Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: neutrino masses constitute concrete evidence for the existence of physics beyond the standard model ( sm ) . however , much about the neutrino sector remains to be understood . it is not known whether neutrinos are dirac or majorana , or whether the pattern of neutrino masses is hierarchical , inverse hierarchical or quasi - degenerate . further , the dynamics by which the neutrinos acquire their masses , and the scale at which this occurs , are also not known . one interesting possibility is that the sm neutrinos acquire their masses at or close to the weak scale through the seesaw mechanism  @xcite . in such a scenario the dynamics underlying neutrino mass generation might be accessible to the large hadron collider ( lhc )  @xcite . this could happen in several different ways . for example , if the sm neutrinos are charged under a new @xmath2 gauge symmetry that is broken only close to the weak scale , they are prevented from acquiring mass at higher scales . in these theories a type i seesaw at the weak scale is perhaps the simplest possibility for neutrino mass generation , with some of the additional particles required for cancellation of the @xmath3 ^ 3 $ ] anomalies playing the role of right - handed ( rh ) neutrinos . such a scenario is promising for the lhc because the rh neutrinos could be pair - produced through decays of the @xmath0 gauge boson , and are in general straightforward to detect through their lepton - number - violating decays . other classes of seesaw models that are exciting for the lhc are type ii models with an @xmath1 triplet higgs at the weak scale  @xcite , and type iii models with @xmath1 triplet rh neutrinos at the weak scale  @xcite .    in this letter we show that in theories where the standard model ( sm ) neutrinos acquire majorana masses through the seesaw mechanism at the weak scale , the requirement that any pre - existing baryon asymmetry is not almost entirely washed out can be used to correlate the pattern of sm neutrino masses to the spectrum of new particles at the weak scale . then , unless the baryon asymmetry is generated at or below the weak scale , or the pre - existing baryon asymmetry is extremely large , this leads to definite predictions at the lhc for each of the three classes of seesaw models described above .    * in the case of type i seesaw models with a weak - scale @xmath0 , if the sm neutrinos are hierarchical , at least one of the rh neutrinos must be ` electrophobic ' , decaying with a strong preference into final states with muons and tauons rather than electrons . on the other hand , if the sm neutrinos exhibit an inverted ( quasi - degenerate ) pattern of masses , at least one of the rh neutrinos must be lighter than 1 tev ( 300 gev ) . * for type iii seesaw models , the corresponding upper bound for @xmath1 triplet rh neutrinos is 300  gev for inverted neutrino mass pattern and 170  gev for the quasi - degenerate case . * in the case of type ii seesaw models , a significant portion of the triplet vev and mass ( @xmath4,@xmath5 ) parameter space accessible at the lhc is disfavored . it should be noted that our objective is different from that of previous works whose purpose was to explain the matter - antimatter asymmetry thanks to leptogenesis ( for a recent review , see  @xcite ) . leptogenesis in the type i case has been extensively studied , and it was found that there exists a lower bound on the scale of leptogenesis around @xmath6  gev in the limit of hierarchical rh neutrinos  @xcite . in the type ii case , @xcite found that there is also a lower bound which points to a very high scale . similarly , the type iii was worked out in @xcite , where a similar bound was obtained . let us stress here that these bounds are in no way inconsistent with our approach , which is not concerned in any way with the mechanism whereby the baryon asymmetry was originally generated . instead we study the constraints that arise from requiring that any such asymmetry survive to low temperatures , and is not erased at the weak scale . more precisely , in this work we focus exclusively on washout , assuming that the effects responsible for the generation of the asymmetry are negligible at the weak scale .    to see the origin of the connection between the properties of the sub - tev scale fields responsible for neutrino mass generation ( i.e. singlet or triplet rh neutrinos or higgs triplet fields ) and the baryon asymmetry , note that since majorana neutrino masses necessarily violate lepton number , any mechanism whereby the sm neutrinos acquire majorana masses at the weak scale will generally lead to some amount of lepton number violation at low energies . if lepton - number - violating processes are in equilibrium at the weak scale , they can , in combination with sphalerons  @xcite , erase any pre - existing baryon asymmetry , regardless of how the baryon asymmetry originated .    as a concrete example , consider a toy type i model with a single sm lepton doublet @xmath7 that acquires a majorana mass after coupling through the higgs @xmath8 to a single rh neutrino @xmath9 that has a weak - scale mass @xmath10 . the relevant part of the lagrangian is @xmath11 at temperatures @xmath12 the rate for lepton - number - violating decays and inverse decays of @xmath9 is given by @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the sm higgs vev and @xmath15 is the sm neutrino mass . for this process to be in equilibrium , this rate must be larger than the expansion rate @xmath16 , where @xmath17 is the planck scale . lepton - number - violating decays will be in equilibrium for @xmath18 if @xmath19 . for @xmath20 of order 0.05  ev , the atmospheric scale , this condition is satisfied in our toy model , and any pre - existing baryon asymmetry will endure washout . however , whether or not the baryon asymmetry is erased in realistic seesaw models is a far more detailed question . there are several reasons for this . * since the medium distinguishes all three lepton flavors @xmath21 , @xmath22 and @xmath23 at the weak scale , and since sphalerons conserve @xmath24 , ( @xmath25 ) lepton flavor violating processes must be in equilibrium for each lepton flavor in order for the baryon asymmetry to be efficiently erased . this requires taking into account the full spectrum of neutrino masses and mixings . * the extent to which the baryon asymmetry is erased depends on the period of time that the lepton - flavor - violating processes , most importantly inverse decays , are in equilibrium . for @xmath20 of order the atmospheric scale , these processes are only in equilibrium for a short time . it then requires a careful analysis to determine how much of the original baryon asymmetry survives . the relevant boltzmann equation describing the washout process by the seesaw mediator(s ) of mass @xmath10 can be written in the general form @xmath26 where @xmath27 , @xmath28 is the @xmath24 number density over the entropy density , and @xmath29 is a generic washout term which will have to be specified in each particular case . this formulation of the washout term is consistent with leptogenesis analyses in the type i and iii cases  @xcite by setting the @xmath30 asymmetry to zero . in the type ii case @xcite , the situation is slightly more complicated since the scalar triplets carry non - zero hypercharge . as we will show explicitly in section  [ sec : typeii ] , in that case , the evolution of the scalar triplet asymmetry must be tracked as well . however , we will find that the more complicated system of equations reduces to this simple form in a certain limit . + the solution to eq . ( [ boltz ] ) can be easily obtained @xmath31,\ ] ] where @xmath32 stands for any pre - existing asymmetry at @xmath33 . one can therefore see that any pre - existing asymmetry will be _ exponentially _ washed out provided the integral is large . * the baryon asymmetry , having been erased , can in principle be regenerated by late out - of - equilibrium decays of rh neutrinos . however , if the masses of the rh neutrinos are of order the weak scale as in the case of interest , the relevant yukawa couplings are generally much too small to allow