Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is sometimes believed , that all interesting phenomena in the universe happen at interfaces @xcite . following this line of thought , we believe that the study of the dynamics of interfaces provides a key for understanding generic features of non - equilibrium phenomena . the electrochemical deposition of metals from aqueous solutions in quasi - two - dimensional geometries is an easily accessible growth phenomenon of such an interface . the emerging structures show a broad variety of growth patterns including fractals , seaweed or dendrites . for a recent review see @xcite and references therein . the focus of this paper is on the electrodeposition of finger deposits @xcite : after the addition of a small amount of an inert electrolyte like sodium sulphate to a copper sulphate solution , the morphology of copper deposits changes from a typical fractal or dense - branched red copper structure to some fine - meshed texture with a fingerlike envelope . figure [ fig : finger ] gives an example of the early stage of a deposit formed under these circumstances . the underlying mechanism is believed to be qualitatively understood . the increase of the electric conductivity enables alternative reaction paths like the reduction of @xmath0 . the resulting increase of the @xmath1h value triggers the formation of a copper hydroxide gel ( @xmath2 ) in front of the advancing deposit @xcite . when considering , that the fluid between the copper filaments contains no gel , the ensuing situation resembles the saffman - taylor instability , where a more viscous fluid is pushed by a less viscous one and their interface develops the same type of fingering ( see ref . @xcite for a recent survey ) . the saffman - taylor instability is strongly influenced by the surface tension of the interface . in this paper we use that idea to measure the strength of an effective surface tension associated to the hydrogel - water interface by analyzing the dispersion relation . it should be remarked , that the nature of surface tension between miscible fluids is still an active area of research @xcite . another necessary ingredient for the occurrence of fingers are density - driven convective currents in front of the growing deposit : if convection is suppressed by turning the electrodeposition cell in a vertical configuration , fingers are not longer formed @xcite . for that reason it appears to be essential to understand the nature of the convection field in our experiment , which we examine using particle image velocimetry ( piv ) . the organization of the paper is the following : in section [ ch : setup ] we introduce the experimental setups . section [ ch : disp ] is devoted to the dispersion relations , with [ ch : disp_img ] covering some technical aspects and [ ch : disp_results ] presenting the measured dispersion relations and analyzing the results for a textured electrode . in section [ ch : piv ] we discuss the piv measurements : [ ch : piv_result_anode ] is devoted to the anode while [ ch : piv_result_cat ] summarizes our results for the cathode . finally , section [ ch : conclusion ] contains our conclusions . the electrodeposition is performed in a cell with two glass plates of 8 x 8 @xmath3 area as side - walls . two parallel copper wires ( 99.9 % , goodfellow ) separated by a distance of 4 cm serve as electrodes and spacers . their diameter @xmath4 ranges between 125 @xmath5 m and 300 @xmath5 m . figure [ fig : setup ] a ) shows a sketch of this setup . we use a coordinate system where the x axis is parallel to the electrode , the y axis points from the cathode to the anode and the z axis is perpendicular to the glass plates .    the space between the electrodes is filled with an aqueous solution of 50 mm @xmath6 and 4 mm @xmath7 for the measurements of the dispersion relations and 50 mm @xmath6 and 7 mm @xmath7 for the piv experiments . all solutions are prepared from merck p.a . chemicals in non deaerated ultrapure @xmath8 . all measurements are performed with constant ( within 0.4 % ) potential between the electrodes ranging between 12 v and 19 v. the average current density is below 35 @xmath9 .     was taken that way . ( c ) side view of the dark field microscopy used for the piv . image [ fig : dark_field ] gives an example of this illumination technique . the ovals inside the cell indicate the convection rolls . , width=325 ]    .image acquisition systems used in the experimental setups . [ cols= " < , < , < , < , < , < " , ]     the two targets of our investigation require two different ways of illumination ( sketched in fig .  [ fig : setup ] ( b ) and ( c ) ) and image acquisition ( summarized in table [ tab : setup ] ) . since the measurements of the dispersion relation demand a high spatial resolution we used a kodak megaplus 6.3i ccd - camera with 3070 x 2048 pixel mounted on a nikkor slr macro lens with 105 mm focal length and a spacer ring . to take full advantage of the spatial resolution of 7.9 @xmath5 m per pixel it was necessary to employ a khler illumination @xcite using filtered light with a wave length of 405 nm from a tungsten lamp . images are taken in intervals @xmath10 of 5 s and are directly transferred with a frame - grabber card to the hard disk of a pc .    to visualize the velocity field inside the cell , we added latex tracer particles to the electrolyte . we used particles with 0.3 @xmath5 m diameter , which stay suspended due to brownian motion . since we can not resolve these particles with our optical system , we used dark - field microscopy : only light scattered from objects inside the cell falls into the lens . image [ fig : dark_field ] gives an example , the white area at the bottom represents the growing deposit , the points above correspond to tracer particles . we did not observe electro - osmosis as reported in @xcite , but the particles show some tendency to coagulate and settle to the bottom plate . this problem is handled in later stages of the image processing . images were acquired using an olympus szh stereo microscope and a sony xc 77rr ce ccd - camera with 512 x 512 pixels which resulted in a spatial resolution of 17 @xmath5 m per pixel . @xmath10 was 2 s and images were also directly transferred to a pc . to characterize the instability of a pattern forming systems there is a quite common method : starting with the uniform system , one adds a small sinusoidal perturbation of wavenumber @xmath11 and amplitude @xmath12 and investigates its temporal evolution . as long as the system is in the linear regime the perturbation will grow or shrink exponentially : @xmath13 the dependency of the growth rate @xmath14 on the wavenumber @xmath11 is called dispersion relation .    in the context of electrodeposition dispersion relations have been measured for the initial phase of compact @xcite and ramified @xcite growth and calculated to explain the stability of the dense radial morphology @xcite .      in order to measure the dispersion relation the first step is to track down the temporal evolution of the front : in the image taken at time @xmath15 we identify for each column @xmath16 the height @xmath17 of the deposit . this is done in two steps : first we search for the pair of pixels with the highest gray value gradient in each column . second we perform a sub - pixel interpolation by calculating the point of inflexion between these two pixels . by evaluating a stationary edge , we could demonstrate that the error of this algorithm is smaller than 0.1 pixel . however the random fine structure of the deposit acts like the addition of shot noise to @xmath17 . we try to mitigate this effect by applying a median filter with 7 pixel width @xcite . figure [ fig : front_dev ] shows @xmath17 for 4 various times of an experiment .     of the front tracking . the curve at the bottom corresponds to the initial position of the cathode . above the front at 156 s , 259 s , 362 s and 466 s after the beginning of the experiment . the experiment is the same as the one presented in fig . [ fig : finger ] . the part of length @xmath18 between the dashed lines was chosen by the cut - out algorithm for further processing.,width=325 ]    our next aim is to do a fourier decomposition of @xmath17 to examine the dynamics of the amplitudes @xmath19 of the individual modes @xmath20 . because our initial conditions are random noise , which can be understood as a superposition of various modes with different wavelengths @xmath21 , we encounter a leakage problem : we observe our system in a window of width @xmath22 . the ratio @xmath23 of the dominant modes is almost always fractional . this has a very unpleasant consequence for the fourier transformation , which computes the amplitudes for integer mode numbers : power of the dominant modes is transfered to other less excited modes and spoils the measurement of the growth rates there . a common answer to this issue is the usage of a windowing function @xcite , which does not eliminate leakage , but restricts it to neighboring mode numbers . the price to be paid is , that this leakage will now occur even if @xmath22 is a common multiple of all wavelengths contained in the initial signal .    