Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the cms experiment at the large hadron collider ( lhc ) announced  @xcite recently that , for standard model ( sm ) with four quark generations ( 4 g ) ,  the higgs boson in the mass range of 120 to 600 gev is excluded at the 95% c.l . " . the atlas experiment is in agreement  @xcite . a common inference is that the 4 g itself is practically ruled out . afterall , cms also reported the most stringent bounds on the @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks to date : @xmath20 gev  @xcite and @xmath21 gev  @xcite , both at 95% c.l . , which are rather close to the unitarity bound ( ub ) of 500550 gev  @xcite . however , in as much as 4 g may not exist , an intriguing possibility  @xcite is that electroweak symmetry breaking ( ewsb ) itself might be triggered by , or related to , the strong yukawa couplings of the @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks . can the ub violation of strong @xmath22 scattering  @xcite be related to the ub violation of strong @xmath23 and @xmath24 scattering ? to pursue such questions is a major purpose of the lhc , and is well within its abilities . if a relatively light higgs particle emerges soon at the lhc with sm cross sections , then 4 g would truly be in trouble  @xcite . but , the exclusion statement of sm/4 g higgs might well get extended to the sm higgs itself with 2011 - 2012 lhc data . for higgs particle beyond 600 gev or so , one enters the strong @xmath22 scattering domain , and the  higgs " becomes a broad object  @xcite , which requires both high energy ( 14 tev ) and high luminosity to explore . for such a heavy higgs boson , if the @xmath2 or @xmath3 quarks were however found below 500550 gev or so , then the yukawa sector may not be strongly coupled enough to link with the strongly coupled  higgs sector " . thus , we have in mind the scenario where neither the ( sm - like ) higgs boson , nor the 4 g quarks , are found below 600 gev and 500550 gev , respectively . it is important to remember that new @xmath25 violating phases associated with 4 g quarks may link to  @xcite the baryon asymmetry of the universe ( bau ) . thus , the existence of a very heavy 4 g may touch both ewsb and bau , which are two of the greatest problems in particle physics . this provides strong motivation for continuing the pursuit of 4 g in this volatile time . if the higgs boson is heavy ( and  fat " ) , while the 4 g quarks are above the ub , then whether the large yukawa coupling induces @xmath23 condensation  @xcite or not , it would be important to explore possible _ bound states _ of this strong coupling . this is not just about potentially interesting lhc phenomenology , but may be necessary to provide a guide for the search of ultraheavy chiral quarks beyond ub . the main purpose of this paper is to explore lower lying bound states of strong yukawa coupling , and the associated properties . however , by venturing above the ub , one immediately encounters the perils of the breaking down of perturbation theory . thus , in lieu of genuine nonperturbative approaches , such as  @xcite lattice field theory ( lft ) , our work is only of an illustrative kind . one aid to the study is a new , heavy isospin . if 4 g quarks exist , by which we mean a sequential left - handed doublet and a pair of right - handed singlets under the weak interaction , the @xmath26 , @xmath27 variables  @xcite or electroweak precision tests ( ewprt ) require the @xmath2 and @xmath3 to be nearly degenerate ( and here , independently , a heavier higgs is also required  @xcite ) . of course , some small splitting is needed to satisfy @xmath27 , but in this paper we will treat the @xmath2 and @xmath3 as degenerate , hence one has a new  isospin " . this isospin , in contrast to the chiral limit of @xmath28 and @xmath29 quarks under qcd , is in the opposite limit of degenerate _ we thus borrow the notation of isovector @xmath30 , @xmath31 ( or @xmath32 $ ] ) and isoscalar @xmath33 , @xmath34 ( or @xmath35 ) etc . , for the heavy @xmath36  mesons " . as we will see , unlike technicolor , the  @xmath31 " meson does not play a major role for yukawa bound states , nor does the @xmath33 . another interesting point is that , if the yukawa interaction is the dominant binding mechanism , since it is color blind , the @xmath36 mesons , unlike the qcd situation , come not only in color singlets , but color octets as well  @xcite . we find the states @xmath37 , @xmath38 , @xmath10 and @xmath39 , where the subscript indicates the color representation , to be of phenomenological interest . in particular , @xmath37 and @xmath10 may be accessible in the near future .    in sec . ii , we bring forth the issues of strongly coupled relativistic bound states . we contrast the necessarily relativistic @xmath40 coupling of weak nambu  goldstone boson ( ng ) , or longitudinal vector boson exchange , to the coulombic qcd bound state , as well as scalar exchange . because the higgs scalar should be treated as heavy now , its effect is less prominent than ng exchange . we compare the traditional relativistic expansion  @xcite with a relativistic bethe - salpeter approach  @xcite , and illustrate why the yukawa bound state involves highly relativistic motion of its constituents . an issue appears regarding the treatment of @xmath41-channel ng exchange , towards strong yukawa binding . this , plus other issues , forces us to compromise in the study of the possible spectrum at this stage , and we restrict ourselves to @xmath42 in the range of 500700 gev , i.e. not far above the ub . in this way , the relativistic expansion provides a partial guide , while we offer a peek beyond and consider binding energies of order @xmath43 gev or more , for the possible spectrum around and above the tev scale . this leads us to focus on , from the production point of view , an @xmath37 state ( effectively a  @xmath44 " , or gluon - prime ) , as well as possibly the @xmath10 and @xmath38 states in its decay final state . in sec . iii we turn to exploring the production and decay properties . we survey the key parameters needed : the binding energy , the vector  pseudoscalar and octet  singlet mass splittings , the vector meson decay constant @xmath45 , and the quark mixing element @xmath13 . production is mostly through @xmath46 and depend only on @xmath45 , but the annihilation , transition , and free quark decays involve all these parameters , where the numerical values we use are only illustrative . we find , in general , that the @xmath37 is relatively narrow , but has a host of decay final states , which might therefore elude early detection . we offer some discussion of the phenomenology at lhc in sec . iv , touching briefly on _ deep _ bound states , i.e. the possibility of binding energy approaching @xmath42 itself , for @xmath42 beyond 700 gev . we end with a conclusion and outlook . when the unitarity bound is reached for very heavy chiral quarks , it means that some _ tree level _ @xmath23 and @xmath24 scattering cross sections will violate unitarity , or conservation of probability , in the high energy limit . pointed out over 30 years ago  @xcite , it is remarkable that we are now at the doorsteps to probe whether such new heavy chiral quarks exist . many , if not most people , tacitly take the ub as a kind of ceiling for sm - like chiral quarks to make sense . but in reality , crossing the ub just implies that the yukawa couplings are becoming so strong , they are turning nonperturbative . we have seen how the remarkable theory of qcd turns nonperturbative in the infrared , resulting in the rich phenomena of hadrons . we will not dwell on deeper short - distance ( uv ) gauge theories like technicolor , but just take the large yukawa couplings  @xcite at face value : if chiral quarks @xmath47 ( a left - handed doublet of @xmath2 and @xmath3 in our case ) exist at or above the ub , what could be the emergent phenomena ? consider first heavy quarkonia bound by qcd . since qcd is perturbative at short distance , we have the familiar coulombic bound states with a @xmath48 enhancement factor , where @xmath49 is the velocity . this is the domain of non - relativistic qcd ( nrqcd ) , where one expands in velocity , which is of order @xmath50 . the nr nature makes good contact with the familiar atomic systems . exchanging higgs bosons brings in the yukawa couplings , which has been considered in the literature . for our case , we will treat the higgs boson as above  @xcite 600 gev and heavy , which suppresses the binding effect due to higgs exchange . however , ng or longitudinal vector boson exchange ( transverse gauge boson exchange has coupling constant @xmath51 or @xmath52 , hence subdominant and largely ignored by us ) also couples with the yukawa coupling strength , but it involves the @xmath40 , which couples the upper and lower components of the massive dirac quark . since the lower component vanishes when the heavy quark is at rest , ng exchange is suppressed in the nr limit . conversely , the coupling to high momentum heavy quarks is large , the more so the heavier the quark . this reflects the derivative coupling nature of longitudinal vector bosons . the upshot is that , yukawa interactions between very heavy quarks are large when these quarks are in relativistic relative motion , i.e. with momentum @xmath53 .    