Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it was only in 1991 that the first extrasolar planets were discovered . they were discovered around a pulsar , psr1257 + 12 , by measuring the variation in arrival times of radio pulses @xcite . the first detection of a planet around a main sequence star was in 1995 . this was found around the sun - like star 51 peg and has a mass 0.47 that of jupiter @xcite . unexpectedly , it has an orbital period of 4.3 days . this is much smaller than the 4333.3 days that jupiter takes to orbit the sun . the main method used for detection of extrasolar planets is the radial velocity technique . this is also know as the doppler wobble method @xcite . the basic idea is that the star and the planet both orbit around their common centre of gravity , obviously this is towards the star . as the star moves towards the observer the wavelength of the light shortens ( i.e. is blue - shifted ) and when it moves away the light is red - shifted . by measuring this slight change the presence of the planet can be inferred ( so not directly detected ) . a description of a classroom experiment using this method can be found in @xcite and a planet finding tool is described in @xcite .    in this experiment we will concentrate on another technique - planetary transits [ transits ] @xcite . a transit of an extrasolar planet occurs when the planet passes in front of its host star in the observer s line of sight . during a transit we observe a reduction in the intensity of light from the star . this fluctuation will be small and typically of the order of one percent of the star s intensity . the principle is the same as in a solar eclipse ; when the moon passes in front of the sun the intensity is reduced by a vast amount . this is an indirect method of detection as the shape of the light curve implies the presence of the planet . for longer period planets they must be in an orbit with an inclination very close to @xmath2 , thus limiting the chances of observing a transit . using transits to detect extrasolar planets was first suggested ( along with the radial velocity method ) by otto struve in 1952 @xcite . it was not until 1999 that the first transiting planet was observed - around hd  209458 @xcite . observing extrasolar planetary transits has become increasingly popular since the equipment required can be very basic . there is a further complication that should at least be considered ; this is limb darkening . limb darkening refers to the reduction of the brightness of the star as one moves away from the centre towards the edge ( or limb ) . this effect occurs due to the density and temperature of the star falling off as distance increases from the star s centre . for well defined transits this effect is negligible . the shape of the dip in the light curve is altered causing the determined planetary radius to be incorrect . in addition , by precisely measuring the periodicity of a transiting planet one could detect an otherwise invisible planet . the gravitational perturbation will cause the transit times to deviate from simple periodicity . the variation of the times of transit is proportional to the ratio of the planetary masses . for an earth - mass planet effecting a transiting jupiter - mass planet the signal can be as large as a few minutes over a period of a few months to years . we now describe a simple laboratory experiment to detect the planet orbiting around the star , hd  209458 . the procedure is based upon that of laboratory aimed at 1st year undergraduates at the university of birmingham . this version of the experiment is aimed at advanced secondary school students and we have run workshops based on these ideas with over 300 14 - 18 year olds , with all students producing reasonable results . the full undergraduate experiment is run over 5 hours whereas the shorter workshop can be completed in 1.5 hours . the aim of this experiment is to use observations made of the brightness of the star hd  209458 over a 7 hour period to infer the properties of the planet orbiting it . this experiment introduces to the student kepler s laws , orbital mechanics , data handling , error analysis , and current astrophysics topics . the analysis is not complex and can all be carried out using standard software packages , such as open office calc or microsoft excel . this is a good practical example of astronomy in the classroom . we believe that astronomy is important to be introduced in the classroom , however , due to the nature of the subject this is difficult in an experimental manner . we suggest that this would broaden the physical knowledge of students by introducing a modern research field into the classroom . this experiment also allows for exploration of key physical concepts such as : orbits , celestial mechanics , stellar types , evolution of the solar system , life in the universe . outside of physics this experiment also demonstrates topics of statistics ( in particular distributions - mean , minimum , standard deviation ) , graphing , error analysis , computing skills and data handling .      here , we make use of ground - based data collected by the stare ( stellar astrophysics and research on exoplanets ) project of hd  209458 . this is the data set used to first detect the extrasolar planet in this system @xcite . data for various other transiting systems can be found on the extrasolar planets encyclopedia ( http://exoplanet.eu ) . the observational data lists the time ( in fractional days ) around the centre of the transit , the normalized intensity of the star , and the @xmath3 error on the normalized intensity . the file can be found on - line at http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~samuel/schools/exoplanet/ in various formats ( including plain text , microsoft excel and open office formats ) .      to determine the size of the planet a plot of observed intensity against time should be made ( see figure [ dataplot ] ) . one now needs to measure the fractional depth of the transit . the fractional depth can be measured in various ways and we now describe a simple procedure . determine when the transit starts and ends . separate the data in time and calculate both mean ( @xmath4 ) during and out of transit ( @xmath5 ) . the fractional depth ( @xmath6 ) is determined by ,    @xmath7    ]    error bars should be added on the graph . this is an ideal time to discuss data reliability . in this case the data after the transit is rather noisy . for this experiment we assume that the planet orbiting hd  209458 crossed along the equator of the star ( as seen from our perspective ) but this is not necessarily true . the larger the inclination of the orbit of the planet , the shorter the transit time will be . if a planet crosses the equator of the star then this is the situation where the inclination is 90@xmath8 . increasing or decreasing the inclination causes the chord across the stellar surface to be smaller and eventually we get to a point when the transit is not detected .    by measuring the depth of the dip during the transit we are able to determine the size of the planet . the transit depth is proportional to the ratio of the planet to star disc area , i.e. , @xmath9 . if the size of the star is know ( for brighter stars by direct measurement or more generally from spectral type ) then the size of the planet can be determined . for the jupiter - sun system ( radius of jupiter , @xmath10  km ; radius of the sun , @xmath11  km ) the fractional depth of the dip would about 1 per cent . in the case of this experiment we take the radius of hd  209458 to be @xmath12 thus allowing us to determine the radius of the planet .      by measuring the length of the transit we are able to determine the planetary orbital radius . figure [ the transit of a planet ] shows a diagram of the transit from above . the observer is located off the right - hand side of the paper and therefore observers a transit as the planet passes from a to b. to simplify the mathematics we make the assumption that the orbit of the planet is circular . in most cases this is not true and means we underestimate the orbital period . for example jupiter is in an elliptical orbit with eccentricity of 0.05 . we also assume that orbital radius ( @xmath13 ) is much larger than the stellar radius ( @xmath14 ) . this is true for the planets in our solar system , but not always for extrasolar planets and results in an overestimate of the orbital period . the orbital period ( @xmath15 ) is determined by ,    @xmath16    where @xmath17 is the circular velocity of the planet . by using figure [ the transit of a planet ] we are able to determine the transit time , @xmath18 ( i.e. the time to pass from a to b ) to be ( using speed = distance / time ) ,    @xmath19    by combining equations [ period_planet ] and [ time_transit ] one is left with    @xmath20    ]    using the stare project data the transit is found to repeat some @xmath21 days later ( i.e. , the time between successive transits ) @xcite . combining all the information together one can determine the orbital radius of the planet . this is much smaller than what we would expect if we assume the solar system to be typical . jupiter has an orbital radius of 5.2 au whilst hd  209458b is 0.045 au . hd  209458b falls into the class of extrasolar planets known as `` hot jupiters '' . these are planets of similar size to jupiter but orbiting closer to the host star .      by applying gravitational physics one can derive an estimate of the mass of the star ( @xmath22 ) . this is achieved by using kepler s 3rd law ( the square of the orbital period of a planet is directly proportional to the cube of the semi - major axis of its orbit ) ,    @xmath23    where , g is the universal gravitational constant ( @xmath24m@xmath25kg@xmath26s@xmath27 ) .      by following this analysis we find the following :    1 . fractional depth @xmath28 2 . radius of planet @xmath29 3 . orbital radius @xmath30  au 4 . mass of the star @xmath31    these results compare well with the currently accepted values ; radius of planet @xmath32 , orbital radius @xmath33  au , mass of the star @xmath34 . this procedure has been carried out with many different groups of students and it seems that a 1 hour session was enough time to give brief insights into the experiment . a 2 hour session would allow for all students to fully complete the experiment . when this experiment is run with undergraduate students ( with significantly less information and more vigorous data analysis techniques required ) they have 5 hours . in a 2 hour session the more able students will have time for further discussion and a more vigorous approach to the removal of `` bad data '' . some limitations are clear . students who are not familiar with spreadsheet software ( such as microsoft excel or open office calc ) do struggle with the initial data manipulation ( though the experiment can be done with printed out graphs and a ruler ) . the concept of error bars confuses students and it is best if experimental error is recapped in advance of the experiment starting . students also have a problem visualising the experiment so a model , such as an orrery and a torch , would be very helpful . in conclusion we have presented an astronomy laboratory experiment that can be undertaken in the classroom with little equipment required . the results obtained are consistent with more robust analysis methods . this experiment provides a simple way of introducing orbital dynamics and extrasolar planets to students . it also introduces basic data analysis techniques . this experiment has been followed , successfully , by a range of students from undergraduate to pre - gcse . this experiment is based on an idea that was introduced into the undergraduate physics laboratories at the university of birmingham by william chaplin and we thank him for useful discussions on the manuscript . we also wish to thank the stare project for placing their data online . +   + this is an author - created , un - copyedited version of an article accepted for publication in physics education . iop publishing ltd is not responsible for any errors or omissions in this version of the manuscript or any version derived from it . the definitive publisher authenticated version will be available online at http://iopscience.iop.org/0031-9120 . 10 charbonneau d , brown t m , latham d w and mayor , m. 2000 , astrophysical journal , 529 , 45 , detection of planetary transits across a sun - like star jones h , newsam a , 2003 , physics education , 38 , 211 , exoplanets latham d w , 1996 , astronomical society of the pacific conference series , 90 , 31 , radial velocity techniques lopresto m c , mckay r , 2004 , the physics teacher , 42 , 208 , detecting our own solar system from afar lopresto m c , mckay r , 2005 , physics education , 40 , 46 , an introductory physics exercise using real extrasolar planet data mayor m , queloz d. , 1995 , nature , 378 , 355 , a jupiter - mass companion to a solar - type star mccray r , 2007 , astronomy education review , 5 , 217 , planetfinder : an online interactive module for learning how astronomers detect extrasolar planets prather e e , slater t f , 2001 , the physics teacher , 39 , 120 , bringing extra - solar planets into the introductory physics classroom struve o , 1952 , the observatory , 72 , 199 , proposal for a project of high - precision stellar radial velocity work wolszczan a and frail d a , 1992 , nature , 355 , 145 , a planetary system around the millisecond pulsar psr1257 + 12
