Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: short clean one - dimensional ( 1d ) mesoscopic wires , often referred to as quantum point contacts , show conductance quantization@xcite as a function of the channel width . the quantization is well described by the theory of adiabatic propagation of free electrons.@xcite for non - interacting particles , conductance quantization should occur in longer channels too , as long as there is no backscattering off inhomogeneities within the channel . a lot is known about the role of electron - electron interaction of 1d channels . electron - electron repulsion in a wire enhances dramatically the reflection coefficient , making it energy - dependent.@xcite however , interaction between electrons does not alter the quantization ( in units of @xmath1 ) of an ideal channel conductance in the limit of zero temperature.@xcite what is still an open question is whether there are other manifestations of interactions due to inelastic processes , which influence the transport properties .    in the absence of interactions , left- and right - moving particles in a wire are at equilibrium with the reservoirs they originate from . if a bias is applied between the reservoirs , then these equilibria differ from each other , giving rise to a particular form of the non - equilibrium distribution inside the channel . on the other hand , in a long ideal channel and in the presence of interactions one may expect equilibration to occur between the left- and right - movers into a single distribution characterized by an equilibrium with respect to a reference frame moving with some drift velocity . interestingly , in a model with momentum - independent electron velocity for left- and right - movers ( as it is the case in tomonaga - luttinger model ) there is no difference between the two distributions . effects originating from the particle - hole asymmetry , however , may discriminate between the two . thermopower and coulomb drag  @xcite are examples of such effects .    . this fabrication method has the advantage of producing reflectionless contacts to the leads,@xcite so that the boundary conditions of the distribution function is given by the fermi function of the reservoirs . we define the thermopower as @xmath2 , i.e.  the voltage @xmath3 required to counteract a current due to the temperature difference @xmath4 . [ fig : qpc - picture],scaledwidth=40.0% ]    at present , little is known about equilibration in a 1d electron system . in higher dimensions the electron - electron interaction provides the most effective relaxation mechanism at low temperatures and therefore we include this relaxation mechanism as the first approach . however , in 1d pair collisions can not change the distribution function for quadratic dispersion , since the momentum and energy conservation@xcite laws result in either zero momentum exchange or an interchange of the two momenta . @xcite in either case the distribution function remains the same . thus , the leading equilibration mechanism is due to three - particle collisions , which we study in this paper.@xcite    we investigate here the effects of three - particle collisions in reasonably short wires ( see fig . [ fig : qpc - picture ] ) , where electron - electron scattering can be considered perturbatively . as measurable quantities , we evaluate the temperature dependence of the thermopower and conductance . note that for more than one mode pair collisions become important for certain fillings.@xcite    the paper is organized as follows : first we review the non - interacting limit of thermopower and give a qualitative explanation of the effects due to three - particle collisions . then we describe how to include the electron interactions using the boltzmann equation . next we calculate the main ingredient for our perturbation theory , namely the three - particle matrix element and scattering rate using a @xmath5-matrix expansion . we note several interesting properties of this scattering rate . finally , we derive the conductance and thermopower corrections and discuss the deviation from the so - called mott formula . furthermore , some technical details are put in two appendices , and in appendix [ appendix - a - meso - princip ] we show that the number of left and right movers have to change in a scattering event for the current to change .      for a wire without interactions the distribution function @xmath6 is determined solely by the electron reservoirs @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the dispersion relation for momentum @xmath9 and spin @xmath10 ( suppressed in the notation ) , and @xmath11^{-1}$ ] is the fermi function with @xmath12 and @xmath13 denoting the chemical potential and temperature of the left / right contact , respectively ( see fig . [ fig : qpc - picture ] ) . the electric current for low temperature @xmath14 and in linear response to the applied bias @xmath3 and temperature difference @xmath15 then follows as ( @xmath16)@xcite @xmath17 from this the well - known leading - order results for conductance @xmath18 and for thermopower @xmath19 for a fully open channel are obtained . here @xmath20 is the fermi temperature .      ) and cold right moving electrons ( @xmath21 ) . due to the temperature difference of the initial distributions the scattering process creating left movers dominate compared to the opposite scattering and therefore it gives a positive correction to the thermopower . [ fig : scattering - picture],scaledwidth=45.0% ]    one of the main results of this paper is that the three - particle collisions give a _ positive _ contribution to the thermopower , i.e.  the current due to a temperature difference is _ increased _ by the three - particle scattering . this can be explained in simple terms . firstly , to change the current the number of left and right moving electrons need to change , since it is the number of electrons going through a mesoscopic structure that determines the current and not their velocity ( see the appendix [ appendix - a - meso - princip ] ) . secondly , we find the dominant scattering process at low temperature to only involve a single electron changing direction . this occurs near the bottom of the band as pictured on fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) . for the initial electronic distribution the left moving electrons have a higher temperature then the right moving ones , which favors scattering into the warmer