with this insight , and ignoring the higgs exchange for the moment , if the bound state formation is dominated by qcd , then the nr nature of the bound state ( @xmath54 ) actually suppresses the effect of yukawa coupling . however , as the yukawa coupling increases with @xmath42 , although the qcd - bound system becomes even more nonrelativistic , at some point ng exchange would ( perhaps suddenly ) take over , and one would find the bound state system turns ultrarelativistic . we shall illustrate with two different perspectives , one a traditional relativistic expansion  @xcite , the other a relativistic bethe - salpeter approach  @xcite . a standard approach in considering bound state phenomena is to make a relativistic expansion around the leading potential . the higgs potential for very heavy quarks , in the context of forming bound states , was considered a long time ago  @xcite . the relativistic corrections were recently calculated in ref . the scattering amplitudes for @xmath17-channel higgs , neutral and charged ng ( called fictitious scalar in ref . @xcite ) , and gluon exchange , as well as @xmath41-channel ng exchange , were computed . @xcite , however , did not put in @xmath41-channel higgs and gluon exchange , even though both color singlet and octet @xmath23 configurations were discussed . touching both @xmath55 gev and @xmath56 cases , a variational approach was used to estimate the size @xmath57 ( equivalent to wavefunction ) and binding energy for @xmath58 , @xmath59 , color singlet and octet states . we will not repeat what was already done here , but just give some salient features . as a control on validity of the relativistic ( @xmath60 or @xmath61 ) expansion , the authors of ref . @xcite required @xmath62 ( @xmath63 is the relative momentum ) , which translates into @xmath64 . since @xmath17-channel gluon exchange gives the coulomb potential , it is clear that one has a coulombic qcd bound state when @xmath42 is not yet too large , with bohr radius @xmath65 . the low mass higgs case is no longer tenable with 4 g , both by direct search  @xcite , and indirectly  @xcite from ewprt due to the heaviness of 4 g quarks . for the heavy higgs case illustrated with @xmath56 , as one can see from fig . 8 of ref . @xcite , the radii @xmath57 of the @xmath38 , @xmath66 and @xmath67 ( the subscript @xmath68 stands for color singlet ) states decrease rather slowly below @xmath65 as @xmath42 increases . the @xmath39 radius rises slowly above @xmath65 due to the extra repulsion it receives from @xmath41-channel ng exchange . the yukawa effect is subdominant compared with qcd , where inspection of the binding energies offer further support : they rise slowly from @xmath69 gev around @xmath70 gev , to @xmath71 gev at @xmath72 gev , with @xmath39 only slightly lower . however , just before @xmath42 reaches 400 gev , radius @xmath57 for @xmath38 drops precipitously , while the binding energy rises sharply from around @xmath73 gev , to around @xmath43 gev at @xmath74 gev . the condition @xmath64 is violated shortly above @xmath75 gev .    the  kink " around 400 gev is the point where the ng exchange has wrestled the mechanism for binding away from the usual nr qcd binding . the sudden drop of the size of the bound state is due to tapping the large attraction at large momentum @xmath76 for the bound quark ( besides the @xmath40 coupling of the ng bosons , the heavy higgs also defines a very short range for the strong yukawa coupling to be effective ) . the resulting larger binding energy overcomes the much increased kinetic energy . for @xmath66 , the onset is delayed until @xmath77 gev or so , with binding energy of @xmath78 gev at @xmath79 gev .    for color octet states , which are not bound by qcd , the binding energy for @xmath37 , due purely to yukawa coupling , turns on sharply around @xmath80 gev , rising to @xmath81 gev for @xmath79 gev . the @xmath82 state turns on much later , around @xmath83 gev . but , unlike @xmath39 , because there is no @xmath41-channel repulsion , @xmath10 is degenerate with @xmath37 . it should be noted that the yukawa effects of neutral and charged ng exchange is weaker but constructive for @xmath37 , while the converse is true for @xmath10 , so this degeneracy could be accidental . furthermore , this degeneracy should be lifted by @xmath41-channel gluon annihilation , which would raise @xmath84 but was not considered by the authors of ref .  @xcite . as we shall soon see , the vector channel also has @xmath26- and @xmath85-wave mixing .    although identifying the @xmath38 as the lightest color singlet , and @xmath37 ( and @xmath10 ) as the lightest color octet , it is ironic that the relativistic expansion breaks down almost immediately after the strong yukawa binding becomes potent . but it does illustrate that one needs a genuine relativistic approach in treating strong yukawa binding . we turn to such an approach that is in principle nonperturbative , but carrying its own dubious features : the bethe - salpeter ( bs ) equation . a long time ago , around the time the ssc ( superconducting super collider ) was under construction but then unfortunately canceled , the authors of ref . @xcite pursued the bs equation approach to the relativistic bound states of very heavy sequential 4th generation quarks . it consists of a ladder sum of the scattering amplitudes that appear in the relativistic expansion . in the heavy isospin limit and treating @xmath86 , a clear isospin reorganization separates into @xmath87 and @xmath88  mesons " .    for @xmath36 meson with total momentum @xmath89 and relative momentum @xmath76 , one has a set of integral equations , with loop momentum @xmath90 , where @xmath91 is the momentum exchange in @xmath17-channel . however , for @xmath41-channel annihilation contribution , the annihilation momentum is @xmath89 itself , and the integral over loop momentum @xmath90 carries no @xmath76 dependence , giving a possibly divergent constant . to remedy this , ref . @xcite took a fixed @xmath76 subtraction at @xmath92 . in this way , all the @xmath41-channel diagram contributions were eliminated from the bs equation . this includes even the @xmath41-channel gluon exchange for the octet , isosinglet vector channel , which was not considered in ref . @xcite , as the authors concerned themselves with color singlet states only .    