Abstract:

Answer: the field of extrasolar planets is still , in comparison with other astrophysical topics , in its infancy . there have been about 300 or so extrasolar planets detected and their detection has been accomplished by various different techniques . here we present a simple laboratory experiment to show how planets are detected using the transit technique . following the simple analysis procedure describe we are able to determine the planetary radius to be @xmath0 which , within errors agrees with the establish value of @xmath1 .    accepted for publication in : _ physics education _


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: shape memory alloys [ sma ] are materials having many applications and attracting a lot of interest due to their unique properties of shape memory and pseudoelasticity , which stem from both temperature - induced and stress - induced martensitic phase transition . the mechanical behaviour of such materials is rather complex and arises from a strong interaction between thermal and mechanical phenomena . in fact , when these materials undergo the martensitic phase transition , the increase in temperature due to localised self - heating / self - cooling has been experimentally found to be anything but negligible @xcite . hence , the effects of heat transfer and of the heat dissipation towards the ambient are of primary relevance in the study of these materials @xcite and play a role in the rate - dependent behaviour of sma @xcite .    in modelling the mechanical behaviour of a sma it is therefore important to account for mechanical and thermal aspects at the same time and to evaluate all the phenomena in their time evolution .    in literature there exist many constitutive models for sma @xcite , which are derived following different approaches . some authors propose models developed within plasticity frameworks , which make use of one or even more internal variables to describe the pseudo - elastic behaviour @xcite . another group of constitutive models has been developed within a thermomechanic context ; in his work , tanaka @xcite proposed a macroscale model comprising an internal variable to quantify the extent of the phase transition , a dissipation potential and an assumed transformation kinetic . similarly , other models based on the same thermodynamic background but featuring different kinetic laws have been formulated @xcite , and a complete heat equation which accounts for the contribution of latent heat and of the dissipation connected with the phase transition was added to the framework @xcite . among others , chang et al . @xcite proposed a model comprising a strain - gradient elastic free energy and a chemical ( transitional ) free energy ; abeyaratne et al . @xcite developed a model including a non - convex helmholtz free energy function of the strain in order to describe the regions of stability of the different phases . in the context of using a non - convex free energy , it is not uncommon that micro - mechanical models are proposed @xcite ; muller and seelecke @xcite developed a microscale model based on statistical physics comprising a bulk free energy function of the lattice shear deformation . another approach to the description of the behaviour of sma consists in applying the ginzburg - landau theory for phase transitions . at a microscopic scale , falk @xcite developed a landau theory based on a shear strain order parameter . levitas and preston @xcite proposed a single - grain model based on the decomposition of the strain in an elastic and a transformational part , the latter being described by a pure order parameter which can assume different values to identify the different phases . in a similar fashion , wang and khachaturyan @xcite proposed a model in which the strain field depends on several order parameters , whose evolution is described by several time - dependent ginzburg - landau [ tdgl ] equations . nevertheless , attempts to handle the problem at a larger scale of observation have been made as well . among others , ahluwalia et al . @xcite and chen and yang @xcite proposed meso - scale models for the description of polycrystalline materials in which the order parameters account for the different orientations of each single grain ; in the same spirit , brocca et al . @xcite proposed a microplane model attempting to bridge the gap between micromechanics - based and macroscale models . berti et al . @xcite proposed a ginzburg - landau model which can be applied at the macroscale and encompasses mechanical as well as thermal effects by introducing the balance of linear momentum equation and the heat equation in a thermodynamically consistent framework ; the order parameter is related to the extent of the phase transition between austenite and the martensite variants and its evolution is regulated by a tdgl equation . owing to the presence of the heat equation , it is possible to describe the thermo - mechanical interactions which strongly influence the constitutive behaviour of a sma and to account for non - isothermal conditions . the model is presented both in a three - dimensional and a monodimensional setting ; the reduction to this latter case is still meaningful because in most engineering applications sma wires are employed .    in this paper , we present a numerical study on the thermomechanical behaviour of a sma , with a particular focus on the rate - dependent response and on the influence of thermal conduction and heat transfer in the mechanical behaviour . starting from the models proposed in berti et al . @xcite and daghia et al . @xcite , we formulate a new free energy functional and give a proper expression for the relaxation parameter regulating the tdgl equation ; this gives the model the properties required to reproduce the symmetrical behaviour between the austenite - to - martensite and the martensite - to - austenite phase transitions observed experimentally . the ability of the model to quantitatively reproduce a variety of experimental evidences of a typical polycrystalline niti alloy is then demonstrated . the paper is organised as follows . in section [ sect : model ] , the theoretical model is described , starting from a suitable ginzburg - landau free energy whose properties are outlined in section [ sect : gl - pot ] . constitutive relations are given in section [ sect : constit ] , while the thermodynamic consistency of the model is shown in section [ sect : consistency ] and the complete differential system with appropriate boundary and initial conditions is provided in section [ sect : equations ] . in section [ sect : galerkin ] the galerkin formulation of the differential problem , suitable for the finite element implementation , is sketched . section [ sect : num - tests ] is the main part of the paper , where the numerical results of a number of simulated tensile tests on a bar specimen under different conditions are reported . after describing , in section [ sect : baseline ] , the effectiveness of the model in recovering the main experimental evidences in terms of stress - strain response , phase morphology and temperature evolution , in section [ sect : temp - test ] tensile tests performed at different values of the initial temperature are illustrated , while in section [ sect : max - def ] the stress - strain response under partial - loading conditions is depicted . the rate - dependent behaviour of the model is investigated in section [ sect : strain - rate ] , with a particular focus on the effects of the strain - rate on the domain nucleation , the hysteresis cycle and the energy dissipation . the influence of heat transfer phenomena on the mechanical response of the specimen is examined in section [ sect : environment ] . the last two aspects are considered jointly in section [ sect : env - rate ] . the paper ends drawing some conclusions in section [ sect : concl ] . the thermomechanical properties of sma stem from the nature of the martensitic phase transition ; here we will account for it by means of a ginzburg - landau approach @xcite . to this end we have to define a phase field , or order parameter , @xmath0 ; differently from the approach followed , among others , by falk @xcite , the order parameter is not identified with the uniaxial strain @xmath1 , but rather the phase field @xmath0 is used here as a macroscopic indicator of the phase ( martensite or austenite ) of the material at every point @xcite . strain is an independent field , though it is coupled with the order parameter . we assume that the martensite phase be present in only two relevant variants , @xmath2 , characterised by opposite uniaxial transformation strains with respect to the austenite phase [ a ] , namely @xmath3 , where @xmath4 is a fixed direction . the ginzburg - landau potential , whose properties will be described in detail in section [ sect : gl - pot ] , is expressly formulated to have ( at most ) three stable values of @xmath0 at values @xmath5 , corresponding to phases @xmath6 , respectively . we remark that , as a consequence of the _ first order _ character of the martensitic phase transition , intermediate values of @xmath0 do not represent any physically stable phase , but only transition layers between different stable or metastable physical phases . the model has to encompass evolution equations for the three basic fields : the order parameter ( @xmath0 ) , the strain ( @xmath7 ) and the temperature ( @xmath8 ) . the evolution of the phase field will be described by the tdgl equation @xmath9 the strain will be determined through the combination of the balance of linear momentum equation and a proper constitutive relation between strain , stress and order parameter , while the heat equation regulating the temperature evolution will arise from the balance of energy equation .    for the formulation of the model , we consider a bar sample of sma occupying a bidimensional material domain @xmath10 . we indicate with @xmath11 the material coordinates and with @xmath12 the displacement vector field . relying on the small displacement approximation , we use the linearised strain tensor @xmath13 $ ] . following berti et al . @xcite , we assume a ginzburg - landau free energy in the form @xmath14},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the temperature function @xmath15 is given by @xmath16 being @xmath17 the specific heat , @xmath18 a reference temperature for the specific heat , @xmath19 the compliance modulus , @xmath20 the stress tensor , @xmath21 the interface energy parameter regulating the interface width , and @xmath22 , @xmath23 , @xmath24 , @xmath25 material parameters related to the phase transition whose physical meaning will be explained in the following . the two potentials @xmath26 and @xmath27 are defined by @xmath28 } + \frac{1}{8 } { \left [ { 1 - \cos { \left ( { 2 \pi { \varphi } } \right ) } } \right]},\\    g({\varphi } ) & = & 1 - \cos { \left ( { \pi { \varphi } } \right)}.