distribution as seen on fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](b ) . this thus creates more left moving electrons and thereby increases the particle current towards the colder reservoir , i.e.  increasing the thermopower . another important point is that the thermopower and conductance corrections are exponential in temperature , i.e.  proportional to @xmath22 . this is a direct consequence of the dominant three - particle scattering process requiring an empty state near the bottom of the band . we find the form of the thermopower correction at low temperatures due to the three particle scattering to be given by @xmath23 where @xmath3 is the electron - electron interaction strength and @xmath24 the fermi temperature . this is found perturbatively in the short wire limit . the long - wire limit remains an open question , and we expect that the length dependence of thermopower saturates once @xmath0 exceeds some relaxation length ( which increases for decreasing temperature ) . in contrast , the conductance correction is negative . to understand this , note that the chemical potential of the initial distribution is higher for the right moving electrons then the left moving ones . this favors scattering into the left moving branch ( still with the process shown in fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) ) for non - zero temperature and thereby decreasing the current . the form of the conductance correction is similar to the thermopower correction : @xmath25 to model the current through a short 1d quantum wire including perturbatively the three particle interactions , we use the boltzmann equation @xmath26 , \label{eq : boltzmann - eq}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath27 is the distribution function at a space point @xmath28 between zero and @xmath0 ( see fig . [ fig : qpc - picture ] ) , @xmath29 is the velocity and @xmath30 $ ] is the three - body electronic collision integral , i.e.  no impurity or interface roughness effects are included here . we include the voltage and temperature difference in the boundary conditions of the reflectionless contacts,@xcite i.e.    [ eq : boundary - conditions ] @xmath31    and therefore omit the term @xmath32 in the boltzmann equation , allowed in the linear response regime.@xcite a similar method has been used to investigate electron - phonon interactions in short quantum wires,@xcite quantum hall effect in quantum wires @xcite and ballistic coulomb drag.@xcite    the three - particle collision integral is assumed to be local in space and is given by    @xmath33= & -\!\!\!\!\!\!\sum_{\substack{\sigma_2\sigma_3\\ \sigma_{1^{\prime}}\sigma_{2^{\prime}}\sigma_{3^{\prime } } } } \sum_{\substack{k_2k_3\\k_{1^{\prime}}k_{2^{\prime}}k_{3^{\prime}}}}\!\!\!\ ! w_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } \left[f_1f_2f_3(1-f_{1^{\prime}})(1-f_{2^{\prime}})(1-f_{3^{\prime } } ) -f_{1^{\prime}}f_{2^{\prime}}f_{3^{\prime}}(1-f_1)(1-f_2)(1-f_3)\right ] , \label{eq : collision - integral - full}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    where the quantum numbers are primed / unprimed after / before the scattering event , @xmath34 and the scattering rate @xmath35 is found in the next section . without interactions ( @xmath36 ) the solution of the boltzmann equation is simply given by @xmath6 in eq . ( [ eq : f-0 ] ) . when interactions are included it becomes a very difficult task to solve the boltzmann equation to all orders in the interaction . however , for a short wire the interactions only have short time to change the distribution function away from the initial distribution @xmath6 and therefore we expand the distribution function in orders of @xmath35 as @xmath37 to find @xmath38 to the first order in @xmath39 , we insert the expansion of @xmath40 in the boltzmann equation and realize that only @xmath6 is necessary in the collision integral . since @xmath41=\mathcal{i}_{k}[f^{(0)}]$ ] is independent of @xmath28 , we find that    [ eq : f-1kk ] @xmath42   \quad & \textrm{for}\quad   & k>0,\\ f_{k}^{(1)}(x)&=\frac{x - l}{v_{k}}\mathcal{i}_{k}[f^{(0 ) } ]   \quad & \textrm{for}\quad & k<0 , \label{eq : f-1}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    using the boundary conditions eq . ( [ eq : boundary - conditions ] ) . therefore the current to the first order in @xmath39 is @xmath43\equiv i^{(0)}+i^{\textrm{int } } , \label{eq : i - int - def}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath44 is the non - interacting ( landauer ) part of the current from eq . ( [ eq : i-0 ] ) and @xmath45 is the part due to interactions .      the form of the interacting part of the current is now known and the next step is therefore to evaluate it to linear response to @xmath3 and @xmath4 to obtain the thermopower and conductance corrections . to this end , we define @xmath46 via @xmath47 where @xmath48 is the fermi function with temperature @xmath5 and fermi level @xmath49 . it turns out that @xmath46 is proportional to either @xmath3 or @xmath4 . this is seen by using the identity @xmath50 so we can identify @xmath46 by expanding the non - interacting distribution function @xmath51 ( see eq . ( [ eq : f-0 ] ) and fig . [ fig : qpc - picture ] )    @xmath52ev,\\ f^0_{\textrm{r}}({\varepsilon}_k)&\simeq f^0({\varepsilon}_k)+\left[-{\partial}_{{\varepsilon}}f^0({\varepsilon}_k)\right]({\varepsilon}-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})\frac{\delta t}{t } , \ ] ]    i.e. @xmath53 therefore to get @xmath45 in linear response to @xmath3 and @xmath4 , we linearized the collision integral @xmath54 $ ] eq .  ( [ eq : collision - integral - full ] ) with respect to @xmath55 and insert it into @xmath45 eq.