in terms of mathematical physics , to set up integral equations to be solved in a self - consistent way , the subtraction at constant @xmath76 seems reasonable . however , as admitted by the authors of ref . @xcite in a footnote , the @xmath41-channel ng exchange leads to repulsion . thus , in discussing bound state solutions , there is the issue of the physical correspondence , and therefore the range of validity ( in @xmath42 ) for implementing the subtraction . in the relativistic expansion , one clearly would not drop the @xmath41-channel diagrams . our purpose here is not to make a full treatment of the bs equation , as it is only a ladder sum of @xmath17-channel exchange diagrams , with higher order corrections ignored . furthermore , while the bs equation is relativistic , its solution depends very much on the approximations and ansatz made . ref . @xcite illustrated with covariant gauge ( but employing a weak coupling relation between spatial and temporal spinor components ) , the instantaneous approximation with positive frequency potential only , as well as keeping both positive and negative frequency potentials . although the numerical solutions share common features , the bound state mass ( @xmath93 ) values differ . starting all from @xmath94 for low @xmath42 , they decrease smoothly as @xmath42 increases , without exhibiting the kink seen in the relativistic expansion . as such , the bs approach is an improvement . but , as a common feature , once the binding energy @xmath95 becomes significant ( e.g. @xmath43 gev or so ) , at high enough @xmath42 , the low lying mesons collapse . that is , the binding energy becomes so large such that the total mass drops to zero . ( solid ) and @xmath96 ( dashed ) potentials in eq . ( 1 ) for the @xmath39 state , for @xmath97 gev , and @xmath98 gev , plotted along @xmath99 . both vanish for @xmath92 , or zero relative motion , but go to rather large values for large @xmath76 , with @xmath96 turning on rather sharply for @xmath100 gev . , title="fig:",width=302 ]    having bound state solutions numerically turning tachyonic for a strongly coupled system is not particularly astounding . for qcd ( and likewise for qed ) , quarkonium masses calculated at fixed order could also vanish at large enough coupling strength . the system has turned fully relativistic with strong coupling , and the familiar bohr - schrdinger solution is no longer valid . for the bs equation , however , it is already relativistic . the collapse of the meson state may be related to the symmetry breaking itself  @xcite , but because of the approximate nature of the bs equation , as well as the numerical approximations made in its solution , we refrain from dwelling further on this . rather , we wish to use the bs equation and its numerical study to compare and contrast with the previously discussed relativistic expansion , to project what may really happen for relativistic , strong yukawa bound states , before any  collapse " , such as illustrated in ref . @xcite , could occur . for this purpose , we note that with the _ subtracted _ bs equation , hence with the @xmath41-channel repulsion removed , the @xmath39 turns out to be the most attractive system , i.e. the lightest bound state : the ng , gluon and higgs exchange are all attractive , as can be seen also from ref . the behavior for @xmath38 is indeed similar , but the formalism is more complicated for the @xmath101 system , where the @xmath26- and @xmath85-wave channels are coupled . note that ref . @xcite used ( sometimes tacitly ) a higgs mass around 100 gev , which is no longer valid . in our mind , we are interested in the bound state dominated by yukawa coupling , i.e. by ng exchange , hence we will view gluonic exchange as correction , with higgs exchange perhaps even milder . this matches to what one finds in the relativistic expansion , that the yukawa binding suddenly turns on , bringing on a rapid rise in binding energy . in effect , we use the bs equation approach to check , and probe beyond , the  kink " seen in the relativistic expansion . the equation for @xmath39 is the most compact . in the impulse approximation , integrating over @xmath102 gives the amplitude @xmath103 , where @xmath104 is the relative momentum . keeping both positive and negative frequency amplitudes @xmath105 , one has the coupled equations , @xmath106 , \label{bspi1}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath93 is the eigenvalue , and @xmath107 . the potentials @xmath108 , where we have absorbed a factor of @xmath109 into its definition as compared to ref . @xcite , arise from @xmath17-channel diagrams as described earlier . let us understand the @xmath110 and @xmath111 potentials . the less familiar one is @xmath111 , which couples @xmath112 to @xmath113 , while @xmath110 is  diagonal " . in the limit that @xmath114 , one simply has @xmath115 , where @xmath116 is analogous to the expectation value of the potential ( @xmath117 is like @xmath118 ) of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics . on the other hand , if @xmath119 , then @xmath120 , hence the @xmath111 contribution is more suppressed than the corresponding @xmath110 contribution when it is weak . the potentials @xmath121 are symmetric in @xmath76 and @xmath90 , and is steepest along @xmath99 . we plot @xmath122 in fig . [ vpm ] , for heavy @xmath98 gev , and for @xmath75 , 500 , 600 , 700 gev . we have checked that the @xmath123 potential drops by a factor of two or more as @xmath124 moves from 100 to 700 gev , but @xmath96 is rather insensitive to @xmath124 . we see from fig . [ vpm ] that both the @xmath123 and @xmath96 potentials are suppressed for low relative momentum @xmath76 , agreeing with the relativistic expansion view . as @xmath76 increases , @xmath123 increases relatively slowly , reaching @xmath125 at @xmath126 ( 700 ) gev for @xmath74 ( 700 ) gev . but @xmath96 turns on more sharply , reaching beyond @xmath127 at @xmath128 gev , and @xmath129 at @xmath130 gev . so what does the strength of @xmath131 mean ? take the @xmath132 equation , the binding energy @xmath133 is equal to @xmath134 , the kinetic energy due to motion , plus the right hand side of eq . ( [ bspi1 ] ) , which should be the  potential " . let us normalize @xmath90 by @xmath42 . since @xmath135 is steepest for @xmath99 , we see that @xmath136 for @xmath137 means the  potential " is comparable to @xmath42 in strength when the momentum is comparable to the rest mass , and the kinetic energy due to motion is @xmath138 . we can now sense why there is a tendency for the @xmath39 state to collapse already for @xmath42 not far above 500 gev in the numerics of ref . @xcite . we have illustrated how the binding energy for the ( heavy ) isovector , color singlet @xmath140 state , which we call @xmath39 , could be already moving towards collapse for @xmath42 as low as 500 gev ( this number from ref . @xcite contains the attraction due to light higgs exchange ) , if the bs approach of eq . ( [ bspi1 ] ) holds true . however , this state receives a repulsive @xmath41-channel ng annihilation contribution . furthermore , as the tendency towards collapse approaches , the ladder sum bs equation may no longer be sufficient . even within the bs approach , where eq . ( [ bspi1 ] ) gives rise to the earliest collapse , if one drops the negative frequency amplitude , the collapse is delayed  @xcite by almost a factor of two in @xmath42 . in the covariant gauge but using a weak coupling relation between temporal and spatial spinor components , the collapse of @xmath39 occurs slightly before the positive frequency only case . it is not clear at what @xmath42 the collapse truly occurs numerically . in any case , we would not touch the collapse here , as it is not yet well understood . it seems prudent , then , to consider binding energies of @xmath43 to @xmath141 gev , but not more , to make a preliminary study of possible phenomena at lhc , running at @xmath142 tev .    a similar equation as eq . ( [ bspi1 ] ) holds for the isosinglet , color singlet @xmath140 state , the @xmath67 . although gluon and higgs exchange are attractive , ng exchange turns repulsive  @xcite . thus , @xmath67 is much heavier than @xmath39 , and can not be a low - lying state .    