Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: in this paper we demonstrate that the profile of angular distribution of electrons emitted in the process of a single - photon ionization from a strongly polarizable target ( in particular , a metal cluster anion ) exposed to a laser field can be noticeably modified due to the action of the field @xmath2 of alternating dipole moment @xmath3 induced at the residue by the laser field . the field @xmath2 acts on the escaping electron and , being dependent on the polarization vector of the laser field , brings additional dependence of the cross section on the emission angle . the degree of this dependence is determined by the magnitude of @xmath3 which , in turn , is proportional to the residue s dynamic polarizability . therefore , for a target with large polarizability the effect can be very pronounced even for laser fields of low intensities . the effect of the laser - field  induced dipole moment in atomic photoionization process was discussed in @xcite ( where one finds also the references to the earlier works by the authors ) and , more recently , in @xcite . both papers were devoted to the study of _ multiphoton _ detachment of electrons from atomic negative ions . in @xcite the process was analyzed by means of the perturbation theory . numerical analysis was carried out for halogen and alkali metal anions , and it demonstrated , that the induced dipole moment influences the magnitude of total cross section of the many - photon detachment . the paper @xcite dealt with the process of a _ strong - field _ many - photon detachment of an atomic anion . the non - perturbative adiabatic theory , developed in @xcite , was modified to account for the field of the induced dipole moment . the numerical calculations , performed for rb@xmath4 and cs@xmath4 , showed the increase of the detachment rate and essential modification of the angular distribution .    in our paper we investigate the influence of the induced dipole moment on the angular and spectral distributions of photoelectrons in the process of _ single - photon _ ionization ( or detachment ) occurring in the _ weak - field _ regime . numerical results are presented for sodium cluster anions na@xmath5 with @xmath6 . the corresponding residue clusters are characterized by large values of the dynamic dipole polarizability @xmath7 , which in the vicinity of plasmon resonances , i.e. at @xmath8 ev , can be as large as @xmath9 a.u . , which by far exceed the maximum values of @xmath7 of individual atoms ( e.g. , @xmath10 a.u . for cs at the photon energy 0.47 ev @xcite ) . we demonstrate that dramatic changes to the profile of angular distribution occur in vicinities of the plasmon resonances and for comparatively low intensities @xmath11 w/@xmath1 of the laser field . these are exactly the ranges used in recent experimental studies @xcite of the photodetachment from various metal cluster anions carried out by means of angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy . therefore , the experimental test of the predicted effects seems to be feasible .    the atomic system of units , @xmath12 is used throughout the paper . consider the process of photoionization of a strongly polarizable target ( a cluster , a fullerene , a complex molecule , etc ) by spatially homogenous linearly polarized laser field @xmath13 we assume , that the field wavelength @xmath14 greatly exceeds the characteristic size @xmath15 of the target , @xmath16 . thus , the process can be treated within the dipole - photon limit . the laser field ionizes the target and polarizes the residue . therefore , in addition to other fields ( the static potential of the residue , the long - range polarizational potential ) the escaping photoelectron feels the field due to the oscillating dipole moment @xmath3 induced at the residue : @xmath17    to simplify the consideration we assume , that the residue is spherically symmetric , so that its tensor of polarizability contains only a scalar part which is notated as @xmath7 . then , the moment @xmath3 reads @xmath18 where @xmath19 . the field of the induced dipole can be written as follows : @xmath20 with @xmath21 . this field is dependent on the direction of @xmath22 , therefore , the angular distribution of photoelectrons acquires additional dependence on the polarization of the laser field . the degree of this dependence is determined by the magnitude of @xmath3 , which is proportional to the residue dynamic dipole polarizability . hence , for a target with large polarizability the modification of the angular distribution due to the induced dipole moment can become noticeable even for a laser field of a comparatively low intensity . let us clearly state the conditions which we impose on the parameters of the laser field . these include the following inequalities : @xmath23 the first condition implies that the laser field strength is much smaller than the strength @xmath24 of the internal field in the target . this condition allows one to ignore the laser field when constructing the wavefunction of the bound electron with the binding energy @xmath25 . numerical results presented in section [ numericalresults ] refer to the laser field strength @xmath26 v / cm . the second condition states that the energy @xmath27 of the escaping electron is large compared to the ponderomotive shift due to the wiggling in the laser field . owing to this condition we do not `` dress '' the photoelectron wavefunction with the laser field . the last inequality in ( [ conditions ] ) indicates that the photon energy exceeds the ionization threshold of the bound electron . therefore , the process of a _ single - photon _ ionization is allowed for which the energy conservation law reads @xmath28    combining the conditions ( i ) and ( iii ) one demonstrates that the following inequality is met : @xmath29 where @xmath30 is a so - called