Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: determining the strength of the magnetization of the `` quiet '' sun is tied to the question of how much flux resides at small scales . this is important , for example , in determining the energy budget available for chromospheric heating . observationally , two methods are employed to constrain the solar magnetic field : the hanle and zeeman effects . the hanle effect measures ( in principle ) the mean magnetic field strength , @xmath6 , as there are no cancellation effects , but quantitative interpretation requires assumptions about the probability distribution function ( pdf ) of the turbulent magnetic field . the hanle de - polarization is measured in strong lines formed in the photosphere and estimates are made of @xmath7 g , the field residing primarily in the intergranular lanes @xcite . the zeeman effect measures the longitudinal component ( via stokes  @xmath1 ) and transverse components ( via stokes  @xmath8 and @xmath9 ) of the magnetic field but suffers from cancellation effects . hence , it is `` blind '' to any `` hidden '' mixed - polarity flux at scales smaller than the resolution limit of an instrument . however , the benefit of zeeman measurements is that their interpretation requires no assumption about the turbulent pdf and measurements can actually be used to determine the pdf on scales larger than the resolution limit . some attempts to incorporate the effects of cancellation into zeeman - based stokes inversions utilize the micro - structured field hypothesis @xcite . however , typical estimates based on the longitudinal zeeman effect give @xmath10 g for the mean unsigned vertical flux density ( see table 3 in @xcite for a review of the spread of recent zeeman - based estimates ) . these values are significantly smaller than the hanle - based estimates . the discrepancy between the results from hanle ( @xmath11 g ) and zeeman ( @xmath12 g ) measurements is not unexpected since the zeeman observations see only the resolved flux while the hanle interpretation depends on assumptions about an unknown pdf .    in this work , we ask the question `` how can the turbulent fractal geometry of the magnetic field in the solar photosphere be accounted for in interpretations of zeeman - based observations ? '' we attempt to derive the spectral / fractal properties from high resolution ( @xmath13 ) zeeman observations with the _ hinode _ spectro - polarimeter ( sp ) @xcite and high resolution ( down to @xmath14km@xmath15 ) , turbulent dynamo simulations ( up to magnetic reynolds numbers , @xmath16 ) with the ` muram ` code @xcite . first , we clarify the consistency of pdfs derived from observations and simulations , respectively . zeeman observations typically show pdfs of quantities derived from stokes  @xmath1 which can be described as a peaked function @xcite . we demonstrate that the peaked pdfs from stokes  @xmath1 measurements and the monotonic pdfs typically reported from numerical simulations are , in fact , compatible . failure to take into account this observational bias can lead to a gross underestimation of the prevalence of weak fields and , consequently , to incorrect estimates of the mean magnetic field strength and magnetic energy density in the solar photosphere . second , we extrapolate the results obtained with observations and simulations ( based on their respective fractal properties ) to scales below the resolution limits to estimate the amount of `` hidden '' flux . to do this , we exploit the fact that the fractal geometry is intimately connected to power - law scaling relations such as @xmath17 . here , @xmath18 is the number of boxes of edge length @xmath19 covering a fractal set ( such as all pixels with apparent magnetic flux above some threshold ) and @xmath20 is the fractal dimension . it has long been known that the distribution of plage magnetic field is such a statistically self - similar fractal @xcite . as the threshold can influence the fractal dimension inferred , however , the geometrical structure is more complicated than a simple fractal . in this case , the fractal concept must be generalized by adding a measure defined by the absolute value of the net magnetic flux through each box of edge length @xmath19 . this measure also displays self - similarity ( a power - law scaling ) for the solar quiet sun network magnetic flux ( down to @xmath21 resolution in @xcite and @xcite ; see also @xcite ) and also for numerical simulations of magnetoconvection @xcite . hence , the geometry of the magnetic field is said to be multifractal . cancellation effects do not play an important role in observations of the multifractal unipolar solar regions discussed above . in contrast , if the magnetic field of the quiet sun internetwork is multifractal ( as we will show ) , cancellation can play a significant role for scales below @xmath22 for these mixed - polarity fields it is necessary to further generalize the fractal concept to a signed measure . here , the power - law scaling exponent is the cancellation exponent @xcite . if this self - similar power - law scaling extends below the observational resolution , small scale cancellation will occur and correct values of the mean field strength and energy can not be established . as was pointed out by @xcite , such a signed measure could also be employed to extrapolate moments of the magnetic field below resolvable limits . until now , no attempt has been made to employ self - similar scaling to estimate the total cancellation , and , hence , the true mean quiet - sun magnetic field strength . [ [ section ] ]    we use ` muram ` simulations @xcite for a rectangular domain of horizontal extent @xmath23mm@xmath24 and a depth of @xmath25 mm . runs of small - scale , local dynamo action with increasing resolution and reynolds numbers have been carried out ( see table [ table : runs ] ) . the turbulence is sufficient for small - scale dynamo action @xcite . all magnetic field in the simulations results from dynamo amplification of a small seed field as there is no net flux through the box , no flux advected into the box , and no initial large - scale field . a well - known rule - of - thumb for forced turbulence simulations is that one decade of scales smaller than the forcing is required before the inertial range begins and another decade is required ( at the opposite end of the spectrum ) for the dissipative scales . for photospheric magneto - convection simulations , where the forcing granulation scale is 1 mm , this means that a grid resolution of 10 km or smaller is required before a simulation becomes turbulent . as we compute simulations down to a grid resolution of 4 km , we are now able to measure the effects of turbulence on observational quantities .    to this end , we require synthetic profiles ( for the fei lines at 6301.5    and 6302.5  ) as calculated from a snapshot of a run with non - grey radiative transfer . owing to the computational expense of such a run , it was started from a snapshot from the statistically stationary state of run c ( see table [ table : runs ] ) and then run for approximately one convective turnover time , 10 minutes . stokes @xmath1 , @xmath8 , and @xmath9 profiles were then computed in one dimension ( 1d ) assuming local - thermodynamic - equilibrium ( lte ) and using the ` stopro ` code in the ` spinor ` package @xcite . we will concentrate in this work , however , on stokes  @xmath1 observations ( and synthetic observations ) at disk center . this allows us to avoid line - of - sight effects , to identify the longitudinal component of the magnetic field as its vertical component , and to avoid the difficult estimation of the cancellation properties of stokes  @xmath8 and @xmath9 . observational data is obtained from the spectro - polarimeter ( sp , @xcite ) of the solar optical telescope ( sot , @xcite ) on the _ hinode _ satellite @xcite . consists of @xmath26 scans taken on march 10 , 2007 ( 11:37:36  14:36:48 ut ) , in the `` normal mode '' ( exposure time of @xmath27s ) with the scanning step of @xmath28 and pixel size along the slit of @xmath29 . the data set covers a quiet sun region at the disk center , over the large field of view of @xmath30 . corrections for various instrumental effects are made using the ` solarsoft ` procedure ` sp_prep ` which calculates the wavelength - integrated stokes  @xmath1 ( @xmath31 ) , @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the sign of the blue peak , @xmath34 is the line center , and @xmath35pm the procedure includes also a milne - eddington - based calibration of the sum of @xmath31 from both lines into a measure of longitudinal `` apparent flux density '' , @xmath36 @xcite . this calibration is tailored to retrieve the field value from weak and noisy internetwork signals . it assumes that magnetic structures are spatially resolved ( fill the resolution element ) and does not take into account the magnetic field variations over the height range where lines are formed . consequences of the latter assumption are studied in the next section , when @xmath36 , obtained from stokes  @xmath1 profiles synthesized from simulations , is compared with the vertical component of the actual magnetic field . [ [ sec : pdfs ] ]    a marked difference exists between the pdfs inferred from zeeman polarimetry ( e.g. , @xcite ) and the pdfs from numerical computations ( e.g. , @xcite ) . for example , in fig . [ fig : pdfcompare ] we present the pdfs magnetogram ( apparent vertical magnetic flux density , line ) and of ` muram ` simulation run c - ng ( average vertical magnetic field , solid line ) . the polarimetric observation peaks at @xmath37 g while the simulation possesses a monotonic distribution without a distinct maximum : there exists a greater amount of weak vertical field than indicated by the observations . the observation also shows greater intermittency ( the distribution has an enhanced strong signal ( field ) tail when compared