turning to vector mesons , ref . @xcite found , similar to the relativistic expansion of ref . @xcite , that the isoscalar @xmath38 has the tightest binding , though it is weaker than ( @xmath41-channel subtracted ) @xmath39 . this concurs with our earlier observation that yukawa effects are weaker but constructive for vector , while stronger but destructive for pseudoscalar . however , there is no repulsive @xmath41-channel effect for @xmath38 . on the other hand , checking the formalism , we find that there is @xmath143-@xmath144 mixing , resulting in a set of more complicated coupled bs equations . from the numerics of ref . @xcite , we expect that for @xmath42 in the range of 500700 gev , binding energies of order @xmath43 to @xmath141 gev is reasonable for @xmath38 . the @xmath66 state , analogous to @xmath67 in receiving the repulsive ng exchange , is far less binding , which is also seen from the relativistic expansion . turning to color octet counterparts , one can treat gluon exchange as a perturbation when binding energies are much large than qcd bound states . given that the bound state should be rather small , the repulsion due to gluon exchange should be larger than typical qcd binding . but without fully solving for the bound state , octet - singlet splitting is uncertain . however , there should be no doubt that @xmath10 and @xmath37 would be the low - lying octet states , in agreement with the relativistic expansion . the octet @xmath145 and @xmath82 are likely not ( or at best weakly ) bound , hence we do not consider these .    to summarize , the states to keep in mind are @xmath39 , @xmath38 , @xmath10 and @xmath37 . there are possibly other states with different quantum numbers , but in general they would not be lighter , while likely possessing more complicated properties . the absence of @xmath31 states is distinct from qcd - like gauge theories such as technicolor . for @xmath42 in the range of 500 to 700 gev , staying short of very tight binding , these states would probably populate the 1 to 1.4 tev range , with binding energies of order @xmath43 to @xmath141 gev . the ordering of the spectra , according to ref . @xcite ( which did not actually consider octet states ) , would be @xmath146 .    since we are concerned with lhc phenomenology and the heavy quark search program in the near future , we should consider briefly issues regarding production :    * @xmath39 and @xmath38 can not be produced via @xmath147 fusion , but can be produced via weak drell - yan processes , hence have a weak production cross section ; * @xmath10 can be pair produced by @xmath147 and @xmath7 scattering  @xcite , but it is heavier and less efficient at 7 tev . this leaves @xmath37 , which has the same quantum numbers as the gluon , that is the most attractive in the near future in terms of production cross section . it can not be produced by @xmath147 fusion , as two massless vectors can not forge a massive vector ( yang s theorem ) particle , hence the production is limited to @xmath7 fusion . in the next section , we turn to the production and decay properties of the @xmath37 meson . note that if an @xmath145 or @xmath67 state existed , such as for qcd binding , it could tap @xmath147 production  @xcite . in this section , we discuss the production and decay of the @xmath148 meson , which we have portrayed as the likely leading harbinger of 4 g bound - states in our scenario , where a very heavy quark _ isospin _ symmetry prevents the production of some mesons directly at hadron colliders .    for the numerical study of the production cross - sections and decay rates , the following parameters are needed as input : the decay constant @xmath149 , the 4 g quark masses @xmath150 ( we assume degeneracy of @xmath2 and @xmath3 as a simplifying approximation , hence an isospin symmetry ) , the mass of resonances , _ i.e. _ the binding energy of resonances , and finally the quark mixing elements @xmath151 . once the constituents as well as their interactions are fixed , the decay constant and binding energy are the consequence of the dynamics of the system . as we stressed previously , in the range of strong yukawa couplings we consider , their estimation has to be done by lft approach  @xcite for more quantitative understanding . however , such an endeavor is beyond the scope of this paper . instead we parameterize them in our phenomenological study . the decay constant of @xmath148 is defined through @xmath152 which we parameterize by a dimensionless parameter @xmath153 . the mass @xmath84 is the most important , as we discuss the production and decay of @xmath148 . we also assume @xmath154 is the dominant quark mixing element , and ignore mixings with lighter generations .     at hadron colliders.,width=113 ] the dominant production mechanism for @xmath148 is , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : prod ] , via @xmath155 annihilation . because one can not fuse two massless gluons into a massive vector boson , gluon - gluon fusion is not operative . we have also computed the higher order @xmath156 process as a check .    at the parton level , the total cross section is @xmath157 convolving with the parton luminosity @xmath158 we get the hadronic cross section , @xmath159 we plot on the left - hand side of fig . [ fig : pro ] the cross section for inclusive @xmath148 production at the lhc with @xmath160  tev . we use cteq6l  @xcite parton distribution functions ( pdfs ) , and set the renormalization and factorization scales to @xmath161 . we use three values of @xmath162 , 0.03 and 0.01 for illustration . although we do not have any suggestive estimation for the decay constant , since the yukawa bound state is highly relativistic , we expect the larger ( smaller ) value of @xmath163 corresponds to a stronger ( weaker ) bound meson . we note that the decay constant divided by meson mass for usual @xmath31 , @xmath164 and @xmath165 are @xmath166 . however , we are not dealing with usual qcd - bound meson production  @xcite , so we leave @xmath163 as a parameter . the cross section is proportional to @xmath167 and decreases with increasing @xmath84 . because of our ignorance of the decay constant @xmath149 , the cross section @xmath168 ranges from pb to fb , for @xmath84 ranging from 900 to 1400 tev . the plot extends to 2 tev , since it depends only on @xmath163 , which we view should be experimentally determined . as the gluon density at the lhc is large , we have checked the higher order @xmath156 scattering process , and find the contributions to be quite small for the region of our interest , @xmath169  tev .    for comparison , we also plot the open @xmath23 pair production cross section at lo and nlo  @xcite , as a function of @xmath170 , matching ( approximately ) to @xmath171 on the same plot . the cross section should be multiplied by two to take into account the production of the degenerate 4 g doublet . in nlo calculation , we use cteq6 m pdfs  @xcite . to see the uncertainty of the cross section , as well as the size of nlo correction , we vary the scales in each calculation from @xmath172 to @xmath173 . the uncertainty for lo ( nlo ) prediction is expressed as the dotted ( hatched ) band .     at the lhc running at 7  tev ( left ) and 14  tev ( right ) for various @xmath153 values . the open @xmath23 cross sections at lo and nlo are also plotted for comparison.,width=306 ]    at the lhc running at 7  tev , the @xmath148 production cross section with @xmath174 is about the same order as twice the open @xmath175 production cross section in the lower mass region , but exceeds the latter in the higher mass region . on the other hand , when @xmath163 is smaller , the cross section could be well below the open production cross section . thus , @xmath148 production can be interesting if @xmath163 is sizable , such as of @xmath176 order . note that @xmath37 is produced through @xmath7 , while open @xmath23 is produced dominantly through @xmath147 fusion . we plot on the right - hand side of fig . [ fig : pro ] the @xmath148 cross section for lhc at @xmath177  tev , which is an order of magnitude larger than those for lhc at 7  tev . the open production cross section grows relatively larger than the @xmath148 production because of increase in gluon luminosities . the decay channels of @xmath148 we consider are    * annihilation decay : @xmath178 , @xmath179 ; @xmath180 , @xmath181 ; * free - quark decay : @xmath182 , @xmath183 ; * meson transition : @xmath184 ; @xmath185 .    in the following , we discuss each decay mode separately . first , @xmath148 can decay into dijets or @xmath179 by the co - annihilation of the 4 g quarks inside the bound state through qcd , as shown in fig . [ fig : anni ] . these are the reverse processes of the production mechanism , therefore the existence of these decay modes is robust .     