Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: blind surveys for optical transients have revealed a class of super - luminous supernovae ( sl ) sne that may in some cases be powered by a collision between the sn ejecta and a massive shell or wind of circumstellar material ( csm )  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? examples include sn 2003ma  @xcite , 2006gy  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , and 2008es  @xcite , among others . as a consequence of the collision with the csm , a significant fraction of the kinetic energy is converted into radiation via shock dissipation , which is responsible for the observed emission ( see figure 1 ) . the rate of slsne with absolute magnitude @xmath1 is order of @xmath2 , @xmath3% of the normal core - collapse sn rate  @xcite , but some normal - luminosity sne such as sn 2005ip  @xcite , 2006jc  @xcite , 2008iy  @xcite and ptf 09uj  @xcite , which may also be powered by ejecta - csm interactions , are more common  @xcite . finally , recent observations of sn 2009ip and 2010mc suggest that the csm eruption is timed to occur months - to - years before the core collapse  @xcite .    interaction - powered sne may be efficient cosmic - ray ( cr ) accelerators , where one can expect that the diffusive shock acceleration mechanism operates at the forward and reverse shocks by a collision between the sn ejecta and csm . for a range of csm parameters ( mass and shock dissipation radius ) , the shock is radiation - mediated  the thomson optical depth is larger than @xmath4  @xcite , where @xmath5 is the shock velocity  and efficient cr acceleration is not expected because the cr collisionless mean free path is much shorter than the deceleration length . however , as the shock propagates in the csm , photons can stream out ahead of the shock , and photon energy can no longer support the shock ( i.e. , shock breakout ) . after the breakout , for wind - like csm profiles , the shock will become collisonless and cr acceleration can be efficient  @xcite . recently , murase et al . ( 2011 ) considered a collision between the sn ejecta with a csm shell and found that cr protons may be accelerated , and furthermore that the protons may experience strong pionic losses via inelastic @xmath0 collisions , producing gamma - rays and neutrinos . thus , interaction - powered sne may be interesting cr accelerators and high - energy / multi - messenger emitters . in this work , we continue our study of the possibility of the non - thermal emission from the shock interaction of a sn embedded in a dense csm . in particular , we focus on the secondary electrons and positrons expected from the same @xmath0 collisions that give rise to neutrinos and gamma rays . importantly , we show that these secondaries can emit detectable synchrotron radiation at high - frequency radio wavelengths including mm / submm and fir bands .    in section 2 , we review the shock physics and the potential for cr acceleration in interaction - powered sne , providing a much more detailed discussion than murase et al . section 3 gives a brief discussion of the high - energy emission expected , and recipes that connect the observed optical emission to the non - thermal signatures are provided in appendix a. in section 4 we discuss high - frequency radio diagnostics . for a range of csm parameters , we show that secondary leptons from @xmath0 interactions should radiate synchrotron at @xmath6 , and with fluxes of @xmath7  mjy at distances of hundreds of mpc . in section 5 , we summarize our results .    throughout this work , we use the notation @xmath8 in cgs unit unless we give notice . in this preparatory section , before we discuss non - thermal signatures , we explain the picture of interaction - powered sne and describe the basic physical setup . let us consider sn ejecta with the kinetic energy @xmath9 and the velocity @xmath10 . noting @xmath11 for the ejecta mass @xmath12 , the momentum and energy conservation laws give @xmath13 where @xmath14 is the total csm mass and @xmath15 is the csm velocity . the total dissipated energy @xmath16 is written as @xmath17 where @xmath18 is used in the last equality . the above equation suggests that a significant fraction of @xmath9 can be dissipated if the csm mass is large  ( see also , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? density profiles of both the ejecta and csm are important for detailed predictions . for example , when the density profile of the ejecta is steep enough and most of its energy is carried by lower - velocity ejecta material , the explosion has driven waves that can be described by chevalier - nadezhin self - similar solutions  @xcite . when the shock wave sweeps up ambient mass comparable to @xmath12 and it is non - radiative , we expect blast waves that can be described by sedov - taylor - like self - similar solutions  ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . in this work , to push the basic idea and avoid uncertainty in the ejecta profile and many other complications due to radiation processes , we discuss non - thermal properties without relying on such details . our treatment still provides an order of magnitude estimate of expected non - thermal signals , and a more detailed study will be presented in an accompanying paper  @xcite . hereafter , we assume that the csm has a wind - like power - law density profile and extends to the edge radius of the wind , @xmath19 . we expect that this is reasonable  ( see , e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , although details are uncertain due to poor understandings of the csm eruption mechanism . then , the csm density is written as @xmath20 where @xmath21 should be expressed in cm , @xmath22  cm , and @xmath23 is defined   that is different from ours . ] for the mass - loss rate of @xmath24 and the wind velocity of @xmath25 . this can also be expressed by @xmath26 the csm mass within @xmath21 is estimated to be @xmath27 where @xmath28 is the csm inner edge radius . in particular , in the wind case ( @xmath29 ) , we have @xmath30 where we have used @xmath31 and @xmath32 . note that , in the one - zone model where the calculation is performed for a csm density @xmath33 at a given radius @xmath21 , qualitative pictures for different density profiles are simply obtained by using @xmath14 instead of @xmath34 ( although the dynamics and temporal evolution depend on density profiles ) . the deceleration is significant after the ejecta accumulates the csm mass equivalent to its own mass , whose radius is characterized by @xmath35 if @xmath36 , most of the ejecta energy is dissipated by the ejecta - csm collision . one of the important quantities is the thomson optical depth . using the csm electron density , @xmath37 the thomson optical depth is estimated to be @xmath38 for @xmath39 , where @xmath40 is the thomson cross section . the thomson optical depth in the downstream is also @xmath41 although the density in the thin , interacting shell is compressed by the shock compression ratio . as seen below , the emission is mostly observed when @xmath42 after photons can leave the system . however , while the interaction with a dense csm shell happens at @xmath43 , hard x rays and soft gamma rays produced at the shock can not avoid compton down - scattering and a significant fraction of the emission would be thermalized  @xcite . equal lines of various optical depths , csm density and luminosities in the ( @xmath21 , @xmath44 ) plane and ( @xmath21 , @xmath14 ) plane are shown in figures  2 and 3 , respectively . the equal csm density line , @xmath45 , is also overlaid . explanations for the optical depths other than the thomson optical depth are given below . as argued by murase et al . ( 2011 ) , efficient cr acceleration is possible at @xmath42 , and for @xmath46 we expect almost all the accelerated cr ions to produce neutrinos , hadronic gamma rays , and secondary electrons and positrons . in the system , hadronic gamma rays can interact with photons via the two - photon annihilation process and/or matter via the bethe - heitler ( bh ) pair - production process , respectively ( see section 3 ) . the attenuation of gev gamma rays due to the bh process is insignificant at @xmath47 , which is not far from @xmath48 .    in this work , we consider the forward shock , so the shock velocity @xmath5 is regarded as the forward shock velocity @xmath49 . the reverse shock power is smaller when the ejecta profile is steep  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? but this might not be the case if the profile is changed , e.g. , possibly by experiencing many interactions with many csm shells .    , @xmath44 ) plane . see the text for meanings of @xmath50 , @xmath51 , @xmath52 and @xmath53 . the shaded region suggests the range where we do not expect either production or escape of gamma rays . the thick curves represent @xmath54 while the thin curves do @xmath55 . with quadruplicate - dotted cures , lines of the constant csm density ( @xmath33=const . ) , constant post - breakout radiation luminosity ( @xmath56=const . ) , constant optically - thin free - free luminosity ( @xmath57=const . ) , and constant csm mass ( @xmath14=const . ) are also shown for comparison . ]    , @xmath14 ) plane , where @xmath14 has the solar - mass unit . lines of the constant csm density ( @xmath33=const . ) , constant post - breakout radiation luminosity ( @xmath56=const . ) , and constant optically - thin free - free luminosity ( @xmath57=const . ) are also shown for comparison . for explanations of specific sn examples , see sub - section 2.6 . ]      when a collision with csm occurs at @xmath58 , photons should experience many compton scatterings , and it takes time for them to leave the system . the photon diffusion time is roughly @xmath59 , which can further be approximated to be @xmath60 for the wind profile if @xmath61  ( c.f . * ; * ? ? ? photons can not essentially diffuse out from the system , when @xmath62 is longer than the dynamical timescale is @xmath63 . hence , when the collision begins at @xmath64 , we start to observe a significant fraction of the emissions in the rise time @xmath65 such that @xmath66  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? we define the breakout radius @xmath67 , where photons can essentially leave the system . when the effective diffusion radius @xmath68 is sufficiently smaller than @xmath19 ( for @xmath69 ) , we have @xmath70 , and the shock breakout radius can be written as @xmath71 . when the csm is so dense that @xmath68 is larger than @xmath19 , the rise time can be smaller than @xmath72 because @xmath73 at the breakout  @xcite . we expect that thermal radiation carries a significant fraction ( @xmath74 ) of the energy carried by the interacting shell ( @xmath75 ) , where the radiated energy  , @xmath76 is obtained in the mini - shell model  @xcite . see also ofek et al . ( 2014 ) . ] is @xmath77 and @xmath75 after the collision is roughly comparable to @xmath16 ( see equation  3 ) . noting @xmath78 , the ( bolometric ) radiation luminosity just after the breakout is @xmath79 the constant radiation luminosity line , @xmath80 ( with @xmath81 ) , is depicted in figures  2 and 3 . a more sophisticated model is given by chevalier & irwin ( 2011 ) , which is summarized in appendix a   and @xmath82  @xcite ] . the collision between the sn ejecta and the csm may start from the optically - thick regime . then , after the shock breakout , the interaction eventually enters the optically - thin regime . this regime typically comes after the time of @xmath83 when @xmath19 is large enough . hence , for optically slsne such as sn 2006gy , it usually happens only after the shock crosses @xmath84 . in order to expect optically - thin ejecta - csm interactions within @xmath19 , relatively large @xmath85 and/or low @xmath14 are needed . alternately , the collision may occur at @xmath42 if csm effectively has an inner edge and can be regarded as a shell . especially for optically - thin interactions at @xmath86 , hard x rays easily leave the system although ultraviolet photons and soft x rays may be attenuated due to bound - free absorption . indeed , such x - ray and radio emissions have been observed in some sne like sn 1988z  @xcite and 2006jd  @xcite . let us consider a csm extending to @xmath19 . for @xmath87 , the characteristic duration of emission is expected to be @xmath88 ( or @xmath89 ) . when the dominant loss process for thermal electrons is the free - free emission , the ( bolometric ) radiation luminosity mainly comes from bremsstrahlung emission . in the non - radiative case , we have  @xcite @xmath90 where @xmath91 is the gaunt factor , @xmath92 for hydrogen is used , and absorption is not considered yet  . here the compression factor @xmath93 is taken to be 4 but can be larger . the constant radiation luminosity line , @xmath94 , is depicted in figures  2 and 3 . when the shock is radiative , @xmath95 should be limited by the kinetic luminosity as in equation  ( 11 ) . it roughly occurs when the cooling time @xmath96 is shorter than time @xmath97 . note that @xmath57 is proportional to @xmath98 and @xmath99  k is assumed , otherwise cooling by line emissions becomes relevant  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) .      whether efficient cr acceleration occurs or not depends on the shock properties . when an ejecta - csm collision occurs at sufficiently small radii , the shock is initially radiation - mediated in the sense that the upstream shock structure is modified by radiation from the downstream . for non - relativistic shocks where effects of pairs are irrelevant , the shock is radiation - mediated when @xmath64  @xcite . when coupling with radiation is strong enough , electrons transfer their energy to photons . in the thermal equilibrium limit , at the far downstream , photons , electrons and protons have the temperature of @xmath100 where @xmath101 is used and @xmath102 is the gray - body factor . note that this emission does not have to be the observed emission since photons start to escape only after @xmath103 . thermal equilibrium may not be realized if sufficient photons are not produced by the bremsstrahlung process  @xcite . at the nearer downstream , protons and electrons have much higher temperatures . in the absence of collisionless - plasma processes , the electron temperature is determined by the balance between coulomb heating and cooling processes . when the relevant cooling process is the compton cooling , we have  @xcite @xmath104 over the length scale of @xmath105 ( where @xmath106 is the ion - electron collision frequency ) , where   is defined for the downstream energy density . on the other hand , as in murase et al . ( 2011 ) , @xmath107 is defined for the total energy while @xmath108 is defined for the ram pressure of the upstream flow . ] @xmath109 , where @xmath110 is the energy density of photons . note that the above equation is valid for sufficiently high - velocity shocks , since @xmath111 is limited by the proton temperature @xmath112  @xcite . in reality , collisionless - plasma processes can be faster than coulomb collisional processes , where @xmath111 can be higher than in equation  ( 14 ) , but should be lower than the equipartition temperature . after @xmath42 , the shock is no longer radiation - mediated , and we expect collisionless ( or collisional ) shocks . for strong , non - relativistic shocks , the proton temperature at the immediate downstream is @xmath113 where @xmath114 is the adiabatic index . when the adiabatic index is @xmath115 , we have a well - known result , @xmath116 . the electron temperature is affected by energy transfer from protons , which may be coulomb heating or faster collisionless plasma processes . if @xmath115 and when electrons and protons achieve the equipartition , we have  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) @xmath117    therefore , in the interaction - powered sn scenario , we can naturally expect x rays via bremsstrahlung or inverse - compton ( ic ) processes since electrons should be heated by the shock  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? also , we may assume the material is highly ionized at least in the immediate upstream . detections of x rays allow us to probe the existence of strong shocks , supporting the scenario  @xcite . however , there are several complications . first , free - free emission may be suppressed if thermal electrons mainly cool via the ic process . secondly , when the ejecta - csm interaction occurs at @xmath118 , hard x rays lose their energies in both the emission zone ( downstream ) and screen zone ( upstream ) , and softer x rays are down - graded via bound - free absorption . if the amount of non - ionized atoms similarly exists in the far upstream , the bound - free optical depth for soft x rays is roughly estimated to be  ( e.g. , * ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) @xmath119 at @xmath120  kev . naively , the x - ray luminosity is then  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) @xmath121 where @xmath122 is the suppression by other losses , @xmath123 is the optical depth in the emission zone and @xmath124 is the optical depth in the screen zone . predictions for both the thermal and non - thermal x rays depend on details including the frequency - dependent opacity and the ionization in the upstream  ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . this work does not study x - ray emissions in detail , since non - thermal x rays can be largely contaminated or masked by thermal x rays . now , we consider particle acceleration . cr acceleration may become efficient when the shock is no longer