Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the physics of hadrons began about one century ago , when it became appealing to build nuclei from protons and neutrons . the experimental search for the neutron was soon resumed along with the search for the particle predicted by yukawa as being responsible for the tight binding of protons and neutrons . see , e.g. , @xcite for the history of this early period . when interacting with nucleons or among themselves , the pions produce many resonances . the exchange of meson resonances , and the formation of nucleon resonances in the intermediate states are crucial for our understanding of the nuclear forces beyond the single - pion exchange proposed by yukawa . for instance , the existence of the vector mesons , nowadays known as @xmath0 and @xmath1 , was somewhat anticipated from the need for isospin - dependent spin - orbit components in the nucleon - nucleon interaction . see , e.g. ,  @xcite for an introduction into the early literature on this subject . the discovery of numerous meson or baryon resonances stimulated intense efforts to understand the underlying mechanisms that generate the hadrons . for instance , the @xmath0 meson can be described as a @xmath2 resonance in a @xmath3-wave , with the @xmath4-wave counterpart being the scalar meson responsible for the spin - isospin averaged attraction observed in nuclei . in 1955 , chew and low described the @xmath5 as the result of a strong @xmath6 interaction @xcite , and today , the scattering of pions off nuclei is still pictured as series of @xmath7-hole formation and annihilation . an ever more ambitious picture was proposed , called `` nuclear democracy '' or `` bootstrap '' , in which every hadron consists of all possible sets of hadrons compatible with its quantum numbers  @xcite . unfortunately , neither the models based on nucleons and pions as elementary bricks , nor the bootstrap , succeeded in providing an overall picture . for instance , the degeneracy of isospin @xmath8 and @xmath9 mesons such as @xmath0 and @xmath1 , does not emerge naturally , if one assumes that their content is dominated by the nucleon - antinucleon component  @xcite .    from the very beginning , the attention was focused on hadrons with properties that look unusual , in contrast to the regularity patterns of the rest of the spectrum . the exotic character of a hadron is of course a time - dependent concept : once a striking property of a hadron is confirmed by further measurements , and understood within a plausible theoretical framework , the hadron ceases to be exotic .    among the most famous examples , there is the @xmath10 meson , a peak of mass 1.02gev with a remarkably small width of about 4mev @xcite , decaying preferentially into a pair of kaons , though the decay into pions is energetically much easier . the decay patterns of the @xmath10 are now understood from its quark content @xmath11 , where @xmath4 denotes the strange quark , with very little mixing . the suppression of the internal annihilation of @xmath11 into light mesons has been codified in terms of the so - called `` zweig rule '' , eventually justified from the asymptotic - freedom limit of quantum chromo - dynamics ( qcd ) . the process took , however , several years , and was not mature enough when the @xmath12 particle was discovered at the end of 1974 ; it is a meson of mass about 3.1gev and width much less than 1mev  @xcite . why the @xmath12 was not immediately identified with @xmath13 ? the great surprise was that the zweig rule works too well ! as compared to the @xmath14 , the @xmath12 is three times heavier , so its phase - space for decay into light mesons is considerably larger , and yet its width is smaller ! for the @xmath15 , the effect is even more pronounced , but when the @xmath15 was discovered in 1977  @xcite , the lesson was learnt , and the @xmath15 was never considered as exotic .    today , any attempt to provide with a definition of an `` exotic '' hadron starts from the quark model . a meson with quantum numbers that can not be matched by any spin - orbital state of a quark and an antiquark is obviously exotic . states with unusual properties but ordinary quantum numbers are named `` crypto - exotic '' states . in particular , ordinary baryons can reach any set of values of the spin - parity @xmath16 with half - integer spin @xmath17 and parity @xmath18 , so a baryon can not be exotic except for its flavour content . a consensus has thus been reached that a hadron is exotic if it can not be understood as mainly made of quark - antiquark nor quark - quark - quark , but `` mainly '' remains vague . while simple quark models will propose a reference with a frozen number of constituents , more advance pictures include an expansion in the fock space , with additional quark - antiquark pairs in the wave function . the hope is that the expansion converges , and that a clean separation emerges between exotic and non - exotics . this review is organised as follows . in sec . [ se : mesons ] , we shall review states with unusual properties in the light ( sec . [ sse : mesons - light ] ) , open heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - open1 ] ) , double heavy flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - open2 ] ) , and hidden heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : mesons - hidden ] ) sectors . the baryon spectrum is discussed in sec . [ se : baryons ] , with , again a separation between the non - exotic light sector ( sec . [ sse : baryons - light - ns ] for non strange and sec . [ sse : baryons - light - negs ] for strange baryons ) , the exotic light pentaquark with positive strangeness in sec . [ sse : baryons - light - poss ] , the case of open heavy - flavour , single ( sec . [ sse : baryons - open1 ] ) or double single ( sec . [ sse : baryons - open2 ] ) , the anticharmed pentaquark in sec . [ sse : antich - baryons ] , and the case of hidden heavy - flavour ( sec . [ sse : baryons - hidden ] ) with in , particular , the recent pentaquark states found by the lhcb collaboration . the multibaryon systems will be discussed in sec . [ se : multibaryons ] . the various theoretical models will be reviewed in sec . [ se : theory ] , with some emphasis on string dynamics and potential models . some limits have to be set . the case of light hadrons will be just outlined , to focus more on the most recent states containing heavy quarks or antiquarks . in the former sector , the literature is enormous , and can be traced back from the conference proceedings that will be cited in the next sections , from some well - known reviews such as @xcite , or from study groups for future facilities @xcite . for the recent exotics with hidden charm , there exists already excellent and even comprehensive reviews , such as @xcite . our aim here is not to compete with these reviews , nor to duplicate them , but rather to discuss critically the recent findings and the models that they inspired . so , this paper will be more subjective . hopefully , it will trigger some discussion , and , perhaps , attract newcomers into the field , where innovative ideas are welcome .    the bibliography for such a subject can not be comprehensive . some past review articles are cited , which give access to the early papers . we apologise in advance in the event where some important contributions are inadvertently omitted . there are many hot issues on light mesons : why are the pseudoscalars so light ? what is the status of the many scalar mesons ? why ideal mixing and zweig rule work so well in some sectors , and not in other sectors ? we refer , e.g. , to @xcite for a critical survey of the claims for exotics , and to  @xcite for a thorough discussion within qcd and the bibliography , and to the last hadron conferences for an update @xcite . one of the puzzles arises from the @xmath19 , measured in several experiments , in particular at l3 @xcite : the comparison of the different charge modes suggest a sizeable isospin @xmath20 contribution . there are interesting theoretical studies on the production mechanism @xcite , but missing is a simple understanding of why there is strong attraction in that channel in terms of quark dynamics .    there is an intense activity in the search of glueballs and light hybrids , either as supernumerary states with ordinary quantum numbers @xmath21 , or as genuine exotics with @xmath21 that can not be matched by ordinary quantum numbers . in particular , evidence has been found for @xmath22 states between 1 and 2gev@xmath23 by ves at serpukhov@xcite , by e852 at brookhaven @xcite , and by compass at cern @xcite , and the search is resumed actively , in particular by gluex at jlab @xcite . for a thorough review of the other contributions , see , e.g. , @xcite . the charmed mesons @xmath24 , @xmath25 have been discovered shortly after the charmonium , and the mesons with charm and strangeness @xmath26 , @xmath27 have followed . relevant for this review on exotics are the so - called @xmath28 states . as summarised in @xcite , the @xmath29 was discovered at babar @xcite and the @xmath30 at cleo @xcite , with a mass remarkably lower than predicted in the `` bible '' @xcite and in similar quark - model calculations . note that the tuning of the spin - dependent forces in such models has been often debated , and no consensus has ever been reached , see , e.g. , @xcite . to explain the low mass and the properties of the @xmath31 states , the coupling to the nearby @xmath32 thresholds certainly plays a role . these mesons have even been considered as molecules , for instance , in  @xcite . after , the discovery of charm , it has been early recognized that configurations including both light and heavy quarks or antiquarks might be particularly interesting , for instance , in the case of baryon - antibaryon or multibaryon systems  @xcite . another pioneering contribution was due to isgur and lipkin @xcite who considered the flavour exotic @xmath33 configuration . shortly after , even more exotic mesons were studied , @xmath34 , with two heavy quarks and two light antiquarks . as explained later in this review , their existence is a prediction shared by many theorists using different approaches , which will be discussed in the next sections . doubly - heavy exotics , which are surprisingly omitted in some `` reviews '' on multiquarks , have not yet been searched for in any experiment , but will be one of the goals of future experiments , and several theorists estimated the rate of production at hadron @xcite or electron @xcite colliders , or in the decay of hadrons with beauty  @xcite . the production of two charm - anticharm pairs is somewhat disconcerting , with the good surprise of a rather abundant production of double charmonium , leading for instance to the identification of the @xmath35 recoiling against the @xmath12 @xcite , and , on the other hand , the double - charm baryons have not been confirmed in recent experiments , see sec . [ sse : baryons - open2 ] . the spectrum is quarkonia , @xmath36 and @xmath37 , is now rather well known and well understood . for a while , the most delicate experimental sector was the one of spin - singlet states , such as @xmath38 , @xmath39 . for instance , a first candidate for the @xmath40 was announced about 300mev below the @xmath12 , triggering some premature announcements on the quark dynamics , but eventually replaced by a more reasonable @xmath40 about 112mev below @xmath12 , see , e.g. , the reviews  @xcite . a first indication for the @xmath41 was given a by @xmath42 formation experiment at cern @xcite , with another indication in a similar experiment at fermilab @xcite . it was eventually firmly identified at cleo @xcite . the @xmath35 was seen at belle in @xmath43 decay @xcite and in double - charmonium production @xcite . it also took some time until the spin - singlet states of @xmath37 were identified  @xcite .    above the threshold , @xmath44 for charmonium and @xmath45 for bottomonium , the spectrum was known to be more intricate , with broader peaks , and an interplay of @xmath4- and @xmath46-states mixed with the @xmath47 continuum , and it was a somewhat a daily grind to improve the measurements .    