Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is well known that the interplay of the linear transmission spectrum of a fiber bragg gratings ( fbg ) , which includes the bandgap , and material kerr nonlinearity gives rise to robust optical pulses , which are often called gap solitons , or , more generally , bragg - grating solitons . the solitons in fbgs were first predicted theoretically @xcite ( see also review sterke ) , and then created in the experiment @xcite ; later , solitons where also created in a photonic grating , induced in an ordinary fiber as a superposition of two mutually coherent pump beams photoinduced . the stability of solitons in the standard fbg model was investigated in detail by means of approximate semi - analytical @xcite and accurate numerical @xcite methods . a well - known feature of the fbg model is that the soliton may have zero velocity , which suggests that fiber gratings may be appropriate media for the creation of stable pulses of _ slow_/_standing light _ , which is a problem of current interest @xcite , including the quest of slow optical solitons @xcite . in the first experiments in the fbg , the smallest velocity of the soliton was @xmath0 , with @xmath1 the speed of light in the fiber . recently , an essentially new experimental result has been reported @xcite , with the soliton s velocity reduced to @xmath2 , which , quite feasibly , can be made still smaller by means of the technique applied in ref . viz_. , the use of an _ apodized _ fbg , with the grating strength gradually increasing along the fiber ( theoretically , the use of an apodized fbg for the retardation of solitons and , eventually , bringing them to a halt was elaborated in detail in ref . @xcite ) . collisions of moving fbg solitons with local defects of the grating has also been the subject of several theoretical works @xcite-@xcite . a general objective of these studies was to predict a possibility of trapping a moving ( relatively fast ) soliton by a defect , and thus transforming it into a stable _ pinned optical soliton _ @xcite . such an outcome may be of considerable interest , as , besides being a challenging problem to fundamental nonlinear optics and nonlinear - wave dynamics in general , it may find applications to the design of all - optical memory and logic elements , the trapped soliton playing the role of a data bit . in addition , the theoretical analysis has demonstrated that the attenuation of the pinned soliton due to the loss in the fbg  material may be compensated by a localized gain , applied at the same position where the pinning defect was created @xcite . besides the soliton proper , one can also consider the interaction of a more general localized wave packet with fbg defects @xcite . similar interaction were examined in models of photonic crystals , which combine a bragg grating and layers of resonantly absorbing atoms ( see a review of the topic in ref . @xcite ) ; in that case , a soliton may interact with an intrinsic defect of the photonic crystal mantsyzov . an attractive local defect in the fbg may be realized as a local suppression of the grating . a repulsive defect is possible too , in the form of a short segment with enhanced bragg reflectivity . in refs . @xcite , it was concluded that three different outcomes of the collision of a free soliton with an attractive defect are possible , _ viz_. , transmission ( i.e. , passage of the soliton through the defect ) , capture , and splitting of the incident soliton into three pulses  transmitted , trapped , and reflected ones . besides that , in the case when the incident soliton is  heavy " ( i.e. intrinsically unstable @xcite ) , almost all the energy may go into the reflected pulse , making the attractive defect to look as a repulsive one @xcite .    as concerns the primary goal , i.e. , efficient capture of a relatively fast free soliton , it was demonstrated in ref . @xcite that better results might be provided not by a simple attractive defect , but rather by structures built as pairs of attractive defects separated by some distance , or , still more efficiently , by _ cavities _ , in the form of a pair repulsive local defects . while a single repulsive inhomogeneity can not trap anything , the cavity has a strong potential for that ( the trapped soliton then performs shuttle oscillations in the cavity ) . it was demonstrated that the paired defects , unlike the single attractive one , give rise to a well - defined region in the respective parameter space where the capture of the fast soliton is especially efficacious ( up to velocities of the incident solitons @xmath3 and @xmath4 , in the cases of the attractive and repulsive pairs , respectively ) . the subject of the present work is to extend the analysis to collisions of solitons in the fbg with more complex ( but still compact and quite simple , as concerns the fabrication ) defects , built as a _ doublet _ ( alias  dipole " ) and , chiefly , _ triplet _ , i.e. , respectively , a pair of attractive and repulsive defects with a relatively small distance between them , or two repulsive defects with an attractive one placed between them . we conclude that the triplet is _ superior _ to all other trapping configurations : it provides for the capture of @xmath5 of the energy of the incident soliton at velocities attaining @xmath6 , and , which is quite important too , the trapped soliton quickly relaxes into a stationary state . the  quality " of the trapped soliton is attested to by its collision with a fresh soliton impinging upon the trapped one : while in other settings ( including the newly introduced doublet ) the outcome of the collision is actually unpredictable , as it strongly depends on the intrinsic state of the trapped soliton , that changes in time , for the soliton trapped by the triplet the outcome is reproducible . the fresh soliton always bounces back , while the pinned one either gets released , or remains pinned . these results may be useful in terms of the above - mentioned soliton - based memory and logic elements . following refs . @xcite and @xcite , the fbg model with imperfections is based on the normalized coupled - mode equations for amplitudes of the right- and left - traveling electromagnetic waves , @xmath7 and @xmath8 :    @xmath9 and @xmath10 are the coordinate along the fiber and time . the cross - phase - modulation coefficient , group velocity of the carrier waves , and bragg reflectivity in the uniform grating are scaled to be @xmath11 . function @xmath12 in these equations describes the defect of the grating , with strength @xmath13 . each individual defect is realized as a rectangular configuration , with @xmath14 within a segment of length @xmath15  @xmath16 , and @xmath17 elsewhere , @xmath18 and @xmath19 corresponding to the attractive and repulsive defects , respectively . the rectangular shape of the defect approximates the @xmath20-function profile assumed in previous studies @xcite . in physical units , @xmath21 typically corresponds to length @xmath22 mm @xcite , while the actual size of the solitons created in the experiment may be @xmath23 cm experiment , recent , hence this approximation of @xmath24 seems reasonable .    in this work , we deal with @xmath25 corresponding to a dipole ( doublet ) set , composed of attractive and repulsive rectangular defects with a small distance between their edges , @xmath26 , and ( chiefly ) a triplet set , consisting of two repulsive defects with an attractive one between them , with the same separation between adjacent defects ( it was checked that , for the doublet and triplet alike , this small separation provides for optimum results , as concerns the capture of fast solitons ) .    the attractive defect is realized as a narrow segment of the fbg with suppressed grating . therefore , as the full local reflectivity in eqs . ( utux ) and ( [ vtvx ] ) can not be negative , only @xmath27 , i.e. , values @xmath28 @xmath16 , are meaningful . unlike that , @xmath19 , which corresponds to a local enhancement of the grating , is not subject to a specific limitation on @xmath29 @xcite ( however , the form of the coupled - mode equations for a strong grating may alter @xcite ) . solitons moving at velocity @xmath30 ( with @xmath31 ) in the uniform fbg are given by the well - known solutions to eqs . ( [ utux ] ) and ( [ vtvx ] ) with @xmath32 @xcite : @xmath33 -t\cos \theta ,   \notag\end{aligned}\]]where @xmath34 , @xmath35 , and the soliton s amplitude , @xmath36 , takes values @xmath37 . soliton family ( [ movsol ] ) is stable for @xmath38 , where @xmath39 @xcite , and @xmath40 very weakly depends on @xmath30 , up to @xmath41 @xcite . we will consider solitons with @xmath42 ; accordingly , the dipole set is built as a right attractive defect followed by a left repulsive one . an exact solution is also available for a quiescent soliton pinned by the defect with @xmath43 @xcite,@xmath44 } ,   \label{pinned}\]]with @xmath45 . this solution exists for @xmath46 . equations ( [ utux ] ) and ( [ vtvx ] ) , with @xmath47 , conserve the corresponding hamiltonian , and the norm ( frequently called _ energy _ in optics ) , @xmath48 . for the exact soliton solution ( [ movsol ] ) , @xmath49 , while , for solution ( [ pinned ] ) , @xmath50 $ ] @xcite . if latexmath:[$%    @xmath43 creates an effective potential for a slowly moving soliton , @xmath52 $ ] , where @xmath53 is the coordinate of the soliton s center , and its effective mass is @xmath54 @xcite . in accordance with what was said above , this potential is attractive and repulsive for @xmath18 and @xmath19 , respectively . numerical simulations of the collision of a free soliton with the dipole set ( the attractive defect followed by the repulsive one ) give rise to results summarized in fig . [ dipole](a ) , which displays the share of the soliton s energy trapped after the collision , the remaining energy being chiefly reflected ( at small @xmath55 ) or transmitted ( at larger @xmath55 ) in the form of small pulses , as shown in fig . [ dipole](b ) . we define the effective capture of the soliton as an outcome of the collision with the share of the trapped energy @xmath56 . figure [ dipole](a ) demonstrates that the capture by the doublet , below the  @xmath57 capture limit " boundary , is possible for @xmath58 , which is a better result than the capture limit for a pair of repulsive defects , @xmath59 we ( which , in turn , was better than for single or paired attractive defects @xcite ) . however , fig . [ dipole](b ) clearly shows that the doublet traps the pulse in a strongly perturbed state ; for this reason , the outcome of its subsequent collision with another free soliton is practically unpredictable , as it strongly depends on the intrinsic state of the trapped pulse at the moment of the new collision . the triplet produces essentially better results . in fact , it may be considered as a generalization of the cavity formed by a pair of far separated repulsive defects , which was introduced in ref . @xcite ; however , the small separation between them in the triplet , and the attractive defect inserted in the middle , help to capture more energy from the incident soliton , and shape the trapped energy into a stationary pulse . a typical example of the capture by the triplet is displayed in fig . 3dpictures(a ) . a noteworthy peculiarity of this figure , in comparison with the capture of solitons by single or paired defects @xcite , as well as by the dipole [ see fig . [ dipole](b ) ] , is that the trapped soliton immediately settles down into a stationary state , without any conspicuous intrinsic dynamics .    in a broad parameter range , the efficiency of the capture by the triplet is characterized by plots shown in fig . [ triplet ] . the capture limit is roughly the same as provided by the dipole , cf . [ dipole](a ) , but the quality of the trapping is much better in the present case , as the trapped soliton is a stationary one , as demonstrated above . it is noteworthy that the capture efficiency is not sensitive to details of the triplet s structures , as seen in fig . [ triplet](b ) , which displays the share of the trapped energy versus the relative strength of the repulsive and attractive components of the triplet . the same figure demonstrates that  heavy " incident solitons , with @xmath60 , which are intrinsically unstable @xcite , may also be used for the creation of stable trapped solitons , if the collision happens before the  heavy " soliton develops its instability . another interesting feature of fig . [ triplet](b ) is that there is a well - defined lower threshold for the amplitude of the free soliton , @xmath61 , which is necessary for the efficient capture . collisions between bound and free solitons were not studied before in the fbg model , even for a single attractive defect . examined were collisions of two free solitons , against the backdrop of the single @xcite or paired @xcite defects . sundry outcomes were found , including the capture of both solitons , which might merge into a single one @xcite ( collisions between free solitons in the uniform - fbg model were studied in detail in ref . wecollision ) .    as mentioned above , the outcome of the collision between a free soliton and one pinned by the dipole defect is very irregular , if the pinned soliton itself was generated by trapping an originally free one by the empty dipole , as , in that case , the pinned soliton performs persistent intrinsic vibrations , and the outcome depends on the phase of the vibrations at the moment of the collision with the incident soliton . we have checked that essentially the same is observed if the first soliton was originally trapped by a single attractive defect . obviously , this irregularity would impede the use of the collisions in applications .    on the contrary , the collision between the soliton originally captured by a triplet and a free soliton is completely predictable . while the incident soliton always bounces back , the pinned one either remains in the same state [ see an example in fig . [ 3dpictures](b ) ] or is kicked out in the forward direction , depending on the velocity of the free soliton , @xmath30 , and phase shift @xmath62 between it and the pinned soliton at the collision moment . small portions of the energy are spent to form additional weak pulses , as seen in fig . [ 3dpictures](b ) . the dependence of the outcome of the collision on @xmath30 and @xmath62 is displayed in fig . [ collision ] . a sharp transition from the rebound without depinning to the release of the pinned soliton , in a narrow interval @xmath63 , is observed in fig . collision(a ) . it is quite natural that the increase of the momentum of the free soliton allows it to kick out the pinned one . figure [ collision](b ) additionally shows that the collision effect ( release of the pinned soliton ) is stronger when the two solitons are phase - shifted by @xmath64 ( the free soliton , with the same momentum , kicks out the pinned one , unlike the situation at @xmath65 ) . the difference can be understood , as in - phase solitons attract each other , while out - of - phase ones interact with repulsion ; therefore , in the former case the interaction force acts on the pinned soliton to the right ( in the direction of the free soliton ) , hence it is less likely for it to be kicked out in the opposite direction , while the repulsion force , acting on it in the case of @xmath64 , makes the eventual depinning more plausible . it is relevant to mention that the simulations did not reveal an outcome of the collision in the form of  recharge " , i.e. , replacement of the originally pinned soliton by the impinging one . we have extended the recent analysis of the interaction of a free soliton in the fbg  ( fiber - bragg - grating ) model with a paired - defect set to a more complex ( but still sufficiently simple ) triplet structure , formed by two repulsive defects and an attractive one between them , with a relatively small separation between the defects . it has been demonstrated that the triplet is superior to other traps ( including the doublet formed by attractive and repulsive defects ) in achieving the aim of the creation of the  standing optical soliton " : the triplet allows one to capture 2/3 of the energy of a free soliton moving at half the light speed in the fiber . a moving intrinsically unstable (  too heavy " ) soliton can also be readily captured by the triplet , giving rise to the stationary pinned pulse . another advantage offered by the triplet is that the trapped soliton quickly settles down to a stationary state , which makes the subsequent collision of the pinned soliton with a free one predictable : the impinging soliton always bounces back , while the pinned one remains in the bound state or is kicked out , depending on the velocity and relative phase of the collision . the triplet structure , whose inner scale is on the ( sub)millimeter scale , can be readily fabricated in the fbg , and the predicted results may be relevant to the design of soliton - based optical memory and logic element , where solitons would serve as data bits . 99 a. b. aceves , s. wabnitz , phys . a * 141 * , 37 ( 1989 ) ; d. n. christodoulides , r. i. joseph , phys . rev . lett . * 62*(1989 ) 1746 .    c. m. de sterke , j. e. sipe , progr . opt . * 33 * ( 1994 ) 203 . b. j.  eggleton , r. e.  slusher , c. m.  de sterke , p. a.  krug , j. e.  sipe , phys . * 76 * ( 1996 ) 1627 ; c. m. de sterke , b. j. eggleton , p. a. krug , j. lightwave technol . * 15 * ( 1997 ) 1494 . g. van simaeys , s. coen , m. haelterman , s. trillo , phys . * 92 * ( 2004 ) 223902 . b. a. malomed , r. s. tasgal , phys . e * 49 * ( 1994 ) 5787 ; d. j. kaup , t. i. lakoba , j. math . * 37 * ( 1996 ) 3442 . i. v. barashenkov , d. e. pelinovsky , e. v. zemlyanaya , phys . * 80 * ( 1998 ) 5117 ; a. de rossi , c. conti , s. trillo , _ ibid_. * 81 * ( 1998 ) 85 . j. marangos , nature *  397 * ( 1999 ) 559 ; k. t. mcdonald , am . * 68 * ( 2000 ) 293 . j. e. heebner , r. w. boyd , q. h. park , phys . e * 65 * ( 2002 ) 036619 . j. t. mok , c. m. de sterke , i. c. m. littler , b. j. eggleton , nature physics * 2 * ( 2006 ) 775 . w. c. k. mak , b. a. malomed , p. l. chu , j. mod . opt . * 51 * ( 2004 ) 2141 . r. h.  goodman , r. e.   slusher , m. i.  weinstein , j. opt . b * 19 * ( 2002 ) 1635 . w. c. k. mak , b. a. malomed , p. l. chu , j. opt . b * 20 * ( 2003 ) 725 . w. c. k. mak , b. a. malomed , p. l. chu , phys . e * 67 * ( 2003 ) 026608 .    c. m. de sterke , e. n. tsoy , j. e. sipe , opt . *  27 * ( 2002 ) 485 . chen , b. a. malomed , p. l. chu , phys . e * 71 * ( 2005 ) 066601 . g. kurizki , a. e. kozhekin , t. opatrny , b. a. malomed , in : _ progress in optics _ , vol . 42 , chapter 2 , pp . 