Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: type i supernovae ( sne i ) are characterized by the lack of prominent hydrogen lines in the spectra ( e.g. , * ? ? ? strong helium lines are present in the spectra of sne ib , while they are practically absent in those of sne ic . sne ib / c are further distinguished from sne ia by the lack of strong siii absorption line at 6355   . most of ordinary sne ib / c , if not all , occur in star - forming galaxies , indicating that sne ib / c have a massive star origin ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? their light curves are dominated by the energy release from radioactive @xmath0ni as in the case of sne ia @xcite , but the inferred amounts of @xmath0ni ejected by sne ib / c are similar , on average , to those of sne ii ( @xmath1;e.g . , @xcite ) rather than sne ia ( @xmath2 ; e.g. @xcite ) . the current consensus is that most of sne ib / c belong to a subset of core - collapse sne that are sn explosions via collapse of the iron cores in massive stars at their deaths . hydrogen can not be easily hidden in sn spectra ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) and sn ib / c progenitors must have lost their hydrogen envelopes by the time of explosion . there exist mainly three possible ways for massive stars to become a hydrogen - deficient sn progenitor : mass loss from single stars via stellar winds ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , binary interactions ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) , and chemically homogeneous evolution with rapid rotation @xcite . the last mode of evolution have been invoked for explaining massive blue stragglers and long gamma - ray bursts within the collapsar scenario @xcite , but is not likely to be much relevant for the majority of sne ib / c that are found in the local universe @xcite .    in this review , we focus on ordinary sne ib / c : our objective here is to summarize theoretical results on sn ib / c progenitors via single and binary evolutionary paths . we emphasize that each case has its own unique prediction that can be in principle well tested by observations . sne ib / c can therefore provide an invaluable insight on massive star evolution . note that we restrict this review to the detailed properties of sne ib / c progenitors that are predicted by recent stellar evolution models . progenitors of sn iib ( i.e. , sne of which the spectra have hydrogen lines at early times , but resemble those of sne ib at later times ) are closely related to sn ib / c progenitors , and will also be discussed briefly . our discussions on observations , sn modeling , and stellar population studies will be highly biased by the selected topics we address here . for more general topics on the evolution of massive stars and sn progenitors , readers are referred to the recent reviews by @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , @xcite and @xcite . it has been widely believed that wolf - rayet ( wr ) stars are observational counterparts of sne ib / c progenitors ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although helium stars as wr stars can be produced by binary interactions  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , a large fraction of wr stars are found in isolation @xcite , and must have been produced from massive single stars via mass loss due to stellar winds ( the so - called conti scenario ; @xcite ) . evolutionary models of massive stars with mass loss predict that there exists an initial mass limit for wr stars , above which stars can lose the entire hydrogen envelope during the post main sequence phases ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? a useful constraint on this mass limit can be provided by galactic wr stars . observations indicate that wr stars of wn type in our galaxy have the lower bolometric luminosity limit of @xmath3  @xcite . this roughly corresponds to 10  @xmath4 of a naked helium star , which requires an initial mass of about 25  @xmath4 . stellar evolution models indicate that non - rotating stars at solar metallicity can not lose their hydrogen envelope to become a wr star if @xmath5  @xmath4 , with the most commonly adopted mass loss rate from red supergiant stars given by @xcite . enhancement of mass loss due to rotation or pulsation compared to the de jager rate and some alternative empirical mass loss prescriptions have been invoked to resolve this discrepancy ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? once a star becomes a wr star , further mass loss due to wr winds determines its final mass . in the 80s and 90s , a fixed value of about @xmath6 or mass - dependent values have been widely used for the wr mass loss rate in most evolutionary models @xcite . later studies began to consider the wr mass loss rate as a function of the luminosity and the surface abundances of helium and metals in a more explicit way ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? more important , with the growing evidence for hydrodynamic clumping of wr wind material , recent estimates for the wr mass loss rate give significantly lower values than previously thought . several different prescriptions for the wr mass loss rate are compared in fig . [ fig : wrwind ] . the single star models produced later than 2000 predict systematically higher final masses of sn ib / c progenitors than those in the 80s and 90s , as summarized in fig . [ fig : finalmass ] . for example , with the langer s mass - dependent wr mass loss rate  @xcite , a 60  @xmath4 star at solar metallicity can become a sn ib / c progenitor with an final mass as low as 4.25  @xmath4  @xcite . by contrast the models with the wr mass loss rate of @xcite give final masses higher than 10  @xmath4 , at solar metallicity .    this high final mass ( @xmath7  @xmath4 ) has consequences on the sn explosion . first of all , such massive helium stars have large amounts of binding energy . this would make successful explosion of these progenitors difficult : they may collapse to a black hole , without making an ordinary sn ib / c ( e.g. * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . secondly , even if they exploded successfully , the resultant light curves would be too broad to be compatible with observations @xcite . this brings into question the importance of single wr stars as progenitors of sne ib / c at solar metallicity . however , the role of single stars at super - solar metallicity may be significant given their relatively low final masses ( fig . [ fig : finalmass ] ) .    ) . the dot - dashed line and the dotted line give the wr mass loss rates by @xcite and @xcite , respectively . the solid line denotes the mass loss rate prescription given by eq . ( 1 ) : the wr mass loss rate by @xcite for @xmath8 and the mass loss rate of relatively low - mass helium stars for @xmath9 , which is based on the extreme helium stars analyzed by @xcite . the blue data points with the error bars are the mass loss rates of these extreme helium stars . the orange point with the error bars denotes the mass loss rate of the quasi - wr star hd 45166 @xcite . the dashed line is 10 times lower than the solid line : @xmath10 is the reduction factor compared to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) . ]    , asterisk : rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 , star : rotating models of @xcite at @xmath12 with a metallicity dependent wr mass loss rate . triangle : non - rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 , square : non - rotating models of @xcite at @xmath11 . ] wr stars have large convective cores , being close to the eddington limit , and rapidly lose the outer helium - rich layers by wr winds . this makes them almost chemically homogeneous . therefore , stellar evolution models predict that wr stars evolve systematically bluewards on the hr diagram  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , in contrast to the case of the evolution of hydrogen - rich stars which evolve redwards in general . the surface composition of chemical elements also evolves . first , as the residual of the hydrogen envelope is removed by winds , they evolve from wnl type to wn type . as they lose more mass , the products of helium burning including carbon and oxygen begin to appear at the surface , to become wc and wo stars ( fig . [ fig : surface ] ) . the general consensus is that wr stars from sufficiently high initial masses evolve according to the following order : wnl @xmath13 wn @xmath13 wc @xmath13 wo .    in this scenario , wr stars should become more compact as they evolve from wnl to wo . indeed , wnl and wo stars in our galaxy have lowest and highest surface temperatures , respectively , in agreement with the theoretical prediction @xcite . but stellar evolution models have great difficulty in explaining many of the surface properties of wr stars . in particular , the observed wr stars are found to have much larger radii and lower surface temperatures than what the evolutionary models predict ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the reason for this discrepancy is not well understood yet . inflation of the envelope with a density inversion is observed in wr star models near the eddington limit in hydrostatic equilibrium  @xcite , but this is still not sufficient to fit observations as seen in fig . [ fig : hr ] . a recent suggestion is that the observationally implied inflation of wr stars may result from density inhomogeneities and the consequent enhancement of opacity in the sub - surface convective layer @xcite . this envelope inflation affects the bolometric correction , making wr stars fairly luminous in the optical ( @xmath14 ) . if the optical luminosities of the observed wr stars represented those of sn ib / c progenitors at the pre - sn stage , the previous search for a sn ib / c progenitor in pre - sn images would have been successful  @xcite . as of today , only one tentative identification has been reported with the sn ib iptf13bvn  @xcite . all of the other searches for sn ib / c progenitors have failed , even for the case with a very deep detection limit ( @xmath15 ; @xcite ) . this result has often been interpreted as evidence for binary star progenitors @xcite . it should be noted that the majority of the observed wr stars must be on the helium