Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it is well known that , studying the spatial structures and dynamics of globular clusters ( gcs ) is of great importance for understanding both their formation condition and dynamical evolution within the environment of their galaxies @xcite . for example , these clusters are ideal laboratories for detailed studies on two - body relaxation , mass segregation , stellar collisions and mergers , and core collapse @xcite . the correlations of structures with galactocentric distance can provide information on the role of the galaxy tides towards the clusters , while the distribution of ellipticity can shed light on the primary factor for cluster elongation . in addition , comparisons of structures of gcs located in different environment of galaxies offer clues to differences in the early formation and evolution of the galaxies or in their subsequent accretion histories @xcite . the `` fundamental plane '' for clusters in parameter space reflects universal cluster formation conditions , regardless of their host environments @xcite . the structural and dynamical parameters of clusters are often determined by fitting the surface brightness profiles to structure models , combined with mass - to - light ratios estimated from velocity dispersions or population - synthesis models . an accurate and well resolved density profile can be obtained by studying the distribution of integrated light coupling with star counts @xcite . several models are often used in the fits : the empirical , single - mass , modified isothermal spheres @xcite ; the isotropic multi - mass models @xcite ; the anisotropic multi - mass models @xcite ; the power - law surface - density profiles @xcite . the nearest large gc system outside the milky way ( mw ) is that of m31 , with a distance of @xmath1 kpc from us @xcite . it is so close to us that most gcs in it can be well resolved with _ hubble space telescope _ ( _ hst _ ) . @xcite first estimated core radii for several clusters in m31 , and subsequently , a number of studies @xcite focused on the internal structures of m31 gcs , including the core radius , half - light radius , tidal radius , and ellipticity , using the images from large ground - based telescopes and _ @xcite derived structural and dynamical parameters for 34 m31 gcs , and construct a comprehensive catalog of these parameters for 93 m31 gcs with corrected versions of those in a previous study @xcite . combined with the structures and dynamics for clusters from the mw , magellanic clouds , the fornax dwarf spheroidal , and ngc 5128 , these authors found the gcs have near - universal structural properties , regardless of their host environments . @xcite found that bright young clusters in m31 are larger and more concentrated than old ones , and are expected to dissolve within a few gyr and will not survive to become old gcs . with measurements of structural parameters for 13 extended clusters ( ecs ) in the halo regions of m31 , @xcite presented that the faintest ecs have magnitudes and sizes similar to palomar - type gcs in the mw halo . @xcite measured structures and kinematics for 10 newly discovered gcs in the outer halo of m31 , and found that they have larger ellipticities than most of gcs in m31 and the mw , which may be due to galaxy tides from satellite galaxies of m31 or may be related to the merger and accretion history that m31 has experienced . using the same sample clusters in @xcite , @xcite found that some gcs in m31 exhibit cuspy cores which are well described by @xcite models . these authors also confirmed the exist of luminous and compact globulars at large galactocentric radii of m31 , with no counterparts found in the mw . the last three studies extended the structural analysis of clusters in m31 out to @xmath2 kpc , providing important information on the accretion history of m31 outer regions .    in this paper , we determined structures and kinematics for 79 clusters in m31 by fitting several structural models to their surface brightness profiles . this paper is organized as follows . in section 2 , we present the _ hst _ observations for the sample clusters , and the data - processing steps to derive the surface brightness profiles . in section 3 , we determine structures and kinematics of the clusters and make some comparisons with previous studies . a discussion on the correlations of the derived parameters is given in section 4 . finally , we summarize our results in section 5 . _ hst _ has imaged a large fraction of globular clusters ( gcs ) in m31 . @xcite used _ hst_/wide field planetary camera 2 ( wfpc2 ) images to measure ellipticities , position angles , and best - fit @xcite model ( hereafter `` king model '' ) parameters for a large sample of m31 gcs . @xcite determined structures and kinematics for m31 gcs by fitting surface brightness profiles to different models , however , for all the gcs but g001 studied in @xcite , only king model was used . in addition , there were some clusters located at the edges of the images or observed with only one filter . with updated observations by _ hst _ , new data can be derived for them now . so , we decided to re - estimate the structure parameters for these gcs in @xcite . however , @xcite determined structures for g001 using three models and new observation , while @xcite determined structure parameters for five clusters ( b315 , b318 , b319 , b368 , and b374 ) using updated _ hst _ data . in addition , there is no new observation for b077 , which is at the edges of the _ hst _ images . we also noticed that bh20 and bh21 had been classified as stars , while bh24 a galaxy @xcite , which would not be discussed again in this paper . the remaining 69 clusters from @xcite would be included in the sample . @xcite estimated metallicities , distance moduli and reddening values for 10 newly - discovered halo gcs in m31 using the acs / wide field camera ( wfc ) images . although @xcite and @xcite determined structures for the 10 gcs , @xcite only used king model , while @xcite presented few structure parameters . so , we re - estimated the structure parameters for these gcs . finally , there are 79 clusters in our sample . we obtained the combined drizzled images from the hubble legacy archive . the images in the bandpass close to @xmath3 band ( f555w or f606w ) and @xmath4 band ( f814w ) were preferred , otherwise the images of f300w , f435w or f475w were selected . the images with high resolution were preferentially adopted ( wfpc2/pc or acs / wfc ) , followed by those obtained with wfpc2/wfc . figure 1 shows the spatial distribution for the sample gcs . the data analysis procedures to measure surface brightness profiles of clusters have been described in @xcite . when the center positions of these clusters were determined using the imcentroid task in iraf , the ellipse task was run in two passes to derive the surface brightness profiles . the ellipse showed inability to converge for several individual clusters . in these cases we first smoothed the images with a boxcar filter @xcite , and then ran the ellipse to derive the density profiles . the overall ellipticity and position angle ( pa ) were determined by averaging the ellipse output in the first pass , with the errors estimated as the standard deviation of the mean . several clusters ( b330 , b468 , bh04 , bh11 , bh29 , and nb39 ) showed errors of p.a.s larger than 15 degrees . we checked the images for these clusters , and found that the random fluctuations due to individual stars @xcite may account for the high errors , leading to a more difficult business for accurate measurements of pas table 1 lists the average ellipticity , p.a . and some additional integrated data for the sample clusters . considering that the metallicities for young ( @xmath5 gyr ) and old clusters are quite different , first , we averaged the ages for the sample 79 clusters from several previous studies @xcite to distinguish young from old clusters . of which , there are 13 clusters ( bh23 , bh29 , nb39 , and the 10 gcs from * ? ? ? * ) with no available age values in the literatures , and we assumed them as old ones . finally , there are six young clusters ( b097d , b324 , bh05 , bh12 , dao38 , and m091 ) in our sample , all of which are from @xcite . for the 69 gcs from @xcite , the metallicities with uncertainties from @xcite were preferentially adopted as our reference , followed by those of @xcite for old clusters , while the solar metallicity was assumed for young clusters @xcite . the reddening values were from @xcite , while the other integrated data were from rbc v.5 @xcite . for the 10 gcs from @xcite , we used the integrated data presented in @xcite , including the @xmath6 magnitudes , galactocentric distances , reddening values , and metallicities ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . in addition , @xmath7 magnitudes for six of the 10 gcs are from rbc v.5 . old clusters with no metallicity measurements are assigned with a mean m31 gc metallicity of [ fe / h]@xmath8 @xcite , while the uncertainties of [ fe / h ] are assumed to be 0.6 as for the standard deviation of the metallicity distribution of the m31 gc system @xcite . clusters with no reddening values are assigned with the galactic reddening in the direction of m31 of @xmath9 @xcite .    raw output from package ellipse is in terms of counts s@xmath10 pixel@xmath10 , which needs to multiply by a number ( 400 for acs / wfc , 100 for wfpc2/wfc , and 494 for wfpc2/pc ) to convert to counts s@xmath10 arcsec@xmath10 . a formula was used to transform counts to surface brightness in magnitude calibrated on the vegamag system ,    @xmath11    as noted by @xcite , occasional oversubtraction of background during the multidrizzling in the automatic reduction pipeline led to `` negative '' counts in some pixels , so we worked in terms of linear intensity instead of surface brightness in magnitude . with updated absolute magnitudes of the sun @xmath12 ( c. willmer , private communication ) listed in table 2 , the equation for transforming counts to surface brightness in intensity was derived ,    @xmath13    converting from luminosity density in @xmath14 to surface brightness in magnitude was done according to @xmath15    table 2 presents the zeropoints , conversion factors , and coefficients used in these transformations for each filter . table 3 gives the final , calibrated intensity profiles for the 79 clusters but with no extinction corrected . the reported intensities are calibrated on the vegamag scale . column 7 gives a flag for each point , which has the same meaning as @xcite and @xcite defined . the points flagged with``ok '' are used to constrain the model fit , while the points flagged with `` dep '' are those that may lead to excessive weighting of the central regions of clusters ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * for details ) . in addition , points marked with `` bad '' are those individual isophotes that deviated strongly from their neighbors or showed irregular features , which were deleted by hand . the point - spread function ( psf ) models are critical to accurately measure the shapes of objects in images taken with _ hst _ @xcite . @xcite found that by fitting models without psf convolution , the scale radii were systematically larger , and the concentrations smaller than those estimated from the convolved models . compared to ground - based telescopes , the psf of _ hst _ is very stable , although it is also known to vary with time @xcite . tiny tim has been the standard modeling software for _ hst _ psf simulation for 20 years , with a variety of uses ranging from deconvolution , model convolution , psf fitting photometry and astrometry , and psf subtraction @xcite . in this paper , we derived the acs / wfc and wfpc2 psf models using tiny tim , and then the models were fitted using a function of the form    @xmath16^{-{\beta}/{\alpha } } , \label{eq : psf}\ ] ]    where @xmath17 , @xmath18 , and @xmath19 for each filter are given in table 4 . it can be seen that the parameters in table 4 are slightly different with those from @xcite for acs / wfc in the f606w and f814w filters . @xcite selected a number of isolated stars on a number of images , and combined them to produce a single , average psf for each filter . here we derived a few model psfs at different positions of the camera , and averaged them to produce the final psf for each filter . the discrepancies of these parameters from the two studies are due to the different methods , but are negligible . the psf variation over the cluster extent was ignored since the clusters are small compared to the camera field of view @xcite . we used three structural models to fit star cluster surface profiles , including king model , @xcite , and @xcite model ( hereafter `` wilson model '' and `` srsic model '' ) . @xcite have described the three structural models in detail , here we briefly summarized some basic characteristics for them . king model is most commonly used in studies of star clusters , which is the simple model of single - mass , isotropic , modified isothermal sphere . @xcite found that m31 clusters are better fitted by king models . the phase - space distribution function for king model is defined as @xmath20 - 1 , &       & e < 0 , \\ 0 ,                        &       & e \geq 0 , \end{array}\right.\ ] ] where @xmath21 is the stellar energy , @xmath22 is a velocity scale . wilson model is an alternate modified isothermal sphere based on the ad hoc stellar distribution function of @xcite . these models have more extended envelope structures than the standard king isothermal spheres @xcite . several studies presented that wilson models fit the majority of gcs in the milky way ( mw ) and some of its satellites and ngc 5128 as well as or better than king models @xcite . the phase - space distribution function for wilson model is defined as @xmath20 - 1+e/{\sigma}_0 ^ 2 , &       & e < 0 , \\ 0 ,                        &       & e \geq 0 . \end{array}\right.\ ] ]    srsic model has a @xmath23 surface - density profile , and has been the standard model for parameterizing the surface brightness profiles of early - type galaxies and bulges of spiral galaxies @xcite . @xcite found that some classical gcs in m31 which exhibit cuspy core profiles are well described by srsic models of index @xmath24 . the clusters with cuspy cores have usually been called post - core collapse ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . the srsic model is defined as @xmath25.