Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: an idea of alferov et al . , @xcite , comprising the use of a geometrically - narrow active recombination region where photon generation occurs ( quantum wells ; qw ) , with waveguides around improving the gain to loss ratio ( separate confinement heterostructures ; sch ) , has largely dominated the field of optoelectronics development in the past years . algaas edge emitting lasers are an example of practical realization of these ideas . now , they are mostly used for pumping solid state @xmath0 lasers used either in high - power metallurgical processes or , already , in first field experiments as a highly directional source of energy in weapons interceptors .    in our earlier works we first were able to find agreement between our calculations of quantum well energy states and the lasing wavelength observed experimentally @xcite . next @xcite , several changes in structure of sch algaas lasers have been shown to considerably improve their electrical and optical parameters . we compared computed properties with these of lasers produced by polyus research institute in moscow @xcite , @xcite .    in particular , by changing the width of active region ( quantum well ) , waveguide width , as well by changing the waveguide profile by introducing a gradual change of al concentration , we were able to decrease significantly the lasing threshold current , increase the slope of optical power versus current , and increase optical efficiency @xcite . we have shown also @xcite that the lasing action may not occur at certain widths or depths of quantum well ( qw ) , and the threshold current as a function of the width may have discontinuities . the effects are more pronounced at low temperatures . we argue that these discontinuities occur when the most upper quantum well energy values are very close to either conduction band or valence band energy offsets . the effects may be observed at certain conditions in temperature dependence of lasing threshold current as well . the main chalanges with the broader use of algaas based sch lasers are related to improving some of their electro - optical characteristics , in particular their optical efficiency . the purpose of this work is to investigate the role of doping levels across the laser structure , and , if only possible , to find doping concentrations that would lead to the best opto - electrical parameters , maximizing optical efficiency . we assume here uniform doping profiles accross laser layers .    for simulations , we use sentaurus tcad from synopsys @xcite , which is an advanced commercial computational environment , a collection of tools for performing modeling of electronic devices . we model a laser with @xmath1 cavity length and @xmath2 laser width , with doping / al - content as described in table [ table_1 ] . the table [ table_2 ] describes its experimental parameters . synopsys s sentaurus tcad , used for modeling , can be run on windows and linux os . linux , once mastered , offers more ways of an efficient solving of problems by providing a large set of open source tools and ergonomic environment for their use , making it our preferred operating system . this is an advanced , flexible set of tools used for modeling a broad range of technological and physical processes in the world of microelectronics phenomena . in case of lasers , some calculations in sentaurus have purely phenomenological nature . the electrical and optical characteristics depend , primarily , on the following computational parameters that are available for adjusting :    @xmath3 of electrodes , @xmath4 , @xmath3 in physics section , @xmath5 , electrical contact resistance @xmath6 . there are several parameters for adjustment that are related to microscopic physical properties of materials or structures studied . however , often their values are either unknown exactly or finding them would require quantum - mechanical modeling of electronic band structure and transport , based on first - principles . this is however not the aim of our work .    in order to find agreement between the calculated results and these observed experimentaly ( the threshold current @xmath7 and the slope of optical power , @xmath8 , are such most basic laser parameters ) , we adjust accordingly values of @xmath4 and @xmath5 .    the results for @xmath7 and @xmath9 , in this paper , are all shown normalized by @xmath10 and @xmath11 , respectively , which are the values computed for the reference laser described in table [ table_1 ] . we neglect here the effect of contact resistance , @xmath6 , by not including buffer and substrate layers and contacts into calculations ( compare with structure described in table [ table_1 ] ) . we use @xmath12 parameter available in sentaurus and treat it as a physical quantity that is closely related to voltage applied . another parameter available in sentaurus , @xmath13 , is simply related to @xmath12 by the ohmic formula : @xmath14 . hence , any results shown here may be easy adjusted after calculations by adding the effect of @xmath6 . let us estimate the value of @xmath6 . we assume that this is the sum of electrical resistance of n - substrate , n - buffer , and p - contact layers ( see table [ table_1 ] ) . by using simplified formula for each of these layers , @xmath15 , and electron / hole mobility from database of synopsys , we have the following specific resistivity values for these layers ( indexed as rows in table [ table_1 ] ) : @xmath16 , @xmath17 , and @xmath18 . taking into account appropriate geometrical dimensions , we obtain : @xmath19 , @xmath20 , and @xmath21 . hence , @xmath6 is dominated by the resistance of n - substrate layer and it is of the order of @xmath22 . at threshold current of @xmath23 , that small resistance will cause a difference between computed by us lasing offset voltage @xmath24 and that one measured by about @xmath25 only . in will however have a noticeable contribution to differential resistance @xmath26 . .structure of algaas sch laser layers used in computer modeling . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^,^ " , ] it is possible to work in a batch mode in sentaurus tcad . however , we find it more convenient to use perl scripts rather for control of batch processing and changing parameters of calculations . it is a very flexible programming language , suitable in particular for working on text files ( e.g. manipulation on text data files ) , and it is convenient to be used from terminal window rather , not by using a gui interface , which is a more productive approach towards computation . tcl is a very powerful but easy to learn dynamic programming language , suitable for a wide range of uses . sentaurus tcad contains libraries designed to be used together with tcl . they are run through sentaurus s tdx interface and are used for manipulating ( extracting ) spacial data from binary tdr files .    besides , we use tools / programs like gnuplot , grep , shell commands , etc . a more detailed description , with examples of scripts , is available on our laboratory web site .      the most accurate way of finding @xmath7 is by extrapolating the linear part of @xmath27 to @xmath28 just after the current larger than @xmath7 . we used a set of gnuplot and perl scripts for that that could be run semi - automatically on a large collection of data . one should only take care here that a properly chosen is the data range for fiting , since @xmath27 is a linear function in a certain range of @xmath29 values only . the choice of that range may affect accuracy of data analysis . we find however that this is the most accurate effective method to analyse the data from a large collection of datasets . textbooks exponential @xmath30 dependence is fullfiled well at voltages which are well below the lasing offset voltage @xmath24 . near the lasing threshold , we observe a strong departure from that dependence , and , in particular , for many data curves a clear kink in @xmath30 is observed at @xmath24 . we find that a modified exponential dependence describes the data very well : @xmath31    where @xmath7 , @xmath24 , as well @xmath32 , @xmath33 , @xmath34 , and @xmath35 are certain fiting parameters . the above function is continuous at @xmath24 , as it obviously should , but it s derivative is usually not . we used equation ( [ exponential_6_parameters ] ) to find out @xmath7 and @xmath24 . however , the accuracy of this method was found lower than accuracy of the following two methods described . figure [ doping21a ] shows a few typical examples of i(u ) dependencies , together with lines computed to fit them by using ( [ exponential_6_parameters ] ) . let us notice that since ( [ exponential_6_parameters ] ) may have a discontinuous derivative , using it to find out differential resistance at @xmath24 is ambiguous . from equation ( [ exponential_6_parameters ] ) , at @xmath36 , we will have @xmath37 on the side @xmath38 and @xmath39 on the side @xmath40 . in fact , the differential resistance measured in experiments is , to some extend , determined by the resistance of buffer layers and contacts , and by the way how it has been actually defined for non - linear @xmath41 curves .    in practice , the @xmath30 dependence , above @xmath24 but not far above , may be asummed to be a linear function . in such a case , we find from data anaylysis , for the third dataset , for instance , in figure [ doping21a ] , @xmath42 , which , together with computed contact resistance @xmath43 gives good qualitative agreement with the differential resistance expected for real laser , as listed in table [ table_2 ] . another approach to find @xmath24 is by finding position of maximum in derivative of logarithm of @xmath45 versus voltage : @xmath46 . this is a very accurate method when there is a sufficiently large number of datapoints available near @xmath24 . however , for that , we would have to perform a lot of computations that are time consuming , in small enough steps in @xmath47 . hence , this method is not always effective . we find that a good accuracy of determining @xmath24 is from extrapolating linearly gain versus voltage curve in a near range of voltage values below @xmath24 , to the value of maximal gain , which is constant above @xmath24 . the results presented in this paper were obtained that way . let us use the simplified assumption that @xmath30 is linear above @xmath24 : @xmath48 . together with linear dependence of lasing light power versus current , @xmath49 , we have the following relation between optical power efficiency , @xmath50 , and current @xmath51 :    @xmath52    equation [ kpd_equation ] gives a resonably accurate qualitative description of @xmath53 . the parameter determining position and value of maximum , @xmath54 , is governed by factor @xmath55 . in a typical case , with @xmath56 , @xmath57 , and @xmath58 , we have @xmath59 . we sometime prefer to use another form of equation [ kpd_equation ] , where @xmath60 as a function of voltage is used :    @xmath61    where @xmath62 . figure [ eta_01 ] shows a few examples of @xmath63 curves computed with equation [ kpd_equation_u ] . by `` n - n '' waveguide structure we mean a doping structure as described in table [ table_1 ] , where both waveguides and the active region ( qw ) are n - type doped . we present here selected examples only of data obtained from semi - automatic analyses of thousands of datasets . figures [ doping10a ] , [ doping10a_1 ] , and [ doping10a_2 ] show the role of doping concentration in active region , for a few values of doping concentrations in emitter regions , on basic characteristics of lasers : threshold current , slope of light power versus current , @xmath64 , and lasing offset voltage , respectively . the doping concentration in waveguide regions is the same on these three figures ; it is @xmath65 . we see that none of these quantities , i.e. @xmath7 , @xmath66 , @xmath24 , depends strongly on active region doping .    