Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: quantum coherence ( qch ) plays an important role in today s physics , more specifically in physics of low temperature starting from the laws of thermodynamics @xcite and most recently in the emerging area of quantum information theory . it has been useful in understanding the underlying process of efficient energy transfer in complex biological systems @xcite . in the recent past researchers have attempted to devolop a framework to formalize the theory of qch within the realms of quantum information theory and quantum resource theories @xcite . in this framework qch is quantified in terms of the functions of coherence monotones . some of these better known measures are based on @xmath0 norm , relative entropy @xcite , skew information @xcite and there are many others @xcite . several works were done in this context to extend the measures of coherence for multipartite systems@xcite . in another work , researchers studied the creation of qch using unitary operations with limited thermodynamic resources and eventually they found explicitly the unitary transformation that creates the maximal coherence @xcite . other works were done where people found the average relative entropy of coherence of pure quantum states sampled randomly from the uniform haar measure and showed that it to be typical @xcite . it was shown that in the asymptotic limit , the minimum amount of noise that is required to fully decohere a quantum system , is equal to the relative entropy of coherence . this is quantified by the cost of erasing qch @xcite . in another work it was demonstrated that measurements in a coherent basis are needed to make use of coherence , and that such measurements must be generated by coherent unitary interactions with an environment @xcite . recently some authors derive complementarity relations between coherence measures on mutually unbiased bases using various coherence measures @xcite . in a similar kind of work the robustness of coherence was suitably defined and was proven a full monotone in the context of the recently introduced resource theories of qch @xcite . another group of authors showed that all measures of coherence are frozen for an initial state in a strictly incoherent channel if and only if the relative entropy of coherence is frozen for the state @xcite . further work show the study the relation between qch and quantum discord , a kind of quantum correlation which appears even in non entangled states @xcite . a new framework for measuring qch in finite dimensional systems was introduced and a theoretical measure satisfying the reliability criteria was established in the context of quantum resource theories @xcite . + the impossibility to clone quantum states is regarded as one of the most fundamental restriction that comes from nature @xcite . the  no cloning theorem " states that there exists no quantum mechanical process , which can take two distinct non - orthogonal quantum states @xmath1 , @xmath2 into states @xmath3 , @xmath4 respectively . even though we can not copy an unknown quantum state perfectly but quantum mechanics never rules out the possibility of cloning it approximately @xcite . it also allows probabilistic cloning as one can always clone an arbitrary quantum state perfectly with some non - zero probability of succsess @xcite . in the year 1996 , buzek et al . went beyond the idea of perfect cloning and introduced the concept of approximate cloning . in this process , they have also introduced the state independent quantum copying machine by keeping the fidelity of cloning independent of the input state parameters . this machine is also popularly known as universal quantum cloning machine ( uqcm ) @xcite . later in another work by gisin and massar this cloner was shown to be optimal @xcite . other than this state independent quantum cloning machine ( qcm ) , there are also state dependent qcms @xcite . state dependent quantum cloning machine can be both dynamic and static depending on the choice of machine parameters @xcite . in this context it was shown that how the fidelity of quantum cloning machine is related with the amount of correlation generated in the process of cloning @xcite . + quantum entanglement @xcite in general quantum correlation is considered as a useful resource as it plays a significant role in computational and communication processes like quantum key generation @xcite , secret sharing @xcite , teleportation @xcite , superdense coding @xcite , entanglement swapping @xcite , remote entanglement distribution @xcite and in many more tasks @xcite . the more  pure " is entanglement , more  valuable " is the given two - particle state at least from the point of view of information processing tasks . therefore it becomes important to extract pure entanglement from mixed entangled state . researchers had done a lot of work in past years on these extraction processes @xcite . this comes at the cost of reduction of number of entangled states . it is interesting to see that in quantum information processing scenario , there exists tasks which are completely opposite to this from the operational point of view . this comes under the umbrella of  broadcasting of inseparability " @xcite . when there is an exigency in increasing the number of available entangled pairs rather than the purity of it , it becomes important to broadcast the amount of entanglement from a given pair to different pairs . one possible way to achieve this is by applying local and non local cloing . in general cloning in this context includes both state dependent and state independent cloning @xcite . in a recent work we have shown that it is impossible to optimally broadcast quantum correlation across different laboratories @xcite . but if we consider non optimal broadcasting it is indeed possible to broadcast quantum correlation between separated parties @xcite . other than application of cloning there are different ways to broadcast quantum correlation . quite recently , many authors showed by using sophisticated methods that correlations in a single bipartite state can be locally or uni locally broadcast if and only if the states are classical ( i.e. having classical correlation ) or classical - quantum respectively @xcite . + in this work our basic objective is to broadcast qch present in a pair of qubits to other pairs . keeping in mind the usefulness of qch in resource theories it is also important to broadcast it to more pair of qubits . here we have considered the @xmath0 norm as a measure of coherence . given a state @xmath5 , with its matrix elements as @xmath6 the amount of coherence present in the state @xmath5 in the basis @xmath7 is given by the quantity @xmath8 , where @xmath9 . it is interesting note that coherence is a basis dependent quantity as the representation of coherence will be different in different basis . more precisely since all these measures are functions of off diagonal elements of a given density matrix representation . the value of the coherence in the eigen basis where there are no off diagonal elements , will be zero . it is intuitive that for all other basis the physical findings followed by implications will be similar . so , without any loss of generality here we have computed the coherence in the computational basis @xmath10 . + let us begin with a situation where we have two distant parties @xmath11 and @xmath12 and they share a two qubit mixed state @xmath13 which can be canonically expressed as , @xmath14 = \left\{\overrightarrow{x},\:\overrightarrow{y},\ : t_{3\times 3}\right\},\:\:\ : \label{eq : mix}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where @xmath15 and @xmath16 are bloch vectors with @xmath17 and @xmath18 . here , @xmath19 s ( @xmath20 = @xmath21 ) are elements of the correlation matrix ( @xmath22_{3 \times 3}$ ] ) , whereas @xmath23 are the pauli matrices and @xmath24 is the identity matrix . +    @xmath25{local}\includegraphics[height=4.5cm , width=4cm]{nonlocal } \end{array}\ ] ]    we start with two qubit state @xmath13 and then apply universal symmetric optimal buzek hillery cloner both locally and non locally ( @xmath26 ) as a cloning transformation . in short , broadcasting will be possible if we are able to produce more coherent pairs out of initial coherent pair . in principle , broadcasting is both optimal and non optimal and depends upon the choice of cloning machine . + we separately investigate both _ optimal _ and _ non optimal broadcasting_. in principle , in order to broadcast the amount of coherence between the desired pairs @xmath27 and @xmath28 ( see fig 1 ) , we need to maximize the amount of coherence between the non - local output pairs , regardless of the states between @xmath29 and @xmath30 . however , for optimal broadcasting of coherence across parties , we need to minimize the amount of coherence within parties , i.e , in the states @xmath29 and @xmath30.this is because the total amount of coherence ( @xmath31 ) produced after cloning operation is equal to the sum of the coherence within parties ( @xmath32 ) and the coherence across the parties ( @xmath33 ) , i.e @xmath34 . to maximize @xmath33 , we must have @xmath35 . in other words , for optimal broadcasting we should have no coherence between the qubits @xmath29 and @xmath30 . + * definition : optimal broadcasting ( local / nonlocal ) * [ def : broad_local ] we start with two parties a and b sharing a coherent input state @xmath13 , with qubits 1 and 2 on a s side and b s side respectively . a coherent input state @xmath13 is said to be broadcast optimally after the application of local cloning operation @xmath36 , on the qubits 1 and 2 respectively , if for some values of the input state parameters , the non - local output states , given by @xmath37=tr_{23}\left[u_1\otimes u_2\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right],{}\nonumber\\ & & \tilde{\rho}_{23 } = tr_{14}\left[\tilde{\rho}_{1234}\right]=tr_{14}\left[u_1\otimes u_2 \left(\rho_{12}\right ) \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] of a and b are coherent i.e @xmath38 , while the local output states , given by @xmath39= tr_{24}\left[u_1\otimes u_2\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right],{}\nonumber\\ & & \tilde{\rho}_{24 } = tr_{13}\left[\tilde{\rho}_{1234}\right]= tr_{13}\left[u_1\otimes u_2\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right ] , \end{aligned}\ ] ] of a and b are incoherent i.e @xmath40 . + [ def : broad_nonlocal]similarly , a coherent input state @xmath13 is said to be broadcast optimally after the application of non local cloning operation @xmath41 together on qubits 1 and 2 , if for some values of the input state parameters , the non - local output states , given by @xmath42=tr_{34}\left[u_{12}\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right ] , { } \nonumber\\ & & \tilde{\rho}_{34 } = tr_{12}\left[\tilde{\rho}_{1234}\right]=tr_{12}\left[u_{12 } \left(\rho_{12}\right ) \right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] of a and b are coherent i.e @xmath43 , while the local output states , given by @xmath39= tr_{24}\left[u_{12}\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right],{}\nonumber\\ & & \tilde{\rho}_{24 } = tr_{13}\left[\tilde{\rho}_{1234}\right]= tr_{13}\left[u_{12}\left(\rho_{12}\right)\right],\end{aligned}\ ] ] of a and b are incoherent i.e @xmath40 .    