\ ] ]      before we fitted models to the brightness profiles of the sample clusters , the intensity profiles were corrected for extinction . table 2 lists the effective wavelengths of the acs and wfpc2 filters from the instrument handbook . with the extinction curve taken from @xcite with @xmath26 , we derived the @xmath27 values for each filter . we first convolved the three models with psfs for the filters used . given a value for the scale radius @xmath17 , a dimensionless model profile @xmath28 was computed , and then the convolution was carried out ,    @xmath29dx^\prime dy^\prime , \label{eq : convol}\ ] ]    where @xmath30 , and @xmath31 . @xmath32 was approximated using the equation ( [ eq : psf ] ) ( see * ? ? ? * for details ) . the best fitting model was derived by calculating and minimizing @xmath33 as the sum of squared differences between model and observed intensities , @xmath34 ^ 2}{\sigma_{i}^{2}}},\ ] ] in which a background @xmath35 was also fitted . the uncertainties of observed intensities listed in table 3 were used as weights .    as an example , we plotted the fitting for one sample cluster in figure 2 . the observed intensity profile with extinction corrected is plotted as a function of logarithmic projected radius . the open squares are the data points included in the model fitting , while the crosses are points flagged as `` dep '' or `` bad '' , which are not used to constrain the fit @xcite . the best - fitting models , including the king model , wilson model , and srsic model are shown with a solid line from the left to the right panel , with a fitted @xmath35 added . the dashed lines represent the shapes of the psfs for the filters used . there are some clusters showing individual isophotes with ellipse intensities that showed irregular features or deviated strongly from their neighbors . as @xcite reported , such bumps and dips may skew the following model fits . in these cases , we first derived the ellipse output through a boxcar filter to make a smoothed cluster profile @xcite , and then fitted these surface profiles using structural models . if some individual isophotes still can not be well fitted , these points were deleted by hand , which were masked with `` bad '' in table 3 . most profiles of the sample clusters were well fitted by the models , except for several clusters with different reasons . there are one or several bright objects at the intermediate radii of b097d , gc9 , and m091 ; the shape is very loose for dao38 ; the signal - to - noise ratio ( snr ) is low for b205 ; there are one or several bright objects near the outer region of b328 , b331 , and bh11 ; the images are not well resolved for b092 , b101 , b145 , bh05 , and nb39 ; several clusters ( b324 , b330 , b333 , b468 , gc3 , gc7 , bh04 , and bh29 ) are lack of a central brightness concentration , which may be candidates of `` ring clusters '' . the `` ring clusters '' have been reported in the magellanic clouds ( mcs ) and m33 @xcite , with irregular profiles such as bumps and dips which may not be attributed to the random fluctuations due to a few luminous stars . the images of these `` ring cluster '' candidates in our sample are displayed in figure 3 . there are three clusters ( b018 , b114 , and b268 ) showing bumps only in the luminosity profiles of the f814w , with the intrinsic color of @xmath36 0.95 , 1.14 , and 1.2 , respectively . some bright redder stars may locate at the intermediate radii of these clusters . there are 15 clusters ( b124 , b127 , b128 , b148 , b153 , b167 , b268 , b331 , bh05 , bh12 , m091 , nb39 , b064 , b092 , and b205 ) with high errors of @xmath35 . we checked the images carefully , and found that several reasons may account for those high errors : most of these clusters are not well resolved in the images ; there are one or several bright objects in the intermediate and outer part of clusters b331 and m091 ; clusters b064 and b205 only have images in one band ( f300w ) , of which the snrs are low . we should notice that if the fitted background is too high , the tidal radius may be estimated smaller artificially . only one band of observations can be derived for six clusters ( b009 , b020d , b064 , b092 , b101 , b205 ) , and none of the bands is close to @xmath3 band . so , we would not include the six objects in the following discussions . we used the same method mentioned in @xcite and @xcite to transform the magnitudes from acs and wfpc2 to @xmath3 on the vegamag scale @xcite . for clusters with available data of f555w or f606w band , we briefly used the extinction - corrected color @xmath37 or @xmath38 to do the transformations , while for clusters with no data of f555w or f606w band , we first transformed the acs or wfpc2 magnitudes to @xmath4 magnitude using the color @xmath39 , and then computed the @xmath3 magnitude using the color @xmath37 . the @xmath40 magnitudes and the reddening values are listed in table 1 . we estimated a precision of @xmath41 mag in the transformation , which was propagated through the parameter estimates @xcite . the mass - to - light ratios ( @xmath42 values ) , which were used to derive the dynamical parameters , were determined from the population - synthesis models of @xcite , assuming a @xcite initial mass function . the ages and metallicities used to computed @xmath42 values in @xmath3 band were derived as follows . an age of 13 gyr with an uncertainty of @xmath43 gyr was adopted for old clusters , while the derived average ages ( in section [ brightness.sec ] ) were adopted for the young clusters . the metallicities with uncertainties are listed in table 1 . the errors for @xmath42 of old clusters include the uncertainties in age and metallicity , while for young clusters , we simply adopted @xmath44 in @xmath42 as the errors as @xcite did .    the basic structures and various derived dynamical parameters of the best - fitting models for each cluster are listed in table 5 to table 7 , with a description of each parameter / column at the end of each table ( see for details of their calculation in * ? ? ? the uncertainties of these parameters were estimated by calculating their variations in each model that yields @xmath33 within 1 of the global minimum for a cluster , while combined in quadrature with the uncertainties in @xmath42 for the parameters related to it ( see * ? ? ? * for details ) .      