([eq : i - int - def ] ) to obtain @xmath56 , \label{eq : i-1-linear - response}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we defined @xmath57 using the shorthand notation @xmath58 and @xmath59 . to linearize the collision integral and thereby the correction to the current due to interactions @xmath45 , we have used the relation @xmath60 valid at @xmath61 . since @xmath62 is different for positive and negative @xmath63 , we need to divide the summation in @xmath45 eq . ( [ eq : i-1-linear - response ] ) into positive and negative @xmath9 sums , which gives @xmath64 terms . for this purpose , we introduce the notation @xmath65 and similarly for other combinations of the summation intervals . the 32 terms can be simplified to only three terms using energy conservation and symmetry properties of @xmath66 in eq . ( [ eq : delta - def ] ) under interchange of indices . there are pairwise exchanges of indices @xmath67 etc . and interchanges between primed and unprimed indices , @xmath68 , using eq . ( [ eq : h - teorem ] ) and the fact that @xmath35 contains a matrix element squared . this leads to six terms . furthermore , @xmath66 is invariant under @xmath69 for all @xmath70 simultaneously due to time reversal symmetry , also seen explicitly from the form of @xmath35 ( derived below ) . an example of how the simplifications occurs can be seen in eq . ( [ eq : simplification - of - sums ] ) . thus we obtain the more compact result    @xmath71\nonumber\\ & + 4(-e)\sum_{\textrm{spin}}\sum_{\substack{--+\\+++}}\delta_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } \left[\frac{\delta t}{{k_{\textrm{b}}^{}}t^2 _ { } } \left\{({\varepsilon}_1-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})+({\varepsilon}_2-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})\right\}-\frac{2ev}{{k_{\textrm{b}}^{}}t}\right]\nonumber\\ & + 3(-e)\sum_{\textrm{spin}}\sum_{\substack{++-\\+-- } } \delta_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } \left[\frac{\delta t}{{k_{\textrm{b}}^{}}t^2 _ { } } \left\{-({\varepsilon}_3-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})+({\varepsilon}_{2^{\prime}}-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})+({\varepsilon}_{3^{\prime}}-{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^{}})\right\}-\frac{ev}{{k_{\textrm{b}}^{}}t}\right ] , \label{eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    where the definition of @xmath62 in eq . ( [ eq : psi-0-value ] ) was inserted . an important point is that the number of positive / negative wave - vector intervals is not the same before and after the scattering . therefore , we note that only scattering events that change the number of left and right moving electrons contributes to the interaction correction to the current . the origin of this is the cancellation of the velocity in the definition of the current and in the distribution functions . this cancellation thus leads to an expression for the interaction correction to the current in eq .   where all the in - going and out - going momenta enter on equal footing . in the appendix [ appendix - a - meso - princip ] , we show that this is valid to all orders in perturbation theory . due to this property and momentum conservation , there are no processes that alter the current possible near the fermi level . consequently , states far away from the fermi level have to be involved in the scattering , which , as we will see , leads to a suppression of @xmath45 by a factor @xmath22 . the distribution function on the other hand , _ can _ be changed by scattering processes near the fermi level .    to identify the important processes we find in the next section the scattering rate @xmath35 . the three particle scattering rate @xmath35 is calculated using the generalized fermi golden rule inserting the @xmath5-matrix , @xmath72 , iterated to second order in the interaction @xmath3 to get the three particle interaction amplitude , i.e. , @xmath73 where @xmath74 is the initial energy , @xmath75 the final energy , @xmath76 is the resolvent operator ( or free green function ) , @xmath77 is short hand for @xmath78 , and the subscript @xmath79 means connected in the sense that the scattering process can not be effectively a two particle process , where one of the incoming particles does not participate in the scattering . explicitly @xmath76 and @xmath3 are given by @xmath80 here @xmath81 is the unperturbed hamiltonian ( i.e.  kinetic energy with some dispersion ) , @xmath82 the fourier - transformed interaction potential , and @xmath83 ( @xmath84 ) is the annihilation ( creation ) operator . to calculate the matrix element @xmath85 , we write the initial and final states as @xmath86 where @xmath87 is the empty state . using the anti - commutator algebra @xmath88 , we obtain @xmath89 where we introduced @xmath90 ( the last equality is only valid for a quadratic dispersion ) , and where the set of permutations is given by @xmath91 . here the signs of the permutation , @xmath92 , are shown as superscripts .    in order to exclude the effectively two - particle processes when multiplying eq . ( [ eq : vg|i > ] ) by @xmath93 from the left , @xmath94 ( @xmath95 ) needs to be different from @xmath96 ( @xmath97 ) . the result is    @xmath98    where @xmath99 is the symmetrized interaction . the matrix element consist of 36 terms and the scattering rate thus has @xmath100 terms . to obtain this result we did not use energy conservation . for a quadratic dispersion , the denominator is only zero if we have an effective pair collision or if the momentum transfer is zero , as seen from the expression @xmath101 . a picture of the matrix element is found in fig . [ fig : diagram](b ) , where the exchange processes ( including the sign ) are visualized as different ways to connect two interaction lines and an intermediate propagation ( @xmath76 ) seen on fig . [ fig : diagram](a ) . the inclusion of the fermi statistics makes a substantial difference for the properties of the scattering rate as compared to the case described in ref . [ ] , which is obtained by setting all @xmath102 . we can rewrite the matrix element eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - vgv - genneral ] ) in a more transparent way in terms of quantum mechanical exchange symmetry . first , we introduce the following combination of three - particle scattering amplitudes @xmath103 , \label{eq : v - def}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    and after some rewriting , we then obtain @xmath104.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] we interpret this result in a way similar to a two - particle matrix element , @xmath105 , \label{eq:2-particle - matrix - element}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which contains a direct ( first term ) and a exchange term ( where @xmath106 ) .    