in this paper we use a different approach , which is illustrated in fig . [ fig : front_dev ] : we cut out a part of @xmath17 of width @xmath18 and offset @xmath24 and use only this part for the subsequent analysis . @xmath24 and @xmath18 , which are constant for the whole run of the experiment , are chosen such that the left and the right end of the cut - out have the same height : @xmath25 and the same slope : @xmath26 fulfilling eq . [ eq : rwod_1 ] and eq . [ eq : rwod_2 ] for all times is for all practical purposes identical to the statement that @xmath18 is a common multiple of all wavelengths contained in @xmath17 , that is the condition under which no leakage occurs .    in practice , [ eq : rwod_1 ] and eq . [ eq : rwod_2 ] can be satisfied only approximately . the algorithm followed to select @xmath24 and @xmath18 minimizes the sum over the height differences according to eq . [ eq : rwod_1 ] while it assures , that the sum over the slope differences according to eq . [ eq : rwod_2 ] does not exceed a threshold . the average height difference obtained in that way is @xmath27 3 pixels while the slope difference threshold was 1 pixel / pixel , both values correspond to the noise level of @xmath17 . the final step is a standard fourier decomposition of the cut - out parts of @xmath17 .      for each fourier amplitude we tried to fit the temporal evolution with the exponential growth law given by eq . [ eq : exp_growth ] . [ fig : wachstum ] gives an example for two modes , corresponding to the experiment displayed in fig . [ fig : front_dev ] . the time interval for the exponential fits is indicated by the solid symbols . the start time is set by the time the hydrogel layer needs to build up ; before that point no instability or destabilization of the growing interface is clearly evidenced . in the experiment shown in fig . [ fig : front_dev ] this point corresponds to an elapsed time of about 150 s. however some modes need longer until they are grown to an amplitude which can be distinguished from the measurement background noise . at the other end the fit is limited by the onset of deviations from the exponential growth law due to nonlinear effects becoming important .    to test the dependence of the dispersion relation on the applied potential , we performed measurements with 15 v and 19 v using electrodes of 250 @xmath5 m diameter . the results are displayed in fig  [ fig : disp_u ] , each is averaged over three experiments . both dispersion relations show a limited band of positive amplitude growth rates with @xmath11 between zero and @xmath28 and a wave number @xmath29 where the growth rate is maximal . the increase of @xmath30 from 15 v to 19 v is accompanied by an increase of the average growth velocity @xmath31 from 13.3 @xmath5 m/s to 15.9 @xmath5 m/s . the distinct shift of @xmath29 to higher wave numbers is in conformity with measurements of the number of incipient fingers as a function of @xmath31 reported in @xcite . the decrease of @xmath28 could originate from a change of the physicochemical properties of the copper hydrogel . negative `` growth rates '' can only be measured if the initial amplitude of the corresponding mode is strong enough . to enforce this we prepared a textured electrode which stimulates the initial growth at a wavenumber of 62.8 @xmath32 . it consists of a synthetic substrate of 120 @xmath5 m height with a 35 @xmath5 m copper plating . the copper layer was etched to derive a comb - like structure with copper stripes of width 0.75 mm and spacings of 0.25 mm . islands of growing deposit evolve at the tips of the copper stripes and amalgamate after some time . fig . [ fig : strukt_devel ] gives an example . the temporal evolution of two fourier modes of this experiment is shown in fig . [ fig : strukt_devel_modes ] . the dispersion relation of the textured electrode is displayed in fig  [ fig : disp_d ] together with results for cell thickness of 125 @xmath5 m and 250 @xmath5 m . within the scope of our experimental errors no influence of @xmath4 is observable . in principle a decrease of @xmath4 is accompanied by a decrease of the surface tension forces , which should result in a higher @xmath28 . however as discussed in chapter  [ ch : piv ] convection will also be significantly reduced . this will result in a steeper transition between the hydrogel and the electrolyte , which increases the surface tension @xmath33 @xcite . presumably these two effects cancel each other .    while we are not claiming that the saffman - taylor dispersion relation : @xmath34 gives a full explanation of this fingering phenomenon , we do believe that it captures the essentials of the physical mechanism , especially the damping effects due to an effective surface tension . therefore we performed a fit of eq . [ sata_disprel ] to the dispersion relation of the textured electrode , which is shown in fig . [ fig : disp_d ] . as results we find a viscosity of the hydrogel @xmath35 of 2.4 @xmath36 kg / ms which is about twice the viscosity of water @xmath37 . the effective surface tension @xmath33 turns out to be 3.5 @xmath38 n / m . this is about five magnitudes lower than the surface tension at the water - air interface , which is presumably due to the fact , that the gel and the water are miscible fluids . electrodeposition is often accompanied by buoyancy - driven convection rolls @xcite . the driving force for the convection are the concentration changes at the electrodes : at the anode the ion concentration and therefore the density of the electrolyte increases . while it descends , lighter bulk solution flows in and a convection roll as sketched in fig  [ fig : setup ] ( c ) starts to grow .    to visualize the growing deposit in the @xmath16-@xmath39 plane , we observe the cells from above . as apparent from fig . [ fig : setup ] ( c ) the plane defined by the convection roll is the @xmath39-@xmath40 plane . this results in the uncomfortable situation , that the observed tracer particles move simultaneously towards and away from the electrode , which obviates the use of standard correlation techniques @xcite for the piv . we therefore developed a software package capable to keep track of the motion of individual particles . this is done in two steps : first we identify the particles in each image and insert their center of mass into a database . then we construct contiguous histories for individual particles using five consecutive time - steps . in this way we are able to measure the @xmath41 and @xmath42 components of the flow . the software is published under the gnu public license and can be downloaded from a url  @xcite . all velocity measurements were performed in cells with thickness @xmath4 = 300 @xmath5 m applying a potential of 12 v. at the anode a convection roll is clearly visible : while having no relevant velocity component in the @xmath16-direction , the tracer particles in a distinct zone move towards or away from the electrode . [ fig : profil_anode ] gives the @xmath42 components of all particles detected in one image as a function of their distance @xmath39 to the anode . due to the big depth of focus of our optical system , we observe particles in all heights @xmath40 of the cell simultaneously . as the particle velocity is a function of @xmath40 , we find for a given @xmath39 all velocities between @xmath43 . it is known that some time after the start of an experiment vertical diffusion starts to smear out the concentration differences between the flows to and away from the electrode . chazalviel and coworkers @xcite proposed a two - dimensional description for this diffusion - hindered spreading ( dhs ) regime . the velocity component perpendicular to the electrode @xmath42 should obey @xcite : @xmath44           \nonumber\\           & &      \left ( z^3 - z \frac{d^2}{4 } \right )       \label{eq : velocity_y}\end{aligned}\ ] ] with @xmath45 and @xmath46 @xmath47 denotes the current density ( 25 @xmath48 3 ma/@xmath49 ) , @xmath50 is the dependency of the density on the ion concentration , which we measured to be 0.156 @xmath48 0.008 kg / mol for @xmath51 using a density measurement instrument dma 5000 from anton paar . @xmath52 and @xmath53 represent the mobility of the anions ( 8.3 @xmath54 @xmath55/sv ) and cations ( 5.6 @xmath54 @xmath55/sv ) , respectively . @xmath56 is the faraday constant ( 9.6 @xmath57 as / mol ) , @xmath58 the acceleration due to gravity and @xmath59 the charge number of the cation ( 2 ) . @xmath60 represents the dynamic viscosity ( @xmath36 kg / ms ) of the solution and @xmath61 the ambipolar diffusion constant ( 8.6 @xmath62 @xmath63/s for @xmath51 @xcite ) . because @xmath61 and @xmath60 are weakly concentration dependent , we assign them errors of 10 % in the subsequent calculations , further on we assume a 5 % error in the determination of @xmath4 . [ eq : velocity_y ] assumes , that the glass plates are at @xmath64 and @xmath39 = 0 at the anode .    