Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: we study heavy - ion collisions to examine the properties of the quark gluon plasma ( qgp ) . the qgp is a form of matter characterized by deconfined quarks and gluons that we expect to appear in these collisions . one of the methods available to study the qgp is by determining the modification of jets due to this medium . a jet , for the purpose of this discussion , is a shower of particles originating from a high transverse momentum ( @xmath1 ) parton .    in order to compare analytical approaches of jet modification to experimental data , a monte - carlo event generator is extremely useful due to the ability to directly simulate the physical process and to make `` measurements '' from the simulation , formulated in very close analogy to experimental observables . there are several other preexisting simulations ; q - pythia @xcite which is based on the armesto - salgado - wiedemann ( asw ) scheme @xcite and martini @xcite which is based on the arnold - moore - yaffe ( amy ) scheme @xcite . there are also a number of event generators that are not strictly based on analytical models , including jewel @xcite@xcite , yajem @xcite@xcite , and pyquen @xcite which include medium effects by manually modifying various matrix elements . generally , these simulations have handled the inclusion of a medium by taking a vacuum event generator and to either add the modification of the jet due to the medium on top of a full vacuum shower , or to alter the vacuum shower generation in such a way that both vacuum radiation and medium induced radiation are performed concurrently .    however , in addition to the technical construction of including a medium , there are two issues that should be considered when adding medium effects to a simulation . the first of which is constructing the space - time structure of the shower since the medium itself has a space - time structure . the second is a modification of hadronization ; the shower partons can potentially recombine with partons from the thermal medium . these two issues are not addressed in a copacetic fashion in the schemes mentioned previously , though we note that yajem has phenomenologically incorporated fluctuations in space - time structure @xcite . the event generator we present in this discussion is based on the higher - twist scheme @xcite@xcite@xcite@xcite . we also attempt to include a consistent space - time structure with fluctuations within the simulation . the higher - twist scheme itself is applicable to high energy , high virtuality partons , in contrast to the other schemes ( amy and asw ) that are more applicable to lower virtuality ( though still high energy ) partons . our simulation is constructed with pythia @xcite to sample the initial high @xmath1 parton , the osu ( ohio state university ) hydrodynamic simulation @xcite to provide the thermal medium , and the matter event generator @xcite for jet quenching . in the remainder of these proceedings , we will briefly discuss the higher - twist model , some details of this event generator , and present some preliminary results from the simulation compared to experimental data . the simulation begins in two parts : pythia and the osu hydrodynamic simulation . pythia was used to generate the initial hard parton for the shower . nuclear shadowing was not included , but is a planned future modification . pythia was setup with the center - of - mass energy of the collision and the @xmath1 bounds for the hard process as well as turning off final state radiation and all hadron level processes . from the produced event , the leading two partons at midrapidity ( @xmath2 ) were taken for jet quenching . multiple hard-@xmath3 bins were used to enhance statistics for high @xmath1 values ( @xmath4 ) to compenstate for the falling jet spectrum . the cross - section for each of these bins was obtained from pythia for use in subsequent calculations . the osu hydrodynamic code is an event - by - event 2 + 1d hydrodynamic simulation for relativistic heavy - ion collisions with fluctuating initial conditions . it was used to generate both a medium for jet quenching and to report the initial density profile @xmath5 for sampling the hard parton s initial location . while it could have been used to generate thermal partons and/or hadrons for the background of the jet , this was not performed for this analysis . the hard parton from pythia and the medium from the hydrodynamic simulation were then read by the matter event generator for jet showering . the matter event generator was used to simulate jet showering in both vacuum and in medium . while the parton showers generated by matter could be be used with a hadronization scheme , such as texas a&m s recombination code@xcite for hadronic results , we instead generated partonic spectra and used the kniehl - kramer - potter ( kkp ) fragmentation function@xcite to generate leading hadron spectra . in addition , fastjet was run over the generated partonic showers to generate full jets using the anti-@xmath6 algorithm with an @xmath7 for analysis . a general flowchart of this simulation is shown in fig . the jet quenching portion of the simulation was performed with the matter++ ( modular all twist transverse scattering based energy - loss routines in c++ ) event generator @xcite . it is based on the higher - twist formalism @xcite and as such it is primarily applicable to the high energy , high virtuality portion of a particular jet in the few scatterings ( meaning zero to one ) per emission limit . in this regime , light quark modification is sensitive to the high @xmath8 , low - x part of the in - medium gluon distribution . in order to introduce space - time into the shower , the notion that the uncertainty in the momentum is conjugate to the position ( and likewise , that the uncertainty in the position is conjugate to the momentum ) was used . for a reasonable uncertainty , we assert that @xmath9 . we assume a gaussian distribution around @xmath10 and insist that    @xmath11    then to obtain the @xmath12 we assume a @xmath13 distribution . thus , we obtain :    @xmath14 } \right ] } { \sqrt{2 \pi [ 2(q^{+})^{2 } / \pi ] } } \ \ .\ ] ]    the off - shell quark will have mometum @xmath15 $ ] . this allows for the parton s travel length to the next split to be determined . before the length traversed for the current parton can be calculated however , its virtuality must first be determined . this is done by sampling the sudakov form factor to obtain the maximum virtuality @xmath16 ( which is also the running scale ) of the splitting parton , which is constructed as :    @xmath17 \ \ . \end{gathered}\ ] ]    the sudakov itself gives the probability of the parton having no emission from initial virtuality @xmath18 to final virtuality @xmath19 . @xmath20 is the splitting function for a quark to split into a quark and a gluon where the final quark carries momentum @xmath21 and the gluon carries momentum @xmath22 . the single emission , multiple scattering kernel @xmath23 as a function of the momentum fraction @xmath24 and the location of the parton @xmath25 starting from location @xmath26 is :    @xmath27   \ \ , \ ] ]    where @xmath0 is the jet transport coefficient @xcite@xcite . since this simulation is based on the higher - twist scheme , multiple emissions are ordered in @xmath1 . these ordered multiple emissions are only considrered when the multiple soft scatterings mildly effect the virtuality of the parent parton . for partons where the virtuality has become too low , this calculation is no longer applicable . this means that our procedure is only valid while :    @xmath28    with this , the code can read in a high-@xmath1 parton , that was generated using pythia , and begin to generate the shower . in order to do so the entropy density of the medium is read in from the pre - run hydrodynamic simulation . this is used to modify @xmath0 in the sudakov form factor . the sudakov is sampled to return the largest virtuality allowable for the process . this virtuality is then used to determine the distance travelled by the parton before it splits . the splitting function is sampled to determine the mometum fraction @xmath24 of one of the outgoing partons . this process is repeated over the outgoing partons for each iteration until all the generated partons have a virtuality at or less than 1 gev@xmath29 , beyond which the higher twist formalism is no longer applicable . the final partons in the shower are then checked to determine if they are able to escape the medium ; this is done by removing any parton that is further than 1fm from the edge of the medium . this can remove high energy but low virtuality partons , though this is a rare occurance ; instead a planned method to deal with these partons is by handing them off to an event generator that includes a multiple scatterings per emission treatment , such as martini @xcite . the low energy , low virtuality partons that were removed are planned to be used to generate source terms for a medium response to the jet . the partons that escape the medium are then taken as the final generated shower from the matter code . jets had been produced over a range of hard @xmath3 bins : 2.5 - 52.5gev in 5gev wide bins for au+au and 2.5 - 227.5gev for pb+pb . the calculation for the nuclear modification factor @xmath30 started by taking each of these hard pt bins , weighting it by its corresponding p+p cross - section , then summing over all the aforementioned hard @xmath3 bins to get the total spectra . the nuclear modification factor @xmath30 is defined as    @xmath31    where n is the yield of jets or leading hadrons binned in @xmath1 and rapidity . the numerator in the preceeding formula also includes an integral over a range of the impact parameter @xmath32 to construct bins in centrality . the factor @xmath33 is the mean number of binary nucleon - nucleon collisions @xmath34 of a nuclear collision from a given centrality bin for @xmath35 . this gives a method of quantifying nuclear effects , as it allows for a comparison of heavy - ion data where the qgp was created to p+p events where we do not expect the presence of the qgp or other nuclear influcences such as initial state cold nuclear matter effects . the a+a cross - section in this case is just @xmath34 multiplied by the previous p+p cross - section . the kkp fragmentation function was applied to partonic spectra to obtain leading hadron ( or pion ) spectra , which were then used to calculate @xmath30 as mentioned above . the results of these calculations are given in figures 2 and 3 . these results use a @xmath36 except for leading hadron data from a+a collisions ; @xmath37 is the value of @xmath0 at the center of an averaged 0 - 5% centrality bin au+au collision .     for 200 gev au+au compared to phenix data @xcite for varying @xmath37,scaledwidth=45.0% ]     for 2.76 tev pb+pb compared to cms data @xcite with @xmath36,scaledwidth=45.0% ] as the plots above show , the simulation produces results that are consistent with experimental data . in the near future , we intend to further refine the presented results . we also plan to present further analyses including @xmath38 and jet shapes . further plans include a method of handling partons with a virtuality of 1 gev or less , incorporating medium response via a source term , including thermal hadrons , incorporating the texas a&m recombination code , and including thermal - shower recombination hadrons . with the execution of these plans we hope to see even better agreement with experimental data , to compare to more experimental data , and to predict a number of future experimental results . n.  armesto , l.  cunqueiro and c.  a.  salgado , eur . j.  c * 63 * , 679 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 009 - 1133 - 9 [ arxiv:0907.1014 [ hep - ph ] ] . n.  armesto , c.  a.  salgado and u.  a.  wiedemann , phys .  