main sequence , which is still far from the final evolutionary stage . after core helium exhaustion , the evolution of the core in a wr star is dominated by neutrino cooling and undergoes rapid kelvin - helmoltz contraction . with a sufficient amount of helium in the envelope , this would lead to further expansion of the helium envelope due to the so - called mirror effect . however , single wr stars would rapidly lose helium in the envelope as implied by the high mass loss rate , and the overall radius would gradually decrease as the stellar evolution models predict . at the pre - sn stage , many wr stars would tend to become very hot , and optically faint like wo stars despite their very high bolometric luminosities @xcite . this means that the non - detection of most sn ib / c progenitors in the previous attempts does not necessarily exclude single wr progenitors , and other constraints like ejecta masses of sne ib / c should also be taken into account to better understand the nature of sne ib / c progenitors . helium star at @xmath11 , with the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the calculation was terminated at the end of core neon burning . ] the production of he  i lines is found to depend both on the total he mass  @xcite and on the helium distribution in the envelope  @xcite . non - thermal excitation and ionization of helium also play the key role for the formation of helium lines in sne ib  @xcite . this does not only require presence of helium in the progenitors , but also strong chemical mixing between helium in the envelope and radioactive @xmath0ni produced in the innermost region of the sn ejecta  @xcite . we still do not know exactly how much helium is needed for sne ib . this limit must depend on the degree of mixing of helium and nickel , which may in turn depend on the detailed structure of the progenitor and the energy and asymmetry of the explosion . many authors simply assume a certain amount of helium ( e.g. , 0.5 - 0.6  @xmath4 ) as the lower limit for sn ib progenitors ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? recently @xcite suggested 0.14  @xmath4 as the maximum possible amount of helium that can be hidden in the sn spectra , based on a spectroscopic study of several sn ib / c with relatively low inferred ejecta masses . in the most recent single star models @xcite , the total amounts of helium in sn ib / c progenitors range from 0.28  @xmath4 to 2.2  @xmath4 . this is significantly higher than the proposed limit of 0.14  @xmath4 by hachinger et al . in fact , helium mass as low as 0.14  @xmath4 is very difficult to achieve with stellar evolution models . @xcite found that a 60  @xmath4 star can become a 4.25  @xmath4 sn ib / c progenitor with a wr mass loss rate much higher than nowadays adopted , but even in this extreme case , the remaining helium mass was as large as 0.18  @xmath4 . the reason for this difficulty is largely related to the dynamical adjustment of the stellar structure of wr stars with mass loss . as shown in fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] as an example , the size of the helium - burning convective core in a wr star decreases as the wr star loses mass by winds ( fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] ) , and therefore some amount of helium can remain unburned until the end of core helium burning even if more than half of the initial mass is lost . the residual helium could be completely removed with efficient mass loss during the later evolutionary stages . the current models predict , however , that the effect of mass loss during the post helium burning phases is relatively minor mainly because of the relatively short evolutionary time . we discuss the problem of helium in sne ib / c progenitors in sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] in more detail . the mass fraction of helium in the outermost layers can also play an important role for the early time light curves and spectra of sne ib / c . @xcite showed that if the helium mass fraction is sufficiently large ( @xmath16 ) , he i lines can be produced without the contribution of non - thermal processes for several days after the shock breakout , while no helium lines are seen for a low helium mass fraction ( @xmath17 ) even with a total helium mass of about 1  @xmath4 . therefore , he i lines during the early epoch of a sn ib / c will provide an important constraint on the progenitor . recent single star models in the literature predict that helium mass fraction at the surface of sn ib / c progenitors is below 0.4 except for a limited initial mass range above the critical mass for wr star progenitors ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , in contrast to the case of binary star models that predict the majority of sn ib / c progenitors have a surface helium mass fraction higher than 0.9 ( sect .  [ sect : binaryhe ] ) . given that the total amount of helium is also systematically smaller in single star models than in binary star models as discussed below , this implies that single star evolution is probably prone to sne ic . helium star , for which the nugis & lamers wr mass loss rate was adopted . the helium - burning convective core is marked by the hatched lines . the black solid line marks the surface of the star . the calculation was terminated at the end of core neon burning . ] super - luminous supernovae ( slsne ) and very energetic explosions like gamma - ray bursts ( grbs ) can be driven by rapid rotation . the most commonly invoked mechanisms for these events include the collapsar scenario  @xcite and the magnetar scenario  ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? so far , all of the supernovae associated with grbs belong to type ic  @xcite , and many slsne are also found to be sne ic . while the collapsar scenario still remains most popular to explain grbs  @xcite , the magnetar - driven explosion is nowadays the most invoked mechanism for the slsne ic ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the contending mechanism for slsne ic is the pair - production instability  ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? it is still a matter of debate which evolutionary channels of sne ib / c progenitors can lead to rotation - driven explosions like grbs and slsne - ic . observations indicate that the majority of massive stars on the main sequence are rapid rotators , where the necessary condition for both collapsar and magnetar mechanism could be fulfilled if they retained the angular momentum until the pre - collapse stage  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? however , massive stars may undergo angular momentum redistribution via mass loss due to stellar winds and/or binary interactions , and the transport of angular momentum @xcite . the angular momentum transfer may occur on a dynamical timescale in convective layers by convection . in radiative layers , rotationally - induced hydrodynamic instabilities like the shear instability and eddington - sweet circulations may transport angular momentum @xcite . dynamo actions may also occur in radiative layers according to the so - called tayler - spruit dynamo theory @xcite , which may cause strong magnetic torques across differentially rotating layers . theoretical studies indicate that , without magnetic fields , angular momentum transport is severely inhibited by the chemical stratification across the boundary between the stellar core and the hydrogen envelope ( @xmath18-barrier ; @xcite ) . single star progenitors of sne ib / c can thus retain a significant amount of angular momentum until the pre - sn stage , even though most of the initial angular momentum is lost by stellar winds @xcite : the predicted amounts of angular momentum in the cores are much more than what neutron stars can have at the break - up velocity , and enough to produce a long gamma - ray burst ( grb ) within the collapsar scenario @xcite . this means that almost all sn ib / c progenitors have enough angular momentum to form grb / slsn - ic progenitors . given that rapid rotation is only one necessary condition for collapsar / magnetar production , this should not necessarily lead to the conclusion that non - magnetic models predict too many grbs and slsne - ic compared to the observation . however , because such exotic explosions belong to a subset of sne ib / c , the result of non - magnetic models implies that grbs and slsne - ic should occur more frequently at higher metallicity as ordinary sne ib / c do , if mass loss by winds provided the main evolutionary path for their progenitors . contrary to this expectation , observations indicate that low - metallicity is preferred for both grbs and slsne - ic ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? magnetic torques can easily overcome the hindrance by the chemical stratification to the transport of angular momentum . magnetic models with the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that single wr stars rotate too slowly to produce a magnetar / collapsar @xcite . this is consistent with the fact that grbs and slsne - ic are very rare . magnetic models also better explain the spin rates of young millisecond pulsars . several authors have questioned the validity of the talyer - spruit dynamo theory  @xcite and we still can not draw any solid conclusion on which case between magnetic and non - magnetic models better represents the reality . however , it is not only massive stars but also intermediate- and low - mass stars that provide evidence for very efficient transport of angular momentum in the radiative layers . such examples include slow rotation of isolated white dwarfs  @xcite , the radial velocity profile in the sun  @xcite , and recent asteroseismic results of low - mass stars  @xcite . our tentative conclusion is that some strong braking mechanism like the tayler - spruit dynamo is actually working in stars , and that magnetic models may better explain recent observations in general . the role of magnetic fields on the evolution of stars still remains a very challenging subject of future study . some other mechanisms like baroclinic instability  @xcite and pulsational instabilities  @xcite may also play an important role for the transport of angular momentum , but have not been extensively studied for massive stars yet . the majority of massive stars form in binary systems  ( e.g. , see * ? ? ? * for a recent observational analysis on the population of binary systems ) . a large fraction of them are believed to experience binary interactions during the course of their evolution , mainly due to the increase of stellar radius . once the more massive star ( the primary star ) fills the roche lobe in a binary system , mass transfer to the less massive star ( the secondary star ) begins . mass transfer can be unstable if the mass ratio of the stellar components ( i.e. , @xmath19 where @xmath20 and @xmath21 are the masses of the primary and secondary stars , respectively ) is sufficiently small . unstable mass transfer will lead the binary system to a contact phase , which may eventually make the stellar components merge to become a single star . although binary mergers are related to many important topics like stellar rotation , peculiar sne and long gamma - ray bursts  @xcite , here we focus our discussion on non - merging systems that can produce ordinary sne ib / c . recent analyses also indicate that the fraction of stable binary systems is much higher than previously believed  @xcite , and thus the event rate of sne ib / c can be well explained by binary progenitors @xcite .    