Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: elastic scattering from a point defect in a hard - walled , multimode quantum waveguide is a problem which has been the subject of experimental@xcite and theoretical@xcite inquiry in both condensed matter and atomic physics . in this paper , we revisit the problem from an unconventional point of view , reducing it to the scattering of a single effective wavefunction off an array of images . our approach enables us to easily understand complex transport phenomena which have already been observed ( such as conductance dips ) , as well as predict other new ones . the problem of scattering from pointlike impurities in waveguides is a general one , and thus has physical applications in several fields . impurity scattering in quantum wires , and the resulting disorder effects on electron transport , have long been of interest in mesoscopic physics . specifically , the problem arises in the context of two - dimensional electron gases ( 2degs ) confined by quantum wire potentials ; the impurity can represent a defect in the wire . such quantum waveguides can be fabricated at low - temperature @xmath0 interfaces , and are of interest due to their potential role in high - frequency and quantum devices . as carbon nanotubes can behave as few - mode quantum waveguides,@xcite our results are relevant to transport in nanotubes with adsorbed impurities  of interest in the study of biosensors . the problem of scattering in confined geometries arises in atom waveguides as well , with potential implications for quantum computing and atom interferometry . in both cases , atoms must maintain coherence as they pass through the waveguide , and the goal is thus to minimize phenomena such as collisional phase shifts.@xcite finally , the wave phenomena arising in quantum waveguides are in direct mathematical correspondence with a number of wave phenomena in other systems : water waves resonantly trapped between an array of cylinders,@xcite large antenna arrays,@xcite and sound waves directed by `` bessel '' line arrays in acoustics . @xcite    motivated by the above applications , we examine low - energy scattering of noninteracting particles from impurities in an infinite two - dimensional quantum wire , with hard walls at @xmath1 and @xmath2 the wire ( fig . [ fig : schematic ] ) contains a point impurity , which we model as an @xmath3 wave scatterer of effective radius @xmath4 . our method differs from previous treatments , such as the renormalized @xmath5 matrix method,@xcite in that we use an unconventional approach which combines the following three ideas :    1 . the method of images . 2 . the realization that a confined scatterer , like a free space scatterer , is a rank - one target . we can , therefore , combine the @xmath6 degenerate transverse modes into a basis in which only a single wavefunction scatters . 3 .   that the effect of scattering from the waveguide walls is to renormalize this single scattering wavefunction , so that it takes on a new effective value at the scatterer location .    using the method of images allows us to explicitly understand how each reflection from the waveguide walls affects the conductance . the fact that the confined scatterer is a rank one target enables us to express the transport properties of the wire entirely in terms of the single scattering wavefunction . finally , the idea of renormalization allows us to fully explain the transport properties of the wire in terms of reflections of this single wavefunction from the waveguide walls .    in section [ sec : freespace ] , we review free space multiple scattering , anticipating phenomena which will appear in the wire . section [ sec : wire ] lays out a similar formalism for scattering in the waveguide . in section [ sec : results - and - discussion : ] , we present physical phenomena which we observed in our model , which we interpret in section [ sec : physical ] in terms of interference effects . we relegate mathematical details to appendices [ sec : diffraction]-[sec : kummer ] . in section [ sec : wire ] , we show that the lippmann - schwinger equation for scattering from a confined impurity resembles the free space lippmann - schwinger equation , with the exception that in the wire , a renormalized incoming wavefunction replaces the true one . surprisingly , even for a single confined scatterer , this renormalized wavefunction includes free space _ multiple _ scattering effects . we thus begin by briefly reviewing free space scattering , emphasizing the three phenomena which will reappear in the lippmann - schwinger equation for a single scatterer in the waveguide . consider @xmath6 pointlike impurities in two - dimensional free space , located at @xmath7 let @xmath8 be the potential at @xmath9 due to the @xmath10 scatterer . we seek scattering solutions @xmath11 to the time - independent schrodinger equation@xmath12\psi(\vec{r})=0,\label{eq : schrodinger}\ ] ] under the assumption of low - energy , @xmath3-wave scattering . except as noted , we henceforth use atomic units , where @xmath13 applying the @xmath5 matrix formalism,@xcite we characterize a single scatterer at @xmath14 by its @xmath5 matrix,@xmath15 where @xmath16 is a function of the wavenumber , @xmath17 we choose the functional form of @xmath16 to simulate the scatterer of interest , under the constraint that @xmath16 must satisfy the optical theorem    @xmath18    in this paper , we choose@xmath19 which represents a hard disk of scattering length @xmath4 .      consider a single scatterer at @xmath20 in our @xmath5 matrix representation , an incident wave @xmath21 scatters into a wavefunction @xmath11 according to the lippmann - schwinger equation@xmath22 where    @xmath23\label{eq : freegreens}\ ] ]    is the 2d free space advanced green s function satisfying    @xmath24    we shall henceforth assume we are using the advanced green s function and omit the superscript on the hankel function ; we shall also omit the implicit @xmath25 dependence in the green s function . any incoming wave @xmath21 must be a solution to the free space schrodinger equation . we can therefore express @xmath21 in the basis of `` cylinder harmonics , '' @xmath26 where @xmath27 correspond to @xmath3,@xmath28@xmath29 waves . an @xmath3 wave scatterer in free space is a rank one perturbation : of all the terms in ( [ eq : freespaceswf ] ) , only the @xmath30 term is nonzero at the scatterer . from ( [ eq : lippmannschwingersingle ] ) , then , only the @xmath3 wave scatters , acquiring a phase shift ; remaining higher partial waves pass through the scatterer unperturbed . while trivial in free space , these facts will reappear more subtly in the wire . the lippmann - schwinger equation describing scattering from a collection of @xmath6 identical point scatterers at @xmath31 is@xmath32 in which we express the @xmath33 recursively as@xmath34 where we have followed foldy s method.@xcite comparing ( [ eq : lippmannschwingermultiple1]-[eq : lippmannschwingermultiple2 ] ) with the single - scatterer version ( [ eq : lippmannschwingersingle ] ) , the @xmath33 are the @xmath35 incoming wavefunctions at each scatterer : @xmath33 is the amplitude incident on the @xmath10 scatterer after scattering from each of the other scatterers . a crucial point is that @xmath33 excludes the singular self - interaction of the @xmath36 scatterer . defining @xmath37 @xmath38 inverting ( [ eq : lippmannschwingermultiple1]-[eq : lippmannschwingermultiple2 ] ) yields@xmath39 where@xmath40 excludes the singular term . an alternate expression of ( [ eq : lippmannschwingermatrix ] ) is as the born series@xmath41\vec{\phi}.