Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: understanding the physics of spacetime singularities is a challenge for any complete theory of quantum gravity . it has been shown that string theory resolves certain seeming singularities , such as orbifolds  @xcite , flops  @xcite , and conifolds  @xcite , in the sense that their physics is completely nonsingular . on the other hand , it has also been argued that certain singularities should not be resolved , but rather must be disallowed configurations  in particular , negative mass schwarzschild , which would correspond to an instability of the vacuum  @xcite . also , in the study of perturbations of the ads / cft duality various singular spacetimes have been encountered , and at least some of these must be unphysical in the same sense as negative mass schwarzschild . a more general understanding of singularities in string theory is thus an important goal . in this paper we study a naked singularity of a particular type  @xcite , which has been dubbed the _ repulson_. a variety of brane configurations in string theory appear to give rise to such a singularity . however , we will argue that this is not the case . rather , as the name might suggest , the constituent branes effectively repel one another ( in spite of supersymmetry ) , forming in the end a nonsingular shell . our interest in this singularity arose from a search for new examples of gauge / gravity duality . in particular , the brane configurations that give rise to the repulson singularity have on their world - volumes pure @xmath3 , @xmath4 gauge theory ( or the equivalent in other dimensions ) , as opposed to the usual pure @xmath3 , @xmath5 , or @xmath3 , @xmath4 with hypermultiplets . we do not precisely find such a duality , in the sense of using supergravity to calculate properties of the strongly coupled gauge theory , but we do find a striking parallel between the moduli space of the large-@xmath0 @xmath6 gauge theory and the fate that we have deduced for the singularity . we also find some clues which allow us to guess at aspects of a possible dual .    in section  2 we describe the repulson singularity and the various brane configurations where it arises . in section  3 we deduce the specific physical mechanism by which it is removed . in section  4 we relate this to behavior of yang  mills theory with eight supersymmetries . we do not find a duality , in the sense of being able to use supergravity to calculate in the strongly coupled gauge theory , but we find a striking parallel between the physical picture deduced in section  3 and the large-@xmath0 seiberg  witten theory . we point out some features suggestive of a dual theory , and remark upon the case of finite temperature . in section  5 we develop two of the dual versions , in terms of bent ns5-branes , and wrapped / fractional d - branes . section  6 offers brief conclusions , and suggestions for future directions . let us consider first the oft - discussed d1d5 system , @xmath7 here @xmath8 run over the 05-directions tangent to all the branes , @xmath9 runs over the 1234-directions transverse to all branes , and @xmath10 runs over the 6789-directions of a @xmath11 , tangent to the d5-branes and transverse to the d1-branes . we have defined @xmath12 with @xmath13 and @xmath14 the volume of the @xmath11 . this configuration leaves 8 unbroken supersymmetries , all of which transform as @xmath15 under the @xmath16 that acts on @xmath17 . at the horizon , @xmath18 , the geometry approaches ads@xmath19 , giving rise to an ads / cft duality  @xcite . the tension of the effective string in 6 dimensions is @xmath20 with @xmath21 and @xmath22 . now imagine taking @xmath23 , but keeping the _ same _ unbroken supersymmetry . this is not the same as replacing the d1-branes with anti - d1-branes , which would leave unbroken @xmath24 supersymmetries instead . rather , the solution  ( [ 15sol ] ) is simply continued to @xmath23 , so that @xmath25 . this radically changes the geometry : the radius @xmath26 is now a naked singularity  @xcite , and the region @xmath27 is unphysical . also , the tension  ( [ tension ] ) can vanish and apparently even become negative .    in spite of these odd properties , the case @xmath23 can be realized physically . to do this , replace the @xmath11 with a k3 , with @xmath28 d5-branes wrapped on the k3 . then as shown in ref . @xcite , the coupling of the d5-brane to the curvature induces a d1-brane charge @xmath29 . for @xmath30 sufficiently large the solution  ( [ 15sol ] ) with @xmath29 ( and with @xmath31 replaced by the metric of a k3 of volume @xmath14 ) would be expected to be a good description of the geometry . the low energy theory on the branes is pure supersymmetric yang  mills with eight supersymmetries  @xcite , in @xmath32 dimensions . one can understand this from the general result that the number of hypermultiplets minus vector multiplets is @xmath33 , from 1 - 5 strings . continuing to @xmath29 gives @xmath34 , corresponding to the @xmath35 adjoint without hypermultiplets . , we can also study the case of @xmath6 with @xmath36 fundamental flavours . it is amusing to note that the case @xmath37 corresponds to @xmath38 , which means that @xmath39 and the supergravity solution simplifies greatly . this is pertinent for the four - dimensional case which is superconformal . ]    by dualities one can find many other brane configurations with singularities of the same sort , and with the same low energy gauge theory in @xmath40 dimensions . our interest in this solution arose from the search for supergravity duals to these gauge theories , and we will return to this point in section  4 . by @xmath41-dualities on the noncompact directions one obtains solutions with d@xmath42 and d@xmath43 charge , for @xmath42 = 0 , 1 , 2 , and 3 . by @xmath41-dualities on the whole k3 one can replace the d@xmath43-branes wrapped on the k3 with d@xmath44-branes wrapped on a nontrivial @xmath45 with self - intersection number @xmath46 . this latter realization can also be obtained as follows . consider @xmath0 d3-branes at a @xmath47 orbifold singularity  @xcite . the low energy gauge theory is @xmath48 with hypermultiplets in the @xmath49 . by going along the coulomb branch in the direction diag@xmath50 one gives masses to all the @xmath51 hypermultiplets . this corresponds to separating the branes along the singularity into two clumps of @xmath0 half - branes , which are secretly  @xcite d5-branes wrapped on the collapsed @xmath45 ( the half d3-brane charge comes from the @xmath52 @xmath53-field at the orbifold point ) . wrapped d5-branes plus @xmath0 d3-branes , producing gauge group @xmath54 with bifundamental hypermultiplets . the focus of these papers is @xmath55 , whereas ours is the opposite limit @xmath56 . ] a @xmath41-duality on this brane - wrapped ale space results in another dual realization , this time involving a pair of ns5-branes with @xmath0 d@xmath57-branes stretched between them  @xcite . finally , by an @xmath58-duality the @xmath59 case can be related to the heterotic string on @xmath11 , with @xmath0 bps winding strings having @xmath60 . these are the strings which become massless non - abelian gauge bosons at special points in moduli space , a fact that will play an important role in the next section . similarly , the @xmath61 case @xmath58-dualizes  @xcite to a combination of the kaluza  klein monopole and the h - monopole  @xcite which is equivalent  @xcite to the @xmath62 magnetic black hole in four dimensions . in this heterotic form , these solutions have previously been considered in refs . @xcite . the nature of the singularity was studied in ref . it was shown that massive particles coupled to the einstein metric feel an infinite repulsive potential at the singularity , hence the name _ repulson_. if instead one takes as probes the same kind of d5-brane as forms the geometry , then by the usual supersymmetry argument the potential should vanish . hence there should be no obstruction to building this geometry from a collection of such d5-branes . however , we will find in the next section that this argument fails for a reason specific to the repulson geometry , so that in fact the geometry is smoothed out in a certain way , and the singularity removed . for @xmath23 the gauge theory has no higgs branch ( which would correspond to one or more bound states ) , and so for @xmath63 infrared fluctuations might prevent the existence of a stable object . for this reason we will focus on the d2-d6 example in this section , @xmath64 now @xmath8 run over the 045-directions tangent to all the branes , @xmath9 runs over the 123-directions transverse to all branes , @xmath65 is the metric of a k3 surface of unit volume , and @xmath66 we have inserted @xmath67 . the bps bound for general charges is @xmath68 with @xmath69 and @xmath70 . a d6-brane probe ( wrapped on the k3 ) has a well - defined moduli space . to understand better the physics of the repulson geometry , consider the effective action of such a probe , @xmath71 here @xmath72 is the projection of the world - volume onto the six noncompact dimensions and @xmath73 is the induced metric . we have written this down on physical grounds . the first term is the dirac action with the position - dependence of the tension  ( [ tension2 ] ) taken into account ; in particular , @xmath74 . the second and third terms are the couplings of the probe charges @xmath75 to the background . note that to derive this action from the full d6-brane action requires two curvature - squared terms . one appears in the wz action and accounts for the induced d2 charge  @xcite . the other appears in the dirac action and produces the @xmath76 term in the tension  @xcite .    expanding the action  ( [ probe ] ) in powers of the transverse velocity gives the lagrangian density @xmath77 the position - dependent potential terms cancel as expected for a supersymmetric system , leaving the constant potential @xmath78 and a nontrivial metric on moduli space as expected with eight supersymmetries . the metric is proportional to @xmath79 we assume that @xmath80 , so that the metric at infinity ( and the membrane tension ) are positive . however , as @xmath81 decreases the metric eventually becomes negative , and this occurs at a radius @xmath82 which is strictly greater than the radius @xmath83 of the repulson singularity .    to understand what is happening , note that this kinetic term comes entirely from the dirac term in the action  ( [ probe ] ) , and that what is vanishing is the factor @xmath84 in the probe tension . this occurs when @xmath85 , and so before the singularity ( where @xmath86 goes to 0 ) . the negative tension at @xmath87 is clearly unphysical . to see how we should interpret it , recall that the probe is dual to a heterotic winding string , and the vanishing of the tension corresponds to the vanishing of the winding string mass at a point of enhanced gauge symmetry . it is well - known that the latter can be interpreted as the ordinary higgs mechanism . in the higgs mechanism the mass is related to the expectation value by @xmath88 note the absolute value .    therefore we should take ( minus ) the absolute value in the first term of the action  ( [ probe ] ) and ( [ lag ] ) . now the metric is positive but another problem appears : the potential no longer cancels , but rises as @xmath81 decreases below @xmath89 . this means that we can not move the probe to @xmath90 in a supersymmetric way , and so contradicts the assumption that we can build the repulson geometry by bringing together a succession of wrapped d6-branes . thus we are led to a very different picture : the @xmath0 d6-branes all live on the sphere at @xmath91 . even if we try to build the geometry by starting with coincident d6-branes at @xmath92 , where @xmath93 , and then increasing the coupling , we would expect the system to expand as @xmath94 is increased . we will see an interesting parallel to this behavior in the gauge theory discussion of the next section .    