therefore , it is not unexpected that the optical efficiency , the ratio of optical power @xmath45 to total power supplied to the laser , @xmath67 , as shown in figure [ kpd01 ] , weakly depends on doping concentration in active region as well . though for the lower doping the higher optical efficiency is obtained . the effects of doping in waveguide regions are similar to these in the active region , but stronger . figures [ doping16c ] , [ doping16 ] , [ doping_u02 ] , and [ kpd02 ] illustrate , respectively , dependencies of threshold currend , @xmath66 , lasing offset voltage @xmath24 , and optical efficiency on doping levels in waveguide regions . we observe , again , that the best characteristics ( lowest @xmath7 and highest @xmath66 values ) are at lowest doping levels in waveguides . @xmath24 also weekly depends on doping in waveguides . the most significant role is played by doping in emitters regions , rather . however , as figure [ kpd02 ] shows , optical efficiency changes significantly with doping levels . one would like here to use equation [ kpd_equation_u ] to describe the data in this figure . however , it could provide only a very qualitative fiting of the data . since all the data in this figure indicate on the same or very close values of @xmath24 ( compare also results of figure [ doping_u02 ] ) , we attribute large differences between these curves to significant increase of differential resistance @xmath68 when doping level increases . and that could be understood as building up of p - n junction outside of quantum well region , with increase of doping .    a characteristic for `` n - n '' structure is parabolic dependence of optical efficiency on doping levels , as shown in figure [ kpd04 ] . doping levels in emitters regions contribute in the most prominent degree to laser characteristics . figures [ doping11 ] and [ doping12 ] show typical example dependencies of @xmath7 and @xmath66 on doping in emitters . clearly is observed a minimum in @xmath69 at @xmath70 somewhat lower than @xmath71 , and a maximum in @xmath72 at a value of @xmath70 close to that but not the same .    in figures [ doping41 ] , [ doping43 ] and [ doping44 ] , we show the presence of such a minimum in @xmath69 for a few more sets of data . we show that a parabolic dependence ( when doping concentration is drawn on logarythmic axes ) is a good approximation of the data : compare the same results as in figure [ doping43 ] shown however in linear scale in figure [ doping44 ] :    @xmath73    where @xmath74 , @xmath75 , and @xmath76 are certain fiting parameters .    the lasing offset voltage @xmath24 ( figures [ doping_u04 ] and [ doping_u03 ] ) is sensitive to emitters doping at low levels , only , below around @xmath71 . strong dependencies of @xmath7 and @xmath66 on doping manifest itself in a strong dependence of optical efficiency on doping levels , as figure [ kpd00 ] shows . again , it has a parabolic character ( figure [ kpd00 ] ) , similar to that one found for waveguides ( figure [ kpd04 ] ) . by `` n - p '' waveguide structure we mean a doping structure that differes from that described in table [ table_1 ] , where both waveguides and the active region ( qw ) are n - type doped . here we assume that the waveguide on the side of n - emitter is of n - type , the other one is of p - type , and qw doping is of n - type . the most remarkable difference between n - n and n - p structures is that in case of the last one a large reduction of @xmath7 and a significant increase in @xmath66 and in optical efficiency are found .      . figures [ np06 ] and [ np06 ] show the role of doping concentration in active region , for a few values of doping concentrations in emitter regions , on basic characteristics of lasers : threshold current and slope of light power versus current , @xmath64 , respectively . we see that none of these quantities depends strongly on active region doping . these effects are similar to the onse observed for `` n - n '' type of waveguide structure .      . the effects of doping in waveguide regions are much stronger for n - p structure than these reported for n - n one . both , lasing threshold current ( figure [ np02 ] ) and corresponding @xmath66 ( figure [ np02 ] ) show a nice strong linear dependence on waveguides doping . since the first one has a positive slope and the second one negative , there will no maximum as a function of @xmath77 in this case , which is different that for the case of n - n structure . the lasing offset voltage @xmath24 corresponding to the data displayed in figures [ np02 ] and [ np03 ] does not change with waveguide doping ( within the accuracy of our modeling , and the studied doping range ) , and it is of the value of @xmath78 .    in figure [ np01a ] we compare optical efficiency for both types of structures .      . as in case on n - n structures , here also doping levels in emitters regions contribute the most to laser characteristics . figures [ np31 ] and [ np31 ] show example dependencies of @xmath7 and @xmath66 on doping in emitters . there are no maxima / minima there like in case of n - n structure , and at concentrations above about @xmath71 the effect of doping becomes small . the lasing offset voltage @xmath24 ( figure [ np09 ] ) is sensitive to emitters doping at low levels , only , below around @xmath71 . this is the same as for n - n structure . optical efficiency does depend weekly on doping at large doping levels , unlike for n - n structures ( figures [ np08 ] and [ kpd29 ] ) . sch algaas lasers with two kinds of waveguide doping structures have been modeled with synopsys tcad : `` n - n '' type structure where both waveguides have n - type of doping ( with qw doping of n - type as well ) , and `` n - p '' structure where the waveguide on the side of p - emitter has p - type doping . the `` n - n '' structure is of the type we have experimental data for and it was used as a reference in our calculation calibration . we observed that the doping level in active region has a small only influence on laser characteristics ( lasing threshold current , slope of light power versus current , lasing offset voltage , optical efficiency ) . better results are obtained for the lowest possible doping . more pronounced influence is of doping in waveguide regions . for `` n - n '' type of structure an optimal doping level is of around @xmath79 , but for `` n - p '' type of structure , it is desirable to have lower level of doping concentration there . the most significant is the role of doping levels in emitters . it should be around @xmath71 in case of both types of structures . however , `` n - p '' type of structure gives significantly better results than `` n - n '' one , with threshold current lowered to about 70% and optical efficiency increased to near 80% . s.  i.  matyukhin , z.  koziol , and s.  n.  romashyn , _ the radiative characteristics of quantum - well active region of algaas lasers with separate - confinement heterostructure ( sch ) _ , arxiv:1010.0432v1 [ cond-mat.mtrl-sci ] ( 2010 ) z.  koziol , s.  i.  matyukhin , _ waveguide profiling of algaas lasers with separate confinement heterostructures ( sch ) for optimal optical and electrical characteristics , by using synopsys s tcad modeling _ , unpublished . z.  koziol , s.  i.  matyukhin , and s.  n.  romashyn , _ non - monotonic characteristics of sch lasers due to discrete nature of energy levels in qw _ , accepted for presentation at _ nano and giga challenges in electronics , photonics and renewable energy symposium and summer school _ , moscow - zelenograd , russia , september 12 - 16 , 2011    a.  yu .  andreev , s.  a.  zorina , a.  yu .  leshko , a.  v.  lyutetskiy , a.  a.  marmalyuk , a.  v.  murashova , t.  a.  nalet , a.  a.  padalitsa , n.  a.  pikhtin , d.  r.  sabitov , v.  a.  simakov , s.  o.  slipchenko , k.  yu .  telegin , v.  v.  shamakhov , i.  s.  tarasov , _ high power lasers ( @xmath80 = 808 nm ) based on separate confinement algaas / gaas heterostructures _ , semiconductors , 2009 , 43(4 ) , 543 - 547 . a.  v.  andreev , a.  y.  leshko , a.  v.  lyutetskiy , a . a.  marmalyuk , t.  a.  nalyot , a.  a.  padalitsa , n.  a.  pikhtin , d.  r.  sabitov , v.  a.  simakov , s.  o.  slipchenko , m.  a.  khomylev , i.  s.  tarasov , _ high power laser diodes ( @xmath80 = 808  850 nm ) based on asymmetric separate confinement heterostructure _ , semiconductors , 2006 40(5 ) , 628 - 632 .
Abstract:

Answer: optical and electrical characteristics of algaas lasers with separate confinement heterostructures are modeled by using synopsys s sentaurus tcad and open source software for semi - automatic data analysis of large collections of data . the effects of doping in all laser layers are investigated with the aim to achieve optimal characteristics of the devise . the results are compared with these obtained for real lasers produced at polyus research institute in moscow , showing that a significant improvement can be achieved , in particular an increase in optical efficiency ( up to over 70 % ) by careful control of type and level of doping through out the entire structure . = 3.00ex


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: if bloch electrons encounter planar interfaces they may be reflected or transmitted . in this paper we develop a technique for the calculation of these reflection and transmission amplitudes within the screened korringa - kohn - rostoker ( screened kkr ) approach , a technique for ab initio electronic structure calculations . there are many uses for bloch wave transmission and reflection amplitudes and probabilities . first of all they can be applied to describe transport @xcite in films and multilayers including the electronic structure of the real material . secondly , they can be used do develop a first principle based theory of electron tunneling . finally , transmission and reflection coefficients are the basic ingredients for the theoretical understanding of interlayer exchange coupling @xcite . consider an arbitrary barrier @xmath2 which is sandwiched by two leads of the material @xmath1 ( see fig . 1 ) . for the propagating bulk - states in @xmath3 the transmission coefficient @xmath0 through the barrier is defined as @xmath4 where the @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the complex amplitudes of the right- and left - moving bloch waves . during the scattering process the energy @xmath7 and the in - plane component @xmath8 of the wave vector @xmath9 are conserved .    in the past different methods were established for the calculation of @xmath0 , e.g. @xcite . these methods usually model the structure of the two semi - infinite leads @xmath1 separated by a barrier @xmath2 . via the green s function or the wave function of the system @xmath0 can be computed . in this work we present a new method which approaches the problem differently : we use the band structure and wave function of a periodic superlattice @xmath2/@xmath1 to calculate @xmath0 . this is strongly motivated by the development of highly efficient n - scaling superlattice kkr codes , e.g. @xcite . a superlattice is a structure @xmath2/@xmath1 which is periodically repeated in all three dimensions ( see fig . 