in the three - particle case @xmath107 is the direct term and one can make five exchange processes ( instead of one ) by exchanging the three final states @xmath108 , @xmath109 and @xmath110 . this gives eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - vha - v ] ) . the sign in front of each @xmath111 is determined by the number of exchanges made , e.g.  in @xmath112 a single exchange , @xmath113 , gives a minus @xmath114 whereas for @xmath115 two exchanges ( @xmath116 followed by @xmath117 ) gives a positive sign @xmath118 . furthermore , the arguments in @xmath107 are ordered in three pairs such that the differences between the elements in each pair are the only arguments of the interaction potential , see eq . ( [ eq : v - def ] ) . this is useful when constructing approximations having a specific scattering process in mind .    how the matrix element was rewritten into the form of eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - vha - v ] ) can also be described in terms of the drawings of fig . [ fig : diagram ] . the direct term @xmath107 is the sum of the six terms having mirror - symmetric exchanges before and after the scattering . the other terms in eq.([eq : matrix - element - vha - v ] ) then can be obtained by suitable changes of outgoing lines . the expressions we obtain for the three - particle scattering rates eq . ( [ eq : w - fermi - rule ] ) are quite cumbersome . nevertheless , the obtained results allow for some consistency checks . remarkably , for some two - body potentials , scattering of the particles of an @xmath119-body system is exactly equivalent to a sequence of two - body collisions . such `` special '' potentials were studied in the context of integrable quantum many - body problems.@xcite we recall now that for a quadratic band a pair collision does not change the momenta of the incoming particles or simply permutes the two momenta . therefore , three - particle scattering for a the integrable potentials may result _ only _ in permutations within the group of three momenta of the colliding particles ; all other three - particle scattering amplitudes must be zero for such potentials . in the context of this work it means that even three - particle ( or higher - order ) collisions would not bring electron equilibration for such types of electron - electron interaction .    in this section we check that the three - particle scattering amplitudes are indeed zero for two special potentials .      in the case of contact interaction , @xmath120 , and for any kind of electron dispersion relation ( i.e. , not necessarily quadratic ) , we find by using the energy conservation law that @xmath121 , \label{eq : v - const - e - general}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath122 . this is a major simplification from @xmath100 to @xmath123 terms by performing the spin summation . if furthermore , the dispersion is quadratic , @xmath124 , then we find the ( at first sight ) surprising cancellation @xmath125 this can be seen directly from eq.([eq : v - const - e - general ] ) or by noting that @xmath126 for a quadratic dispersion and constant interaction for @xmath127 , i.e.  each term of eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - vha - v ] ) is zero . @xmath107 cancels in such a way , that the three first terms of eq . ( [ eq : v - def ] ) cancel each other ( the even permutations of @xmath128 combined with the same primed permutation ) and the three last terms cancel each other ( the odd permutations of @xmath128 combined with the same primed permutation ) . in fact , the described above cancellation is in agreement with the general factorization results for the @xmath129matrix of one - dimensional @xmath119body problem with @xmath130function interaction in real space.@xcite in this context , it is crucial that the particles have quadratic dispersion relation ; if we use e.g.  @xmath131 , then the cancellation does not occur . notice also that the cancellation we demonstrate is not a trivial zero . indeed , the underlying two - particle amplitudes eq . ( [ eq:2-particle - matrix - element ] ) are finite for a @xmath132independent potential , if one includes spins . ( for spinless fermions and contact interaction the matrix element would be zero because the direct and the exchange terms cancel in accordance with the pauli principle . ) we checked also that the energy conserving part of the matrix element @xmath85 in the case of _ spinless _ fermions , quadratic dispersion , and the fourier transformed interaction potential of the form @xmath134 becomes equal to zero . this is also possible to expect because of the relation of the potential eq . ( [ liebliniger ] ) to the integrable 1d bosonic lieb - liniger model  @xcite . indeed , the bosonic model with contact interaction potential @xmath135 may be exactly mapped  @xcite onto the spinless fermionic model with interaction @xmath136 . the integrability of the bosonic model guarantees the integrability of the corresponding fermionic one . adding a contact interaction to @xmath137 does no harm , as we are considering spinless fermions . finally , fourier transformation takes us to eq . ( [ liebliniger ] ) . we checked that including the spin degree of freedom , spoils the remarkable cancellation for a three - particle amplitude .    in the following sections , we assume a general case interaction potential for which the three - particle scattering amplitudes lead to a non - trivial re - distribution of the momenta between the particles . in this section , we go though the main ideas and approximations in evaluating the current correction due to interactions @xmath45 eq .  ( [ eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact ] ) to lowest order in the temperature , @xmath14 . we give a more detailed calculation in the appendix [ appendix - b - detailed - calcualtion ] .    as noted previously , all three terms in @xmath45 eq . ( [ eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact ] ) are exponentially suppressed , since momentum conservation @xmath138 forbids scattering processes near the fermi level for the given combinations of positive and negative @xmath9 intervals . to be more specific , it is the phase space restrictions of the fermi functions that give the exponential suppression , i.e. @xmath139 we begin by identifying the most important three particle scattering process . the three terms in @xmath45 eq .  ( [ eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact ] ) are : ( i ) two right movers backscattering a left mover while remaining right movers ; ( ii ) one right mover keeping its direction , while backscattering two left movers , and ( iii ) a left and a right mover keeping their directions , while backscattering the third particle . from now on , we will concentrate on the case of coulomb interaction @xmath140 , which is the largest for small @xmath132 , therefore we want to identify processes where the initial and final state are close in momentum space  @xcite . further , the process(es ) should not require more than one electron in states suppressed exponentially by the fermi functions . one can see that due to the constraints stemming from momentum and energy conservation , in fact only process ( iii ) allows both initial and final states to be close to each other in momentum space and at the same time having only a single exponentially suppressed factor . the corresponding scattering process is of the type shown in fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) . therefore to the first order in @xmath22 , we include only the third one in eq . ( [ eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact ] ) . this leads to @xmath141 . \label{eq : i - int - vigtigt}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath66 expresses the available phase space in form of the fermi functions and the three - particle scattering rate , see eq . ( [ eq : delta - def ] ) . one essential approximation is that for the scattering process depicted in fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) , we may replace the full fermi distribution functions by the exponential tales or the low - temperature limit expressions , i.e.    [ f0s ] @xmath142    note that @xmath143 , @xmath144 and @xmath145 are all positive . we see that the product of the fermi functions is indeed exponentially suppressed , i.e.  @xmath146 . the second essential approximation is that for the scattering process seen in fig . [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) the initial and final states differ by a small momentum . therefore the matrix element in the transition rate @xmath35 is dominated by the direct term @xmath107 in eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - vha - v ] ) , since the five exchange terms are suppressed by the coulomb interaction @xmath147 , i.e. @xmath148    the direct term eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - direct - only ] ) would be zero for @xmath149 . in the case of quadratic dispersion relation and general @xmath150 , it vanishes in the limit @xmath151 and @xmath152 for @xmath153 due to the pauli principle . for a quadratic dispersion and for a general symmetrized interaction @xmath154 , the direct term @xmath107 simplifies to the following expression @xmath155}{(k_1-k_3+q_1)q_1q_3(k_1-k_3-q_3 ) } \label{eq : v - direct - quadratic - sec4}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where we used energy conservation and introduced @xmath156 and @xmath157 . next , we give a qualitative explanation for the power law in @xmath5 for the interacting current correction eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) using the quadratic dispersion . first , we consider the phase space constraint . to do the sum over all @xmath9 in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) we use the momentum and energy conservation and introduce new variables @xmath156 and @xmath157 , i.e. , change the summation variables , @xmath158 the energy conservation for a quadratic dispersion gives a factor of @xmath159 ( see e.g.  eq . ( [ eq : energy - conservation ] ) ) . for the process at hand , the @xmath143 and @xmath160 are close to the fermi level and each of their sums contribute with a factor of @xmath161 and @xmath162 , respectively . the fermi functions give the exponential suppression and a contribution to the phase space in form of an exponential tail , i.e. @xmath163 see eq . ( [ eq : fermi - function-1 - 1m]-[eq : fermi - function-3 - 3 m ] ) . to get the low temperature result for @xmath45 , eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) , we use the method of steepest decent to calculate the integral . to this end , we note that the exponent @xmath164 is a function of @xmath161 and @xmath162 and in the limit @xmath165 the most important part is around the origin @xmath166 . here @xmath164 vanishes as @xmath167 ( see appendix [ appendix - b - detailed - calcualtion ] for details ) . therefore collecting the phase space factors the current correction due to three particle interactions eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) becomes @xmath168.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the limit @xmath14 . furthermore , it turns out that the constraints @xmath169 and @xmath170 in the sum eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) only leaves phase space close to @xmath171 for @xmath165 , so we can set @xmath172 in the integrand and do the integral over @xmath162 , which is @xmath173 due to the phase space limits . to lowest order in temperature this yields @xmath174 . \label{eq : i - int - uden - fase - rum}\end{aligned}\ ] ] from this we conclude that phase space alone ( i.e.  assuming @xmath175 to be a constant ) gives a temperature dependence of the form @xmath176 \quad \textrm{(phase space only)}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] however , as we have seen the three - particle interaction rate has delicate momentum dependence that needs to be taken into account . therefore , to calculate the direct interaction term @xmath107 we expand the symmetrized potential @xmath140 for small @xmath132 , as @xmath177 , \label{eq : vq - taylor - series}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the parameter @xmath178 describes the screening due to the metallic gates near the quantum wire and @xmath179 is ( twice ) the @xmath180 fourier transform of the coulomb potential cut - off by the screening . setting @xmath181 into the three - particle scattering rate eq . ( [ eq : v - direct - quadratic - sec4 ] ) , we obtain @xmath182 to lowest order in @xmath132 . inserting this into the eq . ( [ eq : i - int - uden - fase - rum ] ) the final result for the current correction , including both phase space factors and the momentum dependent scattering rate , becomes @xmath183.\end{aligned}\ ] ] ( here we noticed that the non - constant three particle scattering rate gave rise to four extra powers in temperature . ) the detailed calculation given in appendix [ appendix - b - detailed - calcualtion ] yields a prefactor , and the end result is @xmath184 + \mathcal{o}\left[\bigg(\frac{t}{{t_{\textrm{f}}}}\bigg)^8\right ] . \label{eq : i - int - resultat}\end{aligned}\ ] ] combining this result with the zero - order in the interaction terms , see eqs . ( [ g0 ] ) and ( [ s0 ] ) , we find for the thermopower and conductance in the low temperature limit , @xmath185 , \label{eq : s - result}\\ g= & \frac{2e^2}{h }     -\frac{2e^2}{h}e^{-{t_{\textrm{f}}}/t}\left[1+\frac{l}{\ell_{\textrm{eee}}}\right ] . \label{eq : g - result}\end{aligned}\ ] ] here we introduced the effective length @xmath186 by the relation@xcite @xmath187 which may be viewed as a mean free path with respect to backscattering for a hole near the bottom of the band .    