with this picture , the geometry  ( [ 26sol ] ) is correct only down to @xmath95 . since the sources are all at this radius , the geometry should be flat in the interior @xmath96 : in the interior by continuity of the metric . c. vafa suggests that there may be an ` overshoot , ' by analogy with ref . @xmath97^{-1/2 } \eta_{\mu\nu } dx^\mu dx^\nu + [ z_2(r_{\rm e } ) z_6(r_{\rm e})]^{1/2 } dx^i dx^i + v_*^{1/2 } ds^2_{\rm k3 } \ , \nonumber \\ e^{2\phi } { \hspace{-6pt}&=&\hspace{-6pt } } g^2 { z_2(r_{\rm e})}/ { z_6(r_{\rm e})}\ , \nonumber\\ c_{\it 3 } { \hspace{-6pt}&=&\hspace{-6pt } } c_{\it 7 } = 0 \ . \label{26flat}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that the non - zero potential that appeared in the proof - by - contradiction is not a real feature , because the geometry  ( [ 26sol ] ) is no longer relevant for @xmath90 . indeed , it is difficult to see how such a potential could be consistent with supersymmetry . now , however , we seem to have another contradiction . there seems to be no obstacle to the probe moving into the flat region  ( [ 26flat ] ) , contradicting the conclusion that the d6-branes are fixed at @xmath89 . to see the obstacle we must look more deeply . note that in the interior region the k3 volume takes the constant value @xmath98 , meaning that the probe is a tensionless membrane . a tensionless membrane sounds even more exotic than a tensionless string , but in fact ( as in other examples ) it is actually prosaic : it is best interpreted as a composite in an effective field theory . note that the ratios @xmath99 are equal . this means that a wrapped d4-brane is a massless particle whenever the wrapped d6-brane is tensionless . in fact , it is a non - abelian gauge boson , which together with an r  r vector and a wrapped anti - d4-brane form an enhanced @xmath100 gauge symmetry . that is , in the interior geometry there is an unbroken @xmath100 gauge symmetry in six dimensions . for this reason we refer to this as the enhanon geometry , and the radius @xmath101 as the enhanon radius . now , a two - dimensional object in six dimensions would be obtained by lifting a point object in four , and so a magnetic monopole naturally suggests itself . indeed , the wrapped d4-brane is a source of a 2-form r  r field strength in six dimensions , and the wrapped d6-brane is the source of the dual 4-form field strength . the mass of a monopole is proportional to the mass of the corresponding @xmath102 boson , so they vanish together when @xmath103 . since the size of the monopole is inverse to the mass of the @xmath102 boson , there is no sense in which a probe can be localized within the enhanon radius . for this same reason the probe begins to expand as it approaches @xmath89 , so it appears that it will essentially melt smoothly into the shell of @xmath0 monopoles at @xmath89 . this has the effect that junction between the exterior geometry  ( [ 26sol ] ) and the interior geometry  ( [ 26flat ] ) is smoothed . we can estimate this smoothing effect as follows . the mass of a wrapped d - brane is @xmath104 . the probe will cease to be effectively pointlike when @xmath105 leading to @xmath106 thus we have a consistent picture in which the repulson is replaced by a smooth geometry . the same principle holds for other values of @xmath42 . the enhanon locus is @xmath107 , whose interior is @xmath108-dimensional . for even @xmath42 the theory in the interior has an @xmath100 gauge symmetry , while for odd @xmath42 there is an @xmath109 ( 2,0 ) theory . this is consistent with the fact that a k3 with volume @xmath98 is @xmath41-dual to a k3 at an @xmath109 singularity . the details of the smoothing depend on @xmath42 , and for @xmath110 it is likely that the ir fluctuations must be considered . note that our result for the lagrangian density ( [ lag ] ) depends only on three moduli space coordinates , @xmath111 , or @xmath112 in polar coordinates . for a ( 2 + 1)-dimensional theory with eight supercharges , the moduli space metric must be hyperkhler  @xcite . a minimum requirement for this is of course that it has four coordinates , and so we must find an extra modulus . on the probe , there is an extra @xmath113 gauge potential @xmath114 , corresponding to the overall centre of mass degree of freedom . we may exchange this for a scalar @xmath115 by hodge duality in the ( 2 + 1)-dimensional world - volume . this is of course a feature specific to the @xmath116 case .    to get the coupling for this extra modulus correct , we should augment the probe computation of the previous section to include @xmath114 . the dirac action is modified by an extra term in the determinant : @xmath117 where @xmath118 is the field strength of @xmath114 . furthermore , in the presence of @xmath118 , there is a coupling @xmath119 where @xmath120 is the magnetic potential produced by the d6-brane charge : @xmath121 . adapting the procedures of refs . @xcite , we can introduce an auxiliary vector field @xmath122 , replacing @xmath123 by @xmath124 in the dirac action , and adding the term @xmath125 overall . treating @xmath122 as a lagrange multiplier , the path integral over @xmath122 will give the action involving @xmath126 as before . alternatively , we may treat @xmath118 as a lagrange multiplier , and integrating it out enforces @xmath127 here , @xmath128 are the components of the pullback of @xmath129 to the probe s world - volume . the solution to the constraint above is @xmath130 where the scalar @xmath115 is our fourth modulus . we may now replace @xmath122 by @xmath131 in the action , and the static gauge computation gives for the kinetic term : @xmath132 where @xmath133 and @xmath134 one of the goals of this work is to obtain a useful dual description of the physics of strongly coupled @xmath6 gauge theory ( with eight supercharges and no hypermultiplets ) at large-@xmath0 . this is a necessarily complex undertaking , as there are at least four different theories which play important roles here , and so in the spirit of ref . @xcite , we should carefully determine where each theory has a weakly coupled description , as we change the energy scale .    to get to the limit where we obtain the decoupled gauge theory we hold fixed the induced @xmath42-dimensional gauge coupling @xmath135 and , as usual  @xcite , hold fixed @xmath136 . let us also define the @xmath57-dimensional t hooft coupling @xmath137 where @xmath0 is the number of d@xmath43-branes wrapped on the k3 . we write the k3 volume as @xmath138 ; the background has a good limit if we hold this fixed as well . then the string metric becomes , in the decoupling limit , @xmath139^{-1/2 } r^{-2}\eta_{\mu\nu}dx^\mu dx^\nu      \\\vspace{5pt }   & \ ! + \left[\left(1-h_p(u)\right)/h_p(u)\right]^{1/2 }   ( 2\pi)^2 ds^2_{\rm k3 }     \\   & \ ! + \left[h_p(u)\left(1-h_p(u)\right)\right]^{1/2 }    r^2\left(du^2+u^2d\omega_{4-p}^2\right ) \ , . \label{scaledmetric } \end{array}\ ] ] we have abbreviated @xmath140 as @xmath141 , and @xmath142 the dilaton becomes @xmath143 note that the ` 1 ' has scaled out of @xmath144 but not @xmath145 . the case of @xmath146 needs to be discussed separately . the spacetime solution is @xmath147 where @xmath148 . this is sensible only for @xmath149 . at @xmath150 , the inner radius , @xmath151 vanishes : this is the repulson , which is again unphysical , lying inside the enhanon . at @xmath152 , the outer radius , @xmath153 vanishes and the dilaton diverges . near this radius there is a story similar to that at the inner radius : nonperturbative corrections remove the singularity . for @xmath154 , this is understood in terms of ( choke ) f - theory  @xcite . for @xmath155 , as here , the details are not so well understood , but should not be relevant to the physics in the enhanon region .    returning to @xmath156 , can work out where the supergravity description ( [ scaledmetric],[dilp ] ) is good by demanding  @xcite that the curvature in string units and the dilaton both be small . for the curvature , we find @xmath157 where the functions @xmath158 are @xmath159 for all @xmath160 . the first thing we notice about the curvature is its value at the enhanon radius : @xmath161 the control parameter @xmath162 will determine the nature of the phase diagram . the physical interpretation of @xmath163 is the value of the dimensionless t hooft coupling of the @xmath57-dimensional gauge theory at the energy scale @xmath164 , which is an effective uv cutoff . below this scale , since the physics is superrenormalizable , the effective coupling grows , becoming strong at @xmath165 . at this point the gauge theory ceases to be a useful description , we have the right to look for a supergravity ( or other ) dual . if @xmath166 is small , we expect to find a region of the phase diagram where gauge theory is a weakly coupled description . otherwise , we will have only supergravity phases . the interesting case is therefore @xmath167 , so that we have at least one region where the gauge theory is weakly coupled . we will take @xmath168 for the remainder of this subsection .    in satisfying this condition , we find that the supergravity geometry is strongly curved at the enhanon radius . since the supergravity fields do not evolve inside the enhanon , this is the maximum curvature . at the enhanon radius , we can also inspect the dilaton ; it is @xmath169 from the equation ( [ dilp ] ) , we find that the dilaton increases monotonically with @xmath170 . it becomes of order one at @xmath171 at radii @xmath172 , we will need to use the @xmath58-dual supergravity description . since at these radii the effect of @xmath145 is very small , by comparison to the effect of @xmath144 , we are in fact matching on to the picture obtained by  @xcite for the d@xmath43-branes alone ; the physics involving the k3 is essentially irrelevant . we now need to find the degrees of freedom best suited to describing the physics for @xmath173 . as @xmath170 decreases from @xmath174 , the curvature of the @xmath175 supergravity geometry will become stronger ; it becomes of order unity at @xmath176 at this place , the @xmath177-dimensional gauge theory will take over . we can see this by starting with its dimensionless t hooft coupling as a function of gauge theory energy @xmath178 @xmath179 now , in order to relate @xmath178 to @xmath170 we need an ir / uv relation for the strings stretched between the probe brane and the source branes . since the source branes are distributed on a s@xmath180 shell at the enhanon radius , the relation is @xmath181 , where @xmath182 encodes which brane on the shell the stretched string attaches to . in addition , we have the condition on the control parameter @xmath183 , so that @xmath184 and thus the size of the shell is not important . so the ir / uv relation is to good accuracy @xmath185 . therefore we see that the dimensionless t hooft coupling of the @xmath177-dimensional gauge theory is order one at @xmath186 . it decreases for smaller @xmath170 . we also have the induced lower - dimensional gauge theory with dimensionless coupling @xmath187 the crossover between the @xmath177- and @xmath57-dimensional gauge theories is clearly at @xmath188 . at lower energies _ i.e. _  smaller @xmath170 , the @xmath57-dimensional gauge theory takes over . however , this time its dimensionless t hooft coupling increases as @xmath170 decreases , _ i.e. _ exhibits the opposite behavior to the @xmath177-dimensional gauge theory . this is consistent with the physics of the @xmath5 supersymmetric systems studied in  @xcite . the dimensionless t hooft coupling of the @xmath57-dimensional theory becomes strong at @xmath189 let us now recall the enhanon radius , defined by @xmath190 , or @xmath191 . from our previous considerations of a probe in the background of @xmath0 branes , we found that the branes were ( evenly ) distributed on a s@xmath180 shell of this radius . the energy of a string stretched between any two branes in this shell must therefore fall between @xmath192 the energy at which the @xmath42-dimensional gauge theory becomes strong is then precisely the energy at which the physics of the system is described by some theory whose dynamics includes only the bps strings stretched between the source branes ( and of probe branes so close to the enhanon radius that they too can be thought of as source branes ) .    