rev . d * 69 * , 114003 ( 2004 ) doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.114003 [ hep - ph/0312106 ] . b.  schenke , c.  gale and s.  jeon , phys . c * 80 * , 054913 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.054913 [ arxiv:0909.2037 [ hep - ph ] ] . g.  y.  qin , j.  ruppert , c.  gale , s.  jeon , g.  d.  moore and m.  g.  mustafa , phys . lett .   * 100 * , 072301 ( 2008 ) doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.072301 [ arxiv:0710.0605 [ hep - ph ] ] . k.  zapp , g.  ingelman , j.  rathsman , j.  stachel and u.  a.  wiedemann , eur . j.  c * 60 * , 617 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 009 - 0941 - 2 [ arxiv:0804.3568 [ hep - ph ] ] . k.  c.  zapp , f.  krauss and u.  a.  wiedemann , jhep * 1303 * , 080 ( 2013 ) doi:10.1007/jhep03(2013)080 [ arxiv:1212.1599 [ hep - ph ] ] . t.  renk , phys . c * 80 * , 044904 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.044904 [ arxiv:0906.3397 [ hep - ph ] ] . t.  renk , phys . c * 88 * , no . 5 , 054902 ( 2013 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.054902 [ arxiv:1212.0646 [ hep - ph ] ] . i.  p.  lokhtin and a.  m.  snigirev , eur . j.  c * 45 * , 211 ( 2006 ) doi:10.1140/epjc / s2005 - 02426 - 3 [ hep - ph/0506189 ] . t.  renk , phys . c * 79 * , 054906 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.79.054906 [ arxiv:0901.2818 [ hep - ph ] ] . a.  majumder , phys .  rev . d * 85 * , 014023 ( 2012 ) doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.014023 [ arxiv:0912.2987 [ nucl - th ] ] . a.  majumder , phys . c * 80 * , 031902 ( 2009 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.80.031902 [ arxiv:0810.4967 [ nucl - th ] ] . a.  majumder and c.  shen , phys . lett .   * 109 * , 202301 ( 2012 ) doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.202301 [ arxiv:1103.0809 [ hep - ph ] ] . a.  majumder and m.  van leeuwen , prog . nucl .  phys . * 66 * , 41 ( 2011 ) doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2010.09.001 [ arxiv:1002.2206 [ hep - ph ] ] . t.  sjstrand _ et al . _ , comput . commun .   * 191 * , 159 ( 2015 ) doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.01.024 [ arxiv:1410.3012 [ hep - ph ] ] . c.  shen , z.  qiu , h.  song , j.  bernhard , s.  bass and u.  heinz , comput . commun .   * 199 * , 61 ( 2016 ) doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.08.039 [ arxiv:1409.8164 [ nucl - th ] ] . a.  majumder , phys .  rev . c * 88 * , 014909 ( 2013 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.88.014909 [ arxiv:1301.5323 [ nucl - th ] ] . r.  j.  fries , k.  han and c.  m.  ko , nucl . a * 956 * , 601 ( 2016 ) . doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.02.045 b.  a.  kniehl , g.  kramer and b.  potter , nucl .  phys . b * 582 * , 514 ( 2000 ) doi:10.1016/s0550 - 3213(00)00303 - 5 [ hep - ph/0010289 ] . r.  baier , nucl . a * 715 * , 209 ( 2003 ) doi:10.1016/s0375 - 9474(02)01429-x [ hep - ph/0209038 ] . a.  majumder , phys . c * 87 * , 034905 ( 2013 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.034905 [ arxiv:1202.5295 [ nucl - th ] ] . a.  adare _ et al . _ [ phenix collaboration ] , phys . c * 87 * , no . 3 , 034911 ( 2013 ) doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.034911 [ arxiv:1208.2254 [ nucl - ex ] ] . s.  chatrchyan _ et al . _ [ cms collaboration ] , eur . j.  c * 72 * , 1945 ( 2012 ) doi:10.1140/epjc / s10052 - 012 - 1945-x [ arxiv:1202.2554 [ nucl - ex ] ] .
Abstract:

Answer: the modification of hard jets in the quark gluon plasma ( qgp ) is studied using the matter event generator . based on the higher twist formalism of energy loss , the matter event generator simulates the evolution of highly virtual partons through a medium . these partons sampled from an underlying pythia kernel undergo splitting through a combination of vacuum and medium induced emission . the momentum exchange with the medium is simulated via the jet transport coefficient @xmath0 , which is assumed to scale with the entropy density at a given location in the medium . the entropy density is obtained from a relativistic viscous fluid dynamics simulation ( vish2 + 1d ) in 2 + 1 space time dimensions . results for jet and hadron observables are presented using an independent fragmentation model . these proceedings will focus on the physics input and simulation details of the matter event generator as compared to a variety of test observables . heavy - ion , jet , nuclear modification , monte - carlo


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: boller , brand & fink 1996 ( hereafter bbf96 ) report the observation with rosat of a sample of 49 narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies ( nls1 ) , finding that nls1 have generally steeper soft x - ray continua than normal seyfert 1s . ( however , not all nls1 are remarkably steep ) . as a result , looking in the fwhm-@xmath1 plane , there are no agn with broad lines and steep x - ray spectra . bbf96 tested nls1 models assuming they are seyfert 1 galaxies with pole - on orientation , warm absorption , thick blr and smaller black hole mass and/or higher accretion rates . the latter showed some promise , but have drawbacks as well , as some nls1s do not have steep spectra , and on the other hand a smaller black hole mass does not necessarily produce narrower lines ( see sect . we suggest a simple physical explanation to the observed correlation between the soft x - ray spectral index and the h@xmath2 line width . assuming the narrower permitted lines reflects a lower keplerian velocity , we explain the observed correlation by showing that a steeper spectrum has a stronger ionizing power , and hence the blr form at a relatively larger distance from the central source . ( indeed , the characteristic distance of the blr estimated by this method , agrees well with the blr sizes determined by reverberation mapping ( wandel 1996;1997 ) ) .    below we formulate this scanario by combining the assumptions of ( 1 ) keplerian velocity doppler width for the broad lines , ( 2 ) a power - law spectrum of the ionizing continuum luminosity , and ( 3 ) characteristic values for the ionization parameter and physical conditions in the blr . we derive a simple analytic relation between the width of broad emission lines and the continuum slope of the central engine . the observed velocity dispersion is determined by the mass of the black hole and the broad line region radius . ( note however that the bh mass does not solely determine the blr velocity ; for example , in bondi accretion we have @xmath3 where @xmath4 is the accretion radius , so that @xmath5 . if the efficiency is constant , @xmath6 than @xmath7 so @xmath8 ) . our basic idea is as follows : sources with steep x - ray spectra ( for a given luminosity ) have a stronger ionizing power than sources with flat spectra . since the ionization parameter at the blr has a characteristic value , a larger ionizing power implies that the blr is formed at a relatively larger distance from the central source , and hence has a smaller velocity dispersion and a smaller observed fwhm . we make the following assumptions ( rather standard in the literature ) :    \a . the width of the broad lines is induced by keplerian motion in the gravitational potential of the central mass . the full width at half maximum is given by :    @xmath9 where m is the mass of the central black hole and r the radius of the broad line region . the physical conditions in the ionized gas emitting the broad lines are characterized by the ionization parameter u , the ratio of ionizing photons to electrons ( cf . netzer 1990 ) defined by    @xmath10 where @xmath11 is the ionizing photon flux ( number of ionizing photons per unit time ) l(e ) is the monochromatic luminosity of the central source , per unit energy , and @xmath12 is the electron density . the radius of the blr may be written as @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the ionizing luminosity , and @xmath15 , is the mean energy of the ionizing photons . analyses of the broad emission lines in various agn indicates that typical values of u for high ionization lines such as h@xmath2 in agn clouds are 0.1 - 1 and @xmath16 in the high excitation lines ( cf . rees , netzer & ferland 1989 ) so that @xmath17 . @xmath18 where @xmath19erg / s , @xmath20 and @xmath21 is in rydbergs . this value ( cf . alexander & netzer 1994 ) , is in agreement with the results from recent reverberation mapping observations ( e.g. clavel et al . 1991 , peterson et al . 1991 )    \c . assuming the energy spectrum of the luminosity emerging from the central energy source can be approximated by a power law @xmath22 we find    @xmath23    ( since we are interested only in the ionizing spectrum , between @xmath241 rydberg and a few kev , the power law assumption may be a reasonable approximation . equation 4 holds only for @xmath25 , as otherwise @xmath26 and e diverge . this divergence is not physical , as actually the hard x - ray spectrum cuts off at at 50 - 100 kev ) .    combining eqs . ( 1 ) , ( 3 ) and ( 4 ) we have    @xmath27 where @xmath28 . since we do not know the ionizing luminosity , we try to express it in terms of the x - ray luminosity and the spectral slope . the observed x - ray luminosity @xmath29 is in the rosat 0.1 - 2.4 kev band , while the ionizing luminosity extends to 1ryd=13.6ev . assuming the power law spectrum in the rosat band may be extrapolated to a lower energy @xmath30 we have for the ratio    @xmath31 where here and below @xmath30 without units indicates @xmath30 in rydbergs . substituting this in eq . ( 5 ) we have @xmath32 @xmath33 where @xmath34erg / s . we do not know the bh mass of individual objects , but we can use a mass - luminosity relation in a statistical sense , over a large enough sample of agn , as we did with the ionization parameter above . we assume that the mass is roughly proportional to the luminosity , that is , that the eddington ratio has a relatively narrow distribution , compared to the range of the luminosity distribution over the sample ( e.g. wandel and yahil 1985 ) . defining , @xmath35 where @xmath36 , we can then express the central mass in terms of the continuum x - ray luminosity , @xmath37 . substitutinging this relation in eq . ( 6 ) we have @xmath38 @xmath39    detemining @xmath30 and @xmath40 will give us a relation between the line width , the spectral index and the x - ray luminosity . the ratio @xmath41 is not known , but may be estimated from theoretical and observational arguments . the bolometic @xmath42 is often estimated to be in the range 0.1 - 1 . observational estimates of @xmath43 and @xmath41 are in the range 0.01 - 0.1 ( e.g. wandel and yahil 1985 , wandel & mushotzky 1986 ) , which may justify a choice of @xmath44 .    combining the parameters in eq . ( 8) as @xmath45 gives @xmath46 note that choosing @xmath47 is equivalent to extrapolating the power law spectrum to 1ryd , which may overestimate the ionizing luminosity , ( especially for large values of @xmath1 ) if the spectrum actually flattens at a higher energy . however , because of the weak dependence on @xmath30 , this effect is small : for example , if @xmath48 , @xmath49 and @xmath50 @xmath51 gives @xmath52 , while for @xmath53 we get 1800 km / s .    