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    [ cols="^,^ " , ]     the stress - strain diagrams referring to the tests performed at different strain rates for the values of the heat transfer coefficient @xmath29 and @xmath30 are reported in figs . [ fig : stress - strain - rate - h5 ] and [ fig : stress - strain - rate - h20 ] , respectively , together with the maximum number of martensite nuclei originated during the loading stage . the behaviour is the same described in section [ sect : strain - rate ] for the case @xmath31 . a ginzburg - landau model that reproduces the most relevant macroscopic features of the behaviour of a shape memory alloy has been considered . the model encompasses a time - dependent ginzburg - landau equation for the evolution of the phase order parameter , the balance of linear momentum and the heat equation , in order to account for the interplay between the transitional , mechanical and thermal aspects which strongly influences the behaviour of sma . starting from the theoretical model described in berti et al . @xcite , a new free energy based on trigonometric functions has been formulated and a suitable form of the relaxation parameter of the tdgl equation has been proposed . the resulting properties of the model ensure the driving force for the phase transition from austenite to martensite to be equal to the driving force for the transition from martensite to austenite and , consequently , provide a symmetrical behaviour of the model upon loading and unloading . numerical simulations have been performed to investigate the mechanical response of the model ; tensile tests on a bar specimen have been simulated under different conditions by changing the initial temperature , the maximum imposed strain , the nominal imposed strain - rate and the environmental conditions . the results obtained illustrate that the model is able to reproduce the main experimental evidences reported in literature @xcite . the simulated tensile tests show the presence of a stress drop during the phase nucleation , which may be absent in the unloading stage if the loading is interrupted before the completion of the phase transition ; temperature profiles consistent with the observed physical phenomena have also been described . the effect of the strain - rate on the mechanical response of the model have been investigated ; its impact on the number of nucleating domains , the nucleation stress , the stress relaxation during nucleation and on the slope of the stress plateau ( strain - hardening ) have been recovered . the role of the environmental conditions in the mechanical response have also been examined , and the concurrent influence of heat transfer conditions and strain - rate on the damping capacity and on the overall behaviour of the model have been described . the authors wish to thank prof . m. fabrizio and prof . molari for the inspiring discussions . 00 p. h. leo , t. w. shield and o. p. bruno , acta metall . 41 ( 8) , 24772485 ( 1993 ) . j. a. shaw and s. kyriakides , j. mech . phys . sol . 43 ( 8) , 12431281 ( 1995 ) . x. zhang , p. feng , y. he , t. yu and q. sun , int . 52 ( 12 ) , 16601670 ( 2010 ) . y. j. he and q. p. sun , int . 47 , 27752783 ( 2010 ) . y. he , h. yin , r. zhou and q. sun , mater . 64 , 14831486 ( 2010 ) . h. tobushi , y. shimeno , t. hachisuka and k. tanaka , mech . 30 , 141150 ( 1998 ) . a. paiva and m. a. savi , math . 2006 , 130 ( 2006 ) . s. leclerq , g. bourbon and c. lexcellent , j. phys . iii 5 , c2 - 513c2 - 518 ( 1995 ) . j. lubliner and f. auricchio , int . 33 ( 7 ) , 9911003 ( 1996 ) . f. auricchio and j. lubliner , int . 34 ( 27 ) , 36013618 ( 1997 ) . k. tanaka , res mech . 18 , 251263 ( 1986 ) . c. liang and c. a. rogers , j. intell . struct . 8 , 285302 ( 1997 ) . l. c. brinson , j. intell . struct . 4 , 229242 ( 1993 ) . l. c. brinson , a. bekker and s. hwang , j. intell . struct . 7 , 97107 ( 1996 ) . s. zhu and y. zhang , smart mater . struct . 16 , 16961707 ( 2007 ) . b. chang , j. a. shaw and m. a. iadicola , continuum mech . 18 , 83118 ( 2006 ) . r. abeyaratne , s. kim and j. k. knowles , int . 31 ( 16 ) , 22292249 ( 1994 ) . r. c. goo and c. lexcellent , acta mater . 45 , 727737 ( 1997 ) . i. muller and s. seelecke , math . comput . model . 34 , 13071355 ( 2001 ) . f. falk , acta metall . 28 , 17731780 ( 1980 ) . v. i. levitas and d. l. preston , phys . b 66 , 134206 ( 2002 ) . y. wang and a. g. khachaturyan , acta . 45 ( 2 ) , 759773 ( 1997 ) . r. ahluwalia , t. lookman , a saxena and r. c. albers , acta . 52 , 209218 ( 2004 ) . l. chen and w. yang , phys . b 50 ( 21 ) , 1575215756 ( 1994 ) . m. brocca , l. c. brinson and z. p. bazant , j. mech . 50 , 10511077 ( 2002 ) . v. berti , m. fabrizio , d. grandi , j. math . 51 , 062901 ( 2010 ) . f. daghia , m. fabrizio , d. grandi , meccanica 45 , 797807 ( 2010 ) . a. artemev , y. wang and a. khachaturyan , acta mater . 48 ( 10 ) , 25032518 ( 2000 ) . a. artemev , y. jin and a. khachaturyan , acta mater . 49 ( 7 ) , 11651177 ( 2001 ) . v. berti , m. fabrizio and d. grandi , phys . d 239 , 95102 ( 2010 ) . f. fried , m. e. gurtin , phys . d 68 ( 34 ) , 326343 ( 1993 ) . m. fabrizio , int . 44 ( 89 ) , 529539 ( 2006 ) . m. fabrizio , c. giorgi , a. morro , math . 31 , 627653 ( 2008 ) . c. polizzotto , eur . a / solids 22 , 651668 ( 2003 ) . a. logg and g. n. wells , acm trans . 37 ( 2 ) , article 20 , 28 pages ( 2010 ) . m. a. iadicola and j. a. shaw , smart mater . 16 , s155s169 ( 2007 ) . m. a. iadicola and j. a. shaw , int . j. plast . 20 ( 45 ) , 577605 ( 2004 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: a ginzburg - landau model for the macroscopic behaviour of a shape memory alloy is proposed . the model is one - dimensional in essence , in that we consider the effect of the martensitic phase transition in terms of a uniaxial deformation along a fixed direction and we use a scalar order parameter whose equilibrium values describe the austenitic phase and the two martensitic variants . the model relies on a ginzburg - landau free energy defined as a function of macroscopically measurable quantities , and accounts for thermal effects ; couplings between the various relevant physical aspects are established according to thermodynamic consistency . the theoretical model has been implemented within a finite - element framework and a number of numerical tests are presented which investigate the mechanical behaviour of the model under different conditions ; the results obtained are analysed in relation to experimental evidences available in literature . in particular , the influence of the strain - rate and of the ambient conditions on the response of the model is highlighted . phase field model , shape memory alloys , strain - rate sensitivity , thermo - mechanical coupling


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the standard model ( sm ) has achieved great success in the last few decades . in particular , the discovery of the higgs boson at the lhc experiment @xcite was the last key ingredient to finalize the sm . however , there are several unsolved problems in the sm , e.g. , explanations of the origin of dark matter ( dm ) , the tiny active neutrino masses , and the inflation , etc . regarding the inflation , the bicep2 experiment has recently reported the non - vanishing tensor - to - scalar ratio  @xcite which is the central value reported in ref . @xcite . ] : @xmath5 this result has not been confirmed yet , but a number of explanations for the result have since been presented . one interesting attempt is given in the context of the higgs inflation  @xcite-@xcite ( see refs . @xcite-@xcite for recent discussions in the ordinary higgs inflation and related works after the bicep2 result ) . in particular , ref . @xcite showed that a higgs potential with @xmath6 of the non - minimal higgs coupling and a suitable plateau for the inflation can explain the above bicep2 result . but the plateau is realized by a slightly smaller top mass than the experimental range as @xmath7 gev  @xcite . then , ref . @xcite pointed out that the higgs inflation with the higgs portal dm ( see , e.g. , refs . @xcite-@xcite ) and the right - handed neutrino can explain the result with the experimental central values of the higgs and top masses , and @xmath8 . in this scenario , dm ( a real singlet scalar ) and the right - handed neutrino play a crucial role in the realization of a suitable higgs potential , _ i.e. _ these particles are important for high - energy behavior in the evolution of the higgs self - coupling @xmath9 obeying the renormalization group equation ( rge ) . in addition , the right - handed neutrino can generate the tiny active neutrino mass through the type - i seesaw mechanism . reference  @xcite found one solution , in which the central values were taken for the higgs and top masses , for realistic inflation . for the quantum corrections to the coupling constants ( @xmath10-functions ) in the model , the numerical analyses included the next - to - leading - order ( nlo ) contributions of the sm particles and the leading - order ( lo ) ones from dm and the right - handed neutrino . in this work , we will analyze the model based on the nlo computations for both the sm and the singlet particles . in addition , the latest experimental errors for the higgs and top masses will be taken into account in the calculations .    as a result , we will point out that this inflation model can explain the results of cosmological observations within regions for @xmath11 for the dm mass , @xmath12 for the right - handed neutrino mass , and @xmath2 for the non - minimal higgs coupling to the ricci scalar with @xmath3 @xcite for the higgs and @xmath4 @xcite for the top masses . a strong correlation between the dm and the right - handed neutrino masses will also be shown and the allowed region of a dm mass will be checked by future dm detection experiments . the paper is organized as follows : in section 2 , we will explain our model . in section 3 , we will briefly review the context of the higgs inflation . our numerical results will be given in section 4 . section 5 is devoted to the conclusions . we will also present the relevant @xmath10-functions up to 2-loop level in the model in the appendix . in this letter , we consider the extended sm with a real singlet scalar and right - handed neutrinos . the adequate lagrangians can be written as @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the sm lagrangian in which the higgs potential is included as shown in eq . ( [ eq : higgs ] ) . @xmath15 is the higgs doublet field and @xmath16 is its vacuum expectation value . @xmath17 , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 are the lepton doublet , an sm gauge singlet real scalar , and the right - handed neutrino fields , respectively . the coupling constants @xmath20 , @xmath21 , and @xmath22 are the portal coupling of @xmath15 and @xmath18 , the quartic self - coupling of @xmath18 , and the neutrino yukawa coupling constant . @xmath23 is the right - handed neutrino mass . we assume that the singlet scalar has odd parity under an additional @xmath24 symmetry . hence , we can have a candidate for dm when the mass and the portal coupling @xmath20 of @xmath18 are taken to be appropriate values . the observed tiny neutrino masses can be obtained by the conventional type - i seesaw mechanism generates one active neutrino mass . others can be obtained by lighter right - handed neutrinos with smaller yukawa coupling . when the neutrino yukawa couplings are smaller than the bottom yukawa coupling , the contributions from the neutrino yukawa couplings to the @xmath10-functions are negligible . in this work , we consider a case in which the neutrino yukawa coupling of only one generation of the right - handed neutrino is effective in the @xmath10-functions . ] . we have fixed the active neutrino mass as @xmath25 ev here .    here , we show the rges to solve : @xmath26 where @xmath27 symbolizes the sm gauge couplings , the top and the neutrino yukawa couplings , and the scalar quartic couplings in our model , and we define @xmath28 with the renormalization scale @xmath29 . in this analysis , we divide the energy region into three parts between the @xmath30 boson mass scale , @xmath31 , and the planck scale , @xmath32 . each part can be considered as @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 . the behavior of @xmath9 can be roughly supposed as follows : at first , the evolution of @xmath20 becomes small as @xmath36 becomes small , because the @xmath10-function for @xmath20 is proportional to @xmath20 itself . in this case , the evolution of @xmath37 is really close to the sm one . second , the contribution from the additional scalar pushes up the evolution of @xmath9 . thus , we can make @xmath9 positive up to @xmath38 with sufficient magnitude of the additional scalar contribution . on the other hand , the contribution from the right - haded neutrinos pulls down @xmath9 in the region of @xmath35 .        a typical behavior of the running of the higgs quartic coupling is shown in fig.