at the very lowest energies we can simply use the moduli space description of the physics . the gap that remains in building our phase diagram is an understanding of the physics in the energy range ( [ newrange ] ) . the curvature is strong there and thus we fail to find a supergravity dual for the strongly coupled @xmath57-dimensional gauge theory . a further indication of that failure is the explicit appearance of @xmath193 in the metric  ( [ scaledmetric ] ) : in the gauge theory , @xmath193 enters the physics only through the parameter @xmath194 , and therefore should not explicitly appear in a dual description . so we have a mystery here . a natural suggestion for @xmath61 ( with a suitable generalization involving the @xmath109 theory for @xmath195 ) is that the dual is the ( 5 + 1)-dimensional @xmath100 gauge theory in the @xmath0-monopole sector , where they are just becoming massless . note that this @xmath100 gauge theory is part of the bulk physics , so what we are conjecturing is that it is the only relevant part and that the supergravity can be omitted . a weak test is that it give the correct moduli space , and it does . note also that the enhanon geometry has a natural interpretation in the gauge theory : in the @xmath0-monopole sector the higgs field has a zero of order  @xmath0 . the function @xmath196 is essentially zero ( the flat interior ) until rising sharply . thus a classical monopole solution of large charge might be expected to have its charge distributed in a thin shell . to go further we need a new expansion to describe this system , which becomes weak for @xmath0 large . it appears that the spacing of the monopoles , of order @xmath197 times the enhanon radius , plays the role of a `` non - commutativity '' parameter , because the sphere has been effectively broken up into @xmath0 domains . in any case , the mysterious dual description should include the dynamics of these stretched strings at large-@xmath0 . again , the case @xmath195 needs special treatment . to orient ourselves , we may review the case of d7-branes by themselves . using the equations ( [ peq3spacetime ] ) , we find that the scalar curvature in string units is @xmath198^{-1 } \,,\ ] ] and this becomes order unity when @xmath199 . substituting this into the dimensionless t hooft coupling on the d7-branes , we find that the gauge coupling is order unity at the same place , and so the @xmath200-dimensional gauge theory and ten - dimensional supergravity parts of the phase diagram fit together as required . the dilaton becomes order unity when @xmath201 , and because @xmath202 , the nature of this theory beyond the supergravity approximation is unclear . let us now add the d3-branes . the effect on the curvature is essentially to multiply the above result by a factor @xmath203 . out at large values of @xmath170 such as @xmath186 and @xmath204 , the effect of the @xmath151-factor must be unimportant , by analogy with the lower-@xmath42 cases . now , recall that at the scale @xmath164 , the @xmath200-dimensional gauge theory crosses over to the @xmath205-dimensional gauge theory , and the coupling must be weak there in order for there to be gauge theory descriptions at all . therefore @xmath206 , and as a consequence we find @xmath207 , a condition necessary for clean separation of some of the phases as in the lower-@xmath42 cases . the remaining conditions needed for clean separation of the other phases involve @xmath204 and remain somewhat puzzling . we assume , by analogy with the @xmath156 cases , that they are met . we summarize our findings in the phase diagram in figure  [ fig : phases ] . = 3.5 in 0.2    to get a little more information on the mystery theory we may consider going to finite temperature , or adding energy to the branes . the first change to the supergravity solution is that a nonextremality function @xmath208 appears multiplicatively in @xmath209 : @xmath210 in addition , the harmonic function of the d@xmath42-branes @xmath145 gets altered by nonextremality as if we had not taken the decoupling limit , while @xmath144 is unaltered fixed in the decoupling limit ; it does not scale with the string length . ] specifically , @xmath211 where @xmath212^{1/2 } - { { ( 2\pi)^{p-2}u_0^{3-p}}\over{2c_{p+4}\lambda_p } } \,.\ ] ] note that @xmath213 , and therefore the enhanon at @xmath214u_{\rm e}$ ] is pulled inwards to smaller @xmath170 as the ratio @xmath215 is increased .    in order for the supergravity horizon at @xmath216 to lie outside the enhanon locus , we need a sufficiently large energy density @xmath217 on the branes . using the relation @xcite @xmath218 , this implies that @xmath219 where we have used the condition ( [ weak ] ) . this can not be satisfied in the @xmath220-dimensional gauge theory , and this is further evidence that the mysterious theory is not gravitational . although we have failed to find a weakly coupled dual for the gauge theory , a study of the coulomb branch of the gauge theory reveals a striking parallel to our probe computations . focusing on the case @xmath116 , suppose that the condition  ( [ weak ] ) holds , so the low energy physics can be described by a @xmath221-dimensional gauge theory . the metric that the probe sees , after applying the scaling of the previous section to eqn . ( [ fourth ] ) , gives the metric on moduli space for the @xmath6 ( 2 + 1)-dimensional gauge theory in the decoupling limit : @xmath222 where @xmath223 the @xmath113 monopole potential is @xmath224 and @xmath225 , and the metric is meaningful only for @xmath226 . our metric ( [ probenear ] ) is the euclidean taub  nut metric , with a negative mass . it is a hyperkhler manifold , because @xmath227 , where @xmath228 . it is striking that the moduli space metric is the same as that which can be derived from field theory , where this has the interpretation as the tree - level plus one - loop result . it is also interesting to note that while the scaled supergravity solution failed to give a dual , the result for the probe s moduli space is independent of @xmath14 . both of these facts could be understood if supersymmetry prevented @xmath14 from appearing in the probe metric : one can use @xmath14 as the control parameter to move from weak gauge theory to weak supergravity . on the surface this does not seem to be the case  the probe moduli live in a vector multiplet , and so does @xmath14  but a more careful analysis may be needed . so there is a mystery here , perhaps confirming our suggestions in the previous section that there is a useful duality to be found . we see that the enhanon phenomenon is the same as the familiar fact that the tree - level plus one - loop kinetic term goes negative  the landau pole . this metric is of course singular , and is therefore incomplete . as shown by seiberg and witten , it receives no perturbative corrections but is fixed nonperturbatively . it is the large @xmath81 expansion of the metric on the moduli space of @xmath0 monopoles . there are nonperturbative instanton corrections to this metric which smooth it out into a generalization of the atiyah  hitchin manifold  @xcite . in the two - monopole case studies in ref @xcite , the atiyah  hitchin manifold is the unique smooth completion of the taub  nut metric consistent with the condition of hyperkhlerity . ( see refs . @xcite for examples of generalizations and further study . )    to discuss quantitatively the nonperturbative corrections to the metric on moduli space it is simpler to look at the case @xmath195 . on the gauge theory side , the metric on moduli space is obtained from the seiberg  witten curve  @xcite , which for @xmath6 is  @xcite @xmath229 the point of maximal unbroken gauge symmetry , which in the present case can only be the weyl subgroup , is @xmath230 earlier work on the large-@xmath0 limit  @xcite focused on a different point in moduli space , but this highly symmetric point would seem to be the most natural place to look for a supergravity dual . the branch points @xmath231 are at @xmath232 this ring of zeros is reminiscent of the enhanon , and is in fact the same . to see this add a probe brane at @xmath233 , @xmath234 for @xmath235 , there are @xmath236 zeros which closely approximate a ring , @xmath237 the new factor , in parentheses , being @xmath238 . the remaining two zeros are at @xmath239 , or more precisely @xmath240 the correction being exponentially small . on the other hand , for @xmath241 , all @xmath242 branch points lie approximately in a ring , ) or ( [ inner ] ) into the polynomial ( [ poly ] ) produces a solution to order @xmath243 , which can be further improved by an @xmath244 correction to @xmath245 . the difference between the two ranges of @xmath246 is that the terms in parentheses are arranged so as not to circle the origin , so that the @xmath247 root comes back to its original value as @xmath248 increases from zero to @xmath249 or @xmath250 . ] @xmath251 as deduced from the string picture , the probe does not penetrate the interior of the enhanon but rather melts into it .    one can extract the moduli space metric from the usual formalism  @xcite . we leave a more detailed treatment for the future , but in the probe region @xmath252 it matches the perturbative result @xmath253 this agrees with the d3-brane probe result on the supergravity side if we identify @xmath254 . as mentioned in the introduction , there are a number of @xmath41- and @xmath58- dual pictures where the same physics arises . ( the physics of the heterotic @xmath58-dual for the @xmath116 case is essentially contained in the recent work of ref .  @xcite . )    to construct some @xmath41-dual cases , consider  @xcite a pair of ns5-branes which are pointlike in the @xmath255 directions , with @xmath0 d@xmath57-branes stretched between them along the @xmath256 direction , where @xmath257 , or 3 . the latter are pointlike in the @xmath258 directions , which are inside the ns5-branes , and also in the @xmath259 directions . all of the branes share the directions @xmath260 . this arrangement of branes , shown in figure [ bendy](a ) preserves eight supercharges . we will state the general @xmath42 case in many of the following formulae . the reader may wish to keep the @xmath116 case in mind for orientation .    denoting the separation of the ns5-branes in the @xmath256 direction by @xmath261 , there is a @xmath262-dimensional @xmath6 gauge theory on the infinite part of the world - volume of the d@xmath262-branes , whose coupling is @xmath263    a number of gauge theory facts from the previous sections are manifest here . for example , the fact that ( for @xmath116 ) the coulomb branch of the @xmath6 gauge theory is dual to the moduli space of @xmath0 monopoles of a ( 5 + 1)-dimensional gauge theory follows from the fact that the ends of the d3-branes are membrane monopole sources ( in @xmath264 ) in the ns5-branes world - volume theory . this is an @xmath100 gauge theory spontaneously broken to @xmath113 by the ns5-branes separation . this will always be the relevant ( 5 + 1)-dimensional theory when @xmath262 is odd because we are in type  iib string theory . when @xmath262 is even , we are in type  iia , and the ( 5 + 1)-dimensional theory is the @xmath109 ( 0,2 ) theory .    