mass which maximizes the likelihood , @xmath19 * plot @xmath19 vs @xmath18 * form the likelihood for the data sample and find its maximum @xmath20 * find @xmath18 such that @xmath19 is larger than @xmath20 @xmath21 of the time * set the upper limit to this value    unfortunately this method does not provide a nice way to combine limits from different experiments . however given the points made in this review , perhaps it is better to suffer from this than to combine likelihoods with unclear statistical properties , and possibly incompatible meanings . i have briefly reviewed the current constraints on an mev scale tau neutrino mass . these constraints are from astrophysical observations as well as from terrestrial observations and all of them taken at face value allow for the existence of an unstable @xmath1 with a mass on an mev scale . recent superkamiokande results indicate that the ( stable ) neutrinos participating in atmospheric @xmath22 disappearance have a mass well below an mev and are consistent with stable tau neutrinos . an inspection of the two dimensional limits on the @xmath3 neutrino mass derived from experimental data reveal that the ensemble of limits is too consistent . i have also for the first time shown that the usual assumption that the likelihood is well behaved for this technique is questionable . i have ended by recommending what extra information future limit setters should publish to allow others to gauge the believability of their limits , and have also recommended a method more suited to obtaining an answer to the question of what neutrino mass is excluded by the observed data than the methods used up to now . the audience would have found this talk far more tedious had it not been for many interesting discussions with ronan mcnulty and many other colleagues at cern and on cleo . i d like to thank the conference organizers for inviting me to give this talk in such a nice location . i also would like to thank the national science foundation for its support .    9 s.s . gershtein . and ya.b . zeldovich , jetp lett . * 4 * ( 1966 ) 174 . r.  cowsik and j.  mcclelland , ap.j . * 180 * ( 1973 ) 7 . e.  kolb and m.  turner , the early universe , addison - wesley , 1990 . m. turner , private communication . b.  barate et  al . , aleph coll . j. * c2 * ( 1998 ) 395 . b.  armbruster et  al . , karmen coll . , phys . lett . * b348 * ( 1999 ) 19 . a.  anastassov et  al . , cleo coll . , phys . rev . * d55 * ( 1997 ) 2559 . bai et  al . , bes collaboration , phys . rev . * d53 * ( 1996 ) 20 . j.  swain and l.  taylor , phys . rev . * d55 * ( 1997 ) 1 . r.  ammar et  al . , cleo coll . * b431 * ( 1998 ) 209 . r.  mcnulty , nuclear physics b ( proc . suppl . ) 76 ( 1999 ) 409 . m.  athanas et  al . , phys . rev . * d61 * ( 2000 ) 052002 . the particle data group , euro . j. * c15 * 2000 . k.  ackerstaff et  al . , opal coll . j. * c5 * ( 1998 ) 229 . d.  buskulic et  al . , phys . lett . * b349 * ( 1995 ) 585 . r.  akers et  al . , z. phys . * c65 * ( 1995 ) 183 . d.  cinabro et  al . * 70 * ( 1993 ) 3700 . h.  schroder et  al . a8 * ( 1993 ) 573 . g.  alexander et  al . , opal coll . , z. phys . * c72 * ( 1996 ) 231 .
Abstract:

Answer: after a quick review of astrophysically relevant limits , i present a summary of mev scale tau neutrino mass limits derived from accelerator based experiments . i argue that the current published limits appear to be too consistent , and that we therefore can not conclude that the tau neutrino mass limit is as low as usually claimed . i provide motivational arguments calling into question the assumed statistical properties of the usual maximum likelihood estimators , and provide a prescription for deriving a more robust and understandable mass limit .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: entanglement content is one of the fundamental ways to characterize nonlocal quantum resources ( nonlocal states and operations ) . for pure bipartite states the ultimate measure of entanglement , the von neumann entropy of entanglement , had been recently discovered @xcite . a universal measure of entanglement for mixed states had not been found yet and different measures are used depending on the operational context . nevertheless , the important feature of all entanglement measures of states is that their values are directly inferred using the parameters of a state itself . similarly to mixed states , the entanglement content of quantum operations can be characterized in different ways , e.g. via the amount of entanglement necessary to generate that operation or via the amount of entanglement the operation is able to produce / destroy ( the so called entangling / disentangling capacities ) . this article is concerned with the two latter measures . unlike the amount of entanglement in a state , the ( dis)entangling capacities of an operation do not have an operational interpretation on their own . they manifest themselves via the change of the entanglement of a particular state that the operation acts upon . and the operation has to act on a specific state ( the  optimal " state ) in order to realize its ( dis)entangling capacity in full . thus , the straightforward way to calculate these quantities is to maximize the change of entanglement over all possible initial states . substantial progress have been made recently in investigating ( dis)entangling capacities of unitary operations . the capacities of two - qubit unitary operations were explicitly calculated @xcite . it was also shown that single - shot capacities are equal to asymptotic capacities @xcite . some results for higher dimensions were also obtained @xcite . however , extending these techniques to systems of higher dimensionality seems to be a very difficult task . even in the two - qubit case the capacities of a general unitary operation have been calculated numerically , no analytical technique is known .    in all real situations an experimentalist never deals with a perfect unitary in the laboratory . and it is needless to say that calculating capacities of non - unitary operations , i.e. nonlocal quantum maps , is even a bigger challenge .    