radiation - mediated and becomes collisionless , which can be realized when @xmath42  @xcite . strong small - scale magnetic fields are expected as a result from plasma instabilities , and mhd mechanisms such as the turbulent dynamo   can also play crucial roles especially in the downstream  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? in addition , crs themselves excite turbulence via cr stream instabilities , which can be important in the upstream  ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . since details of these processes are uncertain , for simplicity , we parameterize the magnetic field with the ratio of @xmath125 to @xmath126 as @xmath127 . then , we obtain @xmath128 in the bohm limit , the proton acceleration time scale is estimated to be  ( see a review * ? ? ? * ) @xmath129 and the proton maximum energy is estimated by comparing it to various cooling time scales ( see below ) . in the fully - ionized plasma ( that is the case in the vicinity of the shock ) , the coulomb cooling time of thermal protons  @xcite , @xmath130 where @xmath131 is assumed but the velocity of injected protons may be higher , depending on details of injection processes . the ratio between the two is @xmath132 when the upstream is cold enough . hence , the coulomb energy loss timescale is longer than their acceleration time , so cr proton acceleration is possible . note that the coulomb cooling is much less relevant in the immediate downstream , where the temperature is much higher . as protons are accelerated above the pion production threshold , @xmath133 , inelastic @xmath0 interactions occur , leading to production of electrons and positrons via @xmath134 . their minimum injection lorentz factor is  @xcite @xmath135 the important point here is that the minimum injection lorentz factor is unique for hadronic injections , which is different from the case of primary electron acceleration . primary electrons can also be shock accelerated via the fermi acceleration mechanism . however , the larmor radius of thermal electrons is smaller than that of thermal protons . thus , electrons need to be energized via some plasma processes to cross the shock length and to get injected to the fermi acceleration process . in other words , the larmor radius of relativistic electrons , @xmath136 , should be larger than that of thermal protons , @xmath137 . the lorentz factor of elections that can be accelerated by the conventional shock acceleration mechanism satisfies @xmath138 keeping this in mind and introducing the energy fraction ( @xmath139 ) and number fraction ( @xmath140 ) of relativistic electrons distributed with a power law , the injection lorentz factor of primary shock - accelerated electrons ( @xmath141 ) is expressed as @xmath142 where @xmath143 for @xmath144 and @xmath145 for @xmath146 . here , @xmath147 is the injection spectral index of accelerated electrons and @xmath148 is the maximum lorentz factor of accelerated electrons . note that equation ( 24 ) is obtained from @xmath149 and @xmath150 . the values of @xmath139 and @xmath140 are uncertain . the cr spectra observed at the earth imply @xmath151 , and such values are inferred from modeling of radio emission from type iib sne  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? smaller values of @xmath152 are obtained in the leptonic scenario for young sn remnants  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? sufficiently large values of @xmath140 imply @xmath153 , where other electron acceleration processes in the shock transition layer should be relevant , and the spectrum for @xmath154 may be steeper than that for @xmath155 . the energy carried by accelerated crs can be summarized as follows . the cr acceleration is efficient only after the radiation escapes from the system and the strong shock jump is formed by collisionless shocks . hence , if @xmath156<r_{\rm bo}$ ] , we do not expect many crs . normal sne correspond to @xmath157 , so only a fraction of the sn explosion energy @xmath9 is converted to crs at the time the shock reaches @xmath19 . if the csm is massive and @xmath158 ( thus @xmath159 ) , we expect @xmath160 , so a significant fraction of the sn explosion energy can be converted into the energy of crs . the energy of accelerated cr protons in interaction - powered sne ( @xmath161 ) is roughly estimated to be @xmath162<r_{\rm bo}$ ) } \end{array } \right.\ ] ] here equation ( 3 ) is used . note that , for @xmath163 ( i.e. , @xmath164 ) , only the fraction of the sn explosion energy can be dissipated by one collision . also , @xmath165 is the energy fraction carried by crs above @xmath166 , and @xmath167 is typically used in the context of sn remnants . when particles are accelerated up to very high energies , high - energy gamma rays and neutrinos should be accompanied via hadronuclear interactions like the @xmath0 reaction . in particular , cr protons interact with nucleons while they are advected to the downstream , so neutrinos and pionic gamma rays are expected in the gev - pev range  @xcite . by comparing the @xmath0 interaction time scale @xmath168 and @xmath169 , we get the @xmath0 optical depth as @xmath170 where @xmath171 is used . from figures  2 and 3 , one sees large parameter space satisfying @xmath42 and @xmath46 , where neutrinos and gamma rays provide promising signals of cr proton acceleration at collisionless shocks . even if @xmath172 , we can say that a significant fraction of the cr energy is converted into hadronic emission via @xmath0 interactions . from equation ( 26 ) , one sees @xmath173 or @xmath174 . thus , as seen from figure  3 , @xmath0 processes are typically efficient for ejecta - csm interactions at radii of @xmath175  cm , for @xmath176 . note that @xmath0 interactions are relevant even in the optically - thin regime of @xmath86 . we here discuss several examples of sne to see if ejecta - csm interactions satisfying @xmath42 and @xmath177 are indeed indicated by recent observations . first , we consider the optically - thick regime around the shock breakout . observationally , the csm nucleon density @xmath33 ( or @xmath34 ) can be estimated from the radiation luminosity @xmath95 ( or the radiated energy @xmath178 ) at the time of the shock breakout , the rise time @xmath65 , and the shock velocity @xmath5 ( or @xmath67 that is the radius at the shock breakout ) . note that the approximation @xmath61 is valid when @xmath179 . 1 .   sn 2006gy : sn 2006gy is one of the slsne  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? the radiated energy is @xmath180 and the breakout time is @xmath181  d  @xcite . the breakout radius is estimated to be @xmath182  cm , corresponding to @xmath183 . these observational parameters imply @xmath184 ( see appendix a ) , leading to @xmath185 and @xmath186 within @xmath67 . these are roughly consistent with numerical modeling of optical light curves  @xcite . 2 .   sn 2009ip : sn 2009ip is one of the luminous type iin sne , which showed re - brightening in 2012 . the radiated energy is @xmath187 and the rising time   given here , are regarded as an upper limit . ] is @xmath188  d. the breakout radius is estimated to be @xmath189  cm , corresponding to @xmath190 . these observational parameters imply @xmath191 , @xmath192 and @xmath193 within @xmath67  @xcite , which are consistent with observational constraints  @xcite .    in figure  3 , both of the examples roughly lie on the @xmath50 lines . the condition @xmath194 is satisfied , so neutrinos and gamma rays should be produced in the presence of cr protons . sn 2006gy almost lies on the constant luminosity line of @xmath195 . note that @xmath160 can be expected for sn 2006gy but not for sn 2009ip . next , we consider post - breakout emission in the later phase . for @xmath42 , the shock crossing time @xmath196 or the deceleration time @xmath197 can also be used instead of @xmath65 . then , one can observationally estimate @xmath33 ( or @xmath34 ) from @xmath95 , @xmath198 ( or @xmath199 ) , and @xmath5 . alternatively , if we assume that the csm is not completely ionized , then the x - ray measurements of the bound - free absorption can provide an estimate ( or at least a lower limit ) on @xmath200 . two examples are given below . 1 .   sn 2006jd : sn 2006jd was a type iin sn , showing bright x - ray emission with the unabsorbed x - ray luminosity of @xmath201 in the @xmath202  kev range  @xcite . radio emission was detected after @xmath203  d. with @xmath54 , we expect @xmath204 at @xmath205  d. then , with the temperature @xmath206  kev , @xmath207 implies @xmath208 and @xmath209 within @xmath21 . this estimated csm density is comparable to @xmath210 obtained with @xmath211 , @xmath212 ( for @xmath22  cm ) , and @xmath213  cm  @xcite . on the other hand , x - ray absorption allows us to estimate the column density of non - ionized hydrogen atoms ( @xmath214 ) that may exist in the far upstream . it is also suggested that this density is different from values based on x - ray observations , which may imply that the csm is highly ionized even in the far upstream so there are not many non - ionized atoms in the line of sight of x rays . however , detections of radio emission may imply the absence of too strong free - free absorption in the upstream . 