[fig : running ] . as a result , we can have a suitable higgs potential with a plateau for the inflation around @xmath39  @xcite . these are the important features for higgs inflation with a real scalar field and right - handed neutrinos just as a sample point . ] . in our estimation , the free parameters are the values of the right - handed neutrino and dm masses and non - minimal coupling @xmath40 . first , we briefly review the ordinary higgs inflation @xcite with the action in the so - called jordan frame , @xmath41 where @xmath40 is the non - minimal coupling of the higgs to the ricci scalar @xmath42 , @xmath43 is given in the unitary gauge , and @xmath14 includes the higgs potential of eq . ( [ eq : higgs ] ) . with the conformal transformation ( @xmath44 with @xmath45 ) which denotes the transformation from the jordan frame to the einstein one , one can rewrite the action as @xmath46 where @xmath47 is the ricci scalar in the einstein frame given by @xmath48 , and @xmath49 is a canonically renormalized field as @xmath50 one can calculate the slow - roll parameters as @xmath51 where @xmath52 is obtained - functions of coupling constants including the self - coupling of the higgs up to 2-loop level . this means that our analysis also contains quantum effects , which partially include effects from the loop level potential . ] as        @xmath53    a typical behavior of the higgs potential @xmath52 is shown in fig.[fig : higgs_pot ] . using slow - roll parameters , the spectral index and the tensor - to - scalar ratio are evaluated as @xmath54 and @xmath55 , respectively . finally , the number of e - foldings is given by @xmath56 where @xmath57 @xmath58 is the initial ( final ) value of @xmath59 corresponding to the beginning ( end ) of the inflation . at the point @xmath60 , the slow - roll conditions @xmath61 are broken . the higgs inflation can be realized even in the sm if the top mass is fine - tuned as @xmath62 for @xmath63 @xcite . with these values , the higgs potentials have a plateau and @xmath64 can be achieved by taking @xmath6 @xcite . even though this framework can accomplish a relevant amount of e - foldings , the required top mass , @xmath65 , is outside @xmath66 @xcite . on the other hand , without the plateau , a sufficient amount of e - foldings can be obtained by assuming @xmath67 . however , this case is plagued with too tiny a tensor - to - scalar ratio on the order of @xmath68 , which is inconsistent with the recent bicep2 result . consequently , we extend the sm with a real scalar and right - handed neutrinos , in which the evolution of @xmath69 ( equivalent to the higgs potential ) is changed , in order to reproduce the values of cosmological parameters within the experimental range @xmath70 . in this section , we give the results of our numerical analysis . we solve rges . ] at 2-loop level for the @xmath10-functions of the relevant couplings in the model . as we discussed above , we analyze within the experimental ranges of the higgs mass @xmath71 @xcite and the top mass @xmath66 @xcite .    as we mentioned in sec.2 , we assume that the additional real scalar is dm . in the case that the dm mass is greater than the higgs mass ( @xmath72 ) , the portal coupling @xmath36 is well approximated as @xcite @xmath73 where @xmath74 denotes the mass of dm given by @xmath75 . our results are shown in fig.[fig : mr_ms ] . one can see that the required values of @xmath23 , @xmath74 , and @xmath40 for reproducing suitable cosmological parameters are on a line in the @xmath23-@xmath74 plane . this is because the form of the higgs potential is strictly constrained and it should be uniquely realized by taking suitable values of @xmath23 , @xmath74 , and @xmath40 for given @xmath76 and @xmath70 . a lighter ( heavier ) top ( higgs ) mass gives lower bounds on @xmath23 , @xmath74 , and @xmath40 , while a heavier ( lighter ) top ( higgs ) mass leads to upper bounds on these parameters . finally , we show the explicit range of @xmath23 , @xmath74 , and @xmath40 for each higgs mass gev for the dm mass , @xmath77 gev for the right - handed neutrino mass , and @xmath78 for the non - minimal coupling in our model . ] :      @xmath36 is determined by a condition that the singlet scalar gives a sufficient amount of the relic density of the dm , _ i.e. _ @xmath82 ( see , _ e.g. _ , refs . @xcite ) where @xmath83 is the density parameter of the dm and @xmath84 is the hubble constant . from this condition , @xmath36 is in the range @xmath85 . the region is consistent with the current experimental constraints so far , and future experiments , _ e.g. _ , xenon1 t or lux for the direct detection , or the combined analysis of the fermi+cta+planck observations might make them clear @xcite . finally , we also comment on the validity of our @xmath10-functions . since the value of @xmath40 is around @xmath86 as in the above results and it is much smaller than the previous work @xcite , we can utilize our @xmath10-functions up to the inflation scale .      the joint analysis of bicep , the keck array and planck showed only an upper bound on the tensor - to - scalar ratio  @xcite of @xmath87    we show our result respecting @xmath88 in fig.[fig : mr_ms_0.05 ] . one can easily see that the mass scales of right - handed neutrino and dm do not drastically change compared with the @xmath89 case . therefore , the future direct - detection experiments of dm can reach even if the mass range of dm shown in fig.[fig : mr_ms_0.05 ] . the difference appears in the magnitude of non - minimal coupling , @xmath40 . its magnitude should be slightly larger in the range @xmath90 . we have investigated the higgs inflation model with the higgs portal dm and the right - handed neutrino by the use of @xmath10-functions up to 2-loop level . in addition , the latest experimental errors of the top and higgs masses have been taken into account in the calculations . as a result , we pointed out that this inflation model can explain the results of cosmological observations @xmath91 , @xmath92 , and @xmath93 within regions of @xmath94 for the dm mass , @xmath95 for the right - handed neutrino mass , and @xmath2 for the non - minimal higgs coupling to the ricci scalar with @xmath3 for the higgs and @xmath4 for the top masses . furthermore , we have shown that the scales of the right - handed neutrino and dm are not significantly changed even though the tensor - to - scalar ratio decreases as @xmath96 . on the other hand , the non - minimal coupling should be slightly larger than the @xmath89 case as @xmath90 . there is a strong correlation between the dm and the right - handed neutrino masses because the form of the higgs potential is strictly constrained ; it should be uniquely realized by taking suitable values of @xmath23 , @xmath74 , and @xmath40 for given @xmath76 and @xmath70 . the dm mass region in our analysis will be confirmed by future dm detections . this work is partially supported by a scientific grant by the ministry of education and science , no . 24540272 . the work of r.t . is supported by research fellowships of the japan society for the promotion of science for young scientists . in this section , we give the @xmath10-functions of the sm gauge couplings , top and neutrino yukawa couplings , and the scalar quartic couplings in our model at 2-loop level - functions , the desired values of the dm mass , the right - handed neutrino mass , and the non - minimal coupling for the successful higgs inflation increase a few % from those values given in eqs . ( [ 14])-([16 ] ) . ] . first , @xmath97\,,\\ \beta_{g } { & \hspace{-0.6em}=\hspace{-0.6em } & }   - \frac{19}{6 } g^3   + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } g^3 \left [ \frac{3}{2 } g'^2 + \frac{35}{6 } g^2 + 12 g_s^2 - \frac{3}{2 } y_t^2   - \frac{1}{2 } y_n^2   \right]\,,\\ \beta_{g_s } { & \hspace{-0.6em}=\hspace{-0.6em } & }   -7 g_s^3   + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } g_s^3   \left [ \frac{11}{6 } g'^2 + \frac{9}{2 } g^2 -26 g_s^2 -2 y_t^2 \right]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] are for the @xmath98 , @xmath99 , and @xmath100 gauge couplings . next , @xmath101\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & }   + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } y_t   \bigg [   -12 y_t^4 + 6 \lambda^2 - 12 \lambda y_t^2   + \frac{131}{16 } g'^2 y_t^2 + \frac{225}{16 } g^2 y_t^2 + 36 g_s^2 y_t^2\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & }   + \frac{1187}{216 } g'^4 - \frac{23}{4 } g^4 - 108 g_s^4 - \frac{3}{4 } g'^2   g^2   + 9 g^2 g_s^2 + \frac{19}{9 } g'^2 g_s^2 + \frac{1}{4 } k^2 \notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em}&}+ \frac{5}{8 } g'^2 y_n^2 + \frac{15}{8 } g^2 y_n^2   - \frac{9}{4 } y_n^4 - \frac{9}{4 } y_n^2 y_t^2 \bigg]\,,\\ \beta_{y_n } { & \hspace{-0.6em}=\hspace{-0.6em } & }   y_n \left [ - \frac{3}{4 } g'^2 - \frac{9}{4 } g^2 + 3 y_t^2 + \frac{5}{2 } y_n^2 \right]\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } y_n   \bigg [ -3 y_n^4 + 6 \lambda^2 -12 \lambda y_n^2 + \frac{103}{16 } g'^2 y_n^2   + \frac{165}{16 } g^2 y_n^2 + \frac{35}{24 } g'^4 - \frac{9}{4 } g'^2 g^2 - \frac{23}{4 } g^4\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{1}{4 } k^2 + \frac{85}{24 } g'^2 y_t^2 + \frac{45}{8 } g^2 y_t^2   + 20 g_s^2 y_t^2 - \frac{27}{4 } y_t^2 y_n^2 - \frac{27}{4 } y_t^4 \bigg ] \,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] are for the top and neutrino yukawa couplings . lastly , @xmath102 + \frac{1}{2 } k^2\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } \bigg [   -312 \lambda^3 + 36 \lambda^2 \left ( g'^2 + 3 g^2 \right ) -   \lambda \left ( -\frac{629}{24 } g'^4 -\frac{39}{4 } g'^2 g^2 + \frac{73}{8 } g^4 \right)\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{305}{16 } g^6 - \frac{289}{48 } g'^2 g^4 - \frac{559}{48 } g'^4 g^2 - \frac{379}{48 } g'^6 -32 g_s^2 y_t^4 -\frac{8}{3 } g'^2 y_t^4 - \frac{9}{4 } g^4 y_t^2\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \lambda y_t^2 \left ( \frac{85}{6 } g'^2 + \frac{45}{2 } g^2 + 80 g_s^2 \right )   + g'^2 y_t^2 \left ( -\frac{19}{4 } g'^2 + \frac{21}{2 } g^2 \right)\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } -144 \lambda^2 y_t^2 - 3 \lambda y_t^4 + 30 y_t^6 -5 k^2 \lambda -2 k^3   - 48 \lambda^2 y_n^2 - \frac{1}{4 } g'^4 y_n^2- \frac{1}{2 } g'^2 g^2 y_n^2 - \frac{3}{4 } g^4 y_n^2 \notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \lambda   y_n^2   \left ( \frac{5}{2 } g'^2 + \frac{15}{2 } g^2 \right )   - \lambda y_n^4 + 10 y_n^6 \bigg ]   \,,\\ \beta_k { & \hspace{-0.6em}=\hspace{-0.6em } & }   k \left [   4 k + 12 \lambda + \lambda_s + 6 y_t^2 + 2 y_n^2 - \frac{3}{2 } \left ( g'^2 + 3g^2   \right ) \right]\notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 }   \bigg [ - \frac{21}{2 } k^3 - 6 k^2 \left ( 12 \lambda + \lambda_s \right )   -5 k \left ( 12 \lambda^2 + \frac{1}{6 } \lambda_s^2 \right )   + k^2 \left ( g'^2 + 3g^2 \right ) \notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } + \frac{1}{8 } k \left ( \frac{557}{6 } g'^4 + 15 g'^2 g^2 - \frac{145}{2 } g^4 \right )   + 5 k y_t^2 \left ( \frac{17}{12 } g'^2 + \frac{9}{4 } g^2 + 8 g_s^2 \right )   + 24 k \lambda \left ( g'^2 + 3 g^2 \right ) \notag\\ { & \hspace{-0.6em}\hspace{-0.6em } & } -12 k^2 y_t^2   - \frac{27}{2 } k y_t^4 - 72 k \lambda y_t^2   + \frac{5}{4 } k y_n^2 \left ( g'^2 + 3g^2 \right )   -4 k^2 y_n^2 - \frac{9}{2 } k y_n^4 -24 k \lambda y_n^2 \bigg ] \,,\\ \beta_{\lambda_s } { & \hspace{-0.6em}=\hspace{-0.6em } & }   3 \lambda_s^2 + 12 k^2 + \frac{1}{16 \pi^2 } \left [   -\frac{17}{3 } \lambda_s^3 - 20 k^2 \lambda_s - 48 k^3 +   24 k^2 \left ( ( g'^2 + 3 g^2 ) - ( 3 y_t^2 + y_n^2 ) \right ) \right]\,,\end{aligned}\ ] ] are for the sm higgs quartic , the portal between the sm higgs and the singlet scalar , and the singlet scalar quartic couplings . p.  a.  r.  ade _ et al . _ [ bicep2 and planck collaborations ] , [ arxiv:1502.00612 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . j.  l.  cervantes - cota and h.  dehnen , nucl .  phys . b * 442 * ( 1995 ) 391 [ astro - ph/9505069 ] . f.  l.  bezrukov and m.  shaposhnikov , phys . b * 659 * ( 2008 ) 703 [ arxiv:0710.3755 [ hep - th ] ] . n.  haba , h.  ishida , k.  kaneta and r.  takahashi , arxiv:1406.0158 [ hep - ph ] . t.  hahn , s.  heinemeyer , w.  hollik , h.  rzehak and g.  weiglein , arxiv:1404.0186 [ hep - ph ] . j.  m.  cline , k.  kainulainen , p.  scott and c.  weniger , phys . d * 88 * ( 2013 ) 055025 [ arxiv:1306.4710 [ hep - ph ] ] . p.  a.  r.  ade _ et al . _ [ planck collaboration ] , arxiv:1303.5082 [ astro-ph.co ] . p.  a.  r.  ade _ et al . _ [ planck collaboration ] , arxiv:1502.01589 [ astro-ph.co ] .