a large - enough asymmetry to be generated . however , an exception to this rule occurs if the the rh neutrinos are extremely degenerate , at the level of one part in @xmath34 , in which case resonant leptogenesis can occur  @xcite . in what follows we will assume that the rh neutrinos are not sufficiently degenerate to allow this possibility , leaving this very special case for future work . in the subsequent sections we analyse each of the three classes of seesaw models in turn , and determine the precise conditions under which the baryon asymmetry is erased , and the consequences for lhc phenomenology . we shall place limits on the spectrum of particles at the weak scale by requiring that the baryon asymmetry not be washed out by a factor greater than @xmath35 . it is important to note that these bounds can be evaded if the baryon asymmetry is generated below the weak scale , or alternatively , if the primordial baryon asymmetry generated at high scales is extremely large , of order @xmath36 or more . however , such a large primordial asymmetry can not be generated by the familiar out - of - equilibrium decays of a heavy field , but instead requires a very efficient mechanism of baryogenesis , such as the one proposed by affleck and dine  @xcite . if the lhc were to discover that these bounds are violated , it would shed new light on the mechanism that generates the baryon asymmetry of the universe . for the type i seesaw case , we assume the presence of three rh neutrinos @xmath37 , @xmath38 with masses @xmath39 around the weak scale . the washout parameter introduced in eq . ( [ boltz ] ) is given in this case by @xmath40 where @xmath41 . the washout is dominated by inverse decays @xmath42 , which can be conveniently expressed as  @xcite @xmath43 where @xmath44 is the modified bessel function , and @xmath45 with @xmath46  ev . we show in fig . [ fig:1 ] how the function @xmath47 behaves for different values of @xmath48 . note that an identical figure would be obtained in the type ii and iii cases , where only the definition of @xmath48 is different . it is useful to derive the maximum washout possible , which from fig . [ fig:1 ] is obtained for @xmath49 . in this limit ( @xmath50 ) , the integral in eq . ( [ analsol ] ) can be solved analytically  @xcite : @xmath51.\ ] ] however , more precisely , the upper bound on the integral in eq . ( [ analsol ] ) should be set by the decoupling temperature of the sphalerons . for @xmath52  gev , it is given by @xmath53  gev  @xcite . at fixed temperature @xmath54 , it can be seen from fig . [ fig:1 ] that the area below the curve @xmath55 increases as @xmath10 increases , so that the washout increases as well [ see eq . ( [ analsol ] ) ] . therefore , by imposing that the washout does not exceed a factor of @xmath56 , we will obtain upper bounds on @xmath10 . the question then is : how to know the magnitude of @xmath48 . this can be answered using the parametrization of the yukawa coupling matrix  @xcite @xmath57 where @xmath58 is the pmns mixing matrix , @xmath59 and @xmath60 are diagonal matrices for the masses of light and heavy neutrinos , respectively , and @xmath61 is a complex orthogonal matrix . using this parametrization , one can express the decay parameters in eq . ( [ decpar ] ) in the following way : @xmath62 it should be noted that @xmath63 obey the following inequality : @xmath64 without flavor effects , the washout implied would be huge . with flavor effects the washout is reduced , but one has to check to what extent .    in the case of normal hierarchy and @xmath65 , due to the small @xmath66 entry in the pmns matrix , the washout in flavor @xmath67 is typically suppressed , and it can be as low as @xmath68 , implying little washout . clearly , the washout in the other two flavors is very effective . we show below that in this case at least one rh neutrino will decay electrophobically . let us explain how this comes about by first writing the branching ratio for the decay of @xmath37 into each flavor @xmath69 : @xmath70 in the case of normal hierarchy with @xmath71 , for flavor @xmath67 the largest mass eigenstate @xmath72 is coupled to the small entry @xmath73 . one can then envisage three situations : @xmath74 , latexmath:[$|\omega_{3i}|\sim    first case , the decay will be roughly 1/3 in each flavor , but the total rate will be suppressed since it is driven by the solar scale . in the second case , both terms are comparable , implying that @xmath37 will decay typically only 8% into @xmath67 . in the third case , one obtains @xmath76 . there is a however a loophole in the first case . from the orthogonality of @xmath61 , @xmath77 , it is not possible to have @xmath74 for all @xmath78 . hence , for at least one rh neutrino , the first case is excluded and the decay will be electrophobic .    for an inverted hierarchy and @xmath79 , the situation is different because both @xmath80 and @xmath81 are roughly at the atmospheric scale , implying typically a larger washout than in the previous case . quantitatively , varying @xmath82 . in fig . [ fig : scatter ] we show the scatter plot from which this lower bound was extracted . this means that the baryon asymmetry will be washed out by more than a factor of @xmath35 when @xmath83  tev for 99% of the parameter space . thus we consider conservatively 1  tev to be the upper bound on the mass of the lightest rh neutrino . note that this result also holds when @xmath84 is allowed to take larger values , because the washout increases as @xmath85 .    for a quasi - degenerate spectrum , @xmath86  ev , the washout is expected to be even larger . it turns out that @xmath87 , implying an upper bound @xmath88  gev , a constraint stronger than the inverted hierarchy case . we present in fig . [ fig : washout ] a plot of the washout factor in eq . ( [ analsol ] ) versus the rh neutrino mass . this figure shows explicitly how the upper bound of about 300  gev was obtained .    . we find the upper bound for a washout factor lower than @xmath56 to be around 300 gev . , scaledwidth=50.0% ]      we now comment on the possibility of evading the bounds derived above in the case of inverted hierarchy or quasi - degenerate spectrum by a suitable texture in the yukawa coupling matrix for neutrinos . the question is whether the points in the parameter space which we did not consider ( e.g. points for which @xmath89 in fig . [ fig : scatter ] ) require fine - tuning of model parameters to get desired neutrino masses and mixings or not . our conclusion will be that the structure needed in order to avoid the washout is not compatible with an inverted hierarchy or a quasi - degenerate spectrum , except with a very careful tuning of the parameters . the most minimal condition for evading our bounds in the case of inverted or quasi - degenerate spectra is to reduce the washout in a particular flavor , as given below : @xmath90 where we impose that @xmath91 . let us now calculate the form of the light neutrino mass matrices from the above @xmath92 matrix structure using type i seesaw and diagonal rh neutrino mass matrix . we obtain the following three different forms : @xmath93 where @xmath94 due to the condition @xmath91 , it can be immediately seen that one eigenvalue will necessarily be suppressed , and therefore it not consistent with a quasi - degenerate spectrum .    