Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: in recent studies on non - equilibrium thermodynamics , the entropy production rate ( ep ) has been highlighted as a promising determinant of self - organized ordered structures . the minimum ep ( minep ) principle succeeded to describe various structures self - organized in nonlinear dissipative systems  @xcite . the minep principle has its historical origin in helmholtz minimum dissipation principle that determines the velocity distribution of a stationary viscous flow  @xcite . l. onsager generalized this principle to a variational principle relating thermodynamic forces ( potentials ) and fluxes  @xcite . the minep principle proposed by i. prigogine , independently rooted in the study of linear discontinuous systems , has extended the scope ( by hypothetical studies ) toward various nonlinear systems . i. gyarmati showed the equivalence of onsager s variational principle and the minep principle in a linear dissipative system  @xcite . a literal application of ep in the variational principle , however , may lead to an improper result . for example , consider a heat diffusion on a homogeneous medium where fick s law @xmath0 ( @xmath1 : heat flux , @xmath2 : temperature , @xmath3 : diffusion coefficient ) applies . then , the total ep is the volume integral @xmath4 , which , however , is not the target of minimization leading to fourier s law ( which must be @xmath5 ) .    at the opposite pole to the expanded narrative of minep , examples of `` maximizing '' ep have been found in various non - equilibrium systems , suggesting the possibility of antithetical `` maximum ep ( maxep ) '' principle . g. w. paltridge showed , in his pioneering work  @xcite , that the atmospheric heat transfer from the tropical to the polar regions maximizes ep in a sense that the temperature contrast tends to be enhanced compared to that of simple heat diffusion ; see also  @xcite . maxep states are often found in turbulent fluid systems . ozawa  _ et al . _ @xcite pointed out that fluid - mechanical instabilities play an essential role in increasing ep a nonlinear regime . yoshida and mahajan  @xcite formulated a thermodynamic model of heat transfer through a self - organizing fluid ( plasma ) , demonstrating the bifurcation of a maxep operation mode ; it is shown that the maxep branch is stable when the system is `` flux - driven , '' i.e. the heat flux driving the non - equilibrium system is the parameter that controls the operation mode ; the opposite is a `` force - driven '' system , in which a thermodynamic force ( for instance , a temperature difference between two boundaries connected to heat baths ) is the control parameter . we note that , in usual plasma experiments ( as well as in most natural processes , like atmospheric heat transfer driven by solar heat source ) , the input power is controlled ( or , given as a determining parameter ) , which must be transferred to some heat sink in a steady state , thus the `` flux '' is the controlling parameter . on the other hand , theoretical analysis or a computational study often uses a force - driven model giving a boundary condition on the intensive quantities ( like the temperature ) . mathematically , a flux - driven condition and a force - driven condition correspond to a neumann boundary condition and a dirichlet boundary condition , respectively ( one may consider a mixed - type boundary condition if appropriate ) . statistical mechanical theories build a foundation for the use of ep as a scalar in variational principle : r. c. dewar  @xcite related ep to the count of `` paths '' in phase space by invoking jaynes formalism  @xcite . r. k. niven  @xcite proposed a different information - theoretic evaluation of ep ; he also pointed out that the driving condition ( what he calls a `` flow controlled '' system is equivalent to the aforementioned flux - driven system ) is essential to yield a maxep state .    here , we note that a `` maximum '' ep does not mean the maximization of the dissipation function in a transient / local process ; in fact , transient / local ep is bounded only from below . we say maximum or minimum by comparing the total ep of _ bifurcated _ operation points in ( quasi ) stationary states . in a general nonlinear system , total ep may be changed by a structure ( flow in a fluid / plasma system ) on a large scale , even if the ultimate dissipation occurs on a small scale ( such as the kolmogorov scale ) . the maxep state is the operating mode with the largest ep among possible modes of ( quasi ) stationary states ( other authors say `` global maximum / minimum of ep ''  @xcite ) . in view of the rich phenomenologies and various theoretical interpretations , it may be useful to develop a simple paradigm by which one can compare basic structures as well as the modes of operation ( or drive ) of systems . for this purpose , the problem of heat transfer in a plasma provides appropriate examples ; a plasma is a strongly nonlinear system which exhibits various aspects of non - equilibrium phenomena . as pointed out by yoshida and mahajan  @xcite , a typical example of bifurcation of a maxep state is the h - mode  @xcite , which is stably sustained by a given large - enough heat flux . recently formulated variational principle of non - equilibrium thermodynamics  @xcite can determine the stable operating point of a nonlinear system ( modeled by a nonlinear impedance ) , and evaluate either maximum or minimum ep depending on how the system is driven ( or sustained ) ; the min / max duality is described by a legendre transformation of a _ generalized dissipation function_.    in the present study , we discuss not only how the system is driven but also how the nonlinear impedance is `` arranged . '' in the h - mode , the nonlinearity of the thermal conduction is caused by the self - organization of a _ zonal flow _ that is directed perpendicular to the heat flow ; its strong shear suppresses the turbulence , resulting an increased impedance of heat transport . however , there is another type of self - organization of an ordered flow in fluid mechanics , known as bnard convection , and in plasma physics , called `` streamer ''  @xcite which brings about an `` opposite '' effect on heat transport ; such a flow parallels to the direction of heat flow and causes convective heat transport , resulting in a reduced impedance of heat transport . while the zonal flow blocks the thermal conduction , the streamer opens up a new channel of heat transfer . to model these two different structures by _ equivalent circuits _ , we consider two different topologies of connecting a nonlinear impedance to a `` baseline '' impedance ; one is series connection and the other is parallel connection ( here , the baseline is determined by the impedance observed when the macroscopic flow is absent , i.e. _ before _ the self - organization ) . the blocking ( series ) impedance changes from zero to a finite value as the zonal flow grows and suppresses the turbulent heat transport ( the baseline impedance is that of the turbulent heat transport ) . the bypath ( parallel ) impedance , on the other hand , changes from infinity to a finite value as the streamer glows ( the baseline impedance is that of classical heat diffusion ) . the aim of this study is to describe an abstract ( general ) balance law that dictates bifurcation , stability , and ep of operation points ( quasi - stationary macroscopic states ) in a nonlinear driven system ; such a thermodynamic relation will be `` mechanism free , '' hence specifying the mechanisms that yield nonlinear impedances or control which type of flow self - organizes is not the subject of the present practice . here we refer to a limited number of theoretical arguments on relevant mechanisms of self - organization . the creation of a zonal flow is explained by the so - called @xmath6 term in the rossby wave equation@xcite and its cousin hasgawa - mima equation of drift wave ( see a review paper@xcite ) . on the other hand , a bnard convection is caused by a buoyancy term measuring a baroclinic effect ( which is related to an inhomogeneity of entropy caused by the gravity ; see@xcite ) . a `` bifurcation '' of the zonal flow and the streamer has been studied for magnetic - curvature driven rayleigh - taylor instabilities , showing that the strength of dissipation is the control parameter@xcite . we consider a layer bounded on one side by a high temperature core plasma ( temperature @xmath2 ) and on the other side by a low temperature outer region ( heat bath with temperature @xmath7 ) . the temperature difference ( thermodynamic force ) and the heat flux are related by a thermal impedance @xmath8 as @xmath9 . when the system is flux - driven , a heat flux @xmath10 is given , and then , the inner boundary temperature @xmath2 is a dependent variable . on the other hand , in a temperature - driven system , the temperature difference @xmath11 is given , and @xmath10 is a dependent variable . we start by reviewing the thermodynamic model of h - mode / zonal flow self - organization  @xcite . in a turbulent heat transport , the thermal impedance @xmath8 may be written as a sum of two components @xmath12 ; @xmath13 represents the background ( baseline ) turbulent heat transport , and @xmath14 represents a blocking impedance modeling the suppression of turbulent heat transport by a zonal flow . the nonlinear impedance @xmath14 is a function of the available power @xmath15 to create the flow . for simplicity , we assume a simple form @xmath16 where @xmath17 is a positive constant modeling the increase of the blocking impedance by creation of a zonal flow . the essential nonlinearity of this system is brought about by the power @xmath15 that obeys the thermodynamic second law . in an ideal ( quasi - stationary ) process ( carnot s cycle ) , the maximum available power as @xmath18 . however , the entropy production in the ( turbulent ) diffusion process diminishes the effective power : denoting @xmath19 , we estimate @xmath20 the force ( temperature difference ) and flux are related by the impedance : @xmath21f.\ ] ] the operating point is determined by eqs . ( [ e : eta_p ] ) , ( [ e : p_series ] ) and ( [ e : series operating point ] ) . the equivalent circuit of eq . ( [ e : series operating point ] ) is shown in fig . [ f : circuit ] ( a ) . next we formulate a model of streamer ( bnard convection ) . since a streamer creates a new route of heat conduction in parallel to the ambient ( baseline ) diffusion path , we consider a parallel - connection circuit such as fig . [ f : circuit ] ( b ) . in terms of a baseline conductance @xmath22 ( assumed to be a constant ) and a nonlinear conductance @xmath23 , the flux @xmath10 and the temperature @xmath2 are related by @xmath24(t - t_0).\ ] ] the heat flow is ( conceptually ) divided into two channels ; @xmath25 in the baseline conductance and @xmath26 in the nonlinear conductance ; see fig .  [ f : circuit ] ( b ) . we assume that the nonlinear conductance @xmath23 is written as @xmath27 where @xmath28 and @xmath29 are constants . the reason why we need the second - order term @xmath30 will be explained later . the power @xmath15 is determined by ( [ e : p_series ] ) ; here we rewrite it as @xmath31 . \label{e : p_parallel}\ ] ] the operating point is determined by eqs . ( [ e : parallel operating point ] ) , ( [ e : chi_p ] ) and ( [ e : p_parallel ] ) .    