\label{eq : expansion}\ ] ] the effective wavefunctions thus have a simple interpretation in terms of interfering paths : the terms in square brackets describe amplitude incident at @xmath14 after interactions with zero , one , two , or three other scatterers respectively . the series continues infinitely . anticipating phenomena that will reappear in the wire , we highlight the following points of this section :    1 .   the effect of multiple scattering is to create a new effective incoming wavefunction at each scatterer.[enu : newwf ] 2 . the effective wavefunction at a particular scatterer is a sum of waves scattered from all the _ other _ scatterers , and excludes the ( singular ) self - interaction of the scatterer.[enu : renorm ] 3 . an @xmath3 wave scatterer in free space is a rank one target.[enu : specialwf ] in this section , we examine how confinement in a wire affects the transport properties of a scatterer . applying the method of images , we derive a form of the empty wire green s function . using this form of the green s function , we show that the sole effect of confinement is to renormalize the incoming wavefunction . the image representation allows us to very simply calculate the renormalization coefficient . we define an effective cross section for a confined scatterer , and relate it to the conductance of the wire - impurity system . we derive an effective optical theorem in the wire . finally , applying this formalism , we investigate the behavior of the cross section and conductance as functions of various parameters .      in order to write down the lippmann - schwinger equation for an impurity in the wire , we require the green s function @xmath42 of the empty wire . the usual spectral form of the empty wire green s function is@xmath43 where the @xmath44 are the transverse modes for the particular waveguide ( see e.g. datta@xcite ) . in our hard wire , the modes have the form @xmath45 we note that the spectral green s function ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) is a sum over evanescent modes as well as propagating ones .    although we could , in principle , proceed using the spectral form ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) of the green s function , the spectral green s function provides little physical insight into the precise mechanism of the scattering . we therefore take an alternative approach , and use the method of images to derive an alternate , equivalent form of ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) for the hard wire . although the problem of an impurity in a hard wire has been the subject of numerous theoretical studies,@xcite the authors are aware of only one work@xcite which applies the method of images : ref . 3 treats the related problem of a point scatterer in a 3d waveguide of rectangular cross section , which the authors reduce to the problem of scattering from an impurity in a finite , 2d box . the method of images has the significant advantage of making multiple scattering effects explicit . we shall thus use the approach of ref . 3 , rather than the more common spectral methods . because our problem of an infinite waveguide is somewhat simpler than the finite box treated in ref . 9 , the role of multiple scattering is more transparent . we are therefore able to explore in detail the considerable effect of multiple scattering on the physical properties of the wire , which , although briefly mentioned , is not examined in ref . 3 .    the empty wire green s function @xmath42 satisfies green s equation inside the wire , and is zero on the wire walls :    @xmath46    the confined green s function differs from the free space version due to the necessity of including reflections off the walls when describing the response to a point excitation . note the factor of two in ( [ eq : greenwire ] ) , obtained by casting ( [ eq : greens ] ) in atomic units .    as in electrostatics , we can linearly combine free space green s functions ( [ eq : freegreens ] ) with point sources in different places , so that the linear combination satisfies ( [ eq : wirebc ] ) . as long as only one of the point sources is inside the wire @xmath47 , our sum will satisfy ( [ eq : greenwire ] ) inside the wire . outside the wire , we discard the solution . if the point source is located at @xmath48 , we use the configuration of image point sources in fig . [ fig : offcenter ] . we reflect the scatterer , creating a series of images such that the position of the @xmath49 image is @xmath50\hat{y}.$ ]    this image configuration yields an empty wire green s function of the form @xmath51 the green s function ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) satisfies ( [ eq : greenwire ] ) inside the wire , and ( [ eq : wirebc ] ) on the wire boundaries . outside the wire we implicitly set the green s function to zero . the green s function satisfies the dirichlet boundary conditions because , as we take infinitely many images , the alternating sum of hankel functions converges to zero on the walls . this series converges extremely slowly , precluding its use for numerical purposes ( see the discussion in morse and feshbach@xcite ) . the lippmann - schwinger equation requires knowledge of both the green s function and the incoming wavefunction . in section [ sub : single - scatterer ] , we calculated the green s function for the wire . in this section , we discuss the incident wavefunction . we show that the effects of confinement resemble free space multiple scattering : confinement renormalizes the effective wavefunction at the scatterer from its true value . in the image formalism , the multiple scattering arises due to scattering off images .    applying the free space multiple scattering formalism ( [ eq : lippmannschwingermultiple1],[eq : lippmannschwingermultiple2 ] ) to the array of images in fig . [ fig : offcenter ] , we find that the lippmann - schwinger equation for the wire is@xmath52 where@xmath53 recall from our discussion of free space multiple scattering the physical meaning of this recursive lippmann - schwinger equation : the @xmath33 defined in ( [ eq : wavelets1 ] ) are the effective incoming wavefunctions at the @xmath36 scatterer in the array . in a general multiple scattering problem , we would have to stop here and solve numerically . the image array is , however , a special case : not only is it periodic , but the boundary conditions at the wall impose the antisymmetry@xmath54 any wavefunction , incident or scatterered , must be zero on the walls . thus , inside the wire , in the @xmath55 direction , the wavefunction is a superposition of modes ( [ eq : wiremodes ] ) . replacing the wire with an image array requires that we extend these modes outside the wire , into the region @xmath56 keeping the @xmath44 continuous at the walls , we can extend them so that the wavefunction is either symmetric or antisymmetric across the wire walls ; either set forms a basis . however , we know that in the absence of a wall @xmath57 must be continuous also , as we have eliminated the hard walls . the symmetric extension does not satisfy this condition . we therefore discard the symmetric extension , leaving ( [ eq : as ] ) as the proper boundary condition .    combining ( [ eq : wavelets1 ] ) and ( [ eq : as ] ) , the equation for the wavelets thus becomes@xmath58\label{eq : wavelets}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have defined the renormalization sum@xmath59 noting that@xmath60    taking @xmath61 in ( [ eq : wavelets ] ) , we find @xmath62 substituting ( [ eq : as],[eq : zerowavelet ] ) into ( [ eq : ms ] ) yields the lippmann - schwinger equation for scattering from an impurity in a wire:@xmath63\sum_{i=-\infty}^{\infty}(-1)^{i}g_{0}(\vec{r},\vec{r}_{i})\label{eq : mswf}\\   & = & \phi(\vec{r})+s\left[\frac{\phi(\vec{r}_{0})}{1-sg_{r}}\right]g_{w}(\vec{r},\vec{r}_{0}).