2 .   sn 2010jl : sn 2010jl was also a type iin sne , showing bright x - ray emission without radio detections . the unabsorbed x - ray luminosity of @xmath215 is obtained in the @xmath202  kev range  @xcite . however , ofek et al . ( 2014 ) suggested a higher intrinsic luminosity and obtained @xmath216 from modeling of the optical emission in the early phase around @xmath217 , which is consistent with a value indicated by x - ray observations . with @xmath218 , we expect @xmath219 at @xmath220  d , implying @xmath221 and @xmath222 at that time . although there is uncertainty , the csm with several solar masses is likely  @xcite , and this energetic sn seems one of the promising targets of dedicated searches for neutrinos and gamma rays . based on these parameters , sn 2010jl has @xmath194 , indicating efficient neutrino and gamma - ray production . on the other hand , @xmath223 is suggested for sn 2006jd , but the @xmath0 efficiency is still significant . sn 2006jd also lies on the constant luminosity line of @xmath224 . note that another estimate is possible based on detailed modeling of radio sne  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ) , although this work does not focus on such more model - dependent studies . most of type iin sne have not been seen by low - frequency radio observations , but we show that some of them may be detectable at high - frequency radio wavelengths including mm / submm and fir bands ( see below ) .    in the figure  3 , we indicate the above examples by stars for the purpose of demonstration . note that their parameters have large uncertainty so such plots do not have to be very precise . also , @xmath21 increases as the observation time @xmath97 , so one can ideally draw evolution curves in the ( @xmath21 , @xmath44 ) plane and ( @xmath21 , @xmath14 ) plane . in addition to the four sne , we indicate sn 2006jc and 2008iy , which are also likely to be interaction - powered sne . for sn 2006jc , we use @xmath225 and @xmath226  cm at the x - ray peak time of @xmath227  d based on immler et al . ( 2008 ) . for sn 2008iy , we adopt @xmath228 and @xmath229  cm at the peak time of @xmath230  d from miller at al . ( 2010 ) . sn remnants have been largely believed to be the origin of galactic crs up to the knee of @xmath231  gev  ( see a review * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . it would also be interesting to consider interaction - powered sne as potential accelerators of high - energy crs . the maximum energy of accelerated protons , @xmath232 , is determined by comparing @xmath233 to the cooling time @xmath234 and dynamical time @xmath169 . if the time scales of energy losses ( including adiabatic losses ) are long enough , the maximum energy is limited by the dynamical time , @xmath235 then , the maximum energy is  @xcite @xmath236 note that the larmor radius ( @xmath237 ) of protons is smaller than the system size ( @xmath21 ) , where the protons are confined .    at small @xmath21 and/or large @xmath44 , the maximum energy is limited by energy losses . the @xmath0 cooling time of protons is expressed as @xmath238 where @xmath239 is the proton inelasticity . equating @xmath240 and @xmath241 gives  @xcite @xmath242    before crs propagate in a galaxy , they need to escape from the system without significant losses  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? while the ejecta interacts with a csm , cr escape may be limited by the free escape boundary @xmath243 , which could be determined , e.g. , by magnetic field amplification processes or wave damping via ion - neutral collisions  @xcite . by comparing the diffusion length @xmath244 ( in the bohm limit ) to @xmath243 , we obtain @xmath245 where @xmath246 is the maximum energy of escaping protons . if @xmath232 is too low for crs to escape within @xmath169 , crs are confined and their escape is non - trivial . if magnetic fields rapidly decay after the shock crossing time ( as often supposed in gamma - ray bursts ) , the condition can be @xmath247 , otherwise it depends on diffusion and adiabatic losses . as a reasonable condition for crs not to be depleted , we here assume @xmath248 and @xmath223 .    in figures  4 and 5 , we show the parameter range allowing @xmath249  ev protons . parameter space allowing for higher @xmath246 is narrower . if an ejecta - csm interaction occurs at @xmath46 , crs are largely depleted . we need @xmath250 to expect @xmath251 , and @xmath252  cm is typically favored for escaping crs to avoid significant @xmath0 cooling . higher - energy protons can generate pairs via the bh process , which occurs at @xmath253 , i.e. , @xmath254 . sufficiently high - energy protons may dominantly lose their energies via the bh process , especially in the optically - thick regime . for @xmath118 , the number density of thermalized photons is @xmath255 , where @xmath256 is the luminosity of thermalized ( re - processed ) photons and @xmath257 is their energy fraction . assuming @xmath258 , the bh cooling time @xmath259 becomes @xmath260 where @xmath261 is used at @xmath262 in the proton rest frame  @xcite . this is typically longer than the @xmath0 cooling time , so we may mainly consider the @xmath0 reaction . as indicated in figures  4 and 5 , on the other hand , the optically - thin regime of @xmath263 is more likely in cases where protons with @xmath264  gev survive . x - ray photons interact with tev protons and the number density of optically - thin bremsstrahlung photons is @xmath265 , so we have @xmath266 which is negligible compared to @xmath241 . in addition , photomeson production may also occur at @xmath267 . although it seems that the proton energy has to be quite high , some interactions with x - ray photons are possible in the attenuation scale of x rays .    finally , we briefly discuss a possible contribution of interaction - powered sne to the observed galactic crs . contributions from various types of sne including `` hypernovae ''  erg , which are usually broadline type ibc sne . note that only a fraction of them are trans - relativistic sne that show a mildly relativistic component . ] have been considered  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? it is still under debade which astrophysical accelerator is responsible for crs around the knee , although normal sne have been commonly believed as a leading candidate . an issue is how cr protons are accelerated up to the knee , and interaction - powered sne could have some advantages because of higher densities and possible stronger fields . the observed cr energy flux at @xmath268  gev is smaller than that at @xmath269  gev by @xmath270 . the contribution of interaction - powered sne at @xmath271 compared to the contribution of normal sne at @xmath272 is  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) @xmath273 where @xmath274 is the conversion factor from the total energy to the energy spectrum ( see appendix a ) , @xmath275 is the rate of interaction - powered sne , @xmath276 is the sn rate , and @xmath277 is the confinement time of galactic crs . although the confinement time is highly uncertain , if @xmath278 and @xmath279 , interaction - powered sne could contribute to the observed cr flux around the knee if the rate of interaction - powered sne is as high as @xmath280 . ev protons in the ( @xmath21 , @xmath44 ) plane . cr acceleration is possible at @xmath42 and @xmath281 and @xmath282 are required to achieve @xmath283  ev in the acceleration region . the shaded region suggests the range where we do not expect either production or escape of @xmath284  ev protons . ]    , @xmath14 ) plane , where @xmath14 has the solar - mass unit . ] by taking into account the inelasticity @xmath239 , we obtain the effective @xmath0 optical depth as @xmath285 which gives the meson production efficiency . using @xmath286 , the neutrino energy fluence ( per flavor ) is estimated to be @xmath287e_p^2\frac{dn_p}{de_p}\nonumber\\ & \simeq&1.4\times{10}^{-4}~{\rm erg}~{\rm cm}^{-2}~{\rm min}[1,f_{pp}]{\left(\frac{e_\nu}{0.05m_pc^2}\right)}^{2-q_p}\nonumber\\ & \times&\epsilon_{p,-1}{\mathcal e}_{51}{(d/10~{\rm mpc})}^{-2}{\mathcal r}_{p0,1}^{-1},\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath288 is the power - law index of the proton spectrum and @xmath289 is @xmath290 at @xmath166 ( see appendix a ) . when the csm mass is sufficiently large , assuming @xmath291 at the collision , we expect the typical energy fluence of @xmath292 due