2 ) . therefore the case of the single barrier @xmath2 with leads @xmath1 is fully contained in this structure and the similarity with the kronig - penney model is obvious . kronig and penney showed in their simple 1-dimensional free electron model how the bandstructure of a periodic system can be derived from the scattering properties of a single barrier . ( for more details on the kronig - penney model see for instance @xcite . ) the keynote of this paper is to derive the scattering properties of a single barrier from the electronic structure of a superlattice . we discuss the theory and numericalimplementation of the new method and present its first successful applications to free electrons and a cu / co ( 001 ) system . first we state our basic assumptions . thereafter we discuss the transmission coefficient @xmath0 of the single barrier and finally its connection to the superlattice wave function .      in fig . 1 and fig . 2 schematic pictures of a single barrier and a superlattice are presented . note that @xmath10 is always perpendicular to the barrier @xmath2 , the other two components are denoted with @xmath11 . along @xmath12 the leads @xmath1 and the barrier @xmath2 show the same 2-dimensional periodicity . the superlattice , however , is also periodic in @xmath10-direction .    the single barrier case ( see fig . 1 ) consists of the barrier and two semi - infinite leads . in difference to the common understanding , we will include the perturbed interface regions of the leads into the barrier @xmath13 . the leads @xmath1 , however , consist of bulk - like potentials only . a superlattice ( see fig . 2 ) consists of an infinite number of barriers separated by interlayers . the barriers @xmath2 contain again the perturbed interface regions . the interlayers consist of bulk - like potentials , the same as in the leads @xmath1 of the single barrier case . furthermore , we assume energy- and @xmath8-conservation due to the elastic scattering and the in - plane symmetry of the system . since @xmath14 is conserved the problem can be treated as quasi 1-dimensional , but the reader should be cautious while keeping track of the components of the other two dimensions . we make two additional simplifications : first , the barrier is symmetric and , secondly , we restrict our considerations to one propagating bulk state @xmath15 at a given energy and @xmath14 . that means , degeneration and band - crossing of bulk states in the leads are excluded . the wavefunction in the leads @xmath1 is a superposition of the right- and left - moving bulk states , since the solution of the schrdinger equation depends only on the local potential ( see fig . 1 ) : @xmath16 @xmath17 denotes the two sides of the barrier . @xmath18 is the bloch function of the bulk system . the decomposition of @xmath19 into a phase factor and a periodic function is due to bloch s theorem with @xmath20 , where @xmath21 is the bulk lattice parameter and @xmath22 an integer . the amplitudes @xmath23 and @xmath24 on both sides of the barrier are related to each other by a transfer matrix @xmath25 which describes all the scattering processes inside the barrier : @xmath26    the four complex variables of this @xmath25-matrix are not independent from each other . due to time - reversal invariance , current conservation and the symmetry of the barrier , @xmath25 can be parametrized with two independent real parameters @xmath27 and @xmath28 in the following form @xcite : @xmath29 therefore the relation @xmath30 is valid .    using the components of the transfer matrix the transmission coefficient @xmath0 is by definition eq . ( [ eg : def_t ] ) : @xmath31    obviously , the problem is solved if the eigenstates @xmath32 of such a single barrier are known . in contrast to the eigenfunctions of the single barrier ( see eq . ( [ eq : wavesingle ] ) ) the eigenfunctions of a superlattice @xmath32 are described by quantum numbers @xmath33 . here , @xmath34 is the superlattice wave vector in @xmath10-direction reflecting the prolonged lattice structure with the lattice constant @xmath35 , that is the length of the unit cell in @xmath10-direction . furthermore , the in - plane component @xmath8 is the same as in the bulk system since in - plane symmetry is conserved . the translational symmetry of @xmath36 in the superlattice direction is given by bloch s theorem : @xmath37 where the integer @xmath38 ranges from minus to plus infinity . let us now consider the superlattice as a periodic repetition of single barriers @xmath2 with the interlayer @xmath1 in between . in the interlayer the potential is bulk - like and therefore we can expand the superlattice wave function ( see eq . ( [ eg : bloch ] ) ) as a superposition of right- and left - moving bloch functions of the bulk system in the cell @xmath39 @xmath40 : @xmath41 \text { . }   \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] by using the relation @xmath42 @xmath43 we can rewrite this into @xmath44   \text { .}\end{aligned}\ ] ] since the right- and left - moving bulk states are orthogonal we find @xmath45 on the other hand we can connect the amplitudes in different cells with the transfer matrix @xmath25 : @xmath46    we can combine eqs . ( [ eg : com1 ] ) and ( [ eq : com2 ] ) to the eigenvalue equation @xmath47 with @xmath48    since @xmath49 is fully determined by the single eigenvalue @xmath50 and the corresponding eigenvector @xmath51 , we obtain the following algebraic set for @xmath27 and @xmath52 : @xmath53 thus , we are able to calculate @xmath0 for a given energy and @xmath54 knowing @xmath55 , @xmath34 and @xmath56 of the superlattice wave function @xmath36 and corresponding bulk state @xmath57 . in this section we explain how to extract @xmath55 and @xmath56 from @xmath58 in the interlayer , which is very similar to a fourier analysis of the @xmath59 . for the electronic band structure calculations we used a screened korringa - kohn - rostoker ( screened kkr ) method . the screened kkr method ( see @xcite ) was developed for the selfconsistent calculation of the electronic structure . it is based on green s functions and the computation time scales linearly with the number of atoms in the unit cell . this allows the computation of systems with a relatively large number of atoms . for the atomic potentials the atomic sphere approximation ( asa ) the superlattice wave function is expanded in terms of spherical solutions : @xmath60 the wave function in the leads as well : @xmath61 @xmath62 is the lattice vector pointing to the @xmath63 unit cell , @xmath64 refers to the @xmath65 atom in the unit cell and @xmath66 is the space coordinate inside the @xmath65 atomic sphere . the @xmath67 are the spherical harmonics with the short hand notation @xmath68 , @xmath35 is the angular momentum and @xmath22 the magnetic quantum number . @xmath69 is the radial solution of the schrdinger equation in the @xmath65 atomic sphere . the @xmath70 and @xmath71 are the expansion coefficients , @xmath72 and @xmath73 are the bloch vectors in the superlattice and in the bulk system , respectively . angular momenta up to @xmath74 were taken into account . as already explained , the superlattice wave function @xmath75 in the interlayer @xmath1 can be decomposed in right- and left - moving bloch waves @xmath76 and @xmath77 : @xmath78 using the angular momentum expansions of eqs . ( [ eg : defofcompcoeff ] ) and ( [ eq : def2 ] ) we can expand eq . ( [ eq : decompos ] ) in the @xmath79 unit cell , which corresponds to @xmath80 : @xmath81 \text { .}\end{aligned}\ ] ] now we make use of the orthogonality relation of the @xmath82 and the following relations between the @xmath83 due to the real potential of the leads and bloch s theorem : @xmath84 so finally we conclude : @xmath85    we can exploit this equation at three different atomic positions @xmath86 in the interlayer and receive an algebraic set for @xmath55 and the ratio @xmath87 . it turns out that the @xmath88 cancel , so no additional computation of the bulk eigenstates of the leads is necessary . all we have to compute are the eigenstates of the superlattice @xmath89 for a given energy @xmath7 and in - plane wave vector @xmath90 which gives us the @xmath91 and @xmath34 . from here on we can calculate @xmath0 via eqs . ( [ eg:2 ] ) and ( [ eq : algset ] ) . as a side effect we obtain the bandstructure @xmath92 of the lead material . this gives us the nice opportunity for an intermediate test of our method as we will see in the next section . still there is another problem we are faced with : if @xmath34 is complex the corresponding @xmath93 is evanescent which means it does not exist in the superlattice . in other words we are in a superlattice bandgap . but also in this energy range we want to calculate the corresponding @xmath55 and @xmath0 . one opportunity is the computation of the complex bandstructure and developing a similar formalism as the one described above . but usually the complex bandstructure is not available . another nice idea is to vary the interlayer thickness @xmath94 ( see fig . 2 ) : the superlattice bandstructure gets stretched or squeezed on the energy axis comparable to the eigenstates of a square well . in this way we can scan the whole energy range , albeit it makes more than one superlattice calculation necessary . we followed this second idea . the results we discuss in this section demonstrate that our new method is working successfully . we considered the scattering of free electrons through a rectangular barrier , which is analytically solvable . furthermore we investigated the transmission of cu electrons through 5 monolayers ( ml ) co ( 001 ) , which we compared with the results of wildberger @xcite , who developed a different method for the computation of @xmath0 . in addition to the @xmath95-dependence we checked the dispersion relation @xmath96 of the lead material . outside the barrier we modelled an exact free electron gas with constant potential @xmath97 . the barrier itself consists of five layers with muffin tin ( mt ) spheres of a constant potential inside the sphere . the potential height is @xmath98 and they are arranged in an fcc lattice with a lattice constant of @xmath99 . this is only an approximate rectangular barrier , but the best one possible with asa potentials .    in fig . 3 the dependence of @xmath100 on @xmath101 for @xmath102 is plotted . the analytical curve was fitted to the numerical data with a potential height of the rectangular barrier @xmath103 . this potential height is given by the dashed line . the factor @xmath104 is very close to @xmath105 which is the effective space filling of mt spheres on an fcc lattice . the remaining small difference of @xmath106 and also the subtle deviations in the @xmath95-dependence can be understood very well in terms of the different barrier shapes . the two numerical curves with the different interlayer thicknesses ( circle and plus ) coincide , which is a brilliant test for the validity of the method itself . the discontinuity of the curves is due to the superlattice bandgaps . obviously these gaps can be filled with different interlayer thicknesses @xmath107 . to fill all gaps more calculations with different interlayer thicknesses @xmath107 would be necessary . this is not done here since we just want to demonstrate the capability of our new method . for a short interpretation we notice that the electrons have a low transmission coefficient below the barrier since they have to tunnel through . above the barrier height they approach @xmath108 very rapidly , the oscillations are due to interference effects on the barrier interfaces .    