within this theory the extension @xmath65 of the convection roll is given by the point , where @xmath66 drops to zero : @xmath67    the maximal velocity @xmath68 occurs at the heights @xmath69 , in the immediate neighborhood of the electrode @xmath70 , and is time independent : @xmath71 however the authors state that due to problems with the boundary conditions at the electrode their solution might be not applicable in the region @xmath72 .      in principle the theory should describe directly our experimental results , however due to the uncertainties in the parameters we decided to perform a fit . because we measure a two - dimensional projection of velocities , we concentrate on an average velocity @xmath73 , which we calculate from all particles with absolute velocities of at least half the velocity of the fastest particle in this distance . in fig  [ fig : profil_anode ] this corresponds to all particles not lying between the two solid lines . this restriction is necessary to remove the contribution of particles which have already settled to the bottom glass plate .    from eq . [ eq : velocity_y ] we derive our fit function : @xmath74\ ] ] the fit of eq . [ eq : fit_v_y ] to @xmath73 is successful for the whole run of the experiment , especially the roll length @xmath65 is determined very precisely . [ fig : rolle_anode ] illustrates the temporal evolution of @xmath65 obtained from the fit . after 70 s @xmath75 becomes constant at a value of 24.7 @xmath48 0.5 @xmath5 m/s . integrating eq . [ eq : velocity_y ] yields @xmath76 = 30.8 @xmath48 2.1 @xmath5 m/s .    the next step is testing eq . [ eq : length_roll ] , which predicts the growth law of @xmath65 . a fit of our experimental @xmath65 for times greater 75 s using equation @xmath77 yields a slope of 0.543 @xmath48 0.001 , which is slightly above the square root law suggested by eq . [ eq : length_roll ] . higher exponents have also been reported by other groups : argoul et al . @xcite found 0.56 @xmath48 0.01 and dengra et al . @xcite measured 0.54 @xmath48 0.02 . the coefficient @xmath78 was found to be 141 @xmath48 1 @xmath5m/@xmath79 . if we insert our experimental parameters in eq . [ eq : k_2 ] we obtain @xmath80 = 134 @xmath48 12 @xmath5m/@xmath81 in agreement with the fit .    fig . [ fig : vergleich_elektroden ] ( b ) shows the experimental results for the maximal fluid velocity , which is located in the vicinity of the anode . after a sharp rise at the beginning of the experiment follows a slightly inclined plateau . a linear fit yields a velocity of 25.5 @xmath48 0.1 @xmath5 m/s for @xmath15 = 0 , which increases at a rate of 1 % per minute . inserting the experimental parameters into eq . [ eq : v_max ] results in a constant velocity of 37.1 @xmath48 2.5 @xmath5 m/s . this discrepancy can be attributed to the unphysical boundary conditions used in the model .    summarizing it can be stated , that the theory presented in @xcite provides a qualitatively and semi - quantitatively good description of the anodic convection roll in the dhs regime .      apart from the dhs regime , fig . [ fig : rolle_anode ] also shows a growth law @xmath82 for times between 12 s and 75 s. the exponent of 0.7 @xmath48 0.01 indicates a faster growth originating from a different mechanism . in the very beginning of an experiment convective fluid transport is faster than the diffusive equalization between the copper ion enriched electrolyte and the bulk electrolyte . therefore the concentrated electrolyte at the electrode sinks down and spreads along the bottom plate without significant mixing . in this so called immiscible fluid ( if ) regime the length @xmath65 of the convection zone is expected to grow with @xmath83 . this has been shown for gravity currents @xcite and was successfully adapted for electrodeposition @xcite . as explained in detail below , the range of applicability of this theory requires in our case @xmath84 470 @xmath5 m , which is out of our measured range . thus we observe a transitional period between the if and the dhs regime and not the if regime itself .    to distinguish between the if and the dhs regime a scaling analysis based on the vertical diffusion time was used in @xcite . we would like to advocate a different approach , using the similarity of the driving mechanism with the well - investigated case of a side heated box filled with fluid @xcite . while in this case the density changes are due to thermal expansion , there exist also two flow regimes : in the so called convective regime small layers of fluid spread along the confining plates with a stagnant core in the middle of the cell . the conductive regime is characterized by a cell filling convection roll and iso - density lines which are almost vertical . these flows can be described by the rayleigh number @xmath85 and the aspect ratio @xmath86 . @xmath87 is the thermal expansion and @xmath88 the thermal diffusivity of the fluid . @xmath89 denotes the distance , @xmath90 the temperature difference between hot and cold side wall . boehrer @xcite pointed out , that @xmath91 , which equals the ratio between the timescales for vertical diffusion and horizontal convection , is the dimensionless control parameter of this transition . for high values of @xmath91 one observes the convective regime , for small values the conductive one . if we transfer this analysis to our situation , we have to substitute the thermal density difference @xmath92 with the density difference due to concentration changes @xmath93 and the thermal diffusivity @xmath88 with the ambipolar diffusivity @xmath61 . this yields a concentration - dependent rayleigh number @xmath94 expressed by : @xmath95 the aspect ratio is calculated using the length of the convection roll : @xmath96 . analyzing the results presented in fig 10 of ref . @xcite this interpretation provides a necessary condition given by : @xmath97 to observe the if regime . in our experiment @xmath98 will only be larger than 1000 for @xmath84 470 @xmath5 m , which is out of our measured range .      at the cathode the situation is more complex due to the growing deposit . in fig . [ fig : rolle_katode ] the solid line describes the position of the most advanced point of the deposit in a width of 2.3 mm in @xmath16-direction , while the dotted line corresponds to the minimum in the same interval . the border of the convection roll was measured using a threshold : the open circles mark the foremost position , where the @xmath99 component of a particle exceeded 4.3 @xmath5 m/s . while the convection roll develops immediately , no growth of the deposit is observable in the first 40 s , because the copper deposits in a planar compact way , which is not observable with our optical resolution . during this so called sand s time , the ion concentration at the cathode drops to zero , which subsequently destabilizes the planar growth mode @xcite .    in the next phase ( 40 s @xmath100 s ) a depth of the deposit ( distance between the most advanced and most retarded parts of the growing deposit ) becomes measurable and finally reaches a constant size . the advancing deposit significantly compresses the size @xmath65 of the convection roll as given by the distance between the dots and the solid line . within this time interval the hydrogel layer is established , which can be seen by visual inspection . the third phase ( @xmath101 s ) is characterized by the appearance of the finger development . the front minimum ( dashed line ) and maximum ( solid line ) in fig . [ fig : rolle_katode ] coincide to the finger tip and the neighboring valley . the length @xmath65 of the convection roll in front of the finger tip tends to converge to a constant size , which has also been observed in the absence of a gel @xcite . the dispersion relations studied in chapter [ ch : disp_results ] were obtained in this phase . [ fig : vergleich_elektroden ] is devoted to a comparison between the flow behavior at the two electrodes . the developments of @xmath65 displayed in fig . [ fig : vergleich_elektroden ] ( a ) differ significantly from each other . however the comparison of the maximal fluid velocities in fig . [ fig : vergleich_elektroden ] ( b ) show similarities with respect to the absolute value and the approximate temporal constance . the fit at the cathode yields a velocity of 23.6 @xmath48 0.3 @xmath5 m/s for @xmath15 = 0 s , which decreases 0.9 % per minute .    