keldysh parameter , and @xmath31 . the limit @xmath32 defines a weak field regime ( see , e.g. @xcite ) . thus , in this paper we investigate the influence of the induced dipole moment @xmath3 on the angular and spectral distributions of photoelectrons in the process of _ single - photon _ ionization ( or detachment ) occurring in the weak field regime . earlier the role of @xmath3 was studied in the process of many - photon detachment ( i.e. , when @xmath33 ) from atomic negative ions . it was done in the weak - field @xcite and in the strong - field @xcite limits . let us note , that the weak field condition ( ii ) does not immediately imply the applicability of the perturbative approach with respect to @xmath2 . indeed , from ( [ problem.2])-([problem2.3a ] ) follows that @xmath34 exceeds @xmath35 by a factor @xmath36 . for a strongly polarizable target this factor can be large enough in a wide range of radial distances @xmath37 , and this might lead to a non - perturbative treatment of the action of @xmath2 .    to carry out a quantitative analysis we first postulate that under certain conditions the field ( [ problem2.3a ] ) can be considered as a time - dependent perturbation which modifies the wavefunction of the escaping electron . the criterion of applicability of this approach will be formulated in the course of calculations . the matrix element @xmath38 , which describes a dipole - photon transition of the electron from the initial bound state @xmath39 to the final state @xmath40 with the asymptotic momentum @xmath41 and energy @xmath42 , can be written in the following form : @xmath43 the right - hand side of this equation represents the power series in @xmath2 . the structure of the terms of the series is illustrated by diagrams in figure [ diagram.fig ] . ( indicated with the dashed vertical lines ) . the double line represents the initial bound state . the solid line stands for the escaping electron whose wavefunction is `` dressed '' with all static fields . ] the zeroth order term @xmath44 describes the direct process of photoionization standing for the matrix element of the operator @xmath45 : @xmath46 where @xmath47 we assume that the wavefunction @xmath48 ( whose asymptotic form is the plane wave + the incoming wave ) corresponds to the state `` dressed '' with all _ static _ fields . the delta - function on the right - hand side of ( [ m0.1 ] ) expresses the energy conservation law ( [ m0.3 ] ) . the terms @xmath49 with @xmath50 are the corrections to the transition amplitude due to the @xmath51-times interaction of the photoelectron with @xmath2 . since this field explicitly depends on @xmath52 ( see ( [ problem2.3a ] ) ) then in each act of the interaction the electron energy is changed ( increased or decreased ) by @xmath53 . as a result , not all terms on the right - hand side of ( [ problem.3 ] ) represent the correction to the direct amplitude @xmath44 , which implies the validity of ( [ m0.3 ] ) . for example , evaluating @xmath54 ( the second diagram in figure [ diagram.fig ] ) one finds , that it contains the terms proportional to @xmath55 and to @xmath56 , which conflict with the conservation law ( [ m0.3 ] ) . therefore , the term @xmath54 must be ignored when constructing the correction to @xmath44 . the lowest - order correction originates from the amplitude @xmath57 ( the last diagram in figure [ diagram.fig ] ) , which contains the terms proportional to @xmath58 . applying the standard technique of the time - dependent perturbation theory , one derives the following expression for this contribution : @xmath59 where @xmath60 here @xmath61 is the green s function of the photoelectron and @xmath62 is the unit vector of the laser field polarization . hence , within the second second order perturbation theory in @xmath2 , the photoionization amplitude is written as : @xmath63    using the amplitude ( [ ampl.1 ] ) one can write the following expression for the spectra - angular distribution : @xmath64 here @xmath65 stands for the differential cross section calculated without the influence of the induced dipole moment . within the dipole - photon approximation the differential cross section @xmath66 can be presented in the well - known general form ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) : @xmath67 where @xmath68 is the total cross section of photoionization , @xmath69 stands for the angle between @xmath41 and @xmath70 , @xmath71 is the legendre polynomial of the second order . the quantity @xmath72 stands for the angular asymmetry parameter @xcite . the factor @xmath73 defines the profile of the angular distribution . equation ( [ cs.3 ] ) indicates , that the profile is modified by the factor @xmath74 , when the field ( [ problem2.3a ] ) is taken into account . the correction term @xmath75 is defined as follows : @xmath76    formula ( [ cs.3 ] ) was obtained by means of the perturbation theory . thus , it is implied that the absolute value of the correction term satisfies the condition @xmath77 . if otherwise , the field @xmath2 must be accounted for in all orders of the perturbation series ( [ problem.3 ] ) . it follows from ( [ ampl.3 ] ) , that @xmath75 is proportional to the squared induced dipole moment , @xmath78 . therefore , for a target of a small polarizability , one has to apply very intensive laser fields in order to achieve a noticeable correction to the photoelectron angular distribution , i.e. @xmath79 . on the contrary , for a strongly polarizable target ( e.g. , a metallic cluster or / and its anion ) a strong effect can be expected for laser fields of a moderate strength . in section [ numericalresults ] we demonstrate , that dramatic change of the angular distribution profile can occur for @xmath80 v / cm . it is important to note , that the correction term ( [ cs.5 ] ) depends on the ratio of the amplitudes @xmath81 and @xmath82 . thus , one can expect that it is less sensitive to the approximation chosen to describe the photoelectron wavefunction than the cross section @xmath83 . therefore , to estimate the influence of the target polarization one can calculate @xmath75 within the framework of a comparatively simple approximation , which is described below . in this section we derive an approximate expression for the correction term @xmath75 using a simple , although realistic and physically clear , model .    