93 - 146 ( e. wolf , editor : north holland , amsterdam , 2001 ) . i. v. melnikov , b. i. mantsyzov , j. s. aitchison , opt . lett . * 29 * ( 2004 ) 289 ; b. i. mantsyzov , i. v. melnikov , j. s. aitchison , phys . e * 69 * ( 2004 ) 055602 ; ieee j. sel . topics quant . * 10 * ( 2004 ) 893 . t. iizuka c. m. de sterke , phys . e * 61 * ( 2000 ) 4491 . w. c. k. mak , b. a. malomed , p. l. chu , phys . e * 68 * ( 2003 ) 026609 . figure 1 . ( a ) contour plots for the share of the energy of the free soliton with velocity @xmath30 , trapped after its collision with the dipole ( doublet ) defect built as a set of the attractive and repulsive defects with strengths @xmath66 . above the  reflection limit " boundary , the soliton as a whole bounces back , due to the reflection from the repulsive defect . ( b ) an example of the collision for @xmath67 and @xmath68 . in this figure and below , the defect is centered at @xmath69 , and the free soliton is always launched at @xmath70 . typical examples of collisions involving a triplet . ( a ) capture of a free soliton by an empty triplet ( the collision also generates a small reflected pulse , which is poorly seen behind the trapped soliton ) . ( b ) bounce of a free moving soliton from the pinned one , which was generated by the collision shown in ( a ) . in either case , the free soliton has amplitude @xmath68 and velocity @xmath71 . the triplet is a set of two repulsive defects , with @xmath72 , and an attractive one between them , with @xmath73 . ( a ) the same as in fig . [ dipole](a ) , but for the capture of a free moving soliton ( with amplitude @xmath74 ) by the triplet formed by two repulsive defects with strengths @xmath75 , and an attractive one set between them , with strength @xmath76 . below the  reflection limit " boundary , the soliton as a whole bounces back ( in fact , it is a sharp border between the capture and rebound ) . ( b ) the share of the captured energy versus amplitude @xmath36 of the free soliton , with velocity @xmath71 , and the ratio of the strengths of the repulsive and attractive defects , if their strengths are not equal . shares of the total energy of the colliding solitons ( a free one and a soliton originally pinned by the triplet with @xmath77 ) which are eventually bound in the bouncing (  reflected " ) pulse and in ones which stay trapped (  captured " ) and move to the left , having been kicked out from the pinned state (  transmitted " ) . the initial amplitude of both solitons is @xmath78 ( the bound soliton was generated by the capture of a free one with @xmath79 ) . in ( a ) , the shares are shown versus the velocity of the free soliton , for the collision with zero phase difference , @xmath80 ; in ( b ) , the same is shown versus @xmath81 , for @xmath71 . the three shares do not add up to @xmath82 , as a small additional share is lost to radiation .
Abstract:

Answer: we examine collisions of moving solitons in a fiber bragg grating with a _ triplet _ composed of two closely set repulsive defects of the grating and an attractive one inserted between them . a _ doublet _ ( dipole ) , consisting of attractive and repulsive defects with a small distance between them , is considered too . systematic simulations demonstrate that the triplet provides for superior results , as concerns the capture of a free pulse and creation of a _ standing optical soliton _ , in comparison with recently studied traps formed by single and paired defects , as well as the doublet : 2/3 of the energy of the incident soliton can be captured when its velocity attains half the light speed in the fiber ( the case most relevant to the experiment ) , and the captured soliton quickly relaxes to a stationary state . a subsequent collision between another free soliton and the pinned one is examined too , demonstrating that the impinging soliton always bounces back , while the pinned one either remains in the same state , or is kicked out forward , depending on the collision velocity and phase shift between the solitons .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the interpretation of hard hadronic processes in terms of partonic ( quark and gluon ) degrees of freedom forms a vital component of modern research in particle physics . in particular , the tagging of parton quantum numbers , such as flavor and charge , using appropriately chosen final states allows important tests of both qcd and electroweak dynamics . in the remainder of this paper , we will focus primarily on the leptoproduction of hadrons in deep inelastic scattering ( dis ) , @xmath1 , where both initial states are polarized . such measurements continue to provide important information on the spin structure of the nucleon  @xcite . however , the conceptual foundations of our approach and the formalism that we introduce pertain to any hard hadronic process , and other applications are mentioned in sec . [ sec : applications ] . the spin structure of the nucleon has received much attention in the past decade  @xcite . the experimental focus until rather recently has been on the leading twist structure function @xmath2 , which is roughly proportional to the inclusive spin asymmetry on a longitudinally polarized target . however , processes where at least one hadron is detected in the final state offer several distinct advantages over the inclusive process alone  @xcite . in particular , semi - inclusive reactions provide a direct probe of the flavor dependence of quark observables , allowing more stringent tests of hadron structure . perhaps more importantly , semi - inclusive processes allow one to separate  @xcite contributions with definite charge conjugation symmetry . this is particularly interesting since charge - odd quantities are free of the axial anomaly . it has been recently suggested  @xcite that a comparison of the charge conjugation even and odd parts of parton helicity and transversity distributions may yield new information on the polarized gluon contribution to the nucleon spin . given this importance of semi - inclusive measurements in hard hadronic processes , it is useful to have a formalism that is independent of model assumptions . in sec . [ sec : formalism ] , we introduce a general method to extract chosen polarized quark distributions from an arbitrary combination of final state asymmetries . this new approach is particularly useful in light of the latest generation of existing [ hermes , spin muon collaboration ( smc ) , tjnaf ] and forthcoming [ compass , elfe , hera-@xmath3 , bnl relativistic heavy ion collider ( rhic ) spin ] experimental efforts , which allow identification of a large number of final state hadrons . within the framework of the presented formalism , we quantify the sensitivity , as a function of kinematics , of various hadrons to the light quark flavors . traditionally , quark flavor tagging has been applied almost exclusively to the current fragmentation region in deep inelastic processes . since a separation between the current and target regions is usually regarded as a necessary criterion for such measurements , one imposes kinematic cuts in order to try to exclude the target region . our point is that such a separation is not possible , even in principle , within a coherent and complete description of hadronic final states . in perturbation theory , this follows from the existence of collinear singularities with respect to initial state partons that generate a contribution to the target fragmentation region  @xcite . we further argue that , generally speaking , there is no _ a priori _ reason to minimize the effects of target fragmentation . indeed , it has been shown  @xcite that , independent of a transverse momentum cutoff , all collinear singularities for sufficiently hard hadrons can be absorbed into so - called fracture functions  @xcite @xmath4 , which give the joint probability of  finding " within the target @xmath5 a parton @xmath6 and hadron @xmath7 . measurements sensitive to target fragmentation offer complementary information on the nucleon state  @xcite and additional insights into a unified view  @xcite of hadronic reactions . quark flavor tagging is based on the idea of local parton - hadron duality ( lphd )  @xcite , where it is assumed that the flow of quantum numbers at the hadron level tends to follow the flow established at the parton level . at leading order in perturbation theory ( for infrared safe or factorizable parton quantities ) , this has the practical consequence that the parton - hadron correspondence is essentially one - to - one . since quarks and gluons are not asymptotic states ( due to confinement ) , it would be a mistake to conclude that we can ever measure , in effect , a primary parton , instead of merely an event property that is _ correlated _ with the primary parton . within a complete description of hadronic processes , valid beyond the leading order , the relevant issue is the degree of correlation between the final state topology and the quantum numbers of the primary partons . it is therefore instructive to discuss briefly the nature of parton - hadron correlations . inclusive hadron distributions in all hadronic processes , regardless of whether the collisions are hard or soft , are characterized by projectile fragmentation regions separated by a central region  @xcite . the key feature of the central region is that it is essentially independent of both projectiles and hence universal for all hadronic processes ( at fixed invariant mass @xmath8 ) . this has been confirmed in hadron - hadron collisions  @xcite , and indeed , hadron spectra in the central region are found to be very similar  @xcite in @xmath9 , @xmath10 , photoproduction , and low-@xmath11 dis processes . these generic features of hadronic final states have been recognized  @xcite a long time ago to be a consequence of lorentz invariance and short range correlations in rapidity . using an approach based on short range rapidity correlations and lphd , we have calculated  @xcite the correlations of light hadrons with respect to the current quark and target remnant . within our discussion , it is important to distinguish between forward ( @xmath12 ) and backward ( @xmath13 ) regions , which are _ defined _ strictly by kinematics , from the current , target , and central fragmentation regions , which are never distinct , but represent varying degrees of correlation with the quark and remnant . as the correlations depend strongly on rapidity differences , our definition of the fragmentation regions coincides with their classification , within perturbative qcd , in terms of collinear and soft divergences . this suggests that it is favorable to use hadronic variables such as @xmath14 or rapidity over the usual energy fraction @xmath15 , since the latter variable can not distinguish between the central and target regions ( both dominate at low @xmath16 ) .    