Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: if the ground state of a quantum dot has a fixed number of electrons , decreasing the temperature to below the charging energy of the dot reduces the conductance @xmath0 through the dot because of coulomb blockade  @xcite . if the electron occupancy is odd , lowering the temperature even further increases @xmath0 , until it reaches ( for a symmetrically - coupled dot ) @xmath10 at zero temperature  @xcite . the enhancement of the conductance is due to the single - channel kondo ( 1ck ) effect  @xcite , in which the dot acts as a magnetic impurity that interacts with the spins of the electrons in the surrounding leads . at low temperature , below a characteristic temperature @xmath4 , a spin resonance is formed , and the conductance through the resonance is perfect and equals @xmath11 per spin . the physics of 1ck at low energy can be described by a fermi liquid theory : at zero temperature , all the particles that scatter off the impurity are scattered into single - particle states , where the incoming and outgoing states are connected by a @xmath12 scattering phase shift  @xcite ( see also sec . [ sec : s - matrix discussion ] ) . the 1ck physics can be generalized to more complex models , known as multi - channel kondo , where a few independent channels compete to screen the impurity  @xcite . in the two - channel kondo ( 2ck ) case , when the couplings of the two channels to the impurity are identical the system flows to a non - fermi liquid fixed point at zero temperature . at a non - fermi liquid fixed point , the simple picture of elastic scattering of single particles is no longer valid . at zero temperature , a single particle that is scattered off a 2ck impurity can be scattered only into a many - body state  @xcite . thus , there is no elastic single - particle scattering off a 2ck impurity at the non - fermi liquid fixed point . the 2ck system was first discussed as a purely theoretical problem  @xcite , but it was soon invoked as a candidate explanation for remarkable low - energy properties of some heavy fermion materials  @xcite and glassy metals  @xcite and more recently in graphene  @xcite . in the past decade , a few single - impurity realizations of the 2ck system were proposed  @xcite , offering the hope of microscopically manipulating system parameters , and one of the proposals  @xcite was built and measured  @xcite . the conductance through a 2ck impurity , within one of the two channels , at the non - fermi liquid fixed point is @xmath13 per spin , assuming equal coupling to two leads in that channel  @xcite . given that there are no elastic single - particle scattering events off the impurity in the non - fermi liquid fixed point , one might imagine that the transport through a 2ck impurity has no coherent part . in this work , we show that at this fixed point exactly half of the conductance is carried by coherent processes  @xcite . this is because in a transport measurement through a single - level quantum dot there are ( at least ) two leads that are attached by tunneling to the dot . the electrons that interact with the effective spin of the dot are described by an operator @xmath14 , a linear combination of electron operators in the two leads . another linear combination of electron operators in the two leads , @xmath15 , is decoupled from the dot . while there are no elastic single @xmath14-particle scattering events , coherent transport via @xmath15-particles is possible . the coherent properties of the transport through an impurity can be measured in a two - path experiment , in which electrons are sent from a source lead through two possible paths to a drain lead ( see fig . [ fig : schematic double slit ] ) . we assume that the propagations along the different paths are independent of each other , namely , changes in the properties of one path do not affect the propagation along the other path . one of the paths contains the impurity of interest , and the two paths encircle a magnetic flux @xmath16 . the interference between the two paths depends on @xmath16 through the aharonov - bohm ( ab ) effect . hence , the conductance of the setup contains two parts : a flux - independent part , which is related to the separate conductances of the two paths , and a flux - dependent part , which is related to the interference of the two paths .     and @xmath17 , and they encircle a magnetic flux @xmath16 . the coherent transport through the kondo impurity can be studied by embedding it into one of the paths . ] two measurable quantities can be extracted from a two - path experiment : the transmission phase shift of the flux - dependent conductance , and the ratio between the amplitude of the flux - dependent part and the flux - independent part of the conductance . we cast the source - to - drain conductance of the two - path device into the form @xmath18 where @xmath19 is the conductance through the path with the impurity when the reference path is switched off , and @xmath20 is the conductance through the reference path when the impurity s conduction is switched off . the impurity will generally be realized as one or more quantum dots , so we will interchangeably refer to `` impurity '' and `` dot '' depending on context . we assume that the paths are independent : manipulations of the dot ( for example , with gate potential ) do not influence the conductance of the reference path , and vice versa . the _ transmission phase _ , @xmath1 , is related to the relative phase between the two paths , and the _ normalized visibility _ @xmath2 is related to the size of the coherent part of the conductance compared to the total conductance . note : the phase of the reference path is arbitrary , determined by path length , potential landscape , etc . so is the phase of the path with the impurity , excluding the transmission phase of the impurity itself . below we assume for simplicity that each of these phases is @xmath21 mod @xmath22 , so that @xmath1 is purely the transmission phase of the impurity itself . the definition of @xmath2 , implicit in eq .  , is such that for fermi liquids , at zero temperature and without spin , @xmath23 . this can be easily checked by applying the landauer formalism  @xcite for the two - path experiment setup . the normalized visibility @xmath2 can be reduced to below one by four mechanisms : first , if the transmitted electrons accumulate an energy - dependent phase when they are scattered through the impurity , or just along either path , then at nonzero temperature @xmath2 is reduced because of the thermal averaging . second , if the phase depends on the spin , the spin summation can also reduce @xmath2 . third , if part of the conductance is carried by incoherent scattering processes , where single electrons are scattered into many - body states , the interference and therefore @xmath2 are reduced . fourth , electrons that are subjected to external dephasing lose their coherence , so external dephasing also decreases the interference and @xmath2 . external dephasing depends on the specific model and the details of the setup . hence , we focus mainly on the first three mechanisms , and only qualitatively explore the effect of external dephasing on @xmath2 . since @xmath19 and @xmath20 can be measured directly , the normalized visibility can be experimentally determined . this requires two measurements : the conductance through one of the paths , and the two - path conductance . measuring the transmission phase of a 1ck impurity in a two - path setup was already suggested before  @xcite , and the predicted @xmath5 was measured  @xcite , demonstrating coherent electron transmission through a many - body state . yet , no special attention was given to the amplitude of the flux - dependent part of the conductance . in particular , non - fermi liquid cases , where @xmath2 can give information on the underlying physics ( and also @xmath1 is different from that in the 1ck case ) , were not treated .    in sec . [ sec : s - matrix discussion ] , we relate @xmath1 and @xmath2 to the single - particle elements of the @xmath3-matrix , @xmath24 ( where the @xmath14-particles are the particles that interact with the dot ) . using arguments of many - body scattering , we find a relation between the coherent and the incoherent parts of the conductance @xmath25 , and rederive the known expression for the conductance  @xcite @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the quantum conductance multiplied by a symmetry factor related to relative coupling to different leads . we also derive the following relations @xmath28 where @xmath29 is the thermal- and spin - averaged value of the @xmath3-matrix . expressions for the dephasing rate and the ratio between the inelastic scattering cross section and the total cross section , both related to the normalized visibility @xmath2 , appear in the literature  @xcite . we show that spin summation has a crucial effect on @xmath1 and @xmath2 of kondo impurities . up to second order in @xmath30 ( and @xmath31 ) , spin summation locks the value of @xmath1 at @xmath12 independent of the actual phases that electrons accumulate when they cross the dot . moreover , spin summation reduces @xmath2 significantly , even when all the conductance is carried by coherent single - particle scattering . the @xmath12 phase - lock , and reduction of @xmath2 , can be avoided if one measures the conductance of each spin separately , and extracts directly the transmission phase of each spin , @xmath32 , separately . a concrete realization of kondo impurities in quantum dots , with access to each spin separately , was proposed by some of the present authors in ref .  . the main results of this work are as follows : it is known that in the 1ck case , at zero temperature , the transmission phase equals the scattering phase shift of the 1ck  @xcite , @xmath5 . since all the electrons are elastically scattered , the normalized visibility is @xmath23 . however , when a magnetic field is applied , regular non - spin - resolved measurements of the conductance miss the magnetic field corrections . in this case , we find that the transmission phase @xmath1 remains @xmath12 to second order in @xmath33 , even though the scattering phase shift for each spin depends on the magnetic field  @xcite , @xmath34 ( @xmath35 and @xmath36 ) . in order to reveal the magnetic field dependence of the phase shift , one needs to perform a spin - resolved measurement , namely , to measure the conductance of each spin separately .    in the non - fermi liquid fixed point of the 2ck case , we find that at zero temperature @xmath37 , that is , exactly half of the conductance is carried by single - particle transmissions  @xcite . the electrons that elastically transmit through the 2ck impurity accumulate a @xmath5 phase when they cross the impurity . in the presence of a finite magnetic field , the system flows under renormalization group to a fermi liquid fixed point , at zero temperature , rather than the non - fermi liquid one  @xcite . at this fermi liquid fixed point , we find that again , one needs to perform a spin - resolved measurement . a spin - summed measurement will lead , at zero temperature , to a transmission phase @xmath5 and a normalized visibility @xmath37 , despite the fact that the spin - dependent scattering phase shifts are @xmath38 , and despite the fact that the conductance is carried exclusively by single - particle scattering [ see eqs .   and  ] . measurement of each spin separately , however , will lead to the desired @xmath23 , and @xmath39 . the rest of the paper is organized as follows : in sec . [ sec : transmission phase and visibility ] , we briefly review possible realizations of electronic two - path experiments , and discuss what we learn from their analysis . we define the two measurable quantities , @xmath1 and @xmath2 , and discuss their physical meaning . in sec . [ sec : s - matrix discussion ] , we develop a scattering approach to the transport through an impurity , similar to the landauer formalism@xcite for the non - interacting case . we consider a many - body scattering matrix to include both elastic single - particle scattering and inelastic single - particle to multi - particle scattering . we rederive the conductance through the impurity and give the mathematical expressions for @xmath1 and @xmath2 . in sec . [ sec : results ] , we focus on kondo impurities , and give the results for @xmath1 and @xmath2 for several kondo fixed points . we also briefly discuss the influence of possible external dephasing on the normalized visibility . finally , we summarize our results and conclusions in sec . [ conclusions ] . in appendix [ s - matrix appendix ] , we give a detailed derivation of the multi - particle scattering approach for the conductance , transmission phase , and normalized visibility . in appendix [ two paths setup appendix ] , we give more details about a possible two - path setup that can be tuned to fulfill the theoretical assumptions we have made in our analysis . in this section , we discuss two - path setups and define the transmission phase @xmath1 and the normalized visibility @xmath2 . we emphasize that the normalized visibility , @xmath2 , is distinct from the more common definition of the visibility . the prototype of two - path experiments is the double - slit experiment . in a double - slit experiment particles are launched toward the double slit , where they split into partial waves which interfere with each other . in the electronic version of the double - slit experiment , schematically drawn in fig . [ fig : schematic double slit ] , a coherent electron beam is emitted from a source lead toward a drain lead , via a beam splitter that allows electron flow along two different paths that encircle a magnetic flux @xmath16 . the source - to - drain conductance is given by @xmath40 where @xmath41 is the probability for an incoming electron with energy @xmath42 and spin @xmath43 to be transmitted through the double slit , and @xmath44 is the fermi - dirac distribution function . if all the electrons that pass through the double slit do so elastically and coherently , the probability @xmath41 is given by  @xcite @xmath45 where @xmath46 and @xmath47 are the transmission amplitudes of the two slits . the transmission amplitudes are complex quantities with a phase difference , @xmath48 , between them . the phase difference contains a contribution @xmath49 determined by the details of the transmission through the double - slit setup , and a magnetic - flux - dependent part @xmath50 coming from the ab effect . equation ( [ eq : transmission probability ] ) is valid only if all the electrons are coherently transferred through the double slit  @xcite . if some of the electrons are transferred incoherently through one of the slits , then , since these electrons do not interfere , the flux - dependent term of @xmath51 is reduced . if we embed into one of the paths a quantum dot ( as in the lower path in fig . [ fig : schematic double slit ] ) , we can examine the dot s coherence properties by measuring the conductance . in such a device , the phase that electrons accumulate as they cross the dot is encoded in the relative phase between the two paths @xmath49 .    in experiments , the measured source to drain conductance is typically cast in the form @xmath52 @xmath53 is the part of the conductance which is independent of the magnetic flux , and is related to the independent conductances of the two paths , and @xmath54 is the amplitude of the flux - dependent part of the conductance . in the general case , @xmath1 is different from @xmath49 , but if @xmath46 , @xmath47 , and @xmath49 are independent of spin and energy , then @xmath55 . in standard two - path experiments , the ratio @xmath56 , is called `` visibility '' , and it measures the strength of the flux - dependent conductance oscillation compared to the average conductance . the ratio @xmath56 can be reduced by several mechanisms . trivially , a mismatch between the transmission amplitudes , @xmath57 , decreases the ratio @xmath58 , and therefore reduces @xmath56 . in addition to the trivial transmission amplitude mismatch , four other mechanisms noted earlier can reduce @xmath56 : thermal averaging , spin averaging , inelastic scattering , and externally - induced dephasing . there is a conceptual difference between transmission amplitude mismatch of the two paths , and the other three mechanisms for @xmath56 reduction ( we assume for the moment that there is no external dephasing ) . unlike the transmission amplitude mismatch , these other mechanisms can not be probed by simple single - path conductance measurements of the system . to isolate the transmission mismatch from elastic versus inelastic scattering and energy or spin dependent phase , we decompose the conductance ( [ eq : typical conductivity ] ) into the form of eq .  : @xmath19 and @xmath20 are the independent conductances through the two paths , which can be measured directly by closing off one and then the other path . equation ( [ eq : definition of eta and phi ] ) defines a new quantity , the _ normalized visibility _ @xmath2 . if all the electrons transmit coherently through the two paths , and accumulate the same phase , then @xmath23 , independent of possible transmission amplitudes mismatch . we want to make a comment about the feasibility of interference measurements in two - path experiments : in real experiments , there is a typical coherence length , @xmath60 , along which the propagating electrons preserve their coherence . this length depends on the details of the realization of the two - path setup , and we assume that it is much larger than the lengths of the two paths @xmath61 . however , this assumption is not enough : electrons with different energies propagate along the two paths , accumulating an energy - dependent phase difference @xmath62 , where @xmath63 is the fermi velocity . as a result , the thermal averaging introduces a new lengthscale , the thermal length  @xcite @xmath64 : @xmath65\nonumber\\ & = 2\left|t_{\text{d},s}t_{\text{ref},s}\right|\cos\left[\frac{e\phi}{\hbar c}\right]\frac{l_{\rm ref}-l_d}{l_t}\frac{1}{\sinh[(l_{\rm ref}-l_d)/l_t]}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] hence we also require that the difference in length between the two paths is much shorter than the thermal length  @xcite @xmath66 . in this case , the difference in length introduces a second - order correction to the amplitude of the oscillations : @xmath67}\approx1-\frac{1}{6}\left(\frac{l_{\rm ref}-l_d}{l_t}\right)^2\sim1-t^2 $ ] .      [ cols="^,^ " , ]     [ table ]      we have focused on the 1ck and the 2ck impurities , since there are concrete realizations of these impurities with quantum dots . yet , it is worthwhile to study the more general @xmath68-channel kondo case . in the fermi liquid fixed points at zero temperature , all the @xmath14-particles are scattered into @xmath14-particles , namely , @xmath69 . in the non - fermi liquid 2ck fixed point , none of the @xmath14-particles are scattered into @xmath14-particles , namely , @xmath70 . in the more general @xmath68-channel kondo case , however , where @xmath71 channels screen the impurity , a finite part of the @xmath14-particles are elastically scattered off the impurity . at zero temperature , the single @xmath14-particle element of the @xmath72-matrix is  @xcite @xmath73 the conductance , up to @xmath74 , is  @xcite @xmath75\;,\ ] ] where the factor @xmath76 can be calculated numerically  @xcite . the normalized visibility is @xmath77+\mathcal{o}\left(t / t_k\right)^{\frac{4}{2+k}}\;,\ ] ] and since @xmath78 is real , the transmission phase is @xmath79      in sec . 2 , we defined the normalized visibility @xmath2 , which is the amplitude of the ab oscillations , normalized in a certain way . in sec . 3 , we showed that @xmath2 has a physical meaning , and that it is related to the proportion of the total conductance carried by single - particle scattering . in this subsection we want to comment about the feasibility of @xmath2-measurements . so far , we have discussed three mechanisms that reduce the normalized visibility : the possibility of non - coherent charge transfer through the dot into many - body states , thermal averaging over a transmission with energy - dependent phase , and averaging over spin - dependent transmission phase . ab oscillations in a real - life experimental setup can also be suppressed by other mechanisms that are not related to the physical properties of the examined impurity . a real experimental two - path setup is usually coupled to a complicated environment . for example , in an open ab ring setup the shapes of the two paths , the quantum dot(s ) , the tunnel barriers , and many other components of the setup are all defined by applying voltages to nearby nano - patterned electrodes . therefore , each component of the system is coupled to an environment ( metal electrodes , semiconducting leads ) with associated noise and degrees of freedom . an electron that propagates through the two paths leaves a trace in the environment ; equivalently , a propagating electron that interacts with the environment , accumulates a _ phase  @xcite , @xmath80 . as a result , the amplitude of the ab oscillations is multiplied by the averaged value @xmath81 . the normalized visibility in the presence of the environment is therefore  @xcite @xmath82    the details of the coupling to the environment depend on the details of a specific experimental setup . yet , we can roughly estimate the external dephasing by assuming that the phase - randomness originates mostly from the thermal fluctuations of the environment . at nonzero temperature @xmath83 , the electrodes in the environment suffer from nyquist noise , and we can estimate @xmath84 .    hence , dephasing by the environment can reduce the normalized visibility linearly in the temperature . in the fermi liquid fixed points , @xmath2 has @xmath85 corrections without external dephasing . this means that at low temperatures the dominant suppression of @xmath2 would be due to external dephasing . in the non - fermi liquid fixed point of the 2ck , @xmath2 has a @xmath86 dependence in the absence of external dephasing . thus , at low temperatures the change in @xmath2 ( enhancement for @xmath87 and reduction for @xmath88 ) , is expected to be stronger than its suppression due to external dephasing . the relation between the system and the environment is outside the scope of this work . in particular , we do not get into specific models for the environment . we want to note that there are models that treat rigorously the effect of a specific environment on the interference in ab rings ( for example , a quantum - point - contact that is coupled to an embedded quantum dot  @xcite ; or a fluctuating magnetic flux  @xcite ) .    in the 2ck non - fermi liquid case , a noisy environment can , in principle , turn on relevant operators . thus , a noisy environment with strong effect on the system would make the observation of the non - fermi liquid behavior difficult . hence , if a non - fermi liquid behavior is indeed observed in an experimental system , it indicates a relatively weak external dephasing . in this work we have focused on information that can be obtained from two - path experiments . typically , in two - path experiments , the measurable quantity is the transmission phase @xmath1 . we showed that the combination of two measurements , the two path conductance together with the conductance of one of the paths ( either of the paths ) , gives us additional physical information about the nature of coherence in the transport . these two measurements allow us to normalize the amplitude of the flux - dependent conductance , with respect to the independent conductances of the two paths [ eq .  ] . we showed that the normalized amplitude @xmath2 is related to the fraction of scattering processes that involve only single particles . we have related @xmath1 and @xmath2 to the single - particle matrix element of the @xmath72-matrix . if there is a linear combination of the two leads ( denoted by @xmath15 ) which is decoupled both from the dot , and from the orthogonal linear combination ( @xmath14 ) , then , working in the @xmath89 basis we showed that @xmath1 and @xmath2 can be used to study @xmath90 . in the simple case of fermi liquids at zero temperature , where @xmath91 , @xmath1 turns out to be identical to @xmath92 , and @xmath23 . we also showed that in the absence of spin - symmetry , both @xmath1 and @xmath2 are affected by the summation over spin in a standard conductance measurement . at zero temperature , we showed that the phase @xmath1 is locked at @xmath12 independent of @xmath92 [ see eq .  ] , and that @xmath2 is suppressed to below one [ see eq .  ] . a proper measurement in this case would involve independent measurement of the transport of each spin .    in the various fermi liquid fixed points of the kondo impurities , we have showed that the transmission phase equals the scattering phase shift @xmath93 . the normalized visibility at zero temperature is @xmath23 , and nonzero temperature reduces it with a correction @xmath94 . the small reduction of @xmath2 is due to two different physical effects of the temperature . first , the transmission phase is energy - dependent . when we thermally average over the temperature , @xmath1 remains at its zero - temperature value ( to this order of correction ) , but @xmath2 is reduced . second , the nonzero temperature allows incoherent scattering processes ( the leading irrelevant operator near the fixed point allows the scattering of single - particle states to many - body states ) . hence , a small part of the conductance is incoherent and therefore @xmath2 is reduced .    in the non - fermi liquid fixed point of the 2ck , we find that although there are no single @xmath14-particle to single @xmath14-particle scattering processes , a part of the conductance is still coherent . the transmission phase is @xmath5 despite the fact that @xmath92 is not defined . the normalized visibility , at zero temperature , is @xmath37 indicating the fact that exactly half of the conductance is carried by elastic single - particle scattering events  @xcite . at nonzero temperature , @xmath2 can either be diminished , or be _ enhanced _ with a @xmath95 behavior . the enhancement is possible since the leading irrelevant operator near the fixed point allows single @xmath14-particle to single @xmath14-particle scattering .    