in this paper , we determined structural parameters for 79 clusters in m31 by comparing their surface brightness profiles with three structural models . in figure 4 , some estimated structural parameters for clusters in this paper were compared with those from previous studies ( e.g. , * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? @xcite presented structural and dynamical parameters in @xmath3 band for 51 clusters in our sample , while @xcite determined structures for 10 gcs using king model . so we used the results on the bandpass close to @xmath3 band ( e.g. , f475w , f555w , and f606w ) and fitted by king model for comparison . it is not unexpected to see that most of our parameters are larger than the results from @xcite , since the isophotes flagged as `` dep '' in this paper may not be excluded from the fitting process in @xcite , resulting in excessive weighting of the inner regions in the fits . in addition , the ellipticities presented by @xcite were averaged over different filters for each cluster , while our results in figure 4 were on the bandpass close to @xmath3 band . the cluster with the largest discrepancy of ellipticity is bh05 , with an estimate of 0.19 by @xcite , and 0.55 in this paper . as discussed above , the image of bh05 is not well resolved , so it is difficult to derive accurate ellipticities and structural parameters . @xcite also concluded that the shapes of outer parts of faint clusters are strongly affected by the galaxy background or low snrs , leading to a difficult business to accurately measure the ellipticities . the largest scatter of the @xmath45 is b018 , which is @xmath46 pc derived by @xcite , while @xmath47 pc in this paper . although the psfs and some calibration factors adopted here are slightly different from those of @xcite , the parameters derived here are in good agreement with their results . @xcite presented observed velocity dispersions for a number of gcs in m31 using new high - resolution spectra from mmt / hectochelle . these authors estimated the @xmath42 values in @xmath3 band for clusters using the virial masses and luminosities , since the virial masses are the nominal estimates of the `` global '' mass of the system and are less sensitive to the accuracy of the king model fit ( see * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * for details ) . here we estimated the @xmath42 values in @xmath3 band from population - synthesis models by giving their metallicities and various ages @xcite . in figure 5 , we presented the comparison of some parameters derived by @xcite and this paper with those from @xcite . there is a large discrepancy between the @xmath42 values derived from the two methods , and most of the @xmath42 values from population - synthesis models are larger than those from observed velocity dispersions . the model masses from @xcite and this paper are slightly larger than the virial masses from @xcite , which were estimated using the half - mass radius and global velocity dispersion @xmath48 . the @xmath49 values from @xcite were the central velocity dispersions estimated using the observed velocity dispersions by integrating a known king model over the fiber aperture , and are consistent with the predicted line - of - sight velocity dispersions at the cluster center from @xcite and this paper . however , there are few young clusters with velocity dispersion measured by @xcite , so more observation data and analysis are needed to check the conclusion of the comparisons . figure 6 plots the correlations of velocity dispersion and mass with @xmath42 for m31 clusters . the left two panels show these parameters of clusters from @xcite , while the right two panels show those derived by king model from @xcite and this paper . we can see that the @xmath50 and @xmath51 from king - model fits show large dependence on the @xmath42 . the old and young clusters show a distinct boundary of the @xmath42 values . there is no clear correlation for @xmath42 and @xmath49 from @xcite , while the decrease in @xmath42 toward lower masses is expected from dynamical evolution like evaporation , which is the steady loss of low - mass ( high @xmath42 ) stars from the cluster driven by relaxation @xcite . considering the sensitive dependence on @xmath42 of @xmath50 , in the following discussion of the correlations of velocity dispersion with ellipticity and [ fe / h ] , we decided to use the @xmath49 values from @xcite for clusters in @xcite and this paper .      in order to determine which model can describe the structure of clusters best , @xcite and @xcite defined a relative @xmath33 index , which compares the @xmath33 of the best fit of an `` alternate '' model with the @xmath33 of the best fit of king model ,    @xmath52    it is evident that the `` alternate '' model is a better fit than king model if @xmath53 is negative , while king model is a better fit if @xmath53 is positive . figure 7 shows the relative quality of fit , @xmath53 for wilson- and srsic - model fits versus king - model fits for the sample clusters in this paper . the @xmath53 values are plotted as a function of age and some structures , including the half - light radius @xmath45 , the total model luminosity @xmath54 , and the surface brightness over the half - light radius in the @xmath3 band @xmath55 . the circles refer to clusters with @xmath56 , while triangles present those with @xmath57 , where @xmath58 is the most large radius for the available observation data . it can be seen that most clusters with @xmath57 are those having fainter luminosity @xmath54 or surface brightness @xmath55 . @xcite presented that the fitting data out to @xmath56 can effectively constrain the model fitting to the outer regions , which are essential to determine which structural model best describes the clusters . however , when @xmath58 is small ( @xmath59 ) , few data are available at large cluster radii , and the fitting are mostly dependent on the inner part . so , these clusters can not be used to determine a preference of one model or the other . similarly , we can not conclude that these clusters are well fitted by both two models even @xmath53 for them are small . @xcite determined a catalogue of structural and dynamical parameters for gcs in ngc 5128 using the three models , and showed that the bright clusters ( @xmath60 ) are better fitted by wilson model and srsic model , indicating that the halos of clusters in ngc 5128 are more extended than what king model describes . there is no evident correlation of @xmath53 with @xmath54 and @xmath55 for clusters in this paper . several studies @xcite showed that young clusters in the large magellanic cloud ( lmc ) and m33 do not appear to be tidally truncated and seem to be better fitted by power - law profiles than king models , while old clusters show no clear differences between the qualities of the fittings . however , there is no correlation of @xmath53 with age in figure 7 . we should notice that there are only six young clusters in our sample , and 13 clusters with no ages estimated in previous studies are assumed to be 13 gyr . a large sample of young star clusters with precise age estimates are needed for the study on correlation of @xmath53 with age . however , we do see that the king- and wilson - model fits are better than the srsic - model fits . we concluded that clusters in m31 can be well fitted by both king model and wilson model ( also reported in * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? figure 8 compares the relative quality of fit , @xmath53 values with a number of structure parameters ( @xmath61 , @xmath45 , @xmath62 , @xmath54 , @xmath50 , and @xmath63 ) for the sample clusters in this paper . the grey and open circles show the physical properties of clusters with @xmath56 derived from wilson- and srsic - model fits comparing to king - model fits , respectively . the triangles refer to clusters with @xmath57 . there are some clusters with comparable @xmath33 , but large discrepancy of @xmath45 and @xmath54 values for king- and wilson - model fits . we can see that most of these clusters have @xmath57 . as discussed above , the few constrain of the fitting to outer regions results in much different extrapolations of models , and it is hard to determine which model does the correct fitting in those cases @xcite . most parameters derived from wilson model are slightly larger than those from king model , while