in fig . 4 we show the correspondence between the calculated dependence of @xmath55 on @xmath109 for different @xmath8 ( circle , cross and triangle ) and the expected free electron dispersion ( solid line ) , and obtain a very good agreement .      we arranged the co and cu on a fcc lattice with a lattice constant of @xmath110 . the value is larger than that of magnetic fcc co and smaller than that of fcc cu . the co layer consists of 5 ml . the potentials of the co layer and three cu layers at both sides of the barrier are taken from a self - consistent co@xmath111cu@xmath112 supercell calculation and form the barrier @xmath113 . the potential in the middle of the cu layer is a bulk - like cu asa potential . this approximation has no influence on the results and has the advantage that we can construct easily any cu interlayer thickness @xmath107 without doing an extra selfconsistent calculation . figure 5b and 5d show the @xmath95-dependence for @xmath114 in the majority and minority channels . since co is a ferromagnetic material the superlattice bandstructure of cu / co has no more spin - degeneracy and we obtain spin - splited majority and minority bands . as for the free electron results the curves for different interlayer thicknesses @xmath107 match , which is not shown explicitly here . large parts of the @xmath95-curve can be justified qualitatively by the band structure ( bs )  of co and cu , which are plotted in fig . 5a ( co majority bs ) , fig . 5c ( cu bs ) and fig . 5e ( co minority bs ) . first we discuss the @xmath115-dependence in the majority channel ( see fig . 5b ) :    since the co and cu states have the same symmetry character in the energy region * i * the cu electrons can propagate through the barrier very well , below the bottom of the co band they have to tunnel . therefore the behavior in section * i * is very similar to the free electron result as discussed in the previous subsection . in region * ii * there are no propagating cu bulk states and consequently there is no @xmath0 . in region * iii * we see that @xmath0 is almost free electron like again , the rapid breakdown at about 0.45 ryd corresponds the change of the symmetry character in the co bands . region * iv * has to be excluded from our discussion since the cu band structure is degenerated there and hence our method is not applicable . in region * v * , including the fermi level at @xmath116 , we obtain a @xmath0 of almost @xmath117 which is due to the corresponding band symmetries in co and cu .    in the minority channel ( see fig . 5d ) we see two major differences to the majority channel in region * iii * and * v * : in region * iii * @xmath0 is almost zero since the co minority band has a gap there and so no band matching is possible between the cu and co states . in region * v * we see a low @xmath0 below 0.64 ryd . this is due to the upward shifted co bands in comparison to the majority channel and therefore no band matching between states with the same symmetry  character occurs . furthermore , we compare our results in the energy region * v * ( see fig . 6a ) with the results obtained with a different method by wildberger @xcite ( see fig . 6b ) , who used a semi - infinite structure with two co barriers at a certain distance ( which is comparable to our interlayer thickness @xmath107 ) for the calculation of the reflection coefficient @xmath118 . the reflection coefficient @xmath119 is related to @xmath120 by @xmath121 . in fig . 6b we see their @xmath122-dependence for the majority- and minority - channel ( dashed and solid line ) for @xmath123 around the fermi energy . the agreement with our own results shown in fig . 6a is very good . slight differences are related to the different lattice parameters which were used . in addition , wildberger evaluates the green s function of the system for energies with a small imaginary part , which causes a broadening corresponding to a finite temperature . the agreement between our calculation and the calculation of wildberger is a confirmation of the capability and the validity of our new method .    in fig . 7 we see the band structure of fcc cu along the line @xmath124 . the solid line is taken from a pure cu band structure calculation , the crosses denote the band structure @xmath92 extracted from the superlattice calculation . the region between the dashed lines corresponds to region * iv * in fig . 5 and has to be excluded for the reasons mentioned above . again , the correspondence between both curves is perfect . we presented a new method to calculate the transmission coefficient @xmath0 of bulk states through a single barrier from a superlattice band structure . its validity is fully confirmed by the successful test results . at this state the method is restricted to symmetric barriers and to only one propagating bulk state at a given energy and in plane wave vector . the generalization to the case of mor than one propagating bulk state and unsymmetric barriers is under development . we like to thank j. opitz , j. binder , m. turek , w. john ( tu dresden ) , the group of g.e.w . ( tu delft ) and the group of p.h . dederichs ( forschungszentrum jlich ) for helpful discussions . ( including the perturbed interface regions ) and interlayer @xmath1 . the superlattice wave function @xmath126 in the interlayers is a superposition of right- and left - moving bulk eigenstates @xmath125 . ]     on @xmath127 for @xmath102 of free electrons through a rectangular barrier with a thickness of 5 ml and an averaged height of 0.092 ryd denoted by the dashed line : analytical results ( solid line ) in comparison with the results obtained with our new method for two different interlayer thicknesses ( cross : 11  ml , circle : 17 ml ) . ]
Abstract:

Answer: a new formalism to calculate the transmission coefficient @xmath0 of electrons from a material @xmath1 into the same material @xmath1 through a barrier @xmath2 is presented . the barrier @xmath2 is arbitrary and can be metallic , semiconducting or insulating . the important feature of this formalism is that it starts from the electronic structure of a periodic @xmath3/@xmath2 superlattice . the electronic stucture of such a superlattice is calculated selfconsistently within a screened korringa - kohn - rostoker method . the capability of the new method is demonstrated by means of a free electron model . first results for the transmission of cu electrons through a co layer are presented . [ theorem]acknowledgement [ theorem]algorithm [ theorem]axiom [ theorem]claim [ theorem]conclusion [ theorem]condition [ theorem]conjecture [ theorem]corollary [ theorem]criterion [ theorem]definition [ theorem]example [ theorem]exercise [ theorem]lemma [ theorem]notation [ theorem]problem [ theorem]proposition [ theorem]remark [ theorem]solution [ theorem]summary


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is remarkable , and at first sight surprising , that a large variety of physical , biological , financial , and other processes can be described by stable lvy processes with _ infinite _ variance @xcite . the latter are defined as continuous - time random processes whose independent and stationary increments are distributed according to heavy - tailed stable distributions . the main feature of these distributions is that the tails can not be cut off or , in other words , rare but large events can not be neglected . as a consequence , the classical stochastic theory , which is based on the ordinary central limit theorem , is no longer valid .    due to the heavy - tailed distributions of the increments , stable lvy processes exhibit large jumps , and for this reason these processes are often called lvy flights . lvy flights are actually observed in various real systems . representative examples include , for instance , fluorescent probes in living polymers @xcite , tracer particles in rotating flows @xcite , ions in optical lattices @xcite , cooled atoms in laser fields @xcite , subsurface hydrology @xcite , and ecology @xcite , though a recent work questions the empirical evidence for lvy flights in animal search patterns @xcite . lvy flights have also been predicted for a large number of model systems @xcite . the ubiquity of these processes is supported by the generalized central limit theorem @xcite , which states that all limiting distributions of properly normalized and centered sums of independent , identically distributed random variables are stable . the langevin equation is one of the most important tools for studying noise phenomena in systems coupled to a fluctuating environment . introduced by paul langevin just one hundred years ago @xcite to describe the dynamics of a brownian particle , this equation and its various modifications are widely used in many areas of science @xcite . the langevin equation driven by lvy white noise , i.e. , noise defined as a time derivative , in the sense of generalized functions , of a stable lvy process , provides a basis for the study of lvy flights in external potentials . it has been shown that the probability density of lvy flights satisfies the fractional fokker - planck ( fp ) equation @xcite . the steady - state solutions of this equation describing _ confined _ lvy flights , i.e. , flights with finite variance , are of particular interest . one reason is that these solutions will clarify the distribution of flying objects in confined domains . this is an important issue , especially near impermeable boundaries , in such complex systems as confined plasmas and turbulent flows . another reason is that exact general solutions of a simple form , which are valid for _ any _ lvy white noise , will be very useful for testing a variety of numerical methods in this area @xcite . however , known solutions are related to power potentials and to a very special case of lvy white noise with unit index of stability and zero skewness parameter @xcite , and thus they are not suitable for those purposes . it should be noted that lvy white noises do not exhaust all possible white noises . as a consequence , the fractional fp equation is a particular case of the _ generalized _ fp equation , which corresponds to the langevin equation driven by an _ arbitrary _ white noise . since any white noise is defined as a time derivative , in the sense of generalized functions , of a stationary process with independent increments , it can be characterized by the transition probability density or , alternatively , by the characteristic function of this white noise generating process . one expects therefore that the term in the generalized fp equation that describes the effect of the noise on the dynamics of the system can also be expressed via the characteristic function . the derivation of the generalized fp equation is of great importance because it accounts for all possible white noise effects in a unified way and will be very useful for applications .    in this paper , we put forward the generalized fp equation and find the analytical solution of this equation for steady - state lvy flights in a confined geometry . in many applications , ranging from physical and chemical to biological and social systems , the relevant degrees of freedom of these systems obey a ( dimensionless ) langevin equation that is equivalent to the equation of motion for an overdamped particle @xmath0 here , @xmath1 is a particle coordinate , @xmath2 , @xmath3 is a force field , @xmath4 is an external deterministic potential , and @xmath5 is a random force ( noise ) resulting from a fluctuating environment . though the quantities in eq . ( [ langevin ] ) have different meanings for different systems , we will use the above terminology to be concrete .    