now place the @xmath256 direction on a circle of radius @xmath265 . there is a @xmath266-dual of this arrangement of branes . the ns5-branes become an @xmath109 ale space  @xcite . to see this in supergravity language , we start by smearing the ns5-branes along the @xmath256 space , writing the supergravity solution for the core of the ns5-branes as  @xcite ( @xmath267 ) : @xmath268 where @xmath269 is a 3-vector in the @xmath259 plane . we have placed one ns5-brane at @xmath270 and the other at @xmath271 . the condition  @xcite @xmath272 defines @xmath273 as a vector @xmath274 which satisfies @xmath275 . applying the usual supergravity @xmath41-duality rules gives : @xmath276 which is the two - centre gibbons  hawking metric for the @xmath109 ale space , nonsingular because of the @xmath277 periodicity of @xmath256 , and hyperkhler because of the condition relating @xmath278 and @xmath273 for a supersymmetric fivebrane solution . there are four moduli associated with this solution , forming a hypermultiplet in the @xmath108-dimensional theory . three of them constitute the vector @xmath279 giving the separation between the two centres . the fourth is a ns  ns 2-form flux , @xmath280 , through the nontrivial two - cycle ( a @xmath281 ) in the space . this @xmath281 is constructed as the locus of @xmath256 circles along the straight line connecting the two centres @xmath282 and @xmath283 , where they shrink to zero size ; it has area @xmath284 . these four numbers specify the separation of the two ns5-branes in the @xmath266-dual picture .    in our case , we have @xmath285 , and so the branes are only separated in @xmath256 , corresponding to having shrunk the @xmath281 away . the flux @xmath286 is kept finite as we send @xmath287 to zero , and is the parameter dual to @xmath261 : @xmath288 ( the full ns5-branes solution , with dependence on @xmath256 , can be recovered in the duality by considering winding strings in the ale geometry  @xcite , doing a sum over those modes which is dual to a fourier transform of the fivebrane harmonic function on the @xmath256 circle . )    on the ale space , the @xmath102-bosons for the enhanced @xmath100 gauge symmetry of the @xmath289-dimensional theory are made from a d2- and an anti d2-brane wrapped on the @xmath281 , their masses being @xmath290 , where the flux appears due to the @xmath291 coupling ; there is some induced d0-brane charge . under @xmath266-duality , the stretched d@xmath262-branes become d@xmath292-branes which are wrapped on the @xmath281 , inducing some d@xmath42-brane charge due to the @xmath293 coupling . so the configuration with @xmath0 d@xmath262-branes stretched between the two ns5-branes is dual to the same number of d@xmath292-branes wrapped on the two - cycle of an @xmath109 ale space , giving rise to @xmath0 effective d@xmath42-branes . the gauge coupling in the resulting @xmath57-dimensional @xmath6 gauge theory is given by : @xmath294    as mentioned in the introduction , this configuration is @xmath41-dual to @xmath0 d@xmath295 branes wrapped on a k3 , of volume @xmath14 , the parameter dual to @xmath286 . the things we learned about this original configuration translate into refinements of the dual pictures . for example , the nontrivial metric on moduli space corresponds to the bending  @xcite of the ns5-branes away from being flat , resulting from the d@xmath57-branes pull on them ( see figure [ bendy](b ) ) . denoting the radial coordinate in the @xmath258 directions as @xmath81 , ( as we did before ) , the @xmath256 position of a ns5-brane is given by the equation @xmath296 , giving the smooth shape of the ns5-brane for large enough @xmath81 , _ i.e. _ far away enough from the details of the junction itself . the solution for the shape is @xmath297 ( @xmath298 ) , or @xmath299 ( for @xmath146 ) , where @xmath300 and @xmath301 are constants set by @xmath261 , the asymptotic separation of the branes , and @xmath94 and @xmath302 . using this , an expression for the separation @xmath303 of the ns5-branes is @xmath304 notice that this is precisely the functional behavior that we see in the harmonic functions for the supergravity solution of the d@xmath42-d@xmath43 system . the parameters @xmath300 and @xmath301 can be fixed completely by comparing to the large @xmath81 limit of probe moduli space computation done there , although we will not do it here .    in the expression ( [ coupling ] ) for the gauge coupling , we should replace @xmath261 by our expression for @xmath303 , giving the running of the coupling with position on the coulomb branch . we recover therefore the singularity in the coulomb branch where the gauge coupling diverges , when the separation @xmath303 of the ns5-branes is of order @xmath302 , resulting in an enhanced gauge symmetry on the ns5-branes ( 5 + 1)-dimensional world - volume . the enhanon is simply the @xmath305 of closest approach of the ns5-branes in the @xmath256 direction . notice that the probe brane we studied previously is a single stretched d@xmath262-brane moving in @xmath258 in this picture . an @xmath81-dependence in the separation between the ns5-branes translates , using ( [ elldual ] ) , into variable @xmath102-boson masses @xmath306 in the @xmath108-dimensional theory , giving the enhanon locus where @xmath307 vanishes . using @xmath307 in the formula ( [ couples ] ) results in the divergence in the @xmath308-dimensional gauge coupling at the enhanon locus . one notable result of this paper is a new mechanism that resolves a large class of spacetime singularities in string theory . this involves a phenomenon , the resolution of a singularity by the expansion of a system of branes in the transverse directions , which is related to that which has recently arisen in other forms  @xcite . one difference from @xcite is that the branes are found not at the singularity in the supergravity metric ; rather , the metric is modified by string / braney phenomena in the manner that we have described . our result may point toward a more general understanding of singularities in string theory .    in the gauge theory we have found a striking parallel between the spacetime picture and the behavior of large-@xmath0 @xmath6 gauge theories . the most interesting open question is to find a weakly coupled dual to the strongly coupled gauge theory ; our results give many hints in this direction . there are a number of technical loose ends , which include a more complete treatment of the d3-d7 case , and a fuller understanding of the constraints of supersymmetry on the probe moduli space . finally , there are many interesting generalizations , including product gauge groups , the addition of hypermultiplets , and rotation . we would like to thank p. ( bruce willis ) argyres , s. ( andrew jackson ) gubser , a. hanany , a. hashimoto , p. horava , a. karch , r. myers , p. pouliot , s. sethi , a. strominger , and c. vafa for helpful remarks and discussions . this work was supported in part by nsf grants phy94 - 07194 , phy97 - 22022 , and career grant phy97 - 33173 . 99 l.  dixon , j.a . harvey , c.  vafa and e.  witten , nucl . * b261 * , 678 ( 1985 ) . e.  witten , nucl . * b403 * , 159 ( 1993 ) hep - th/9301042 ; + p.s . aspinwall , b.r .  greene and d.r . morrison , phys . * b303 * , 249 ( 1993 ) hep - th/9301043 . p.  candelas , p.s . green and t.  hubsch , phys . lett .  * 62 * , 1956 ( 1989 ) ; + a.  strominger , nucl . * b451 * , 96 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9504090 ; + b.r . greene , d.r . morrison and a.  strominger , nucl . * b451 * , 109 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9504145 . g.t .  horowitz and r.  myers , * 27 * , 915 ( 1995 ) gr - qc/9503062 . k.  behrndt , nucl . * b455 * , 188 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9506106 . r.  kallosh and a.  linde , phys . * d52 * , 7137 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9507022 . m.  cveti and d.  youm , phys . * b359 * , 87 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9507160 . j. maldacena , adv . * 2 * , 231 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9711200 . m.  bershadsky , c.  vafa and v.  sadov , nucl . * b463 * , 398 ( 1996 ) hep - th/9510225 . s.  kachru and e.  silverstein , phys . lett .  * 80 * , 4855 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9802183 . j.  polchinski , phys . rev .  * d55 * , 6423 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9606165 . c.v .  johnson and r.c . myers , phys . * d55 * , 6382 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9610140 . douglas , jhep * 07 * , 004 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9612126 ; + d.  diaconescu , m.r . douglas and j.  gomis , jhep * 02 * , 013 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9712230 . a.  hanany and e.  witten , nucl . * b492 * , 152 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9611230 . johnson , n.  kaloper , r.r . khuri and r.c . myers , phys . * b368 * , 71 ( 1996 ) hep - th/9509070 . sorkin , phys . 51 * , 87 ( 1983 ) ; + d.j . gross and m.j . perry , nucl . * b226 * , 29 ( 1983 ) . khuri , phys . * b294 * , 325 ( 1992 ) hep - th/9205051 ; + r.r . khuri , nucl . * b387 * , 315 ( 1992 ) hep - th/9205081 . m.j . duff , r.r . khuri , r.  minasian and j.  rahmfeld , nucl . * b418 * , 195 ( 1994 ) hep - th/9311120 . s.s .  gubser and i.r . klebanov , phys . * d58 * , 125025 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9808075 ; + i.r . klebanov and n.a . nekrasov , hep - th/9911096 . m.  green , j.a . harvey and g.  moore , class . * 14 * , 47 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9605033 . k.  dasgupta , d.p . jatkar and s.  mukhi , nucl . * b523 * , 465 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9707224 . bachas , p.  bain and m.b . green , jhep * 05 * , 011 ( 1999 ) hep - th/9903210 . r.  gopakumar and c.  vafa , hep - th/9811131 . l.  alvarez - gaume and d.z . freedman , commun . phys .  * 80 * , 443 ( 1981 ) . townsend , phys . * b373 * , 68 ( 1996 ) hep - th/9512062 . c.  schmidhuber , nucl . * b467 * , 146 ( 1996 ) hep - th/9601003 . n.  itzhaki , j.m . maldacena , j.  sonnenschein and s.  yankielowicz , phys . * d58 * , 046004 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9802042 . c.  vafa , nucl . * b469 * , 403 ( 1996 ) m.f . atiyah and n.j . hitchin , _ `` the geometry and dynamics of magnetic monopoles . porter lectures '' _ , princeton university press ( 1988 ) . n.  seiberg and e.  witten , hep - th/9607163 . g.  chalmers and a.  hanany , nucl . * b489 * , 223 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9608105 . n.  dorey , v.v . khoze , m.p . mattis , d.  tong and s.  vandoren , nucl . * b502 * , 59 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9703228 . hep - th/9602022 . n.  seiberg and e.  witten , nucl .  phys . * b426 * , 19 ( 1994 ) hep - th/9407087 . argyres and a.e . faraggi , phys . lett .  * 74 * , 3931 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9411057 ; + a.  klemm , w.  lerche , s.  yankielowicz and s.  theisen , phys .  lett .  * b344 * , 169 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9411048 . douglas and s.h . shenker , nucl . * b447 * , 271 ( 1995 ) hep - th/9503163 . m.  krogh , hep - th/9911084 . johnson , nucl . * b507 * , 227 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9706155 . a.  karch , d.  lust and d.  smith , nucl . * b533 * , 348 ( 1998 ) hep - th/9803232 . k.  dasgupta and s.  mukhi , jhep * 07 * , 008 ( 1999 ) hep - th/9904131 . e.  witten , hep - th/9507121 ; + h.  ooguri and c.  vafa , nucl . phys .  * b463 * , 55 ( 1996 ) hep - th/9511164 . gauntlett , j.a . harvey and j.t . liu , nucl . * b409 * , 363 ( 1993 ) hep - th/9211056 . a.  strominger , nucl . * b343 * , 167 ( 1990 ) ; + s.  rey , phys . rev .  * d43 * , 526 ( 1991 ) ; + c.g . callan , j.a . harvey and a.  strominger , hep - th/9112030 . r.  gregory , j.a . harvey and g.  moore , adv . * 1 * , 283 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9708086 . e.  witten , nucl . * b500 * , 3 ( 1997 ) hep - th/9703166 . p.  kraus , f.  larsen and s.p . trivedi , jhep * 03 * , 003 ( 1999 ) hep - th/9811120 ; + d.z . freedman , s.s . gubser , k.  pilch and n.p . warner , hep - th/9906194 ; + a.  brandhuber and k.  sfetsos , hep - th/9906201 . myers , hep - th/9910053 ; + j. polchinski and m. strassler , in progress ; + s.s . gubser , k.  pilch and n.p . warner , in progress .