one may solve the series model eq . ( [ e : series operating point ] ) or the parallel model eq . ( [ e : parallel operating point ] ) either for @xmath2 ( with respect to a given @xmath10 ) or @xmath10 ( with respect to a given @xmath2 ) . since the series model has been analyzed in @xcite , we focus on the parallel model . solving eqs . ( [ e : parallel operating point ] ) , ( [ e : chi_p ] ) and ( [ e : p_parallel ] ) for @xmath10 , we obtain two branches : @xmath32 & ( t\ge t_\mathrm{c})\\          \end{array }      \ri.,\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath33 is threshold temperature at which the bifurcation occurs . evidently , @xmath34 corresponds to baseline _ linear state _ , while @xmath35 ( achieved by @xmath36 ) represents the _ nonlinear state _ with a streamer ; see fig . [ f : operating point ]  ( a ) .    by these solutions , we find that the critical temperature @xmath37 is determined only by @xmath28 . the bifurcation of the nonlinear solution occurs for every positive @xmath28 ; this is in marked contrast to the zonal - flow ( series ) model in which the bifurcation needs a sufficiently large @xmath17  @xcite . we also find that the nonlinear solution becomes singular if @xmath38 ; a higher order nonlinearity of @xmath23 determines @xmath39 . in the temperature - driven system , the nonlinear solution in the regime of @xmath40 is unphysical , because the condition @xmath41 makes the power @xmath15 negative ; see eq . ( [ e : p_parallel ] ) . the flux - driven system is more complicated because the nonlinear solution @xmath42 is given as an implicit function . in fig . [ f : operating point ] , we plot the numerical solution of the operating points . in the temperature - driven system the nonlinear solution must enhance the heat flux , thus we have to assume @xmath43 . while the force - driven system has physical solution only for @xmath43 , the flux - driven system has physical solutions for every @xmath29 , satisfying @xmath44 . if @xmath45 , @xmath2 increases monotonically with @xmath10 . the temperature difference diminishes when @xmath29 approaches 0 , and , @xmath46 ( constant ) for all @xmath10 when @xmath47 . with a positive @xmath29 , @xmath2 decreases monotonically with the increase in @xmath10 , and approaches @xmath7 . in fig . [ f : chi ] , we plot the conductance @xmath48 of the flux - driven system as a function of @xmath10 . if @xmath45 , the nonlinear conductance converges to @xmath22 in the limit of @xmath49 .     and @xmath50 . in ( a ) the nonlinear branch with @xmath51 is unphysical , since the corresponding power @xmath15 becomes negative.,scaledwidth=45.0% ]     of the flux - driven system , plotted as a function of the heat flux @xmath10.,scaledwidth=43.0% ] we analyze the stability of each branch , and determine which branch is realized . we start by the temperature - driven system . we fix the temperature @xmath2 and define the total conductance @xmath52 . the following chain of events is caused by a fluctuation @xmath53 in the heat flux : @xmath54 the factor @xmath55 scales the amplification of fluctuation @xmath53 . the system is stable ( unstable ) if @xmath56 ( @xmath57 ) . the first step of the events requires certain amount of time while other events can occur simultaneously . when @xmath58 is the time period of one cycle , the flux perturbation grows or diminishes as @xmath59 . the amplification factor of linear solution is estimated as @xmath60 on the other hand , the amplification factor of the nonlinear solution is @xmath61 evidently , @xmath62 for @xmath63 , while @xmath64 and @xmath65 for @xmath66 . therefore , the linear solution , which is the unique and stable solution in @xmath63 , is destabilized at the bifurcation point @xmath67 , and , beyond the bifurcation , the nonlinear branch takes over the linear ( smaller @xmath10 ) solution as the stable branch . next , we study the stability of the flux - driven system . in this case , it is difficult to display the amplification factor explicitly . here we consider the chain of events caused by a fluctuation @xmath68 in the temperature : @xmath69 we plot the numerical estimate of the amplification factor of each branch in fig . [ f : stability ] . the linear solution destabilizes beyond the critical flux @xmath70 , and the bifurcated nonlinear branch is stable for every value of @xmath29 . ( the critical flux of bifurcation ) . in @xmath71 , the nonlinear branch ( dashed lines ) with all @xmath29 is stable , while the linear branch is unstable.,scaledwidth=43.0% ] here , we compare ep in parallel / series systems connected to a flux / temperature drives . the entropy production caused by heat flow is given by the volume integral @xmath72 , where @xmath73 is the local heat flux . in a stationary system , @xmath74 , thus , integrating by parts , we may represent ep by the boundary terms as @xmath75 . figure  [ f : ep ] shows ep in the flux - driven and temperature - driven systems . in the series - connection system , ep is maximized by the nonlinear solution when it is flux - driven ( a ) , but is minimized when it is temperature - driven ( b ) . on the contrary , ep of the parallel - connection system is minimized by the nonlinear solution when it is flux - driven ( c ) , and is maximized when it is temperature - driven ( d ) . r. k. niven  @xcite studied numerically the ep of turbulent flow in parallel pipes driven by a fixed head ( force ) , and found similar behavior . table  [ t : ep ] summarizes the ep of the series - connection and the parallel - connection systems in flux - driven and temperature - driven operations . .ep of the series - connection and the parallel - connection systems in flux - driven and temperature - driven modes of operation . [ cols="^,^,^",options="header " , ]     [ t : ep ] we have introduced a paradigm of describing operating points ( macroscopic quasi - stationary state ) of a nonlinear heat conduction system ; two different connections ( series and parallel connections ) of nonlinear impedances ( modeling the self - organization of zonal flow and streamer , respectively ) , as well as two different types of drives ( flux drive and temperature drive ) , frame the paradigm . thermodynamic stability of bifurcated operating points can be understood by the phenomenological model based on this paradigm ; the nonlinear branch ( created by a positive power @xmath15 ) is always stable ( when it bifurcates from the linear branch ) . the parallel and series - connection systems , respectively , minimize and maximize ep when connected to a flux drive . when they are connected to a temperature - drive , however , the minimum / maximum relation flips . 99 g. nicolis and i. prigogine , _ self - organization in nonequilibrium systems  from dissipative structures to order through fluctuations _ ( wiley , new york , 1977 ) . h. helmholtz , wiss . abh . * 1 * , 223 ( 1868 ) . l. onsager , phys . rev . * 37 * , 405 ( 1931 ) . l. onsager , phys . rev . * 38 * , 2265 ( 1931 ) . i. gyarmati , _ nonequilibrium thermodynamics _ ( north - holland , amsterdam , 1962 ) . g. w. paltridge , q. j. r. meteorol . * 101 * , 475 ( 1975 ) ; g. w. paltridge , nature ( london ) * 279 * , 630 ( 1979 ) . s. shimozawa and h. ozawa , q. j. r. meteorol . soc . * 128 * , 2115 ( 2002 ) . s. shimokawa and h. ozawa , tellus , ser . a * 53 * , 266 ( 2001 ) . h. ozawa , a. ohmura , r. d. lorenz and t. pujol , rev . geophys . , * 41 * , 4 , 1018 ( 2003 ) . r. d. lorenz , j. i. lunine , and p. g. withers , geophys . * 28 * , 415 ( 2001 ) . h. ozawa , s. shimokawa , and h. sakuma , phys . e * 64 * , 026303 ( 2001 ) . z. yoshida and s. m. mahajan , phys . plasmas * 15 * , 032307 ( 2008 ) . r. c. dewar , j. phys . a * 36 * , 631 ( 2003 ) . r. c. dewar , j. phys . a * 38 * , l371 ( 2005 ) . e. t. jaynes , phys . rev . * 106 * , 620 ( 1957 ) . e. t. jaynes , phys . rev . * 108 * , 171 ( 1957 ) . r. k. niven , phys . e * 80 * , 021113 ( 2009 ) . r. k. niven , j. non - equilib . * 35 * , 347 - 378 ( 2010 ) . a. kleidon and r. d. lorenz , _ non - equilibrium thermodynamics and the production of entropy  life , earth , and beyond _ ( springer , berlin , 2004 ) chap . 8 . f. wagner _ et al_. , phys . * 49 * , 1408 ( 1982 ) . p. b. rhines , j. fluid mech . * 69 * , 417 ( 1975 ) . a. hasegawa , adv . phys . * 34 * , 1 ( 1985 ) . l. d. landau and e. m. lifshitz , _ fluid mechanics _ , 2nd ed . ( pergamon , oxford , 1987 ) . a. das , a. sen , s. mahajan and p. kaw , phys . plasmas * 8 * , 5104 ( 2001 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: two different types of self - organizing and sustaining ordered motion in fluids or plasmas one is a bnard convection ( or streamer ) and the other is a zonal flow  have been compared by introducing a thermodynamic phenomenological model and evaluating the corresponding entropy production rates ( ep ) . these two systems have different topologies in their equivalent circuits : the bnard convection is modeled by parallel connection of linear and nonlinear conductances , while the zonal flow is modeled by series connection . the `` power supply '' that drives the systems is also a determinant of operating modes . when the energy flux is a control parameter ( as in usual plasma experiments ) , the driver is modeled by a constant - current power supply , and when the temperature difference between two separate boundaries is controlled ( as in usual computational studies ) , the driver is modeled by a constant - voltage power supply . the parallel ( series)-connection system tends to minimize ( maximize ) the total ep when a constant - current power supply drives the system . this minimum / maximum relation flips when a constant - voltage power supply is connected .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: several non - thermal processes have recently been detected in clusters of galaxies from the extreme ultraviolet ( euv ) radiation in excess of the thermal expectation to the soft x - rays detected by rosat and bepposax and again to hard x - ray excesses and radio radiation . for the coma cluster , by far the best studied cluster , a complete investigation of the soft excess can be found in ( lieu et al . 1996a , 1996b ; bowyer , lampton & lieu 1996 ; fabian 1996 ; mittaz , lieu & lockman 1998 , sarazin & lieu 1998 ) while the detection of the hard excess above 20 kev is reported in ( fusco - femiano et al . 1998 ) . a recent review of the diffuse radio emission can be found in ( feretti et al . some clusters show only emission in some region of frequency and not in others . also for this reason coma gives the best possibility to make multiwavelengths studies . a review of the current status of the multifrequency observations of coma and viable models for the non thermal radiation can be found in ( ensslin et al . 1998 ) . as stressed by fusco - femiano et al . ( 1998 ) , if the hard x - ray excess is due to inverse compton scattering ( ics ) off the photons of the microwave background , then the combined radio and hard x - ray observations of coma imply a small value for the average intracluster magnetic field , of order @xmath1 . such a small value of the field requires large energy densities in electrons , and , as pointed out in ( lieu et al . 1999 ) , cr energy densities comparable with the equipartition value are required . this conclusion is only weakly dependent on the specific model ( primary or secondary ) for the production of the electrons responsable for the radiation . in fact the need for large cr energy densities was recently confirmed by blasi & colafrancesco ( 1999 ) , in the context of the secondary electron model . lieu et al . ( 1999 ) also correctly pointed out that the assumption of equipartition is limited by the production of gamma rays through neutral pion decay , but this flux was claimed to be much smaller than the egret sensitivity , falling below the egret upper limit already imposed on the gamma ray flux from the coma and virgo clusters ( sreekumar et al . 