here , in this work , we show that it is impossible to broadcast coherence optimally in both the cases of local and non local cloning . we show this for the computational basis @xmath10 starting with most general mixed state ( given in eq .  ) as a resource with the help of the following theorems . +    [ theo : local_broad_no_optimal ] _ given a two qubit general mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) and b - h local cloning transformations ( @xmath44 ( see appendix b ) ) , it is impossible to optimally broadcast the coherence within @xmath13 into two lesser coherent states : [ ( a ) ] @xmath45 = @xmath46 $ ] , [ ( b ) ] @xmath47 = @xmath48 $ ] ( here we have @xmath49 ) in the computational basis @xmath10 . _    here , we consider the input state as the most general two qubit mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) . the b - h local cloning transformation @xmath50 is applied to clone qubits ( @xmath51 and @xmath52 ) of @xmath13 . we have local output states as , @xmath53 , where @xmath54 and the non local output states @xmath55 . here , @xmath56 with @xmath57 and @xmath58 being the cloning machine parameters and @xmath59 represent the bloch vector and @xmath60 represents the correlation matrix of the input state . the coherence calculated by using @xmath0 norm of the local output states in the computational basis @xmath10 are given by , @xmath61 on a s side and @xmath62 on b s side . each of these quantities are positive as the norm @xmath63 are positive quantities lying between @xmath64 and @xmath65 . this is true for all values of @xmath58 lying between @xmath66 . since the coherence of local output states are non vanishing , it is clear enough that it is impossible to optimally brodcast quantum coherence . + now for @xmath67 , the above b - h local cloner @xmath44 reduces to state independent b - h optimal local cloner . subsequently , the coherence of local output states changes to , @xmath68 and @xmath69 . [ theo : nonlocal_broad ] _ given a two qubit general mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) and b - h non - local cloning transformations ( @xmath70(see appendix b ) ) , it is impossible to optimally broadcast the coherence within @xmath13 into two lesser coherent states : [ ( a ) ] @xmath71 = @xmath72 $ ] , [ ( b ) ] @xmath73 = @xmath74 $ ] . ( here we have @xmath75 ) in the computational basis @xmath10 . _    similar to the previous proof , here also we start with most general version of the two qubit mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) . when b - h non - local cloning transformation @xmath76 is applied non locally to clone qubits ( @xmath51 and @xmath52 ) of @xmath13 , then , we have local output states as , @xmath77 , where @xmath78 and the non local output states @xmath79 . here , @xmath80 with @xmath57 and @xmath58 being the cloning machine parameters and @xmath59 represent the bloch vector and @xmath60 represents the correlation matrix of the input state . the coherence calculated by using @xmath0 norm measure in the computational basis @xmath81 . hence , for the local output states , we have , @xmath82 on a s side and @xmath83 on b s side . each of these quantities are positive as the norm @xmath63 are positive quantities lying between @xmath64 and @xmath65 . this is true for all values of @xmath58 lying between @xmath84 . similarly here also we see that it is impossible to broadcast quantum coherence optimally as we have non vanishing quantum coherence for local output states . + now for @xmath85 , the above b - h non - local cloning machine @xmath70 reduces to state independent b - h optimal non - local cloner . subsequently , the coherence of local output states changes to , @xmath86 and @xmath87 . +    at this point it is interesting to note that though it is impossible to broadcast optimally qch between the desired qubits . however , it does not rule out the entire possibility of broadcasting . if we relax the condition @xmath40 , then we show that subsequently it will be possible to broadcast qch . we show this for the most general two qubit mixed state as a resource . + * definition : non optimal broadcasting ( local / non local ) * a coherent state @xmath13 is said to be broadcast non optimally after the application of local cloning operation @xmath36 , on the qubits 1 and 2 respectively or by non local cloning operation @xmath41 together on qubits 1 and 2 , if for some values of the input state parameters , the coherence of non - local output states are greater than coherence of local output states , i.e , @xmath88 and @xmath89 in the local cloning case ; and , @xmath90 and @xmath91 in the non - local cloning case . + under this relaxation , the quantum coherence of the cloned state @xmath92 can either increase , or remain same or even decrease from the initial resource state @xmath13 , which implies the following three scenarios after broadcasting :    * @xmath93 $ ] , @xmath94 $ ] @xmath95 @xmath96 * @xmath93 $ ] , @xmath94 $ ] @xmath97 @xmath96 * @xmath93 $ ] , @xmath94$]@xmath98 @xmath96    interestingly , in this work we show that it is indeed impossible to increase the quantum coherence by local and non local cloning operation though in general it is possible to increase the quantum coherence by local operations . we present this result in form of two following theorems , where we have considered general local and non local cloning transformations . [ theo : local_broad ] _ given a two qubit general mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) and b - h local cloning transformations ( @xmath44 ) , we can always create two states @xmath45 and @xmath99 , such that : ( a ) @xmath100 ( b ) @xmath101 in the computational basis @xmath10 . _    we start with most general representation of two qubit mixed state @xmath13 ( given by eq .  ) . when buzek hillary local cloning transformation @xmath50 is applied to @xmath13 , we get the non local output states as @xmath102 . here , @xmath56 with @xmath57 and @xmath58 being the cloning machine parameters and @xmath59 represent the bloch vector and @xmath60 represents the correlation matrix of the input state . using @xmath0-norm as measure of coherence we find out the coherence in the computational basis @xmath10 , @xmath103 $ ] and @xmath104 $ ] . where , @xmath105 if we can show that the conditions @xmath106 , @xmath107 and @xmath108 hold true , then we can always conclude that @xmath109 @xmath98 @xmath110 . + at first , if we observe the terms @xmath111 and @xmath112 carefully , we find that @xmath112 @xmath97 @xmath113 @xmath95 @xmath111 because @xmath114 + now , we need to compare @xmath115 and @xmath116.if we observe the terms in @xmath115 and @xmath116 , and ignoring the constant @xmath117 , they can be thought of as distance between two points in a cartesian plane . let us denote the distance between two points a and b in a 2-dimensional space ( like xy cartesian plane ) by @xmath118.let us consider @xmath119 and as @xmath120 , so , we have , @xmath121 . now , assume 4 points in cartesian plane , namely , @xmath122 , @xmath123,@xmath124 and @xmath125 without @xmath126 as the origin . now , as @xmath120 , hence , it is always true that @xmath127 ; that is , @xmath128 . so , d always lies on @xmath129 , inside @xmath130 . @xmath131{triangle }   \end{array}\ ] ]    now , from the figure 2 , we have , @xmath132 and @xmath133 . now , we have proved @xmath134 in the appendix a by plane geometry . hence , we have,@xmath135 similarly , we can show @xmath136 hence , we have proved that @xmath137    [ theo : non_local_broad ] _ given a two qubit general mixed state @xmath13 and b - h non local cloning transformations ( @xmath70 ) , we can always create two states @xmath71 and @xmath73 , such that : ( a ) @xmath138 ( b ) @xmath139 in the computational basis @xmath10 , where @xmath140 , is the machine parameter . _    first of all we apply buzek hillary non - local cloning transformation @xmath76 to the 2- qubit general mixed quantum states @xmath13 ( eq .  ) . the non local output states obtained as aresult of this are given by , @xmath79 . here , @xmath80 with @xmath57 and @xmath58 being the cloning machine parameters , @xmath59 represent the bloch vector and @xmath60 represents the correlation matrix of the input state . the qch present in these states are calculated in the computational basis @xmath10 by using the @xmath0 norm are given by , @xmath141 and @xmath142 where , @xmath143\end{aligned}\ ] ] now , we know , @xmath144 and @xmath145 . so , clearly , @xmath146 and @xmath147 . hence , we have created two weaker ( in terms of coherence ) correlations from input correlation after non - local cloning . in this section , we consider the standard examples of two qubit mixed state as a resource state . these include werner like states ( wls ) and bell diagonal states ( bds ) . we apply the standard bh cloner both locally and non locally , to find the range where at least non optimal broadcasting is possible , in terms of input state parameters . in both the examples , we have chosen computational basis @xmath10 for measuring coherence via @xmath0-norm . + * _   example : a. werner like states ( wls ) : _ * + as our first example , we consider werner - like states ( wls ) , which can be formally expressed in terms of bloch vectors as , @xmath148 , where @xmath149 is the bloch vector and the correlation matrix is given by , @xmath150 with the condition @xmath151 and @xmath152 . +   + the local output states obtained after applying general local cloning operation ( @xmath44 ) on both the qubits @xmath65 and @xmath153 are given by , @xmath154 , where @xmath155 is the bloch vector of the state @xmath156 , @xmath157 $ ] and @xmath158 , where @xmath57 and @xmath58 being the machine state parameter ( see appendix b ) . also , we have the non - local output states as , @xmath159 , where @xmath155 is bloch vector , @xmath160 is the correlation matrix of the state @xmath156 . + now , coherence for the local output state is independent of @xmath161 and @xmath162 and it is given by , @xmath163 . on the other hand , coherence of non - local output state depends on @xmath161 , @xmath162 , @xmath58 and it is given by , @xmath164 . for non optimal broadcasting of coherence , our region of interest is the one where the condition @xmath165 or @xmath166 is satisfied . this condition eventually reduces to @xmath167 for general local cloning case . + in order to obtain the state independent local cloner , we substitute the value of @xmath58 as @xmath168 . the corresponding values of coherence of the local output states , if we perform state independent cloning , are given by , @xmath169 and the coherence of non - local output state is given by , @xmath170 . subsequently , the condition under which non optimal broadcasting would be possible reduces to @xmath171 . +    .broadcasting ranges for local state independent cloning in case of werner like states . [ cols="<,<",options="header " , ]     in table [ tab : bell_sidnl_table ] , we have shown some of the trends in broadcasting ranges obtained in terms of @xmath172 , @xmath173 and @xmath174 after state independent non - local cloning transformations . we fix the values of @xmath172 and @xmath174 and substitute their respective values in the expression @xmath175 > 1.