in the literature , mass transfer is often categorized into case a , case b and case c , depending on the evolutionary stage of the primary star when it fills the roche lobe  @xcite , as the following :    * case a mass transfer : mass transfer during the main sequence . * case b mass transfer : mass transfer during the helium core contraction phase . * case c mass transfer : mass transfer during the core helium burning and later evolutionary stages . some binary systems may undergo multiple mass transfer phases , depending on the initial orbital periods and masses of the stellar components . the mass transfer phases that follow case a / b mass transfer are often denoted as the following :    * case ab mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone the case a mass transfer , during the helium core contraction phase . * case bb mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone case b mass transfer , during the late evolutionary stages ( mostly after core helium exhaustion for sn ib / c progenitors ) . * case abb mass transfer : mass transfer from the primary star that has previously undergone case ab mass transfer , during the late evolutionary stages ( mostly after core helium exhaustion for sn ib / c progenitors ) . helium stars as sn ib / c progenitors can be made via case b / ab mass transfer as illustrated in fig . [ fig : binary ] . the initial mass of such a helium star corresponds to the helium core mass ( @xmath22 ) of the primary star at the onset of case b / ab mass transfer . for case b systems , @xmath22 can be given by a well - defined function of the zams mass of the primary star as shown in fig . [ fig : mimf ] . the evolution of the helium stars produced via case b / ab mass transfer largely depends on their masses . stellar evolution models indicate that case bb / abb mass transfer occurs when the primary star becomes a helium giant if the helium star mass is initially less than about 3.5 - 4.0  @xmath4 , depending on the adopted mass loss rate and metallicity . more massive helium stars do not interact anymore with the secondary stars after case b / ab mass transfer , but can still lose mass further by winds . wr winds may be induced if the helium star mass is sufficiently high ( @xmath23  @xmath4 ) but the mass loss rate from less massive helium stars is not well constrained observationally because such relatively low - mass helium stars have been rarely observed ( see sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and  [ sect : counterpart ] below for more discussions ) . it is not only the primary star , but also the secondary star that can produce a sn ib / c . in a close binary system , the primary star will leave a compact star remnant if it explodes as a sn ib / c via case b / ab / bb / abb mass transfer , or if it becomes a white dwarf via case bb / abb mass transfer ( see fig . [ fig : binary ] ) . unless the binary system is unbound by a strong neutron star kick , it will form a common envelope after the core hydrogen exhaustion in the secondary star . a short - period binary system consisting of a helium star plus a compact star ( white dwarf , neutron star , or black hole ) will be produced after the common envelope ejection . explosion of the helium star will then produce a sn ib / c . note also that fig . [ fig : binary ] still does not depict all the possible binary paths for sne ib / c , and there may exist other relatively rare channels . for example , some authors found that with case a mass transfer , the sn order can be reversed for a limited parameter space : the secondary star first explode as a sn ib / c , followed by sn ib / c explosion of the primary star as a helium star in isolation or in a compact binary system with a neutron star companion , depending on the impact of the neutron star kick @xcite . the contribution of each evolutionary path to the total production of sne ib / c may depend on several physical parameters . they include the so - called mass accretion efficiency ( i.e , the ratio of the accreted mass onto the secondary star to the transferred mass from the primary star ) , the specific angular momentum of any matter that is not accreted on the secondary star but lost from the binary system , distribution of neutron star kick velocities , and the common envelope ejection efficiency ( e.g. * ? ? ? it is beyond the scope of this review to discuss all the details regarding binary population with respect to sne ib / c , and readers are referred to @xcite , @xcite , @xcite , as well as the contribution by s.e . de mink in this issue . here , it may be sufficient to say that the dominant channel to sne ib / c in binary systems is the case b / bb , among others  @xcite . in the sections below , we focus on the detailed properties of sn ib / c progenitors predicted from evolutionary models . to model the evolution of a binary system , we have to consider the change of the orbit due to stellar winds , mass transfer and/or gravitational wave radiation , and mass exchange between the stellar components via mass transfer . to investigate the effect of rotation , angular momentum exchange between stars and the orbit via tidal synchronization and the spin - up effect of the secondary during the mass transfer phases should also be followed  ( see * ? ? ? * for a recent review ) . many evolutionary models of massive binary stars have been presented in the literature , but only a limited number of studies aimed at detailed investigation of the structure of sne ib / c progenitors near / at the pre - sn stage  @xcite . before we summarize the main results of these studies , we give an example for the evolution of relatively low - mass sn ib / c progenitors , which is very different from that of massive wr stars . the evolution of a sn ib / c progenitor having @xmath24  @xmath4 in a case bb system is illustrated in  figs .  [ fig : hr2 ] and  [ fig : kippen ] . after case b mass transfer , the primary star becomes a hot and compact helium star . the surface hydrogen and helium mass fraction at this stage is about 0.28 and 0.7 , respectively and a small amount of hydrogen of about 0.05  @xmath4 is still retained in the outermost layer . as a result , the convective helium burning core can grow with hydrogen shell burning even though the total mass somewhat decreases due to mass loss by winds ( fig .  [ fig : kippen ] ) . this is contrasted to the case of mass - losing pure helium stars where the convective helium burning core shrinks in size in terms of the mass coordinate ( fig . [ fig : kipp1 ] ) . during the post - helium burning stages , the helium envelope rapidly expands and case bb mass transfer is initiated when carbon burning begins in the core ( figs . [ fig : hr2 ] and  [ fig : kippen ] ) . the sn explosion will occur when the surface temperature becomes fairly low ( @xmath25 , fig . [ fig : hr2 ] ) while the star is still undergoing case bb mass transfer . this is in stark contrast to the case of massive wr star progenitors that evolve bluewards throughout and explode when they become very hot ( @xmath26 ; fig . [ fig : hr ] ) . the helium envelope expansion makes this binary progenitor bright in the optical bands compared to the case of wr progenitors , as discussed below ( sect . [ sect : binarysurface ] ) . of course , more massive progenitors having @xmath27 will become a wr star even in binary systems after case b / ab transfer , and evolve like a single wr star thereafter .     plus 14  @xmath4 stars with the initial period of 5 days . convective layers are marked by green hatched lines , and semi - convection layers by red dots . the surface of the star is indicated by the black solid line . the blue and pink color shading marks net energy gain or loss from nuclear energy generation and neutrino emission . ]      as mentioned above , one of the biggest uncertainties in the evolution of sn ib / c progenitors is the mass loss rate of naked helium stars . the mass loss rate of wr stars ( @xmath28 ) is relatively well known , but less luminous helium stars have not been well studied observationally . several authors therefore used extrapolated values of the nugis & lamers rate or the langer rate ( see fig . [ fig : wrwind ] ) for the whole possible range of helium star mass @xcite . on the other hand , @xcite and @xcite used a significantly reduced mass loss rate for @xmath29 as the following : @xmath30[eqhewind ] here the wr mass loss rate for @xmath31 is given by @xcite . the prescription for less luminous helium stars ( @xmath29 ) is based on the observations of extreme helium stars by @xcite . [ fig : wrwind ] indicates that the simple extrapolation of the wr mass loss rate down to @xmath32 may lead to a significant overestimate even with the nugis & lamers rate , which is about 10 times lower than that of @xcite for @xmath31 . given that the stellar wind mass loss rates of massive stars were usually overestimated before the late-90s ( see sect . [ sect : singlemass ] above ) , mass - loss rates reduced by a certain factor ( @xmath10 ) compared to that of eq . ( 1 ) were applied for some binary models of ( * ? ? ? * @xmath33 ) and for all the models of ( * ? ? ? * @xmath34 ) . note that the case of @xmath35 , for which the mass loss rate becomes comparable to the nugis & lamers rate with @xmath31 , is still compatible with the observation of extreme helium stars of @xmath29 ( fig . [ fig : wrwind ] ) . the caveat is that the extreme helium stars in the figure are giant stars at a pre - white dwarf stage , having masses of only about 0.8  @xmath4  @xcite , and can not represent ordinary sn ib / c progenitors .    