1996 ) . we calculate here the flux of gamma rays from the coma and virgo clusters in the assumption of equipartition of crs with the thermal energy in the cluster , for two different models of the cr injection in the intracluster medium ( icm ) , and for different injection spectra and find that in some cases the gamma ray flux is in excess of the egret limit . moreover , we find that for injection cr spectra flatter than @xmath0 ( for @xmath2 ) some currently operating experiments like stacee , hegra and whipple could detect the gamma ray signal from coma and virgo in the tev range , provided the crs are in equipartition , or put strong constraints on this condition if no signal is detected .    the paper is planned as follows : in section [ gamma ] we outline the calculations of the gamma ray fluxes from clusters ; in section [ cr ] we describe the models of cr propagation that we used and in section [ results ] we describe our results for the coma and virgo clusters . in this section we calculate the flux of gamma rays due to the decay of neutral pions produced in cr collisions in the icm . this channel provides the dominant contribution to gamma rays above @xmath3 mev . independent of the sources that provide the crs in clusters , the equilibrium cr distribution is some function @xmath4 of the proton energy @xmath5 and of the position in the cluster . for simplicity we assume the cluster to be spherically symmetric , so that the distance @xmath6 from the center is the only space coordinate . we determine @xmath7 for different injection models in the next section . the rate of production of gamma rays with energy @xmath8 per unit volume at distance @xmath6 from the cluster center is given by blasi & colafrancesco ( 1999 ) @xmath9 where @xmath10 is the pion energy , @xmath11 is the minimum pion energy needed to generate a gamma ray photon with energy @xmath8 and @xmath12 is some maximum energy in the injected cr spectrum ( our calculations do not depend on the value of @xmath12 ) . here @xmath13 is the density of thermal gas at distance @xmath6 from the cluster center . for coma we model the gas density through a king profile : @xmath14^{-3\beta/2 } , \label{eq : den_coma}\ ] ] where @xmath15 kpc is the size of the cluster core , @xmath16 and @xmath17 is a phenomenological parameter in the range @xmath18 ( sarazin 1988 ) ( we use @xmath19 ) .    for virgo , we fit the gas density profile given by nulsen & bohringer ( 1995 ) to find @xmath20 the function @xmath21 in eq . ( [ eq : gamma1 ] ) represents the cross section for the production of neutral pions with energy @xmath10 in a cr collision at energy @xmath5 in the laboratory frame . determining this function is complicate in the low energy regime where data is scarse . a possible approach was proposed by dermer ( 1986 ) and recently reviewed by moskalenko & strong ( 1998 ) and is based on the isobar model . this approach is valid for cr collisions at @xmath22 gev and consists in treating the pion production as a process mediated by the generation and decay of the resonance @xmath23 in the @xmath24 interaction . we refer to the papers by dermer ( 1986 ) and moskalenko & strong ( 1998 ) for the detailed expressions for @xmath21 . for @xmath25 gev the scaling approach is an excellent approximation of the function @xmath21 . in this regime the differential cross section for @xmath24 collisions can be written as @xmath26 where @xmath27 , @xmath28 and @xmath29 is the so called scaling function . in the scaling regime , the function @xmath21 coincides with the differential cross section given in eq . ( [ eq : scaling ] ) .    once the gamma ray emissivity is known from eq . ( [ eq : gamma1 ] ) , the flux of gamma rays with energy @xmath8 is simply given by volume integration @xmath30 where @xmath31 is the distance to the cluster and @xmath32 is the cluster radius . in fact @xmath32 here plays the role of the size of the region where the non thermal processes are observed . we adopt here the value suggested from radio observations in coma , @xmath33 mpc . this is however a very conservative case and it seems likely that magnetic fields extend to larger regions . in fact in ensslin , wang , nath & biermann ( 1998a ) the injection of energy due to formation of black holes in the coma cluster was estimated and compared with the thermal energy in a region of @xmath34 mpc ( @xmath35 ) . for the coma cluster we shall also consider this less conservative case . several sources of crs in clusters of galaxies were discussed by berezinsky , blasi & ptuskin ( 1997 ) and it was argued that the known sources ( agns , radiogalaxies , accretion shocks ) are not able to provide crs in equipartition with the thermal gas . an intense and short period of powerful emission from the cluster sources was also considered , consistently with the observed iron abundance in the cluster , with the same conclusion . since recent observations of non thermal radiation from clusters seem to suggest that equipartition is indeed required , we do not make here any assumption on the type of sources and instead we assume equipartition and analyze the observational consequences of this assumption .    the equipartition energy can be easily estimated from the total thermal energy of the gas , assuming it has a temperature @xmath36 : @xmath37 where @xmath13 is given by eq . ( [ eq : den_coma ] ) for the coma cluster and by eq . ( [ eq : den_virgo ] ) for the virgo cluster . the temperature adopted for coma is @xmath38 k while for virgo we used @xmath39 k ( nulsen & bohringer 1995 ) . therefore , from the previous equation we obtain @xmath40 erg for coma and @xmath41 erg for virgo . these numbers could underestimate the total thermal energy due to the contribution of gas out of the @xmath42 mpc region . in fact ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) estimated for the coma cluster that the thermal energy in a region of @xmath34 mpc is @xmath43 erg , a factor @xmath44 larger than estimated above . they also calculate the expected injection of total ( thermal plus non thermal ) energy due to black hole formation in the cluster , and find in the same region a similar number . since not only the energy budget in crs is not known , but also their spatial distribution is very poorly constrained , we consider here two extreme scenarios for the injection of crs and we calculate the equilibrium cr distribution from the transport equation .    _ i ) point source _    as argued by berezinsky , blasi & ptuskin ( 1997 ) , colafrancesco & blasi ( 1998 ) and ensslin et al . ( 1998 ) it is likely that for most of the cluster s age the main contributors to crs in clusters are located in the cluster core . this is the case if a radiogalaxy or more generally a powerful active galaxy or a shock produced by merging is the source/ accelerator of crs . there is an additional argument that plays in favor of a source mainly concentrated in the center of the cluster : if the average spatial distribution of the galaxies in a cluster is not a strong function of time , then it is reasonable to assume that at all times , as today , the distribution of the sources is peaked around the cluster center . according with ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) ( see also references therein ) the spatial distribution of galaxies in coma is well represented by a king - like profile @xmath45^{-0.8}$ ] , with @xmath46 kpc , appreciably smaller that the cluster core , so that a source concentrated in the center seems a reasonable assumption . therefore we assume that the source can be modelled as a point source with a rate of injection of crs given by a power law in momentum @xmath47 , where @xmath48 is the cr momentum and the normalization constant is determined by energy integration @xmath49 where @xmath50 is the kinetic energy and @xmath51 is the cr luminosity at injection , forced here to be correspondent to the establishment of equipartition in the cluster . we estimate it averaging the equipartition energy on the age of the cluster : @xmath52 . the transport equation that gives the distribution of crs at distance @xmath6 from the source and after a time @xmath53 , namely @xmath54 , can be written in the form @xmath55 = q(e_p)\delta ( \vec { r } ) , \label{eq : transport}\ ] ] where @xmath56 is the diffusion coefficient and @xmath57 is the rate of energy losses . as shown in ( berezinsky , blasi & ptuskin 1997 , colafrancesco & blasi 1998 , blasi & colafrancesco 1999 ) for cr protons the energy losses can be neglected and eq . ( [ eq : transport ] ) has the simple solution ( blasi & colafrancesco 1999 ) @xmath58 where @xmath59^{1/2}$ ] is the maximum distance that on average particles with energy @xmath5 could diffuse away from the source in the time @xmath53 . we are interested here in the case @xmath60 ( @xmath61 here is the age of the cluster , taken as comparable with the age of the universe ) . the solution of the equation @xmath62 gives an estimate of the maximum energy @xmath63 for which crs can be considered confined in the cluster volume for all the age of the cluster . for reasonable choices of the diffusion coefficient the confined crs provide the main contribution to the energy budget of crs in clusters and also to the integral flux of gamma rays above @xmath3 mev , calculated as explained in the previous section . as far as gamma rays produced by interactions of confined crs are concerned the flux of gamma radiation is independent on the choice of the diffusion coefficient , as pointed out by berezinsky , blasi & ptuskin ( 1997 ) , and the spectrum of gamma rays simply reflects the spectrum of the parent protons ( for @xmath64 gev ) . rigorously this is true only for spatially constant intracluster gas density , while a density profile , as assumed here , results in a weak dependence of the gamma ray spectrum on the diffusion details . therefore , for the sake of completeness we adopt here a specific choice of the diffusion coefficient : we assume that the fluctuations in the magnetic field in the cluster are well represented by a kolmogorov power spectrum @xmath65 and we calculate the diffusion coefficient according with the procedure outlined by colafrancesco & blasi ( 1998 ) , which gives @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the value of the magnetic field in @xmath68 and @xmath69 is the scale of the largest eddy in the power spectrum of the magnetic field . ( [ eq : diff ] ) and ( [ eq : sol ] ) completely define the distribution of cosmic rays in the cluster in the case of a point source .    _ i ) spatially homogeneous injection _    as pointed out above , the budget of crs in clusters is largely dominated by confined crs , so that in the case of spatially homogeneous injection the distribution of crs can be easily written in the form @xmath70 where @xmath71 is the injection volume , @xmath72 is the total energy injected in the cluster in the form of crs and @xmath73 is calculated by the normalization condition @xmath74 where @xmath75 is calculated according to eq . ( [ eq : equi ] ) . clearly eq . ( [ eq : homo ] ) does not describe well the cr distribution very close to the cluster boundary . moreover at sufficiently high energy , where crs are not confined in the cluster volume the cr spectrum suffers a steepening to @xmath76 , with @xmath77 for a kolmogorov spectrum . we study the observational consequences of the assumption of equipartition between crs and thermal gas in clusters of galaxies . in particular we calculated the flux of gamma radiation from the coma and virgo clusters when equipartition is assumed . this assumption seems to be required if a ics origin is accepted for the hard and soft x - ray excess and for the euv flux from coma and other clusters of galaxies ( note however that alternative possibilities can be proposed ) . in particular , according to lieu et al . ( 1999 ) , _ in order to account for the observed cluster soft excess flux from coma , equipartition between crs and gas is unavoidable_. in ( berezinsky et al . ( 1997 ) ) different possible models of cr injection in clusters were considered , including active galaxies , accretion shocks during the formation of the cluster and a possible bright phase in the past of the cluster galaxies , but none of these sources could account for cr energy densities larger that @xmath78 of the equipartition value , if a conversion efficiency of @xmath79 was assumed for the injection of non thermal energy from the total energy of the sources .    