then came the shock of the discovery of the @xmath48 by belle @xcite , in the @xmath49 mass spectrum of the reaction @xmath50 . neither the mass nor the decay properties were according to the expectations of the charmonium models , in particular for the @xmath51 level . on the other hand , such a state was announced in the molecular models , as discussed in sec . [ sse : molec - xyz ] . not only the experts on quark- or hadron - dynamics commented this new state , but also some non - experts became attracted to the subject . as well summarised in a recent review @xcite , a second shock was the discovery of the @xmath52 by babar  @xcite , in @xmath53 with isr .. ] this @xmath54 sector of charmonium was already thoroughly explored , with radial excitations , with @xmath4- and @xmath46-waves mixed between them and with the continuum . so this new state was immediately associated with an exotic , or , say crypto - exotic structure . the @xmath52 was seen also at cleo and belle  @xcite . a third shock was the discovery of charged states , with minimal content @xmath55 or c.c . the first announcement was the @xmath56 by the belle collaboration , in the @xmath57 mass distribution of the decay @xmath58 @xcite . it is hardly possible to list all the states of @xmath59 or @xmath60 type without duplicating the very comprehensive reviews such as @xcite . let us stress a few points :    * the @xmath61 and @xmath62 have been seen in double - charmonium production @xcite , which gives a clear signature of their @xmath13 content , * some states have been seen in @xmath63 , indicating a charge conjugation @xmath64 , and very likely @xmath65 or @xmath66 . this is the case for @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 @xcite . * some states , in particular among the above ones , are just candidates for radial excitations of charmonium . if confirmed , they indicate the supernumerary character of other states sharing the same quantum numbers . * the @xmath70 has been seen as an enhancement in the @xmath71 spectrum of the isr reaction @xmath72 @xcite . many references about this state can be found in a recent paper  @xcite . as stressed in this literature , the decay into a baryon and an antibaryon might indicate a `` baryonium '' type of structure , though other scenarios have been proposed  @xcite . * there is sometimes a clustering of states with similar masses . it might the same state with a peak that depends on the production and decay process . * most quark models and , to a lesser extent , molecular models predict an isospin @xmath9 partner of the @xmath8 state , analogous to @xmath0 vs.  @xmath1 . this stimulated searches for charged partner , such as @xcite . * while the @xmath48 has been seen in many experiments , @xmath52 in a few experiments , some states have been seen in just a single experiment . in between , @xmath73 has been seen by belle and  @xcite , but these experiments share many collaborators , and used the same reaction @xmath74 , with a slight variant for the confirmation by cleo @xcite . so , the negative result of a search by compass in photoproduction is particularly important for the existence or at least the coupling properties of this state  @xcite . * the lightest @xmath75 states have minimal quark content @xmath76 , where @xmath77 . in several models , their @xmath78 with hidden strangeness are expected . recently , the lhcb collaboration re - analysed the @xmath79 mass spectrum from the decay @xmath80 @xcite , and found evidence for @xmath81 and @xmath82 both with @xmath83 , in disagreement with some models ( cited in @xcite ) and in partial or full agreement with others , in particular the extension by stancu @xcite of the chromomagnetic model proposed for the @xmath48  @xcite . * the models somewhat differ about the existence and location of the @xmath84 analogues of the exotic mesons with hidden charm : the heavier @xmath85-quark mass , for instance , suppresses the chromomagnetic effect but enhances the chromoelectric ones , while the coupling schemes are sensitive to the gap between bare quarkonia and meson pairs . the list of candidates is rather scarce for the time being , and are due to belle only . the charged @xmath86 and @xmath87 have been seen in @xmath88 , where @xmath37 stands here for some lower @xmath89 or @xmath90 or @xmath91 . later , belle also got some candidate for the neutral @xmath92 . on the other hand , a search for the heavy partner of @xmath48 , decaying into @xmath93 or @xmath94 , has been so far unsuccessful . the history of the quark model is intimately linked to baryon spectroscopy . one of the motivation for su(3 ) flavour symmetry , nowadays denoted su(3)@xmath95 , was the observation that the hyperons have properties similar to that of non - strange baryons . the quark model was developed first in the baryon sector , with the pioneering works by greenberg , dalitz , etc . , and pushed very far by the subsequent works by dalitz et al . , hey et al . , isgur and karl , and many others . for a review , see , e.g. , @xcite . obviously , the field has been much enriched by the study of baryons with charm or beauty , and baryons carrying two or three heavy flavoured quarks are eagerly awaited . there are many issues there , that have been presented in conferences such as `` baryons '' , `` nstar '' , etc . for years , one of the most striking issues was the signature for the `` symmetric quark model '' with two degrees of freedom , vs.  the quark  diquark model . clearly , the recent progress , as e.g. , summarised at the recent conference in tallahassee @xcite , confirms the existence of states such as @xmath96 which can not be accommodated in a naive quark - diquark picture with a frozen diquark . the lightest state with an excitation in each of the jacobi variables , say , @xmath97 and @xmath98 , has isospin @xmath99 , spin @xmath100 and orbital momentum and parity @xmath101 . in the particular case of the harmonic oscillator , its wave function reads @xmath102 and is antisymmetric under the permutations . thus , if associated with an antisymmetric colour wave function @xmath103 and an antisymmetric spin - isospin wave function , it fits perfectly the requirement of fermi statistics . note that an antisymmetric spin - isospin wave function is possible for @xmath99 ( @xmath104 ) , but not for @xmath105 ( @xmath106 ) nor @xmath8 ( @xmath107 ) .    experimentally , the search for doubly - excited baryons is difficult . as often underlined ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) photon or meson scattering off a nuclear target favours the production of states with a single quark being excited . and in amplitude analyses , doubly excited baryons , if any , come in a region that is already well populated ! another hot issue is the roper resonance , an excitation with the same quantum numbers as the ground state . in potential models , this is mainly a hyper - radial excitation , but in explicit model calculations , it is found higher than the negative - parity excitation , while the experimental roper state lies degenerate or even slightly below the lowest negative - parity excitation . chiral dynamics , as implemented in specific models or in lattice simulations , accounts for this property , which sets limits to naive potential models .      here , again , is the problem of missing states , with slow but continuous progress to fill the holes . a very striking property is the low mass of the @xmath108 , discussed first by dalitz @xcite and now in an abundant literature ( see , e.g. , @xcite for a recent summary ) . in the case of the nucleon spectrum , the spin - orbit splittings , such as between @xmath109 with @xmath110 and @xmath111 with @xmath112 , are very small , and isgur and karl , for instance , have set the spin - orbit potential to zero in their fit @xcite . hence the large @xmath113 splitting of the strange analogues appears as somewhat a surprise in a pure quark model . a minimal solution explains the discrepancy by a shift due the coupling to the nearby @xmath114 threshold . similarly , the @xmath115 is shifted down by the nearby @xmath44 threshold , and the hyperfine splitting @xmath116 is slightly smaller than expected . similarly , the @xmath117 state of charmonium gets some admixture of @xmath118 in conservative models of the @xmath48 , etc . now , a more appealing solution is also suggested , in which there are two poles with @xmath119 near @xmath108  @xcite , a mixing of a @xmath120 molecule and a quark - model state . as often underlined in the case of mesons @xcite , the mixing scheme might be more involved than in ordinary quantum mechanics , with the absorptive part , i.e. , the coupling the decay channels , playing the major role .      for years , there has been debates about baryons carrying positive strangeness . in the 60s and 70s , much effort was devoted to exploit the analyticity properties of the @xmath121-matrix , and to reconstruct the amplitudes from the scattering data . this program was rather successful in the case of the @xmath6 and @xmath120 reactions , and led to the identification of a number of baryon resonances with strangeness @xmath122 and @xmath123 , respectively . the case of @xmath124 scattering with @xmath125 was much more delicate and controversial . some early analyses , based only on differential cross - sections ( and just a few data on the recoil polarisation ) , suggested the possibility of resonances , see , for instance , @xcite . the resonances were named @xmath126 or @xmath127 , where @xmath8 or @xmath128 is the isospin .    then came data on the analysing power , obtained using a polarised target , as in @xcite . not surprisingly , the uncertainties were narrowed @xcite , and the @xmath60 resonances tended to fade away . for years , the particle data group ( pdg ) , summarised the state of art , as in the 1980 edition @xcite , where one finds candidates for several exotic baryons with @xmath125 . there are @xmath129 and @xmath130 in the isospin @xmath8 sector , and @xmath131 , @xmath132 and @xmath133 for @xmath9 . then the @xmath60 baryon disappeared from the review , and the letter @xmath60 was given to another particle . note that other risky amplitudes analyses were done later , for instance for @xmath134 or @xmath135 before the advent of data taken on the polarised target , or for the elastic @xmath42 scattering with just data on the polarisation , while the simpler @xmath136 case notoriously requires several spin observables . act two of the play is better known . meanwhile the name `` pentaquark '' was introduced in the anticharmed sector , as will be discussed shortly , in sec . [ sse : antich - baryons ] . it reflects that the minimal content of the @xmath126 baryon is @xmath137 . in 2003 , nakano et al .  found a narrow peak in the @xmath138 distribution of the reaction @xmath139 this state , named @xmath140 , was predicted in a model by diakonov et al . @xcite based on some developments of the chiral dynamics . it was of course rather remarkable to have a relatively small experiment revealing a major discovery . but the sequels quickly went out of control . on the theory side , a flurry of papers , with hasty calculations and ad - hoc assumptions . on the experimental side , some collaborations discovered that they had data on tape , that were never analysed , and contained in fact the pentaquark ! other positive results came , both for the @xmath141 , and for other members of the anti - decuplet of su(3)@xmath95 that was predicted . however , the trend became inverted , and experiments with better statistics and particle identification did not confirm the existence of the these light pentaquarks . this is reviewed for instance in @xcite . the theory part also came under better scrutiny . in ref . @xcite , some lattice qcd calculations following the discovery of the @xmath141 are criticised . in , e.g. , @xcite , some inconsistencies are pointed out in the estimate of the width in the model of diakonov et al . , a crucial property of the putative light pentaquark .      