on the other hand , the quasi - wr star hd 45166 is currently one of the most promising observational counterparts of relatively low - mass helium stars on the helium main sequence ( sect . [ sect : counterpart ] ) . its mass is about 4.2  @xmath4 with a surface helium mass fraction of 0.5 and surface luminosity of @xmath36 . this star is likely on the helium main sequence . the estimated mass loss rate gives a better agreement with the extrapolated value of the nugis & lamers rate than the mass loss rates of extreme helium stars of @xcite . but we still have only one sample for such relatively low - mass helium stars in the core helium burning phase , and can not make a solid conclusion on which mass loss prescription is best suited for our purpose . as shown in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] , however , this uncertainty does not make a great difference in terms of the final masses . the predicted final masses of sn ib / c progenitors that undergo case b / bb mass transfer are given by fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] . the models in the figure , for which the considered initial period of the orbit ranges from 4 to 7 days , were taken from @xcite and @xcite . in @xcite , conservative mass transfer ( i.e. , the mass accretion efficiency @xmath37 , which is the ratio of the transferred matter from the primary to the accreted matter onto the secondary , equals to 1.0 ) was assumed and rotation was not taken into account . @xcite considered the effects of rotation , with which @xmath37 is self - regulated by the interplay between the mass transfer from the primary star and the mass - loss enhancement due to rotation from the secondary star that is spun - up by mass and angular momentum accretion . these models indicate @xmath38 for case a mass transfer and @xmath39 for case b mass transfer , respectively .    for case b systems , the final masses converge to about 3.15  @xmath4 with @xmath40 and gradually increases with increasing @xmath41 for @xmath42  5 and 10 . the result with the nugis & lamers rate is comparable to that with @xmath35 . for @xmath43  @xmath4 , helium stars produced by case b mass transfer undergoes case bb mass transfer during carbon burning and later phases . consequently the final masses for case bb systems decrease more rapidly from this point with decreasing @xmath41 , and the lower boundary of the zams mass for sn ib / c progenitors becomes about 12.5  @xmath4 , below which the primary star becomes a white dwarf .    in a case a system , the primary star loses a significant fraction of the initial mass on the main sequence , and the helium core mass at the end of core hydrogen burning becomes lower than the corresponding case b system . this makes the lower limit of zams mass for sne ib / c shift to about 16  @xmath4 for case a systems @xcite . very short orbits ( typically @xmath44 ) are required for case a systems , and their contribution to the sne ib / c rate from binary systems may be smaller by about a factor of 3  4 than that of case b systems ( cf . * ? ? ? these minimum zams mass limits for sne ib / c ( i.e. , 12.5  @xmath4 and 16  @xmath4 for case b and case a , respectively ) are significantly higher than for sne iip from single stars , which is about 8 - 9  @xmath4  @xcite . note that binary interactions can make this limit for sn iip lowered even down to about 4  @xmath4 : for example , mergers of 4  @xmath4 plus 4  @xmath4 star would make a 8  @xmath4 sn iip progenitor . therefore , the stronger association of sne ib / c with younger stellar populations than sne iip in their host galaxies  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) is in qualitative agreement with the binary scenario . according to recent analyses of sn light curves @xcite , sne ib / c have typically ejecta masses of 1  @xmath4  6  @xmath4 . this means that , assuming the remnant mass of 1.4  @xmath4 , the final masses of ordinary sne ib / c range from 2.4  @xmath4 to 7.4  @xmath4 at least . if some amounts of helium were hidden in these analyses as argued by @xcite , the actual final mass would be somewhat higher . this observation is not compatible with the case of @xmath45 in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] , which predicts too low ejecta masses on average . the results with lower mass loss rates give a better agreement : stars of @xmath46 14  @xmath4 - 35  @xmath4 can explain the observed ejecta mass range with @xmath35 and the nugis & lamers rate for example . @xcite also gives a similar conclusion from the comparison of their stellar population model with the observation . the effect of different values of @xmath10 can be regarded as the metallicity effect , because both observations and theories indicate that wr mass loss becomes stronger for higher metallicity  @xcite . the result in fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] implies that sn ib / c ejecta should be systematically more massive for lower metallicity , which can be tested by observations . if there were a certain mass cut for the boundary between successful sn explosion and black hole formation in terms of the final mass , this metallicity dependence of final masses would lead to gradual decrease of the sn ib / c rate for decreasing metallicity  ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? for example , if @xmath47  @xmath4 were the lower limit for bh formation , we would not expect a sn ib / c explosion from @xmath48  @xmath4 at solar metallicity ( @xmath49 ) and @xmath50  @xmath4 at smc metallicity ( @xmath51 ) , respectively . denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) : @xmath52 10 and 20 roughly corresponds to solar and smc metallicity , respectively . the presented results are based on the full binary models by @xcite for @xmath45 and the binary models and pure helium star models by @xcite for the others . the boundary line between case b and bb systems is marked by the dashed line . the data with @xmath53  @xmath4 in @xcite is based on the full binary evolution calculations but it is based on pure helium star models for @xmath54  @xmath4 assuming that the pure helium star was produced via case b mass transfer from the primary star with the corresponding zams mass in a binary system . see @xcite for more details . the result with the wr mass loss rate by @xcite at solar metallicity from unpublished binary star models ( yoon , s .- c . , in prep ) is marked by the green dashed line , for which the boundary for case b and bb shifts to about @xmath55  @xmath4 . ]      as discussed in sect . [ sect : singlehe ] , the amount of helium retained in progenitors may be one of the key factors that make the difference between sne ib and sne ic . as shown in fig .  [ fig : hemass ] , helium mass varies from 0.1 to 1.9 for the considered range of zams mass and mass loss rates in case b / bb systems . helium mass ( @xmath56 ) as a function of @xmath41 has a local maximum at @xmath57  @xmath4 for @xmath42  1 and 5 , and at @xmath58  @xmath4 for @xmath42  20 , respectively . the rapid decrease of @xmath56 as @xmath41 approaches 12  @xmath4 results from case bb mass transfer , while the gradual decrease of @xmath56 with increasing @xmath41 is the effect of the increasing mass loss rate . it is important to note that , even for the case of very strong mass loss ( i.e. , @xmath45 ) , the amounts of helium at the pre - sn stage are significantly greater than the upper limit of @xmath59  @xmath4 for sne ic that was suggested by @xcite , except for the extreme case bb case at around @xmath60  @xmath4 . therefore , both single and binary star models can not fulfill the condition of low amounts of helium for sn ic . this might mean that , in reality , the chemical mixing between helium and nickel in sn ejecta is not as efficient as considered by @xcite for most sne ic ( cf . * ? ? ? * ) such that more helium could be hidden . such inefficient mixing is not usually supported by observations ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but we need a systematic study on how the mixing efficiency via the rayleigh - taylor instability depends on the pre - sn structure of sne ib / c progenitors to resolve this issue . mass loss from helium stars is another uncertain factor that should be better understood . in particular , some helium stars can closely approach the eddington limit during the final evolutionary stages if the mass is high enough . this might make the surface layers unstable to cause rapid mass eruption  ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ) , thus removing most of helium in the envelope shortly before the sn explosion as evidenced by many sne ib / c  @xcite . @xcite assumed a certain value of the ratio of the helium mass to the ejecta mass ( @xmath61 ) as the demarcation criterion between sn ib and sn ic . because the chemical mixing between helium and nickel plays an important role for having helium lines in sn spectra , using @xmath61 instead of @xmath56 may be appropriate because a lower value of @xmath61 means that helium can be more easily shielded from the gamma - ray photons produced in the innermost nickel - rich layer of the sn ejecta . interestingly , fig . [ fig : hemass ] indicates that @xmath61 does not depend on the adopted mass loss rate ( hence on metallicity ) as strongly as @xmath56 does . this is because , for a lower mass loss rate , the final mass and the co core mass become higher and compensate the higher helium mass . this has important consequences in the prediction of sn ib / c rate as a function of metallicity as discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] below .     denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) ( see the figure caption of fig .  [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . the nl rate means the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the data were taken from @xcite for @xmath45 , @xcite for @xmath52 5 , 10 and 20 , and unpublished models by yoon ( in prep . ) for the nl rate . _ lower panel _ : the corresponding ratios of the helium to ejecta mass . here we assumed that the remnant neutron star mass is 1.4  @xmath4 . see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] for the corresponding final mass.,title="fig : " ]   denotes the reduction factor that are applied to the mass loss rate given by eq . ( 1 ) ( see the figure caption of fig .  [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . the nl rate means the wr mass loss rate by @xcite . the data were taken from @xcite for @xmath45 , @xcite for @xmath52 5 , 10 and 20 , and unpublished models by yoon ( in prep . ) for the nl rate . _ lower panel _ : the corresponding ratios of the helium to ejecta mass . here we assumed that the remnant neutron star mass is 1.4  @xmath4 . see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] for the corresponding final mass.,title="fig : " ]    if relatively low - mass helium star progenitors in binary systems have helium masses of about 1 - 1.5  @xmath4 in their envelopes as the most recent models predict , this may lead to an early plateau phase due to helium recombination for several days as shown by @xcite . this prediction has recently been tentatively confirmed with the early - time light curve of sn ib 2006lc  @xcite . even in the absence of non - thermal effects , helium lines will also be observed during this phase , given that the mass fraction of helium in the envelope is very high ( @xmath62 ; see sect . [ sect : singlehe ] ) .    on the other hand , sn ib / c progenitors with a compact star companion ( see fig .  [ fig : binary ] ) may undergo very strong mass transfer after core helium exhaustion , because these systems have a small mass ratio and short orbital period . most of the helium envelope can be stripped off in this case , and very little helium will be left at the pre - sn stage  @xcite . this evolutionary channel has been often invoked to explain sne ic having low ejecta masses and fast declining light curves  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , including some ultra - faint sne ic  @xcite . the frequency of such events would be rare compared to ordinary sne ib / c , and its quantitative prediction heavily depends on the uncertain parameters related to the common envelope efficiency and neutron star kick . case b / ab mass transfer in a binary system stops when the hydrogen envelope of the primary star is almost stripped off , but it does not completely remove hydrogen . the amount of hydrogen remaining in the outermost layers of the helium core immediately after the mass transfer phase is typically @xmath63  @xmath4 . @xcite found that the final amount of hydrogen at the pre - sn stage is a function of the progenitor mass as the following . at solar metallicity , which roughly corresponds to the case with @xmath64 in figs . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and  [ fig : hemass ] ( see also fig .  [ fig : wrwind ] ) , no hydrogen will be left for helium stars having final masses of @xmath65  @xmath4 . for the case of @xmath66  @xmath4 , case bb / abb mass transfer becomes efficient enough to completely remove hydrogen . for the final mass range in - between , the remaining hydrogen until sn explosion will be about @xmath67  @xmath4 . on the other hand , the models with the nugis and lamers mass loss rate at solar metallicity lose all the hydrogen in the envelope for the whole mass range  ( @xcite ; yoon , s .- c . in prep ) . therefore , in principle , the signature of hydrogen in sn ib / c progenitors can indirectly constrain the mass loss rate from helium stars if we have good information about the metallicity in the vicinity of the sn site .    this small amount of hydrogen can be easily detected in the early time spectra of the resulting sn @xcite , in which case it will be identified as a sn iib  ( cf . these progenitors have relatively small radii ( @xmath68 ) compared to the yellow - supergiant sn iib progenitors  ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) produced via case c mass transfer  @xcite , and may belong to the compact category of sn iib @xcite . some authors argue that several sne classified as type ib also have weak hydrogen absorption lines at high velocity  @xcite . therefore , whether the explosion of a helium star having a thin hydrogen layer may be recognized as sn iib or sn ib depends on the details of the sn observation . the progenitor mass range for which a thin hydrogen layer is present at the pre - sn stage becomes widened and the total amount of remaining hydrogen increases with decreasing metallicity . the ratio of sn ib / c to sn iib rate should decrease with decreasing metallicity ( fig . [ fig : fate ] ) .      from the above discussion , we can make a crude prediction on the sn types from case b / bb mass systems as summarized in fig . [ fig : fate ] . with case ab / abb systems , each boundary in the figure would simply shift to a higher @xmath41 . for example , the lower limit of @xmath41 for sn ib / c from case b / bb systems is about 12.5  @xmath4 , while it is about 16  @xmath4 for case ab / abb systems . because we still do not have any clear demarcation between sn ib and sn ic in terms of the progenitor structure ( sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] ) , ad - hoc assumptions of @xmath69  @xmath4 ( case i ) and @xmath70 ( case ii ) were made for the upper and lower panels , respectively . several interesting predictions can be made from this figure , which should be tested in future observations . these predictions are only relevant for ordinary sne ib / c and those associated with grbs or slsne - ic are not considered here .    * for case i , the ratio of sn ic to sn ib rate from binary systems would decrease with decreasing metallicity in good agreement with @xcite and @xcite , and sn ic is hardly expected at sufficiently low metallicity . by contrast , this ratio would not necessarily decrease for decreasing metallicity with case ii , unless there existed a mass cut of @xmath41 for bh formation ( @xmath71 ) . if sn ib / c progenitors with a sufficiently high final mass could not produce an ordinary sn ib / c , the sn ic rate would significantly decrease with decreasing metallicity even with case ii . * for case ii , sne ic with hydrogen or sne iic are expected to occur at sufficiently low metallicity  ( cf . @xcite indeed showed that sne iic can be produced if helium is effectively shielded from radioactive nickel . * the sn ib / sn iib ratio would decrease with decreasing metallicity for both cases , which is in good agreement with the recent observation by @xcite . * comparison of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and fig . [ fig : fate ] implies that both the initial and final masses of sne ic progenitors would be systematically higher than those of sn ib progenitors , regardless of the adopted demarcation criterion of helium . this prediction is in qualitative agreement with sn observations  @xcite and the stronger association of sne ic with younger stellar population than sne ib in the host galaxies  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . * for case ii , the average ejecta masses would increase following the order of sn ib , iib and ic at sufficiently low metallicity . * the average ejecta masses of sn ib / c would increase with decreasing metallicity . this effect would be more dramatic for sne ic than for sne ib ( see fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] ) . * the comparison of fig . [ fig : finalmass2 ] and fig . [ fig : fate ] indicates that for case ii , the maximum final mass of sn ib ( and iib ) would be limited to a fairly small value ( about 7.0  @xmath4 with the assumed value of @xmath70 ) even for very low metallicity .      as explained in sect . [ sect : binaryexample ] , a relatively low - mass helium star progenitor of sn ib / c in binary systems undergo rapid expansion of its envelope during the carbon burning phase and later stages . this envelope expansion becomes stronger for a lower mass star for which the carbon - oxygen core becomes more compact , following the mirror effect @xcite . within the framework discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] , therefore , sne ib progenitors would have a more extended envelope than sn ic progenitors for most cases , which may in turn lead a more luminous early plateau in the consequent sn @xcite . the extended envelope at the pre - sn stage can make a sn ib / c progenitor fairly bright in the optical . the expected visual magnitude is about @xmath72 for the progenitors having final masses of 3  5  @xmath4 ( @xcite ) . with an o - type star companion , the visual brightness would be even higher ( @xmath73 ) . by contrast , wr star progenitors ( @xmath27  @xmath4 ) from both single and binary stars have much higher bolometric luminosities , but the expected high surface temperatures at the pre - sn stage result in fainter visual brightness ( i.e. , @xmath74 * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) in most cases , which would make them more difficult to directly identify in pre - sn images as discussed in sect . [ sect : singlesurface ] . recently , @xcite have reported the tentative identification of the progenitor of the sn ib iptf13bvn . the estimated absolute magnitudes of the object in the optical range from -5.0 to -7 , depending on the filters , adopted extinction values , and photometry methods @xcite . @xcite argued for a single star progenitor with initial masses of 31 - 35  @xmath4 based on the non - rotating models of the geneva group . unlike more massive stars that become wo stars at the end , these models end their lives as wn stars having relatively thick helium envelopes with surface temperatures of about @xmath75 . the predicted optical magnitudes ( @xmath76 ) agree with the observation , but the final mass ( @xmath77  @xmath4 ) seems to be too high , compared to the estimated ejecta mass of the sn ( @xmath78  @xmath4 ; @xcite ) that supports the binary scenario . the optical brightness of the progenitor candidate can also be explained by a binary progenitor having an initial mass of 10 - 20  @xmath4  @xcite . if future observations find evidence for the companion star that survives the sn explosion , it will directly confirm a binary star origin of sne ib for the first time . massive stars in a close binary system before mass transfer are likely to be synchronized with the orbit because of the short tidal interaction timescale . after case b / ab mass transfer , the orbit becomes too wide to keep the tidal synchronization , and the final rotation velocity of the primary star is mainly determined by the amount of angular momentum that is retained after the mass transfer phase . binary evolution models including the effects of rotation indicate that sn ib / c progenitors via case b / ab mass transfers are slow rotators as they lose mass and angular momentum @xcite . both models with and without magnetic torques due to the tayler - spruit dynamo ( see sect . [ sect : singlerot ] for the discussion on angular momentum redistribution inside stars ) predict that the surface rotation velocity of naked helium stars on the helium main sequence after the mass transfer phase is only about @xmath79 .    