on the other hand ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) compared the thermal energy in a @xmath80 mpc region with the energy injected during the formation of massive black holes in the coma cluster . the total energy ( thermal plus non thermal ) released in this process was estimated to be comparable with the thermal energy in the cluster ( if an efficiency factor is assumed , the non thermal energy may be smaller than the equipartition value ) . since our knowledge of the sources of crs in clusters is still very poor , we decided to adopt here a phenomenological approach and try to find observational tests or consequences of our assumptions . the most striking consequence of a large abundance of crs in a cluster is the production of gamma rays through the generation and decay of neutral pions in @xmath24 interactions . since the egret instrument put an upper limit on the flux of gamma radiation above @xmath3 mev from coma and virgo ( @xmath81 ( sreekumar et al . 1996 ) ) , we can use this constraint to test the equipartition assumption . our calculations were carried out for two extreme models of injection of crs in the cluster , namely a point source in the cluster core and a spatially homogeneous injection in the cluster volume . in the case of a point source , we can think of it as an _ effective source _ , in the sense that on average a dominant source or a set of sources are located at the cluster center . in this sense it is not needed that the same source remains active for all the age of the cluster . the energy spectrum of the injected crs was assumed to be a power law in momentum , as expected for a shock acceleration spectrum , and two extreme values of the power index were studied , namely @xmath82 and @xmath83 , which encompass the whole range of power indexes expected from shock acceleration ( other models of acceleration also give power laws in the same range of parameters ) .    since the gamma ray spectra depend ( although very weakly ) on the choice of the diffusion coefficient , we made here a specific choice , modelling the spectrum of fluctuations of the field by a kolmogorov spectrum and calculating the diffusion coefficient according with eq . ( [ eq : diff ] ) . in the numerical calculations we used @xmath84 and @xmath85 kpc ( if for instance we use @xmath86 the results on the integral fluxes change only by @xmath79 , confirming the weak dependence on the diffusion details mainly due to the use of a specific gas density profile ) .      due to the appearence of the flat region at low gamma ray energy , typical of spectra from pion decay , there is not a strong dependence of the integral flux on @xmath88 . in some cases considered the gamma ray flux exceeds the egret upper limit . as it could be expected , the gamma ray flux is larger for the case of a point source in the cluster center and the egret limit is exceeded by a factor @xmath89 for coma and by a factor @xmath90 for virgo . in the case of homogeneous injection the gamma ray fluxes are slightly smaller than the egret upper limit both for coma and virgo . these results are more impressive when the condition of equipartition is imposed on a larger region of size @xmath34 mpc ( ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) ) : for a single source in the cluster center the egret limit is exceeded by @xmath90 for @xmath82 and by @xmath91 for @xmath83 . for an homogeneous injection the predicted fluxes are in excess of the egret limit by @xmath92 for @xmath82 and by @xmath44 for @xmath83 . it is worthwhile to stress again that this result is practically independent on the specific choice of the diffusion coefficient . in fact , the crs relevant for the production of gamma rays in the energy range @xmath93 gev are certainly confined in the cluster for any reasonable choice of the diffusion coefficient , and the spectrum in this region is independent on this choice . the effects of the diffusion may appear only at higher energy where gamma rays are produced by crs not confined in the cluster . as shown in ( berezinsky et al . 1997 ) this produces a steepening of the gamma ray spectrum to a power law with index @xmath94 ( with @xmath77 in the case of a kolmogorov spectrum of fluctuations ) at energies larger than a _ knee _ energy @xmath95 . at smaller energies the gamma ray spectrum reproduces the spectrum of the parent crs . the transition appears at @xmath96^{1/\eta}$ ] , as obtained from the equation @xmath62 . actually this was shown in ( berezinsky et al . 1997 ) for the case of a constant intracluster gas density . in the more realistic case considered here , where the gas is modelled by a king or a power law profile , the gamma ray spectrum suffers a smooth steepening even for confined crs , but this affects the integral flux above @xmath3 mev only at the level of @xmath79 . the integral spectra of gamma rays from coma with energy @xmath97 as functions of the energy @xmath8 are shown in fig . 1a ( for the point source ) and 1b ( for the homogeneous case ) for @xmath87 mpc . in the same plot we draw the sensitivity limits for several present and planned experiments for gamma ray astronomy . the solid lines refer to @xmath82 while the dashed lines are obtained for @xmath83 . the fluxes in the energy region @xmath98 gev are well above the detectability limit of glast , so that there is no doubt that the question of equipartition will be completely answered with the next generation gamma ray satellites . however fig . 1 also shows that the signal from coma could be detectable even in some current experiments , provided @xmath99 . in particular stacee could detect the signal above @xmath100 gev and whipple might detect the signal for @xmath101 gev . the flux should be detectable by the hegra cerenkov telescope above @xmath102 gev . a non - detection from these experiments would imply a reduction of the energy density in clusters by about one order of magnitude below equipartition for @xmath82 . for steep spectra only stacee has a slim chance to detect the signal . in the same energy range the next generation gamma ray experiments will very likely measure the flux of gamma rays for any value of @xmath88 in the range considered here .    in the case of the virgo cluster and @xmath87 mpc , the fluxes are plotted in fig . 2a ( for sources in the center ) and fig . 2b ( for a homogeneous injection ) and conclusions similar to the ones outlined for coma hold . note that this result is subtantially different from the one obtained in previous calculations . in particular ensslin et al . ( 1997 ) reached the conclusion that the fluxes from coma and virgo are _ orders of magnitude too low to be detectable _ in the tev range . this conclusion was obtained because following dar and shaviv ( 1995 ) the gamma ray spectrum was assumed to reproduce the equilibrium spectrum of crs in the galaxy @xmath103 ( this did not affect appreciably their integral fluxes above 100 mev , which are not very different from the ones obtained here for the homogeneous case ) . however , as shown in ( berezinsky et al . 1997 , colafrancesco & blasi 1998 , blasi & colafrancesco 1999 ) and confirmed here , the spectrum of gamma rays from @xmath24 collisions in clusters does not reproduce the equilibrium cr spectrum , but the generation spectrum as far as gamma ray photons are produced by interactions of crs confined in the cluster , as it is the case for gamma rays with energy less than @xmath104 tev , for the values of the parameters used here ( though , as pointed out before , a slight steepening is introduced by the gas density profile ) . therefore the gamma ray spectrum from crs in clusters is approximately @xmath105 up to some maximum energy @xmath95 where crs begin to be no longer confined in the cluster volume . as a consequence the gamma ray fluxes in the tev range could be detectable even by present experiments if the crs are in equipartition with the gas in the cluster . on the other hand , if no flux is detected , this will put a strong constraint on the equipartition assumption . while the low energy integral gamma ray flux is very weakly dependent on the choice of the diffusion coefficient , the correspondent flux at higher energies is more sensitive to it , since , as explained above , the position of the knee is affected by this choice . in the context of a kolmogorov spectrum , the maximum diffusion coefficient is obtained for a larger value of @xmath69 . the choice @xmath106 kpc was inspired by the typical size of the galaxies in the cluster . the largest scale where the magnetic fluctuations are injected is the typical distance between galaxies , of the order of @xmath107 kpc . for @xmath108 kpc the position of the knee is at @xmath104 tev , while for @xmath107 kpc the knee is at @xmath109 gev . however , since the steepening in the gamma ray spectrum begins at large energy , the difference in the plots caused by the use of this larger diffusion coefficient is a factor @xmath110 at @xmath111 gev ( for @xmath87 mpc ) , so that the possibility of detecting the gamma ray fluxes in this energy region is not appreciably affected and remains an interesting possibility . the situation improves rapidly with an increasing @xmath32 . in fact the value of the knee energy for a kolmogorov spectrum goes like @xmath112 and high energy crs are easily confined in a region of @xmath113 mpc . if , following ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) , we use @xmath114 mpc , then , as shown before the absolute gamma ray fluxes increase at all energies by a factor @xmath115 and the steepening at high energy is only found at @xmath116 tev for the diffusion coefficient in eq . ( [ eq : diff ] ) .    at present we can only use the egret limit as a constraint . for coma this limit implies that the energy density must be smaller than @xmath117 of the equipartition value if the crs are mainly contributed by sources in the central part of the cluster ( with @xmath87 mpc ) . if injection occurs uniformly over the cluster volume , than the equipartition cr energy density is compatible with the egret limit ( for @xmath87 mpc ) . for virgo cluster the egret limit implies that the energy density in crs must be smaller than @xmath79 of the equipartition value for the case of sources in the center .    as stressed above , the case of equipartition in a larger region , ( ensslin et al . ( 1998a ) ) is already ruled out by present gamma ray observations by egret . as a consequence the cr energy density in this case for coma is forced to be @xmath118 of the equipartition value for a point source and @xmath119 for homogeneous injection . we suggest that experiments like stacee , hegra , whipple and future gamma ray experiments look at the signal from nearby clusters , because this could definitely confirm or rule out the possibility that equipartition of crs with the thermal gas is achieved in clusters of galaxies , or at least impose new and stronger constraints on the maximum allowed cr energy density in clusters . the author is grateful to a. olinto , s. colafrancesco , c. covault and r. ong for many useful discussions and to the anonymous referee for several interesting comments . the research of p.b . is funded through a infn fellowship at the university of chicago . feretti , l. , & giovannini , g. 1997 , contribution to the rencontres astrophysiques international meeting _ a new vision of an old cluster : untangling coma berenices _ , eds . f. durret et al . , held in marseille , france 17 - 20 june 1997 ( astro - ph/9709294 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: clusters of galaxies are revealing themselves as powerful sources of non thermal radiation in a wide range of wavelengths . in order to account for these multifrequency observations equipartition of cosmic rays ( crs ) with the thermal gas in clusters of galaxies is often invoked . this condition might suggest a dynamical role played by cosmic rays in the virialization of these large scale structures and is now testable through gamma ray observations . we show here , in the specific case of the coma and virgo clusters , for which upper limits on the gamma ray emission exist , that equipartition implies gamma ray fluxes that are close or even in excess of the egret limit , depending on the adopted model of cr injection . we use this bound to limit the validity of the equipartition condition . we also show that , contrary to what claimed in previous calculations , the equipartition assumption implies gamma ray fluxes in the tev range which can be detectable even by currently operating gamma ray observatories if the injection cosmic ray spectrum is flatter than @xmath0 .    epsf


