Instruction: Write an abstract for the following acadamic paper.

Input:
Paper: we have recorded the flight of a fly during take off and landing using digital high speed photography . it is shown that the dynamics of flexible wings are different for these procedures . during this observation fly flew freely in a big box and it was not tethered .
Abstract: in this fluid dynamics video , we demonstrated take off and landing of a fly . the deformation of wings is in focus in this video .

Paper: it has been recognized for many years that observations of clusters of galaxies can be applied effectively to test theories of the evolution of the universe . as the largest gravitationally bound objects emerging from the growth and subsequent collapse of primordial density fluctuations , their spatial distribution at different epochs is a relic containing evidence which can test cosmological models of structure formation . x - ray astronomy has enhanced the results of such studies greatly , for a number of reasons . first , clusters are x - ray sources of relatively high luminosity , with a luminosity function sufficiently well defined to allow , in principle at least , cosmic structure to be studied out to epochs of @xmath6 and beyond . further , ambiguities in the identification of clusters , caused by chance line - of - sight superposition of objects , are fewer in x - ray than in optical sky surveys . this is a consequence of the sharply peaked x - ray brightness distribution in most clusters , and of the relatively low surface density of bright x - ray sources . second , the x - ray properties of clusters are defined by events reaching back to the earliest epoch of cluster formation , and therefore may be used to test cosmological models . the x - ray luminosity and temperature of the intracluster gas depend on the cluster mass , so that the shape and amplitude of the luminosity and temperature functions of the cluster population are dependent on the spectrum of the early density perturbations . further , the morphology of clusters in the whole population may be dependent on the characteristics of the expansion , and is a diagnostic of cluster merging processes . finally , the abundance of heavy elements in the intracluster gas is a measure of galaxy evolution and ram - pressure stripping , and of the proportion of primordial gas in the cluster . therefore much effort has been given to the production of statistically complete samples of x - ray emitting clusters . the first were produced using @xmath7 ( schwartz 1978 ) and @xmath8 ( mchardy 1978 ) observations , and the heao-1 all - sky surveys ( piccinotti et al . 1982 ; kowalski et al . 1984 ) , and contained up to 76 clusters . the flux limits of these surveys ( @xmath9 , expressed here in the rosat band @xmath1 ) , and their angular resolution were limited by the use of proportional counters , and improvements were possible only after the first missions using imaging x - ray instruments . edge et al . ( 1990 ) reported the use of einstein and exosat observations to refine the results of the earlier surveys , producing a sample of 55 clusters free of , for example , the effects of source confusion . in the einstein extended medium sensitivity survey ( emss ) it was possible , by examining the fields of einstein pointings covering a total of 740 @xmath10 , to create a sample with a flux limit of @xmath11 and containing clusters with redshifts out to @xmath12 ( henry et al . 1992 ) .    the rosat x - ray telescope , equipped with an imaging proportional counter in the focal plane , allowed for the first time complete detailed surveys of large areas of sky ( trmper 1983 ) . the analysis of the rosat all - sky survey ( rass ) proceeded in two phases rass-1 and rass-2 , described below in section 3.1 , in which the second phase incorporated a number of improvements suggested by rass-1 ( voges et al . . the first x - ray flux - limited samples of clusters based on analysis of a large area of sky in the rosat survey were obtained by romer et al.(1994 ) , romer ( 1995 ) , ebeling et al.(1996 ) and ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) . the sgp sample described in romer et al.(1994 ) , based on analysis of the rass-1 data base , contained 161 cluster candidates with a limiting flux of @xmath13 . redshifts were obtained for 128 clusters in this sample , and this subset was used in a study of the cluster spatial correlation function ( romer et al . 1994 ) . the bcs survey by ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) addressed the whole extragalactic sky ( @xmath14 ) in the northern hemisphere , and reanalysed the fields in which clusters had been detected in the rass-1 analysis . the survey yielded a sample of 201 clusters at @xmath15 , having a limiting flux of @xmath16 , which is statistically complete at the 90 percent level . in a recent publication the bcs sample has been extended to an x - ray flux limit of @xmath17 , at which the completeness was 75 percent ( ebeling et al . 2000 ) . a recent survey of clusters in the northern sky ( noras ) , based on x - ray sources classified as extended in the rass analysis , is described by bhringer et al . deeper surveys have been possible in areas around the ecliptic poles ( henry et al . 2001 , gioia et al . 2001 , mullis et al . 2001 and voges et al . 2001 ) , where the rosat survey achieved unusually long exposure times , and in areas where deep pointings have been made ( romer et al . 2000 , jones et al . 1998 , rosati et al . 1998 , vikhlinen et al . 1998 and collins et al . the deepest survey was made by rosati et al . ( 1998 ) , in which the sample was complete down to a flux of @xmath18 and included clusters out a redshift of @xmath19 .    in what follows we concentrate on complete large - area cluster surveys in the southern hemisphere . this has its roots in an agreement between the royal observatory in edinburgh ( roe ) , the naval research laboratory ( nrl ) and the max - planck - institut fr extraterrestrische physik ( mpe ) in garching , made early in the rosat program , to make the cosmos digitised uk schmidt iiia - j survey of the southern sky ( macgillivray & stobie 1985 , yentis et al . 1992 ) available for identification of x - ray sources . this data base , containing @xmath20 objects with a limiting magnitude of @xmath21 , was installed at mpe for use in x - ray source identification . in cluster studies it was used to derive unbiased lists of candidates through systematic correlations of x - ray source positions with concentrations of galaxies . a comprehensive search for clusters is being undertaken at mpe in the reflex southern hemisphere project ( bhringer et al . 2001 ) . the first results ( de grandi et al . 1999 ) described a sample of x - ray bright clusters , obtained by searching a region of area @xmath22 ( @xmath23 ) . the study reanalysed clusters identified in the rass-1 analysis and arrived at a sample of 130 clusters having a completeness of at least 90 percent and a limiting flux of @xmath24 in the @xmath1 band . the complete reflex study area covers @xmath25 in the southern sky , and the techniques used in constructing the cluster sample have been described by bhringer et al . ( 2001 ) . at the current stage of the study a sample of 452 clusters has been obtained , which is at least 90 percent complete , using a flux limit of @xmath26 . a power - law fit to the log n - log s distribution yielded an exponent of @xmath27 . collins et al . ( 2000 ) have analysed the spatial correlation function of clusters using a reflex sample of 452 clusters covering an area 4 times larger than the sgp , and derived a value of @xmath28 mpc for the correlation length , significantly greater than the value of @xmath29 mpc obtained by romer et al . however for the 109 reflex clusters in the sgp area collins et al . ( 2000 ) find a correlation length of @xmath30 mpc , consistent with the result of romer et al . the difference between the complete reflex and the sgp results is most likely due to sample fluctuations caused by cosmic variance ( see collins et al . a significant conclusion of the reflex study is that low - density cold dark matter ( cdm ) models ( @xmath31 ) provide a better fit to the observed correlation function , and that high - density cdm models ( @xmath32 ) yield a poorer fit because they provide insufficient power at large scales . schuecker et al . ( 2001 ) have analysed the power spectrum of the reflex sample , and the results are consistent with the results of collins et al . ( 2000 ) . a prominent aspect of the sgp and reflex survey projects has been optical observing programs to obtain cluster redshifts , which we describe briefly in section 2 . however , it should be borne in mind that while these two projects have a common root and have followed similar procedures for cluster selection , x - ray analysis and redshift determination , they do possess some differences in approach .    following this introduction section 2 provides a summary of how the sgp survey was performed . section 3 describes the various procedures by which the cluster sample was extracted from the rass-2 data base and section 4 summarises how the x - ray energy flux and luminosity were calculated . section 5 presents the sgp cluster catalog in the form of a table and describes the archive of sgp cluster images in the form of overlays of the x - ray and optical data , which is accessible at mpe over the internet . section 6 examines the completeness of the cluster sample and section 7 discusses the large - scale structure traced by the clusters out to a redshift of @xmath33 . finally a summary of the results and conclusions of the paper are presented in section 8 . throughout the article we have assumed that the hubble constant @xmath34 , the deceleration parameter @xmath35 and the cosmological constant @xmath36 . this survey selected a region at high galactic latitude in the southern sky centered on the south galactic pole . rectangular in shape , it extends in right ascension from @xmath37 to @xmath38 and in declination from @xmath39 to @xmath40 ( see figure [ f18 ] ) , giving it an area of 1.013 steradian . the search for clusters in this region invoked no flux threshold , but intead worked to the limit of the rass data to maximise the completeness of the sample of cluster candidates . a flux limit is established subsequently to define a complete subsample . the first step in the search for clusters was to select all x - ray sources found in the region by the rass-2 analysis ( voges et al . 1999 ) . in this analysis the threshold values for the source detection algorithmns were lowered ( section 3.1 ) , with the aim of achieving as deep a survey as the rass would allow . therefore cluster searches using this data base have more sensitivity than has been available to previous southern hemisphere searches using the rass-1 data base ( romer 1995 , de grandi et al . 1999 ) . the rass-2 analysis was not equipped for detailed examination of the x - ray properties of extended sources such as clusters . to this end a number of techniques have been developed , including voronoi tesselation and percolation ( vtp , ebeling & wiedemann 1993 ) , the steepness ratio technique ( srt , degrandi et al . 