the specific angular momentum in the innermost region of 1.4  @xmath4 that would collapse to a neutron star significantly according to the prescription of angular momentum transfer @xcite . models without the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that neutron stars from sne ib / c in binary systems would almost reach the critical rotation . this means that the majority of sn ib / c progenitors in binary systems would also be good progenitor candidates for magnetars / collapsars without the talyer - spruit dynamo , which can not be easily reconciled with observations . models with the tayler - spruit dynamo predict that the specific angular momentum of the collapsing core would be comparable to those of single star models ( i.e. , @xmath80 ) and the resultant neutron stars would be rotating at a period of several milliseconds .    as in the case of single stars , therefore , binary models with the tayler - spruit dynamo do not predict magentar / collapsar progenitors for energetic sne and/or long grbs via the standard case b / bb / ab / abb systems  @xcite under normal circumstances . at sufficiently low metallicity , however , mass accreting stars in case b mass transfer systems may be spun up to undergo the chemically homogeneous evolution , which may end up as a grb  @xcite . sn ib / c progenitors in very close binary systems consisting of a helium star and a low - mass main sequence star / compact object ( cf . fig .  [ fig : binary ] ; sect .  [ sect : binaryexample ] ) may experience strong tidal interaction , given that the orbital period can be as short as 0.1  day in this case ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . some of these systems may produce unusually rapid rotators even within the framework of the tayler - spruit dynamo , but more detailed evolutionary studies are needed to make a meaningful conclusion on this . the fact that host galaxies of broad - lined sne ic and grbs are found to be systematically overdense compared to other sdss galaxies might be an indication for the importance of the binary channel for producing rapidly rotating progenitors to produce these events  @xcite . wr stars in binary systems are excellent observational counterparts for sn ib / c progenitors during the post case b / ab mass transfer phase , for @xmath81  @xcite . relatively low - mass helium stars ( @xmath82 ) in binary systems are only rarely observed . this is probably because such helium stars on the helium main sequence are very hot and faint in optical bands ( see fig .  [ fig : hr2 ] ) and because many of them have bright ob - type companion stars .    as mentioned above ( sect . [ sect : binarymass ] ) , the best observational counterpart of binary sn ib / c progenitors with @xmath29 is the quasi - wr ( qwr ) star hd 45166 @xcite : the primary is a helium rich 4.2  @xmath4 star with @xmath83 and the secondary is a 4.8  @xmath4 main sequence star , in a 1.596 day orbit @xcite . this system was probably produced via unstable case b / ab mass transfer and the consequent common envelope phase . this star gives important information about the mass loss rate from such a relatively low - mass helium star as discussed in sect . [ sect : binarymass ] . wr 7a is another qwr star  @xcite . no companion of this star has been found so far . radial periodicity of 0.204 day has been reported , and if this is related to binarity , its companion should be a low - mass main sequence star ( @xmath84  @xmath4 ) or a compact object . to our knowledge , no estimate of the wind mass loss rate from this star has been reported yet .    there also exist candidates for evolved helium giant stars beyond core helium exhaustion . they include @xmath85 sgr , ks per and lss 4300  @xcite . among these , the @xmath85 sgr system has been best studied  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the mass , surface temperature and bolometric luminosity of the hydrogen - deficient primary of this system are @xmath86  @xmath4 , @xmath87  k and @xmath88 . it also shows radial pulsation of a 20 day period @xcite , and evidence for mass transfer and a circumbinary disk @xcite , which agrees well with the case bb mass transfer scenario  @xcite . therefore , these systems can provide useful information about the progenitor evolution as well as their circumstellar environments immediately before sn explosion . the visual magnitude of this star is @xmath89 @xcite , which is consistent with the model predictions discussed in sect . [ sect : binarysurface ] . the companion stars of binary progenitors of sne ib / c will survive the sn explosion and may be found in some young sn remnants ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) . there may be several types of companion stars : main sequence stars of early to late types , compact objects like white dwarfs , neutron stars and black holes , and helium stars ( sect . [ sect : binaryevol ] ; fig . [ fig : binary ] ) . in terms of stellar population , the most common type ( i.e. , more than 30% of all binary sn ib / c progenitors ) may be relatively high mass stars ( o / b type ) on the main sequence that underwent stable case b / bb / ab / abb mass transfer ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? these massive companion stars accrete mass and angular momentum via stable mass transfer to be spun up to the critical value  @xcite . at solar metallicity , however , they will lose angular momentum again via stellar winds after the mass transfer phase , and the rotation velocity shortly after the sn explosion depends on how much mass is lost by winds until that time . models by @xcite indicate that the surface rotation velocity will be about 300 - 450  @xmath90 for surviving companion of @xmath91  @xmath4 . by contrast , more massive stars loses mass and angular momentum very quickly : a 48  @xmath4 companion star would be slowed down to about 60  @xmath90 at the pre - sn stage . the transferred mass to the secondary star is enriched with the ashes of hydrogen burning compared to the initial composition @xcite . the surface composition of the surviving secondary star after the sn explosion should be therefore marked by the enhancement of helium and nitrogen . the models of @xcite give typically the mass fractions of helium and nitrogen of about 0.35 and @xmath92 ( i.e. , 4.3 times the solar value ) at the surface of surviving companion stars , respectively . > x| > x & single & binary + initial mass & @xmath50  @xmath4 at @xmath11 & @xmath93  @xmath4 + final mass & @xmath94 at @xmath11 & @xmath95 at @xmath11 + final radius & @xmath96 & @xmath97 + wind mass loss rate & @xmath98 & @xmath99 + escape velocity ( @xmath100 ) & @xmath101 & @xmath102 + circumstellar structure & @xmath103 & complex with wind - wind collision and orbital motion + optical magnitudes & @xmath104 for wo type progenitor , and @xmath105 for wn type progenitor . & @xmath106 for most helium star progenitors . it will be more luminous in optical bands with a bright companion . + light curves & relatively faint at early times . broad light curves & fairly luminous early time plateau for @xmath107  @xmath4 + spectra & no or weak helium lines for most cases , and hence biased towards the production of sne ic . & helium lines even without non - thermal processes during the early time plateau phase for @xmath108  @xmath4 +                      many of wr progenitors would end their lives as a wo type star that is relatively faint with optical filters ( @xmath104 ; @xcite ) . binary systems with a sufficiently high initial mass of the primary star can produce wr progenitors of which the properties would be very similar to those of single wr stars , but the presence of the companion star would result in rather complex structures of the circumstellar medium and the sn remnant  @xcite . compared to the single star case , the detectability of wr progenitors can be significantly enhanced with a luminous early type companion . however , given the preference for lower masses of the initial mass function , the majority of binary progenitors should have several unique properties that are very different from wr progenitors . their final masses at the pre - sn stage are systematically lower ( @xmath109 for @xmath110 ) than those of wr progenitors ( @xmath7  @xmath4 ) . this agrees well with the recent ejecta mass estimates of ordinary sne ib / c ( @xmath111  @xmath4 ; @xcite ) . the current binary model predictions are also consistent with the observational facts that the association of the sn locations in their host galaxies with young stellar populations becomes stronger following the order of sn ii , sn ib and sn ic  ( sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and  [ sect : fate ] ) , which is usually interpreted within the single star scenario in the literature  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) .    