to start with let us assume , that the ionized target is a spherically - symmetric anion . then , firstly , the ground state wavefunction @xmath84 does not depend on the angles of the position vector : @xmath85 . secondly , the wavefunction @xmath86 of the photoelectron does not contain the contribution of a long - range coulomb field of the residue . these assumptions , being not of a principal nature , allow one to simplify the intermediate algebra . making use of the partial wave expansion @xmath87 where @xmath88 are the spherical harmonics , @xmath89 are the scattering phaseshift , and @xmath90 are the radial wavefunctions , one writes the amplitude @xmath82 in the following form : @xmath91    another simplification is based on the approximation that the field @xmath2 acts on the escaping electron only outside the target , i.e. at the distances @xmath92 . additionally , one can assume , that the wavefunction @xmath93 is concentrated in the interior of the target , i.e. at @xmath94 . therefore , when evaluating the right - hand side of ( [ ampl.3 ] ) one takes into account that @xmath95 . this allows one to relate @xmath81 to the amplitude @xmath82 . to do this let us approximate the green s function @xmath96 as follows : @xmath97 here @xmath98 is the largest / smallest of @xmath99 , @xmath100 stands for the irregular solutions of the radial schrdinger equation for the energy @xmath42 . the quantity @xmath101 is the exact radial green s function corresponding to the multipolarity @xmath102 . the first equality in ( [ longdistance.2 ] ) states the partial - wave expansion of the green s function . the approximate equality is based on the assumption @xmath103 .    using ( [ longdistance.2 ] ) in ( [ ampl.3 ] ) one notices that the radial integral over @xmath104 reduces to that from ( [ m0_born.1 ] ) . therefore , the amplitude @xmath81 acquires the form : @xmath105 with @xmath106 here the integration is carried out over the spatial region @xmath107 . the correction term ( [ cs.5 ] ) is related to @xmath108 as @xmath109 . let us comment on the evaluation of the right - hand side of ( [ longdistance.8 ] ) . introducing the expansion ( [ m0.1a ] ) and representing the green s functions @xmath110 and @xmath111 in terms of the partial - wave series similar to ( [ longdistance.2 ] ) , one carries out the angular integration by means of the standard methods ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) and arrives at : @xmath112 { { \rm im}}\ , b_{ll^{\prime}}. \label{longdistance1.5}\end{aligned}\ ] ] the kronecker symbols @xmath113 , which reduce the allowed values of the orbital momenta to @xmath114 and @xmath115 , reflect the dipole selection rules applicable to each of the vertices in the last diagram in figure [ diagram.fig ] . the ratio @xmath116 reduces to @xmath117 with the help of the recurrence relation for the legendre polynomials . the quantities @xmath118 stand for the following radial integrals : @xmath119 for any realistic target the exact evaluation of these integrals can be done by numerical means only , implying the computation of the regular @xmath90 and the irregular @xmath120 functions as well as of the green s functions @xmath121 and @xmath122 . to carry out the approximate integration one can substitute these quantities with the leading terms of their asymptotic representations . for @xmath90 and @xmath120 this results in @xmath123 and @xmath124 . the leading terms in the expansions of the radial green s functions are : @xmath125 here @xmath126 , @xmath127 , @xmath128 and @xmath129 are the elements of the scattering matrix . for the real argument @xmath130 this quantity reads as @xmath131 .    by using the asymptotic formulae one carries out analytical evaluation of the integrals from ( [ longdistance1.5a ] ) . the final result ( the leading term ) for @xmath132 is as follows : @xmath133 _ { l=1,3 \atop l^{\prime}=0,2 } , \label{functionb3.3}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath134 , @xmath135 and @xmath136 . it follows from the approximations formulated above , that formula ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) is valid if the photoelectron momentum @xmath137 and the ground state energy @xmath138 satisfy the conditions : @xmath139    letting @xmath140 in ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) one finds the plane - wave born limit of @xmath132 . the presence of oscillatory terms on the right - hand side of ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) is physically clear . indeed , in the limit @xmath141 the wavelength of the photoelectron is less than the size of the target , which is supposed to have a well - pronounced edge ( e.g. , the edge of an ionic core in a cluster ) . thus , the electron experiences a diffraction at the edge when leaving the core . this diffraction leads to the oscillatory character of the cross section . this phenomenon was discussed previously in connection with various processes involving metallic clusters and fullerenes : the radiative electron capture by metallic clusters @xcite , the electron scattering @xcite , the polarizational bremsstrahlung @xcite . carrying out obvious summations in ( [ longdistance1.5 ] ) , one writes correction factor as follows : @xmath142 where @xmath143    formula ( [ correctionfactor2.1 ] ) stresses the proportionality of @xmath75 to the laser field intensity ( which is proportional to @xmath144 ) and exhibits explicitly its dependence on the emission angle @xmath69 , which enters , as well as in ( [ cs.4a ] ) , via the second order legendre polynomial .    