1997 ) and the growth curve analysis ( gca , bhringer et al . the goal of these techniques is to obtain reliable fluxes for both extended and point sources , and to extract from the raw data as much information as possible about the x - ray source characteristics . in this study the gca technique has been used to analyse the list of candidates obtained from the rass-2 data base . cluster candidates were selected from this sample using the cosmos digitised iiia - j survey and a search procedure called csearch . this procedure , which is not designed to select clusters in an unambiguous manner , compares the galaxy density around the rass-2 position with the background galaxy density on the uk schmidt plate , and derives a probability that the result was a random coincidence . a sample of cluster candidates is obtained by setting a threshold to this probability , and this threshold is set low enough to ensure that few genuine clusters are lost and a high completeness is attained in the final sample . in our study a rass-2 list of 11981 sources is reduced by csearch to 3236 candidates ( section 3.3 ) . at this point much remains to be done to remove contaminating sources , which we estimate from internal statistical tests to comprise about half the candidates , in an objective process . at high redshifts ( @xmath41 ) the method reaches a limit of the cosmos data , when many cluster galaxies become so faint as to be classified by cosmos only as faint objects , which are not counteed by csearch . therefore some clusters at high redshift may be missed , which may be one source of incompleteness near the flux limit of the survey . the analysis of this sample of cluster candidates began by setting a limit of @xmath42 to the x - ray count rate in the hard band ( @xmath43 , section 3.1 , 3.4 ) , which reduced the number of candidates from 3236 to 477 . this was followed by the process of removing contaminating sources from this sub - sample , which proceeded through a number of stages . the first was the removal of cosmos artifacts , bright sources which to the eye were clearly not clusters , and redundant detections by rass-2 of the same source , particularly in extended sources such as clusters . this was done by examination of cosmos optical finding charts and of overlays of the optical and x - ray images . the second was to correlate rass-2 positions with the simbad catalog , in order to eliminate bright stars found in the rass-2 error circle , and then to use two x - ray properties of the source , hardness ratio and extent , as selection criteria . the hardness ratio was used to exclude those stars and active galactic nuclei ( agn ) whose spectra are sufficiently soft to exclude the possibility that the source is a cluster . the x - ray extent was used to classify candidates in three groups , namely clusters , agn candidates and a remainder of uncertain nature . the third and final stage , identifying the clusters and known agn among the remaining sample , proceeded along two parallel paths . the first comprised correlations of the candidate list with a variety of catalogs , in particular the nasa extragalactic data base ( ned ) , the simbad catalog , and the veron catalog of agn ( veron - cetty & veron 1998 ) . the second was an ongoing examination of the results of the supporting optical observations , described below , which identified agn in the sample . we summarise here briefly the sources of incompleteness in the final catalog obtained , which reduce the cluster count at low fluxes : + i ) the csearch analysis has a predetermined level of incompleteness in correlating + x - ray sources with galaxy concentrations ( section 3.3 ) . + ii ) the sharp count - rate limit ( @xmath42 ) rejects some sources at low energy + flux , due to the variation of interstellar column density in the field ( section 3.4 ) . + iii ) some distant clusters elude the tests applied in searching the list of candidates + yielded by csearch and the x - ray count - rate cut ( section 3.5 ) . + finally , a vital complementary part of the sgp survey and the reflex project has been a program of optical observations to obtain the redshifts of those clusters detected in the rosat survey , for which no redshifts were available in the literature . the sgp survey , which commenced not long after the launch of rosat in 1990 , was supported by three campaigns at the 4 m anglo - australian telescope ( aat ) and three at the 1.9 m telescope of the south african astronomical observatory . the results of these campaigns have been reported by romer ( 1995 ) . a larger program , which started in 1992 and was completed in 1995 , was installed as a key project at the european southern observatory ( eso ) . its purpose was to obtain redshifts for clusters in the reflex sample . an ongoing continuation of these observations is being pursued to support the extension of the reflex survey to lower x - ray flux limits . the rosat observatory was launched on 1990 june 1 , and saw first light on 1990 june 16 ( trmper et al . 1991 ) . after a two - month verification of the instrument operation it commenced its six - month long survey of the whole sky on 30 july 1990 . during the rass the observatory rotated about an axis through the sun , scanning on a given day a @xmath44 wide strip passing through the ecliptic poles the survey ended on 1991 february 18 . the first analysis of the survey ( rass-1 ) , which took place in 1991 - 1993 , used data collected into the same @xmath45 wide strips , and yielded a list of some 50,000 sources containing positions and such characteristics as count - rate , hardness ratio , angular extent and source detection likelihood . rass-1 was used to test the algorithms implemented in the analysis and to start scientific studies , and as a consequence a series of improvements was initiated ( voges et al . 1999 ) : + i ) sorting the data into 1378 sky fields of size @xmath46 , overlapping at least @xmath47 . + this improved the efficiency of source detection . + ii ) for operational reasons the rass-1 data base contained a few regions of low + exposure , which were filled in later by supplementary observations . this + later data was included in the rass-2 data base . + iii ) searching for sources in the soft @xmath48 , hard @xmath49 and broad + @xmath50 energy bands independently . + iv ) refining the pointing attitude solution and improving source positions . + v ) improvement of the spline - fit to the background , yielding more accurate source + count - rates . + vi ) the list of candidates selected by the sliding - window source detection algorithmns + was increased by lowering the detection threshold , and in the subsequent maximum + likelihood analysis the likelihood threshold for accepting sources was lowered + from 10 ( rass-1 analysis ) to 7 . + reanalysis of the survey data using the new software ( rass-2 ) was performed in 1994 - 1995 , yielding a list of 145060 sources . the sgp field contained 11981 sources above a likelihood threshold of 7 . the characteristics of the new software and results from the rass-2 analysis have been described by voges et al . the results described here relied solely on the rass-2 data base ( rass bright source catalog in voges et al . 1999 and rass faint source catalog in voges et al . 2000 ) . the @xmath45 wide rass scan strips overlap to an extent which increases with ecliptic latitude , and consequently the exposure time grows and reaches a maximum at the poles . this effect is visible in the map of the rass exposure time in the sgp survey region ( figure [ f1 ] ) , in which there is a systematic increase from the nw to the se corner . upon this change are superposed striations caused by periodic protective shutdown of the focal - plane detector as it traversed radiation belts . analysis of the exposure map of the sgp survey region yields the histogram shown in figure [ f2 ] , in which the mean exposure time is 300 seconds . there is an area of @xmath51 in the sgp field , in which the exposure time is less than @xmath52 . the roe cosmos digital data base contains the results of scanning 894 plates of the uk schmidt iiia - j ( blue ) southern hemisphere survey . the sgp study area contains 161 fields , each of size @xmath53 . cosmos analyses and classifies each object in a field , and records the @xmath54 magnitude , position ( r.a . and declination ( 2000 ) ) and object shape parameters . objects are classified primarily as stars , galaxies or faint objects , the last being objects whose low intensity on the plate defies a reliable determination of their class . heydon - dumbleton , collins , & macgillivray ( 1989 ) compared the cosmos galaxy number count - magnitude distribution with those derived from several independent optical surveys , and deduced that the galaxy sample was essentially complete ( @xmath55 percent completeness level ) to a magnitude limit @xmath56 . beyond this limit the star - galaxy discrimination gradually becomes less reliable as @xmath54 increases ( macgillivray & stobie 1985 , heydon - dumbleton et al . 1989 ) , leading to a significant incompleteness of the galaxy sample in the range @xmath57 . in the cosmos data base star / galaxy separation was performed down to a limit of @xmath58 . an example of the results is given in a figure , which shows the @xmath59 galaxies identified by cosmos in the sgp field ukj 411 ( this figure is in the published article , but was too large for this archived version ) . the galaxy magnitudes have been calibrated using photometric ccd observations of sequences of galaxies , which were used also in the calibration of the edinburgh / durham galaxy catalog ( heydon - dumbleton et al . 1989 ) . for any given plate cosmos yields a galaxy intensity , which depends on such factors as exposure time , emulsion characteristics and measures taken to keep the plate in a dry environment during exposure . this implies that the galaxy magnitudes for any given plate must be adjusted to match the surrounding plates . this is done by identifying galaxies in the overlapping border zone of adjacent plates , and deriving a shift which matches the galaxy magnitudes . no unique solution for the whole southern sky is possible , and instead a set of plate magnitude shifts is obtained by a fitting procedure which globally minimises the inconsistencies between adjacent plates . the resulting cosmos galaxy magnitudes are on an arbitrary machine scale , which now must be adjusted to match the ccd calibrations , in essence providing a global zero point solution to the matched plate data . this is done by fitting a correlation between the ccd and cosmos magnitudes of galaxies in the ccd observation sequences . to further ensure there were no calibration problems as a result of the iosophotal thresholding of the cosmos galaxies ( isophotal thresholding results in loss of light below the isophote level used and hence underestimation of the true brightness of a galaxy ) , we accepted for calibration purposes only galaxies in the cosmos data which were at least three magnitudes above the plate limit ( i.e. @xmath60 ) . this resulted in 207 sequence galaxies being accepted for calibration . the rms scatter of the correlation between the cosmos and the ccd magnitudes for these galaxies was found to be @xmath61 . as the intrinsic error in the ccd photometry is estimated to be @xmath62 , we estimate that the resulting error in the magnitudes derived for galaxies in the cosmos iiia - j southern hemisphere survey is @xmath63 . some independent corroboration of the cosmos galaxy photometry is provided by the study of caretta , maia , & willmer ( 2000 ) . they confirm after comparisons with their ccd data that the cosmos galaxy magnitudes are reliable at the @xmath63 level . their results indicate that galaxy samples are @xmath64 percent complete at magnitudes down to @xmath65 , in broad agreement with the cosmos estimates . however this agreement should be treated with caution , as caretta et al . ( 2000 ) studied a small area of sky having a lower galaxy