in the last 20 years , much experimental progress has been done in the sector of baryons with single charm or beauty . when available , the comparison of @xmath85- and @xmath142-baryons is compatible with the idea of a flavour - independent confinement . for instance , the first evidence for @xmath143 came from d0 at fermilab , with a mass about @xmath144mev , corresponding to a double - strangeness excitation @xmath145 substantially larger than its charm analogue . further measurements by cdf at fermilab and lhcb at cern gave a mass around @xmath146 in closer agreement with the expectations @xcite . a remarkable feature of charmed baryons is their narrowness , with , e.g. , @xmath147mev for @xmath148 , @xmath149mev for @xmath150 , @xmath151mev for @xmath152 @xcite . of course , this gives a better view on the spectrum than in the case of overlapping resonances . an optimistic columnist of pdg @xcite even stated : ``  models of baryon - resonance spectroscopy should now _ start _ with the narrow charmed baryons , and work back to those broad old resonances . '' among the current discussions , there is the suggestion that @xmath153 is mainly a @xmath154 molecule @xcite . the same narrowness is observed for @xmath85-baryons , as listed in the latest pdg review @xcite or revealed in the latest lhcb papers @xcite . thirty years ago , double charm baryons were considered as just a straightforward extension of the quark model , to be checked just for the sake of completeness . at most , some experts stressed the co - existence within the same hadron of the slow , adiabatic , charmonium - like motion of the two heavy quarks , and the fast , @xmath24-meson - like motion of the light quark around them . in the literature , @xmath155 is often described as a quark - diquark @xcite ; however , the first excitations occur between the two heavy quarks and thus one has to introduce `` excited diquarks '' . an alternative is the born - oppenheimer method @xcite , which , as discussed later , might also be adequate in the @xmath75 sector and for hybrids . some evidence for double - charm baryons was found at fermilab , in the selex experiment @xcite , but unfortunately not confirmed in other experiments at fermilab or elsewhere @xcite . this becomes particularly annoying . double - charm baryons will certainly receive more attention in the near future @xcite . it is an important question to understand why double - charm baryons have not yet been seen . if the golden modes such as @xmath156 or @xmath157 are suppressed , the detection scheme should be revised . and , perhaps , new production mechanisms should be exploited . our ability to detect double - charm baryons and measure their properties is eagerly watched by people waiting for exotic tetraquarks and dibaryons . as pointed out in @xcite , the binding and the correlation of the two charmed quarks in @xmath155 gives some idea about @xmath158 and @xmath159 . and , in most production experiments , they share the same triggers , so that a simultaneous search for double - charm baryons , mesons and dibaryons can be envisaged .      two simultaneous papers by gignoux et al .  and lipkin @xcite , in which the word `` pentaquark '' was first used , suggested the existence of stable or metastable states @xmath160 with @xmath161 denoting @xmath162 , @xmath163 or @xmath164 . this pentaquark was searched for in an experiment at fermilab , which was not conclusive @xcite . at the time of the light pentaquark , the h1 collaboration at hera looked at the @xmath165 mass spectrum , i.e. , states of minimal content @xmath166 , without strangeness contrary to the prediction in @xcite , and found a peak near 3.1gev with a width of about 12mev @xcite , which was confirmed neither by zeus @xcite , also operating at hera , nor by babar @xcite at slac , nor in the analysis by h1 of their heraslowromancap2@ data . the anticharmed pentaquark was initially one the goals of the compass experiment @xcite , but it has disappeared from the agenda . this is one of the latest findings , inducing an intense phenomenological activity supplementing the discussions about @xmath75 mesons . the rumour is that , due to the bad reputation of the light pentaquark , the lhcb collaboration tried during months to kill the evidence , with more checks than usual for this type of discovery . the result published in @xcite deals with the weak decay @xmath167 of the lowest baryon with beauty . the dalitz plot , as well as the @xmath168 mass spectrum , indicates two peaks , one with a mass of @xmath169mev and a width of @xmath170mev , an another with a mass of @xmath171mev and a width of @xmath172mev . as the @xmath173 mass is always reconstructed , some ambiguities are removed . the background is fitted as @xmath174 , with many @xmath175 excitations , up to high mass and high spin . when two resonances are added , the preferred quantum numbers are spin @xmath176 and @xmath177 , and opposite parities , namely @xmath178 and @xmath179 . see , also , @xcite .    the process is schematically described in fig . [ fig : lhcb - penta1a ] , as well as the companion reaction ( cabibbo suppressed ) @xmath180 .     decay ( left ) and @xmath180 decay ( right),title="fig : " ]    decay ( left ) and @xmath180 decay ( right),title="fig : " ]    this process @xmath180 has been measured by lhcb and published before the discovery of hidden - charm pentaquarks @xcite , but the statistics was not sufficient to identify peaks . this reaction has been discussed in a few papers , as well as other weak decays involving the hidden - charm pentaquark @xcite , shown in fig .  [ fig : lhcb - penta2 ] . a more recent analysis of the reaction @xmath180 provides some support for the contribution of hidden - charm pentaquarks  @xcite . -hadrons producing a hidden - charm pentaquark.,title="fig : " ] -hadrons producing a hidden - charm pentaquark.,title="fig : " ]    it has been proposed @xcite to check the existence of the lhcb pentaquarks and provide more information on their properties by studying the photoproduction reaction @xmath181 , and the experiment will be done at jlab . the situation in the non - strange sector has been recently reviewed at the conference baryon 2016 @xcite . there are regularly some claims for resonant behaviour of some partial waves @xcite . negative results include : @xcite in the isospin @xmath20 sector , @xcite for multineutrons bound by a few @xmath182 . the most serious candidates are the state of mass 2380mev and width @xmath183mev by the wasa collaboration , in the @xmath184 coupled partial waves , corresponding to @xmath185 @xcite , which was expected by various models @xcite , and the more recent state at 2.15gev which is under investigation at jlab @xcite .    in the sector of single strangeness @xmath123 , there are recurrent discussions about the possibility of dibaryons . see , e.g. , @xcite and refs .  there . note that a study of the atomic @xmath186 system could provide some indirect information . in the two - body case , say @xmath187 , the atomic spectrum is much modified if the strong - interaction @xmath188 potential generates a bound state near threshold . this was realised by zeldovich in the 50 s and has been much studied @xcite . the case of three - body exotic atoms with a combination of coulomb interaction and short - range hadronic interaction remains to be clarified , but probably deserves a detailed study . the most advertised case deals with strangeness @xmath189 , following the work by jaffe@xcite on the coherent chromomagnetic attraction in @xmath190 with isospin and spin @xmath191 . more than 20 experiments have searched without success for the @xmath192 , ranging from the absence of @xmath192 in the decay of double hypernuclei @xcite to the mass spectra emerging from heavy - ion collisions @xcite . new experiments are currently under construction . the status of theoretical studies will be reviewed in sec . [ ssse : chromo ] . the speculations have been extended to the @xmath193 sector , see , e.g. , @xcite .      if the @xmath192 , considered as @xmath194 system , is close to binding , as well as some other baryon - baryon systems , it is natural to guess that some multi - baryon configurations will be bound , as an illustration of the quantum phenomenon of borromean binding @xcite . there are for instance debates about the existence of @xmath195 or @xmath196 @xcite , as well as @xmath197 or @xmath198  @xcite . the field of hypernuclear physics is rather active , with new facilities contributing , and is reviewed regularly at dedicated conferences .    almost immediately after the discovery of charm , the possibility of new species of hypernuclei was envisaged , with hyperons replaced by charmed baryons @xcite . in atomic physics , the study of multi - electron systems looks at first rather straightforward : the same non relativistic dynamics is at work , and one has `` just '' to solve the @xmath199-body equations with increasing @xmath199 . even there , the progress is slow , and the calculations , which are very delicate , have to be cross - checked . for instance , the last bound state of h@xmath200 , the excitations of the positronium molecule or the existence of borromean molecules were discovered only recently @xcite . in nuclear physics , the situation is even more delicate , as the basic two - body interaction is presumably modified by the presence of other nucleons , and supplemented by 3-body forces .    in qcd , the situation is even worse . if one uses simple constituent models to describe mesons and baryons , their extension to multiquark states is hazardous . if one uses more sophisticated approaches to ordinary hadrons , their application to higher configurations becomes technically very difficult . before discussing in some details a few specific schemes , we review the early history of exotic hadrons .      in the 60s , much attention was paid to _ crossing symmetry _ , which relates , e.g. , @xmath201 to @xmath202 . the reaction @xmath203 describes what is exchanged to monitor the direct reaction @xmath204 . it is reasonable to assume an equivalence between the content of the two reactions , as well as that of the third reaction , @xmath205 . this principle of _ duality _ was often used as a constraint in building models . for instance , if one describes @xmath6 elastic scattering with several @xmath206 and @xmath207 resonances , duality dictates to refrain from exchanging @xmath208 , @xmath0 ,  , in the @xmath209-channel . a consequence of duality is that is the reaction @xmath204 is weak , i.e. , without resonances , it does not benefit from coherent @xmath209-channel exchanges . though duality was first formulated at the hadron level , it is nowadays explained in terms of quark diagrams . we refer to @xcite for a review and references . for instance , in the case of @xmath2 scattering with isospin @xmath8 , the diagram of fig . [ fig : dual1 ] ( left ) shows that the possibility of annihilating a quar - antiquark pair opens the way for @xmath210 exchange in the @xmath209-channel and @xmath210 resonances in the @xmath4-channel . this is why there is a strong @xmath2 interaction with @xmath8 . on the other hand , for isospin @xmath20 , there is @xmath4-channel resonance , and the @xmath209-channel dynamics suffers from a more intricate topology . similarly , @xmath120 scattering , shown in fig .  [ fig : dual1 ] ( right ) , benefits from both @xmath211 resonances in the @xmath4-channel and @xmath210 exchanges in the @xmath209-channel . this is not the case for @xmath114 scattering which is notoriously less strong . this led rosner to address the problem of baryon - antibaryon scattering @xcite , which is depicted in fig . [ fig : dual2 ] . the interaction is very strong , and benefits , indeed , from the exchanges of mesons in the @xmath209-channel . hence there should be resonances in the @xmath4-channel . this is how baryonium was predicted . -channel ( intersecting the dotted line ) contains two quarks and two antiquarks . the intermediate state in the @xmath209-channel ( crossing the dashed line ) is made of a quark and antiquark . ]    as noted by roy @xcite , once one accepts baryonium , in a _ gedankenexperiment _ colliding a baryonium against a baryon , meson - exchange is dual of a pentaquark . in turn , the analysis of pentaquark - baryon scattering implies the existence of dibaryons ! this is illustrated in fig . [ fig : dual3 ] . -channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in baryonium - baryon scattering . right : dibaryon ( six quarks in the @xmath4-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in pentaquark - baryon scattering.,title="fig:"]-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in baryonium - baryon scattering . right : dibaryon ( six quarks in the @xmath4-channel ) dual of mesons ( quark - antiquark in the @xmath209-channel ) in pentaquark - baryon scattering.,title="fig : " ]      in line with duality , a string model was developed for hadrons , explaining why the squared masses increase linearly with the spin @xmath17 . this model was echoed by the elongated version of the bag model , the flux - tube model , or some potential models with multi - body forces which will be mentioned later in this section . the string model was first rather empirical , but later received a support from some topological and non - perturbative properties of qcd , as reviewed recently @xcite . the mesons are pictured as a string linking a quark to antiquark , see fig . [ fig : string1 ] ( left ) . the picture of baryons was suggested by artru , and rediscovered in several approaches @xcite . it consists of three strings linking each quark to a junction @xmath17 , which plays somewhat the role of a fourth constituent of each baryon , and , in particular , is submitted to an extension of the zweig rule , which prohibits any internal junction - junction annihilation . in this scheme , the baryonium of rosner contains two junctions , see fig . [ fig : string2 ] and thus widely differs from a set of two disconnected mesons . the decay of baryonium occurs by string breaking via pair creation : in the case of an external leg , it corresponds to the pionic cascade @xmath212 , while the breaking of the central string corresponds to the decay into baryon and antibaryon . several experimental states were good candidates for baryonium @xcite , but they were not confirmed in experiments using better antiproton beams . perhaps the nucleon - antinucleon interaction suffers from too strong an annihilation , while the heavy quark sector gives better opportunities .    