to @xmath293 . on the other hand , when the csm mass is not large enough , assuming @xmath291 at the collision , the typical energy fluence is expected to be @xmath294 due to @xmath295 . the typical neutrino energy is @xmath296 , so we expect gev - pev neutrino emission given that @xmath232 reaches @xmath297  pev . the icecube effective area for muon neutrinos is order of @xmath298 in the 100  tev range while @xmath299 in the 1  tev range , implying the fluence sensitivity of @xmath300  @xcite . hence , high - energy neutrinos are detectable by icecube for nearby sne that occur at @xmath301  mpc , and stacking analyses for aggregated signals from a number of interaction - powered sne will also be useful  @xcite . in appendix a , we provide recipes that connect the observed optical emission to the neutrino signal . the pionic gamma - ray energy fluence is 2 times larger than the neutrino fluence per flavor ( after neutrino mixing ) , so we expect @xmath302e_p^2\frac{dn_p}{de_p}\nonumber\\ & \simeq&2.8\times{10}^{-4}~{\rm erg}~{\rm cm}^{-2}~{\rm min}[1,f_{pp}]{\left(\frac{e_\gamma}{0.1m_pc^2}\right)}^{2-q_p}\nonumber\\ & \times&\epsilon_{p,-1}{\mathcal e}_{51}{(d/10~{\rm mpc})}^{-2}{\mathcal r}_{p0,1}^{-1},\end{aligned}\ ] ] or using @xmath303 , the typical gamma - ray energy flux is @xmath304e_p^2\frac{dn_p}{de_pdt}\nonumber\\ & \sim&1.1\times{10}^{-11}~{\rm erg}~{\rm cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}~{\rm min}[1,f_{pp}]\nonumber\\ & \times&{\left(\frac{e_\gamma}{0.1m_pc^2}\right)}^{2-q_p}\epsilon_{p,-1}d_*\nonumber\\ & \times&{(v_s/5000~{\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1})}^{3}{(d/10~{\rm mpc})}^{-2}{\mathcal r}_{p0,1}^{-1}.\end{aligned}\ ] ] the _ fermi _ 1  yr sensitivity at gev energies is @xmath305  @xcite , so interaction - powered sne may be detectable with _ fermi _ for powerful explosions at @xmath306  mpc  @xcite . stacking analyses are useful for gev gamma rays as well as neutrinos ( see appendix a ) . in addition , future ground cherenkov detectors will be more sensitive . for example , the cta 100  hr sensitivity at tev is @xmath307  @xcite , whereas the hawc 3  yr sensitivity at 2  tev is @xmath305  @xcite . if the cr spectrum is as hard as @xmath308 , we expect that detections are possible up to @xmath309  mpc via followup observations by cta within days - to - years .    for extragalactic gamma rays , one has to keep in mind attenuation processes . there are two effects : attenuation by the extragalactic background light ( ebl ) and attenuation by target photons in the source . the attenuation by ebl is relevant above @xmath310  tev  @xcite , so we can neglect it to discuss the detestability in the gev - tev range . the attenuation in the source can be relevant especially for emission from the reverse shock , but we show below that gamma rays from the shocked csm can typically escape from the source after the shock breakout , @xmath42 . gamma rays around mev energies are downgraded via compton scattering with electrons in the matter . the bh pair - creation process occurs at @xmath311 and becomes dominant over the compton scattering above the gev range , where the compton scattering is reduced by the klein - nishina suppression . at sufficiently high energies , the approximate cross section of the bh process is  @xcite @xmath312.\ ] ] then , the bh opacity for gamma rays is expressed as @xmath313 where @xmath314 is evaluated at @xmath315 . the parameter space such that @xmath316 is shown in figures  2 and 3 . interestingly , it is comparable to the parameter space such that @xmath317 for typical shock velocities , since gamma - ray attenuation due to the bh process is irrelevant when @xmath5 is higher than @xmath318 . note that the bh opacity may be even smaller . several observations have suggested that csm is clumpy rather than uniform . the bh opacity becomes irrelevant when the csm is anisotropic or so clumpy that most of the csm mass is concentrated in dense clumps . for example , if the density enhancement in the clumps is @xmath319 , the bh opacity is changed by @xmath320 , where the attenuation by the bh process becomes even less relevant .      gamma rays interact with photons via @xmath321 . the interaction typically happens at @xmath322 , and the @xmath323 opacity for sufficiently high - energy gamma rays is @xmath324 where @xmath325 is the photon number density at @xmath326 . when the collision with csm occurs at @xmath43 , most of the emissions are thermalized . using @xmath327 , we obtain @xmath328 at @xmath329 . above this energy , interactions mainly happen in the klein - nishina regime , so the @xmath330 opacity decreases as @xmath331e_\gamma^{-1}$ ] . hard x rays , which can be produced by bremsstrahlung emission in the downstream , could potentially prohibit lower - energy gamma rays from leaving the emission region because the pair - creation threshold energy is lower for target photons with higher energies . using @xmath322 and @xmath332 , the typical energy of gamma rays interacting with x - ray photons is estimated to be @xmath333    as explained below we expect that gev gamma rays can leave the system without significant attenuation . first , we consider an optically - thin collision at @xmath86 with @xmath334 . the black - body approximation is invalid , and hard x - ray emission becomes largely visible . the number density of optically - thin bremsstrahlung photons is @xmath265 , so we obtain @xmath335 so gamma rays will be able to leave the emission region for ejecta - csm interactions at @xmath86 . the radiation luminosity may be limited by the kinetic luminosity , and interactions with x rays can be relevant in the length scale of @xmath336 even in the optically - thick regime of @xmath337 . then , we may roughly expect @xmath338 and @xmath339 at @xmath67 . therefore , given @xmath74 , gev gamma rays would be able to escape from the system . note that the bh attenuation is also avoidable for sufficiently high shock velocities . electrons and positrons ( for which we simply say electrons ) can generate synchrotron emission . the synchrotron cooling time of relativistic electrons is @xmath340 on the other hand , the ic cooling timescale is @xmath341 where @xmath342 is the compton @xmath343 parameter , @xmath344 is the synchrotron self - compton ( ssc ) @xmath343 parameter , and @xmath345 is the external inverse - compton ( eic ) @xmath343 parameter . the ic emission is bolometrically more important than the synchrotron emission if @xmath346 . we expect that the ssc emission is typically weak . this is because the ssc @xmath343 parameter in the thomson regime  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , @xmath347 is less than unity . here , @xmath348 $ ] and @xmath349 ( or @xmath350 ) , where @xmath351 ( or @xmath352 ) is the injection lorentz factor and @xmath353 is the cooling lorentz factor defined below . external radiation fields are mainly supplied by sn emission , which is more relevant in our cases . if the system is optically thin , the energy density of thermal photons is @xmath354 whereas the magnetic field energy density is @xmath355 because of @xmath356 , we see that the synchrotron cooling would be typically stronger than the eic cooling , although the situation can be altered depending on parameters such as @xmath357 . as a result , non - thermal x rays can be expected mainly due to eic emission . but they will be weaker than thermal x rays ( except at hard x rays ) , and this work focuses on radio signals .    in the dense csm environment , one also has to care about other losses such as bremsstrahlung and coulomb losses . the relativistic bremsstrahlung cooling time scale is  @xcite @xmath358 which is longer than @xmath169 , @xmath359 and @xmath360 for our typical parameters . the coulomb loss time scale of relativistic electrons is  @xcite @xmath361)}\nonumber\\ & \simeq&2.2\times{10}^8~{\rm s}~\gamma_{e,2}\mu_ed_{*,-1}^{-1}r_{16}^{2 } , \end{aligned}\ ] ] which suggests that sufficiently high - energy electrons typically cool via the synchrotron emission . at lower energies , however , the coulomb loss can be the shortest time scale , and the resulting synchrotron spectrum becomes complicated . the cooling lorentz factor is given by equating @xmath362 as @xmath363 if @xmath364 , the system is in the fast cooling regime , so the energy flux has a peak at @xmath365 . if @xmath366 , the system is in the slow cooling regime , so the energy flux has a peak at @xmath367 . primary protons with @xmath133 lead to inelastic @xmath0 reactions , providing secondary electrons . the characteristic frequency of electrons with @xmath352 is @xmath368 for our typical parameters , @xmath369 and @xmath370  cm , we expect @xmath371  ghz . we here point that these secondary electrons can be more relevant in the interaction - powered sn scenario . very naively , the secondary electronic emission dominates over the primary electronic emission when @xmath372\epsilon_p>\epsilon_e,\ ] ] which is likely to be realized if @xmath286 is as high as @xmath373 . one should keep in mind that this is the crude argument applied to the bolometric emission , and the relative importance changes with frequency , depending on spectral energy distributions of cr protons and electrons . assuming the fast cooling regime , the resulting synchrotron flux from hadronically - injected electrons ( at @xmath374 ) is @xmath375e_p^2\frac{dn_p}{de_pdt}\nonumber\\ & \sim&2.7\times{10}^{-14}~{\rm erg}~{\rm cm}^{-2}~{\rm s}^{-1}\nonumber\\ & \times&{\rm min}[10,f_{pp,-1}]{\left(\frac{\nu}{\nu_h}\right)}^{2-q_p}\epsilon_{p,-1}\nonumber\\ & \times&d_{*,-1}{(v_s/5000~{\rm km}~{\rm s}^{-1})}^{3}{\mathcal r}_{p0,1}^{-1}{(d/10~{\rm mpc})}^{-2},\end{aligned}\ ] ] which corresponds to @xmath376 for @xmath308 . hence , the synchrotron signal is detectable with high - frequency radio telescopes when several absorption processes we discuss below are irrelevant . in particular , the alma sensitivity at 100 ghz is @xmath377 , allowing detections up to @xmath378  gpc if followup observations are successful . primary electrons can also emit synchrotron photons , and the corresponding characteristic frequency of electrons with @xmath141 is @xmath379 it suggests that studying radio sne at relatively low frequencies can probe electron acceleration in the shock transition layer , whereas investigations at high frequencies allow us to see the conventional shock acceleration of electrons and/or hadronic injections . the synchrotron energy flux ( at @xmath380 ) in the fast cooling case is @xmath381 where @xmath147 is the electron spectral index and we expect @xmath382 for @xmath383 . note that @xmath147 may naturally be different from values expected in the conventional diffuse shock acceleration theory at @xmath384 , corresponding to electrons with @xmath385 , and steep indices of @xmath386 are indeed indicated in non - relativistic radio sne . the synchrotron signal from primary electrons is also detectable by current radio telescopes and mm / submm facilities including alma if secondary electrons are sub - dominant . for a given @xmath326 , the secondary electronic emission dominates over the primary electronic emission when @xmath387\frac{\epsilon_{p,-1}}{\epsilon_{e,-3}}{\left(\frac{\nu_l}{\nu_h}\right)}^{2-q}\gtrsim0.06,\ ] ] where the fast cooling regime is assumed for @xmath388 . hence , we expect that secondaries are typically more important for high - frequency radio emission from interaction - powered sne . however , detecting radio signals may suffer from scattering and various absorption processes . first , if @xmath43 , the synchrotron emission can be modified by comptonization due to thermal electrons . in particular , thermal electrons in the hot downstream may up - scatter low - energy photons the condition that the comptonization does not change the synchrotron spectrum is roughly given by @xmath389\lesssim1 $ ] , so we focus on ejecta - csm collisions satisfying @xmath390 . in addition , there are three important absorption processes that can hinder observations at the radio band , razin - tsytovich ( rt ) suppression , synchrotron self - absorption ( ssa ) and free - free absorption . we discuss these suppression and absorption processes below .    , @xmath44 ) plane , at @xmath391  ghz , where @xmath54 , @xmath392 and @xmath393 and @xmath394 are used . the suppression or absorption of radio emission is insignificant at @xmath395 , @xmath396 , @xmath397 and @xmath398 . the light shaded region indicates the forbidden region for the radio emission in the pessimistic case , where the upstream is assumed to be ionized with @xmath399  k. the dark shaded area indicates the forbidden region in the optimistic case , which may be realized for different upstream properties . the downstream temperature is set to @xmath400  kev . from this figure , one sees that radio emission from interaction - powered sne satisfying @xmath401 is suppressed at this band . ]    , @xmath14 ) plane , where @xmath14 has the solar - mass unit . ]    ghz . from this figure , one sees that observations at 100  ghz are useful for probing interaction - powered sne satisfying @xmath401 . ]    , @xmath14 ) plane , where @xmath14 has the solar - mass unit . ] ghz . ]    , @xmath14 ) plane , where @xmath14 has the solar - mass unit . ] synchrotron emission in a plasma is different from that in a vacuum . when a cold plasma plays a role , it is suppressed at low frequencies due to collective effects . the suppression occurs at the rt frequency  @xcite , @xmath402 the line of @xmath403 is shown in figures  6 - 11 . instead , given a frequency , we can obtain the upper limit on @xmath34 as @xmath404      the ssa opacity is estimated to be ( see appendix b ) @xmath405 where @xmath406 is the spectral index of electrons ( that is generally different from @xmath407 for injected particles ) , @xmath408 , and @xmath409 here , when the coulomb cooling is irrelevant , @xmath410 $ ] and @xmath411 is evaluated as a function of @xmath406 , which is order of @xmath412 ( see appendix b ) . when only synchrotron and ic ( in the thomson regime ) losses are relevant , we have @xmath413 at @xmath414 in the fast cooling case or @xmath415 when @xmath416 ( i.e. , the slow cooling case ) . here , @xmath417 is related to the number of electrons swept by the shock as @xmath418 where @xmath419 is the number fraction of electrons defined against @xmath420 . note that , for primary electron acceleration , the different parameter @xmath140 satisfies @xmath421 assuming a power - law injection spectrum , we have @xmath422 for @xmath423 and @xmath424 for @xmath425 , and we typically expect @xmath426 . for secondary electrons , we have @xmath427\epsilon_p}{6\gamma_h\ln(\gamma_p^m)}\frac{m_p}{m_e},\ ] ] for @xmath423 and @xmath427\epsilon_p(q-2)}{6\gamma_h(q-1)}\frac{m_p}{m_e},\ ] ] for @xmath425 . the proton spectrum is assumed to be a power law above @xmath428 , where we typically obtain @xmath429 $ ] . introducing @xmath419 allows us to discuss primary and secondary electrons in parallel .    setting @xmath430 , the ssa frequency is estimated to be @xmath431 for @xmath413 ( leading to @xmath432 ) , and @xmath433 for @xmath434 ( leading to @xmath435 ) . instead , given a frequency , we can obtain the upper limit on @xmath34 as @xmath436 for @xmath413 , and @xmath437 for @xmath434 . note that we should use @xmath438 and @xmath413 for the fast cooling case . results for @xmath423 and @xmath439 are shown in figures  6 - 11 . in this work , we assume the case of @xmath440 $ ] , although ssa heating is relevant when @xmath441 $ ]  @xcite . the free - free absorption is important especially when photons propagate in the ionized plasma . for simplicity , here we assume that ions are protons . in the hot downstream , the free - free opacity for photons with @xmath442 is  @xcite @xmath443 where @xmath444 is the free - free absorption coefficient and @xmath91 is the gaunt factor . high temperatures of @xmath445  k are expected in the immediate downstream , while the temperature is lower at the far downstream due to bremsstrahlung cooling especially if the shock is radiative . the free - free absorption frequency is given by @xmath446 , and we have @xmath447 instead , given a frequency , we can obtain the upper limit on @xmath34 as @xmath448 if the free - free absorption in the emission region is dominant , we expect the suppression factor of @xmath449 at @xmath450 . however , one typically expects that upstream material would be more crucial for absorbing low - frequency emission  ( but see * ? ? ? the upstream temperature is lower than the immediate downstream temperature , so the free - free optical depth can be much larger . before the shock reaches @xmath19 , assuming ionized material , the free - free optical depth in the upstream is @xmath451 the free - free absorption frequency is given by @xmath452 , and we have @xmath453 instead , given a frequency , we can obtain the upper limit on @xmath34 as @xmath454 note that , if the free - free absorption in the screen region is dominant , we expect the suppression of @xmath455 , which can be in principle distinguished from the other possibilities . as shown in figures  8 and 9 , at @xmath456  ghz , the free - free absorption is typically the most important attenuation process in sne with dense csm . even at @xmath457  ghz , it is the dominant attenuation process for ejecta - csm interactions at @xmath458  cm . this process is sensitive to the electron temperature , and @xmath459  k is used in figures  6 - 11 . the temperature may indeed be high enough , as suggested by successful radio detections of sn 2006jd  @xcite . in figure 7 , sn 2006jd   lies near the lines of @xmath452 and @xmath430 . on the other hand , non - detections of radio emission from many other type iin sne like sn 2010jl seem consistent with the large absorption that is easily realized with more conservative values of @xmath460  k  @xcite .    