in this article we consider nonlocal completely positive trace preserving ( cptp ) maps of the form    @xmath0    where @xmath1 are unitary transformations . maps of this type are often called _ random unitary processes _ , and they are doubly stochastic . the map ( [ map ] ) may arise , for example , if the desired unitary transformation can be implemented successfully only with certain probability , while another unitary is realized in the case of failure . a continuous version of the map ( [ map ] ) may arise naturally in experiment if parameters of a desired unitary transformation are subject to a noise ( the case of gaussian noise will be analyzed in detail in section [ sec : continuous ] ) . the scope of this article covers the case of @xmath2 that act on two qubits . we calculate single - shot ( dis)entangling capacities of @xmath2 in some particular cases .    the structure of the article is as follows . in sec . [ sec : unitary ] the definition(s ) of ( dis)entangling capacities of unitaries are presented and some recent results concerning two - qubit unitaries . sec . [ sec : nonunitary ] generalizes the definition of ( dis)entangling capacities for non - unitaries . some numerical results for ( lower bounds on ) ( dis)entangling capacities for discreet and continuous mixtures of unitaries are presented in sec . [ sec : examples ] . consider an unitary operation @xmath3 that acts on a tensor product hilbert space @xmath4 of two spatially separated particles @xmath5 and @xmath6 . if @xmath3 can not be decomposed into a tensor product of local unitaries , i.e. @xmath7 , then we say that @xmath3 is nonlocal . unlike local unitaries , nonlocal unitaries have an ability to produce or destroy entanglement . this ability is usually characterized by the entangling , @xmath8 , and the disentangling , @xmath9 , capacities , i.e. by the maximal increase ( decrease ) of entanglement that can be achieved when @xmath10 acts on quantum states . to quantify these capacities we have to choose appropriate measures of entanglement . the most sensible choice is to use _ the entanglement of formation _ @xcite as a measure of entanglement of the initial state @xmath11 , and _ the distillable entanglement _ @xcite as a measure of entanglement of the final state @xmath12 . the reason for this asymmetric choice is purely operational one . what counts is the amount of resources ( pure maximally entangled states ) needed to create @xmath11 ( asymptotically ) and the amount of pure - state entanglement one will be able to extract from @xmath12 , again asymptotically . thus the most general definition is    where the maximization is over all possible states @xmath11 ( mixed and pure ) accessible to @xmath10 . the hilbert space of an accessible @xmath11 is not necessarily restricted to @xmath4 . it turns out to be the case that some @xmath10 create more entanglement if the original particles are entangled with local ancillary particles @xcite . it also appears to be the case that the maximization in eq . ( [ def_u_mixed ] ) can be restricted to pure - states only @xcite , therefore , the definition ( [ def_u_mixed ] ) can be simplified as    where @xmath13 is an entanglement measure for pure state ( throughout this paper we will use the von neumann entropy of entanglement as the most appropriate measure ) . this obviously simplifies the job significantly . let us briefly recall the main results for @xmath5 and @xmath6 being two - level particles , qubits . any @xmath3 acting on qubits can be decomposed as @xcite @xmath14e^{i\sum_{\alpha = x , y , z } \xi_{\alpha } \sigma_\alpha^a\sigma_\alpha^b } \left [ w_a\otimes w_b\right ] , \ ] ] where @xmath15 . the middle term sandwiched by local unitaries is called the _ canonical decomposition _ of @xmath10 . any @xmath10 can be transformed to its canonical form by sandwiching it with hermitian conjugates of corresponding local unitaries . that means that the canonical form is genuinely nonlocal part of @xmath10 - everything else is local . the beauty of this results is that out of 15 real parameters that parameterize a general two - qubit unitary only three are necessary to describe its nonlocal nature . it simplifies considerably the classification of nonlocal unitaries . for the purpose of our discussion three classes can be identified ; namely , the controlled - not(cnot)-class ( @xmath16 , @xmath17 ) , the doublecnot - class ( @xmath18 , @xmath19 , @xmath20 ) , and the swap - class ( all three @xmath21 are not equal zero ) . the names reflect the fact that the corresponding  mother " unitary transformation ( i.e. with @xmath22 for @xmath23 ) belongs to that class . the main results for qubits are @xcite :    \(a ) @xmath24 . \(b ) for cnot - class the optimal state , i.e. the state that satisfies definition ( [ def_u_pure ] ) , lives solely in the hilbert space of particles @xmath5 and @xmath6 ( no ancillas are needed ) and takes the form @xmath25 and @xmath26 respectively . thus all @xmath10 from that class achieve their capacity by acting on pure states with the same schmidt basis ( only values of schmidt coefficients differ depending on the value of @xmath27 ) . the values @xmath28 can be obtained by straightforward numerical optimization . \(c ) if @xmath29 the maximal capacity is achieved when @xmath30 is already entangled . \(d ) unitaries of the cnot - class achieve their capacities by acting on optimal states that lie in @xmath4 . however , unitaries of the dcnot and swap - classes achieve their capacities only if the original particles are entangled with local ancillas . it was conjectured that it is sufficient to take the size of ancillas equal to the size of original particles . this conjecture was supported by numerical simulations for qubits @xcite . for non - unitaries we will use a definition similar to eq . ( [ def_u_mixed ] ) , i.e. we define    however , in general here we can not justify reducing the search to pure states . this is due to the fact that distillable entanglement is not necessary a convex measure . we can argue , nevertheless , that in the case of mixtures of unitaries acting on two qubits without ancillas the distillable entanglement can be regarded