in fig . 1 we overlay the analytic relation between the fwhm and @xmath1 with the observed data from fig . ( 8) of bbf96 for different values of @xmath29 . the general shape of the observed distribution and the analytic relation of eq . ( 9 ) are in good agreement . ( note that the convergence of the theoretical curves at a photon index of 2 ( corresponding to @xmath54 ) for large fwhm is not physical ; if a high energy cutoff would have been introduced , the curves would extend also to lower values ) . using eq . ( 8) or ( 9 ) we may predict the line width from the observed luminosity and the x - ray continuum slope . figure 3a shows the predicted line width ( model ) versus the actually observed one fwhm(observed ) . ideally , one would expect all the points to be on the diagonal however , the scatter in the parameters @xmath40 and @xmath55 ( which , in the analytic model we have assumed to have a single value for all objects ) and eventualy in the spectral shape of the euv , can easily explain the scatter in the plot ; infact , it is surprising the scatter is not larger than a modest factor of  3 . the ratio between the observed fwhm and the calculated velocity is scattered about unity , and shows no significant dependence on the other observables ( @xmath29 or @xmath1 ) , as is expected if the model gives the correct dependence on these observables . the ratio appears to be weakly anticorrelated with the observed fwhm ( fig . 3b ) , in the sense that very narrow line objects give larger values for the predicted / observed fwhm ratio , and vice verca . however , the correlation coeffient is @xmath56 which is insignificant , certainly compared with the @xmath57 correlation coefficient of the predicted vs. observed fwhm . this indicates that the model probably takes the main effects into account , but there is a systematic residual dependence on the line width . what does this residual dependence tell us ? if the basic assumptions made above are correct , the bias has to be sought in the parameters . if , for example , @xmath58 depended on fwhm , so that it _ decreased _ with increasing fwhm , this would reduce the effect , since for objects with larger fwhm eq . ( 8) would give larger calculated values and vice versa . one explanation for such a dependence is that objects with narrow lines tend to have a smaller l / m ratio , that is , narrow line objects tend to have relatively smaller mass black holes . we now present a different , explanation , by showing that such a dependence does indeed follow from the well known phenomenological relation between the optical - uv luminosity ( @xmath59 ) and x - ray luminosity in agn . in transforming the black - hole mass to luminosity we have assumed that the eddington ratio ( @xmath60 ) is approximately the same for all objects . since we use the x - ray luminosity , we should actually take into account the ratio @xmath58 , or , @xmath61 . it has been shown that in large samples of agn @xmath62 ( kriss 1988 , mushotzky and wandel 1989 ; note however that there is a considerable scatter around this relation ) . if so , assuming @xmath63 const . implies ( on average ) @xmath64 we can plug this into the theoretical relation ( eq . ( 8) or ( 9 ) ) to get a phenomenological relation , which gives a modified dependence on @xmath29 : @xmath65    in order to see whether this explains the residual dependence on fwhm ( fig . 3b ) , we should express the fwhm calculated / observed ratio in terms of fwhm instead of @xmath29 . expressing @xmath29 in terms of fwhm in eq . ( 8) and using eq . ( 10 ) gives @xmath66 . since the values of fwhm calculated in fig . 3b assume a fixed value for @xmath58 , the calculated / observed fwhm ratio will have a bias of @xmath67 which agrees with the dependence seen in fig . 3b . ( 8) predicts that the x - ray luminosity of individual objects should increase in the direction normal to curves of constant @xmath29 in the fwhm-@xmath1 plane ( see fig . 1 ) . fig . 2 gives the actual observed rosat luminosities ( the size of the symbols corresponds to l ) indicating a general increase of the observed luminosities as predicted by the analytical relation . reversing eq . ( 9 ) and using the observed fwhm we have @xmath68 @xmath69 so we may calculate a _ predicted _ value for the x - ray ( rosat band ) luminosity , assuming e.g. @xmath70 ( fig . 4 ) . comparing this with the observed rosat luminosity may be an alternative test of the model . theoretically , if there were no scatter in the parameters , all objects should lie on the diagonal . the scatter in fig . 4 appears larger than in fig . 3a , since the parameters are in the fourth power . we also note that the slope of the best linear regression appears larger than unity , which reflects the residual dependence seen in fig . 3b . if we assume @xmath40 does not depend on @xmath29 , eqs . ( 11 ) and ( 12 ) give @xmath71 , approximately the right slope for the regression in fig . 2 ( eq . 8) we have assumed all objects have the same mass - luminosity ratio to derive an estimate for the black hole mass . in order to test this assumption we make below an alternative derivation with an independent estimate of the mass .    an upper limit for the black hole mass is given by ( e.g. wandel & mushotzky 1986 ) @xmath72 where @xmath73 is in seconds . this relation assumes that the bulk of the x - ray continuum is emitted within 5 schwarzschild radii , and that the variability is not affected by beaming or relativistic motions ( cf . boller et al . 1997 for an example of relativistic boosting effects in a radio - quiet , ultrasoft nls1 ) .    using the doubling time as the characteristic time for variability we determine upper limits for the black hole mass for those objects of bbf96 and wandel & mushotzky ( 1986 ) whose continuum luminosities have been observed to vary significantly . 5 gives the doubling time ( we have extrapolated amplitude variations linearely to a factor of 2 to determine @xmath73 ) versus the observed fwhm . although there is some scatter , there is a strong indication for an increase of the doubling time with observed fwhm . this may indicate that nls1 tend to have lower - mass black holes than ordinary seyfert 1 galaxies .    finally , for the objects with an established doubling time and mass upper limit , we may calculate the model velocity without having to assume any @xmath74 relation . combining eqs . ( 7 ) and ( 12 ) we have @xmath75    fig . 6a shows the predicted fwhm upper limits , and 6b - the ratio fwhm(observed)/fwhm(predicted ) , vs. fwhm(observed ) for the objects with doubling times . we see that the predicted fwhm is larger than the observed one by an average factor of 10 , which is not surprising , considering that the variability method gives only an upper limit for the mass . similarly to the photoionization method , also here the ratio shows a slight anticorrelation with the observed fwhm . we derive a simple theoretical model which explains the observed distribution of line width and spectral index for seyfert 1 galaxies . the observed velocity dispersion is determined by the mass of the black hole and the broad line region radius . sources with steep x - ray spectra ( for a given luminosity ) have a stronger ionizing power than flat - spectrum sources , which implies that the blr is formed at relatively larger distances from the central source , and hence has a smaller velocity dispersion and a smaller observed fwhm .      the model predicts a particular distribution of the luminosities in the three dimensional fwhm-@xmath76 space , which is essentially confirmed by the data . the fwhm also depends on the parameters @xmath77 ( and perhaps other parameters we are not aware of ) , as shown in eqs . ( 8) and ( 9 ) . all those parameters , however , can not be observed directly or are not available for the individual objects , so we develop and test the explicit teoretical relation for the observables that are available for the individual objects in our sample , and show that the data is consistent with the theoretical relation we derive . the dependence on the other parameters is kept in the equations , but because of our observational ignorance we assume that all objects have the same values for those parameters . this choise leads to an implicit error , which contributes to the scatter in fig . 3 . because of the weak dependence on the parameters , the expected error is relatively small , of the order of 3 for the expected parameter range . in addition to the scatter in the parameters , there may be also a systematic dependence on some of the observables , which would lead to a dependence of the predicted / observed fwhm ratio . this is shown to be the case for the parameter @xmath78 , and is treated in sect . 3.2 . in principle , also the other parameters may systematically depend on some variable , but the data required to check this ( e.g. separate determinations of @xmath79 ) for individual objects are not yet available . bbf96 searched the literature for reports of nls1 and found 46 in total . 32 of these nls1 were located in in the fields of view of rosat pointings in the public archive . only one of these 32 objects was not found above a 5 @xmath80 detection limit . walter & fink 1993 selected all seyfert 1 type agn with more than 300 counts in the rosat all - sky survey data which were observed at least once in the ultraviolet with iue . although the selection of broad and narrow - lined agn is based on these special selection criteria , there are no obviousg selection effects that can account for the absence of broad line agn with steep soft x - ray spectra . the measurements in the photon index and the h@xmath81 values are totally independent so that there is no obvious way a spurious correlation could be induced .      estimating an upper limit for the central mass directly from x - ray variability data we find that agn with narrow optical emission lines may have lower black hole masses than broad line agns ( fig . in a separate work we will consider physical parameters leading to soft x - ray spectra to further improve our model . in order to test this mass estimate , it is possible to compare the blr radius calculated from the ionizing luminosity ( e.g. eq . 2 ) or from reverberation mapping to the radius inferred from the observed fwhm and the mass estimated from the variability . doing this indicates that the variability mass tends to be larger than the real mass for low narrow - line agn ( wandel and boller 1997 ) . we have shown that sources with a steep soft x - ray spectrum will have narrower broad lines than objects with flat spectra . a question we have not touched in this work is the cause for the observed steep x - ray spectra in many nls1s . in principle , smaller central masses could produce steep soft x - ray spectra as follows . for a given accretion rate , lower mass black holes could yield a hotter accretion disk , which would radiate more energy in the soft x - ray band . x - ray reprocessing by the accretion disk would produce a soft x - ray spectrum ( matsuoka et al . 1990 , pounds et al . 1990 ) that extends to higher energies . this would make them appear to have steeper rosat spectra since there would be more flux in the soft x - ray band . this scenario will be considered in a separate work .