the model can be extended to more complicated structures , as to include pentaquarks and dibaryons . some examples are given in fig . [ fig : string3 ] . the above string pictures of baryonium was challenged by other schemes : the nuclear model which is reviewed in the next section , and some quark models . one of them describes baryonium states as a diquark and an antidiquark separated by an orbital barrier which suppresses the decay into mesons @xcite . in colour chemistry , there is also the possibility of colour - sextet diquark , and thus of @xmath213 states , named ` mock baryonia' which are predicted to be rather narrow @xcite . this was , indeed , an interesting challenge to identify spectroscopic signatures of the colour degree of freedom . the name has evolved . it used to be _ quasi - nuclear _ , and became _ molecular _ model . it starts with the observation that the meson - exchange interaction of yukawa , which successfully binds the deuteron and other nuclei , holds for other hadrons , in particular these containing light quarks .      in the 60s , attempts have been made to describe mesons as baryon - antibaryon states , a simplified version of the bootstrap . fermi and yang @xcite had noticed that the @xmath214 potential is often more attractive than the @xmath215 one , as the cancellations in the latter become coherences in the former . but this approach does not account for some important properties of the meson spectrum @xcite , such as exchange degeneracy , e.g. , the @xmath0 and @xmath1 having the same mass .    in the late 70s and early 80s , another point of view was adopted , namely that baryon - antibaryon bound states and resonances correspond to new type of mesons , lying higher in mass than ordinary mesons , and preferentially coupled to the baryon - antibaryon channel . in practice , the @xmath214 potential is deduced from the @xmath215 one by the @xmath216-parity rule : if the exchange of a meson @xmath217 ( or set of mesons @xmath217 ) contributes as @xmath218 to the @xmath215 potential in isospin @xmath219 , then its contributes as @xmath220 to the @xmath214 in isospin @xmath219 @xcite . when annihilation is neglected , a rich spectrum of bound states and resonances is found @xcite , with the hope than some of them will not become too broad when annihilation is switched on . before the discovery of the antiproton , annihilation was believed to be be a short - range correction . however , the annihilation part of the @xmath214 integrated cross - section was measured to be about twice the elastic one . to fit the cross- sections , one needs an annihilation acting up to about @xmath221fm , and this makes most quasi - nuclear baryonium states very broad . the molecular model might have better chances to predict exotics in channels with heavy hadrons whose interaction is less absorptive . the yukawa model made a come back in the heavy quark sector . the @xmath222 or @xmath223 potential , where @xmath224 , is perhaps weaker than the @xmath215 potential , but being experienced by heavier particles , it can produce binding as well . the first papers were by okun and voloshin and glashow et al . @xcite . in the latter case , the idea was to explain some intriguing properties of some high - lying charmonium states , but it was eventually realised that these properties were due to the nodes of the wave function when the states are described as radial excitations @xcite . the best known application of the molecular model deals with @xmath75 states . almost simultaneously , a few papers came , stressing the attraction due to one - pion - exchange in some @xmath222 or @xmath223 channels @xcite . of course , the @xmath48 discovery at belle was greeted as a success of this approach . today , the @xmath48 is generally considered as having both a quarkonium and a multiquark component @xcite . for a clarification of the molecular approach , see @xcite . the anticharmed pentaquark has been studied with molecular dynamics , as a light baryon linked to an anticharmed meson . see , for instance , @xcite . note that the @xmath225 or @xmath163 and @xmath164 content of the light sector in the chromomagnetic model is not necessarily the same when mesons are exchanged between a @xmath226 or a @xmath227 and a baryon . after the publication of the lhcb results on the hidden - charm pentaquark @xcite , it was reminded or discovered that there were some predictions of bound states of a charmed baryon and an anticharmed meson , in particular by hofman and lutz @xcite , oset and collaborators @xcite , and z.c . yang et al . the game was even initiated earlier for the case of hidden - strangeness @xcite . of course , the model has been refined recently and compared to the lhcb results . the literature is comprehensively reviewed in @xcite . one might wonder why the hidden - charm pentaquark was not searched for before , given the above predictions .    1 . there are many predictions vs.   just a few experiments , which are not primarily devoted to spectroscopy . 2 .   in the molecular model , there are many states of this type , and it is not easy to focus on the configuration giving the best signature for the molecular dynamics . for instance , the binding of a charmed baryon and an anticharmed antibaryon was already envisaged in 1977 @xcite , shortly after the meson - meson case @xcite , but he meson - baryon case was unfortunately overlooked in the 70s . 3 .   there is rather generally more effort and more interest in the meson than in the baryon sector . the negative parity states , either @xmath112 or @xmath228 , can be accommodated in the molecular model , with a main @xmath4-wave between a meson and a baryon , and a small admixture of @xmath46-wave , as in the more familiar case of the deuteron . the orbital excitation with positive parity is probably much higher in mass .      in @xmath223 , the annihilation and creation of light quarks opens a coupling to @xmath13 , leading to description of some isoscalar @xmath75 states as a mixture of molecule and quarkonium states . isovector states do not mix with quarkonium , except for some minor effects of isospin violation . the sector of double - charm molecules has also received much attention , from the very beginning . see for instance , @xcite . it is immediately realised that if the exchange of mesons bind @xmath222 , @xmath223 , and @xmath229 their beauty or mixed charm - beauty analogues and other configurations could as well be formed by this mechanism , such as some meson - baryon and baryon - baryon states  @xcite . we already mentioned the prediction of hidden - charm pentaquarks as molecules such as @xmath230 , before their discovery by lhcb . one could also include @xmath231 or @xmath232-nuclei states , see , e.g. , @xcite , where the possibility of @xmath233 states is also envisaged . the non - strange heavy pentaquark @xmath234 is related to the non - confirmed state claimed by h1 @xcite . in particular , there are many studies of bound states of charmed or doubly - charmed baryons with nucleons or with other singly or doubly charmed baryons @xcite . one can even speculate about a new periodic table , where the proton is replaced by @xmath235 and the neutron by @xmath236 @xcite . of course some rearrangement into triple charm and single charm should be taken into account .    in several model calculations , many interesting hadron - hadron systems are estimated at the edge between binding and non - binding . this means that 3-body or larger systems are probably bound as long as they are not suppressed by the fermi statistics . so , accounting for the @xmath75 states implies many other states .      in qcd , the gluon field carries a colour charge and coupled to itself . this lead to speculations about the existence of new neutral states , made essentially of gluons , except for @xmath237 loop corrections . this was sometimes hotly debated . i remember for instance that in his talk at the thessaloniki conference on antiprotons , van hove expressed doubts about the necessity of glueballs within qcd , though the written version was somewhat softened @xcite . the estimates for the mass and even the quantum numbers of the lightest glueball or gluonium has somewhat changed during the years . the situation is now stabilised , and is reviewed , e.g. , in @xcite . note that the lowest glueballs with unusual quantum numbers , such as @xmath238 , are sometimes found with rather high masses  @xcite . another sector that used to be rather fashionable is the one of hybrids . very schematically , hybrids combine quark(s ) , antiquark(s ) and gluons . there are even explicit constituent models in which the constituent gluon is given a mass , and interacts via an effective potential , see , e.g. ,  @xcite . the first approaches describes hybrids as an excitation of the string or , say , of the gluon field linking the quarks . some pioneering attempts can be found in  @xcite . in @xcite , a born - oppenheimer treatment was made , with a variant of the bag model used to estimate the energy of the gluon field . for a given interquark separation , the shape of the bag is adjusted as to give the lowest gluon energy . the ground state of the gluon field provide with the usual quarkonium potential . the first excited state of the gluon field is linked to the effective @xmath239 potential within a hybrid . the first @xmath240 hybrid was predicted near 4.0gev , and this estimate has been much refined with the bag model replaced by more elaborate lattice calculations @xcite , or effective field theory @xcite .    note that in the late 70s and early 80s , the motivation was that the hybrids would show up clearly atop a clean and well - understood charmonium spectrum ! with the proliferation of @xmath75 states , we realise today that identifying hybrids is a little more challenging .      the method of qcd sum rules ( qcdsr ) is a very ambitious and efficient approach , initiated by shifman , vainshtein and zakharov @xcite , allowing an interpolation between the rigorous perturbative regime and the long - range regime . for a review , see , e.g. , @xcite . it was first applied to ground - state mesons . there is no limitation , in principle , but the numerical stability become more and more delicate for excitations with the same quantum numbers as the ground state ( say , radial excitations ) . for baryons , the choice of the most appropriate operator is not unique , and triggered some debates . this is of course even more delicate for multiquarks . hence , the choice of the strategy is often dictated by models , such a diquark - antidiquark . a few groups have applied qcdsr to exotic states , in particular at montpellier , so paulo and peking , see , e.g. , @xcite for examples of early attempts , and @xcite for some reviews of the state of art over the years . needless to say that qcdsr calculations of multiquark exotics are extremely delicate and require weeks of cross - checks . so any overnight analysis published just after the release of a new experimental state should have been anticipated long in advance . lattice qcd ( lqcd ) is well known and well advertised , and hardly needs to be presented . for an introduction to the recent literature , see , e.g. , @xcite . dramatic progress have been accomplished on various aspects of strong interaction . there are interesting recent developments , for instance to study how the results behave numerically and have to depend theoretically on the pion mass . another extension deals with _ ab - initio _ nuclear physics , at least for light nuclei , and multiquark physics @xcite , with in particular , a renewed interest in the study of the @xmath192 dibaryon .    