to recapitulate , the temperature dependence @xmath188 in eq . can be understood in the following way : the three - particle scattering of a single particle leaves five free momenta , and since two are taken by energy and momentum conservation this gives @xmath189 . in addition , the interaction , @xmath82 , is proportional to @xmath190 , and when squared it gives rise to four more powers , which results in the @xmath191 dependence .    in the limit of a point - like interaction , @xmath192 , the corrections are zero in agreement with the result of section [ subsec : point - like - int ] . it is known from the luttinger liquid theory that in the limit of linear spectrum , which corresponds to @xmath193 , the conductance remains finite even if the wire is infinitely long ( @xmath194 ) . therefore it is tempting to speculate that the two terms in the square brackets of eq . ( [ eq : g - result ] ) are the first terms of an expansion in @xmath195 of some function @xmath196 which saturates at a constant value in the limit @xmath197 . one may also have a similar speculation generalizing eq . ( [ eq : s - result ] ) for the thermopower , @xmath198\to f_s(l/\ell_{\textrm{eee}})$ ] .    as a final remark , we note that the so - called mott formula  @xcite relating the thermopower to the low - temperature conductance , @xmath199 is clearly violated by eqs . ( [ eq : g - result ] ) and ( [ eq : s - result ] ) . this violation could be expected , because the conventional derivation of the mott formula ( for the non - interacting case ) assumes that the main contribution to the conductance _ and _ thermopower comes from the states around the fermi level , in an energy interval of the order of temperature.@xcite however , in the considered case the main contribution to @xmath129 comes from the `` deep '' states , even in the zeroth order with respect to the interaction potential . correspondingly there is no surprise that eqs . ( [ eq : s - result ] ) and ( [ eq : g - result ] ) being substituted , respectively , in the left- and right - hand sides of eq . ( [ mott ] ) produce a parametrically large mismatch @xmath200 . we have calculated the leading interaction correction to the transport properties of a clean mesoscopic wire adiabatically connected to the leads , using perturbation theory in the length of the wire .    for a single - mode wire , the leading interaction corrections turns out to be given by three - particle scattering processes . this is because two - particle processes can not change the current due to momentum and energy conservation . to calculate the effect of the three - body processes , we have utilized the boltzmann equation formalism , with three - particle scattering events defining the collision integral . we have identified the leading - order scattering processes and found that they involve at least one state near the bottom of the band , i.e. far from the fermi level . the involvement of such `` deep '' states results in an exponentially small , @xmath201 , interaction - induced correction to thermopower and conductance at low temperatures . the account for interaction in this paper is performed for relatively short wires , where perturbation theory in the interaction or equivalently in the wire length is valid . for longer wires one needs to find the distribution function by treating the collision integral in the boltzmann equation non - perturbatively . it is not clear whether the relaxation of the distribution function would instead yield non - exponential corrections to the transport coefficients for longer wires . however , since the scattering processes that contribute to the current must involve a particle that changes direction ( which is proven in appendix [ appendix - a - meso - princip ] ) , one might speculate that the exponential suppression is valid for all lengths , as long as electron - electron scattering is the only active relaxation mechanism . the question of what the relaxed distribution function looks like for a mesoscopic wire is an interesting and unsolved problem . here we have only given a partial answer for the leading contributions for a short wire , i.e. to lowest order in the interaction . further studies should involve a self - consistent determination of the distribution function .    since thermopower is sensitive to the electron distribution function , it might be a good experimental tool for answering the fundamental questions regarding the effect of electron - electron collisions . indeed refined measurements of thermopower of short 1d quantum wires have been performed yielding a reasonably good agreement with the free - electron theory.@xcite it remains an open question whether the accuracy of thermopower measurements is high enough to see the interaction effects in longer wires . we acknowledge illuminating discussions with m. garst , a. kamenev , m. khodas , t. l. larsen and m. pustilnik . a.m.l . appreciates and enjoyed the hospitality of the william i. fine theoretical physics institute , university of minnesota . this work is supported by nsf grants dmr 02 - 37296 and dmr 04 - 39026 . in this appendix , we show that _ the particle current change due to electronic scattering if and only if the scattering changes the number of left and right moving electrons_. in the main text ( see eq.([eq : i-1-linear - simplificeret - exact ] ) ) , this was shown to first order in the transition rate , but here we show it to _ all orders in the interaction_.    we show it explicitly in the boltzmann equation framework , however , suspect it to be a general feature of mesoscopic systems . intuitively , the statement means that it is the _ number _ of particles that passes though the mesoscopic system that matters and not their velocity . in contrast to this is e.g.  a long 1d wire or a bulk metal , where a velocity change of the particles is enough to change the current .    to show the above statement explicitly , we formally rewrite the boltzmann equation ( [ eq : boltzmann - eq ] ) including the boundary conditions eq.