in real experiments , the propagating electrons are subjected to an external dephasing by the environment . we expect a reduction of the normalized visibility due to this external dephasing . assuming mostly thermal fluctuations in the environment ( nyquist noise ) , we roughly estimate a linear temperature dependence of the external dephasing . therefore , near the fermi liquid fixed points one might not be able to see the predicted @xmath96 reduction of @xmath2 . near the non - fermi liquid 2ck fixed point , however , the @xmath97 dependence is expected to be parametrically stronger than the external dephasing . thus we expect that measuring this effect would be possible in the presence of external dephasing . we would like to thank andrew keller , oded zilberberg , natalie lezmy , eran sela , and gergely zarand for useful discussions . this research was supported by the bsf , gif , the isf center of excellence program , by the minerva foundation , by the segre foundation , and by the us nsf under dmr-0906062 . in this appendix , we present in detail the derivation of the relations between the transmission properties ( from the left lead through the impurity to the right lead ) and the single - particle matrix elements of the @xmath3-matrix . we want to write a scattering matrix that connects incoming states and outgoing states in the leads . in general , these states can be complex many - body states that involve the two leads . a general state in the two leads can be characterized by two numbers , @xmath98 and @xmath99 , according to the charge carried in the two leads . there are , of course , many possible states with charges @xmath100 and @xmath101 , since states with the same charges in the two leads can differ by multiple particle - hole excitations . we use the notation @xmath102 for these states , where the index @xmath103 labels the possible states with charges @xmath100 and @xmath101 . the scattering matrix , @xmath72 , connects incoming and outgoing states @xmath104 charge conservation imposes @xmath105 , hence , @xmath72 is a block - diagonal matrix . we work in the zero - bias limit at low temperature , and therefore only single electrons can be sent from the source and the drain . hence , we focus only on the block @xmath106 of the @xmath72-matrix . there are two types of states in the subspace of states with @xmath106 , single electron states , and many - body states . we can make this distinction since the two leads are free . we denote by @xmath107 and @xmath108 the incoming and outgoing single - electron states in the left lead , and similarly @xmath109 and @xmath110 in the right lead . we denote the other states , which are many - body states of the form @xmath111 , by @xmath112 ( @xmath113 )  . notice that in the cases @xmath114 , the states @xmath115 span only the multi - particle states . the single electron states of the form @xmath116 and @xmath117 are denoted by @xmath118 and @xmath119  . schematically , the @xmath106 block of eq . is @xmath120 where the exact definitions for all the terms in appear in sec . [ sec : s - matrix discussion ] [ see eqs .  - ] . here we do nt include spin , and generalization of what follows to spinful electrons is straightforward .    since the @xmath72-matrix is unitary and block diagonal , its @xmath106 block is also unitary . this leads to the following relations @xmath121 consider now the average current at the right lead . as mentioned before , at low temperature and bias voltage we can assume that only single electrons are sent toward the impurity . the average current is @xmath122\nonumber\\ & = \frac{e}{h}\int d\epsilon\left[f_l(\epsilon)\left(|t|^2+\sum_{n , i } n\left|b_l^{ni}\right|^2\right)\right.\nonumber\\ & \left .- f_r(\epsilon)\left(|t'|^2+\sum_{n , i } ( 1-n)\left|b_r^{ni}\right|^2\right)\right]\label{eq : s - matrix - current1}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] at equilibrium , the current is zero , therefore @xmath123 and the current becomes @xmath124\left(|t|^2+\sum_{n , i } n\left|b_l^{ni}\right|^2\right).\ ] ] thus , the conductance is @xmath125 the proportion of the total conductance carried by coherent single - particle scattering is @xmath126    suppose now , that there is a linear combination of the two leads , @xmath127  , which is decoupled both from the impurity and from the orthogonal combination of the leads , @xmath128  . this is the case , for example , in the anderson model for a single level quantum dot that is coupled to two leads . the fact that @xmath15 is a free decoupled field simplifies the above expressions as it imposes the following restrictions on the @xmath72-matrix in the @xmath89 basis : @xmath129 ( @xmath130 ) , and @xmath131 . in particular , the restriction @xmath132 requires @xmath133 which , together with eq . , yields the relation @xmath134    moreover , we can relate @xmath135 and @xmath136 . since ( omitting the in and out subscripts ) @xmath137 and as @xmath138 we get @xmath139 we obtain the relation @xmath140 plugging this relation into eq .   gives @xmath141 thus , we get the important equalities @xmath142 together with eqs . ( [ eq : s - unitary1 ] ) and ( [ eq : s - unitary2 ] ) , the sum rules ( [ eq : s - matrix sum rulel ] ) and ( [ eq : s - matrix sum ruler ] ) , tell us that the incoherent part of the conductance , which is carried by single - particle to many - particles scattering processes , can also be determined by the coherent single - particle part of the @xmath72-matrix . notice also that @xmath143 is the sum of probabilities to find outgoing states if the incoming state is @xmath144 . since we sum over all possible outgoing states besides @xmath144 and @xmath145 , and as @xmath146 we find that @xmath147 so @xmath148 the conductance   can be written as @xmath149}\;,\label{ea : s - matrix conductance}\ ] ] and the contribution of the single - particle processes to the conductance , out of the total conductance is @xmath150    the fact that there is a linear combination of @xmath151 and @xmath152 which is decoupled both from the impurity and from the orthogonal linear combination imposes restrictions on the values of @xmath153 ( since @xmath132 and @xmath131 ) . by applying the unitary transformation on the @xmath72-matrix one finds that @xmath154 plugging ( [ eq : s - matrix relation between t and s ] ) into and gives @xmath155\right),\label{eq : s - matrix conductance1}\\ & g_{\rm coh}/g_{\rm d}=\frac{\int d\epsilon\frac{\partial f}{\partial\epsilon}\left|\mathcal{s}_{\psi\psi}-1\right|^2}{\int d\epsilon\frac{\partial f}{\partial\epsilon}\left(\left|\mathcal{s}_{\psi\psi}-1\right|^2+\left[1-|\mathcal{s}_{\psi\psi}|^2\right]\right)}\;.\label{eq : s - matrix normalized visibility1}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    at this point we can already see two important features : first , @xmath156 depends only on @xmath90 and in particular does not depend directly on @xmath157 . second , if @xmath69 ( but @xmath158 ) then @xmath159 , and if @xmath160 then @xmath161 . in other words , for a zero temperature fermi liquid theory @xmath23 , and for a theory where @xmath14 has no single - particle to single - particle scattering processes ( like in the 2ck case at zero temperature ) @xmath37 .    using the definition @xmath162 for the @xmath3-matrix , we can bring and into the form @xmath163 , @xmath164,@xmath165,@xmath166 ) , are very small . to the lowest order in the external transmission coefficients the propagations along the arms are independent of each other . because of the losses , time reversal symmetry is broken . we encode the losses in the transmission coefficients . ]    in this appendix , we present a model for a possible setup of a quantum dot that is embedded into an open ab ring . setups of this kind , can be used to study the transmission through 1ck and 2ck impurities . consider the open ab ring setup that is depicted in fig . [ fig : system ] . the system contains two external leads ( source and drain ) and two internal paths . the external leads are coupled to the two paths by four transmission coefficients ( @xmath167 , @xmath168 , @xmath169 , @xmath170 ) which are assumed to be very small . the two possible paths are either through the quantum dot ( the lower arm in fig . [ fig : system ] ) or through the reference arm ( the upper arm in fig . [ fig : system ] ) . when an electron is propagating along the lower arm , it has a finite probability to leak outside the system . however , once it gets close enough to the dot we assume that it can only scattered ( forward or backward ) off the dot . we refer to the area near the dot from the left ( right ) as left ( right ) lead ( not to be confused with the external leads , source and drain ) . the hamiltonian of the system is @xmath171 where each of the three first elements on the right hand side of ( [ eq : general h ] ) describes one part of the system . @xmath172 describes the external leads @xmath173 where @xmath174 are the annihilation operators of electrons with spin @xmath43 in external lead @xmath175 . @xmath176 describes the free electrons in the reference arm . the lower arm is described by the hamiltonian @xmath177 where @xmath174 are the annihilation operators of electrons with spin @xmath43 in the internal lead @xmath103 , and @xmath178 annihilates an electron with spin @xmath43 in the dot . @xmath179 describes the quantum dot itself and any other system that might interact with it but do not interact directly with the other part of the setup ( _ e.g. _ a capacitively coupled gate electrode , other dots etc . ) . the different parts of the setup are connected via @xmath180 @xmath181 we do nt get into the details of how the setup is coupled to other side leads .    to the lowest order in the external transmission coefficients , @xmath180 , the two paths are independent of each other . therefore , using the definitions of @xmath1 and @xmath2 [ see eq . ] , the conductance can be written in the form @xmath182 where @xmath183 is the conductance through the reference arm , and @xmath184 is the conductance through the dot . there is a linear combination of the internal leads , @xmath185 , where @xmath186 , which is decoupled both from the dot and from the orthogonal combination of the leads , @xmath187  . following the discussion in section [ sec : s - matrix discussion ] the transmission through the dot is proportional to the @xmath3-matrix of the @xmath14-particles , @xmath188 . so far , we havent specified what is the hamiltonian of the dot , @xmath179  . in other words , we havent specified other systems that interact with the dot ( and do not interact directly with the ring ) . in the following two subsections , we discuss two specific cases : a 1ck case , where the dot is attached to a gate electrode and tuned to form a 1ck impurity , and a 2ck case , where another large dot is coupled to the small dot with appropriate gate electrodes to form a 2ck impurity  @xcite . the dot is capacitively coupled to a gate electrode . if a gate voltage is applied , then at low enough energies , by tuning the gate voltage and the tunneling barriers between the dot and the ring ( @xmath189 ) , one can bring the hamiltonian ( [ eq : lower arm hamiltonian ] ) to the form of kondo hamiltonian  @xcite @xmath190 where @xmath185 , and @xmath187 . @xmath191 is the kondo interaction strength , @xmath192 are the three pauli matrices , and @xmath193 is the total spin of the dot . up to second order in @xmath194 the @xmath195-matrix is  @xcite @xmath196\;.