$ ] here , from @xmath176 onwards , discontinuities in the intervals corresponding to the ranges of @xmath173-parameter are observed , which imply the presence of a no - broadcast zone in between . +     or @xmath177 ) after normalised in a scale of 0 to 1.,title="fig:",width=283,height=245 ] +    in figure [ fig : bell_sidnl ] , the region of broadcasting is superimposed on the tetrahedral - region hosting all bell - diagonal states in @xmath178-coordinate system , with axes @xmath172 , @xmath173 and @xmath174.the light light regions represent the no - broadcast zones , while the regions on the dark blue - magenta spectrum , occupying a significant fraction of the tetrahedron s volume , highlight the regions where we can broadcast coherence . in the bluish - magenta region , the change in hue signifies how the values of the non - local coherence , @xmath179 or @xmath177 , changes with respect to the values of the @xmath178-parameters . as the value of @xmath179 or @xmath177 increases , the hue changes from blue to magenta . for instance , the concentrated presence of magenta - pink hue , especially in the regions along the tetrahedron s edge and in the regions surrounding the corners , suggests that non - local coherence is much higher in those regions , compared to the other regions in the broadcasting zone . also , we find that there is a light purple cavity - like zone sandwiched in between the bluish - magenta regions , which points to a no - broadcast zone . this cavity - like zone accounts for discontinuities int the intervals corresponding to ranges of @xmath173-paramter in table [ tab : bell_sidnl_table ] . moreover , we observe in the figure that in terms of coverage of the tetrahedron s volume , the zone of broadcasting in the non - local cloning scenario is significantly larger when compared to that of the local cloning scenario ( figure [ fig : bell_sidl ] ) , thereby suggesting that non - local state independent cloning performs much better when it comes to broadcasting of coherence in the bell - diagonal states . + _ acknowledgements : _ authors acknowledge mr . tushant jha and mr . sourav chatterjee for their suggestions . 99    m.horodecki , j. openheim , http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2013/130626/ncomms3059/full/ncomms3059.html[nat . commun * 4 * 2059 ( 2013 ) ] ; c. a. rodriguez - rosario _ et . al _ , https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.1245[arxiv : 1308.1245 ] ; m. lostaglio _ et . al _ , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.5.021001[phys . x * 5 * , 0210001 ( 2015 ) ] ; l. a. correa _ et . al _ http://www.nature.com/articles/srep03949[scientific reports * 4 , 3949 * ( 2014 ) ] ; p. skrzypczyk , a. j. short , and s. popescu , http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2014/140627/ncomms5185/abs/ncomms5185.html[nature communications * 5 , 4185 * ( 2014 ) ] ; m. lostaglio , d. jennings , and t. rudolph , http://www.nature.com/ncomms/2015/150310/ncomms7383/full/ncomms7383.html?wt.ec_id=ncomms-20150311[nat . commun . * 6 , 6383 * ( 2015 ) ] ; m. lostaglio , k. korzekwa , d. jennings , and t. rudolph , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.5.021001[phys . x * 5 * , 021001 ( 2015 ) ] ; k. korzekwa , m. lostaglio , j. oppenheim , and d. jennings , http://iopscience.iop.org / article/10.1088/1367 - 2630/18/2/023045/meta[new j. phys . 18 , 023045 ( 2016 ) ] ; p. kammerlander and j. anders , http://www.nature.com/articles/srep22174[scientific reports * 6 , 22174 * ( 2016 ) ] ; g. vacanti , c. elouard , and a. auffeves , ( 2015 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.01974[arxiv:1503.01974 ] ; a. l. malvezzi , g. karpat , b.  akmak , f. f. fanchini , t. debarba , and r. o. vianna , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.93.184428[phys . rev . b 93 , 184428 ( 2016 ) ] ; s. bhattacharya , s. banerjee , and a.k . pati , ( 2016 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04742[arxiv:1601.04742 ] ; y. yang and g. chiribella , ( 2015 ) , http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00259v2[arxiv:1502.00259v2 ] . s. llyod , http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/302/1/012037/meta[j phys : conf . * 302 * , 012037 ( 2011 ) ] ; s. huelga , m. plenio , http://www.tandfonline.com / doi / abs/10.1080/00405000.2013.829687[contemp . phys . , * 54 * , 181 ( 2013 ) ] ; f. levi , f. mintert , http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033007/meta[new . j. phys , * 16 * , 033007 ( 2014 ) ] ; c.m . li , n. lambert , y.n . chen , g.y . chen , and f. nori , http://www.nature.com/articles/srep00885[sci . * 2 , 885 * ( 2012 ) ] ; v. singh poonia , d. saha , and s. ganguly , ( 2014 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.1327[arxiv:1408.1327 ] . e. chitambar , a. streltsov , s. rana , m. n. bera , g. adesso , and m. lewenstein , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.070402[phys . lett . * 116 * , 070402 ( 2016 ) ] ; a. winter and d. yang , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.120404[phys . lett . * 116 * , 120404 ( 2016 ) ] ; i. marvian and r.w . spekkens , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.90.062110[phys . rev . a * 90 * , 062110,(2014 ) ] ; j. aberg , ( 2006 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0612146[arxiv:quant-ph/0612146v1 ] ; g. gour , i. marvian , and r.w . spekkens , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.80.012307[phys . a * 80 * , 012307 ( 2009 ) ] ; j. chen , j. cui , and h. fan , ( 2015 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.03576[arxiv:1509.03576v1 ] ; j. chen , n. johnston , c .- k . li , and s. plosker , ( 2016 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.06269[arxiv:1601.06269 ] ; s. cheng and m.j.w . hall , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.042101[phys . a * 92 * , 042101 ( 2015 ) ] ; p. deb , http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2915444[quantum information processing , * 15(4 ) * 1629 - 1638(2016 ) ] ; s. du , z. bai , and y. guo , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.91.052120[phys . rev . a * 91 * , 052120 ( 2015 ) ] ; m. n. bera , t. qureshi , m. a. siddiqui , and a. k. pati , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.012118[phys . rev . a * 92 * , 012118 ( 2015 ) ] ; x. liu , z. tian , j. wang , and j. jing , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0003491615004340[annals of physics , * 366 * 102 - 112 ( 2016 ) ] ; k. von prillwitz , l. rudnicki , and f. mintert , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.052114[phys . a * 92 * , 052114 ( 2015 ) ] ; m. hillery , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.012111[phys . a * 93 * , 012111 ( 2016 ) ] ; k. bu , u. singh , and j. wu , ( 2015 ) , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.042326 [ phys . rev . a 93 , 042326 ( 2016)];. j. m. matera , d. egloff , n. killoran , and m. b. plenio , ( 2015 ) , http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.07486[arxiv:1512.07486v1 ] ; y.r . zhang , l .- h . shao , y. li , and h. fan , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.012334[phys . a * 93 * , 012334 ( 2016 ) ] ; u. singh , m. n. bera , h. s. dhar , and a. k. pati , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.91.052115[phys . rev . a * 91 * , 052115 ( 2015 ) ] . t. baumgratz . al _ , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.140401[phys . * 113 * , 140401 ( 2014 ) ] . davide girolami , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.170401[phys . 113 , 170401 ( 2014 ) ] . x. yuan , h. zhou , z. cao , and x. ma , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.022124[phys . a * 92 * , 022124 ( 2015 ) ] ; d. p. pires , l. c. cleri , and d. o. soares - pinto , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.91.042330[phys . rev . a * 91 * , 042330 ( 2015 ) ] ; b. yadin and v. vedral , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.022122[phys . rev . a * 93 * , 022122 ( 2016 ) ] ; s. rana , p. parashar , and m. lewenstein , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.012110[phys . a * 93 * , 012110 ( 2016 ) ] ; m. allegra , p. giorda , and s. lloyd , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.042312[phys . rev . a * 93 * , 042312 ( 2016)];r . chandrashekar , p. manikandan , j. segar , and t. byrnes , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.150504[phys . lett . * 116 * , 150504 ( 2016 ) ] ; e. chitambar and g. gour , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.030401[phys . 117 , 030401 ( 2016 ) ] ; m. piani , m. cianciaruso , t. r. bromley , c. napoli , n. johnston , and g. adesso , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.042107[phys . rev . a 93 , 042107 ( 2016 ) ] . x. hu , a. milne , b. zhang , and h. fan , http://www.nature.com/articles/srep19365[scientific reports 6 , 19365 ( 2016 ) ] ; e. chitambar and m .- h . hsieh , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.117.020402[phys . 117 , 020402 ( 2016 ) ] ; a. streltsov , s. rana , m. nath bera , and m. lewenstein,(2015 ) , http://arxiv.org/abs/1509.07456[arxiv:1509.07456v2 ] ; t. r. bromley , m. cianciaruso , and g. adesso , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.210401[phys . lett . * 114 * , 210401 ( 2015 ) ] ; a. streltsov , u. singh , h. s. dhar , m. n. bera , and g. adesso , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.115.020403[phys . lett . * 115 * , 020403 ( 2015 ) ] ; y. yao , x. xiao , l. ge , and c. p. sun , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.92.022112[phys . a * 92 * , 022112 ( 2015 ) ] . avijit misra , uttam singh , samyadeb bhattacharya , arun kumar pati , https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.08437v2[arxiv:1602.08437v2 ] . uttam singh , l. zhang , and a. k. pati , ( 2015 ) , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.032125[phys . a 93 , 032125 , ( 2016 ) ] . uttam singh , manabendra nath bera , avijit misra , arun kumar pati , http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.08186[arxiv:1506.08186v1 ] . b. yadin , j. ma , d. girolami , m. gu , and v. vedral , ( 2015 ) , https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.02085[arxiv:1512.02085v1 ] . carmine napoli , thomas r. bromley , marco cianciaruso , marco piani , nathaniel johnston , gerardo adesso , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.150502[phys . 