Abstract:

Answer: recent rosat studies of narrow - line seyfert 1 galaxies revealed these objects ( with fwhm @xmath0 ) generally show steeper soft x - ray spectra than broad line seyfert 1 s and that there are no agn with broad lines and steep x - ray spectra . we derive a simple theoretical model which explains this observed correlation between the line width and the spectral index for seyfert 1 galaxies . assuming the line width is due to gravitational velocity dispersion , it is determined by the radius of the broad line region . sources with steep x - ray spectra ( for a given luminosity ) have a stronger ionizing power than flat - spectrum sources with comparable luminosity , which implies that the blr is formed at relatively larger distances from the central source , and hence has a smaller velocity dispersion and a smaller observed fwhm . we test the model over a hetrogeneous ( normal and narrow - line ) sample of some 50 agn finding a good agreement with the data .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: stochastic resonance @xcite is one of effects demonstrating constructive role of noises in physical systems . in the stochastic resonance , a weak input signal , due to presence of a stochastic component in the system dynamics , is amplified and consequently detectable . the presence of the stochastic resonance is an universal feature of barrier crossing events over a periodically modulated potential @xcite . the seminal system demonstrating the stochastic resonance is an overdamped brownian particle moving in a double well , fourth order periodically modulated potential . the joint action of a periodic modulation and an optimal level of noise result in periodic character of transitions of a test particle over the potential barrier . consequently , a weak periodic signal ( periodic barrier modulation ) due to the presence of a noise is amplified and detectable . an analysis of the stochastic resonance @xcite is based on appropriate measures . these measures depend in a non - monotonous way on the noise intensity @xcite . an increase of the noise intensity to a certain optimal level improves the output signal quality as measured by signal - to - noise ratio , spectral power amplification , residence time distribution @xcite , probability of a given number of transitions per period of an external driving @xcite . stochastic resonance is not only a property of dynamical systems but it is also a property of level crossing triggered devices @xcite or time series sequences @xcite . usually it is assumed that noise in physical systems is gaussian . this is a direct consequence of the central limit theorem saying that a sum of independent bounded ( characterized by a finite variance ) random variables converges to the gaussian distribution . nevertheless , the gathered experimental evidence suggests that there is a need to consider a more general type of noises . the presence of a more general , heavy - tailed fluctuations has been recorded in versatility of situations : diffusion in the energy space @xcite , exciton and charge transport in polymers under conformational motion @xcite , spectral analysis of paleoclimatic @xcite and economic data @xcite , motion in optimal search strategies among randomly distributed target sites @xcite , two - dimensional rotating flows @xcite . the area of applicability of lvy stable noises is steadily growing over time including noise induced effects @xcite , epidemiology @xcite , ecology @xcite and many others . the current research extends earlier studies on the non - dynamical stochastic resonance induced by the gaussian noise . here , it is assumed that the noise is more general , i.e. the gaussian noise is replaced by the non - equilibrium , heavy tailed @xmath0-stable noise . the findings presented in the following sections extend existing studies on the role of lvy flights in physical systems . for the @xmath0-stable white noise with @xmath1 ( stability index ) , @xmath2 ( asymmetry parameter ) , i.e. for the white gaussian noise , with various threshold @xmath3 as a function of the scale parameter @xmath4 . to increase the readability of figures , recorded values of the spectral power amplification are divided by a normalization constant , which is fixed for all parameters in a figure . ] we study properties of the following system @xmath5 where @xmath6 are independent @xmath0-stable random variables distributed according to the @xmath0-stable density @xmath7 , see next paragraph . the analyzed signal @xmath8 is obtained by means of digital filtering of @xmath9 as @xmath10 such a system is an archetypal model for the non - dynamical stochastic resonance @xcite . contrary to earlier examinations , here , it is assumed that the gaussian noise is replaced by the more general @xmath0-stable noise .     for symmetric @xmath0-stable noises ( @xmath2 ) with various stability index @xmath11 as a function of the scale parameter @xmath4 . the threshold is set to @xmath12 . ] @xmath0-stable random variables are distributed according to the density function @xmath13 with the characteristic function ( @xmath14 ) @xcite @xmath15 \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\mbox{for}\;\ ;   \alpha\neq 1 , \\ \exp\left [ -\sigma|k|\left ( 1+i\beta\frac{2}{\pi}\mathrm{sgn } ( k ) \ln|k| \right ) + i\mu k \right]\\   \;\;\;\;\;\;\mbox{for}\;\ ;   \alpha= 1 . \\ \end{array } \right.\ ] ] stable densities are characterized by four parameters : the stability index @xmath0 ( @xmath16 $ ] ) , the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 ( @xmath18 $ ] ) , the scale parameter @xmath4 ( @xmath19 ) and the location parameter @xmath20 ( @xmath21 ) . the stability index @xmath0 describes asymptotic behavior of stable densities , i.e. for a large @xmath22 stable densities with @xmath23 decay as a power law @xmath24 . the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 characterizes skewness of the distribution @xcite . for @xmath2 stable densities are symmetric ones while for @xmath25 they are asymmetric . finally , @xmath4 describes the overall distribution width . in the limiting case of @xmath1 the gaussian density is recovered . in such a case , @xmath20 represents the mean value and @xmath4 stands for the standard deviation . in the further studies it is assumed that @xmath26 .    depending on the threshold value @xmath27 and noise parameters , the recorded signal @xmath8 can display some periodicity . the pronounced periodicity is observed when noise pulses are strong enough to induce threshold crossing events only when @xmath9 is close to the threshold , i.e. when @xmath28 ( assuming that @xmath29 ) , see below . the periodicity of the recorded signal can be detected by the standard measures of the stochastic resonance : spectral power amplification or signal to noise ratio . for @xmath30 ( stability index ) , @xmath12 ( threshold ) with various asymmetry parameter @xmath31 as a function of the scale parameter @xmath4 . ]    the spectral power amplification @xmath32 and the signal to noise ratio are the most common measures of the stochastic resonance @xcite . both of them are derived from power spectra @xmath33 . assuming that there is a periodic input with an angular frequency @xmath34 the spectral power amplification @xcite is given by @xmath35 where @xmath36 is a power carried in delta - like spikes of @xmath33 at the driving frequency @xmath34 , while @xmath37 is a power carried by the input signal . therefore , the spectral power amplification measures relative amplification of the output at the driving frequency . the signal to noise ratio @xcite measuring separation of the output from the noisy background is defined as @xmath38 where @xmath39 is a background level .    , i.e. the scale parameter @xmath4 leading to the largest values of the spectral power amplification , as a function of the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 . the threshold level is set to @xmath12 . various curves correspond to different values of the stability index @xmath0 . ]     as a function of the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 . the threshold level is set to @xmath12 . various curves correspond to different values of the stability index @xmath0 . ]    for @xmath1 any @xmath0-stable noise is equivalent to the gaussian noise . therefore , obtained results reproduce earlier findings on the non - dynamical stochastic resonance , see @xcite and fig .  [ fig : a20 ] . the signal to noise ratio and the spectral power amplification depend in non - monotonous way on the noise intensity @xmath4 . for a large enough threshold @xmath27 and a small noise intensity @xmath4 , the process @xmath9 is always sub - threshold , i.e. @xmath40 . consequently @xmath41 and no signal is recorded . with the increasing noise intensity , the process @xmath9 can cross the threshold @xmath27 . if the noise intensity is small , these crossings can take place only at time instants @xmath42 when @xmath43 is maximal ( closest to the threshold ) , i.e. when @xmath28 . for even larger noise intensities the exact value of @xmath44 is not important , because noise pulses are large enough to make @xmath9 supra - threshold and @xmath8 becomes insensitive to the periodic modulation @xmath44 . the described mechanism explain non - monotonous dependence of stochastic resonance measures on the noise intensity , see fig . [ fig : a20 ] . furthermore , the increase in the threshold level @xmath27 weakens the non - dynamical stochastic resonance and shifts slightly the optimal noise intensity towards larger values , see fig . [ fig : a20 ] . on the one hand , the increase in the optimal noise intensity is produced by an increasing gap between the maximal value of the periodic signal and the threshold . on the other hand , the increase in the noise intensity decreases the strength of resonance . the @xmath0-stable noise is characterized not only by the scale parameter @xmath4 but also by the stability index @xmath0 . both these parameters control the distribution width as measured by the interquantile distance ( note that @xmath0-stable distributions are characterized by the infinite variance ) . for @xmath1 , @xmath0-stable densities are equivalent to the gaussian density . [ fig : b00 ] presents the spectral power amplification @xmath32 as a function of the scale parameter @xmath4 for symmetric ( @xmath2 ) @xmath0-stable noises . various curves correspond to various values of the stability index @xmath0 . the threshold @xmath27 is set to @xmath12 . in comparison to the gaussian case ( @xmath1 ) , in the non - equilibrium regime , the optimal scale parameter @xmath45 shifts insignificantly towards larger values with the decreasing value of the stability index @xmath0 , see figs . [ fig : b00 ] and  [ fig : optimalnoise ] . moreover , the maximal values of spectral power amplification @xmath32 for symmetric noises ( @xmath2 ) significantly decay with the decrease of the stability index @xmath0 , see fig . [ fig : b00 ] . the decay of the maximal spectral power amplification originates in the increase of the distribution width with the decrease of the stability index @xmath0 . consequently , in this situation the decrease in @xmath0 acts in the same manner like the increase in the scale parameter @xmath4 , which also leads to the decay of the spectral power amplification .     