\ ] ]      we can tune the part of the system that is described by @xmath179 to form a 2ck impurity ( _ e.g. _ , by adding another relatively large quantum dot , and couple it to the small dot  @xcite ) . the hamiltonian ( [ eq : lower arm hamiltonian ] ) becomes  @xcite @xmath197 where @xmath198 are the annihilation operators of the large dot , and @xmath199 ( @xmath200 ) is the strength of the interaction between the spin of the electrons in the large dot ( in the @xmath14 lead ) and the total spin of the small dot . by tuning the parameters properly , we can bring the system to the symmetric point @xmath201 , where it displays a non fermi liquid behavior  @xcite . in this case , up to order @xmath202 , the @xmath195-matrix is  @xcite @xmath203 where @xmath204 was defined in eq .  .
Abstract:

Answer: we study the coherent properties of transmission through kondo impurities , by considering an open aharonov - bohm ring with an embedded quantum dot . we develop a novel many - body scattering theory which enables us to calculate the conductance through the dot @xmath0 , the _ transmission _ phase shift @xmath1 , and the normalized visibility @xmath2 , in terms of the single - particle @xmath3-matrix . for the single - channel kondo effect , we find at temperatures much below the kondo temperature @xmath4 that @xmath5 without any corrections up to order @xmath6 . the visibility has the form @xmath7 . for the non - fermi liquid fixed point of the two channel kondo , we find that @xmath5 despite the fact that a scattering phase shift is not defined . the visibility is @xmath8 with @xmath9 , thus at zero temperature exactly half of the conductance is carried by single - particle processes , and coherent transmission may actually increase with temperature . we explain that the spin summation masks the inherent scattering phases of the dot , which can be accessed only via a spin - resolved experiment . in addition , we calculate the effect of magnetic field and channel anisotropy , and generalize to the k - channel kondo case .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: an effective theory for heavy mesons , implementing the heavy quark symmetries , has been very successful at the phenomenological level ( for reviews see @xcite and references therein ) . predictions are easily obtained once the unknown effective couplings are fixed from experimental data . moreover such an effective approach can be combined with chiral symmetry for light mesons , thus giving a simple framework for implementing the known approximate symmetries of quantum chromodynamics ( qcd ) @xcite . the disadvantage of such an approach is the number of free parameters , which grows very rapidly if one tries to improve the calculations beyond leading order .    in order to go beyond the symmetry approach , one should be able to derive the free couplings at the meson lagrangian level from a more fundamental theory , for example directly from qcd . this is clearly a difficult task . in the long run the definitive answer will come from systematic first principle calculations , such as in lattice qcd , but at present heavy meson physical quantities such as spectra and form factors are still subject to extrapolations , even if recent improvements are impressive @xcite . moreover an alternative and intuitive way for interpolating between qcd and an effective theory would be interesting in itself , allowing us to understand better the underlying physics . obviously there is a price to pay for any simplification that may allow to calculate the parameters of an effective heavy meson theory without solving the nonperturbative qcd problem . our point of view here will be to consider a quark - meson lagrangian where transition amplitudes are represented by diagrams with heavy mesons attached to loops containing heavy and light constituent quarks . it should be kept in mind that what we study here is only a model and not full qcd . however one can hope to describe the essential part of the qcd behavior in some energy range and extract useful information from it . since the model used in the present paper is based on an effective constituent quark - meson lagrangian containing both light and heavy degrees of freedom it is constrained by the known symmetries of qcd in the limit @xmath2 . a similar model , for light quarks only , was pioneered , in the context of chirally symmetric effective theories , several years ago in @xcite . a related approach is the one based on the extended nambu jona - lasinio ( njl ) models @xcite , whose generalization to include both heavy and light quarks has been studied in @xcite . in this approach path integral bosonization is used , which replaces the effective 4-quark interactions by yukawa - type couplings of heavy and light quarks with heavy meson fields . one may think of going even further and try to bosonize directly qcd , but a number of approximations are needed and one usually ends up with a non - local lagrangian .    in the following we are interested in the description of the heavy meson interactions for the doublets with spin / parity @xmath3 , @xmath4 , @xmath5 , i.e. s- and p - wave heavy - light mesons . these states are the object of experimental search @xcite . our aim is therefore to extend the approach of @xcite and @xcite to the description of the three spin - parity doublets mentioned above . we will consider a lagrangian at the meson - quark level , fixing the free parameters from data . this will allow us to deduce from a small number of parameters the heavy meson couplings and form factors , with a considerable reduction in the number of free parameters with respect to the effective lagrangian written in terms of meson fields only . the plan of the paper is as follows . in section 2 we give an outline of the model . in section 3 we compute some fundamental parameters of the model , such as mass splittings and renormalization constants . the model is used in section 4 to obtain predictions for semileptonic @xmath6 decays into negative parity and positive parity charmed resonances ; in particular we compute the relevant universal form factors that describe such decays in the @xmath7 limit and discuss the bjorken sum rule @xcite . in section 5 we compute strong and radiative @xmath0 and @xmath1 decays . finally in section 6 we draw our conclusions . to begin with we briefly review the description of the heavy quark field in the heavy quark effective theory ( hqet ) @xcite . the heavy quark is defined as follows : we indicate by @xmath8 the velocity of the hadron containing the heavy quark @xmath9 . this is almost on shell and its momentum @xmath10 can be written , introducing a residual momentum @xmath11 , as @xmath12 one extracts the dominant part @xmath13 of the heavy quark momentum by defining the new field @xmath14 @xmath15 the field @xmath16 is the large component field , satisfying the constraint @xmath17 . if the quark @xmath9 is exactly on shell , it is the only term present in the previous equation . @xmath18 , the small component field , is of the order @xmath19 and satisfies @xmath20 . the effective lagrangian can be derived by integrating out the heavy fields in the qcd generating functional @xcite , however here we only show the effect of the @xmath21 limit on the feynman rules relevant to our calculation @xcite . the heavy quark propagator in the large @xmath22 limit is : @xmath23 the @xmath24 projection operator can always be moved close to a spinor @xmath16 satisfying @xmath25 since @xmath26 commutes with the heavy quark - gluon vertex .    in our model the heavy quark propagator appears in the loops always together with light quark propagators as the heavy mesons we consider are made up of constituent heavy quark and light antiquark . the light - quark momentum @xmath11 may be taken equal to the integrated loop momentum and the heavy - quark propagator in the heavy quark limit becomes : @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the difference between the quark mass and the common mass of the heavy meson doublet .      in order to implement the heavy quark symmetries in the spectrum of physical states the wave function of a heavy meson has to be independent of the heavy quark flavor and spin . it can be characterized by the total angular momentum @xmath29 of the light degrees of freedom . to each value of @xmath29 corresponds a degenerate doublet of states with angular momentum @xmath30 . the mesons @xmath31 and @xmath32 form the spin - symmetry doublet corresponding to @xmath33 ( for charm for instance , they correspond to @xmath34 and @xmath0 ) .    