despite their relatively low masses , the detectability of binary progenitors in optical bands is not necessarily lower than single wr star progenitors . to the contrary , a significant fraction of binary progenitors should have very high visual luminosities because relatively low - mass helium stars can rapidly expand during the late evolutionary stages , and/or because many of them would have luminous companion stars @xcite . the sn models by @xcite indicate that early time light curves and spectra would have the critical information about the nature of sn ib / c progenitors . in particular , the plateau phase due to helium recombination at early times and he i lines formed with thermal processes during this phase would be strong evidence for a relatively low - mass helium star progenitor having an extended helium envelope . as demonstrated by several recent observations(e.g . ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , the progenitor size can also be best constrained by early - time sn light curves including shock breakouts . we therefore conclude that observations of early - time light curves and spectra will be an excellent probe into the nature of sn ib / c progenitors .      * a caveat in the above conclusions is that the predictions summarized in table  [ tab1 ] are mostly based on the models at solar metallicity . the final masses of single star progenitors at super - solar metallicity can become as low as 5  @xmath4 , depending on the adopted mass loss rate ( fig . [ fig : finalmass ] ; * ? ? ? * ) . this value is within the ejecta mass range of ordinary sne ib / c by @xcite and @xcite , although it still can not explain sne ib / c having ejecta masses lower than about 3.5  @xmath4 . given that the final amounts of helium must also be smaller than in the case of solar metallicity ( fig . [ fig : hemass ] ) , the contribution from super - solar metallicity single stars might be particularly significant for sne ic  ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? although the sn ib / c event rate implies the dominant role of binary systems for the production of sne ib / c  @xcite , more direct evidence for binary progenitors comes from sne ib / c ejecta masses ( @xmath112 ; sects . [ sect : binarymass ] and  [ sect : fate ] ) . precise estimates of sn ejecta masses can give one of the best constraints for progenitor models . the uncertainties related to the effects of asymmetry of the explosion , mixing of chemical compositions in the sn ejecta and the presence of helium on the estimates of @xmath112 using sn light curves should be clarified in the near future ( cf . * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * the question on how much helium can be hidden in sn ic spectra is another critical test case for sn ib / c progenitor models ( sects .  [ sect : singlehe ] , [ sect : binaryhe ] and [ sect : fate ] ; fig . [ fig : fate ] ) . recent observations indicate very low helium mass ( @xmath113 ) in the ejecta @xcite . this can not be easily accommodated to the current model predictions that most sn ib / c progenitors have @xmath114 . this conflict may be due to our lack of proper knowledge on the mass loss rate from helium stars ( in particular during the post - helium burning phase ; sect . [ sect : binaryhe ] ) but a rigorous estimate of helium masses for a large sample of sne ib / c is highly required to resolve this issue . the ratio of sn ic to sn ib is another important constraint for progenitor models , which should be better estimated in the future . several authors reported that the ic to ib ratio is about 2 ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , but @xcite point out that many sne ib had been misclassified as sne ic , suggesting a lower value . * as discussed in sect . [ sect : fate ] , future observations on sn ib / c and sn iib properties and their relative frequencies as a function of metallicity ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) would greatly help to clarify the role of mass loss from helium stars in the evolution of sn ib / c progenitors . it would be particularly important to investigate how the ejecta masses of sne ib / c and the ratio of sn ib / sn ic rate systematically depend on metallicity . * in the discussions above , we did not address progenitors of broad - lined sne ic ( sne ic - bl ) , simply because we do not have a good clue on what makes them . the association of long grbs and some sne ic - bl  ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ) implies the importance of rapid rotation , and attempts have been made to explain long grbs , sne ic - bl and super - luminous sne ic within the single framework of the magnetar scenario  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? binary star models including rotation do not predict any particular parameter space where unusually rapid rotation in the core can be realized from the standard case b / bb / ab / abb channels for sne ib / c @xcite , except for the so - called chemically homogeneous evolution induced by mass accretion at low metallicity  @xcite . future studies should investigate more carefully the evolution of some specific binary systems where the condition of rapid rotation for magnetars can be rather easily fulfilled compared to the standard channels , such as binary systems consisting of a helium star plus a compact object in a very tight orbit  ( fig . [ fig : binary ] ; sect . [ sect : binaryrot ] ) . the author is grateful to norbert langer , stan woosley , luc dessart , hyun - jeong kim , bon - chul koo , gtz grfener , jorick vink , wonseok chun , thomas tauris , rob izzard , alexandra kozyreva , and john hillier for their contribution to this work and fruitful collaboration , and john eldridge , maryam modjaz , philipp podsiadlowski , kenichi nomoto , keiichi maeda , selma de mink and cyril georgy for helpful discussions . this work was supported by basic science research ( 2013r1a1a2061842 ) program through the national research foundation of korea ( nrf ) and by research resettlement fund for the new faculty of snu . anderson , j.p . , habergham , s.m . , james , p.a . , & hamuy , m. 2012 , mnras , 424 , 1372 arcavi , i. et al . 2010 , apj , 721 , 777 barkat , z. , rakavy , g. , & sack , n. 1967 , phrvl , 18 , 379 bersten , m. , benvenuto , o.m . , & folatelli , g. et al . 2014 , apj , 148 , 68 boissier , s. , & prantozs , n. 2009 , a&a , 503 , 137 branch , d. , et al . 2002 , apj , 566 , 1005 braun , h. 1997 , phd thesis , ludwig - maximilians university of munich burrows , a. , dessart , l. , livne , e. , ott , c.d . , & murphy , j. 2007 , apj , 664 , 416 cao , y. , kasliwal , m. m. , & arcavi , i. et al . 2013 , apj , 775 , l7 cano , z. 2013 , mnras , 434 , 1098 cano , z. , maeda , k. , & schulze , s. 2014 , mnras , 785 , 95 cantiello , m. , yoon , s .- c . , langer , n. , & livio , m. 2007 , a&a , 465 , 29 cantiello , m. , mankovich , c. , bildsten , l. , christensen - dalsgaard , j. , & paxton , b. 2014 , apj , 788 , 93 chevalier , r.a . , & soderberg , a. , 2010 , apj , 711 , l40 chiosi , c. & maeder , a. 1986 , ara&a , 24 , 328 chomiuk , l. et al . 2011 , apj , 743 , 114 chornock , r. et al . 2011 , apj , 739 , 41 claeys , j.s.w . , de mink , s > e . , pols , o.r . , eldridge , j.j . , & baes , m. 2011 , a&a , 528 , a131 conti , p.s . 1976 , in proc . 20th colloq . lige , p. 193 , univ . lige corsi , a. , ofek , e.o . , & gal - yam , a. , et al . 2012 , apj , 747 , 5 crockett , r.m . , smartt , s.j . , & eldridge , j.j . 2007 , mnras , 381 , 835 crowther , p.a . 2007 , ara&a , 45 , 177 de jager , c. , nieuwenhuijzen , h. , & van der hucht , k.a . 1988 , a&as , 72 , 259 de mink , s.e . , pols , o.r . , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . 2009 , a&a , 507 , 169 de mink , s.e . , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . , sana , h. , & de koter , a. 2013 , apj , 764 , 166 de mink , s.e . , sana , h. , langer , n. , izzard , r.g . , & schneider , f.r.n . 2014 , apj , 782 , 7 deng , j.s . , qiu , y.l . , hu , j.y . , hatano , k. , & branch , d. 2000 , apj , 540 , 452 dessart , l. , hillier , d.j . , livne , e. , yoon , s .- c . , woosley , s.e . , waldman , r. , & langer , n. 2011 , mnras , 414 , 2985 dessart , l. , hillier , d. , li , c. , & woosley , s.e . 2012a , mnras , 424 , 2139 dessart , l. , hillier , d. , waldman , r. , livne , e. , & blondin , s. 2012b , mnras , 426 , l76 detmers , r.g . , langer , n. , podsiadlowski , ph . , & izzard , r.g . 2008 , a&a , 484 , 831 dewi , j.d.m . , pols , o.r . , savonije , g.j . , & van den heuvel , e.p.j . 2002 , mnras , 331 , 1027 drout , m.r . 2011 , apj , 741 , 97 dudley , r.e . , & jeffery , c.s . , 1993 , mnras , 262 , 945 eggenberger , p. , maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 2005 , a&a , 440 , l9 eggenberger , p. , montalbn , j. , & miglio , a. 2012 , a&a , 544 , l4 ekstrm , s. , georgy , c. , eggenberger , p. et al . 2012 , a&a , 537 , a146 eldridge , j.j . , fraser , m. , mound , j.r . , & smartt , s.j . 2015 , mnras , 446 , 2689 eldridge , j.j . , fraser , m. , smartt , s.j . , mound , j.r . , & crockett , r. m. 2013 , mnras , 436 , 774 eldridge , j.j . , izzard , r.g . , tout , c.a . 2008 , mnras , 384 , 1109 eldridge , j.j . , langer , n. , & tout , c.a . 2011 , mnras , 414 , 3501 eldridge , j.j . , & vink , j.s . 2006 , a&a , 452 , 295 elmhamdi , a. , danziger , i.j . , branch , d. , leibundgut , b. , baron , e. , & kirchner , r.p . 2006 , a&a , 450 , 305 filippenko , a.v . 1997 , ara&a , 35 , 309 foley , r.j . , smith , n. , ganeshalingam , m. , li , w. , chornock , r. , & filippenko , a.v . 2007 , apj , 657 , 105 frame , d.j . , cottrell , p.l . , gilmore , a.c . , kilmartin , p.m. , & lawson , w.a . 1995 , mnras , 276 , 383 fremling , c. , sollerman , j. , & taddia , f. , et al . 2014 , a&a , 565 , 114 fryer , c.l . , & heger , a. 2005 , apj , 623 , 302 fujimoto , m.y . 1993 , apj , 419 , 768 gal - yam , a. 2009 , nature , 462 , 624 gal - yam , a. , arcavi , i. , & ofek , e.o . , et al . 2014 , nature , 509 , 471 gellert , m. , rdiger , g. , & elstner , d. 2008 , a&a , 479 , l33 georgy , c. , ekstrm , s. , & meynet , g. et al . 2012 , a&a , 542 , a29 gorbikov . 2014 , mnras , 443 , 671 grfener , g. , & hamann , w .- r . 2008 , a&a , 482 , 945 grfener , g. , owocki , s.p . , & vink , j.s . 2012 , a&a , 538 , a40 grfener , g. , & vink , j.s . 2013 , a&a , 560 , a6 graham , j.f . , & fruchter , a.s . 2013 , apj , 774 , 119 groh , j.h . , oliveira , a.s . , & steiner , j.e . 