as a function of @xmath69 the modulus of @xmath75 attains its maximum either at @xmath145 ( and @xmath146 ) or at @xmath147 , depending on the sign of the product @xmath148 and on the relative magnitudes of @xmath149 and @xmath150 . for further reference let us define the quantity @xmath151 which allows one to estimate the laser field strength needed to achieve a noticeable correction to the angular distribution ( see the discussion in section [ numericalresults ] ) .    substituting ( [ correctionfactor2.1 ] ) into ( [ cs.3 ] ) , taking into account ( [ cs.4a ] ) and expressing @xmath152 via @xmath71 and @xmath153 , one derives the following formula for the differential cross section within the lowest order of perturbation theory in @xmath2 : @xmath154 the coefficients @xmath155 are related to the asymmetry parameter @xmath156 and to @xmath157 via @xmath158 , \quad a_4 = { 18 \over 35}\,e_0 ^ 2\,\beta\,\kappa_2 . \label{modification2.9}\end{aligned}\ ] ]    the right - hand side of ( [ modification2.3 ] ) suggests that not only the profile of the angular distribution can be changed , but the magnitude of the cross section , integrated over the emission angles , is scaled by the factor @xmath159 which can be greater or lower than one depending on the signs and magnitudes of @xmath156 and @xmath157 . if the action of @xmath2 is ignored then @xmath160 , @xmath161 and @xmath162 , and equation ( [ modification2.3 ] ) reduces to ( [ cs.4a ] ) . numerical analysis of the influence of the induced dipole moment on the profile of the angular distribution was carried out for the process of photodetachment of sodium cluster anions na@xmath163 . the results presented below in this section refer to @xmath164 and @xmath165 . the corresponding neutral clusters are spherically - symmetric which makes applicable the theory described in section [ framework ] . the parameters of sodium clusters and their anions , used in our numerical calculations , are summarized in table [ nan.table ] . let us comment on these data . the ionic core radius was calculated using the standard relation @xmath166 with the wigner - seitz radius @xmath167 set to 4 a.u . the values of electron affinities @xmath168 are taken from a recent work by kostko @xcite which contains , in particular , an excellent collection of reference data on various metal clusters . the other data presented in the table refer to the polarizability of the core and the parameters of the plasmon peak . we considered the dynamic dipole polarizability @xmath7 of the clusters within the framework of the resonance plasmon approximation ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) : @xmath169 here @xmath170 is the static polarizability , @xmath171 is the surface plasmon energy , and @xmath172 is the linewidth of the plasmon resonance .    due to the spill - out effect the static polarizability of a metallic cluster of a radius @xmath15 exceeds the classical value @xmath173 , which characterizes a metallic ball of the same radius . in the table we present the ratio @xmath174 calculated within the rpa @xcite and the lda @xcite ) as well as the experimentally measured values @xcite . the @xmath171 values were obtained with the help of the relation proposed in @xcite to account for the size - dependence of the plasmon energy : @xmath175 , where @xmath176 ev is the mie plasmon energy in a sodium metallic sphere , and @xmath177  takes into account the spill - out effect . @r|rrrrrrrr & & & & & & + & ( a.u . ) & ( ev ) & ( a.u . ) & @xcite & @xcite & @xcite & ( ev ) & ( ev ) + na@xmath178 & 8.00 & 0.915 & 512 & 1.48 & 1.44 & 1.72 & 2.64 & 0.2 + na@xmath179 & 10.86 & 1.337 & 1280 & 1.41 & 1.37 & 1.67 & 2.81 & 0.4 + na@xmath180 & 13.68 & 1.509 & 2560 & 1.10 & 1.32 & 1.60 & 2.90 & 0.7 + na@xmath181 & 15.48 & 1.719 & 3712 & 1.24 & 1.22 & - & 2.95 & 0.4 + na@xmath182 & 18.06 & 1.847 & 5888 & 1.22 & 1.20 & - & 2.99 & 0.2 +    [ nan.table ]    the size dependence of the width @xmath172 of the plasmon resonance for neutral sodium clusters with @xmath183 up to several hundreds was analyzed in @xcite within the rpa scheme and in @xcite within a semiclassical approach . these two methods , being consistent for @xmath184 , deviate noticeably for lower @xmath183 values . the rpa calculations reproduce the @xmath185 scaling law which , is inadequate when compared to the experimental data for @xmath186 ( see the discussion in @xcite ) . the semiclassical calculations @xcite seem to be consistent with the experimental data in the whole region @xmath187 . the values of @xmath172 , presented in the table , were deduced from figure 1 in @xcite . it is seen from the table , that for all @xmath183 the plasmon energy exceeds the electron affinity . this fact justifies the choice of cluster anions in a view of the present study . indeed , the inequality @xmath188 leads to the additional enhancement of @xmath75 owing to the pronounced increase of the modulus of the dynamic polarizability in the region @xmath189 .    to conclude the discussion on the parameters of the chosen targets let us note , that both criteria from ( [ functionb3.3a ] ) can be easily met for na@xmath163 . the first inequality fails only in the narrow near - threshold region @xmath190 but is well fulfilled for @xmath189 . the validity of the second condition one proves by introducing @xmath191 .     