for the case of inverted hierarchy , it can be shown that the condition to have one zero eigenvalue and two degenerate eigenvalues , i.e. @xmath95 and @xmath96 , is given by @xmath97 and @xmath98 . allowing for a small perturbation , we have a matrix of the following form [ for illustration we show only the first matrix in eq . ( [ mnuepsilon ] ) ] : @xmath99 note that the potential phase difference between @xmath100 and @xmath101 can be absorbed by making the transformation @xmath102 . diagonalizing a mass matrix of this form , it is easy to show that one mixing angle , @xmath103 , can be large , whereas the other two , @xmath104 and @xmath105 have to be small because of the smallness of @xmath106 . this is at odds with the observed large solar mixing angle , which , though not maximal , is large . it seems from the previous discussion that the observed neutrino masses and mixings constrain the possible patterns of the @xmath92 matrix in such a way that a small washout in one flavor is not expected for inverted and quasi - degenerate spectra . in order to further illustrate this point , we give two examples of known neutrino models , which lead to different neutrino mass hierarchies . [ [ l_e - l_mu - l_tau - symmetry - case ] ] @xmath107 symmetry case : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    the well - known symmetry @xmath107  @xcite predicts an inverted spectrum . one way to implement this symmetry is to use @xmath108 seesaw with the following yukawa coupling matrix : @xmath109 the @xmath110 terms denote small breaking of this symmetry . the @xmath107 charges of @xmath111 are @xmath112 respectively . the rh neutrino mass matrix in the flavor basis is given by @xmath113 in the basis where the rh neutrino masses are diagonal , it can be immediately seen that the @xmath92 matrix , @xmath114 does not allow the washout to be avoided in any flavor . one can also have examples with @xmath115 seesaw with obvious assignments under @xmath107 symmetry for the lepton doublet and singlet fields . in the strict symmetry limit , the rh neutrino mass matrix is singular . one can therefore consider a softly broken @xmath107 symmetry with a rh neutrino mass matrix of the following form : @xmath116 where the @xmath117 term breaks the symmetry softly . the yukawa matrix in this case is : @xmath118 using seesaw in the limit @xmath119 , one finds the following form for the neutrino mass matrix , which is characteristic of the inverted hierarchy : @xmath120 where @xmath121 . from eqs . ( [ majole ] ) and ( [ yukle ] ) we obtain the following @xmath92 matrix : @xmath122 which clearly does not allow for a weak washout in any flavor . [ [ quasi - degenerate - a_4-model ] ] quasi - degenerate @xmath123 model : + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +    the above conclusion holds also in models that predict quasi - degenerate neutrinos . as an example , consider a model based on discrete non - abelian @xmath123 symmetry  @xcite . the yukawa matrix in this model is given by @xmath124 where @xmath125 is a phase . since the moduli of all yukawa couplings are of the same order , any spectrum of rh neutrino masses will lead to a strong washout in all flavors .    in summary , realistic neutrino mass models do not lead to dramatic flavor effects . this is certainly true for inverted and quasi - degenerate neutrino mass spectra . only for normal hierarchy , a reduced washout by an order of magnitude in the electron flavor can be naturally achieved . this is the reason why we did not obtain any constraint in that case . the type iii seesaw has the same parameters as the type i , namely a neutrino yukawa coupling matrix @xmath126 and a majorana mass matrix @xmath10 which can be taken to be diagonal . the essential difference is that the seesaw mediators are fermionic @xmath1 triplets , with one neutral and two charged components . leptogenesis in this model was studied in  @xcite . in particular , the washout parameter in eq . ( [ boltz ] ) is given by @xmath127 where @xmath128 because the three components of the triplet contribute to the washout . we now study the constraints on the spectrum of the triplets from washout arguments . in the case of normal hierarchy and @xmath71 , a pre - existing asymmetry in flavor @xmath67 will again partially escape the washout , although not as much as in the type i case : @xmath129 , implying a maximum washout factor of @xmath130 . second , for the same reason as in the type i case , at least one of the triplets will decay electrophobically . for an inverted hierarchy and @xmath79 , we have @xmath131 . we then obtain the conservative upper bound @xmath88  gev , substantially more stringent than the corresponding type i case .    for a quasi - degenerate spectrum , @xmath132 ev , we obtain that @xmath133 . this leads to the upper bound @xmath134  gev . it is worth pointing out that the lhc has the capability to observe the triplet fermions up to 1  tev in five years of operation  @xcite . a considerable portion of this allowed range would therefore be in conflict with high - scale baryogenesis . in the type ii seesaw , neutrino masses are generated by the vev of the neutral component of scalar @xmath1 triplet @xmath135 . for our purposes , the relevant part of the lagrangian is @xmath136 where @xmath137 , and the neutrino mass matrix is given by @xmath138 it should be noted that only one triplet is able to generate three active neutrino masses , contrary to the type i and iii cases . we are interested in the case where @xmath135 mass in the 100 gev to tev range so that it is accessible at lhc  @xcite . we vary the parameter @xmath139 so that the triplet vev @xmath140 also correspondingly changes . note that electroweak @xmath141-parameter constraint implies @xmath142  gev . we will always stay far below this value . depending on the magnitude of @xmath139 , the decay of the @xmath143 will either be to a higgs pair @xmath144 or to a like - sign dilepton pair @xmath145 . which lepton pair will of course depend on the neutrino mass hierarchy ; specifically , we expect the dominant channels to be @xmath146 , @xmath147 and @xmath148 for normal hierarchy and @xmath149 and @xmath150 or @xmath151 for inverted hierarchy .    due to the presence of the scalar triplet , which carries a non - zero hypercharge , the washout is here evaluated solving a set of boltzmann equations , as presented in  @xcite . more precisely , coupled equations for the evolution of the asymmetries in the higgs field , in the scalar triplet , as well as in each lepton flavor must be solved . including flavor effects and the most relevant spectator processes , i.e. the yukawa interactions  , and imposing hypercharge conservation , which allows one to remove one equation , we obtain the following system of equations : @xmath152\ , , \nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath153 is the number of quark generations , and where we defined @xmath154 with the total triplet decay rate @xmath155 . the branching ratios in each flavor @xmath69 are given by @xmath156 where @xmath157 is the pmns matrix without majorana phases , and @xmath158 . we solve eqs . ( [ typeiieq1 ] ) and ( [ typeiieq2 ] ) with initial asymmetries in the lepton fields and higgs fields so as to satisfy hypercharge neutrality , and we obtain the region of parameters @xmath159 where the washout is greater than a factor of @xmath35 . the result is shown in fig . [ fig:2 ] for the different neutrino mass spectra . it can be seen that a substantial portion of the parameter space is disfavored by our washout argument in the case of inverted and quasi - degenerate spectra . the washout for a normal hierarchy is again suppressed , with no relevant bound . it is interesting to notice that the system of equations  ( [ typeiieq1 ] ) and ( [ typeiieq2 ] ) reduces to one equation of the form eq . ( [ boltz ] ) in the limit @xmath160 , or equivalently @xmath161 , and when the number of quark generations is large , @xmath162 . indeed , to first order in small @xmath163 , starting with zero initial asymmetry in @xmath135 , from eq . ( [ typeiieq2 ] ) it follows that @xmath164 remains negligible , and therefore it can be neglected in eq . ( [ typeiieq1 ] ) . in that case , we obtain that the washout function in eq . ( [ boltz ] ) is given by @xmath165 if the branching ratios in each lepton flavor @xmath166 are similar , as it is the case for a quasi - degenerate spectrum , it is possible to go to second order in small @xmath163 and still find a simple equation of the form eq . ( [ boltz ] ) . from eq . ( [ typeiieq2 ] ) it follows that @xmath164 will remain small if @xmath167 . strictly speaking this is only consistent if @xmath160 . replacing in eq . ( [ typeiieq1 ] ) , we obtain that the washout function in eq . ( [ boltz ] ) is given by @xmath168 the approximations  ( [ washoutiizero ] ) and ( [ washoutii ] ) were derived in the limit of a large number of quark generations , @xmath169 . for @xmath170 , we find that using eq . ( [ washoutiizero ] ) or ( [ washoutii ] ) to compute the exclusion region shown in