into light quark pair ( dijets ) or @xmath179 . , width=113 ]    the decay partial width in this mode is proportional to @xmath167 . the two - body decay width is calculated at born level to be @xmath186 where @xmath187 is the number of light quark flavors , and @xmath188 is the velocity of the top quark in the @xmath148 rest - frame . due to the number of light quark flavors , the decay partial width into dijets is larger than that into @xmath179 by @xmath189 . analogous to @xmath190 production , we have also estimated the three - body @xmath191 decay rate , following the tree - level calculation of ref . @xcite , and found that it can be ignored . another type of annihilation decay channel is caused by weak boson exchange , where an off - diagonal quark mixing element acts on one of the bound quarks , as shown in fig . [ fig : weak](a ) . this is rather similar to the binding mechanism , where the quark mixing elements are always within 4 g . once the cross - generation interaction occurs , the recoil due to the energy release from the mass difference between the 4 g quarks and lower generations would eject the lighter quark and destroy the bound state , followed by subsequent decay of the leftover 4 g quark . the lower generation quark mass is too light such that it can not bind with the heavy 4 g quark by yukawa coupling . the decay width is calculated in terms of the decay constant in eq . ( [ eq : dec ] ) using the fierz identity for the current products , giving ( @xmath192 ) @xmath193 where @xmath194.\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath195 . the charge conjugate decays have the same partial width as above . we have actually performed a full calculation , but set @xmath196 , or weak coupling @xmath51 , to zero at the end , as we are concerned with longitudinal vector boson exchange . we have also not distinguished between @xmath197 and @xmath84 , where the latter provides the scale parameter . the decay rate depends on both the off - diagonal quark mixing element @xmath154 as well as @xmath163 .    in this mode , @xmath148 decays into on - shell @xmath8 or @xmath9 ( and conjugate ) . if we restrict to @xmath198 and @xmath199 for the decay of 4 g quarks , the final state all end up as @xmath200 . the signal is similar to @xmath179 production , but the kinematical distribution differs from the standard model counterpart . a second type of decay mode is induced by the decay of the constituent quarks , as illustrated in fig . [ fig : weak](b ) . it is similar to the weak boson exchange decay discussed just before , and quantum mechanically speaking , the exchanged boson escapes the system as an on - shell particle . we call this the  free " quark decay mode , even though the decaying quark is bound . the decay partial width in this mode depends crucially on @xmath13 and @xmath12 , but not strongly on the structure of @xmath148 . this last statement would no longer hold when one enters the realm of deeply bound states , where binding energy is much larger than the @xmath43 gev adopted here .    inside the bound state system , the decay of the constituents is suppressed by phase - space and time dilatation effects  @xcite . that is , the decaying quark constituent is off - shell . however , for simplicity , we ignore these effects in our rate calculation , and use @xmath201   = \gamma_{t'}+\gamma_{b'},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath202 , @xmath203 are given at born level as @xmath204 with @xmath205 or @xmath206 , and @xmath207 with @xmath208 as defined earlier . note that we have kept @xmath196 here , since the decay process is quite similar to the familiar top quark decay . the decay width of the 4 g quarks is suppressed by the small @xmath13 and @xmath12 , but grows rapidly with the 4 g quark mass . if @xmath148 decays through @xmath2 , the final state would be @xmath200 , and @xmath209 if decay is through @xmath3 . the search of these signal can be along the standard 4 g quark search strategy  @xcite , except that , if heavy quark mass could be reconstructed , then for example one @xmath210 pair has a lower mass ( due to binding energy ) than the other @xmath210 pair from on - shell @xmath2 decay  @xcite .    , and @xmath211 . , title="fig:",width=132 ] , and @xmath211 . , title="fig:",width=132 ]      finally , a third class of decay is for @xmath148 to turn into other resonances . we consider the two channels of @xmath212 and @xmath184 . the other possible channel @xmath213 is forbidden by the heavy isospin . the partial width for these decays depend on the mass difference as well as the transition amplitude of these resonances . the meson transition to @xmath185 would open only if @xmath214 . for @xmath215 , @xmath148 can decay into @xmath216 or @xmath217 through the off - shell @xmath15 boson . however , the partial width would be negligibly small . we can write down a general vector to pseudoscalar transition amplitude via ( color singlet ) vector or axial - vector currents as , @xmath218,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath219 , @xmath220 are 4-momentum of @xmath148 , @xmath221 respectively , @xmath222 is the polarization vector of @xmath148 , and @xmath223 and @xmath224 are form factors in @xmath225    a straightforward calculation gives ( @xmath192 ) @xmath226 with @xmath227x(1-x^2+y^2)\lambda^3    { \nonumber}\\   & \ ; + \frac{1}{4}|a_2+a_3|^2\lambda^5 + 2|v^2| \ , y^2\lambda^3 ,   \label{eq : hpw}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath228 as already defined . here , @xmath196 has to be kept , since transverse @xmath15 emission has a @xmath61 phase space factor , while longitudinal @xmath15 emission has a @xmath229 factor and more suppressed . using the assumption that a free quark inside a meson interacts with currents , the form factors are reduced to @xmath230 , @xmath231 , @xmath232 and @xmath233 . for simplicity , we use this limit in our numerical calculation , and eq . ( [ eq : hpw ] ) reduces to @xmath234 where @xmath235 . a vector to vector transition amplitude via color octet vector current is parameterized as @xmath236,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath222 , @xmath237 are the polarization vectors of @xmath148 , @xmath238 , respectively , and @xmath239 are form factors in @xmath240 . a straightforward calculation gives ( @xmath192 ) @xmath241 where we take the scale of the strong coupling constant to be at the mass of @xmath148 , and @xmath242 the second step follows from taking the free - quark limit as described above , which reduces the form factors to @xmath243 and @xmath244 . we use this result , which is highly suppressed by phase space , for our numerical estimation .      to perform numerical studies of the branching ratios and decay widths , we finally have to specify the numerical values of the following parameters : @xmath163 , @xmath13 ( @xmath245 ) and @xmath246 for @xmath247 ( @xmath248 for @xmath249 ) . without a full solution to the relativistic strong coupling bound state problem , however , it is difficult to ascertain the values for @xmath153 as well as the mass splittings , and @xmath84 itself . we therefore examine four sets of parameters as a survey ,    * case  1  : @xmath174 , @xmath250  gev , @xmath251 ; * case  2  : @xmath252 , @xmath250  gev , @xmath251 ; * case  3  : @xmath174 , @xmath253  gev , @xmath251 ; * case  4  : @xmath174 , @xmath250  gev , @xmath254 . these are chosen simply to emphasize large variety of possible dominant decay channels . in all the cases we set the binding energy of @xmath148 to @xmath255  gev , which is much larger than qcd binding . a different choice of the @xmath148 binding energy changes our results only modestly . for the choices specified in case  1 , we assume the larger decay constant , @xmath256  gev mass difference in the meson spectrum , and @xmath13 is set to the nominal current upper limit  @xcite . in case  2 , we examine the smaller decay constant . case  3 is for larger mass difference , and case  4 is when @xmath13 is more suppressed . we will discuss the two different mass differences ( vector  pseudoscalar and octet  singlet ) as variations . we plot in fig . [ fig : br ] the branching ratio of various @xmath148 decays as a function of @xmath84 for cases  1 to 4 . in case  1 , the dominant decay modes are the transition decay into @xmath185 , especially for lighter mass region , and free quark decay , i.e. via the decay of 4 g constituent quark for heavier mass region . the branching ratios of free quark decay and the @xmath13-dependent annihilation ( @xmath15 boson exchange ) decay increase with @xmath84 , because @xmath257 reflects a larger yukawa coupling . the @xmath7 is of order 10% and drops slightly at higher @xmath84 , with @xmath179 branching ratio a factor of 5 lower , at the percent level . the transition decay into @xmath258 is at the percent level or less .    