\label{eq : mswf2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] comparing ( [ eq : mswf2 ] ) to the free space lippmann - schwinger equation ( [ eq : lippmannschwingersingle ] ) for a single scatterer , we see that the wire simply renormalizes the incoming wavefunction at the scatterer to have a new effective value @xmath64 and so our final lippmann - schwinger equation is@xmath65 for convenience , we define a renormalization factor@xmath66 which is the ratio between the original and renormalized incoming wavefunctions at the scatterer .    in order to cast the renormalized incoming wavefunction in terms of interfering paths , we expand perturbatively , as we did in ( [ eq : expansion ] ) for free space . for shorthand , define@xmath67 we find@xmath68\phi(\vec{r}_{0})\nonumber \\   & = & \left[1+\mathop{\sum_{i=-\infty}^{\infty}}_{i\neq0}sg_{i\rightarrow0}\right.\label{eq : bouncesfeynman}\\   &   & \left.+\mathop{\sum_{i=-\infty}^{\infty}}_{i\neq j}\mathop{\sum_{j=-\infty}^{\infty}}_{j\neq0}sg_{i\rightarrow j}\times sg_{j\rightarrow0}\right]\phi(\vec{r}_{0})\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] where we have used ( [ eq : signstrength ] ) . the @xmath69 term of the sum ( [ eq : bouncesfeynman ] ) describes propagation to @xmath70 after scattering from any @xmath71 images , beginning with the first term , which describes free propagation to @xmath70 . alternately , the @xmath69 term corresponds to @xmath72 scattering events combined with any number of reflections off the wall , each of which introduces an additional phase of -1 . [ fig : born ] illustrates the correspondence between scattering from an image and reflecting from the wall . renormalization of the effective wavefunction is simply the manifestation of the identical phenomenon in free space ( see item [ enu : newwf ] in the list of section [ sub : freespacemultiple ] ) . from a semiclassical point of view , the incoming wave , given infinite time to spread , reflects from each possible combination of scatterers before returning to the source . note that @xmath73 is simply the wire s green s function evaluated at the scatterer , with the singular self - interaction of the source removed,@xmath74.\label{eq : gr}\ ] ] this idea , as expressed in ( [ eq : gr ] ) , is the essence of `` renormalized @xmath5 matrix theory.''@xcite the theory , as applied to our case , is equivalent to the idea that in free space multiple scattering , the effective wavefunction at a scatterer excludes the singular self - interaction ( see item [ enu : renorm ] of section [ sub : freespacemultiple ] ) . we note that although we have derived ( [ eq : gr ] ) via images only for the special case of a hard walled guide , the result ( usually derived perturbatively ) is in fact true for an arbitrary guide or confining potential.@xcite      we have presented both the image series ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) and the spectral series ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) for the green s function . because the green s function of a system is unique , these two forms must be equivalent . however , the physical relationship between the method of images and the spectral form is far from obvious . the two forms of the green s function highlight different physical phenomena . for example , reflections from the walls , which appear immediately in ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) , are far less obvious in the spectral form ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) . contrastingly , the role of evanescent channels in the scattering , while straightforward in the spectral green s function ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) , is less transparent in the image expansion ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) of the same green s function ( although even the image expansion suggests that evanescent channels will be present in some form , because hankel functions are singular ) . in order to understand the connection between the image and spectral forms of the green s function , we show their equivalence mathematically in appendix [ sec : diffraction ] .    in appendix a , we use an integral form of the hankel function to show the equivalence of ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) and ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) . the physical connection between the image and spectral formalisms is diffraction . the images in fig . [ fig : offcenter ] form a periodic array , which is effectively a diffraction grating . we note one small difference from a typical diffraction situation : due to the wire boundary conditions , the incident modes are superpositions of two plane waves each , rather than a single incident plane wave . this difference is trivial , due to the linearity of schrodinger s equation . when such modes are incident on the effective lattice of images , they diffract : plane waves ( or superpositions of plane waves ) striking the grating scatter , at large distances , into sums of plane waves at the bragg angles . the diffracted spectral orders are evident as the quantized wavenumbers appearing in the spectral form of the green s function . as the green s function for each image scatterer is singular , evanescent waves appear in the fresnel regime , near the lattice . we examine these statements rigorously in appendix [ sec : diffraction ] .      while the method of images led quickly to the central results ( [ eq : mswf2],[eq : gr ] ) , these results expressed in terms of image sums converge so slowly as to be impractical for numerics . although the spectral form ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) converges more rapidly than the image series ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) , its convergence is still not uniform , as the evanescent modes include a logarithmic singularity .    in appendix [ sec : kummer ] , we use kummer s method to accelerate the convergence of the green s function , casting it in the form ( [ eq : limitform ] ) suitable for numerical work . a side benefit of applying kummer s method is that we obtain a more rapidly converging expression for @xmath73 : in appendix [ sec : kummer ] , we show that the series ( [ eq : lambda ] ) for @xmath73 ( which is a schlmilch series ) resums to@xmath75+\frac{i}{2}-\frac{\gamma}{\pi}\label{eq : schlomilchgreens}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath76 is the euler - mascheroni constant . we note that this expression is considerably more complex than the expression ( [ eq : lambda ] ) derived via the method of images . in the image formalism , the expression for the renormalization constant @xmath73 has the intuitive form ( [ eq : lambda ] ) , because removing the contribution of the source simply involves excluding the scatterer itself , while retaining the images . in the spectral formalism , because the singularity is not explicit , its removal is considerably less transparent .      in this subsection we define an effective cross section and optical theorem for the confined impurity . as we have shifted from the image formalism ( which applies only to the hard wire ) to the spectral one , where ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) applies generally , the results presented in section [ sub : scattering - in - wire ] apply to arbitrary waveguides , not only hard wires . since the wire is infinite , for calculating transmission / reflection at infinity , we need consider only the open channels . without loss of generality ( due to translational invariance of the wire in the @xmath77 direction ) , suppose the scatterer is at @xmath78 with incident mode @xmath72 , normalized to unit flux , the wavefunction at large distances from the scatterer is@xmath79\label{eq : larger}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from which we can read off a scattering matrix@xmath80 where the reflection and transmission coefficients are@xmath81 one can show algebraically ( or verify numerically ) that @xmath82      in this section , we define an effective scattering cross section for the wire . the usual three - dimensional free space differential scattering cross section is@xmath83 where @xmath84 is the number of particles per area scattered into the solid angle @xmath85 , and @xmath86 is the number of incident particles per unit area . expressed in terms of probability currents , the above relation becomes@xmath87 where @xmath88 is the probability current , @xmath89 is the incoming probability current , and @xmath90 is the radial probability current . integrating over solid angles , we find that@xmath91 the optical theorem in free space relates the forward scattering amplitude to the cross section .    