in our calculations , we find that at small @xmath17 and _ fixed _ @xmath18 , both the current and target correlations decrease as @xmath8 increases . collisions . however , as discussed in refs . @xcite , these scaling violations are actually due to threshold production of charmed particles , where , as expected , the region of scaling extends down to lower values of @xmath14 as @xmath8 is increased . ] this implies that most of the increase in hadron production with increasing @xmath8 occurs in the central region , a result well known from hadronic phenomenology . indeed , in dis at _ constant _ @xmath18 , the charged pion fragmentation functions @xmath19 rise linearly with @xmath20 at small @xmath21 , but remain constant at larger values of @xmath22 , both in the forward and backward regions  @xcite . this is an important result , because it illustrates that independent of the target remnant , there are kinematical effects in the forward region that can not be described by fragmentation functions depending on @xmath16 and @xmath18 alone , as is usually assumed . for increasing values of @xmath8 , while the current and target regions become better separated kinematically , the fraction of hadrons that are strongly correlated with the current quark decreases ( roughly as @xmath23 ) . even in the central region , however , the correlation between an arbitrary final state and the flavor of the current quark remains significant due to the finite number of accessible flavors . in the next section , we introduce a new formalism that allows one to quantify the above correlations and to relate chosen hadron - level asymmetries to the polarization of partons involved in the hard scattering process . hadronic final states in deep inelastic processes are typically analyzed in terms of the usual fragmentation functions @xmath24 @xcite , which parameterize the probability density for producing hadrons @xmath7 , given an initial state parton of flavor @xmath6 ( @xmath25 ) . the corresponding formulas for polarized and unpolarized scattering , at leading twist , are well known . however , fragmentation functions are not the most useful quantities in the context of quark flavor tagging . instead , we define the _ quark flavor purity _ @xmath26 as the probability that a quark of flavor @xmath6 was probed by the virtual photon , given a final state @xmath7 . in terms of the usual quantities , we can write @xmath27 where @xmath28 are the quark charges , @xmath29 are helicity averaged quark distributions , @xmath30 are generalized fragmentation functions , and @xmath31 . ] and @xmath32 holds for any final state . the purities not only have the physically meaningful interpretation mentioned above , but also are the relevant quantities for performing a polarized quark flavor decomposition from semi - inclusive asymmetries .    as a specific example , we consider semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering with both beam and target longitudinally polarized , where the photon is the exchanged boson . in this case , for hadrons @xmath7 in the final state , one measures the virtual photon - nucleon asymmetry @xmath33 where @xmath34 denotes the cross section when the projection of the total angular momentum of the photon - nucleon system is @xmath35 . we can then write any such asymmetry ( at leading twist ) in terms of only purities and quark flavor polarizations @xmath36 : @xmath37 following the arguments in the previous section , eq . ( [ eq : asymmetry ] ) holds in both the forward and backward regions , for sufficiently hard hadrons . the derivation of eq . ( [ eq : asymmetry ] ) depends crucially on the independence of the fragmentation process on the quark polarization . although this is usually stated as an additional assumption , it is actually a consequence of the parity invariance of the strong interaction : for inclusive production of unpolarized hadrons , there is no pseudovector observable in the final state that could in principle couple to the quark polarization . it follows that , for example , the presence of target fragmentation does not dilute the asymmetry . in general , there is no reason to minimize the contribution of target fragmentation , as long as the correct purities are used in the analysis . the form of eq . ( [ eq : asymmetry ] ) allows us to combine several independent asymmetries into a column vector , yielding the matrix equation : @xmath38 when the matrix elements of @xmath39 are determined ( from data or simulations ) , eq . ( [ eq : puritymatrix ] ) contains _ all _ information needed to extract specified polarized quark distributions from a chosen set of semi - inclusive asymmetries . the inclusive asymmetry , where only the scattered lepton is detected , also contains useful information and can be trivially incorporated within the purity formalism : @xmath40 within the presented approach , then , the extraction of polarized quark flavor distributions is reduced to optimization , via choice of final ( and initial ) state hadrons and kinematics , of the purity matrix . several methods of optimization are suggested in ref . @xcite . we have studied the kinematical dependence of purities for light quark flavors and hadrons , on proton and deuteron targets , using lepto-6.1  @xcite for event generation and jetset-7.4  @xcite for hadronization . since the purities are independent of the quark helicities , an unpolarized simulation can be used to generate them . we have used the hermes kinematics and a parametric model  @xcite of its acceptance in our simulations ( see ref . @xcite for details ) , applying standard dis selection cuts of @xmath41 gev@xmath42 , @xmath43 gev@xmath42 , and @xmath44 . the following numerical results therefore apply primarily to the forward region , as hermes detects mostly forward hadrons . as expected from the form of eq . ( [ eq : purity ] ) , the purities are relatively insensitive to the choice of hadronization model parameters and unpolarized parton distributions . = 8.6 cm    in fig . [ fig1 ] , we plot quark flavor purities for typical final states as a function of the bjorken-@xmath11 variable , using a deuteron target ( results on the proton are qualitatively similar ) . all quark flavor labels refer to the proton , using isospin symmetry . the cut @xmath45 is applied to suppress very central hadrons . using the purities shown , it is straightforward to quantify the sensitivity of semi - inclusive asymmetries to the light quark and antiquark flavors . we summarize our general conclusions here . as expected from charge counting , positively charged hadrons are primarily sensitive to the @xmath46-quark [ see figs . [ fig1](a),(c ) ] . given that the inclusive asymmetry on a proton target essentially probes the combination @xmath47 , one can reasonably constrain the @xmath46- and @xmath48-quark polarizations from a combined analysis of inclusive and positively charged hadron data alone . since @xmath49 is dominated by @xmath46- , @xmath48- , and @xmath50-quarks at small @xmath51 [ see fig . [ fig1](b ) ] , including @xmath52 in the above analysis allows one to extract @xmath53 , @xmath54 , and @xmath55 in the sea region . in addition , as only @xmath46- and @xmath50-quarks contribute significantly to @xmath49 in the valence region ( @xmath56 ) , one can extract @xmath53 and @xmath55 ( at large @xmath11 ) using _ only _ @xmath57 and @xmath52 . we conclude that a combination of asymmetries using copiously produced hadrons can be used to extract @xmath53 , @xmath54 , and @xmath55 . on the other hand , it will be a challenge to measure the polarization of @xmath58-quarks , since the corresponding purities never exceed 10% for the final states shown in fig . we suggest combining @xmath59 with a measurement of @xmath60 ( @xmath61 ) using the pion charge difference asymmetry method of ref . @xcite . = 8.6 cm    we have also studied the sensitivity of semi - inclusive asymmetries to polarized strange quarks and antiquarks in the nucleon . in fig . [ fig2 ] , we plot the purities of selected strange hadrons as a function of @xmath14 in the sea region ( @xmath51 ) . the @xmath62 is often regarded as an interesting probe of the nucleon , as it is an  all sea " object . we indeed find a large sensitivity to sea quarks . as expected from charge counting , the @xmath48-quark dominates over the @xmath63-quark contribution , independently of @xmath14 [ see fig . [ fig2](a ) ] . on the other hand , selecting charged kaons from @xmath31 meson decay provides improved sensitivity to @xmath63- and @xmath64-quarks [ see fig . [ fig2](b ) ] . for example , using the cuts @xmath51 and @xmath65 , we find that @xmath66 . the @xmath31 meson may therefore be a useful probe of the polarized strange sea , provided one applies kinematical cuts to suppress elastic