from fig . [ fig : vergleich_elektroden ] ( a ) we infer , that the theoretical description presented in @xcite can not be applied to the cathode . indeed three prerequisites of the theory are not fulfilled : most importantly , it does not consider the moving boundary originating from the growth process . moreover this model can lead to unphysical negative concentrations at the cathode due to its inherent simplifications . finally the theory is two - dimensional in the @xmath39-@xmath40 plane and therefore not able to describe the influence of the ramified deposit , which evolves in the @xmath16-@xmath39 plane . remarkably enough our measurements show that the presence of hydrogel does not prevent convection . for a better understanding of the contribution of the flow field to the finger morphogenesis , we visualize it in fig . [ fig : felder_stack ] for two different times of the same experiment . the solid line denotes the interface of the deposit , and the arrows indicate the velocity of individual particles . it is apparent that convection is restricted to a small zone in front of the growing deposit . the hydrogel occurs also in the immediate vicinity of the front , however its extension could not be investigated in any detail here .    to examine the orientation of the flow field with respect to the interface we first computed the distribution of the angle @xmath87 between the velocity vectors @xmath102 of the particles and the @xmath39 axis . these data correspond to the thin lines shown in fig . [ fig : winkel_stack ] . the distribution clearly broadens with time and exhibits two distinct maxima for the fully developed fingers analyzed in fig . [ fig : winkel_stack ] ( c ) . then we identified for each particle an associated point of the finger envelope by prolonging @xmath102 . the angle between the normal vector at this meeting point and the @xmath39 axis is labeled @xmath103 . the angle difference @xmath104 is a measure for the mismatch between the deposit and the convection roll and is displayed as the thick line in fig . [ fig : winkel_stack ] .    fig . [ fig : winkel_stack ] ( b ) reveals that the convection field has a mismatch of about 15 degrees to the front during the initial phase of finger development . thus we conclude that the development of the convection field lags behind the development of the front . after the fingers are fully developed , the convection field readjusts again perpendicularly to the interface as shown in fig . [ fig : winkel_stack ] ( c ) , which is a sign of the concentration gradient adapting to the geometry of the deposit .    due to the lack of comparable measurements of other electrodeposition systems we can not judge if this effect is due to hydrogel or a generic feature of the cathodic convection roll .     between the velocity vector @xmath105 of a particle and the @xmath39 axis . prolonging @xmath105 we determine the meeting point with the finger surface . its normal vector encloses the angle @xmath103 with the @xmath39 axis . the thick line shows the distribution of the angle difference @xmath104 . these data correspond to the experiment presented in fig . [ fig : felder_stack ] . , width=325 ] we measured the dispersion relation in the linear regime of the finger morphology and their dependence on cell thickness and applied potential . by means of a textured electrode , we were able to measure negative growth rates . the striking feature of the smooth finger envelope is connected with the existence of a limited band of wavenumber between 0 an @xmath28 with positive growth rates . the damping of all perturbations with higher wavenumbers can be attributed to an effective surface tension associated with a hydrogel boundary in front of the deposit a fit of the dispersion relation yields some estimates for the effective surface tension and the viscosity of the copper hydrogel . furthermore we performed piv measurement at both electrodes . at the anode we could confirm the @xmath106 growth law for the length @xmath65 of the convection roll . we determined @xmath65 by fitting the suggested analytic expression for the velocity field and could therefore successfully test the model proposed by chazalviel and coworkers .    at the cathode the maximal fluid velocity inside the convection roll is of the same order as at the anode , but the temporal evolution of @xmath65 differs strongly . an analysis of the orientation of the velocity vectors reveals the existence of some mismatch between the development of the convection roll and the deposit front while the system is in the linear regime . in the fully developed finger regime , the velocity vectors are again perpendicular to the envelope of the deposit . our results provide a reasonable explanation why in the absence of gravity - driven convection rolls the fingering instability can not be observed : without convective mixing , the concentration gradient at the hydrogel interface can be assumed to be steeper , which will increases the effective surface tension . in consequence @xmath28 shifts to smaller wavenumbers and the overall growth rates decrease , which will suppress the evolution of fingers . an alternative explanation assumes two zones within the hydrogel layer . one part of the hydrogel in immediate vicinity of the deposit will be mixed by the convection roll and the consequential shear thinning will decrease its viscosity . in front of it there is a zone of quiescent hydrogel of higher viscosity , at the interface between this two the instability takes place . in this scenario @xmath28 is determined by the length of the convection roll @xmath65 . we want to thank marta - queralt lpez - salvans , thomas mahr , wolfgang schpf , bertram boehrer , ralf stannarius and peter kohlert for clarifying discussions . we are also indebted to niels hoppe and gerrit schnfelder , which were instrumental in the density measurements and jrg reinmuth for preparing the textured electrodes . this work was supported by the _ deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft _ under the projects en 278/2 - 1 and for 301/2 - 1 . cooperation was facilitated by the tmr research network fmrx - ct96 - 0085 : patterns , noise & chaos .
Abstract:

Answer: recently a fingering morphology , resembling the hydrodynamic saffman - taylor instability , was identified in the quasi - two - dimensional electrodeposition of copper . we present here measurements of the dispersion relation of the growing front . the instability is accompanied by gravity - driven convection rolls at the electrodes , which are examined using particle image velocimetry . while at the anode the theory presented by chazalviel et al . describes the convection roll , the flow field at the cathode is more complicated because of the growing deposit . in particular , the analysis of the orientation of the velocity vectors reveals some lag of the development of the convection roll compared to the finger envelope .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: of the various types of supernovae ( sne ) we observe , only certain subtypes of type ii sne have been conclusively connected to their progenitors . pre - explosion imaging has shown that sne ii - plateau ( sne  iip ) , for example , come from red supergiants ( see review by @xcite ) . owing to their cosmological significance , the progenitor systems of sne ia have been pursued relentlessly over the last two decades , but their nature is still debated ( see for a recent review ) . sne ii and stripped - envelope sne ( se sne ; i.e. , sne  iib , ib , ic , and broad - lined ic ; e.g. , ) are attributed to the core collapse ( cc ) of stars more massive than @xmath0 . spectroscopically , se sne are distinguished from sne ii by the lack of hydrogen features ( either partial , as in sne iib , or nearly complete , as in sne ib ; e.g. , ) . sne ic also lack helium features . in order to explain this lack of hydrogen and helium , se  sne are thought to be the explosions of stars that have had their outer envelopes stripped away before the explosion ( hence their name ) . of all the processes suggested to explain this stripping , the leading models make use of either stellar winds ( e.g. , @xcite ) , interaction with a binary companion ( e.g. , ) , or a combination of both ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in the case of broad - lined sne ic connected to gamma - ray bursts , chemically homogeneous evolution ( e.g. , ) and explosive common - envelope ejection @xcite have also been suggested . pre - explosion imaging of the sites of these