under certain conditions ( see , e.g. , refs . @xcite ) , the noise @xmath5 can be chosen to be white . in this case , the increment @xmath6 of the particle coordinate during a time interval @xmath7 ( @xmath8 ) is written as @xmath9 which defines the meaning of eq . ( [ langevin ] ) in the white - noise approximation . here @xmath10 , and we assume that the integral exists in the mean square sense . a white noise generating process , i.e. , a stationary random process @xmath11 - 1 } \delta \eta(j\tau)$ ] , with @xmath12 and where @xmath13 $ ] denotes the integer part of @xmath14 , is completely defined by the transition probability density @xmath15 of a discrete - time process @xmath16 ( @xmath17 ) as @xmath8 . here @xmath18 and @xmath19 denote the possible values of @xmath20 and @xmath21 , respectively . note that all transition probability densities of the form @xmath22 can be expressed through @xmath23 by using the chapman - kolmogorov equation @xcite . in particular , @xmath24 . this implies that the influence of any white noise on the system can also be fully characterized by the function @xmath25 . we assume that the transition probability density @xmath15 is properly normalized , @xmath26 , and that it satisfies the condition @xmath27 , where @xmath28 stands for the dirac @xmath29 function . for simplicity , we also assume that @xmath30 with @xmath31 . we define the probability density of the particle coordinate @xmath1 in the usual way , namely @xmath32 , where the angular brackets denote averaging over the noise . taking the fourier transform of @xmath33 according to the definition @xmath34 , we obtain @xmath35 , i.e. , the characteristic function of @xmath1 . equation ( [ incr ] ) implies that the increment of this quantity , @xmath36 , can be written in the form @xmath37 as @xmath8 . the use of the well - known properties of the fourier transform yields @xmath38 , and the statistical independence of @xmath1 and @xmath39 implies @xcite @xmath40 , where @xmath41 is the characteristic function of @xmath42 . dividing @xmath43 by @xmath7 and taking the limit @xmath44 , we obtain the generalized fp equation in fourier space , @xmath45 where @xmath46 . it is advantageous to introduce the characteristic function @xmath47 of @xmath48 . we rewrite it as @xmath49}$ ] , using the formula @xmath50 - 1 } \delta \eta(j\tau)$ ] . replacing @xmath51 by @xmath52 and taking into account that @xmath53 , we readily find that @xmath54 . finally , applying the inverse fourier transform @xmath55 to eq . ( [ f - p0 ] ) and using @xmath56 , we obtain the generalized fp equation in real space @xmath57 with @xmath58 , which corresponds to the langevin equation ( [ langevin ] ) driven by an arbitrary white noise . equation ( [ f - p1 ] ) represents our first main result . it constitutes a closed , concise representation of the combination of the fokker - planck and kolmogorov - feller equations , which are the basic equations governing continuous and discontinuous markov processes , respectively @xcite . a remarkable feature of this equation is that it accounts for the noise influence in a _ unified _ way , namely by means of the characteristic function @xmath59 of the white noise generating process @xmath60 at @xmath61 . all presently known fp equations associated with eq . ( [ langevin ] ) can be obtained directly from eq . ( [ f - p1 ] ) . in particular , if @xmath5 is poisson white noise characterized by the transition probability density @xmath62 , where @xmath63 is the average number of jumps of @xmath60 per unit time and @xmath64 is the probability density of jump sizes , then @xmath65 and eq . ( [ f - p1 ] ) yields @xcite @xmath66      & & \!\ ! + \lambda \int_{-\infty}^{\infty } dy p(y , t)\ , q(x - y ) . \label{poissf - p}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    if @xmath5 is lvy white noise then the generalized central limit theorem @xcite implies that @xmath59 is the characteristic function of lvy stable distributions . as is well known ( see , e.g. , ref . @xcite ) , the characteristic function @xmath67 of non - degenerate stable distributions depends on four parameters : an index of stability @xmath68 $ ] , a skewness parameter @xmath69 $ ] , a scale parameter @xmath70 , and a location parameter @xmath71 . assuming in accordance with the initial condition @xmath58 that @xmath72 and excluding from consideration the singular case where @xmath73 and @xmath74 simultaneously ( in this case @xmath75 , and the system reaches the final state immediately ) , we obtain @xmath76 , where @xcite @xmath77}.      \label{charfunct}\ ] ]    equation ( [ f - p1 ] ) with @xmath78 can be easily rewritten as a fractional differential equation . the riemann - liouville derivatives of a function @xmath79 on the interval @xmath80 $ ] are defined as @xcite @xmath81 here , @xmath82 and @xmath83 denote the operators of the left- and right - hand side derivatives of order @xmath84 ( @xmath85 ) , respectively , with @xmath86 $ ] , and @xmath87 is the gamma function . since @xmath88 , which follows from the definition ( [ r - l ] ) , eq .  ( [ f - p1 ] ) reduces to the desired fractional fp equation : @xmath89      & & \!\ ! \times _ { \infty}d_{+}^{\alpha } + ( 1 - \beta)_{\infty }      d_{-}^{\alpha}]\,p(x , t ) . \label{f - p2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] all previously known forms of the fractional fp equation , which correspond to the langevin equation ( [ langevin ] ) driven by lvy white noise , can be derived from eq . ( [ f - p2 ] ) . in particular , taking into account the relation @xmath90 and the definition of the fractional riesz derivative @xcite , @xmath91 , eq . ( [ f - p2 ] ) in the case of symmetric lvy white noise ( @xmath92 ) yields @xcite @xmath93 specifically , if @xmath5 represents gaussian white noise of intensity @xmath94 , i.e. , @xmath95 and @xmath96 , then eq . ( [ f - p3 ] ) becomes the ordinary fp equation @xcite . we note that eq . ( [ f - p1 ] ) also applies to the case of compound white noises . for example , if @xmath5 is the sum of independent lvy and poisson white noises then @xmath97 and eq . ( [ f - p1 ] ) can be written as @xmath89      & & \!\ ! \times _ { \infty}d_{+}^{\alpha } + ( 1 - \beta)_{\infty }      d_{-}^{\alpha}]\,p(x , t )      \nonumber\\[6pt ]      & & \!\ ! - \lambda p(x , t ) + \lambda \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\ ! dy      p(y , t)\ , q(x - y).\quad \ ;      \label{f - p4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] we apply eq . ( [ f - p2 ] ) to the case of stationary lvy flights in an infinitely deep potential well . we assume that @xmath98 within the well , i.e. , for @xmath99 $ ] , and that the boundaries at @xmath100 are impermeable for particles , i.e. , @xmath101 at @xmath102 . with these conditions , eq . ( [ f - p2 ] ) for the stationary probability density @xmath103 reduces to @xmath104 . rewriting this equation as @xmath105 , where @xmath106 is the probability current , and using the boundary condition @xmath107 @xcite , we obtain the equation @xmath108 , which for @xmath109 reads @xmath110    the fact that @xmath111 @xcite suggests seeking a solution of eq . ( [ f - pst2 ] ) in the form @xmath112 , where @xmath113 is a normalization factor . the parameters @xmath114 and @xmath115 are determined by the equation @xmath116      & \;=(1\ ! - \!\beta ) \text{b}(1\ ! - \!\alpha,1\ ! - \!\mu )      f(1\!-\!\alpha,\nu;2\!-\!\alpha\!-\!\mu ;- z^{-1}).\quad\ ; &      \label{rel1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here , @xmath117 , @xmath118 is the beta function , and @xmath119 is the gauss hypergeometric function . equation ( [ rel1 ] ) must be independent of @xmath120 , since @xmath114 and @xmath115 do not depend on @xmath120 . this requirement leads to the condition @xmath121 . using the relation @xmath122 @xcite , we find that in this case eq . ( [ rel1 ] ) becomes @xmath123 solving the equations @xmath121 and ( [ rel2 ] ) with respect to @xmath115 and @xmath114 , we find @xmath124 where @xmath125 denotes the principal value of the inverse tangent function . similar calculations for @xmath126 lead to the same result , and formula ( [ nu_mu ] ) is valid for all @xmath127 $ ] ( excluding the case @xmath73 , @xmath74 ) . finally , calculating the normalization factor @xmath113 , we obtain @xmath128    equations ( [ nu_mu ] ) and ( [ pst ] ) represent our second main result . particles that perform lvy flights are distributed in an infinitely deep well according to the beta distribution ( see fig .  1 ) . the main feature of this distribution is the singular behavior of @xmath129 as @xmath130 if @xmath131 and @xmath132 . the reason is that for @xmath133 the particles can perform random jumps in both directions . however , the boundaries are impermeable , and consequently the particles are concentrated preferably near these two boundaries . in particular , for @xmath92 , eqs . ( [ nu_mu ] ) and ( [ pst ] ) yield @xmath134 . in contrast , for @xmath135 , one - sided jumps dominate and the particles are concentrated near one of the boundaries . specifically , @xmath136 , if @xmath137 , and @xmath138 , if @xmath139 . finally , for @xmath95 the sample paths of @xmath1 are continuous and the stationary distribution is uniform , i.e. , @xmath140 . we have derived the generalized fp equation associated with the langevin equation driven by an _ arbitrary _ white noise . this fp equation accounts for the influence of the noise by means of the characteristic function of the white noise generating process . in the case of lvy flights , this equation has been reduced to a fractional fp equation and has been solved analytically in the steady state for a confined domain . it has been shown that both symmetric and asymmetric lvy flights in an infinitely deep potential well are distributed according to the beta probability density . the preferred concentration of flying objects near impenetrable boundaries results from the jumping character of lvy flights . the authors are grateful to a. dubkov and i. goychuk for useful discussions . s.i.d . acknowledges the support of the eu through contract no . mif1-ct-2006 - 021533 and p.h . acknowledges financial support by the deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft via the collaborative research centre sfb-486 , project no . a10 , and by the german excellence cluster _ nanosystems initiative munich _ ( nim ) . bouchaud and a.  georges , phys .  rep .  * 195 * , 127 ( 1990 ) . _ lvy flights and related topics in physics _ , edited by m.  f.  shlesinger , g.  m.  zaslavsky , and u. frisch ( springer - verlag , berlin , 1995 ) . a.  v.  chechkin , v.  y.  gonchar , j. klafter , and r.  metzler , adv . phys.*133 * , 439 , ( 2006 ) . a.  ott , j .- bouchaud , d.  langevin , and w.  urbach , phys . lett.*65 * , 2201 ( 1990 ) . t.  h.  solomon , e.  r.  weeks , and h.  l.  swinney , phys . lett .  * 71 * , 3975 ( 1993 ) . h.  katori , s.  schlipf , and h.  walther , phys . lett .  * 79 * , 2221 ( 1997 ) . f.  bardou , j .