Abstract:

Answer: we investigate the higgs inflation and the higgs portal dark matter with the right - handed neutrino . the dark matter and the right - handed neutrino in the higgs inflation play important roles in explaining the recent experimental results of the higgs and top masses , and the cosmic microwave background by bicep2 at the same time . this inflation model predicts @xmath0 for the dm mass , @xmath1 for the right - handed neutrino mass , and @xmath2 for the non - minimal coupling within @xmath3 for the higgs and @xmath4 for the top masses .    0.6 cm    su - het-06 - 2014    * higgs inflation and higgs portal dark matter + with right - handed neutrinos *    1.2 cm     naoyuki haba , hiroyuki ishida , and ryo takahashi    0.4 cm     _ graduate school of science and engineering , shimane university , + matsue 690 - 8504 japan _    0.2 cm    .5 in


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is generally believed that galaxies are formed within the deep potential wells of the virialized dark matter ( dm ) halos and that clusters of galaxies are recently collapsed objects . the study of the physical properties of the dm halos in cosmological models therefore provides important clues to our understanding of the universe . in this letter , we report a fitting formula for the two - point correlation function @xmath11 of the dm halos in hierarchical clustering models . the accuracy of the fit is about @xmath12 in @xmath13 for a wide range of halo masses . the two - point correlation function of dm halos has been the subject of many recent attempts at analytical modelling ( e.g. cole & kaiser @xcite ; mann , heavens , & peacock @xcite ; mo & white @xcite , hereafter mw96 ; catelan et al . @xcite ; porciani et al . @xcite ) as well as of n - body simulation studies ( e.g. white et al . @xcite ; efstathiou et al . @xcite ; bahcall & cen @xcite ; jing et al . @xcite ; watanabe , matsubara , & suto @xcite ; gelb & bertschinger @xcite ; jing , brner , & valdarnini @xcite ; mw96 ; mo , jing , & white @xcite ) . in particular , using the extended press - schechter formalism to calculate the correlation function of dm halos in lagrangian space ( cf . cole & kaiser @xcite ) and mapping from lagrangian space to eulerian space within the context of the spherical collapse model , mw96 have derived an analytical expression for @xmath13 : [ linear ] _ hh(r;m)=b^2(m)_mm(r ) . this should hold in the linearly clustering regime where the mass two - point correlation function @xmath14 is less than unity . the bias parameter @xmath15 is [ bias ] b(m ) = 1+^2 - 1_c=1+_c ^2(m)-1_c , where @xmath16 is the linearly evolved rms density fluctuation of top - hat spheres containing on average a mass @xmath17 , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 ( see mw96 and references therein for more details about these quantities ) . the parameter @xmath20 will be called the peak height for convenience . equations ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) were found in good agreement with their n - body results by mw96 and by mo et al . ( @xcite ) , but their tests were limited to high mass halos with @xmath21 due to limited mass and force resolutions . the formula has been widely used : from modeling the correlation function of different types of galaxies ( e.g. , kauffmann et al . @xcite ; baugh et al . @xcite ) to interpreting the observed clustering of various extragalactic objects ( e.g. , mo et al . @xcite ; mo & fukugita @xcite ; matarrese et al . @xcite ; steidel et al . @xcite ; coles et al . @xcite ; fang & jing @xcite ) . we have measured the two - point correlation functions for the dm halos in a large set of high - resolution n - body simulations . each simulation uses @xmath4 particles , and a wide range of hierarchical models are covered : four scale - free models and three representative cdm models . moreover , each model is simulated with three to four different realizations , and two different box sizes are used for each cdm model . with these simulations of very high accuracy , we can determine @xmath22 for a wide range of the halo mass @xmath17 . as a result , we find that the linear bias ( eq .  [ linear ] ) is a good approximation in the linearly clustering regime , but the bias parameter given by eq.([bias ] ) agrees with the n - body results only for massive halos with mass @xmath23 , where @xmath3 is a characteristic non - linear mass scale defined by @xmath24 . for the less massive halos , the n - body results imply significantly higher bias than the analytical prediction eq . ( 2 ) and the difference in the correlation amplitude amounts to a factor @xmath8 for @xmath25 . fortunately , the difference between the n - body results and the mw96 formula can be modeled by a simple fitting formula (  3 ) . this formula can fit the simulation bias parameter for halo mass @xmath26 with an accuracy of about 5% . the new findings have profound implications for the formation of the large scale structures . one of the most interesting applications of the fitting formula would be the clustering of galaxies , since the local late type and dwarf galaxies are believed to have mass @xmath27 and to form recently ( redshift @xmath28 ; mo et al.@xcite ) while @xmath29 is expected for the present universe ( cf . the simulations will be described in section 2 , with emphasis on the aspects relevant to this letter . in section 3 , we will present the correlation function of the halos and the fitting formula . the implications for theories and observations are discussed in section 4 . the two - point correlation functions of halos are studied both for scale - free models and for representative cdm models of hierarchical clustering . in the scale - free models , a power - law power spectrum @xmath30 is used for the initial density fluctuation and the universe is assumed to be einstein  de sitter , @xmath31 . four models with @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 are studied . because these models are conceptually simple and exhibit interesting scaling properties , it is relatively easy to understand how physical properties depend on the shape of the power spectrum and , perhaps more importantly , to distinguish the physical effects from numerical artifacts , since the latter should not in general obey the scaling relations . for this reason , we will extensively use the scaling property that the bias parameter @xmath36 depends only on the halo mass @xmath17 scaled by @xmath3 , i.e. @xmath37 for each @xmath5 . this scaling property manifests itself when the bias parameter for @xmath37 is plotted for different evolution times . each of our simulations for @xmath38 is evolved for 1000 time steps with a total of seven outputs , and that for @xmath39 is evolved for 1362 steps with eight outputs . the output time interval is chosen so that @xmath3 at each successive output is increased by a factor 2.5 , and the @xmath3 values ( in units of the particle mass ) at the first output are 74 , 59 , 35 , and 13 for @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 respectively . note that fixing the @xmath3 values is equivalent to fixing the normalization for the power spectra . the time step and the integration variables are taken similarly to efstathiou et al . ( @xcite ) . in this letter we will rely on these scale - free models to understand how the halo - halo correlation depends on the shape of the power spectrum . then we will examine whether the result obtained from the scale - free models can be applied to cdm models , since cdm models , at least variants thereof , are believed to be close to reality .    three cdm models are very typical : one is the ( ever ) standard cdm model ( scdm ) , one is an open model with @xmath40 and with a vanishing cosmological constant @xmath41 ( ocdm ) , and the other is a flat lower density model with @xmath40 and @xmath42 ( lcdm ) . these cdm models are completely fixed with regard to the dm clustering if the initial density power spectrum is fixed . for our simulations , the linear cdm power spectrum of bardeen et al . ( @xcite ) for the primordial harrison - zeldovich spectrum is used for the initial condition , which is fixed by the shape parameter @xmath43 and the amplitude @xmath44 ( the rms top - hat density fluctuation on radius @xmath45 ) . the values of ( @xmath46 , @xmath44 ) are ( 0.5 , 0.62 ) for scdm , ( 0.25 , 1 ) for ocdm , and ( 0.20 , 1 ) for lcdm . each model is simulated with our vectorized @xmath47 code on the fujitsu vpp300/16r supercomputer at the national astronomical observatory of japan . each simulation is performed with @xmath4 ( @xmath48 million ) particles and with good force resolution @xmath49 ( where @xmath50 is the simulation box size ) . to properly understand the effect of the cosmic variance , three to four independent realizations are generated for each simulation of one model . furthermore , two different box sizes , @xmath51 and @xmath52 , are adopted for each cdm model . further details about the code and the simulations will be given in a forthcoming paper ( jing , in preparation ) , where many clustering statistics of the dark matter will also be presented . the cdm simulations with box size @xmath51 were used by jing & suto ( @xcite ) to study the constraints on cosmological models of the high concentration of the lyman break galaxies at redshift @xmath53 discovered by steidel et al . the dm halos are identified with the friends - of - friends ( fof ) algorithm with a linking parameter @xmath54 times the mean particle separation . the halos with at least 20 members are used for the clustering analysis . it is known that the mass defined by the members of such fof groups is very close to that defined by the spherical overdensity ( so ) virialization ( cole & lacey @xcite ) and that the mass function of such fof groups follows the predictions of the ps formalism ( e.g. lacey & cole @xcite ; mo et al . more importantly , the correlation function of dm halos is quite robust to reasonable halo identification methods , since , for example , the correlation function of the fof groups is statistically indistinguishable from that of the so groups ( mo et al . @xcite ) . therefore , it would suffice to use the fof groups for the present purpose . the first concern of this work is whether the bias of the halos is linear ( eq .  [ linear ] ) in the linearly clustering regime . we have calculated the ratio of @xmath11 to @xmath55 for every simulation output . some examples which are also typical are shown in figure  [ fig1 ] , which show the ratio at two different outputs of the @xmath56 simulation for three different halo masses . the results are plotted only for the linear clustering regime i.e. @xmath57 , as only this regime is considered here . error bars are calculated by averaging over the different realizations . it is remarkable that the ratio is a constant within the @xmath58 error bars , i.e. the bias is linear and the bias parameter @xmath36 is a function of @xmath17 only . this statement is consistent with many previous studies , but is shown here with higher accuracy . since @xmath15 depends only on @xmath17 , we predict that for a scale - free model , if the mass @xmath17 is scaled by the characteristic mass @xmath3 , the bias parameter @xmath36 depends only on the scaled mass @xmath37 . interestingly , by definitions of @xmath20 and @xmath3 , the scaled mass obeys a simple relation to the peak height @xmath20 , i.e. @xmath59 . thus it is also very convenient to compare the simulation data of @xmath60 with the formula of mw96 ( cf . .  [ bias ] ) . in figure [ fig2 ] , we plot the square of the bias parameter @xmath61 as a function of the scaled mass @xmath37 . the results for all simulation outputs are depicted . this is equivalent to a factor @xmath62 in the halo mass resolution . it is very remarkable that the @xmath63 results agree very well for different evolutionary outputs . the precise scaling behaviour given by the simulation data assures that any numerical artifacts have negligible effect on the results of fig . [ fig2 ] . now we compare our simulation results with the prediction of mw96 . the mw96 predictions are drawn on fig . ( [ fig2 ] ) in dotted lines . it is interesting to see that the mw96 formula agrees well ( within @xmath64 uncertainty ) with the simulation results for massive halos , i.e. @xmath65 . however , at @xmath66 the simulation data start to deviate from the mw96 prediction , and the deviation increases with the decrease of the scaled mass ( or equivalently with the decrease of the peak height ) . at @xmath67 , the simulation result is about 2 to 4 times higher than the prediction . considering the important role played by the correlation functions of the halos in the cosmological studies , we have searched for a fitting formula for @xmath60 . the formula [ fitting ] b(m)=(0.5 ^ 4 + 1)^(0.06 - 0.02n ) ( 1+^2 - 1_c ) ; = ( m / m_)^n+3/6 can fit the simulation results ( fig . [ fig2 ] ) with an accuracy of about 5% for the halo mass that the simulations can probe , i.e. @xmath68 for @xmath32 ; @xmath69 for @xmath70 ; @xmath71 for @xmath72 ; @xmath73 for @xmath39 . the fitting formula recovers the mw96 analytical formula ( eq . [ bias ] ) at high mass @xmath74 . the deviation of the mw96 prediction from the simulation results at small mass is accounted for by the factor @xmath75 . since the scale - free models are only approximations to the real universe at some specific scales , it is very important to consider more realistic models . in figure [ fig3 ] , we present the @xmath76 for the halos in the three cdm models . the blue squares are determined from the simulations of box size @xmath52 and the red triangles are from those of the smaller boxes . in consistency with the scale - free models , the simulation data are significantly higher than the mw96 prediction ( the dotted lines ) for masses less than @xmath3 , where @xmath3 is about @xmath77 for the scdm and about @xmath78 for the low density models . since the slopes of the cdm power spectra change with scale , the fitting formula  ( [ fitting ] ) is not directly applicable . fortunately , the fitting formula depends very weakly on the power index @xmath5 , and it can describe the cdm data very accurately if an effective index @xmath6 replaces @xmath5 in eq . ( [ fitting ] ) and the original definition of @xmath79 is used for @xmath20 . the effective index is defined as the slope of @xmath80 at the halo mass @xmath17 [ neff ] n_eff = d p(k ) d k|_k=2r ; 1.5 cm r=(3m4|)^1/3 , where @xmath81 is the mean density of the universe . the solid lines in fig . ( [ fig3 ] ) are predicted in this way . they agree very well with the simulation results . the fact that @xmath6 changes very slowly with the mass m for @xmath82 might be the main reason why the fitting formula can work very well for cdm models after the simple modification . we have determined the correlation function of the dm halos for the hitherto largest set of high - resolution n - body simulations . the excellent scaling exhibited in the bias parameter @xmath60 at the different evolutionary outputs for the scale - free models assures that the results in figures  [ fig2 ] and [ fig3 ] are physical , not contaminated by numerical artifacts . the simulation results are in good agreement with the formula of mo & white ( 1996 ) for massive halos @xmath23 . however , for less massive halos the simulation results are significantly higher . the mw96 formula was found in good agreement with the results of @xmath83-particle scale - free simulations by mw96 and with the results of @xmath84-particle cdm simulations of box size @xmath85 by mo et al.(1996 ) . however , their tests were limited to halos with @xmath23 because of the relatively poorer mass resolutions . the results found here therefore do not contradict with , but in fact support and extend the previous n - body tests .    the fitting formula ( [ fitting ] ) we found for @xmath15 is accurate for halo masses @xmath86 with only about 5% error . the formula can be applied both to the scale - free models and to the cdm models . in the latter case , the index @xmath5 in equation ( [ fitting ] ) should be replaced with the effective power spectrum index @xmath6 ( eq .  [ neff ] ) and the original definition of @xmath79 is used for @xmath20 . this fitting formula could have many important applications for the studies of the large - scale structures . one of them would be to predict and to interpret the clustering of late type galaxies and dwarf galaxies both in real observations and in analytical modeling of galaxy formation , since these galaxies are believed to have formed recently ( @xmath28 ; cf mo et al . @xcite ) with halo masses much less than @xmath3 .    at present we do not know the _ exact _ reasons which cause the mw96 formula to fail at the small halo masses @xmath87 . in the derivation of mw96 , two main assumptions are 1 ) the halo formation is determined by the peak height through the extended press - schechter formalism ; 2 ) the mapping of the halo clustering pattern from the lagrangian space to the eulerian one is local and linear ( with the spherical collapse model ) . the first assumption could break down more seriously for low peak - height halos , because the tidal force plays a more important role in their formation . though , as katz , quinn & gelb ( @xcite ; see also katz et al . @xcite ) pointed out , the peak - height is not the sole parameter even for the formation of high - peak halos . the validity of the local linear mapping was recently questioned by catelan et al.(@xcite ) in a different context . unfortunately their result is not directly applicable to this letter . in relation to the gentle rise observed for the bias parameter at the small @xmath37 ( fig . [ fig2 ] ) , we have visually inspected the spatial distribution for halos with @xmath88 ( @xmath89 ) , @xmath90 ( @xmath91 ) , and @xmath92 ( @xmath93 ) in one late output of the @xmath32 model . the small and large halos appear to delineate filamentary structures more closely than the median - mass halos , consistent with the measured @xmath36 . this however might hint that either or both of the two assumptions are violated for the small halos , since the small halos are otherwise expected to be more preferentially located in low density regions . obviously it would be very interesting to find out why the mw96 formula fails . in a future paper , we will examine this question more closely . i am indebted to gerhard brner and yasushi suto for their critical reading of earlier versions of the manuscript . constructive comments by them , by houjun mo , and by an anonymous referee improve the presentation of this letter . yasushi suto is thanked for his invaluable assistance and continuing encouragement ; it would be impossible to get these very large , high quality simulations without his help . it is also my pleasure to acknowledge the jsps foundation for a postdoctoral fellowship . the simulations were carried out on vpp/16r and vx/4r at the astronomical data analysis center of the national astronomical observatory , japan .
Abstract:

Answer: an accurate fitting formula is reported for the two - point correlation function @xmath0 of the dark matter halos in hierarchical clustering models . it is valid for the linearly clustering regime , and its accuracy is about 10% in @xmath1 for the halos with mass @xmath2 where @xmath3 is the characteristic non - linear mass . the result is found on the basis of a careful analysis for a large set of scale - free simulations with @xmath4 particles . the fitting formula has a weak explicit dependence on the index @xmath5 of the initial power spectrum , but can be equally well applied to the cold dark matter ( cdm ) cosmological models if the effective index @xmath6 of the cdm power spectrum at the scale of the halo mass replaces the index @xmath5 . the formula agrees with the analytical formula of mo & white ( mw96 ) for massive halos with @xmath7 , but the mw96 formula significantly underpredicts @xmath0 for the less massive halos . the difference between the fitting and the analytical formulae amounts to a factor @xmath8 in @xmath0 for @xmath9 . one of the most interesting applications of this fitting formula would be the clustering of galaxies since the majority of halos hosting galaxies satisfies @xmath10 . # 1*r*_#1 # 1*s*_#1 # 1|n(*r*_#1 ) # 1|n(*s*_#1 ) # 1_z(r_p#1,_#1 ) # 1(r_#1 ) # 1(s_#1 ) # 1w(r_p#1 )