at @xmath457  ghz , as shown in figures  6 and 7 , the free - free absorption and ssa processes suppress radio signals , and the parameter space around @xmath401 is located in the dark shaded area . so it is difficult to see hadronic signatures with synchrotron emission at radio wavelengths . but the situation drastically changes at higher frequencies . at @xmath456  ghz , the free - free absorption is still an obstacle for ejecta - csm interactions at @xmath461  cm , but not for @xmath458  cm . importantly , as shown in figures  8 and 9 , a large parameter space of @xmath401 is free of absorption and scattering processes . so observations at high - frequency radio wavelengths including mm / submm and fir bands are indeed powerful to test the hadronic model and probe cosmic - ray proton acceleration . at higher frequencies such as 1000  ghz , all the absorption processes discussed here are negligible compared to the comptonization due to thermal electrons . not all interaction - powered sne allow us to expect high - frequency radio signals from secondaries . as pointed out by murase et al . ( 2011 ) , except at sufficiently late phases , optically - bright slsne are difficult to detect with synchrotron emission at radio bands . on the other hand , as shown in figures 9 and 11 , some type iin sne such as sn 2006jd and 2008iy seem very promising . there are some possibilities that we have effectively lower values of @xmath462 . first , the csm may be anisotropic or clumpy as suggested in several type iin sne like sn 2005ip  @xcite and 2009ip  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) , where the emission more easily escape from partial regions where the csm density is much lower . secondly , @xmath462 is smaller when the csm is little ionized , which may be realized especially in the far upstream . this is different from soft x rays that are more strongly absorbed in the non - ionized csm . such more transparent cases correspond to the light shaded area in figures  6 - 11 . note that the free - free optical depth declines after the shock reaches the outer edge of csm , @xmath19 . after @xmath463 , it becomes @xmath464 where @xmath465 ( at @xmath466 ) is assumed . for example , a possible value of @xmath467 is suggested in the late phase of the re - brightening of sn 2009ip  @xcite . in this work , we provide a broad discussion of multi - messenger diagnoses of interaction - powered sne including type iin sne and some slsne , focusing on non - thermal signals . the shock would be radiation - mediated at very early times , and thus cr acceleration is inefficient . however , as photons escape the system , a collisionless shock can form and cr acceleration becomes possible . while shock heating leads to x rays , crs are expected to produce broadband non - thermal emission , including gamma rays , x rays , radio waves and neutrinos . photon emission in general may be largely thermalized depending the optical depth , which in turn depends on details of the csm . neutrinos are the most direct probe in the sense that they do not suffer from attenuation in the source . in addition , by advancing the idea proposed by murase et al . ( 2011 ) , we have shown that gev gamma rays can typically escape after the shock breakout , although tev gamma rays are attenuated due to the two - photon annihilation process  . along with neutrinos , gev gamma rays can provide unique opportunities to probe the formation of collisionless shocks and the onset of cr acceleration . interestingly , the physical parameters suggested by observed interaction - powered sne imply densities similar to those inferred from gamma - ray novae  @xcite , allowing us to expect analogous high - energy emission and to probe the physics of cr acceleration in the dense environment . detecting signals from one sn requires a nearby event , but stacking analyses are still useful . gamma rays and neutrinos are especially powerful for optically - bright slsne , for which the recipes provided in appendix a can be used .    for normal luminosity interaction - powered sne , broad - band non - thermal emissions from radio to tev gamma - ray bands are possible . in particular , high - frequency radio observations in the mm / submm and fir bands can probe cr proton acceleration and test the hadronic model . we pointed out that secondary electrons produced via @xmath0 reactions play an important pole role in the synchrotron emission from some interaction - powered sne such as sn 2006jd . comprehensive observations from ghz to 1000  ghz may also be relevant to study acceleration of primary electrons that may not be accelerated by the conventional shock acceleration . our work demonstrates the importance of multi - messenger approaches in revealing the mechanism of type iin sne and cr acceleration in real time . the interaction - powered sn scenario has been commonly used to interpret slsne , but slsne are diverse and other scenarios also possible . for example , some slsne such as sn 2007bi may be rather pair - instability sne originating from progenitors with @xmath468 , where the stellar collapse is caused by the pressure decrease due to electron - positron pair - production  @xcite . or luminous sne including slsne ic  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ) may be driven by newborn pulsars  ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? some slsne seem difficult to explain using these scenarios  @xcite . high - energy emissions including gamma rays and neutrinos have been predicted in both the interaction - powered sn scenario  @xcite and the pulsar - driven sn scenario  @xcite . detecting thermal and non - thermal signals from shocks in the dense csm and studying time - dependent spectra are crucial in order to discriminate among the scenarios . the most important point of this work is that secondary electrons and positrons from inelastic @xmath0 collisions will radiate detectable synchrotron photons efficiently at high - frequency radio wavelengths including the mm / submm and fir bands . although details depend on the mass of csm , its physical location relative to the progenitor star at the time of explosion , and the velocity of the ejecta , for typical parameters , we expect the synchrotron spectrum to peak at @xmath469  ghz and with flux of @xmath7  mjy for 2006jd - like interaction - powered sne at distances of hundreds of mpc . in particular , high - frequency radio signals using instruments like the high - frequency channels of the vla and alma can be very powerful to probe physics of collisionless shocks . for this reason , we encourage followup observations especially at the mm / submm band within months - to - years and at the gev - tev gamma - ray band within days - to - years . k. m. thanks john beacom , roger chevalier , boaz katz , brian lacki , keiichi maeda , jose prieto , masaomi tanaka and ryo yamazaki for useful discussions . k. m. is supported by nasa through hubble fellowship , grant no . 51310.01 awarded by the space telescope science institute , which is operated by the association of universities for research in astronomy , inc . , for nasa , under contract no . nas 5 - 26555 . k. m. also thanks supports by ccapp since this project was started in the beginning of 2011 when k. m. was a member of ccapp . the preliminary results of this work was presented in march 2013 , hubble fellows symposium . here , we provide recipes to test the hadronic model for gamma - ray and neutrino emissions from interaction - powered sne . basically , we need to know two quantities , the cr energy @xmath470 and the @xmath0 efficiency @xmath286 . the latter depends on @xmath33 , @xmath21 and @xmath5 , which can be determined from the breakout emission . the more sophisticated approach is possible based on self - similar solutions in the engine - driven case  @xcite . we here overview the prescription by chevalier & irwin ( 2011 ) . let us consider the ejecta whose outer density profile is @xmath471 at @xmath472 . the shock is initially radiation - mediated and the flows are radiation - dominated since @xmath473 . the contact discontinuity is located at @xmath474 , where @xmath475 . the forward shock radius is estimated to be @xmath476 and the forward shock velocity is @xmath477 . the energy carried by the interacting shell is estimated to be @xmath478 , where @xmath479 . for @xmath480 , the radiation energy is @xmath481 , so we have @xmath482 in the wind case , the photon diffusion timescale is comparable to the breakout time , and we have @xmath483 as long as the breakout happens at @xmath484 . the breakout radius can also be estimated from the evolution of the radiation luminosity and temperature if the black - body approximation is valid , or if @xmath49 is known .    