in the sector of heavy quark spectroscopy , lqcd has confirmed many important results obtained by simpler , but empirical , tools . for instance , the @xmath13 interaction of charmonium , including its spin dependence , has been estimated , in agreement with the current potential models . latter , the charmonium spectrum was calculated directly . as already mentioned , some decisive contributions were made for the study of hybrid mesons with hidden heavy flavour @xcite . a born - oppenheimer potential can be computed for other configurations , e.g. , double - charm baryons , and lqcd is very suited for the treatment of the light degrees of freedom .    for multiquarks , pure _ ab - initio _ studies are preceded by preliminary investigations inspired by models . for instance , in the sector of doubly - heavy mesons , an effective @xmath241 potential or an effective @xmath242 or @xmath243 interaction has been studied see , e.g. , @xcite . nowadays , multiquark states are often studied directly on the lattice , without the intermediate step of an effective potential . needless to say , lqcd faces difficulties as qcdsr , for the study of multiquark states . in the early days , the quantum numbers were not always clearly identified , and the genuine states were cleanly separated from the artefacts due to lattice boundaries . nowadays , the field is mature , and an impressive program of multiquark and multihadron physics has been developed by several groups @xcite .      in this section , we briefly survey some phenomenological models which have been used to predict some exotic hadrons or describe them after their discovery . it should be stressed , indeed , that if these models are more empirical than qcdsr and lqcd , they can be adapted more flexibly to describe the world of ordinary hadrons and used to extrapolate towards novel structures .      in the 70s , the hyperfine splitting among hadron multiplet was interpreted as the qcd analogue of the breit - fermi interaction in qed , namely the spin dependent part of the one - gluon exchange @xcite . the corresponding hyperfine interaction reads @xmath244 to be treated at first order , otherwise it requires some regularisation in the channels where it is attractive . a tensor term also contributes beyond @xmath4-waves .    in 1977 , jaffe applied this hamiltonian to the configuration @xmath190 with @xmath191 assuming _ i ) _ su(3)@xmath95 flavour symmetry , and _ ii ) _ that the short - range correlation @xmath245 has the same value as for ordinary baryons  @xcite . he found a remarkable coherence in the spin - colour operator , with @xmath246 for @xmath192 , to be compared to @xmath247 for @xmath199 or @xmath248 , i.e. , @xmath249 for the @xmath194 threshold . this means that the @xmath192 is bound below the @xmath194 threshold by half the @xmath7-@xmath199 splitting , about @xmath250mev . the @xmath192 was searched for in many experiments , without success so far . for instance , the double hypernucleus @xmath251[\lambda\lambda]{he}$ ] @xcite was not seen decaying into @xmath252 . the model has been reexamined thoroughly @xcite , with the result that any correction tends to reduce the binding , and eventually , the @xmath192 is pushed in the continuum . these corrections are : su(3)@xmath95 breaking , more realistic estimate of the short - short correlation ( a dibaryon is more dilute than a baryon ) , and proper inclusion of the full hamiltonian ( kinetic energy and spin - independent confinement besides @xmath253 ) . of course , some additional attraction such a scalar - isoscalar exchange between the two @xmath248 can restore the binding . meanwhile , some other configurations were found , for which the chromomagnetic interaction , if alone , induces binding . in 1987 , the grenoble group and h.j . lipkin @xcite proposed independently and simultaneously a heavy pentaquark @xmath254 , where @xmath255 or @xmath164 . with the same hypotheses as jaffe s for the @xmath192 , and assuming an infinite mass for the heavy antiquark @xmath256 , they found an optimal @xmath257 , to be compared to @xmath247 for the threshold @xmath258 , i.e. , the same binding energy @xmath250mev . in a series of papers @xcite , leandri and silvestre - brac applied the chromomagnetic operator @xmath259 with suitable changes for antiquarks , to a variety of configurations , and found several cases , for which the chromomagnetic interaction , if alone , induces binding . as noted by lichtenberg @xcite , the @xmath260 dependence is somewhat extreme , as heavy quarks give more compact wave - functions with larger short - range correlation factor . this led some authors to adopt a more empirical prescription , @xmath261 where the coefficients are taken from a fit to ordinary mesons and baryons @xcite . for instance , in the case of @xmath262 with @xmath83 , the diagonalisation of , supplemented by effective constituent masses , gives a state which corresponds nicely to the mass and properties of the @xmath48 . its narrowness comes from being almost a pure octet - octet state of colour in the channels @xmath263 . as most approaches based on quark dynamics , the chromomagnetic model predicts an isospin @xmath9 partner of @xmath48 , with @xmath264 and @xmath64 for the neutral , which is not yet seen experimentally . [ [ the - role - of - flavour - independence ] ] the role of flavour independence + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    in constituent models , one can switch off the spin - dependent part of the interaction , and study the limit of a pure central potential . its main property is _ flavour independence _ , with some interesting consequences , which are independent of the detailed shape of the interaction . in particular , if a constituent mass increases , the kinetic energy decreases , and one gets a lower energy , or , say , more binding . this explains why the @xmath15 family has more bound states than the @xmath265 family below the open - flavour threshold .    another well - studied consequence deals with doubly - heavy tetraquarks @xmath266 . the 4-body system benefits from the heavy - heavy interaction , which is absent in the @xmath267 threshold . hence , for a large enough @xmath268-to-@xmath269 mass ratio , the system becomes stable . explicit calculations with a colour - additive model @xmath270 normalised to the quarkonium potential @xmath271 , indicates that in such spin - independent interaction , @xmath158 is probably unbound , but @xmath272 stable @xcite . one hardly finds similar configurations . if , for instance , one considers @xmath273 within , there is no obvious gain with respect to the best threshold made of two baryons , but flavour independence dictates that before any spin corrections , the threshold @xmath274 is lower than @xmath275 . the stability of @xmath266 for large mass ratios is intimately related to the observation that the hydrogen molecule is more deeply bound ( in units of the threshold binding energy ) than the equal - mass molecules such as ps@xmath276 . the hamiltonian for @xmath277 reads @xmath278\\ { } + \left(\frac{1}{4\,m}-\frac{1}{4\,m}\right ) \left({\boldsymbol{p}}_1 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_2 ^ 2-{\boldsymbol{p}}_3 ^ 2-{\boldsymbol{p}}_4 ^ 2\right)~. \end{gathered}\ ] ] its @xmath279-breaking term @xmath280 lowers the ground - state energy with respect to the @xmath279-even part @xmath281 . since @xmath281 , a rescaled version of the ps@xmath276 molecule , and @xmath192 , have the same threshold , and since ps@xmath276 is stable , h@xmath276 is even more stable . clearly , the coulomb character of @xmath282 hardly matters in this reasoning . the key property is that the potential does not change when the masses are modified . in the case of a simple spin - independent potential with the colour - additive rule  , one does not get binding for @xmath283 , but binding shows up when @xmath284 increases .    note that , if one breaks the symmetry of ps@xmath276 differently and considers instead @xmath285 configurations , stability is lost for @xmath286 , or , of course , @xmath287 @xcite . a protonium atom can not polarise strongly enough a positronium atom and attach it . similarly a chromoelectric potential can not produce a bound @xmath288 tetraquark : one needs chromomagnetism or long - range yukawa interaction .    [ [ more - detailed - comparison - of - ps_2-and - tetraquark ] ] more detailed comparison of ps@xmath276 and tetraquark + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    another problem is to understand why the positronium molecule ps@xmath276 ( neglecting annihilation ) lies slightly below its dissociation threshold , while a chromo - electric model , associated with the colour - additive rule  , does not bind ( at least according to most computations , an exception being @xcite ) . this is due to a larger disorder in the colour coefficients than in the electrostatic strength factors @xmath289 entering the coulomb potential in ps@xmath276 . consider , indeed , a 4-body hamiltonian scaled to @xmath290={\boldsymbol{p}}_1 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_2 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_3 ^ 2+{\boldsymbol{p}}_4 ^ 2 + \sum_{i < j } g_{ij}\,v(r_{ij})~ , \qquad g=\{g_{ij}\}~,\ ] ] with @xmath291 , having at least one bound state in the symmetric case @xmath292 for which @xmath293 @xmath294 . the variational principle , with the solution of this symmetric case as a trial function , implies that @xmath295)\le \min(h[g_0])~,\ ] ] so that , schematically , the more asymmetric the distribution @xmath216 , the lower the ground - state energy . for the cases of interest , one could be more precise , as the distribution is of the type @xmath296 . the ground - state energy @xmath297 is convex as a function of @xmath298 , and , since maximal at @xmath299 , it is convexly decreasing as a function of @xmath300 for both @xmath301 and @xmath302 . if one compares two values of @xmath298 with opposite sign , then it is a good guess , but not a rigorous statement , to say that the larger @xmath300 , the lower the energy , as @xmath297 is nearly parabolic near @xmath299 .    now consider the actual values in table  [ tab : coeff - tetra ] . .strength coefficients for the positronium molecule and the tetraquark states with colour wave - function @xmath303 or @xmath304 , as well as for their threshold . the list of coefficients is of the type @xmath305 after suitable renumbering , and summarised as @xmath306 , where @xmath307 is the symmetric case @xmath308 . [ tab : coeff - tetra ] [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     the asymmetry parameter @xmath300 is much larger for ps@xmath276 than for @xmath309 . this explains why the positronium molecule is bound . means that ps@xmath276 benefits from correlation and anticorrelation effects in the various pairs . ] a tetraquark with a pure @xmath310 colour structure has its asymmetry parameter smaller than that of the threshold and has the same sign , so this toy model is rigorously unbound . for @xmath304 , the signs are different , and the magnitude are comparable , so the analysis is more delicate . we note that @xmath311 for ps@xmath276 results in a fragile binding , so it is not surprising that @xmath312 leaves @xmath304 unbound in numerical studies .    