sne has so far failed to reveal the nature of their progenitors conclusively ( e.g. , @xcite ) , though the case for yellow super - giants in binary systems as the progenitors of sne iib is gaining traction ( e.g. , ) . new observational methods are required to address this question . sne ia are thought to be thermonuclear explosions of carbon - oxygen white - dwarf remnants of @xmath1  @xmath2 stars . in order to disrupt the otherwise stable white dwarf , most models place it in a binary system where it can grow in mass , raising the temperature in the core until the carbon is ignited in a thermonuclear runaway . to grow in mass , the white dwarf can either siphon matter off of a main - sequence or evolved companion star ( the so - called `` single - degenerate '' scenario ; @xcite ) or merge with a second carbon - oxygen white dwarf after the two spiral in owing to loss of energy and angular momentum to gravitational waves ( the `` double degenerate '' scenario ; @xcite ) . recently , direct collisions of white dwarfs have also been suggested as a possible progenitor channel ( e.g. , @xcite ; but see also @xcite ) . many methods have been used to constrain these various sn progenitor models , including ( but far from limited to ) direct imaging of the explosion sites either before or long after the sn explosion ( e.g. , @xcite ) , multiwavelength follow - up observations ( e.g. , @xcite ) , and analyses of sn remnants ( e.g. , @xcite ) .    in this work , we concentrate on correlations between sn rates and various galaxy properties and what those correlations can tell us about sn progenitors . @xcite showed that sn ia rates per unit mass decreased with increasing galaxy stellar mass . * hereafter l11 ) showed the same effect for all sn types , in all types of galaxies ( but see section  [ sec : snia ] ) , and dubbed this the `` rate - size , '' or rate - mass , relation . we confirmed this trend for sne  ia in star - forming galaxies in @xcite and for sne  ii in ( * ? ? ? * hereafter g15 ) . following @xcite , we showed that the dependence of the sn ia rates on stellar mass results from a combination of galaxy scaling relations ( older galaxies are more massive , on average , than younger ones ; @xcite ) and the sn ia delay - time distribution ( dtd ) , which behaves as a power law with an index of @xmath3 ( e.g. , observations by @xcite ; and reviews by ) . , @xcite , @xcite , and g15 also measured sn ia rates as a function of the galaxies specific star - formation rate ( ssfr ) . in g15 , we showed that our explanation for the rate - mass correlation also explained the observed trend between sn ia rates and ssfr , where the rates are constant in passive galaxies but rise with increasing ssfr in star - forming galaxies .    in g15 , we also measured sn rates as a function of stellar mass and ssfr for sne ii and claimed that their rate - mass relation was simply the result of their progenitors short lifetimes : because sne ii come from massive ( @xmath4 ) stars , their rates track the star - formation rates of their galaxies . similar measurements of cc sn rates ( i.e. , combining sne ii and se sne ) were made by @xcite . l11 was part of a series of papers that explored the sn sample collected by the lick observatory supernova search ( loss ; l11 ; @xcite ) . loss is an ongoing survey for sne in local galaxies using the 0.76-m katzman automatic imaging telescope . for detailed descriptions of the survey , see @xcite , @xcite , and @xcite .    here , we use the loss sample to remeasure and re - analyze the sn rates originally published by l11 . in section  [ sec : galaxies ] , we match between the loss sample and spectroscopy from the sloan digital sky survey ( sdss ; @xcite ) in order to go beyond l11 and measure the sn rates not only as a function of galaxy stellar mass but also of ssfr and metallicity , as expressed by the abundance of gas - phase oxygen in the centers of the loss galaxies .    in section  [ sec : addendum ] , we make several addendums to the loss sample . we publish the control times necessary to measure sn rates with this sample , as well as updated galaxy - property tables and sn rates . we deal with sne ia in section  [ sec : snia ] , and with cc sne in section  [ sec : ccsn ] . we find significant correlations between the sn rates and the various galaxy properties . most importantly , we find that the cc sn rates behave differently in different types of galaxies : the se sn rates are shown to be deficient , relative to the sn ii rates , in galaxies with low stellar mass , high ssfrs , and low metallicity values . other studies have reported similar trends through measurements of correlations between fractions of sne within a given sample and metallicity ( e.g. , ) , or by splitting sn fractions between different types of galaxies , which encompass different metallicity regimes @xcite . we conduct an in - depth comparison of our results with these works in section  [ subsec : ccsn_context ] . in section  [ sec : discuss ] , we discuss how the various rate correlations are not independent . for all sn types , a correlation with one galaxy property can be transformed into the measured correlations with any other galaxy property by using well - known galaxy scaling relations . this makes it impossible to distinguish causation from correlation , especially for the deficiency of se sne in lower - mass galaxies . however , we argue that the structure seen in the correlations ( e.g. , the way the ratio between the se sn and sn ii rates depends on galaxy stellar mass ) can be used to constrain progenitor models . paper ii in this series will use population fractions , as measured from the loss volume - limited subsample of sne , to strengthen the results presented here and add further constraints on sn progenitor scenarios . for paper ii , we rely on a reclassification of the sne in this subsample , as reported by shivvers et al . ( in prep . ) . between march 1998 and december 2008 , loss discovered a total of 1,036 sne . most of these were discovered among the 14,882 galaxies directly targeted by the search ( at a median distance of @xmath5 mpc , where the upper and lower bounds contain 68% of the galaxies in the sample ) , but a few dozen were also discovered in background galaxies in the loss fields . this sample , along with the subsamples used to measure the loss sn luminosity functions @xcite and rates ( l11 ) , are described in detail by @xcite . loss classified their sne into three broad categories ( e.g. , ): sne ia , ib / c , and ii . the first category included all sn  ia subtypes , including the subluminous sn 1991bg - like sne , overluminous sn 1991t - like sne , and sn 2002cx - like sne  ia ( now referred to as sne iax ; @xcite ) . sne ib / c included sne ib , ic , and `` peculiar '' se sne ( such as broad - lined sne ic ; see , e.g. , for a review ) . the final category comprised sne iip , iil , iin , and iib . however , as mentioned earlier , sne iib are characterized by hydrogen deficiency , which is an indication of envelope stripping . thus , they should be grouped with the sne ib / c ( e.g. , @xcite ) . in this work , we use `` se sne '' instead of `` sne ib / c . '' however , because we use the control times calculated by l11 for the loss sample ( see sections  [ sec : addendum ] and [ subsec : rates_mass ] , below ) , we must keep the sne iib grouped with the sn ii class when calculating rates . fourteen sne had no spectroscopic classification . @xcite divided these sne into the three sn categories `` according to the statistics of the sne having spectroscopic classification '' and used them in the l11 rate calculations . we choose to exclude these sne from the rate measurements performed in this work . @xcite divided the loss galaxies into eight hubble types  e , s0 , sa , sb , sbc , sc , scd , and irr ( irregular )  according to their designations in the nasa extragalactic database . we keep these designations in the current work . we divide the complete loss galaxy sample into several subsamples , which we label the `` loss , '' `` ssfr , '' and `` metallicity '' samples . the loss sample is similar to the sample used by l11 to measure the original loss sn rates ( i.e. , the `` full - optimal '' subsample ; 10,121 galaxies from the targeted list only , i.e. , excluding sne discovered in background galaxies ) and is used here to measure sn rates per unit mass ( `` specific '' rates ) as a function of galaxy stellar mass . the ssfr sample comprises 2,415 galaxies targeted by loss that had spectra acquired by the sdss and were analyzed by both the mpa - jhu galspec pipeline @xcite and the nasa - sloan atlas ( nsa ) , which is based on the sdss dr8 spectroscopic catalog @xcite . this sample is used to correlate the sn rates with