production . semi - inclusive @xmath0 ( @xmath67 ) asymmetries are predominantly sensitive to @xmath46- ( @xmath46- and @xmath48- ) quark polarizations , except at rather large values of @xmath14 [ see figs . [ fig2](c),(d ) ] . however , we find that the @xmath0 is sensitive , at the 20% level , to @xmath64-quarks at slightly negative @xmath68 , where the event rate is still reasonably large . the key point is that the @xmath0 asymmetry in this region is determined essentially by @xmath53 , @xmath55 , and @xmath69 ( and the corresponding purities ) . since @xmath53 and @xmath55 will be well constrained by charged hadron and inclusive asymmetries ( as discussed above ) , @xmath0 production in the backward region may be used to constrain the polarized @xmath64-quark sea . in this case , to a good approximation , one can write @xmath70 } . \label{eq : sbar}\end{aligned}\ ] ] likewise , as the @xmath0 event rate distribution in @xmath14 is rather broad , one obtains appreciable sensitivity to polarized @xmath63-quarks using only a modest cut on @xmath14 . in particular , for @xmath71 ( and @xmath51 ) , we find that @xmath72 and @xmath73 . hence , given the contribution of @xmath46- and @xmath50-quarks , the @xmath74 asymmetry in this region probes @xmath75 . we therefore emphasize the importance of measuring @xmath0 asymmetries in _ both _ the forward and backward regions . thus far , we have introduced the quark flavor purities with particular emphasis on their key role in interpreting electroproduction of unpolarized hadrons , where both beam and target are longitudinally polarized . however , it is clear that our considerations generalize directly to all sufficiently hard hadronic processes . in general , the purities allow us to quantify , in a well defined way , the sensitivity of chosen hadrons to the flavor of quarks involved in the hard scattering process . for the special case of polarization in the initial state , the purities relate , within the framework of a compact formalism , hadron - level asymmetries to the polarization of initial state partons . for example , one may imagine using the purity formalism to measure the polarization of various quark flavors using identified hadrons in electroweak interactions , where parity violation provides polarization observables for free . we leave these possibilities to future work . we will focus instead on one example of particular interest in spin physics : deep inelastic production of polarized hadrons ( or jets ) . it is well known that polarized quarks can give rise to parity - odd correlations in the final state  @xcite . we illustrate here how virtual photoproduction of vector polarized final states ( see ref . @xcite ) can be conveniently analyzed using a formalism based on purities . our results , written explicitly for virtual photon - nucleon scattering , generalize trivially for other hard hadronic processes . for definiteness , we choose a helicity basis oriented along the virtual photon direction ( @xmath76 ) and neglect finite angle effects , so that the fragmentation helicity basis is collinear with the quark helicity basis . we then combine the polarizations @xmath77 of chosen final states @xmath7 ( possibly specified by kinematics and choice of target ) into a column vector @xmath78 . our result is that at leading twist , for an _ unpolarized _ beam incident on a target with longitudinal polarization @xmath76 , @xmath79 where the matrix elements of @xmath80 are defined by @xmath81 the @xmath82 are helicity difference fragmentation functions , which are assumed to be related , modulo dilution factors , to the quark helicity structure of the final state . also , just as the purities satisfy the constraint @xmath83 , the quantities @xmath84 that enter eq . ( [ eq : lambda_tarpol ] ) are normalized by the longitudinal polarizations @xmath77 using a _ polarized _ beam ( @xmath76 ) and an _ unpolarized _ target : @xmath85 equations ( [ eq : lambda_tarpol])-([eq : spinpurity ] ) also hold for transversely polarized hadrons produced off a transversely polarized target , provided we everywhere make the replacement @xmath86 ( helicity@xmath87transversity ) . indeed , formulas such as eqs . ( [ eq : lambda_tarpol])-([eq : lambda_tarunpol ] ) are generic to processes with polarization observables in the final state , where the @xmath88 are the corresponding analyzing powers . we therefore conclude that the purities previously defined are also the natural quantities for performing a global analysis of polarized hadron ( or jet ) production in hard processes . we have benefited from discussions with r.  j.  holt , r.  l.  jaffe , x.  ji , l.  mankiewicz , and r.  p.  redwine . this work is supported in part through funds provided by the u.s . department of energy under contract no . de - fc02 - 94er40818 .    for recent reviews , see e.  reya , in _ deep inelastic scattering off polarized targets , _ proceedings of the 2nd topical workshop , zeuthen , germany , 1997 , edited by j.  blumlein _ et al . _ ( desy report no . 200 , hamburg , 1997 ) ; j.  ellis , in spin96 proceedings , hep - ph/9611208 . r.  l.  heinmann , nucl . * b121 * , 445 ( 1977 ) ; j.  phys . g * 4 * , 173 ( 1978 ) . r.  p.  feynman , _ photon hadron interactions _ ( benjamin , reading , ma , 1972 ) ; f.  e.  close , _ introduction to quarks and partons _ ( academic , new york , 1978 ) , chap .  13 . l.  l.  frankfurt _ et al . _ , phys . b * 230 * , 141 ( 1989 ) . f.  e.  close and r.  g.  milner , phys . d * 44 * , 3691 ( 1991 ) . j.  m.  niczyporuk , s.  b.  thesis , massachusetts institute of technology , 1997 ( available at http://www-hermes.desy.de/@xmath89dilys/pub/97-lib/nicz.97.018.ps.gz ) . d.  graudenz , nucl . * b432 * , 351 ( 1994 ) . l.  trentadue and g.  veneziano , phys . b * 323 * , 201 ( 1994 ) . g.  m.  shore and g.  veneziano , nucl . phys .  * b516 * , 333 ( 1998 ) ; j.  ellis , d.  kharzeev , and a.  kotzinian , z.  phys . c * 69 * , 467 ( 1996 ) . d.  de florian and r.  sassot , phys . d * 56 * , 426 ( 1997 ) ; c.  boros , z.  liang , and t.  meng , freie univ . report fub - hep-95 - 21-rev , 1995 , hep - ph/9603236 . y.  i.  azimov , y.  l.  dokshitser , v.  a.  khoze , and s.  i.  troian , z.  phys . c * 27 * , 65 ( 1985 ) ; * 31 * , 213 ( 1986 ) . j.  d.  bjorken and j.  b.  kogut , phys . d * 8 * , 1341 ( 1973 ) . m.  adamus _ et al . _ , z.  phys . c * 39 * , 311 ( 1988 ) . h1 collaboration , s.  aid _ et al . _ , phys . b * 358 * , 412 ( 1995 ) . r.  p.  feynman , phys . * 23 * , 1415 ( 1969 ) ; e.  l.  berger , in _ proceedings of the workshop on electronuclear physics with internal targets , _ stanford , california , 1987 , edited by r.  g.  arnold and r.  c.  minehart ( slac report no .  316 , stanford , 1987 ) , argonne report anl - hep - cp-87 - 045 . j.  l.  siegrist _ et al . _ , phys . d * 26 * , 969 ( 1982 ) . f.  halzen and a.  d.  martin , _ quarks and leptons _ ( wiley , new york , 1984 ) . m.  arneodo _ et al . _ , z.  phys . c * 31 * , 1 ( 1986 ) . g.  ingelman , in _ proceedings of workshop on physics at hera , hamburg , 1991 _ , edited by w.  buchmller and g.  ingelman ( desy , hamburg , 1991 ) . t.  sjstrand , comput . commun .  * 82 * , 74 ( 1994 ) . h.  ihssen ( private communication ) . d.  de florian , c.  g.  canal , s.  joffily , and r.  sassot , hep - ph/9606265 . for a review , see j.  collins , hep - ph/9510263 . r.  l.  jaffe , phys . d * 54 * , 6581 ( 1996 ) ; x.  artru and m.  mekhfi , z.  phys . c * 45 * , 669 ( 1990 ) ; nucl . * a532 * , 351 ( 1991 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we describe a general approach to quark flavor tagging in polarized hadronic processes , with particular emphasis on semi - inclusive deep inelastic scattering . a formalism is introduced that allows one to relate chosen quark flavor polarizations to an arbitrary combination of final - state hadron spin asymmetries . within the context of the presented formalism , we quantify the sensitivity of various semi - inclusive hadron asymmetries to the light quark flavors . we show that _ unpolarized _ @xmath0 s may allow one to measure strange quark and antiquark polarizations independently . we also highlight several applications of our formalism , particularly to measurements intended to probe further the spin structure of the nucleon .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the standard model ( sm ) has been the most satisfactory and widely recognized theory of particle interaction . to an extent , this is an effective theory , whose certain parameters are estimated and then refined by increasing high - precision experiments . however , this also means that the dynamical origin of some of these parameters is not found within the sm . one example is the pattern of family mixing characterized by the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa ( ckm ) matrix , which in turn is related to the sm fermion mass spectrum and cp violation . recently , considerable attention has been directed to phenomenological models with extra dimensions since among many other things , they can offer potential answers to puzzling questions related to the sm .    