116 , 150502 ( 2016 ) ] . debasis mondal , tanumoy pramanik , arun kumar pati , http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.03770[arxiv:1508.03770v2 ] . xiao - dong yu , da - jian zhang , c. l. liu , d. m. tong , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.060303[phys . a 93 , 060303(r ) , ( 2016 ) ] . jiajun ma , benjamin yadin , davide girolami , vlatko vedral , mile gu , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.116.160407[phys . lett . 116 , 160407 ( 2016 ) ] .    w. k. wootters and w. h. zurek , http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v299/n5886/abs/299802a0.html[nature * 299 * , 802 ( 1982 ) ] . v. buzek and m. hillery , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.54.1844[phys . rev . a * 54 * , 1844 ( 1996 ) ] . d. bruss , p.d . divincenzo , a. ekert , c. a. fuchs , c. macchiavello and j. a. smolin , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.57.2368[phys . a * 57 * , 2368 ( 1998 ) ] . v. buzek and m. hillery , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.81.5003[phys . lett . * 81 * , 5003 ( 1998 ) ] . a. chefles and s. m. barnett , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.136[phys . a * 60 * , 136 ( 1999 ) ] ; h. fan , k.matsumoto and m.wadati , http://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/physreva.64.064301[phys a * 64 * , 064301 ( 2001 ) ] ; j. fiurasek , s. iblisdir , s. massar , and n. j. cerf , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.65.040302[phys . a * 65 * , 040302 ( 2002 ) ] ; h. p.yuen , phys . lett . a * 113 * , 405 ( 1986 ) ; k. azuma , j. shimamura , m. koashi and n. imoto , phys . rev . a * 72 * , 032335 ( 2005 ) ; s. adhikari , n. ganguly , i. chakrabarty and b. s. choudhury , http://iopscience.iop.org / article/10.1088/1751 - 8113/41/41/415302/meta [ j. phys . a * 41 * , 415302 ( 2008 ) ] ; s adhikari , ak pati , i chakrabarty , bs choudhury , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11128-007-0053-6[quantum information processing * 6 * ( 4 ) , 197 - 219 ] . n. gisin and s. massar , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.79.2153[phys . lett . * 79 * , 2153 ( 1997 ) ] . n. j. cerf , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.84.4497[phys . 84 * , 4497 ( 2000 ) ] . n. j. cerf , http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09500340008244036[j . mod . opt . * 47 * , 187 ( 2000 ) ] . v. scarani , s. iblisdir , n.gisin and a. acin , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.77.1225[rev . phys . * 77 * , 1225 ( 2005 ) ] , and references therein . l. m. duan and g. c. guo , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.80.4999[phys . lett . * 80 * , 4999 ( 1998 ) ] ; l.hardy and d. d. song , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s037596019900448x[phys . a * 259 * , 331 ( 1999 ) ] . n. gisin , doi:10.1016/s0375 - 9601(98)00170 - 4[phys . a * 242 * , 1 ( 1998 ) ] . s. adhikari , i. chakrabarty and b. s. choudhary , http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0305-4470/39/26/011/meta[j . a * 39 * , 8439 ( 2006 ) ] . m. k. shukla , i. chakrabarty , s . chatterjee , http://arxiv.org / pdf/1511.05796.pdf[arxiv : 1511.05796 ] . sk sazim , i. chakrabarty , a. datta and a. k. pati , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.91.062311[phys . rev a * 91 * , 062311 ( 2015 ) ] . a. einstein , b. podolsky and n. rosen , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrev.47.777[phys . , 47 777 ( 1935 ) ] . a. ekert , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.67.661[phys . 67 * , 661 ( 1991 ) ] .    c. h. bennett and g. brassard , http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/files/us-bennetc/bb84highest.pdf[proceedings of ieee international conference on computers , system and signal processing , bangalore , india , pp.175 - 179 ( 1984 ) ] ; p. w. shor and j. preskill , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.441[phys . lett . * 85 * , 441 ( 2000 ) ] . m. hillery , v. buzek and a. berthiaume , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.59.1829[phys . a * 59 * , 1829 ( 1999 ) ] ; s. k. sazim , i. chakrabarty , c. vanarasa and k. srinathan , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11128-015-1109-7[quant . inf . process * 14 * 4651 ( 2015 ) ] ; s. adhikari , i. chakrabarty and p. agrawal , http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5570[quant . inf . comp . * 12 * , 0253 ( 2012 ) ] ; m.ray , s. chatterjee and i. chakrabarty , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjd/e2016-60683-x[eur . j. d * 70 * : 114 ( 2016 ) ] .    c. h. bennett , g. brassard , c. crepeau , r. jozsa , a. peres and w. k. wootters , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.70.1895[phys . lett . * 70 * , 1895 ( 1993 ) ] ; r. horodecki , m. horodecki and p. horodecki , http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960196006391[phys . a * 222 * , 21 ( 1996 ) ] . c.h.bennett and s.j.weisner , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.69.2881[phys.rev.lett . * 69 * , 2881 ( 1992 ) ] ; r. nepal , r. prabhu , a. sen de and u. sen , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.87.032336[phys . a * 87 * , 032336 ( 2013 ) ] . r. horodecki , p. horodecki , m. horodecki and k. horodecki , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.81.865[rev . phys . * 81 * , 865 ( 2009 ) ] , and references therein . s. bose , v. vedral and p. l. knight , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.57.822[phys . a * 57 * , 822 ( 1998 ) ] ; m. zukowski , a. zeilinger , m. a. horne and a. k. ekert , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.71.4287[phys . rev . lett . * 71 * , 4287 ( 1993 ) ] . sk sazim and i. chakrabarty , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjd/e2013-30746-9[eur . j. d * 67 * , 174 ( 2013 ) ] . d. deutsch , a. ekert , r. jozsa , c. macchiavello , s. popescu and a. sanpera , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.77.2818[phys . . lett . * 77 * , 2818 ( 1996 ) ] ; l. goldenberg and l.vaidman , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.75.1239 [ phys . lett . * 75 * , 1239 ( 1995 ) ] ; a. cabello , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.61.052312[phys . a * 61 * , 052312 ( 2000 ) ] ; c. li , h - s song and l. zhou , http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1464-4266/5/2/306/pdf[journal of optics b : quantum semiclass . opt . * 5 * , 155 ( 2003 ) ] ; a. orieux , g. ferranti , a. darrigo , r. lo franco , g. benenti , e. paladino , g. falci , f. sciarrino and p. mataloni , http://www.nature.com/articles/srep08575[scientific reports 5 , 8575 ( 2015 ) ] ; a. darrigo , r. lo franco , g. benenti , e. paladino and g. falci , link:10.1016/j.aop.2014.07.021[ann . phys . * 350 * , 211224 ( 2014 ) ] .    c. h. bennett , h. j. bernstein , s. popescu and b. schumacher , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.53.2046[phys . a * 53 * , 2046 ( 1996 ) ] . v. buzek , v. vedral , m. b. plenio , p. l. knight and m. hillery , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.55.3327[phys . rev . a * 55 * , 3327 ( 1997 ) ] . s. bandyopadhyay and g. kar , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.60.3296 [ phys . a * 60 * , 3296 ( 1999 ) ] . i. chakrabarty , http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.3393[int . inf , * 7 * ( 02 ) , 559 - 565 ] . s. adhikari and b. s. choudhury , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.74.032323[phys a * 74 * , 032323 ( 2006 ) ] ; i. chakrabarty and b. s. choudhary http://arxiv.org/abs/0804.2568[arxiv:0804.2568 ] . s. chatterjee , s. sazim , i. chakrabarty , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.93.042309[phys . rev . a * 93 * , 042309 ( 2016 ) ] . a. kheirollahi . et.al , https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.04995[arxiv : 1604.04995 ] . h. barnum , c. m. caves , c. a. fuchs , r. jozsa and b. schumacher , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.76.2818[phys . lett . * 76 * , 2818 ( 1996 ) ] . m. piani , p. horodecki and r. horodecki , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.090502[phys . . lett . * 100 * , 090502 ( 2008 ) ] . h. barnum , j. barrett , m. leifer and a. wilce , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.99.240501[phys . 99 * , 240501 ( 2007 ) ] . s. luo , http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11005-010-0389-1[lett . phys . * 92 * , 143 ( 2010 ) ] . s. luo , n. li and x. cao , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.79.054305[phys . rev . a * 79 * , 054305 ( 2009 ) ] . i. ghiu , http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physreva.67.012323[phys . a * 67 * , 012323 ( 2003 ) ] . @xmath131{proof }   \end{array}\ ] ]    _ let m be a point in the interior of @xmath180 then , @xmath181 , @xmath182 and @xmath183 . _    as shown in figure 5 , @xmath184 is extended to point e outside @xmath130 intersecting @xmath185 at @xmath186 . by applying triangle inequality on @xmath187 and @xmath188 , we get @xmath189 + @xmath190 @xmath98 @xmath191 and , @xmath192 + @xmath193 @xmath98 @xmath194 respectively . + also , as @xmath195 lies on @xmath196 , we have , @xmath184 + @xmath192 = @xmath197 + now , adding these two inequalities , we have ,    @xmath189 + @xmath190 + @xmath193 + @xmath192 @xmath98 @xmath191 + @xmath194 + @xmath198 @xmath189 + @xmath199 + @xmath200 + @xmath192 @xmath98 @xmath201 + @xmath202 + @xmath194 + @xmath198 @xmath189 + @xmath185 + @xmath192 @xmath98 @xmath184 + @xmath192 + @xmath194 +    cancelling out @xmath192 , we finally get,@xmath203 + @xmath185 @xmath98 @xmath184 + @xmath204 similarly , the other two inequalities can be proved . the cloning of arbitrary quantum states is forbidden by no - cloning theorem . however , there still exists the possibility of cloning arbitrary quantum states approximately with certain fidelity , or , imperfection. quantum cloning transformations are ( cptp ) completely positive trace preserving map between two quantum systems , supported by an ancilla state . in this section , at first , we briefly describe the buzek - hillery ( b - h ) qcm . + the b - h cloning machine ( @xmath205 ) is a @xmath206-dimensional quantum copying transformation acting on a state @xmath207 ( @xmath208 = 1 , ... , @xmath206 ) , which is to be copied onto a blank state @xmath209 . initially , the copy is prepared in state @xmath210 which subsequently gets transformed into another set of state vectors @xmath211 and @xmath212 as a result of application of the cloning machine . here @xmath213 , @xmath111 and @xmath214 represent the input , blank and machine qubits respectively . in this case , these transformed state vectors belong to the orthonormal basis set in the @xmath206-dimensional space . the transformation scheme @xmath205 is given by , @xmath215 where @xmath20 = @xmath216 , and the coefficients @xmath217 and @xmath218 are real . an optimal state independent version of the b - h cloner can be obtained from eq . by imposing the unitarity and normalization conditions which give rise to the following set of constraints , + @xmath219 , + @xmath220 and @xmath221 here , @xmath222 where @xmath223 is the number of qubits in a given quantum register . in this transformation , the fidelity of the output copies does nt depend on the input state because the shrinking or scaling property is independent of the input states . + now , by substituting @xmath217 = @xmath218 = 1 , the unitarity constraints on the b - h cloning transformation in eq .   