Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is still unknown how the central engine of long gamma - ray bursts ( hereafter it is called as grbs for simplicity ) is working at the center of massive stars . in other words , we poorly know the engine that drives the most powerful explosion in the universe . some of the supernovae that associate with grbs were very energetic . their energies were of the order of @xmath4 ergs , which is @xmath5 times larger than the ones of normal core - collapse supernovae . this fact strongly suggests that other engine from the one of normal core - collapse supernovae should be working at the center of the grb s progenitors . there are some possible scenarios to drive a grb jet . one of the most promising scenarios is the collapsar scenario ( @xcite ) . in this study , we investigate the collapsar scenario . in the collapsar scenario , a black hole is formed as a result of gravitational collapse . also , rotation of the progenitor plays an important role . due to the rotation , an accretion disk is formed around the equatorial plane . after the formation of the accretion disk , there are several possible stories as below . one is that a jet - induced explosion along the rotation axis may occur due to the heating through neutrino anti - neutrino pair annihilation that are emitted from the accretion disk  @xcite . this is an interesting possibility , although neutrino heating efficiency looks small ( @xmath6 ) . a very careful treatment of neutrino transfer with conserved - scheme of hydrodynamics will be necessary to prove that this effect is the key - process of grb s engine . another is that a jet is driven by extracting rotational energies of the accretion disk with a help of magnetic fields that pierce the disk ( blandford - payne effect : @xcite ) . this scenario is also investigated by several authors  @xcite . this is also a promising possibility . further study will be necessary whether a relativistic jet will be launched by this mechanism . recently , the effect of extraction of rotation energy from the black hole through outgoing poynting flux ( blandford - znajek effect : @xcite ) is investigated by using a general relativistic magneto - hydro dynamics ( grmhd ) code  @xcite . energy extraction from a rotating black hole is a general relativistic effect , so grmhd code is necessary to investigate the effect . in barkov and komissarov ( 2008 ) , they showed that a jet is launched by blandford - znajek effect using a kerr black hole with kerr parameter ( @xmath7=0.9 ) and a polytrope density profile for a massive star model . in their successive papers ( komissarov and barkov ( 2009a ) , barkov and komissarov 2010 ) , they also succeeded to launch a jet by blandford - znajek effect ( kerr parameter was chosen to be 0.9 in komissarov and barkov 2009a , while 0.46 and 0.6 in barkov and komissarov 2010 ) using a polytrope density profile for a massive star model . in nagataki ( 2009 ) , it was shown that a jet is launched by blandford - znajek effect ( kerr parameter was chosen to be 0.5 ) using a realistic progenitor model developed by woosley and heger ( 2006 ) . in nagataki ( 2009 ) , it was pointed out that blandford - payne effect may be also working . as stated above , in the previous papers , it was shown that a jet is successfully launched by blandford - znajek effect . however , there is no systematic study how the dynamics depends on the kerr parameter . it is true that komissarov and barkov ( 2010 ) presented results for different kerr parameters , but they also changed the amplitude of the initial magnetic fields . also , no simulation has been reported for @xmath8 , that is , schwartzschild black hole case . by performing a simulation for that case , we can clearly see how effectively the rotating black hole is working to drive the jet . in this study , we present 4 simulations for the same initial condition with nagataki ( 2009 ) , but with different kerr parameters @xmath00 , 0.5 , 0.9 , 0.95 . it is shown clearly that a more rapidly rotating black hole is driving a more energetic jet . especially , in the case of the schwartzschild case , no jet is found . that proves that the jet is really driven by the rotating black hole .    in section [ method ] , method of calculation is explained . in section [ initial ] , initial condition is shown . results are given in section [ result ] . discussion is presented in section [ discussion ] . conclusion is stated in section [ conclusion ] . in this study , we use the grmhd code developed in nagataki ( 2009 ) . thus we briefly explain the method of calculation here , and please see nagataki ( 2009 ) for details .    in nagataki ( 2009 ) , we have developed a two - dimensional grmhd code following gammie et al . ( 2003 ) and noble et al . we have adopted a conservative , shock - capturing scheme with harten , lax , and van leer ( hll ) flux term ( @xcite ) and flux - interpolated constrained transport technique ( @xcite ) . we use a third - order total variation diminishing ( tvd ) runge - kutta method for evolution in time , while monotonized central slope - limited linear interpolation method is used for second - order accuracy in space ( @xcite ) . 2d scheme ( 2-dimensional newton - raphson method ) is usually adopted for transforming conserved variables to primitive variables ( @xcite ) .    when we perform simulations of grmhd , modified kerr - schild coordinate is basically adopted with mass of the black hole ( @xmath9 ) fixed where the kerr - schild radius @xmath10 is replaced by the logarismic radial coordinate @xmath11 . when we show the result , the coordinates are transfered from modified kerr - schild coordinates to kerr - schild ones . in the following , we use @xmath12 unit . @xmath13 is the gravitational constant , @xmath14 is the speed of light , and @xmath9 is the gravitational mass of the black hole at the center . the initial condition is also same with nagataki ( 2009 ) , but for different kerr parameters . thus we explain it briefly here , and please see nagataki ( 2009 ) for details . the calculated region corresponds to a quarter of the meridian plane under the assumption of axisymmetry and equatorial symmetry . the spherical mesh with 256(@xmath10)@xmath15 128(@xmath16 ) grid points is used for all the computations . the radial grid is nonuniform , extending from @xmath170.98@xmath18 to 3@xmath19 ( @xmath20 is the outer horizon , and 3@xmath21 corresponds to 8.9@xmath22 cm in cgs units ) with uniform grids in the modified kerr - schild coordinate . we adopt the model 12tj in woosley and heger ( 2006 ) ( as for the progenitor evolution model , see e.g. , tutukov and fedorova 2007 ) . this model corresponds to a star that has 12@xmath23 initially with 1@xmath24 of solar metallicity , and rotates rapidly and does not lose its angular momentum so much by adopting small mass loss rate . as a result , this star has a relatively large iron core of @xmath25 , and rotates rapidly at the final stage . we assume that the central part of the star has collapsed and formed a black hole of 2@xmath23 . since @xmath26 , @xmath27 corresponds to 2.95 @xmath28 cm . we also assume that the gravitational mass of the black hole is unchanged throughout the calculation . in nagataki ( 2009 ) , the kerr parameter , @xmath7 , was assumed to be 0.5 , but in this study we perform simulations for @xmath0 0 , 0.5 , 0.9 , 0.95 , respectively ( we name them as model a , b , c , d , respectively ) . since 1-d calculation is done for the model 12tj , we can use the data directly for the physical quanta on the equatorial plane . as for the density , internal energy density , and radial velocity , we assume the structure of the star is spherically symmetric . we also set @xmath29 initially . as for @xmath30 , we extrapolate its value such as @xmath31 . we assume the vector potential @xmath32 where @xmath33 is the peak density in the progenitor ( after extracting the central part of the progenitor that has collapsed and formed a black hole ) . the field is normalized so that the minimum value of @xmath34 where @xmath35 is the thermal pressure and @xmath36 is the magnetic pressure . we use a simple equation of state @xmath37 where @xmath38 is the internal energy density . we set @xmath39=4/3 so that the equation of state roughly represents radiation gas .    as for the boundary condition in the radial direction , we adopt the outflow boundary condition for the inner and outer boundaries . as for the boundary condition in the zenith angle direction , axis of symmetry boundary condition is adopted for the rotation axis , while the reflecting boundary condition is adopted for the equatorial plane . as for the magnetic fields , the equatorial symmetry boundary condition , in which the normal component is continuous and the tangential component is reflected , is adopted . in figure [ fig:1 ] , contours of rest mass density in logarismic scale for all models at the same time - slice @xmath40 ( that corresponds to 1.5760 sec ) are shown . cgs units are used for the rest mass density , while the length in the vertical / horizontal axes is written in @xmath12 unit . @xmath27 and 4000 corresponds to 2.95 @xmath28 cm and 1.18 @xmath41 cm , respectively . these results are projected on the ( r sin@xmath16 , r cos @xmath16)-plane . upper left panel shows the state of model a ( @xmath8 ) , upper right panel shows the one of model b ( @xmath42 ) , lower left panel shows the one of model c ( @xmath43 ) , and lower right panel shows the one of model d ( @xmath2 ) . it is clearly shown that the rotating black hole drives the jet ( the schwartzschild black hole can not drive a jet ( model a ) , while a more rapidly rotating black hole is driving a stronger jet ) .    from figure [ fig:2 ] to [ fig:6 ] , we show the results for model d at @xmath40 ( that corresponds to 1.5760 sec ) . the length in the vertical / horizontal axes is written in @xmath12 unit ( @xmath44 correspond to 2.95 @xmath28 cm , 5.9 @xmath45 cm , 2.95 @xmath46 cm , respectively ) .    