count than is available in the uk schmidt southern hemisphere survey . the cluster search procedure ( csearch ) counts galaxies within 5 circles of radius @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 , 7.5 and 10 arcmin ( circles 1 through 5 ) , centered at the rosat source position , and compares the results with those of random sampling in the ukj field . these radii correspond to the range of expected cluster core diameters ( e.g. at @xmath67 a radius of 300 kpc is equivalent to an angular scale of 1.1 arcmin and at @xmath68 to 11 arcmin ) . the random sampling was performed 1000 times for each radius , yielding for each field five histograms of the galaxy count . for each histogram a table is created , giving the probability @xmath69 that the galaxy count exceeds a value , @xmath70 : + @xmath71 where @xmath72 is the number of cases where the galaxy count was @xmath73 . selection of cluster candidates is made after setting a threshold @xmath74 , which implies that for each plate a threshold be set for @xmath70 . individual plate sensitivity and statistics make this galaxy count threshold vary from plate to plate and yield a significant uncertainty . the following argument describes how this is circumvented by analysing the ensemble of probability values @xmath69 for the whole sgp rass-2 source sample . the rosat source is accepted if the probability associated with one of the 5 galaxy counts ( circles 1 through 5 ) at the rosat position falls below a selected threshold @xmath75 . for convenience , we have defined and used the quantity @xmath76 , as this approaches a maximum value of 1 for cluster candidates . the range @xmath77 is divided into bins of equal width ( typically 400 in number ) , and for any given search radius @xmath66 we create a histogram of the source count ( @xmath78 ) per bin for all the rass-2 sources in the sgp field . if there were no correlation between the rosat position and the galaxy count , as would be close to the truth for an ensemble of stars and agn , the expectation value for the number of sources , @xmath78 , per bin would be independent of @xmath79 ( bhringer et al . figure [ f4 ] shows the histograms of the probability p obtained for the rosat sources detected in the sgp region . to save space we show results for @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 and 10 arcmin only . the major characteristic of these histograms is indeed a flat distribution with statistical fluctuations , but in addition there is an enhancement at values of @xmath79 approaching @xmath80 , which is the signature of clusters . a comment on the data used to create these histograms is necessary . following the first csearch analysis of the sgp sources in the rass-2 data base , examination of images overlaying the x - ray and the optical fields revealed multiple detections by rass-2 of the more nearby clusters , due to their markedly extended x - ray emission ( e.g. a119 ) . this biases the csearch analysis , and therefore we removed 256 redundant multiple detections from the rass-2 sgp source list , and then repeated the analysis . this number is small compared to the total of 11981 sources , but is more significant in relation to the size of the eventual csearch sample of cluster candidates ( 3236 ) . the threshold @xmath81 must be chosen carefully in terms of the desired compromise between formal completeness @xmath82 and contamination @xmath83 , for inevitably the selected sample contains rosat sources having chance associations with concentrations of galaxies , which build the flat distribution , and so the price of higher completeness is an increased contamination . the probability threshold @xmath81 is related to @xmath82 and @xmath83 by the following equations : + @xmath84 @xmath85 where @xmath86 is the number of sources per bin in a specified flat portion of the probability histogram . before the results of csearch are discussed , two characteristics of the histograms shown in figure [ f4 ] should be clarified . first , the dip in @xmath79 for circle 1 in the range @xmath87 is a quantisation effect , due to the galaxy count jumping from 0 to 1 . the dip for circle 5 in the same region appears to be due to sampling limits , resulting from the circle diameter being a significant fraction of the field width . we have examined the number density of clusters found in our analyses as a function of position on the plate , and have found no sign of incompleteness near the cosmos digitisation boundaries on the plate . second , whereas the histograms for circles 1 and 2 decay rapidly from the peak at @xmath88 to a flat plateau , those for circles 3 and 5 decay even more rapidly to a minimum and then rise to a second enhancement in @xmath89 , covering the range @xmath90 for circle 3 and @xmath91 for circle 5 . to search for the cause of this second enhancement we examined how candidates found using circles 1 and 2 were registered using circles 3 through 5 . a typical result ( figure [ f5 ] ) shows how compact groupings of galaxies found by circle 2 , for which @xmath92 , are detected using circle 5 . the number of sources falls sharply from @xmath93 to a minimum , rises to a peak at @xmath94 and then falls again gradually , i.e. much of this second enhancement is due to relatively compact groups , for which the number of galaxies counted is not significantly enhanced when detected with circles 3 and 5 . as a consequence the effect of increasing the circle radius is to reduce @xmath79 .    the five candidate lists ( @xmath66 = 1.5 , 3 , 5 , 7.5 and 10 arcmin ) are cross - correlated to remove redundant detections , and so this second enhancement is in principle not a problem . however , if for each circle @xmath81 is set so as to yield a high value of @xmath95 ( equation 2 ) , then for circles 3 through 5 the contamination @xmath83 is increased substantially , making the subsequent screening of the sample more difficult and time - consuming . therefore as a precaution , for circles * 4 and 5 only * we have set @xmath81 at @xmath96 , so as to include only the sharp peak . we show below that this is a reliable procedure . the sgp field contains 11981 rass-2 sources having a likelihood greater than or equal to @xmath97 . table 1 shows the results of analysing this sample with csearch , and summarises the assumptions made in selecting cluster candidates . the last entry @xmath98 gives the yield of new candidates as one starts with circle 1 , and then proceeds from circles 2 to 5 , * removing redundant detections * at each stage . the trends in these numbers confirm the expectation that the smaller circles should detect the majority of clusters . the decision to set @xmath81 to @xmath96 for circles 4 and 5 was supported later by a search of the final list of 186 cluster candidates , which revealed no case in which the csearch detection relied solely on circle 4 and/or circle 5 . the total sample extracted using csearch comprised 3236 candidates . table 1 indicates that the majority of clusters are detected using circles 1 , 2 and 3 , and we deduce from column 6 that the contamination of the sample should lie between 46 and 56 percent . +    ccccccc 1 & 1.5 & 0.92 & @xmath99 & 0.925 & 0.46 & 1857 + 2 & 3 & 0.90 & @xmath99 & 0.900 & 0.50 & 884 + 3 & 5 & 0.90 & @xmath100 & 0.700 & 0.56 & 428 + 4 & 7.5 & 0.95 & @xmath101 & - & @xmath102 & 33 + 5 & 10 & 0.95 & @xmath101 & - & @xmath102 & 34 + & & & & & & +      previous studies found that the energy flux from extended extended sources is underestimated by the standard rass source detection algorithm ( ebeling et al . 1996 , 1998 and de grandi et al . 1997 ) , and section 2 has stated the various analyses developed to correct this problem . the growth curve analysis ( gca ) method , described in detail by bhringer et al . ( 2000 ) , has been used in this study to analyse the rass-2 data base . the gca returns among other information the following important parameters : background subtracted source count - rate and its poisson ( photon statistical ) error , a locally redetermined position of the centroid of the source x - ray emission , the mean exposure for the source region , a significance of the source detection , the radius out to which source emission is significantly detected , a hardness ratio characterizing the source spectrum and its photon statistical error , a fitted source core radius , and the probability , obtained using a kolmogorov - smirnov test , that the object is consistent with being a point source . the source position is determined with an error which in most cases is less than @xmath103 , the exceptions being nearby clusters with irregular emission structure . errors in count - rate and hardness ratio are given in our catalog ( table 3 ) . taking a2726 as an example , the hard band count - rate is @xmath104 and the hardness ratio is @xmath105 . the basic parameters are derived from the photon distribution using the three energy bands ` hard ' ( 0.5 to 2.0 kev , channel 52 - 201 ) , ` broad ' ( 0.1 to 2.4 kev , channel 11 - 240 ) , and ` soft ' ( 0.1 to 0.4 kev , channel 11 - 40 ) . the band definitions are the same as those used in the standard analysis ( voges et al . most of the derived parameters are based on analyses of data in the hard energy band , as clusters are detected in this energy band with the highest signal - to - noise ratio . one of the exceptions is the hardness ratio , which requires also the results from the soft band . the gca method uses the photon event distributions in two circles ( figure [ f6 ] ) , of radii 20 and 41.3 arcmin , centered initially on the rass-2 source center . events within the inner circle are analysed to determine the source characteristics , and those in the outer annulus are used to determine the background level . in some cases special analyses were necessary , where either clusters had an unusually large angular extent , or where two or more sources lay in a confused region , requiring the use of deblending algorithms . the source count - rate is determined from the cumulative , radial source count rate profile ( growth curve ) after background subtraction . the construction of the growth curve is preceded by a redetermination of the source center and by the background measurement . a typical example for the resulting growth curve is displayed in figure [ f7 ] , showing the count - rate plotted as a function of integration radius ( solid curve ) . the dashed lines show the limits determined by applying the photon event statistical error ( including the error for the background subtraction ) . the count - rate is determined in two alternative ways . in the first a significant outer radius of the source is defined as the point where the increase in the @xmath106 error is larger than the increase of the source signal . the integrated count - rate is calculated using events within this cutoff radius . in the second method a horizontal level is fitted to the outer region of the plateau , and this value is adopted as the standard in quoting hard - band x - ray count - rates and in calculating cluster energy flux and luminosity ( section 4 ) . however , we use the first method also as a check on the count - rate and as a means of estimating systematic uncertainties in the count - rate determination , which must be combined with the pure photon statistical errors .    