([eq : boundary - conditions ] ) as @xmath202}{v_{k } } \ \ \ \textrm{for}\ k>0 , \label{eq : solution - to - be - genneral - positive - k}\\ f_{k}(x)&=f^0_{\textrm{r}}({\varepsilon}_{k})+\int_l^x\!\!\ ! { \textrm{d}}x^{\prime}\frac{\mathcal{i}_{kx^{\prime}}[f]}{v_{k } } \ \ \ \textrm{for}\ k<0 . \label{eq : solution - to - be - genneral - negative - k}\end{aligned}\ ] ] note that this is not a closed solution of the boltzmann equation , since the distribution function is still contained inside the collision integral . however , this rewriting enables us to find the current without finding the distribution function first , i.e.  by inserting eq . ( [ eq : solution - to - be - genneral - positive - k],[eq : solution - to - be - genneral - negative - k ] ) into the current definition @xmath203 and obtain ( after a few manipulations ) : @xmath204\nonumber\\ & -\frac{(-e)}{l } \int_0^l\!\!\ ! { \textrm{d}}x \sum_{\sigma k<0}\mathcal{i}_{kx}[f ] + \frac{(-e)}{l } \int_0^x\!\!\ ! { \textrm{d}}x^{\prime } \overbrace{\sum_{\sigma k}\mathcal{i}_{kx^{\prime}}[f]}^{=0}\nonumber\\ \equiv&\   i^{(0)}+i^{(\textrm{int})},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the @xmath28-dependent part can be seen to be zero by changing variables . we note the cancellation of the velocity in the distribution function eqs . ( [ eq : solution - to - be - genneral - positive - k ] ) , ( [ eq : solution - to - be - genneral - negative - k ] ) and the current definition eq . ( [ eq : current - def ] ) , which is the origin of the statement we are showing ( as in the first order calculation ) . a similar cancellation occurs in the landauer formula thus relating the transmission to the conductance . by using the explicit form of the collision integral eq . ( [ eq : collision - integral - full ] ) the current from the interactions is    @xmath205.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    we can divide the summation over @xmath9 quantum number into positive and negative intervals as in the main text ( see section [ sec : linear - response - limit ] ) . the essential point is now , that all terms that have the same number of positive ( and negative ) intervals for the primed and unprimed wave numbers @xmath9 are zero . in other words , if the number of left and right moving electrons does not change then the contribution is zero by symmetry of the transition rate . we show this cancellation in practice by an example ( using the notation of eq.([eq : notation - def-++ ] ) ) : @xmath206\label{eq : simplification - of - sums}\\ = & \sum_{\textrm{spin } } \sum_{\substack{-+-\\-+- } } w_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } \left[f_1f_2f_3(1-f_{1^{\prime}})(1-f_{2^{\prime}})(1-f_{3^{\prime } } ) -f_{1^{\prime}}f_{2^{\prime}}f_{3^{\prime}}(1-f_1)(1-f_2)(1-f_3)\right]\nonumber\\ = & \sum_{\textrm{spin } } \sum_{\substack{-+-\\-+- } } w_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } f_1f_2f_3(1-f_{1^{\prime}})(1-f_{2^{\prime}})(1-f_{3^{\prime } } ) - \sum_{\textrm{spin } } \sum_{\substack{-+-\\-+- } } \underbrace{w_{123;1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime } } f_{1^{\prime}}f_{2^{\prime}}f_{3^{\prime}}(1-f_1)(1-f_2)(1-f_3)}_{\textrm{interchange}\ ( 123)\leftrightarrows(1^{\prime}2^{\prime}3^{\prime})}=0,\nonumber \ ] ]    interchanging @xmath108 and @xmath109 at the first equality using @xmath207 and interchanging @xmath208 in the second term as indicated . thereby we have shown to all orders that to change the current by electronic interactions the number of left and right movers have to change . the statement is _ not limited _ to only three particle scattering and can be show equivalently for pair interaction including several bands , electron phonon coupling or any other interaction with the same kind of symmetry under particle interchange . furthermore , the statement is still true if the collision is non - local in space , since that only introduce some spatial integrals in the collision integral that can be handled similarly . note however that the distribution function can be changed by processes that does not change the number of left and right movers . the purpose of this appendix is to calculate @xmath45 in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt ] ) @xmath141 . \label{eq : i - int - vigtigt - appendix - b}\end{aligned}\ ] ] in the low - temperature limit , @xmath14 , step by step to find the prefactor given in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - resultat ] ) . as already mentioned , we preform the calculation with the scattering process seen in fig .  [ fig : scattering - picture](a ) in mind . therefore we use the fermi functions as given in eq .   and the matrix element entering in the scattering rate from eq . ( [ eq : matrix - element - direct - only ] ) and eq . ( [ eq : v - direct - quadratic - sec4 ] ) , i.e.  using a quadratic dispersion . we preform the summation over all the @xmath9 in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt - appendix - b ] ) in the following way : first of all , we note that due to the momentum and energy conservation in the interaction process described , the scattering of @xmath160 to @xmath209 has to be from above to below the fermi level , i.e. @xmath210 this is due to the signs of @xmath145 and @xmath211 and can be understood as a sign of the difference between the curvature of the dispersion near the bottom of the band and near the fermi level . next , we introduce the momentum transfer around the fermi level @xmath212 for @xmath213 and using the momentum conservation to do the @xmath211 summation , we obtain @xmath214 remembering the constraint @xmath215 , @xmath216 and @xmath217 . the fermi factors @xmath218 and @xmath219 restrict the momentum transfer @xmath161 and @xmath162 to be much smaller then @xmath220 and the @xmath143 and @xmath160 to be near the fermi level for the process in mind . therefore we can use the fermi functions @xmath218 to do the summation over @xmath143 . assuming slow variation of the scattering rate over a range of @xmath221 at the fermi level , the @xmath143 summation becomes @xmath222 similarly the @xmath160 summation is done using the phase space constraint in eq . ( [ eq : fase - rum - restriktion - k3 ] ) @xmath223 we see that since @xmath143 and @xmath160 are restricted to the fermi level , we can insert @xmath224 and @xmath225 in the rest of the integrand . to do the @xmath169 summation , we use the energy conservation contained in the scattering rate . it is rewritten as ( inserting @xmath226 and @xmath227 ) : @xmath228 . \label{eq : energy - conservation}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    we have now done the summation over @xmath143 , @xmath145 and @xmath160 and are left with the summation over @xmath161 and @xmath162 of the scattering rate , some fermi functions and the phase factors described above . to this end , we introduce @xmath229 by inserting @xmath226 and @xmath230 in eq . ( [ eq : v - direct - quadratic - sec4 ] ) @xmath231 for a general symmetrized interaction @xmath154 . furthermore , we collect the exponential tales of the fermi functions eq . ( [ eq : fermi - function-2 - 2m]-[eq : fermi - function-3 - 3 m ] ) , @xmath232 defining @xmath233 inserting @xmath234 , @xmath145 from the energy conservation eq . ( [ eq : energy - conservation ] ) and @xmath235 and @xmath230 . therefore we finally get the interacting contribution to the current in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - vigtigt - appendix - b ] ) as : @xmath236.\nonumber\end{aligned}\ ] ] here only the step functions , that restricts the integral are included . next we introduce the dimensionless integration variables @xmath237 for @xmath213 and the dimensionless functions @xmath238 in the integral : @xmath239 , \label{eq : three - particle - contribution - to - current - midway-2-dimless}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath240 is the integration area shown in fig . [ fig : int - area](a ) . note that this expression is valid for a general interaction @xmath140 and that it is not possible to extract a power law in temperature times some integral by defining new integration variables .     for the integral eq . ( [ eq : three - particle - contribution - to - current - midway-2-dimless ] ) to calculate the current due to interactions . the two boundaries for the integration area _ close to the origin _ stemming from the signs of @xmath145 and @xmath211 are indicated . ( b ) the @xmath241 function , a dimensionless version of @xmath242 eq . ( [ eq : xi - def ] ) , important in the calculation using the method of steepest decent . [ fig : int - area],scaledwidth=35.0% ]    to proceed , we consider the low temperature limit @xmath243 by using the method of steepest decent : due to the exponential function @xmath244 the maximum of @xmath245 will dominate the integral for @xmath246 , since @xmath247 . the maxima are @xmath248 and @xmath249 and @xmath245 is shown in fig . [ fig : int - area](b ) . for a decreasing interaction the area of @xmath250 and @xmath251 dominates even though the integrand is zero for @xmath252 . therefore we expand around the maximum @xmath253 to get the lowest order result in @xmath254 . in view of the integration region fig . [ fig : int - area](a ) , we use @xmath255 in the integral eq.([eq : three - particle - contribution - to - current - midway-2-dimless ] ) and thereby do the @xmath256 integral using the approximate limits seen in fig . [ fig : int - area](a ) , i.e. @xmath257 to model the symmetrized potential @xmath140 for small @xmath132 , we include the deviation from a constant as described in eq . ( [ eq : vq - taylor - series ] ) . this gives @xmath258 to lowest order in @xmath259 . in the exponential we keep @xmath260 to lowest order in @xmath259 , i.e. @xmath261 so using the lowest order in @xmath259 in the integrand ( leading to lowest order in @xmath5 ) the interacting contribution to the current is : @xmath262\\ \simeq & \frac{8505}{2048\pi^4}e^{-\frac{{t_{\textrm{f}}}}{t } } \frac{e}{{\hslash}}\frac{(v_0{k_{\textrm{f}}^{}})^4}{{\varepsilon}_{\textrm{f}}^3}\nonumber \\ & \times ( l{k_{\textrm{f}}^ { } } ) \bigg(\frac{{k_{\textrm{f}}^{}}}{q_0}\bigg)^4 \bigg(\frac{t}{{t_{\textrm{f}}}}\bigg)^7 \bigg[\frac{\delta t}{t}+\frac{ev}{{\varepsilon_{\textrm{f}}^ { } } } \bigg]\end{aligned}\ ] ] to lowest order in temperature . this is the result stated in the text in eq . ( [ eq : i - int - resultat ] ) . this statement is still true for energy bands like @xmath263 or @xmath264 for @xmath265 . a special case is linear dispersion where two - particle collisions _ can _ change the distribution . however , even for this case the two - particle collisions _ can not _ change the number of left- and right movers and hence not the current , as shown in appendix a.                        see _ e.g. _ , m.a . cazalilla , physical review a * 67 * , 053606 ( 2003 ) . the interaction potential between fermions is written there in a slightly different form , which however can be reduced ( m. khodas , a. kamenev , l.i . glazman , unpublished ) to the one we present in the text . we assume that electrons in the channel produce some image charges in a distant gate . as the result , the coulomb interaction is cut off at some distance @xmath266 large compared to the fermi wavelength . note here that the sign of the conductance correction is negative even though there is a positive sign in eq.([eq : i - int - resultat ] ) . this is due to the way the bias is defined the left contact having the higher chemical potential .      surprisingly , mott formula still yields a reasonably good approximation for thermopower even if the temperature is comparable to the energy scale over which the transmission amplitude changes value , see a.  m. lunde and k. flensberg , j. phys . : condens . matter * 17 * , 3879 ( 2005 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we consider the effect of electron - electron interaction on the electron transport through a finite length single - mode quantum wire with reflectionless contacts . the two - particle scattering events can not alter the electric current and therefore we study the effect of three - particle collisions . within the boltzmann equation framework , we calculate corrections to the thermopower and conductance to the leading order in the interaction and in the length of wire @xmath0 . we check explicitly that the three - particle collision rate is identically zero in the case of several integrable interaction potentials . in the general ( non - integrable ) case , we find a positive contribution to the thermopower to leading order in @xmath0 . the processes giving rise to the correction involve electron states deep in the fermi sea . therefore the correction follows an activation law with the characteristic energy of the order of the fermi energy for the electrons in the wire .