in case  2 , because of the small decay constant , the annihilation decay channels @xmath8 , @xmath9 , @xmath7 and @xmath259 are suppressed . in this case , free quark decay and transition decay into @xmath185 are the two predominant modes .    in case  3 , the large mass differences enhance the branching ratio of the transition decays , and the @xmath185 mode dominates . the other transition decay into @xmath258 can also be enhanced , especially in the lighter mass region . it could be that the mass difference of only @xmath260 is large , i.e. when the mass spectrum is like @xmath261 . if so , @xmath185 could be considerably suppressed , and @xmath258 would be more prominent , especially for low @xmath84 .    in case  4 , the free quark decay and the @xmath13 induced annihilation decay are suppressed , due to small @xmath13 . the decay width of 4 g quarks is also suppressed for the same reason . in this case , the transition decay into @xmath185 dominates , and the annihilation decay into dijets can be sub - dominant with branching ratio at ten percent order . however , this sensitively depends on the @xmath262 mass difference , as well as the decay constant . if @xmath185 becomes kinematically suppressed , dijets would be dominant . let us summarize some general features regarding branching ratios . basically , the transition decay into @xmath185 is large , because of the large yukawa coupling and no suppression effect by bound state deformation . this decay mode can be more enhanced if the mass difference is large , but much suppressed if the mass difference is small , especially if less than @xmath196 , as we have seen . free quark decay has sizable contribution for the heavier mass region , if @xmath13 is close to the current upper limit of 0.1 . 0.13 cm   and @xmath221 for the four parameter sets . the upper curves are for @xmath148 , where case 3 is enhanced by a larger @xmath262 mass difference . the lower curves , plotted 100 gev less in mass , are for @xmath221 , where cases 1 and 2 are barely distinguishable.,title="fig:",width=283 ]    in fig . [ fig : wid ] , we show the total decay width of @xmath148 as a function of @xmath84 for the four parameter sets . the decay width increases with @xmath84 , from a few gev to around 10 gev . for case 3 , due to the rapid decay into @xmath185 from a relatively large @xmath262 mass difference , the width is at 20 gev range , and increases mildly with @xmath84 . still , compared with its tev scale mass , @xmath148 is a heavy but narrow meson resonance . we see that the binding energy , therefore strong yukawa dynamics , and flavor structure through @xmath13 all play crucial role for the eventual phenomenology one expects at lhc .      to be able to address lhc phenomenology , we need to treat @xmath38 and @xmath10 further , as they may appear in @xmath37 decay final state . from fig . [ fig : br ] we see that in general @xmath263 is the leading decay . note , however , that we have assumed @xmath264 gev . the rate would drop sharply as this vector  scalar splitting diminishes , and becomes practically negligible when @xmath15 turns virtual . on the other hand , if the strong binding found by ref . @xcite in the bethe  salpeter approach with @xmath41-channel subtracted has any bearing , then @xmath10 may be deeper bound than @xmath37 . for this situation , case 3 stands as an illustration , where @xmath265 decay would be preeminent . in contrast , the process @xmath266 is never more than 10% , and more typically at @xmath267 order or smaller . the exception would be if @xmath268 is of order @xmath196 or less , but @xmath269 is sizable ( plot of case 3 in fig . [ fig : br ] , but with @xmath265 removed ) . viewing this exception as unlikely , we relegate the discussion of @xmath38 to a concurrent discussion of weak drell  yan production . but we need to address how @xmath10 decays . it is interesting that @xmath270 vanishes because it is a @xmath271 transition , which we have verified by direct computation . the @xmath272 exchange diagram of fig . [ fig : weak](a ) is absent for charged @xmath273 ( i.e. @xmath274 and @xmath275 mesons ) because of isospin , while the @xmath41-channel annihilation is absent by the octet / isovector nature . the upshot is that we are left with only two decay processes : the familiar free quark decay , and a new type of decay , @xmath276 , where the @xmath15 is transverse . the latter is an inverse process of @xmath265 , with @xmath51 replacing @xmath148 . however , the annihilation rather than transition nature implies that @xmath276 is relatively suppressed .     for the four parameter sets , ranging from predominance ( case 4 ) , to below @xmath267 ( case 2).,width=272 ]    direct computation gives @xmath277 where @xmath278 is the @xmath10 decay constant normalized by @xmath10 mass . the rate of @xmath279 is suppressed by @xmath280 compared to the rate of @xmath281 of eq . we have checked explicitly that longitudinal @xmath15 emission again vanishes . we plot the @xmath10 width in fig . [ fig : wid ] , and the @xmath282 branching fraction , in fig . [ fig : pi8 ] . the width is at gev order , narrower than @xmath37 , but could be much smaller if a small @xmath13 suppresses the free quark decay widths . thus , @xmath279 decay branching fraction is below 10% , and much smaller for case 2 ( suppressed by a smaller decay constant ) . for case 4 , the small @xmath13 case , @xmath279 could dominate .     into dijets , for the four parameter sets at the lhc 7  tev . cms upper limit  @xcite for the cross section of dijet resonance production is also plotted.,width=264 ] we now discuss the possible phenomenology , as well as other issues . let us first comment on the dijet decay of @xmath148 , which could appear as a dijet resonance . absence of dijet features in tevatron and lhc searches constrains or rules out any model with particles in tev range . in fig . [ fig : jj ] , we plot the total cross section times dijet branching ratio for @xmath148 production at the lhc 7 running at tev , as a function of @xmath84 for the four parameter sets . we compare with the cms dijet resonance search  @xcite with @xmath283  fb@xmath284 data at @xmath160  tev . we note that the data includes acceptance cuts for dijets , but our model numbers do not , which makes the comparison conservative . we find the cross section times dijet branching ratio are at least an order of magnitude lower than the current upper limit for all four cases , with case  4 the largest . even with @xmath285 channel removed making @xmath281 the leading decay , one is still below the cms limit . let us call this special situation case  @xmath286 . our results show that , while a narrow resonance signal might start to show up with a considerably larger data set , it could show up soon for case  @xmath286 . that is , if @xmath285 decay is forbidden , while free quark and exchange decays are suppressed by small @xmath13 . the need for these two conditions to be met , however , makes this possibility not particularly likely .    