in figure [ fig:2 ] , color - contours of rest mass density in logarismic scale ( cgs units ) with velocity fields ( arrows ) are shown . it is noted that stagnation region where the radial velocity becomes positive ( outgoing ) from negative ( accreting ) is seen around @xmath47 in the jet . in contrast , it is shown later ( in figure [ fig:5 ] ) that outgoing poynting flux is positive from the outer horizon .    in figure [ fig:3 ] , color - contours of rest mass density in logarismic scale ( cgs units ) with contours of the @xmath48 component of the vector potential ( @xmath49 ) are shown . level surfaces coincide with poloidal magnetic field lines , and field line density corresponds to poloidal field strength . upper panel shows the central region ( @xmath50 ) , while lower panel shows the wider region ( @xmath51 ) . in the upper panel , the ordered poloidal field lines are seen in the jet . in the lower panel , a wall - like structure that contains vertical magnetic fields is seen .    in figure [ fig:4 ] , contours of total pressure ( sum of thermal and magnetic pressure ) in logarismic scale . cgs units are used for the pressure contours are shown . it is clearly seen that the wall - like structure has high pressure : it is higher than the one in the jet region .    in figure [ fig:5 ] , contours of outgoing poynting flux ( @xmath52 in eq.[bzeq1 ] ) in logarismic scale . it is noted that the total energy flux , which is the integrated outgoing poynting flux over the zenith angle , can be written as @xmath53 where @xmath54 and @xmath55 are determinant of the metric and ( @xmath10,@xmath56 ) component of energy - momentum tensor of electro - magnetic fields . the unit of the contours is @xmath1 erg s@xmath57 sr@xmath57 . outer horizon is seen at the center ( @xmath58 ) . it is clearly seen that outgoing poynting flux is coming out from the outer horizon . this figure clearly shows that blandford - znajek process is working in this system . we could see also a powerful outgoing poynting flux toward the accretion disk . partially this may be working for the variability of the mass accretion rate seen in nagataki ( 2009 ) .    in figure [ fig:6 ] , contours of the electro - magnetic field energy flux per unit rest - mass flux are shown , which represent the bulk lorentz factor of the invischid fluid element when all of the electro - magnetic field energy are converted into kinetic energy ( @xcite ) . even though the bulk lorentz factor of the jet is still low ( of the order of unity ) , the terminal bulk lorentz factor can be relativistic . finally , in figure [ fig:7 ] , plots of the jet energy for all models at @xmath40 are shown . the definition of the jet energy is : @xmath59 where @xmath60 is the ( @xmath56,@xmath56 ) component of total energy - momentum tensor and integration is done only for the region where @xmath61 ( radial component of 4-velocity of fluid ) is positive . it is noted that the contribution of the rest mass energy is subtracted . factor 2 is coming from the symmetry of the system with respect to the equatorial plane . blue curve represents the jet energy within the opening angle @xmath62 , while red curve represents the one within @xmath63 . the unit of vertical axis is @xmath64 erg . it is clearly seen that a more rapidly rotating black hole is driving a stronger jet . the total energy of the jet for model d ( @xmath2 ) is as large as @xmath1 erg . for comparison , the analytic curves of the bz - flux formulation of tchekhovskoy et al . ( 2010 ) for the case of monopole solution b=@xmath65 g are shown by the red - dashed curve ( until forth power of @xmath66 where @xmath67 is the horizon of the black hole ) . the analytic curve of the bz - flux formulation of tanabe and nagataki ( 2008 ) for the case of b=@xmath65 g is shown by the black - dashed curve ( until forth power of @xmath7 ) . it is seen that the jet energy obtained in this study fits well with the previous analytical formulations . \1 . whole picture . + in section [ result ] , we could see that a stronger jet is driven by a more rapidly rotating black hole . it is clear that the rotating black hole is driving the jet . in fact , no jet is seen for the case of model a ( @xmath8 ) . on the other hand , the total energy of the jet for model d ( @xmath2 ) is as large as @xmath1 erg . we showed some figures for model d to understand the dynamics more clearly . we have found that ( i ) the stagnation region is seen around @xmath47 in the jet region , ( ii ) the ordered poloidal field lines are seen in the jet ( that is consistent with other previous study on the jet formation from a torus ( e.g. @xcite ) ) , ( iii ) the jet region is surrounded by a wall - like structure that has a higher pressure than the jet region and contains strong vertical magnetic fields , and ( iv ) the jet is initiated by outgoing poynting flux from the outer horizon . effect ( blandford - znajek effect ) . \2 . wall - like structure . + we found the wall - like structure around the jet . it is considered that the structure will depend on the initial angular momentum and density profile of the progenitor star and initial configuration and its strength of magnetic fields . we should investigate this feature by performing some simulations systematically as a next step . however , this wall - like structure seems not to work so much for the formation and collimation of the jet , because the collimated jet has been launched already before the formation of the wall - like strucuture . jet energy . + it has been shown that the jet energy can be as large as @xmath1 erg in 1.5 sec for model d. thus we expect that the energy of the jet can be @xmath68 erg in 10 sec , and we can say that blandford - znajek mechanism is very promising to drive a grb jet . on the other hand , for a slowly - rotating black hole case , the jet power looks too low , because the luminosity of a grb jet ( @xmath69 erg s@xmath57 ) is hard to explain . thus it is concluded that a rapidly rotating black hole is favored ( faster is better ) . this result is consistent with some previous test calculations @xcite . due to the limit of computational resources , we had to stop the simulation at @xmath40 in this study . we are going to present a simulation that should last more than 10 sec in the near future . lorentz factor . + it is found that the bulk lorentz factor of the jet can not be so high in this study ( of the order of unity ) , although the electro - magnetic field energy flux is much greater than rest - mass flux in the jet , which was also seen in nagataki ( 2009 ) . we believe this jet has a good property , because the jet speed will become relativistic if the electro - magnetic field energy is converted to kinetic energy through the propagation . also , we can be optimistic because the wall - like structure was found in our simulations . it is pointed out that such a wall is necessary to drive a relativistic jet in some papers @xcite . moreover , there have been many papers on the propagation of relativistic jet from a massive star  @xcite where the jet is driven by injecting energy from the inner boundary . some of their results suggest that the bulk lorentz factor of the jet will be increasing with time ( e.g. @xcite ) because the material of the progenitor star is blown off and the jet region becomes cleaner with time . thus we expect that a relativistic jet will be seen if we perform a simulation for a longer time scale ( of the order of @xmath3 sec . see also suwa and ioka 2010 ) . \5 . blandford - payne effect . + in this study , we showed that blandford - znajek effect is working . on the other hand , it was found that no jet was driven with a help of rotation of the accretion disk ( blandford - payne effect ) in model a ( @xmath8 ) . of course there is a possibility that the disk will drive a jet later . also , the interaction between the rotating black hole and the accretion disk may be important . that is , if the rotating black hole is connected with the accretion disk by magnetic fields and rotation power is conveyed to the disk , blandford - payne effect will become more effective . further study will be necessary to conclude the necessity of blandford - payne effect to drive a grb jet . \6 . microphysics . + in this study , microphysics such as neutrino physics and nuclear reaction is not included . the disk structure is deformed by neutrino cooling process @xcite . nucleosynthesis study provides us with an opportunity to compare the simuations with observations of supernova ejecta and supernova remnants @xcite . we are planning to include these microphysics as a next step . 3d simulation . + we showed our results of two - dimensional ( 2d ) simulations in this study . it will be important to compare the 2d simulations with 3d ones . in 3d simulations , hydrodynamic instability in the azimuthal direction will be seen  @xcite . we have performed 4 simulations of collapsars with different kerr parameters @xmath00 , 0.5 , 0.9 , 0.95 . it is clearly shown that a more rapidly rotating black hole is driving a more energetic jet . no jet is seen for the case of model a ( @xmath8 ) , while the total energy of the jet for model d ( @xmath2 ) is as large as @xmath1 erg . we expect that the energy of the jet can be @xmath68 erg in 10 sec for model d. in order to explain the high luminosity of a grb , it is concluded that faster is better.    we have found in model d that ( i ) the stagnation region is seen around @xmath47 in the jet region , ( ii ) the ordered poloidal field lines are seen in the jet , ( iii ) the jet region is surrounded by the wall - like structure that has a higher pressure than the jet region and contains strong vertical magnetic fields , and ( iv ) the jet is initiated by outgoing poynting flux from the outer horizon ( blandford - znajek effect ) .    as for the bulk lorentz factor , it is still not so high in this study ( of the order of unity ) , although energy density of electro - magnetic field dominates the one of rest - mass in the jet . we expect that a relativistic jet will be seen if we perform a simulation for a longer time scale ( of the order of @xmath3 sec ) . this research was supported by grant - in - aid for scientific research on priority areas no . 