ssfr . the `` metallicity '' sample is a subset of 1,000 galaxies from the mpa - jhu galspec catalog , which we use to measure specific sn rates as a function of the central oxygen abundances of the galaxies . we detail the selection criteria for each of the subsamples in appendix  [ appendix : samples ] . in appendix [ appendix : consistency ] , we show that the rates measured with each sample are mutually consistent . the numbers of galaxies and sne in each subsample are summarized in table  [ table : sample_general ] and the properties of the galaxies in the entire loss sample are given in table  [ table : gal_prop ] . cc   &   +    before delving into correlations between sn rates and galaxy properties , we use this section to present several updates and extensions to the original loss papers . figures 3 and 4 of l11 show measurements of specific sn rates as a function of galaxy stellar mass in galaxies of different hubble types . however , in these figures , the rates for each type are scaled to match the rates as measured in sbc galaxies . this means that the scatter of the rates in different galaxy types is not visible in the figures ( though it can be reconstructed to some degree from the parameters of the fits to the original , unscaled measurements , which appear in table 4 of l11 ) , and the rate - mass correlation appears tighter than it really is . in figure [ fig : rates_all ] , we show similar measurements , but do not scale them , so that their spread is apparent . in the sn ii rates , where the scatter is largest , there is a clear progression from late - type ( i.e. , younger and less massive ) galaxies , where the rates are highest , to early - type ( older , more massive ) galaxies . in the se sn and sn ia rates , where the scatter is smaller , this trend is not as clear . we publish our newly calculated loss rates in table  [ table : rates ] . l11 fit power laws to their rates and published the fits in their table 4 . they did not , however , publish the measurements themselves . our rates are not identical to those measured by l11 , as we use the entire full - optimal subset of galaxies , after filling in missing masses ( see appendix  [ appendix : samples ] ) , but leave out the 14 sne without spectroscopic classifications ( see section  [ sec : galaxies ] , above ) . however , the differences between the loss sample used here and the one used by l11 are minor and have little effect on the resultant rates .    l11 divided their sne into bins so that each rate bin contained roughly the same number of sne ( `` sn - fixed '' bins ) . this is a common practice in studies where the sn sample sizes are either small to begin with , or reduced owing to binning ( in this case , by binning the host galaxies according to hubble type ) ; we will follow this binning scheme in the following sections . once the sample size is increased , though , other binning schemes become available , such as using bins of constant stellar mass ( `` mass - fixed '' bins ) . it then becomes necessary to formulate an objective , data - driven method to determine the binning scheme that will extract the most information out of the sample . to better trace the correlation between the sn rates and stellar mass , we use a sliding mass bin of constant width . the size of this bin depends on the size of the sn sample and is determined by knuth s rule @xcite , with the added constraint that the bin width not exceed 1 dex of @xmath2 . in each iteration , the bin either gains or loses the nearest sn to its current borders , such that in some iterations , losing one sn on one end may lead to a gain of several sne on the other . in each bin @xmath6 , the specific sn rate , @xmath7 , is measured according to @xmath8 where @xmath9 is the number of sne in the bin , @xmath10 is the stellar mass of the @xmath11-th galaxy in the bin , and @xmath12 is the control ( or visibility ) time of the @xmath11-th galaxy  i.e . , the time during which a given sn type could have been detected by loss during the survey . these control times take into account the detection efficiency of the survey , as well as our broad knowledge of sn characteristics ( i.e. , light curve shapes and luminosity functions ) . we use the original loss control times as computed by l11 ( see also @xcite and @xcite ; see section  [ subsec : rates_mass ] for a discussion of how the inclusion of sne iib in the sn ii control times may affect the rates measured here).these control times were not included in tables 2 and 4 of @xcite , which laid out most of the properties of the loss galaxy and sn samples . in order for our work to be reproducible , and for others to continue to explore the loss sample , we publish the control times in table  [ table : sample_general ] . as can be seen in figure  [ fig : rates_all ] , the sliding - bin rates diverge wildly at the edges of the mass range in each panel . as the number of galaxies that go into the denominator in equation  [ eq : rate ] grows smaller ( as shown in the stellar mass histograms in the bottom panels ) , and the number of sne decreases , the poisson noise dominates , and the rate eventually diverges . this problem also affects rates measured with sn - fixed or mass - fixed bins ( as shown in figure  [ fig : all_samples ] ) , but is usually not as apparent . the sliding - bin rates are useful for visual recognition of possibly interesting features , such as the break and rate ratio discussed in section  [ subsec : rates_mass ] , below . however , they are not independent measurements and so can not be used for curve fitting . thus , throughout this work , we use sn - fixed bins for fitting purposes . the number of bins for each fit is chosen to maximize the number of sne in each bin while also revealing as much structure in the rates . we repeat each fit with a different number of bins to make sure that the results do not change appreciably . all rates in this paper are presented in units of @xmath13 , which are abbreviated to `` snum '' ( i.e. , sn rate per unit mass ) . in all the sn rate figures presented here , vertical error bars are 68% poisson uncertainties , while horizontal error bars denote the 16th and 84th percentiles of the distribution of galaxies within each bin .    [ cols="^,^ " , ] in this work , we measure specific sn rates using the loss `` full - optimal '' sample and two subsamples of this sample , labeled `` ssfr '' and `` metallicity , '' which are described in section  [ sec : galaxies ] . as one chooses progressively smaller subsamples of a given sample , there arises the possibility that any resulting measurements from those subsamples would be biased , relative to measurements performed with the main sample . to test for any such biases , and whether the sliding - bin rates are a good representation of the rates , figure  [ fig : all_samples ] shows the rates for each sn type as measured from the different subsamples and with various binning schemes . `` sn - fixed '' bins are chosen so that they contain roughly the same number of sne in each bin while `` mass - fixed '' bins contain roughly the same amount of stellar mass , in log scale . finally , we also show the rates in fixed bins of varying width , as calculated with the astroml @xcite realization of the @xcite bayesian blocks algorithm . the various binning schemes produce measurements that generally agree with each other , except at the lower end of the mass range , where the small number of galaxies and sne can cause relatively large fluctuations in the rates . it is also clear that the rates as measured with a sliding bin are a good representation of the data . moreover , the rates measured with the ssfr subsample are consistent with those measured with the main loss sample . the rates measured from the metallicity subsample , however , are markedly higher in the largest - mass bin for both sne ii and se sne ; no such bias is noticeable for the sn ia rates . we ascribe this bias to the small size of the metallicity subsample ( @xmath14% of the main loss sample ) . this bias means that a larger sample is required to test the validity of the correlations between the sn rates and metallicity shown in figure  [ fig : rates_oh ] . the connection between these correlations and the galaxy scaling relations between metallicity and stellar mass , however , should not be affected by this bias , as in this work we measure the latter scaling relation directly from the galaxies and sn hosts in the metallicity subsample . the likelihood ratio test is used to compare the goodness - of - fit of nested models , such as polynomials of increasing order . in this work , we use the likelihood ratio test to compare between zeroth- , first- , and second - order polynomials as fits to various datasets . the likelihood ratio ( @xmath15 ) is simply the ratio of the likelihoods ( @xmath16 ) of the data ( @xmath17 ) given the best - fitting parameters of each type of fit , @xmath18 for the null hypothesis ( the lower - order polynomial ) and @xmath19 for the model being tested : @xmath20 the likelihood ratio is distributed as a @xmath21 distribution , with the number of degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the degrees of freedom of the models tested ( one or two in our case ) . @xmath22 , so that through the likelihood ratio we can obtain a @xmath23-value for the significance of the rejection of the null hypothesis . these @xmath23-values can then be translated into gaussian standard deviations , so that here we report the significance of the tests in multiples of @xmath24 , with @xmath25 as the minimal significance for a `` discovery . ''    when fitting the sn rates , the likelihood function is simply that of the poisson probability density function ( pdf ) , as the uncertainties of the rates are dominated by the sizes of the sn samples . the likelihood function is then @xmath26 where @xmath27 is the number of bins in which the rates are measured , @xmath28 is the observed number of sne , and @xmath29 is the number of sne resulting from the best fit to the rates .    