here , we modify the above free space relations , in order to define a cross section for our confined geometry . with incident mode @xmath92 , the scattering wavefunction is@xmath93 which yields a probability current in the @xmath77 direction@xmath94 integrated over @xmath95 the cross terms cancel , and this current yields a scattered flux@xmath96 going in each direction . as our basis is normalized to unit flux , in our case , the incident flux is simply 1 . we define a differential cross section for the @xmath69 incoming mode , similar to the free space differential cross section ( [ eq : freespxsec]):@xmath97 where we note the exact analogy between plane waves in our waveguide and partial waves in free space . note also that @xmath98 has the correct dimensions of length .    in free space , the cross section of a spherically symmetric scatterer is independent of the direction of the incident plane wave . in the waveguide , however , the cross section depends on the incoming mode , because the waveguide breaks spherical symmetry . we can define a total cross section as the average over incoming directions,@xmath99 we note that @xmath100 represents a sort of fraction of the incoming wavefunctions which scatter . flux conservation imposes the bound@xmath101 the maximal value of @xmath100 will , therefore , be @xmath102 , and its minimal value will be 0 . we had previously mentioned that @xmath103 this reduced rank indicates that , as in free space , a basis exists in which a single wavefunction scatters , while the remaining @xmath104 do not . the quantity @xmath105 thus tells us the fraction of the flux of this scattering wavefunction , and should be between 0 and 1 . henceforth we will speak of @xmath106 as the cross section ( as a fraction of the wire width ) . our final cross section is thus@xmath107 and satisfies@xmath108 we note that for @xmath109 impurities in the wire , assuming there are @xmath110 modes available , @xmath111 by arguments analogous to the single scatterer case , with @xmath109 scatterers present , we could choose a basis where only @xmath109 wavefunctions would scatter , while the remaining @xmath112 would be transmitted without any perturbation . the usual free space optical theorem involves the imaginary part of the forward scattering amplitude . one can show that the free space optical theorem constrains @xmath3 via@xmath113 a similar relation holds in the wire , and as it turns out , flux conservation implies that not every value of @xmath114 is physically permissible . unitarity of @xmath115 implies that@xmath116 using ( [ eq : rmatrix]-[eq : trmatrix ] ) in ( [ eq : unitaritycondition ] ) , after some algebra , we find@xmath117 which requires that @xmath114 satisfy the constraint@xmath118 we can express ( [ eq : optical ] ) as an optical theorem , like the one in free space . define the `` forward scattering amplitude '' to be the amplitude which scatters in the direction of the incoming wave:@xmath119 with this definition , our `` optical theorem '' in the wire becomes@xmath120 which is very similar to the 2-d free space optical theorem , @xmath121 where @xmath122 is the forward scattering amplitude . combining ( [ eq : crossmodes ] ) and ( [ eq : optical ] ) allows us to define a cross section,@xmath123      we note that our cross section is trivially related to the conductance of the wire , calculated as in the landauer formalism@xcite as @xmath124 noting that @xmath125 and letting @xmath6 equal the number of open channels,@xmath126 where we have used ( [ eq : rmatrix ] ) , ( [ eq : optical ] ) , and ( [ eq : sigmacalculation ] ) .    in this section , we have laid out the formalism which we shall use to examine scattering in the wire . in section [ sec : results - and - discussion : ] , we use our formalism to examine how the cross section and conductance of the confined scatterer vary as the physical parameters of the wire change . confinement - induced effects on transport , in particular `` conductance dips '' as each new mode opens , have been observed experimentally @xcite as well as in other theoretical investigations@xcite of impurity scattering in quantum wires . changes in the transport due to motion of a single defect are studied in relation to universal conductance fluctuations.@xcite theoretically , the observed phenomena are generally explained via mode - mixing effects,@xcite or loosely attributed to multiple scattering from the walls.@xcite in this section , we discuss some confinement induced phenomena as we specifically observe them in our wire .    the first quantity we wish to examine is how the cross section of the confined scatterer relates to the free space cross section of the identical scatterer , as a function of energy . the cross section of a free space scatterer is@xmath127    fig . [ fig : freespace ] shows that one feature resulting purely from confinement is the appearance of sharp discontinuities in the cross section as new modes become available ; the effect is present only if the newly opened mode is nonzero at the scatterer . to the left of each mode opening , the scatterer appears entirely transparent , whereas to the right of the mode opening its cross section is the full width of the wire . another point to note is that , while the free space cross section decreases monotonically with @xmath25 , the cross section of the confined impurity does not , and can be nonzero at arbitrarily high @xmath25 . we wish to examine some of the features of the confined cross section in fig . [ fig : freespace ] in greater detail . in particular , we want to look at the resonances , and understand the effect of varying the scatterer position [ fig : xseccond ]    shows how the cross section and conductance vary as functions of energy , for three different values of @xmath128 . we observe the general property that resonances in the cross section appear as new transverse modes open @xmath129 unless the newly opened mode is zero at the scatterer . we further observe that the resonances have a universal structure : if a resonance exists at @xmath130 , then@xmath131    as the scatterer position changes , the character , shape , and number of resonances change also . in fig . [ fig : xseccond]a ) , the scatterer is located at @xmath132 , where each of the modes is nonzero . each resonance obeys ( [ eq : sigmaleft]-[eq : sigmaright ] ) . in fig . [ fig : xseccond]c ) , the scatterer position is @xmath133 because @xmath134 , the resonance at @xmath135 is much narrower than the others , and will in fact vanish if we move the scatterer slightly to @xmath136 . in fig [ fig : xseccond]e ) , we observe such missing resonances  with the scatterer in the precise center of the wire , all even modes are zero there , and the resonances at @xmath137 have vanished .    figs . [ fig : xseccond]b ) , [ fig : xseccond]d ) , and [ fig : xseccond]e ) show the conductance for each scatterer position , which is related to the cross section by ( [ eq : conductancexsec ] ) . discontinuities such as ( [ eq : sigmaleft]-[eq : sigmaright ] ) in the cross section lead to a continuously varying conductance . the impurity reduces the conductance by at most one stairstep . comparing the conductance with ( heavy line ) and without the impurity ( thin line ) , we observe that to the right of each mode opening , the conductance falls , generally to the value of the next - lowest stairstep .    