careful examination of the overlays of x - ray and optical images ( section 3.5.1 ) of the cluster sample revealed 19 cases in which the source was very extended , or source confusion might cause errors in deriving the source count - rate . these 19 were subjected to the special analyses referred to above , in which the source count - rates were revised . six systems were identified as double clusters and not subjected to the deblending analysis . they are identified as double clusters in the survey catalog ( table 3 ) . the other two important source properties determined by the gca method are the spectral hardness ratio and the source extent . the hardness ratio , @xmath107 , is defined as @xmath108 where @xmath109 is the hard band and @xmath110 the soft band source count - rate ( both determined for the same outer radius limit ) . the source extent is investigated in two ways . in the first a @xmath111-model profile ( cavaliere & fusco - femiano 1976 ) convolved with the averaged survey psf is fitted to the differential count - rate profile ( using a fixed value of @xmath112 ) , and we derive from the results a core radius , @xmath113 . in the second a kolmogorov - smirnov ( ks ) test is used to estimate the probability that the object is a point source . it is taken as highly likely that the source is extended when the ks probability is less than 0.01 . tests with x - ray sources which have been identified with stars and agn showed that a false classification as an extended source occurred in less than 5% of the sample . the final step in the x - ray analysis was to establish a lower limit to the source count - rate , in order to set practical limits to source identification and redshift determination . the list of 3236 candidates from the csearch analysis ( section 3.3 ) was truncated using a threshold of @xmath42 for the cut - off radius count - rate in the hard band . this reduced the list of candidates to 477 . a sharp limit in count - rate corresponds to a range of energy flux , determined by the variation of interstellar column density @xmath114 in the field , which leads to some incompleteness at low fluxes . bhringer et al . ( 2001 ) estimate a range of @xmath115 in the band @xmath1 for @xmath116 . in the sgp field @xmath117 takes on relatively low values so that , for example , for only 8 percent of the clusters selected is @xmath118 . therefore we can be certain that this source of incompleteness is absent at fluxes greater than @xmath119 . the removal of contaminating sources from the list of 477 candidates was by necessity an iterative process , in which the decisions made were reviewed repeatedly to ensure that the criteria used had been applied consistently . the following sections describe the steps in this process .      for each cluster candidate a finding chart @xmath120 in size was extracted from the cosmos data base . in addition an overlay was made of the x - ray surface brightness contours upon the cosmos optical field . for example figure [ f8 ] shows the overlay made for the abell cluster a3854 . examination of these finding charts and overlays during the selection process has been valuable for several reasons . first , visual scrutiny has removed cases in which csearch had been deceived by artifacts , for example satellite trails , the haloes and diffraction spikes of bright stars , and the attempt by cosmos to resolve the structure of bright nearby galaxies . these structures often were resolved by cosmos into objects identified as galaxies . second , the rass-2 analysis resulted in multiple detections of extended sources such as clusters , which may be removed after examination of the x - ray / optical overlays . as described in section 3.3 , a significant number of redundant detections was removed to minimise any bias of the csearch analysis . however this process was not perfect , and it was possible later to identify further cases by careful re - examination of the overlays . the latter are counted in the detection statistics shown later in table 2 . finally , scrutiny of the finding charts and overlays has identified occasional errors , which are simple to correct , where a csearch candidate is identified with a faint rass-2 x - ray source having a brighter x - ray neighbour . the gca technique then has preferred the latter and derived the higher count - rate . this problem was detected through visual examination of the overlays . the temperature and extent of the hot gas in clusters of galaxies make it possible to set limits to both the x - ray hardness ratio and the angular extent of a rass cluster source ( ebeling et al . 1996 , 1998 ) . this provides effective discriminants between clusters and the majority of contaminating sources in the csearch sample , made up of agn and stars . in this section we justify the following two criteria , which have been used in removing a large fraction of these contaminating sources : + 1 ) the * upper limit * of the x - ray hardness ratio ( section 3.4 ) is less than zero , + i.e. if @xmath121 , the source is too soft . + 2 ) the core radius @xmath113 obtained from the angular extent calculation is less than + @xmath122 , i.e. the object is a point source . + these criteria were applied independently in rejecting sources . in order to establish criteria using these parameters , we selected control samples describing the characteristics of clusters , agn and stars . the first contained @xmath123 abell clusters extracted from the total sample of @xmath124 candidates ( section 3.4 ) , using as a criterion a correlation between the x - ray position and the centroid of an abell cluster . conservatively we excluded from the sample clusters where the separation between the rosat and abell positions was greater than @xmath125 , where the survey exposure was low @xmath126 , or where x - ray maps revealed nearby components in the source region , one of which might not be a cluster . in each case the x - ray / optical overlay image ( section 3.5.1 ) and the cosmos finding chart were examined . the count - rates of these clusters covered the full range of the study reported here . the second and third control samples comprised agn and stars detected by the rosat survey and identified through spectroscopic optical observations . this project was a collaboration between mpe and eso , in which the error circles of all rass-1 sources in four relatively small regions of the southern hemisphere were searched using the cosmos data base to identify optical candidates . the nature of these candidates was examined through spectroscopic observations , after which the likely source of the x - ray emission was identified ( t. a. fleming 1994 , private communication ) . using three of these fields having a total area of @xmath127 , we selected samples of @xmath128 agn and @xmath129 stars , whose positions are within 20 arcsec of the rass-2 source positions . again , the x - ray count - rate of these sources covered the full range of the cluster survey reported here . the hardness ratio ( @xmath130 ) distributions for these samples are shown in figure [ f9 ] . whereas @xmath131 for @xmath132 percent of the abell clusters in our test sample , @xmath133 for @xmath134 and @xmath135 percent of the agn and star samples respectively . therefore a conservative threshold of zero for the * upper limit * to @xmath130 has been set , above which rass sources qualify for retention in the list of cluster candidates . this is an effective method of removing a large fraction of the stars and agn in our sample of 477 candidates . the angular extent , as measured by the derived core radius @xmath113 , provides an effective test for distinguishing clusters from agn , which however runs into two difficulties . the first is caused by the diminishing size of clusters with increasing redshift , an effect which is emphasised if the cluster contains a cooling flow . the second is the effect of source confusion in a rass-2 detection of an agn , when the gca analysis may yield a finite value for the source extent . these difficulties are constrained to a certain extent by the redshift limit ( @xmath67 ) and by the limit set to the x - ray count - rate in the hard band ( section 3.4 ) . the distributions of @xmath113 derived from the two samples are shown in figure [ f10 ] . the rise in these curves at a radius of @xmath136 is a result of setting a limit @xmath137 in the gca , and to a lesser extent of the influence of surrounding sources on the growth curve analysis ( section 3.4 ) . the important characteristic is that 58 percent of agns satisfy @xmath138 , whereas @xmath132 percent of abell clusters in our test sample satisfy the condition @xmath139 . therefore only those sources among the 477 csearch cluster candidates were retained which satisfied the condition @xmath139 . as discussed in section 3.5.5 , this results in some incompleteness near the survey limit , where the rass and cosmos data become marginal in the detection of distant clusters . we have examined four clusters in the abell control sample , which were rejected when these hardness ratio and core radius criteria were used . one , associated with a2800 , failed the hardness ratio test . this may be due to contamination , as it is in a confused region of x - ray emission . three sources , associated with a3866 , s181 and s1121 , failed the core radius test . in the case of s181 the galaxies are faint and displaced from the center of the x - ray source , which is comparatively strong ( @xmath140 in the hard band ) . the small rass-2 error circle contains a stellar object ( @xmath141 ) , and therefore we conclude that this source is an agn ( the emission from agn comes from a concentrated region , so that often cosmos classifies the object as a star ) . the source coincident with a3866 has a high count - rate ( @xmath142 ) yet shows only weak signs of extent . although the spectroscopic observations ( romer 1995 ) revealed evidence of an agn , overlaying an einstein hri image upon an optical dss image indicates that the central object is probably a cd galaxy and that the x - ray source is very compact but not a point source . thus the decision to reject this source is open to correction . s1121 appears to be an example of a distant cluster near the limit of the survey sensitivity . thus four clusters in the test sample of 118 abell clusters were rejected , from which we estimate that in applying the hardness ratio and core radius criteria to our cluster sample , the loss of clusters should be less than 4 percent . bright stars appear in the sample of cluster candidates either because of a chance association with a region of high galaxy density , or because cosmos has broken down the diffraction spikes and/or halo into objects classified as galaxies . they have been removed using two tests , one being the hardness ratio test described in section 3.5.2 and one being a statistical test . in the latter we have analysed @xmath143 regions of diameter @xmath144 in the sgp field , using the cosmos data to derive the mean density of stars as a function of @xmath54 magnitude . the following argument was used to reject rass-2 sources having stars brighter than @xmath145 in the error circle . the density of stars brighter than @xmath145 was found to be @xmath146 , which implies that the probability of finding such a star by chance in a rass-2 90-percent confidence error circle , which typically has a radius of about @xmath147 , is @xmath148 . therefore if we reject all candidates having a star brighter than @xmath145 within the error circle , the loss of clusters from the sample should be no more than @xmath149 . this procedure has been applied by correlating the candidate list with stars in the simbad and tycho ( hg et al . 