19047004 and scientific research on innovative areas no . 21105509 by ministry of education , culture , sports , science and technology ( mext ) , grant - in - aid for scientific research ( s ) no . 19104006 and scientific research ( c ) no . 21540404 by japan society for the promotion of science ( jsps ) , and grant - in - aid for the global coe program `` the next generation of physics , spun from universality and emergence '' from mext of japan . the computation was carried out on nec sx-8 at yukawa institute for theoretical physics ( yitp ) in kyoto university and cray xt4 at center for computational astrophysics ( cfca ) in national astronomical observatory of japan ( naoj ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we performed simulations of collapsars with different kerr parameters @xmath00 , 0.5 , 0.9 , 0.95 . it is shown that a more rapidly rotating black hole is driving a more energetic jet . no jet is seen for the case of schwartzschild black hole case , while the total energy of the jet is as large as @xmath1 erg for a rapidly rotating kerr black hole case ( @xmath2 ) . in order to explain the high luminosity of a grb , it is concluded that a rapidly rotating black hole is favored ( faster is better ) . we also find in the case of @xmath2 that ( i ) the stagnation region is clearly found in the jet region , ( ii ) the ordered poloidal field lines are seen in the jet , ( iii ) the jet region is surrounded by a wall - like structure that has a higher pressure than the jet region and contains strong vertical magnetic fields , and ( iv ) the jet is initiated by outgoing poynting flux from the outer horizon of the black hole ( blandford - znajek effect ) . the bulk lorentz factor of the jet is still of the order of unity . however , energy density of electro - magnetic fields dominates the one of rest - mass in the jet . it can be expected that a relativistic jet will be seen if we perform a simulation for a longer time scale ( of the order of @xmath3 sec ) .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: physical cosmology  @xcite is the branch of astronomy concerned with the large scale structure and evolution of the universe . cosmology is unique in that two apparently disjoint disciplines  the physics of the very small and the physics of the very large  are both needed to achieve our current understanding of the universe . it is remarkable , for example , that quantum fluctuations that occurred on microscopic scales in the very early universe may have left an imprint on the largest structures in the universe . the observation that the universe contains matter  with only trace amounts of antimatter , rather than matter and antimatter in equal amounts , may find its explanation , one day , using earthbound particle accelerators . dark matter , for which there is much compelling evidence ,  @xcite may yet turn out to comprise weakly interacting particles that may be accessible in laboratories . the relatively recent synergy between the theories of the very small and the very large is a thrilling achievement . however , there is a cloud on the horizon called dark energy . @xcite    a big surprise in cosmology came in 1998 when the high - z team  @xcite and the supernova cosmology project  @xcite both observed , independently , that type ia supernovae were fainter than expected . after careful consideration of alternative explanations , both teams of researchers interpreted their observations as evidence that the sne ia are further away than expected , given their red shifts and assuming a decelerating universal expansion . if the sne ia are further away than expected , then the average expansion rate of the universe since the big bang must be higher than previously thought . both teams , in fact , went further : they concluded that the expansion of the universe is accelerating . today , the broadly accepted hypothesis is that this acceleration is driven by a form of energy called dark energy that pervades the universe . in the simplest model , dark energy is identified with the cosmological constant @xmath1 that appears in the general form of einstein s theory of gravity , general relativity . in more complicated models , @xcite dark energy is modeled as a dynamical , evolving , field . cosmologists have created a compelling and coherent cosmology based on the friedmann equation @xmath2 and the associated friedmann - lematre - robertson - walker ( flrw ) metric  @xcite , @xmath3 , \label{eq : metric}\ ] ] where @xmath4 is the dimensionless scale factor  normalized so that @xmath5 at the present time @xmath6 , @xmath7 , @xmath0 is the gravitational constant , @xmath8 is the density of _ all _ forms of energy  , denoted @xmath9 $ ] , are in fact _ mass _ per unit volume @xmath10 , where @xmath11 is the mass unit and @xmath12 the unit of length . however , it is common to choose units so that @xmath13 , thereby erasing the distinction between mass and energy . for pedagogical clarity however we keep the symbol @xmath14 in all expressions . note : @xmath15 = $ ] [ k ] = @xmath16 . ] excluding the contribution from the cosmological constant , @xmath1 , and @xmath17 is the spatial curvature . the radial coordinate @xmath18 is defined so that the proper area of a sphere , centered at any conveniently chosen origin , is @xmath19 at the present time . as usual , symbols with a subscript of zero denote quantities evaluated at @xmath6 . the comoving distance @xmath20 associated with the radial coordinate @xmath18 is given by @xmath21 while @xmath22 is the proper distance at time @xmath23 . by construction , the comoving and proper distances are numerically identical today . the radial coordinate @xmath18 , comoving distance @xmath20 , radius of curvature @xmath24 , and proper distance @xmath25 are conventionally measured in mega - parsecs ( mpc ) . inverting eq . ( [ eq : d0 ] ) , we obtain @xmath26 for a spatially flat universe , that is , one with @xmath27 , eq . ( [ eq : r ] ) simplifies to @xmath28 . the standard model of cosmology , with @xmath27 and @xmath29 , works remarkably well ; however , current physics predicts  @xcite a value of the cosmological constant @xmath1 that exceeds the observed value by a factor of at least @xmath30 ! this difficulty motivates the exploration of alternative explanations , such as ones that invoke time - varying  constants " . @xcite after all , we know of no compelling reasons why the parameters that appear in our current theories of the physical universe should be independent of space and time . from some perspectives , the puzzle is why they should be constant at all . @xcite    another motivation for exploring alternative explanations of the supernovae data is to determine whether they alone are sufficient to distinguish between a model with a cosmological constant and models without , such as the varying - g models we consider in this paper . a third , rather different motivation , is the pedagogical value of such investigations . this topic is ideally suited for directed individual study ( dis ) by an undergraduate physics major . it is exciting and lends itself to open - ended exploration . the work reported below was undertaken by one of the authors ( rd ) , an undergraduate physics major , under the supervision of the other ( hbp ) . we share the view of many that , ideally , all undergraduates should be afforded the opportunity to engage in authentic research . however , this is not always easy : many exciting topics unfortunately require rather more material than can be mastered in a reasonable amount of time by a busy student . the advantage of cosmology is that it is intrinsically interesting to many students and , provided one chooses the topic carefully and one is prepared to make appropriate _ conceptual _ approximations , one can find interesting cosmological studies that can be done using mathematics and concepts that are readily accessible to an undergraduate student . we fully endorse the idea that , for such students , a  mathematics first " approach followed by applications is less desirable than the  physics first " approach as advocated by hartle for general relativity . @xcite the cosmological investigation described below was done in that spirit . this paper explores two simple phenomenological models of varying - g cosmology  @xcite using the data compiled by kowalski _ et al . _ @xcite on 307 supernovae . we assume a spatially _ flat _ ( @xmath31 ) universe ( motivated in part by the expectations from inflation  @xcite ) and we set @xmath32 . however , for completeness , we write all expressions in a form that is valid for arbitrary values of @xmath33 and @xmath1 . we find fits to the supernovae data that are competitive with the simplest dark energy model . the fact that non - dark energy models can account for these data is a reminder that the supernovae data alone are insufficient to establish dark energy as the preferred hypothesis . that hypothesis becomes compelling only when different data - sets are analyzed together . likewise , any varying - g model must fit not only the supernovae data , but must also be in accord with other data . however , in view of our expressed goal to provide an example of an authentic research project that can be conducted in its entirety by an undergraduate student , we restrict the scope to only one other datum : the bounds on @xmath34 at our current epoch . we find that our two varying - g models fail the bounds on @xmath34 , thereby ruling out this form of variation in @xmath0 . an interesting aspect of the first model is that the scale factor becomes infinite in a finite amount of time . in such a model , all comes to an end in a catastrophic shredding of everything , a doomsday scenario that has been dubbed the _ big rip_.  @xcite    the paper is organized as follows . section  [ sec : cosmology ] describes those additional aspects of flrw cosmology that are needed to understand the sne ia data . section  [ sec : varyg ] motivates the varying - g friedmann equation we have used to describe the evolution of the scale factor , while sec . [ sec : models ] introduces our varying - g models and summarizes the results we obtained from them . the paper ends with a discussion and concluding remarks . a key problem in observational cosmology is measuring distances to galaxies . to do that we need two things : 1 ) a standard candle and 2 ) an operational definition of distance . we consider first the standard candle . a standard candle is a source whose absolute luminosity is known . type ia supernovae  @xcite are currently the best  standardizable " candles for very large distances . a type ia supernova is believed to occur when a star in a binary system overflows its roche lobe ( the region within which its matter is gravitationally bound ) causing material from it to accrete onto the companion white dwarf . the mass of the white dwarf gradually increases towards the chandrasekhar limit ( of about 1.4 solar masses ) ,  @xcite triggering runaway nuclear burning within the star that releases more energy in a matter of weeks than the sun will emit in ten billion years . in another class of models , an explosion is triggered by the merger of two low - mass white dwarfs . in a third class of models , a carbon - oxygen low - mass white dwarf explodes when the helium , accreted from a companion star , detonates . for a good review of type ia supernovae models , see ref . @xcite . by measuring specific characteristics of the supernovae light curves ( graphs of brightness as a function of time ) , it is possible to make empirically - derived corrections for the observed variations in sne ia brightness and thereby create well - calibrated standard candles . @xcite      the proper distance between two points in space is a well - defined concept , but , unfortunately , it can not be measured in practice . instead , astronomers use a definition of distance based on the flux of energy received on earth from the luminous object , that is , on the energy received per unit area per unit time , @xmath35 where @xmath36 is the object s luminosity , that is , its rate of total energy emission , and @xmath19 is the proper area , at @xmath6 , of the sphere centered at the location once occupied by the supernova . this formula for the flux is valid for a static universe and for a source that emits energy isotropically . in an expanding universe , however , the luminosity @xmath12 crossing this sphere is diminished by the factor @xmath37 . one factor of @xmath38 arises from the reduction in energy of each photon received on earth relative to the energy it had at emission , yielding @xmath39 . by definition , the red shift @xmath40 where @xmath41 and @xmath42 are the emitted and received wavelengths , respectively . the second factor of @xmath38 is due to the reduction in the rate of arrival of photons at the earth , which yields @xmath43 . the corrected expression for the flux is then @xmath44 ^ 2 } \equiv \frac{l}{4 \pi d_l^2},\ ] ] where @xmath45 is called the luminosity distance . for arbitrary values of the curvature @xmath33 , the radial coordinate @xmath18 is related to the comoving distance @xmath20 via eq . ( [ eq : r ] ) , which , as noted above , reduces to @xmath46 when @xmath27 . astronomers measure energy fluxes . but , by convention , fluxes are converted into magnitudes @xmath47 defined by @xmath48 , where @xmath49 is the flux from objects of magnitude zero , with the luminosity distance @xmath50 measured in mega - parsecs ( mpc ) , and absolute magnitudes @xmath11 defined by @xmath51 where @xmath52 mpc . next they take the logarithm to base 10 of the ratio @xmath53 to arrive at @xmath54 , \nonumber \\              & = & 5 \log_{10 } [ ( 1+z ) r(z)/10^{-5 } ] . \label{eq : modulus }   \end{aligned}\ ] ] note that in the ratio the constant @xmath49 cancels . the difference @xmath55 between the apparent magnitude @xmath47 of a source and its absolute magnitude @xmath11 is called the distance modulus . the analysis of a supernova light curve results ultimately in two measured quantities : @xmath56 and @xmath57 . the data  @xcite used in our study are plotted in fig . [ fig : sndata ]  -band filters . @xcite an observed supernova spectrum is red shifted with respect to the spectrum in the rest frame of the supernova . therefore , in general , a filter will transmit a flux that differs from that which would have been measured were it possible to measure the flux in the supernova s rest frame . astronomers use corrections called k corrections to map the measured flux back to its value in the object s rest frame . given a model of the object s spectrum , it is then possible , in principle , to infer the bolometric flux and hence the bolometric magnitude of the object . the distance moduli data compiled by kowalski _ are derived from @xmath58-band magnitude data . ] . the cosmology is all contained in the dependence of the radial distance @xmath18 , or , equivalently , the comoving distance @xmath20 , on the red shift @xmath57 . the red shift , in turn , is related to the dimensionless scale factor , @xmath4 , as follows @xmath59     for 307 type ia supernovae , compiled by kowalski _ _ et al . _ _ ]    given a functional relationship between the comoving distance @xmath20 and red shift @xmath57 , the distance modulus function in eq . ( [ eq : modulus ] ) can be fitted to the data in fig . [ fig : sndata ] to extract the parameters of the cosmological model . a formula for the comoving distance @xmath20 can be deduced from the flrw metric , eq . ( [ eq : metric ] ) , by noting that light in vacuum travels on null worldlines ( for which @xmath60 ) . therefore , a light ray from a supernova at red shift @xmath57 satisfies the relationship @xmath61 . hence , @xmath62 noting that the light ray was emitted when the scale factor was @xmath63 and received when it assumes the value unity , today . our first assumption , which we have alluded to , is that the universe has zero spatial curvature . our second assumption is that the friedmann equation , eq . ( [ eq : feq ] ) , for a @xmath64 universe remains valid when @xmath0 is allowed to vary with time . by valid we mean that the equation is a good approximation to some ( unknown ) exact equation describing the evolution of the scale factor in a universe in which @xmath0 varies . this is an example of a conceptual approximation that renders the problem tractable for an undergraduate student . if we wish to remain strictly within the framework of general relativity , we should be cautious about replacing eq . ( [ eq : feq ] ) with one in which @xmath0 is a function of time because the friedmann equation is derived from einstein s equations @xmath65 which do not permit variations  @xcite in @xmath0 . the tensors @xmath66 and @xmath67 are the components of the einstein and energy - momentum tensors , respectively , and @xmath68 is the metric tensor . in order to allow for a possible variation of @xmath0 , theories more general than einstein s are needed , such as the scalar - tensor theories  @xcite in which gravity is assumed to couple to a scalar field @xmath69 , which  for weak constant coupling  yields the relationship @xmath70 . this , in turn , yields a modified friedmann equation with a time - dependent @xmath0 and additional terms of order @xmath34 . if the latter terms are small enough , we obtain a friedmann equation identical in form to the standard one , but with a time - dependent @xmath0 . writing @xmath71 , where @xmath72 is the current value of @xmath0 and @xmath73 describes the assumed dependence of @xmath0 on the scale factor @xmath4 and therefore cosmic time @xmath23 , and using the definitions @xmath74 where @xmath75 is the critical density now , @xmath76 is the matter density parameter , and @xmath77 is the hubble constant  that is , the value of the hubble parameter @xmath78 today , we may write the modified friedmann equation as @xmath79 ,                   \label{eq : friedmann}\ ] ] noting that @xmath80 with these definitions , we can write the expressions for the comoving distance @xmath81 and the universal time @xmath82 as follows , @xmath83 and @xmath84 the lifetime of the universe is given by @xmath85 . our third assumption is that the _ total _ mass - energy in the universe , whatever its nature , scales in the same way as matter ; that is , we assume that @xmath86 and @xmath87 , where @xmath88 denotes the value of the matter density parameter today . since we also assume @xmath27 , eqs . ( [ eq : defs ] ) and ( [ eq : k ] ) show that , necessarily , @xmath89 . however , observations , interpreted within the context of the standard cosmology  @xcite indicate that the matter density parameter @xmath90 . the difference between @xmath91 and @xmath92 is presumed to be due to the cosmological constant or dark energy . if we wished to be consistent with this value of @xmath92 , while keeping @xmath32 , we need to use a model with @xmath93 . one of our goals , however , is to ascertain whether the sne data , _ on their own _ , are sufficient to conclude that the @xmath29 model is preferred . to do so , we need merely exhibit another model that works as well . here we consider varying - g models with @xmath64 and therefore @xmath94 . alternatively , one could consider @xmath32 , @xmath95 , models . it should be noted , however , that the curvature term @xmath96 can not accelerate the expansion . in a universe dominated by curvature , the friedmann equation is @xmath97 , which implies zero acceleration . to obtain acceleration , one needs a term that dilutes less rapidly than the curvature term , which is the case for a cosmological constant or for the varying - g models described below . in principle , a model for the variation of @xmath0 should arise from some deep theory . @xcite this , however , is far beyond the scope of this paper , which is to give an example of an interesting cosmological study than can be executed in its entirety by an undergraduate physics major , but that nonetheless yields interesting results . we proceed in a purely phenomenological manner . our basic premise is that the supernovae are further away than expected because gravity was weaker in the past and , consequently , the universe decelerated less rapidly than would be the case were @xmath0 constant and equal to its current