give rise to the following set of conditions : @xmath224 where @xmath9 and @xmath225 for @xmath226 ; and the output states are no longer necessarily orthonormal . + let us assume that , @xmath227 where again @xmath9 for @xmath228 ; @xmath57 and @xmath58 are the machine parameters .      the optimal cloning machine described above with @xmath229 becomes a local cloning machine ( @xmath230 ) . by substituting the values of the coefficients @xmath217=@xmath231 and @xmath218=@xmath232 in eq .  , we obtain the optimal state independent cloning machine which can be used for local copying purposes.in this case , the value of @xmath58 is @xmath168 . +      similarly , the optimal cloning machine described above becomes a non local cloning machine ( @xmath233 ) for @xmath234 . then the corresponding values of the coefficients @xmath217 and @xmath218 in eq.10 become @xmath235 and @xmath236 respectively.now , by substituting the values of the coefficients @xmath217=@xmath235 and @xmath218=@xmath236 in eq . , we obtain the optimal state independent non local cloning machine.in this case , the value of @xmath58 is @xmath237 .
Abstract:

Answer: quantum coherence ( qch ) is considered to be a key ingredient in quantum resource theories and also plays a pivotal role in the design and implementation of various information processing tasks . consequently , it becomes important for us to create more number coherent quantum states between two labs from a given coherent state shared initially . we call this process as * broadcasting of quantum coherence ( qch)*. in this work we extensively study the problem of broadcasting of qch . in order to have a holistic view of broadcasting , we start with a most general representation two qubit mixed state in terms of bloch vectors . as a cloning transformation we have used universal symmetric optimal buzek - hillery ( bh ) cloner locally as well as non locally . remarkably , we find that in either of the case it is impossible to do optimal broadcasting of qch . further we show in case of non optimal broadcasting it is impossible to increase qch of the state by both local and non local cloning operations . in non optimal case , apart from general result we consider examples like , a ) werner like states ( wls ) and b ) bell diagonal states ( bds ) and obtain ranges for broadcasting in terms of input state parameters .


Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: adaptation is a common feature in sensory systems , well familiar to us from light and dark adaptation of our visual system . biological cells , ranging from bacteria to complex eukaryotes , including single - cell organisms and human sensory receptors , adopt different strategies to fulfill this property . however , all of them require substantial amounts of energy to adapt . here , we compare the different biological strategies and design two minimal models which allow adaptation without requiring energy consumption . schemes similar to the ones we proposed in our minimal models could have been adopted by ancient protocells , that have evolved into the pathways we now know and study . analyzing our models can thus help elucidate the advantages brought to the cells by consumption of energy , including the bypassing of hard - wired cell parameters such as diffusion constants with increased control over time scales . the ability to adapt to different environmental conditions is a hallmark of any living organism , allowing sensory systems to adjust their sensitivity to changes in nutrient availability , stress , and other stimuli @xcite . adaptation mechanisms generally rely on biochemical feedback pathways , specific for the organism and type of stimulus @xcite . surprisingly , when comparing adaptation pathways in different organisms , one can not help noticing the wide variety of pathway designs , ranging from remarkably simple in bacterial chemotaxis @xcite to highly complex in eukaryotes , including _ dictyostelium discoideum _ chemotaxis @xcite , olfactory - transduction @xcite and photo - transduction @xcite . since bacterial chemotaxis is known to work ( and adapt ) exquisitely well , it is unclear why eukaryotic organisms have such elaborated pathway designs , and what their advantages might be .    in light of such complexity , the `` physicist s approach '' may help guide the identification of common principles among the different pathways . recently , lan _ et al . _ @xcite analyzed a core adaptation pathway and concluded that adaptation always relies on energy consumption by the cell . however , whether it is generally impossible to adapt without consuming energy is still an open question , considering how adaptation mechanisms could have evolved in ancient protocells without sophisticated pathways . we address this issue by first comparing the sensory pathways of small bacterial and large eukaryotic cells , highlighting their similarities and differences . we then investigate the possibility of achieving adaptation with no energy consumption by means of a `` protocell '' based on equilibrium physics . the hypothesis of no cost of energy for the cell guides us in designing minimal adaptation mechanisms . by pondering the drawbacks of these mechanisms and the advantages brought by energy - consuming pathways , we unravel some of the complexity of sensory systems . these considerations may provide a path towards a general theory of adaptation in eukaryotic cells . constrained by their small size , bacteria are spatially highly organized @xcite . consider e.g. bacterial chemotaxis in _ escherichia coli _ , known for amplifying weak signals by cooperative receptors and precise adaptation ( fig . [ fig : pathways]a ) . there is an apparent high level of local control in these processes : receptors are arranged hexagonally in clusters @xcite and the adaptation enzymes cher and cheb are tethered to the receptors to increase local enzyme concentration and specificity , and to reduce noise @xcite . adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis is a robust feature of the pathway , without `` fine - tuning '' of biochemical parameters @xcite , achieved by integral feedback control @xcite . integral feedback control @xcite and the related incoherent feedforward loop @xcite are also found in eukaryotes .    despite these similarities , eukaryote s most striking feature is the staggering complexity , often relying on long , multistep signaling cascades in parallel @xcite . consider three different pathways : chemotaxis in _ dictyostelium discoideum _ [ fig : pathways]b ) , and photo- ( fig . [ fig : pathways]c ) and olfactory - transduction ( fig . [ fig : pathways]d ) in mammalian sensory systems . perhaps most perplexing , the key signaling component for all of them are small , fast - diffusible second messengers , like @xmath0 for olfactory- and photo - transduction ( which is even toxic for the cell in large quantities @xcite ) , and camp in _ dictyostelium _ amoeba . relying on these small signaling molecules could negatively affect the precision of the response . due to their fast diffusion , affected targets may not only be the designated molecules , but large parts of the cells . moreover , all of the eukaryotic examples mentioned rely on g - protein coupled receptors ( gpcr ) . the excitation of the receptor catalyzes the production of gtp and the dissociation of the g - protein . gtp then binds to the @xmath1 subunit and the @xmath2 subunits ( for _ dictyostelium _ @xcite ) or the @xmath1 subunit ( for photo- and olfactory - transduction @xcite ) can activate the downstream processes . the activity of the guanosine triphosphatase ( gtpase ) hydrolizes the gtp which detaches from the @xmath1 subunit . subsequently , the @xmath1 subunit can re - bind the @xmath2 subunits , thus reassembling the g - protein @xcite . all bacterial and eukaryotic adaptation pathways share the consumption of energy by hydrolysis of fuel molecules , including s - adenosyl methionine ( sam ) in bacterial chemotaxis , and cyclic adenosine and guanosine monophosphate ( camp and cgmp ) in eukaryotes @xcite . these observations led to the conclusion that energy consumption is an essential ingredient in precise adaptation @xcite ( see fig .  [ fig : pathways ] , middle panel , for a definition ) . however , ancient protocells might have been able to respond and adapt to stimuli without this requirement , with molecular components added later by evolution , to produce the currently observed pathways . as it turns out , our protocell models , which only rely on equilibrium physics for the cellular components , may help unravel some of the signaling complexity in eukaryotic cells .      here , we present two minimal models in which a protocell exploits the non - equilibrium aspect of the changing external environment to respond and adapt to a stimulus without consuming ( dissipating ) energy itself . the first model contains only one component , represented by a receptor on the cellular membrane ( fig . [ fig : models]a , left ) . this receptor includes two sensing regions : the first binds extracellular ligand , the second mediates intracellular sensing and adaptation . as soon as the ( extracellular ) ligand arrives at the cell surface , the receptor binds and starts signaling . however , the stimulus molecules are also able to permeate the cellular membrane , e.g. via passive pores , and to consequently bind additionally to the intracellular region of the receptor . this second binding blocks the signaling activity of the receptor , thus precisely counteracting the activation due to the extracellular binding .    