1998 ) catalogs . a correlation of the @xmath150 magnitudes in these catalogs with the cosmos @xmath54 magnitudes shows that the latter are lower by about 0.5 magnitudes for stars fainter than @xmath151 , but that the difference widens steadily for brighter stars . therefore in examining bright simbad or tycho catalog stars in the rass-2 error circle we set a threshold of @xmath152 , below which the star was judged to be the cause of the x - ray emission . additional stars , not listed in the simbad and tycho catalogs , were identified later by inspection of the cosmos finding charts and the x - ray / optical overlay images for the 477 candidates . the x - ray sources removed by the hardness ratio @xmath153 and core radius @xmath154 tests have been reviewed carefully , using correlations of the list of 477 candidates with the veron catalog of active galaxies ( veron - cetty & veron 1998 ) and the nasa extragalactic data base ( ned ) to identify sources for which the 90 percent rass-2 error circle contained an identified agn , and examination of the x - ray / optical overlay images and the cosmos finding charts . however in the sample remaining after these tests , after removal of stars ( section 3.5.3 ) and after identification of detections resulting from cosmos artifacts , there remained a contaminant comprising 28 sources for which @xmath155 or @xmath139 , but whose identification as a cluster was suspect . these sources were reviewed using again the veron and ned correlations , overlay images and cosmos finding charts , but in addition using the results of the csearch analysis . of these 28 we rejected 9 as being agn and 1 as an x - ray source superposed on a nearby galaxy over 5 arcmin in extent . nine sources were excluded because the extent detection was due to source confusion , and 8 because csearch either made an identification at a large radius only , inconsistent with the small x - ray extent , or made an error due to cosmos artifacts . the one remaining source requires further study and was rejected tentatively . there is a possible association with a2813 , but the minimum found by gca in the core radius fit was very shallow and the evidence for a cluster in the x - ray / overlay image was indecisive . the total number of agn identified was 127 , and figure [ f11 ] shows the distribution of their @xmath54 magnitudes , as measured by cosmos . where the agn was not identified in the veron catalog or ned , @xmath54 for the brightest object inside the 90 percent error circle was used . the half - width of the distribution lies in the range @xmath156 . finally , we discovered five candidates showing large extended regions of x - ray emission @xmath157 in diameter , whose optical fields show no signs of a significant galaxy population and whose origin as the confusion of several sources is not obvious . after removal of rass-2 sources contaminating the sgp sample of 477 cluster candidates , using the procedures described above , there remained 186 candidates . the statistics of this selection process are summarised in table 2 . of the 61 redundant rass-2 detections in table 2 which eluded the earlier screening , 24 were associated with clusters . therefore of the 477 candidate sources @xmath158 are associated with clusters , which implies that the contamination of the sample of 477 was 0.56 . this is in marginal agreement with the results of the csearch analysis ( section 3.3 ) , which predicted @xmath159 . examination of table 1 shows that @xmath160 of the cluster candidates were identified by csearch using the smaller circles 1 and 2 , and consequently that formally the contamination of the sample should be 0.5 or less , and the completeness about 0.90 . therefore we can estimate that the sample of 477 candidates should contain @xmath161 clusters and that a complete sample obtained using csearch would have yielded @xmath162 clusters . therefore we can estimate that the overall completeness of the sample of selected clusters is @xmath163 . this incompleteness , which is the sum of the three effects summarised in section 2 , contributes to the flattening of the log n / log s distribution at fluxes below @xmath2 in the band @xmath1 ( section 5 ) . cc clusters of galaxies & 186 + active galactic nuclei ( agn ) & 127 + stars & 74 + extended x - ray emission regions & 5 + redundant rass-2 detections & 61 + sources below x - ray count - rate threshold & 24 +   + total & 477 +    the above argument implies that @xmath164 clusters have been missed in searching the 477 candidates . this has arisen in most cases while applying the criteria @xmath121 and @xmath138 to reject candidates , and in section 3.5.2 we have estimated that applying these criteria applied to a control sample of abell clusters should yield an incompleteness of @xmath165 . two examples of clusters with overly soft spectra are a2800 ( @xmath166 ) and the cluster @xmath167 ( @xmath168 ) discovered by tucker et al . ( 1995 ) in the emss . in neither case is the nature of the contaminating source clear . one limit of this study is that the criterion @xmath139 for selecting cluster candidates will inevitably discriminate against the more distant clusters of small angular extent , particularly those in which a cooling flow makes the x - ray source more compact . this loss is evident in the flattening of the log n - log s distribution at low flux ( section 5 ) . three aspects of the analysis bear out this trend . first , of the sources rejected because @xmath138 we identified at least 4 cases , where the x - ray / optical overlays showed suggestive but marginal evidence that they were clusters . second , there were 11 in our catalog of 186 clusters , for which the detection of angular extent appeared to be near its limits . the gca yielded a small but non - zero core radius , but simultaneously the ks - test yielded significant probabilities , between @xmath169 and @xmath170 percent , of the source being point - like . third , in the case of distant clusters accepted by csearch , cosmos classified some of the galaxies as faint objects , which the csearch analysis did not count . this is obvious in some of the x - ray / optical overlays of these objects , which show the dominant elliptical galaxy with halo surrounded by faint objects . therefore we conclude that some distant clusters may have been missed by csearch . in order to convert the rosat count - rate into an energy flux outside the galaxy , the spectrum of the hot intracluster medium ( icm ) has been convolved with the response functions of the interstellar medium ( ism ) and the instrument . the plasma emissivity was derived using the version of the raymond & smith ( 1977 ) code installed in 1994 in the mpe exsas software . the technique has been verified by comparing results with those obtained using the exspec analysis code ( bhringer et al . the cluster plasma was assumed to contain elements heavier than hydrogen having abundances 0.35 times the solar abundance . the hi column densities used in calculating the ism absorption have been taken from dickey & lockman ( 1990 ) . these calculations have been made over ranges of temperature between 0.05 and 10 kev ( @xmath171-@xmath172 k ) , and of hi column density between @xmath173 and @xmath174 . the resulting matrix was used to convert the count - rate in the hard band to an energy flux @xmath175 in units of @xmath176 in the 0.1 - 2.4 kev band .    for each cluster whose redshift has been measured the x - ray luminosity has been calculated using the relations : + @xmath177 @xmath178 where @xmath179 is the luminosity in the 0.1 - 2.4 kev band , @xmath180 is the correction for redshifting of the radiation , and @xmath181 is the luminosity distance . k has been calculated for ranges of redshift between 0.025 and 0.5 , and of icm temperature between 0.05 and 10 kev . the resulting matrix was used to convert energy flux into luminosity .    measured cluster temperatures have been taken from the compilation in table 1 of white et al . ( 1997 ) . where measured temperatures have not been found we have used the luminosity - temperature correlation derived by white et al . ( 1997 ) : + @xmath182 where @xmath183 is the x - ray luminosity in the 0.01 - 80 kev band and t is the temperature in kev . the assumed temperature was used to calculate a bolometric correction to the luminosity . for each source a cycle of iterations was performed in the flux and luminosity calculations , until the change in temperature fell below 1 percent . where neither redshift nor temperature has been measured , we have assumed a temperature of @xmath184 . the procedures described in sections 2 , 3 and 4 for searching the rass-2 data base for cluster candidates , selecting clusters from this sample and determining their x - ray characteristics , have resulted in the catalog of 186 clusters shown in table 3 . the following notes , listed by the column number in the table , augment the information given in the header to each column . + ( * 1 * ) rosat x - ray source name . + ( * 2 * ) right ascension ( h : m : s j2000 ) of the centroid ( gca ) of the cluster x - ray emission . + ( * 3 * ) declination ( d : m : s j2000 ) of the centroid ( gca ) of the cluster x - ray emission . + ( * 4 * ) count - rate in @xmath185 in the hard band ( @xmath43 ) , with error ( gca ) . + ( * 5 * ) x - ray hardness ratio , with error ( gca ) . + ( * 6 * ) total rosat survey exposure time for the cluster , in seconds . + ( * 7 * ) column density of interstellar atomic hydrogen at the cluster center , in units of @xmath186 . + ( * 8 * ) temperature of the cluster gas , derived by the procedure described in section 4 , in @xmath187 . the superscript @xmath188 indicates that no measurement was found , and the temperature was determined using an @xmath189 correlation . where no redshift was available a temperature of @xmath184 was assumed . + ( * 9 * ) energy flux from the cluster , with the absorption by galactic interstellar absorption removed . the units are @xmath190 in the @xmath1 band . + ( * 10 * ) x - ray luminosity of the cluster in its rest - frame , derived using the procedure described in section 4 . the units are @xmath191 in the energy band @xmath1 . we assume @xmath34 and @xmath35 . + ( * 11 * ) optical identification of the cluster . the meaning of the prefix to the identification and the appropriate reference are given in table 4 . for five sources identified as double clusters , the label dc has been appended to the identification . + ( * 12 * ) redshift of the cluster . + ( * 13 * ) label for the reference from which the redshift was obtained : + * 1 . * romer ( 1995 ) * 2 . * h. bhringer and l. guzzo 1999 , eso key project , private communication ) * 3 . * struble & rood ( 1999 ) * 4 . * katgert et al . ( 1996 ) * 5 . * quintana & ramirez ( 1995 ) * 6 . * fetisova et al . ( 1993 ) * 7 . * de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) * 8 . * h. andernach 1989,``a compilation of measured redshifts of abell clusters '' , unpublished , private communication * 9 . * crawford et al . ( 1995 ) * 10 . * huchra et al . ( 1999 ) * 11 . * shectman ( 1985 ) * 12 . * mazure et al . ( 1996 ) * 13 . * collins et al . ( 1995 ) * 14 . * dalton et al . ( 1997 ) * 15 . * de vaucouleurs et al . ( 1991 ) * 16 . * stocke et al . ( 1991 ) * 17 . * postman et al . ( 1992 ) * 18 . * abell , corwin , & olowin ( 1989 ) * 19 . * katgert et al . ( 1998 ) * 20 . * ebeling & maddox ( 1995 ) * 21 . * muriel , nicotra , & lambas ( 1995 ) * 22 . * shectman et al . ( 1996 ) * 23 . * lauberts & valentijn ( 1989 ) * 24 . * da costa et al . ( 1998 ) * 25 . * dalton , efstathiou , & sutherland ( 1994 ) * 26 . * di nella et al . ( 1996 ) * 27 . * ratcliffe et al . ( 1998 ) * 28 . * given in ned , reference uncertain . + ( * 14 * ) number of galaxy redshifts used in deriving the cluster redshift . +    ccc a & abell catalog & abell et al . ( 1989 ) + s & abell catalog : southern supplementary clusters & abell et al . ( 1989 ) + am & cambridge apm catalog & ned : arp & madore ( 1987 ) + apmcc & cambridge apm cluster catalog & dalton et al . ( 1997 ) + cid & efar survey & barton et al . ( 1996 ) + edcc & edinburgh - durham cluster catalog & lumsden et al . ( 1992 ) + emss & einstein medium sensitivity survey & stocke et al . ( 1991 ) + eso & european southern observatory & no reference in ned + hcg & hickson compact group catalog & hickson ( 1982 ) , barton et al . ( 1996 ) + scg & catalog of cosmos southern compact groups & prandoni , iovino & macgillivray ( 1994 ) + ngc & cluster dominated by ngc galaxy & ned + sh & cluster catalog from shane - wirtanen galaxy counts & shectman ( 1985 ) +    images of these clusters , showing overlays of the hard band x - ray contours upon optical images reconstructed from the cosmos digital data base , are accessible over the internet at ( http://wave.xray.mpe.mpg.de/publications/papers/2001/rass-sgp-clusters/ xray - optical - images ) . they comprise 134 abell clusters , 15 clusters found in other catalogs , and 37 newly discovered clusters . the number of abell clusters in the sgp survey area is 1215 , including 332 southern supplementary clusters , therefore the abell clusters in the sgp catalog ( table 3 ) comprise 11.0 percent of all abell clusters in the sgp survey area . the abell fraction of the sgp cluster sample ( 72% ) is in good agreement with that of the bcs ( ebeling et al . 