and for na@xmath192 as indicated . + in each graph the upper panel represents the dependence of @xmath193 on @xmath53 ; the middle panel - dependences @xmath194 and @xmath195 , eqs . ( [ correctionfactor2.3])-([correctionfactor2.1a ] ) ; the lower panel - dependence of @xmath196 , eq . ( [ correctionfactor2.1b ] ) . parameters @xmath171 and @xmath172 are as indicated in table [ nan.table ] . the data refer to the @xmath197 ratio equal to 1.45 for na@xmath198 and to 1.30 for na@xmath180 . , title="fig : " ] +   and for na@xmath192 as indicated . + in each graph the upper panel represents the dependence of @xmath193 on @xmath53 ; the middle panel - dependences @xmath194 and @xmath195 , eqs . ( [ correctionfactor2.3])-([correctionfactor2.1a ] ) ; the lower panel - dependence of @xmath196 , eq . ( [ correctionfactor2.1b ] ) . parameters @xmath171 and @xmath172 are as indicated in table [ nan.table ] . the data refer to the @xmath197 ratio equal to 1.45 for na@xmath198 and to 1.30 for na@xmath180 . , title="fig : " ]     but for na@xmath199 and na@xmath200 . for both clusters the ratio @xmath197 is set to 1.20 . , title="fig : " ] +   but for na@xmath199 and na@xmath200 . for both clusters the ratio @xmath197 is set to 1.20 . , title="fig : " ]    the results of calculation of the quantities relevant to the correction term @xmath75 are presented in figures [ na08_40.fig ] and [ na58_92.fig ] . for each anion the calculations were performed for the photon energies above the ionization threshold @xmath168 and in the vicinity of the plasmon peak . the latter manifests itself as a resonance in the dependence of @xmath193 on @xmath53 , as it is seen from the upper panel in each graph . the dynamic polarizabilities were calculated via ( [ numerical.1 ] ) with the parameters @xmath171 and @xmath172 as indicated in table [ nan.table ] . given the differences between the calculated and experimentally measured values of the static polarizabilities @xmath170 , as well as the absence of the experimental data for na@xmath181 and na@xmath182 , for the ratio @xmath197 we used the values close to the theoretical data ( see the figures captions ) . the dependences of the coefficients @xmath149 and @xmath150 on @xmath53 are presented in the middle panels . they were computed from ( [ correctionfactor2.3 ] ) and ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) . to calculate the right - hand side of the latter formula beyond the plane - wave born approximation one must know the scattering phaseshifts @xmath201 and @xmath202 . to determine the phaseshifts we solved numerically the phase equation ( see , e.g. , @xcite ) for an electron moving in a local potential . the model potential , which was used to describe the interaction between the photoelectron and the neutral residue , accounted for the following three terms : ( a ) the short - range potential due to the coulomb interaction with the core s electrons and the ionic jellium core , ( b ) the exchange - correlation term , which was treated within the gunnarsson - lundqvist approximation @xcite , ( c ) the polarization potential was considered in the form @xmath203 for @xmath37 and @xmath204 if otherwise . inclusion of the polarization term is important for an adequate description the low - energy electron scattering from metallic clusters ( e.g. , @xcite ) . a more rigorous treatment accounts for the many - body correlations , which may be considered , for example , within the dyson equation scheme @xcite . however , for the purpose of our paper it is sufficient to treat the polarization potential in the simple form described above .    comparing the middle panels in the graphs from figures [ na08_40.fig ] and [ na58_92.fig ] one notices that the behaviour of @xmath194 ( and of @xmath195 as well ) exhibits some general trends along with the specific features determined by the dynamic and geometrical properties of an individual target . common to all clusters is the existence of extrema for @xmath194 at @xmath189 , which is due to the factor @xmath193 , see ( [ correctionfactor2.3 ] ) . the extremum can be clearly defined ( see the curves @xmath149 for na@xmath198 and @xmath150 for na@xmath182 which have distinct maxima ) or less pronounced ( both curves for na@xmath181 ) or barely seen ( the case of na@xmath180 ) . the variation in the shape of the extremum , as well as the behaviour of the curves in the regions below and above the plasmon resonance , can be understood by analyzing the @xmath53-dependence of the right - hand sides in ( [ correctionfactor2.3 ] ) and ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) . the non - oscillatory part of the latter depends on the photon energy mainly through the factor @xmath205 . this leads to @xmath206 . therefore , a symmetric resonance profile of @xmath193 is distorted due to the factor @xmath207 . for a powerful and narrow resonance ( as in the case of na@xmath182 ) the distortion is comparatively small , whereas for a wide resonance the disproportion between the low- and the high-@xmath53 shoulders may completely change the behaviour of the curve in the vicinity of the resonance , as it happens for na@xmath180 . in either case the factor @xmath207 results in a faster decrease of @xmath208 with @xmath53 beyond the resonance . in the region @xmath209 the curves @xmath194 , being enhanced by the factor , exhibit a non - monotonous oscillatory character ( most clearly seen in na@xmath180 , na@xmath181 and na@xmath182 graphs ) . this is due to the second and the third terms on the right - hand side of ( [ functionb3.3 ] ) , which contain the oscillating factors @xmath210 and @xmath211 , dependent on the cluster size , and the factors @xmath212 , @xmath213 , dependent on the phaseshifts . the solid curves in the middle panels of each graph represent the dependences @xmath195 defined in ( [ correctionfactor2.1a ] ) . for a given photon energy the quantity @xmath214 stands for the maximum value of @xmath215 within the interval @xmath216 $ ] . it was already mentioned , that the correction term must satisfy the condition @xmath77 . thus , taking into account that @xmath217 , one can introduce a critical value @xmath218 , which defines the upper boundary for the laser field strength consistent with the perturbative approach adopted in this paper : @xmath219 the corresponding intensity of the laser field ( in w/@xmath1 ) can be calculated from the relation @xmath220 , where @xmath221 is measured the atomic units .    