the negative parity spin doublet @xmath35 can be represented by a @xmath36 dirac matrix @xmath37 , with one spinor index for the heavy quark and the other for the light degrees of freedom . these wave functions transform under a lorentz transformation @xmath38 as @xmath39 where @xmath40 is the usual @xmath36 representation of the lorentz group . under a heavy quark spin transformation @xmath41 , @xmath42 , where @xmath41 satisfies @xmath43=0 $ ] to preserve the constraint @xmath44 . an explicit matrix representation is : @xmath45\\ { \bar h } & = & \gamma_0 h^{\dagger } \gamma_0~~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] here @xmath46 is the heavy meson velocity , @xmath47 and @xmath48 . moreover @xmath49 , @xmath50 and @xmath51 and @xmath31 are annihilation operators normalized as follows : @xmath52 the formalism for higher spin states is given in @xcite . we will consider only the extension to @xmath31-waves of the system @xmath53 . the heavy quark effective theory predicts two distinct multiplets , one containing a @xmath54 and a @xmath55 degenerate state , and the other one a @xmath55 and a @xmath56 state . in matrix notations , analogous to the ones used for the negative parity states , they are described by @xmath57\ ] ] and @xmath58.\ ] ] these two multiplets have @xmath59 and @xmath60 respectively , where @xmath29 is conserved together with the spin @xmath61 in the infinite quark mass limit because @xmath62 . the effective quark - meson lagrangian we introduce contains two terms : @xmath63 the first term involves only the light degrees of freedom , i.e. the light quark fields @xmath64 and the pseudo - scalar @xmath65 octet of mesons @xmath66 . at the lowest order one has : @xmath67 here @xmath68 , @xmath69 , @xmath70 , @xmath71 mev and @xmath72 the term with @xmath73 is the coupling of pions to light quarks ; it will not be used in the sequel . it is a free parameter , but in njl model @xmath74 . differently from @xcite the gluon field is absent in the present description . apart from the mass term @xmath75 is chiral invariant . we can introduce a quark - meson effective lagrangian involving heavy and light quarks and heavy mesons . at lowest order we have : @xmath76+\frac{1}{2 g^{\prime}_3 } { \mathrm { tr}}[{\bar s}s ] + \frac{1}{2 g_4 } { \mathrm { tr } } [ { \bar t}_\mu t^\mu ]   \label{qh}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the meson fields @xmath77 have been defined before , @xmath14 is the effective heavy quark field , @xmath78 are coupling constants ( to allow a comparison with previous work we follow , as far as possible , the notations of @xcite ) and @xmath79 ( @xmath80 gev ) has been introduced for dimensional reasons . lagrangian ( [ qh ] ) has heavy spin and flavor symmetry . this lagrangian comprises three terms containing respectively @xmath37 , @xmath41 and @xmath81 .  from a theoretical point of view , the @xmath82 and @xmath83 couplings could have been determined by @xmath84 and @xmath85 , the experimental values of the mass differences between the mesons , belonging to the h and s multiplets respectively , and their heavy quark constituent masses . since these data are not all known , we have adopted the dynamical information coming from the njl - model as proposed in  @xcite and so we use the following modified version of ( [ qh ] ) in which we give the fields @xmath37 and @xmath41 the same coupling to the quarks :    @xmath86 + \frac{1}{2 g_4 } { \mathrm { tr } } [ { \bar t}_\mu t^\mu ] \label{qh1}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    in doing this we assume that this effective quark meson lagrangian can be justified as a remnant of a four quark interaction of the njl type by partial bosonization . @xmath37 and @xmath41 are degenerate in mass in the light - sector chirally symmetric phase . in the broken phase the mass splitting is calculable and will be computed in the next section in terms of the order parameter @xmath87 , the constituent light quark mass . the part containing the @xmath81 field can not be extracted from a bosonized njl contact interaction and requires a new coupling constant @xmath88 . an essential ingredient of the nonperturbative behavior of qcd is the suppression of large momentum flows through light - quark lines in the loops . the way this suppression is introduced in the model is crucial and is part of the definition of the model itself . one can for example include factors in the vertices which damp the loop integrals when the light - quark momentum is larger than some scale of the order of 1 gev@xcite . our model describes the interactions in terms of effective vertices between a light quark , a heavy quark and a heavy meson ; we describe the heavy quarks and heavy mesons consistently with hqet , and thus the heavy quark propagator in the loop contains the residual momentum @xmath11 which arises from the interaction with the light degrees of freedom . it is therefore natural to assume an ultraviolet cut - off on the loop momentum of the order of @xmath89 gev , even if the heavy quark mass is larger than the cut - off . concerning the infrared behavior , the model is not confining and thus its range of validity can not be extended below energies of the order of @xmath90 . in practice one introduces an infrared cut - off @xmath91 , in order to drop the unknown confinement part of the quark interaction . we choose a proper time regularization ( a different choice is followed in @xcite ) . after continuation to the euclidean space it reads , for the light quark propagator : @xmath92 where @xmath91 and @xmath38 are infrared and ultraviolet cut - offs . this choice of regularization is consistent with the one in the second paper in @xcite . in ( [ cutoff ] ) @xmath87 is the constituent light quark mass , whose non vanishing value implies the mass splitting between the @xmath37-type and @xmath41-type multiplets . its value , as well as the values of the cutoffs @xmath91 and @xmath38 are in principle adjustable parameters . on physical grounds , we expect that @xmath93 gev , @xmath94 mev . given our choice of the cut - off prescription as in @xcite , we assume for @xmath38 the same value used there i.e. @xmath95 gev ; we observe , however , that the numerical outcome of the subsequent calculations are not strongly dependent on the value of @xmath38 . the constituent mass @xmath87 in the njl models represents the order parameter discriminating between the phases of broken and unbroken chiral symmetry and can be fixed by solving a gap equation , which gives @xmath87 as a function of the scale mass @xmath91 for given values of the other parameters . in the second paper of ref . @xcite the values @xmath96 mev and @xmath97 mev are used and we shall assume the same values . as shown there , for smaller values of @xmath91 , @xmath87 is constant ( = 300 mev ) while for much larger values of @xmath91 , it decreases and in particular it vanishes for @xmath98 mev . for the computation of the constants @xmath82 , @xmath88 appearing in the quark - meson effective lagrangian of eq.([qh ] ) we consider the meson self energy diagram depicted in fig.1 . = 8truecm    * fig . 1 * - self - energy diagram for the heavy meson field .    for @xmath37 and @xmath41 states the evaluation of fig.1 gives the results ( @xmath11 is the residual momentum , see eq . ( [ uno ] ) ) : @xmath99 = i n_c\int\frac{d^4 \ell}{(2 \pi)^4 } \frac{{\mathrm { tr}}[(\slash \ell - \slash k -m){\bar h}h ] } { ( ( \ell - k)^2 - m^2+i\epsilon)(v\ell + i \epsilon ) } \label{pih}\ ] ] and @xmath100 = i n_c\int\frac{d^4 \ell}{(2 \pi)^4 } \frac{{\mathrm { tr}}[(\slash \ell - \slash k + m){\bar s}s ] } { ( ( \ell - k)^2 -m^2+i\epsilon)(v\ell + i \epsilon)}\label{pis}\ ] ] respectively , and for @xmath81 states we get @xmath101   = \frac{i n_c}{\lambda^2_\chi}\int\frac{d^4 \ell}{(2 \pi)^4 } \frac{{\mathrm { tr}}[(\ell_\mu -k_\mu ) ( \slash \ell -\slash k + m ) ( \ell_\nu- k_\nu){\bar t}^\mu t^\nu ] } { ( ( \ell - k)^2 -m^2+i\epsilon)(v\ell + i \epsilon)}\label{pit}\ ] ]    we notice that the only difference between @xmath102 and @xmath103 is in the sign in front of @xmath87 in the numerators of the integrands . we now expand ( [ pih]),([pis ] ) and([pit ] ) around @xmath84 , @xmath85 and @xmath104 respectively : @xmath105 in this way we obtain the kinetic part of the effective lagrangian for heavy mesons in the usual form @xcite @xmath106 provided we satisfy the conditions : @xmath107 and renormalize the fields as : @xmath108 the renormalization constants are given by : @xmath109 here , prime denotes differentiation and @xmath110 and @xmath81 . in the previous equations , @xmath111 are the mass differences between the heavy mesons @xmath112 and the heavy quark . the expressions of @xmath102 , @xmath103 , and @xmath113 are : @xmath114 \right]\end{aligned}\ ] ] while the field renormalization constants are : @xmath115    @xmath116    @xmath117\nonumber \\ & + & ( m+\delta_t ) [ { \frac{\partial i_0(\delta_t)}{\partial \delta_t}}+ i_1 + 2 \delta_t i_3(\delta_t ) ] + i_0 + \delta_t i_1 \big]\end{aligned}\ ] ]    the integrals @xmath118 and @xmath119 are defined in the appendix . we employ the first equation in ( [ g3 ] ) to obtain @xmath82 from a given value of @xmath84 ( we use @xmath84 in the range @xmath120 gev ) , while the second equation in ( [ g3 ] ) can be used to determine @xmath85 .    