Abstract:

Answer: we study brane configurations that give rise to large-@xmath0 gauge theories with eight supersymmetries and no hypermultiplets . these configurations include a variety of wrapped , fractional , and stretched branes or strings . the corresponding spacetime geometries which we study have a distinct kind of singularity known as a repulson . we find that this singularity is removed by a distinctive mechanism , leaving a smooth geometry with a core having an enhanced gauge symmetry . the spacetime geometry can be related to large-@xmath0 seiberg witten theory . epsf    3.7 in    * gauge theory and the excision of repulson singularities *    * clifford v. johnson , amanda w. peet , joseph polchinski *    @xmath1school of natural sciences    institute for advanced study    princeton , nj 08540 , u.s.a . @xmath1centre for particle theory    department of mathematical sciences    university of durham , durham dh1 3le , u.k . @xmath2institute for theoretical physics    university of california    santa barbara , ca  93106 - 4030 , u.s.a .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: building scalable multi - qubit systems is presently the main challenge towards the implementation of a solid - state quantum information processor  @xcite . high - fidelity single qubit gates based both on semi-  @xcite and super - conducting technologies are nowadays available . in particular , for the three basic types of superconducting qubits ( charge , flux and phase ) single - qubit operations with high quality factor have been demonstrated in different laboratories  @xcite . further improvement has been recently achieved with circuit - qed architectures  @xcite . multi - qubit systems instead have been proved harder to operate , the main limitation arising from the broadband solid state noise . the requirements for building an elementary quantum processor are in fact quite demanding on the efficiency of the protocols . this includes both severe constraints on readout and a sufficient isolation from fluctuations to reduce decoherence effects . based on experiments on the different josephson junction ( jj ) setups , there is presently a general consensus on the most common noise spectral forms and on the main consequences on systems evolutions . typically noise is broadband and structured , i. e. the noise spectrum extends to several decades , it is non - monotonic , sometimes a few resonances are present . noise with @xmath0 spectrum is common to virtually all nanodevices . its physical origin varies from device to device and depends on the specific material . different implementations are in fact more sensitive either to charge , flux or to critical current fluctuations with spectral density scaling as the inverse of the frequency . the presence of slow components in the environment makes the decay of the coherent signal strongly dependent on the experimental protocol being used  @xcite . measurements protocols requiring numerous repetitions are particularly sensitive to the unstable device calibration due to low - frequency fluctuations . the leading effect is defocusing of the measured signal , analogous to inhomogeneous broadening in nmr  @xcite . the intrinsic high - frequency cut - off of @xmath0 noise is hardly detectable , measurements typically extending to @xmath1  hz ( recently charge noise up to @xmath2  mhz has been detected in a set  @xcite ) . incoherent energy exchanges between system and environment , leading to relaxation and decoherence , occur at typical operating frequencies ( about @xmath2 ghz ) . indirect measurements of noise spectrum in this frequency range often suggest a white or ohmic behavior  @xcite . in addition , narrow resonances at selected frequencies ( sometimes resonant with the nanodevice relevant energy scales ) have being observed  @xcite . in certain devices they originate from the circuitry  @xcite and may eventually be reduced by circuit design . more often , resonances are signatures of the presence of spurious fluctuators which also show up in the time resolved evolution , unambiguously proving the discrete nature of the noise sources  @xcite . such fluctuators may severely limit the reliability of nanodevices  @xcite . explanation of this rich physics is beyond phenomenological theories describing the environment as a set of harmonic oscillators . on the other side , an accurate characterization of the noise sources might be a priory inefficient , since a huge number of parameters would be required for a microscopic description . therefore one may follow a different route , consisting in classifying noise sources on the basis of their effects instead of on their nature and to understand , case by case , which is the efficient description of the environment . the required information may in fact depend on the specific protocol , especially when the environment is long - time correlated . this program is meaningful for quantum information where relevant time scales are much smaller than the decoherence time . this means that in the generic favorable situation coupling with the environment has simple effects on the system dynamics . as a difference with condensed matter physics where long time behavior is emphasized and interesting problems involve entanglement of a many - body system . here we illustrate a road - map to treat broadband noise which allows to obtain reasonable approximations by systematically including only the relevant information on the environment , out of the huge parametrization needed to specify it . the multi - stage approach for the different classes of broadband noise has been originally introduced for single qubit gates  @xcite . the obtained predictions for the decay of the coherent signal are in agreement with observations in various jj implementations and in different protocols  @xcite . we mention the observed decay of ramsey fringes in charge - phase qubits  @xcite and recent results on flux / phase qubits  @xcite . here we extend the procedure to complex solid - state architectures . as an illustrative case , we perform a systematic analysis of the effects and interplay of low and high frequency noise components in a two - qubit gate in a fixed coupling scheme . such a systematic analysis points out that efficient operations in the solid state require an accurate preliminary characterization of the noise spectral characteristics and tuning appropriately the device working point . the paper is organized as follows : in section 2 we introduce the general framework of solid - state multi qubit gates and illustrate the characteristics of the most common spectral forms . in section 3 we propose a classification of the noise sources and in section 4 we present a multi - stage approach to deal with broadband noise . section 5 is dedicated to adiabatic noise . in section 6 the multistage approach is applied to a universal two - qubit gate . section 7 summarizes our main findings . a multi - qubit gate can be modeled by the following hamiltonian ( @xmath3 ) @xmath4 where for each qubit , labeled by @xmath5 , @xmath6 includes set of parameters intrinsic to the device and time dependent classical control fields . manipulation of tunable fields allows control of the dynamics and design of arbitrary single qubit operations via unitary transformations . interactions among qubits and the needed additional parametrization to describe the multi - qubit gate are included in @xmath7 . depending on the design , the control hamiltonian may span a reduced subspace of the qubit liouville space . in other words , there is a limited number of ports available for control , for tuning , for state preparation and measurement . noise is also coupled via these ports . it is rather usual that only one of the control fields allows the required fast addressing of each qubit . therefore we focus on a model where both the control fields , @xmath8 , and the environment are coupled to a single qubit operator , say @xmath9 , @xmath10 where the polar angles @xmath11 define qubit-@xmath12 working point . the environment hamiltonian is @xmath13 and @xmath14 is a collective environment variable acting on qubit @xmath12 . model ( [ h ] ) implies a projection of the device hamiltonian onto the subspace spanned by the two lowest energy eigenstates for each qubit . this description is valid provided that manipulations with the control fields do not induce leakage to higher energy states of the device  @xcite . we leave unspecified the nature of the noise sources described by @xmath15 , relevant cases being either discrete or gaussian fluctuations . in addition , the environment hamiltonian may include correlations among noise sources affecting each qubit . in the spirit of the present analysis , we assume that the only information at our disposal is the power spectrum of @xmath16 fluctuations @xmath17 where @xmath18 denotes the equilibrium average with respect to @xmath13 . we remark that the effect of the environment on the system dynamics is completely characterized by @xmath19 only if the environment is composed of harmonic oscillators or if it is weakly coupled to the system and short time correlated . of course this is not the case if low - energy excitations determine memory effects . this is the typical situation in the solid state where in general additional statistical information on the environment is required . we assume that each noise component @xmath16 has broadband spectrum @xmath20 , @xmath21 followed by a white or ohmic flank at frequencies @xmath22 . low- and high - frequency cutoffs depend on the specific setup . impurities of various origin responsible for random telegraph fluctuations contribute lorentzian peaks to the power spectrum @xmath23 . such a spectrum originates from classical fluctuations @xmath24 , where @xmath25 randomly switches between two values @xmath26 with rate @xmath27 . an ensemble of @xmath28 bistable impurities with a distribution of switching rates @xmath29 , @xmath30 $ ] and average coupling strength @xmath31 , gives rise to @xmath0-spectrum , @xmath32\,\,\omega^{-1}$ ]  @xcite . selected lorentzian peaks may be visible in the spectrum if individual impurities are strongly coupled , i. e. when @xmath33 . instead , damped coherent fluctuators at frequencies @xmath34 , in the simplest cases contribute to the total spectrum with additional peaks , @xmath35 . spectroscopic evidence of coherent impurities of frequency @xmath36 close to the qubit larmor frequency has been reported in @xcite . remarkably , the possibility to exploit spurious quantum two - level systems as qubits  @xcite or for quantum memory operations has been recently demonstrated  @xcite . in these cases a quantum description of the impurity is required  @xcite . the above description illuminates that in the solid state we have to deal with broadband and structured noise . in other words , the noise spectrum extends to several decades , it is non - monotonic , sometimes a few resonances are present . the various noise sources responsible for the above phenomenology have a qualitative different influence on the system evolution . this naturally leads to a classification of the noise sources according to the effects produced rather than to their specific nature . the effects of high - amplitude noise at low frequencies , like @xmath0 noise , vary from protocol to protocol . this feature is typical of non - markovian baths . quantum operations necessarily require repetitions of single detections , each leading to boolean answer . therefore , even `` single shot '' measurements result from numerous repetitions of single runs in an overall process which may last minutes . in the presence of low frequency fluctuations this leads to unstable device calibration and random clock frequencies in the various repetitions . as a result , a de - focused signal is observed , a phenomenon analogous to inhomogeneous broadening in nmr . re - focusing protocols , like echo or some dynamical decoupling schemes , allow partial