for @xmath12 ( threshold ) , @xmath2 ( asymmetry parameter ) , @xmath46 ( scale parameter ) as a function of the stability index @xmath0 ( top panel ) and the spectral power amplification @xmath32 divided by the maximal spectral power amplification @xmath47 ( bottom panel ) . , title="fig : " ] +   for @xmath12 ( threshold ) , @xmath2 ( asymmetry parameter ) , @xmath46 ( scale parameter ) as a function of the stability index @xmath0 ( top panel ) and the spectral power amplification @xmath32 divided by the maximal spectral power amplification @xmath47 ( bottom panel ) . , title="fig : " ]    the asymmetry of the noise also affects the model performance . [ fig : a15 ] presents the spectral power amplification as a function of the scale parameter @xmath4 for various asymmetry parameters @xmath17 . the stability index @xmath0 is set to @xmath30 while the threshold @xmath27 is @xmath12 . @xmath0-stable densities with the stability index @xmath48 and the asymmetry parameter @xmath49 are fully skewed , i.e. for @xmath50 random numbers distributed according to these densities are always smaller than location parameter @xmath20 , which is set to @xmath26 , while for @xmath51 they are always larger than @xmath20 . consequently , when @xmath52 the process @xmath9 can be always sub - threshold , because playing with noise parameters it is possible to produce noise pulses which shift @xmath9 towards negative values and consequently makes @xmath53 . for example , such a situation is observed for @xmath12 with @xmath48 and @xmath50 and any value of the scale parameter @xmath4 . contrary to the extreme case ( @xmath48 and @xmath54 ) the changes in the asymmetry parameter lead to richer behavior of the spectral power amplification , see below . for @xmath55 , the increase in the asymmetry parameter results in weakening of the non - dynamical stochastic resonance . with increasing @xmath17 heights of recorded resonance curves decrease . at the same time width of resonance curves increase , see fig . [ fig : a15 ] , what is further confirmed in the bottom panel of fig . [ fig : sigma055 ] . figure  [ fig : optimalnoise ] presents the optimal scale parameter @xmath45 as a function of the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 . various curves correspond to different values of the stability index @xmath0 . when the stability index @xmath0 is close to 2 , i.e. the noise is close to the gaussian noise , the optimal scale parameter @xmath45 displays very weak sensitivity or lack of sensitivity to the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 because changes in @xmath17 induce only minor changes in the shape of @xmath0-stable densities . complementary fig . [ fig : maxeta ] presents the spectral power amplification corresponding to the optimal noise intensity @xmath45 , i.e. maximal values of the spectral amplification @xmath56 , as a function of the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 . various curves correspond to different values of the stability index @xmath0 . for symmetric noise ( @xmath2 ) , the decrease in the stability index @xmath0 weakens the strength of the non - dynamical stochastic resonance ( as documented in fig . [ fig : b00 ] ) . the very different situation is observed for asymmetric noises ( @xmath25 ) , when the non - dynamical stochastic resonance can be either weakened or enhanced in comparison to the reference gaussian case . for the fixed @xmath0 with the decreasing value of the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 left tail of the @xmath0-stable density becomes heavier and heavier . at the same time ( for @xmath55 ) the modal value moves to the right . therefore , a smaller scale parameter @xmath45 leads to the maximal spectral power amplification @xmath56 . the decrease in the asymmetry parameter leads to the increase in the maximal spectral power amplification @xmath56 . when @xmath0 approaches 2 changes in @xmath56 are small , because changes in the noise distribution are minimal . traditionally the system is tuned to the stochastic resonance by adjusting the scale parameter @xmath4 ( noise intensity ) . since @xmath0-stable noises are characterized by four parameters it is possible to fine tune the system by changing values of the stability index @xmath0 or the asymmetry parameter @xmath17 , see fig . [ fig : maxeta ] . top panel of fig . [ fig : sigma055 ] presents a cross section through a spectral amplification surface at a fixed value of the scale parameter @xmath46 for symmetric @xmath0-stable noises . the threshold level @xmath27 is set to @xmath12 . the well pronounced maximum of spectral power amplification is recorded at @xmath57 . the bottom panel of fig . [ fig : sigma055 ] shows fraction of the maximal spectral power amplification observed for a given value of the stability index @xmath0 , i.e. @xmath58 . the fraction of the maximal spectral power amplification is decreasing function of the stability index @xmath59 because with decreasing @xmath0 resonance curves flatten , see fig .  [ fig : a15 ] . an @xmath0-stable noise provides natural generalization of the gaussian noise . the generalized central limit theorem together with well deweloped numerical methods makes @xmath0-stable noises especially suitable for approximation of far - from - equilibrium fluctuations . analogously , like in the case of equilibrium fluctuations , non - equilibrium heavy tailed @xmath0-stable noises can induce the non - dynamical stochastic resonance . in comparison to the gaussian non - dynamical stochastic resonance , the strength of recorded resonances can be significantly enhanced or weakened by @xmath0-stable noise . in the close to gaussian regime ( @xmath60 ) the system performance display weak sensitivity to stable noise parameters . the largest sensitivity to the exact shape of noise pulses is observed in the far from gaussian regime , especially for asymmetric noises . the strength of the non - dynamical stochastic resonance is not only controlled by the scale parameter ( noise intensity ) but also by remaining noise parameters : stability index and asymmetry parameter .
Abstract:

Answer: the archetypal system demonstrating stochastic resonance is nothing more than a threshold triggered device . it consists of a periodic modulated input and noise . every time an output crosses the threshold the signal is recorded . such a digitally filtered signal is sensitive to the noise intensity . there exist the optimal value of the noise intensity resulting in the `` most '' periodic output . here , we explore properties of the non - dynamical stochastic resonance in non - equilibrium situations , i.e. when the gaussian noise is replaced by an @xmath0-stable noise . we demonstrate that non - equilibrium @xmath0-stable noises , depending on noise parameters , can either weaken or enhance the non - dynamical stochastic resonance .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: an extraordinary explosion in late 2007 brought comet 17p / holmes ( hereafter , 17p ) back to the limelight of scientific interest , more than one hundred years after it was discovered by edwin @xcite . the discovery and early interest were triggered by an earlier , double outburst @xcite . since then and until the 2007 event , 17p had received little attention due to its rather ordinary dynamical and photometric properties . 17p is a jupiter - family comet , with an orbit between mars ( perihelion @xmath5 au ) and jupiter ( aphelion @xmath6 au ) that has now experienced two explosive events separated by a comparatively quiet period of over 100 years . here we report data taken shortly after the 2007 outburst to constrain the properties of the dust coma of this comet .    like most active comets , 17p appeared optically bright owing to scattering from dust particles expelled from the nucleus by gas drag . in principle , measurements of extinction from cometary dust particles can be made by measuring the brightness of field stars when projected behind the coma of a passing comet @xcite . measurements of cometary extinction are potentially important as , when combined with measurements of the scattered light , they can provide direct estimates of the ensemble dust albedo . in extreme cases , extinction effects in cometary comae might influence the radiation budget at the nucleus and so influence the mass loss rate caused by sublimation . several such measurements have been reported @xcite but the results are mostly negative or difficult to interpret , as a result of uncertainties in the photometric data . @xcite reported an extinction of about 20% in bright comet c / hale - bopp but , unfortunately , observed through highly non - photometric skies that bring the significance of the dimming into question . even deeper events were reported in 95p / chiron by @xcite and interpreted by them as resulting from extinction in narrow , near nucleus dust jets . extinction from the diffuse coma of chiron was not detected . the bright coma of exploding comet 17p provided an opportunity to search for measurable extinction of light from field stars . the comet impulsively ejected ( 2 - 90)@xmath710@xmath8 kg of dust into the coma , with a peak production rate 3.5@xmath710@xmath9 kg / s on ut 2007 oct 24.54@xmath100.01 @xcite . these authors inferred , from surface photometry alone , an optically thick region near the nucleus subtending 0.1 arcseconds when the comet was at peak brightness . extinction was reported by four days later and at much larger angular distances from the nucleus ( 25 to 180 arcsec ) , where surface photometry indicates immeasurably low line of sight optical depths @xmath112.5@xmath710@xmath12 @xcite . ll ut date & 2007 october 29 + time of closest approach & ut 12:28:42 + heliocentric distance , @xmath13 & 2.455 au + geocentric distance , @xmath14 & 1.627 au + phase angle , @xmath15 & 15.6 + rate of motion & 26.4  hr@xmath16 + weather & photometric + telescope & uh 2.2 m + instrument & tek + pixel scale & 0.219/pixel + seeing & @xmath17 + filters ( exp . time ) & bc  ( 120 s ) , rc  ( 25 s ) , @xmath13 ( 1 s ) observations of 17p were obtained using the university of hawaii 2.2-m telescope situated atop mauna kea . the telescope was equipped with a tektronix tek charged coupled device ( ccd ) , which holds 2048@xmath72048 pixels each 0.219@xmath70.219  on the sky , and is read out in @xmath1835 s. our measurements were obtained through the hale - bopp narrowband blue continuum ( bc ; @xmath19  , @xmath20   fwhm ) and red continuum ( rc ; @xmath21  , @xmath22   fwhm ) filters @xcite . for absolute calibration purposes we obtained a number of broadband @xmath13 ( kron - cousins - type filter ) images of 17p and landolt standard stars throughout the night . to avoid saturation of the bright central region we were forced to use an integration time of 1 s , shorter than the minimum advised 5 s for the tek camera . integrations shorter than @xmath185 s suffer from a systematic spatial pattern due to the finite shutter time that is more noticeable towards the edges of the ccd . using 1 s dome flatfield images we found that within our region of interest ( near the center of the ccd as we tried to image the full circular coma ) the shutter pattern uncertainty amounts to @xmath23 . the data were calibrated using bias frames and flatfield images obtained from dithered , median - combined images of the twilight sky . the night was