in theories with compact extra dimensions , each original field in higher dimensional space can be effectively `` viewed '' as a tower of kaluza - klein ( kk ) states in equivalent 4-d theories after compactification processes . if sm is assumed to be the low - energy manifestation of a higher dimensional theory , the tower s lowest state ( or kk zero mode ) is identified as a sm field . in @xcite ( see also earlier works @xcite ) , by introducing a @xmath1-invariant yukawa interaction between a background scalar field and a fermion field in 5-d theory , after a @xmath2 compactification , one can obtain a non - trivial ( i.e. localized ) solution for the kk zero - mode wavefunction along the fifth dimension ( brane scenario ) . from a 4-d point of view , any interaction term is now associated with a coupling being the overlap integration of extra dimensional wavefunctions of related fields . one then can flexibly control this 4-d theory effective coupling by regulating the localized wavefunctions along the extra dimension . this very interesting mechanism has found potential application in many problems such as proton decay suppression @xcite , fermion mass hierarchy @xcite , cp violation @xcite , etc .    in this work , we discuss the problem of quark mass spectrum and mixing angles by making extensive use of a democratic structure for the mass matrices . we found that a democratic structure for the mass matrices ( dmm ) is a particularly convenient choice , because it raises quite naturally in brane picture , and it can adequately generate both quark mass spectrum and ckm matrix to the precision determined by current experimental data . previous works dealing with fermion mass hierarchy and cp violation within split - fermion scenario @xcite focus on placing fermion families on different positions in the bulk , with the possibility to make mass matrix elements , originating from couplings between geographically very distant families , approximately zero . these highly hierarchical mass matrix approach however requires additional techniques ( see section ii ) because naively localizing fermions in an arbitrary position along the extra dimension may contradict @xmath0 orbifold compactification being used . in the dmm approach , we can avoid this subtlety by localizing all fields only at the two fixed points of the orbifold , while we break the family symmetry by modifying the detailed shapes of their wavefuctions . further , the approach turns out to be more symmetric too . our work is structured as follows : in section ii we introduce the lagrangian to generate pure - phase mass matrices ( ppmm ) and dmm within a fermion localization mechanism , in section iii we give the description of parameter space , in section iv we present the numerical method and report the results for the mass spectrum and ckm matrix for the 24 parameter version of our model and in section v for the 15 parameter version . finally we give a brief conclusion of the work in section vi . we first briefly review the mechanism of fermion localization in extra dimension @xcite . we begin with the 5-d lagrangian for a single massless fermion interacting with a real background scalar field . the fifth dimension is compact with support @xmath3 $ ] . the generalization to the case with different families of fermions is straightforward . @xmath4 it is important that this lagrangian is invariant under a @xmath1 symmetry @xmath5 @xmath6 to obtain the chiral zero mode for fermions as they are in the sm , it is necessary to compactify the 5-d theory on an @xmath0 orbifold through the imposition of the following relations on the fields @xmath7 @xmath8 which constrain the fermion left - handed component and the scalar wavefunctions to be antisymmetric , and the fermion right - handed component to be symmetric at the orbifold fixed points @xmath9 . this in turn gives rise to a stable and non - constant vev solution for the background scalar field when @xmath10 is sufficiently large ( @xmath11 ) @xmath12 where @xmath13 characterizes the extent of the brane in the transverse direction , to which standard model chiral quarks are going to be confined . clearly , vev kink - antikink approximation ( [ compositesol ] ) holds only for @xmath14 . after performing a chiral decomposition @xmath15 one obtains the massless ( zero - mode ) fermion wavefunctions satisfying the motion equation associated with lagrangian ( [ lag ] ) @xmath16 } \ , ,   \\ \label{soll } \xi_{l}(y ) & = & \frac{1}{n_l } \exp{\left(f \int_{0}^{y } h(y')dy ' \right ) } =   \frac{1}{n_l}\exp{\left[-f \left(\mu y +   \frac{1}{\tanh \mu}\ln{\frac{\cosh \mu ( 1-y)}{\cosh \mu y \cosh \mu}}\right )   \right ] } \ , ,           \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath17 and @xmath18 are the normalization factors . now let us mention some important properties of these zero - mode solutions which are relevant to the present work . first , both solutions ( [ solr ] ) and ( [ soll ] ) are symmetric at the orbifold fixed points @xmath19 , so the right component survives and the left component vanishes by contradiction with the orbifold boundary conditions ( [ obcpsi ] ) assuring the single - handedness of sm fermions . by inverting the sign of @xmath20 in ( [ z2psi ] ) one can change the chirality of the surviving fermion . second , the sign of the yukawa coupling @xmath21 decides the localization position of the surviving chiral zero - mode fermions along the extra dimension ; if @xmath22 it is @xmath23 , if @xmath24 it is @xmath25 . localizing fermions at an arbitrary location other than the two fixed points in the bulk requires additional extensions of the lagrangian such as odd - mass terms @xcite or two background scalar fields @xcite . in the next section , sticking just to the minimal localization mechanism , we exhaust all possibilities of placing different @xmath26 representations @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 at the two fixed points and find that , in all configurations , this is indeed sufficient to obtain the right quark mass spectrum and ckm matrix . remarkably , this minimal localization mechanism also features a democratic structure for the quark mass matrices , because fields of identical @xmath30 gauge symmetry ( @xmath31 s , @xmath32 s or @xmath33 s ) are localized at the same point along the extra dimension . small deviations from a democratic mass matrix , which is necessary in any realistic model , are realized in our approach by slightly modifying the fermions wavefunctions . third , in the difference with other works in literature , here we make use of the exact solution for the zero - mode wavefunctions ( [ solr ] ) , ( [ soll ] ) in place of a gaussian profile approximation .      in the spirit of sm , we now introduce three @xmath26 doublets @xmath34 and six @xmath26 singlets @xmath35 , @xmath36 ( @xmath37 ) whose zero modes are identified respectively with the sm quark chiral components @xmath38 , @xmath39 , @xmath40 after orbifold compactification . the higgs doublet zero mode is assumed to be uniform along transverse direction ( @xmath41 ) . we construct a general 5-d lagrangian concerning three fermion families @xmath42 in order to obtain a ppmm in 4-d effective theory , we use the following ansatz for 5-d yukawa couplings @xmath43 with @xmath44 and @xmath45 real positive . we note in particular in the above ansatz that complex higher - dimensional yukawa couplings have universal absolute values @xmath46 , @xmath47 for both up and down sector , and family symmetry is broken only in the phases . the difference between @xmath48 and @xmath49 to eventually give rise to the up - down quark mass hierarchy can also be accommodated conveniently in the brane picture with more extra dimensions ( section iic ) . the sm quarks obtain masses via spontaneous symmetry breaking with the higgs developing a vev @xmath50 ( note that sm chiral fields @xmath51 and @xmath52 have identical extra - dimensional wavefunctions because they originally come from the same doublet in higher - dimensional theory ) , the higgs zero mode is the only mode that receives non - zero vev @xcite ] @xmath53 + h.c . \ , ,          \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath54    with real , dimensionless effective couplings @xmath55 and @xmath56 . one has to notice that a pure - phase structure for the matrices @xmath57 and @xmath58 arises when the left - handed zero mode of @xmath34 are localized at the same position along the extra dimension independently of the family index @xmath59 and the same happens for the right - handed zero mode of @xmath35 and @xmath36 . then as it is clear from eqs . ( [ massupnew ] ) and ( [ massdownnew ] ) the elements of each matrix differ only by a phase factor . we first perform the usual transformation from gauge eigenbasis to mass eigenbasis @xmath60 where @xmath61 , @xmath62 diagonalize respectively the matrices ( @xmath63 ) , ( @xmath64 ) @xmath65 and whose product gives the ckm matrix @xmath66 the origin of cp violation in weak interaction is related to the phase appearing in the ckm matrix , which by virtue of above relations comes from the complexity of mass matrices ( it is well - known that real mass matrices do not give rise to cp violation ) . the localization mechanism in 5-d theory clearly provides a direct control over the modulus of each mass matrix element , but it does nothing to their phases . that is , a priori @xmath57 and @xmath58 may possess in total 18 arbitrary phases @xmath67 , @xmath68 . in the present work , stemming from the interest in model s simplicity , we just attribute four phases @xmath69 , @xmath70 , @xmath71 , @xmath72 to elements of @xmath57 ( say @xmath73 , @xmath74 ) and @xmath58 ( say @xmath75 , @xmath76 ) . one can note here that hermitian matrices ( @xmath63 ) and ( @xmath64 ) have altogether six phases , but two of them are non - physical and can be eliminated by a simultaneous transformation involving a single diagonal phase matrix @xmath77 @xcite @xmath78 now the 4 physical phases left in @xmath63 , @xmath64 can be reproduced by the