Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: iron - based high-@xmath0 superconductors@xcite have a complex fermi surface that is determined by several bands , an effect resulting from the hybridization of the @xmath1 orbitals of iron.@xcite band structure calculations have shown that the bands that define the two hole pockets around the @xmath2 point have mostly @xmath3 and @xmath4 character , while the two electron pockets around the m point have @xmath5 , @xmath4 , and a smaller amount of @xmath6 contributions.@xcite for this reason it is important to understand superconductivity in multiorbital systems in general terms .    among the first to address this complex problem several years ago were suhl _ et al._@xcite using a model consisting of two orbitals , one @xmath7 and one @xmath8 , that did not hybridize with each other . thus , in this case each band was determined by one single orbital . they showed that bcs pairing@xcite could occur in each band and , since in the most general case the electron - phonon interaction would have different strengths for electrons in the different bands , it was proposed that two different superconducting gaps could arise . almost 50 years were needed to observe experimental evidence of this phenomenon . in 2001 , superconductivity with @xmath9  k was observed in mgb@xmath10.@xcite despite the high-@xmath11 , it became clear that the bcs mechanism@xcite was at play and for the first time two different superconducting gaps were observed.@xcite as shown in ref . , the fermi surface ( fs ) is determined by two bands : the @xmath12 band formed by the @xmath13 orbitals of b , and the @xmath14 band constituted by a linear combination of the @xmath15 and @xmath16 b - orbitals . although three orbitals determine the fs , it is interesting to notice that only two different bcs gaps are observed . this occurs because two of the three orbitals hybridize with each other and determine one single band , which couples strongly to the lattice phonons . this opens a large superconducting gap on the @xmath14 fs . the other orbital , @xmath13 , does not hybridize and forms the @xmath12 band that couples weakly to the lattice phonons determining a second , smaller , superconducting gap at the fs of the @xmath12 band . thus , the number of different gaps that can arise in a multiorbital system is related to the degree of hybridization among the orbitals . also note that in this early effort _ interband hopping of pairs of electrons belonging to the same band was included _ but the possibility of interband pairing , i.e. , _ pairs formed by electrons belonging to two different bands _ , was not considered .    in this paper , the subject of superconductivity in multiorbital systems is revisited , in particular to shed light on the possible symmetry of the pairing operator of the pnictides superconductors . the motivation is that the pairing operators that have been discussed the most thus far@xcite assume that only intraband pairing should occur , namely the two electrons of the cooper pair belong to the same band.@xcite however , numerical simulations@xcite performed on a two - orbital model@xcite for the pnictides favor an interorbital pairing operator that , when transformed to the band representation , results not only in intraband pairing but it includes interband pairing as well.@xcite for the pnictides , interband hopping of pairs formed between electrons in _ the same _ band is often denoted as `` interband superconductivity''.@xcite the situation discussed in the present paper is _ different _ and involves cooper pairs where the two electrons come from two different bands , which we will call `` interband pairing '' . using symmetry arguments and mean - field approximations , the plausibility and physical meaning of such an interband pairing in multiorbital systems will be discussed . interband pairing has previously been addressed in the context of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) and cold atoms,@xcite heavy fermions,@xcite cuprates@xcite , and bcs superconductivity.@xcite in the case of heavy fermions , it was argued that interband pairing could occur if two fermi surfaces arising from different bands are very close to one other,@xcite while in qcd and cold atoms it was presented as a possibility for the case of sufficiently strong attractive pairing interactions , or for weaker attractions among particles with very different masses.@xcite as it will be discussed for a simple model in sec . [ sec : interband ] , three different regimes , shown schematically in fig . [ regimes ] , can result from a purely interband pairing as a function of the strength of the pairing potential @xmath17 : ( 1 ) a normal regime where the ground state is not superconducting ( namely in purely interband pairing an infinitesimal attraction does not lead to superconductivity ) , ( 2 ) an exotic superconducting `` breached '' regime where gaps open at the normal fermi surfaces while new fermi surfaces defining regions containing unpaired electrons are created , and ( 3 ) a superconducting regime resembling bcs states , at large attractive coupling.@xcite     of an interband pairing attraction . the label `` normal '' denotes a non - superconducting state . the case `` breached '' is an exotic regime with superconductivity and gaps , coexisting with fermi surfaces ( or several nodes ) and electrons that do not pair . `` bcs '' is the large attraction region , where the ground state resembles that of a bcs superconductor and all electrons participate in the pairing.,title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm    the paper is organized as follows . in sec . [ sec : pairings ] , the general form of pairing operators in multiorbital systems will be presented , remarking how the symmetry is determined by the spatial and the orbital characteristics of the operator . the interorbital pairing operator with @xmath18 symmetry obtained numerically in a two - orbital model for the pnictides is discussed , emphasizing that this operator presents a mixture of intra and interband pairing in the band representation . in sec . [ sec : interband ] , a simple toy model with pure interband pairing attraction is introduced . this simplified model is discussed in order to illustrate the effects of interband pairing on observables , such as the occupation number and the spectral functions @xmath19 . the stability of the interband paired state is also discussed . the occupation number , spectral functions , and the stability of the @xmath18 pairing state are the subject of sec . [ sec : interorbital ] which is directly related to the physics of pnictides , while sec . [ sec : conclusions ] is devoted to the conclusions . in single - orbital models , the symmetry of a spin - singlet pairing state is completely determined by the properties of its spatial form factor . more specifically , the pairing operator will have the form : @xmath20 where @xmath21 destroys an electron with momentum @xmath22 and spin projection @xmath14 and @xmath23 is the form factor that transforms according to one of the irreducible representations of the crystal s symmetry group . thus , @xmath23 determines the symmetry of the operator . these form factors depend on the lattice geometry and generally they may be very complex . however , in materials with short pair coherence lengths , such as the high-@xmath0 cuprates , the assumption that the two particles that form the pair can be very close to one other is usually made . the cu - oxide planes in the cuprates have the symmetry properties of the @xmath24 group and the case @xmath25 , which transforms according to the irreducible representation @xmath26 , provides the well - known @xmath8-wave symmetry pairing .    in multiorbital systems , on the other hand , a spin singlet pairing operator will have both spatial and orbital degrees of freedom and it will be given by @xmath27 where @xmath28 destroys an electron with momentum @xmath22 , in orbital @xmath29 , and with spin projection @xmath14 , @xmath23 is the spatial form factor as indicated above , and @xmath30 is a matrix in the space spanned by the orbitals involved . the dimension of @xmath31 is equal to the number of orbitals that are considered to be of relevance . in this case , notice that the symmetry of the pairing operator would in general be determined by the product of the symmetry properties of @xmath32 and the symmetry of the orbital contribution @xmath30 . only if @xmath30 is the identity matrix do the orbital contribution become trivial , because the identity matrix transforms according to @xmath33 . thus , this is the only case where @xmath23 fully determines the symmetry of the pairing operator , as in the single - orbital example . the minimum model for the pnictides considers the two orbitals @xmath5 and @xmath4 , which are strongly hybridized.@xcite all the possible pairing operators , up to nearest - neighbor distance , that are allowed by the lattice and orbital symmetries have been already calculated.@xcite numerical simulations performed on the two - orbital model suggest that the favored pairing operator at intermediate couplings , where the state is both magnetic and metallic ,  @xcite has symmetry @xmath18 and is given by eq . ( [ 2 ] ) with @xmath34 , which transforms according to @xmath33 , and @xmath35 which transforms according to @xmath18  @xcite ( where @xmath36 are pauli matrices ) . thus , the non - trivial symmetry under rotations arises from the orbital portion of the operator . this pairing operator has been studied at the mean - field level in ref .  . in the orbital representation , the bogoliubov - de gennes hamiltonian matrix is given by : @xmath37 with    @xmath38    and @xmath39 where @xmath40 , with @xmath41 being the strength of the pairing interaction and @xmath42 the mean - field parameter obtained by minimizing the energy . since the two orbitals are hybridized via @xmath43 , in the band representation the hamiltonian matrix becomes : @xmath44 where @xmath45 and @xmath46 are given by @xmath47 @xmath48 and @xmath49 and @xmath50 are the elements of the change of basis matrix @xmath51 given by @xmath52 with @xmath53 . remember that @xmath45 and @xmath46 , are functions of the momentum @xmath22 , and @xmath54 . thus , it is clear that in the band representation , in addition to the intraband pairing given by @xmath45 , there is also interband pairing given by @xmath46 . among pairing operators compatible with the symmetry of the model , the ones that do not lead to interband pairing not only can not mix orbitals , but have to contain @xmath55 , i.e. , the identity matrix.@xcite one example for such an operator would be the @xmath56 pairing.@xcite    the discussion above describes general properties of hybridized multi - orbital systems . if the orbitals are hybridized , but not related to one another by symmetry , there is no reason to expect that the coupling between the electrons in each orbital , and the interaction that produces the pairing , will have the same strength for all the orbitals and lead to a unit matrix in the orbital sector . then , it is expected that interband pairing will arise in general and , thus , it is important to understand its consequences , providing the main motivation for the present manuscript . to address qualitatively the issue of interband pairing , postponing the matters of stability to the next subsection ( sec . [ sec : stable ] ) , let us consider the following two - bands simplified model with interband pairing : @xmath57 where @xmath58 label two bands that are not hybridized , @xmath14 is the spin projection , and for simplicity @xmath59 which gives parabolic bands that are degenerate at @xmath60 with energy @xmath61 , and with a chemical potential @xmath62 . this can be considered as a crude representation of the two hole - pocket bands around the @xmath2 point in the pnictides , but more importantly presents a simple toy model where the effects of interband pairing can be studied . as before , the parameter @xmath63 is the product of an attractive potential @xmath41 between electrons in the two different bands and a mean - field parameter @xmath42 determined by minimizing the total energy . the band dispersion without the interaction is presented in the inset of fig . [ bands ] .    ) , for the indicated values of @xmath64 ( defined in the text ) as a function of the momentum @xmath65 . the case shown is for @xmath66 , @xmath67 , and @xmath68 . inset : non - interacting band dispersion for the same parameters . , title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm    the bogoliubov - de gennes matrix expressed in the basis expanded by @xmath69 has the form : @xmath70 this matrix can be diagonalized becoming @xmath71 in the basis expanded by @xmath72 and the change - of - basis matrix is given by @xmath73 with @xmath74 . the four energy eigenvalues are @xmath75 , \label{13}\ ] ] where the first positive ( negative ) sign corresponds to the eigenvalues of the upper ( lower ) block , labeled @xmath76 and @xmath77 ( @xmath78 and @xmath79 ) in eq . ( [ 12a ] ) and in fig . [ bands ] . the second sign differentiates between the two solutions in each block . figure  [ bands ] shows the eigenvalues for @xmath80 and @xmath81 . when @xmath80 , then @xmath82 and @xmath83 , the two bands define two circular fermi surfaces with radius @xmath84 and @xmath85 where they cross the chemical potential ( @xmath62 ) . this is illustrated schematically in fig . [ diag ] .    . @xmath84 and @xmath85 indicate the fermi momentum of the two bands when @xmath80 , while @xmath86 and @xmath87 indicate the position of the fermi momenta for the case of a finite but small pairing potential . the shaded rings indicate the regions with width @xmath88 and @xmath89 in momentum space where electrons can pair . the white region in between the rings contains unpaired electrons in band 1.,title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm    notice that number operators can be defined in the two bases that are being considered here , i.e. @xmath90 and @xmath91 , which of course become equivalent when @xmath64=0 . thus , in the basis @xmath90 the number operator is , @xmath92 while in basis @xmath91 the number operator is ( @xmath93=a , b ) @xmath94 the total electronic occupation of the system is given by @xmath95 then , for @xmath80 we find that @xmath96 for @xmath97 , @xmath98 for @xmath99 since in this region @xmath100 while @xmath101 , and finally @xmath102 for @xmath103 since both orbitals are totally filled with electrons . these results are represented by the dashed lines in fig . [ nkab12 ] .     for ( a ) the whole system ; ( b ) band b , ( c ) band a ; ( d ) orbital 1 ; and ( e ) orbital 2 for the indicated values of the pairing potential @xmath64 , and @xmath66 , @xmath67 , and @xmath68.,title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm      in the nontrivial case of @xmath64 different from zero , the bands @xmath104 and @xmath105 result from the hybridization of the @xmath106 and @xmath107 bands due to @xmath64 . it is interesting to observe that an internal gap opens at the crossing of bands @xmath76 with @xmath77 @xmath108 the chemical potential and between @xmath78 and @xmath79 @xmath109 the chemical potential , as indicated with circles in fig . [ bands ] where results for @xmath81 are displayed . these are very important differences with respect to conventional bcs calculations were all the action is restricted to the original fermi surfaces : for multiorbital models , gaps can open in other portions of the band structure as well . while the @xmath104 bands are separated by a gap , the bands @xmath105 still cross the chemical potential determining two fermi surfaces at @xmath110 and at @xmath111 , even in this pairing state ( again , this is different from the one - orbital pairing standard bcs ideas ) . the new fermi surfaces are shown schematically in fig . [ diag ] : the interior fs has expanded and the exterior one has contracted . in fact , it will be shown below that the effect of @xmath64 is to try to equalize the two fermi surfaces , as this pairing attraction grows in magnitude . calculating @xmath112 we observe that @xmath113 for @xmath114 and @xmath115 , where @xmath116 is the element of the change - of - basis matrix in eq . ( [ 12b ] ) . this agrees with the bcs expression for @xmath112 but it jumps discontinuously to @xmath98 for @xmath117 . such a result is shown by the solid lines in fig . [ nkab12](a ) . the jumps indicate the existence of the two fermi surfaces , which are here present even in the paired state . thus , some electrons in the region in between the two fermi surfaces may behave like normal unpaired electrons . a better understanding of the electronic behavior can be achieved by studying the electronic density in the two bases @xmath91 and @xmath90 . we find that @xmath118 , as shown in fig . [ nkab12](c ) , which is the standard bcs behavior in agreement with the fact that bands @xmath104 are separated by a gap . thus , all the electrons in this band participate in the pairing and they do not have a fs . on the other hand , it can be shown that @xmath119 for @xmath114 and @xmath115 , but for @xmath117 there is a discontinuous change of behavior to @xmath120 [ fig . [ nkab12](b ) ] . thus , the fermi surfaces are determined by electrons in the band @xmath78 . however , note that in this region @xmath121 is an increasing function of @xmath122 while @xmath123 is a decreasing function of @xmath122 which satisfies @xmath124 for all @xmath122 . this behavior can be better understood by calculating the ( photoemission ) spectral functions @xmath19 , which allow us to obtain @xmath125 .     for the non - interacting case , @xmath80 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath81 . note that there are still fermi surfaces in this intermediate coupling case , namely gaps open far from the chemical potential but not at the fermi level . ( c ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath126 . the presence of a gap for all the momenta shown is now clear.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]   for the non - interacting case , @xmath80 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath81 . note that there are still fermi surfaces in this intermediate coupling case , namely gaps open far from the chemical potential but not at the fermi level . ( c ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath126 . the presence of a gap for all the momenta shown is now clear.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]   for the non - interacting case , @xmath80 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath81 . note that there are still fermi surfaces in this intermediate coupling case , namely gaps open far from the chemical potential but not at the fermi level . ( c ) same as ( a ) but for @xmath126 . the presence of a gap for all the momenta shown is now clear.,title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] 0.3 cm    in the non - interacting case , shown in fig . [ akw0](a ) , the spectral function shows two peaks , corresponding to the two bands @xmath106 and @xmath107 , for each value of @xmath122 . this is the expectation for free electrons in a non - interacting multiorbital system . the two non - interacting fs s are located where each band passes across the chemical potential . when the pairing interaction becomes finite , the spectral function develops four peaks for each value of @xmath122 as it can be observed in fig . [ akw0](b ) for @xmath81 . this is also the expected result since the bcs interaction generates a `` shadow '' or bogoliubov band for each band present in the non - interacting system . for example , close to @xmath127 the bands @xmath76 and @xmath78 have almost all the spectral weight , given by @xmath128 which is very close to 1 in this region , and follow a dispersion similar to the non - interacting bands @xmath106 and @xmath107 , while the bands @xmath79 and @xmath77 appear with very small spectral weight given by @xmath129 . the latter are the bogoliubov or `` shadow '' bands . these shadow bands appear above the chemical potential for large values of @xmath122 , as expected . but what happens in the intermediate region @xmath117 ? we see that the band @xmath130 crosses with @xmath131 at @xmath86 determining a fs . most of the spectral weight below the chemical potential belongs to the band @xmath131 which contains the unpaired electrons but the band @xmath132 has appreciable shadow spectral weight indicating that there are also some paired electronic population as indicated in figs .  [ nkab12](b ) and ( c ) . as @xmath133 increases , spectral weight is transferred continuously from @xmath131 to @xmath132 , behavior associated with the internal gap opened by the pairing interaction , so that when @xmath133 approaches @xmath87 most of the spectral weight below the chemical potential is in @xmath132 , paired electrons , and @xmath131 , unpaired electrons , has shadow spectral weight as seen in figs . [ nkab12](b ) and ( c ) . at @xmath134 the second fs is determined by the crossing of @xmath135 at the chemical potential indicated by the sudden jump in @xmath136 . thus , the unpaired electrons in this region coexist with paired electrons and the spectral functions do not resemble the non - interacting ones .    it is also illuminating to analyze what happens with @xmath112 in the basis @xmath90 . while @xmath137 in the regions where there are no unpaired electrons , we find discontinuities associated with fermi surfaces in the two distributions that are given by @xmath138 and @xmath139 for @xmath117 [ figs . [ nkab12](d , e ) ] . this indicates that the pairing interaction @xmath64 has been able to promote some electrons from above to below @xmath85 in orbital 2 . also , electrons have been transferred from their original location in orbital 1 , in the neighborhood of @xmath85 and above @xmath84 , to both orbitals 1 and 2 around @xmath84 . these are the electrons in 1 and 2 that have become paired ( the pairing is indicated by the shadowed circular regions in fig . [ diag ] ) . but the interaction was not strong enough to provide pairing partners to all the extra electrons originally in orbital 1 and , thus , they have been left unpaired in between the two paired regions , as indicated in fig . [ diag ] . thus , the interband pairing attraction creates pairs of electrons belonging to different orbitals within an interval @xmath140 around each of the two original fermi surfaces . the width of the pairing region increases with @xmath64 . the pairing partners are obtained by promoting electrons with momentum @xmath141 and @xmath142 in both orbitals and by moving electrons from the more populated to the less populated orbital . this creates the conditions to pair electrons near both fermi surfaces . the electrons in band 1 that could not find promoted partners remain unpaired . whether this state is stable or not depends , of course , on the balance between kinetic and pairing energies , which will be discussed in sec . [ sec : stable ] .      as the interaction @xmath64 increases further , the number of unpaired electrons is reduced . this means that @xmath86 and @xmath87 become closer to each other making the size of the intermediate region with unpaired electrons in fig . [ diag ] smaller . eventually , the two momenta become the same @xmath143 for @xmath144 , and for @xmath145 the region with unpaired electrons vanishes and a full gap opens in the system whose physics now resembles bcs , except for the fact that the pairs are constituted by electrons from different orbitals . the electronic population of the system in such a case , e.g. at @xmath126 , is presented in fig . [ nk1 ] and the corresponding spectral functions are shown in fig .  [ akw0](c ) . it can be shown that now @xmath146 for all values of @xmath133 and all the particles around the two noninteracting fermi surfaces now participate in the pairing . the spectral functions show four peaks , i.e. bogoliubov bands for all values of @xmath133 , as it can be observed in fig . [ akw0](c ) .    , and for @xmath66 , @xmath67 , and @xmath68 . the case @xmath126 illustrates the `` strong '' pairing attraction regime where gaps open in the original fermi surface.,title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm    thus , notice that while band 1 contained more electrons than band 2 for @xmath80 [ see figs . [ nk1](b ) and ( c ) ] , the interband pairing mechanism transfers electrons from one band to the other so that both bands have the same number of electrons in the superconducting state . consequently , the smaller fs expands and the larger one shrinks . then , when the pairing becomes strong enough , the two fermi surfaces become equalized and no unpaired electrons remain . whether this situation can be achieved will depend on the strength of the interaction and the energy balance , as discussed in the next subsection . if the two non - interacting fermi surfaces are very close to each other in momentum space , even relatively weak pairing interaction could effectively be strong enough to make the interband pairing resemble bcs pairing as in the case of large @xmath64 in the present example . as discussed in the introduction , the possibility of interband pairing has been previously discussed in the context of qcd and cold atomic matter . similar effects on the fs as found in the present study were described , although the physics was different because in the qcd context each band contained different kinds of particles and the pairing was thus not able to promote particles from the majority to the minority band.@xcite the issue of stability was explored in the qcd framework , and it was found that a purely interband paired state could be stabilized for pairing attractions @xmath108 a certain cut - off value , which could become very small for a large difference between the masses of the two paired species.@xcite    in the case of our model , however , we have found ( see below ) that the purely interband - paired state only becomes stable when the attraction is sufficiently strong that no unpaired particles are left , i.e. when the two shaded regions overlap and the unpaired region in fig . [ diag ] vanishes . this means that , although the pairs would be formed by electrons in different orbitals , the physics would be analogous to bcs . a gap will be opened in the full fermi surface of the simple model studied here .    in order to study the issue of stability , let us assume that the interaction term responsible for the interband attraction is given by @xmath147 where @xmath148 and @xmath149 is the number of sites . performing the standard mean - field approximation : @xmath150 and @xmath151 and making the substitution @xmath152 ( and an analogous substitution for the product of annihilation operators ) , the mean - field results are obtained . as usual , the fluctuations around the average given by @xmath153 are assumed to be small . defining @xmath154 we obtain the following mean - field hamiltonian : @xmath155 equation  ( [ eq:12 ] ) can be recovered by defining @xmath156 , and disregarding the constant last term of eq . ( [ mf ] ) . we can calculate the total energy @xmath157 for eq . ( [ mf ] ) as a function of @xmath40 . if for a given @xmath158 the energy has a minimum , this indicates that the interband - paired state is stable . note that having a term linear in @xmath42 in eq.([mf ] ) is not sufficient to conclude the appearance of a superconducting state at small @xmath42 , since the sign of the coefficient of the linear term can change sign with @xmath64 . a similar situation occurs for the magnetic state of undoped pnictides : a finite hubbard @xmath51 must be reached to stabilize the `` striped '' state @xcite . returning to superconductivity , there are two regions of interest : ( i ) @xmath159 , which corresponds to the case in which two fermi surfaces are present in the paired state ; ( ii ) @xmath145 , which corresponds to the fully gapped case . in fig . [ fig : stab](a ) , @xmath160 vs. @xmath64 is shown for different values of @xmath41 . it can be observed that a second minimum develops for @xmath161 and it becomes stable for @xmath162 . the minimum always occurs for @xmath145 which means that it corresponds to the case in which there are no unpaired electrons in the system . the results shown in the figure are robust in the sense that changes in the values of @xmath163 , @xmath164 or the chemical potential were not found to stabilize the state with unpaired electrons . thus , in this respect an attraction that is only interband can only lead to a stable superconducting state in the strong attraction region .    ) per site vs. @xmath40 for different values of @xmath41 . the case @xmath144 is indicated with dashed lines : it separates the regions corresponding to nodal and nodeless states . ( b ) mean - field energy ( eq .  [ mf ] ) per site with intraband pairing with strength @xmath165 vs. @xmath40 , for different values of @xmath41.[fig : stab],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ] ) per site vs. @xmath40 for different values of @xmath41 . the case @xmath144 is indicated with dashed lines : it separates the regions corresponding to nodal and nodeless states . ( b ) mean - field energy ( eq .  [ mf ] ) per site with intraband pairing with strength @xmath165 vs. @xmath40 , for different values of @xmath41.[fig : stab],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]      the results of the previous paragraphs may seem negative with respect to the relevance of the `` intermediate '' state with simultaneous coexistence of pairing and fermi surfaces . however , as pointed out in sec . [ sec : pairings ] , most of the pairing operators allowed by the lattice and orbital symmetry in the pnictides are characterized by a _ mixture _ of both intra and interband pairing . thus , it is important to consider such a situation in our simple model as well . in the case of the @xmath18 pairing operator , eqs . ( [ 6 ] ) , ( [ 7 ] ) , and ( [ 8 ] ) indicate that the pairing is purely interband only for @xmath166 or @xmath12 and @xmath167 or @xmath12 , because @xmath168 along these lines . thus , let us now consider our simple model in a brillouin zone ( bz ) defined by @xmath169 and with the addition of _ intraband _ pairing with intensity @xmath165 that is vanishing for @xmath166 or @xmath12 and @xmath167 or @xmath12 , i.e. , the pairing is purely interband only along those directions . the energy bands now behave as in fig . [ bands ] only along @xmath170 and @xmath171 , while the dispersion along any other direction is shown in fig . [ bandasmix ] for @xmath80 and @xmath81 .    ) ( along the main diagonal ) for the indicated values of the pairing potential @xmath64 , with the addition of an intraband pairing with strength @xmath165 , as described in the text.,title="fig:",width=302 ] 0.3 cm    performing the mean - field approximation similarly as explained above , we have found that the superconducting state now becomes stable on _ both _ sides of the original critical value @xmath144 . figure  [ fig : stab](b ) shows that the pairing state is stabilized for @xmath172 but the value of @xmath42 where the minimum is located is such that @xmath173 and , thus , two nodes will be present along the @xmath174 and @xmath175 axes . increasing the value of @xmath41 , the minimum eventually occurs for @xmath145 . for these larger values of @xmath41 , there would consequently be no nodes . then , in this section it has been shown using a simple model that the interorbital paired state can become stable if the attraction @xmath41 is sufficiently strong . in this case , it is the nodeless case that is stable even for purely interband attraction . in addition , the very interesting novel phase with coexisting nodes and unpaired electrons in the majority band also requires intraband pairing to be stable , with strength similar to that of the interband , at least in parts of the bz . in the previous section , a simple model was presented , both with exclusively interband pairing and with both inter and intraband pairing , and it was found that the intraband pairing stabilizes the state with a mixture of superconductivity and metallicity . as mentioned in the introduction , it is expected that in the most general cases the pairing operators allowed by the symmetry of the lattice and of the orbitals will , in the band representation , have both intra and interorbital pairing . thus , now we will present and discuss , at the mean field level , the occupation number and the spectral functions for the pairing operator obtained from the numerical study of the two - orbital model for the superconducting state of the pnictides introduced in sec . [ sec : pairings ] . for the two - orbital model eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) with pairing interaction @xmath81 ( continuous lines ) and @xmath80 ( dashed lines ) . parameters : @xmath176 , @xmath177 , @xmath178 , @xmath179 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for the orbital @xmath5 . ( c ) same as ( a ) but for the orbital @xmath4 . ( d ) same as ( a ) but for band 1 . ( e ) same as ( a ) but for band 2.[fig : nkxy05],scaledwidth=40.0% ]       for the two - orbital model eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) without pairing interaction for the orbital @xmath5 ( orange / light ) and the orbital @xmath4 ( red / dark ) . the ` floor ' indicates the fs in red . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for band 1 ( orange / light ) and band 2 ( red / dark)[nkxysurv0],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]   for the two - orbital model eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) without pairing interaction for the orbital @xmath5 ( orange / light ) and the orbital @xmath4 ( red / dark ) . the ` floor ' indicates the fs in red . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for band 1 ( orange / light ) and band 2 ( red / dark)[nkxysurv0],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]    let us start with the non - interacting case in which @xmath80 . the spectral functions along high - symmetry directions in momentum space are presented in fig . [ fig : akb2g_00 ] and , as expected , they reproduce the non - interacting band dispersion . we also show the total occupation number @xmath112 along the same directions [ dashed lines in fig . [ fig : nkxy05](a ) ] , as well as the occupation number for each orbital @xmath180 [ dashed lines in panel ( b ) ] and @xmath181 [ dashed lines in panel ( c ) ] and the orbital occupation in the quadrant of the first bz defined by @xmath182 in fig .  [ nkxysurv0](a ) . it is clear that the electron - like and hole - like fermi surfaces are determined by an admixture of the two orbitals .    on the other hand , in the band representation , band 1 determines the electron pockets while band 2 forms the hole pockets as it can be seen from the behavior of @xmath183 and @xmath184 ( indicated by the dashed lines in panels ( d ) and ( e ) of fig . [ fig : nkxy05 ] ) and by the light ( orange ) and dark ( red ) surfaces in fig . [ nkxysurv0](b ) where the fs is also indicated . it is clear that the electronic occupation of band 1 is smaller than the electronic population of band 2 , so that unpaired electrons would be expected to belong predominantly to band 1 , as in the simple model of the previous sec . [ sec : interband ] . it is interesting to notice that in the orbital representation , on the other hand , the electrons are equally distributed among the @xmath185 and @xmath186 @xmath1 orbitals . let us discuss what occurs when the pairing interaction becomes nonzero . to simplify the discussion , define the following points in momentum space : @xmath187 , @xmath188 , @xmath189 , and @xmath190 . as remarked in ref .  , the @xmath18 pairing operator always has nodes along the @xmath191 direction because the spatial form factor @xmath192 vanishes along that line . but , as soon as @xmath64 is finite , a gap opens along the @xmath193 direction [ notice that along this direction the pairing is purely intraband since in eq .  ( [ 6 ] ) , @xmath194 and thus @xmath195 in eq . ( [ 8 ] ) ] . along @xmath196 , @xmath197 , @xmath198 , and @xmath199 nodes associated to the different number of electrons in band 1 and band 2 remain [ notice that along these directions the pairing is purely interband since @xmath168 because eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) and eq . ( [ 6 ] ) become identical to one other ] . when the pairing interaction @xmath64 becomes strong enough to make @xmath146 , as described in the simplified model presented in the sec . [ sec : interband_strong ] , these nodes vanish . along any other direction in the bz a mixture of intra and interorbital pairing will be present.