as a convex measure . indeed , a mixture of optimal states ( [ input ] ) forms a bell - diagonal state for which the lower and upper bounds on distillable entanglement @xcite @xmath31 coincide . here we recall that the relative entropy of entanglement @xmath32 is a convex measure . if ancillas are used then the situation is more complicated . we leave the question of whether the capacities are attained on pure states as an open question and calculate the lower bounds on these capacities using pure states . the properties of two - qubit unitaries described above in section [ sec : unitary ] can help us to generalize that approach to mixtures of unitaries as in eq . ( [ map])@xcite . here we use two methods for calculating @xmath33 and @xmath34 . * method i : * we make an assumption about the particular form of the optimal input state , and subsequently find the optimal values of its parameters . * method ii : * we perform a direct numerical optimization without making any _ a priori _ assumption about the optimal state ( except of its purity ) . consider a mixture of unitaries of the cnot - class , @xmath35 here we use method i. from continuity it follows that the optimal state is expected to lie on the 2-dimensional manifold of ( superpositions of ) states of the form ( [ input ] ) or their convex mixtures . moreover , in this special case we can adopt the argument of @xcite ( see sec . [ sec : unitary ] ) and claim that the search can be restricted to pure states only . thus , the state optimal for @xmath2 is again of the type ( [ input ] ) .    as a simplest case let us consider only two unitaries @xmath36 and @xmath37 : @xmath38    = 3.7truein    for convenience let us define @xmath39 , and denote @xmath40 simply by @xmath41 , so @xmath42 . we will fix @xmath41 and analyze @xmath43 and @xmath26 for various @xmath44 . for @xmath45 the map reduces to a unitary ( with an appropriate capacity ) . as smaller angle means smaller @xmath8 , we would expect that if @xmath36 is mixed with @xmath37 , where @xmath46 , then the entangling capacity of the resulting map will decrease relative to @xmath8 . this intuition is consistent with the results presented on fig . similarly , we might expect that the entangling capacity of the map will increase with @xmath47 , and that this capacity will reach its maximum for maximal @xmath44 , i.e. maximal @xmath48 . however , fig . [ fig1 ] shows that this is not the case . @xmath49 indeed grows while @xmath44 is positive and relatively small , reaching its maximum for certain intermediate positive value of @xmath44 and then starting to decrease . in other words , if @xmath36 and @xmath50 are fixed , then maximal @xmath33 is achieved for some intermediate @xmath37 with @xmath51 , but not for @xmath52 . this result might seem counterintuitive from the first sight , but it has a clear explanation . let @xmath53 , @xmath54 be the corresponding optimal values of @xmath55 in eq . ( [ input ] ) for @xmath36 and @xmath37 respectively , then the optimal value of @xmath56 will lie somewhere in between , i.e. satisfy @xmath57 . for @xmath58 , @xmath37 can realize its entangling capacity of 1 ebit if @xmath59 . however , when @xmath37 acts on a state with @xmath60 , then it creates less than @xmath61 $ ] ebit . disentangling capacity , @xmath34 , behaves differently . it is monotonic with @xmath44 . it equals @xmath62 for @xmath45 as expected , and it is strictly larger than @xmath62 for all other values of @xmath44 . the last observation shows behavior completely opposite to that of unitaries . in a sense , it is easier for non - local map to destroy entanglement rather than create it , while for unitary operations the opposite holds @xcite . this approach can be similarly applied to any finite number of unitaries and to continuous distribution of unitaries , which will be discussed in section [ sec : continuous ] .      for mixtures of unitaries of dcnot and swap - class method ii the details of numerical calculations are presented in appendix . = 3.5truein    we conjectured that it is sufficient if local ancillas are qubits . selected results are shown in fig . we can see that for dcnot - mixture the behavior of @xmath33 and @xmath34 is qualitatively similar to cnot - mixture ( fig . [ fig1 ] ) . however , for swap - mixture slightly different behavior is obtained . in particular @xmath34 exhibits maximum at an intermediate value of @xmath44 . it is also noticeable that for @xmath63 , @xmath33 is smaller for swap - mixture than for dcnot - mixture . it is a counterintuitive result that swap - mixture which is naturally considered as  stronger " that dcnot - mixture has lower entangling capacity . however , again similar to the line of thought in example i we can argue that for ( relatively ) large @xmath44 the second unitary , @xmath37 is too strong , and therefore when it acts on the optimal state ( optimal for the mixture , not for itself ) it causes more destruction that corresponding @xmath37 of dcnot - class would have caused . so far we analyzed discrete mixtures of unitaries . in this section we analyze a continuous distribution , which is usually what experimentalists deal with . these distributions arise due to uncertainty in one or more parameters . such uncertainties may be caused by the limits of calibration precision of the devices and by high sensitivity of systems used to generate desired interactions . for example , the strength of exchange coupling between donors in silicon based solid - state architectures for quantum computing exhibit significant uncertainty resulting in error in gate operation @xcite . in particular , we consider the case when a non - unitary map arises if a unitary from cnot - class is subject to a gaussian noise . recent work @xcite analyzed the capability of noisy hamiltonians to create entanglement . in particular , interactions of the form eq . ( [ cnot ] ) , where @xmath41 is gaussian distributed with the mean @xmath64 and standard deviation @xmath65 , were considered . without noise this operation ( cnot operation ) is able to create a maximally entangled state if it acts on a disentangled pure state . the authors analyzed