photometric with very stable seeing , @xmath17 . we set the telescope to track the non - sidereal rate ( 26  hr@xmath16 ) of 17p and , as a result , stellar trailing in the longer bc  exposures is comparable to the seeing . a journal of the observations can be found in table  [ table.journal ] . we identified several field stars in the projected path of the comet and selected the one ( tyc 3334 - 166 - 1 ) having the highest brightness ( @xmath24 mag ) and minimum impact parameter ( @xmath25 ) for this study ; we refer to this as star s. figure  [ fig.starpath ] shows some representative images in rc  band . by 2007 october 29 , the coma of 17p had expanded to fill the entire 7.5  field of view of the tek detector @xcite . consequently , each ccd pixel included contributions from the background sky and from the 17p coma . to measure small changes in the flux from star s it was necessary to subtract the contribution from the sky and the coma of 17p . we attempted this subtraction in two different ways . , for @xmath26 and @xmath27 . the inset shows the slope of the profile as a function of projected distance . ] firstly , we employed pair - wise subtraction of near - consecutive frames aligned on the comet nucleus . before subtraction , the frames were scaled by dividing each by the median pixel value measured in a 0.7@xmath70.7  square region centered on the comet nucleus . the point spread function ( psf ) of the star overlapped slightly in consecutive frames ( 17p moved @xmath183.9  between frames ) so we used every second frame for pair subtraction . a second method consisted of constructing `` starless '' frames by median - combining sets of three near - consecutive exposures . each median frame was then subtracted from the central of the medianed exposures . as before , the median of three consecutive exposures retained artifacts due to the star , so we used sequences 1 - 3 - 5 to construct the median to be subtracted from frame 3 . medians of 5 frames ( median of frames 1 - 3 - 5 - 7 - 9 subtracted from frame 5 ) produced similar results to 3-frame medians . neither of the methods was ideal due to the fast - expanding coma , to slight changes in the seeing , and to imperfect alignment of the nucleus in different frames . both methods left traces of the coma that were strongest near the nucleus , but that amounted to at most , 1% of the flux from star s. the following results are based on the pair - wise subtraction method which we found to produce slightly better ( less noisy ) results . ccccc @xmath28 & @xmath29 & @xmath29 & 0.04 & 13.3 + @xmath28 & @xmath30 & @xmath30 & 0.04 & 0.19 + from sb & variable & @xmath31 & 0.04 & 3.46 + from sb & variable & @xmath29 & 0.04 & 8.28 +    we performed circular aperture photometry centered on star s in each of the sky- and coma - subtracted images . tests with increasing apertures indicated that an aperture radius of 3.3  produced the most stable photometry when star s projected far from the nucleus . because of the subtraction , the flux surrounding the star should be zero , with a combined uncertainty that is approximately gaussian . however , we chose to subtract the sky measured in an annulus surrounding the star to remove local residual subtraction offset . to estimate the uncertainty in the flux from star s at position @xmath32 we used the standard deviation of the fluxes measured at that same position @xmath32 in the @xmath33 frames ( @xmath34 ) for which the star is not present in the aperture . in addition , to confer protection against small seeing variations and other time - dependent variations we employed relative photometry . for this , we used another star ( c , see fig . [ fig.starpath ] ) that lies further ( @xmath352.3 ) from the nucleus , which we measured in the same way as star s. star c ( @xmath36 mag ) lies distant enough from the bright central region of the coma that it should suffer much smaller extinction than star s @xcite . we computed the ratio of the fluxes of stars s and c as a function of time . figure  [ fig.fluxvsdistance ] shows the relative flux of stars s and c versus projected radius from the nucleus through the bc  and rc  filters . we divided the curve by its median value so that it explicitely represents the fractional dimming of star s. near closest approach to the nucleus of 17p , the star dims by about 3% in bc(at 1.7  from the nucleus ) and about 4% in rc  ( at 1.5 ) . the nearest bc  and rc  measurements occur on opposite sides of the nucleus and , for both bands , the brightness dip is visible in two separate measurements bracketing the nearest projected distance from 17p . the two bc  points are 0.6@xmath37 and 1.7@xmath37 below the median , while the two rc  points are 5.1@xmath37 and 4.0@xmath37 below the median . assuming that each pair of measurements is uncorrelated ( i.e. , their probabilities can be multiplied ) the combined significance of the two dips is 2.0@xmath37 in bc  and 6.6@xmath37 in rc . we note that both bands show a consistent trend of stronger dimming on the post - appulse side of the nucleus . this is true even though for rc  the closest post - appulse measurement lies slightly farther from the nucleus ( at @xmath38 ) than the nearest pre - appulse point . the observed dimming can be converted to an optical depth @xmath39 using @xmath40 \label{eq.tau}\ ] ] where @xmath41 is the impact parameter at which the dimming is detected , @xmath42 is the star s flux at @xmath41 and @xmath43 is the unimpeded star s flux . substituting 0.97 and 0.96 into equation ( [ eq.tau ] ) we obtain optical depths @xmath44 in bc  and @xmath45 in rc . in the remainder of the paper we use the higher significance rcoptical depth . assuming a spherically symmetric coma composed of dust particles of radius @xmath46 with a radial number density dependence @xmath47 , the optical depth along a line - of - sight to the center of the nucleus , @xmath48 , can be related to the optical depth at a projected distance @xmath41 by @xmath49 where @xmath50 , @xmath51 is measured along the line - of - sight to projected radius @xmath41 , @xmath52 is the radius of the nucleus , and the @xmath53 factor accounts for the opaqueness of the nucleus . we can use the observed coma surface brightness profile ( surface brightness versus projected radius from the nucleus , @xmath41 ) to infer the dust number density profile , @xmath47 . if we assume the latter varies proportionally to @xmath54 then by integration the former will vary proportionally to @xmath55 , where @xmath56 . figure [ fig.comasbprofile ] shows the near - nucleus surface brightness profile from our rc  data measured on a 3-wide band centered on the path of star s across the coma . the profile is steepest near the nucleus , where it approaches the canonical slope @xmath57 of a spherically symmetric , steady state coma , and is on average @xmath58 in the inner 30  of the coma . using @xmath28 with the maximum slope @xmath59 ( from @xmath27 ) , and replacing @xmath45 and @xmath60 km into equation ( [ eq.taunuctaurho ] ) we obtain @xmath61 . if , instead , we use the average inner coma slope @xmath62 we obtain @xmath63 ( table  [ table.tau ] ) . the former , larger estimate can be regarded as an upper limit to the optical depth towards the nucleus . steeper slopes than @xmath27 are generally due to solar radiation pressure which has insufficient time to act in the inner 1  ( @xmath181000 km ) of the coma @xcite .    shown as an inset in fig . [ fig.comasbprofile ] is the measured surface brightness profile slope as a function of projected radius @xmath41 , which varies from @xmath64 at @xmath65 to @xmath66 at @xmath67 . these slopes match the @xmath66 to @xmath68 found by @xcite at distances 10000 to 20000 km ( 8  to 16  in our data ) from the nucleus in data obtained a few days to a few weeks after our own observations . we can use the measured radial dependence of @xmath69 to solve numerically the integrals in equation ( [ eq.taunuctaurho ] ) and improve our estimate of the optical depth to the nucleus , @xmath48 . table  [ table.tau ] summarizes our results where , again , we used @xmath45 and @xmath60 km . because we only measure @xmath69 to within approximately @xmath70 of the nucleus we need to assume the value of @xmath71 in the innermost 1  of the coma . we consider two possibilities : the limiting case @xmath72 , and a constant @xmath73 . in both cases we obtain optical depths to the nucleus only slightly larger than unity , falling off to @xmath74 at @xmath75 . our measurement is consistent with the findings of @xcite who used coarser spatial resolution photometry on data taken around 2012 october 24.5 to conclude that the coma of 17p was optically thick only within a tiny central region , @xmath76 . they find a peak optical depth towards the nucleus @xmath77 on october 24.8 . another detection of extinction by the coma of 17p was reported by , using an ensemble of 20 stars located between 25  and 180from the nucleus of the comet . they infer optical depths @xmath78 , two to three orders of magnitude larger than the @xmath79 implied by our measurements in the region @xmath80 .      the extinction obtained in  [ sec.nucleustau ] can be combined with the measured scattered light , to provide a direct estimate of the coma dust albedo . we here use the @xmath13 band images mentioned in  [ sec.observations ] . assuming that the inner coma of 17p is spherically symmetric then the optical depth at projected radius @xmath41 from the nucleus can be written @xmath81 where @xmath82 is the projected area of the annulus centered on the nucleus with inner radius @xmath83 and outer radius @xmath84 , and @xmath85 is the total effective scattering cross - section of the dust grains within the annulus . the latter can be calculated from @xcite @xmath86}\ ] ] where @xmath87 is the red albedo of the dust grains , @xmath88 is the apparent red magnitude of the sun , and @xmath89 is the absolute red magnitude of the dust contained within the annulus defined above . equations ( [ eq.cda1 ] ) and ( [ eq.cda2 ] ) can be combined to yield @xmath90}}{2\,\rho\,\delta\rho\,\delta^2\,\tau(\rho)}.\ ] ] we take @xmath91 , @xmath92 ( 1 pixel ) , @xmath45 and calculate the magnitude of the coma in the annulus using @xmath93 where @xmath94 mag and @xmath95 mag are the absolute red magnitudes measured within the outer and inner radii of the annulus . replacing those quantities into equation [ eq.albedo ] we obtain @xmath96 .    