@xcite    let us first consider a relatively small pairing @xmath81 . in fig . [ fig : nkxy05](a ) , @xmath112 is presented along high symmetry directions . along @xmath200 there is no pairing and , thus , @xmath112 is unchanged from the non - interacting case shown in the figure with dashed lines . along @xmath198 , where only interband pairing occurs , no effects are observed at the electron pocket fs but a rounding in @xmath112 indicating pairing is observed at the hole pocket fs . however , @xmath112 shows discontinuities at two points indicating the existence of nodes . along the diagonal direction @xmath201 , where all the pairing is intraband , it is found that @xmath112 exhibits standard bcs behavior at both hole fermi surfaces indicating the opening of gaps . finally , along @xmath196 it can be observed a rounding of @xmath112 at the hole fermi surfaces , indicating pairing , and a sharp jump at the electron fs . we can further analyze the pairing in the orbital representation . the occupation number for the orbitals @xmath185 and @xmath186 is shown in figs . [ fig : nkxy05](b - c ) . along @xmath200 , where the pairing is zero , we observe how the fs for the electron pocket at @xmath202 @xmath203 is totally determined by electrons in the orbital @xmath185 @xmath204 and how the population of each orbital varies smoothly between the two fermi surfaces , always satisfying @xmath205 . from @xmath206 to @xmath207 , @xmath208 for @xmath209 indicating that the electrons at the hole pocket fs are paired in a wide region around it , but the pairing region is very narrow around the electron pocket because the pairing is reduced by the small value of @xmath23 . along the diagonal , i.e. from @xmath207 to @xmath2 , standard intraband pairing occurs at both hole fermi surfaces and , thus , @xmath208 while from @xmath2 to @xmath206 @xmath208 for @xmath210 indicating pairing around the hole fs and almost no pairing occurs at the electron pocket fs . the behavior @xmath211 for all @xmath133 for which pairing occurs and @xmath212 unchanged from the non - interacting value for all other @xmath133 , was observed for all values of @xmath64 . for this reason , figures for @xmath212 in the orbital representation will not be shown for the additional values of @xmath64 discussed below . the population of the different bands is presented in fig.[fig : nkxy05 ]  ( d - e ) . the fermi surfaces along @xmath200 are clearly determined only by band 1 , which is the band that forms the electron pockets . it can also be observed that there is almost negligible pairing at the electron fs along @xmath198 , but there is clear interband pairing at the hole fs . this is an indication that , due to the spatial variation of the pairing interaction , the attraction is much stronger at the hole pockets than at the electrons pockets . also notice that at the hole pocket fs the pairing is interband and thus @xmath146 , but this does not happen along the diagonal direction @xmath201 where intraband pairing occurs , and there are more paired electrons belonging to band 2 than to band 1 . along the direction @xmath213 again we observed a stronger pairing effect at the hole fs than at the electron one .      in this section , we discuss the form of the spectral functions @xmath214 , which can be measured in angle resolved photoemission spectroscopy ( arpes ) experiments , for weak to strong interorbital pairing . the spectral function for @xmath81 is depicted in fig . [ fig : akb2g_05 ] . as discussed above , the interorbital @xmath18 operator leads to _ intra_-band coupling along the @xmath193 line , where one consequently clearly sees the hole pockets to be gapped . along @xmath196 , the pairing is purely _ inter_-band , and one finds a fermi surface on both the hole and electron pockets , indicating that @xmath81 corresponds to the `` breached '' phase in fig . [ regimes ] . however , the spectral weight determining the hole - pocket node is weak and might thus be missed in the analysis of experiments . the node on the electron pocket fs , on the other hand , is robust and it should be observed , if present . the same occurs along @xmath198 ; the signal for the node at the electron pocket fs should be robust while the one at the hole pocket fs will be weak . as the pairing interaction increases , the nodes resulting from the interband pairing should get closer to each other , as discussed in sec . [ sec : interband ] . figures  [ fig : nk36](a - c ) show @xmath112 for @xmath215 along high - symmetry directions in the band representation . one can see that there are still unpaired electrons , and @xmath215 consequently falls into the `` breached '' region schematically represented in fig . [ regimes ] .     for the two - orbital model eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) with pairing interaction @xmath215 ( continuous lines ) and @xmath80 ( dashed lines ) . parameters : @xmath176 , @xmath177 , @xmath178 , @xmath179 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for band 1 . ( c ) same as ( b ) but for band 2 . ( d ) total occupation number @xmath112 for the two - orbital model eq .  ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) with pairing interaction @xmath216 ( continuous lines ) and @xmath80 ( dashed lines ) . ( e ) same as ( d ) but for band 1 . ( f ) same as ( e ) but for band 2.[fig : nk36],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]   for the two - orbital model eq .  ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) with pairing interaction @xmath215 ( continuous lines ) and @xmath80 ( dashed lines ) . parameters : @xmath176 , @xmath177 , @xmath178 , @xmath179 . ( b ) same as ( a ) but for band 1 . ( c ) same as ( b ) but for band 2 . ( d ) total occupation number @xmath112 for the two - orbital model eq .  ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) with pairing interaction @xmath216 ( continuous lines ) and @xmath80 ( dashed lines ) . ( e ) same as ( d ) but for band 1 . ( f ) same as ( e ) but for band 2.[fig : nk36],title="fig:",scaledwidth=40.0% ]    it is interesting to notice that while @xmath217 , on the other hand @xmath218 indicating that the reconstruction around the hole pockets is much larger than around the electron pockets . this can also be observed in fig . [ fig : nk36](b ) , where we observe unpaired electrons along @xmath198 , but not along @xmath196 . the effect occurs in part due to the smaller value of @xmath23 at the electron pockets but also because , due to the band dispersions , the price in kinetic energy for interband pairing is much larger at the electron pockets than at the hole pockets . the spectral density in fig .  [ fig : akb2g_3 ] further illustrates that the pairing interaction is more effective along @xmath196 than along @xmath198 . only shadow spectral weight crosses the chemical potential along @xmath196 , while strong spectral weight crosses the chemical potential twice along @xmath198 and leads to two nodes .      finally , let us consider a much stronger value of the pairing , such as @xmath216 , in the bcs region of fig . [ regimes ] , for which the only nodes observed are those along @xmath191 , due to the vanishing of the pairing operator . figures  [ fig : nk36](d - f ) , show that @xmath112 is discontinuous only along @xmath191 , while it is smooth along all the other directions indicating pairing . note that @xmath146 along @xmath196 and @xmath198 where interband pairing occurs , while along @xmath193 , @xmath212 is smooth but different for each band because the pairing is intraband . the behavior of the spectral functions displayed in fig . [ fig : akb2g_6 ] shows that spectral weight only crosses the chemical potential along the @xmath191 direction . in this situation , in the folded bz , nodes should occur only at the points where the two electron pockets cross with each other , as indicated in ref .  . in the rest of the bz an anisotropic gap will be observed . finally , let us discuss the important issue of the stability of the @xmath18 pairing state . it will be assumed , following the notation in appendix a of ref .  , that eq . ( [ eq : bcs_ours ] ) has arisen from an interorbital attractive potential of the form @xmath219 and that @xmath220 where @xmath221     for different values of the attraction @xmath222 as a function of @xmath223.[fig : ebg],scaledwidth=40.0% ]    @xmath64 in eq . ( [ 5 ] ) is then given by @xmath223 and the mean - field energy @xmath157 can be calculated for a given @xmath222 as a function of @xmath64 . the results are presented in fig . [ fig : ebg ] . in this figure , a minimum for @xmath158 can be seen for @xmath224 . this indicates that if the pairing attraction overcomes a finite threshold level , the mean field results presented here with @xmath225 will be stable . thus , _ if the attraction exists , both multinodal ( breached ) and states with nodes only along x - y ( strong coupling ) are possible . _ summarizing , in this manuscript the possibility of intra and interband pairing in multiorbital systems has been discussed . while interband pairing has previously been studied in the context of qcd , cold atoms,@xcite heavy fermions,@xcite cuprates@xcite , and bcs superconductivity,@xcite most of the pairing operators proposed for the pnictides are based on the premise that the pairing has to be purely intraband , i.e. , both electrons in the cooper pairs belonging to the same band , compatible with the assumption that in these superconductors all the action must occur at the fermi surfaces . however , symmetry considerations show that in models for the pnictides interorbital pairing is allowed with the two members of the cooper pair belonging to different bands.@xcite this is not surprising since the bands that determine the electron and hole fermi surfaces consist of hybridized orbitals . these interorbital pairing operators give rise to not only intra but also interband pairing when the band representation is used . in addition , numerical calculations in a minimal two orbital model for the pnictides favor one of these non - trivial pairing operators.@xcite as a consequence , a clear discussion of the role of interband pairing is necessary . the explicit calculations shown here of the electronic occupation in the orbital and the band representations , as well as the calculation of the spectral functions showing the distribution of bogoliubov bands , may offer guidance in the interpretation of arpes experiments . in particular , most arpes measurements determine the fs in the normal state and study the opening of the superconducting gap by monitoring @xmath226 as they lower the temperature.@xcite notice that this approach would miss the nodes associated with the `` breached '' phase since in the superconducting state a gap would be observed in @xmath226 while the node would be detected in @xmath227 . thus , experimentalists should investigate the possibility of nodes at points in momentum space that do not belong to the normal state fs and they must keep in mind that some of the nodes may be determined by shadow bands with very small spectral weight .    the most recent experimental results with the polarization dependence of the arpes spectra for bafe@xmath228co@xmath229as@xmath10 provided the allowed contribution of each of the five @xmath1 orbitals to the electron and hole fermi surfaces.@xcite while discrepancies with proposed four and five orbital models are remarked in that publication , it is interesting to observe that the minimal two - orbital model addressed here does not contradict the arpes findings if we disregard the additional @xmath230 hole pocket fs that they present , which is reasonable because it has @xmath231 character , an orbital not included in the minimal model considered here . in fact , along their @xmath193 direction , which corresponds to our @xmath196 , our first hole fs is purely @xmath5 as it is their @xmath232 hole fs ; our second hole fs , which arises upon folding our extended fs along @xmath191 is purely @xmath4 , as it is their @xmath233 hole fs , and our electron fs is purely @xmath4 as it is their @xmath234 electron fs . our second electron fs ( obtained upon folding ) has a purely @xmath5 character , while their electron fs @xmath235 appears to be mostly @xmath4 and @xmath6 , but with some amounts of @xmath5 as well . along the diagonal direction @xmath196 , which corresponds to our @xmath193 , the two hole fermi surfaces are a symmetric admixture of @xmath5 and @xmath4 , exactly as in the two - orbital model.