from fig . [ fig : xseccond ] , our observations are as follows : ( 1 ) resonances occur for values of @xmath25 at which a new mode opens , unless the new mode is zero at the scatterer . ( 2 ) the general structure of a resonance is that the scatterer becomes transparent immediately before a mode opens , and that its cross section jumps to one immediately after the mode has opened . ( 3 ) the shape and width of the resonances depend on the scatterer position , @xmath138 in section [ sec : physical ] , we shall prove these statements , and explain them in terms of interference effects . although we have examined the case of a repulsive scatterer in fig . [ fig : xseccond ] , our analytic and numerical results indicate that even for an attractive impurity ( @xmath139 ) the conductance is reduced by a single unit immediately after the subband opening @xmath130 , rather than just below it . similar results about the conductance reduction near the opening of each subband appear in other theoretical investigations of quantum wires ; we cite some representative works.@xcite one result@xcite is for a scatterer in a rectangle , and therefore can not be exactly compared to ours . however , the remaining references@xcite treat the infinite wire , and show a slight difference from ours : in refs . 6 and 7 , which examine only attractive impurities , the reduction in conductance appears slightly _ below _ the subband opening . 10 examines both attractive and repulsive scatterers . for repulsive scatterers , ref . 10 presents results similar to our fig . [ fig : xseccond ] , while for attractive scatterers the results of ref . 10 resemble those in refs . 6 and 7 . because delta functions in more than one dimension do not scatter , many different methods exist of representing a point impurity in two dimensions . we have chosen to use a @xmath5 matrix representation as in refs . 12 , 16 , and 17 , and the particular @xmath5 matrix we have chosen in ( [ eq : optical1 ] ) mimics the @xmath3 wave scattering of a hard disk of radius @xmath4 . the references whose results differ from ours have used explicit limiting forms of delta potentials . we attribute the slight difference in results to the different forms and representations of the point impurity . we have observed that the scatterer position in the wire influences not only the width and shape of the resonances , but can even cause a resonance to disappear . between resonances , we note the opposite phenomenon : the scatterer position barely affects the cross section at all . as we vary the scattering length @xmath4 , the cross section behaves very similarly to the free space cross section ( see fig . [ fig : crosssection ] ) . our general observations from the numerical results are the following : ( 1 ) scattering resonances occur where nonzero modes open . ( 2 ) the cross section jumps from zero to @xmath140 across a resonance . ( 3 ) the width and existence of a resonance is influenced by @xmath138 ( 4 ) away from resonances , the cross section behaves like the free space cross section . we have shown that items [ enu : newwf]-[enu : renorm ] in our list of section [ sub : freespacemultiple ] are characteristics of free space scattering which have analogs in the wire . we have yet to examine whether item [ enu : specialwf ] has an analog as well . in this section , we show that in the waveguide , as in free space , a basis exists in which only a single wavefunction scatters . we write this basis explicitly , and show that the scattering of this single wavefunction allows us to explain the confinement - induced phenomena shown in figs . ( [ fig : freespace]-[fig : crosssection ] ) simply , in terms of reflections from the scatterer and its images .      in the basis of plane waves , the scatterer couples the channels so that , in general , an incoming mode scatters into all the modes . however ,    @xmath141=1,\label{eq : ranks}\ ] ]    which implies that a particular choice of basis exists in which only @xmath142 of the incoming wavefunctions scatters at all , and is decoupled from the other @xmath143 basis functions . this wavefunction is the analog of the @xmath3 wave in free space .    another way of seeing that only one wavefunction scatters is by the following argument : for a given energy , @xmath6 channels are open . any incoming wavefunction is a linear combination of the @xmath6 basis functions@xmath144 ( we require only the left- or right - moving set ) . any linear combination@xmath145 of the @xmath6 basis functions ( [ eq : inclr ] ) which is nonzero at the scatterer will satisfy@xmath146 equivalently , define an @xmath147 matrix @xmath148 such that @xmath149 and a vector of coefficients @xmath150.$ ] then , for any scattering wavefunction , the @xmath151 will satisfy @xmath152 as @xmath148 is a rank 1 matrix , only one solution exists . that solution is simply @xmath153 that is , the single scattering wavefunction is@xmath154 where the choice of sign determines whether the incoming wave is right or left - moving . suppose we take a linear combination of the two so the scattering wavefunction is symmetric in @xmath155 the scattering wavefunction becomes@xmath156\label{eq : swfplane}\ ] ] ( the other linear combination does nt scatter ) . by comparison with ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) , we recognize the above form of the scattering wavefunction as@xmath157 note that all the definitions in this section , and in particular ( [ eq : speqimg ] ) , are independent of the specific form of @xmath158 , and thus apply to arbitrary guides , not only to the hard wire . as we shall discuss later , ( [ eq : speqimg ] ) is particularly important because it shows that for an arbitrary guide , we can obtain the scattering wavefunction entirely from the green s function , which we can approximate semiclassically . we now return to the specific case of the hard wire , and try to understand the scattering wavefunction physically . from ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) , an alternate form of the green s function is@xmath159 where the @xmath160 are the image positions . combining ( [ eq : speqimg ] ) and ( [ eq : hankelgreens ] ) , we find an alternate expression for the scattering wavefunction:@xmath161 eq . ( [ eq : specialbessel ] ) shows that the analog of the free space @xmath3 wave in the hard wire is , as we might have expected , simply the free space @xmath3 wave , plus an infinite series of images  a `` hall of mirrors @xmath3 wave . '' we can complete the analogy between free space and our wire by expressing the @xmath143 unscattered wavefunctions in terms of a `` mirrors '' basis . we do so by including higher order mirrored waves as in table [ table : swfs ] . @xmath162 ( twelve modes open)@xmath3 & @xmath163 & @xmath164 & @xmath165 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & @xmath168 & @xmath169 & @xmath170 & @xmath170 & @xmath170    the mirroring , and the signs assigned to each image , are somewhat subtle : only those combinations of free space orbitals which satisfy the boundary conditions , but are also zero at the scatterer , will not scatter . we note that the basis in table [ table : swfs ] is @xmath171 an orthogonal one ; inner products of an @xmath172 wave centered on one image and a @xmath140 wave centered on another image , for example , do not vanish , nor do the various such cross - terms cancel each other . however the important point is that the higher partial waves we have defined are all orthogonal to the mirror @xmath3 wave : higher mirrored partial waves do not scatter , whereas the mirror @xmath3 wave does . we note that the image sums in table [ table : swfs ] converge slowly and are unsuitable for numerical purposes . however , we have the plane wave expansion ( [ eq : swfplane ] ) for the @xmath3 wave , as well as the analogous expansion@xmath173\label{eq : psisplus}\end{aligned}\ ] ] for the @xmath3 wave plus @xmath174 images . we can apply the raising operator @xmath175 to these plane wave expansions to obtain plane wave expansions for the higher partial waves . for example , we can obtain plane wave expansions of the waves in table [ table : swfs ] as@xmath176 & = & \frac{1}{k}\partial_{x}\phi_{s}(\vec{r})\\ \phi_{d_{xy}}(\vec{r } ) & = & { \rm im}\left[\hat{l}_{+}^{2}\phi_{s}^{+}(\vec{r})\right ] & = & \frac{2}{k^{2}}\partial_{xy}\phi_{s}^{+}(\vec{r})\\ \phi_{f_{x^{3}-3xy^{2}}}(\vec{r } ) & = & { \rm re}\left[\hat{l}_{+}^{3}\phi_{s}(\vec{r})\right ] & = & \frac{1}{k^{3}}\left(\partial_{x}^{3}-3\partial_{x}\partial_{y}^{2}\right)\phi_{s}(\vec{r}),\end{array}\ ] ] and we could proceed similarly to obtain higher partial waves . we might expect that the cross section is related to the fraction of the single scattering wavefunction which actually scatters , and we might thus expect the cross section to be proportional to the amplitude of the mirror wavefunction at the scatterer . however , some numerics reveal that the mirror wavefunction alone is insufficient to fully describe the scattering . from ( [ eq : crossmodes ] ) and ( [ eq : swfplane ] ) , we find@xmath177 meaning that the relevant quantity is the @xmath178 mirror wavefunction , and that its value at the scatterer alone explains all the scattering phenomena . ( [ eq : sigmaswf ] ) is again independent of the form of the waveguide . we have already discussed how renormalization of the scattering wavefunction arises from interference between all possible bounces off images . the implication of ( [ eq : sigmaswf ] ) is that the value of the resulting interference pattern at the location of the scatterer determines the cross section : at configurations ( wire widths , incident wavenumbers , etc . ) for which this interference is destructive at the scatterer , the scatterer is transparent . if the system is configured so that the bounces interfere constructively at the scatterer , a resonance results . we wish to highlight another important point , which is that combining ( [ eq : sigmaswf ] ) with ( [ eq : gr ] ) and ( [ eq : speqimg ] ) , we find that@xmath179}\right|^{2}\right\ } .\label{eq : semiclassical}\ ] ] the significance of ( [ eq : semiclassical ] ) , which applies to an arbitrary wire , is that the cross section is fully determined by the green s function of the empty guide . this relation is important because the green s function is a quantity which we can approximate semiclassically . substituting the semiclassical green s function into ( [ eq : semiclassical ] ) will give us a semiclassical approximation to the cross section . semiclassical methods may be of use in determining the transport properties of guiding potentials which are more complicated than the hard wire , and thus not amenable to exact quantum treatment .      in figs . [ fig : freespace]-[fig : xseccond ] , we observed a reduction in the conductance , which are similar ( although not identical ) to the conductance dips observed in other theoretical investigations.@xcite using our formalism , we can understand the resonances and conductance dips of figs . [ fig : freespace]-[fig : xseccond ] simply , in terms of interference between different paths . again the results of this section do not depend on the specific form of the transverse modes @xmath158 , and consequently apply to a general waveguide .    as we showed in ( [ eq : bouncesfeynman ] ) , the renormalized mirror wavefunction contains contributions that have propagated from each of the image scatterers . we are interested in the behavior of a cross section when a mode is about to open . the mirror wavefunction involves only open channels , and is thus discontinuous across a mode opening . using ( [ eq : swfplane ] ) , we can examine the behavior of the mirror wavefunction near @xmath180 , where the @xmath181 mode opens . suppose that the newly opened mode is nonzero at the scatterer , @xmath182 on the left of the mode opening,@xmath183 is finite . immediately after the mode opening , @xmath184 diverges as @xmath185 that is , the mirror wavefunction is always finite immediately before a nonzero mode opens , and diverges afterwards . the value of @xmath186 determines the width of the resonance ( and the lifetime of the corresponding quasibound state ) . however , while the limiting behavior of the mirror wavefunction influences the shape of the resonances , it does not fully describe their shape . as we discussed , the general structure of a resonance is that @xmath187 drops to zero just before the mode opens ; see e.g. fig . [ fig : xseccond ] . clearly the incoming wavefunction , which includes only modes which are already open , can not explain this transparency . the renormalization factor due to the wire , however , includes @xmath188 modes , both evanescent and propagating  and unlike the incoming mirror wavefunction , varies continuously across the mode opening . using the expression ( [ eq : kummerform ] ) for @xmath73 , we find that@xmath189 generally . combining ( [ eq : renormalizedswfgr ] ) with the limits ( [ eq : mirrorleft]-[eq : grright ] ) , and using ( [ eq : sigmaswf ] ) , we can show that@xmath190^{2}}{\sqrt{n^{2}-n^{2}}}\right|^{2}.\label{eq : limitsigmaepsilon}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the value of @xmath191 controls the width and structure of the resonance . examining the right side of the resonance,@xmath192 under the assumption that @xmath193 an important point to note is that when @xmath194 as it does at a resonance , the free space properties of the scatterer have little effect on the cross section ( see for example ( [ eq : sigmaright1 ] ) ) , and so the structure of resonances is universal .      we would like to note , in passing , that the transparency of the scatterer at certain energies is reminiscent of the ramsauer - townsend effect in free space . in free space , we define the @xmath3 wave phase shift @xmath195 of an @xmath3 wave scatterer by@xmath196 let us define it in the confined scatterer as the phase shift of @xmath197 @xmath3 wave generated from the source and the images , when the incident wavefunction is our mirror @xmath3 wave:@xmath198 comparing to the form ( [ eq : mswf ] ) of the lippmann - schwinger equation , we find that@xmath199 applying ( [ eq : sigmaswf ] ) , we find that@xmath200 so that @xmath201 when @xmath202 and @xmath203 when @xmath204 as in the free space ramsauer townsend effect , the cross section vanishes when our analog of the @xmath3 wave phase shift does .    in conclusion , we can make the following general statements about the cross section :    1 . if @xmath205 the cross section will be discontinuous at @xmath206 the limit on the left hand side will be finite , and depend the value of @xmath207 the limit on the right hand side will be unity . 2 .   