recovery of the signal  @xcite . since the environment is long - time correlated , statistical information beyond the power spectrum may be required to describe its effects . this is the case for instance in echo protocols  @xcite . environments with long - time memory belong to the class of adiabatic noise , for which the born - oppenheimer approximation is applicable . we classify this part of the noise spectrum as `` adiabatic noise '' . noise at higher frequency , around the system typical scales ( e.g. single qubit larmor frequencies ) , results in incoherent energy exchanges between the quantum device and the environment . in particular , high - frequency noise is responsible for spontaneous decay . for systems relevant for quantum information , the system - bath coupling is rather small , in addition high - frequency noise is short - time correlated . therefore , in simplest cases , effects can be described by a born - markov master equation  @xcite . for single qubit gates it leads to the relaxation and secular dephasing times , @xmath37 and @xmath38  @xcite . we classify this part of the noise spectrum as `` quantum noise '' . finally , resonances in the spectrum unveil the presence of discrete noise sources which severely effect the system performances , in particular reliability of devices . this is the case when classical impurities are slow enough to induce a visible bistable instability in the system intrinsic frequency . for instance , single qubit gates in the presence of random telegraph noise ( switching rate @xmath27 ) may display two effective frequencies , @xmath39 and @xmath40 , depending on the impurity state . their visibility is measured by the ratio @xmath41 . beatings can be observed in the `` strong coupling '' regime @xmath42  @xcite . quantum impurities may also entangle with the device . this additionally leads to a variety of features , like peculiar temperature dependencies of decay rates  @xcite . under these conditions , knowledge of the power spectrum is absolutely insufficient and in order to describe these effects the relevant system hilbert space has to be enlarged to include the responsible environmental degrees of freedom . effects in general depend on the specific protocol and require a microscopic model of the fluctuators . we classify this part of the noise spectrum as `` strongly - coupled noise '' . each noise class requires a specific approximation scheme , which is not appropriate for the other classes . the overall effect results from the interplay of the three classes of noise . in the following section we will illustrate a multi - scale theory to deal with solid state broadband noise . we are interested to a reduced description of the @xmath43-qubit system , expressed by the reduced density matrix @xmath44 . it is formally obtained by tracing out environmental degrees of freedom from the total density matrix @xmath45 , which depends on quantum ( q ) , adiabatic ( a ) and strongly coupled ( sc ) variables . the elimination procedure can be conveniently performed by separating in the interaction hamiltonian , @xmath46 , various noise classes , e.g. by formally writing @xmath47 adiabatic noise is typically correlated on a time scale much longer than the inverse of the natural frequencies @xmath48 , then application of the born - oppenheimer approximation is equivalent to replace @xmath49 with a classical stochastic field @xmath50 . this approach is valid when the contribution of adiabatic noise to spontaneous decay is negligible , a necessary condition being @xmath51 . this condition is usually satisfied at short enough times , since @xmath52 is substantially different from zero only at frequencies @xmath53 . this fact already suggests a route to trace - out different noise classes in the appropriate order . the total density matrix parametrically depends on the specific realization of the slow random drives @xmath54 and may be written as @xmath55 . the first step is to trace out quantum noise . in the simplest cases this requires solving a master equation . in a second stage , the average over all the realizations of the stochastic processes , @xmath56 , is performed . this leads to a reduced density matrix for the @xmath43-qubit system plus the strongly coupled degrees of freedom . these have to be traced out in a final stage by solving the heisenberg equations of motion , or by approaches suitable to the specific microscopic hamiltonian or interaction . for instance , the dynamics may be solved exactly for some special quantum impurity models at pure dephasing , @xmath57 , when impurities are longitudinally coupled to each qubit  @xcite . the ordered multi - stage elimination procedure can be formally written as @xmath58 \ , p[\vec x(t ) ] \ ;   tr_{q } \big [ \ , w^{q , sc}\big(t | \vec x(t)\big ) \ , \big]\right\ } \ , .\ ] ] in the following section we concentrate on the elimination of adiabatic noise . the ordered procedure will be illustrated in section 6 for a two - qubit gate . in general , the adiabatic approximation holds true for times short enough to fulfill the necessary condition , @xmath59 . in the peculiar , pure dephasing regime , @xmath57 , relaxation processes are forbidden and the adiabatic approximation is exact for any @xmath60 . in addition , the adiabatic scheme can be applied also in the presence of correlations between processes @xmath61 and @xmath62  @xcite . for the sake of clarity here we consider adiabatic noise affecting independently each qubit . moreover , we exclude time - dependent drives in @xmath8 and in @xmath63 . the procedure can be straightforwardly extended for instance to rabi oscillations and other ac - drives  @xcite . suppose we are able to diagonalize , for each realization @xmath56 of the stochastic processes , the system hamiltonian , @xmath64 and denote @xmath65 an instantaneous eigenstate of ( [ eq : hamiltonian - stochastic ] ) with eigenvalue @xmath66 . if the system is prepared in a pure state , @xmath67 , in the adiabatic approximation , each component @xmath68 evolves in time according to @xmath69 where @xmath70 is the dynamic phase . the stray fields @xmath56 affect the time evolution of the gate fidelity via modifications of the phases @xmath71 and of the eigenstates @xmath72 . in addition , @xmath73 reflects imperfect preparation due to the random field . this occurs , for instance , when the system is prepared by a reset to a pure state vector @xmath67 followed by an initialization pulse whose effect depends also on the stray field at @xmath74 . the evolution of the system conditional density matrix can be presented in a compact form @xmath75 \ ; { \mathrm e}^{- i \int_0^t d s \ , \omega_{m p}(s ) }   \ , , \end{aligned}\ ] ] where the instantaneous splittings appearing in the phase factor are @xmath76 and we have introduced the operator @xmath77 = \ , { \,| \ , { m(\vec x_t ) } \,\rangle   \,}{\ , \langle\,{m(\vec x_0 ) } \,|\ , }   \rho(0 ) { \,| \ , { p(\vec x_0 ) } \,\rangle   \ , } { \ , \langle\,{p(\vec x_t ) } \,|\,}\ ] ] which contains information about the preparation and the eigenstates errors . finally , the average of @xmath78 over the stochastic process yields the system density matrix , which can be presented as a path integral @xmath79 \ , p[\vec x(s ) ] \ , \rho^n\big(t|\vec x(s)\big )   \ , .\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath80 $ ] contains information both on the stochastic processes and on details of the specific protocol . it is convenient to split it as follows @xmath81 \,=\ , f[\vec x(s ) ] \ ; p[\vec x(s ) ] \ , , \ ] ] where @xmath82 $ ] is the probability of the realization @xmath83 . the filter function @xmath84 $ ] describes the specific operation . for most of present day experiments on solid - state qubits @xmath84=1 $ ] . for an open - loop feedback protocol , which allows initial control of some collective variable of the environment , say @xmath85 , we should put @xmath84 \propto \ , \delta(\vec x_0 ) = \ , \pi_i \delta(x_{i0})$ ] . a critical issue is the identification of @xmath82 $ ] for the specific noise sources , as those displaying @xmath0 power spectrum . if we sample the stochastic process at times @xmath86 , with @xmath87 and @xmath88 , we can identify @xmath89 = \lim_{m \to \infty }   p_{m+1}(\vec x_m , t;\dots ; \vec x_1 , t_1 ; \vec x_0 , 0 )   \ , ,   \label{sampling}\ ] ] where @xmath90 is a @xmath91 joint probability and we have used the shorthand notation @xmath92 . in the following we will propose a systematic method to select only the relevant statistical information on the stochastic process out of the full characterization included in @xmath82 $ ] . we would like to remark , at this point , that in the adiabatic treatment the word decoherence is perhaps abused . decoherence is ultimately due to entanglement of the qubit to a quantum environment  @xcite , whereas classical adiabatic noise produces only de - focusing . however , unless the signal can be _ totally _ re - focused , and this is impossible in practice , the behavior of @xmath93 is the same as for true decoherence  @xcite . in other words , although proper and improper mixed states at the fundamental level are well distinct concepts  @xcite , they are not distinct in the density matrix description . we also observe that present day `` applied '' research on solid - state coherent nanodevices for quantum information focuses on the `` short - time '' dynamics , since a signal which is almost decayed is useless . in this context , methods as the adiabatic approximation are valuable even if they are not accurate at long time scales and are not valid down to zero temperature . the longitudinal approximation consists in neglecting modifications of the eigenstates @xmath72 and preparation effects . without loss of generality , we may assume vanishing average of the stochastic processes after the preparation pulse , @xmath94 . the longitudinal approximation amounts to put @xmath95 where @xmath96 is an eigenstate of the system hamiltonian @xmath97 . then @xmath98 \approx   { \,| \ , { m } \,\rangle   \ , } \rho^n_{mp}(0 ) { \ , \langle\,{p } \,|\,}$ ] is a projected element of the initial density matrix and eq.([eq : pathint - adiabatic ] ) simplifies to @xmath99 \ , p[\vec x(s ) ] \ ;   { \mathrm e}^{- i \int_0^t \!\!d s \ ,   \omega_{m p}(s ) }   \ , .\end{aligned}\ ] ] the significance of the longitudinal approximation is easily illustrated for a single qubit gate , when the system hamiltonian reduces to @xmath100 in this case , retaining variations of the splitting @xmath39 amounts to consider only fluctuations of the length of the vector @xmath101 . this would be the only effect if the noise would act longitudinally , @xmath102 . variations of the eigenstates @xmath103 originate instead from `` transverse '' variations of @xmath101 . the longitudinal assumption has been performed in ref.@xcite to discuss the effect of gaussian adiabatic environments . the present approach automatically provides constraints on its validity and shows that whereas errors due to transverse fluctuations are weakly dependent on time , phase errors accumulate . therefore , transverse noise in the adiabatic approximation has possibly some effect only at very short times , but the phase damping channel eventually prevails . these considerations strongly depend on the amplitude of the noise . we checked analytically and with simulations that they hold true for realistic figures of noise as those measured in experiments by zorin et al . @xcite .    in the longitudinal approximation , diagonal elements of the reduced density matrix in the eigenstate basis , @xmath104 , do not decay . instead , the decay of the off - diagonal elements results from @xmath105 $ ] , where the complex average phase is given by @xmath106 \ , p[x(s ) ] \ ,   { \mathrm e}^{i \int_0^t \!\!ds   \ , \omega[x(s ) ] } \ , .