fig . [ fig:2 ] would imply a change of less than 10% in the region @xmath161 . moreover , even though the approximation  ( [ washoutii ] ) is not strictly speaking valid for @xmath171 , or equivalently @xmath172 , it is also relatively good in that range ; the bounds presented in fig . [ fig:2 ] would become less stringent by no more than 30% . note that the yukawa interactions which redistribute the higgs asymmetry among all sm particles , and which are at the origin of the factor @xmath173 in eq . ( [ typeiieq2 ] ) , are absolutely essential to get the correct result . using strictly the equations proposed in  @xcite adding only flavor effects , and therefore neglecting these yukawa interactions , leads to an overestimation of the washout by up to 12 orders of magnitude ! the bounds presented in fig . [ fig:2 ] would then become more stringent in the region @xmath172 by up to a factor of 2 . we studied in detail the consequences of weak - scale seesaw mechanisms on any pre - existing baryon asymmetry . if it is not to be efficiently washed out , we found correlations between the pattern of neutrino masses and the spectrum of new particles at the weak scale . for type i seesaw models with a tev scale @xmath0 coupled to sm neutrinos , we found that for a normal neutrino mass hierarchy , at least one of the rh neutrinos must be ` electrophobic ' , decaying with a strong preference into final states with muons and tauons rather than electrons . for inverted or quasi - degenerate mass patterns , on the other hand , we found upper bounds on the mass of at least one rh neutrino . in particular , for an inverted mass hierarchy , this bound is 1 tev , while the corresponding upper limit in the quasi - degenerate case is 300 gev . similar results hold in type iii seesaw models , albeit with somewhat more stringent bounds . for the type ii seesaw case with a weak scale @xmath1 triplet higgs , we again found that an interesting range of higgs triplet masses is disallowed by these considerations . p.  minkowski , _ phys . lett . _ * b67 * ( 1977 ) 421 . t.  yanagida in _ workshop on unified theories , kek report 79 - 18 _ , p.  95 m.  gell - mann , p.  ramond and r.  slansky , _ supergravity _ , p.  315 . amsterdam : north holland , 1979 . s.  l. glashow , _ 1979 cargese summer institute on quarks and leptons _ , p.  687 . new york : plenum , 1980 . r.  n. mohapatra and g.  senjanovic , _ phys . _ * d23 * ( 1981 ) 165 . j.  kersten and a.  y.  smirnov , phys . d * 76 * , 073005 ( 2007 ) ; f.  del aguila and j.  a. aguilar - saavedra , arxiv:0808.2468 [ hep - ph ] . w.  konetschny and w.  kummer , phys . b * 70 * , 433 ( 1977 ) ; r.e . marshak , r. n. mohapatra invited talk given at orbis scientiae , coral gables , fla . , jan 14 - 17 , 1980 ( published in the proceedings p. 277 ) ; t.  p.  cheng and l.  f.  li , phys .  rev . d * 22 * , 2860 ( 1980 ) ; g.  lazarides , q.  shafi and c.  wetterich , nucl . b * 181 * , 287 ( 1981 ) ; j.  schechter and j.  w.  f.  valle , phys . d * 22 * , 2227 ( 1980 ) ; r.  n.  mohapatra and g.  senjanovic , phys .  rev . d * 23 * , 165 ( 1981 ) . r.  foot , h.  lew , x.  g.  he and g.  c.  joshi , z.  phys . c * 44 * , 441 ( 1989 ) . s.  davidson , e.  nardi and y.  nir , phys . rept .   * 466 * , 105 ( 2008 ) [ arxiv:0802.2962 [ hep - ph ] ] . m.  fukugita and t.  yanagida , phys . b * 174 * , 45 ( 1986 ) . s.  davidson and a.  ibarra , phys . b * 535 * , 25 ( 2002 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0202239 ] . w.  buchmuller , p.  di bari and m.  plumacher , annals phys . * 315 * , 305 ( 2005 ) . g.  f.  giudice , a.  notari , m.  raidal , a.  riotto and a.  strumia , nucl . b * 685 * , 89 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0310123 ] . t.  hambye , m.  raidal and a.  strumia , phys . b * 632 * , 667 ( 2006 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0510008 ] . t.  hambye , y.  lin , a.  notari , m.  papucci and a.  strumia , nucl . b * 695 * , 169 ( 2004 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/0312203 ] . v.  a. kuzmin , v.  a. rubakov and m.  e. shaposhnikov , _ phys . lett . _ * b155 * ( 1985 ) 36 . a.  pilaftsis , phys . d * 56 * , 5431 ( 1997 ) . a.  pilaftsis and t.  e.  j.  underwood , nucl . b * 692 * , 303 ( 2004 ) . i.  affleck and m.  dine , nucl . b * 249 * , 361 ( 1985 ) . s.  blanchet and p.  di bari , jcap * 0606 * , 023 ( 2006 )    y.  burnier , m.  laine and m.  shaposhnikov , jcap * 0602 * , 007 ( 2006 ) . j.  a. casas and a.  ibarra , _ nucl . * b618 * , 171 ( 2001 ) . s.  t.  petcov , phys . b * 110 * , 245 ( 1982 ) ; w.  grimus and l.  lavoura , phys . d * 62 * , 093012 ( 2000 ) ; a.  s.  joshipura and s.  d.  rindani , eur . j.   c * 14 * , 85 ( 2000 ) ; k.  s.  babu and r.  n.  mohapatra , phys . b * 532 * , 77 ( 2002 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we consider theories where the standard model ( sm ) neutrinos acquire masses through the seesaw mechanism at the weak scale . we show that in such a scenario , the requirement that any pre - existing baryon asymmetry , regardless of its origin , not be washed out leads to correlations between the pattern of sm neutrino masses and the spectrum of new particles at the weak scale , leading to definite predictions for the lhc . for type i seesaw models with a tev scale @xmath0 coupled to sm neutrinos , we find that for a normal neutrino mass hierarchy , at least one of the right - handed neutrinos must be ` electrophobic ' , decaying with a strong preference into final states with muons and tauons rather than electrons . for inverted or quasi - degenerate mass patterns , on the other hand , we find upper bounds on the mass of at least one right - handed neutrino . in particular , for an inverted mass hierarchy , this bound is 1 tev , while the corresponding upper limit in the quasi - degenerate case is 300 gev . similar results hold in type iii seesaw models , albeit with somewhat more stringent bounds . for the type ii seesaw case with a weak scale @xmath1 triplet higgs , we again find that an interesting range of higgs triplet masses is disallowed by these considerations .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: the phenomenon of zitterbewegung ( zb , trembling motion ) , devised in 1930 by erwin schrodinger  @xcite , has been for the last 80 years a subject of controversy and excitement . the interest in this phenomenon experienced a strong revival in 2005 , when it was demonstrated that the trembling motion can occur also in solids  @xcite . since then there has been a real surge of papers proposing zb in various periodic systems , as reviewed in  @xcite . the nature of zb in solids was investigated and it was shown that , in its `` classical '' form analogous to zb in a vacuum  @xcite , the trembling motion represents oscillations of velocity when an electron moves in a periodic potential of the lattice  @xcite . the situation resembles a roller - coaster : when the train moves upwards gaining the potential energy , it slows down ; when the train goes down losing the potential energy , it accelerates . however , in the solid state literature the largely prevailing picture is based on the bloch theorem in which electrons are treated as quasi - free particles with a modified ( effective ) mass . this picture suggests that the electrons move in a solid with a constant velocity . the same approach is used in the transport theory , in which carrier velocity is assumed constant and equal to  @xmath2 , where  @xmath3 is the wave vector and  @xmath4 is the effective mass . to the author s knowledge , there exist only two textbooks discussing an instantaneous carrier velocity in a crystal : `` wave mechanics of crystalline solids '' by r. a. smith  @xcite and `` semiconductor physics '' by p. s. kireev  @xcite . the problem arises : how to reconcile the two pictures ? this is the first purpose of our work . we show that the above question is related to the difference between carrier s momentum and quasi - momentum in a periodic potential . our second purpose is to introduce properly an effective mass of carriers . in solid state textbooks the effective mass is always defined as a quantity relating an external force to carrier s acceleration . we show that it is by far more useful to define the effective mass as a quantity relating the average carrier velocity to the quasi - momentum  @xmath5 . the `` velocity mass '' is a scalar for spherical nonparabolic energy bands  @xmath0 , whereas the `` acceleration mass '' is not . important applications of the velocity mass are indicated . in addition , we briefly describe a `` semi - relativistic '' behavior of charge carriers in narrow - gap semiconductors including monolayer graphene . this feature was discussed in the past but gained new significance with `` the rise of graphene ''  @xcite and the advancement of zitterbewegung . to ensure the completeness and continuity of presentation , we include in our exposition a few elements which are already known from the literature . as it stands , the text has both scientific and pedagogical aspects . we begin by general considerations concerned with the motion of charge carriers in crystalline solids . the hamiltonian for an electron in a periodic potential  @xmath6 is @xmath7 where  @xmath8 is the free electron mass . the periodicity signifies  @xmath9 for  @xmath10 being a lattice vector . the velocity operator is given by the hamilton equation @xmath11 the same result is obtained from the relation  @xmath12 $ ] . the acceleration operator is @xmath13   = -\frac{1}{m_0 } \frac{\partial v}{\partial { \hat{x}}_i } = \frac{1}{m_0}f_i^{pr},\ ] ] where  @xmath14 is a periodic force acting on the electron moving in a periodic potential . equation  ( 3 ) is equivalent to the second newton law of motion in an operator form . it follows from eq . ( 3 ) that the momentum operator does not commute with the hamiltonian  ( 1 ) , so it is not a constant of the motion . in consequence , the velocity of eq .  ( 2 ) and the acceleration of eq .  ( 3 ) are also not constants of the motion . it is intuitively clear that , since the potential and the resulting force in eq . ( 3 ) are periodic in  @xmath15 , the acceleration and the velocity will also be periodic functions of  @xmath15 . this result has an elementary classical interpretation . classically , the total electron energy is  @xmath16 , so if the potential energy oscillates , the kinetic energy ( i.e. , the velocity ) also oscillates to keep the total energy constant . this is , in fact , the physical origin of the trembling motion of electrons in crystalline solids , see ref . the results given in eqs . ( 2 ) and  ( 3 ) apply to any hamiltonian with a scalar potential . the specificity of a crystalline solid is that the potential is periodic , so the bloch theorem applies . thus @xmath17 where  @xmath18 is the energy of the  @xmath19-th band depending on the wave vector  @xmath3 . the bloch state is  @xmath20 in which the bloch amplitude has the same periodicity as the potential in eq . ( 1 ) , i.e.  @xmath21 . the quantity  @xmath5 is an eigenvalue of the quasi - momentum operator  @xmath22 , which should be carefully distinguished from the standard momentum operator  @xmath23 introduced in eq . the hamiltonian  ( 1 ) is invariant with respect to transformations possessing the symmetry of the potential and there should exist a constant of the motion corresponding to this invariance . this constant of the motion is precisely  @xmath5 . it means that the bloch state  @xmath24 should also be an eigenstate of the quasi - momentum  @xmath25 , i.e. there should be by definition @xmath26 we try to find an explicit expression for  @xmath22 looking for the quasi - momentum operator in the form ( see ref . @xcite ) @xmath27 in which  @xmath28 is a function of coordinates . we have @xmath29 { \psi_{n\bm k}}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] putting  @xmath30 we get  @xmath31 , so that eq . ( 5 ) is satisfied if @xmath32 in the second term in eqs . ( 7 ) and  ( 8) the differentiation acts only on the expression in parentheses . equation  ( 8) is instructive , as it shows explicitly that the operators of momentum and quasi - momentum are distinctly different . by using eqs . ( 4 ) and  ( 5 ) one easily shows that  @xmath33 , so that the quasi - momentum  @xmath34 is really a constant of the motion . to say it differently @xmath35=0,\ ] ] which means that the periodic potential  @xmath6 in eq . ( 1 ) does not change the quasi - momentum  @xmath22 whereas , as follows from eq . ( 3 ) , it periodically changes the momentum  @xmath23 and velocity  @xmath36 . still , the electron does not radiate because it is in the bloch eigenenergy state . suppose now that , in addition to the periodic potential  @xmath6 , the electron experiences an additional nonperiodic potential  @xmath37 . this potential can be due to an external field , an impurity , a defect , etc . then the total hamiltonian is @xmath38 it is easy to see that @xmath39 where  @xmath40 . thus the momentum is changed by both periodic and nonperiodic potentials , whereas the quasi - momentum is changed only by the additional nonperiodic potential . the question arises how to reconcile the oscillating electron velocity  @xmath41 described in eqs . ( 2 ) and  ( 3 ) with the velocity appearing , for example , in the transport phenomena and other kinetic effects in crystalline solids . the time - dependent instantaneous velocity is given in general in the heisenberg picture by @xmath42 and it is this velocity operator that leads to the trembling motion , see ref . let us calculate an average of  @xmath43 on the bloch state  @xmath24 . we obtain by a simple manipulation @xmath44 where  @xmath45 . thus the average velocity in the bloch state is time independent because of the basic property of eq . the average velocity has been calculated in various ways , see refs . below we use the method based on the hellmann - feynman theorem  @xcite . let us first write the schrodinger equation for the bloch amplitude . as follows from eq . ( 4 ) @xmath46 where @xmath47 depends parametrically on  @xmath3 . we have @xmath48 in which the first equality follows from the hellmann - feynman theorem . further @xmath49 so that @xmath50 the result  ( 19 ) is simple and important . it relates the average of instantaneous velocity in the bloch state  @xmath51 to the electron energy  @xmath18 given as a function of the quasi - momentum  @xmath34 . below we will consider a specific energy band , so we drop the band index  @xmath19 . now we want to associate the above results with an effective mass of charge carriers in an energy band . in textbooks one considers standard parabolic and spherical energy bands described by the energy - wave vector relation  @xmath52 , where  @xmath53 is a constant effective mass at the band edge . it is then shown that such a mass relates carrier s acceleration to an external force . however , we want to consider a more general case of spherical but nonparabolic energy bands in which the energy depends on the absolute value of the wave vector in an arbitrary way , i.e.  @xmath54 . in fact , many iii - v semiconducting compounds ( insb , inas , gasb , gaas , inp ) as well as ii - vi compounds ( hgte , cdte , hgcdte , hgse ) and their alloys possess the conduction bands of this type . in contrast to the procedure adopted in textbooks , we define an effective mass not by a relation between an external force and acceleration , but as a quantity relating the average velocity  @xmath55 to the quasi - momentum  @xmath34 . thus we _ define the effective mass _ by the equality @xmath56 where  @xmath55 is given by eq . since  @xmath55 and  @xmath34 are vectors , the mass  @xmath4 is in principle a  @xmath57 tensor . using eq . ( 19 ) and the sphericity of the band we calculate @xmath58 where in the last term we adopt the sum convention over the repeated coordinate subscript  @xmath59 . using the definition  ( 20 ) , the inverse mass tensor is @xmath60 by equating eq . ( 21 ) with eq . ( 22 ) we obtain @xmath61 thus the inverse mass tensor is a _ scalar _ for a spherical energy band @xmath62 the average velocity is finally , see eq . ( 22 ) , @xmath63 recalling that  @xmath64 , see eq .  ( 19 ) , we can write @xmath65 which shows an analogy between the average momentum in the bloch state  @xmath66 and the quasi - momentum . however , it is known that for electrons and light holes in semiconductors there is usually  @xmath67 , so that  @xmath68 . this shows once again the difference between momentum and quasi - momentum . equation  ( 25 ) represents the basic formula for velocity used in the description of charge carriers in semiconductors and metals . here we have obtained this formula with two important qualifications . first , on the left - hand side we have the _ average velocity _ of a carrier in the bloch state , not the instantaneous velocity considered in the beginning , see eq . second , on the right - hand side we have the velocity effective mass defined in eq . this mass depends in general on carrier s energy ( or wave vector ) . since the average velocity  @xmath55 is expressed by the _ first derivative _ @xmath69 , the velocity effective mass  @xmath4 is also related to the first derivative  @xmath69 . on the other hand , the `` acceleration '' effective mass  @xmath70 relating force to acceleration , as introduced in textbooks , is given by the second derivative of energy with respect to  @xmath3 , so this mass does not enter into the basic formula  ( 25 ) , unless one takes the simplest energy band described by  @xmath52 . as is easy to see , in this particular case both masses are equal to  @xmath71 . we emphasize that the velocity mass , defined in eq . ( 20 ) , is much more useful than the acceleration mass defined in textbooks . in particular , it is the velocity mass that defines carrier s mobility and is measured in various experiments . we discuss this point below .    to conclude this section , we relate the first derivative  @xmath72 to the group velocity of a carrier in a periodic potential . let us form a wave packet of bloch states @xmath73 it is assumed that the packet is narrow in  @xmath3 space and it is centered around the value of  @xmath74 . this means that in the coordinate space the packet extends over several unit cells . thus the amplitudes  @xmath75 in eq . ( 27 ) are non - vanishing only for small values of  @xmath76 . in consequence , it is possible to take an average value of  @xmath77 out of the integral sign . we further have @xmath78 the integrand on the right - hand side of eq . ( 28 ) is formally identical to that of a free particle and one may apply to this wave packet the well known arguments determining the group velocity , which gives @xmath79 where the derivative is taken at  @xmath80 . thus the average velocity given in eq . ( 19 ) is also the group velocity of the carrier . now we consider an instructive and sufficiently general example of a band structure in semiconductors in order to illustrate consequences of the above formalism . as mentioned in relation to eqs . ( 1 ) and  ( 4 ) , the bloch states are solutions to the eigenenergy equation with the hamiltonian having a periodic potential of the crystal lattice . however , it is known that , for questions related to the band structure near a specific point of the brillouin zone or to problems of carriers in external fields , it is more practical to work with the luttinger - kohn  ( lk ) representation ( see refs . @xcite and  @xcite ) . the lk functions are  @xmath81 , where  @xmath82 are the bloch periodic amplitudes taken at a fixed point  @xmath83 of the brillouin zone . we take for simplicity  @xmath84 , i.e. the zone center . it is clear that the lk amplitudes satisfy the eigenenergy equation @xmath85{u_{n 0}}=\epsilon_{n0}{u_{n 0}},\ ] ] where  @xmath86 is the energy of the  @xmath19-th band at  @xmath87 . one can show that the lk functions form a complete orthogonal set , so one can represent a bloch state as @xmath88 in which  @xmath89 are  @xmath3-dependent coefficients . the summation is over all bands  @xmath19 . what follows is the standard procedure of transforming a differential eigenvalue equation into an algebraic problem . by inserting the form  ( 31 ) into initial eq . ( 1 ) , using eq .  ( 30 ) , multiplying on the left by  @xmath90 and integrating over the unit cell , one obtains @xmath91     c_n^{n ' } = 0,\ ] ] for  @xmath92 . here @xmath93 and  @xmath94 are the interband matrix elements of momentum . equation  ( 32 ) represents an infinite set of equations for  @xmath95 coefficients and the condition of non - trivial solutions determines the energies  @xmath96 . we now assume that an energy gap  @xmath97 between the conduction and valence bands is much smaller than other gaps of interest , so we can neglect the distant bands and keep in eq . ( 32 ) only the two close bands . in addition , we neglect the free electron term  @xmath98 in the energy as it is small compared to the effective mass term , see below . taking the zero of energy in the middle of the gap , so that  @xmath99 and  @xmath100 , the set  ( 32 ) is reduced to @xmath101 where  @xmath102 and similarly for  @xmath103 . solving the above set for the energies one obtains @xmath104^{1/2},\ ] ] if we assume the simplest symmetry of the matrix elements giving  @xmath105 . here @xmath53 is the electron effective mass at the band edge . plus and minus signs correspond to the conduction and valence bands , respectively . bands described by eq . ( 34 ) are spherical and nonparabolic . for  @xmath106 one can expand the square root and obtain  @xmath107 , so that for small  @xmath108 values the bands are parabolic , while for large  @xmath108 values they are linear in  @xmath108 . using for  @xmath0 relation  ( 34 ) one can easily calculate the energy dependence of the velocity mass  @xmath4 given by eq . ( 24 ) . for the conduction band one obtains @xmath109 at the band edge  @xmath110 there is  @xmath111 , as it should be . the band - edge mass  @xmath53 in most semiconducting materials is much smaller than the free electron mass  @xmath8 , so neglecting the free electron term  @xmath98 in eq . ( 32 ) was justified . it was remarked that the two - band  @xmath112 model  ( 2bm ) for the band structure of semiconductors closely resembles the description of free relativistic electrons in a vacuum  @xcite . the hamiltonian  ( 33 ) , having the quasi - momentum terms off the diagonal , looks very much like the dirac equation without spin , while the dispersion  ( 34 ) is analogous to the relativistic relation  @xmath113 with the correspondence  @xmath114 and @xmath115 it is easy to determine the maximum velocity  @xmath116 in the 2bm @xmath117 in light of our previous considerations ,  @xmath116 is the maximum average velocity in the bloch state . the value of  @xmath116 can be determined by measuring the energy gap  @xmath97 and the band - edge mass  @xmath53 in a semiconductor material . it turns out that the velocity  @xmath116 is almost the same in different materials and is given by  @xmath118 cm / s , i.e. it is about 300 times smaller than the maximum velocity for relativistic electrons in a vacuum  @xmath119 . using eq . ( 37 ) for  @xmath116 one can rewrite eq . ( 35 ) in the form @xmath120 this is equivalent to the famous einstein formula :  @xmath121 relating the energy to the mass . the compton wavelength  @xmath122 , playing an important role in the relativistic quantum mechanics , also has a corresponding length in the two - band  @xmath112 model , see ref . @xcite @xmath123 this length determines the amplitude of zitterbewegung oscillations mentioned in the introduction , see  @xcite . in narrow - gap semiconductors one can have  @xmath124 and , since  @xmath125 , one obtains  @xmath126 , i.e. a sizable length for nanostructures . the dispersion relation  ( 34 ) can be rewritten in terms of  @xmath116 and  @xmath127 in the form @xmath128    energy - wave vector dependence in the forbidden gap of inas . various symbols show experimental data of parker and mead  @xcite , the solid line is theoretical fit using eq . the determined parameters are  @xmath127 = 41.5  and  @xmath116 = 1.33@xmath129 cm / s . after ref . @xcite.,width=321,height=321 ]    for  @xmath130 , eq . ( 40 ) describes the conduction and light - hole bands . for  @xmath131 , that is for imaginary values of  @xmath132 , this equation describes the dispersion in the gap . the latter can be determined in metal - semiconductor tunnelling experiments . in fig .  1 we show the results of parker and mead  @xcite for inas , as described by eq .  ( 40 ) with the use of adjustable parameters  @xmath116 and  @xmath127 . one obtains a very good description which confirms the validity of the two - band model for narrow - gap materials . in particular , one obtains the above mentioned large value of  @xmath127 .    regarding the phenomenon of zitterbewegung we want to emphasize the following subtle point . if one calculates the velocity operator using the matrix hamiltonian  ( 33 ) :  @xmath133 , the velocity matrix does not commute with the hamiltonian :  @xmath134 , so the velocity depends on time and it is the _ instantaneous velocity _ containing the zitterbewegung , see refs . @xcite . however , if one calculates the velocity using the energy  ( 34 ) :  @xmath135 , it is the _ average velocity _ not depending on time and given by eq . this means that the two - band model in the matrix form still `` keeps track '' of the periodic hamiltonian  ( 1 ) from which it originates , because both give the zitterbewegung . on the other hand , in the energy  ( 34 ) the track of periodicity of the original hamiltonian  ( 1 ) is already lost . one can use the lk transformation to separate the conduction and valence bands in the hamiltonian  ( 33 ) , which gives  @xmath136 corresponding to the above mentioned expansion of the square root in eq . ( 34 ) . in this case the velocity is  @xmath137 , i.e. it is the average velocity for each band with no zitterbewegung . thus the two - band model is the simplest  @xmath1 description reproducing the essential features of the initial periodic hamiltonian  ( 1 ) . finally , we want to consider briefly the important case of monolayer two - dimensional graphene in light of the above discussion . graphene s band structure near the k point of the brillouin zone is described by the hamiltonian  @xcite @xmath138 where  @xmath118 cm / s . the above form can be considered to be a special case of the two - band model  ( 33 ) with the vanishing gap  @xmath139 and properly chosen matrix elements  @xmath140 and  @xmath141 . the resulting energy dispersion is linear in quasi - momentum :  @xmath142 , where  @xmath143 . in view of our semi - relativistic analogy this case can be considered to be the `` extreme relativistic limit '' . the matrix velocity operator  @xmath133 does not commute with the hamiltonian  ( 41 ) and the instantaneous velocity contains the zb component  @xcite . the velocity  @xmath144 represents an average velocity calculated in eq . the absolute value of velocity vector for any direction is  @xmath145 . the velocity mass can still be defined as before :  @xmath146 . for the linear band dispersion one has  @xmath147 , so that  @xmath148 . this gives , as before ,  @xmath149 , see eq . one can also write  @xmath150 which means that at the band edge ( called in the literature `` the dirac point '' ) the effective mass is zero , but as the energy increases the mass increases as well . now let us suppose that an external force is applied along the  @xmath151 direction to an electron characterized by  @xmath152 . according to eq . ( 12 ) there is  @xmath153 . since for  @xmath152 there is  @xmath154 . thus the change of  @xmath155 due to the external force goes entirely into the change of the mass . in this section we consider the use of the velocity effective mass in spherical and spheroidal energy bands . at the end we mention some properties of the acceleration effective mass of charge carriers . we begin with the velocity mass  @xmath4 which , as mentioned above , is much more useful than the acceleration mass . in our considerations below we are concerned with the average electron motion related to the quasi - momentum , so we drop the sign of `` average '' over the velocity , i.e. we write  @xmath156 . the important property of the velocity mass is that it is measured in the cyclotron resonance  ( cr ) . we first demonstrate it using the classical electron motion in a magnetic field . the equation of motion is @xmath157 where  @xmath158 $ ] is a magnetic field applied along the  @xmath159 direction . using the definition  ( 20 ) of the velocity mass for a spherical band :  @xmath160 , we have @xmath161 since , as we showed above ,  @xmath4 for a nonparabolic band depends in general on electron energy , one can imagine that  @xmath4 depends also on time if the energy during the motion as not constant . however , it is well known that a constant and uniform magnetic field does not do any work , so the electron energy is a constant . for this reason we assumed  @xmath4 not to depend on time in arriving at eq . ( 43 ) . for the first two components the above equation gives @xmath162 one can now differentiate eq . ( 45 ) with respect to time , insert the result into eq . ( 44 ) and arrive at the second - order differential equation for  @xmath163 , which can be easily solved in terms of trigonometric functions . instead , we simply guess the solutions ( see ref . @xcite ) :  @xmath164 and  @xmath165 , in which  @xmath166 is the cyclotron frequency with which the electron circles on the orbit . using the above solutions one obtains from eqs . ( 44 ) and  ( 45 ) the same result @xmath167 thus the cyclotron frequency is determined by the velocity mass  @xmath4 . the cyclotron orbit can be obtained by integrating the velocity over time , which gives :  @xmath168 . this means that the classical cyclotron radius is also determined by  @xmath4 . the same result concerning the velocity mass can be obtained from the quantization of motion in a magnetic field . to be specific , we use the orbital and spin quantization resulting from the band structure of insb - type iii - v semiconducting compounds . the band structure includes three levels at the  @xmath169 point of the brillouin zone ( eight bands including spin ) . the resulting quantized orbital and spin levels are  @xcite @xmath170^{1/2},\ ] ] where @xmath171 here  @xmath172 , in which  @xmath53 is the band - edge mass [ see eq . ( 34 ) ] ,  @xmath173 is the band - edge spin lande factor and  @xmath174 is the bohr magneton . the cyclotron energy  @xmath175 is given by the energy difference between two consecutive orbital levels :  @xmath176 . using eqs .  ( 47 ) and  ( 48 ) we have @xmath177 for small magnetic fields there is  @xmath178 , so that  @xmath179 , see eq . thus , again , the cyclotron frequency is determined by the velocity effective mass  @xmath4 . the same reasoning can be applied to the so called `` inverted '' band structure of zero - gap and narrow - gap ii - vi compounds based on hgte and hgse , see  @xcite .    as mentioned above , the basic relation for the classical transport theory is  @xmath180 . this leads to the definition of carrier s mobility  @xmath181 , which involves the relaxation time  @xmath182 and the velocity mass  @xmath4  @xcite . as a consequence , the mobility is directly affected by the energy variation of  @xmath183 . some d.c . transport phenomena at high magnetic fields do not depend on the relaxation time so that , by studying them , one gains a direct access to the mass  @xmath4  @xcite . finally , the free - carrier optics depends on the band structure only through the velocity mass . and so the reflectivity depends on  @xmath184 , the magneto - reflectivity on  @xmath185 , the faraday rotation is proportional to  @xmath186 and the voigt phase shift to  @xmath187 . here the brackets denote appropriate averages over electron energies in the band  @xcite . the knowledge of  @xmath183 gives then a direct information on the band structure . another strong indication , that the velocity effective mass is much more useful than the acceleration mass , is the fact that the corresponding mass is commonly used in the special theory of relativity  ( str ) . in str this mass is defined by the relation :  @xmath188 , it is a scalar and it has the famous velocity dependence :  @xmath189 . its energy dependence is not written down so often , but it is not difficult to derive . since in str the energy is given by  @xmath190^{1/2}$ ] , the velocity is  @xmath191 , and the velocity mass is  @xmath192 . it is seen that , using the semi - relativistic analogy :  @xmath193 and  @xmath194 , the relativistic velocity mass has the same energy dependence as the effective velocity mass resulting from the two - band  @xmath112 model , eq . we mention that the relativistic velocity - dependent mass  @xmath195 is somewhat reluctantly used in str by some authors because of its unorthodox transformation properties , see  @xcite . however , the transformation problem is not relevant for solids .    