the situation when the noisy operation acts on initially disentangled state , which is by itself subject to a gaussian noise . its capability to create entanglement was characterized in terms of the condition for inseparability of the resulting mixed state ( via peres - horodecci separability criterion ) . the aim of our analysis is different . we consider noisy interactions with @xmath66 $ ] and calculate their entangling and disentangling capacities in terms of @xmath67 and @xmath65 . thus , we give a comprehensive quantitative characterization of the non - local content of these noisy maps in terms of their entangling and disentangling capacities . unlike @xcite we do not test the resulting state on inseparability , rather calculate its distillable entanglement explicitly . the action of a unitary @xmath68 $ ] , where @xmath41 is gaussian distributed with the mean @xmath67 and the standard deviation @xmath65 , on the state @xmath69 can be seen as a non - unitary cptp map @xmath70 which is a continuous mixture of unitaries of the cnot - class . similarly to the sec . [ sec : example_i ] we consider pure initial state , i.e. @xmath71 , where @xmath72 takes the form ( [ input ] ) , calculate the distillable entanglement of the output mixed state , and maximize it over @xmath55 . figure [ fig3 ] presents numerical results for @xmath33 and @xmath34 as functions of @xmath67 for several values of @xmath65 . we can see that already for @xmath73 we obtain only very small deviation from the ( dis)entangling capacity of the unitary , i.e. @xmath74 without noise - @xmath75 . as @xmath65 increases the disentangling capacity increases and the entangling capacity decreases . = 3.4truein    the former fact should not be surprizing as it is known that entanglement can be destroyed even by local cptp unital maps @xcite . thus , the more dispersed the distribution of @xmath41 becomes , the easier for @xmath74 to destroy entanglement and the harder to create it . nevertheless , we see that even when @xmath65 is relatively large @xmath74 is still able to create considerable amount of entanglement . we have discussed the entangling and disentangled capacities of nonlocal cptp unital maps , i.e. maps that can be represented as probabilistic mixtures of unitaries , and have calculated these capacities in some particular cases for two qubits . three classes of unitaries were considered , namely the cnot , dcnot , and swap classes .    we have observed that the disentangling capacity was always larger than corresponding entangling capacity , which contrasts with the unitary case where the both capacities are equal for qubits and for higher dimensions disentangling capacity can not be greater than entangling capacity @xcite .    in the case of the cnot - class our results were obtained via straightforward generalization of the method for cnot - class unitaries . we argue that the ( dis)entangling capacity is achieved when a map acts on the optimal pure state from the same family as in the unitary case . both discrete and continuous mixtures were analyzed . in the case of the dcnot and swap - class direct numerical optimization was performed . we have conjectured that dimensions of the local ancillas are equal to the dimensions of the original particles , i.e. the ancillas were taken to be qubits .        here we have calculated single - shot capacities . in the case of unitaries it had been shown that in the asymptotic regime one can not do better @xcite . it is important to check whether this result holds in the non - unitary case .      in our future research we will address the question of whether these bounds are tight . it might be the case that optimal states for these operations are mixed and , consequently , the capacities are higher than we have calculated . this work was funded by the u.k . engineering and physical sciences research council , grant no . ep / c528042/1 , and supported by the european union through the integrated project qap ( ist-3 - 015848 ) and secoqc . we have used two - dimensional ancilla on each side . consider a general state of four qubits in the tensor - product of the computational bases of the original particles @xmath5 , @xmath6 and the ancillary particles @xmath76 , @xmath77 @xmath78    there are @xmath79 terms in the above superposition with @xmath79 complex amplitudes @xmath80 , therefore @xmath81 can be parameterized using @xmath82 real numbers ( if we take into account the global phase and normalization ) . we will parameterize it in the following way @xcite . first , to facilitate our analysis it is easier to incorporate four indexes @xmath83 and @xmath84 , each of which runs from 0 to 1 , into a single index , @xmath85 , that runs from 1 to 16 . this can be done by using the formula @xmath86 , which is essentially a formula for converting a number from the boolean representation to the decimal . second , we present amplitudes @xmath87 in the form @xmath88 where @xmath89 and @xmath90 . third , we introduce new parameters @xmath91 such that @xmath92 where @xmath93 . thus the state @xmath81 is parameterized by 30 angles . the advantage of this parametrization is that we restrict their values only to the interval @xmath94 $ ] that simplifies numerics . we proceed as follows . a program generates a vector of @xmath82 random numbers in the interval @xmath94 $ ] . this is the initial state . we then apply the non - local map and obtain a final state . we calculate the value of the gain in entanglement @xmath95 . after that we vary the values of the random vector by a small amount and repeat these calculations again , thereby obtaining a gradient of the change in entanglement in that point . we move along the gradient to obtain the next @xmath81 , and the procedure is repeated . eventually , the program reaches the maximum where it stops .                                  strictly speaking dcnot - class and swap - class should be unified under a single class if analyzed according to the criteria of interconvertability under locc . in the framework of ( dis)entangling capacity it is useful to identify them as separate classes , because their behavior differs qualitatively .