\ ] ] we notice that the longitudinal approximation may be exact for certain protocols , which therefore are not affected by adiabatic transverse noise . for instance , this is the case if the system is described by ( [ eq : hamiltonian - stochastic2 ] ) and it is prepared in a state @xmath107 . if we measure @xmath108 , since @xmath109 do not depend on @xmath110 , the result is not affected by transverse fluctuations and @xmath111 \ , \exp\{{{\cal i } m \,}\ ! \phi(t)\}$ ] . this the case of the decaying oscillations pattern measured with ramsey interference  @xcite , if the effect of imperfect @xmath112 pulses is negligible .      a standard approximation of the path integrals ( [ eq : pathint - adiabatic],[eq : pathint - adiabatic - longitudinal ] ) consists in neglecting the time dependence in the path , @xmath113 and taking @xmath114=1 $ ] . in this static path approximation ( spa ) the problem reduces to ordinary integrations with @xmath115 . in the single qubit case , for instance , eq.([eq : blur ] ) gives average phase shift @xmath116 where @xmath117 ^ 2 + ( \omega \cos \theta)^2}$ ] . eq.([eq : blur - static ] ) describes the effect of a distribution of stray energy shifts @xmath118 and corresponds to the rigid lattice breadth contribution to inhomogeneous broadening  @xcite . in experiments with solid state devices this approximation describes the measurement procedure consisting in signal acquisition and averaging over a large number @xmath119 of repetitions of the protocol , for an overall time @xmath120 ( which may also be minutes in actual experiments ) . due to slow fluctuations of the solid state environment calibration , the initial value , @xmath121 , fluctuates during the repetitions blurring the average signal , independently on the measurement being single - shot or not . the probability @xmath122 describes the distribution of the random variable obtained by sampling the stochastic process @xmath25 at the initial time of each repetition , i. e. at times @xmath123 , @xmath124 . if @xmath125 results from many independent random variables of a multimode environment , the central limit theorem applies and @xmath122 is a gaussian distribution with standard deviation @xmath126 @xmath127 with integration limits @xmath128 , and the high - frequency cut - off of the @xmath0 spectrum , @xmath129 . in the spa the distribution standard deviation , @xmath126 , is the only adiabatic noise characteristic parameter . if the equilibrium average of the stochastic process vanishes , eq.([eq : blur - static ] ) reduces to @xmath130 ^ 2 + ( \omega \cos \theta)^2 } } \ , . \label{spa - oneqb}\ ] ] a convenient approximation is obtained by expanding @xmath131 to second order in @xmath125 , which leads to  @xcite @xmath132 the short - times decay of coherent oscillations qualitatively depends on the working point . in fact , the suppression of the signal , @xmath133 $ ] , turns from a @xmath134 behavior at @xmath135 to a power law , @xmath136^{-1/4}$ ] , at @xmath137 . in these limits eq.([ref : quadratic ] ) reproduces known results for gaussian @xmath0 environments . in particular , at @xmath138 we obtain the short - times limit , @xmath139 , of the exact result of ref.@xcite . at @xmath140 the short and intermediate times result of ref . @xcite is reproduced . the fact that results of a diagrammatic approach with a quantum environment , as those of ref . @xcite , can be reproduced and generalized already at the simple spa level makes the semi - classical approach quite promising . it shows that , at least for not too long times ( but surely longer than times of interest for quantum state processing ) , the quantum nature of the environment may not be relevant for the class of problems which can be treated in the born - oppenheimer approximation . notice also that the spa itself has surely a wide validity since it does not require information about the _ dynamics _ of the noise sources , provided they are slow  @xcite . going beyond the spa amounts to sample more accurately the stochastic process @xmath83 in ( [ sampling ] ) . the first correction to the spa is obtained by parametrizing the random process as follows @xmath141 . inserting this expression in ( [ eq : pathint - adiabatic ] ) and approximating @xmath82 $ ] in ( [ sampling ] ) with the conditional probability @xmath142 $ ] , we obtain @xmath143 the joint probability depends on the statistics of the noise sources . therefore the first correction to the spa distinguishes discrete and gaussian processes . considering again a single qubit , the average phase ( [ eq : blur ] ) at the working point @xmath144 for generic gaussian noise becomes @xmath145 t \over \omega } \big ] + { 1 \over 2 }   \ln \big[1 +   i   { \sigma^2 \pi(t)\,t \over 3 \ , \omega } \big ] \ , , \ ] ] where @xmath146 is a transition probability , depending on the stochastic process . for ornstein - uhlenbeck processes it reduces to the result of ref . the first correction suggests that the spa , in principle valid for @xmath147 , may have a broader validity . this is illustrated in fig.([figure1 ] ) where the adiabatic approximation ( numerical evaluation of eq.([eq : blur ] ) ) is compared with the exact ( numerical ) dynamics in the presence of @xmath0 noise and with the analytic forms resulting from the spa and its first correction . for @xmath0 noise due to a set of bistable impurities the spa valid also for @xmath148 , if @xmath149 . of course the adiabatic approximation is tenable if @xmath150 .    by sampling more accurately the adiabatic process @xmath56 it is possible to selectively include the statistical information needed for the specific measurement process . for instance , echo protocols are able to partly re - focus the signal , in other words de - focusing described by the spa is almost canceled by the echo pulse sequence . the decay of the echo signal is due to the un - canceled dynamics of the low - frequency fluctuations and to quantum noise . the leading effect of adiabatic noise can be estimated by a proper parametrization of @xmath56 , similar to the one considered in the present paragraph  @xcite . in the present section we apply the multi - stage approach to a universal two - qubit gate based on a fixed coupling scheme . capacitive and inductive fixed couplings  @xcite have been used to demonstrate two - qubit logic gates in different jj implementations  @xcite . entanglement is generated by tuning single - qubit energy spacing to achieve mutual resonance . to this end , during the gate operation at least one qubit has to be moved away from the working point of minimal sensitivity to parameters variations , the `` optimal point '' . this has so far represented the main drawback of the fixed - coupling scheme for josephson implementations , with the exception of phase qubits  @xcite . more recent proposals have attempted to solve this problem by introducing tunable coupling schemes  @xcite . most of them rely on additional circuit elements and gain their tunability from ac - driving  @xcite or from `` adiabatic '' couplers  @xcite . some of these coupling schemes have been tested in experiments and are potentially scalable  @xcite . none of these implementations is however totally immune from imperfections . in general , introducing additional on - chip circuits elements opens new ports to noise . the possibility to employ `` minimal '' fixed coupling schemes has been recently reconsidered in ref . @xcite , pointing out the possibility to single out `` optimal coupling '' conditions which ensure reasonable protection from @xmath0 fluctuations .    in order to implement a @xmath151 gate in a fixed coupling scheme we need two resonant qubits with a transverse coupling , as described by the hamiltonian @xmath152 where @xmath153 is the coupling strength , and @xmath154 the pseudo - spin operators whose eigenstates @xmath155 ( eigenvalues @xmath156 ) are the computational states of qubit @xmath12 . eigenvalues and eigenvectors of @xmath157 are given by -6pt @xmath158 where @xmath159 , @xmath160 with @xmath161 and we have used the shorthand notation @xmath162 . the level structure of the coupled system is schematically illustrated in fig.([splittings ] ) . as a result of the diagonal block structure of the hamiltonian ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) in the computational space , the two - qubit hilbert space is factorized in two subspaces spanned by pairs of eigenvectors . a system prepared in @xmath163 , freely evolving for a time @xmath164 , yields the entangled state @xmath165 , corresponding to a @xmath151 operation . the pair of states @xmath166 and @xmath167 span the subspace where the @xmath151 gate is realized , which we name swap - subspace . the subspace spanned by the pair of states @xmath168 and @xmath169 is termed z - subspace . eq.([eq : hamiltonian ] ) models , for instance , capacitive coupled charge qubits or inductively coupled flux qubits  @xcite . typically , these system can be driven by pulses acting along the transverse direction , @xmath9 . the same port introduces noise into the system  @xcite . this is the case of the charge - phase two - port design of ref . @xcite . ] . here we consider noise sources acting transversely with respect to each qubit , i. e. the interaction hamiltonian takes the form @xmath170 each noise component @xmath16 has broadband spectrum @xmath20 , @xmath21 followed by a white flank at frequencies @xmath171 . correlated noise sources acting on both qubits have been addressed in @xcite . if the system is initialized in the swap subspace , for instance in the state @xmath172 , bitwise readout gives the qubit 1 switching probability @xmath173 , i.e. the probability that it will pass to the state @xmath174 , and the probability @xmath175 of finding the qubit 2 in the initial state @xmath174 . cyclic anti - correlation of the probabilities signals the formation of the entangled state during the @xmath151 operation . in terms of the two qubit reduced density matrix in the eigenstate basis the switching probabilities read @xmath176 + \rho_{00}(t ) + \left [ \ , \rho_{33}(t ) - \rho_{00}(t ) \right ] \sin^2 \frac{\varphi}{2 }   \nonumber \\ & & + { \rm re}[\rho_{12}(t ) ] +   { \rm re } [ \rho_{03}(t ) ] \sin \varphi \label{eq : psw1 } \\ \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!p^{(2)}(t )    = \langle - | { \rm tr}_1 \rho(t ) | - \rangle & = & \frac{1}{2 } \left [ \ , \rho_{11}(t ) + \rho_{22}(t ) \right ]   +   \rho_{00}(t )    +   \left [ \ , \rho_{33}(t ) - \rho_{00}(t ) \right ] \sin^2 \frac{\varphi}{2 }   \nonumber \\   & & -   { \rm re}[\rho_{12}(t ) ] + { \rm re}[\rho_{03}(t ) ] \sin \varphi . \label{eq : psw2}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the matrix elements entering the above probabilities can be evaluated in the multi - stage approach . we split the interaction as in eq.([int - plit ] ) , @xmath177 . low - frequency noise is treated in the adiabatic and longitudinal approximation . in addition we limit the analysis to the spa . we denote with @xmath178 the eigenvalues of @xmath179 with @xmath180 .    _ first stage : elimination of quantum noise _ quantum noise is traced out by solving the born - markov master equation for the reduced density matrix  @xcite with eigenvalues parametrically dependent on the random fields @xmath181 . in the system eigenstate basis   with @xmath180 ] and performing the secular approximation ( to be self - consistently checked ) it takes the standard form  @xcite : @xmath183 where @xmath184 . the rates @xmath185 , @xmath186 depend on the real parts of the lesser and greater green s functions , describing emission ( absorption ) rates to ( from ) the quantum reservoirs  @xcite . in addition , for white quantum noise energy shifts are vanishing and do not appear in eq . ( [ eq : coherences ] ) . because of the symmetry of ( [ eq : hamiltonian ] ) , dissipative transitions inside each -  swap or z  - subspace are forbidden . the allowed inelastic energy exchange processes are evidenced in fig.