our estimated dust albedo is significantly lower than an earlier , independent measurement using a different technique by @xcite . those authors used combined optical and infrared observations of 17p taken on 2010 october 25 - 28 to find an albedo @xmath97 . both estimates were obtained at similar phase angle , @xmath4 . interestingly , @xcite report a decrease in albedo with time , from @xmath98 on october 25 to @xmath99 on october 28 . our estimate follows the trend but we find a 5@xmath7 lower albedo just a day later , on october 29 . earlier attempts to estimate the reflectivity of cometary dust grains using stellar appulses have also found surprisingly low albedos . @xcite observed comet bowell ( 1980b ) and found a dust albedo of @xmath100 . they suggested that photons might go through two reflections ( @xmath101 ) before escaping the dust grain to reconcile their findings with the typical 4% albedo of cometary surfaces . @xcite reported an albedo @xmath102 for the coma dust of comet hale bopp . such low albedos are not unprecedented . spacecraft imaging of comet borrelly revealed very dark regions with geometric albedos @xmath103 at wavelengths @xmath104 @xcite . high - porosity carbon - based aerogels are also known to have very low albedos over a broad range of wavelengths @xcite . the least reflective carbon aerogels ( reflectivities as low as 0.003 ) are made of @xmath181 nm amorphous carbon particles and @xmath1810 nm voids resulting in bulk porosities larger than 90% . indeed , theoretical studies predict that the albedo of porous grain aggregates of small particles should decrease with increasing bulk porosity @xcite , reaching sub-1% reflectivities at void volume fraction of about 70% @xcite . the low reflectivity of carbon aerogels is due in part to strong absorption from amorphous carbon but results mostly from the rough , highly porous physical structure of the material ( silica aerogels are also highly porous but are smoother on 1 @xmath105 m scales ) . our observations and those of others may be suggesting that comet dust is highly porous and , in the case of 17p , possibly carbon - rich . we note that a significant amount of amorphous carbon is required to explain spitzer spectra of 17p taken on 2007 november 10 , only a few days after our observations @xcite . we used narrowband photometry of a background star that passed within @xmath106 of the nucleus of outbursting comet 17p / holmes to constrain the extinction optical depth of the cometary dust coma . our conclusions are as follows :    * we detect a 3 to @xmath107 dimming of the background star depending on wavelength that coincides with the nearest projected distance to the cometary nucleus . if caused by extinction due to coma dust , this dimming implies an optical depth @xmath108 to 0.04 at projected radius 1.5  from the comet nucleus . we infer that the coma was optically thick only in a tiny region , @xmath109 in radius , surrounding the nucleus . our measurements are compatible with those by @xcite but difficult to reconcile with those by . * we combine the measured extinction with photometry of the coma to estimate a dust albedo of ( @xmath110)% . our albedo estimate is 5@xmath7 lower than an independent measurement using optical and thermal observations of light scattered by the dust @xcite , but it is consistent with the darkest regions on comet borrelly , and with the dust being composed of very small , highly porous grains of carbonaceous composition . we thank yan fernndez for a very helpful review , and andrew mcneill for useful contributions to this work . we appreciate support from a nasa outer planets research grant to dj .
Abstract:

Answer: on 2007 october 29 the outbursting comet 17p / holmes passed within 0.79  of a background star . we recorded the event using optical , narrowband photometry and detect a 3% to 4% dip in stellar brightness bracketing the time of closest approach to the comet nucleus . the detected dimming implies an optical depth @xmath0 at 1.5  from the nucleus and an optical depth towards the nucleus center @xmath1 . at the time of our observations , the coma was optically thick only within @xmath2 from the nucleus . by combining the measured extinction and the scattered light from the coma we estimate a dust red geometric albedo @xmath3 at @xmath4 phase angle . our measurements place the most stringent constraints on the extinction optical depth of any cometary coma .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: heavy - ion reactions around the coulomb barrier often show a behavior that can not be accounted for by a simple potential model  @xcite . they have thus provided a good opportunity to investigate the role of internal degrees of freedom in the reaction process . one of the well known examples is a large enhancement of sub - barrier fusion cross sections due to the couplings between the relative motion of the projectile and target nuclei and their internal degrees of freedom , such as surface vibrations for spherical nuclei , or rotational motion for nuclei possessing a static , intrinsic deformation . it is well recognized that these couplings lead to a distribution of potential barriers  @xcite , and a method was proposed by rowley , satchler and stelson to extract the barrier distributions directly from experimental fusion cross sections  @xcite . the barrier distributions extracted in this way are found to be sensitive to details of the couplings , often showing a characteristic structured behavior  @xcite . similar heavy - ion barrier distributions can also be defined for large - angle quasi - elastic scattering  @xcite .    in order to analyze experimental data for these low - energy heavy - ion reactions , the coupled - channels method has been employed as a standard approach  @xcite . this method describes the reaction in terms of the internal excitations of the colliding nuclei , representing the total wave function of the system as a superposition of wave functions for the relevant reaction channels . conventionally , a few low - lying collective excitations , that are strongly coupled to the ground state , are taken into account in these calculations . such analyses have successfully accounted for the strong enhancement of sub - barrier fusion cross sections , and have successfully reproduced the structure of the fusion and quasi - elastic barrier distributions for many systems  @xcite . recently , quasi - elastic barrier distributions have been measured for the @xmath2ne + @xmath3zr systems  @xcite . the corresponding coupled - channels calculations show that the main structure of these barrier distributions is determined by the rotational excitations of the strongly deformed nucleus @xmath2ne . the calculated barrier distributions are in fact almost identical for the two systems , even when the collective excitations of the zr isotopes are taken into account . it was , therefore , surprising when the two experimental barrier distributions were found to be different in an important respect . that is , the barrier distribution for @xmath2ne + @xmath4zr exhibits a much more smeared behavior than that for the @xmath2ne + @xmath4zr system . the origin of this difference has been conjectured in ref . @xcite to be the multitude of non - collective excitations of the zr isotopes , that are generally ignored in a coupled - channels analysis . in fact , the two extra neutrons in the @xmath4zr nucleus lead to a significantly larger number of non - collective excited states compared with @xmath5zr , since this latter possesses an @xmath6 closed shell ( the difference is reflected by the number of known states up to an excitation energy of 5  mev ; one finds 35 for @xmath5zr and 87 for @xmath4zr  @xcite ) . there are many ways to describe non - collective excitations in heavy - ion reactions @xcite . in the 1970 s , weidenmller _ et al . _ introduced a random - matrix model for such excitations in order to study deep inelastic collisions  @xcite . in ref . @xcite , we have used a similar model in a schematic one - dimensional barrier - penetration problem , in order to study the role of these non - collective excitations in low - energy reactions . on the other hand , in ref . @xcite , we have explicitly taken into account in the coupled - channels formalism all of the 70 known non - collective states in @xmath1pb below 7.382  mev  @xcite without resorting to the random - matrix model , and have analysed in this way the experimental data for the @xmath0o+@xmath1pb reaction . although some discrepancies between the experimental and theoretical barrier distributions remain after the inclusion of non - collective excitations , we have shown in ref . @xcite that these excitations play a more important role as the incident energy increases . we have also compared there the role of non - collective excitations in the fusion and quasi - elastic barrier distributions , and have shown that they affect both distributions in a similar fashion .    given that exact calculations with a realistic spectrum for non - collective states is possible here , it is intriguing to also apply the random - matrix model to this system in order to test its applicability . this theoretical test is the main aim of this paper , and we achieve it by comparing our new results with those obtained in ref . note that , in contrast to @xmath1pb , the properties of the non - collective states in @xmath3zr are not known sufficiently well . as we will show in this paper , the random - matrix model provides a good method for a description of non - collective excitations in such a situation . the paper is organized as follows . in sec . ii , we explain the coupled - channels formalism with non - collective excitations based on the random - matrix model . in sec . iii , we discuss the strength distribution and fusion cross sections obtained with this model . we then compare these with calculations using the more exact couplings and discuss the applicability of the random - matrix model . the paper is summarised in sec . in order to describe internal excitations during the reaction process , we assume the following hamiltonian , @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the separation of the projectile and target nuclei , and @xmath9 is the reduced mass . in this equation , @xmath10 is the intrinsic hamiltonian with @xmath11 representing a set of internal degrees of freedom . the optical potential for the relative motion is @xmath12 , and it includes an imaginary part to simulate the fusion process ( that is , strong absorption into compound - nucleus degrees of freedom inside the coulomb barrier ) . the coupling hamiltonian between the relative motion and the intrinsic degrees of freedom is denoted by @xmath13 . the coupled - channels equations for this hamiltonian are obtained by expanding the total wave function in terms of the eigenfunctions of @xmath10 . the equations read , @xmath14u_n^{j}(r ) \nonumber&&\\   +   \sum_m v_{nm}(r)u_m^{j}(r ) = 0,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath15 is the excitation energy for the @xmath16-th channel . in deriving these equations , we have employed the iso - centrifugal approximation @xcite . in this approximation , the orbital angular momentum in the centrifugal potential is replaced by the total angular momentum  @xmath17 , thereby considerably reducing the dimension of the coupled - channels equations .    in solving these equations , we impose the following asymptotic boundary conditions , @xmath18 for @xmath19 , together with the regular boundary condition at the origin . here , @xmath20 is the wave number for the @xmath16-th channel , where @xmath21 corresponds to the entrance channel . @xmath22 is the nuclear @xmath23-matrix , and @xmath24 and @xmath25 are the incoming and the outgoing coulomb wave functions , respectively . the fusion cross sections are then obtained as @xmath26 in the random - matrix model  @xcite , one assumes an ensemble of coupling matrix elements whose first moment satisfies @xmath27 while the second moment satisfies @xmath28 here , @xmath29 is the spin of the intrinsic state labeled by @xmath16 , and @xmath30 is the coupling form factor .    