in general , the @xmath285 decay is the dominant @xmath148 decay mode , unless it is kinematically suppressed by @xmath262 being too close to , or smaller than , @xmath196 . we have investigated the decay of @xmath10 itself , and found that it is dominated by free quark decay , with @xmath287 subdominant for cases 13 . it is important now to spell out the isospin nature : isosinglet @xmath288 , @xmath289 with a @xmath290 ratio , where the subscript @xmath41 indicates a relatively soft vector boson , and @xmath291 stands for the @xmath292 boson , as we have ignored heavy isospin breaking . thus , the signature for @xmath293 leads to @xmath294 , @xmath295 , and @xmath296 , plus c.c . except for the last case with presence of a @xmath292 boson ( the identification via dileptons would be costly in branching fraction ) , the additional @xmath297 which is relatively soft makes it an even more complicated signature than direct open @xmath23 production . the same sign dilepton approach  @xcite remains a good one , but more jets would be present . note that the @xmath292 is usually vetoed against in same sign dilepton studies . however , if boosted @xmath15 and top jets can be exploited to isolate the @xmath298 and @xmath299 ( both in @xmath300 final state ) , then the associated soft @xmath301 could be an extra tag for @xmath5 production . besides the relatively low @xmath302 @xmath15 , the 7-jet system has rich imbeddings of @xmath15 , @xmath16 and @xmath17 jets . it can be part of the @xmath303 search program , which would in any case be a background . but the multi - jet system is of rather high mass , and with different signature content , that one may be able to separate . if the total jet mass resolution is good , one may discover both the @xmath273 in multijets with a soft @xmath15 tag , with the @xmath273 and the @xmath304 reconstructing to @xmath37 . the lhc experiments should also look for a @xmath292 boson associated with high jet multiplicity , perhaps with a hint of unusual @xmath305 plus multijets as backdrop . given that @xmath221 is very narrow , one could look for a relatively soft @xmath292 recoiling from 6 or 8 hadronic jets with very high , but relatively specific mass , containing substructures of multiple boosted @xmath15 jets or boosted top jets . the whole event , @xmath306 6 or 8 jets , would also reconstruct to a narrow resonant mass . one might think that @xmath307 multijets can be similarly pursued . however , eq .  ( [ eq : opw ] ) does not apply to @xmath308 : the @xmath309 term vanishes with @xmath310 . the photonic decay involves heavy quark spin flip , hence suppressed by @xmath311 . treating @xmath312 , since we allow @xmath313 gev at best , the radiative rate is @xmath314 . since a larger @xmath315 ( case  3 ) gives a larger total @xmath148 width , we find that @xmath316 is always below the percent level . however , photon detection does not suffer from the factor of 0.06 as for @xmath317 detection . hence , the lhc experiments might also consider @xmath307 multijet studies . case 4 offers yet again an intriguing signature , assuming @xmath285 decay dominance . from fig . [ fig : pi8 ] we see that @xmath287 is dominant , as free quark decay is suppressed by a small @xmath13 . one therefore has a unique signature of @xmath318 ( @xmath319 and @xmath320 ) . here , one @xmath15 is soft , and the other hard , with @xmath302 greater than 500 gev , accompanied by a similarly hard gluon . both @xmath15 s tend to be transverse , but the hard @xmath15-jet and the gluon jet would form a rather narrow resonance ! this case offers dramatic signature and should be quickly searched for . the production cross section , of course , is modulated by @xmath149 ( see fig . [ fig : pro ] ) . case 4 , which is the limiting case of small @xmath13 , has better likelihood than the even more special case 4@xmath321 discussed earlier .    leaving case 4 , i.e. if @xmath13 is closer to 0.1 , the next prominent decay compared with @xmath285 in general is  free " quark decay , i.e. one of the bound @xmath2 or @xmath3 quarks decays , dissolving the bound state system . this could be practically the only other decay mode , if the exchange and annihilation decays are suppressed by a small decay constant ( case 2 ) . the signature is @xmath322 , @xmath323 ( plus c.c . ) , where the notation implies the associated @xmath324 or @xmath325 decays on - shell , but the @xmath210 and @xmath326 are decay products of a bound , somewhat off - shell @xmath2 or @xmath3 quark , which is not too different from open @xmath23 production . unless the on - shell nature is used in the direct search , the search limits would not be affected . however , once 4 g quarks are discovered , one should check whether , for some fraction of the events ( depending on resonance vs open @xmath23 production ratio ) , one of the heavy quarks is in fact off - shell , which would be an indication for bound state phenomena . we remark that open @xmath23 production at the lhc is dominantly through @xmath147 fusion , while the @xmath148 resonance production is through @xmath7 fusion . there is little resonance phenomena in @xmath327 via yukawa effects . in fact , in the @xmath328 channels , it is even repulsive . thus , even above the unitarity bound , standard search can continue , except that there may be some  anomalies " as we have discussed , if any thing is found at all . we have already dealt with the special case of dijet resonance for case 4 . dijets from @xmath329 tend to be subdominant in all other cases ( i.e. 13 ) , but it could be at 10% level . it would provide a spectacular dijet resonance signal , and definite measurement  @xcite of resonance mass , and spin if there is good signal over background . if the branching ratio could be measured in some way , one could access the important decay constant . in general , a resonance would also appear in @xmath259 ( boosted top jets ) , with cross section 1/5 the dijet resonance .    finally , there is also the exchange decay to @xmath8 and @xmath9 , which is a subdominant channel typically below 10% . it mimics  single @xmath2 ( @xmath3 ) " production , and can be studied that way . but an associated boosted top , or a high @xmath302 @xmath16-jet that tags a resonant @xmath326 , could be quite distinct . we offer some remarks on the @xmath330  @xcite and @xmath331  @xcite anomalies at the tevatron . naively , one might think that the presence of resonance production of @xmath259 could be relevant for @xmath330 . but @xmath148 has same quantum numbers as the gluon , i.e. the coupling to @xmath259 is fully vector . thus , it can not generate @xmath330 suggested by tevatron data . for the @xmath331 anomaly , the yukawa bound resonances are so massive , they can have nothing to do with it . this brings us to comparing with technicolor ( tc ) models . low scale tc has been invoked  @xcite for the @xmath331 anomaly suggested by cdf . our @xmath148 and @xmath221 are yukawa bound @xmath23 mesons with an operative heavy isospin , from degenerate chiral quark doublet @xmath47 not too far above the unitarity bound . thus , our @xmath148 and @xmath221 mesons are much heavier than those in low scale tc . for more generic tc models @xcite , since  walking " is generally required , the technipion @xmath332 tends to be closer to the technirho @xmath333 in mass such that @xmath334 is absent , while ( near ) degeneracy of @xmath335 and @xmath336 with @xmath333 is also often invoked . the signature for these technimesons are typically @xmath337 , @xmath338 and @xmath339 . thus , not only the spectrum is rather different  absence of @xmath31 and @xmath340 mesons  the decay signature is also in strong contrast . the bound states due to strong yukawa coupling , which follow simply from the existence of new heavy chiral quarks without assuming new dynamics , should be easily distinguished from technicolor . the yukawa - bound ultraheavy mesons are also quite distinct from qcd bound states . not only there is the absence of @xmath33 ( where @xmath147 fusion would be possible ) and @xmath31 type mesons , they have a much larger binding energy , and are much smaller in size . this is brought about by not only a strong coupling constant , but facilitated by a @xmath40 coupling due to goldstone or longitudinal vector bosons ; the @xmath341 higgs boson , being heavy , would in fact be subdominant . thus , the tight bound states involve ultrarelativistic motion of its very heavy constituents , hence somewhat counterintuitive . by far we have not attempted any actual solution of the bound state problem here . we therefore chose to remain close to the unitarity bound , considering bound state masses not more than 1.5 tev . we have chose to parameterize with a few key parameters . our numerics , and associated phenomenology , should be viewed as only illustrative , with the _ key parameters to be determined by experiment_.    