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: hoii is a gas - rich dwarf irregular galaxy on the outskirts of the m81 group , at a distance of 3.2  mpc ( @xmath1  mag ) . it was one of the first galaxies outside of the local group where the effects of sequential star formation on the interstellar medium ( ism ) were systematically investigated . puche et al . ( 1992 ) presented high - resolution multi - configuration vla h@xmath0i  observations , revealing a complex pattern of interconnected shells and holes . they argued for a picture where star formation is self - propagating , photoionization , stellar winds , supernova explosions ( sne ) , and secondary star formation shaping the ism . while we do not wish here to challenge the general relevance of such scenarios , we will introduce in the next paragraphs numerous problems they face in the particular case of hoii . some have been pointed out before , but others are highlighted here for the first time or are revealed by our reanalysis of puche et al . ( 1992 ) data . we have reanalyzed puche et al . ( 1992 ) multi - configuration vla observations of hoii , keeping only the d - array data . we produced a continuum - subtracted naturally - weighted cube cleaned to a depth of 1@xmath2 ( 2.75  mjy  beam@xmath3 ) , which was used to produce moment maps . the total h@xmath0i   map is shown in figure  1 , superposed on an optical image . undetected before , a large but faint component extends over the entire northwest half of the galaxy , encompassing the h@xmath0i  cloud detected by puche et al . the h@xmath0i   on the southeast side of the galaxy is compressed , giving rise to a striking nw - se asymmetry , and suggesting that hoii may be affected by ram pressure from an intragroup medium ( igm ) . the h@xmath0i  now reaches over 16  ( 4@xmath4 ) , twice the radius reached previously . the velocity field shows a clear differentially rotating disk pattern ( with a warp ) in the inner 78 , but the kinematics at larger radii is rather disturbed . the largest shells are clearly visible as peaks in the velocity dispersion . the total h@xmath0i  flux @xmath5  jy  km  s@xmath3 , corresponding to @xmath6  @xmath7 . the morphology of the h@xmath0i  in figure  1 is reminiscent of ram pressure , but it could also be caused by interactions . hoii lies 475  kpc in projection from the center of the m81 group , defined by m81 , m82 , and ngc  3077 . at the group velocity dispersion of 110  km s@xmath3  ( e.g.  huchra & geller 1982 ) , it would take hoii a third of a hubble time to reach the center of the group . however , hoii appears to be part of subsystem of three dwarf irregular galaxies to the northwest of the group s core , along with kar  52 ( m81  dwarf  a ) and ugc  4483 . if hoii is interacting , it must be with one of these two galaxies . both kar  52 and ugc  4483 are much smaller and fainter than hoii and have an irregular optical morphology , but none shows obvious signs of interactions ( bremnes , binggeli , & prugniel 1998 ) . in h@xmath0i , kar  52 displays a lumpy ring with little rotation , incomplete to the nw ( sargent , sancisi , & lo 1983 ) , and ugc  4483 shows a peaked distribution with a faint envelope extended nw - se ( whisp database ) . the distance to hoii is identical to that of ugc  4483 , but also to that of ngc  2403 and ddo  44 to the sw . this suggests that hoii belongs to the ngc  2403 subgroup , along with kar  52 , ugc  4483 , ngc  2365 , and ddo  44 . karachentsev et al . ( 2000 ) show that the ngc  2403 subgroup is nearer to us by 0.5  mpc but has a larger radial velocity , suggesting that it is moving towards the m81 group at 110 - 160  km  s@xmath3 . observations of the environment of hoii therefore do not support interactions as a likely mechanism to shape its large - scale structure , and considerations of the m81 and ngc  2403 subgroup as a whole suggest that hoii could have a large velocity relative to a putative igm . ram pressure must therefore be considered a serious candidate to explain the h@xmath0i  morphology of hoii . observations of the entire region around hoii , kar  52 , and ugc  4483 should help clarify this issue . the condition for ram pressure stripping can be written as the balance between the pressure exerted by an ambient medium and the restoring force of a galactic disk . the ism will be stripped if @xmath8 ( gunn & gott 1972 ) , where @xmath9 is the igm density , @xmath10 the relative velocity of the galaxy with respect to the igm , and @xmath11 and @xmath12 the total and ism surface densities , respectively . taking @xmath13  km  s@xmath3  and @xmath11 and @xmath12 ( corrected for other gaseous species ) at the first significantly disturbed contour in figure  1 , we derive a critical density for ram pressure @xmath14  atoms  @xmath15 . a virial mass of @xmath16  @xmath7  is derived from the five most prominent members of the m81 group ( huchra & geller 1982 ) . spreading 1% of this mass in a sphere just enclosing hoii , we obtain a mean density of @xmath17  atoms  @xmath15 , 25 times too little for stripping . although it suffers from many shortcomings , this number provides a benchmark with which to compare more sophisticated calculations . the igm is likely to be more concentrated and clumpy , and the encounter may not be exactly `` face - on '' , but since the group velocity dispersion estimate is based only on a few large galaxies , it is probably an underestimate , and it is in any case unlikely that the group is virialized at the distance of hoii , making its three - dimensional velocity highly unconstrained . if hoii is bound to the m81 group , then the virial mass adopted is severely underestimated . these factors can easily bring the required and derived igm densities within a factor 23 of each other . more convincingly , typical parameters for poor groups are @xmath18  mpc and @xmath19  @xmath7   ( zabludoff & mulchaey 1998 ) , of which only 1020% is associated with individual galaxies , leading to a mean density for the remaining matter of @xmath20  atoms  @xmath15 ( within the virial radius ) . if only 1% of this is ordinary interacting baryonic matter , then its density is sufficient to strip galaxies like hoii of their ism . this is promising , since on scales of the virial radius , the dominant baryonic mass component in groups is the igm ( mulchaey 2000 ) . in fact , zabludoff & mulchaey ( 1998 ) report x - ray gas masses of @xmath21  @xmath7  for their groups , leading to mean densities for the hot gas of @xmath22  atoms  @xmath15 within the virial radius .    the total x - ray luminosity in groups does not correlate with either the total number of galaxies or the optical luminosity , but it does correlate with the group velocity dispersion and gas temperature . a common fit to cluster and compact group data yields , for @xmath23  km  s@xmath3 , @xmath24  erg  s@xmath3 and @xmath25  kev ( ponman et al . a similar correlation for loose groups alone yields @xmath26  erg  s@xmath3 and @xmath27  kev ( helsdon & ponman 2000 ) . the large errors on @xmath28 are probably related to the wind injection histories of the groups , which also lead to rather flat surface brightness profiles . there are also indications that the correlations for groups and clusters may be different , so both @xmath28 and @xmath29 are probably underestimates . there can thus be a substantial amount of hot gas in groups like the m81 group . another issue of interest is the survival of any stripped gas in the hot igm . following cowie & mckee ( 1977 ) , the evaporation timescale for a typical cloud ( @xmath30  @xmath15 , @xmath31  pc ) embedded in an igm at the temperatures mentioned above is @xmath32 to @xmath33  yr . the disturbed ism in hoii extends over @xmath34 in the radial direction . at a velocity of 110  km  s@xmath3 , it takes hoii about @xmath35  yr to cross that distance . given the strong dependence of the evaporation on the assumed properties of the clouds and igm , the timescales calculated seem consistent with the observations . it is also possible to show that , in the conditions of interest here , cooling and viscous stripping ( nulsen 1982 ) are negligible compared to evaporation . at the igm density required for ram pressure stripping , the cooling timescale is @xmath36  yrs and the timescale for ( complete ) viscous stripping of our typical cloud is @xmath37  yr . over 50 h@xmath0i  holes were cataloged in hoii by puche et al . ( 1992 ) , who obtained estimates of their kinematics ages , previously enclosed h@xmath0i  masses , and creation energies . many correlations between these quantities are presented , arguing for a formation of the holes through sne and stellar winds , but many are truly a reflection of the properties of hoii rather than of the formation mechanism of the holes . also , h@xmath38 emission does not preferentially fill small holes or trace the edges of large ones . a similar picture emerges from far - ultraviolet observations ( stewart et al . furthermore , the shells are devoid of hot gas , and x - ray emission is not preferentially associated with h@xmath0ii  regions or h@xmath0i  holes ; only a mixed bag of objects is observed ( kerp & walter 2001 ) . the sn rate derived from radio continuum observations agrees well with that derived from the h@xmath0i  shells ( tongue & westpfahl 1995 ) , but the energy is deposited in the central regions of hoii only , hardly helping to explain how the entire web of interconnected shells formed . furthermore , in most cases where useful limits are derived , stellar clusters expected to remain from massive star formation episodes are simply not seen ( rhode et al . multi - wavelength observations thus pose a challenge to sne and stellar winds scenarios for the formation of the shells in hoii , particularly in the outer parts of the disk where no star formation appears to be taking place . other mechanisms exist to explain the formation of the shells and reconcile models with observations ( see rhode et al . in particular , sn may not be spherically expanding in a uniform ism , as assumed , and the initial mass function could be very top - heavy . gamma - ray bursts may also be more efficient at creating holes and shells . all these mechanisms , however , still require massive star formation in the outer parts of the disk . a fractal h@xmath0i , overpressured h@xmath0ii  regions , external ionization sources , and/or high - velocity clouds can bypass this requirement .    here , we would like to suggest that ram pressure can provide yet another solution to the problem of shell formation in hoii . ram pressure can create holes in an h@xmath0i  disk where local minima in the surface density exist . thus , it can provide an efficient mechanism to enlarge pre - existing holes , created by sne or otherwise , and it can explain the overestimated energy requirements ( or lack of observational signature ) from sne and stellar wind scenarios . obviously , however , shell formation through ram pressure should be properly modeled before making further claims . ram pressure should be easy to distinguish from internal , pressure - driven events such as sne and stellar winds , as the shells will have a `` bullet - hole '' geometry similar to that caused by high - velocity cloud collisions ( e.g.  tenorio - tagle 1980 ) . of course , in the case of hoii , a direct proof of a sufficiently dense igm must also be found before any ram pressure model can be taken seriously .