@xcite thus , these similarities between the experimental results and the band composition of the simple two - orbital model offer encouragement towards exploring whether the main physics of the pnictides can be captured with such a minimum number of degrees of freedom .    we have also mentioned in the text that the symmetry of the lattice and of the orbitals introduce constraints on the possible pairing operators . in general , a purely intraband pairing , such as the proposed @xmath236 state,@xcite would occur only if the coupling of the electrons with the source of the attraction is _ identical _ for all orbitals . considering the different spatial orientations of the orbitals , it is not obvious that this should be the case , since , as discussed in the introduction , phonons couple differently to electrons in the @xmath13 and @xmath15 boron orbitals in the case of mgb@xmath10 . thus , if indeed the coupling results to be the same for all @xmath1 orbitals we could use this fact to elucidate the pairing mechanism ; but , if this is not the case , we would expect some degree of interband pairing , at least in some regions of the brillouin zone and , thus , it is important to study the experimental and theoretical consequences of such a possibility . it is interesting to observe that in the undoped limit there are also three regimes : normal , coexisting magnetism and metallicity , and magnetism without a fermi surface . for details see r. yu , k. t. trinh , a. moreo , m. daghofer , j. a. riera , s. haas , and e. dagotto , phys . b * 79 * , 104510 ( 2009 ) . h. ding , p. richard , k. nakayama , k. sugawara , t. arakane , y. sekiba , a. takayama , s. souma , t. sato , t. takahashi , z. wang , x. dai , z. fang , g.  f. chen , j.  l. luo , and n.  l. wang , epl * 83 * , 47001 ( 2008 ) . l. wray , d. qian , d. hsieh , y. xia , l. li , j.g . checkelsky , a. pasupathy , k.k . gomes , c. v. parker , a.v . fedorov , g.f . chen , j.l . luo , a. yazdani , n.p . ong , n.l . wang , m.z . hasan , phys . b * 78 * , 184508 ( 2008 ) . v. b. zabolotnyy , d. s. inosov , d. v. evtushinsky , a. koitzsch , a. a. kordyuk , j. t. park , d. haug , v. hinkov , a. v. boris , d. l. sun , g. l. sun , c. t. lin , b. keimer , m. knupfer , b. buechner , a. varykhalov , r. follath , and s. v. borisenko , nature * 457 * , 569 ( 2009 ) . y. zhang , b. zhou , f. chen , j. wei , m. xu , l.  x. yang , c. fang , w.  f. tsai , g.  h. cao , z.  a. xu , m. arita , c. hong , k. shimada , h. namatame , m. taniguchi , j.  p. hu , and d.  l. feng , arxiv:0904.4022 , 2009 .
Abstract:

Answer: the discovery of high-@xmath0 superconductivity in the pnictides , materials with a fermi surface determined by several bands , highlights the need to understand how superconductivity arises in multiband systems . in this effort , using symmetry considerations and mean - field approximations , we discuss how strong hybridization among orbitals may lead to both intra and interband pairing , and we present calculations of the spectral functions to guide the experimental search for this kind of state .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: popularity plays a major role in the dynamics of online systems . public attention can suddenly concentrate on a web page or application  @xcite , a youtube video  @xcite , a trending topic in twitter  @xcite , or on a story in the news media  @xcite , sometimes even in absence of an apparent reason . typically , after an initial increase of attention , the focus will move elsewhere leaving as a trace a characteristic activity profile . such popularity peaks are not only of great relevance for the monetization of online content , but also pose scientific challenges related to understanding the mechanisms ruling their dynamics  @xcite . in particular , specific features of the popular item under consideration can now be related to its activity profile by means of semantic analysis and natural language processing of the messages exchanged by the users  @xcite . here we use data from the twitter micro - blogging system to investigate the relation between activity profiles over time and content . there are several reasons for selecting twitter : it is one of the most popular online social networks , part of its message stream is programmatically accessible to the public  @xcite , and the content of the messages is short , making it amenable to automated processing . twitter is used as an hybrid between a communication media and an online social network  @xcite and hosts real - time discussion of current topics of popular interest . we take advantage of the practice introduced by twitter users of attaching `` hashtags '' to their messages as a way of explicitly marking the relevant topics . twitter has incentivated this practice by supporting hashtags in their web interface and in their programmatic api , turning them into lightweight social annotations of the information streams users consume . here we focus our analysis on those hashtags that exhibited a popularity peak during our observation period , and systematically analyze the corresponding messages ( `` tweets '' ) by grounding the words they contain in a semantic lexicon . this paper is structured as follows : section  [ sec : background ] reviews the literature on twitter and in particular the literature on temporal patterns of twitter activity . section  [ sec : data ] describes the twitter dataset we used and the techniques we applied to select popular hashtags and their usage patterns . in section  [ sec : classes ] we identify dynamical classes of hashtag usage and relate them to the semantics of the corresponding tweets . in section  [ sec : spreading ] we relate the same dynamical classes to the spreading properties of hashtags over the underlying social network . section  [ sec : discussion ] summarizes our findings and points to applications and further research directions . several aspects of twitter have been extensively investigated in the literature , including its network topology  @xcite , the relations and types of messages between users  @xcite , the internal information propagation  @xcite , the credibility of information  @xcite , and even its potential as an indicator of the state of mind of a population  @xcite . the possibility that popular trends or hashtags could be classified in groups have been discussed in refs . @xcite , and the effect of semantic differences on the persistence of a hashtag have also been considered  @xcite . the shape of peaks in popularity profiles has been used to classify the events in groups  @xcite . the hypothesis that both the increase and decrease of public attention follow a power - law - like functional shape whose exponents define universality classes , in parallel to what occurs with phase transitions in critical phenomena , has been explored  @xcite . this approach , however , is difficult to apply to twitter : the fast timescales involved and the highly reactive nature of twitter make the time series very noisy and pose the challenge of characterizing activity dynamics in a way which is both robust and scalable . the causes that underlie the existence of distinct classes of popularity are thought to be a combination of all the mechanisms that drive public attention . news regarding a popular item can propagate either over the social network of the users of a given system  a so - called endogenous process  or it can be injected through mass media ( exogenous driving ) . the duality between exogenous and endogenous information propagation has permeated the analysis of popularity in several recent studies  @xcite , even though it is not always clear how to distinguish between them based solely on the shape of the respective popularity profiles  @xcite . our dataset comprises about @xmath0 million twitter messages or _ tweets _ posted between november @xmath1 , @xmath2 and may @xmath3 , @xmath4 . the data were collected at indiana university thanks to their temporary privileged access to the twitter data stream  @xcite . each tweet includes textual content , an author , the time at which it was posted , whether or not it was in reply to another tweet , and additional metadata . the collected tweets come from about @xmath5 million unique user accounts .    in order to build a representation of the social network over which hashtag diffusion takes place , we queried the twitter rest api for the complete list of followers and friends of @xmath6 million users . we collected neighbor information for @xmath7 million of them , the discrepancy being accounted for by users with a private profile . using this information we constructed a directed follower network , where each edge takes on the direction in which information flows : if user a follows user b , the respective social link points from b to a , as a can see b s status updates .      for the identification of topics , we extracted all the hashtags contained in the twitter messages ( by matching the tweet content to the pattern # [ a - za - z0 - 9 _ ] * ) . our dataset includes about @xmath8 distinct hashtags ( see table  [ tab : data ] ) . we selected the most popular topics by restricting our data to the hashtags used by at least @xmath9 distinct users and to the messages containing at least one of such hashtags . based on this selection , we used for the following analysis about @xmath10 million tweets and @xmath11 popular hashtags . .general statistics about the dataset [ tab : data ] [ cols= " < , > " , ]      like most systems driven by human actions , twitter exhibits bursty activity , circadian rhythms , and in general the full temporal complexity of a large - scale social aggregate . because of this , there is no single natural scale for investigating its temporal behavior , and the choice of a time scale is not neutral with respect to the phenomena one can study at that scale . here we choose to investigate activity at the scale of days , i.e. , we do not study human dynamics at the level of minutes and seconds , nor phenomena driven by the circadian cycle , nor slower trends that develop over several weeks of months . we analyze daily activity levels , and focus on events that are meaningful at that scale , such as the wait for a scheduled social event .    at the daily scale the popularity profile of hashtags can look very different . on visual inspection the individual temporal profiles of hashtag usage display behaviors that typically fall into one of the following three categories : continuous activity , periodic activity , or activity concentrated around an isolated peak . continuous - activity profiles are those for which a rather constant level of daily activity is maintained by the user community ( e.g. , ` music ` ) . hashtags with periodic activity profiles display series of spikes spaced by one or more weeks , or months ( e.g. , ` followfriday ` ) . finally , activity profiles with an isolated peak are characteristic of hashtags associated with a unique event to which a user community pays attention for a limited span of time ( e.g. , ` oscars ` ) . in the following we will concentrate on this class of hashtags .    to identify activity peaks , for every hashtag @xmath12 we compute the time series of daily activity , where the activity @xmath13 on day @xmath14 is defined as the number of tweets containing @xmath12 . in the following we will write @xmath15 to indicate the activity level of a generic hashtag . we use a sliding window of @xmath16 days ( @xmath17 ) centered on day @xmath18 , @xmath19 $ ] , and let @xmath18 slide along the activity time series for the hashtag . within this window we evaluate the baseline hashtag activity as the median @xmath20 of @xmath21 . then , we define the outlier fraction @xmath22 of the central day @xmath18 as the relative difference of the hashtag activity @xmath23 with respect to the median baseline @xmath20 : @xmath24 / \max(n_b , n_{\mbox{\tiny min}})$ ] . here @xmath25 is a mininum activity level used to regularize the definition of @xmath22 for low activity values . we say that there is an activity peak at @xmath18 if @xmath26 , where @xmath27 is an arbitrary threshold value that in the following we set as @xmath28 . we checked that different values of the threshold do not change significantly our results , and that the same peaks can be identified by using different peak - detection techniques . of course it may happen that for a given hashtag @xmath12 the time series @xmath13 exhibits more than one peak . since we are interested in isolated popularity bursts , we ignore all peaks that are separated from other peaks by less than one week . finally , for every hashtag we select the peak ( if any ) with the highest @xmath22 and we offset the day index so that for all hashtags the activity peak occurs on day @xmath29 , as shown in fig . [ activity ] . using this method we select @xmath30 peaks of daily hashtag activity : the corresponding hashtags are listed in appendix  [ appendix - usage ] , together with manual annotations about their meaning and a coarse classification .          