parameters derived by srsic model are smaller than those from king model , especially for @xmath61 , @xmath50 , and @xmath63 . @xcite concluded that rather than an intrinsic difference between clusters in m31 and other galaxies , the preference for king models over wilson models for m31 clusters is due to some subtle features of the observations . we combined the newly derived parameters here with those derived by king - model fits for m31 young massive clusters ( ymcs ) @xcite , m31 globulars @xcite , m31 extended clusters ( ecs ) @xcite , and mw globulars @xcite to construct a large sample to look into the correlations between the parameters . the ellipticities and galactocentric distances for the mw gcs are from @xcite ( 2010 edition ) . the parameters used in the following discussion for m31 gcs @xcite are those derived on the bandpass close to @xmath3 band ( e.g. , f555w and f606w ) , while the data from bluer filters are preferred for the ymcs in @xcite . the metallicities for most young clusters in @xcite were assumed to be solar metallicity , while metallicities from @xcite were adopted for some older clusters ( b083 , b222 , b347 , b374 , and nb16 ) . @xcite derived structure parameters of 13 ecs , including the core radius , half - light radius , tidal radius , and the central surface brightness in magnitude . the metallicities of 4 ecs ( hec4 , hec5 , hec7 and hec12 ) were determined by @xcite , and the integrated cluster masses for them were derived here using the absolute magnitudes and @xmath42 values in @xmath3 band from population - synthesis models ( see * ? ? ? * for the details ) . figure 9 shows structural parameters as a function of galactocentric distance @xmath64 for the new large sample clusters in m31 and the mw . some global trends can be seen . both @xmath45 and @xmath65 increase with the @xmath64 as expected , although the trend is largely driven by the ecs from @xcite . the star clusters with large @xmath64 can keep more stars with weaker tides relatively to those located at bulge and disk . @xcite explained that the @xmath45 and @xmath65 of the clusters in the halo of galaxies , which may be accreted into the galaxies from dwarf galaxies , can expand due to the change from strong to a weaker tidal field . @xcite concluded that the correlation of @xmath45 with @xmath64 reflects physical formation conditions as suggested by @xcite for gcs in the mw . however , @xcite found that no clear correlation between @xmath45 and @xmath64 exists beyond @xmath66 kpc for gcs in ngc 4649 , and they suggested that the sizes of gcs are not generically set by tidal limitation . it can be seen that there are no compact clusters at large radii ( @xmath67 kpc ) in the mw , while in m31 , there is a bimodality in the size distribution of gcs at large radii ( also reported in * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? it is interesting that there are few gcs having @xmath45 in the range from 8 to 15 pc at large radii ( @xmath67 kpc ) in m31 . there are three clusters ( b124 , b127 , and nb39 ) with large @xmath45 and @xmath65 at small @xmath64 , leading to more diffuse trends . however , the total model masses for them are @xmath68 , @xmath69 , and @xmath70 , respectively , meaning that they are massive clusters . it is not unexpected that these massive clusters can contain more stars than other clusters , although they are at small @xmath64 . the luminosities of clusters decrease with increasing @xmath64 , implying that either strong dynamical friction drives predominantly more massive gcs inwards , or massive gcs may favor to form in the nuclear regions of galaxies with the higher pressure and density @xcite . however , the lack of faint clusters with small galactocentric distance may be due to selection effects , since these clusters are difficult to detect against the bright background near m31 center , which is also reported by @xcite using the correlation of central surface brightness with galactocentric distance . the metallicities of clusters decrease with increasing @xmath64 , indicating that metal - rich clusters are typically located at smaller galactocentric radii than metal - poor ones , although with large scatter . @xcite found that metal - rich clusters ( [ fe / h]@xmath71 ) in m31 seem to form in a rotating disk extending to @xmath72 kpc . the metal - rich gcs may have undergone accelerated internal evolution due to strong tidal shocks @xcite from both bulge and disk passages . there are two matal - poor clusters ( b114 , b324 ) at small @xmath64 , which are at the bottom - left in the [ fe / h]-@xmath64 panel . the diffuse distribution of these parameters vs. @xmath64 may be caused by the different galactocentric distance used , which is true three - dimensional distances for galactic gcs while projected radii for m31 clusters . figure 10 shows the distribution of ellipticity with galactocentric distance , metallicity , and some structure parameters for clusters in the mw and m31 , which may show clues to the primary factor for the elongation of clusters : rotation and velocity anisotropy , cluster mergers , `` remnant elongation '' , and galaxy tides @xcite . @xcite presented that the tidal forces can only distort a cluster s outer region , while the elongation of the inner parts are due to its own gravitational potential and the total orbital angular momentum . \1 ) rotation and velocity anisotropy . cluster rotation is the generally accepted explanation for cluster flattening @xcite . dynamical models show that internal relaxation coupled to the external tides will drive a cluster toward a rounder shape over several relaxation times ( see * ? ? ? * and references therein ) . @xcite presented that more compact clusters which experience more relaxation processes , and clusters with larger velocity dispersions which rotate more slowly , should be rounder . @xcite presented that dynamical evolution could reduce the initial flattening caused by rotation or velocity anisotropy , indicating that more evolved clusters would be rounder . in order to check these predictions , we show the correlations of @xmath17 , @xmath73 , the observed velocity dispersion @xmath49 , and @xmath74 with the ellipticity . the observed velocity dispersion @xmath49 for m31 clusters are from @xcite , while @xmath49 for clusters in the mw are from @xcite . all the @xmath49 have been extrapolated to their central values with an aperture of 0 . there is no clear correlation of ellipticity with these parameters . however , we do see that more compact clusters  smaller @xmath17 and larger @xmath73are more rounder , which is consistent with previous studies @xcite . \2 ) cluster mergers and `` remnant elongation '' . @xcite presented that ellipticity correlates strongly with luminosity for clusters in lmc : more luminous clusters are more flattened , while @xcite presented that the most flattened gcs in both the mw and m31 are also brightest . this may be explained by the cluster mergers and `` remnant elongation '' , which is from some clusters former lives as dwarf galaxy nuclei . so , the larger ellipticities for clusters located at large galactocentric radii of m31 may be related to the merger or accretion history that m31 has experienced ( e.g. * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? * ; * ? ? ? . however , no clear