to a gaussian ) than the simulation . this can possibly be attributed to the much lower reynolds number of the numerical simulation compared to the sun as well as to the smaller simulation box : contributions from dynamo action in the deeper layers and supergranular network flux concentrations are absent . to address the qualitative difference ( peaked versus monotonic ) between simulations and observations , we ask what pdf of zeeman - based observational signatures would result if pdf@xmath38 monotonically decreases with increasing vertical field strength ( instead of possessing a peak ) . our approach will be to assume the distribution of field strengths from turbulent ` muram ` simulations and examine the consequences of such a distribution on stokes  @xmath1 observations . though noise , resolution , and other instrumental factors are important in any real observation , we first address the question assuming a `` perfect '' instrument . using the synthetic profiles from run c - ng , we calculate @xmath31 with eq . ( [ eq : vtot ] ) and determine @xmath39 following @xcite . in fig . [ fig : snaps ] , the derived @xmath39 signal versus @xmath40 , the vertical magnetic field strength averaged over the height range corresponding to @xmath41 $ ] , is shown . this quantity was selected for its linear pearson correlation with @xmath39 of @xmath42 and its coefficient of linearity , @xmath43 , which is consistent with the calibration of @xcite . this height range also encompasses most of the formation height of the ` fei ` lines at 6301 and 6302   . though @xmath39 and @xmath40 are well correlated , there is a large scatter . we note , also , that changing the range to @xmath44 $ ] does not significantly affect the correlation , @xmath45 . this indicates that most of the stokes  @xmath1 signal is generated in deeper layers @xcite .    in fig . [ fig : pdfcompare ] , we present a comparison between the pdfs of @xmath39 as derived from the synthetic stokes  @xmath1 profiles ( line ) and @xmath40 ( solid line ) . pdf@xmath46 monotonically decreases with increasing field strength while pdf(@xmath39 ) shows a peak near @xmath47 g and a strong decline towards smaller field strengths . the pdfs for maximum stokes  @xmath1 amplitude and total circular polarization are qualitatively similar to that shown for @xmath39 . pdfs for the vertical magnetic field from different volumes and 2d cross sections from all simulation runs , chosen either by height or by optical depth , show similar pdfs to that shown for @xmath40 . that is , the monotonically decreasing distribution is a robust feature of the vertical magnetic field when sampled by geometrical height , optical depth , or by averaging over the vertical direction . the difference between observations and simulations is caused by the radiative transfer that produces circular polarization from longitudinal magnetic field . the above result shows that caution is needed when interpreting the distribution of stokes  @xmath1 signal in order to avoid a drastic underestimation of the occurrence of weak field . this caution naturally extends to moments of the distribution such as mean vertical flux density or mean vertical magnetic energy density . for example , @xmath39 and @xmath40 are very well correlated with a coefficient of linearity of unity , but their averages , @xmath48 g and @xmath49 g , differ significantly . we see that an over estimation of 26% results from assuming the vertical magnetic field to have the same distribution as the signal derived from stokes  @xmath1 , even in the absence of noise    to understand in more detail how radiative transfer affects contribute to a peaked pdf , we examine a few selected @xmath50profiles . pixels with weak @xmath40 must be generating strong @xmath39 signals for pdf(@xmath39 ) to become peaked . indeed , fig . [ fig : snapb ] shows this is the case . there are many pixels for which @xmath51 g while @xmath52 g . on the other hand , we see that when @xmath53 g , @xmath54 is always less than 4  g. in fig . [ fig : ray ] , we examine one case of how weak @xmath40 can be associated with strong @xmath39 . for @xmath55 $ ] , the vertical magnetic field takes on values of tens of gauss . in this region , there are also strong gradients ( and direction reversals ) for both the magnetic and velocity fields . in this case , because of the magnetic field reversal , @xmath40 is nearly zero . however , because of the velocity gradient , the contributions to the stokes@xmath4 profile from the positive and negative magnetic polarities are doppler - shifted with respect to each other . for this reason , the stokes  @xmath1 signal is not cancelled . this is further illustrated in fig . [ fig : sami ] where we plot the mean @xmath39 for all pixels with @xmath51 g versus the strength of the vertical velocity fluctuations . there is a clear trend of stronger signal with increased doppler shifts between the different heights in the atmosphere . we conclude that doppler shifts of absorption profiles are responsible for the peaked pdf from our noiseless synthetic @xmath39 . in effect , @xmath56 is some combination of the vertical mean of @xmath57 and the vertical mean of @xmath58 ( depending on @xmath59 ) and , consequently , the pdf of @xmath39 does not correspond to pdf@xmath38 from any geometrical height , optical depth , or volume . such a failing of @xmath39 to accurately represent @xmath57 can not be captured using the milne - eddington approximation ( used to calibrate @xmath39 ) , which has no gradients by definition .    to examine the effect of noise on the pdf , we consider synthetic stokes  @xmath1 profiles with noise added at a polarization precision of ( similar to that of the _ hinode _ observations ) in determining @xmath39 . the pdf of this noisy synthetic observation is shown as a line in fig . [ fig : pdfcompare ] the noise accentuates the peak in the pdf even further . in examining eq . ( [ eq : vtot ] ) for @xmath31 ( @xmath39 is a nearly - linear function of @xmath31 ) , we see that by taking the absolute value of the blue and red lobes separately the effect of noise becomes the sum of two non - negative measurement errors . that is , @xmath60 where @xmath61 and @xmath62 are the measurement noise in the blue and red lobes ( e.g. , @xmath63 where @xmath64 are the random variables associated with the measurement noise in each wavelength bin ) . assuming these two random variables , @xmath61 and @xmath62 have gaussian distributions , their separate pdfs for their absolute values will peak at zero . however , the pdf of the sum of their absolute values will peak at a non - zero value due to reduced likelihood that @xmath65 and @xmath66 are small simultaneously : the pdf of the sum of two independent random variables is the convolution of their individual pdfs , @xmath67 for @xmath61,@xmath62 gaussian and @xmath68 . because of taking the absolute values , the individual pdfs are zero for negative values ( this sets the limits of integration for eq . ( [ eq : pdf ] ) ) . hence , their convolution is zero at zero and peaks instead for some finite positive value . assuming @xmath61 and @xmath62 have identical identical standard deviation ( taken from @xcite ) , it can be shown that the peak in the pdf for @xmath39 , eq . ( [ eq : pdf ] ) , is given by the solution to @xmath69 this predicts a peak in the pdf at @xmath39@xmath70 g , close to the seen in the actual observation . consequently , adding noise leads to a further decrease of the number of pixels with very weak field and thus accentuates the maximum of the pdf . this illustrates that a monotonic pdf@xmath38 is qualitatively consistent with observations . [ [ sec : cancel ] ]    turbulence gives rise to a statistically self - similar fractal pattern of the magnetic field ( within the inertial range )  the field retains the same degree of complexity of distinct structures regardless of the scale at which it is observed ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) . in this section , we show that this also applies to solar surface magnetic fields and we use this self - similarity to estimate the portion of unsigned vertical flux unobservable at a given resolution . to begin with , we examine the cancellation properties of the magnetic field itself using a series of high - resolution ` muram ` dynamo simulations . this illustrates how the turbulent nature of the magnetic field limits measurement under the sole consideration of spatial resolution and in the absence of other observational constraints . as it separates the statistics of the field itself from observational constraints , the study also allows us to extrapolate the results to realistic solar magnetic reynolds numbers .    extending the ideas of singularity in probability measures for self - similar fractal fields to signed fields , @xcite introduced the _ cancellation exponent _ for studying the self - similar sign oscillations on very small scales in turbulent flows . for our application , their partition function , @xmath71 , measures the portion of the flux remaining after averaging over boxes of edge length @xmath19 , @xmath72 where @xmath73 is a hierarchy of disjoint subsets of size @xmath19 covering the entire domain , @xmath74 . in our case , we call the function @xmath75 the _ cancellation function _ since it measures the flux cancellation at a given length - scale @xmath19 . if the magnetic field is self - similar ( for scales much larger than the dissipation scale ) , we expect a power - law @xmath76 where @xmath77 is called the _ cancellation exponent_. it is related to the characteristic fractal dimension of the magnetic field structures on all scales , @xmath20 , by @xmath78 where @xmath79 is the embedding euclidean dimension of the solar surface @xcite . dimensions and uncorrelated in the other @xmath80 dimensions , the smooth dimensions contribute to the sum of vertical fluxes proportional to their area while the integral of an uncorrelated field contributes proportional to the square root of its area ( random process ) . ( [ eq : vsp94 ] ) then follows @xcite . ] an improved method to determine @xmath71 using a monte carlo box counting technique was proposed by @xcite . its advantages include better counting statistics when @xmath19 is a large fraction of the edge length of the domain @xmath74 , applicability to non - square pixels , and less sensitivity to the accidental placement of larger flux patches ( e.g. , network elements ) with respect to the partitioning . for our simulation data , the monte carlo technique proved as accurate as rigid partition boxes but led to a significant reduction of the noise in @xmath71 : it averages over many partitionings and allows a more faithful representation of the field distribution @xcite . we use this technique for the results shown below .    