to summarise , the tetraquark is penalised by the non - abelian character of the colour algebra in the simple model , and its stability can not rely on the asymmetries of the potential energy . it should use other asymmetries , in particular through the masses entering the kinetic energy , or spin effects , or mixing of @xmath310 and @xmath313 , or the coupling to decay channels , etc . [ [ string - dynamics-1 ] ] string dynamics + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    the prescription is of course rather crude , as it treats colour as a global variable similar to isospin , and assumes arbitrarily the choice of a pairwise interaction . it can be justified in the limiting cases were @xmath314 quarks are clustered and the last quark isolated . so it might provide a reasonable interpolation for other spatial configurations .    as mentioned earlier , an alternative is the @xmath315-shape interaction of fig . [ fig : string1 ] , now used to estimate a potential which reads @xmath316 if @xmath317 is the linear confinement of mesons . note that features the minimal path linking three points , an old problem first raised by fermat and torricelli . and the value of the minimal sum of distances  @xcite . ] for baryons alone , solving the 3-quark problem with instead of the perimeter - based confinement @xmath318 is technically more involved , but does not change the patterns of the excitation spectrum .    for tetraquarks , a precursor of non - pairwise potential was the flip - flop model @xcite , with quadratic confinement . in the more recent linear version , one takes the minimum of the two possible meson - meson pairing configurations and the connected diagram shown in fig . [ fig : tetra - string ] . the good surprise is that this potential is more attractive than the one deduced from the colour - additive rule and thus is more favourable for binding @xcite . the same property is observed for the pentaquark @xcite , fig . [ fig : penta - string ] , the dibaryon , fig . [ fig : hexa - string ] and the system made of 3 quarks and 3 antiquarks @xcite , fig .  [ fig:3q-3qbar - string ] . however , this string potential corresponds to a kind of born - oppenheimer approximation for the colour fluxes at given quark positions . it mixes colour @xmath319 and @xmath320 for any pair of quark , to optimise the overall energy . thus it holds for quarks bearing different flavours . in @xcite , an attempt is proposed to combine quark statistics and string dynamics in the case of tetraquarks with identical quarks or antiquarks : not surprisingly , the possibility of binding is reduced .             +     note that in the above potential models , there is no explicit junction _  la _ rossi and veneziano : the minimal length is the only guidance , and nothing refrain a transition from a disconnected flip - flop to a connected string . it is observed , however , that the ground - state uses mainly the flip - flop term , so there are probably two classes of states : the lowest have the same number of junctions as the thrshold , and thus are rather broad if the fall - apart decay is energetically allowed . the second class might be higher in mass , but benefits from a kind of metastability due to its junction content . these string - inspired potentials , however simplistic , have motivated some studies . for instance , the literature on steiner trees helps in optimising the location of the junctions and the estimate of the minimal strength  @xcite .      as discussed at length in sec . [ sse : chromoelectric ] , the tetraquark @xmath266 might become stable by the sole effect of chromomagnetic forces , but the stability requires a very large @xmath284 mass ratio . it was also noticed @xcite , that some configurations such as @xmath83 , there is a favourable spin - spin interaction in the light sector that benefits the tetraquark and not the threshold . a calculation by rosina et al . @xcite , using a potential tuned to fit the ordinary hadrons , and the colour - additive rule , demonstrated stability for @xmath321 , and this was confirmed by vijande et al . there are not too many similar configurations , in which both chromoelectric and chromomagnetic effects are favourable . for instance , for the doubly - flavoured dibaryons @xmath273 , the two thresholds @xmath274 and @xmath322 are nearly degenerate , at least in case the charm , @xmath323 . the former threshold benefits from the chromoelectric attraction between the two heavy quarks , while the second can receive a favourable chromomagnetic interaction . it is , however , difficult for the 6-quark configuration to combine astutely the two effects , and double - charm baryons seem hardly stable in constituent models  @xcite . once a model is adopted , typically @xmath324~,\ ] ] or a more complicated model involving multi - body forces , one is left with solving the wave equation to obtain the energies and the wavefunctions .    in the case of quarkonium , there are dozens of reliable numerical methods , starting with the one proposed by hartree @xcite , consisting of matching a regular outgoing solution and a regular incoming solution of the radial equation . most methods can be extended to the case of coupled equations in the unnatural - parity channels , similar to the @xmath325 coupling of the deuteron in nuclear physics . many rigorous results have been revisited and developed for studies related to the quarkonium : scaling law , virial - like theorems , level order , value of wave - function at the origin for the successive radial excitations , etc . this is reviewed in @xcite . the 3-body problem one has to solve for baryons is often a psychological barrier that refrain to envisage a detailed and rigorous treatment beyond the harmonic oscillator , and there is sometimes a confusion between the `` constituent model of baryons '' and the  harmonic oscillator model of baryons  . for instance , the negative - parity excitation being half - way of the positive - parity excitation is a property of the latter , but not necessarily of the former .    for baryons , there are just a few rigorous results , for instance dealing the level order of states when the degeneracy obtained in the harmonic oscillator or hyperscalar limit are lifted at first order @xcite . as for the numerical solution , various methods have been used , such as hyperspherical expansion , faddeev equations , or variational methods , with a comparison in @xcite . note that among the latter , the expansion on a harmonic - oscillator basis is less and less adopted , as it does not give good convergence for the short - range correlation parameters which enter some decays and some production mechanisms .    for multiquark systems , the hyperspherical expansion works rather well @xcite , especially for deeply bound states , if any , for which the various r.m.s . radii are of the same order of magnitude . the tendency is towards the method of gaussian expansion , already used in quantum chemistry . if @xmath326 are jacobi variable describing the relative motion of the @xmath199-body system , then the wave - function is sought as @xmath327\,|a\rangle~,\ ] ] where @xmath328 denotes the basis of internal colour - spin - flavour states needed to construct the most general colour singlet of given overall spin and flavour , and @xmath329 is a @xmath330 definite positive symmetric matrix . for a given set of matrices @xmath329 , the weight factors @xmath331 are given by a generalised eigenvalue equation . then the range parameters entering the @xmath329 are minimised numerically . this latter task is not obvious , and sophisticated techniques have been developed , such as the stochastic search  @xcite , and the method of hiyama , kino and kamimura @xcite , in which a specific choice of jacobi variables is chosen in each channel . the variational energies below the threshold are interpreted as bound states . the scaling properties of the states above the threshold are scrutinised to decide whether they are genuine resonances or artefacts of the finite variational expansion . this is somewhat similar to the analyses of states above the threshold in qcdsr or lqcd . [ [ diquarks ] ] diquarks + + + + + + + +    hadron spectroscopy with diquarks has ups and downs , or , say , pros and cons . the art of physics is to identity effective degrees of freedom at a certain scale , and any simplification is welcome . the concept of diquark is very useful to describe many phenomenons such a multiple production @xcite , and might be legitimated by boson - fermion symmetry @xcite . in spectroscopy , the diquark model provides a simple physical picture that might be obscured in complicated three - body calculations , and it provides an efficient tool for investigating exotics @xcite . some reservations are however expressed about the abundant literature on diquarks , which is sometimes confusing , as some recent papers do refer to the old ones :    * explicit quark model calculations find diquark correlations , but the effect depends on a somewhat arbitrary regularisation of the chromomagnetic interaction @xcite . in other studies , no diquark clustering is found for the ground state @xcite . this means that the diquark picture of low - lying baryons implies a change of dynamics . on the other hand , a dynamical diquark formation is obtained for highly excited baryons : if the total angular momentum @xmath332 increases , it is first shared equally among the 3 quarks , but at larger @xmath332 the third quark takes @xmath333 while the two first are mainly in a relative @xmath4-wave ( of course modulo permutations ) @xcite . * the diquark model becomes a good approximation for the ground state of double - charm baryons @xmath334 provided it is handled and interpreted properly , since a part of the @xmath241 interaction comes from the third quark . in the case of the harmonic oscillator , with the usual definition of the jacobi variables @xmath97 and @xmath335 , one notices that @xmath336 , so the direct @xmath241 interaction @xmath337 gets a 50% increase from the light quark . moreover , the first excitations of @xmath334 ( besides spin ) occur with @xmath338 , so a new diquark has to be estimated for each level . in fact a born - oppenheimer treatment  la h@xmath200 is more appropriate . [ [ bornoppenheimer ] ] born  oppenheimer + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    along this review , we stressed the importance of the born - oppenheimer point of view : the quarkonium potential is just an effective interaction integrating out the gluon and light - quark degrees of freedom surrounding a heavy quark and a heavy antiquark ; doubly - heavy baryons @xmath334 have typically two scales of energy for its spectrum , the excitation energy of the @xmath241 pair , and the excitation energy of the light quark , and this comes very naturally in the born - oppenheimer treatment , as it does in atomic physics for h@xmath200 . we also mentioned that hybrid mesons , schematically noted @xmath339 have been studied by estimating an `` excited quarkonium potential '' : for a given @xmath239 separation , the energy of the excited gluon field is computed either from a simple bag model , or from lqcd . a born - oppenheimer treatment of @xmath266 would also be feasible , to cross - check the 4-body calculations discussed in sec . [ sse : chromoelectric ] . recently , a very comprehensive and unifying born - oppenheimer treatment of the @xmath75 states was presented @xcite , with a series of effective @xmath239 potentials adapted to the quantum states of the light constituents ( gluon and light quarks ) . this work could of course be generalised as to include @xmath340 instead of @xmath341 in the light sector , and applied to the lhcb pentaquarks . there are interesting alternatives for the coupling of @xmath239 to light quarks and antiquarks . for instance , a relatively weak interaction between @xmath12 or @xmath342 with nuclei has been proposed , but , once more , this potential is probed by a particle which is heavy enough to get bound . in _ , the compact @xmath239 is trapped inside an extended light hadron . see @xcite . in the future , the field of exotic hadrons might be extended very far , if some new constituents are discovered , for instance at lhc . as stressed by many authors ( see , for instance , @xcite ) , some anomalies in the higgs branching ratios , and the other recent observations at cern might indicate the existence of heavy scalars . among the many possible scenarios , there is the possibility of scalar quarks with colour charge @xmath343 , having the same colour - mediated interaction as the ordinary quarks , except of course for spin and statistics . perhaps the lowest of theses scalars will live long enough to hadronise , and give rise to new hadrons .    