to correlate the temporal activity patterns with content , we perform a simple semantic grounding of the tweets by using the wordnet  @xcite semantic lexicon . for each tweet , we pre - process the text by removing user mentions ( ` @username ` ) , hashtags , urls and a standard set of english stop words . then , for each word we perform stemming ( with the standard porter algorithm ) , lemmatization , and we finally attempt to look up in wordnet the corresponding ( i.e. , the basic node of the wordnet lexicon , a set of synonyms that refer to a single concept ) . from now on we will refer to wordnet synsets as _ concepts_. words for which no concept can be looked up in wordnet are ignored . if few or no terms are successfully looked up in wordnet as english words , we attempt to identify the tweet language : we run the textcat  @xcite language categorization algorithm on the text and we discard the tweet if english is not included in the top @xmath31 most likely languages identified by textcat . overall , the above analysis identifies about @xmath32 distinct concepts that are associated with the hashtags under study . typical examples of the activity profiles for the selected hashtags are shown in figure  [ activity ] . the curves are centered around the day on which the popularity reaches its maximum ( day @xmath29 ) . the displayed time window spans one week before and after the peak . in the top plots of figure  [ activity ] the activity of four sample hashtags is reported as a function of time in days after the peak . the bars on the top right display the percentage of activity before , at and after the peak . the four hashtags exhibit different behaviors in terms of approach to the peak ( dark blue bars ) and relaxation after the peak ( light blue bars ) . the hashtag ` masters ` exhibits an anticipatory pattern , with a gradual build - up of activity before the peak . the hashtag ` winnenden ` , conversely , corresponds to an unexpected event , with a sudden onset of activity followed by a gradual relaxation . the hashtag ` watchmen ` displays both a gradual build - up of attention and a gradual relaxation after the peak . finally , the hashtag ` nsotu ` concentrates almost all of its activity during the single day of the peak . in the middle plot row we show the activity of individual users as a function of time . users who have posted the hashtag at least once ( within the observation interval ) are ranked according to the time of first usage of the hashtag ( rank along the ordinate axis ) : early adopters lie at the bottom and late adopters are at the top . for each user , colored segments mark the times at which the hashtag under consideration was used . the inset bar plots show the fraction of users who used the hashtag more than once during the selected time window . finally , in the bottom plot row we visualize the content of tweets as word clouds . each word cloud contains the @xmath33 most frequent words , with font sizes proportional to word frequencies . the patterns displayed by these hashtags are representatives of the four classes of activity peaks found in our analysis . and @xmath34 axes ( vvi model of the mclust implementation ) . [ em - clusters ] ]        the possibility of classifying online popularity peaks in a few discrete classes has been discussed in the literature  @xcite . typically the classification is done according to the different shapes or functional forms of the increasing and decreasing parts of the popularity profiles . the origin of these few classes has been linked in the literature to two mechanisms that , to some extent , are present in most online social systems : endogenous propagation of information over the social network , and the injection into the system of information from exogenous online or offline sources . this scenario was tested for the evolution of popularity of youtube videos  @xcite and has also been discussed for trending topics or memes in twitter  @xcite . the lack of a clear distinction between endogenous and exogenous information flow in twitter means that the number of classes , the possible functional shapes of the popularity profiles , and even the importance of the endogenous / exogenous distinction are all far from clear  @xcite . here we take a different approach and attempt to simplify the possible scenarios by shifting emphasis from the detailed time series of popularity to coarse - grained information on the balance of activity before , during , and after the popularity peak . to achieve this , for each hashtag exhibiting a popularity peak we summarize the hashtag usage timeline with the triple @xmath35 of the fractions of tweets posted before ( @xmath34 ) , during ( @xmath36 ) and after the peak ( @xmath37 ) . by definition these fractions satisfy @xmath38 . we restrict the computation to a two - week period centered on the peak time , as shown in the examples of fig . [ activity ] . we identify hashtag clusters in the @xmath39 space of independent parameters using a standard implementation of the expectation maximization ( em ) algorithm  @xcite to learn an optimal gaussian mixture model . the number of components ( clusters ) of the mixture is set by using the bayesian information criterion , as well as by means of a @xmath31-fold cross - validation , yielding in both cases the @xmath40 clusters shown in fig  [ em - clusters ] . the clusters are robust with respect to the initial conditions and parameters of the em algorithms ( provided that care is taken to deal with the points on the @xmath41 axis ) : @xmath42 of the hashtags have a classification accuracy below @xmath43 , and only @xmath44 of them have a classification accuracy in excess of @xmath45 . figure  [ simplex ] shows the identified clusters in the @xmath46-simplex @xmath47 . the marker representing each of the @xmath30 selected hashtag is colored and shaped according to the group it has been classified into . the hatched area is the parametric space excluded by the constraint that hashtags should have a peak - day activity of at least @xmath31 times the baseline daily activity ( i.e. , the excluded parametric space is due to our selection of hashtags that exhibit a peak in their activity timeline ) . the four groups of fig .  [ simplex ] correspond to different temporal patterns of collective attention , as illustrated below in relation to the hashtags of fig . [ activity ] . * activity concentrated _ before and during _ the peak ( orange triangles ) . these hashtags correspond , by definition , to anticipatory behavior , with users posting increasing amount of content as the date of the event approaches , followed by a sharp drop in attention right after the event . see for example the hashtag ` # masters ` ( underlined in the figure ) which was used to discuss the @xmath4 golf masters . * activity concentrated _ during and after _ the peak ( purple circles ) . in this class we find hashtags indicating unexpected events that make an impact , such as the ` # winnenden ` school shooting . the sudden onset of activity is a reaction to the unexpected event , and it is likely to be driven by exogenous sources such as communication in mass media . * activity concentrated _ symmetrically _ around the peak ( red squares ) . these hashtags have neither the purely anticipatory nor the purely reactive behaviors illustrated above , and this may indicate a mix of exogenous and endogenous factors building up collective attention to a peak intensity , as a specific day approaches , and then away from it as user attention shifts away . see for example the case of the hashtag ` # watchmen ` , used to discuss a blockbuster movie . the peak occurs on the day of the movie release in theatres . * activity almost totally concentrated _ on the single day of the peak _ ( green rounded square ) . these hashtags correspond to transient collective attention associated with events that are highly discussed only while they happen , such as the @xmath4 state of the union address ( ` # nsotu ` ) , or the transient large - scale malfunctions of widely used google services ( ` # gfail ` ) . these patterns are somehow expected , in the sense that these are the only possibilities for the coarse - grained temporal profile of a hashtag with a popularity peak . however , the existence of well defined hashtag clusters , as well as their stability , are far from trivial and indicate that coarse graining the temporal dynamics of collective attention as shown here can expose robust indicators of the social semantics associated with hashtags . the presence of clearly separated clusters may also be deeply linked to the diverse nature of the mechanisms driving popularity in online social systems . details on the usage and origin of the hashtags shown in fig . [ simplex ] are available in appendix  [ appendix - usage ] .      the examples discussed above , such as those of fig . [ activity ] , point to important differences in the social semantics of the different classes of hashtags . in order to shed light on this aspect , we systematically analyze the content of the tweets associated with each group of hashtags , using the semantic grounding described in section  [ semanticanalysis ] . wordnet provides hierarchical structures of concepts that can be made into a single directed acyclic graph by adding a root `` entity '' node as parent of the wordnet taxonomies . thus , wordnet can be used to coarse - grain the semantics of the looked - up terms by focusing on a given ( high enough ) level of the subsumption hierarchy . our interest here is to provide a semantic fingerprint of the content associated with the different hashtag classes , in order to expose differences in their social semantics . the concepts at depth @xmath40 of the wordnet hierarchy were identified as appropriate for this purpose , as that hierarchical level provides a good enough semantic diversity while featuring a small number of generic subsuming categories . we restricted our analysis to the concepts at depth @xmath40 that occur most frequently in the text associated with the hashtags under study : the right - hand side of fig . [ semantic ] lists the @xmath48 selected wordnet concepts , together with sample terms that are subsumed by them .    to expose the semantic differences between hashtag classes we proceed as follows : for each hashtag we compute a normalized feature vector of the frequencies of occurrence of the selected wordnet concepts . we then average this vector over all hashtag belonging to a given class and obtain the class feature vectors of fig . [ semantic ] , where the radius of discs is proportional to the normalized frequency of the corresponding concept in a given class of hashtags . clearly , different dynamic classes correspond to different semantics of the corresponding tweets . the content of hashtags with activity concentrated before the peak has a stronger prevalence of concepts like `` social events '' and `` time period '' ( e.g. , ` easter ` ) , consistent with the social anticipation of a known event . conversely , hashtags whose activity is concentrated after the peak , usually associated to unexpected events , include several marketing campaigns such as ` macheist ` , and this is reflected in the prevalence of concepts like `` free '' and `` evidence '' . tags with the activity concentrated mostly on the peak day correspond to events that attract the users attention for short periods of time , such as sport events and media events ( e.g. , concepts associated with ` oscar ` , subsumed by the `` symbol '' concept ) . the detailed annotations of appendix  [ appendix - usage ] allow to make contact between specific hashtags or hashtag classes and the information of figs .  [ simplex ] and [ semantic ] . notice that the observed selectivity between content and activity profiles may open the door to content tagging techniques based on popularity dynamics and on other behavioral cues . ]    having identified classes of popular hashtags that differ in activity profiles and semantics , we now turn to investigating whether such classes are also associated with distinct patterns of information propagation . similarly to the approach of ref . @xcite , we regard information spreading as an epidemic process , where the behavior of using a given hashtag spreads from one user to another . the relevant social network for this epidemic process is twitter s _ follower network _ : whenever a user posts a given hashtag , her followers are exposed to the hashtag and can decide to adopt it in turn . of course , users can also start using the hashtag spontaneously , as a result of exposure to external events ( elections , sport matches , disasters , etc . ) or to exogenous information sources . the first feature we analyze is the fraction of retweets to total tweets in the messages associated with each hashtag under study . retweets are forwarding actions in which a tweet from a followed user is delivered to one s followers together with a reference to the source . because of their nature , retweets have been investigated as a mechanism for information diffusion in twitter  @xcite . the fraction of retweets is an indicator of how many ( forwarded ) copies are present in the tweets associated with a hashtag , and provides information on the spreading attitude of the corresponding topic . retweets were identified both by checking for an initial `` rt '' marker or through tweet metadata . the top - left panel of figure  [ epidemic ] reports the fraction of retweets for the four hashtag classes . a box plot is used to provide information on the dispersion of parameter values inside each hashtag class . hashtags with the activity distributed symmetrically around the peak or concentrated at the peak day have a higher fraction of retweets . this supports the idea that those hashtags are associated with a higher level of endogenous activity , similarly to what happens for some youtube videos  @xcite . conversely , hashtags characterized by activity before the peak are associated to anticipatory behaviors and appear less prone to viral spreading .    the box - plot in the top - right panel of fig . [ epidemic ] reports the fraction @xmath49 of users who adopt the hashtag when none of the users they follow have used it before . in other words , @xmath49 estimates the fraction of `` seeders '' that inject the information related to the hashtag into the social network . although the level of heterogeneity inside the four groups is high , we see that the hashtags with activity concentrated after the peak tend to have more seeders . this indicates that the propagation is probably fueled by exogenous factors , such as publicity campaigns or mass media communication . a further corroboration is provided by the semantic analysis of fig . [ semantic ] , as these hashtags contain concepts such as `` sign '' ( sign - up for a service ) , `` account '' ( create an account ) or `` free '' that are usually associated with commercial campaigns that are heavily diffused in traditional media .      . bottom left : fraction @xmath50 of followers that adopt the hashtag after seeing it . bottom right : average time @xmath51 between the first tweet with the hashtag and the last one . [ epidemic ] ]    the box - plot in the bottom - left panel of fig . [ epidemic ] reports the average fraction @xmath50 of a user s followers who adopt the hashtag after he or she has posted a tweet containing it . in modeling epidemic processes , @xmath50 is a measure of infectiousness . in this context , it bears information about the capacity of a behavior or meme to propagate from a user to her followers . the box - plot shows that @xmath50 does not depend strongly on the hashtag class and its median value is about @xmath52 . this might suggest the existence of a generic mechanism controlling the propagation of the information over the twitter social network independently of the content or popularity profile of the hashtags . the estimation of both @xmath49 and @xmath50 depends on the sampling of the social network at hand . however , an analysis made using sub - samplings of the follower network obtained by cutting edges has showed that @xmath50 is relatively stable to the level of sampling , while @xmath49 is more sensitive . nevertheless , since our sampling of the network is fixed it is legitimate to compare the results obtained for different hashtags even in the case of @xmath49 .    finally , in the bottom - right panel of fig .  [ epidemic ] we report the average time @xmath51 , in hours , between the first tweet and the last tweet with the same hashtag posted by each user ( we set @xmath53 for those users who post the hashtag only once ) . that is , @xmath51 indicates the time during which users are likely to spread their use of the hashtag to followers . the four hashtags classes display similar values of @xmath51 except for the case of activity concentrated on the peak day . in that case , hashtags have the lowest @xmath51 value , since activity is concentrated in a small period of time corresponding , for example , to a short - term disruption of online services . in summary , we performed an extensive analysis of the twitter hashtags that exhibit a popularity peak . previous work found that popularity peaks in online systems can be clustered in a few prototypical classes according to the temporal features of their popularity dynamics . here we introduce a simple way of coarse - graining the temporal usage patterns of hashtags that exposes discrete dynamical classes . the clusters we find correspond to the four possible ways of distributing the hashtag activity with respect to the day of peak usage . clusters are well defined and the classification of hashtags is stable with respect to small perturbations . we ground in a semantic lexicon the contents of tweets associated with popular hashtags , and find insightful correlations between the class a hashtag belongs to and the ( social ) semantics of the associated content . in particular , hashtags that are mostly active before reaching a peak usually deal with scheduled social events or specific moments in time , indicating an anticipatory collective behavior . hashtag with symmetric activity patterns across the peak seem to be associated with endogenous propagation over the social network . hashtags that only exhibit a tail of activity after the peak correspond to unexpected events or exogenous driving . furthermore , we measure standard parameters of epidemic propagation over the on - line social network and relate these parameter values to the different hashtag classes , to unveil patterns of injection or propagation of information . the balance between internal propagation ( endogenous ) and external injection of information was assumed so far to be the main explanation for the existence of different clusters of online popular events . our results indicate that the content type is also very important . for instance , the hashtags used to discuss the `` swine flu '' pandemic ( top of fig . simplex ) or a popular event such as the oscars ceremony ( bottom - left of the simplex ) show markedly different popularity profiles despite the fact that both attract a high level of attention from the media . both hashtags display high levels of external seeding , as well as relatively low levels of endogenous propagation . thus , the different social semantics of these hashtags is likely the cause underlying the observed differences in activity dynamics . we remark that a robust classification into dynamical classes of user attention was obtained by using very simple parameters computed on time series of daily popularity . contrary to other methods , which require the estimation of power - law exponents for popularity growth , or the computation of expensive correlations between high - resolution activity time series , the parameters introduced here can be easily computed in a scalable way . while they lack predictive power , as they need a record of past activity to be computed , they can support the discovery of specific behavioral patterns in large - scale records of user activity . the robustness of the proposed approach , if confirmed in other settings , could support implicit temporal tagging of the twitter data stream , where  for example  anticipatory behavior associated to a given date points to that date as a focus of collective expectation . the specific semantics that can be linked to a given temporal profile may be used to mine collective attention in order to construct implicit annotations of timelines on the basis of social media streams . of course , this requires an extensive work of validation that falls outside the scope of the present work . progress in this direction will requires more refined content analysis by means of natural language processing and sentiment analysis , as well as validation in user studies or crowd - sourced settings . the authors thank the pis of the truthy project , fil menczer , alessandro flammini , johan bollen and alessandro vespignani , for their support and for many inspiring discussions . cc and jl thank andr panisson for interesting discussions and technical help . cc thanks yamir moreno for stimulating discussion . this work was carried out while jl was at the isi foundation with support from the leonardo da vinci scholarship . jl acknowledges support from the spanish ministry of science through the project tin2009 - 14560-c03 - 01 . jjr acknowledges support from the jae program of the csic and from the spanish ministry of science ( micinn ) through the project modass ( fis2011 - 24785 ) . cc acknowledges support from the lagrange project funded by the crt foundation and from the q - aracne project funded by the fondazione compagnia di san paolo .    10    m.  vlachos , c.  meek , z.  vagena , and d.  gunopulos . identifying similarities , periodicities and bursts for online search queries . in _ proc . 2004 acm sigmod international conference on management of data _ , pages 131142 , 2004 . f  wu and b  a huberman . novelty and collective attention . , 104:17599 , 2007 . e.  adar , d.s . weld , bershad , b.n . , and s.d . gribble . why we search : visualizing and predicting user behavior . in _ proc . www2007 _ , pages 161170 , 2007 . onnela and f.  reed - tsochas . spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems . , 107:1837518380 , 2009 . s.  goel , j.  m hofman , s.  lahaie , d.  m pennock , and d.j . watts . predicting consumer behavior with web search . , 107(41):1748617490 , 2010 . j.  ratkiewicz , f.  menczer , s.  fortunato , a.  flammini , and a.  vespignani . traffic in social media ii : modeling bursty popularity . in _ socialcom 2010 : sin _ , 2010 . r  crane and d  sornette . robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system . , 105:15649 , 2008 . f.  figueiredo , f.  benevenuto , and j.  almeida . the tube over time : characterizing popularity growth of youtube videos . in _ proc . acm international conference on web search and data mining ( wsdm ) _ , pages 745754 , 2011 . m.  naaman , h.  becker , and l.  gravano . hip and trendy : characterizing emerging trends on twitter . , 62:902918 , 2011 . h.  kwak , c.  lee , h.  park , and s.  moon . what is twitter , a social network or a news media ? , page 591 , feb 2010 . s.  asur , b.  a. huberman , g.  szabo , and wang c. trends in social media : persistence and decay . in _ proc . 