2008 , a&a , 485 , 245 groh , j . h. , meynet , g. , georgy , c. , & ekstroem , s. 2013a , a&a , 558 , a131 groh , j . h. , georgy , c. , & ekstroem , s. 2013b , a&a , 558 , l1 hakobyan , a.a . , mamon , g.a . , petrosian , a.r . , kunth , d. , & turatto , m. 2009 , a&a , 508 , 1259 hamann , w .- r . , schoenberner , d. , & heber , u. 1982 , a&a , 116 , 273 hamann , w .- r . , koesterke , l. , wessolowski , u. 1995 , a&a , 299 , 151 hamann , w .- r . , grfener , g. , & liermann , a. 2006 , a&a , 457 , 1015 hachinger , s. , mazzaili , p.a . , taubenberger , s. , hillebrandt , w. , nomoto , k. , & sauer , d.n . 2012 , mnras , 422 , 70 heger , a. , langer , n. , & woosley , s.e . 2000 , apj , 528 , 368 heger , a. , fryer , c.l . , woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & hartmann , d.h . 2004 , apj , 591 , 288 heger , a. , woosley , s.e . , & spruit , h.c . 2005 , apj , 626 , 350 hirschi , r. , meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2004 , a&a , 425 , 649 hjorth , j. 2013 , rspta , 371 , 20120275 ibeling , d. , & heger , a. 2013 , apj , 765 , 43 inserra , c. et al . 2013 , apj , 770 , 128 ishii , m. , ueno , m. , & kato , m. 1999 , pasj , 51 , 417 izzard , r.g . , ramirez - ruiz , e. , & tout , c.a . 2004 , mnras , 348 , 1215 ivanova , n. , belczynski , k. , kalogera , v. , rasio , f.a . , & taam , r.e . 2003 , apj , 592 , 475 jeffery , c.s . , & hamann , w .- r . 2010 , mnras , 404 , 1698 justham , s. , podsiadlowski , ph . , vink , j.s . 2014 , apj , 796 , 121 kasen , d. , & bildsten , l. 2010 , apj , 717 , 245 kelly , p.l . , & kirshnir , r.p . 2012 , apj , 759 , 107 kelly , p.l . , filippenko , a.v . , modjaz , m. , & kocevski , d. 2014 , apj , 789 , 23 kim , h .- j . , yoon , s .- c . , & koo , b .- 2015 , apj , submitted kippenhahn , r. , & weigert , a. 1967 , z. astrophys . 65 , 251 kipper , t. , & klochkova , v.g . , 2012 , baltic astronomy , 21 , 219 kobulnicky , h.a . , & fryer , c.l . 2007 , apj , 670 , 747 kochanek , c. 2009 , apj , 707 , 1578 koo , b.c . , mckee , c.f . , & suh , k.w . 2011 , apj , 732 , 6 koubsky , p. , harmanec , p. , yang , s. , netolick , m. , et al . 2006 , a&a , 459 , 849 kozyreva , a. , blinnikov , s. , langer , n. & yoon , s .- c . 2014 , a&a , 565 , 70 langer , n. 1989a , a&a , 210 , 93 langer , n. 1989b , a&a , 220 , 135 langer , n. 1992 , a&a , 265 , 17 langer , n. 2012 , ara&a , 50 , 107 lauterborn , d. 1970 , a&a , 7 , 150 li , w. , leaman , j. , & chornock , r. et al . 2011 , mnras , 412 , 1441 lucy , l.b . 1991 , apj , 383 , 308 lunnan , r. et al . 2014 , apj , 787 , 138 lyman , j. , bersier , d. , james , p. et al . 2014 , arxive:1406.3667 macfadyen , a. , & woosley , s. 1999 , apj , 524 , 262 maeda , k. , katsuda , s. , bamba , a. , terada , y. , & fukazawa , y. 2014 , apj , 785 , 95 maeder , a. 1987 , a&a , 178 , 159 maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 1987 , a&a , 182 , 243 maeder , a. , & meynet , g. 2000 , ara&a , 38 , 143 maeder , a. , georgy , c. , meynet , g. , & ekstrm , s. 2012 , a&a , 539 , a110 massey , ph . 2003 , ara&a , 41 , 15 maund , j.r . , & smartt , s.j . 2005 , mnras , 360 , 288 maund , j.r . , smartt , s.j . , kudritzki , r.p . , podsiadlowski , ph . , & gilmore , g.f . , 2004 , nature , 427 , 129 maund , j.r . , smartt , s.j . , & schweizer , f. 2005 , apj , 630 , 33 mazzali , p.a . , rpke , f.k . , benetti , s. , & hillebrandt , w. 2007 , science , 315 , 825 mazzali , p.a . , mcfadyen , a.i . , woosley , s.e . , pian , e. , & tanaka , m. 2014 , mnras , 443 , 67 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 1997 , a&a , 321 , 465 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2003 , a&a , 404 , 975 meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 2005 , a&a , 429 , 581 meynet , g. , maeder , a. , schaller , g. , schaerer , d. , & charbonnel , c. 1994 , a&as , 103 , 97 modjaz , m. , blondin , s. , & kirshner , r.p . 2014 , apj , 147 , 99 modjaz , m , kewley , l. , bloom , j.s . , filippenko , a.v . , perley , d. , & silverman , j.m . 2011 , apj , 731 , 4 modjaz , m , kewley , l. , & kirshner et al . 2008 , aj , 135 , 1136 modjaz , m , li , w. , & butler , n. et al . 2009 , apj , 702 , 226 netolick , m. , bonneau , d. , cehsneau , o. et al . 2009 , a&a , 499 , 827 nicholl , m. et al . 2013 , nature , 502 , 346 nomoto , k. , yamaoka , h. , pols , o.r . , van den heuvel , e.p.j . , iwamoto , k. , kumagai , s. , & shigeyama , t. 1994 , nature , 371 , 227 nugis , t. , & lamers , h.j.g.l.m . 2000 , a&a , 360 , 227 oliveira , a.s . , steiner , j.e . , & cieslinski , d. , 2003 , mnras , 346 , 963 pereira , c.b . 1998 , a&a , 338 , l91 petrovic , j. , langer , van der hucht , k.a . 2005a , 435 , 1013 petrovic , j. , langer , yoon , s .- c . , hger , a. 2005b , 435 , 247 petrovic , j. , pols , o. , & langer , n. 2006 , a&a , 450 , 219 piro , a. , & morozova , v.s . 2014 , apj , 792 , l11 podsiadlowski , ph . , joss , p.c . , & hsu , j.j.l . 1992 , apj , 391 , 246 podsiadlowski , ph . , hsu , j.j.l . , joss , p.c . , & ross , r.r . 1993 , nature , 364 , 509 podsiadlowski , ph . , ivanova , n. , justham , s. , rappaport , s. 2010 , mnras , 406 , 840 pols , o.r . 1994 , a&a . 290 , 119 pols , o.r . , & dewi , j.d.m . 2002 , pasa , 19 , 233 prieto , j.l . , stanek , k.z . , & beacom , j.f . 2008 , apj , 673 , 999 saio , h. 1995 , mnras , 277 , 1393 salasnich , b. , bressan , a. , & chiosi , c. 1999 , a&a , 342 , 131 sana , h. et al . 2012 , science , 337 , 444 sander , a. , hamann , w .- r . , & todt , h. 2012 , a&a , 540 , a144 sanders , n.e . , soderberg , a.m. , & levesque , e.m . 2012 , apj , 758 , 132 scalzo , r.a . , ruiter , a.j . , & sim , s.a . 2014 , mnras , 445 , 2535 schaeffer , r. , casse , m. , & cahen , s. 1987 , apjl , 316 , 31 schaerer , d. , charbonnel , c. , meynet , g. , maeder , a. , & schaller , g. 1993a , a&as,102 , 339 schaerer , d. , meynet , g. , maeder , a. , & schaller , g. 1993b , a&as , 98 , 523 schaller , g. , schaerer , d. , meynet , g. , & maeder , a. 1992 , a&as , 96 , 269 schoenberner , d. , & drilling , j.s . 1983 , apj , 268 , 225 schwartz , r.d . , persson , s.e . , & hamann , f.w . , 1990 , aj , 100 , 793 smartt , s.j . 2009 , ara&a , 47 , 63 smith , n. , li , w. , filippenko , a.v . , & chornock , r. 2011 , mnras , 412 , 1522 smith , n. 2014 , ara&a , 53 , 487 soderberg , a.m. , et al . 2008 , nature , 453 , 469 spencer , j. , baron , e. 2010 , apj , 718 , 957 spruit , h.c . 2002 , a&a , 381 , 923 steiner , j.e . , & oliveira , a.s . 2005 , a&a , 444 , 895 stritzinger , m. , leibundgut , b. , walch , s. , & contardo , g. 2006 , a&a , 450 , 241 suijs , m.p.l . , langer , n. , poelarends , a.j . 2008 , a&a , 481 , 87 taddia , f. , sollerman , j. , & leloudas , g. et al . 2014 , arxiv:1408.4084 tauris , t.m . , langer , n. , moriya , t.j . , podsiadlowski , ph . , yoon , s .- c . , blinnikov , s.i . 2013 , apjl , 778 , l23 townsend , r. , & macdonald , j. 2008 , in massive stars as cosmic engines , iau symp . 250 , p. 161 vanbeveren , d. , de loore , c. , & van rensbergern , w. 1998 , a&ar , 9 , 63 vanbeveren , d. , van bever , j. , & belkus , h. 2007 , apj , 662 , 107 van blerkom , d. , 1978 , apj , 225 , 175 van den berg , s. , li , w. , filippenko , a.v . 2005 , pasp , 117 , 773 van den heuvel , e.p.j . , & yoon , s .- c . 2007 , ap&ss , 311 , 177 van der hucht , k.a . 2001 , new . 45 , 135 van dyk , s.d . , zheng , w. , & fox , o.d . , 2014 , apj , 147 , 37 van loon , j.th . , cioni , m .- r.l . , zijlstra , a.a . & loup , c. 2005 , a&a , 438 , 273 van loon , j.th . 2008 , a&a , 487 , 1055 vink , j.s . , & de koter , a. 2005 , a&a , 442 , 587 wellons , s. , soderberg , a.m. , & chevalier , r.a . 2012 , apj , 752 , 17 wellstein , s. , & langer , n. 1999 , a&a , 350 , 148 wellstein , s. 2001 , phd thesis , university of potsdam wellstein , s. , langer , n. , & braun , h. 2001 , a&a , 369 , 939 wheeler , j.c . , yi , i. , hflich , p. , & wang , l. 2000 , apj , 537 , 810 wheeler , j.c . , johnson , v. , & clocchiatti , a. 2014 , arxiv:1411.5975 willis , a.j . , & stickland , d.j . , 1983 , mnras , 203 , 619 woosley , s.e . 1993 , apj , 405 , 273 woosley , s.e . 2010 , apj , 719 , 204 woosley , s.e . , & bloom , j. s. 2006 , ara&a , 44 , 507 woosley , s.e . , & eastman , r.g . 1997 , in thermonuclear supernovae , nato asi proc . sereis c. , vol . 486 , p. 821 , ruiz - lapuente , p. , canal , r. , isern , j. , eds . , kluwer , dortrecht woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & weaver , t.a . 1993 , apj , 411 , 823 woosley , s.e . , langer , n. , & weaver , t.a . 1995 , apj , 448 , 315 woosley , s.e . , & heger , a. 2006 , apj , 637 , 914 yoon , s .- c . , & langer , n. 2005 , a&a , 443 , 643 yoon , s .- c . , langer , n. , norman , c. 2006 , a&a , 460 , 199 yoon , s .- c . , & cantiello , m. 2010 , apjl , 717 , l62 yoon , s .- c . , woosley , s.e . , & langer , n. 2010 , apj , 725 , 940 yoon , s .- c . , dierks , a. , & langer , n. 2012a , a&a , 542 , a113 yoon , s .- c . , grfener , g. , vink , j.s . , kozyreva , a. , & izzard , r.g . 2012b , a&a , 544 , l11 zahn , j .- p . , brun , a.s . , & mathis , s. 2007 , a&a , 474 , 145
Abstract:

Answer: type ib / c supernovae ( sne ib / c ) mark the deaths of hydrogen - deficient massive stars . the evolutionary scenarios for sne ib / c progenitors involve many important physical processes including mass loss by winds and its metallicity dependence , stellar rotation , and binary interactions . this makes sne ib / c an excellent test bed for stellar evolution theory . we review the main results of evolutionary models for sn ib / c progenitors available in the literature and their confrontation with recent observations . we argue that the nature of sn ib / c progenitors can be significantly different for single and binary systems , and that binary evolution models can explain the ejecta masses derived from sn ib / c light curves , the distribution of sn ib / c sites in their host galaxies , and the optical magnitudes of the tentative progenitor candidate of iptf13bvn . we emphasize the importance of early - time observations of light curves and spectra , accurate measurements of helium mass in sn ib / c ejecta , and systematic studies about the metallicity dependence of sn ib / c properties , to better constrain theories . stars : evolution  binaries : general  supernovae : general  stars : massive  stars : wolf - rayet