chosen configuration with four phases in @xmath57 , @xmath58 . let us next consider the magnitude of mass matrix elements , whose complete expressions are @xmath79 \ , , \\ m^d_{ij } & = & \frac{v}{\sqrt{2}}g_{yd}\exp{(i\theta^d_{ij } ) }   \int dy \xi_{qi}(y ) \xi_{dj}(y)= \nonumber   \\   & & \frac{\exp{(i\theta^d_{ij})}}{n_{qi}n_{dj } } \int dy \exp\left [ f_{qi } \left(\mu_{qi } y +   \frac{1}{\tanh \mu_{qi } } \ln{\frac{\cosh \mu_{qi } ( 1-y ) } { \cosh \mu_{qi } y \cosh \mu_{qi}}}\right)\right . \nonumber \\ & & \left . + f_{dj } \left(\mu_{dj } y +   \frac{1}{\tanh \mu_{dj } } \ln{\frac{\cosh \mu_{dj } ( 1-y ) } { \cosh \mu_{dj } y \cosh \mu_{dj}}}\right ) \right ] \ , ,                 \label{elementmd }          \end{aligned}\ ] ] where only @xmath80 , @xmath81 , @xmath82 , @xmath83 are the non - zero phases . indeed , without these phases , the solution satisfying the quark mass ratios and the ckm matrix can not be obtained @xcite . further , if these phases are small enough , the mass matrices structure transforms from almost pure - phase @xmath84 to almost democratic @xmath85 . all our numerical solutions obtained below indeed clearly reflects this democratic structure . one very important advantage of a dmm is that it has three eigenvalues of `` loose hierarchy '' : ( 0 , 0 , @xmath86 ) , and by slightly modifying the mass matrix elements from `` 1 '' one can reproduce the right mass spectrum and right ckm matrix . more specifically , because small differences in @xmath87 s and @xmath88 s induce small modification in the corresponding wavefunction profiles @xmath89 s , eqs . ( [ elementmu ] ) , ( [ elementmd ] ) , to recover realistic quark masses we will attribute different values of @xmath90 and @xmath91 to different flavors ( the quartic coupling @xmath92 is kept universal ) . meanwhile we preserve essential democratic structure by localizing fields from each of the three groups ( doublets , up and down - type singlets ) at the same point along the extra dimension regardless of family index . choosing identical signs for @xmath93 ( @xmath94 , @xmath95 ) for different indices @xmath59 one can fulfill this requirement . our approach hence is different from that of @xcite where wavefunctions of different chiral flavors are very carefully and distinctly constructed in the bulk so that their overlaps render the correct mass spectrum . however , associated ckm matrix found therein does not generate sufficient cp violation as to the level it is observed in meson rare decays , ( as long as the model has only one extra dimensions ) , even when one assigns to each mass matrix element an arbitrary phase @xcite . in the present work a dmm structure will be the key point to overcome this difficulty .      with the model with just one extra dimension presented in the previous sections , one can fit quark mass spectrum and ckm matrix all by twisting around the pure - phase and democratic structures of mass matrices . we in particular have employed two different 5-d yukawa couplings @xmath46 , @xmath47 ( @xmath96 , sections iv - v ) to generate up - down quark mass hierarchy , whose nature was not seen directly within the framework of 5-d theory . in this subsection , for the purpose of completeness , we briefly mention a possible solution to this issue , which consists of adding another spatial dimension to the theory . beginning with six - dimensional model , we can repeat the orbifold compactification procedure for the two extra dimensions , one after the other , to secure the single - chirality of zero modes . we choose to localize all doublets identically along the sixth dimension ( the same holds for up - type and down - type singlets ) . in the result , the 5-d ( now effective ) yukawa coupling @xmath97 ( @xmath98 ) are just the product of 6-d couplings @xmath99 ( @xmath100 ) and the @xmath101 ( @xmath102 ) wavefunction overlap along the sixth dimension . so by starting with a single yukawa coupling ( @xmath103 ) in 6-d theory , we can end up with two different 5-d couplings because @xmath28 and @xmath29 fields have been placed differently from @xmath27 fields along the sixth dimension . further , the phases of mass matrices elements could also be generated from 6-d models ( see details in @xcite ) . rather , the point we would like to emphasize here is that , extra dimension theory can potentially provide necessary ingredients to reproduce 4-d effective theory of particle interaction . in this section we present the parameter space for the particular choice of the model considered with 24 parameters . also if the number of parameters is large , what has to be said here is that the `` naturality '' of the parameters , ( generally all the values are of order one or differ by no more than one order of magnitude ) , we believe , is the most important factor , and the parameter space found satisfies this condition . the list of the parameters is the following :    * @xmath104 and @xmath105 * @xmath106 , @xmath107 , and @xmath108 , with @xmath37 are dimensionless quantities whose inverse is proportional to the thickness of the domain wall . * @xmath109 , @xmath110 and @xmath111 with @xmath37 and @xmath21 s being the yukawa couplings appearing in eq . ( [ lag ] ) * @xmath69 , @xmath70 , @xmath71 , and @xmath72 are the phases appearing respectively in the up and down mass matrices    as it can be seen from this particular choice of the parameter space , we decided to break family symmetry by choosing different values for @xmath91 and @xmath112 for different indices @xmath59 ( toghether with four different phases @xmath113 , @xmath114 , @xmath115 , @xmath116 appearing in the mass matrices ) , and at the same time to break the left - right symmetry by different values for the left component parameters @xmath117 and @xmath118 and the right component parameters @xmath119 , @xmath120 , @xmath121 and @xmath122 . in this section we present the numerical results obtained for the parameter space and for the physical quantities of table 1 . we consider four different cases , which correspond to the all four possible ways of picking the sign of the yukawa couplings @xmath21 for the left and right components . the four different cases are the following :    * @xmath123 denoted as @xmath124 * @xmath125 denoted as @xmath126 * @xmath127 denoted as @xmath128 * @xmath129 denoted as @xmath130    the first case corresponds to the doublets , up and down - type singlets all localized at the orbifold fixed point @xmath23 . the second case corresponds to the doublets and up - type singlets localized at @xmath23 , while the down - type singlets at @xmath25 . the third case corresponds to the doublets and down - type singlets localized at @xmath23 , while the up - type singlets at @xmath25 . and finally the fourth case corresponds to the doublets localized at @xmath23 , while both the up and down - type singlets at @xmath25 . the other four possible cases obtained when one changes at the same time all the signs of the yukawa couplings are just symmetrical to the four presented , with each wave function now localized at the other orbifold fixed point , and with symmetrical profile . so they do not present any new mixing pattern . the approach we use to derive the parameter space consists in minimizing a particular function , built in such a way that its global minima correspond to the region defined by the experimental constraints . this function is defined as :    @xmath131    where @xmath132 is the step function , n is the number of quantities that we want to fit , @xmath133 is the predicted value for the @xmath134 quantity , @xmath135 and @xmath136 fix the range for the @xmath134 quantity , and @xmath137 is its average value . it is immediate to verify from eq . ( [ ee ] ) that when all the predicted quantities @xmath133 s are contained in the proper ranges , the function @xmath138 takes its minimum value equal to zero . the set of parameters which correspond to a zero value for the function @xmath138 is called a solution . the minimization procedure we used is called simulated annealing @xcite@xcite , and when the function that we want to minimize depends on many parameters , this procedure seems to work more efficiently than others . in particular the simulated annealing method is mostly used when the global minima are surrounded by a lot of local minima . in fact this minimization process can find a global minimum also after being trapped in a local minimum .    in the following we will present the numerical results for each of the cases mentioned above . we will present graphically together with the parameter space ( figs . [ figure_1],[figure_6],[figure_11],[figure_16 ] ) , the solutions of the mass spectrum ( figs . [ figure_3],[figure_8],[figure_13],[figure_18 ] ) ( masses are given in gev and are evaluated at the @xmath139 scale ) , the ckm matrix ( figs . 4,9,14,19 ) , and the @xmath140 cp parameters ( figs . [ figure_5],[figure_10],[figure_15],[figure_20 ] ) . for each case we will also give one particular numerical example of all model s parameters , the corresponding mass matrices with eigenvalues ( i.e. quark masses ) , the rotation matrices , the ckm matrix , the cp parameters , the corresponding plots of background scalar fields and the wavefunction profiles for left and right components ( figs . [ figure_2],[figure_7],[figure_12],[figure_17 ] ) . complex phases are measured in radiant .    * @xmath123    @xmath141    @xmath142    @xmath143    @xmath144    @xmath145    @xmath146    @xmath147    @xmath148    @xmath149    @xmath150    @xmath151    @xmath152    in eqs . ( [ matrixupppp ] ) , ( [ matrixdownppp ] ) the mass matrices are written in a form that better evidenciates the almost democratic structure . in eqs . ( [ uudagappp ] ) and ( [ udppp ] ) we give the expressions for the rotation matrices @xmath153 and @xmath154 whose product is just the ckm matrix , eq . ( [ ckmmatppp ] ) . in eq . ( [ absckmmatppp ] ) we give the absolute value of the ckm matrix , and in eq . ( [ rhoetavalppp ] ) the values for the cp parameters @xmath155 and @xmath156 and the invariant area of the unitary triangle @xmath157 . @xmath158    @xmath159    @xmath160    @xmath161    @xmath162    with @xmath155 and @xmath156 defined as    @xmath163    @xmath164    and @xmath157 as    @xmath165    * @xmath125    @xmath166    @xmath167    @xmath168    @xmath169    @xmath170    @xmath171    @xmath172    @xmath173    @xmath174    @xmath175    @xmath176    @xmath177    @xmath178    @xmath179    @xmath180    @xmath181    @xmath182    * @xmath127    @xmath183    @xmath184    @xmath185    @xmath186    @xmath187    @xmath188    @xmath189    @xmath190    @xmath191    @xmath192    @xmath193    @xmath194    @xmath195    @xmath196    @xmath197    @xmath198    @xmath199    * @xmath129    @xmath200    @xmath201    @xmath202    @xmath203    @xmath204    @xmath205    @xmath206    @xmath207    @xmath208    @xmath209    @xmath210    @xmath211    @xmath212    @xmath213    @xmath214    @xmath215    @xmath216    by looking at the four cases one can notice that all mass matrices have almost democratic structure with deviations from democracy for the up and down sector which depend on the different cases . in particular the situation with all components localized at the same orbifold fixed point @xmath124 has both mass matrices very close to a dmm . the mass matrices , except the different yukawa prefactors , are very similar . in this case a small top mass seems to be favored ( fig . [ figure_3 ] ) . for the configuration with the doublets localized at the zero orbifold fixed point and both the up and down - singlets at the other orbifold fixed point @xmath130 , the deviations from a pure democratic mass matrix are large for both mass matrices . also in this case a small top mass seems to be favored ( fig . [ figure_18 ] ) . the situation is different in the other two cases where the up and down - type singlets are localized at different orbifold fixed points . in particular the case with the doublets and down - type singlets right components localized at the zero fixed point and the up - type singlets at the other orbifold fixed point @xmath128 seems to be the one which allows a larger range for the top - quark mass values ( fig . [ figure_13 ] ) . in this case the deviation from a pure democratic mass matrix for the up sector is bigger than the one for the down sector . as we will show in the next section this is also the only case for which we were able to find solutions for the 15 parameter version of the model . the forth case where the doublets and up - type singlets are at the same orbifold fixed point while the down - type singlets are at the other orbifold fixed point @xmath126 gives for the top - quark mass a very narrow value - region around @xmath217 ( fig . [ figure_8 ] ) . in this case the mass matrix for the up sector is very close to a pure democratic mass matrix while the deviation from it is larger for the down sector . what is important to say here is that by looking at the four different cases , it seems that deviation from a dmm are bigger when left and right components are localized at different orbifold fixed points . in this section we present the results for another particular choice of the model with 15 parameters , which correspond to all the yukawa couplings with the same absolute value , @xmath218 . the family symmetry and left - right symmetry are now broken only through the parameters @xmath88 s and phases @xmath219 s . the important point is that for the 15 parameter model choice we were able to find solutions only for the case corresponding to @xmath220 with the conditions that all @xmath88 s are bigger than one ( [ compositesol ] ) . in the other three cases we were not be able to find solutions if we decided to keep the constraints @xmath221 . the fact that we found solutions only for one of the four possible cases does not obviously exclude completely the existence of solutions for the other three cases , but we believe that we can at least conclude that the configuration @xmath220 is favored respect to the others .    in the following we give the solutions for the model s parameters and physics quantities as in the cases of 24 parameter version ( see also figs . [ figure_21]-[figure_25 ] )    * @xmath222    @xmath223    @xmath224    @xmath225    @xmath226    @xmath227    @xmath228    @xmath229    @xmath230    @xmath231    @xmath232    @xmath233    @xmath234    @xmath235    @xmath236    as it can be seen in the numerical example given above , also in the case of the 15 parameter version , as for all the 24 parameter cases , both mass matrices for the up and down sector are almost democratic . what has to be also noticed is that the 15 parameter case favors a small top mass ( fig . [ figure_23 ] ) , on the contrary to the 24 parameter corresponding case @xmath128 which gives a much larger range for the top - quark mass . we suggest that using one extra dimension compactified on an @xmath237 orbifold one is able to produce an almost democratic mass matrix and obtain the right mass spectrum and right ckm matrix . in the model presented the zero modes are localized only at the orbifold fixed points and different profiles for the zero mode wave functions are allowed . we show that in the case of the 24 parameter version of the model , for all four possible scenarios to localize the left and right handed components of quarks at one or the other orbifold fixed point , we were able to fit the mass spectrum and ckm matrix . on the other hand in the case of the 15 parameter version of the model , which corresponds to having the universal absolute value of the yukawa couplings with the background scalar field for the different fermion families , we were able to reproduce the right mass spectrum and right ckm only in the case with the doublets and down - type singlets localized at one orbifold fixed point and the up - type singlets at the other orbifold fixed point . finally we just also explain how the existence of a sixth dimension could account for the different yukawa couplings for the up and down sectors . h. georgi , a.k . grant and g. hailu , phys . rev . * d 63 * , 064027 ( 2001 ) , ( hep - ph/0007350 ) . r. jakiw and s. rebbi , phys . d 13 * , 3398 ( 1976 ) n. arkani - hamed and m. schmaltz , phys . rev . * d 61 * , 033005 ( 2000 ) , ( hep - ph/9903417 ) . a. masiero , m. peloso , l. sorbo and r. tabbash , phys . rev . * d 62 * , 063515 ( 2000 ) , ( hep - ph/0003312 ) . d. e. kaplan and t. m. p. tait , jhep * 11 * , 051 ( 2001 ) , ( hep - ph/0110126 ) . y. grossman , and g. perez , phys . * d 67 * , 015011 ( 2001 ) , ( hep - ph/0210053 ) . p. q. hung , m. seco , nucl . * b 653 * , 123 ( 2003 ) , ( hep - ph/0111013 ) . p. q. hung , m. seco and a. soddu , in preparation ; a. soddu , phd thesis , university of virginia ( 2003 ) . e. a. mirabelli and m. schmaltz , phys . rev . * d 61 * , 113011 ( 2000 ) , ( hep - ph/9912265 ) . g. c. branco , a. de gouvea and m. n. rebelo , phys * b 506 * , 115 ( 2001 ) , ( hep - ph/0012289 ) . f. del aguila and j. santiago , jhep * 03 * , 010 ( 2002 ) , ( hep - ph/0111047 ) . w .- f . chang and j. n. ng , jhep * 12 * , 077 ( 2002 ) , ( hep - ph/0210414 ) . t. teshima and t. sakai , prog . . phys . * 97 * , 653 ( 1997 ) , ( hep - ph/9608447 ) . a. muck , a. pilaftsis and r. ruckl , phys.rev . * d 65 * , 085037 ( 2002 ) , ( hep - ph/0110391 ) . s. kirkpatrick , c. d. gelatt , m. p. vecchi , science * 220 * , 671 - 680 ( 1983 ) . s. kirkpatrick , journal of statistical physics * 34 * , 975 - 986 ( 1984 ) . n. metropolis , a. rosenbluth . m. rosenbluth , a. teller , e. teller , journal of chemical physics * 21 * , 1087 - 1092 ( 1953 ) . numerical recipes in c , second edition , w. h. press , s. a. teukolosky , w. t. vetterling , b. p. flannery , cambridge . ccc @xmath238 & @xmath137 & @xmath239 +   + @xmath240 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 + @xmath243 & @xmath244 & @xmath245 + @xmath246 & @xmath247 & @xmath248 + @xmath249 & @xmath250 & @xmath251 + @xmath252 & @xmath253 & @xmath254 + @xmath255 & @xmath256 & @xmath257 + @xmath258 & @xmath259 & @xmath260 + @xmath261 & @xmath262 & @xmath263 + @xmath264 & @xmath265 & @xmath266 + @xmath267 & @xmath268 & @xmath269 + @xmath270 & @xmath271 & @xmath272 + @xmath273 & @xmath268 & @xmath269 + @xmath274 & @xmath275 & @xmath276 + @xmath277 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 + @xmath280 & @xmath281 & @xmath282 + @xmath283 & @xmath284 & @xmath269 + @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 + @xmath155 & @xmath288 & @xmath289 + @xmath156 & @xmath290 & @xmath291 +
Abstract:

Answer: we reconstruct the standard model ( sm ) quark masses and the cabibbo - kobayashi - maskawa ( ckm ) matrix from a five - dimensional model , with the fifth dimension compactified on an @xmath0 orbifold . fermions are localized only at the orbifold fixed points and the induced quark mass matrices are almost democratic . two specific versions of our model with 15 and 24 parameters are presented , and for both versions we can reproduce the quark mass spectrum and ckm matrix correctly to the level they are observed in current experiments . = = = = = = = = = == === = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ==== = = =