as a result , if we can observe @xmath178 , @xmath65 and @xmath49 ( or @xmath67 ) , we can evaluate @xmath44 , @xmath485 and @xmath486 as  @xcite @xmath487 @xmath488 @xmath489 one should keep in mind that the engine - driven self - similar solution is valid as long as @xmath490 . then , we can estimate @xmath33 , allowing us to calculate @xmath286 and resulting neutrino and gamma - ray spectra . there are two important free parameters , the cr spectral index ( @xmath288 ) and cr energy ( @xmath470 ) . for @xmath491 , the cr proton spectrum is given by @xmath492 and @xmath493 for our typical parameters . for @xmath494 , we have @xmath495 here , @xmath274 is the conversion factor from the total energy to the differential energy spectrum and @xmath496 is the minimum proton energy . these equations can be rewritten as @xmath497 where @xmath498 . the cr energy is parametrized as @xmath499 where @xmath500 is the cr loading parameter that is commonly introduced in the literature of hadronic emissions from gamma - ray bursts  @xcite . since both @xmath165 and @xmath501 are order of 0.1 , we expect @xmath502 and we can make predictions for breakout high - energy emissions , based on observational quantities . such an application was done in margutti et al . note that high - energy emissions continue after the breakout . given sufficient time - dependent data , later contributions can easily be taken into account by more detailed modeling . for example , one can directly use self - similar solutions for @xmath480 or @xmath115 at @xmath42  @xcite . most naively , instead , the overall contribution can be incorporated in the cr loading parameter . here we provide formulas to calculate ssa . for a power - law electron distribution , the ssa coefficient is  @xcite @xmath503 where @xmath504 is the angle between the electron velocity and magnetic field . the normalization is determined by @xmath505 assuming @xmath506\gg\gamma_n={\rm min}[\gamma_i,\gamma_c]$ ] , we have @xmath507 , where @xmath508 for @xmath509 and @xmath510 for @xmath511 . when only the synchrotron emission is relevant , we have @xmath413 at @xmath414 in the fast cooling case or @xmath415 at @xmath416 in the slow cooling case . averaged over @xmath504 , the ssa coefficient is written as @xmath512 where @xmath513 for example , we obtain @xmath514 for @xmath413 and @xmath515 for @xmath434 , respectively .    note that the spectrum in the optically - thick limit is obtained from @xmath516 , where @xmath517 is the synchrotron emissivity  @xcite . the coefficient agrees with katz ( 2012 ) . one should keep in mind that the @xmath518 is obtained only if @xmath519 , whereas we expect @xmath520 if @xmath521 . balberg , s. , loeb , a. , 2012 , mnras , 414 , 1715 bell a. r. , 2004 , mnras , 353 , 550 bell , a. r. , 2013 , astropart . phys . , 43 , 56 bykov , a. m. , brandenburg , a. , malkov , m. a. , osipov , s. m. , 2013 , space sci . , 178 , 201 budnik , r. , katz , b. , macfadyen , a. , waxman , e. , 2008 , apj , 673 , 928    caprioli , d. , blasi , p. , amato , e. , 2009 , mnras , 396 , 2065 the cta consortium , 2011 , experimental astronomy , 32 , 193 chandra , p. , chevalier , r. a. , chugai , n. , fransson , c. , irwin , c. m. , soderberg , a. m. , chakraborti , s. , immler , s. , 2012a , apj , 755 , 110 chandra , p. , chevalier , r. a. , irwin , c. m. , chugai , n. , fransson , c. , soderberg , a. m. , 2012b , apj , 750 , l2 chevalier , r. a. , 1982a , apj , 258 , 790 chevalier , r. a. , 1982b , apj , 259 , 302 chevalier , r. a. , 1984 , apj , 285 , l63 chevalier , r. a. , 1998 , apj , 499 , 810 chevalier r. a. , fransson c. , 2003 , in weiler k. , ed . , lecture notes in physics vol . 598 , supernovae and gamma - ray bursters . springer - verlag , berlin , p. 171 chevalier , r. a. , irwin , c. m. , 2011 , apj , 729 , l6 chevalier , r. a. , irwin , c. m. , 2012 , apj , 747 , l17 chodorowski , m. j. , zdziarski , a. a. , sikora , m. , 1992 , apj , 400 , 181 chornock , r. et al . , 2013 , apj , 767 , 162 chugai , n. n. , danziger , i. j. , 1994 , mnras , 268 , 173      falk , s. w. and arnett , w. d. , 1973 , apj , 180 , l65 fransson , c. , lundqvist , p. , chevalier , r. a. , 1996 , apj , 461 , 993 fransson , c. et al . , 2013 , arxiv:1312.6617 funk , s. , hinton , j. a. , for the cta consortium , 2013 , astropart . , 43 , 348      immler , s. et al . , 2008 , apj , 674 , l85 inoue , t. , yamazaki , r. , inutsuka , s. , 2009 , apj , 695 , 825 inoue , t. , yamazaki , r. , inutsuka , s. , fukui , y. , 2012 , apj , 744 , 71 inserra , c. et al . , 2013 , apj , 770 , 128    kasen d. , bildsten l. , 2010 , apj , 717 , 245 kashiyama , k. , murase , k. , horiuchi , s. , gao , s. , mszros , p. , 2013 , apj , 769 , l6 katz , b. , 2012 , mnras , 420 , l6 katz , b. , budnik , r. , waxman , e. , 2010 , apj , 716 , 781 katz , b. , sapir , n. , waxman , e. , 2011 , arxiv:1106.1898 katz , b. , waxman , e. , 2008 , jcap , 01 , 018 kotera , k. , phinney , e. s. , olinto , a. v. , 2013 , mnras , 432 , 3228 kulsrud , r. m. , cesarsky , c. j. , 1971 , al , 8 , 189    maeda , k. , 2012 , apj 758 , 81 mauerhan , j. c. et al . , 2013 , mnras , 430 , 1801 metzger , b. d. , giannios , d. , thompson , t. a. , bucciantini , n. , quataert , e. , 2011 , mnras , 413 , 2031 miller , a. a. et al . , 2009 , apj , 690 , 1303 miller , a. a. et al . , 2010 , mnras , 404 , 305 margutti , r. et al . , 2014 , apj , 780 , 21 moriya , t. j. , blinnikov , s. i. , tominaga , n. , yoshida , n. , tanaka , m. , maeda , k. , nomoto , k. , 2013a , mnras , 428 , 1020 moriya , t. j. , maeda , k. , taddia , f. , sollerman , j. , blinnikov , s. i. , sorokina , e. i. , 2013b , mnras , 435 , 1520 murase , k. , mszros , p. , zhang , b. , 2009 , phys . d , 79 , 103001 murase , k. , nagataki , s. , 2006 , phys . d , 73 , 063002 murase , k. , thompson , t. a. , lacki , b. c. , beacom , j. f. , 2011 , phys . d , 84 , 043003 murase , k. et al . , 2014 , in preparation    ofek , e. o. , lin , l. , kouveliotou , c. , younes , g. , ggs , e. , kasliwal , m. m. , cao , y. t. , 2013a , apj , 768 , 47 ofek , e. o. et al . , 2007 , apj , 659 , l13 ofek , e. o. et al . , 2013b , apj , 763 , 42 ofek , e. o. et al . , 2010 , apj , 724 , 1396 ofek , e. o. et al . , 2013c , nature ( london ) , 494 , 65 ofek , e. o. et al . , 2014 , apj , 781 , 42 ohira , y. , murase , k. , yamazaki , r. , 2010 , a&a , 513 , a17      quimby , r. m. et al . , 2011 , nature , 474 , 487 quimby , r. m. , yuan , f. , akerlof , c. , wheeler , j. c. , 2013 , mnras , 431 , 912 rest , a. et al . , 2011 , apj , 729 , 88 rybicki g. b. , lightman a. p. , 1986 , radiative processes in astrophysics . wiley , new york    sari , e. , & esin , a. a. , 2001 , apj , 548 , 787 schlickeiser , r. , 2002 , cosmic ray astrophysics , ( new york : springer ) smith , n. , 2013 , mnras , 429 , 2366 smith , n. , chornock , r. , silverman , j. m. , filippenko , a. v. , foley , r. j. , 2010 , apj , 709 , 856 smith , n. , foley , r. j. , filippenko , a. v. , 2008 , apj , 680 , 568 smith , n. et al . , 2007 , apj , 666 , 1116 smith , n. , mccray , r. , 2007 , apj , 671 , l17 smith , n. et al . , 2009 , apj , 695 , 1334 sveshnikova , l. g. , 2003 , a&a , 409 , 799 svirski , g. , nakar , e. , sari , r. , 2012 , apj , 759 , 108
Abstract:

Answer: the optical and near - ir emission from some classes of supernovae ( sne ) , including type iin and possibly some super - luminous sne , is likely powered by a collision between the sn ejecta and dense circumstellar material ( csm ) . we argue that for a range of csm masses and their radii , a collisionless shock can form , allowing for efficient cosmic - ray ( cr ) acceleration . we show that @xmath0 collisions between these newly accelerated crs and the csm leads to not only gamma rays but also secondary electrons and positrons that radiate synchrotron photons in the high - frequency radio bands . our estimates imply that various facilities including the jansky very large array ( vla ) and the atacama large millimeter / submillimeter array ( alma ) may observe such sne at gpc distances by followup observations in months - to - years , although the detectability strongly depends on the csm density as well as observed frequency . detecting this signal would give us a unique probe of cr acceleration at early times , and even non - detections can put interesting limits on the possibility of cr ion acceleration . following our previous work , we also show that gev gamma rays can escape from the system without severe attenuation , encouraging point - source and stacking analyses with _ fermi_. we provide recipes for diagnosing interaction - powered sn scenario with multi - messenger ( neutrino and gamma - ray ) observations . [ firstpage ]    non - thermal  supernovae