value , @xmath72 . we studied several forms for the function @xmath73 in @xmath98 , but in this paper we report results for only two of them , each with a _ single _ adjustable , dimensionless , parameter , @xmath99 . the first varying - g model we studied is defined by @xmath100 in this model , there is no limit to how strong gravity can become . another model studied is defined by @xmath101 in which @xmath0 is limited to twice its current value in the distant future . we have normalized both models so that @xmath102 assumes its current value , @xmath72 , when @xmath103 . for @xmath27 models , the distance modulus , eq . ( [ eq : modulus ] ) , may be written as @xmath104 + q , \label{eq : mu}\ ] ] where the offset @xmath105 determines the vertical location of the modulus curve  . consequently , in the fit of the modulus function to the data , it is only the _ shape _ of the function that contains useful information about the cosmology . the offset @xmath105 depends both on @xmath77 as well as on the flux corrections . ] . note that @xmath106 is dimensionless and independent of the hubble constant . evaluating eqs . ( [ eq : chi ] ) and ( [ eq : ta ] ) for model 1 , with @xmath27 ( that is , @xmath91 ) and @xmath86 , we find @xmath107,\ ] ] and @xmath108 / b. \label{eq : lifetime}\ ] ] this model exhibits a striking feature : the scale factor becomes infinite in a finite amount of time . we shall return to this point below . for model 2 , the integrals in eqs . ( [ eq : chi ] ) and ( [ eq : ta ] ) are evaluated numerically using the mid - point rule . $ ] is divided into @xmath109 intervals of width @xmath110 , the mid - point rule is @xmath111 . ] we fit eq . ( [ eq : mu ] ) to the sne data in fig . [ fig : sndata ] by minimizing the function @xmath112 ^ 2 / \sigma_n^2 , \label{eq : chi2}\ ] ] with respect to the parameters @xmath99 and @xmath105 , where @xmath113 labels the @xmath114 supernova at red shift @xmath115 and distance modulus @xmath116 , measured with an uncertainty of @xmath117 . the minimization of eq . ( [ eq : chi2 ] ) is done using the program tminuit , which is part of the root data analysis package from cern . @xcite for model 1 , we get the result shown in fig . [ fig : model1 ] . the fit gives the value @xmath118 , from which we infer a lifetime of @xmath119 ( 70 km s@xmath120mpc@xmath120/@xmath77 ) gyr .   and however , since we can not extract a value of @xmath77 from the fits , we compute the lifetimes using the nominal value 70 km s@xmath120mpc@xmath120 for the hubble constant , but we write all lifetimes in terms of the parameter @xmath77 to make clear how the numerical values will change if @xmath77 differs from the nominal value . ] the fact that the @xmath121 per degree of freedom ( @xmath122 is 1.03 suggests that the modulus uncertainties are estimated correctly and that model 1 provides an excellent description of the data .   to be sampled from a probability density with mean @xmath123 , where @xmath124 is the number of data points and @xmath125 is the number of adjustable parameters . therefore , for a fit that neither over - fits nor under - fits , we expect @xmath126 . the quantity @xmath127 would be exactly equal to 2 if the constraints that define the parameter estimates were _ linear _ in the parameters . ] a similarly good fit is found for model 2 , as shown in fig . [ fig : model2 ] . , of fit of model 2 to sne ia data ( @xmath128 ) . ] this fit yields @xmath129 , with a @xmath130 = 316/305 = 1.04 . we find @xmath131 ( 70 km s@xmath120mpc@xmath120/@xmath77 ) gyr . for the simplest dark energy model , for which @xmath132 and @xmath133 with @xmath134 , we find @xmath135 and @xmath136 ( 70 km s@xmath120mpc@xmath120/@xmath77 ) gyr , consistent with the accepted results . @xcite the @xmath121 per degree of freedom of the fit is 310/305 = 1.02 .    since there is no compelling statistical basis to reject any of these models , we conclude that the supernovae data alone are insufficient to distinguish between them . however , these data when analyzed along with others  @xcite are consistent with a simple cosmology in which dark energy mimics a cosmological constant with the value @xmath137 . the varying - g models should likewise be analyzed along with other data to see if a consistent picture emerges . the fact that a @xmath64 model requires @xmath94 , while the preferred value from galaxy and galaxy cluster measurements is @xmath138 , is already an indication of a difficulty . a systematic analysis of the relevant data , however , is a large task beyond the scope of this paper . instead , we illustrate the importance of including other data by comparing the predicted fractional variation of @xmath0 , @xmath34 at the present epoch , with the available bounds .      the possible variation of @xmath0 is usually characterized by the quantity @xmath34 , which in terms of the logarithmic derivative of the function @xmath73 is given by @xmath139 where we have used the fact that @xmath140 at the present epoch . figure  [ fig : gdotg ] shows @xmath34 as a function of the scale factor , for models 1 and 2 . we see that at @xmath141 , @xmath34 is equal to @xmath142 y@xmath143 and @xmath144 y@xmath143 , respectively . unfortunately , these values for @xmath34 are one to three orders of magnitude larger than the upper bounds that range from about @xmath145 y@xmath120 to @xmath146 y@xmath120 depending on the method used to extract the bound .  @xcite     per year for model 1 ( solid curve ) and model 2 ( dashed curve ) as a function of the dimensionless scale factor @xmath4 . ] engaging undergraduate students in research can be an effective way to keep them excited about science . cosmology is particularly well suited in this regard because it is possible to find topics that are both manageable in scope and scientifically interesting . we have presented an investigation of varying - g cosmological models that serve as examples of interesting research problems that are well matched to the mathematical sophistication of an undergraduate . the two phenomenological models we presented , in which the strength of gravity _ increases _ with cosmic time , provide excellent fits to the type ia supernovae data . we therefore conclude that the supernovae data alone can not establish the dark energy hypothesis unambiguously . other data are needed to render this hypothesis plausible . however , both our varying - g models fail to satisfy the bounds on @xmath34 . consequently , the particular variation of @xmath0 described by these models is ruled out . in fact , one can make a stronger statement : _ all _ varying - g models that give rise to accelerated expansion , and that are based on the flrw metric and the friedmann equation , are ruled out by these bounds . @xcite consider , for example , matter - dominated models , for which the friedmann equation is @xmath147 . this yields @xmath148 , from which we conclude that @xmath149 . but a value of @xmath34 of the order of @xmath77 is inconsistent with the bounds on @xmath34 , which are _ less _ than @xmath77 by one to three orders of magnitude . the inability to distinguish between models ( model degeneracy ) is inherent in the friedmann equation because the latter is sensitive only to the _ total _ energy density of the universe and is agnostic with respect to how the energy density arises . this may be seen by writing the friedmann equation , eq . ( [ eq : feq ] ) , as @xmath150 where @xmath151 , @xmath152 , and @xmath153 are the density contributions from matter , the curvature and the cosmological constant , respectively . the hubble parameter @xmath154 is related to the _ sum _ of @xmath155 not the individual components ; or , equivalently , to the sum @xmath156 therefore , it is possible to entertain different interpretations of the total energy density . for example , _ any _ model based on the friedmann equation can be reinterpreted as one in which matter , perhaps of several different sorts , is either _ created _ , _ destroyed _ , or both , as the universe evolves . consider , for example , the simple cosmological constant dark energy model , for which @xmath132 , @xmath91 and the total energy density is given by @xmath157 . this can be rewritten as @xmath158 with @xmath159 . since @xmath160 is the dilution factor for matter , the function @xmath161 describes an increasing matter density in a comoving volume , which can be interpreted as the creation of matter as the universe expands ! alternatively , as done here , one can maintain the mass continuity equation , in which case matter is neither created nor destroyed and @xmath162 , but allow @xmath0 to vary like @xmath163 . because of the invariance of the friedmann equation with respect to such changes in interpretation , it is necessary to impose constraints on the cosmological parameters to remove the model degeneracy . such constraints can come from other data , or other equations , or both . it seems odd , at first , that the strengthening of gravity with time leads not to the eventual gravitational collapse of the universe , but rather to its accelerating expansion . the reason for this is that every form of energy contributes to the geometry of spacetime . a model in which the strength of gravity changes with time is equivalent to another model in which the energy density changes in a specific way . if the energy density dilutes more rapidly than @xmath164 , then the expansion will slow down . if the strength of gravity increases such that in the equivalent , constant - g model , the energy dilutes more slowly than @xmath164 , the expansion will accelerate . in our varying - g models , the effective energy density increases with time .    