in case the external stimulus can not be used to mediate adaptation , e.g. for photo - transduction , a second model with two components is needed ( fig . [ fig : models]b , left ) . the first represents the receptor , which senses the extracellular stimulus and , upon stimulation , releases two intracellular subunits , @xmath3 and @xmath4 . the @xmath3 subunit is smaller and can diffuse faster than the @xmath4 subunit . the second component is a membrane - bound protein , able to respond to the binding of the @xmath3 and @xmath4 subunits . in particular , the binding of @xmath3 to this second protein causes an increase of its signaling activity , while the binding of @xmath4 exactly compensates for it , and hence turns signaling off . * one - component model . * let us assume the cell is initially equilibrated to concentration @xmath5 and then the external concentration is suddenly changed to @xmath6 . the resulting difference in concentration between inside and outside the cell equilibrates following the solution of the diffusion equation with spherical symmetry ( hypothesizing that the cellular membrane is sufficiently permeable)@xcite @xmath7 where @xmath8 is the internal concentration at time @xmath9 , @xmath5 and @xmath6 are the respective initial internal and external concentrations , @xmath10 is the radius of the cell , @xmath11 the diffusion coefficient , and @xmath12 the normalized radius corresponding to the inner length of the receptor @xmath13 ( see fig .  [ fig : main_results]a for a schematic ) . we further assume that external ligand binding favors the receptor _ off _ ( inactive ) state ( with ligand dissociation constants @xmath14 ) and that the internal ligand binding favors the _ on _ ( active ) state ( @xmath15 ) , in order to compensate for external ligand binding during adaptation . for simplicity , we consider @xmath16 and @xmath17 . the corresponding free - energy difference of the single receptor and the activity associated with it become ( using equilibrium boltzmann statistics ) @xcite @xmath18 with energy in units of @xmath19 .    figure  [ fig : main_results]b shows adaptation of the one - component model to an extracellular concentration - step change as input , @xmath20 ( left ) . the intracellular concentration response @xmath8 due to the diffusive process for different lengths of the inner side of the receptor ( middle ) allows the activity output , @xmath21 , to adapt precisely at no cost for the cell ( see figs . s1-s4 for additional results ) . * two - component model . * the second model also relies on equilibration for adaptation , albeit by an all - internal mechanism ( see fig .  [ fig : main_results]c ) . the external concentration @xmath6 becomes the input for the first component - the receptor , which responds to the transmembrane free - energy difference by changing its activity . in particular , its free - energy difference and activity are , respectively , @xmath22 parameter @xmath23 represents the bias towards the off state in absence of external stimulus , and the contribution of the binding energy of the @xmath3 and @xmath4 subunits on the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor . the concentration of @xmath3 and @xmath4 , released by the first component , is set proportional to the activity @xmath24 . the solution of the diffusion equation , eq . , is then used to represent the diffusive process of @xmath3 and @xmath4 molecules from the receptor to the second component . the free - energy difference and the activity of the second component are calculated as @xmath25 where , for simplicity , we assume @xmath26 and @xmath27 ( see text s1 for details ) .    figure  [ fig : main_results]d shows adaptation of the two - component model . the outer concentration is followed by activity @xmath24 of the first component , which does not adapt ( left ) . however , the ratio in the concentrations of @xmath3 and @xmath4 , as sensed by the second component after diffusion ( middle ) , allows the activity @xmath28 to adapt precisely ( right ) . hence , similar to the one - component model , also the two - component model achieves precise adaptation , just relying on diffusion of the @xmath3 and @xmath4 subunits at no energy cost ( see figs . s8-s11 for additional results ) .    * energy dissipation . * our models do not require energy consumption , but achieve adaptation by means of the _ external _ energy provided by the stimulus . figure  [ fig : entropy]a shows the resulting energy - dissipation rate of the one - component model , which confirms that most energy is dissipated right after the step change with the rate decreasing to zero during equilibration . in contrast , a biologically regulated system constantly dissipates internal energy . to illustrate this , we consider the linear bacterial chemotaxis model introduced in @xcite @xmath29 with @xmath30 the receptor - methylation level , @xmath31 and @xmath32 the methylation and demethylation rate constants depending on enzymes cher and cheb , and @xmath21 the receptor activity . to obtain a precisely adapting non - equilibrium process , we add reverse reactions to eq .  . to compare this with an imprecisely adapting equilibrium process we use a similar equation , which , however , now depends on @xmath30 instead of @xmath21 ( see _ methods _ for a detailed description of this model ) . from fig . [ fig : entropy]b it emerges clearly that in bacterial chemotaxis there is a trade - off between energy consumption and precision in adaptation , i.e. energy consumption is required to achieve a high degree of precision @xcite . figure  [ fig : entropy_cycle ] illustrates the sources of energy dissipation . in bacterial chemotaxis ( fig . [ fig : entropy_cycle]a ) , receptors are constantly being modified , even in the adapted steady state . at a given ligand concentration , demethylated receptors tend to be inactive . once inactive , receptors become methylated by the action of cher . once methylated , receptors tend to be active , and subsequently become demethylated by cheb . the whole process represents a futile cycle , driven by the ( nearly ) irreversible methylation and demethylation reactions , which do not satisfy detailed balance . in stark contrast , in our one - component model depicted in fig . [ fig : entropy_cycle]b , all reactions are equilibrated when adapted ( and similarly in our two - component model ) . specifically , inactive receptors are `` modified '' by the influx of ligand , which after binding to the receptors establishes an equilibrium between active and inactive states . the influx is , however , counterbalanced by the efflux ( and thus the unbinding ) of ligand , which again is accompanied by equilibration of the receptors . only when the external ligand concentration changes , detailed balance is temporally broken . when the external concentration of ligand is increased , the activity drops , followed by an influx of the ligand through the membrane . this is followed by ligand binding on the intracellular site of the receptor , which then restores the equilibrium activity state ( orange dashed line ) . if the extracellular concentration is subsequently decreased back to the initial level , the activity increases , followed by an efflux of the ligand and restoration of the equilibrium activity state ( yellow dashed line ) . any energy dissipation is paid for by the environment , not by the cell . how do these minimal models compare with data from actual adaptation mechanisms ? the _ adaptation time _ , a measure of the speed of adaptation , can be defined as the time required for the response to return back to half of the displacement from the prestimulus value ( see fig .  [ fig : pathways ] for a graphical explanation ) . experimentally measured adaptation times vary from seconds to minutes : adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis by receptor methylation can take up to hundreds of seconds for very large stimuli @xcite and similarly for cell - internal adenylyl cyclase aca in _ dictyostelium _ chemotaxis @xcite ( although cgmp and activated rasg can be significantly faster @xcite ) . in contrast , adaptation of the transmembrane currents in the olfactory- @xcite and photo - transduction @xcite pathways is faster ( a few seconds ) . another important feature of adapting systems is _ fold - change detection _ ( fcd ) , which allows cells to interpret chemical gradients irrespective of scale @xcite . specifically , when applied to a step change in concentration , the output response should only depend on the fold change in the input ; if the input is rescaled by a multiplicative factor , the output should remain exactly the same for every time point considered . this feature entails both exact adaptation ( that the system returns exactly to the prestimulus value ) and weber s law ( that the smallest detectable stimulus is proportional to the background stimulus ) , but it is not implied by either or both of them . bacterial chemotaxis , despite considerable energy consumption , indeed exhibits fold - change detection @xcite . olfactory- and photo - transduction do not adapt perfectly , and thus do not satisfy fcd . figure  [ fig : times_fcd ] shows the results for the adaptation time and fcd for the one - component system ( see also figs . s5-s7 ; the two - component behaves very similarly , see figs . s12 , s13 ) . the adaptation time in response to a positive step decreases with increasing size ( fig . [ fig : times_fcd]a ) , while the response to a negative step has the opposite behavior ( fig .  [ fig : times_fcd]b ) . this can be explained within our intuitive , minimal model : since @xmath33 for extracellular binding ( and vice versa for the intracellular ) , in response to a positive step , ligand strongly binds to the off - state and weakly to the on - state of the extracellular domain of the receptor . as a result , the state of the receptor switches from _ on _ to _ off_. when the ligand enters the cell , even a small concentration is enough to bind intracellularly the receptor in the on - state , turning it on . therefore adaptation is fast , and the adaptation time decreases with increasing input steps due to the increased ligand gradient and flux . on the contrary , after a negative step , the state of the receptor is _ on _ with a high intracellular concentration of ligand , and thus for the receptor to switch off , the intracellular concentration has to decrease below the ( small ) intracellular @xmath34 . in this case , the larger the initial intracellular concentration the greater the time required to reach a small intracellular ligand concentration ; the adaptation time consequently increases . the experimental adaptation times behave very differently ( see insets of fig .  [ fig : times_fcd]a , b for a comparison with the slowest adaptation time course of the one - component model ) . in particular , in most of the experimental data , the adaptation time in response to a positive step tends to increase with increasing step size ( although activated rasg in _ dictyostelium _ chemotaxis has the opposite trend @xcite ) . in bacterial chemotaxis , this trend can be traced back to a maximal , saturated rate of receptor modification during adaptation @xcite . interestingly , the bacterial chemotaxis data we considered in response to a negative step exhibit a `` stereotypical response '' , with an adaptation time independent of the amplitude of the stimulus , reflecting a more complicated and highly activated demethylation reaction @xcite . finally , fig . [ fig : times_fcd]c , d shows that fold - change detection is almost perfectly satisfied by our minimal model , demonstrating that even a simple model is capable of producing sophisticated sensory features .      