Abstract:

Answer: neutral hydrogen vla d - array observations of the dwarf irregular galaxy hoii , a prototype galaxy for studies of shell formation and self - propagating star formation , are presented . the large - scale h@xmath0i  morphology is reminiscent of ram pressure and is unlikely caused by interactions . a case is made for intragroup gas in poor and compact groups similar to the m81 group , to which hoii belongs . numerous shortcomings of the supernova explosions and stellar winds scenario to create the shells in hoii are highlighted , and it is suggested that ram pressure may be able to reconcile the numerous observations available . ps . @plainmkbothoddheadoddfoot``dwarf galaxies and their environment '' ; international conference in bad honnef , germany , 23 - 27 january 2001evenheadevenfootoddfoot


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: investigation of the properties of the tensor mesons is an area where experimental data is well ahead of the theoretical works . in this area there are a little theoretical works devoted to the analysis of the main characteristics of the tensor mesons ( especially strange tensor mesons ) and their decay modes comparing with scaler , pseudo - scalar , vector and axial vector mesons . therefore , theoretical calculations on the physical parameters of these mesons and their comparison with experimental data could give essential information about their nature . the light tensor mesons spectroscopy can also be useful for understanding of low energy qcd . the qcd sum rules method as one of the most powerful and applicable tools to hadron physics could play an important role in this respect . hadrons are formed in a scale of energy where the perturbation theory fails and to study the physics of mesons , we need to use some non - perturbative approaches . the qcd sum rules approach @xcite , which enjoys two peculiar properties namely its foundation based on qcd lagrangian and free of model dependent parameters , as one of the most well established non - perturbative methods has been applied widely to hadron physics . present work is devoted to the analysis of mass and decay constant of the strange tensor @xmath0 with quantum numbers @xmath1 by means of the qcd sum rules . the @xmath0 tensor meson together with the unflavored @xmath3 , @xmath4 and @xmath5 are building the groundstate @xmath6 nonet , which are experimentally well established in contrast to the scalar mesons @xcite . note that , the mass and decay constant of light unflavored tensor mesons have been calculated in @xcite . our aim here is to estimate the order of the su(3 ) flavor symmetry breaking effects . recently , the magnetic moments of these mesons have also been predicted in lattice qcd @xcite . the layout of the paper is as follows : in the next section , the sum rules for the mass and decay constant of the ground state strange tensor meson is calculated . section iii encompasses our numerical predictions for the mass and leptonic decay constant of the @xmath0 tensor meson . in this section , we calculate the mass and decay constant of the strange tensor meson in the framework of the qcd sum rules . the following correlation function , the main object in this approach , is the starting point : @xmath7\mid   0{\rangle},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath8 is the interpolating current of the tensor meson . this current in the following form is responsible for creating the ground state strange tensor @xmath0 meson with quantum numbers @xmath1 from the vacuum : @xmath9.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the @xmath10 denotes the derivative with respect to x acting on left and right . it is given as : @xmath11,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath12 and the @xmath13 are the gell - mann matrices and @xmath14 are the external ( vacuum ) gluon fields . in fock - schwinger gauge , @xmath15 , this field can be expressed directly in terms of the gluon field strength tensor as : @xmath16    after this remark let calculate the correlation function presented in eq . ( [ correl.func.1 ] ) . in qcd sum rules approach , this correlation function is calculated in two ways :    * phenomenological or physical part which is obtained by saturating the correlation function with a tower of mesons with the same quantum numbers as the interpolating current , * qcd or theoretical side which is obtained considering the internal structure of the hadrons , namely quarks and gluons and their interactions with each other and also the qcd vacuum . in this side the correlation function is calculated in deep euclidean region , @xmath17 , via operator product expansion ( ope ) where the short and long distance effects are separated . the former is calculated using the perturbation theory , whereas the latter is represented in terms of vacuum expectation values of the operators having different mass dimensions . the sum rules for decay constant of the ground state meson is obtained isolating it in phenomenological part , equating both representations of the correlation function and applying borel transformation to suppress the contribution of the higher states and continuum . first , let us start to compute the physical side . inserting a complete set of @xmath0 state between the currents in eq . ( [ correl.func.1 ] ) , setting @xmath18 and performing intergal over x we obtain : @xmath19 where @xmath20 represents the higher states and continuum contributions . the matrix elements creating the hadronic states out of vacuum can be written in terms of the leptonic decay constant and polarization tensor as follows : @xmath21 combining two above equations and performing summation over polarization tensor using the relation @xmath22 where , @xmath23 we obtain the following final representation of the correlation function in physical side : @xmath24 where , we have kept only structure which contains a contribution of the tensor meson . on qcd side , the correlation function in eq . ( [ correl.func.1 ] ) is calculated using the explicit expression of the interpolating current presented in eq . ( [ tensorcurrent ] ) . after contracting out all quark pairs using the wick s theorem we obtain : @xmath25+\left[\beta\leftrightarrow\alpha\right]+\left[\nu\leftrightarrow\mu\right]+\left[\beta\leftrightarrow\alpha,\nu\leftrightarrow\mu\right]\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] from this equation , it follows that for obtaining the correlation function from qcd side the expression of the light quark propagator is needed . the light quark propagator is obtained in @xcite : @xmath26 - { ( x - y)^2 \over 192 } m_0 ^ 2 \langle qq\rangle \left[1 -i { m_q \over 6 } ( \not\!{x}- \not\!{y})\right ] \nonumber \\ & - & i g_s \int_0 ^ 1 du \left\ { { ( \not\!x-\not\!y ) \over 16 \pi^2 ( x - y)^2 } g_{\mu\nu}[u(x - y ) ] \sigma^{\mu\nu } - u ( x - y)^\mu g_{\mu\nu}[u(x - y ) ] \gamma^\nu { i \over 4 \pi^2 ( x - y)^2 } \right . \nonumber \\ & - & \left . i { m_q \over 32 \pi^2 } g_{\mu\nu}[u(x - y ) ] \sigma^{\mu\nu } \left [ \ln\left ( -{(x - y)^2 \lambda^2 \over 4 } \right ) + 2 \gamma_e \right ] \right\}~,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath27 is the scale parameter , we choose it at the factorization scale @xmath28 @xcite , and @xmath29 now , we put the expression of the propagators and apply the derivatives with respect to x and y in eq . ( [ correl.func.2 ] ) and eventually set @xmath18 . as a result , we obtain the following expression in coordinate space : @xmath30+\left[\beta\leftrightarrow\alpha\right]+\left[\nu\leftrightarrow\mu\right]+\left[\beta\leftrightarrow\alpha,\nu\leftrightarrow\mu\right]\right\}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] where , @xmath31\right.\nonumber\\&+&\left.\frac{m_0 ^ 2\langle\bar dd\rangle}{96}\delta_\beta^\nu\right\}\gamma_\alpha-\left\{\frac{i}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{\gamma_\beta } { x^4}-\frac{4\not\!{x}x_\beta } { x^6}\right]-\frac{m_sx_\beta}{2 \pi^2 x^4}+\frac{im_s\langle\bar ss\rangle}{48}\gamma_\beta+\frac{m_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar ss\rangle } { 96}x_\beta(1 + i \frac{m_s\not\!x}{6})+\frac{im_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar ss\rangle m_sx^2}{1152}\gamma_\beta\right\}\gamma_\mu\nonumber\\&&\left\{\frac{i}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{\gamma_\nu } { x^4}-\frac{4\not\!{x}x_\nu}{x^6}\right]-\frac{m_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar dd\rangle x_\nu}{96}\right\}\gamma_\alpha-\left\{\frac{i}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{-\gamma_\nu } { x^4}+\frac{4\not\!{x}x_\nu } { x^6}\right]+\frac{m_sx_\nu}{2 \pi^2 x^4}-\frac{im_s\langle\bar ss\rangle}{48}\gamma_\nu- \frac{m_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar ss\rangle } { 96}x_\nu(1 + i \frac{m_s\not\!x}{6})\right.\nonumber\\&-&\left.\frac{im_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar ss\rangle m_sx^2}{1152}\gamma_\nu\right\}\gamma_\mu\left\{\frac{i}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{-\gamma_\beta } { x^4}+\frac{4\not\!{x}x_\beta}{x^6}\right]+\frac{m_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar dd\rangle x_\beta}{96}\right\}\gamma_\alpha+\left\{\frac{2i}{\pi^2}\left[\frac{-\gamma_\nu x_\beta}{x^6}-\frac{\gamma_\beta x_\nu+ \not\!{x}\delta^\beta_\nu}{x^6}+\frac{6\not\!{x}x_\beta x_\nu}{x^8}\right]\right.\nonumber\\&+&\left.\frac{m_0 ^ 2\langle\bar ss\rangle}{96}\delta^\beta_\nu(1 + i \frac{m_s\not\!x}{6})-\frac{m_s}{2\pi^2}\left[\frac{\delta^\beta_\nu}{x^4}-\frac{4x_\beta x_\nu}{x^6}\right]+\frac{im_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar ss\rangle m_s}{1152}\left[x_\beta\gamma_\nu+x_\nu\gamma_\beta\right]\right\}\gamma_\mu\left\{{i \not\!x \over 2 \pi^2 x^4 }   - { \langle \bar dd\rangle \over 12 }   - { x^2 \over 192 } m_0 ^ 2 \langle \bar dd\rangle \right\}\gamma_\alpha.\nonumber\\\end{aligned}\ ] ] in calculations , we neglected the d quark mass . the calculations also show that the terms proportional to the gluon field strength tensor and four quark operators are very small ( see also @xcite ) and therefore , we do not present those terms in our final expression . the next step is to perform the integral over x using : @xmath32 where , @xmath33 denotes the euclidean space . now , we separate the coefficient of the structure @xmath34 form both sides of the correlation function and apply the borel transformation as : @xmath35 where , @xmath36 is the borel mass squared . finally , we obtain the following sum rule for the leptonic decay constant of the strange tensor meson : @xmath37 where , @xmath38 is the number of color and @xmath39 is the continuum threshold . the mass of the strange tensor meson is obtained by taking derivative with respect to @xmath40 from the both sides of the above sum rule and dividing by itself , i.e. , @xmath41 present section is devoted to the numerical analysis of the sum rules for the mass and decay constant of the ground state strange tensor meson . the main input parameters entering to the sum rules expressions are continuum threshold @xmath39 , borel mass parameter @xmath36 , strange quark mass and quark condensates . in further analysis , we put @xmath42 @xcite , @xmath43 , @xmath44 at @xmath45 @xcite , @xmath46 @xcite . the continuum threshold @xmath39 and borel mass parameter @xmath36 are auxiliary parameters , hence the physical quantities should be independent of them . therefore , we look for working regions at which the physical quantities are weakly dependent on these parameters . the continuum threshold @xmath47 is not completely arbitrary and it is related to the energy of the first exited state . the working region for the continuum threshold is obtained to be the interval @xmath48 . the working region for the borel mass parameter are determined by the requirement that not only the higher state and continuum contributions are suppressed but also the contribution of the highest order operator must be small . in our analysis , the working region for the borel parameter is found to be @xmath49 . the dependence of the mass and decay constant of the ground state strange tensor meson are presented in figs 1 and 2 , respectively .        our final results on the mass and decay constant of the ground state strange meson are given as : @xmath50 the result for the mass is in good consistency with the experimental value ( @xmath51 ) @xcite . comparing our results on the decay constant of this meson with predictions of the @xcite for the light unflavored tensor mesons , we see that the su(3 ) symmetry breaking effect is about @xmath2 .    99 m. a. shifman , a. i. vainshtein , v. i. zakharov , nucl . b 147 ( 1979 ) 385 . p. colangelo , a. khodjamirian , in `` at the frontier of particle physics / handbook of qcd '' , edited by m. shifman ( world scientific , singapore , 2001 ) , vol . 3 , p. 1495 . v. m. braun , arxiv : hep - ph/9801122 . i. i. balitsky , v. m. braun , a. v. kolesnichenko , nucl . phys . b 312 ( 1989 ) 509 .    s. v. dombrowski , nucl . 56 , 125 ( 1997 ) . t. m. aliev , m. a. shifman , phys . lett . b 112 , 401 ( 1982 ) . f. x. lee , s. moerschbacher , walter wilcox , phys . rev . d 78 , 094502 ( 2008 ) . i. i. balitsky , v. m. braun , nucl . b 311 , 541 ( 1989 ) . v. m. braun , i. e. filyanov , z. phys . c 48 , 239 ( 1990 ) . k. g. chetrykin , a. khodjamirian , a. a. pivovarov , phys . lett . * b * 661 , 250 ( 2008 ) ; i. i. balitsky , v. m. braun and a. v. kolesnichenko , nucl . * b * 312 , 509 ( 1989 ) . b. l. ioffe , prog . 56 ( 2006 ) 232 . c. dominguez , n. f. nasrallah , r. rontisch , k. schilcher , jhep 0805 , 020 ( 2008 ) . v. m. belyaev , b. l. ioffe , jetp 56 , 493 ( 1982 ) . ] c. amsler et al . , particle data group , phys . b 667 1 ( 2008 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the mass and decay constant of the ground state strange tensor meson @xmath0 with @xmath1 is calculated using the qcd sum rules method . the results are consistent with the experimental data . it is found that su(3 ) symmetry breaking effect constitutes about @xmath2 of the decay constant .