for model 1 , the increasing strength of gravity leads to a startling prediction : a catastrophic end to such a universe . this conclusion follows from the limit @xmath165 of the lifetime expression , eq . ( [ eq : lifetime ] ) . we find that @xmath166 according to this model , the universe has a finite lifetime of about 33 gyr and will tear itself to pieces in its final moments ! such behavior has been dubbed the _ big rip _ and is a feature of cosmological models containing phantom energy . @xcite within regions that are dominated by non - gravitational forces , the effect of a cosmological constant does not change with time and consequently the accelerating universal expansion will not disrupt already bound systems . by contrast , as the universe ages the effect of phantom energy increases in _ any _ finite volume of space . eventually , this precipitates an escalating cascade of destruction at ever smaller scales until everything is torn asunder . we can only hope that phantom energy is just that : a phantom ! we thank peter hflich for an insightful discussion on the physics of type ia supernovae . this work was supported in part by a grant from the u.s . department of energy . e.  gaztaaga , e.  garca - berro , j.  isern , e.  bravo , and i.  domnguez ,  bounds on the possible evolution of the gravitational constant from cosmological type - ia supernovae , " phys . d * 65 * , 023506 ( 2001 ) ; e.  garca - berro , y.  kubyshin , p.  loren - aguilar , j.  isern ,  the variation of the gravitational constant inferred from the hubble diagram of type ia supernovae , " int . d * 15 * , 11631174 ( 2006 ) . see for example , j.  d.  barrow and p.  parsons ,  the behaviour of cosmological models with varying - g , " phys . * d*55 , 19061936 ( 1997 ) ; e.  garca - berro , j.  isern , y.  a.  kubyshin ,  astronomical measurements and constraints on the variability of fundamental constants , " astron . * 14 * , 113170 ( 2007 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: the observation that type ia supernovae ( sne ia ) are fainter than expected given their red shifts has led to the conclusion that the expansion of the universe is accelerating . the widely accepted hypothesis is that this acceleration is caused by a cosmological constant or , more generally , some dark energy field that pervades the universe . in this paper , we explore what , _ on their own _ , the supernovae data tell us about this hypothesis . we do so by answering the following question : can these data be explained with a model in which the strength of gravity varies on a cosmic timescale ? we conclude that they can . consequently , the supernovae data alone are insufficient to distinguish between a model with a cosmological constant and one in which @xmath0 varies . however , the varying - g models prove not to be viable when other data are taken into account . this topic is an ideal one for investigation by an undergraduate physics major because the entire chain of reasoning from models to data analysis is well within the mathematical and conceptual sophistication of a motivated undergraduate .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: chiral symmetry , as one of the symmetries of qcd , is a key to understanding the dynamics of the strong interaction . in the real world chiral symmetry is spontaneously broken , and plays a dynamical role in various scattering processes involving the nambu - goldstone bosons . hadrons are then classified only according to the residual vector symmetry and the full chiral symmetry can be conveniently represented by the non - linear realization . yet , as pointed out by weinberg  @xcite , it still makes sense to talk about irreducible representations of the complete chiral symmetry group , and consider hadrons as mixtures of a ( small ) number of such chiral multiplets . if so , one can use the chiral symmetry as an algebraic symmetry that puts constraints on physical observables , such as masses and coupling constants . furthermore , as chiral symmetry is restored at high temperature and density , the change in hadron properties can be viewed as a function of the change in the representation mixing . the present paper is based on this point of view , where we extend some previous work by christos  @xcite for @xmath6 , to include chiral  mirror " nucleon fields , with a view to ultimately extending it to @xmath7 , where some pioneering work has been done in refs . so , this paper may be viewed , to some extent , as an intermediate pedagogical step on the way to the full - blown problem . yet , we shall see that this simpler @xmath6 case contains most of the features of the @xmath7 case , and that certain characteristic problems become clearer without the algebraic complexity of the @xmath7 case . it is , therefore , important to determine the starting point here , _ viz . _ the chiral multiplets of bare hadrons , in particular of baryons , which are then mixed by the interactions to produce the physical / dressed hadrons . phenomenologically , the success of the quark model implies the dominance of three valence quark component in nucleon states . our strategy is therefore to choose nucleon chiral multiplets guided by the nucleon fields written in terms of three quarks . strictly speaking , in the broken symmetry world the chiral structure of the interpolating field is not identical to that of the physical state that is coupled to the field ; generally , the latter could be more complicated than the former . in this sense , our choice of chiral multiplets is perhaps the simplest one consistent with qcd . the chiral multiplets associated with the lowest fock space components of the @xmath8 ( nucleon ) fields are @xmath9 and @xmath10 . for higher fock space components ( e.g. pentaquarks , septaquarks etc . ) one finds chiral multiplets @xmath11 , @xmath12 etc . , all of which we shall ignore here . indeed we shall not even include the @xmath13 multiplet , which appears only with non - local three - quark interpolating fields . the classification of local three - quark nucleon fields into chiral multiplets has been recently worked out in ref . following up on this , we use the @xmath2 and @xmath14 chiral ( here and in what follows we shall refer to them as the abelian and the non - abelian chiral symmetries , respectively ) transformation properties of the two independent @xmath15 local nucleon fields to write down and classify the possible nucleon - meson interaction terms in the present paper . nucleon fields containing no derivatives are natural for the even - parity ground state nucleons ; in that case only the @xmath16 non - abelian multiplet is allowed by the pauli principle @xcite . it turns out , however , that there are two such linearly independent fields . their linear combinations form different (  opposite " ) irreducible representations of the @xmath2 symmetry : one with the axial baryon number @xmath17 and another with axial baryon number @xmath18   transformation properties of one linear combination of the nucleon fields , but did not mention that it was an abelian  mirror " assignment . ] we shall use these properties to classify the nucleon - meson interaction terms in the present paper .    for odd - parity nucleon excited states , on the other hand , fields with ( at least ) one derivative appear natural . once we allow for one space - time derivative to exist , we find nucleon fields with chiral properties that are opposite , or complementary , i.e.  mirror " to the non - derivative  naive " ones @xcite , e.g. the @xmath19 . this fact allows one to explicitly construct the interactions of the four different nucleon fields with chiral mesons that can account for both the masses and decays of the lowest - lying even- and odd - parity nucleon resonances .    as a specific example , we choose four particular nucleon fields , forming a @xmath2 chiral nucleon quartet , that we identify with the four lowest - lying nucleon resonances : the nucleon - roper even - parity pair and the @xmath20 and @xmath21 odd - parity resonances . we estimate the coupling strengths from the nucleon masses . our method applies equally well to any , and not just the lowest - lying , @xmath2 chiral nucleon quartet , i.e. , pair of nucleon parity doublets . it turns out that there are many allowed one - meson - baryon interaction terms , even in the limit of exact @xmath5 and @xmath2 chiral symmetries . this large latitude in the theory stems from the existence of cubic - meson - field interactions , first noticed by christos @xcite , which turn into one - meson - baryon interaction terms after spontaneous breakdown of the chiral symmetry . the existence of cubic - meson - field interactions , in turn , is a consequence of the existence of nucleon fields with the abelian axial charge @xmath18 . we shall show that this fact implies that one does not need explicit @xmath22 symmetry breaking terms due to the @xmath22 anomaly in the nucleon sector to describe the nucleon masses and decays : they can all be described without taking explicit @xmath22 symmetry breaking into account . this is in contrast with the case of purely linear - meson - field interactions , which requires some explicit @xmath22 symmetry breaking terms in the nucleon sector to describe the nucleon masses . consequently , the explicit @xmath22 symmetry breaking , or its restoration , do not need to have an impact on the nucleon resonance spectrum . note , however , that it is always possible to incorporate the explicit @xmath22 symmetry breaking effects by including e.g. the t hooft interaction in the mesonic sector , or even in the baryon sector of the lagrangian without  spoiling " the pattern / ordering of baryon masses . this would not be the case if there were only one kind of nucleon field , i.e. , it is a consequence of the existence of two kinds of nucleon fields with different axial baryon numbers . it must be stated that a closely related study of the nucleon ground state and one resonance has been done by christos in ref . @xcite , but without introducing the nucleon mirror fields . indeed , he studied only the two independent nucleon non - derivative fields and related their masses to certain @xmath2 symmetry conserving interactions . one distinct disadvantage of models without mirror nucleons is that phenomenologically they can not describe the one - pion decays of nucleon resonances at the tree level  @xcite . this motivates us to consider a class of models that includes mirror nucleons , which task we complete in the present paper . there is another kind of baryon chiral multiplet mixing : the @xmath23 and @xmath24 mixing . that is possible only when one allows derivatives in the three - quark interpolating fields , and will be dealt with in a separate paper @xcite . this paper falls into five sections . after the introduction , in sect . ii we give a reminder of the basic facts regarding the nucleon fields and their chiral transformation properties , as well as derive the chiral properties of the new derivative fields . then in sect . iii we examine the nucleon - meson couplings and classify the interaction terms according to their symmetry properties for one particular pair of nucleon fields . in sect . iv we calculate some of the basic predictions of this effective interaction . finally , in sect . v we summarize and draw our conclusions . firstly we examine the @xmath5 and @xmath2 transformation properties of various quark trilinear forms with quantum numbers of the nucleon . this leads us to two pairs of independent even and odd - parity nucleon resonances with particularly simple @xmath5 and @xmath2 transformation properties . five non - vanishing , apparently different baryon local fields have been explicitly constructed from three quark fields without derivatives , such that the nucleon quantum numbers are properly reproduced . only two out of these five local trilinear fields , are linearly independent , however @xcite . their propriety for the job at hand can be tested in various ways : one way is by study of their chiral symmetry transformation properties , another is by directly applying them to the study of physical quantities , e.g. by qcd sum rule or lattice qcd . in the qcd sum rule approach , it was shown that one linear combination of the two independent nucleon fields couples predominantly to the ground state nucleon , while the one with orthogonal weights couples to the lowest - lying odd - parity nucleon resonance @xmath25(1535 )   @xcite .      for completeness sake we show the five non - derivative objects involving three quark fields @xmath26 which are assigned as even - parity ( as indicated by the superscript @xmath27 ) , spin 1/2 , isospin 1/2 (  nucleon " ) fields . here indices @xmath28 and @xmath29 label the color of the three quarks , whereas the pauli matrices @xmath30 operate in the isospin space , and @xmath31 is the light quark iso - doublet ; we also define the @xmath32 to stand for @xmath33 in shorthand notation : @xmath34 where @xmath35 and @xmath36 is the second pauli matrix in isospin space . ioffe  @xcite used fierz transformations to show that there are two independent nucleon fields . thus , one may use various combinations of independent fields among eqs . ( [ n_1 ] ) - ( [ n_5 ] ) for the computation of two point correlation functions , but the linearly independent choices are all equivalent , for instance , to eqs . ( [ n_1 ] ) - ( [ n_2 ] ) . we shall try and systematize the nucleon fields according to both their abelian and non - abelian chiral transformation properties and show that this classification lends new meaning to certain concepts introduced into the linear gell - mann  levy sigma model some time ago . as mentioned in the introduction , lee , detar and kunihiro , and jido et al . @xcite used such a model to calculate the even - odd parity nucleon mass difference as well as the decay properties of the odd - parity resonances as a function of their chiral transformation properties (  naive " or  mirror " ) .    in the qcd sum rule studies , it is well known that a typical combination of a scalar - isoscalar nucleon field eq.([n_1 ] ) and of the pseudoscalar - isoscalar one eq . ( [ n_2 ] ) successfully describes the properties of the nucleon . in addition , this choice leads to one of the best known non - abelian chiral transformation properties , _ viz . _ the  naive " non - abelian one , while we find a somewhat complicated abelian chiral transformation law ( that can be reduced to a direct sum of a  triple naive " and a  mirror " abelian chiral transformations ) . this is the starting assumption of this paper , and its consequences will be discussed extensively . let us consider the scalar - isoscalar @xmath37 and the pseudoscalar - isoscalar @xmath38 even - parity nucleon fields @xmath39 they transform according to the linear realization under the non - abelian chiral transformations : @xmath40 whereas under the abelian chiral transformations the rule is also linear , but slightly more complicated as it mixes in the second nucleon field : @xmath41 in other words they seem to form a two - dimensional representation of the abelian chiral symmetry @xmath42 , or an @xmath2 doublet . of course , all irreducible representations of an abelian lie group are one - dimensional . therefore the  chiral doublet " two - dimensional representation of @xmath2 furnished by the fields @xmath43 and defined by eqs . ( [ e : nuc+atrf1 ] ) and ( [ e : nuc+atrf ] ) must be a reducible one . the symmetric and antisymmetric linear combinations of two ( identical parity ) nucleon fields @xmath43 transform according to the irreducible representation : @xmath44 then their abelian chiral transformation properties are @xmath45 note the factor 3 in front of the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e : nuc+atrf1 ] ) , i.e. , it is the  triply - naive " abelian axial baryon charge transformation law , as it should be for an object consisting of three quarks , and the negative sign in front of the r.h.s . of eq . ( [ e : nuc+atrf2 ] ) , as it should for an abelian  mirror " nucleon . the non - abelian transformations remain unchanged (  naive " ) @xmath46    the triply - naive abelian field does not have an @xmath2 symmetric interaction that is linear in meson fields . the factor 3 on the right - hand side of the abelian chiral transformation law ( [ e : nuc+atrf1 ] ) suggests , however , that the appropriate power of meson fields should also be three , and , indeed , there are two independent @xmath22 invariants that are cubic in meson fields , see [ app : cubic ] . in other words , the @xmath22 symmetry breaking is not intrinsic in the  triple - naive " abelian nucleon structure . now , from the pair - wise nature of the nucleon fields under the @xmath22 transformations , it is natural to consider the nucleon resonance states consisting of two parity doublets , i.e. , of two even - parity and two odd - parity nucleons . if all the resonances belong to the naive non - abelian representation , we can not avoid the decoupling of off - diagonal @xmath47 interaction , as shown in ref . hence we need to find two fields with  mirror " non - abelian chiral properties . we have shown that it is not possible to construct a  mirror " non - abelian nucleon from three quarks without derivatives @xcite . without such a  mirror " field , it is impossible to have a pure  naive - mirror mass term " that prevents the decoupling of the pion interaction term . therefore , let us try and see if that can be done when one derivative is available . we can construct nucleon fields with  contravariant " chiral transformations to those shown above by the replacement of @xmath48 with a derivative @xmath49 ( or a covariant @xmath50 in qcd ) , for example the following two derivative objects involving three quark fields @xmath51 they are odd - parity , spin 1/2 and isospin 1/2 fields , i.e. they describe ( some ) nucleon resonances . a prime in the superscript implies that the fields contain a derivative , and we show below that therefore they have opposite , i.e. , mirror , non - abelian chiral transformation properties to those of the corresponding non - derivative fields . taking , once again , the symmetric and antisymmetric linear combinations of two ( identical parity ) nucleon fields @xmath52 as the new canonical fields @xmath53 their abelian chiral transformation properties read @xmath54 whereas the non - abelian ones remain  mirror " @xmath55 with these fields we are ready to construct  naive - mirror " interactions . we summarize the properties of the four fields in table.[tab : prpb ]    thus , we have constructed four independent nucleon fields : two fields with naive and two fields with mirror abelian and non - abelian chiral transformation properties . in the present paper , we identify these fields with the nucleon ground state @xmath56 and its resonances @xmath57 , @xmath58 and @xmath59 . .the axial charges of the nucleon fields . two generic tentative assignments of physical states are shown as cases i and ii . in case i both even - parity fields are non - abelian naive , in case ii the roper is a mirror one . [ cols="^,^,^,^,^",options="header " , ]     we are forced to conclude that none of these scenarios lead to a viable picture of the nucleon ground state ( though perhaps some may be viable for the resonances ) . of course , we have not included the mixing with the @xmath13 chiral multiplet , as yet , which was assumed by weinberg @xcite to be vital for the isovector axial coupling , and may yet solve the isoscalar axial coupling problem , as well @xcite . we have analyzed the role of chiral symmetry in general and of the @xmath2 symmetry in particular in the nucleon - roper - two - odd - parity - nucleon - resonances system , under the assumption that the above four nucleon states form a particular set of chiral multiplets , as implied by the three - quark construction of the baryon interpolating fields . the four nucleon fields naturally split into two  parity doublets " due to their @xmath2 symmetry transformation properties . we classify the meson - nucleon interactions according to their @xmath2 symmetry transformation properties . it is crucial to keep all @xmath2 symmetry conserving interaction terms , even the  cubic " ones , which are sometimes redundant for the purpose of mass determination . yet , note , that _ if we had only ( incorrectly ) insisted on interactions that are linear in meson fields , we would have been led to the different conclusion that the masses of the  triple abelian " nucleon parity doublet are degenerate in the good @xmath2 symmetry limit_.    