in the limit @xmath222 a strong inequality @xmath223 is valid , so that the photoionization process is not affected by the induced dipole moment . the influence of the latter can become pronounced for @xmath224 resulting in @xmath79 . @l|crrccccc & @xmath225 & & & @xmath226 & @xmath227 & @xmath228 & @xmath229 & @xmath230 + & ( ev ) & ( @xmath231 ) & ( @xmath231 ) & ( @xmath231 ) & ( @xmath232 a.u . ) & ( @xmath233w/@xmath1 ) & ( @xmath232 a.u . ) & ( @xmath232 ev ) + na@xmath178 & 2.64 & -0.470 & -0.031 & 0.501 & 1.41 & 0.66 & 17.5 & 1.44 + na@xmath179 & 2.73 & 0.021 & 0.022 & 0.043 & 4.82 & 7.67 & 30.8 & 15.7 + na@xmath180 & 2.72 & 0.022 & -0.100 & 0.078 & 3.58 & 4.23 & 37.0 & 8.64 + na@xmath181 & 2.89 & 0.151 & -0.160 & 0.231 & 2.08 & 1.43 & 44.9 & 2.61 + na@xmath182 & 2.98 & 0.128 & -1.589 & 1.461 & 0.83 & 0.23 & 50.1 & 0.39 +    [ nan.table2 ]    dependences @xmath218 are plotted in the lower panels in figures [ na08_40.fig ] and [ na58_92.fig ] . for all clusters this function attains its minimum in the point @xmath234 in the vicinity of the plasmon resonance . the values of @xmath225 , as well as of other quantities calculated in this point , are presented in table [ nan.table2 ] . it is instructive to compare the critical field @xmath235 with the strength @xmath229 of the internal anionic field . the latter can be related to the ionization potential @xmath168 through @xmath236 . it is seen that @xmath229 exceeds @xmath235 by the order of magnitude . the strong inequality @xmath237 , being in accordance with the first condition from ( [ conditions ] ) , justifies the approximation adopted in this paper to neglect the modification of the ground state orbitals due to the laser field . the last column in the table contains the values of ponderomotive energy of the photoelectron in the critical laser field . comparing the ponderomotive shifts and the kinetic energies @xmath238 ev , one notices that the latter is larger by several orders of magnitude . therefore , the second condition in ( [ conditions ] ) is also well fulfilled . hence , one can expect , that for the intensities @xmath239 w/@xmath1 the modification of the spectral - angular distribution due to the action of the field of the induced dipole moment can be quite pronounced . to carry out the corresponding quantitative estimates one can use the formulae obtained within the framework of perturbation theory .     of the angular distribution ( [ profile.1 ] ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated ) , and for several values of the ratio @xmath240 ( see the legend in the graph @xmath241 for na@xmath242 ) . the data refer to the photon energies @xmath225 indicated in table [ nan.table2 ] . thick black curves in each graph represent the field free distribution @xmath243 , eq . ( [ profile.0 ] ) . the length of line segment connecting the origin and a given point on the curves is equal to the value of @xmath244 or @xmath243 ( in absolute units ) in the corresponding direction . the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to @xmath22 , which is shown in the graphs with @xmath245 . in each graph the spacing between ticks is equal to 1 for both directions . , title="fig : " ] +   of the angular distribution ( [ profile.1 ] ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated ) , and for several values of the ratio @xmath240 ( see the legend in the graph @xmath241 for na@xmath242 ) . the data refer to the photon energies @xmath225 indicated in table [ nan.table2 ] . thick black curves in each graph represent the field free distribution @xmath243 , eq . ( [ profile.0 ] ) . the length of line segment connecting the origin and a given point on the curves is equal to the value of @xmath244 or @xmath243 ( in absolute units ) in the corresponding direction . the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to @xmath22 , which is shown in the graphs with @xmath245 . in each graph the spacing between ticks is equal to 1 for both directions . , title="fig : " ] +   of the angular distribution ( [ profile.1 ] ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated ) , and for several values of the ratio @xmath240 ( see the legend in the graph @xmath241 for na@xmath242 ) . the data refer to the photon energies @xmath225 indicated in table [ nan.table2 ] . thick black curves in each graph represent the field free distribution @xmath243 , eq . ( [ profile.0 ] ) . the length of line segment connecting the origin and a given point on the curves is equal to the value of @xmath244 or @xmath243 ( in absolute units ) in the corresponding direction . the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to @xmath22 , which is shown in the graphs with @xmath245 . in each graph the spacing between ticks is equal to 1 for both directions . , title="fig : " ] +   of the angular distribution ( [ profile.1 ] ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated ) , and for several values of the ratio @xmath240 ( see the legend in the graph @xmath241 for na@xmath242 ) . the data refer to the photon energies @xmath225 indicated in table [ nan.table2 ] . thick black curves in each graph represent the field free distribution @xmath243 , eq . ( [ profile.0 ] ) . the length of line segment connecting the origin and a given point on the curves is equal to the value of @xmath244 or @xmath243 ( in absolute units ) in the corresponding direction . the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to @xmath22 , which is shown in the graphs with @xmath245 . in each graph the spacing between ticks is equal to 1 for both directions . , title="fig : " ] +   of the angular distribution ( [ profile.1 ] ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated ) , and for several values of the ratio @xmath240 ( see the legend in the graph @xmath241 for na@xmath242 ) . the data refer to the photon energies @xmath225 indicated in table [ nan.table2 ] . thick black curves in each graph represent the field free distribution @xmath243 , eq . ( [ profile.0 ] ) . the length of line segment connecting the origin and a given point on the curves is equal to the value of @xmath244 or @xmath243 ( in absolute units ) in the corresponding direction . the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to @xmath22 , which is shown in the graphs with @xmath245 . in each graph the spacing between ticks is equal to 1 for both directions . , title="fig : " ]    the calculated profiles of the angular distributions are presented in figure [ profiles.fig ] . in the present paper we have not made an attempt to compute the angular asymmetry parameter @xmath246 for sodium anion clusters ( neither have we found its values in the literature ) . instead , for each target we carried out the calculations for the three values , @xmath247 , aiming to demonstrate that the modification of the profile takes place for _ any _ @xmath156 from the allowable interval @xmath248 $ ] .    in each graph from figure [ profiles.fig ] the thick solid curve represents the unperturbed profile @xmath249 the emission angle @xmath69 is measured with respect to the vector @xmath22 , which is indicated in the graphs with @xmath245 . other curves correspond to the modified profiles @xmath250 ( see ( [ cs.3 ] ) , ( [ correctionfactor2.1 ] ) and ( [ correctionfactor2.1b ] ) ) calculated for several values of the ratio @xmath251 . for each anion the data refer to the photon energy @xmath225 . figure [ profiles.fig ] demonstrates , that even for comparatively low intensities ( corresponding to @xmath252 ) the changes in the profiles are already visible . for @xmath253 they become much more pronounced . it is seen that variation of the profile depends , both qualitatively and quantitatively , on the value of @xmath156 and on the choice of the target anion which enters via the coefficients @xmath254 and @xmath255 .    in the case @xmath245 the field - free profile @xmath243 is proportional to @xmath256 yielding @xmath257 as the minimum and @xmath258 as the maximum values within the interval @xmath259 $ ] . the modified profile can be written as @xmath260 with @xmath261 and @xmath262 . one easily shows , that for @xmath263 the function @xmath264 acquires additional extremum . however , this inequality can not be met for the considered targets ( see the values of @xmath254 , @xmath255 and @xmath265 in table [ nan.table2 ] ) and for @xmath253 . therefore , the pattern of the modified angular distribution is similar to that obtained without the influence of the induced dipole . namely , the strongest emission occurs in the directions perpendicular to the field @xmath22 and there is no emission for @xmath145 and @xmath266 . on the whole , the distortion increases with @xmath267 , attaining the largest values at @xmath147 . the trend of the largest distortion depends on the sign of @xmath254 : if @xmath268 ( as in the cases of all anions but na@xmath178 ) then @xmath269 whereas negative @xmath254 leads to a shrinking of the modified profiles ( as it happens for na@xmath242 ) .    for @xmath270 the unperturbed angular distribution is isotropic . the modified profile reads as @xmath271 , with @xmath272 and @xmath273 defined as above . the way the profile evolves with the increase of @xmath267 to a great extent depends on the sign of @xmath255 . for @xmath274 the emission along @xmath275 dominates over the emission in the perpendicular directions ( see the case of na@xmath276 ) , whereas for negative @xmath255 the perpendicular direction becomes preferable . the graphs from the central column in figure [ profiles.fig ] demonstrate , that for @xmath277 the distortion can become dramatic both in form and in magnitude .    in the limit @xmath241 the modified profile behaves as @xmath278 . the additional extrema appear if the following two conditions , @xmath279 and @xmath280 , are met . these conditions can be satisfied in the limit @xmath281 for all considered anions but na@xmath276 . most explicitly it is seen in na@xmath192 and na@xmath200 graphs , where the curves with @xmath282 represent the four - petal angular distributions with the maximum emission at @xmath283 and @xmath284 . the same pattern characterizes na@xmath285 , although in this case it is hardly visible due to a strong decrease in the magnitude of @xmath286 for @xmath282 . ( see ( [ spectra.1 ] ) ) calculated for different sodium cluster anions and for the three values of asymmetry parameter @xmath156 ( as indicated in the top left graph ) . the data refer to the laser field intensity @xmath287 w/@xmath1 . ]    finally , let us briefly discuss the influence of the induced dipole moment on the cross section integrated over the emission angles . recalling ( [ modification2.3 ] ) and ( [ modification2.9 ] ) , one finds the following formula for the ratio of the cross sections with , @xmath288 , and without , @xmath289 , account for the correction : @xmath290 figure [ spectra.fig ] presents the ratios @xmath291 versus @xmath53 . for each anion the ratio was calculated using the dependences @xmath149 and @xmath149 , presented in figures [ na08_40.fig ] and [ na58_92.fig ] , and for three values of the asymmetry parameter ( as indicated ) . the intensity of the laser field was set to @xmath287 w/@xmath1 , which corresponds to the field strength @xmath292 a.u . comparing the latter value to the critical field @xmath218 ( see figures [ na08_40.fig ] and [ na58_92.fig ] ) one notices , that for all targets and in the whole range of @xmath53 the parameter @xmath293 is less than one . thus , formula ( [ spectra.1 ] ) is applicable for the quantitative estimate of the correction due to the induced moment . as one can see from figure [ spectra.fig ] , the largest deviation ( up to @xmath294 ) of @xmath288 from @xmath289 occurs for na@xmath285 and na@xmath200 in the vicinities of the plasmon resonances , where @xmath267 reaches its maximum values : @xmath295 for na@xmath285 and @xmath296 for na@xmath200 . in the case of na@xmath200 a strong inequality @xmath297 is valid ( see figure [ na58_92.fig ] or / and table [ nan.table2 ] ) . therefore , the magnitude of the correction term from the right - hand side of ( [ spectra.1 ] ) becomes sensitive to the choice of the asymmetry parameter . as a result , the ratio @xmath298 strongly varies with @xmath156 . on the contrary , for na@xmath285 the relation @xmath299 is valid , leading to a weak dependence of the ratio on @xmath156 .    