the height range that corresponds ( in a horizontally averaged sense ) to @xmath81 $ ] ( as discussed in  [ sec : pdfs ] , the contribution for @xmath82 $ ] to the stokes  @xmath1 signal is insignificant ) is @xmath83\,$]km ( @xmath84 corresponds to the continuum optical depth @xmath85 at @xmath86 nm ) . for this height range we compute the averaged cancellation functions , @xmath71 , for ` muram ` dynamo simulations with magnetic reynolds numbers ranging from @xmath87 to @xmath16 . by definition , we have @xmath88 at the resolution of the simulation since there are no smaller scales for the computation . furthermore , we expect dissipation to strongly affect @xmath71 for the smallest decade of scales ( analytically , its slope must go to zero ) . also , as our dynamo simulations have zero signed total flux , @xmath89mm@xmath90 and we would expect scales down to approximately @xmath91 km to be affected by this constraint . only for smaller scales should we be able to observe a turbulent scaling . however , very little room is left between these two constraints so that no clear power - law scaling is observed for any of the simulations ( see fig . [ fig : use_caexp ] for one example ) .    since the dissipation scale of magnetic energy , @xmath92 , decreases with increasing @xmath93 , for fixed @xmath19 , @xmath71 decreases with increasing magnetic reynolds number ( fluctuations at smaller scales increase the total cancellation ) . this is emphasized in fig . [ fig : extrap2 ] , where we plot the value of the cancellation function for @xmath94 km ( corresponding roughly to _ hinode _ sp s angular resolution of @xmath13 ) versus @xmath93 . we can fit a power law and extrapolate to the results we would expect from a ` muram ` simulation at solar @xmath93 ( which must be estimated ) . from @xcite , we estimate the magnetic diffusivity for @xmath95 , @xmath96cm@xmath24s@xmath98 . the driving of the small - scale dynamo is mainly subsurface where @xmath99 is roughly 100 times smaller ( @xmath100cm@xmath24s@xmath98 , cf . @xcite ) . for an upper limit of @xmath101km@xmath102 , we employ the more conservative estimate : @xmath96cm@xmath24s@xmath98 . taking the forcing scale to be the granulation scale , @xmath103 mm , and using @xmath104 km  s@xmath98 from the simulation , we find @xmath105 for this magnetic reynolds number , our extrapolation yields @xmath101km@xmath106 . this indicates that with a perfect observation at this spatial resolution and assuming that the ` muram ` simulation faithfully reproduces the solar conditions , we should multiply an observation by a factor of 5 to obtain the true mean vertical unsigned flux density of the quiet - sun internetwork . it is also suggested by fig . [ fig : extrap2 ] that @xmath101km@xmath102 decreases with decreasing magnetic prandtl number , @xmath107 where @xmath108 is the kinematic viscosity and @xmath99 the magnetic diffusivity . as the magnetic prandtl number of the sun is much less than that of the simulations , we expect that @xmath101km@xmath109 . the cancellation functions for @xmath57 and for @xmath39 inferred from run c - ng are shown in fig . [ fig : use_caexp ] . we see that the two functions are essentially equivalent . this demonstrates an excellent correspondence between the cancellation of the field itself and the signal derivable from observations ( excluding instrumental effects ) . therefore , we may take the cancellation of @xmath39 as a proxy for the cancellation of @xmath110 . this we do . we present the normalized cancellation function , @xmath111mm@xmath102 , for the _ hinode _ sp observation in fig . [ fig : hinode_caexp ] . without knowing the value of the true unsigned vertical flux , the denominator in eq . ( [ eq : chi ] ) , the value of the cancellation function can only be normalized to some arbitrary scale . we find a self - similar power - law over two decades in length scales , demonstrating the multifractal geometry of the turbulent quiet - sun magnetic field . this is somewhat surprising as the dominant granulation pattern at scales near @xmath47 mm might have been expected to affect the cancellation scaling . the cancellation exponent of the scaling is @xmath112 . this exponent predicts a 20% increase in the observed mean unsigned vertical flux density with a doubling of resolution in agreement with the difference in flux densities found between ground and space - based telescopes @xcite . note also that the power - law behavior holds down to the two - pixel scale . this is a clear indication of cancellation extending to smaller scales than resolved by _ hinode _ @xcite . compare this , for example , to the simulation case in fig . [ fig : use_caexp ] where dissipation is seen to affect a strong turnover in @xmath71 for the smallest decade of scales . as the observation is not so affected , we may safely conclude that the smallest scale of magnetic structuring is at least one decade smaller than the _ hinode _ sp resolution limit . the scales of magnetic structuring in the photosphere must therefore extend to    from eq . ( [ eq : vsp94 ] ) , we see that our result corresponds to @xmath113 for the fractal dimension of the quiet sun internetwork magnetogram . within uncertainties , this is the same dimension as for solar plage regions , @xmath114 @xcite . this might indicate that some similar mechanisms are at play in solar plage and quiet sun internetwork . for the cancellation exponent of network magnetic fields , values of @xmath115 @xcite and of @xmath116 @xcite have been reported , but without an estimate of the uncertainties . recent work has highlighted the sensitivity of fractal dimension ( perimeter - area ) estimators to pixelization and resolution @xcite . by using a signed measure , however , we avoid difficulties inherent to fractal dimension estimations using bi - level images in general and the perimeter - area method , specifically . nonetheless , we have tested the sensitivity of the cancellation exponent to reducing our resolution by theoretical point spread functions for apertures 1/2 and 1/4 that of the _ hinode _ sot ( @xmath117 cm ) . we find the slope of @xmath71 to be robust in these cases for lengths exceeding 30 pixels . there is no change in the power law for almost one decade of length scales ( 3 - 20 mm ) . we therefore conclude that our estimation , @xmath118 is robust and insensitive to pixelization and resolution effects . as pointed out by @xcite , however , because of what they call `` resolution - limited asymptotics '' , different definitions of fractal dimension can give different values at finite resolution . for this reason , our value @xmath113 might differ from a well - resolved perimeter - area estimate .    using the self - similar power law derived from fig . [ fig : hinode_caexp ] , we may estimate the true mean unsigned vertical component of the magnetic field ( hereafter , `` mean unsigned vertical flux density '' ) in the quiet - sun photosphere , @xmath119 . below the magnetic dissipation scale , @xmath92 , there is no cancellation : @xmath120 . this , together with the self - similarity relation , eq . ( [ eq : ss ] ) , gives @xmath121 where @xmath19 is any scale in the inertial range , @xmath122 is the mean absolute value of the vertical component of the field measured at that resolution ( @xmath19 ) , @xmath123 and @xmath124 is given by @xmath125 @xcite report @xmath126 g . as @xmath127 mm ( approximate _ hinode _ sp pixel size ) is below the sot resolution limit , however , we rebin @xmath39 to @xmath128 mm pixels to find @xmath129 g as the starting point of our estimate , @xmath130    estimating the magnetic dissipation scale is not straight - forward . as we have shown that observationally it is unresolved , we are left to rely on a phenomenological estimate . kolmogorov phenomenology predicts ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) @xmath131 where @xmath132 is a large characteristic scale , such as the granulation scale . using @xmath133 , derived previously , we estimate @xmath134 m . for the dissipative range , power - law scaling for @xmath71 will not apply and the slope of the cancellation function will approach zero . to provide a lower bound to the solar mean unsigned vertical field , we should then be conservative by ignoring any cancellation in the first decade of scales . hence , we use @xmath135 m in eq . ( [ eq : correct ] ) to estimate the true mean unsigned vertical flux density to be @xmath136 g . this means that , at a resolution of @xmath5 km , at most one quarter of the unsigned vertical flux is observable . our estimates suggest that three - quarters or more of the vertical unsigned magnetic flux is cancelled at the resolution of _ hanle - based estimates suggest @xmath137 g @xciteg estimate in @xcite , we take here the @xmath138 g estimate from their assumption of an exponential pdf . ] while zeeman - based estimates suggest @xmath139 g ( see table 3 in @xcite ) . note that even with estimation of the cancellation , there remains almost a factor of 3 difference between reported hanle estimates and the zeeman - based estimates we present . however , we have considered only one component of a vector quantity while the hanle - based estimates are sensitive to the magnitude of that vector . recent observations @xcite and simulations @xcite suggest that horizontal fields are on average a factor of 5 stronger than vertical fields . therefore , our estimate of @xmath140 g coupled with an even stronger mean horizontal field is consistent with the hanle - based estimate . another observational discrepancy lies in determining the mean `` location '' of the fields . @xcite interpret scattering polarization from molecular ` c_2 ` to indicate the mean field strength is weak ( @xmath12 g ) over the bright granules , so that the turbulent field inferred from the hanle measurements should be concentrated in the intergranular lanes . this the location of strong horizontal fields not in the lanes but near the edges of granules @xcite . in resolving the details over the location and strength of the mean components of the magnetic field , future work should also address the cancellation statistics of the horizontal field ( and the linearly - polarized stokes signals @xmath8 and @xmath9 ) as well as the effect on stokes  @xmath1 presented here . on the basis of surface dynamo simulations , we have demonstrated that the pdf generated from the stokes  @xmath1 spectra are not necessarily equivalent in form to that of the pdf of the vertical component of the underlying magnetic field . the pdf for stokes  @xmath1 shows a reduction of likelihood for weak vertical magnetic field compared to the pdf of the field itself . this effect is not due to a reduction in horizontal resolution , but is caused by a combination of vertical radiative transfer through a turbulent fluid ( via the doppler effect ) and noise . that is , any systematic sampling ( by geometrical height , optical depth , or volume ) of @xmath57 from the simulation yields a monotonic pdf , due to doppler shifts between different atmospheric heights , the stokes @xmath1 signal is not such a systematic sampling . consequently , the pdf of stokes @xmath1 field estimates do not accurately represent the pdf of the actual vertical magnetic field a monotonic pdf for the field can result in a peaked pdf in observations and the assumption that pdf(@xmath57 ) can be uniquely derived from stokes  @xmath1 observations becomes dubious .    from the cancellation function for a _ hinode _ observation of the apparent longitudinal flux density , we have demonstrated that the multi - fractal self - similar pattern of the quiet - sun photospheric magnetic field covers two decades of length scales down to the resolution limit , @xmath5 km . this constitutes observational evidence that the the smallest scale of magnetic structuring in the photosphere is the power law also allows us to constrain the quiet - sun true mean unsigned vertical flux density . we estimate the lower bound to be @xmath141 g . estimates based solely on our numerical simulations suggest that the vertical unsigned flux at _ hinode _ s resolution should be multiplied by 5 to obtain the true vertical unsigned flux ( i.e. , @xmath3 g ) . these two results are consistent and suggest that the order of magnitude disparity between hanle and zeeman - based estimates may be fully resolved by a proper consideration of the cancellation properties of the full vector field . the authors would like to acknowledge fruitful discussions with s. solanki , a. pietarila , and r. cameron . _ hinode _ is a japanese mission developed and launched by isas / jaxa , collaborating with naoj as a domestic partner , nasa and stfc ( uk ) as international partners . scientific operation of the hinode mission is conducted by the hinode science team organized at isas / jaxa . this team mainly consists of scientists from institutes in the partner countries . support for the post - launch operation is provided by jaxa and naoj ( japan ) , stfc ( u.k . ) , nasa , esa , and nsc ( norway ) .                                , t. , matsuzaki , k. , sakao , t. , shimizu , t. , sone , y. , tachikawa , s. , hashimoto , t. , minesugi , k. , ohnishi , a. , yamada , t. , tsuneta , s. , hara , h. , ichimoto , k. , suematsu , y. , shimojo , m. , watanabe , t. , shimada , s. , davis , j.  m. , hill , l.  d. , owens , j.  k. , title , a.  m. , culhane , j.  l. , harra , l.  k. , doschek , g.  a. , & golub , l. 2007 , , 243 , 3            , b.  w. , elmore , d.  f. , & streander , k.  v. 2001 , in astronomical society of the pacific conference series , vol . 236 , advanced solar polarimetry  theory , observation , and instrumentation , ed . m.  sigwarth , 33+                                        , s. , ichimoto , k. , katsukawa , y. , nagata , s. , otsubo , m. , shimizu , t. , suematsu , y. , nakagiri , m. , noguchi , m. , tarbell , t. , title , a. , shine , r. , rosenberg , w. , hoffmann , c. , jurcevich , b. , kushner , g. , levay , m. , lites , b. , elmore , d. , matsushita , t. , kawaguchi , n. , saito , h. , mikami , i. , hill , l.  d. , & owens , j.  k. 2008 , , 249 , 167              lccc run e & @xmath142 & @xmath143 km & @xmath144 + run c & @xmath145 & @xmath146 km & @xmath147 + run c - ng & @xmath145 & @xmath146 km & @xmath147 + run g - p & @xmath148 & @xmath149 km & @xmath147 + run g & @xmath148 & @xmath149 km & @xmath150 + run h & @xmath151 & @xmath14 km & @xmath152 + [ table : runs ]
Abstract:

Answer: using turbulent mhd simulations ( magnetic reynolds numbers up to @xmath0 ) and _ hinode _ observations , we study effects of turbulence on measuring the solar magnetic field outside active regions . firstly , from synthetic stokes  @xmath1 profiles for the fei lines at 6301 and 6302  , we show that a peaked probability distribution function ( pdf ) for observationally - derived field estimates is consistent with a monotonic pdf for actual vertical field strengths . hence , the prevalence of weak fields is greater than would be naively inferred from observations . secondly , we employ the fractal self - similar geometry of the turbulent solar magnetic field to derive two estimates ( numerical and observational ) of the true mean vertical unsigned flux density . we also find observational evidence that the scales of magnetic structuring in the photosphere extend at least down to the self - similar power - law scaling in the signed measure from a _ hinode _ magnetogram ranges ( over two decades in length scales and including the granulation scale ) down to the @xmath2 km resolution limit . from the self - similar scaling , we determine a lower bound for the true quiet - sun mean vertical unsigned flux density of @xmath3 g . this is consistent with our numerically - based estimates that 80% or more of the vertical unsigned flux should be invisible to stokes@xmath4 observations at a resolution of @xmath5 km owing to the cancellation of signal from opposite magnetic polarities . our estimates significantly reduce the order - of - magnitude discrepancy between zeeman- and hanle - based estimates .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: observations of the cmb , supernovae , lensing and baryon acoustic oscillations have led to the cosmological standard model which requires an accelerated expansion of the late universe , driven by dark energy but despite many years of research its origin has not yet been identified . there are two major explanations for the origin and properties of dark energy . the first solution consists of introducing a cosmological constant @xmath0 with a constant energy density causing an effective repulsive force between cosmological objects at large distances . from the particle physics perspective the cosmological constant could correspond to the vacuum energy density . the theoretical expectations for the vacuum energy density caused by fluctuating quantum fields , however , exceeds the observational bounds on @xmath0 by up to 120 orders of magnitude . this discrepancy remains for more almost a century one of the most challenging puzzles in physics , @xcite . alternatively , the acceleration of the universe can be explained by introducing new dynamical degrees of freedom , either by invoking new fluids @xmath1 with negative pressure or by changing the geometrical part of einstein s equations . in particular , weakening gravity on cosmological scales could not only tackle the cosmological constant problem , but would also come hand in hand with new degrees of freedom which might be responsible for a late - time speed - up of the hubble expansion . such scenarios could arise in massive gravity or in higher - dimensional frameworks .    