to further compare our minimal adaptation models with data , we consider three additional characteristics of adaptation . _ sensitivity _ represents the relative change of the output response with respect to a change in input stimulus ( see fig . [ fig : pathways ] ) . both our one- and two - component models display small sensitivity values and dynamic ranges when compared with the experimental data available for bacterial chemotaxis and photo - transduction ( see fig . [ fig : sens_rt]a ) . this discrepancy can be understood considering that chemoreceptors in bacteria are known to cluster to increase their sensitivity . additionally , receptor types with different ligand - binding strengths are known to extend the dynamic range of sensing @xcite . these strategies could also be exploited in our equilibrium - physics models , but making clusters of different receptor types would nonetheless cost energy for the cell , even if this is paid for during cell growth and thus is not directly connected with sensing .    the _ response time _ is the time interval between the onset of the stimulus step and the peak amplitude of the response ( see fig .  [ fig : pathways ] ) . figure  [ fig : sens_rt]b shows that the response of the one - component model is instantaneous , and is therefore similar to the fast bacterial chemotaxis response , while the two - component model resembles the slower eukaryotic responses . both in our one - component model and bacterial chemotaxis , the response is mainly determined by a `` conformational '' change in the receptor , which is very fast ( ns-@xmath35s ) @xcite . in contrast , eukaryotic responses involve long cascades based on diffusion . consistently , in both our simulations and the experimental data , the response time does not depend on the background stimulus , as this time is determined by the speed of cellular components .    considering the steady state after adaptation to a step change , we can distinguish the level of precision of adaptation . in particular , if we define the _ imprecision _ as presented in fig .  [ fig : pathways ] , we notice that both our one- and two - component models are perfectly precise , i.e. the steady state of the system is independent of the stimulus strength , even for large stimuli ( fig . [ fig : sens_rt]c ) . this does not occur for bacterial chemotaxis , which is perfectly adapting for small background stimuli but loses precision with increasing stimulus strength . while our minimal models are precisely adapted when fully equilibrated , precision in bacterial chemotaxis is regulated by a non - equilibrium pathway with constraints , e.g. from the finite number of methylation sites . the same trend of imprecision is present in photo - transduction , which is not even fully precise at small background stimuli . this may be explained considering that the photo- and olfactory - transduction pathways ( see fig . 1 of @xcite ) represents only the first stage of a complex response , and consequently the output signal of these pathways undergoes further processing and error corrections . the _ dictyostelium _ adenylyl cyclase activity shows a constant 33% imprecision independent of stimulus strengths ( fig . [ fig : sens_rt]c ) . note however that cgmp ( fig . 2a of @xcite ) and activated rasg ( fig .  2a of @xcite ) exhibit near perfect adaptation ( data not shown in fig . [ fig : sens_rt]c ) . when considering adaptation in _ dictyostelium _ chemotaxis , it is worth noting that cells do not respond to step changes but to spatial gradients . in particular , even if the models we are considering do not include cell motility , we can nevertheless study the response to those stimuli : approximating the cell by a round circle in a 2d plane with an initial homogeneous internal ligand concentration , we simulated the response of the one - component model when the external ligand concentration changes linearly in space across the cell length . figure  [ fig : gradient]a shows the spatial distribution of the attractant at different times due to slow diffusion across the membrane . the internal concentration and receptor - activity time courses at the cell rear ( minimal external concentration ) and at the cell front ( maximal external concentration ) for different receptor lengths are depicted in fig . [ fig : gradient]b and d , respectively . also in spatial sensing the activity of the receptors adapts perfectly along the cell circumference .    to quantify directional sensing we consider the dipole moment @xmath35 of the receptor activity , defined as the sum of the activity on the cell circumference weighted by the normalized @xmath36 position along the gradient : @xmath37 , \label{dir_sens}\ ] ] where @xmath38 represents the adapted steady - state activity . the initial response of @xmath35 is strong but then vanishes completely with adaptation of the receptors ( see fig . [ fig : gradient]c , top ) . although the response ceases , the internal gradient remains , thus representing the cell s degree of polarization ( fig . [ fig : gradient]c , bottom ) . the results of the two - component model are shown in text s1 . in this work we analyzed and compared adaptation pathways from very different organisms , ranging from bacteria to eukaryotes . all these pathways require energy in order to adapt @xcite . here , we showed that it is possible to build minimal adaptation mechanisms without the need of energy consumption by the cell , as possibly relevant for ancient protocells . despite their extreme simplicity , our two minimal models can help elucidate some aspects of complex signaling pathways . known transmembrane receptors in eukaryotes are grouped into ionotropic and metabotropic receptor types . ionotropic receptors are characterized by a direct response , much as an ionic channel changing its conformation ( such as opening or closing ) in response to an extracellular stimulus . a direct activation of this kind is similar to the conformational change - based mechanism in the bacterial chemotaxis pathway . in contrast , metabotropic receptors are more sophisticated : triggering of the receptor activates a cascade , usually a g - protein , leading to a change of second messenger concentration . this often involves complex feedback mechanisms @xcite . the influx / efflux of these second messengers , together with the current flowing through any ion channel activated by them , produce a change in membrane potential , which usually represents the output of the pathway . all the eukaryotic examples presented in this work fall into this category ( fig .  [ fig : pathways]b - d ) . our two minimal models directly relate to metabotropic signaling pathways . the one - component model functions by means of a small diffusible ligand , which can permeate through the membrane . this is somewhat comparable to the presence of camp both inside and outside starving _ dictyostelium _ cells and to the inflow of @xmath0 in photo- and olfactory - transduction . in addition , in both our one - component model and the _ dictyostelium _ pathway this ligand is responsible for both sensing _ and _ adaptation . camp is not only outside _ and _ inside the cell , but also follows the external stimulus ( fig . 5b of @xcite ) and thus can be considered mediating adaptation of the adenylyl cyclase aca ( fig . 4c in @xcite ) . in contrast , the two - component model involves the detaching of the two subunits , @xmath3 and @xmath4 , from the receptor after its activation , precisely resembling the dissociation of the @xmath1 and the @xmath2 subunits in _ dictyostelium _ , photo- and olfactory - transduction pathways . similar to the car1 receptor and g - protein in _ @xcite , the first component of the two - component model does not adapt , leaving the adapting response to the second component , the latter resembling the time course of adenylyl cyclase aca . the network motif effectively implemented in both minimal models is the incoherent feedforward loop ( see fig .  [ fig : models ] , right panels ) , which is encountered in the _ dictyostelium _ pathway as well @xcite . this design principle can easily be identified through the presence of a slow inhibitory process , which is the transmembrane diffusion of the ligand in the one - component model and the diffusion of the @xmath4 subunit in the two - component model . an important difference between the biological signaling pathways and our minimal models is the source of energy dissipation . unlike our minimal models , cells have to pay for their significant energy costs . hence , what are the advantages which may have led to the evolution of biological non - equilibrium pathways ? a first drawback of our models is that they exhibit a low sensitivity and dynamic range ( fig . [ fig : sens_rt]a ) . however , as already mentioned , this could be amended by introducing receptor complexes of different receptor types @xcite . a more serious constraint of our equilibrium models is that the response and adaptation times are determined by diffusion constants which can not easily be adjusted by the cell . furthermore , the one - component model requires the external stimulus to enter the cell , while modern energy - consuming pathways generally separate external sensing from internal signaling , thus avoiding that toxic chemicals enter the cell to mediate adaptation . why do g - protein cascades employ small fast diffusible molecules with little spatial control to mediate adaptation ? a possibility is stimulus amplification since active g - protein subunits can further activate many downstream signaling molecules @xcite . in addition , eukaryotic cells are often highly specialized , as in the case of olfactory receptor neurons and photoreceptors , and thus the low specificity of these small molecules is compensated by the high specificity of the cell types . alterations in transmembrane potential also permits fast and reliable electrical transmission through excitation , typical of neurons . some molecular species of our minimal models may represent `` fossils '' , remnants of ancient protocells in current adaptation pathways . for instance , the role of the `` non activating '' g - protein subunit remains unclear in eukaryotic signaling @xcite . others may have taken on new roles : gtp binding and hydrolysis may have introduced a `` timer '' into the pathways , promoting the reassociation of the g - protein complex and thus the termination of the downstream activation . the consequence may be a bursty , frequency modulated signaling , with the advantage of being more accurate for both sensing and encoding @xcite .    