5th international conference on weblogs and social media ( icwsm ) _ , page 434 , 2011 . j.  yang and j.  leskovec . patterns of temporal variation in online media . in _ proc . of the fourth acm international conference on web search and data mining _ , pages 177186 , 2011 . j.  leskovec , l.  backstrom , and j.  kleinberg . meme - tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle . in _ proceedings of the 15th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining _ , page 497 , 2009 . j.  ratkiewicz , s.  fortunato , a.  flammini , f.  menczer , and a.  vespignani . characterizing and modeling the dynamics of online popularity . , 105(15):158701 , oct 2010 . j.  huang , k.  m. thornton , and e.  n. efthimiadis . conversational tagging in twitter . in _ proceedings of the 21st acm conference on hypertext and hypermedia _ , pages 173178 , 2010 . shaomei wu , jake  m hofman , winter  a mason , and duncan  j watts . who says what to whom on twitter . , pages 110 , feb 2011 . http://dev.twitter.com . a.  java , x.  song , t.  finin , and b.  tseng . why we twitter : understanding microblogging usage and communities . in _ proceedings of the 9th webkdd _ , pages 5665 , 2007 . b  krishnamurthy , p  gill , and m  arlitt . a few chirps about twitter . in _ proceedings of the first workshop on online social networks _ , pages 1924 , 2008 . huberman , d.m . romero , and f.  wu . social networks that matter : twitter under the microscope . , 14:1 , 2008 .    c.  honeycutt and s.  c. herring . beyond microblogging : conversation and collaboration via twitter . in _ proc . 42nd hawaii international conference on system sciences _ , 2009 . m.  cha , h.  haddadi , f.  benevenuto , and k.p . measuring user influence in twitter : the million follower fallacy . , pages 18 , mar 2010 . w.  galuba , d.  chakraborty , k.  aberer , z.  despotovic , and w.  kellerer . outtweeting the twitterers - predicting information cascades in microblogs . in _ 3rd workshop on online social networks ( wosn 2010 ) _ , 2010 . k.  lerman and r.  ghosh . information contagion : an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks . in _ proc . of 4th int . conf . on weblogs and social media icwsm _ , volume abs/1003.2 , pages 9097 . aaai , 2010 . s.  gonzlez - bailn , j.  borge - holthoefer , a.  rivero , and y.  moreno . the dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network . , 1 , 2011 . m.  mendoza , b.  poblete , and c.  castillo . twitter under crisis : can we trust what we rt ? in _ proc . 1st workshop on social media analytics ( soma10 ) _ , pages 7179 , 2010 . c.  castillo , m.  mendoza , and b.  poblete . information credibility on twitter . , pages 110 , jan 2011 . b.  j. jansen , m.  zhang , k.  sobel , and a.  chowdury . twitter power : tweets as electronic word of mouth . , 60(11 ) , 2009 . j.  ratkiewicz , m.  meiss , m.  conover , b.  gonalves , s.  patil , a.  flammini , and f.  menczer . truthy : mapping the spread of astroturf in microblog streams . in _ www 11 proceedings of the 20th int . companion on world wide web _ , page 249 , 2011 . j.  ratkiewicz , m.  conover , m.  meiss , b.  gonalves , a.  flammini , and f.  menczer . detecting and tracking political abuse in social media . in _ fifth international aaai conference on weblogs and social media _ , page 297 , 2011 . dodds , k.d . harris , i.m . kloumann , c.a . bliss , and c.m . temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network : hedonometrics and twitter . , 6(12):e26752 , 2011 . j.  bollen and h.  mao . twitter mood as a stock market predictor . , 44(10):9194 , 2011 . d.  romero , b.  meeder , and j.  kleinberg . differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics : idioms , political hashtags , and complex contagion on twitter . in _ proc . www2011 _ , pages 695704 , 2011 . d.  laniado and p.  mika . making sense of twitter . in _ semantic web - iswc _ , volume 6469 , pages 470485 , 2010 . b.  gonalves , n.  perra , and a.  vespignani . modeling users activity on twitter : validation of dunbar s number . , 6:e22656 , 2011 . http://www.let.rug.nl / vannoord / textcat/.    c.  fraley and a.  e. raftery . version 3 for r : normal mixture modeling and model - based clustering . , 504 , 2009 .    c.  fraley and a.  e. raftery . model - based clustering , discriminant analysis and density estimation . , 97:611631 , 2002 . p70ptp100ptp220pt * hashtag name * & * event type * & * description * + & +   + advertising & twitter game & shorty awards for advertisements + apps & twitter game & shorty awards for applications + asot400 & holiday / honor & event for the 400th episode of armin van buuren s radio show + cparty & convention & technology festival and lan party in brazil ( campus party ) + earthhour & awareness / charity & event against climate change ( turning off the lights for one hour ) + easter & holiday / honor & celebration of eastern + entertainment & twitter game & shorty awards for entertainment + firstfollow & twitter application & relates to # followfriday + macworld & convention & macworld conference & expo + masters & sport & golf tournament ( masters cup ) + mrtweet & twitter application & introduction of a new twitter service to find people + myfirstjob & twitter game & sharing of first job experiences + nfl & sport & super bowl : cardinals vs. steelers + oneword & twitter game & tweeting of a word that s in the mind of twitter user + plurk & twitter application & integration of plurk into twitter ( service similar to twitter ) + poynterday & holiday / honor & honoring of dougie poynter + rncchair & political & rnc chairmanship election + sxswi & convention & set of film , interactive and music festivals ( south by southwest ) + teaparty & political & protests across the united states + therescue & awareness / charity & event from the organization `` invisible children '' against child soldiers in northern uganda + tweepme & twitter game & contest for the twitter application tweepme + twestival & awareness / charity & charity event of cities to raise money for clean water + wbc & sport & japan s world baseball classic +    & +   + amazonfail & disruption & demonstration against the new ranking of books in amazon + americanidol & media & television competition to find new singing talents + blogger & twitter application & introduction of a new twitter directory ( wefollow ) + bsg & media & finale of battlestar galactica + contest & marketing / contest & competition to win the album `` cardinology '' from ryan adams + cricket & sport & cricket game : india vs. england + earthday & awareness / charity & celebration of the earth day + evernoteclarifigiveaway & marketing / contest & competition to win iphone 3 g cases + free & marketing / contest & see # macheist + fridayfollow & twitter game & unusual tag for # followfriday + g20 & political & g-20 summit + happy09 & holiday / honor & congratulations to new year s eve + hoppusday & holiday / honor & honoring of mark hoppus of the band blink182 + inaug09 & political & inauguration of barrack obama + job & twitter application & see # tweetmyjob + macheist & marketing / contest & offering of free devonthink licenses from the website macheist + mix09 & convention & conference for web designers and developers + peace & disruption & call of people for peace in gaza + safari4 & technic & beta release of the web browser safari 4 + skittles & marketing / contest & competition from the brand skittles ( candies ) + spectrial & political & conviction of the pirate bay founders + starwarsday & media & star wars day ( every may 4 ) + tweetmyjobs & twitter application & twitter service for sending job posts + unfollowfriday & twitter game & countermovement to # followfriday + winnenden & disruption & school shooting at a school in winnenden , germany + yourtag & twitter application & see # blogger + zombies & disruption & see # blackout +    & +   + 3hotwords & twitter game & tweeting of three hot word that s in the mind of twitter user + aprilfools & holiday / honor & celebration of the april fools day + bachelor & media & discussion of the finale episode of the reality show _ the bachelor _ in the night before + blackout & disruption & electricity blackout in sydney + budget & political & delivering of the budget statement in uk + crapnames forpubs & twitter game & tweeting of worst names for a pub + followme stephen & twitter game & call to stephen fry to follow him + gfail & disruption & gmail blackout + gmail & disruption & see # gfail + googmayharm & disruption & google bug : google may harm your computer + grammys & media & music award + horadoplaneta & awareness / charity & see # earthhour + mikeyy & disruption & worm attack in twitter + nerdpickup lines & twitter game & tweeting of phrases about computers , star wars , etc . + nfldraft & sport & people are giving advices for the nfl draft + nsotu & political & first state of the union of barrack obama + oscar & media & movie award + oscars & media & see # oscar + oscarwildeday & twitter game & competition by tweeting the best wildean remarks , pics , etc . ( game from stephen fry ) + schiphol & disruption & airline crash at amsterdam s schiphol airport + snowmageddon & disruption & storm in washington + superads09 & sport & advertisments during the super bowl + superbowl & sport & championship game of the nfl + superbowlads & sport & see # superads09 +    & +   + 25c3 & convention & conference organized by the chaos computer club + brand & twitter game & shorty awards for brands + bushfires & disruption & bushfires in australien + cebit & convention & computer expo ( cebit ) + ces & convention & see # ces09 + ces09 & convention & trade show for technology + chuck & media & see # savechuck + coalition & political & prime minister in canada won the right to suspend the parliament + davos & political & annual meeting of global political and business elites + dbi & twitter application & douche bag index is used from tweetsum to rank your followers by relevance + design & twitter game & shorty awards for design + drupalcon & convention & event for drupalcon developers ( content management system ) + geek & twitter application & see # blogger + glmagic & marketing / contest & competition to win over $ 6,000 in electronics ( from hp ) + google & disruption & see # googlemayharm + h1n1 & disruption & see # swineflu + hadopi & political & adoption of the hadopi law of control and regulation of internet access in france + house & media & unexpected suicide of lawrence kutner , one of the main characters in the series dr . house + humor & twitter game & shorty awards for humor + ie6 & activism & campaign against the usage of the ie6 + iloveyou & twitter game & call to post _ i love you _ in online social networks + inauguration & political & see # inaug09 + influenza & disruption & see # swineflu + leweb & convention & internet conference in paris ( leweb ) + phish & media & reunion show of the american rock band phish ( mar 6 - 8th , 2009 ) + pman & activism & protests against moldovas parliamentary elections + politics & twitter game & shorty awards for politics + ptavote & twitter game & ptavote platinum twitter award + rp09 & convention & conference about web 2.0 ( re : publica ) + safari & technic & see # safari4 + savechuck & activism & call to save the television program _ + skype & technic & iphone os release including the integration of skype + socialmedia & twitter application & see # blogger + swineflu & disruption & spread of the 2009 h1n1 virus ( swineflu ) + sxsw & convention & see # sxswi + ted & convention & conferences of luminary speakers + toc & convention & conference for the publishing and tech industries ( feb 9 - 11th 2009 ) + tweetbomb & twitter game & suggestion to bomb a person ( mostly celebraties ) with tweets + w2e & convention & web 2.0 expo + watchmen & media & release of the movie _ watchmen _ + web & twitter application & see # blogger +
Abstract:

Answer: micro - blogging systems such as twitter expose digital traces of social discourse with an unprecedented degree of resolution of individual behaviors . they offer an opportunity to investigate how a large - scale social system responds to exogenous or endogenous stimuli , and to disentangle the temporal , spatial and topical aspects of users activity . here we focus on spikes of collective attention in twitter , and specifically on peaks in the popularity of hashtags . users employ hashtags as a form of social annotation , to define a shared context for a specific event , topic , or meme . we analyze a large - scale record of twitter activity and find that the evolution of hashtag popularity over time defines discrete classes of hashtags . we link these dynamical classes to the events the hashtags represent and use text mining techniques to provide a semantic characterization of the hashtag classes . moreover , we track the propagation of hashtags in the twitter social network and find that epidemic spreading plays a minor role in hashtag popularity , which is mostly driven by exogenous factors . = 10000 = 10000    [ web - based services ] [ sociology ]