the width and shape of the resonances in item ( 2 ) will depend on @xmath191 . physically this means that one can tune the resonances by sliding the scatterer up and down in the wire , or by changing the nature of the confining potential . having explored the structure of the resonances , we wish to understand them semiclassically , from an interference point of view . we again turn to the hard wire for insight into the scattering processes . the scattering cross section depends only on a single quantity , the renormalized mirror wavefunction . we have previously expressed this renormalized mirror wavefunction as a sum over the different paths ending on the scatterer ( [ eq : bouncesfeynman ] ) . when the interference between these paths is maximally constructive , the cross section is maximal . when it is maximally destructive , the cross section vanishes . in order to make this interference clearer , we shall make a simple approximation . consider the most straightforward case , with the scatterer in the center of the wire ( the case we examined in fig . [ fig : freespace ] ) . the image positions are @xmath208 in the green s function ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) , we replace each hankel function by its asymptotic form , which is equivalent to making a semiclassical approximation . this yields an approximate green s function@xmath209 the contribution from each image carries a phase related to the path length from the image to the observation point , as well as a maslov index @xmath210 describing the sign change after @xmath72 reflections from the wire walls . in the limit that @xmath211 , we see that the contribution propagating to the scatterer from the @xmath69 image has relative phase @xmath212 . for values of @xmath25 such that@xmath213 all the scattered wavelets thus interfere constructively . comparing with fig . [ fig : freespace ] , we see that this constructive interference coincides precisely with the resonances which occur as new modes open . to fully explain the structure of the resonances , and understand the scatterer s transparency just before modes open , we would have to consider the effects of renormalization in this approximation . we shall not pursue the semiclassical limit further here , as we have already examined the exact case in great detail in section [ sub : universal - conductance - reduction ] . however , purely from this simple semiclassical argument , we can see that the resonances induced by the wire are indeed related to interference effects between different reflections . combining the method of images with the idea of a single scattering wavefunction , we have developed a formalism with which to treat scattering from a single impurity confined in a quantum guide . we find many similarities between scattering in the confined geometry and scattering in free space : we have defined meaningful analogs of the free space cross section , optical theorem , partial waves , and ramsauer - townsend effect . although the hard guide is particularly useful for insight , many of our results apply to other types of waveguides also . we have examined the transport properties of a confined scatterer , making several general observations about the existence , locations , and and characters of the resonances . additionally , we have outlined a method for approximating the cross section and conductance semiclassically , for arbitrary guides . we have derived an effective optical theorem for general quantum wire potentials . using the fact that a confined target is rank one , we have described the transport properties of the wire entirely in terms of a single scattering wavefunction , renormalized by reflections from the confining potential . our central result is that the cross section of a confined impurity is@xmath214 where @xmath215 is the renormalized single scattering wavefunction , which includes interference effects due to reflections from the waveguide walls .    despite the common use of the hard - walled guide as a theoretical model for 2deg quantum wires,@xcite actual confining potentials for both atom waveguides as well as 2deg quantum wires tend to be soft or even parabolic  whereas in nanotube quantum wires , the relevant boundary conditions are periodic ( the periodic boundary case is also exactly solvable via the method of images , although we have not presented the derivation here ) . while the hard wall itself is not the best model for 2degs , it is the ideal system in which to examine how effects like conductance reduction , which are independent of the confining potential and occur in more realistic geometries , arise from simple reflection and interference phenomena . the effects of multiple scattering from the impurity are in fact very similar for general confining potentials ( see e.g. the renormalized t matrix formalism@xcite ) .    a second limitation of this work includes the inadequacy of the @xmath3 wave scatterer model at high energies , and in particular at energies which are sometimes relevant when imaging electron flow . in a future publication,@xcite we plan to extend our formalism to treat higher partial waves . another possible extension of this work could be to examine the transport properties of many scatterers in the wire ; for example , explicitly explaining the transition from ballistic to diffusive transport in terms of interference between multiple mirror wavefunctions . jyv was funded during the earliest stages of this work by a fellowship from the national defense science and engineering graduate ( ndseg ) fellowship program . subsequent research was funded by a grant from the national science foundation , nsf che-0073544 , and by the nanoscale science and engineering center ( nsec ) under nsf grant phy-0117795 . jyv is grateful to m. stopa for a helpful critical reading of the manuscript . 24 natexlab#1#1bibnamefont # 1#1bibfnamefont # 1#1citenamefont # 1#1url # 1`#1`urlprefix[2]#2 [ 2][]#2    , , , * * , ( ) .    , , , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) . , , , , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , , , * * , ( ) .    , , , * * , ( ) .    , _ _ ( , ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , , , , , , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) . , , , , * * , ( ) .    , _ _ ( , , ) .    , thesis , ( ) . , , , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , _ _ , vol . ( , , ) .    , * * , ( ) .    , , ( ) .    , _ _ ( , , ) .    , * * , ( ) . in sec . [ sec : greensfunction ] , we used the mathematical equivalence of the wire to a periodic array of image scatterers . further extending the analogy , we now reformulate the problem of the confined impurity as one of diffraction from an infinite , periodic grating , and the scattered wavefunction as a diffracted beam . we wish to note the detail that because of our dirichlet boundary conditions , our incident beam is a sum of two plane waves rather than a single plane wave:@xmath216 due to the linearity of schrodinger s equation , we can consider each of the constituent plane waves as scattering independently . the relevant physics thus reduces to diffraction of a single plane wave incident on a periodic array of scatterers .    when our incident wavefunction strikes the diffraction grating , we expect that in the fraunhofer limit , far from the array , the diffracted beam will be a sum of plane waves at the bragg angles ( see fig . [ fig : diffractedbeam ] ) . each order of the diffracted beam will have a different weighting ; our object is to cast our green s function ( [ eq : wiregreens ] ) in a manner that makes these weightings explicit . this formulation is of interest because it is equivalent to determining the transmission and reflection coefficients of our system . namely , if we send in a mode , we would like to know what modes come out and with what intensities , which is precisely what we shall find by casting our scattering wavefunction as a diffracted beam .    