the likelihood function of the rate - ratio measurements shown in figure  [ fig : rate_ratio ] is more complicated . formally , it should be the ratio ( @xmath30 ) of the poisson pdfs of the se sne , @xmath31 , and sne ii , @xmath32 , in each bin . however , as @xcite notes , if @xmath33 , the denominator vanishes , and @xmath15 is undefined . @xcite uses a truncated version of @xmath32 , so that @xmath34=1 $ ] , to solve this problem , but the resultant pdf of @xmath30 is hard to compute . however , for sufficiently large values of @xmath35 and @xmath36 , the poisson pdfs will approach the gaussian pdfs @xmath37 and @xmath38 , with means @xmath39 and @xmath40 , and standard deviations @xmath41 and @xmath42 . @xcite calculated the ratio of normal pdfs . for gaussian functions , @xcite have shown that given that @xmath17 and @xmath43 are uncorrelated , and that the coefficients of variation satisfy @xmath44 and @xmath45 , the ratio @xmath30 can be transformed via the geary - hinkley transformation into @xmath46 and the pdf of @xmath47 will then be a normal distribution with @xmath48 and @xmath49 . for @xmath37 and @xmath38 , the conditions on the coefficients are satisfied for @xmath50 and @xmath51 . the latter conditions are satisifed for all binning methods of the rate ratio . however , owing to the small sn samples , the basic condition for the approximations described above  that the numbers of sne are large enough that their poisson pdfs approach gaussian ones  is clearly not satisifed . to alleviate this problem , when fitting the polynomials to the measurements , we take the upper uncertainty ( which , for a poisson distribution , is always larger than the lower uncertainty ) of each measurement as the overall uncertainty .                                                                      , a.  v. , li , w.  d. , treffers , r.  r. , & modjaz , m. 2001 , in astronomical society of the pacific conference series , vol . 246 , iau colloq . 183 : small telescope astronomy on global scales , ed . b.  paczynski , w .- p . chen , & c.  lemme , 121                                                                                , w.  d. , filippenko , a.  v. , treffers , r.  r. , et  al . 2000 , in american institute of physics conference series , vol . 522 , american institute of physics conference series , ed . s.  s. holt & w.  w. zhang , 103106                                                                                lccccccccccccbcccccccccccc ugca_017 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 8.222 & 7.817 & 7.799 & 0.2599 & 1.4566 & 1.0383 & 25.78 & sc & 21.5601 & -6.0942 & & & & & & & & & & + ugca_024 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 9.772 & 9.534 & 9.599 & 0 & 0.1499 & 0 & 17.44 & scd & 31.1308 & -6.1989 & & & & & & & & & & + ugc_03825 & 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 & 6.776 & 2.215 & 4.993 & 10.0454 & 3.3206 & 15.1121 & 115.29 & sbc & 110.8882 & 41.4350 & 1864 & 53313 & 171 & 0.0276 & 6.7895 & 0.1012 & 0.0137 & & 4.3351 & 0.2624 + ugc_03944 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 8.730 & 7.540 & 6.696 & 0.9475 & 1.2143 & 2.2752 & 55.03 & scd & 114.6521 & 37.6335 & 431 & 51877 & 34 & 0.0130 & 0.8508 & 0.4333 & 0.4667 & 9.0732 & 0.6577 & 0.7980 + ugc_04226 & 1 & 0 & 1 & 0 & 6.624 & 4.436 & 3.355 & 5.3292 & 2.4379 & 8.9522 & 110.23 & scd & 121.8392 & 40.3983 & 545 & 52202 & 111 & 0.0264 & 4.4377 & 0.0777 & 0.0161 & & 4.4055 & 0.0253 + columns : + @xmath52galaxy name . + @xmath53whether galaxy belongs to the loss `` full - optimal '' subsample used to measure sn rates here and by l11 ( 1 = yes , 0 = no ) . + @xmath54number of sne  ia , se  sne , and sne  ii ( respectively ) discovered in each galaxy . + @xmath55sn control time for sne  ia , se  sne , and sne  ii ( respectively ) . + @xmath56galaxy stellar mass measured by l11 from the @xmath57- and @xmath58-band luminosities . + @xmath59@xmath57- and @xmath58-band luminosities ( respectively ) . + @xmath60distance to galaxy . + @xmath61hubble type of galaxy , according to the system adopted by @xcite . + @xmath62right ascension and declination ( respectively ) of galaxy , in decimal units . + @xmath63sdss plate , modified julian date ( mjd ) , and fiber identifier ( respectively ) . + @xmath64galaxy redshift , measured from the sdss spectrum . + @xmath65galaxy stellar mass , sfr , ssfr , and oxgen abundance ( respectively ) measured by the sdss mpa - jhu galspec pipeline . + @xmath66galaxy stellar mass and ssfr ( respectively ) measured from nsa petrosian and sersic photometry . +    lccccccccccccc + e & 6.1^+4.4_-5.0 & 0.092^+0.042_-0.030 & 9 & 14.1^+2.3_-1.6 & 0.095^+0.047_-0.033 & 8 & 21.1^+2.6_-2.3 & 0.086^+0.040_-0.028 & 9 & 33.4^+15.4_-6.3 & 0.034^+0.016_-0.011 & 9 & 35 + s0 & 2.2^+1.8_-1.7 & 0.177^+0.061_-0.047 & 14 & 7.0^+2.2_-1.7 & 0.073^+0.025_-0.019 & 14 & 13.6^+3.7_-2.1 & 0.052^+0.018_-0.014 & 14 & 26.5^+10.9_-5.1 & 0.051^+0.018_-0.014 & 14 & 56 + sab & 1.6^+1.2_-1.2 & 0.253^+0.102_-0.075 & 11 & 4.4^+0.5_-0.7 & 0.188^+0.080_-0.058 & 10 & 7.5^+2.4_-1.7 & 0.074^+0.030_-0.022 & 11 & 15.8^+6.4_-3.5 & 0.067^+0.027_-0.020 & 11 & 43 + sb & 1.2^+1.0_0.9 & 0.284^+0.108_-0.081 & 12 & 3.7^+0.8_-0.7 & 0.233^+0.084_-0.064 & 13 & 7.4^+2.6_-1.9 & 0.067^+0.025_-0.019 & 12 & 15.1^+5.9_-2.7 & 0.082^+0.030_-0.022 & 13 & 50 + sbc & 1.0^+1.1_-0.8 & 0.228^+0.104_-0.075 & 9 & 3.9^+0.8_-0.8 & 0.167^+0.076_-0.055 & 9 & 6.5^+1.2_-1.0 & 0.147^+0.067_-0.048 & 9 & 11.3^+6.4_-2.2 & 0.078^+0.035_-0.025 & 9 & 36 + sc & 0.7^+0.9_-0.5 & 0.237^+0.117_-0.082 & 8 & 3.1^+0.9_-0.7 & 0.194^+0.096_-0.067 & 8 & 6.0^+1.2_-1.0 & 0.176^+0.087_-0.061 & 8 & 11.3^+6.5_-2.7 & 0.103^+0.051_-0.036 & 8 & 32 + scd & 0.1^+0.3_-0.1 & 0.217^+0.211_-0.118 & 3 & 1.2^+0.4_-0.3 & 0.406^+0.200_-0.141 & 8 & 2.9^+1.3_-0.8 & 0.111^+0.075_-0.048 & 5 & 9.1^+6.1_-2.5 & 0.128^+0.076_-0.051 & 6 & 22 + e  scd & 0.9^+1.4_-0.8 & 0.236^+0.032_-0.029 & 68 & 4.7^+1.3_-1.0 & 0.140^+0.019_-0.017 & 69 & 9.3^+2.5_-1.9 & 0.086^+0.012_-0.011 & 67 & 19.5^+11.4_-5.0 & 0.056^+0.008_-0.007 & 70 + all galaxies & 0.8^+1.4_-0.7 & 0.231^+0.032_-0.028 & 68 & 4.6^+1.3_-1.0 & 0.139^+0.019_-0.017 & 69 & 9.3^+2.5_-1.9 & 0.085^+0.012_-0.010 & 67 & 19.5^+11.4_-5.0 & 0.056^+0.008_-0.007 & 70 + passive & 5.5^+2.9_-3.4 & 0.069^+0.037_-0.025 & 7 & 11.6^+1.4_-1.0 & 0.119^+0.058_-0.041 & 8 & 19.6^+6.7_-4.2 & 0.043^+0.023_-0.016 & 7 & & & 22 + star forming & 0.3^+0.7_-0.2 & 0.704^+0.224_-0.174 & 16 & 2.7^+1.1_-0.9 & 0.215^+0.071_-0.055 & 15 & 7.4^+5.3_-2.3 & 0.085^+0.027_-0.021 & 16 & & & 47 +   + e & 1.2^+1.6_-1.1 & 0.132^+0.304_-0.109 & 1 & 8.8^+2.8_-3.4 & 0.000^+0.031_-0.000 & 0 & 21.7^+11.0_-6.9 & 0.007^+0.015_-0.006 & 1 & 55.6^+21.0_-7.3 & 0.040^+0.093_-0.033 & 1 & 3 + s0 & 2.9^+2.1_-2.2 & 0.010^+0.024_-0.009 & 1 & 7.4^+0.9_-0.9 & 0.018^+0.042_-0.015 & 1 & 9.2^+0.3_-0.3 & 0.075^+0.172_-0.062 & 1 & 15.8^+10.8_-4.5 & 0.004^+0.010_-0.004 & 1 & 4 + sab & 0.8^+0.8_-0.5 & 0.403^+0.319_-0.193 & 4 & 2.7^+0.5_-0.5 & 0.292^+0.197_-0.126 & 5 & 4.5^+0.6_-0.7 & 0.122^+0.097_-0.059 & 4 & 9.3^+7.3_-2.8 & 0.041^+0.028_-0.018 & 5 & 18 + sb & 0.6^+0.5_-0.5 & 0.625^+0.423_-0.270 & 5 & 1.9^+0.2_-0.2 & 0.558^+0.378_-0.241 & 5 & 4.1^+1.5_-1.3 & 0.106^+0.072_-0.046 & 5 & 10.4^+5.5_-2.8 & 0.056^+0.038_-0.024 & 5 & 20 + sbc & 0.7^+0.7_-0.5 & 0.487^+0.329_-0.210 & 5 & 3.3^+1.4_-1.2 & 0.128^+0.087_-0.055 & 5 & 6.6^+0.6_-0.7 & 0.358^+0.214_-0.142 & 6 & 10.7^+6.2_-2.5 & 0.120^+0.081_-0.052 & 5 & 21 + sc & 0.5^+0.6_-0.3 & 0.511^+0.275_-0.188 & 7 & 2.3^+0.9_-0.6 & 0.255^+0.126_-0.088 & 8 & 4.8^+1.2_-0.9 & 0.241^+0.130_-0.089 & 7 & 9.4^+5.4_-2.1 & 0.159^+0.078_-0.055 & 8 & 30 + scd & 0.2^+0.5_-0.2 & 0.225^+0.178_-0.108 & 4 & 1.4^+0.2_-0.2 & 0.538^+0.426_-0.258 & 4 & 2.3^+0.6_-0.5 & 0.295^+0.199_-0.127 & 5 & 5.2^+5.7_-1.7 & 0.091^+0.072_-0.043 & 4 & 17 + irr & 0.1^+0.1_-0.0 & 1.494^+3.435_-1.236 & 1 & 0.2^+0.0_-0.0 & 0.000^+25.3_-0.000 & 0 & 0.4^+1.1_-0.2 & 0.357^+0.820_-0.295 & 1 & 5.3^+8.8_-2.4 & 0.066^+0.152_-0.055 & 1 & 3 + sab  scd & 0.4^+0.7_-0.3 & 0.402^+0.098_-0.080 & 25 & 2.3^+0.7_-0.6 & 0.261^+0.059_-0.049 & 28 & 4.7^+1.1_-0.9 & 0.151^+0.037_-0.030 & 25 & 10.2^+6.3_-2.7 & 0.088^+0.020_-0.017 & 28 + all galaxies & 0.4^+0.7_-0.3 & 0.377^+0.086_-0.071 & 28 & 2.4^+0.7_-0.6 & 0.203^+0.044_-0.037 & 30 & 4.9^+1.2_-0.9 & 0.112^+0.025_-0.021 & 29 & 12.1^+10.2_-4.0 & 0.035^+0.008_-0.007 & 29 +   + s0 & 1.8^+1.4_-1.4 & 0.016^+0.037_-0.013 & 1 & 4.0^+0.0_0.0 & 0.985^+1.299_-0.636 & 2 & 5.2^+1.0_-0.8 & 0.020^+0.026_-0.013 & 2 & 12.9^+10.8_-4.5 & 0.004^+0.005_-0.002 & 2 & 7 + sab & 0.9^+0.8_-0.6 & 0.645^+0.259_-0.192 & 11 & 3.6^+1.1_-1.0 & 0.126^+0.054_-0.039 & 10 & 7.3^+1.9_-1.4 & 0.098^+0.039_-0.029 & 11 & 14.4^+6.9_-3.0 & 0.075^+0.030_-0.022 & 11 & 43 + sb & 1.4^+1.2_-1.1 & 0.303^+0.105_-0.080 & 14 & 4.4^+0.9_-0.8 & 0.223^+0.081_-0.061 & 13 & 8.0^+1.7_-1.7 & 0.146^+0.050_-0.039 & 14 & 14.0^+6.2_-2.1 & 0.123^+0.042_-0.032 & 14 & 55 + sbc & 0.7^+0.6_-0.5 & 1.317^+0.365_-0.292 & 20 & 2.7^+0.9_-0.7 & 0.451^+0.129_-0.103 & 19 & 5.1^+1.2_-0.8 & 0.382^+0.106_-0.085 & 20 & 10.2^+5.7_-2.5 & 0.204^+0.057_-0.045 & 20 & 79 + sc & 0.4^+0.5_-0.3 & 2.096^+0.642_-0.503 & 17 & 1.5^+0.3_-0.3 & 1.241^+0.380_-0.298 & 17 & 3.5^+1.8_-1.2 & 0.419^+0.124_-0.098 & 18 & 9.3^+5.5_-2.1 & 0.403^+0.123_-0.097 & 17 & 69 + scd & 0.1^+0.2_-0.1 & 2.256^+0.717_-0.558 & 16 & 0.7^+0.3_-0.2 & 1.442^+0.458_-0.357 & 16 & 1.7^+0.5_-0.3 & 1.194^+0.365_-0.287 & 17 & 4.1^+5.0_-1.2 & 0.355^+0.113_-0.088 & 16 & 65 + irr & 0.0^+0.0_-0.0 & 1.416^+3.255_-1.171 & 1 & 0.4^+1.1_-0.2 & 0.725^+0.956_-0.468 & 2 & 3.3^+0.8_-1.0 & 0.316^+0.727_-0.262 & 1 & 8.8^+7.3_-2.0 & 0.194^+0.256_-0.126 & 2 & 6 + sab  scd & 0.3^+0.5_-0.2 & 1.52^+0.19_-0.17 & 78 & 2.0^+0.7_-0.6 & 0.547^+0.070_-0.062 & 77 & 4.6^+1.4_-1.1 & 0.253^+0.032_-0.029 & 78 & 10.7^+6.3_-2.8 & 0.139^+0.018_-0.016 & 78 + all galaxies & 0.3^+0.5_-0.2 & 1.33^+0.16_-0.15 & 81 & 2.0^+0.7_-0.6 & 0.426^+0.053_-0.047 & 81 & 4.7^+1.4_-1.1 & 0.175^+0.022_-0.019 & 81 & 12.2^+10.2_-4.0 & 0.052^+0.006_-0.006 & 81 +    cccc|cccc|cccc & & +   + 0.035^+0.016_-0.013 & 2.2^+5.1_-1.8 & 1 & 171 & 0.011^+0.007_-0.007 & 8.0^+18.5_-6.7 & 1 & 166 & 0.015^+0.011_-0.007 & 4.2^+9.8_-3.5 & 1 & 189 + 0.084^+0.036_-0.030 & 0.4^+0.3_-0.9 & 1 & 454 & 0.075^+0.045_-0.049 & 0.4^+0.9_-0.3 & 1 & 592 & 0.09^+0.07_-0.04 & 0.3^+0.6_-0.2 & 1 & 623 + 0.09^+0.04_-0.03 & 1.1^+1.1_-0.6 & 3 & 456 & 0.08^+0.07_-0.05 & 0.9^+0.8_-0.5 & 3 & 670 & 0.14^+0.11_-0.06 & 1.2^+0.6_-0.4 & 8 & 728 + 0.10^+0.06_-0.03 & 0.9^+0.8_-0.5 & 3 & 483 & 0.10^+0.10_-0.05 & 0.6^+0.6_-0.3 & 3 & 784 & 0.15^+0.11_-0.07 & 2.5^+0.8_-0.6 & 17 & 727 + 0.14^+0.07_-0.05 & 0.9^+0.7_-0.4 & 4 & 478 & 0.11^+0.11_-0.06 & 0.7^+0.5_-0.3 & 4 & 865 & 0.15^+0.11_-0.07 & 2.4^+0.8_-0.6 & 16 & 713 + & & & & & & & & & & & + & & & & & & & & & & & +   + 0.035^+0.051_-0.022 & 2.7^+6.2_-2.2 & 1 & 143 & 0.012^+0.018_-0.006 & 13.7^+31.5_-11.3 & 1 & 90 & 0.02^+0.03_-0.01 & 6.9^+15.9_-5.7 & 1 & 108 + 0.09^+0.12_-0.05 & 0.5^+1.1_-0.4 & 1 & 374 & 0.050^+0.071_-0.026 & 1.6^+3.8_-1.4 & 1 & 208 & 0.09^+0.13_-0.05 & 0.5^+1.2_-0.4 & 1 & 372 + 0.09^+0.13_-0.06 & 1.3^+1.3_-0.7 & 3 & 379 & 0.08^+0.12_-0.04 & 1.2^+1.5_-0.7 & 2 & 373 & 0.10^+0.15_-0.06 & 2.3^+1.4_-0.9 & 6 & 402 + 0.10^+0.16_-0.07 & 1.0^+1.0_-0.5 & 3 & 416 & 0.2^+0.3_-0.1 & 0.3^+0.4_-0.2 & 2 & 601 & 0.13^+0.20_-0.08 & 1.7^+1.0_-0.7 & 6 & 435 + 0.14^+0.21_-0.09 & 1.0^+0.8_-0.5 & 4 & 430 & 0.3^+0.5_0.2 & 0.2^+0.2_-0.1 & 3 & 744 & 0.13^+0.21_-0.08 & 2.3^+1.1_-0.8 & 8 & 433 + & & & & & & & & & & & + & & & & & & & & & & & + columns : + @xmath67stellar mass of the galaxies in the bin . error bars represent the upper and lower limits of the bin . + @xmath68specific sn rate . error bars are 68% poisson uncertainties stemming from the number of sne in each bin . + @xmath69number of sne in the given bin . + @xmath70number of galaxies in the given bin . +    cccc 0.32^+0.12_-0.09 & 0.13^+0.09_-0.08 & 3 & 26 + 0.84^+0.28_-0.23 & 0.35^+0.11_-0.11 & 14 & 47 + 2.1^+0.7_-0.6 & 0.59^+0.13_-0.11 & 34 & 77 + 5.1^+1.8_-1.3 & 0.64^+0.14_-0.11 & 38 & 93 + 12^+4_-3 & 0.64^+0.15_-0.15 & 20 & 58 +    cccccccccc & 8.83^+0.17_-0.24 & 0.55^+0.29_-0.20 & 7 & -12.16^+0.19_-0.25 & 0.087^+0.028_-0.022 & 16 & -1.16^+0.29_-0.42 & 0.118^+0.032_-0.026 & 21 + & 9.113^+0.036_-0.042 & 0.20^+0.10_-0.07 & 8 & -11.20^+0.49_-0.46 & 0.073^+0.023_-0.018 & 16 & -0.23^+0.27_-0.34 & 0.100^+0.026_-0.021 & 22 + & 9.224^+0.050_-0.045 & 0.30^+0.16_-0.11 & 7 & -10.33^+0.12_-0.14 & 0.16^+0.05_-0.04 & 17 & 0.34^+0.25_-0.14 & 0.135^+0.035_-0.029 & 22 + & & & & -9.80^+0.38_-0.25 & 0.31^+0.10_-0.08 & 16 & + & 8.80^+0.16_-0.22 & 0.76^+0.60_-0.37 & 4 & -11.84^+0.57_-0.45 & 0.008^+0.019_-0.007 & 1 & -0.68^+0.45_-0.64 & 0.045^+0.027_-0.018 & 6 + & 9.088^+0.038_-0.042 & 0.26^+0.21_-0.12 & 4 & -10.43^+0.17_-0.30 & 0.09^+0.03_-0.05 & 6 & 0.11^+0.13_-0.13 & 0.13^+0.08_-0.05 & 6 + & 9.174^+0.075_-0.025 & 0.24^+0.19_-0.12 & 4 & -10.08^+0.09_-0.07 & 0.28^+0.19_-0.12 & 5 & 0.45^+0.21_-0.12 & 0.13^+0.08_-0.05 & 6 + & & & & -9.67^+0.32_-0.20 & 0.35^+0.21_-0.14 & 6 & + & 8.72^+0.15_-0.18 & 3.4^+1.3_-1.0 & 12 & -11.84^+0.57_-0.45 & 0.033^+0.015_-0.011 & 9 & -0.78^+0.40_-0.59 & 0.08^+0.02_-0.02 & 20 + & 9.010^+0.041_-0.048 & 1.39^+0.53_-0.39 & 12 & -11.51^+0.15_-0.28 & 0.17^+0.05_-0.04 & 17 & -0.05^+0.11_-0.11 & 0.30^+0.09_-0.07 & 19 + & 9.110^+0.020_-0.031 & 0.70^+0.25_-0.19 & 13 & -10.20^+0.06_-0.08 & 0.56^+0.17_-0.13 & 18 & 0.22^+0.09_-0.08 & 0.35^+0.10_-0.08 & 20 + & 9.181^+0.069_-0.031 & 0.43^+0.17_-0.12 & 12 & -9.95^+0.10_-0.11 & 0.92^+0.28_-0.22 & 17 & 0.51^+0.22_-0.11 & 0.32^+0.09_-0.07 & 20 + & & & & -9.55^+0.34_-0.17 & 1.35^+0.40_-0.31 & 18 & +    cccccc ( r_ia / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.44 0.06 & 3.8 0.6 & 2.7/2 & > 5 + log(r_ia / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.43 0.08 & 3.7 0.8 & 3.9/2 & > 5 + log(r_ia / snum ) & log(ssfr / yr^-1 ) & 0.23 0.08 & 1.7 0.8 & 3.2/2 & > 3 + log(r_ia / snum ) & 12+log(o / h ) & -1.3 0.7 & 11 7 & 1.0/1 & > 1 + ( r_se / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.64 0.09 & 5.8 0.9 & 7.3/2 & > 4 + log(r_se / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.46 0.10 & 4.1 1.0 & 2.1/2 & > 4 + log(r_se / snum ) & log(ssfr / yr^-1 ) & 0.8 0.5 & 7.0 4.8 & 0.5/1 & > 5 + log(r_se / snum ) & 12+log(o / h ) & -1.5 1.0 & 13 9 & 10 ^ -5/1 & > 1 + ( r_ii / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.84 0.05 & 8.2 0.5 & 21/4 & > 4 + log(r_ii / snum ) & log(m_/m _ ) & -0.68 0.05 & 6.6 0.5 & 5.6/4 & > 4 + log(r_ii / snum ) & log(ssfr / yr^-1 ) & 0.9 0.2 & 8.8 1.9 & 2.7/2 & > 5 + log(r_ii / snum ) & 12+log(o / h ) & -1.73 0.45 & 16 4 & 0.6/2 & > 5 + ( m _ ) & 12+log(o / h ) & 2.5 & -12.6 & & + log(m_,ia ) & 12+log(o / h ) & 2.31 0.13 & -10.8 1.2 & 481/24 & + log(m_,se ) & 12+log(o / h ) & 3.39 0.11 & -20.4 1.2 & 16/10 & + log(m_,ii ) & 12+log(o / h ) & 3.33 0.08 & -20.1 0.7 & 321/45 & +
Abstract:

Answer: most types of supernovae ( sne ) have yet to be connected with their progenitor stellar systems . here , we re - analyze the ten - year 19982008 sn sample collected by the lick observatory supernova search ( loss ) in order to constrain the progenitors of sne ia and stripped - envelope sne ( se  sne ; i.e. , sne  iib , ib , ic , and broad - lined ic ) . we matched the loss galaxy sample with spectroscopy from the sloan digital sky survey and measured sn rates as a function of galaxy stellar mass , specific star - formation rate ( ssfr ) , and oxygen abundance ( metallicity ) . we find significant correlations between the sn rates and all three galaxy properties . the sn ia correlations are consistent with other measurements , as well as with our previous explanation of these measurements in the form of a combination of the sn  ia delay - time distribution and the correlation between galaxy mass and age . intriguingly , we measure a deficiency in the se  sn rates , relative to the sn ii rates , in galaxies with low stellar masses , high ssfr values , and low metallicities . using well - known galaxy scaling relations , any correlation between the rates and one of the galaxy properties examined here can be expressed as a correlation with the other two . these redundant correlations preclude us from establishing causality , i.e. , from ascertaining which of the galaxy properties ( or their combination ) is the physical driver for the difference between the se  sn and sn  ii rates .