the lifetime of the hypothetical scalar quarks would of course be crucial . remember that for many years the potential model of charmonium and bottomonium was extrapolated towards topomonium . then it was realised that , when the mass of @xmath209 quark is too large , its weak decay becomes too fast for hadronisation to take place  @xcite . if this is the case for any new super - heavy quark or squark , then the realm of exotic hadrons will remain the privilege of low - energy hadron physics . let us consider a scenario with heavy scalar quarks of colour @xmath343 , as predicted by supersymmetry or any other bsm ( beyond standard model ) theory . ( there are speculations about colour @xmath320 or other gauge groups . ) we note them `` squarks '' without necessarily endorsing supersymmetry . then , one gets squarkonia ( @xmath344 ) , and perhaps the scalar ground state could be responsible for the excess tentatively seen at 750gev . see , e.g. , @xcite . i apologise for the lack of space needed to cite the other @xmath345 relevant references , and the lack of expertise to separate the really innovative papers from the `` ambulance chasing '' opportunities @xcite . the lightest charged hadron is likely @xmath346 for @xmath347 with charge @xmath348 or @xmath349 of @xmath350 type , but spin 0 , if @xmath351 with charge @xmath352 . the baryon sector becomes entertaining if several squarks are put together . for instance @xmath353 has quantum numbers @xmath110 as the @xmath354 disquark contains one unit of orbital excitation , to fulfill the bose statistics . the triply - superexotic @xmath355 requires a fully antisymmetric wave function @xmath356 , as per eq .   that was proposed 50 years ago for the last member of the @xmath357 multiplet for light baryons , the so - called @xmath358 $ ] multiplet in the notation of , e.g. ,  @xcite . fifty years after the first baryon conference , the physics has evolved , but one uses the same wave function ( besides some scaling ) . exotic hadrons are coming up and down , or back and forth if one prefers . for outsiders , there is somewhat a discredit on a field in which many states regularly show up rapidly and then disappear within a few years , with many papers hastily written to explain the new hadrons , and never any deep understanding on why the models fail . this is of course , a superficial view . the truth is that the experiments are very difficult , due to a low statistics for a signal above an intricate background . the situation is even worse for broad resonances . as often stressed @xcite , the location of the peak might depend on the production process and on the final state , so that there is often the question on whether two or more candidates correspond to the same `` state '' . so far , several mass ranges and flavour sectors have been investigated with already a few good candidates for exotics such as @xmath48 . the main lesson of the last decades is clearly the richness of the configurations mixing heavy and light constituents . the hidden - charm sector is already much explored , and even if the recent discoveries have to be checked , refined and completed , there is clearly an urgent need for investigating the double charm and other flavor exotic sectors . hopefully , there will be an emulation between electron - positron machines , proton colliders , heavy - ion collisions and intense hadron facilities to develop this program . on the theory side , the fundamental approaches such as lqcd or qcdsr involve lengthy calculations and usually come second , to clarify some predictions . first appear the speculations based on more empirical models , inspired by qcd .    in phenomenological qcd , _ arx tarpeia capitoli proxima _ : physicists inventing molecules or quark clusters that account for the latest exotics are praised for their inspiration , invited to many workshops and conferences , hired in committees , etc . , but , when the states disappear , the same model - builders are pointed out as lacking rigour and corrupting the field . to be honest , it often happens that the pioneers have written their predictions rather carefully , with many warnings about the width of states in the continuum , but that the followers have developed the models beyond any reasonable control , with tables and tables of states which simply fall part .    for one of the models of multiquarks , a warning was set @xcite that only a few states will show up as peaks , the others , being very broad , just paving the continuum , but the warning was often forgotten . pandora box syndrome _ affects practically all approaches . for instance , the molecular picture was first focused on one - pion exchange , with strict selection rules , that makes the interaction repulsive in any second channel . with the exchange of vector mesons , and the old - fashioned potentials replaced by effective theories , the molecular picture has gained some respectability , but has dramatically widened the spectrum of predictions . in the diquark model , frederikson and jandel @xcite discussed the existence of possible dibaryons , and the problem was rediscovered recently @xcite , that the picture of @xmath75 as diquark - antidiquark states probably implies higher configurations . this is why genuinely exotic states , lying below their dissociation threshold , will always play a privileged role , and the searches in the sector of double heavy flavour should be given the highest priority .    in any case , the studies on the mechanisms of confinement and the resulting nuclear forces should be pursued . the strong - coupling limit of qcd and lattice simulations explain how a linear confinement is developed between a quark and an antiquark . it is already more delicate to understand its extension to baryons , with possible interplay between @xmath7-shape and @xmath315-shape configurations for the gluon density , and even more speculative to write down a confining hamiltonian for multiquarks . what remain to be further investigated , based on the already rich literature is how clustering sometimes occur in baryons and higher multiquarks , and how the linear confinement breaks to lead to the actual decay of resonances and the virtual hadron - hadron components , i.e. , to operate the matching of the quark dynamics and the long - range hadron - hadron interaction . this review benefited from stimulating discussions with my past and present collaborators and with many colleagues . it was completed during a visit at riken , in the framework of a jsps - cnrs agreement , and finalised during a visit at ect*. the hospitality provided by emiko hiyama , by jochen wambach , and by their colleagues is gratefully acknowledged . thanks are also due to m.  asghar for very interesting comments on the manuscript .    300ifxundefined [ 1 ] ifx#1 ifnum [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo ifx [ 1 ] # 1firstoftwo secondoftwo `` `` # 1''''@noop [ 0]secondoftwosanitize@url [ 0 ]  + 12$12  & 12#1212_12%12@startlink[1]@endlink[0]@bib@innerbibempty http://cds.cern.ch/record/100978[__ ] ( ,  , )   http://cds.cern.ch/record/107749[__ ]  ( ,  ,  ) http://cds.cern.ch/record/317696[__ ]  ( ,  ,  ) link:\doibase    10.1103/revmodphys.34.766 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrev.101.1570 [ * * ,   ( ) ] http://cds.cern.ch/record/107781[__ ] ( ,  , ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.142.1000 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1088/1674 - 1137/38/9/090001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.07.006 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   in  http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0105412[__ ]  ( ) p.   link:\doibase    10.1016/s0375 - 9474(97)00348 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/s0375 - 9474(97)00694 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2013.10.040 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.005 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 [ ( ) ,  10.1016/j.physrep.2016.05.004 ] ,   https://books.google.fr/books?id=r_27t1yxxqac[__ ] ,  cambridge monographs on particle physics , nuclear physics and cosmology  ( ,  ) , ed . ,  http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/proceeding/aipcp/1735[__ ] ,  vol . ( ) , , , ,  and  ,  eds . , http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/findarticle?series=sup&vol=8&page=503[__ ] ,  vol . ( ) @noop link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2005.04.011 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2003.05.003 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.08.113 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1063/1.1482444 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,  , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.79.1630 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.241803 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   in  https://inspirehep.net/record/1409299/files/arxiv:1512.03699.pdf[__ ] ( )   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.03.001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , @noop link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.90.242001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.68.032002 ,    10.1103/physrevd.75.119908 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,  ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.32.189 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(79)90347 - 2 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(82)90140 - 7 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1143/ptp.117.1077 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2007.03.173 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1140/epja / i2006 - 10199 - 0 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.91.094020 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.93.034035 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.39.1506 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.16.799 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.212001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.096 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.88.054029 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.70.071102 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x09046576 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(86)91013 - 0 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.69.2337 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.72.092004 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.89.102001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,  ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   ( )  ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.100.142001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.98.082001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.100.202001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.96.082003 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.092001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.104.112004 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.101.172001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.82.094008 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.71.031501 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.110.252002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.041 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   in  http://inspirehep.net/record/1415952/files/arxiv:1601.05025.pdf[__ ]  ( )   @noop   ( ) , link:\doibase    10.1088/0954 - 3899/37/7/075017 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * , ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1088/0034 - 4885/76/7/076301 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1142/s0218301392000242 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(60)90001 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.18.4187 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.013 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x02012715 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,  ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.18.801 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrev.165.1770 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(72)90491 - 9 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(71)90291 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(75)90104 - 2 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/revmodphys.52.s1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.91.012002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1007/s002180050406 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop ( ) link:\doibase    10.1140/epjh / e2012 - 20032 - 0 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1140/epjc / s2004 - 01815 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.75.114018 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.101.232002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.80.072003 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.110.182001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.83.094005 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.114.062004 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.66.014008 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/s0920 - 5632(02)01948 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.74.011103 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.89.052003 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1007/jhep12(2013)090 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1146/annurev - nucl-102711 - 094949 [ * * , ( ) ] ,  ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.90.094007 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/s0370 - 2693(02)03069 - 1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.74.094003 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 2693(87)91244 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(87)90055 - 4 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.81.44 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/s0370 - 2693(99)00058 - 1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2004.03.012 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s2004 - 02042 - 9 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.73.091101 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , https://cds.cern.ch/record/298433[__ ] ,  ( ,  ,  ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.115.072001 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1007/jhep07(2014)103 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1140/epja / i2015 - 15152 - 6 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.93.094001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.117.082003 , 10.1103/physrevlett.117.109902 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,  ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.92.031502 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.94.034002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.068 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop ( ) ,   @noop link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.35.128 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.48.1926 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.50.1796 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.59.1878 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.63.1570 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.53.423 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.112.202301 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.90.035204 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.39.1889 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/s00601 - 012 - 0390 - 6 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1093/ptep / ptv076 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase    10.1016/0375 - 9474(96)00211 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1142/s0217979207037855 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.38.195 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1098/rspa.1989.0115 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/28/7/323 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.59.627 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.92.065202 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.47.903 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 1573(93)90141-y [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop   ( ) , ,   link:\doibase    10.1007/s00601 - 011 - 0296 - 8 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.65.041001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/42/2/025103 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.91.014003 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.94.024002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1209/epl / i2003 - 00176 - 1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevlett.80.1876 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.05.118 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physreva.67.034702 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.21.950 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/jhep06(2016)041 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(80)90906 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(77)90081 - 8 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.17.1444 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(78)90872 - 9 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrev.76.1739 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 1573(78)90190 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(79)90091 - 5 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * , ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.21.203 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01413192 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.88.015207 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.78.034007 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.86.014004 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.92.014005 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   in  @noop _ _  ( )   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.08.022 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.88.056012 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1088/1674 - 1137/36/1/002 , 10.1088/1674 - 1137/36/3/006 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.69.055202 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.86.034019 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.115.122001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.80.034008 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.01.022 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.85.014015 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2011.09.088 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.89.035201 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.84.014031 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.86.014020 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.03.050 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   in  http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0082623[__ ]  ( ) link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/40/4/043001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.01.017 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1007/s00601 - 008 - 0263 - 1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * , ( ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(80)90491 - 8 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(84)90473 - 8 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.92.114019 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90022 - 1 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90023 - 3 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(79)90024 - 5 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.75.014005 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.78.034012 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2010.10.064 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) ,  ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.162002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.106.162001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1063/1.3647373 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1093/ptep / pts010 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.92.054002 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1063/1.4949382 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevc.57.3384 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.60.054012 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.93.034501 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.87.212502 [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(83)91523-x [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.33.2043 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.36.2079 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0146 - 6410(90)90023-w [ * * , ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.40.2340 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.45.4221 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.51.3628 [ * * ,   ( ) ] in  http://alice.cern.ch/format/showfull?sysnb=0160281[__ ]  ( ) link:\doibase    10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 006 - 0142 - 1 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase    10.1103/physreva.57.4956 [ * * ,   ( ) ] in  @noop _ _ ,  ( )  p.   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.70.014009 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.018 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/0003 - 4916(86)90088 - 6 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.76.114013 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevc.81.015205 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.85.014019 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.87.034040 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s2003 - 01416 - 9 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.008 [ * * , ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 009 - 1050-y [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01413104 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.76.094027 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.94.034038 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   http://cds.cern.ch/record/112712[__ ]  ( ,  ,  ) link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 1573(79)90095 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 1573(80)90031 - 9 [ * * ,   ( ) ] http://cds.cern.ch/record/847188[__ ] , cambridge monographs on particle physics , nuclear physics , and cosmology ( ,  , ) link:\doibase 10.1016/0550 - 3213(90)90144 - 3 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 2693(91)90163-k [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 1573(92)90078-e [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.85.693 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1016/s0146 - 6410(03)90015 - 9 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/revmodphys.65.1199 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1142/s0217751x16300295 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1088/0954 - 3899/23/8/001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1007/bf01344395 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.38.1519 [ * * ,   ( ) ] @noop * * ,   ( ) link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.90.014044 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.086 [ * * ,   ( ) ] , link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.87.091501 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1142/s0217751x15502012 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/0370 - 2693(86)91275-x [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1103/physrevd.93.055042 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   @noop   ( ) , link:\doibase 10.1016/0370 - 1573(83)90114-x [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1140/epjad / s2004 - 03 - 010 - 4 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1088/1674 - 1137/40/4/042001 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevd.19.2105 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase 10.1103/physrevlett.48.14 [ * * ,   ( ) ] link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2015.08.049 [ * * ,   ( ) ] ,   link:\doibase    10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 [ * * ,   ( ) ]
Abstract:

Answer: the physics of exotic hadrons is revisited and reviewed , with emphasis on flavour configurations which have not yet been investigated . the constituent quark model of multiquark states is discussed in some detail , as it can serve as a guide for more elaborate approaches .