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: since the focus of this conference is the starburst phenomenon , many of us would rather `` sweep agn activity under the rug '' and only consider star formation . this would be a mistake ! there is growing evidence that intense star formation and nuclear activity often come hand in hand . the apparent correlation between the mass of dormant black holes at the centers of nearby galaxies and the mass of their spheroids ( e.g. , kormendy & richstone 1995 ; faber et al . 1997 ; magorrian et al . 1998 ; gebhardt et al . 2000 ) suggests a direct link between the formation of spheroids and the growth of central black holes . since a starburst is a natural consequence of the dissipative gaseous processes associated with spheroid formation ( e.g. , barnes & hernquist 1991 ; kormendy & sanders 1992 ; mihos & hernquist 1994 ) , a starburst - agn connection dating back to the early universe is implied by these results . closer to us , the presence of circumnuclear starbursts in an increasing number of local agns ( discussed in more detail in  2 ) also suggests a connection between the starburst and agn phenomena . this possible starburst - agn connection has direct bearings on our understanding of the early universe . a large contribution from unsuspected ( hidden ) agns would complicate the deduction of the star formation history of the universe from galaxy luminosity functions ( e.g. , blain et al . this in turn may change our current views on the history of metal enrichment and the importance of feedback processes in the early universe ( e.g. , franx et al . 1997 ; pettini et al . 2000 ; ferrara & tolstoy 2000 ) . similarly , a correction needs to be applied to account for obscured agns as contributors to the far - infrared extragalactic background . recent x - ray observations with _ chandra _ have added substantially to the debate . the discovery that some fraction of the x - ray background appears to be produced by a population of heavily obscured agns ( e.g. , mushotzky et al . 2000 ; barger et al . 2000 ) , objects which have been largely missed in optical surveys due to extremely heavy obscuration , has clearly further increased the importance of studies of the starburst - agn connection in distant infrared - selected galaxies . the rest of this paper is organized as follows . in  2 , i discuss recent ( @xmath0 5 years approx . ) results which appear to favor a starburst - agn connection . this discussion is not meant to be a exhaustive ( or even impartial ) review of the recent literature on this subject ; it is only meant to illustrate some of the best cases where a starburst - agn connection indeed appears to exist . in the last section (  3 ) , i raise several questions regarding the nature of this starburst - agn connection . since the triggering mechanism for agn activity probably depends on the luminosity of the agn , i make a distinction in the following discussion between the nearby , low - luminosity seyferts and fanaroff - riley type i ( fr i ) radio galaxies and the more distant and powerful quasars , fanaroff - riley type ii ( fr ii ) radio galaxies , and ultraluminous infrared galaxies ( ulirgs ; log  [ l@xmath1/l@xmath2 @xmath3 12 by definition ) . the fueling of agns requires mass accretion rates dm / dt @xmath4 1.7 ( 0.1/@xmath5)(l/10@xmath6 ergs s@xmath7 ) m@xmath8 yr@xmath7 , where @xmath5 is the mass - to - energy conversion efficiency . a modest accretion rate of order @xmath9 0.01 m@xmath8 yr@xmath7 is therefore sufficient to power a seyfert galaxy like ngc  1068 . only a small fraction of the total gas content of a typical host galaxy is therefore necessary for the fueling of these low - luminosity agns . a broad range of mechanisms including intrinsic processes ( e.g. , stellar winds and collisions ; dynamical friction of giant molecular clouds againts stars ; nuclear bars or spirals produced by gravitational instabilities in the disk ) and external processes ( e.g. , `` minor '' galaxy interactions or mergers ) may be at work in these objects . while a detailed discussion of these processes is beyond the scope of the present paper ( see combes 2000 for a recent review of the subject ) , suffice it to say that there is little or no observational evidence for seyfert nuclei to occur preferentially in barred systems ( e.g. , mcleod & rieke 1995 ; heraudeau et al . 1996 ; mulchaey & regan 1997 ; ho , filippenko , & sargent 1997 ) or to have recently experienced a major interaction or merger ( fuentes - williams & stocke 1988 ; dultzin - hacyan 1998 ; de  robertis , yee , & hayhoe 1998 ; virani , de robertis , & van dalfsen 2000 ; although see last paragraph of this subsection ) . these results seem to favor minor intrinsic processes over large - scale external processes for the fueling of low - luminosity agns . ejecta from a nuclear star cluster ( e.g. , norman & scoville 1988 ; petty 1992 ; williams , baker , & perry 1999 ) may be all that is needed in the cases of seyferts and other low - luminosity agns to keep their nuclei active . the `` angular momentum problem '' in feeding low - luminosity agns may therefore reduce to forming the dense stellar cluster in the first place . nuclear starbursts are the prime candidates for the formation of these clusters . several studies have shown that the molecular material needed to fuel nuclear starbursts in seyfert galaxies is present near the nuclei of these objects ( e.g. , meixner et al . 1990 ; tacconi et al . 1997 ; kohno et al . 1998 ; baker & scoville 1998 ) . but is this material forming stars ? direct evidence for recent _ nuclear _ star formation now exists in a number of seyfert 2 galaxies ( i.e. seyferts without broad recombination lines ) . optical and ultraviolet spectroscopy of the nuclear regions of these galaxies often reveals the signatures of young and intermediate - age stars . the stellar ca ii triplet feature at @xmath10 8498 , 8542 , 8662 in seyfert 2s has an equivalent width similar to that in normal galaxies while the stellar mg  ib @xmath115175 is often weaker ( terlevich , diaz , & terlevich 1990 ) . this result is difficult to explain with a combination of an old stellar population and a featureless power - law continuum from an agn . the most natural explanation is that young red supergiants contribute significantly to the continuum from the central regions . evidence for intermediate - age ( a few 100 myrs ) stars in these galaxies is also apparent in the blue part of the spectrum , where the high - order balmer series and he i absorption lines appear to be present in more than half of the brightest seyfert 2 galaxies ( e.g. , cid fernandes & terlevich 1995 ; gonzles delgado , heckman , & leitherer 2001 ) . a few of these objects may even harbor a broad emission feature near 4680  , possibly the signature of a population of young ( a few myrs ) wolf - rayet stars ( gonzles delgado et al . 2001 ) . the ultraviolet continuum from some of the brightest uv seyfert 2s also appears to be dominated by young stars based on the strength of absorption features typically formed in the photospheres and in the stellar winds of massive stars ( e.g. , heckman et al . 1997 ; gonzles delgado et al . the extended , soft , thermal x - ray emission from these objects seems to confirm these results ( levenson , weaver , & heckman 2001 ) . the bolometric luminosities of these nuclear starbursts ( @xmath9 10@xmath12 l@xmath8 ) are similar to the estimated bolometric luminosities of their obscured seyfert 1 nuclei . interestingly , a distinction appears to exist between seyfert 1s and seyfert 2s . seyfert 2 galaxies have long been known to present a larger far- and mid - infrared excess than seyfert 1s ( e.g. , rodriguez - espinosa , rudy , & jones 1986 ; dultzin - hacyan et al . 1988 ; pier & krolik 1993 ; maiolino et al . 1995 ) , but most of this excess emission may be attributed to star formation in the host galaxy rather than from a nuclear starburst . the departure of the galaxy or bulge blue luminosity of seyfert 2s from the tully - fisher and faber - jackson relationships ( e.g. , whittle et al . 1992a , 1992b ; nelson & whittle 1995 ) and the diffuse radio emission around some seyfert nuclei ( wilson 1988 ) may have the same origin . however , recent investigations have also suggested excess _ nuclear _ starburst activity in seyfert 2s relative to seyfert 1s ( gonzlez delgado et al . 2001 ; gu et al . 2001 ) and possibly a higher frequency of companions near type 2 objects ( e.g , de robertis et al . 1999 ; dultzin - hacyan et al . 1999 ; levenson , weaver , & heckman 2001 ) . these results can not be explained in the context of the seyfert unification theory ( which purports that seyfert 1s and 2s are basically the same type of objects seen from different perspectives ) , but they may reflect an evolutionary connection between starbursts , seyfert 2s , and seyfert 1s . the stringent requirements on the mass accretion rates for luminous agns almost certainly require external processes such as `` major '' galaxy interactions or mergers to be involved in triggering and sustaining this high level of activity over @xmath9 10@xmath13 years . substantial evidence exists that the precursors to at least some powerful agns have indeed been gas - rich mergers . classical double ( fr ii ) radio galaxies have long been known to show tidal tails and other signs of interaction ( smith & heckman 1989 ; baum , heckman , & van breugel 1992 ) . evidence for recent or on - going galactic interactions is also seen in several quasars ( e.g. , hutchings et al . 1994 ; bahcall et al . 1997 ; boyce et al . abundant molecular gas has been detected in radio galaxies and quasars ( e.g. , sanders et al . 1988b , 1989b ; barvainis et al . 1989 , 1995 ; mirabel , sanders , & kazs 1989 ; scoville et al . 1993 ; ohta et al . 1996 ; omont et al . 1996 ; evans et al . 1999a , b ) , and many of them also show the spectroscopic signatures of recent star formation ( e.g. , tadhunter , dickson , & shaw 1996 ; tran et al . 1999 ; brotherton et al . the far - infrared excess in some of these objects may also be attributed to star formation ( e.g. , rowan - robinson 1995 ; see sanders et al . 