- bouchaud , a.  aspect , and c.  cohen - tannoudji , _ lvy statistics and laser cooling _ ( cambridge university press , cambridge , 2002 ) . d.  a.  benson , r.  schumer , r.  m.  w.  meerschaert , and s.  w.  wheatcraft , transp.porous media * 42 * , 211 ( 2001 ) . b.  berkowitz , j.  klafter , r.  metzler , and h.  scher , water resour . res.*38 * , 1191 ( 2002 ) . g.  m.  viswanathan et al . , nature * 381 * , 413 ( 1996 ) . d.  austin , w.  d.  bowen , and j.  i.  mcmillan , oikos * 105 * , 15 ( 2004 ) . b.  baeumer , m.  kovcs , and m.  meerschaert , bull . biol.*69 * , 2281 ( 2007 ) . a.  m.  edwards et al . , nature * 449 * , 1044 ( 2007 ) . p.  d.  ditlevsen , phys . e  * 60 * , 172 ( 1999 ) . s.  jespersen , r.  metzler , and h.  c.  fogedby , phys . e  * 59 * , 2736 ( 1999 ) . v.  v.  yanovsky , a.  v.  chechkin , d.  schertzer , and a.  v.  tur , physica  a**282 * * , 13 ( 2000 ) . d.  brockmann and i.  m.  sokolov , chem . phys .  * 284 * , 409 ( 2002 ) . a.  dubkov and b.  spagnolo , fluct . noise  lett . * 5 * , l267 ( 2005 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we derive the generalized fokker - planck equation associated with a langevin equation driven by arbitrary additive white noise . we apply our result to study the distribution of symmetric and asymmetric lvy flights in an infinitely deep potential well . the fractional fokker - planck equation for lvy flights is derived and solved analytically in the steady state . it is shown that lvy flights are distributed according to the beta distribution , whose probability density becomes singular at the boundaries of the well . the origin of the preferred concentration of flying objects near the boundaries in nonequilibrium systems is clarified .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: quantum entanglement not only plays an elementary role in quantum physics , but also has wide applications in quantum information processing ( qip ) tasks , for instance quantum key distribution @xcite , quantum teleportation @xcite , quantum metrology @xcite , quantum cryptography @xcite and quantum computation @xcite . the structure and the characteristics of bipartite entanglement is well understood , while theoretical and experimental exploration of multipartite entanglement is still a great challenge . among many interesting properties of multipartite entanglement , a major feature is the presence of inequivalent classes of multipartite entangled states , such as greenberger - horne - zeilinger ( ghz ) states @xcite and w states @xcite , and states in one class can not be converted into a state in another class by local operations and classical communication @xcite . the entanglement of w states is more robust against particle losses than that of ghz states @xcite . a w state of appropriate size is a superior candidate for leader election in anonymous quantum networks @xcite and required for several secure quantum communication protocols @xcite .    quantum coherence of a w state is also unique and introduces new advantages in quantum thermodynamics . it has recently been found that in the thermalization process of a single mode cavity by three - atom systems , w states achieve the maximum thermalization , in contrast to ghz states which provide no thermalization @xcite . this interesting finding suggests that a large - scale atomic w state , as a quantum information molecule , can be good a candidate to be a novel quantum energy resource in quantum heat engines @xcite . the increasing of the size of the quantum system is essential to overcome the decoherence effects and to increase the thermalization capability @xcite . therefore , besides realizing qip tasks , quantum heat engines require experimentally accessible schemes for preparing large - scale atomic w states . several schemes have been presented for preparing and characterizing multipartite entangled w states in various physical systems , for instance cavity quantum electrodynamics ( qed ) system @xcite , nuclear magnetic resonance ( nmr ) system @xcite , optical system @xcite , superconducting quantum system @xcite and ion traps system @xcite . however , the achievable sizes of the prepared w states are far from being large - scale . it was recently found that a w state of polarization encoded photons can be expanded by adding one or two photons at a time via accessing only one photon of the w state @xcite and that two epr pairs @xcite and even two arbitrary size w states can be fused to obtain a larger size w state @xcite with simple optical setups . at a cost of integrating three - qubit gates , it is possible to increase the probability of success of the fusion process @xcite , or to fuse several w states to arrive at a large - scale w state with a fewer number of fusion processes , to ease the practical implementations @xcite . when it comes to atomic w states , we have used light - matter interface to design expansion and fusion schemes for generating large - scale atomic w states in cavity qed @xcite . although the fusion and expansion approaches via accessing a single qubit of the state enable preparing large - scale w states , their probabilistic nature still requires at least a sub - exponential resource _ cost _ with respect to the target size , in terms of the spent entanglement during the preparation process . what is more , as ozaydin _ _ demonstrated via the monte carlo simulation in ref.@xcite , the similar scaling of the number of fusion attempts physically limits the experimental accessibility to large - scale w states . the probabilistic nature of these approaches also requires detection mechanisms for post - selection to find out whether the attempt has been successful or not , not only introducing additional complexity to the system but also shrinking the final size of the prepared w state in the successful attempts . an additional inherent weakness of most of the above mentioned schemes is that they require prior entanglement , in particular tripartite w states or at least w - type bell pairs to start and to sustain the process i.e. they actually require another scheme to prepare these primary resources . since the _ cost _ of the generation process in terms of the total entanglement spent throughout the process considerably depends on the _ cost _ of the primary resources to be spent , yesilyurt _ et al . _ proposed a scheme for deterministic generation of w states of four polarization - based entangled photons , to serve as the primary resource @xcite .    very recently , yesilyurt _ et al . _ designed an all - optical expansion mechanism for polarization based entangled photons , which can deterministically expand an @xmath0-photon w state to a @xmath1-photon w state using @xmath0 ancillary photons @xcite . the expansion mechanism used there consists of a controlled - not ( cnot ) gate and a controlled hadamard ( ch ) gate , the latter being decomposable into a cnot gate and single qubit gates . although this mechanism can be realized easily with the current technology for polarization based photonic qubits , this is not the case for the matter qubits , due to the difficulty in experimental realization of the controlled gates . therefore , a new , simple , and feasible deterministic expansion mechanism must be designed for preparing matter - qubit w states .    in this paper , we present a simple scheme for deterministically generating large - scale atomic w states by expanding small - size atomic w states in a cavity qed system . detuned interactions between a cavity field and two atoms constitute the new deterministic expansion mechanism . the velocity of the atoms is selected for realizing the deterministic expansion mechanism , which is much easier than realizing the controlled gates , and the feasibility analysis at the end of the paper shows that our scheme can be realized with the current technology . the key step of our expanding scheme is the detuned interaction between two identical two - level atoms and a cavity mode . assume that two atoms are simultaneously sent through the single - mode cavity , and the interaction hamiltonian can be described in the interaction picture as @xcite    @xmath2    where @xmath3 and @xmath4 , with @xmath5 and @xmath6 representing the ground and excited states of the @xmath7th atom , respectively . @xmath8 and @xmath9 denote , respectively , the annihilation and creation operator of the cavity mode , and @xmath10 is the coupling strength between the cavity mode and each atom . the atomic transition frequency is described by the parameter @xmath11 , @xmath12 is the cavity mode frequency , and @xmath13 is the detuning between them . in this scheme , the interaction is detuned , therefor there is no energy exchange between the cavity mode and the atomic system , and the condition is described as @xmath14 . the effective hamiltonian can be described as    @xmath15,\ ] ]    where @xmath16 . assume the cavity field is initially prepared in the vacuum state , thus the system effective hamiltonian reduces to @xmath17.\ ] ] by solving the schrdinger equation , we can obtain the system evolution of each initial state as @xcite @xmath18 . in step 1 , an epr pair is prepared , which is then expanded in step 2 to a w state of four atoms , illustrated with green spheres labeled as @xmath19 , @xmath20 , @xmath21 and @xmath22.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] as depicted in fig .  [ 1 ] , there are two steps in our deterministic generation scheme : creating a @xmath23 state , and expanding @xmath23 state to @xmath24 state . the four two - level atoms ( @xmath25 , @xmath26 , @xmath27 and @xmath28 ) to be entangled are supposed to be identical . in the first step , atoms @xmath26 and @xmath28 which are initially in the excited and ground states , respectively , are sent through the cavity @xmath29 simultaneously . the detuned interaction between the atoms and the cavity field induces a @xmath23 state , given that the velocity of the atoms are adjusted appropriately . after these two atoms fly out the cavity @xmath29 , the second step starts , where two ancillary atoms , @xmath25 and @xmath27 which are initially in ground states , are introduced with adjusted velocities . atoms @xmath25 and @xmath26 are sent through cavity @xmath30 , and atoms @xmath27 and @xmath28 are sent through cavity @xmath31 , simultaneously . the expansion process is realized by these two detuned interactions , generating a four - atom w state deterministically .    in more detail , in the first step , the atoms @xmath26 and @xmath28 are initially prepared in the excited state @xmath32 and ground state @xmath33 , respectively , and their velocities are adjusted so that the detuned interaction time satisfies @xmath34 . via eq.([4 ] ) , it is easy to see that a @xmath23 state @xmath35 as flying out of the cavity @xmath29 , with unit probability . here a global phase factor has been omitted .    