the nucleon mass spectrum and the one - pion decay properties have been used to fix some of the free coupling constants in the ( @xmath60 ) sector , see tables [ t : coupl1]- [ t : coupl3 ] . only two @xmath61 decays are kinematically allowed , so they are not sufficient to determine ( all of ) the remaining ( @xmath62 ) couplings . the insight that the nucleon and the roper fields may form two different representations of the @xmath22 symmetry , and that their mass differences can be explained only by the spontaneous breaking of @xmath63 and @xmath22 symmetries , while explicitly preserving the @xmath22 symmetry , is the main result of the present paper . a corollary of this result is that the parity - doublet mass splittings are not determined by the @xmath2 symmetry breaking , as was conjectured in the literature @xcite . moreover , the nucleon - roper mass difference in some calculations , such as the one of ref . @xcite in the njl model , are not a consequence of the broken @xmath2 symmetry in that model , either .    @xmath2 symmetry in nucleon spectra has been discussed before , most notably by christos @xcite , who used only one parity doublet ( @xmath64(940 ) and @xmath25(1535 ) ) , however , and drew conclusions that are consistent with , but only a small subset of ours . he argued that the parity doublet mass difference is proportional to a particular @xmath65 coupling constant , which is in close agreement with our results . he did not try to connect other mass differences , such as the roper - nucleon one , to this mechanism , as he did not use alternative (  mirror " ) sets of fields , which is a novel contribution of our paper ( for a comparison of our formalism with christos , see [ app : christos ] ) . jido , oka and one of us ( a.h . ) @xcite studied qcd sum rules for the odd - parity nucleon resonance @xmath25(1535 ) as a function of the field and its @xmath2 transformation property . we found that this transformation property is the crucial ingredient determining the @xmath65 coupling constant . this was perhaps the first explicit demonstration of the @xmath2 symmetry s role in the odd - parity nucleon spectra ; jaffe _ et al . _ have argued for the same goal , but along different , more general lines @xcite : it is well known that spontaneously broken symmetry , like the @xmath5 one , can not lead to mass splitting predictions without additional assumptions @xcite . @xmath2 symmetry is different in this regard as it is explicitly broken , and badly at that . different operators break this symmetry in different ways and this difference might show up in the mass spectra . an explicitly broken linear abelian chiral symmetry such as the @xmath2 one , can predict mass relations in certain special situations , however , as was shown in the case of scalar mesons in ref . @xcite . in the nucleon - meson problem , however , there is a sufficiently large latitude to allow a fit of the four nucleon masses and of the most important nucleon decays without having to invoke the explicit @xmath2 symmetry breaking . we wish to thank dr . n. ishii and prof . w. bentz , for valuable conversations about the fierz transformation of nucleon fields and ( in)dependence of nucleon fields . one of us ( v.d . ) thanks prof . h. toki for hospitality at rcnp , where this work was started , on two occasions and prof . s. fajfer for warm hospitality at the institute joef stefan in ljubljana where this work was finished . let us consider the two baryon operators , @xmath66 here indices @xmath67 and @xmath29 label the color of the three quarks , whereas the pauli matrices @xmath30 operate in the flavor space . we shall omit the color index from now on . the choice of the second operator is different from the original choice by christos @xcite , who employed @xmath68 ( in the original paper , @xmath69 was labelled @xmath70 and _ vice versa_. ) spin and parity of @xmath70 and @xmath69 are the same . christos @xcite considered the decomposition of @xmath71 fields in the @xmath72 representation . the operators @xmath73 and @xmath69 are reduced to @xmath74 q_l\\ b^1_r&=&[-q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l + q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_r\\ b^3_l&=&[q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l + q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_l\\ b^3_r&=&[q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l + q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_r\end{aligned}\ ] ] we see that in the @xmath72 representation , there are four independent operators , @xmath75q_l,\ ; [ q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_l,\ ; [ q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l]q_r,\ ; [ q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_r . \label{eq : operator2}\ ] ]    it is important that the four operators @xmath76 are independent ( different ) as expressed by the four combinations of the four operators in @xmath72 representation . in other words , we may rewrite the four independent operators in the @xmath72 representation by way of @xmath76 . for example , @xmath75 q_l=(b^3_l - b^1_l)/2.\ ] ] all four operators of eq .  ( [ eq : operator2 ] ) can be expressed in terms of @xmath76 , none of which are identical . christos constructed the chiral lagrangian by using the operators @xmath77 and @xmath78 . next we consider the same algebra with operators eq . ( [ eq : operator1 ] ) , @xmath79 q_l\\ b^1_r&=&[-q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l+q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_r\\ b^2_l&=&-[-q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l+q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_l\\ b^2_r&=&[-q_l^t c i\tau_2 q_l+q_r^t c i\tau_2 q_r ] q_r\end{aligned}\ ] ] in this case we find @xmath80 and @xmath81 . thus , we can not represent four operators in @xmath72 representation with @xmath82 independently . hence , we can not apply christos method to operators @xmath77 and @xmath83 . this tells us that only four helicity components are independent : a pair of l- and r - handed baryon operators each . as each massive dirac field requires two chiral components we conclude that there are ( only ) two independent nucleon operators , of either parity . the parity of the field can be arbitrarily chosen and the opposite parity field ( the parity partner ) is necessarily degenerate . we consider higher order terms with containing two- and three - meson fields . the linear meson terms was defined in eq.([abmeson ] ) as , @xmath84,\\ b & = & \big[\mbox{\boldmath$\tau$ } \cdot \mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$ } + i \gamma_{5 } \eta \big].\end{aligned}\ ] ] under @xmath85 transformation , these terms transform into @xmath86 both of them are covariant under @xmath85 . in contrast they are not covariant under @xmath87 , however we can construct covariant terms by choosing the linear combinations of them as , @xmath88 higher power terms are constructed by these linear terms . the term with two - meson fields are given as @xmath89 these terms are reexpressed by using the determinant term with @xmath90 , as @xmath91 or explicitly , @xmath92 the transformation under @xmath93 are @xmath94 where @xmath95 . note that the difference between the transformations @xmath96 and @xmath97 , by which the non - abelian naive - mirror mixing terms can be constructed . under @xmath22 transformation , these terms transform into @xmath98 finally , we construct the cubic meson terms by the combinations of the linear and square terms . the @xmath99 symmetry allows the following terms to be covariant , @xmath100 of course their hermite conjugates can also be used . however there is a relation @xmath101 and @xmath102 . then , the hermite conjugate of the second of eqs.([eq : trsmab ] ) gives just the former one . hence there are eight cubic meson terms . finally , we summarize the @xmath22 transformation properties of the cubic terms . @xmath103        h.  q.  zheng,``singlet axial coupling , proton structure and the parity doublet model , '' cern - th-6327 - 91 preprint ( unpublished);h .  q.  zheng,``chiral theory with 1/2- octet baryons , '' cern - th-6522 - 92 preprint ( unpublished ) . v.  dmitrainovi c , a.  hosaka and k.  nagata , `` baryon chiral multiplet mixing : @xmath16 and @xmath24 '' , in preparation ( 2008 ) . ioffe , nucl . phys . * b 188 * , 317 ( 1981 ) ; ibid . * b 191 * , 591 ( 1981 ) ( e ) ; z. phys . * c 18 * , 67 ( 1983 ) . d.  jido , n.  kodama and m.  oka , phys . d * 54 * , 4532 ( 1996 ) [ arxiv : hep - ph/9604280 ] . keitaro nagata , atsushi hosaka , hep - ph/0506193 ; keitaro nagata , atsushi hosaka , laith j. abu - raddad , phys.rev.c72:035208 ( 2005 ) , ( e)-ibid.c73:049903 ( 2006 ) . v. dmitrainovi ' c , phys * c 53 * , 1383 ( 1996 ) , nucl . phys . * a 686 * , 377 ( 2001 ) ; e. klempt , b. c. metsch , c. r. m " unz , and h. r. petry , phys . * b 361 * , 160 ( 1995 ) ; m. hirata and n. tsutsui , phys . d 56 * , 5696 ( 1997 ) ; m. takizawa , and t. umekawa , prog . * 109 * , 969 ( 2003 ) and t. umekawa , k. naito , m. oka , and m. takizawa , phys.rev . * c 70*:055205 ( 2004 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we study the nucleon and three @xmath0 resonances properties in an effective linear realization chiral @xmath1 and @xmath2 symmetric lagrangian . we place the nucleon fields into the so - called  naive " @xmath3 and  mirror " @xmath4 ( fundamental ) representations of @xmath5 , two of each - distinguished by their @xmath2 chiral properties , as defined by an explicit construction of the nucleon interpolating fields in terms of three quark ( dirac ) fields . we construct the most general one - meson - baryon chiral interaction lagrangian assuming various parities of these four nucleon fields . we show that the observed masses of the four lowest lying nucleon states can be well reproduced with the effective lagrangian , after spontaneous symmetry breakdown , without explicit breaking of @xmath2 symmetry . this does not mean that explicit @xmath2 symmetry breaking does not occur in baryons , but rather that it does not have a unique mass prediction signature that exists e.g. in the case of spinless mesons . we also consider briefly the axial couplings with chiral representation mixing .