1989a for another interpretation ) . in this merger scenario , quasars were more common in the past because of the enhanced frequency of collisions [ @xmath14 ( 1+z)@xmath15 ; e.g. , zepf & koo 1989 ] and the larger proportion of unprocessed gas . moreover , the observed redshift cut - off for quasars ( @xmath16 @xmath4 5 ) marks the epoch at which disk systems formed . ulirgs may provide the clearest observational link between galaxy mergers , starbursts and powerful agns . nearly all uligs show strong signs of advanced tidal interactions ( e.g. , sanders et al . 1988a ; melnick & mirabel 1990 ; murphy et al . 1996 ; clements et al . all of them are very rich in molecular gas ( e.g. , solomon et al . 1997 ; frayer et al . 1998 , 1999 ) , most of which is distributed well within the inner kpc of the galaxy ( e.g. , downes & solomon 1998 ; bryant & scoville 1999 ; sakamoto et al . they also present a large concentration of activity in their nuclei , including strong optical emission lines characteristic of a starbursting stellar population and in about 30% of cases , broad or high - ionization emission lines that suggest the presence of a powerful agn coexisting with the starburst ( e.g. , kim et al . 1998 ; wu et al . 1998a , b ; veilleux et al . 1995 , 1999a ; kewley et al . similar results are found in the near - infrared ( e.g. , goldader et al . 1995 , 1997 ; veilleux et al . 1997 , 1999b ) and in the mid - infrared ( e.g. , genzel et al . 1998 ; lutz et al . 1998 ; rigopoulou et al . 1999 ; lutz , veilleux , & genzel 1999 ; dudley 1999 )    the fraction of agn - dominated ulirgs is significantly larger among objects with high infrared luminosities and warm infrared colors ( e.g. , kim et al . 1998 ; veilleux et al . 1995 , 1999a , b ; wu et al . 1998b ; kewley et al . 2001 ) . current results on a limited set of ulirgs ( e.g. , rigopoulou et al . 1999 ) suggest that the dominance of agn or starburst in ulirgs may depend on local and short - term conditions ( e.g. , compression of the circumnuclear interstellar medium as a function of gas content and galaxy structure , local accretion rate onto the central black hole , etc . ) in addition to the global state of the merger . still several lines of evidence suggest that _ warm _ ulirgs are indeed more advanced , transition objects and that ( radio quiet ) qsos correspond to the final state of the merger - induced sequence `` starburst @xmath17 ulirgs @xmath17 qsos '' ( e.g. , surace & sanders 1999 ; scoville et al . 2000 ; zheng et al . 1999 ; veilleux et al . the exact nature of this starburst - agn connection is not at all clear . unanswered questions include :    * can an agn be triggered without a burst of star formation ? * if a smbh is indeed present in every ( massive ) galaxy , can a starburst be taking place without any agn activity ? * can starbursts and agns simply coexist without interacting with each other ? * if not , in what way are the starbursts and agns interacting ? is mass loss from the central stellar cluster fueling ( low - luminosity ) agns ? is the molecular gas `` unused '' by the starburst feeding the smbh ? * is there an evolutionary connection between starbursts and agns ? which of the starburst or agn comes first ? is the merger - induced starburst @xmath17 qso model correct ? is there a similar sequence in low - luminosity objects ? is there a evolutionary connection between narrow and broad - line objects ? * is the nature of the starburst - agn connection dependent on look - back time ? some of these questions should be testable in the near future . for instance , in the merger - induced scenario starburst ages should increase along the sequence `` starburst @xmath17 cool ulirgs @xmath17 warm ulirgs @xmath17 quasars '' . detailed spectroscopic studies should be able to answer this question . increasingly sensitive techniques and instruments to detect obscured agns ( e.g. , infrared and x - ray spectroscopy from the ground and with satellites ) will allow to put better constraints on the contribution of the agn to the total energy output of galaxies ( questions # 2 ) . questions regarding the starburst - agn connection in the early universe will obviously be more difficult to answer . for these we probably have to wait for the next generation of ground - based telescopes and astronomical satellites to decipher the nature of the starburst - agn connection in proto - galaxies . in the meantime , much effort should be invested in _ predicting _ what we should expect to see !      a. j. baker , n. z. scoville : baas * 30 * , 862 ( 1998 ) j. n. bahcall , s. kirhakos , d. h. saxe , d. p. schneider : apj * 479 * , 642 ( 1997 ) a. barger et al . : aj in press ( astroph/0007175 ) ( 2001 ) j. e. barnes , l. hernquist : apj , * 370 * , l65 ( 1991 ) r. barvainis , d. alloin , r. antonucci : apj * 337 * , l65 ( 1989 ) r. barvainis , r. antonucci , t. hurt , p. coleman , h. p. reuter : apj * 451 * , l9 ( 1995 ) s. a. baum , t. m. heckman , w. van breugel : apj * 389 * , 208 ( 1992 ) a. w. blain et al . : mnras * 302 * , 632 ( 1999 ) p. j. boyce et al . : mnras * 298 * , 121 ( 1998 ) m. s. brotherton et al . : apj * 520 * , 87 ( 1999 ) p. m. bryant , n. z. scoville : aj * 117 * , 2632 ( 1999 ) r. cid fernandes , r. terlevich : mnras * 272 * , 423 ( 1995 ) d. l. clements , w. j. sutherland , r. g. mcmahon , w. saunders : mnras * 279 * , 477 ( 1996 ) f. combes : lectures given at gh advanced lectures on the starburst - agn connection , inaoe , eds . d. kunth , i. aretxaga ( 2000 ) m. m. de  robertis , h. k. yee , k. hayhoe : apj * 496 * , 93 ( 1998 ) d. downes , p. m. solomon : apj * 507 * , 615 ( 1998 ) c. c. dudley : mnras * 307 * , 553 ( 1999 ) d. dultzin - hacyan : in iau symp . # 186 galaxy interactions at low and high redshift , p. 329 ( 1998 ) d. dultzin - hacyan , y. krongold , i. fuentes - guridi , p. m. marziani : apj * 513 * , 111 ( 1999 ) d. dultzin - hacyan , m. moles , j. masegosa : a&a * 206 * , 95 ( 1988 ) a. s. evans , d. b. sanders , j. a. surace , j. m. mazzarella : apj * 511 * , 730 ( 1999a ) a. s. evans et al . : apj * 521 * , l107 ( 1999b ) s. m. faber et al . : aj * 114 * , 1771 ( 1997 ) a. ferrara , e. tolstoy mnras * 313 * , 291 ( 2000 ) m. franx et al . : apj * 486 * , l75 ( 1997 ) d. t. frayer et al . : apj * 506 * , l7 ( 1998 ) d. t. frayer et al . : apj * 514 * , l13 ( 1999 ) t. fuentes - williams , j. t. stocke : aj * 96 * , 1235 ( 1988 ) k. gebhardt et al . : apj * 539 * , l13 ( 2000 ) r. genzel et al . : apj * 498 * , 579 ( 1998 ) j. d. goldader et al . : apj * 444 * , 97 ( 1995 ) j. d. goldader et al . : apjs * 108 * , 449 ( 1997 ) r. m. gonzalez delgado et al . : apj * 505 * , 174 ( 1998 ) r. m. gonzales delgado , t. m. heckman , c. leitherer : apj * 546 * , 000 ( 2001 ) q. gu , d. dultzin - hacyan , j. a. de diego : rev . mex . de astron . , * 00 * , 1 ( astroph/0011419 ) ( 2001 ) t. m. heckman et al . : apj * 482 * , 114 ( 1997 ) p. heraudeau , f. simien , g. a. mamon : a&as * 117 * , 417 ( 1996 ) l. c. ho , a. v. filippenko , w. l. w. sargent : apj * 487 * , 591 ( 1997 ) j. b. hutchings et al . : apj * 429 * , l1 ( 1994 ) l. j. kewley , c. a. heisler , m. a. dopita , s. lumsden : apj in press ( 2001 ) k. kohno , r. kawabe , k. sakamoto , s. ishizuki , b. vila - vilaro : in the central regions of the galaxy and galaxies , ed . y. sofue ( dordrecht : kluwer ) , 239 ( 1998 ) d .- c . kim , s. veilleux , d. b. sanders : apj * 508 * , 627 ( 1998 ) j. kormendy , d. richstone : araa * 33 * , 581 ( 1995 ) j. kormendy , d. b. sanders : apj * 390 * , l53 ( 1992 ) n. a. levenson , k. a. weaver , t. m. heckman : apj in press ( astroph/0012035 ) ( 2001 ) d. lutz et al . : apj * 505 * , l103 ( 1998 ) d. lutz , s. veilleux , r. genzel : apj * 517 * , l13 ( 1999 ) j. magorrian et al . : aj * 115 * , 2285 ( 1998 ) r. maiolino , m. ruiz , g. rieke , l. keller : apj * 446 * , 561 ( 1995 ) k. k. mcleod , g. h. rieke : apj * 441 * , 96 ( 1995 ) m. meixner , r. puchalsky , l. blitz , m. wright , t. heckman : apj * 354 * , 158 ( 1990 ) j. melnick , i. f. mirabel : a&a * 231 * , l19 ( 1990 ) j. c. mihos , l. hernquist : apj , * 431 * , l9 ( 1994 ) i. f. mirabel , d. b. sanders , i. kazs : apj * 340 * , l9 ( 1989 ) j. s. mulchaey , m. w. regan : apj * 482 * , l135 ( 1997 ) t. w. murphy et al . : aj * 111 * , 1025 ( 1996 ) r. f. mushotzky et al . : nature * 404 * , 459 ( 2000 ) c. nelson , m. whittle : ap&ss * 99 * , 67 ( 1995 ) c. norman , n. z. scoville : apj * 332 * , 124 ( 1988 ) k. ohta et al . : nature * 382 * , 426 ( 1996 ) a. omont et al . : a&a * 315 * , 10 ( 1996 ) j. perry : in relationships between agns and starburst galaxies , ed . a. v. filippenko , asp conference series ( asp : san francisco ) , 31 , p. 169 ( 1992 ) m. pettini et al . : apj * 528 * , 96 ( 2000 ) e. a. pier , j. h. krolik : apj * 418 * , 673 ( 1993 ) d. rigopoulou et al . : apj * 118 * , 2625 ( 1999 ) m. rowan - robinson : mnras * 272 * , 737 ( 1995 ) j. m. rodriguez - espinosa , r. j. rudy , b. jones b. : apj * 309 * , 76 ( 1986 ) k. sakamoto et al . : apj * 514 * , 68 ( 1999 ) d. b. sanders et al . : apj * 325 * , 74 ( 1988a ) d. b. sanders et al . : apj * 347 * , 29 ( 1989a ) d. b. sanders et al . : a&a * 213 * , l5 ( 1989b ) d. b. sanders et al . : apj * 325 * , 74 ( 1998 ) d. b. sanders , n. z. scoville , b. t. soifer : apj * 335 * , l1 ( 1988b ) n. z. scoville et al . : aj * 119 * , 991 ( 2000 ) n. z. scoville et al . : apj * 252 * , l455 ( 1993 ) e. p. smith , t. m. heckman : apj * 341 * , 658 ( 1989 ) p. m. solomon , d. downes , s. j. e. radford , j. w. barrett : apj * 478 * , 144 ( 1997 ) j. a. surace , d. b. sanders : apj * 512 * , 162 ( 1999 ) l. tacconi , e. schinnerer , j. f. gallimore , r. genzel , l. e. tacconi - garman , d. downes : baas * 29 * , 1333 ( 1997 ) c. n. tadhunter , r. c. dickson , n. a. shaw : mnras * 281 * , 591 ( 1996 ) e. terlevich , a. i. diaz , r. terlevich : mnras * 242 * , 271 ( 1990 ) h. d. tran et al . : apj * 516 * , 85 ( 1999 ) s. veilleux et al . : apjs * 98 * , 171 ( 1995 ) s. veilleux , d .- c . kim , d. b. sanders : apj * 522 * , 113 ( 1999a ) s. veilleux , d .- kim , d. b. sanders : apj submitted ( 2001 ) s. veilleux , d. b. sanders , d .- kim : apj * 484 * , 92 ( 1997 ) s. veilleux , d. b. sanders , d .- kim : apj * 522 * , 139 ( 1999b ) s. n. virani , m. m. de robertis , m. l. vandalfsen : aj * 120 * , 1739 ( 2000 ) m. whittle : apj * 387 * , 121 ( 1992a ) m. whittle : apjs * 79 * , 49 ( 1992b ) r. j. r. williams , a. c. baker , j. j. perry : mnras * 310 * , 913 ( 1999 ) a. s. wilson : a&a * 206 * , 41 ( 1988 ) h. wu , z. l. zou , x. y. xia , z. g. deng : a&as * 127 * , 521 ( 1998a ) h. wu , z. l. zou , x. y. xia , z. g. deng : a&as * 132 * , 181 ( 1998b ) s. e. zepf , d. c. koo : apj * 337 * , 34 ( 1989 ) z. zheng et al . : a&a * 349 * , 735 ( 1999 )
Abstract:

Answer: the issue of a starburst - agn connection in local and distant galaxies is relevant for understanding galaxy formation and evolution , the star formation and metal enrichment history of the universe , the origin of the extragalactic background at low and high energies , and the origin of nuclear activity in galaxies . here i review some of the observational evidence recently brought forward in favor of a connection between the starburst and agn phenomena . i conclude by raising a number of questions concerning the exact nature of this connection .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it has long been known that there is an @xmath0 supermultiplet which , with respect to @xmath1 supersymmetry , appears as a combination of one vector and one chiral multiplet @xcite . this supermultiplet is irreducible under @xmath0 supersymmetry and carries vanishing central charge . it is usually referred to as the vector supermultiplet . not long after its introduction , it was realized that there exists a variant , the vector - tensor multiplet , which , under @xmath1 supersymmetry , appears as a combination of one vector and one linear multiplet @xcite . this variant is irreducible under @xmath0 and , in contrast , carries non - vanishing central charge off - shell . on shell it is equivalent to the vector multiplet . this multiplet was originally constructed using component field techniques @xcite , and it and its properties have received little attention . recently , however , within the context of trying to understand the consequences of @xmath0 duality in superstrings , the vector - tensor multiplet has re - emerged . specifically , when heterotic string theory is reduced to an @xmath0 theory in four dimensions the dilaton and the antisymmetric tensor field lie in a vector - tensor multiplet @xcite . it is clear from this work that the vector - tensor supermultiplet is fundamental in heterotic theories and that elucidation of its properties , such as its behavior under duality transformations , is of importance . the coupling of the vector - tensor multiplet to supergravity has also recently been considered @xcite . it was shown that this requires the gauging of the central charge , leading to a chern - simons coupling between the vector - tensor multiplet and a vector multiplet . if one wants to fully understand the complete , off - shell structure of the tensor - vector multiplet , one powerful approach is to construct the appropriate @xmath0 superfield . it is the purpose of this paper to provide such a formulation . much of the interesting structure of the vector - tensor multiplet appears in its couplings to other multiplets @xcite . here , however , we will restrict ourselves to a superfield formulation of the free abelian case , leaving interacting generalization to future publications . since the vector - tensor supermultiplet has non - zero central charge , it is necessary to expand the usual superspace . the maximal central extension of the @xmath0 superalgebra has two central charges . consequently the corresponding superspace has two extra bosonic coordinates @xcite . working in this superspace , one can introduce superfields and covariant constraints . following the geometrical formulation of supergauge fields , we introduce a super - connection and the associated curvature . we then introduce the appropriate constraints , solve the bianchi identities and show how the component fields of the tensor - vector multiplet emerge . using superspace techniques we rederive the supersymmetry and central charge transformations and , after showing that there exist a lagrangian superfield in central charge superspace , the higher components of which are all total derivatives , we give the superfield and component actions . the existence of a superfield lagrangian is an example of a central - charge generalization of the superactions described in @xcite . it suggests that there is an even - dimensional submanifold of the central charge superspace naturally associated with the vector - tensor multiplet . central charge superspace has recently also been considered in @xcite and used to rederive the usual gauge supermultiplet . also , we want to point out that there is a strong relationship between the theory of @xmath1 supersymmetry in six dimensions and four - dimensional , @xmath0 central charge superspace . indeed , the superfield equations of motion in the six - dimensional theory motivated the choice of one important constraint equation in four - dimensional central charge superspace . in this sense , our constraint can be understood as a superfield realization of the dimensional reduction by legendre transformation discussed in @xcite . we start by briefly recapitulating the relevant formulae of @xmath0 superspace . throughout the paper we will use the conventions of @xcite . the @xmath0 supersymmetry algebra is obtained from the poincar algebra by adding four fermionic operators @xmath2 ( @xmath3 and @xmath4 ) and their anti - hermitian conjugates @xmath5 . moreover the algebra admits one complex `` central charge '' @xmath6 where @xmath7 and @xmath8 are hermitian . these operators satisfy the following anticommutation relations : @xmath9 where @xmath10 are the four - momenta and @xmath11 . the automorphism group of algebra is @xmath12 where the @xmath13 acts on the @xmath14 index in @xmath2 . the antisymmetric tensor @xmath15 with @xmath16 provides an invariant metric for raising and lowering the @xmath13 indices by @xmath17 and @xmath18 . @xmath0 superspace is a space with coordinates @xmath19 where @xmath20 , @xmath21 , and @xmath22 are commuting bosonic coordinates while @xmath23 and @xmath24 are anticommuting fermionic coordinates . a superfield @xmath25 is a function of the superspace coordinates , @xmath26 . taylor - series expansion of a general superfield @xmath25 in the @xmath27 coordinates terminates after a finite number of terms due to the anticommuting nature of @xmath27 . on the other hand , the expansion in @xmath21 and @xmath28 never ends . this means there are an infinite number of component fields ( functions of the spacetime coordinates @xmath20 ) in a general superfield . this infinite number of component fields can be reduced to a finite number either off - shell , by applying appropriate constraints , or on - shell , by choosing equations of motion which propagate only a finite number of component fields . translations in the superspace are generated by the supercovariant differential operators @xmath29 , @xmath30 , @xmath31 , and @xmath32 where @xmath33 . it is straightforward to compute the anticommutation relations for these operators . they are @xmath34 by construction @xmath35 and @xmath36 anticommute with @xmath37 and @xmath38 and so can be used to impose supersymmetric covariant conditions on superfields . the supervielbein @xmath39 of the @xmath0 superspace is defined as the matrix that relates the supercovariant derivatives @xmath40 and the ordinary partial derivatives @xmath41 the matrix @xmath42 is the inverse of @xmath39 . these two matrices define the geometry of the @xmath0 superspace . the torsion @xmath43 is defined as the exterior derivative of the supervielbein one - form @xmath44 , @xmath45 the non - vanishing components of the torsion are found to be @xmath46 in this section we give a geometrical superfield formulation of the vector - tensor multiplet . we begin by considering the usual geometrical form of super - gauge theory , though in superspace with central charge . we then find a suitable set of constraints on the superfield strength to reproduce the field content of the vector - tensor multiplet . restricting our attention to abelian gauge theories , let us introduce a hermitian connection @xmath47 . the hermiticity of the connection implies @xmath48 where @xmath49 is real , @xmath50 , and @xmath51 . the curvature two - form is defined as @xmath52 the coefficient functions @xmath53 comprise thirteen lorentz - covariant types . the ones that contain torsion terms are given by @xmath54 the curvature tensor @xmath55 is subject to the bianchi identities @xmath56 or equivalently @xmath57 each tensor component of the curvature tensor is an @xmath0 superfield which , in turn , has an infinite number of component fields . all but a finite number of these component fields must be eliminated by virtue of appropriate constraints . these constraints must be lorentz , gauge , and supersymmetric covariant . it is natural to adopt a set of constraints which set the pure spinorial part of the curvature tensor to zero . that is @xmath58 before imposing further conditions we would like to explore the consequences of . to do so we must solve the bianchi identities subject to these constraints . the result is that all the components of the curvature tensor @xmath59 are determined in terms of a single superfield @xmath60 and its hermitian conjugate @xmath61 . henceforth , we denote these superfields by @xmath62 and @xmath63 . in particular @xmath64 and @xmath65 furthermore , @xmath62 is constrained to satisfy @xmath66 }   = - \epsilon^{\dot\alpha\dot\beta } \bar d_{\dot\alpha}^{[i } \bar   w_{\dot\beta}^{j ] } , \label{3 } \\ & \epsilon^{\alpha\beta } d_\alpha^{(i } w_\beta^{j ) }   = \epsilon^{\dot\alpha\dot\beta } \bar d_{\dot\alpha}^{(i } \bar   w_{\dot\beta}^{j)}. \label{4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] let us explore the consequences of  on the field content of @xmath62 . the expansion of @xmath62 in the anti - commuting coordinates has the general form @xmath67 it is obvious that conditions  will not impose any restriction on @xmath68 . first we consider the implications of the lowest component of superfield constraints . condition implies that @xmath69 where @xmath70 and @xmath71 . conditions and further implies the reality condition @xmath72 and @xmath73 where @xmath74 . condition yields @xmath75 higher components of the superfield constraint  imply further conditions on the fields @xmath76 , @xmath77 , and @xmath78 . one way to realize these conditions is to note that , from equations , , and , @xmath79 where @xmath80 and @xmath81 . the equations  are the general solution of the bianchi identities subject to our constraints . three of the bianchi identities they satisfy are @xmath82 taking the lowest component of equation gives rise to @xmath83 so that @xmath84 is the field strength of a gauge field @xmath85 . that is @xmath86 the lowest components of and give @xmath87 } & = - \tfrac12 ( \partial_z + \partial_{\bar z } )   \mathscript f_{ab } , \\ \partial_{[a } h^i_{b ] } & = - \tfrac12 i ( \partial_z-\partial_{\bar z } )   \mathscript f_{ab } , \label{h1 } \\ \partial_a d & = - \tfrac14 i \left\ { ( \partial_z-\partial_{\bar z } )   h_a^r   + i ( \partial_z + \partial_{\bar z } ) h_a^i \right\ } , \label{temp11}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath88 . this is as far as we can go using solely the constraints . so far we have the following component fields : an @xmath13 doublet of spinors @xmath89 , a real gauge field @xmath85 , a complex vector field @xmath90 , a real scalar @xmath78 and a real @xmath13 triplet of scalars @xmath91 . we would like to impose further constraints to reduce the number of fields to an irreducible multiplet . as we will show very shortly , it is possible to impose further constraints to ensure that the real and imaginary parts of @xmath90 are each field strengths , one of an anti - symmetric tensor and the other of a scalar . what about the fields @xmath78 and @xmath91 ? we will find that @xmath78 and @xmath91 play the role of auxiliary fields . note that the usual @xmath0 gauge multiplet has a triplet of auxiliary fields . hence , if we want to derive the usual gauge multiplet we are led to set @xmath78 to zero by promoting the constraint to the stronger one @xmath92 } = 0 , \qquad    \epsilon^{\dot\alpha\dot\beta } \bar d_{\dot\alpha}^{[i } \bar   w_{\dot\beta}^{j ] } = 0.