for the anions na@xmath192 and na@xmath199 the largest values of @xmath267 equal to 0.05 and 0.15 , correspondingly . hence , the intensity @xmath300 is small compared to @xmath301 . as a result , the deviation of @xmath288 from the field - free value @xmath289 is less pronounced . in summary , we have demonstrated that the dipole moment , induced at the residue by the incoming laser field , can strongly influence the photoionization process . the additional time - dependent long - range field due to the induced moment , acting on the escaping electron , modifies the spectral - angular and spectral distributions of photoelectrons . the effect itself , as well as its quantitative treatment , is quite sensitive to the choice of the target and to the parameters of the laser field . we have demonstrated , that for a strongly polarizable target ( e.g. , metallic cluster anions ) strong modifications of the characteristics of a single - photon ionization process in the vicinity of the plasmon resonance ( typically , @xmath302 ev ) can be achieved by applying laser fields of comparatively low intensities @xmath0 w/@xmath1 .    from a theoretical viewpoint , the advantage of this regime is that the field of induced dipole moment can be treated perturbatively , whereas the influence of the laser field on the photoelectron ( a ponderomotive effect ) and on the ground state of the target can be ignored . we have shown , that even in this weak - field regime one can expect dramatic changes in the profile of angular distribution of photoelectrons as well as in the @xmath53 dependence of the photoionization cross section . to a great extent , these changes depend on the parameters of the target , like its radius , the static and dynamic polarizabilities , the energy of the plasmon resonance peak and the affinity ( or , the ionization potential in the case of a neutral target ) . additional variety can be obtained by changing the intensity and the frequency of the laser field . the analysis , which we have carried out , is based on simple models adopted for the description of the photodetachment process ( the plasmon resonance approximation ) and of the interaction of the escaping electron with the static field of the residue ( via the lda + long - range polarization potential ) . we have also restricted ourselves to the case of spherically - symmetric targets . a more accurate quantitative treatment must include more sophisticated approaches , which take into account the many - body correlation effects intrinsic to both the photodetachment and the electron escape . however , these will leave untouched the physics behind the basic phenomenon discussed in our paper . it is possible to study the predicted phenomena by means of modern experimental techniques . the latter include the production and manipulation of the beams of cluster anions of various types and sizes , the energy and angle resolved photoelectron spectroscopy , the availability of the laser fields of various intensity , frequency and pulse duration @xcite . we believe , that with all these components at hand , soon it will become possible to test the theory against experimental data . we are grateful to roman polozkov for the help in numerical calculation of the ground states of sodium clusters , and to steven manson and bernd von issendorff for the helpful discussions . this work was supported by the european commission within the network of excellence project excell ( project number 515703 ) . 99    p.a . golovinski , i.yu . kiyan , 1990 , _ sov . - uspekhi _ * 33 * , 453 . chernov , i.yu . kiyan , h.  helm , b.a . zon , _ phys . rev . _ a * 71 * , 033410 ( 2005 ) . gribakin , m.yu . kuchiev , _ phys . rev . _ a * 55 * , 3760 ( 1997 ) . o.  kostko , c.  bartels , j.  schwbel , c.  hock , b. v.  issendorff , _ j. phys . series _ * 88 * , 012034 ( 2007 ) . o.  kostko , 2007 , _ photoelectron spectroscopy of mass - selected sodium , coinage metal and divalent metal cluster anions . _ inaugural - dissertation ( universitt freiburg ) . gordon w.  f.  drake ( ed . ) , 2006 , _ springer handbook of atomic , molecular and optical physics _ ( germany : springer ) .
Abstract:

Answer: we demonstrate that the angular distribution of photoelectrons from a strongly polarizable target exposed to a laser field can deviate noticeably from the prediction of conventional theory . even within the dipole - photon approximation the profile of distribution is modified due to the action of the field of alternating dipole moment induced at the residue by the laser field . this effect , being quite sensitive to the dynamic polarizability of the residue and to its geometry , depends also on the intensity and frequency of the laser field . numerical results , presented for sodium cluster anions , demonstrate that dramatic changes to the profile occur for the photon energies in vicinities of the plasmon resonances , where the effect is enhanced due to the increase in the residue polarizability . strong modifications of the characteristics of a single - photon ionization process can be achieved by applying laser fields of comparatively low intensities @xmath0 w/@xmath1 .