in this paper , for simplicitly , we assume that the non - collective excitations couple only to the ground state , as in the linear coupling approximation employed in our previous work  @xcite . for the form factor @xmath30 , we assume the following dependence @xmath31 where @xmath32 is the level density at an excitation energy @xmath15 , and ( @xmath33 ) are adjustable parameters . the appearance of the level density in the denominator reflects the complexity of the non - collective excited states , as discussed in ref . @xcite . for the function @xmath34 , we adopt the derivative of the woods - saxon potential , that is , @xmath35 ^ 2}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that this choice of the form factor corresponds to the coupling hamiltonian in the linear coupling approximation derived from the woods - saxon potential . pb obtained as a first derivative of the fitting function @xmath36 shown in fig . [ fig7.5].,width=294 ]    pb obtained as a first derivative of the fitting function @xmath36 shown in fig . [ fig7.5].,width=294 ]    let us now apply the random - matrix model to the @xmath0o+@xmath1pb reaction and discuss its applicability . we first discuss the strength distribution for the non - collective excitations in @xmath1pb obtained with the random - matrix model . to this end , we define the strength distribution as @xmath37 this quantity essentially corresponds to the square root of eq . ( [ second_moment ] ) , except for an overall scale factor ( here we have assumed @xmath38 for all @xmath39 and omitted @xmath40 in the definition for the strength function ) .    the level density in eq . ( [ strength_dist ] ) is treated in the following way . it is originally defined by @xmath41 for a discrete spectrum . for practical purposes , we define the function @xmath42 that gives the number of levels up to the excitation energy @xmath43 . we fit this function with a polynomial in @xmath43 , and then define a continuous level density by differentiating this polynomial . figure [ fig7.5 ] shows the experimental @xmath44 for @xmath1pb @xcite in the interval between 4  mev and 7.5  mev ( solid line ) and its fit with a polynomial @xmath45 ( dashed line ) . the values of @xmath46 are @xmath47 ( mev@xmath48 ) , @xmath49 ( mev@xmath50 ) , @xmath51 ( mev@xmath52 ) , @xmath53 ( mev@xmath54 ) , @xmath55 ( mev@xmath56 ) , and @xmath57 ( mev@xmath58 ) . the continuous level density , @xmath59 , is shown in fig .  [ fig7.6 ] . pb as a function of excitation energy @xmath43 . the dashed line shows the distribution of the experimental deformation parameters , while the solid line is obtained based on the random - matrix model using eq . ( [ strength_dist ] ) . both distributions are smeared with a gaussian function with a width of 0.15  mev . an overall scaling factor is introduced to the dashed line as the dimension is different between the two curves ( see text).,width=302 ]    the strength distribution @xmath60 calculated with this level density is shown in fig .  [ comp_str_dist ] by the solid line as a function of excitation energy @xmath43 . the parameter @xmath61 in eq . ( [ strength_dist ] ) is chosen to be 7  mev , as in refs . @xcite . for comparison , the figure also shows the distribution of the experimental deformation parameters @xmath62 @xcite , smeared with a gaussian function with a width of 0.15  mev ( dashed line ) . we have also performed the same smearing for the strength distribution @xmath63 . also , since the dimensions of @xmath62 and @xmath60 are not the same , the deformation parameters @xmath64 are scaled by a factor 10 so that the heights of the first peaks at about 4.3  mev match one another . although there exists a small deviation for the peaks between 5  mev and 7  mev , the overall structure of the strength distribution is well reproduced by this model .       and ( c ) fusion barrier distributions @xmath65 for the @xmath0o + @xmath1pb system obtained from three different calculations . dashed lines show results obtained with the experimental , non - collective deformation parameters , whereas the solid lines are obtained from the random - matrix model . dotted lines result from calculations that include only the @xmath1pb collective excitations . , width=321 ]    the strength distribution discussed in the previous subsection determines the coupling strength to each excited state . let us then examine how the random - matrix model can be compared with the exact results in terms of the fusion cross sections for the @xmath0o + @xmath1pb system . for this purpose , we use the same woods - saxon potential for the nuclear potential as in ref . @xcite ; it has a surface diffuseness @xmath66  fm , a radius @xmath67 fm and a depth @xmath68 = 550  mev . for the couplings to the collective excitations , we take into account the vibrational @xmath69 state at 2.615  mev , the @xmath70 state at 3.198  mev , and the @xmath71 state at 4.085  mev in @xmath1pb . the octupole mode is included up to the two - phonon states , while the other , weaker , vibrational modes are taken into account only up to their one - phonon states . the deformation parameters for these vibrational modes are estimated from the measured electromagnetic transition probabilities . they are @xmath72 = 0.122 , @xmath73 = 0.058 , and @xmath74 = 0.058 together with a radius parameter of @xmath75=1.2  fm . although we took into account the octupole phonon state of @xmath0o in our preivous study  @xcite , for simplicity we do not include it in the present calculations , since its effect can be well described by an adiabatic renormalization of the potential depth  @xcite . for the parameter @xmath76 in eq . ( [ form_factor ] ) , we follow refs .  @xcite and use @xmath77 fm . on the other hand , the parameter @xmath78 is chosen to be @xmath79  mev@xmath80 so that the height of the main peak in the fusion barrier distribution is reproduced by the random - matrix model . figures [ fusion ] ( a ) and [ fusion ] ( b ) show the @xmath0o+@xmath1pb fusion excitation function on linear and logarithmic scales respectively . the dashed lines show the results obtained with the _ measured _ deformation parameters for the non - collective excitations , while the solid lines show the results obtained using the random - matrix approximation . for comparison , the dotted lines show results that account only for the collective excitations . although a small overall shift can be seen , it is clear that the random - matrix model reproduces the exact results reasonably well .    in order to highlight the energy dependence , fig . [ fusion ]  ( c ) shows the fusion barrier distribution @xmath81 @xcite . although the main peak is slightly shifted in energy , this confirms that the random - matrix model reproduces well the exact results . that is , with respect to the dotted line , the change in the energy dependence of fusion cross sections due to the non - collective excitations is similar in the two calculations . in particular , both barrier distributions are smeared out in a similar way at energies around 80  mev , and both calculations yield a similar second peak around 87.5  mev . ( we note that if the strength @xmath82 was somewhat larger , the second peak could appear at even higher energies , possibly reflecting the broad bump seen at around 97  mev in the experimental data . )    as we have argued in ref . @xcite , the higher - energy peaks in the barrier distribution are affected more by non - collective excitations than are the lower - energy peaks . unfortunately this is not easy to see in fig . [ fusion ] because the peaks obtained with purely collective couplings are not resolved . this difference can , however , be easily understood using perturbation theory . that is , the eigenchannels corresponding to the higher - energy peaks in the barrier distribution couple more strongly to the non - collective states via their ground state component simply because the energy differences are smaller . higher peaks are thus redistributed more , effectively removing much of their strength from that region of energy .    from these calculations , it is evident that the effects of non - collective excitations are not sensitive to details of the non - collective couplings , and that the random - matrix model is applicable to the description of non - collective excitations , so long as the relevant parameters are chosen appropriately . we have investigated the applicability of the random - matrix model for the description of non - collective excitations in low - energy heavy - ion reactions . to this end , we have calculated the fusion excitation function for the @xmath0o + @xmath1pb system , where the role of the non - collective excitations has already been investigated in our previous study using empirical deformation parameters . we have first shown that the coupling strength distribution obtained with the random - matrix model agrees well with the experimental distribution . the fusion cross section and barrier distribution for the @xmath0o + @xmath1pb system obtained with empirical non - collective couplings are also well reproduced by the random - matrix model with appropriately chosen parameters . these results provide a validation of the random - matrix model for the description of non - collective couplings .    for the @xmath1pb nucleus , detailed properties of non - collective states are known over a large energy range . however , this is not always the case for other systems . that is , for many nuclei , even though the energies and spin - parity may be relatively well known for many non - collective states , the coupling strengths are poorly determined . in such a situation , the present study suggests that the random matrix model provides a powerful tool to treat these coupling strengths . a good example is the quasi - elastic barrier distribution for the @xmath2ne + @xmath3zr systems , where it has been suggested that non - collective excitations may play an important role . analyses for these systems within the random - matrix model are under way . we shall report the results in a separate publication  @xcite . this work was supported by the global coe program `` weaving science web beyond particle - matter hierarchy '' at tohoku university , and by the japanese ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology by grant - in - aid for scientific research under the program number ( c ) 22540262 . e. piasecki ,  . widerski , w. gawlikowicz , j. jastrzebski , n. keeley , m. kisieliski , s. kliczewski , a. kordyasz , m. kowalczyk , s. khlebnikov , e. koshchiy , e. kozulin , t. krogulski , t. loktev , m. mutterer , k. piasecki , a. pirkowska , k. rusek , a. staudt , m. sillanp , s. smirnov , i. strojek , g. tiourin , w. h. trzaska , a. trzciska , k. hagino , and n. rowley , phys . c*80 * , 054613 ( 2009 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we investigate the applicability of a random - matrix model to the description of non - collective excitations in heavy - ion reactions around the coulomb barrier . to this end , we study fusion in the reaction @xmath0o + @xmath1pb , taking account of the known non - collective excitations in the @xmath1pb nucleus . we show that the random - matrix model for the corresponding couplings reproduces reasonably well the exact calculations , obtained using empirical deformation parameters . this implies that the model may provide a powerful method for systems in which the non - collective couplings are not so well known .