correlation of ellipticity with luminosity can be seen . \3 ) galaxy tides . a strong tidal field might rapidly destroy the velocity anisotropies , and force an initially triaxial , rapidly rotating elliptical gc to a more isotropic distribution and spherical shape , while weak tidal fields are unable to change the initial shapes of gcs @xcite . it seems plausible that clusters located at different galactocentric radii or different galaxies have various distributions of ellipticities , due to the diverse galaxy tides . @xcite and @xcite found the distributions of ellipticities for m31 and ngc 5128 are very similar , but differ from the mw distribution , which has few very round clusters . no clear correlation of ellipticity with @xmath64 can be seen for clusters in these galaxies ( also see * ? ? ? * ) . however , the innermost clusters are slightly more spherical @xcite , which may due to the strong tidal field near galaxy center that reduces ellipticities of them . some clusters located at large projected radii of m31 do have larger ellipticities than most gcs in m31 and the mw , which may be caused by galaxy tides coming from satellite galaxies @xcite . @xcite summarized the orientation of a large sample of clusters in m33 and found that the distribution of pas shows a strong peak at @xmath75 , which is close to the direction towards m31 . these authors suggested that the elongation of clusters in m33 may be attributed to the tidal forces of m31 , considering that a recent encounter between m33 and m31 @xcite may have led to significant effects on the properties of m33 disk . figure 11 depicts the distribution of pas of star clusters in this paper and 34 clusters from @xcite , which were not included in @xcite . no clear trend is present in the orientation vectors towards m33 , although a small peak at @xmath76 does exist in the distribution of the pas . here we concluded that the elongation of clusters seems to be due to various factors @xcite . figure 12 plots structural parameters as a function of [ fe / h ] for the new large sample clusters in m31 and the mw . the trends of the parameters with [ fe / h ] nearly disappear when we add the data for the m31 ymcs , which were fitted with solar metallicities @xcite . however , we noticed that the metallicities for most of these ymcs obtained by @xcite are poorer than [ fe / h]@xmath77 . if we do not consider the ymcs in @xcite , it is evident that the metal - rich clusters have smaller average values of @xmath45 than those of metal - poor ones @xcite . @xcite presented that the sizes of metal - rich gcs are smaller than the metal - poor ones in ngc 4649 , which is a massive elliptical galaxy in the virgo galaxy cluster . these authors explained that as an intrinsic size difference rather than projection effects . @xcite carried out n - body simulations of metallicity effects on cluster evolution , and found that there is no evident difference for the half - mass radii of metal - rich and metal - poor cluster models . so , they explained that metal - rich and metal - poor clusters have similar structures , while metallicity effects combined with dynamical effects such as mass segregation produce a larger difference of the half - light radii . @xcite also found that @xmath45 decreases with increased metallicity for gcs in the mw , the mcs , fornax dwarf spheroidal , and m31 , except for gcs in ngc 5128 . an evident feature is that these four ecs are all metal - poor and have large @xmath45 . no clear correlation of model luminosity @xmath54 with [ fe / h ] is present , but we do see that the metal - rich clusters tend to be more luminous . both the observed velocity dispersion @xmath49 and central `` escape '' velocity @xmath78 increase with metallicity . @xcite presented that the higher @xmath79 of more metal - rich clusters in the observation may reflect the metallicity dependence of the terminal velocities of the stellar winds , since the @xmath79 of a metal - rich cluster should be higher to retain the fast stellar winds . core - collapsed clusters in general show a power - law slope in the central surface brightness profiles , which can be better fitted by a power - law model than king model @xcite . @xcite presented that the process of core collapse can be divided into two stages . in the first stage , stars are driven to the halo of the cluster due to close encounters . stellar evaporation occurs and the core contracts due to energy conservation . in the second stage , the low - mass stars are scattered to high velocities and escape to the halo , while the high - mass stars sink to the core due to energy equipartition . the increasing core density also increases the interaction rate of the binaries and single stars , which can generate energy in the core , reverse the contraction process , and produce an expansion . after a long time , the core shrinks again , and the process repeats . m15 , which has a central cusp , may be at an intermediate state between the extremes of collapse and expansion @xcite . @xcite presented that the core - collapsed clusters are those that have reached or are about to reach the `` binary burning '' stage , while the non core - collapsed clusters are still contracting under two - body relaxation . @xcite presented a catalogue of surface brightness profiles of 125 galactic gcs , and classified 16% of their sample as core - collapsed clusters and 6% as core - collapsed candidates . @xcite noticed that a number of clusters ( more than half of their sample ) in ngc 5128 have the index @xmath0 derived from srsic model , indicating that these clusters have strongly peaked central density profiles . these authors explained that the psf may flatten the models , and then the cuspy central density profiles are shown relatively . @xcite presented that galactic clusters with steep cusps are all close to the center of the galaxy , indicating that an increased incidence of tidal shocking @xcite may accelerate the core collapse process . @xcite also concluded that most of the m31 core - collapsed candidates are within 2 kpc of the center of m31 . figure 13 shows the distributions of galactocentric distance , and some structure parameters derived from srsic - model fitting for clusters in this paper and m31 gcs in @xcite . there are 25 clusters bested fitted by srsic model ( @xmath80 and @xmath81 ) , and 11 of them have @xmath0 , indicating that they have cuspy central density profiles . we assumed these 11 clusters to be possible core - collapsed clusters . in fact , the clusters with @xmath0 do have smaller @xmath61 and larger @xmath82 than their counterparts with @xmath83 . @xcite presented several clusters ( b011 , b064 , b092 , b123 , b145 , b231 , b268 , b343 , and bh18 ) as core - collapsed candidates in m31 . however , most of these clusters are best fitted by king model or wilson model in this paper except b145 and b343 . we checked the images of these clusters and found that the images of b123 , b231 , and b268 are not fully resolved , while the snrs of images for b064 and b092 are low . actually , the discrimination between the core - collapsed clusters and the `` king model clusters '' @xcite may often become unclear for several reasons : ( 1 ) statistical noise due to some unresolved bright stars in the cores of clusters ; ( 2 ) the similarity between the