in conclusion , our simple schemes for perfect adaptation are energy efficient , but evolution may have replaced them by energy - consuming pathways to increase adjustability and control of the response and adaptation times for the cells changing needs . similar to kinetic proofreading , in which the probability of a correct output is increased through repeated cycles @xcite , adaptation pathways could represent schemes in which cells improve the control and robustness of the response by exploiting energy expenditure for enhanced fitness . * energy dissipation of one - component model . * for a process described by forward ( @xmath39 ) and reverse ( @xmath40 ) rates , the entropy production rate is given by @xcite @xmath41 with entropy in units of the boltzmann constant @xmath42 . for our one - component model , following fick s first law , @xmath43 and @xmath44 , with @xmath45 @xmath35m@xmath46/s the diffusion constant of the ligand , and @xmath47 nm the membrane thickness , leading for the total cell of radius @xmath10 to @xmath48\ln\left(\frac{c_e(t)}{c_i(t)}\right ) , \label{eq : entropy_models}\ ] ] which is equal to 0 at steady state ( i.e. when @xmath49 ) , and @xmath50 only when a concentration gradient across the membrane is present . the energy dissipation rate corresponds to eq . multiplied by the temperature @xmath51 of the system . * energy dissipation vs precision in bacterial chemotaxis . * equation   for precise adaptation @xcite can be generalized to include both the forward and reverse reactions @xmath52 , \label{eq : bact_precise}\end{aligned}\ ] ] where the first two terms represent the contribution of cher , and the last two the contribution of cheb . the reverse rate constants , @xmath53 and @xmath54 , can be adjusted to keep the net fluxes @xmath55 and @xmath56 at steady state , such that the net actions of cher and cheb are methylation and demethylation , respectively . we used parameters @xmath57 @xmath58 @xcite , @xmath59 @xmath31 , @xmath60 @xmath58 @xcite , @xmath61 @xmath32 . to describe imprecise adaptation in response to a stimulus of concentration @xmath62 , we consider @xmath63 , \label{eq : bact_imprecise}\end{aligned}\ ] ] which does not dissipate energy when rate constants @xmath64 , @xmath65 , @xmath66 , @xmath67 fulfill equilibration conditions @xmath68 and @xmath69 . here , we chose @xmath70 @xmath71 and @xmath72 @xmath58 ( this leads to equilibrium for @xmath73 ) . since the dynamics of the methylation level does not depend on the activity , eq . leads to imprecise adaptation . equations   and can be considered two components of the same system . by combining them through a parameter @xmath74 , we can describe their relative contributions @xmath75 following eq . , summing over the different reactions and neglecting the contributions of phosphorylation of cheb and chey , the corresponding entropy - production rate is given by @xmath76 , \label{eq : entropy_total}\ ] ] with @xmath77 the approximate number of receptors in a bacterium @xcite . by moving @xmath74 from 0 to 1 , this system becomes gradually imprecise and approaches equilibrium ( see fig .  [ fig : entropy]b ) . * gradient sensing simulations . * to simulate the response of the one- and two - component models we considered a two - dimensional cell and numerically solved the diffusion equation where the boundary conditions at a distance @xmath10 from the center are given by a gradient in the @xmath36 direction , with 0 mm corresponding to the minimal concentration at @xmath78 @xmath35 m and 1 mm corresponding to the maximal concentration at @xmath79 @xmath35 m . both the creation of the mesh and the solution of the equation were obtained by means of the partial differential equation toolbox of matlab ( the mathworks , inc . , natick , massachusetts , united states ) . g.d.p . and r.g.e . were supported by erc starting grant 280492-pphpi . briegel a , li x , bilwes a , hughes k , jensen g , et  al . ( 2012 ) bacterial chemoreceptor arrays are hexagonally packed trimers of receptor dimers networked by rings of kinase and coupling proteins . proc natl acad sci u s a 109 : 3766 - 71 . franois p , voisinne g , siggia e , altan - bonnet g , vergassola m ( 2013 ) phenotypic model for early t - cell activation displaying sensitivity , specificity , and antagonism . proc natl acad sci u s a 110 : e888e897 . valeyev n , kim j , heslop - harrison j , postlethwaite i , kotov n , et  al . ( 2009 ) computational modelling suggests dynamic interactions between @xmath80 , ip3 and g protein - coupled modules are key to robust _ dictyostelium _ aggregation . mol biosyst 5 : 612 - 28 . pathway @xcite , is activated , and produces camp , secreted for cell aggregation . the concentration of camp is also increased through erk2 , which inhibits the phosphodiesterase ( pde ) rega , in turn hydrolyzing camp . this pathway is inhibited by pka , activated by camp @xcite . ( c ) photo - transduction . light activates rhodopsin ( @xmath81 ) and , following a g - protein cascade , phosphodiesterase hydrolyzes cgmp . at low pde levels ( in the dark ) , cgmp allows the influx of @xmath0 through cyclic nucleotide - gated channels ( cngc ) . adaptation is mediated via @xmath0-dependent feedback loops : inhibition of gc , phosphorylation of @xmath81 , and cngc @xcite . ( d ) olfactory - transduction . odorant binds to the g - protein coupled olfactory receptor , activating ac to produce camp , causing the opening of cngc . the influx of @xmath0 opens chloride channels to amplify signal . several @xmath0-dependent feedback mechanisms mediate adaptation : inhibition of ac , cngc and camp @xcite . ( central panel ) response of an adaptive system to a step stimulus , and characteristic features considered here , with @xmath82 and @xmath83 @xcite . ]     the slow intermediate species mediating adaptation . ( b ) two - component model . ( left ) the first component is a receptor , comprising an extracellular binding site for ligand , and an intracellular domain to which two subunits , @xmath3 and @xmath4 , are bound . the second component is responsible for downstream signaling . when the receptor is stimulated ( e.g. by ligand or light ) the @xmath3 and @xmath4 subunits are released and diffuse towards the second component . since diffusion of @xmath3 is faster than that of @xmath4 , @xmath3 binds first to the second component , which starts signaling until @xmath4 binds . ( right ) schematic diagram of corresponding incoherent feedforward loop with two intermediate species @xmath3 and @xmath4 . species @xmath4 diffuses more slowly than @xmath3 and mediates adaptation . ]     and @xmath84 the extracellular and intracellular concentrations , @xmath10 the radius of the cell , and @xmath13 the length of the receptor . ( b ) simulation results for the one - component model showing time courses of stimulus @xmath6 ( left ) , inner concentrations @xmath84 ( middle ) , and activity ( right ) for different relative receptor lengths @xmath12 , with @xmath85 @xmath35 m , @xmath45 @xmath35m@xmath46/s , @xmath86 mm and @xmath87 mm . ( c ) two - component model , with @xmath13 the length of the second component . ( d ) simulation results for the two - component model . shown are outer concentration @xmath6 ( left axis ) and activity of the first receptor ( right axis ) ( left ) , @xmath3 and @xmath4 concentration ratio as bound to the second component ( middle ) , and activity of the second component ( right ) for different relative receptor lengths @xmath88 , with @xmath85 @xmath35 m , @xmath89 @xmath35m@xmath46/s and @xmath90 @xmath35m@xmath46/s , @xmath91 mm , @xmath92 mm , and @xmath93 mm . ]       and 1 ) . for simplicity only one methyl - group ( green diamond ) is shown , added by cher and removed by cheb . the red arrow represent the futile cycle undertaken when adapted . ( b ) one - component model with different receptor states . _ influx _ and _ efflux _ describe the continuous entering and leaving of ligand , and the green disc represents internally bound ligand ( external ligand is not shown ) . when adapted all individual reactions are equilibrated and satisfy detailed balance . dashed arrows represent the breaking of detailed balance in response to an increase ( orange arrow ) or a decrease ( yellow arrow ) of external ligand concentration . ]        , for the one - component ( light blue ) and two - component ( dark blue ) models in response to a step increase of 50% in concentration , with prestimulus values from 0.01 to 100 mm . bacterial chemotaxis ( bc ) and photo - transduction ( pt ) data of , respectively , receptor activity from _ in vivo _ fret and transmembrane current are taken from fig . 3b of @xcite ( 20% step change ) and fig . 6b of @xcite . ( b ) response time , as defined in fig . [ fig : pathways ] , and its dependence on the background stimulus . shown are the one - component model ( dashed line ) , two - component model ( dark blue ) , as well as _ dictyostelium _ data ( dc ) of aca calculated from fig . 4c of @xcite , olfactory - transduction transmembrane current data ( ot ) from fig  1a of @xcite , and photo - transduction transmembrane current data ( pt ) from fig . 6b of @xcite . ( c ) imprecision , as defined in fig . [ fig : pathways ] , for the one- and two - component model , bc data in response to measp from fig . 2c of @xcite , _ dictyostelium _ data ( dc ) of aca from fig . 4c of @xcite and transmembrane current pt data from fig . 6b of @xcite . ]    ) and extracellular ( @xmath6 ) ligand concentration in the @xmath36-@xmath94 plane for different times . initially , the concentrations are homogeneously 0.5 mm . when the linear gradient is applied , this is changed to 0 mm at the cell rear at ( -5 @xmath35 m , 0 ) and 1 mm at the cell front at ( 5 @xmath35 m , 0 ) . ( b ) internal concentration ( top ) and activity ( bottom ) time courses for different receptor lengths at the cell rear . ( c ) directional sensing ( top ) , as defined in eq .  , and polarization ( bottom ) for different receptor lengths . polarization is defined as the difference between internal concentrations at positions ( -5 @xmath95 , 0 ) and ( 5 @xmath96 , 0 ) , normalized by the concentration at ( 0 , 0 ) . ( d ) internal concentration and activity time courses for different receptor lengths at the cell front . see _ methods _ for a more detailed description . ]
Abstract:

Answer: eukaryotic adaptation pathways operate within wide - ranging environmental conditions without stimulus saturation . despite numerous differences in the adaptation mechanisms employed by bacteria and eukaryotes , all require energy consumption . here , we present two minimal models showing that expenditure of energy by the cell is not essential for adaptation . both models share important features with large eukaryotic cells : they employ small diffusible molecules and involve receptor subunits resembling highly conserved g - protein cascades . analyzing the drawbacks of these models helps us understand the benefits of energy consumption , in terms of adjustability of response and adaptation times as well as separation of cell - external sensing and cell - internal signaling . our work thus sheds new light on the evolution of adaptation mechanisms in complex systems .