Abstract:

Answer: entangling and disentangling capacities are the key manifestation of the nonlocal content of a quantum operation . a lot of effort has been put recently into investigating ( dis)entangling capacities of unitary operations , but very little is known about capacities of non - unitary operations . here we investigate ( dis)entangling capacities of unital cptp maps acting on two qubits .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: clarification of the chiral phase transition and the confinement / deconfinement transition are the longstanding central issues in qcd . there have been numerous efforts to understand the phase structure of qcd at zero and finite temperature or density regions  @xcite . chiral phase transition is detected by monitoring the order parameter , chiral condensate @xmath2 , whereas a polyakov loop is widely used in order to know whether a system is in the confinement phase or not . the expectation value of a polyakov loop is zero when a system is in the confinement phase , and it can be finite in the deconfinement phase . a polyakov loop may be considered as an order parameter for the color confinement . these two `` order parameters '' unfortunately do not go together . ( interestingly , a polyakov loop and dirac eigenvalues , which also reflect the chiral phase transition , can be related  @xcite . ) while chiral condensate @xmath3 can be a good order parameter if we neglect the small current quark masses , a polyakov loop can serve as an order parameter only in pure gauge systems without quarks ( or with infinitely heavy quarks ) , where deconfinement transition is expressed by the spontaneous @xmath4-symmetry breaking . the presence of dynamical quarks explicitly breaks the @xmath4 symmetry and a polyakov loop results in an approximate order parameter . the color fields induced by a polyakov loop is readily screened by the dynamical quark loops that twist along the euclidean time direction . nevertheless , a polyakov loop surely reflects the confinement nature and has been used in many studies . it may be however desired to clarify the confinement nature in a clearer manner . for example , the chiral symmetry breaking surely has an impact on the properties of quarks . current quarks would change their natures due to the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking acquiring the large effective masses  @xcite , and therefore a polyakov loop screened by `` constituent '' quarks could be affected by the chiral phase transition . the apparent coincidence of the critical temperatures for the chiral and confinement transitions is still under debate . even if we evaluate a polyakov loop correlator @xmath5 , it is not so straightforward to clarify the color - confinement nature since we always have string - breaking effects . in high - density systems , the concept of color confinement could be obscure . quarks may freely move from one hadron to another in sufficiently dense hadronic systems , even if the vacuum is still in `` color confinement '' phase . in fact , `` quarkyonic '' phase has been proposed recently  @xcite , where quarks are confined but their degrees of freedom can dominate the system . in any case , as long as we insist on a polyakov loop , it is needed to single out the vacuum property independently of the direct charge - screening effects . search for order parameters have a long - standing history , and several studies have been performed so far  @xcite . we consider prescriptions that remove the dynamical quark loops which directly screen the color fields from a polyakov loop . we introduce the basic ideas  @xcite in this section to make this paper self - contained . we assume su(3 ) lattice gauge theory with single quark - flavor in what follows . ( extensions to other cases are simple . ) the qcd partition function is expressed as @xmath6},\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath7 a ( lattice ) dirac operator , in which non - zero chemical potential can be introduced , and @xmath8 $ ] being the gauge action . in advance of the gauge fields integration , quark fields are integrated out , and all the quark dynamics is encoded in @xmath9 . the quark loops that can directly screen the color fields from a polyakov loop originate from such a fermionic determinant . this fermionic determinant can be expanded in terms of two types of quark loops ( see fig . [ loops ] ) ; ordinary quark loops and wraparound quark loops . ordinary loops exist entirely in a system and can be smoothly shrunk . wraparound loops twist along the imaginary - time direction , and they are the very loops that can directly screen a polyakov loop . such wraparound loops are also responsible for the finiteness of quark density at finite chemical potential , and are important ingredients . schematic figure for the expansion of a fermionic determinant in terms of quark loops . ]    a fermionic determinant can be generally divided into three terms ; @xmath10 with @xmath11 ( @xmath12 ) the terms which contain @xmath13 wraparound quark loops , respectively . here @xmath14 is an integer and can be negative , and a wraparound anti - quark loop is counted as @xmath15 . one connected quark loop which twists @xmath16-times along the euclidean time direction is counted as @xmath16 quark loops . the total number of quark loops is defined as a net number : in case a