high - concentration king - model and power - law profiles ( see * ? ? ? * for details ) . b145 is best fitted by srsic model in this paper , but @xmath84 . the cluster b343 shows a cuspy density profile in the center , and has been classified as a core - collapsed cluster @xcite . we also find a better fitting by srsic model for it with @xmath85 . the distribution of core - collapsed cluster candidates is not constrained to the center of m31 . there are only two out of the 11 clusters with @xmath86 kpc , while four ones with @xmath87 kpc . it has been widely noticed that gcs do not occupy the full four - dimensional parameter space ( concentration @xmath73 , scale radius @xmath17 , central surface brightness @xmath62 , and central @xmath42 or velocity dispersion @xmath88 ) instead locate in a remarkably narrow `` fundamental plane '' ( fp ) . it is interesting to learn which of the structural and dynamical properties are either universal or dependent on characteristics of their parent galaxies @xcite . @xcite explored some tight correlations between various properties using a large sample of galactic clusters , and @xcite defined an fp for gcs in terms of velocity dispersion , radius , and surface brightness . @xcite investigated the mass - binding energy relationship for a few gcs and ellipticals , while @xcite defined an fp using the binding energy and luminosity , which is formally different from that of @xcite . @xcite found that the ngc 5128 gcs describe a relation between binding energy and luminosity tighter than in the mw . here we show the two forms of the fp for the new large sample clusters in the mw and m31 . figure 14 shows the mass - density - based fp relations . the left two panels show the correlations of the properties derived with the @xmath42 values from the velocity dispersions @xcite , using king model and the same fitting process in this paper ( section [ fit.sec ] ) , while the right two panels show the correlations of the properties derived with the @xmath42 values from population - synthesis models . @xcite presented the surface - brightness - based fp relations and found a large offset between the young m31 clusters and old clusters . they explained that as a result from lower @xmath42 values for the young clusters in m31 . it is obvious that the velocity dispersion , characteristic radii , and surface density for these clusters show tight relations , both on the core and half - light scales . the exist of fp for clusters strongly reflects some universal physical conditions and processes of cluster formation . figure 15 shows the correlation of binding energy with the total model mass . the left panel shows the @xmath51 and @xmath63 derived with the @xmath42 from the directly observed velocity dispersions @xcite , using king model and the same fitting process in this paper ( section [ fit.sec ] ) , while the right panel shows those properties derived with the @xmath42 from population - synthesis models . all the clusters locate in a remarkably tight region although in the widely different galaxy environments , which is consistent with the previous studies @xcite . @xcite concluded that the scatter around this relation is so small that the structures of star clusters may be far simpler than those scenarios derived from theoretical arguments . high - resolution imaging can be derived from _ hst _ observations for m31 star clusters . in this paper , we presented surface brightness profiles for 79 clusters , which were selected from @xcite and @xcite . structural and dynamical parameters were derived by fitting the profiles to three different models , including king model , wilson model , and srsic model . we found that in the majority of cases , king models fit the m31 clusters as well as wilson models , and better than srsic models . we discussed the properties of the sample gcs here combined with gcs in the mw @xcite and clusters in m31 @xcite . in general , the properties of the m31 and the galactic clusters fall in the same regions of parameter spaces . there is a bimodality in the size distribution of m31 clusters at large radii , which is different from their galactic counterparts . there are 11 clusters in m31 best fitted by srsic models with index @xmath0 , meaning that they have cuspy central density profiles , which are classified as core - collapsed cluster candidates . we investigated two forms of the fp , including the correlation of velocity dispersion , radius , and surface density , and the correlation of binding energy with the total model mass . the tight correlations of cluster properties indicate a tight fp for clusters , regardless of their host environments , which is consistent with previous studies @xcite . in addition , the tightness of the relations for the internal properties indicates some physical conditions and processes of cluster formation in different galaxies . we thank the anonymous referee for providing a rapid and thoughtful report that helped improve the original manuscript greatly . we would like to thank dr . mclaughlin for his help in deriving the parameters of the three structure models , and richard hook in understanding the tinytim package , and pauline barmby in understanding the psf of _ hst _ , and christopher willmer in providing the updated table of absolute solar magnitudes . this work was supported by the chinese national natural science foundation grands no . 10873016 , and 10633020 , and by national basic research program of china ( 973 program ) , no . 2007cb815403 .                                                                                cccccccccccc name & @xmath89 & @xmath90 & @xmath91 & @xmath92 & @xmath7 & @xmath3 & @xmath4 & @xmath93 & @xmath94 & @xmath95}$ ] & @xmath96 + & & ( deg e of n ) & & ( deg e of n ) & ( vegamag ) & ( vegamag ) & ( vegamag ) & ( kpc ) & & & ( gyr ) + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) & ( 12 ) + b006 & @xmath97 & @xmath98 & @xmath99 & @xmath100 & 16.49 & 15.50 & 14.33 & 6.43 & 0.11 & @xmath101 & 13.25 + b011 & @xmath102 & @xmath103 & @xmath104 & @xmath105 & 17.46 & 16.58 & 15.56 & 7.73 & 0.09 & @xmath106 & 15.85 + b012 & @xmath107 & @xmath108 & @xmath97 & @xmath109 & 15.86 & 15.09 & 14.03 & 5.78 & 0.11 & @xmath110 & 8.00 + b018 & @xmath111 & @xmath112 & @xmath113 & @xmath114 & 18.37 & 17.53 & 16.38 & 9.31 & 0.20 & @xmath115 & 1.20 + b027 & @xmath116 & @xmath117 & @xmath118 & @xmath119 & 16.49 & 15.56 & 14.41 & 6.02 & 0.19 & @xmath120 & 15.75 + b030 & @xmath121 & @xmath122 & @xmath123 & @xmath124 & 18.75 & 17.39 & 15.68 & 5.66 & 0.57 & @xmath125 & 9.62 + b045 & @xmath102 & @xmath126 & @xmath127 & @xmath128 & 16.72 & 15.78 & 14.51 & 4.90 & 0.18 & @xmath129 & 11.40 + b058 & @xmath130 & @xmath131 & @xmath132 & @xmath133 & 15.81 & 14.97 & 13.87 & 6.96 & 0.12 & @xmath134 & 8.01 + b068 & @xmath135 & @xmath136 & @xmath116 & @xmath137 & 17.60 & 16.39 & 14.84 & 4.32 & 0.42 & @xmath138 & 7.90 + b070 & @xmath102 & @xmath139 & @xmath127 & @xmath140 & 17.61 & 16.76 & 15.72 & 2.46 & 0.12 & @xmath141 & 8.75 +      ccccccc filter & pivot @xmath142 & @xmath143 & zeropoint@xmath144 & @xmath145 & conversion factor@xmath146 & coefficient@xmath147 + & (  ) & & & & & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) +   + f435w & 4318.9 & 4.20 & 25.779 & 5.459 & 3.1693 & 27.031 + f475w & 4746.9 & 3.72 & 26.168 & 5.167 & 1.6926 & 26.739 + f555w & 5361.0 & 3.19 & 25.724 & 4.820 & 1.8508 & 26.392 + f606w & 5921.1 & 2.85 & 26.398 & 4.611 & 0.8207 & 26.183 + f814w & 8057.0 & 1.83 & 25.501 & 4.066 & 1.1349 & 25.638 +   + f300w & 2986.8 & 5.66 & 21.448 & 6.061 & 297.9614 & 27.633 + f450w & 4555.4 & 3.93 & 24.046 & 5.263 & 13.0545 & 26.835 + f555w & 5439.0 & 3.14 & 24.596 & 4.804 & 5.1542 & 26.376 + f606w & 5996.8 & 2.81 & 24.957 & 4.581 & 3.0100 & 26.153 + f814w & 8012.2 & 1.85 & 23.677 & 4.074 & 6.1342 & 25.646 +      cccccccc name & detector & filter & @xmath148 & @xmath4 & uncertainty & flag + & & & ( arcsec ) & ( @xmath149  pc@xmath150 ) & ( @xmath149  pc@xmath150 ) & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) + b006 & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0234 & 44001.773 & 155.603 & ok + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0258 & 43776.562 & 171.971 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0284 & 43528.629 & 188.743 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0312 & 43258.270 & 206.935 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0343 & 42964.875 & 227.137 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0378 & 42647.070 & 249.659 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0415 & 42303.609 & 274.847 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0457 & 41919.195 & 299.011 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0503 & 41381.914 & 308.833 & ok + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0553 & 40666.176 & 309.009 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0608 & 39884.902 & 322.641 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0669 & 38966.234 & 328.825 & dep + & wfpc2/pc & f555w & 0.0736 & 37925.949 & 316.808 & ok +      lccccc detector & filter & @xmath17 & @xmath18 & @xmath19 + & & ( arcsec ) & & + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) + acs / wfc & f435w & 0.068 & 3 & 3.80 + & f475w & 0.064 & 3 & 3.60 + & f555w & 0.057 & 3 & 3.39 + & f606w & 0.053 & 3 & 3.14 + & f814w & 0.056 & 3 & 3.05 + wfpc2/wfc & f300w & 0.076 & 2 & 5.05 + & f450w & 0.073 & 2 & 4.89 + & f555w & 0.064 & 2 & 4.35 + & f606w & 0.059 & 2 & 4.11 + & f814w & 0.051 & 2 & 3.71 + wfpc2/pc & f300w & 0.051 & 2 & 3.76 + & f555w & 0.045 & 2 & 3.10 + & f606w & 0.045 & 2 & 2.96 + & f814w & 0.059 & 2 & 3.18 +      cccccccccccc name & detector & band & @xmath151@xmath152 & model & @xmath153@xmath144 & @xmath35@xmath154 & @xmath155@xmath146 & @xmath156@xmath147 & @xmath157@xmath158 & @xmath159@xmath160 & @xmath159@xmath161 + & & & & & & ( @xmath149  pc@xmath150 ) & & & @xmath162 & ( arcsec ) & ( pc ) + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) & ( 12 ) + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 555 & 49 & k66 & 35.44 & @xmath163 & @xmath164 & @xmath165 & @xmath166 & @xmath167 & @xmath168 + & & & 49 & w & 5.53 & @xmath169 & @xmath170 & @xmath171 & @xmath172 & @xmath173 & @xmath174 + & & & 49 & s & 130.08 & @xmath175 & @xmath176 & @xmath177 & @xmath178 & @xmath179 & @xmath180 + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 814 & 49 & k66 & 14.97 & @xmath181 & @xmath182 & @xmath183 & @xmath184 & @xmath185 & @xmath186 + & & & 49 & w & 1.88 & @xmath187 & @xmath188 & @xmath189 & @xmath190 & @xmath191 & @xmath192 + & & & 49 & s & 32.24 & @xmath193 & @xmath176 & @xmath194 & @xmath195 & @xmath196 & @xmath197 +      cccccccccccccc name & detector & band & model & @xmath198@xmath152 & @xmath199@xmath144 & @xmath200@xmath154 & @xmath201@xmath146 & @xmath202@xmath147 & @xmath203@xmath158 & @xmath204@xmath160 & @xmath205@xmath161 & @xmath206@xmath207 & @xmath55@xmath208 + & & & & ( pc ) & ( pc ) & ( pc ) & & ( @xmath209  pc@xmath150 ) & ( @xmath209  pc@xmath210 ) & ( @xmath209 ) & ( mag ) & ( @xmath209  pc@xmath150 ) & @xmath162 + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) & ( 12 ) & ( 13 ) & ( 14 ) + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 555 & k66 & @xmath211 & @xmath212 & @xmath213 & @xmath214 & @xmath215 & @xmath216 & @xmath217 & @xmath218 & @xmath219 & @xmath220 + & & & w & @xmath221 & @xmath222 & @xmath223 & @xmath224 & @xmath225 & @xmath226 & @xmath227 & @xmath228 & @xmath229 & @xmath230 + & & & s & @xmath231 & @xmath180 & @xmath232 & @xmath233 & @xmath234 & @xmath235 & @xmath236 & @xmath237 & @xmath238 & @xmath239 + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 814 & k66 & @xmath240 & @xmath241 & @xmath242 & @xmath243 & @xmath215 & @xmath244 & @xmath217 & @xmath218 & @xmath245 & @xmath246 + & & & w & @xmath247 & @xmath248 & @xmath249 & @xmath250 & @xmath225 & @xmath226 & @xmath227 & @xmath228 & @xmath251 & @xmath252 + & & & s & @xmath231 & @xmath197 & @xmath253 & @xmath254 & @xmath234 & @xmath255 & @xmath236 & @xmath237 & @xmath256 & @xmath257 +      cccccccccccccc name & detector & band & @xmath258@xmath152 & model & @xmath259@xmath144 & @xmath260@xmath154 & @xmath261@xmath146 & @xmath262@xmath147 & @xmath263@xmath158 & @xmath264@xmath160 & @xmath265@xmath161 & @xmath266@xmath207 & @xmath267@xmath208 + & & & ( @xmath268 ) & & ( @xmath12 ) & ( erg ) & ( @xmath12  pc@xmath150 ) & ( @xmath12  pc@xmath210 ) & ( @xmath12  pc@xmath150 ) & ( km s@xmath10 ) & ( km s@xmath10 ) & ( yr ) & ( @xmath12  ( pc  km  s@xmath269 + ( 1 ) & ( 2 ) & ( 3 ) & ( 4 ) & ( 5 ) & ( 6 ) & ( 7 ) & ( 8) & ( 9 ) & ( 10 ) & ( 11 ) & ( 12 ) & ( 13 ) & ( 14 ) + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 555 & @xmath270 & k66 & @xmath271 & @xmath272 & @xmath273 & @xmath274 & @xmath275 & @xmath276 & @xmath277 & @xmath278 & @xmath279 + & & & @xmath280 & w & @xmath281 & @xmath282 & @xmath273 & @xmath283 & @xmath284 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath287 & @xmath288 + & & & @xmath280 & s & @xmath289 & @xmath290 & @xmath291 & @xmath292 & @xmath293 & @xmath294 & @xmath295 & @xmath296 & @xmath297 + b006 & wfpc2/pc & 814 & @xmath270 & k66 & @xmath271 & @xmath298 & @xmath273 & @xmath299 & @xmath300 & @xmath301 & @xmath302 & @xmath303 & @xmath304 + & & & @xmath280 & w & @xmath281 & @xmath305 & @xmath273 & @xmath283 & @xmath306 & @xmath285 & @xmath286 & @xmath307 & @xmath288 + & & & @xmath280 & s & @xmath289 & @xmath308 & @xmath291 & @xmath309 & @xmath310 & @xmath311 & @xmath312 & @xmath313 & @xmath314 +
Abstract:

Answer: in this paper , we present surface brightness profiles for 79 globular clusters in m31 , using images observed with _ hubble space telescope _ , some of which are from new observations . the structural and dynamical parameters are derived from fitting the profiles to several different models for the first time . the results show that in the majority of cases , king models fit the m31 clusters as well as wilson models , and better than srsic models . however , there are 11 clusters best fitted by srsic models with the srsic index @xmath0 , meaning that they have cuspy central density profiles . these clusters may be the well - known core - collapsed candidates . there is a bimodality in the size distribution of m31 clusters at large radii , which is different from their galactic counterparts . in general , the properties of clusters in m31 and the milky way fall in the same regions of parameter spaces . the tight correlations of cluster properties indicate a `` fundamental plane '' for clusters , which reflects some universal physical conditions and processes operating at the epoch of cluster formation .