in the second step , two ancilla atoms @xmath36 are both prepared in the ground state ( @xmath37 and @xmath38 ) , and their velocities are adjusted so that the two detuned interactions in cavities @xmath39 have the same duration satisfying @xmath34 too . after leaving the cavities , the state of the four - atom system is found as :    latexmath:[\[\label{6 }     where the global phase factor has been omitted . since the four - atom w state is generated with unit probability , no quantum measurement is required in the generation scheme , therefore the complexity of the scheme is reduced considerably . a consecutive round of four expansion schemes in parallel can expand this four - atom w state to an eight - atom w state , and so on . therefore , in principle , our scheme enables the deterministic generation of any even - number - atom w state , starting with atoms in a separable state , i.e. requiring no prior entanglement . in the next section , we demonstrate how a @xmath1-atom w state can be deterministically expanded from an @xmath0-atom w state . an @xmath0-atom @xmath41 state is expressed as @xmath42/\sqrt{n } $ ] , where the subscript @xmath25 denotes the @xmath25th atom and @xmath43 denotes the rest @xmath44 atoms of @xmath45 . the evolution of a @xmath46 state together with @xmath0 ancilla atoms through @xmath0 parallel expansion mechanisms can be obtained by the following equations    latexmath:[\[\label{7 }     latexmath:[\[\label{8 }     therefore , the final state of the whole system is latexmath:[\[\label{9 }    which is a standard @xmath1-atom w state . we have presented a new expansion mechanism which can generate a bell state from a product state of two atoms , and can double the size of a given atomic w state of two or more atoms , deterministically . it is well - known that if an entangled w state with odd number of atoms ( @xmath48 ) is required , one can first deterministically generate the state @xmath49 and then via a projective measurement on any atom of the state @xmath49 , will be left with the remaining @xmath50 atoms in the state @xmath48 , if the measurement result is @xmath51 , with a probability of success @xmath52 which approximates to @xmath53 for large @xmath0 . since the large detuning interaction between the cavity mode and the atoms adiabatically eliminates the excitation states of cavity mode during the interaction , the cavity decay time does not affect the scheme . the radiative time of a rydberg atom with principal quantum number @xmath54 , @xmath55 or @xmath56 is @xmath57 , the atom - cavity coupling strength is @xmath58 khz @xcite , and the choice @xmath59 satisfies the large detuning condition , i.e. the interaction time in each step between the cavity mode and atoms is in the order of @xmath60 , implying that the time required for accomplishing the whole process is approximately @xmath61 , which is much shorter than @xmath62 . therefore , the interaction time of our scheme is much shorter than the radiative time of atoms , and thus the deterministic expansion scheme is realizable with the current cavity - qed technology . actually , the basic expansion mechanism described in eq.([1 ] ) , i.e. a coherent control of an atomic collision in a detuned cavity has been experimentally demonstrated @xcite . since the radiative time of the rydberg atom is about @xmath63 times that of the interaction time , expansion mechanism can be repeated @xmath63 times in principle , thus the number of atoms of the final w state can reach up to @xmath64 . in conclusion , a new expansion scheme based on detuned interaction between a vacuum cavity mode and two atoms is proposed to double the size of a given atomic w state , with a unit probability of success . the scheme can not only expand a given w state but it can also generate a w - type bell state from a product state of two atoms , allowing one to prepare an arbitrarily large scale w state , starting with atoms initially in a separable state , requiring no other setup for preparing any prior entanglement . no quantum measurements and no controlled operations are required . the feasibility analysis shows that our expansion scheme is experimentally realizable with the current cavity - qed technology . enabling efficient generation of large - scale atomic w states , our scheme promotes advances in quantum information processing , storage and computation tasks , quantum communication protocols , and the extraction of heat and work in quantum heat engines . we believe that our work may also open new insights in self - testing of atomic w states .    this work is supported by national natural science foundation of china ( nsfc ) under grants no.11274010 and no.11374085 , the key program of the outstanding young talent of anhui province under grant no.gxyqzd2016370 , and the personnel department of anhui province . f. ozaydin and m. yang are funded by isik university scientific research funding agency under grant number : bap-15b103 . 99 n. gisin , g. ribordy , w. tittel , and h. zbinden , rev . phys . * 74 * , 145 ( 2002 ) . c. h. bennett , g. brassard , c. crpeau , r. jozsa , a. peres , w. k. wootters , phys . lett . * 70*,1895 ( 1993 ) . l. pezze and a. smerzi , phys . * 102 * , 100401 ( 2009 ) . c. h. bennett , g. brassard , n. d. mermin , phys . lett . * 68 * , 557 ( 1992 ) . a. steane , rep . phys . * 61 * , 117 ( 1998 ) . d. m. greenberger , m. a. horne , a. shimony , and a. zeilinger , am . j. phys . * 58 * , 1131 ( 1990 ) . w. dr , phys . a * 63 * , 020303(r ) ( 2001 ) . j. joo , j. lee , j. jang and y. j. park , arxiv : quant - ph/0204003v2 ( 2002 ) . j. wang , q. zhang and c. j. tang , commun . . phys . * 48 * , 637 ( 2007 ) . h. j. cao and h. s. song , chin . * 23 * , 290 ( 2006 ) . w. liu , y. b. wang and z. t. jiang , opt . comm . * 284 * , 12 ( 2011 ) .    c. b. dag and o. e. mustecaplioglu , arxiv : quant - ph/1507.08136 ( 2015 ) . c. b. dag , f. ozaydin and o. e. mustecaplioglu , manuscript in preparation . a. u. c. hardal , o. e. mustecaplioglu , sci . rep . * 5 * , 12953 ( 2015 ) . f. altintas , a. u. c. hardal , o. e. mustecaplioglu , phys . rev . a * 91 * , 023816 ( 2015 ) . d. turkpence , o. e. mustecaplioglu , phys . e * 93 * , 012145 ( 2016 ) . z. j. deng , m. feng , and k. l. gao , phys . a * 73 * , 014302 ( 2006 ) . s. dogra , k. dorai , and arvind , phys . rev . a * 91 * , 022312 ( 2015 ) . l. m. k. vandersypen and i. l. chuang , rev . phys . * 76 * , 1037 ( 2005 ) . r. laamme , d. cory , c. negrevergne , l. viola , quant . inf . comp . * 2 * , 166 ( 2002 ) . d. das , s. dogra , k. dorai , and arvind , phys . a * 92 * , 022307 ( 2015 ) . m. eibl , n. kiesel , m. bourennane , c. kurtsiefer , and h. weinfurter , phys . lett . * 92 * , 077901 ( 2004 ) . j. shi , p. xu , m. l. zhong , y. x. gong , y. f. bai , w. j. yu , q. w. li , h. jin , and s. n. zhu , opt * 21 * ( 7 ) , 7875 ( 2013 ) . z. j. deng , m. feng , and k. l. gao , phys . a * 74 * , 064303 ( 2006 ) . m. h. devoret , r. j. schoelkopf , science * 339 * , 1169 ( 2013 ) . s. y. huang , h. s. goan , x. q. li , and g. j. milburn , phys . rev . a * 88 * , 062311 ( 2013 ) . l. m. duan and c. monroe , rev . * 82 * , 1209 ( 2010 ) . c. f. roos , m. riebe , h. hffner , w. hnsel , j. benhelm , g. p. t. lancaster , c. becher , f. s. kaler , and r. blatt , science * 304 * ( 5676 ) , 1478 ( 2004 ) . h. hffner w. hnsel , c. f. roos , j. benhelm , and m. chwalla , nature * 438 * , 643 ( 2005 ) . t. tashima , s. k. ozdemir , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , phys . a * 77 * , 030302 ( 2008 ) . t. tashima , s. k. ozdemir , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , new j. phys . * 11 * , 023024 ( 2009 ) . t. tashima , t. kitano , s. k. ozdemir , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , phys . * 105 * , 210503 ( 2010 ) . r. ikuta , t. tashima , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , phys . a * 83 * , 012314 ( 2011 ) . t. tashima , t. wakatsuki , s. k. ozdemir , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , phys . * 102 * , 130502 ( 2009 ) . s. k. ozdemir , e. matsunaga , t. tashima , t. yamamoto , m. koashi and n. imoto , new j. phys . * 13 * , 103003 ( 2011 ) . x. p. zang , m. yang , x. c. wang , and z. l. cao , canadian . j. phys . * 93 * , 556 ( 2015 ) . x. p. zang , m. yang , f. ozaydin , w. song and z. l. cao , sci . * 5 * , 16245 ( 2015 ) . x. p. zang , m. yang , w. f. wu , s. d. fang and z. l. cao , indian j. phys . * 88 * , 1141 ( 2014 ) .      c. yesilyurt , s. bugu , f. ozaydin , a. a. altintas , m. tame , l. yang , and s. k. ozdemir , arxiv : quant - ph/1602.04166 ( 2016 ) . s. b. zheng , g. c. guo , phys . * 85 * , 2392 ( 2000 ) . m. yang , and z. l. cao , physica a * 366 * , 243 ( 2006 ) m. brune , e. hagley , j. dreyer , x. maitre , a. maali , c. wunderlich , j. m. raimond , and s. haroche , phys . . lett . * 77 * , 4887 ( 1996 ) . s. osnaghi , p. bertet , a. auffeves , p. maioli , m. brune , j. raimond , and s. haroche , phys . lett . * 87 * , 037902 ( 2001 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we present a deterministic scheme for generating large - scale atomic w states in cavity qed system via a simple expansion mechanism , which is realized only by a detuned interaction between two identical atoms and a vacuum cavity mode . with the presented scheme , a w - type bell pair can be created and an @xmath0-atom w state can be expanded to a @xmath1-atom w state with a unit probability of success in principle . no multi - atom gates , quantum memories or quantum non - demolition measurements are required , greatly simplifying the experimental realization of the scheme . the feasibility analysis shows that our expansion scheme can be implemented with state - of - the - art technologies . our scheme enables advances not only in quantum information and communication but also in quantum thermodynamics , where atomic w states plays a crucial role .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: there has been an increasing interest in unparticle scenario which was introduced by georgi @xcite . in this scenario , new physics contains both standard model ( sm ) fields and a scale invariant sector described by banks - zaks ( bz ) fields @xcite . these two sector interact via the exchange of particles with a mass scale @xmath1 . below this large mass scale interactions between sm fields and bz fields are described by non - renormalizable couplings suppressed by powers of @xmath1 @xcite :    @xmath2    renormalization effects in the scale invariant bz sector then produce dimensional transmutation at an energy scale @xmath3 @xcite . in the effective theory below the scale @xmath3 , the bz operators are embedded as unparticle operators . the operator ( 1 ) is now match onto the following form ,    @xmath4    here , @xmath5 is the scale dimension of the unparticle operator @xmath6 and the constant @xmath7 is a coefficient function . phenomenological implications of unparticles have been discussed in the literature @xcite . in some of these researches mentioned above several unparticle production processes have been studied . a possible evidence for this scale invariant sector might be a missing energy signature . it can be tested experimentally by examining missing energy distributions . another evidence for unparticles can be explored by studying its virtual effects . imposing scale invariance , unparticle propagators for spin-0 and spin-1 unparticles are given by @xcite :    @xmath8    respectively , where    @xmath9    in eq.(3 ) , @xmath10 in t or u - channel diagrams where @xmath11 is negative , @xmath12 in s - channel diagrams where @xmath11 is positive . interaction vertices for the scalar and vector unparticles with the sm fermions are given respectively , by    @xmath13    @xmath14    the top quark is the heaviest fermion in the standard model ( sm ) and its mass is at the electroweak symmetry - breaking scale . because of its large mass top quark couplings are expected to be more sensitive to new physics than other particles@xcite . therefore deviations from the sm expectations in top quark production processes would be a signal for the new physics .    