([splittings ] ) . the only independent emission rates are @xmath187 , @xmath188 . they read @xmath189 \\ \gamma_{20 } = \frac{1}{8 } \ , ( 1-\sin \varphi ) \ , [ c_{x_1}(\omega_{20 } )   +   c_{x_2}(\omega_{20 } ) ] \ , , \end{array } \label{eq : ratesgeneral}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the absorption rates , @xmath190 , are related to the spectrum of quantum noise , @xmath191 . emission rates have the same form with @xmath192 replaced by @xmath193 . for the considered initial condition , @xmath194 , the only non vanishing elements of the reduced density matrix in the eigenbasis of @xmath195 are the populations and the swap coherence , @xmath196 . for independent quantum noise sources acting on the two qubits , the swap decay rate reads @xmath197 = \frac{1}{2 } \ , [ \gamma_1 + \gamma_2 ] $ ] , where @xmath198 , @xmath199 , are relaxation rates of the swap levels . from eq.([eq : coherences ] ) we get @xmath200 the secular approximation is valid provided that @xmath201 . this condition is fulfilled , for instance , for white noise levels extrapolated from single charge - phase qubit experiments , as it can be evinced from the slow decay due to quantum noise reported in fig.([figure2 ] ) , gray line . equations ( [ eq : populations ] ) for the populations do not decouple even in the secular limit . general solutions are quite lengthy . here we report the approximate forms in the small temperature limit with respect to the uncoupled qubits splittings , @xmath202 . in this case level @xmath203 remains unpopulated and @xmath204   \quad , \quad   \rho_{11}(t )   \approx   \frac{1}{2 } \ , e^{- \gamma_{10 } t } \quad , \quad \rho_{22}(t ) \approx \frac{1}{2 } \ , e^{- \gamma_{20 } t } \ , . \label{populations}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    _ second stage : elimination of adiabatic noise _ we now consider the effect of low - frequencies in the adiabatic , longitudinal and static path approximations . populations are unaffected by adiabatic noise , whereas the swap coherence , @xmath205 , has to be averaged over @xmath206 . here we disregard the negligible @xmath206 dependence of the rates @xmath207 via @xmath208 . under these simplifying assumption , we are left with the following average @xmath209 with @xmath210}$ ] . the swap splitting can be estimated by treating in perturbation theory @xmath211 , with @xmath180 , with respect to @xmath157 . this leads to @xmath212 the average in eq . ( [ eq : staticint ] ) can be evaluated in analytic form and gives  @xcite @xmath213   \label{eq : spa - swap}\ ] ] where @xmath214 , and @xmath215 $ ] is the k - bessel function of order zero  @xcite . we considered equal standard deviations for noise sources acting on both qubits , @xmath216 . inserting ( [ populations ] ) and ( [ eq : spa - swap ] ) in ( [ eq : psw1 ] ) and ( [ eq : psw2 ] ) we obtain the switching probabilities in the multi - stage approach . out of phase oscillations signals two - qubit states anti - correlations and follows from @xmath217 $ ] , with @xmath218 +   \cos^2\left ( \frac{\varphi}{2}\right ) \approx   - \frac{1}{4 } \ , \cos \varphi \ , \left [ e^{- \gamma_{10}t } + e^{- \gamma_{20}t } \right ] +   g^2/4 $ ] . the efficiency of the gate results from the interplay of quantum and adiabatic noise . high - frequency noise levels expected from single qubit experiments  @xcite weakly affect the switching probability , whose decay is mainly due to low - frequency noise , fig . ( [ figure2 ] ) . remarkably , considerable recovery of short - times oscillation amplitude may be achieved by an optimal choice of the coupling strength , @xmath219  @xcite . this regime is illustrated in fig.([figure3 ] ) . in this article we presented a road - map to treat broadband noise typical of solid state nanodevices . the introduced multi - stage approach allows to obtain reasonable approximations by systematically including only the relevant information on the complex environment , out of the huge parametrization which would be required for a microscopic description . since the environment is in general long - time correlated , the required information depends on the specific protocol . the predictions obtained with the present approach are in agreement with observations in various single qubit jj implementations and in different protocols  @xcite . we extended the procedure to deal with complex solid - state architectures . this is a required step in order to predict efficiency and possibly appropriately design of nanodevices for quantum information processing . both because of the complexity of architectures and of the unavoidable broadband nature of solid state noise , theoretical tools allowing systematic and controlled approximations are particularly valuable .    as an illustrative case , we performed a simplified analysis of the effects and interplay of low and high frequency noise components in a two - qubit gate in a fixed coupling scheme . our results points out that efficient operations in the solid state require an accurate preliminary characterization of the noise spectral characteristics and tuning appropriately the device working point . we acknowledge support from the eu - eurosqip ( ist-3 - 015708-ip ) . 99 m. nielsen , i. chuang , `` quantum computation and quantum information '' , cambridge univ . press , 2005 . t. hyashi _ et al . _ , lett . * 91 * , 226804 ( 2003 ) ; j. r. petta _ et al . lett . * 93 * , 186802 ( 2004 ) ; j.r . et al . _ , science * 309 * , 2180 ( 2005 ) ; j. gorman , d.g . hasko , and d.a . williams , phys . lett . * 95 * , 090502 ( 2005 ) ; f. h. l. koppens _ et al . _ , nature * 442 * , 766 ( 2006 ) . y. nakamura _ et al . _ , nature * 398 * , 786 ( 1999 ) ; y. yu _ et al . _ , science * 296 * , 889 ( 2002 ) ; j.m . martinis _ et al . _ , lett . * 89 * , 117901 ( 2002 ) ; i. chiorescu _ et al . _ , science , * 299 * , 1869 , ( 2003 ) ; t. yamamoto _ et al . _ , nature * 425 * , 941 ( 2003 ) ; s. saito _ et al . * 93 * , 037001 ( 2004 ) ; j. johansson _ et al . _ , ibid . * 96 * , 127006 ( 2006 ) ; f. deppe _ et al . _ , nat . * 4 * , 686 ( 2008 ) ; d. vion _ et al . _ , science * 296 * , 886 ( 2002 ) . j. koch et al . a * 76 * , 042319 ( 2007 ) ; j. a. schreier _ et al . _ , b * 77 * , 180502(r ) ( 2008 ) . d. i. schuster , _ et al . _ nature * 431 * , 162 ( 2004 ) ; d. i. schuster _ nature * 445 * , 515 ( 2007 ) ; m. gppl _ nature * 454 * , 315 ( 2008 ) ; lev s. bishop _ et al . _ nature physics * 5 * , 105 ( 2008 ) . y. nakamura _ et . al _ , phys . lett . * 88 * , 047901 ( 2002 ) . g. falci , e. paladino , r. fazio , in _ quantum phenomena of mesoscopic systems _ , b. l. altshuler and v. tognetti eds . , proc . of the international school `` enrico fermi '' , varenna 2002 , ios press ( 2003 ) , cond - mat/0312550 . lett . * 94 * , 167002 ( 2005 ) . c. p. slichter _ principles of magnetic resonance _ , springer - verlag , berlin ( 1996 ) s. kafanof _ et al . b , * 78 * , 125411 ( 2008 ) . o. astafiev _ lett . * 93 * , 267007 ( 2004 ) . g. ithier _ et al . _ , b * 72 * , 134519 ( 2005 ) . r.w . et al . _ ,  phys . lett . * 93 * , 077003 ( 2004 ) ; k.b . cooper _ et al . _ , ibid . * 93 * , 180401 ( 2004 ) . j. eroms _ et al . . lett . * 89 * , 122516 ( 2006 ) . c. h. van der wal , _ et al . _ , science 290 , 773777 ( 2000 ) . t. duty _ et al . _ , phys . rev . b * 69 * , 140503(r ) ( 2004 ) ; y. m. galperin _ 96 * , 097009 ( 2006 ) ; j bergli , y m galperin and b l altshuler , new j. phys . * 11 * , 025002 ( 2009 ) . f. chiarello private communication 2008 . experiment based on the setup of s.poletto _ et al . _ new j. phys . * 11 * , 013009 ( 2008 ) . r. fazio , g. m. palma , and j. siewert phys . 83 * , 5385 ( 1999 ) . , rev . * 60 * , 537 ( 1988 ) . j. claudon _ et al . _ , b * 76 * , 024508 ( 2007 ) ; l. tian and r.w . simmonds , phys . 99 * , 137002 ( 2007 ) ; f. deppe _ b * 76 * , 214503 ( 2007 ) ; z. kim , _ b * 78 * , 144506 ( 2008 ) ; a. lupascu _ _ arxiv:0810.0590 . a. m. zagoskin _ lett . * 97 * , 077001 ( 2006 ) . m. neeley , _ et al . _ nature physics * 4 * , 523 ( 2008 ) . e. paladino _ b * 77 * , 041303(r)(2008 ) . s. ashab _ _ , new j. phys . * 8 * , 103 ( 2006 ) ; n. p oxtoby _ et al . _ new j. phys . * 11 * , 063028 ( 2009 ) . c. cohen - tannoudji , j. dupont - roc and g. grynberg _ atom - photon interactions _ , wiley - interscience ( 1993 ) . e. paladino _ et al . _ , * 88 * , 228304 ( 2002 ) . correlated noise and cross - talk effects have been addressed in a. darrigo _ et al . njp * 10 * , 115006 ( 2008 ) . g. falci _ _ in preparation . w. zurek , physics today * 44 * , 36 ( 1991 ) . g. m. palma , k.a . suominen , a. k. ekert , proc . london a , * 452 * , 567 ( 1996 ) . d. g. cory _ * 81 * , 2152 ( 1998 ) . c. isham , _ lectures on quantum theory : mathematical and structural foundations _ , imperial college press , london ( 1995 ) . y. makhlin , a. shnirman , phys . lett . * 92 * , 178301 ( 2004 ) . a.b . zorin _ et al . _ , b * 53 * , 13682 ( 1996 ) . ( [ ref : quadratic ] ) is also valid for ornstein - uhlenbeck processes , see @xcite . for random telegraph noise the discrete nature of the process modifies this result see e. paladino _ state phys . , * 43 * , 747 ( 2003 ) k. rabenstein , v.a . sverdlov , d.v . averin jetp letters * 79 * , 646 ( 2004 ) . et al . _ , nature * 398 * , 305 ( 1999 ) ; j.  q. you _ et al . lett . * 89 * , 197902 ( 2002 ) . . a. pashkin _ et al . _ , nature * 421 * , 823 ( 2003 ) ; a.  j. berkley _ et al . _ , science * 300 * , 1548 ( 2003 ) ; t.  yamamoto _ et al . _ , nature * 425 * , 941 ( 2003 ) ; r.  mcdermott _ et al . _ , science * 307 * , 1299 ( 2005 ) ; j.  b. majer _ lett . * 94 * , 090501 ( 2005 ) ; m. steffen _ et al . _ , science * 313 * , 1423 ( 2006 ) ; j.h . et al . _ , nature * 447 * , 836 ( 2007 ) . m. a. sillanp , j. i. park and r. w. simmonds nature * 449 * , 438 ( 2007 ) . averin , c. bruder , phys . * 91 * , 057003 ( 2003 ) ; a. blais _ et al . _ , ibid . * 90 * , 127901 ( 2003 ) ; f. plastina , g. falci , phys . b * 67 * , 224514 ( 2003 ) ; b.plourde _ et al . _ , ibid . * 70 * , 140501(r ) ( 2004 ) ; a.o . niskanen , y. nakamura , j.s . tsai , ibid . * 73 * , 094506 ( 2006 ) ; p. bertet , c.  j. harmans , j.e . mooij , ibid . * 73 * , 064512 ( 2006 ) ; y - d wang , a. kemp , k. semba , ibid . * 79 * , 024502 ( 2009 ) . c.  rigetti , a.  blais , and m.  devoret , phys . * 94 * , 240502 ( 2005 ) ; yu - xi liu _ et al . _ , ibid . * 96 * , 067003 ( 2006 ) ; g. s. paraoanu , phys . rev . b 74 , 140504(r ) ( 2006 ) . t.  v. filippov _ et al . _ , ieee trans . * 13 * , 1005 ( 2003 ) ; j.  lantz _ et al . b * 70 * , 140507(r ) ( 2004 ) ; a.  maassen van den brink _ et al . _ , new j. phys . * 7 * , 230 ( 2005 ) . a. izmalkov _ * 93 * , 037003 ( 2004 ) ; m. grajcar _ _ , prb * 72 * , 02503 ( 2005 ) ; t. hime _ et al . _ , science * 314 * , 1427 ( 2006 ) ; a. o. niskanen _ _ , science * 316 * 723 ( 2007 ) ; a. o. niskanen _ et al . _ , nature * 447 * , 386 ( 2007 ) ; j. majer _ _ , ibid . * 449 * , 443 ( 2007 ) ; s. h. w. van der ploeg _ et al . _ , * 98 * , 057004 ( 2007 ) ; a. fay _ * 100 * , 187003 ( 2008 ) ; a. o. niskanen _ et al . _ , b * 77 * , 064505 ( 2008 ) ; k. harrabi _ _ , phys . rev . b 79 , 020507 ( 2009 ) . e. paladino , a. mastellone , a. darrigo , g. falci , arxiv:0906.3115 u. weiss , `` quantum dissipative systems '' , third edition , world scientific 2008 . m. abramowitz , i. a. stegun `` handbook of mathematical functions '' , dover ( 1965 ) . e. paladino _ at al . _ physica e in press ( 2009 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: broadband noise represents a severe limitation towards the implementation of a solid - state quantum information processor . considering common spectral forms , we propose a classification of noise sources based on the effects produced instead of on their microscopic origin . we illustrate a multi - stage approach to broadband noise which systematically includes only the relevant information on the environment , out of the huge parametrization needed for a microscopic description . we apply this technique to a solid - state two - qubit gate in a fixed coupling implementation scheme .