1999 , 2000 ) . we have compared the catalog in table 3 with the reflex catalog of bright clusters published by de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) , which contains 54 clusters lying in the sgp region . applying their energy flux threshold of @xmath192 in the @xmath1 band to table 3 , we find all but one cluster from the list of de grandi et al . the exception is a3866 , which we have rejected tentatively as a source whose x - ray flux may be dominated by an agn ( section 3.5.2 ) . however table 3 contains 20 clusters above this threshold , which are not in the list of de grandi et al . the reason is that these sources were not in the rass-1 source list , but were found by the rass-2 analysis as a consequence of the improvements , in particular lowering source detection thresholds and searching for sources in the hard energy band , which are described in section 3.1 and by voges et al . these 20 sources are ngc 720 , ngc 1132 , five newly discovered clusters , sh518 , and the abell clusters 194 , 2410 , 2442 , 2474 , 2496 , 2554 , 2556 , 2566 , 3984 , 4010 , 4068 and s1136 . the sgp catalog contains 113 clusters having fluxes below the threshold of the de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) study . the log n - log s distribution for the sgp cluster sample is shown in figure [ f12 ] , where it is compared with the results of other surveys . to avoid any errors caused by converting hard band ( @xmath43 ) fluxes in these surveys to broad band ( @xmath1 ) fluxes , we have made this comparison in the hard band . the circular symbols ( @xmath193 ) are the result of the survey of clusters by de grandi et al . ( 1999 ) , who reanalysed clusters detected in the rass-1 data base over a @xmath23 area of the southern sky and made first use of redshifts obtained from the eso key project . figure [ f12 ] includes also one point from the heao-1 a-2 cluster survey ( piccinotti et al . 1982 ) , the fit to the log n - log s curve obtained by ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) from the rosat brightest cluster sample ( bcs ) , and a box setting limits at low fluxes , derived from an analysis of emss results ( rosati et al . 1995 ) . there are significant differences among these results at energy fluxes less than @xmath194 . there is a flattening of the sgp log n - log s distribution at energy fluxes less than about @xmath195 , equivalent to a flux of @xmath26 in the rosat broad band ( @xmath1 ) , which is the completeness limit derived in section 6 . applying this limit we obtain a sample of 112 clusters , of which 110 have measured redshifts . the sources of the incompleteness of the sgp catalog at low fluxes have been discussed in section 3.5.5 . in addition there is a steepening of the sgp log n - log s curve over a short range of hard band flux near @xmath196 , a characteristic evident to a lesser extent also in the results of de grandi et al . this results in the distribution being higher than the fit of ebeling et al . ( 1998 ) and being at the upper limit set by rosati et al . ( 1995 ) , within the range @xmath197 . this may be a statistical fluctuation , but as we show in section 7 , there is significant large - scale structure in the sgp field out to a redshift of @xmath33 , which may be one cause of this feature in the sgp log n - log s distribution ( figure [ f12 ] ) .    the optical observing program and a search of the literature yielded redshifts for 157 of the 186 clusters in table 3 . the distribution of the clusters in redshift space is summarised in the wedge diagram shown in figure [ f13 ] , in which the clusters are projected onto a plane whose co - ordinates are cluster redshift and right ascension . in this figure the symbol size is a measure of the cluster x - ray luminosity in the @xmath1 band . table 3 contains five sources , labelled dc in column 11 , for which the x - ray and optical data provide compelling evidence that they are interacting double clusters . in contrast the pair of objects rxcj0108.8 - 1524 and rxcj0108.9 - 1537 , which in projection are close , do not constitute a double cluster as they are well separated in redshift space . the former is a151 , which has a redshift of 0.0537 ( h. andernach 1989 , unpublished , private communication ) , whereas spectroscopic observation of the latter yield two redshifts which tie the galaxies to a151 but nine having a mean of @xmath198 ( katgert et al . 1996 , 1998 ) . in section 3.5.5 it was estimated from a comparison of the number of clusters detected in the sgp with the csearch predictions , that the sample completeness was 0.79 , and it was concluded that the missing ones were mainly distant clusters of small angular extent . the effect is to flatten the log n - log s distribution at low fluxes ( figure [ f12 ] ) , and using the following arguments we have established that the sample is essentially complete at fluxes greater than @xmath2 . first , we compare our log n - log s distribution with the results of deeper surveys , and of the wider field reflex and bcs surveys . at @xmath2 in the sgp distribution ( figure [ f12 ] ) we obtain @xmath199 . for deeper surveys , which have smaller fields and therefore limited statistics at this flux , we obtain @xmath200 ( rosati et al . 1998 ) , @xmath201 ( vikhlinen et al . 1998 ) , @xmath202 ( henry et al . 2001 ) , and @xmath203 ( gioia et al . 2001 ) . for the reflex survey we obtain @xmath204 ( bhringer et al . 2001 ) and for the bcs survey @xmath205 ( ebeling et al . we find no evidence that the sgp result is inconsistent with these surveys at this flux threshold . second , we apply a standard measure of the formal completeness of a sample , namely the @xmath206 test ( e.g. , schmidt 1968 , avni & bahcall 1980 ) . for the computation of the maximum volume @xmath207 the effective area , the local variation of the x - ray flux limit ( both for a minimum of 10 source counts ) , and the @xmath180 correction ( see section 4 ) are taken into account . the test is performed for subsamples with different x - ray flux limits . the mean of the @xmath206 values and their @xmath208 standard deviations are plotted in figure [ f14 ] . note that the errors do not include cosmic variance . below @xmath209 the deviations from the ideal value of 0.5 are significant , indicating that the sample gets definitively incomplete below this flux limit . between @xmath210 and @xmath211 it is difficult to make a definite statement about significant deviations from the 0.5 line because the large scale inhomogeneities in the spatial distribution of the clusters ( see section 7 ) start to modulate the averaged @xmath206 values . note also that the measurements at different flux limits are not statistically independent . a good estimate of the flux completeness limit is @xmath212 , because for fluxes brighter than this limit the averaged @xmath206 values are all within the 90 percent confidence range ( note that cosmic variance increase the given formal errors ) . third , we examine the behavior of the radially averaged comoving cluster number density along the redshift direction . if we assume that within the tested redshift range no large evolutionary effects are present , one would expect an almost constant cluster number density profile with superposed large - scale inhomogeneities . figure [ f15 ] shows the superposition of a set of cluster number density profiles obtained from 10 volume - limited subsamples within the luminosity range @xmath213 to @xmath214 . outside this luminosity interval the sizes of the subsamples are smaller than 10 and are thus dominated by small - number statistics . the subsamples are restricted to clusters with at least 10 source counts and x - ray fluxes larger than @xmath215 , as obtained from the @xmath206 test mentioned above . the effective survey area covered by each subsample is taken into account . the individual density profiles are normalized using the average cluster number density estimated for each subsample . the bars in figure [ f15 ] represent the formal @xmath216 poisson errors , within which no systematic large - scale gradients of the number density are found for @xmath217 . the comparatively large high - density region found in the redshift interval @xmath218 is composed mainly of several superclusters . a more detailed analysis of the large - scale structure is given in section 7 . finally , we have verified that the variation of rass exposure time in the sgp field ( figure [ f1 ] ) has little effect on the effective area at a flux level of @xmath2 . at the detection threshold of the gca ( 10 source counts ) , this area is 98 percent of the total area of the field . the wedge diagram for the sgp cluster sample ( figure [ f13 ] ) reveals that the spatial density of clusters at redshifts greater than @xmath3 is too low for the purpose of tracing large - scale structure , and we concentrate the discussion on clusters within this limit . a detailed examination of large - scale structure in the southern sky was made by tully et al . ( 1992 ) , who analysed the abell , corwin & olowin ( 1989 ) catalog of clusters . in this study measured redshifts were complemented by estimates based on the magnitudes of the third and tenth brightest galaxies , having an accuracy of @xmath219 out to redshifts of about @xmath220 ( zamorani et al . we have condensed the results into a sky map of the centroids of superclusters identified in the sgp region ( figure [ f16 ] ) . another wedge diagram ( figure [ f17 ] ) shows the distribution of these superclusters in redshift space .    . [ f16 ]    the dotted line in figure [ f16 ] traces the supergalactic equator , defined by the plane of a disk - like structure , the local supercluster , identified by de vaucouleurs & de vaucouleurs ( 1964 ) using measurements of the radial velocities of a large sample of local galaxies . the maximum values of these velocities were around @xmath221 ( @xmath222 ) . tully et al . ( 1992 ) have presented persuasive evidence that the pisces - cetus supercluster is likewise a flattened structure extending along the supergalactic equator , which is an extension of the local supercluster out to redshifts of at least @xmath223 . this idea is supported by our x - ray survey of clusters in the sgp . figure [ f18 ] is a sky map of all clusters in the sgp catalog ( table 3 ) having a redshift of less than @xmath224 , which shows clearly a concentration of clusters around the supergalactic equator ( figure [ f16 ] ) . of the 36 clusters identified by tully ( 1987 ) as members of the pisces - cetus supercluster , the following seven appear in table 3 and have a redshift @xmath225 : a14 , a85 , a119 , a133 , a147 , a151 , and a168 . the six brightest clusters in figure [ f18 ] , having hard - band x - ray count rates greater then @xmath226 , lie close to the supergalactic equator . five of these clusters , a85 , a119 , a133 , a4059 and s1101 , have redshifts between @xmath227 and @xmath228 , consistent with their being members of the pisces - cetus supercluster . the fifth , a4038 , is nearer at a redshift of @xmath229 , placing it at the edge of the local supercluster . the pisces - cetus supercluster is evident also in the wedge diagram ( figure [ f13 ] ) , in which the group of x - ray clusters at @xmath230 and @xmath231 is close to the location of the supercluster center . more distant structures are difficult to identify in the x - ray survey . tully et al . ( 1992 ) identified a structure orthogonal to the supergalactic equator , which includes the superclusters aquarius a and b , aquarius - capricornus , and sculptor a and b. the location of this structure , which extends from @xmath231 to @xmath232 ( @xmath233 ) , may be traced in figures [ f16 ] and [ f17 ] . to search for evidence of this structure in the x - ray data , we have constructed a sky map ( figure [ f19 ] ) which includes only x - ray clusters in the range @xmath234 . the map shows an elongated feature in the nw quadrant , which is perpendicular to the supergalactic equator . the argument that this feature traces the structure evident in the findings of of tully et al . ( 1992 ) is supported by two observations . first , the group of x - ray clusters in the nw corner of figure [ f19 ] belongs to the aquarius - capricornus supercluster . a correlation in sky position is evident upon comparing figures [ f19 ] and [ f16 ] , and a correlation in redshift space is seen upon comparing figures [ f13 ] and [ f17 ] . second , the two bright clusters a2597 and a2670 , highlighted as black circles in the nw quadrant , were identified by tully ( 1987 ) as members of the aquarius supercluster . batuski et al . ( 1999 ) have performed redshift measurements recently which establish that aquarius a and b are essentially one filamentary structure almost aligned with the line - of - sight between @xmath235 and @xmath236 . this concentration of abell clusters on the sky near @xmath237 , @xmath238 ( batuski et al . 1999 ) is not evident in the x - ray data ( figure [ f19 ] ) . however , care is needed in interpreting this result as it may be biased by the relatively low exposure time in this part of the rass ( figure [ f1 ] ) . therefore we conclude that , at least for redshifts out to @xmath33 , there is significant large - scale structure in the sgp field . however , there is one part of this structure which is not strongly evident in the x - ray maps shown in figure [ f18 ] and figure [ f19 ] . this is the horologium - reticulum supercluster ( tully et al . 1992 ) , a rich association of clusters having its centroid at @xmath239 and located at the position shown in figure [ f16 ] . there is only one bright x - ray cluster in our survey , a3113 at ( @xmath240 , figure [ f19 ] ) and @xmath241 , which may be associated with this supercluster . we can not rule out the possibility that the supercluster is inconspicuous because of its location close to the boundary of the sgp survey region . a systematic search of the rosat all - sky survey for clusters of galaxies has been performed in an area of @xmath242 centered on the south galactic pole . the search was made by correlating the list of rass sources detected in the hard x - ray band ( @xmath43 ) with the projected surface density of galaxies derived from the cosmos digitised uk schmidt iiia - j survey of the southern sky . the analysis yielded a list of 3236 candidates , of which @xmath243 should be chance associations with non - cluster sources , mainly agn and stars , and which should be 90 percent complete in containing clusters . the study was bounded during x - ray analysis by applying a lower limit of @xmath42 to the count - rate in the hard band , yielding a list of 477 candidates . non - cluster sources were removed by applying tests using the source x - ray extent and hardness ratio , by scrutiny of cosmos finding charts and overlays of the rass and cosmos images , and by correlation with such catalogs as the nasa extragalactic ( ned ) , simbad , tycho and veron data bases . this was performed in as objective a manner as possible , requiring an iterative sequence of procedures . the search resulted in 186 clusters , comprising 134 abell clusters , 15 clusters found in other catalogs , and 37 newly discovered clusters . the catalog shown in table 3 , and the overlays of the rass hard x - ray and cosmos optical images , are accessible over the internet ( http://wave.xray.mpe.mpg.de / publications / papers/2001/rass - sgp - clusters / xray- optical - images ) . the catalog has a minimum energy flux of @xmath244 in the band @xmath1 . tests show that a sample of 112 clusters , obtained when a flux limit of @xmath2 is applied , is essentially complete . we estimate the completeness of the overall catalog at a flux limit of @xmath0 to be @xmath245 .    in support of studies of cluster evolution and large - scale structure using the results of the survey , a series of optical observing campaigns at the aat and at saao was conducted to obtain cluster redshifts . in addition we have used a number of redshifts obtained in programs at eso in support of the reflex project . using these campaigns and an extensive search of the literature we have obtained redshifts for 157 of the clusters in the catalog ( table 3 ) . redshifts are available for 110 of the 112 clusters in the complete flux - limited sample . examination of the spatial distribution of the sgp x - ray cluster sample corroborates earlier studies of large - scale structure , which were based on optical observations ( de vaucouleurs & de vaucouleurs 1964 , tully et al . the basic features are a flattened structure in the supergalactic plane , reaching out to @xmath246 and embracing the pisces - cetus supercluster , and an orthogonal structure at @xmath247 which includes the aquarius , aquarius - capricornus and sculptor a and b superclusters . we thank prof . trmper and the rosat team for the unstinting support , the myriad valuable discussions , the access to the rass data base , the use of the rass and exsas software , and the use of the powerful computing system under joachim paul and his team , which have made this work possible . the rosat project is supported by the bildungsministerium fr bildung und forschung ( bmbf / dlr ) and the max - planck - gesellschaft ( mpg ) . in equal measure we thank the royal observatory edinburgh and the naval research laboratory ( nrl ) for the intensive effort that went into the creation of the cosmos digitised optical data base and its installation at mpe , which was an essential factor in identifying clusters in the rass data base . our gratitude goes also to the anglo - australian telescope , the south african astronomical observatory and the european southern observatory for the expert assistance provided to the optical observations crucial to this project . we thank the reflex project for its cooperation in exchanging redshifts , and in particular luigi guzzo of the osservatorio astronomica di brera for his analysis of those eso key project observations , which yielded 14 redshifts used in this study . finally , this research has been supported by the office of naval research and nrl , and by the national aeronautics and space administration through an astrophysics data program grant ( s57759-f ) . abell , g. o. , corwin jr . , h. g. , & olowin , r. p. 1989 , apjs , 70 , 1 + arp , h. c. , & madore , b. f. 1987 , `` a catalogue of peculiar galaxies and associations + ( cambridge : cambridge university press ) + avni , y. & bahcall , j.n . 1980 , apj , 235 , 694 + barton , e. , geller , m. j. , ramella , m. , marzke , r. o. , & da costa , l. n. 1996 , aj , 112 , + 871 + batuski , d. j. , miller , c. j. , slinglend , k. a. , balkowski , c. , maurogordato , s. , + cayatte , v. , felenbok , p. , & olowin , r. 1999 , apj , 520 , 491 + bhringer , h. , et al . 2000 , apjs , 129 , 435 + bhringer , h. , et al . 2001 , a&a , 369 , 826 + caretta , c. a. , maia , m. a. g. , & willmer , c. n. a. 2000 , aj , 119 , 524 + cavaliere , a. , & fusco - femiano , r. 1976 , a&a , 49 , 137 + collins , c. a. , guzzo , l. , nichol , r. c. , & lumsden , s l. 1995 , mnras , 274 , 1071 + collins , c. a. , burke , d. a. , romer , a.k . , sharples , r. m. , & nichol , r. c. 1997 , apj , + 479 , l117 + collins , c. a. , et al . 2000 , mnras , 319 , 939 + crawford , c. s. , edge a. c. , fabian , a. c. , allen , s. w. , boehringer , h. , ebeling , h. , + mcmahon , r. g. & voges , w. 1995 , mnras , 274 , 75 + da costa , l. n. , et al . 1998 , aj , 116 , 1 + dalton , g. b. , efstathiou , g. & sutherland , w. j. 1994 , mnras , 269 , 151 + dalton , g. b. , maddox , s. j. , sutherland , w. j. , & efstathiou , g. 1997 , mnras , 289 , 263 + de grandi , s. , molendi , s. , bhringer , h. , & voges , w. 1997 , apj , 486 , 738 + de grandi , s. , et al . 1999 , apj , 514 , 148 + de vaucouleurs , g. , & de vaucouleurs , a. 1964 , first reference catalogue of bright + galaxies ( austin , university of texas press ) + de vaucouleurs , g. , de vaucouleurs , a. , corwin , h. , buta , r. , paturel , g. & fouque , p. + 1991 , third reference catalogue of bright galaxies ( springer - verlag : new york ) + di nella , h. , couch , w. j. , paturel , g. , & parker , q. a. 1996 , mnras , 283 , 367 + dickey , j. m. , & lockman , f. j. 1990 , ann . astrophys . , 28 , 215 + ebeling , h. , & wiedemann , g. 1993 , phys . e , 47 , 704 + ebeling , h. , & maddox , s. j. 1995 , mnras , 275 , 1155 + ebeling , h. , voges , w. , bhringer , h. , edge , a. c. , huchra , j. p. , & briel , u. g. 1996 , + mnras , 281 , 799 + ebeling , h. , edge , a. c. , bhringer , h. , allen , s. w. , crawford , c. s. , fabian , a. c. , + voges , w. , & huchra , j. p. 1998 , mnras , 301 , 881 + ebeling , h. , edge , a. c. , allen , s. w. , crawford , c. s. , fabian , a. c. , & huchra , j. r. + 2000 , mnras , 318 , 333 + edge , a. c. , stewart , g. c. , fabian , a. c. , & arnaud , k. a. 1990 , mnras , 245 , 559 + fetisova , t. s. , kuznetsov , d. yu . , lipovetski , v. a. , starobinski , a. a. , & olovin , r. p. + 1993 , astronomy letters , 19 , 198 + gioia , i. m. , henry , j. p. , mullis , c. r. , voges , w. , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l105 + henry , j.p . , gioia , i. m. , maccacaro , t. , morris , s. l. , stocke , j. t. , & wolter , a. 1992 , + apj , 386 , 408 + henry , j. p , gioia , i. m. , mullis , c. r. , voges , w. , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l109 + heydon - dumbleton , n. h. , collins , c. a. , & macgillivray , h. t. 1989 , mnras , 238 , 379 + hickson , p. 1982 , apj , 255 , 382 + hg , e. , kuzmin , a. , bastian , u. , fabricius , c. , kuimov , k. , lindegren , l. , + makarov , v. v. , & rser , s. 1998 , a&a , 335 , l65 + huchra , j. p. , vogeley , m. s. & geller , m. j. 1999 , apjs . 