in the higher dimensional picture , the dvali - gabadadze - porrati ( dgp ) model is one of the important large scale modified theories of gravity @xcite . in this braneworld model our universe is confined to a three - brane embedded in a five - dimensional bulk . on small scales , four - dimensional gravity is recovered due to an intrinsic einstein hilbert term sourced by the brane curvature , whereas on larger , cosmological scales gravity is systematically weaker as the graviton acquires a soft mass @xmath2 which limits its effective range . being a fundamentally higher dimensional theory , the effective four - dimensional graviton on the brane carries five degrees of freedom , namely the usual helicity-2 modes , two helicity-1 modes and one helicity-0 mode . whilst the helicity-1 mods typically decouple , the helicity-0 one can mediate an extra fifth force . in the limit @xmath3 , one recovers general relativity ( gr ) through the vainshtein mechanism : the basic idea is to decouple the additional modes from the gravitational dynamics via nonlinear interactions of the helicity-0 mode of the graviton , @xcite . as a result , at the vicinity of matter , the non - linear interaction for the helicity-0 mode become large and hence suppresses its coupling to matter . this decoupling of the nonlinear helicity-0 mode is manifest in the limit where @xmath4 and @xmath5 while the strong coupling scale @xmath6 is kept fixed . this limit enables a linear treatment of the usual helicity-2 mode of gravity while the helicity-0 mode @xmath7 is described non - linearly , which is the so - called decoupling limit . one of the successes of the dgp model is the existence of a self - accelerating solution , where the acceleration of the universe is sourced by the graviton own degrees of freedom ( more precisely its helicity-0 mode ) . unfortunately that branch of solution seems to be plagued by ghost - like instabilities @xcite , in the dgp model , but this issue could be avoided in more sophisticated setups , for instance including gauss - bonnet terms in the bulk @xcite . more recently , it has been shown that the decoupling limit of dgp could be extended to more general galilean invariant interactions @xcite . this galileon model relies strongly on the symmetry of the helicity-0 mode @xmath7 : invariance under internal galilean and shift transformations , which in induced gravity braneworld models can be regarded as residuals of the 5-dimensional poincar invariance . these symmetries and the postulate of ghost - absence restrict the construction of the effective @xmath7 lagrangian . there exist only five derivative interactions which fulfill these conditions . from the five dimensional point of view these galilean invariant interactions are consequences of lovelock invariants in the bulk of generalized braneworld models , @xcite . since their inception there has been a flurry of investigations related to self - accelerating de sitter solutions without ghosts @xcite , galileon cosmology and its observations @xcite , inflation @xcite , lensing @xcite , superluminalities arising in spherically symmetric solutions around compact sources @xcite , k - mouflage @xcite , kinetic gravity braiding @xcite , etc ... . furthermore , there has been some effort in generalizing the galileon to a non - flat background . the first attempt was then to covariantize directly the decoupling limit and to study its resulting cosmology @xcite . in particular it was shown in @xcite that the naive covariantization would yield ghost - like terms at the level of equation of motion but a given unique nonminimal coupling between @xmath7 and the curvature can remove these terms resulting in second order of equations of motion @xcite , which are also consistent with a higher - dimensional construction @xcite . in this paper , we will pursue the same strategy when constructing our proxy theory . the outcome of this kind of covariantization method was explored further in @xcite . while this covariantization is ghost - free , the galileon symmetry is broken explicitly in curved backgrounds . only recently there has been a successful generalization to the ( anti- ) de sitter background and ultimately to maximally symmetric backgrounds where it has been discovered that the de sitter galileon interactions acquire additional , potential - like terms being functions of @xmath7 and mixtures of @xmath7 and gradients of @xmath7 , all fulfilling a generalized galileon symmetry @xcite . there exists a parallel to theories centered on a massive graviton : galileon - type interaction terms naturally arise in gravitational theories using a massive spin-2 particle as an exchange particle , which has , in addition , been constructed to be ghost - free be it in three dimensions , @xcite or for an generalized fierz - pauli action in four dimensions @xcite . not only is the existence of a graviton mass a fundamental question from a theoretical perspective , it could also have important consequences both in cosmology and in solar system physics , @xcite . although solar system observations have confirmed gr to high accuracy and placed bounds on the graviton mass to be smaller than a few @xmath8ev , even such a small mass would become relevant at the hubble scale which corresponds to the graviton compton wavelength . in particular , it has been successfully shown that this massive gravity theory exhibits a stable self - accelerated solution in the decoupling limit since the scalar mode can generate a constant negative pressure density . in the decoupling limit , the expansion history of the universe in this self - accelerating branch was found to be indistinguishable from @xmath0cdm , @xcite . while the self - accelerating solutions in the above models yield viable expansion histories including late - time acceleration , they do not address the cosmological constant problem , the giant mismatch between the theoretically computed high energy density of the vacuum and the low observed value . a possible answer comes from the idea of degravitation , which asserts that the energy density could be as large as the theoretically expected value , but would not bear a large effect on the geometry . technically , gravity is less strong on large scales ( ir - limit ) and could act as a high - pass filter suppressing the gravitational effect of a potentially large vacuum energy . since such modifications of gravity in the ir naturally arise in models of massive gravity , they logically provide a possible mechanism to degravitate the vacuum energy density , @xcite , which was observed in bi - galileon models @xcite as well as in the decoupling limit of massive gravity , @xcite . analogously , the dgp braneworld model can be extended to higher dimensions to tackle the cosmological constant problem as well , @xcite .    in this paper , we focus on the covariantization of a ghost - less extension of fierz - pauli massive gravity recently proposed in @xcite and show that this proxy model allows for a stable self - accelerating solution . hereby , we have performed the covariantization in the jordan as well as in the einstein frame . we discuss the differences between the two approaches and the consequences of choosing the wrong starting frame . in the well defined proxy theory we are able to tackle the puzzle about the self - acceleration of the universe but not the one about the cosmological constant problem . furthermore , we study the perturbations around the self - accelerating background and provide the expression for the modified evolution equation for these density perturbations . as expected , the @xmath7 field enhances the gravitational clustering resulting in a rapid growth of structures . this result is quite different from the one we had obtained in @xcite , where the self - accelerating solution was indistinguishable from a @xmath0cdm , but we emphasize that the theory used in this paper , is a proxy model distinct from massive gravity . at early times , the enhancement of clustering is restrained since the galileon self - interactions are the dominant ones suppressing their energy density relative to that of matter or radiation . once the matter density has dropped sufficiently , the galileon become an important contribution to the dark sector of the universe driving cosmic expansion . + the paper is organized as follows : we start in section [ sec : mg1 ] with a summary of the non - linear theory of massive gravity @xcite which we use for constructing our proxy theory , where we discuss the successful implementation of ghost - free massive gravity in the decoupling limit . we then move to our proxy theory in section [ sec : proxy ] where we first give some motivations on why we use a proxy theory rather than the exact non - linear theory . we then work out the consequences of this covariantization for cosmology and specifically for late - time acceleration in section [ sec : sa ] where we study also the stability conditions and the reason why a degravitating solution can not be constructed in our covariantized theory . we then move onto more general cosmology in section [ sec : cosmology ] and follow the helicity-0 mode contribution to the universe throughout its evolution , before quickly presenting the consequences for structure formation in section [ sec : structure ] . we use the same notation as @xcite , with @xmath9 , @xmath10 and @xmath11 where the covariant derivative is taken w.r.t . @xmath12 and square brackets @xmath13 $ ] represent the trace of a tensor @xmath14=\pi_{\mu\nu}\pi^{\mu\nu}$ ] and @xmath15 ^ 2=\pi^\mu_\mu\pi^\nu_\nu$ ] . the first theory of massive gravity was proposed by fierz and pauli in 1939 @xcite , but was shown to be unstable by boulware - deser ( bd ) @xcite , due to the non - propagation of the hamiltonian constraint at the non - linear level . this instability can also be seen in the language @xcite where in the decoupling limit , the helicity-0 mode typically has equations of motion with more than two derivatives , and hence does not possess a well defined cauchy surface . however it was shown in @xcite that the graviton potential could be built in such way as to remove any higher derivative term in the equations of motion , and obtain a galileon - type of action for the additional helicity-0 mode . to review this , let us start with a graviton of mass @xmath2 described by l=(r - u(g , h))[eq : full ] with the potential @xmath16 , where the tensor @xmath17 is constructed in terms of the metric @xmath18 and the four fields @xmath19 by @xmath20 . we can then split the fields into helicity-1 and -0 contributions , but the helicity-1 mode decouples in the decoupling limit and can be consistently set to zero . we therefore focus on the helicity-0 mode @xmath7 and write @xmath21 such that @xmath22 . defining the quantity @xmath23 the most generic potential that bears no ghosts in the decoupling limit is u(g , h)=-4@xmath24[eq : fullu ] where @xmath25 are two free parameters and _ 2&=&[]^2-[^2 ] + _ 3&=&[]^3 - 3 [ ] [ ^2]+2[^3 ] + _ 4&=&[]^4 - 6[^2][]^2 + 8[^3 ] [ ] + 3[^2]^2 - 6[^4 ] . notice that @xmath26 can be expressed in terms of @xmath27 and the tadpole @xmath28 $ ] , @xcite . it has then been shown that ghost - like pathologies in this theory of massive gravity theory disappear to all orders in the decoupling limit and at least up to quartic order beyond the decoupling limit , as well as completely non - linearly in some specific cases . while this theory is completely covariant , studying the cosmology as well as other non - trivial curved geometries can be extremely complicated . instead , we will here focus on its version in the decoupling limit and covariantize the theory directly from this limit . we emphasize that the resulting proxy theory will be distinct from the theory of massive gravity presented above , but presents nevertheless some interesting features for cosmology . in the decoupling limit , taking the scales @xmath29 and @xmath3 , while keeping the strong coupling scale @xmath30 fixed , the above lagrangian reduces to the more compact expression l=-12h^e^_h_+h^x^(1)_+h^x^(2)_+h^x^(3)_+h^t_[eq : massivegravity ] where @xmath31 stands for the helicity-2 mode canonically normalized , @xmath32 is the lichnerowicz operator , the coefficients @xmath33 are related to the free parameters @xmath25 and @xmath34 denote the interactions with the helicity-0 mode @xcite x^(1 ) _ & = & g_- _ [ eq : x1 ] + x^(2 ) _ & = & ^2_-_-12([^2]-[]^2)g _ + x^(3 ) _ & = & 6 ^ 3_-6[]^2_+3([]^2-[^2])_-g_([]^3 - 3[^2][]+2[^3]).