contribution contains as many wraparound quark loops as wraparound anti - quark loops , the number is defined as zero . we concentrate only on wraparound loops , since ordinary quark loops are irrelevant in the following argument . next , we consider the uniform @xmath4 transformation ; @xmath17 with @xmath18 . here @xmath19 are the link variables on a lattice . by such a transformation , a polyakov loop @xmath0 is rotated as @xmath20 . this @xmath4 transformation also affects dynamical ( wraparound ) quark loops , and @xmath11 are transformed as @xmath21 . using this property , we can single out each @xmath11 by means of such @xmath4 link - variable transformations . denoting the fermionic determinant after @xmath22-times such @xmath4 transformations as @xmath23 , @xmath11 can be obtained as @xmath24 ( see earlier works  @xcite . ) with vanishing quark chemical potential , @xmath25 and @xmath26 hold due to the charge conjugation symmetry . as we have mentioned above , @xmath11 contains @xmath13 wraparound quark loops , and hence what screens the polyakov loop s color fields are the quarks encoded in @xmath27 . in fact , the complex phase associated with @xmath27 rotates a polyakov loop into the real sector . ( @xmath28 and @xmath29 do not . ) the important note is that quarks in @xmath28 and @xmath29 can not screen a fundamental charge completely . then , if we evaluate only @xmath28 , the response of a polyakov loop would be the same as that obtained in a quenched system . @xmath28 is in fact @xmath4-transformation invariant and does not cause the explicit @xmath4-symmetry breaking . we note here that this removal of the explicit @xmath4-symmetry breaking is essentially different from the quark - loop quenching . evaluating @xmath11 corresponds to computing the partition function @xmath30 in the @xmath31-triality sector ( @xmath32 ) , latexmath:[\[{\mathcal z}_i = \sum_{|3k+i\rangle } \langle 3k+i| e^{-\beta \hat h}\     possible states that contain @xmath13 net quarks ( @xmath14 is an arbitrary integer ) . the vacuum still contains dynamical quark loops , and if the quark chemical potential is finite , there will exist @xmath34 net quarks ( @xmath14 net `` baryons '' ) in the system . string - breaking phenomena caused by dynamical quarks will be also reproduced . it was also shown in ref . @xcite that such a projection does not change thermal properties . we expect that it would be possible to unambiguously clarify the confining property of a vacuum independently of the direct charge - screening effect by dynamical quarks . ( if we employ an anti polyakov loop , the roles of @xmath29 and @xmath27 switch positions with each other . ) in this subsection , we individually and explicitly investigate the distributions of a polyakov loop evaluated with @xmath35 . we generate quenched gauge configurations with the plaquette action at @xmath36 on @xmath37 lattice , and perform reweighting using @xmath11 as well as the full determinant @xmath38 generated with the wilson fermion at @xmath39 . [ z3bk](upper ) and fig . [ z3bk](lower ) are the polyakov - loop distributions in the complex plain evaluated with @xmath38 and @xmath28 , respectively , at @xmath40 , where the broken @xmath4 symmetry is observed . as expected , the strength in the real sector is much enhanced by the effect of @xmath38 , which can be seen in fig .  [ z3bk](upper ) . on the other hand , [ z3bk](lower ) shows the similar strength to the quenched case , which was expected in the previous section . especially one can find a three - peak structure in the complex plain . we show the same plots obtained at @xmath41 in fig . [ z3ok ] , where no @xmath4 breaking can be found . the strength in the real sector is again ( but weakly ) enhanced by the effect of @xmath38 as can be seen in fig . [ z3ok](upper ) , whereas fig . [ z3ok](lower ) shows the similar distributions to the quenched system . this prescription , where we measure a polyakov loop in zero - triality backgrounds ( evaluating @xmath28 ) , is free from the direct screening effects or the string - breaking effects by quark loops , and seems to enable us to clarify the confining nature of a vacuum .    for further clarification , we present the distributions reweighted with @xmath1 in fig .  [ d1d2 ] . one can observe that only @xmath27 can rotate a polyakov loop into the real sector , which implies that directly - screening quarks are coming from @xmath27 . the polyakov loops evaluated with @xmath29 are rather uniformly distributed around the origin . then , @xmath29 or @xmath42 may be also employed for this prescription . the nonvanishing polyakov loops are sometimes related to the explicit @xmath4-symmetry breaking caused by fermions . including @xmath29 actually breaks the @xmath4 symmetry explicitly , but it gives a similar polyakov loop distribution to the @xmath4-symmetric quenched case , which is natural if we take into account that quarks in @xmath29 can not screen a polyakov loop completely and hence the situation is physically similar to the quenched system . so far , the response of the polyakov loop evaluated with @xmath28 has been simply similar to the quenched case , and the difference is unclear . in order to show the difference , we perform a test with non - vanishing quark chemical potentials . we hereafter focus on the phase angles of @xmath28 and @xmath38 at finite chemical potential . ( averaging the fermionic determinants at finite chemical potential was suggested and performed some years ago in the context of the reduction of phase fluctuations  @xcite . )    fig . [ phases ] shows the phase angles of @xmath28 and @xmath38 obtained at @xmath40 , @xmath43 , and @xmath44 , with one gauge configuration . the phase angle of the full determinant @xmath38 grows as we increase the chemical potential @xmath45 , which is caused by the asymmetry between quarks and antiquarks . however , as can be found in fig . [ phases ] , the phase angle of @xmath28 remains zero in the small-@xmath45 region , and rapidly grows above some value of @xmath45 . the reason for this behavior would be that the number of wraparound quarks in @xmath28 is @xmath34 . when @xmath45 is small enough , it is not likely for the system to accommodate three net quarks , and @xmath28 is still symmetric between quarks and anti - quarks , which implies @xmath46 . the phase angle at small-@xmath45 region is brought about by @xmath29 and @xmath27 . at large @xmath45 , the charge conjugation symmetry in @xmath28 is largely broken , and the phase angle can be finite , which implies @xmath47 . the phase angles of @xmath28 and @xmath38 obtained as a function of chemical potential @xmath45 are plotted . they were evaluated with one gauge configuration . ] we next take a look of the distributions of fermionic determinants themselves in quenched qcd in this subsection . fig . [ distfd ] shows the distributions of @xmath29 in the complex plain computed at @xmath48(upper ) and @xmath49(lower ) . these distributions are qualitatively similar to the polyakov - loop distributions evaluated with @xmath28 . such behaviors can be understood intuitively : @xmath29 contains @xmath50 wraparound quark loops , and hence corresponds to the free energy of @xmath50 light quarks  @xcite . the physical situation is similar to the @xmath34-quark vacuum ( obtained by evaluating @xmath28 ) with one polyakov loop , where @xmath50 net charges exist . @xmath1 can be another candidate for an order parameter  @xcite . the distributions of @xmath29 computed at @xmath48(upper ) and @xmath49(lower ) are plotted in the complex plain . these distributions are qualitatively similar to the polyakov - loop distributions evaluated with @xmath28 . , title="fig : " ]   the distributions of @xmath29 computed at @xmath48(upper ) and @xmath49(lower ) are plotted in the complex plain . these distributions are qualitatively similar to the polyakov - loop distributions evaluated with @xmath28 . , title="fig : " ]    if we directly generate unquenched gauge configurations adopting @xmath28 instead of @xmath38 via some adequate algorithms  @xcite , what is measured is the ratio , @xmath51 , which will yields @xmath52 values . @xmath51 measured in zero - triality sector gives @xmath53 } } { \int du { \mathcal d}_{0 } \ e^{-s_g[u]}},\ ] ] which differs in normalization from the original proposal in ref . @xcite , @xmath54 } } { \int du { \mathcal d }      \ e^{-s_g[u]}}. \label{dmop}\ ] ] the latter can be obtained by measuring @xmath55 } } { \int du { \mathcal d }      \ e^{-s_g[u]}},\ ] ] in zero - triality sector . @xmath51 as well as a polyakov loop evaluated in zero - triality sector also seems usable for the clarification of the color confinement .    if we allow non - zero triality sectors in unquenched gauge - updation processes ( ordinary updations ) , the order parameter should be @xmath56 , which also turns out to be the original form proposed in ref . @xcite ( eq.([dmop ] ) ) . this implementation , however , would not be suitable for such purposes , simply because ergodicity is worse . though the configurations that have smaller statistical weights @xmath57 will produce larger @xmath56 and @xmath4 symmetry in @xmath58 could be finally recovered , such configurations would less appear in actual calculations . we note here that the inevitable failure of such treatments in the thermodynamic limit was discussed in ref . even so , if we directly measure @xmath59 in quenched backgrounds ( like our analyses in this paper and the original form in ref . @xcite ) , the ergodicity itself is not lost  @xcite and this simple prescription could be valid , though it is time - consuming .      the deconfinement phase transition , if it exists , would be detected still as the spontaneous @xmath4-symmetry breaking , as in the quenched case . ( even when the transition is crossover , the argument is not invalidated . ) we have to introduce a small explicit @xmath4-symmetry breaking effect and take the thermodynamic limit before removing the explicit breaking , in finite volume systems . practically , it will be workable for the detection of transition to evaluate @xmath60 . here @xmath61 is a polyakov loop @xmath0 or the fermionic determinants @xmath1 . especially , the fluctuation of @xmath1 is much suppressed than that of a polyakov loop in zero - triality sector , which can be seen in fig . [ distfd](upper ) : the values of @xmath1 are very sharply distributed on the @xmath4-axes , and we can find three `` lines '' in the complex plain . in any case , the use of @xmath1 seems much more advantageous than a polyakov loop , since it gives us more clearer signals . the reason for the tiny deviations from the @xmath4 axes in fig .  [ distfd](upper ) is the discontinuous behavior in @xmath62 in the deconfined phase . to see this , we compute @xmath29 on the gauge configurations where polyakov - loop s absolute values are less than 0.4 . such polyakov - loop s distributions are round - shaped both at @xmath36(deconfined ) and 5.0(confined ) . on the other hand , @xmath29 at @xmath36 ( fig . [ distfd04](upper ) ) still reproduces the three - peak structure , which implies @xmath29 at small @xmath63 also reflects the phase . to have a closer look , we classify configurations into three categories , sector 1 ( @xmath64 ) , sector 2 ( @xmath65 ) , sector 3 ( @xmath66 ) , in terms of the phase angle ( @xmath67 ) of a polyakov loop . the scatter plot of @xmath29 in each sector can be found in fig . [ distfd04 ] . though , at @xmath36 , the distribution of a polyakov loop ( @xmath68 ) is round - shaped , that of @xmath29 is split onto @xmath4 axes , which are drawn as three solid lines in the figure . this splitting indicates that @xmath1 `` as a function of @xmath0 '' quickly changes its value at the boundaries between sectors in the deconfinement phase whereas they seem to be rather smooth functions in the confinement phase . @xmath1 would be discontinuous at the boundaries in the thermodynamic limit , which is considered as the consequence of the spontaneous @xmath4-symmetry breaking . even if the @xmath4 symmetry in the @xmath4-symmetrized canonical formulation is always spontaneously broken in the presence of dynamical quarks and the transition is crossover , it will be still reflected in @xmath1 . the distributions of @xmath29 at @xmath48(upper ) and @xmath49(lower ) , obtained on the gauge configurations where polyakov - loop s absolute values are less than 0.4 , are plotted in the complex plain . , title="fig : " ]   the distributions of @xmath29 at @xmath48(upper ) and @xmath49(lower ) , obtained on the gauge configurations where polyakov - loop s absolute values are less than 0.4 , are plotted in the complex plain . , title="fig : " ] we have considered prescriptions that are free from the direct charge - screening effects by quark loops and enable us to clarify the confining nature of a vacuum . we have tested two candidates for an order parameter , a polyakov loop ( @xmath0 ) evaluated in zero - triality sector and fermionic determinants ( @xmath1 ) with non - zero triality . we have also individually investigated the distribution of a polyakov loop in each triality sector . especially , @xmath1 has much smaller fluctuations in comparison with a polyakov loop in zero - triality sector , and seems to well reflect the characteristic of a vacuum . such prescription could single out the confinement nature of a vacuum properly and independently of the direct screening effects or the string - breaking effects . the author thanks t.  onogi for fruitful discussions , and thanks o.  borisenko , m.  faber , p.  de  forcrand , k.  fukushima , and c.  gattringer for helpful comments . the numerical calculations in this work were performed with the computer facility at yitp , kyoto university . this work was supported by a grant - in - aid for scientific research by monbu - kagakusho ( no . 20028006 ) and yukawa international program for quark - hadron sciences ( yipqs ) . o.  philipsen , eur . j.  st * 152 * ( 2007 ) 29 [ arxiv:0708.1293 [ hep - lat ] ] . c.  gattringer , phys . * 97 * ( 2006 ) 032003 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0605018 ] . f.  bruckmann , c.  gattringer and c.  hagen , phys . b * 647 * ( 2007 ) 56 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0612020 ] . y.  nambu and g.  jona - lasinio , phys . * 122 * ( 1961 ) 345 . y.  nambu and g.  jona - lasinio , phys . * 124 * ( 1961 ) 246 . l.  mclerran and r.  d.  pisarski , nucl . phys .   a * 796 * ( 2007 ) 83 [ arxiv:0706.2191 [ hep - ph ] ] . k.  miura and a.  ohnishi , arxiv:0806.3357 [ nucl - th ] . c.  e.  detar and l.  d.  mclerran , phys . b * 119 * , 171 ( 1982 ) . k.  fukushima , annals phys . * 304 * ( 2003 ) 72 [ arxiv : hep - ph/0204302 ] . m.  faber , o.  borisenko and g.  zinovev , nucl . b * 444 * ( 1995 ) 563 [ arxiv : hep - ph/9504264 ] . s.  kratochvila and p.  de forcrand , phys . d * 73 * ( 2006 ) 114512 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0602005 ] . p.  de forcrand and v.  laliena , phys . d * 61 * ( 2000 ) 034502 [ arxiv : hep - lat/9907004 ] . g.  aarts , o.  kaczmarek , f.  karsch and i.  o.  stamatescu , nucl . * 106 * ( 2002 ) 456 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0110145 ] . y.  sasai , a.  nakamura and t.  takaishi , nucl .  phys . * 129 * ( 2004 ) 539 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0310046 ] . a.  alexandru , m.  faber , i.  horvath and k.  f.  liu , phys . d * 72 * ( 2005 ) 114513 [ arxiv : hep - lat/0507020 ] .
Abstract:

Answer: we consider prescriptions that are free from the direct charge - screening effects by quark loops and enable us to clarify the confining nature of a vacuum . we test two candidates for an order parameter , a polyakov loop ( @xmath0 ) evaluated in zero - triality backgrounds and fermionic determinants ( @xmath1 ) with non - zero triality . especially , @xmath1 has very small fluctuations in comparison with a polyakov loop in zero - triality sector , and seems to well reflect the characteristic of a vacuum . such prescriptions could be still usable for the clarification of the confinement property of a vacuum .