\ ] ] on the other hand , if we want to derive the vector - tensor multiplet , which has a single auxiliary field , we must eliminate @xmath91 . this can be achieved by promoting condition to the stronger condition @xmath93 henceforth , we add condition as a further constraint on the theory . now let us proceed using conditions  as well as the stronger version of , constraint . apart from eliminating @xmath91 , it can be shown that the consequences of imposing are @xmath94 we note that the conditions obtained so far on @xmath90 given in and are not sufficient to render the real and imaginary components of @xmath90 as field strengths . we would like , therefore , to impose yet another , and final , constraint that will achieve this goal . we take a reality condition on the central charge @xmath95 this means that superfield @xmath62 , and hence all the curvature tensor components , depend on the two central charges @xmath21 and @xmath96 only through the combination @xmath97 with no dependence on @xmath98 . substituting from constraint into and immediately gives the following constraints on the real and imaginary components of @xmath90 @xmath99}^i = 0 . \label{t5}\ ] ] these equations achieve just the goal we were aiming for . they assert that @xmath100 and @xmath101 are field strengths of an anti - symmetric tensor and a scalar field respectively . that is @xmath102 in conclusion , we find that the component fields in @xmath62 are exactly those of the vector - tensor multiplet , namely @xmath103 . it will not have escaped the readers notice that these fields are actually functions of the central charge coordinates as well as the spacetime coordinates . however , by virtue of constraint , they depend on the central charge coordinates only via @xmath104 . let us introduce a real central charge coordinate @xmath105 . moreover , the dependence of these fields on @xmath106 is highly restricted by the conditions we derived so far . in fact , as we now show , these conditions completely determine their dependence on @xmath106 in terms of their lowest component in their central charge expansion . to see this let us summarize the relevant conditions in , , and derived on the bosonic fields . they are @xmath107}^r . \end{split } \label{t4}\ ] ] equations constitute a system of first - order `` differential equations '' for the @xmath108 dependence of the bosonic fields . the general solution is completely determined in terms of the `` initial conditions '' ; that is , the values of the fields at @xmath109 , say , @xmath110 , @xmath111 , and @xmath112 . thus in a taylor series expansion in @xmath106 each term in the series gets related to lower - order terms , so that for instance , @xmath113 with similar formulas for @xmath100 , @xmath101 , and @xmath84 . furthermore , in the next section , we will derive the corresponding equation for the fermionic field @xmath68 . in this section , we would like to derive the supersymmetry and central charge transformations of the component fields . in order to exhibit these transformations it is necessary to compute the part of @xmath62 quadratic in the fermionic coordinates . moreover , since all the component fields are present in the lowest and first order terms of @xmath62 , the quadratic term is sufficient for computing the supersymmetry transformations . we have @xmath114 let us first consider the constraint equations , , and . demanding that the linear term in @xmath27 in these equations vanish completely determines @xmath115 , @xmath116 , and @xmath117 . we find @xmath118 we note that these terms do not involve any new fields . they are completely given in terms of the lowest component of @xmath62 , namely @xmath68 . we are still left with equation which is a reality condition . evaluating the linear term in , and making use of , yields the following constraint on the fermionic field @xmath68 @xmath119 where @xmath120 . equation is the relation for the fermionic field @xmath121 corresponding to equations for the bosonic fields . it fixes the expansion of @xmath68 in the central charge @xmath106 , leaving only the lowest component @xmath122 arbitrary . we are now in a position to compute the supersymmetry transformation of the different component fields . to do this we have to act on @xmath62 with @xmath123 we find @xmath124 }   + 2 \xi_\alpha^i d   + \tfrac{i}{3 } \bar\xi^{\dot\alpha i } { { \smash{{\sigma}^{a}}_{\alpha\dot\alpha } } }   \epsilon_{abcd } \partial^b b^{cd } - 2 { { \smash{{\sigma}^{a}}_{\alpha\dot\alpha } } }   \bar\xi^{\dot\alpha } \partial_a \phi . \end{split } \label{susy}\ ] ] note that the fields in these supersymmetry transformations are formally functions of both @xmath20 and @xmath106 . we have already shown that the only independent components of these fields are the lowest order terms in @xmath106 . further , transformations do not mix component fields from different orders in @xmath106 . thus equations also express the variations of the lowest - order independent fields , which are functions of @xmath20 only .    to get the central charge transformations we have to act with @xmath125 on @xmath62 . it is straightforward to get the following set of transformations @xmath126 expressions and reproduce the supersymmetry and central charge transformations of the vector - tensor multiplet given in the component field calculations of @xcite . they are a realization of the @xmath0 supersymmetry algebra with central charge . note that as a result of our constraints , in particular , only one of the two central charges is represented nontrivially . we now discuss how to write a superfield action for the vector - tensor multiplet . we start by noting that the relevant field strengths of the different bosonic fields occur at the linear level in @xmath62 . to get a quadratic expression in these field strengths , we have to consider expressions quadratic in @xmath62 . these expressions can contain both @xmath35 and @xmath36 . contracting the indices to get a proper lorentz invariant lagrangian implies that there must be an even number of @xmath78 s . in such an expression , the relevant terms will occur at @xmath127 level if it involves no derivatives or the lowest component if it involves two derivatives . in the former case we will have to integrate over two @xmath27 s only . but in contrast to the chiral space for @xmath1 supersymmetry , there is no two - dimensional subspace of the @xmath0 superspace over which supersymmetry is represented . hence , we are forced to consider expressions quadratic in @xmath62 with two supersymmetric covariant derivatives , and to integrate over spacetime only . in fact , we find that the free lagrangian for all the component fields is contained in the lowest component of @xmath128 to be precise , we have @xmath129 it is straightforward to verify that lagrangian is invariant under supersymmetry transformations up to a total divergence . although this implies that it must be invariant under central charge transformation as well , since the latter is equivalent to two successive supersymmetry transformations , one can check directly that it is indeed invariant under up to a total divergence . this invariance of the lowest component of the lagrangian under central charge and supersymmetry transformations , in fact , implies that the higher components are spacetime total divergences . to show this let us consider first the invariance under central charge transformation . since the lagrangian transforms by a total divergence under a single central charge transformation , it must does so under @xmath130 such transformations . that is @xmath131 put another way , all the coefficients in the @xmath106 expansion of @xmath132 but the lowest one are , in fact , spacetime total divergences . therefore we have @xmath133 although a little involved we can extend this proof to the expansion in @xmath27 as well . that is , it can be shown that @xmath134 we would like to stress that this is completely general . if the lowest component of a superfield is supersymmetric invariant up to a spacetime total divergence , all the higher components in @xmath106 as well as @xmath27 are spacetime total divergences . this has the immediate consequence that a spacetime integral of this superfield will single out the lowest component . in other words we can write down the following superfield expression for the invariant action @xmath135 this represents a central charge generalization of the type of superactions considered in @xcite . this completes our study of the superfield formulation of the vector - tensor multiplet . we conclude by briefly mentioning the connection between the superspace formulation of the vector - tensor multiplet and @xmath1 supersymmetry in six dimensions . the presence of central charge led us to augment @xmath0 superspace by two new bosonic coordinates , @xmath21 and @xmath96 . the resulting space , with six bosonic coordinates , is actually none - other than the superspace of @xmath1 supersymmetry in six dimensions ( though with the fermionic coordinates treated slightly unconventionally , being formulated as a pair of @xmath13 majorana - weyl spinors @xcite ) . the introduction of a connection @xmath136 in the central charge superspace then mirrors the formulation of supersymmetric gauge theory in six dimensions . in fact our first set of constraints are precisely those used for the six - dimensional vector multiplet @xcite . to obtain the vector - tensor multiplet we imposed two further constraints . the first condition still has a six - dimensional interpretation : it corresponds to the on - shell condition for the six- dimensional vector multiplet . it is important to note that this does not imply that the multiplet is on - shell in four - dimensions . instead it implies a relationship between the derivatives of the component fields in the internal @xmath21@xmath137 directions and in the four - dimensional @xmath138 directions , as shown in equation . the second condition breaks the six - dimensional lorentz symmetry . it forces the superfield to be independent of one of the internal @xmath21@xmath137 directions . as we have shown , together these conditions are sufficient to completely determine the dependence of the multiplet on the central charge coordinates . the connection to the component formulation of the vector - tensor multiplet given by sohnius _ @xcite now also becomes clear . the second condition is a conventional dimensional reduction of the six- dimensional vector multiplet down to five - dimensions . the first condition , corresponding to an on - shell condition in six- dimensions , reproduces the `` dimensional reduction by legendre transform '' from five to four dimensions . a superspace formulation of the vector - tensor multiplet allows a number of further issues to be addressed . first is the question of duality . on shell , the usual vector multiplet and the vector - tensor multiplet describe the same degrees of freedom . from the @xmath1 point of view , one is the dual of the other since the chiral multiplet in the usual vector multiplet is dual to the tensor multiplet in the vector - tensor multiplet . central charge superspace should provide a realization of this duality in a manifestly @xmath0 supersymmetric way . a related question is to find an unconstrained @xmath0 prepotential for the vector - tensor multiplet . we also note that the form of the multiplet described here has been explicitly non - interacting . however , the superspace formalism also allows the description of non - abelian multiplets as well as multiplets with gauged central charge and chern - simons terms as have been discussed in components in @xcite . it is also pertinent to the discussion of the most general form of the action for the vector - tensor multiplet . finally the central charge superspace can be used to give a superfield description of other exotic @xmath0 multiplets , in particular the tensor and double - tensor multiplets mentioned in @xcite . we leave the discussion of these issues to future publications . this work was supported in part by doe grant no .  de - fg02 - 95er40893 and nato grand no .  crg-940784 .
Abstract:

Answer: we use the four - dimensional @xmath0 central charge superspace to give a geometrical construction of the abelian vector - tensor multiplet consisting , under @xmath1 supersymmetry , of one vector and one linear multiplet . we derive the component field supersymmetry and central charge transformations , and show that there is a super - lagrangian , the higher components of which are all total derivatives , allowing us to construct superfield and component actions . pacs numbers : 11.30.pb , 11.15.-q     +