for @xmath104 we can use experimental information . let us call @xmath121 and @xmath122 the spin - averaged @xmath37-multiplet and @xmath81-multiplet masses . we can write @xmath123 and @xmath124 . for charm , the positive parity experimental masses and widths are as follows : for @xmath125 we have @xmath126 mev , @xmath127 mev and @xmath128 mev , @xmath129 mev . these particle are identified with the state @xmath56 belonging to the @xmath81 @xmath130 multiplet . as for the @xmath131 state , experimentally we have @xmath132 mev , @xmath133 mev ; this particle can be identified with the state @xmath55 belonging to the @xmath81 multiplet , neglecting a possible small mixing between the two @xmath55 states belonging to the @xmath41 and @xmath81 multiplets @xcite . we observe that the narrowness of the states @xmath125 and @xmath134 is due to the fact that their strong decays occur via @xmath34-waves . from this analysis we get @xmath135 mev . for beauty , the experimental data on positive parity resonances show a bunch of states with a mass @xmath136 mev and width @xmath137 mev @xcite . if we identify this mass with the mass of the narrow @xmath81 states , we obtain @xmath138 mev . for reasonable values of the heavy quark masses , we get @xmath139 which is the value we adopt . the preceding analysis produces the figures in table i.    [ htb ]    in table ii we report the computed values of @xmath140 and @xmath141 for three values of @xmath84 . let us finally observe that we predict , according to the value of @xmath84 , a value for the @xmath142multiplet mass @xmath143 mev ; these states , called in the literature @xmath144 have not been observed yet since they are expected to be rather broad ( for instance in @xcite one predicts @xmath145 mev and @xmath146 mev ) . theoretical predictions in the literature are somehow larger ( @xmath147 mev ) . to begin with , we compute the leptonic decay constants @xmath148 and @xmath149 that are defined as follows : @xmath150 it is easy to compute these constants by a loop calculation similar to that considered in the previous section for the self - energy ; one finds    @xmath151    the numerical results for different values of the parameters can be found in table iii . [ htb ]    we observe that , neglecting logarithmic corrections , @xmath148 and @xmath149 are related , in the infinite heavy quark mass limit , to the leptonic decay constant @xmath152 and @xmath153 defined by @xmath154 by the relations @xmath155 and @xmath156 . for example , for @xmath157 mev , we obtain from table iii : @xmath158    the numerical values that can be found in the literature agree with our results . for example the qcd sum rule analysis of @xcite gives @xmath159 gev@xmath160 ( without @xmath161 corrections ) and higher values ( around @xmath162 gev@xmath160 ) including radiative corrections . as for lattice qcd , in @xcite the value summarizing the present status of lattice calculations for @xmath152 is @xmath163 mev . as for @xmath164 , a qcd sum rule analysis @xcite gives @xmath165 gev@xmath160 , which is significantly higher than the results reported in table iii . let us now consider semileptonic decays . the first analysis to be performed is the study of the isgur - wise function @xmath166 which is defined by : @xmath167\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath168 and @xmath169 is a coefficient containing logarithmic corrections depending on @xmath161 ; within our approximation it can be put equal to 1 : @xmath170 . we also note that , in the leading order we are considering here @xmath171 . to compute @xmath166 one has to evaluate the diagram of fig.2 . = 8truecm    * fig . 2 * - weak current insertion on the heavy quark line for the heavy meson form factor calculation .    one finds @xcite : @xmath172 ~~.\label{xi}\ ] ]    = 8truecm    * fig . 3 * - isgur - wise form factor at different @xmath28 values . the @xmath166 function is plotted in fig.3 . the integrals @xmath173 can be found in the appendix . it is obvious from ( [ zh]),([xi ] ) that @xmath174 is correctly normalized , i.e. @xmath171 . for the slope of the isgur - wise function , defined by @xmath175 one gets the values reported in table iv . the plot of the isgur - wise function is given in fig . 3 for three values of @xmath84 . it is useful to compare our results with other approaches . qcd sum rules calculations are in the range @xmath176 , therefore they agree with our results@xcite . the results from different quark models @xcite,@xcite,@xcite,@xcite have been recently reviewed by the authors of @xcite ; they have studied the results of different models with the common approach of boosting the wave - functions by the bakamjian - thomas method @xcite ; for @xmath177 they obtain results in the range @xmath178 , to be compared to the results in table 4 . lattice qcd gives significantly smaller results ; for example in @xcite the value @xmath179 is obtained . let us now turn to the form factors describing the semileptonic decays of a meson belonging to the fundamental negative parity multiplet @xmath37 into the positive parity mesons in the @xmath41 and @xmath81 multiplets . examples of these decays are @xmath180 where @xmath181 can be either a @xmath41 state ( i.e. a @xmath54 or @xmath182 charmed meson having @xmath183 ) or a @xmath81 state ( i.e. a @xmath56 or @xmath182 charmed meson having @xmath184 ) .    the decays in ( [ bd * * ] ) are described by two form factors @xmath185 @xcite according to @xmath186\right ] \label{tau32}\end{aligned}\ ] ] @xmath187-   i ( \omega+1 ) \epsilon_{\mu \alpha \beta \gamma } \epsilon^ { * \alpha } v^{\prime \beta } v^\gamma \right\ } \label{tau32bis}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    @xmath188\}~.\end{aligned}\ ] ]    in all these equations we neglect logarithmic corrections . the form factors @xmath189 can be computed by a loop calculation similar to the one used to obtain @xmath174 . the result is @xmath190\ ] ] and    @xmath191\end{aligned}\ ] ]    where the integrals @xmath192 are defined in the appendix . given the small phase space which is available for these decays ( @xmath193 for @xmath194 and @xmath195 for @xmath196 ) , we can approximate @xmath197~.\ ] ]    numerically we find the results reported in table iv . [ htb ]    an important test of our approach is represented by the bjorken sum rule , which states @xmath198~.\ ] ] numerically we find that the first excited resonances , i.e. the @xmath41 and @xmath81 states ( @xmath199 ) practically saturate the sum rule for all the three values of @xmath84 .    in table v we compare our results ( for @xmath200 gev ) with other approaches . for @xmath201 we find a broad agreement with some of the constituent quark model results , whereas for @xmath202 we only agree with @xcite . [ htb ]    finally in table vi we present our results for the branching ratios of b semileptonic decays to @xmath142 and @xmath203wave charmed mesons for three values of @xmath84 computed with @xmath204 @xcite and @xmath205 psec . we see that data favor a value of @xmath206 mev . in this section we consider the strong decays @xmath207 as well as the radiative decay @xmath208 where @xmath32 and @xmath31 are the @xmath209 and @xmath210 members of the multiplet @xmath37 . the calculation of the strong coupling constants describing the decays @xmath211 ( i.e. @xmath212 ) and @xmath213 is strongly simplified by adopting the soft pion limit . in the case of the decay @xmath214 this procedure introduces only a small error since the phase space is actually very small ( for the @xmath215 decay the situation is different , see below ) . let us define @xmath216 by the equation : @xmath217 the constant @xmath216 is related to the strong coupling constant of the effective meson field theory @xmath218 appearing in @xcite @xmath219 \label{lg}\ ] ] by the relation @xmath220 valid in the @xmath21 limit .    to compute @xmath218 in the soft - pion - limit ( @xmath221 ) we consider the matrix element of @xmath222 and derive a goldberger - treiman relation , following the approach of @xcite ; this approach differs from the method employed in the first paper in  @xcite , that assumes the so - called low - momentum - expansion approximation and a mixing between the nambu - goldstone bosons and higher mass resonances . our method amounts to a loop calculation involving a current and two @xmath37 states ( see fig . = 8truecm    * fig . 4 * - pion vertex on the light quark line for the heavy - heavy - pion interaction . the result for @xmath218 is as follows : @xmath223~,\ ] ] where @xmath224 have been defined already and @xmath225 is in the appendix . numerically we get @xmath226 where the central value corresponds to @xmath227 gev and the lower ( resp . higher ) value corresponds to @xmath228 gev ( resp . @xmath229 these values agree with qcd sum rules calculations , that give @xmath230 ( for a review see @xcite ; see also @xcite ) , with the result of relativistic constituent quark model : @xmath231 @xcite , @xmath232 @xcite . from the computed values of @xmath218 we can derive the hadronic width using @xmath233 . a complete calculation of the corresponding decay constant @xmath234 appearing in ( [ lg ] ) is much more involved and one can preliminary try to compute it in the soft - pion limit . this approximation implies that we must assume @xmath235 ; putting @xmath236 , we obtain @xmath237 were @xmath238 is given by @xmath239^{-\frac{1}{2}}.