[eq : x3 ] it is worth to mention that these interaction terms are all transverse and at most second order in time derivatives to ensure the absence of ghost . being ghost - free , these interactions are closely related to the galileon interactions and fulfill the same internal symmetry . in the next section we will covariantize these interaction terms @xmath35 and discuss their physical properties . + in the case of external sources there is a coupling between the metric @xmath31 and the stress energy tensor via @xmath36 but there is not such a direct coupling with the field @xmath7 . nevertheless , if one diagonalizes the first interaction term @xmath37 by a change of variables of the form @xmath38 , then the coupling between @xmath7 and external sources will become transparent , @xmath39 . instead of studying the cosmology in the exact non - linear covariantized theory which can be extremely hard , we use the alternative approach of covariantizing the lagrangian in the decoupling limit , and use the resulting theory as a proxy . we claim that the covariantized version of the above lagrangian is simply given by [ eq : totalaction ] s=(^2 r+^(,g)+l^matter(,g ) ) , where @xmath40 is the lagrangian for the matter fields @xmath41 living on the geometry , the lagrangian for @xmath7 is @xcite [ eq : covjor ] ^=@xmath42 . and the tensor @xmath43 stands for the dual riemann tensor l^=2r^+2(r^g^+r^g^-r^g^-r^g^ ) + r(g^g^-g^g^ ) . this form of tensor structure has been first discussed by horndeski @xcite in the context of the most general scalar - tensor theory , and more recently in @xcite . however we point out here that these interactions come as a direct outcome of massive gravity . we can show explicitly the following correspondences , h^x^(1 ) _ & & -r + h^x^(2 ) _ & & -__g^ + h^x^(3 ) _ & & - _ _ _ l^. [ eq : corres ]    the einstein equation is given by [ eq.:einstein ] g_=t^_+t^matter _ with t^_=t^(1)_-t^(2)_-t^(3 ) _ and the structure of the einstein and riemann dual tensor ensure that @xmath7 enters at most with two derivatives in the stress - energy tensor , t^(1)_&=&x^(1)_+g _ [ eq : t1 ] + t^(2)_&=&x^(2)_+12l_^^+12g_()^2 [ eq : t2 ] + t^(3)_&=&x^(3)_+32l_^()^2 [ eq : t3 ] where @xmath44 are defined in ( [ eq : x1 ] - [ eq : x3 ] ) . furthermore , the fact that @xmath45 , @xmath46 , @xmath47 and @xmath48 have at most one time - derivative guarantees the propagation of constraints .    since we are not in the einstein frame , these stress - energy tensor are only transverse on - shell , and satisfy the relation , @xmath49 where @xmath50 is the equation of motion with respect to @xmath7 . since both the einstein tensor and the riemann dual tensor are transverse , this equation of motion is also at most second order in derivative , _ & = & + & = & -r - g^-l^(__+r^___)=0,[eq : pij ] where we have used the fact that d_d_d_l^&=&-r^__l^=14 ^l_gb with @xmath51 . in the rest of this paper , we study the resulting cosmology in this proxy theory , starting with the existence of self - accelerating solutions . in what follows , we focus on the cosmology of the covariantized theory ( [ eq : totalaction ] , [ eq : covjor ] ) , and focus for that on a frw background with scale factor @xmath52 and hubble parameter @xmath53 . the resulting effective energy density and pressure for the field @xmath7 are then ^&=&(6h+6h^2-h^2 ^ 2-h^3 ^ 3)[eq : effdens ] + p^&=&3,[eq : effpress ] and the equation of motion for @xmath7 ( [ eq : pij ] ) in the frw space - time is equivalent to @xmath54+@xmath55=r . similarly as in @xcite , this expression can be rewritten more compactly + 3h - r=0 if we define @xmath56 as = h^2@xmath57 . now , we would like to study the self - acceleration solution with @xmath58const and @xmath59 . for the @xmath7 field we make the ansatz @xmath60 . furthermore , we assume that we are in a regime where @xmath61 so that we can neglect terms proportional to @xmath7 and consider only the terms including @xmath62 or @xmath63 . thus , the friedmann and field equations can be recast in h^2=(6q-9a_2 q^2 - 30a_3 q^3)[eq : modfrid ] + h^2(18a_2 q+54a_3 q^2 - 12)=0 . assuming @xmath64 , the field equation then imposes , q= while the friedmann equation ( [ eq : modfrid ] ) sets the hubble constant of the self - accelerated solution . similar to what has been found in @xcite our proxy theory admits a self - accelerated solution , with the hubble parameter set by the graviton mass . for the stability condition of this self - accelerating solution the first constraint we have is to demand @xmath65 . the other constrain comes from the stability condition for perturbations on the background which we discuss in the following subsection .      in the last subsection we have shown explicitly that our proxy theory exhibits a self - accelerating solution with @xmath66 . now , we would like to study whether the perturbations on this background are stable and what the constraints are . for this purpose , consider perturbations on the background solution of the following form = _ 0(t)+(t , x , y , z)[eq : perturbations ] the second order action for the perturbations is l=-__g^-__^(0)_l^-__0_d_d_l^[eq : perlag ] , which can be written in the form l = k_tt(^2-()^2 ) where k_tt=-(a_2 + ) and c_s^2=13 ( 2 + ) . the condition for the stability is then given by @xmath67 , @xmath68 and @xmath69 , which are fulfilled if [ eq : stability ] a_2>0 0>a_3>-18 a_2 ^ 2 . to compare this result with the condition obtained in the decoupling limit , @xcite , we first mention that @xmath70 and @xmath71 . in terms of the parameters used there , we need to compare our conditions @xmath72 , @xmath73 to the conditions @xmath74 and @xmath75 . we see that our theory is less constraining but is still within the parameter space derived in @xcite . it is not surprising that the stability condition in the decoupling limit and in our covariantized theory do not coincide totally as we have explicitly broken the symmetry when getting the proxy and in particular , our solution does now spontaneously break lorentz invariance , which was not the case in the decoupling limit , @xcite .    it is also worth pointing out that the self - accelerating solution by itself does not propagate any superluminal mode , since @xmath76 . we emphasize as well that the constant @xmath77 solution is a dynamical attractor . for this we just consider time dependent perturbations @xmath78 which is a special case of fulfilling the same stability conditions . the equation of motion for perturbations simplifies to _ t(a^3 ) = 0 the solution for @xmath79 is given by ( t)~a^-3 . thus , these perturbations @xmath80 redshift away exponentially compared to the @xmath81 self - accelerating solution . therefore , the self - accelerating solution is an attractor . more interestingly , one can wonder whether degravitation can be exhibited in these class of solutions . if one take @xmath82 and @xmath83 , it is straightforward to see that we obtain @xmath84 , so the field has absolutely no effect and can not help the background to degravitate . the situation is however different when setting @xmath85 , which was possible in the decoupling limit . in this proxy theory , such a behaviour will involve explicit space dependances in the equations of motion which should be dealt with specifically . interestingly , the interactions considered here are precisely of the same form as that studied recently in @xcite . there as well , in the absence of spatial curvature @xmath86 , the contribution from the scalar field vanishes if @xmath83 . comparing with @xcite , we can hence wonder whether the addition of spatial curvature @xmath87 in our proxy theory could help achieving degravitation , but relying strongly on spatial curvature brings concerns over instabilities which are beyond the scope of this study . in the following we would like to discuss in more detail the interplay of all the constituents of the universe . we assume that matter , radiation and the scalar field @xmath7 contribute to the total energy density of the universe . + ^mat ) consider the scalar field @xmath7 as a perfect fluid with the effective energy density and pressure given by ( [ eq : effdens ] , [ eq : effpress ] ) . thus , the equation of state parameter of this new field would be _ & = & + & & + . at this point one should mention that the energy density for the @xmath7-field is not conserved but rather given by @xmath49 ( where @xmath50 is the equation of motion for @xmath7 ) , which is not surprising since @xmath7 is non - minimally coupled to gravity in the jordan frame . therefore , we can have @xmath88 . + in the following we will first assume that at early times in the evolution history of the universe we can neglect the extra density coming from the helicity-0 @xmath89 . we will then check this assumption by plugging the