to conclude our considerations of the velocity mass we treat an important case of ellipsoidal energy bands which occur in semiconducting ii - vi lead salts pbte , pbse , pbs , as well as in silicon and germanium . such an energy band with arbitrary nonparabolicity can be described by the relation  @xcite @xmath196 where  @xmath197 is a `` reasonable '' function of energy describing the nonparabolicity of the band . the limiting assumption is that the shape of the ellipsoid does not vary with the energy . we use the sum convention over the repeated coordinate indices . the tensor  @xmath198 is symmetric and it can be brought to a diagonal form by an appropriate rotation of coordinates in  @xmath3 space . then the unequal diagonal components  @xmath199 express band s ellipsoidal shape . an inverse tensor of velocity mass is defined by the relation  ( 22 ) . on the other hand , since the velocity is  @xmath200 , one obtains with the help of eq . ( 50 ) @xmath201 for a parabolic band there is  @xmath202 , and the inverse mass components are numbers . a spherical band with arbitrary nonparabolicity is described by  @xmath203 , the kronecker delta . this gives  @xmath204 , [ see eq .  ( 50 ) ] , which is equivalent to the spherical case considered above . finally , we calculate the inverse tensor of acceleration mass for a spherical nonparabolic band  @xmath0 . the general expression of the inverse mass tensor relating force to acceleration is well known @xmath205 a simple manipulation gives @xmath206 it is seen that , in contrast to the velocity mass , the acceleration mass is not a scalar quantity even for a spherical energy band . interestingly , it is the band nonparabolicity that makes the acceleration mass non - scalar . for a standard parabolic band :  @xmath52 , the second term in eq . ( 53 ) vanishes , so that  @xmath207 . this is identical with the velocity mass for a parabolic band . only in this simple case the two masses coincide . because of the non - scalar character of the acceleration mass  ( 53 ) the acceleration in a nonparabolic band is not parallel to the force . this feature is well known in the special relativity , which illustrates once again the semi - relativistic analogy . we summarize our work by enumerating the main conclusions and indicating the corresponding equations . for a carrier moving in a periodic potential , the momentum , velocity , and acceleration are not constants of the motion , see eqs . ( 1)-(3 ) . the quasi - momentum , which is a distinctly different operator from the momentum , see eq . ( 8) , is a constant of the motion in a bloch state , see eq . the average electron velocity in a bloch state is given by a gradient of the energy with respect to the quasi - momentum  @xmath5 , see eq . it is this average velocity  @xmath55 which is used in the classical transport theory for charge carriers . a `` velocity effective mass '' is defined as a quantity relating the average velocity to the quasi - momentum , see eqs . ( 20 ) and  ( 21 ) . the velocity mass for a spherical energy band is a scalar , see eq . ( 23 ) , and it enters into the basic relation for the transport theory , see eq . ( 25 ) . a two - band  @xmath1 model in the matrix form is the simplest description of the band structure that still keeps track of the periodic potential , see eq . the two - band  @xmath1 hamiltonian  ( 33 ) and the resulting energy  ( 34 ) bear strong similarity to the description of free relativistic electrons in a vacuum . in particular , they lead to an analog of the famous einstein relation between the mass and the energy , see eq . in this perspective , the band structure of gapless graphene can be regarded as an extreme relativistic case . the velocity effective mass is much more useful than the acceleration mass commonly introduced in solid state textbooks . in particular , it is the velocity mass that is measured in the cyclotron resonance , see eqs . ( 46 ) and  ( 49 ) , in d.c . transport phenomena and in the free - carrier optics . the velocity mass can also be introduced for ellipsoidal nonparabolic energy bands , see eq . ( 51 ) . 99 e. schrodinger , sitzungsber . * 24 * 418 , ( 1930 ) . schrodinger s derivation is reproduced in a. o. barut and a. j. bracken , phys . d * 23 * , 2454 ( 1981 ) . w. zawadzki , phys . b * 72 * , 085217 ( 2005 ) . j. schliemann , d. loss and r. m. westervelt , phys . lett . * 94 * , 206801 ( 2005 ) . w. zawadzki and t. m. rusin , j. phys . * 23 * , 143201 ( 2011 ) . w. zawadzki and t. m. rusin , phys . a * 374 * , 3533 ( 2010 ) . r. a. smith , _ wave mechanics of crystalline solids _ ( chapman and hall , london , 1961 ) . p. s. kireev , _ semiconductor physics _ ( mir publishers , moscow , 1975 ) . k. s. novoselov , a. k. geim , s. v. morozov , d. jiang , y. zhang , s. v. dubonos , i. v. grigorieva , and a. a. firsov , science * 306 * , 666 ( 2004 ) . n. w. ashcroft and n. m. mermin , _ solid state physics _ ( holt , rinehart and winston , new york , 1976 ) . a. i. anselm , _ introduction to the theory of semiconductors _ ( prentice hall , englewood , 1982 ) . c. kittel , _ quantum theory of solids _ ( wiley , new york , 1963 ) . c. aslangul , _ mecanique quantique , vol . 2 _ ( de boeck , bruxelles , 2008 ) . in french . j. m. luttinger and w. kohn , phys . rev . * 97 * , 869 ( 1955 ) . j. zak and w. zawadzki , phys . rev . * 145 * , 536 ( 1966 ) . w. zawadzki , in _ optical properties of solids _ , edited by e. d. heidemenakis ( gordon and breach , new york , 1970 ) , p  179 . w. zawadzki , in _ high magnetic fields in the physics of semiconductors ii _ , edited by g. landwehr and w. ossau ( world scientific , singapore , 1997 ) , p  755 . w. zawadzki , phys . b * 74 * , 205439 ( 2006 ) . g. m. parker and c. a. mead , phys lett * 21 * , 605 ( 1968 ) . t. m. rusin and w. zawadzki , phys . b * 76 * , 195439 ( 2007 ) . j. c. slonczewski and p. r. weiss , phys . rev . * 109 * , 272 ( 1958 ) . c. kittel , w. d. knight and m. a. ruderman , _ mechanics _ ( mcgraw - hill , new york , 1962 ) . r. bowers and y. yafet , phys . rev . * 115 * , 1165 ( 1959 ) . w. zawadzki , in _ narrow gap semiconductors . physics and applications _ , edited by w. zawadzki ( springer , berlin , 1980 ) , p.  85 . w. zawadzki , adv . in physics * 23 * , 435 ( 1974 ) . s. zukotynski and j. kolodziejczak , phys . solidi ( b ) * 3 * , 990 ( 1963 ) . v. a. ugarov , _ special theory of relativity _ ( mir publishers , moscow , 1977 ) . supplement by v. l. ginzburg .
Abstract:

Answer: electron dynamics in crystalline semiconductors is described by distinguishing between an instantaneous velocity related to electron s momentum and an average velocity related to its quasi - momentum in a periodic potential . it is shown that the electron velocity used in the theory of electron transport and free - carrier optics is the average electron velocity , not the instantaneous velocity . an effective mass of charge carriers in solids is considered and it is demonstrated that , in contrast to the `` acceleration '' mass introduced in textbooks , it is a `` velocity '' mass relating carrier velocity to its quasi - momentum that is a much more useful physical quantity . among other advantages , the velocity mass is a scalar for spherical but nonparabolic energy bands  @xmath0 , whereas the acceleration mass is not a scalar . important applications of the velocity mass are indicated . a two - band  @xmath1 model is introduced as the simplest example of a band structure that still keeps track of the periodic lattice potential . it is remarked that the two - band model , adequately describing narrow - gap semiconductors ( including zero - gap graphene ) , strongly resembles the special theory of relativity . instructive examples of the `` semi - relativistic '' analogy are given . the presentation has both scientific and pedagogical aspects .