\ ] ]    we obtain , for @xmath28 in the range @xmath240 gev the result @xmath241 which is somehow higher , but still compatible , within the theoretical uncertainties , with a result obtained by qcd sum rules : @xmath242 @xcite . let us now consider the radiative decays @xmath243 and @xmath244 . to be definite we consider only the former decay ; moreover we use the su(3 ) flavor symmetry for the light quarks . the matrix element for this radiative transition is the following : @xmath245 where @xmath246 is the photon polarization and the coupling @xmath91 comprises two terms : @xmath247 corresponding to the decomposition : @xmath248 here @xmath249 and @xmath250 are the light and the heavy quark parts of the electro - magnetic current : @xmath251 and @xmath252 correspondingly , eq . ( [ 5.1.5.bis ] ) becomes @xmath253 where @xmath254 and @xmath255 are mass parameters to be determined . the photon insertion on the heavy quark line generates the @xmath256 coupling , while the @xmath257 arises when the photon is inserted on the light quark line of the loop .    in the @xmath2 limit , the matrix element of @xmath258 can be expressed in terms of the isgur - wise form factor @xmath174 as follows : @xmath259 where @xmath260 , @xmath261 and @xmath262 because : @xmath263    taking into account the normalization @xmath264 one gets , for the charm and beauty mesons respectively ( with @xmath265 ) , @xmath266 with @xmath267 in the leading order in @xmath268 and @xmath269 one finds : @xmath270 which fixes @xmath256 . as for the coupling @xmath257 , in our approach it stems from the diagram where the photon line is inserted on the light quark propagator ( see fig . 5 ) . = 8truecm    * fig . 5 * - electro - magnetic current insertion on the light quark line . the result is : @xmath271\ ] ] numerically we get : @xmath272 where the central value corresponds to @xmath227 gev and the lower ( resp . higher ) value corresponds to @xmath229 gev ( resp . @xmath228 gev ) . these values agree with the result of heavy quark effective theory and the vector meson dominance hypothesis @xcite . one can use the formula : latexmath:[\[\gamma(d^ * \to d \gamma ) =   \frac{\alpha}{3 } \frac{m_{d^*}}{m_{d } }    momentum ) , to compute the @xmath0 radiative widths . using this equation together with ( [ strong ] ) we obtain the results of table vii . [ htb ]    taking into account the approximations involved in the present calculation , we find comparison between theoretical prediction and experimental data of table vii encouraging . finally we compute total widths for @xmath0 and @xmath1 ( for @xmath274 gev ) : @xmath275 the increasing number of available data on heavy meson processes and the even more promising increase of data from forthcoming experiments demands theoretical predictions for these processes to be compared with experiment and to suggest subsequent lines of investigation . calculating directly from the qcd lagrangian remains an extremely difficult task , in spite of the impressive success of recent lattice work . a most promising approach is the one based on heavy meson effective lagrangians , which incorporate the heavy quark symmetries and in addition the approximate chiral symmetry for light quarks . although with increasing data such an approach will remain the best one beyond direct qcd calculations , at this stage it is made cumbersome by the large number of parameters that have to be fixed before obtaining predictions . in this note we have presented an intermediate approach , not as rigorous and general as that of the effective meson lagrangian , but which allows for a smaller number of input parameters . we start from an effective lagrangian at the level of mesons and of constituent quarks , and we then calculate the meson transition amplitudes by evaluating loops of heavy and light quarks . in this way we can compute the isgur - wise function , the form factors @xmath202 and @xmath201 , the leptonic decay constant @xmath148 and @xmath149 , the coupling constants @xmath218 and @xmath234 relative to @xmath276 and @xmath277 processes respectively , the @xmath278 coupling relative to the @xmath279 processes . the agreement with data , when available , seems rather impressive . additional data should be able to confirm some of the predictions of the model or suggest modifications . in conclusion the model presented here , based on meson and quark degrees of freedom , seems capable of incorporating a number of essential features of qcd and to provide a useful approach to calculate heavy meson transitions in terms of a limited number of physical parameters . we list here the integrals used in the paper . @xmath280\nonumber \\ & - & \delta { { n_c m^2}\over { 16 \pi^2 } } \gamma(-1,{{{m^2 } } \over { { { \lambda}^2}}},{{{m^2}}\over { { { \mu } ^2 } } } ) \\ i_1&=&\frac{in_c}{16\pi^4 } \int^{reg } \frac{d^4k}{(k^2 - m^2 ) } = { { n_c m^2}\over { 16 \pi^2 } } \gamma(-1,{{{m^2 } } \over { { { \lambda}^2}}},{{{m^2}}\over { { { \mu } ^2 } } } ) \\ i_1^{\prime}&=&\frac{in_c}{16\pi^4 } \int^{\mathrm { reg } } d^4 k\frac{k^2}{(k^2 - m^2 ) } = { { n_c m^4}\over { 8 \pi^2 } } \gamma(-2,{{{m^2 } } \over { { { \lambda}^2}}},{{{m^2}}\over { { { \mu } ^2}}})\\ i_2&=&-\frac{in_c}{16\pi^4 } \int^{\mathrm { reg } }   \frac{d^4k}{(k^2 - m^2)^2}= \frac{n_c}{16\pi^2 } \gamma(0,\frac{m^2}{\lambda^2 } , \frac{m^2}{\mu^2})\\ i_3(\delta ) & = & - \frac{in_c}{16\pi^4 } \int^{\mathrm { reg } } \frac{d^4k}{(k^2-m^2)(v\cdot k + \delta + i\epsilon)}\nonumber \\ & = & { n_c \over { 16\,{{\pi } ^{{3/2 } } } } } \int_{1/{{\lambda}^2}}^{1/{{\mu } ^2 } } { ds \over { s^{3/2 } } } \ ; e^{- s ( { m^2 } - { { \delta } ^2 } ) } \ ; \left ( 1 + { \mathrm { erf } } ( \delta\sqrt{s } ) \right)\\ i_4(\delta)&=&\frac{in_c}{16\pi^4}\int^{\mathrm { reg } } \frac{d^4k}{(k^2-m^2)^2 ( v\cdot k + \delta + i\epsilon ) } \nonumber\\ & = & \frac{n_c}{16\pi^{3/2 } } \int_{1/\lambda^2}^{1/\mu^2 } \frac{ds}{s^{1/2 } } \ ; e^{-s(m^2-\delta^2 ) } \ ; [ 1+{\mathrm { erf}}(\delta\sqrt{s})]~.\end{aligned}\ ] ] in these equations @xmath281 is the generalized incomplete gamma function and erf is the error function .            a.d . acknowledges the support of a `` marie curie '' tmr research fellowship of the european commission under contract erbfmbict960965 . he also thanks l. lellouch for a discussion on lattice data and o. pne for discussion on ref . this work has also been carried out in part under the ec program human capital and mobility , contract ue erbchrxct940579 and ofes 950200 .      for further references see the review papers : h. georgi , contribution to the _ proceedings of tasi 91 _ , r.k . , world scientific , singapore,1991 ; b. grinstein , contribution to _ high energy phenomenology _ , r. huerta and m.a . peres eds . , world scientific , singapore , 1991 ; n. isgur and m. wise , contribution to _ heavy flavours _ , a. buras and m. lindner eds . , world scientific , singapore,1992 ; m. neubert , phys . rep . * 245 * 259 ( 1994 ) . d. buskulic et al . , aleph collaboration , z. phys . * c73 * 60 ( 1997 ) ; ibidem , phys . lett . * b395 * 373 ( 1997 ) ; k. ackerstaff et al . , opal collaboration , z.phys . * c76 * 425 ( 1997 ) ; p. avery et al . , cleo collaboration , phys . * b331 * 236 ( 1994 ) , erratum , ibidem * b342 * 453 ( 1994 ) . b. holdom and m. sutherland , phys . rev . * d47 * 5067 ( 1993 ) , b. holdom and m. sutherland , phys . lett . * b313 * ( 1993 ) 447 , b. holdom and m. sutherland , phys * d48 * ( 1993 ) 5196 , b. holdom , m. sutherland and j. mureika , phys . rev . * d49 * ( 1994 ) 2359 . b. blok and m. shifman , phys . rev . * d47 * 2949 ( 1993 ) ; m. neubert , phys . rep . * 245 * 259 ( 1994 ) ; e. bagan , p. ball and p. gosdzinsky , phys . * b301 * 249 ( 1993 ) ; s. narison , report cern - th 7103/93 , pm-93/45 . a. a. ovchinnikov , sov . j. of nucl . phys . * 50 * 519 ( 1989 ) ; p. colangelo , g. nardulli , a. deandrea , n. di bartolomeo , r. gatto and f. feruglio , phys . * b339 * 151 ( 1994 ) ; v.m . belyaev , v.m . braun , a. khodzamirian , r. rueckl , phys . rev . * d51 * 6177 ( 1995 ) ; t.m . aliev , d.a . demir , e. iltan and n.k . pak , phys . b351 * 339 ( 1995 ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we describe the effective heavy meson lagrangian for s- and p - wave heavy - light mesons in terms of a model based on meson - quark interactions , where mesonic transition amplitudes are represented by diagrams with heavy mesons attached to loops containing heavy and light constituent quarks . the model is relativistic and incorporates the heavy quark symmetries . the universal form factors of the heavy meson transition amplitudes are calculated together with their slopes and compared to existing data and limits . as further applications of the model , strong and radiative decays of @xmath0 and @xmath1 are considered . the agreement with data is surprisingly good and shows that the model offers a viable alternative to effective meson lagrangians which require a larger number of input parameters . /#10=#1 - 00=5pt0 by-00 by00.50to0_/ _