solution for @xmath53 back in the equation of motion for @xmath7 . if we assume that at early times the radiation density dominates , we simply have h^2=_0^rada^-4 a~t^1/2=1/3[eq : raddom ] during the radiation era , the dominant terms in the equation of motion for @xmath7 are then @xmath90 which can be solved assuming the previous expression for @xmath53 ( [ eq : raddom ] ) _ rad~t^1.75 ^_rad~t^-1/4    , @xmath91 and @xmath89 during the epochs of radiation , matter and @xmath0-domination normalised to today @xmath89 . during the radiation domination the energy density for @xmath7 goes as @xmath92 and during matter dominations as @xmath93 and is constant for later times @xmath94.,scaledwidth=80.0% ]     + at later times when the matter dominated epoch starts we have h^2=_0^mata^-3 a~t^2/3=0 now the dominant terms in the equation of motion for @xmath7 are @xmath95 . we get for @xmath7 this time ^mat~c_2t+ ^_mat = c_2 t^-1 + . summarizing , during radiation domination the effective energy density for the @xmath7-field goes like @xmath96 while during matter domination as @xmath97 and approaches a constant at late time . as shown in the figure @xmath98 can be neglected at early times where @xmath99 and @xmath100 . we end the cosmological analysis by looking at the evolution of matter density perturbations . the density perturbations follow the evolution _ m+2h_m= where @xmath41 is the newtonian potential . the effects of @xmath7 are all encoded in its contribution to the poisson equation . consider perturbations of @xmath7 around its cosmological background solution @xmath101 . @xmath102 gives a contribution to the newtonian potential of the form @xmath103 . in the newtonian approximation we have @xmath104 . the equation of motion for the scalar field in first order in @xmath102 is -g^ d_d_- l_(4_0^ d^d^+2r^__0^)=r which is equivalent to ( neglecting @xmath105 ) = r and last but not least we need the trace of einstein equation , ( [ eq.:einstein]-[eq : t3 ] ) . perturbing the trace to first order , we get -r&= & + & & + to reach that point , we have neglected the perturbations of the curvature of the form @xmath106 as they are negligible compared to @xmath107 since we work in the regime where @xmath108 . we have also ignored terms of the form @xmath109 , which could a priori be relevant , but their inclusion would require solving the full einstein equation , which is beyond the scope of this study . as a first approximation , such terms are hence ignored . the perturbations for the source is just given by @xmath110 for non - relativistic sources , thus we have = where @xmath111 stands for & & q1-(2 h _ 0+_0+(2 h + 3 h^2 ) ) + & & -@xmath112 . finally , the modified evolution equation for density perturbations is _ m+2h_m=(1 + 13q ) . knowing the background configuration it is then relatively straightforward to derive the effect on structure formation . we recover the usual result that when the field is screened , @xmath113 , the extra force coming from the helicity-0 is negligible and the formation of structure is similar as in @xmath0cdm . after having studied the cosmology and the structure formation of our proxy theory in the jordan frame , the natural question is whether we would expect similar results in a different frame . instead of covariantizing our lagrangian in the jordan frame , it is on an equal footing to go to the einstein frame where the ricci scalar is not multiplied by the scalar field @xmath7 and covariantize the theory at that stage . since it is unclear at first sight which frame is the physical frame we will consider both frames and discuss their differences . our starting lagrangian was l=-12h^e^_h_+h^x^(1)_+h^x^(2)_+h^x^(3)_+h^t _ now , when we do the following change of variables h_=|h_+_[eq : ef1 ] we can diagonalize the first mixed term @xmath37 such that the lagrangian takes the following form l=-12|h^e^_|h_+32+|h^x^(2)_-32()^2 + + |h^x^(3 ) _ -2()^2([^2]-^2 ) + ( |h_+_)t^ covariantizing this action is straightforward . we use again the correspondences in and it has been shown explicitly that the covariant equivalence to @xmath114 and @xmath115-\box\pi^2)$ ] are given by @xmath114 and @xmath116-\frac14(\partial\pi)^2r ) $ ] respectively , which do not yield any ghostlike instabilities ( @xcite , @xcite ) . thus , the covariantized action in the einstein frame is simply given by & = & ^2 r+32-__g^-32()^2 + & & - _ _ _ l^ + 2()^2(^2-[^2]-14()^2r ) [ eq : einstein ] + & & + l_m ( , ( 1+)g_)similarly as before , the properties of @xmath117 and @xmath43 ensure that their equations of motion lead at most to second order derivative terms . to find a self - accelerating solution we set again a pure de sitter metric , with @xmath118 . the friedmann and the field equations then take the form & & ^2h^2=3a_2 ^ 3q^2 + 10a_3 ^ 3q^3 - 12q^2 + 3a_2q^3 + 15a_3q^4 + & & ^3(-1 + 3q(a_2 + 4a_3q))+2(a_2 + 3a_3q)h^2=0[eq : frein ] when comparing the above friedmann and the field equations with the one we had in the jordan frame , we see significant differences coming from the extra terms which were not there in the jordan frame . these terms yield friedmann and field equations proportional to @xmath119 and @xmath120 which are more difficult to solve . + for fairness , we should compare both actions in the same frame . we do so by performing a conformal transformation on the action : g_=^2 g _ ^2=(1- ) . for simplicity we consider the case for which @xmath121 , so under this conformal transformation the covariantized action becomes _ j= ^2r-32 ^ -4()^2-(^^g_+32()^2 + 54()^4 ) in the limit where @xmath122 we have then finally the following expression _ j= ^2 r+32-__g^-32()^2 , which coincides with the theory obtained from the einstein frame , with @xmath121 . so within the regime of validity of our results , our conclusions are independent of the choice of frame . however beyond this regime the theory originally constructed from the jordan frame could violate the null energy condition from the term proportional to @xmath123 . common to generic massive gravity models is the presence of at least one additional helicity-0 degree of freedom which originates from a spin - two graviton field . in contrast to an arbitrary scalar field , its dynamics is not driven by a potential but rather by specific derivative terms fixed by symmetries . such a degree of freedom is experimentally testable . on solar system and galactic scales gravity is very well compatible with gr and correctional terms from a modified gravity model are excluded . on these scales , however , the effects of massive gravity might be cloaked by the vainshtein mechanism , where the helicity-0 mode interactions become appreciable to freeze out the field fluctuations . a number of screening mechanisms have been devised such as the chameleon and symmetron mechanisms . contrary to those the success of the vainshtein mechanism does not rely on some specific potential but instead on derivative interactions , which cause the helicity-0 mode to become decoupled from matter and light on short distances , which nevertheless could have observational signatures on larger scales in cosmic structure formation . a further benefit of the vainshtein mechanism would be a natural solution to the problem that the matter density and the cosmological constant are of similar magnitudes today . the cosmological application of the vainshtein mechanism works such that at early times , the galileon interactions are dominated by self - interaction , which suppresses their energy density relative to that of matter or radiation . if the matter density has decreased sufficiently by cosmic expansion , the galileon constitutes an important contribution to the energy density of the universe and drives cosmic expansion .    although the precise cosmology of the theory of massive gravity proposed in @xcite has not been derived , most models of massive gravity give rise to alterations of the hubble function similar to dgp - gravity . experimental tests of the expansion dynamics of the universe include the distance - redshift relation of supernovae , and measurements of the angular diameter distance as a function of redshift , as in the case of the cosmic microwave background and the baryon acoustic oscillations . apart from these geometrical tests , the time - dependence of evolving cosmic structures can be investigated , and the influence of the gravitational theory on the geodesics of relativistic ( photons ) and nonrelativistic ( dark matter ) test particles . the first category includes gravitational lensing and the sachs - wolfe effects , which have been shown to differ from their gr - expectation in some modified gravity theories , and a similar result can be expected in massive gravity . the second category includes the homogeneous growth of the cosmic structure , and the formation of galaxies and clusters of galaxies by gravitational collapse . again , massive gravity would influence the time sequence of gravitational clustering and the evolution of peculiar velocities , as well as the number density of collapsed objects . in particular , massive gravity would enhance gravitational clustering since they tend to lower the collapse threshold for density fluctuations in the large - scale structure , leading to a higher comoving number density of galaxies and clusters of galaxies . naturally , these changes are degenerate with a different choice of cosmological parameters and with introducing non - gaussian initial conditions , which would be very interesting to quantify . recent discrepancies of @xmath0cdm with observational data on large scales include the number of very massive clusters , the strong lensing cross section , anomalous multipole moments of the cmb , the axis of evil , and large peculiar velocities . it is beyond the scope of this paper to address these issues using massive gravity , but we propose how to proceed from constructing a massive gravity theory to providing observationally testable quantities . from