what mass scale would nature actually choose , if she so chooses to offer an extra chiral doublet above the existing three generations ? it may be related to the electroweak symmetry breaking through @xmath36 condensation . it could in principle lead to very deeply bound states , with binding energy approaching @xmath42 order or more . we have only scratched the surface of yukawa - bound heavy mesons , the treatment of which would require genuine nonperturbative methods , such as  @xcite lattice field theory . paradoxically , it is not impossible that heavier quark masses than considered here could result in lower heavy meson masses . again , experiment might take the lead here . with the experimental limits on sequential chiral 4th generation already at 500 gev , i.e. at the doorsteps of the unitarity bound , we have considered the possibility of new @xmath36 mesons bound by strong yukawa couplings . comparing a relativistic expansion approach ( which indicated nonapplicability ) , versus a relativistic bethe  salpeter equation approach , we chose to illustrate what might appear in early data of lhc running , i.e. bound states just above the tev scale , but with relatively complicated decay final states . electroweak precision tests suggest a new ( heavy ) isospin symmetry , such that the leading production would be a color octet , isosinglet vector meson , which we call @xmath148 . it can be produced via @xmath4 fusion , through an unknown decay constant , @xmath149 . for decay , the key parameters besides @xmath149 are the quark mixing element @xmath13 , and the mass differences @xmath262 and @xmath269 where @xmath221 is a heavy color octet  pion " and @xmath238 a color singlet  we find the leading decay is likely @xmath285 , while the other transition channel into @xmath258 is relatively suppressed . the other leading decay is  free " , or constituent , quark decay . illustrating with four cases for large / small decay constant , nominal / suppressed mass differences or @xmath13 , together with the two decay channels of free quark decay and @xmath11 decay of @xmath221 , we considered the possible lhc phenomenology . we find in general the @xmath37 to be narrow compared to its mass . the special case of small @xmath13 leads to two possible spectacular signatures . one is @xmath342 , where a massive back - to - back @xmath11 system is accompanied by a relatively soft @xmath15 . this mode could become suppressed if @xmath262 is close to or less than @xmath196 . then , one could have a dijet resonance close to current lhc limits , and a narrow dijet resonance could appear soon . in the general case , dijet signal is suppressed by a decay branching ratio . other than the above two ( perhaps unlikely ) spectacular signals , the generic leading decay is @xmath343 , @xmath344 , followed by free quark decay of @xmath221 ( @xmath287 is typically subdominant ) . this leads to possible multijet signals with an associated relatively soft @xmath15 or @xmath292 tag , where the multijet system is very massive , and with multiple @xmath16 , @xmath15 and @xmath17 jet substructures . if such massive multijet systems can be studied , one could possibly reconstruct both the @xmath221 and @xmath148 resonances . assuming single channel dominance , one can measure the meson decay constant by the total cross section . if @xmath285 is suppressed by kinematics , however , the likely leading decay would be by the constituent heavy quark decay , which is very similar to standard @xmath23 signal , except one heavy quark decays somewhat off - shell . since in any case the leading @xmath327 fusion does not exhibit resonance phenomena , _ the current 4th generation @xmath18 and @xmath19 search can continue beyond the unitarity bound_. but if 4 g quarks are discovered , then some good fraction of the events would have one quark decaying below threshold , indicating bound state phenomena . one , of course , would have to disentangle also @xmath285 , as already discussed . we have provide some definite signatures for yukawa - bound heavy @xmath23 mesons in the 1 to 1.5 tev range . but our study is only of precursory nature . as lhc energy increases , and with higher luminosity , it could uncover new chiral quarks above the unitarity bound , with new unusual bound states . one could probe into the truly nonperturbative regime , which our results only offer a glimpse of what might happen . there may be a host of new heavy mesons awaiting us beyond the horizon .    0.3 cm * acknowledgement*. we thank k .- f . chen , a. djouadi , k. ishiwata , b. kniel , t. kugo , m.b . wise , b .- young and c .- p . yuan for discussions , and k. hagiwara for encouraging comments . wsh thanks the national science council for academic summit grant nsc 99 - 2745-m-002 - 002-asp , and te and hy are supported under nsc 100 - 2811-m-002 - 061 and nsc 100 - 2119-m-002 - 001 . this has been explored , in the context of the nambu  jona - lasinio model , by w.a . bardeen , c.t .  hill and m.  lindner , phys . d * 41 * , 1647 ( 1990 ) . the authors credit the idea to y.  nambu ,  bootstrap symmetry breaking in electroweak unification " , efi preprint 89 - 08 ( 1989 ) . for a recent brief review on the 4th generation , see b.  holdom _ et al . _ , pmc phys .   a * 3 * , 4 ( 2009 ) . b.w . lee , c.  quigg and h.b . thacker , phys . rev .  lett . * 38 * , 883 ( 1977 ) ; phys . d * 16 * , 1519 ( 1977 ) . kribs , t.  plehn , m.  spannowsky and t.m.p . tait , phys . d * 76 * , 075016 ( 2007 ) ; h .- j . he , n.  polonsky and s .- f . su , phys . d * 64 * , 053004 ( 2001 ) ; v.a . novikov , l.b . okun , a.n . rozanov and m.i . vysotsky , jetp lett .   * 76 * , 127 ( 2002 ) [ pisma zh . fiz .   * 76 * , 158 ( 2002 ) ] . j.  pumplin _ et al . _ , jhep * 0207 * , 012 ( 2002 ) . r.  baier and r.  rckl , z.  phys . c * 19 * , 251 ( 1983 ) . et al . _ , d * 35 * , 3366 ( 1987 ) [ erratum - ibid . d * 38 * , 1632 ( 1988 ) ] . p.  nason , s.  dawson and r.k . ellis , nucl . b * 303 * , 607 ( 1988 ) . a.  petrelli _ et al . _ , nucl . b * 514 * , 245 ( 1998 ) . y.  sumino _ et al . _ , phys . d * 47 * , 56 ( 1993 ) . m.  jezabek , j.h . khn and t.  teubner , z.  phys . c * 56 * , 653 ( 1992 ) . s.  chatrchyan _ et al . _ [ cms collaboration ] , phys . b * 701 * , 204 ( 2011 ) . this effect is examined for the top quark case in the @xmath345 resonance region , in y.  sumino and h.  yokoya , jhep * 1009 * , 034 ( 2010 ) . t.  aaltonen _ et al . _ [ cdf collaboration ] , phys . lett .   * 106 * , 171801 ( 2011 ) . note that this has been refuted by the d0 collaboration , v.m . abazov _ et al . _ [ d0 collaboration ] , _ ibid . _   * 107 * , 011804 ( 2011 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: current limits from the lhc on fourth generation quarks are already at the unitarity bound of 500 gev or so . if they exist , the strong yukawa couplings are turning nonperturbative , and may form bound states . we study the domain of @xmath0 and @xmath1 in the range of 500 to 700 gev , where we expect binding energies are mainly of yukawa origin , with qcd subdominant . to be consistent with electroweak precision tests , the @xmath2 and @xmath3 quarks have to be nearly degenerate , exhibiting a new  isospin " . comparing relativistic expansion with a relativistic bound state approach , we find the most interesting is the production of a color octet , isosinglet vector meson ( a  gluon - prime " ) via @xmath4 . leading decay modes are @xmath5 , @xmath6 , and constituent quark decay , with @xmath7 and @xmath8 and @xmath9 subdominant . the color octet , isovector pseudoscalar @xmath10 meson decays via constituent quark decay , or to @xmath11 . these decay rates are parameterized by the decay constant , the binding energy and mass differences , and @xmath12 . for small @xmath13 , one could have a spectacular signal of @xmath14 , where a soft @xmath15 accompanies a very massive @xmath11 pair . in general , however , one has high multiplicity signals with @xmath16 , @xmath15 and @xmath17 jet substructures that are not so different from @xmath18 and @xmath19 search . pacs numbers : :    14.65.jk 11.10.st 13.85.rm 13.25.jx