to begin , we note that bessel functions are regular , and consequently have plane wave expansions . in fact , the well - known integral form of the bessel function@xmath217 expresses the bessel function as an isotropic sum of plane waves emanating in all directions from the origin . we can rewrite ( [ eq : intbessel ] ) in terms of a line integral over @xmath218as@xmath219 where @xmath220 lies along the real axis , going back and forth within the interval @xmath221 . we seek an analogous expression for the hankel function . since @xmath222 is always less than @xmath25 in ( [ eq : intbessel2 ] ) , @xmath223 is always real , and the plane waves in ( [ eq : intbessel2 ] ) do not include evanescent waves . suppose we modify the right - hand side of ( [ eq : intbessel2 ] ) . by permitting @xmath218 to range from @xmath224 to @xmath225 , we may include contributions from all possible evanescent waves , yielding@xmath226 for @xmath227 the corresponding value of @xmath228 , where @xmath229 is imaginary . choosing the positive value makes the evanescent waves die off to the right @xmath230 and diverge to the left @xmath231 therefore , with this choice of sign , we may expect ( [ eq : evanescent_sum ] ) to converge only in the right half - plane .    by adding on an evanescent contribution to the bessel function s plane wave expansion , we have in fact arrived ( up to a constant ) at an integral form of the hankel function , valid in the right half - plane only ,    @xmath232    where@xmath233 eq . ( [ eq : inthankel ] ) is a well - known expansion,@xcite readily obtained by fourier transforming green s equation . consider now the sum@xmath234 which is the green s function for a fully periodic array of scatterers at @xmath235 ( or equivalently , a periodic wire with walls at @xmath236 and a scatterer halfway between ) . based on the physical picture of diffraction ( fig . [ fig : diffractedbeam ] ) , the sum in ( [ eq : althanksum ] ) must be a superposition of plane and evanescent waves at real and complex bragg angles respectively . we wish to find the weighting on each wave ( analogous to the structure factor in x - ray diffraction ) .    to find the weights , we calculate the expansion explicitly . using ( [ eq : inthankel ] ) in ( [ eq : althanksum ] ) , we find    @xmath237    where we have used@xmath238^{n}=2\pi\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\delta(k_{y}d-2\pi n),\ ] ] ( similar to stationary phase ) to reach the expression ( [ eq : poisson ] ) . one can , more rigorously , reach ( [ eq : poisson ] ) via the poisson sum formula.@xcite    performing the integral in ( [ eq : poisson ] ) yields the final expression@xmath239 where we use the absolute value signs to extend the green s function to converge on @xmath240 and we define@xmath241 where the @xmath242 are the bragg angles@xmath243 and the complex - valued @xmath242 are the result of the logarithmic singularity . the image representation of our wire is not exactly the periodic array of fig . [ fig : diffractedbeam ] . the images alternate in sign , and in general the scatterer is off - center . we can , however , represent our image array as a sum of two arrays , as in fig . [ fig : twoarrays ] . one can easily verify that the green s function for the wire with point source at @xmath244 becomes the sum@xmath245\nonumber \\   & = & -i\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k_{x}^{(n)}}e^{ik_{x}^{(n)}|x - x_{0}|}\label{eq : imagegreensequal}\\   &   & \hspace{.5in}\times\chi_{n}(y)\chi_{n}(y_{0})\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the bragg angles are modified slightly from the case of the periodic wire , and defined by@xmath246 the form ( [ eq : imagegreensequal ] ) is identical to ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) . we have shown that diffraction translates the method of images into the usual eigenfunction expansion of the green s function . form ( [ eq : dattagreenswire ] ) of the green s function converges slowly also . the reason for the slow convergence is the singularity at the source , which is present but disguised in the evanescent modes . we use the kummer method for convergence acceleration,@xcite which also makes the singularity explicit . kummer s method involves adding and subtracting a multiple of the static ( @xmath247 ) green s function . we note that [ 12 ] obtains similar results , via a slightly different procedure . we wish to consider a more rapidly converging form of the green s function:@xmath249\label{eq : quickconverge}\\   &   & \hspace{.5in}+\alpha g_{w}(\vec{r},\vec{r}_{0};0)\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath250 is a constant which we shall determine . the static green s function happens to be the potential which solves poisson s equation for a point charge between two grounded , conducting plates,@xcite and we can put it in closed form as follows:@xmath251e^{-\frac{m\pi}{d}\left|x - x_{0}\right|}\nonumber \\   & = & \frac{1}{\pi}\textrm{re } \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{m}e^{-\frac{m\pi}{d}\left|x - x_{0}\right|}\label{eq : g24}\\   &   & \hspace{.5in}\times\left[e^{\frac{im\pi(y+y_{0})}{d}}-e^{\frac{im\pi(y - y_{0})}{d}}\right]\nonumber \\   & = & \frac{1}{\pi}\textrm{re } \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{z_{+}^{m}}{m}-\frac{z_{-}^{m}}{m}\right)\label{eq : gw5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where@xmath252 using the identities@xmath253 and@xmath254 we find@xmath255\nonumber \\   & = & \frac{1}{2\pi}\ln\frac{\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(y - y_{0})\right]-\cosh\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(x - x_{0})\right]}{\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(y+y_{0})\right]-\cosh\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(x - x_{0})\right]}.\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ]    the singularity of the green s function arises from a logarithmic singularity in the hankel term at the source . near the scatterer , the contribution from this term becomes@xmath256 where @xmath76 is the euler - mascheroni constant , while from eq . ( [ eq : limitform ] ) , we find that the limiting behavior of the static green s function is ( after some algebra)@xmath257 in order to cancel the logarithmic singularity in green s function , we thus require that@xmath258 so that@xmath259 & = \nonumber \\   &   & \hspace{-1.5in}-\frac{1}{\pi}\ln\left[\frac{kd}{\pi}\sin\left(\frac{\pi y_{0}}{d}\right)\right]+\frac{i}{2}-\frac{\gamma}{\pi}\label{eq : limit6}\end{aligned}\ ] ] our final form for the green s function , using ( [ eq : quickconverge]-[eq : gamma ] ) is@xmath260-\cosh\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(x - x_{0})\right]}{\cos\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(y+y_{0})\right]-\cosh\left[\frac{\pi}{d}(x - x_{0})\right]}.\nonumber \end{aligned}\ ] ] this expression is of further use in that it allows us to obtain another form of the renormalization constant ( [ eq : lambda ] ) , which we had shown to have the slowly convergent expansion@xmath261 we can now express @xmath73 in an equivalent , but more rapidly convergent expression , suitable for numerical purposes:@xmath262\label{eq : limit9}\\   & = & \sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac{1}{ik_{x}^{(m)}}+\frac{d}{m\pi}\right)\chi_{m}^{2}(y_{0})\nonumber \\   &   & \hspace{.25in}-\frac{1}{\pi}\ln\left[\frac{kd}{\pi}\sin\left(\frac{\pi y_{0}}{d}\right)\right]+\frac{i}{2}-\frac{\gamma}{\pi}.\label{eq : kummerform}\end{aligned}\ ] ]
Abstract:

Answer: this paper develops a scattering theory to examine how point impurities affect transport through quantum wires . while some of our new results apply specifically to hard - walled wires , others  for example , an effective optical theorem for two - dimensional waveguides  are more general . we apply the method of images to the hard - walled guide , explicitly showing how scattering from an impurity affects the wire s conductance . we express the effective cross section of a confined scatterer entirely in terms of the empty waveguide s green s function , suggesting a way in which to use semiclassical methods to understand transport properties of smooth wires . in addition to predicting some new phenomena , our approach provides a simple physical picture for previously observed effects such as conductance dips and confinement - induced resonances .