our point of view it is advisable to focus on probes of large scales , due to difficulties related to nonlinear structure formation and the influence of baryons on small scales . natural questions concern the homogeneous dynamics of the universe , the formation of structures and the shape of geodesics of relativistic and nonrelativistic particles . basically , using our proxy theory one should be able to make predictions concerning these four issues and the combination of the four should give insight into the nature of the gravitational sector . in our proxy theory , from the modified field equation the hubble - function can be derived easily , which allows the definition of distance measures , needed in the interpretation of supernova data . cosmic structure growth tests the newtonian limit for slowly - moving particles and describes the clustering of galaxies and the growth of structures which are investigated by e.g. gravitational light deflection . lensing , in turn , makes use of the geodesic equation for relativistic particles , and measures the correlation function of the matter density , weighted with the lensing efficiency function , which in turn is derived from distance measures . it would be quite interesting to study these observational consequences and constraints of our proxy theory in a future work . we would like to thank clare burrage , paul de fromont , gregory gabadadze , parvin moyassari and andrew tolley for useful discussion . furthermore , special thanks for robert caldwell ! this work is supported by the snf . g.  r.  dvali , g.  gabadadze and m.  porrati , phys . b * 485 * , 208 ( 2000 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0005016 ] ; g.  r.  dvali and g.  gabadadze , phys . d * 63 * , 065007 ( 2001 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0008054 ] . a.  i.  vainshtein , phys . b * 39 * ( 1972 ) 393 .    c.  deffayet , g.  r.  dvali and g.  gabadadze , phys . d * 65 * , 044023 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : astro - ph/0105068 ] . k.  koyama , phys . d * 72 * , 123511 ( 2005 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0503191 ] . c.  charmousis , r.  gregory , n.  kaloper , a.  padilla , jhep * 0610 * , 066 ( 2006 ) . [ hep - th/0604086 ] . a.  nicolis , r.  rattazzi and e.  trincherini , phys . d * 79 * , 064036 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0811.2197 [ hep - th ] ] . c.  de rham and a.  j.  tolley , jcap * 1005 * , 015 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1003.5917 [ hep - th ] ] . f.  p.  silva and k.  koyama , phys . d * 80 * , 121301 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0909.4538 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . n.  chow and j.  khoury , phys . d * 80 * , 024037 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0905.1325 [ hep - th ] ] . j.  khoury , m.  wyman , phys . rev .   * d80 * , 064023 ( 2009 ) . [ arxiv:0903.1292 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; t.  kobayashi , h.  tashiro and d.  suzuki , phys . d * 81 * , 063513 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0912.4641 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; t.  kobayashi , arxiv:1003.3281 [ astro-ph.co ] ; m.  wyman , j.  khoury , phys .  rev .   * d82 * , 044032 ( 2010 ) . [ arxiv:1004.2046 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; r.  gannouji and m.  sami , phys . d * 82 * , 024011 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1004.2808 [ gr - qc ] ] ; a.  de felice , s.  mukohyama and s.  tsujikawa , phys . d * 82 * , 023524 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1006.0281 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . a.  ali , r.  gannouji and m.  sami , phys . d * 82 * , 103015 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1008.1588 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; a.  de felice and s.  tsujikawa , arxiv:1008.4236 [ hep - th ] ; a.  de felice , r.  kase and s.  tsujikawa , phys . d * 83 * , 043515 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1011.6132 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; k.  hirano , z.  komiya , h.  shirai , [ arxiv:1103.6133 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; k.  hirano , [ arxiv:1012.5451 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; p.  brax , c.  burrage , a.  -c . davis , [ arxiv:1106.1573 [ hep - ph ] ] ; x.  gao , [ arxiv:1106.0292 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . p.  creminelli , a.  nicolis and e.  trincherini , jcap * 1011 * , 021 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1007.0027 [ hep - th ] ] ; l.  p. levasseur , r.  brandenberger , a.  -c . davis , [ arxiv:1105.5649 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; t.  kobayashi , m.  yamaguchi and j.  yokoyama , phys .  rev .  lett .   * 105 * , 231302 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1008.0603 [ hep - th ] ] ; t.  kobayashi , m.  yamaguchi and j.  yokoyama , arxiv:1103.1740 [ hep - th ] .    c.  burrage , c.  de rham , d.  seery and a.  j.  tolley , jcap * 1101 * , 014 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1009.2497 [ hep - th ] ] ; p.  creminelli , g.  damico , m.  musso , j.  norena and e.  trincherini , jcap * 1102 * , 006 ( 2011 ) [ arxiv:1011.3004 [ hep - th ] ] . s.  mizuno , k.  koyama , phys .  rev . * d82 * , 103518 ( 2010 ) . [ arxiv:1009.0677 [ hep - th ] ] ; s.  renaux - petel , [ arxiv:1105.6366 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . e.  babichev , c.  deffayet and r.  ziour , int . j.  mod . d * 18 * , 2147 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0905.2943 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  deffayet , o.  pujolas , i.  sawicki and a.  vikman , jcap * 1010 * , 026 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1008.0048 [ hep - th ] ] ; r.  kimura and k.  yamamoto , arxiv:1011.2006 [ astro-ph.co ] .    c.  deffayet , g.  esposito - farese and a.  vikman , phys . d * 79 * , 084003 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0901.1314 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  deffayet , s.  deser and g.  esposito - farese , phys . d * 80 * , 064015 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0906.1967 [ gr - qc ] ] ; c.  deffayet , x.  gao , d.  a.  steer , g.  zahariade , [ arxiv:1103.3260 [ hep - th ] ] . a.  de felice and s.  tsujikawa , phys . lett .   * 105 * , 111301 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1007.2700 [ astro-ph.co ] ] ; s.  nesseris , a.  de felice and s.  tsujikawa , phys . d * 82 * , 124054 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:1010.0407 [ astro-ph.co ] ] . g.  goon , k.  hinterbichler , m.  trodden , [ arxiv:1103.5745 [ hep - th ] ] ; g.  goon , k.  hinterbichler , m.  trodden , [ arxiv:1103.6029 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  burrage , c.  de rham , l.  heisenberg , jcap * 1105 * , 025 ( 2011 ) . [ arxiv:1104.0155 [ hep - th ] ] . g.  gabadadze , phys . b * 681 * , 89 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0908.1112 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  de rham , phys .  lett . b * 688 * , 137 ( 2010 ) [ arxiv:0910.5474 [ hep - th ] ] . c.  de rham and g.  gabadadze , phys . b * 693 * ( 2010 ) 334 [ arxiv:1006.4367 [ hep - th ] ] . s.  f.  hassan , r.  a.  rosen , [ arxiv:1104.1373 [ hep - th ] ] . l.  berezhiani , m.  mirbabayi , [ arxiv:1104.5279 [ hep - th ] ] . g.  dvali , g.  gabadadze and m.  shifman , _ published in * minneapolis 2002 , continuous advances in qcd * 566 - 581 _ ; arxiv : hep - th/0208096 ; g.  dvali , g.  gabadadze and m.  shifman , phys . 044020 ( 2003 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0202174 ] . n.  arkani - hamed , s.  dimopoulos , g.  dvali and g.  gabadadze , arxiv : hep - th/0209227 . g.  dvali , s.  hofmann and j.  khoury , phys . d * 76 * , 084006 ( 2007 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0703027 ] . g.  gabadadze and m.  shifman , phys . d * 69 * , 124032 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - th/0312289 ] . c.  de rham , g.  dvali , s.  hofmann , j.  khoury , o.  pujolas , m.  redi and a.  j.  tolley , phys . lett .   * 100 * , 251603 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0711.2072 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  de rham , s.  hofmann , j.  khoury and a.  j.  tolley , jcap * 0802 * , 011 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0712.2821 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  de rham , j.  khoury and a.  j.  tolley , phys . lett .   * 103 * , 161601 ( 2009 ) [ arxiv:0907.0473 [ hep - th ] ] ; c.  de rham , j.  khoury and a.  j.  tolley , arxiv:1002.1075 [ hep - th ] .
Abstract:

Answer: we covariantize the decoupling limit of massive gravity proposed in @xcite and study the cosmology of this theory as a proxy , which embodies key features of the fully non - linear covariant theory . we first confirm that it exhibits a self - accelerating solution , similar to what has been found in @xcite , where the hubble parameter corresponds to the graviton mass . for a certain range of parameters fluctuations relative to the self - accelerating background are stable and form an attractor solution . we also show that a degravitating solution can not be constructed in this covariantized proxy theory in a meaningful way . as for cosmic structure formation , we find that the helicity-0 mode of the graviton causes an enhancement relative to @xmath0cdm . for consistency we also compare proxy theories obtained starting from different frames in the decoupling limit and discuss the possibility of obtaining a non - representative proxy theory by choosing the wrong starting frame . 0.9 cm    * cosmology of the galileon from massive gravity *    0.7 cm    claudia de rham and lavinia heisenberg    0.3 cm    _ dpartement de physique thorique and center for astroparticle physics , _    _ universit de genve , 24 quai e. ansermet , ch-1211 , genve , switzerland _    1.9 cm