in this work we analyzed vector and scalar unparticle effects on top quark spin correlations in pair production process @xmath15 . since the top quark is very heavy its weak decay time is much shorter than the typical time for the strong interaction to affect its spin@xcite . therefore top polarization information is not distributed by hadronization effects and transferred to the decay products . the angular distribution of the top quark decay involves correlations between top decay products and top quark spin :    @xmath16    here the dominant decay chain of the top quark in the standard model @xmath17 is considered . @xmath18 is the spin asymmetry and @xmath19 is defined as the angle between top quark decay products and the top quark spin quantization axis in the rest frame of the top quark . @xmath20 is the correlation coefficient and @xmath21 for @xmath22 or @xmath23 which leads to the strongest correlation . therefore top quark polarization can be determined by means of the angular distribution of its decay products . we take into account top quark spin and antitop quark spin polarizations along the direction of various spin bases . these spin bases are the helicity basis and the incoming beam directions . in the sm there is a spin asymmetry between the produced top - antitop pairs . more specifically , the number of produced top - antitop quark pairs with both spin up or spin down is different from the number of pairs with the opposite spin combinations . therefore , if the top quark is coupled to a new physics beyond the sm , the top - antitop quark spin correlations could be altered@xcite . the top - antitop correlations can be used to search new physics beyond the sm . the unparticle couplings are examples of such new physics . we consider the scalar and vector unparticle interaction terms which are given in eq.5,6 in addition to the sm contributions . in our calculations we assume that @xmath24 . the research and developments on linear @xmath25 colliders have been progressing and physics potential of these future machines is under study . linear @xmath25 collider can provide a very useful laboratory to study physics of the top quark . furthermore this linear colliders have a clean environment and the experimental clearness is an additional advantage of @xmath25 collisions with respect to hadron collisions . since top quark possesses a large mass its helicity is frame dependent and changes under a boost from one frame to another . the helicity and chirality states do not coincide with each other and there is no reason to believe that the helicity basis will give the best description of the spin of top quarks . therefore it is reasonable to study other spin bases for top quark . top quark spinors are eigenstates of the operator @xmath26 :    @xmath27u(p_{t},\pm s)=\pm u(p_{t},\pm s)\end{aligned}\ ] ]    where spin four vector of a top quark is defined by    @xmath28    here @xmath29 in the top quark rest frame .    in the presence of unparticles , @xmath30 process occur via s - channel exchange of unparticles and usual electroweak bosons , @xmath31 and z. during amplitude calculations one can project the top quark and antitop quark spin to a given spin direction . we consider incoming beam directions and helicity basis . in the top quark rest frame ( or in antitop quark rest frame),its spin direction along any beam can be defined as ,    @xmath32    where , @xmath33 is the particle momentum ( positron or electron ) , observed in the rest frame of the top quark . it is possible to analyze the top and antitop quark spin correlations via angular correlations of two charged leptons @xmath34 produced by the top - antitop quark leptonic decay channels . we consider the leptonic decay channels of the top pairs . after integration over azimuthal angles the correlation is given by @xcite ,    @xmath35    here @xmath36 represents the cross section for the process of the leptonic decay modes , @xmath37 represents the angle between the top ( antitop ) spin axis and the direction of motion of the anti - lepton ( lepton ) in the top ( antitop ) rest frame . the _ a _ coefficient stands for the spin asymmetry between top and antitop pairs and defined as ,    @xmath38    where @xmath39 is the cross section of pair top quark production process .    in table [ tab1]-[tab2 ] spin asymmetries are given for various spin bases . one can see from table [ tab1 ] , sm spin asymmetry is @xmath40 for @xmath41=0.5 tev when top spin and antitop quark spin are in the helicity basis . in unparticle scheme , there are new contributions to pair production process . we calculated spin dependent squared amplitudes including scalar and vector unparticle mediated process . in the scalar unparticle exchange case , spin asymmetry increases and it takes a positive value , @xmath42 . when we consider vector unparticle exchange , asymmetry takes a negative value , @xmath43 . it is seen from the tables that maximum deviation from the sm one occurs in the scalar unparticle case . on the other hand , another useful basis is the incoming beam directions , in which the top quark spin axis is along the positron beam direction in the top rest frame , and antitop quark spin axis is along the electron direction in the antitop rest frame . in this basis , sm asymmetry is @xmath44 for @xmath41=0.5 tev . in scalar unparticle exchange , @xmath45 increases and takes a positive value , @xmath46 . in vector unparticle exchange spin asymmetry is , @xmath47 . it is shown that maximum deviation from the sm observed in the scalar unparticle exchange for the helicity basis . at the tables we considered that @xmath48 and @xmath49 tev . the influence of the center of the mass energy on the spin asymmetry is shown in fig.[fig1]-[fig4 ] . in fig.[fig1 ] we consider the scalar unparticle and helicity basis for top - antitop quark spin . we see from this figure that a sizeable deviation from the sm one occurs at @xmath48 . in fig.[fig2 ] we take into account vector unparticle effects . one can see that unparticle contributions leads to a little deviation from the sm at each center of mass energy . fig.[fig3 ] shows similar behavior with fig.[fig1 ] but for the top spin axis is along the incoming positron beam direction and antitop spin axis is along the incoming electron beam direction . in fig.[fig4 ] vector unparticle effects are shown for the same basis with fig.[fig3 ] . in this figure maximum deviation can be seen at @xmath48 .    in fig.[fig5 ] the spin asymmetries as a function of the scale dimension @xmath5 are given . we consider helicity direction in this figure and it can be seen that scalar unparticle contribution leads to a considerable deviation from the sm . on the other hand , vector unparticle contribution leads to a little deviation . at growing values of @xmath5 sm , scalar and vector unparticle asymmetries close up . fig.[fig6 ] has similar behavior with fig.[fig5 ] but in this figure top - antitop spin is along the incoming beam directions .    in our calculations phase space integrations have been performed by grace @xcite which uses a monte carlo routine . in this paper we have studied the top spin correlations with the unparticle effects in @xmath25 collision . we calculate spin dependent cross sections to obtain top and antitop spin asymmetry . it is shown that existence of scalar or vector unparticle leads to a significant deviation of the spin asymmetry from the its sm value . variations of the spin asymmetry are reflected by the angular distribution of the top and antitop decay products . therefore spin correlations provide us useful information to test the new physics beyond the sm . 99 h. georgi , phys . lett . * 98 * , 221601 ( 2007 ) . h. georgi , phys . * b650 * , 275 ( 2007 ) . t. banks and a. zaks , nucl b196 * , 189 ( 1982 ) . k. cheung , w .- y . keung and t .- c . yuan , arxiv:0706.3155 . s. coleman and e. weinberg , phys . rev , * d7 * , 1888 ( 1973 ) . m. luo and g. zhu , arxiv:0704.3532 ; + c.h . chen and c. q. geng , arxiv:0705.0689 ; + y. liao , arxiv:0705.0837 ; + g.j . ding and m.l . yan , arxiv:0705.0794 ; + t.m . aliev , a.s . cornell and n. gaur , arxiv:0705.1326 ; + x.q.li and z.t . wei , phys . b651 * , 380 ( 2007 ) ; + m.a . stephanov , phys . rev . * d76*,035008 ( 2007 ) ; + n. greiner , arxiv:0705.3518 ; + s.l . chen and x.g . he , arxiv:0705.3946 ; + h. davoudiasl , arxiv:0705.3636 ; + t.m . aliev , a.s . cornell and n. gaur , jhep * 0707 * , ( 2007 ) ; + p. mathews and v. ravindran , arxiv:0705.4599 ; + s. zhou , arxiv:0706.0302 ; + g.j . ding and m.l . yan , arxiv:0706.0325 ; + c.h . chen and c.q . geng , arxiv:0706.0850 ; + y. liao and j.y . liu , arxiv:0706.1284 ; + m. bander , j.l . feng , a. rajaraman and y. shirman , arxiv:0706.2677 ; + t.g . rizzo , arxiv:0706.3025 ; + s.l . chen , x.g . he and h.c . tsai , arxiv:0707.0187 : + r. zwicky , arxiv:0707.0677 ; + t. kikuchi and n. okada , arxiv:0707.0893 ; + r. mohanta and a.k . giri , arxiv:0707.1234 ; + c.s . huang and x.h . wu , arxiv:0707.1268 ; + n.v . krasnikov , arxiv:0707.1419 ; + a. lenz , arxiv:0707.1535 ; + d. choudhury and d.k . ghosh , arxiv:0707.2074 ; + t.a . ryttov and f. sannino , arxiv:0707.3166 ; + m. neubert , arxiv:0708.0036 ; + g. bhattacharyya , d. choudhury and d.k . ghosh , arxiv:0708.2835 ; + y. liao , arxiv:0708.3327 ; + a. t. alan and n. k. pak , arxiv:0708.3802 ; + a. b. balantekin and k. o. ozansoy , arxiv:0710.0028 ; + a. t. alan , n. k. pak and a. senol , arxiv:0710.4239 ; + i. sahin , b. sahin , arxiv:0711.1665 + k. cheung , c . s. li , t .- c . yuan , arxiv:0711.3361 ; + r.mohanta , a. k. giri , arxiv:0711.3516 ; + k. huitu , s. k. rai , arxiv:0711.4754 ; + s. dutta , a. goyal , arxiv:0712.0145 ; + j .r . mureika , arxiv:0712.1786 ; + y.wu , d.- x. zhang , arxiv:0712.3923 ; + t. kikuchi , n.okada , m. takeuchi , arxiv:0801.0018 ; + x .- g . he , s. pakvasa , arxiv:0801.0189 ; + c .- h . chen , c. s. kim , y. w. yoon , arxiv:0801.0895 ; + k. cheung , t. w. kephart , w. y. keung , t.- c. yuan , arxiv:0801.1762 ; + i. sahin , arxiv:0801.1838 + s.dutta,a . goyal arxiv:0801.2143 + c .- f . chang , k. cheung , t .- c . yuan , arxiv:0801.2843 + v. barger , y. gao , w .- y . keung , d. marfatia , v. n. senoguz , arxiv:0801.3771 + h .- f . li , h. li , z. -g . si , z.- j. yang , arxiv:0802.0236 + m. j aslam , c .- d . lu , arxiv:0802.0739 k. cheung , w .- y . keung and t .- c . yuan , arxiv:0704.2588 . peccei , x. zhang , nucl.phys . * b337 * , 269 ( 1990 ) ; + r.d . peccei , s. peris and x. zhang , nucl.phys . * b349 * , 305 ( 1991 ) ; i. bigi , y. dokshitzer , v. khoze , j. khn and p. zerwas , phys.lett . * b181 * , 157 ( 1986 ) . m. arai , n. okada , k. smolek , v. simak , phys.rev.d70 , 115015 ( 2004 ) . t. stelzer , s. willenbrock , phys.lett . * b374 * 169(1996 ) ; + a. brandenburg , phys.lett . * b388 * ( 1996 ) 626 ; + d. chang , s.c . lee , a. soumarokov , phys . 77 ( 1996 ) 1218 ; + g.mahlon , s.parke , phys . rev . * d53 * ( 1996)4886 ; + g.mahlon , s.parke , phys . lett . * b411 * ( 1997)173 ; + t. kaneko in `` new computing techniques in physics research '' , ed . d. perret - gallix , w. wojcik , edition du cnrs , 1990 ; + minami - tateya group , `` grace manual '' , kek report 92 - 19 , 1993 ; + f. yuasa _ et al . 138 ( 2000 ) 18 .
Abstract:

Answer: we investigate the effects of scalar and vector unparticles on top quark spin correlations via the process @xmath0 . in addition to the standard model diagrams , there is a new contribution to top - antitop quark production process mediated by unparticle in the s - channel . it is shown that scalar and vector unparticle contribution leads to a considerable deviation of the top spin correlations from the standard model one .