121 , 287 + katgert , p. , et al . 1996 , a&a , 310 , 8 + katgert , p. , mazure , a. , den hartog , r. , adami , c. , biviano , a. , & perea , j. 1998 , a&as , + 129 , 399 + kowalski , m. p. , ulmer , m. p. , cruddace , r. g. , & wood , k. s. 1984 , apjs , 286 , 822 + jones , l. r. , scharf , c. , ebeling , h. , perlman , e. , wegner , g. , malkan , m. , & horner , d. + 1998 , apj , 495 , 100 + lauberts , a. , & valentijn , e. 1989 , eso catalog , ' ' the surface photometry of the + eso - uppsala galaxies `` ( european southern observatory : garching ) + lumsden , s. l. , nichol , r. c. , collins , c. a. , & guzzo , l. 1992 , mnras , 258 , 1 + macgillivray , h. t. , & stobie , r. s. 1985 , vistas in astronomy , 27 , 433 + mazure , a. , et al . 1996 , a&a , 310 , 31 + mchardy , i. 1978 , mnras , 184 , 783 + mullis , c.r . , henry , j. p , gioia , i. m. , bhringer , h. , briel , u. g. , voges , w. + & huchra , j. p. 2000 , apj , 553 , l115 + muriel , h. , nicotra , m. a. , & lambas , d. g. 1995 , aj , 110 , 1032 + piccinotti , g. , mushotzky , r. f. , boldt , e. a. , holt , s. s. , marshall , f. e. , + serlemitsos , p. j. , & shafer , r. a. 1982 , apj , 253 , 485 + postman , m. , huchra , j. p. , & geller , m. j. 1992 , apj , 384 , 404 + prandoni , i. , iovino , a. , & macgillivray , h. t. 1994 , aj , 107 , 1235 + quintana , h. , & ramirez , a. 1995 , apjs , 96 , 343 + ratcliffe , a. , shanks , t. , parker , q. a. , broadbent , a. , watson , f. g. , oates , a. p. , + collins , c. a. , & fong , r. 1998 , mnras , 300 , 417 + raymond , j. c. , & smith , b. w. 1977 , apjs , 35 , 419 + romer , a. k. , collins , c. a. , bhringer , h. , cruddace , r. g. , ebeling , h. , + macgillivray , h. t. , & voges , w. 1994 , nature , 372 , 75 + romer , a. k. 1995 , doctoral thesis , university of edinburgh + romer , a. k. , et al . 2000 , apjs , 126 , 209 + rosati , p. , della ceca , r. , burg , r. , norman , c. , & giacconi , r. 1995 , apj , 445 , l11 + rosati , p. , della ceca , r. , norman , c. , & giacconi , r. 1998 , apj , 492 , l21 + schmidt , m. 1968 , apj , 151 , 393 + schwartz , d. a. 1978 , apj , 220 , 8 + shectman , s. a. 1985 , apjs , 57 , 77 + shectman , s. a. , landy , s. d. , oemler , a. , tucker , d. l. , lin , h. , kirschner , r. p. , + & schecter , l. p. 1996 , apj , 470,172 + schuecker , p. , et al . 2001 , a&a , 368 , 86 + stocke , j. t. , morris , s. m. , gioia , i. m. , maccacaro , t. , schild , r. , wolter , a. , + fleming , t. a. , & henry , j.p . 1991 , apjs , 76 , 813 + struble , m. f. , & rood , h. j. 1999 , apjs , 125 , 35 + trmper , j. 1983 , adv . space res . , 27 , 1404 + trmper , j. , et al . 1991 , nature , 349 , 579 + tucker , w. h. , tananbaum , h. , & remillard , r. a. 1995 , apj , 444 , 532 + tully , r. b. 1987 , apj , 323 , 1 + tully , r. b. , scaramella , r. , vettolani , g. , & zamorani , g. 1992 , apj , 388 , 9 + veron - cetty , m. p. , & veron , p. 1998 , eso scientific report 18 + vikhlinen , a. , mcnamara , b. r. , forman , w. , & jones , c. 1998 , apj , 502 , 558 + voges , w. , et al . 1999 , a&a , 349 , 389 + voges , w. , et al . 2000 , iau circular 7432 + voges , w. , henry , j. p , briel , u. g. , bhringer , h. , mullis , c. r. , gioia , i. m. & + huchra , j. p. 2001 , apj , 553 , l119 + white , d. a. , jones , c. , & forman , w. 1997 , mnras , 292 , 419 + yentis , d. j. , cruddace , r. g. , gursky , h. , stuart , b. v. , wallin , j. f. , + macgillivray , h. t. , & collins , c. a. 1992 , ' ' digitised optical sky surveys `` , ed . + h. t. macgillivray & e. b. thomson , ( netherlands : kluwer academic publishers ) , 67 + zamorani , g. , scaramella , r. , vettolani , g. , & chincarini , g. 1992 , in ' ' traces of primordial + structure in the universe , ed . h. bhringer & r. a. treumann , mpe report 227 +    cccccccccccccc rxcj2201.8 - 2226 & 22 01 50.5 & -22 26 37 & 0.286@xmath2480.043 & 0.82@xmath2480.30 & 237 & 2.61 & 3.554@xmath249 & 5.75 & 1.193 & s987 & 0.0693 & 8 & 20 + rxcj2202.1 - 0949 & 22 02 07.2 & -09 49 48 & 0.280@xmath2480.038 & 1.15@xmath2480.31 & 307 & 4.20 & 4.039@xmath249 & 5.89 & 1.629 & a2410 & 0.0801 & 17 & 1 + rxcj2203.8 - 2130 & 22 03 50.6 & -21 30 31 & 0.139@xmath2480.030 & 0.11@xmath2480.19 & 227 & 2.45 & 2.809@xmath249 & 2.77 & 0.644 & & 0.0732 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2205.6 - 0535 & 22 05 39.6 & -05 35 29 & 0.674@xmath2480.109 & 0.79@xmath2480.12 & 191 & 4.68 & 3.800@xmath250 & 14.40 & 2.103 & a2415 & 0.0582 & 2 & 3 + rxcj2210.3 - 1210 & 22 10 20.0 & -12 10 33 & 0.746@xmath2480.056 & 1.04@xmath2480.08 & 278 & 3.92 & 6.000@xmath250 & 15.70 & 4.642 & a2420 & 0.0831 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2213.0 - 2753 & 22 13 05.0 & -27 53 56 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.14@xmath2480.17 & 205 & 1.40 & 3.760@xmath249 & 8.28 & 1.373 & & 0.0620 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2214.4 - 1701 & 22 14 26.3 & -17 01 24 & 0.198@xmath2480.020 & 0.79@xmath2480.24 & 305 & 2.61 & 5.845@xmath249 & 4.02 & 4.016 & a3847 & 0.1530 & 3 & 1 + rxcj2214.5 - 1022 & 22 14 32.4 & -10 22 12 & 0.594@xmath2480.052 & 0.95@xmath2480.09 & 280 & 3.84 & 6.578@xmath249 & 12.50 & 5.343 & a2426 & 0.1001 & 1 & 4 + rxcj2216.2 - 0920 & 22 16 15.2 & -09 20 18 & 0.405@xmath2480.041 & 0.87@xmath2480.09 & 274 & 5.24 & 4.869@xmath249 & 8.78 & 2.567 & a2428 & 0.0825 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2216.9 - 1725 & 22 16 56.4 & -17 25 30 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.35@xmath2480.12 & 277 & 2.28 & 6.969@xmath249 & 8.56 & 6.163 & & 0.1301 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2217.7 - 3543 & 22 17 43.7 & -35 43 32 & 0.329@xmath2480.035 & 0.32@xmath2480.11 & 319 & 1.10 & 6.865@xmath249 & 6.42 & 5.929 & a3854 & 0.1474 & 13 & 9 + rxcj2218.2 - 0350 & 22 18 17.1 & -03 50 01 & 0.427@xmath2480.047 & 0.92@xmath2480.14 & 273 & 5.73 & 5.375@xmath249 & 9.39 & 3.267 & ms2215.7 - 0404 dc & 0.0901 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2218.6 - 3853 & 22 18 40.3 & -38 53 48 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.27@xmath2480.09 & 314 & 1.33 & 7.246@xmath249 & 8.35 & 6.746 & eso 344-g 019 & 0.1379 & 28 & ? + rxcj2218.8 - 0258 & 22 18 49.0 & -02 58 07 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.90@xmath2480.19 & 268 & 5.84 & 5.350@xmath249 & 9.37 & 3.246 & & 0.0899 & 2 & 7 + rxcj2223.9 - 0137 & 22 23 56.7 & -01 37 44 & 0.454@xmath2480.049 & 1.00@xmath2480.12 & 224 & 5.34 & 9.000@xmath250 & 9.92 & 3.509 & a2440 & 0.0912 & 8 & 24 + rxcj2225.8 - 0636 & 22 25 50.8 & -06 36 09 & 0.239@xmath2480.034 & 0.68@xmath2480.15 & 251 & 5.14 & 4.196@xmath249 & 5.16 & 1.787 & a2442 & 0.0897 & 2 & 12 + rxcj2226.1 - 4745 & 22 26 10.6 & -47 45 01 & 0.091@xmath2480.020 & 0.31@xmath2480.23 & 329 & 1.44 & 3.289@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.978 & a3876 & 0.1130 & 14 & ? + rxcj2227.4 - 4852 & 22 27 28.3 & -48 52 54 & 0.126@xmath2480.022 & 0.24@xmath2480.17 & 367 & 1.65 & 3.321@xmath249 & 2.47 & 1.004 & apmcc782 & 0.0970 & 14 & 3 + rxcj2227.8 - 3034 & 22 27 52.9 & -30 34 11 & 0.522@xmath2480.043 & 0.05@xmath2480.06 & 308 & 1.09 & 3.800@xmath250 & 10.10 & 1.415 & a3880 & 0.0570 & 13 & 11 + rxcj2231.2 - 3802 & 22 31 15.1 & -38 02 39 & 0.088@xmath2480.022 & 0.88@xmath2480.44 & 233 & 1.20 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj2234.5 - 3744 & 22 34 30.4 & -37 44 05 & 0.573@xmath2480.051 & 0.09@xmath2480.07 & 241 & 1.22 & 7.900@xmath250 & 11.20 & 11.986 & a3888 & 0.1590 & 8 & 70 + rxcj2234.8 - 3033 & 22 34 53.5 & -30 33 56 & 0.119@xmath2480.027 & 0.64@xmath2480.28 & 305 & 1.11 & 6.983@xmath249 & 2.32 & 6.182 & a3889 & 0.2512 & 8 & 19 + rxcj2235.6 + 0128 & 22 35 40.6 & + 01 28 21 & 0.510@xmath2480.080 & 0.76@xmath2480.12 & 167 & 5.81 & 4.113@xmath249 & 11.20 & 1.702 & a2457 & 0.0594 & 3 & 18 + rxcj2239.2 - 1719 & 22 39 16.4 & -17 19 46 & 0.102@xmath2480.033 & 0.76@xmath2480.33 & 110 & 2.99 & 2.559@xmath249 & 2.05 & 0.503 & a2462 & 0.0751 & 17 & 1 + rxcj2241.9 - 4235 & 22 41 56.7 & -42 35 51 & 0.085@xmath2480.022 & 0.49@xmath2480.25 & 259 & 1.66 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.68 & & a3902 & & & + rxcj2243.0 - 2010 & 22 43 05.1 & -20 10 34 & 0.246@xmath2480.098 & 0.71@xmath2480.20 & 185 & 2.60 & 5.892@xmath249 & 4.99 & 4.085 & a2474 & 0.1385 & 1 & 1 + rxcj2244.5 - 1744 & 22 44 34.9 & -17 44 21 & 0.128@xmath2480.035 & 0.38@xmath2480.29 & 151 & 2.79 & 4.361@xmath249 & 2.60 & 1.963 & a2478 & 0.1325 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2246.1 - 3600 & 22 46 11.8 & -36 00 22 & 0.100@xmath2480.022 & 0.40@xmath2480.25 & 260 & 1.14 & 2.290@xmath249 & 1.90 & 0.374 & & 0.0673 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2247.2 + 0204 & 22 47 15.2 & + 02 04 35 & 0.168@xmath2480.064 & 0.93@xmath2480.18 & 151 & 5.84 & 5.000@xmath249 & 3.70 & & & & & + rxcj2248.7 - 4431 & 22 48 43.4 & -44 31 41 & 0.431@xmath2480.047 & 0.47@xmath2480.10 & 208 & 1.79 & 11.946@xmath249 & 8.59 & 22.736 & s1063 & 0.2520 & 7 & ? + rxcj2249.2 - 3727 & 22 49 17.6 & -37 27 26 & 0.154@xmath2480.028 & 0.23@xmath2480.20 & 253 & 1.13 & 1.388@xmath249 & 2.66 & 0.096 & s1065 & 0.0289 & 23 & 2 + rxcj2250.8 - 4521 & 22 50 48.9 & -45 21 33 & 0.104@xmath2480.026 & 0.44@xmath2480.30 & 203 & 1.88 & 1.898@xmath249 & 1.99 & 0.226 & s1067 & 0.0511 & 21,22 & 6 + rxcj2251.0 - 1624 & 22 51 00.4 & -16 24 21 & 0.255@xmath2480.052 & 0.83@xmath2480.16 & 103 & 3.16 & 5.426@xmath249 & 5.24 & 3.342 & a2496 & 0.1221 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2253.5 - 3343 & 22 53 34.2 & -33 43 21 & 0.155@xmath2480.029 & 0.29@xmath2480.16 & 195 & 1.24 & 7.133@xmath249 & 3.04 & 6.504 & a3934 & 0.2250 & 8 & 6 + rxcj2305.5 - 4513 & 23 05 34.7 & -45 13 11 & 0.220@xmath2480.094 & 0.11@xmath2480.20 & 159 & 1.69 & 5.132@xmath249 & 4.34 & 2.919 & a3970 & 0.1253 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2306.8 - 1324 & 23 06 51.7 & -13 24 59 & 0.200@xmath2480.043 & 0.51@xmath2480.24 & 139 & 3.07 & 5.000@xmath249 & 4.10 & 0.765 & & 0.0659 & 2 & 2 + rxcj2307.2 - 1513 & 23 07 15.5 & -15 13 41 & 0.242@xmath2480.063 & 1.12@xmath2480.12 & 90 & 2.78 & 4.894@xmath249 & 4.92 & 2.599 & a2533 & 0.1110 & 5 & 1 + rxcj2308.3 - 0211 & 23 08 23.1 & -02 11 32 & 0.200@xmath2480.029 & 1.11@xmath2480.22 & 354 & 4.29 & 10.221@xmath249 & 4.26 & 15.544 & a2537 & 0.2966 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2312.2 - 2129 & 23 12 16.3 & -21 29 35 & 0.335@xmath2480.051 & 0.63@xmath2480.20 & 86 & 2.03 & 4.100@xmath250 & 6.65 & 3.532 & a2554 & 0.1111 & 3 & 28 + rxcj2313.0 - 2138 & 23 13 02.2 & -21 38 07 & 0.273@xmath2480.070 & 0.41@xmath2480.15 & 88 & 2.03 & 4.700@xmath250 & 5.43 & 1.746 & a2556 & 0.0865 & 3 & 2 + rxcj2313.9 - 4243 & 23 13 58.2 & -42 43 59 & 1.185@xmath2480.085 & 0.20@xmath2480.06 & 183 & 1.85 & 5.337@xmath249 & 23.50 & 3.211 & s1101 & 0.0564 & 1 & 4 + rxcj2315.7 - 3746 & 23 15 44.2 & -37 46 53 & 0.295@xmath2480.060 & 0.54@xmath2480.17 & 128 & 1.50 & 7.709@xmath249 & 5.82 & 7.852 & am 2312 - 380/a3984 & 0.1786 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2315.7 - 0222 & 23 15 46.0 & -02 22 38 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.80@xmath2480.18 & 337 & 4.18 & 2.024@xmath249 & 8.73 & 0.268 & ngc 7556 & 0.0267 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2316.1 - 2027 & 23 16 08.0 & -20 27 19 & 0.373@xmath2480.068 & 0.48@xmath2480.15 & 95 & 2.07 & 4.589@xmath249 & 7.43 & 2.222 & a2566 & 0.0834 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2321.4 - 2312 & 23 21 25.9 & -23 12 31 & 0.164@xmath2480.042 & 0.42@xmath2480.21 & 98 & 1.96 & 5.100@xmath250 & 3.26 & 4.883 & a2580 & 0.1870 & 16 & 1 + rxcj2321.5 - 4154 & 23 21 33.0 & -41 54 04 & 0.440@xmath2480.059 & 0.40@xmath2480.12 & 143 & 2.15 & 5.178@xmath249 & 8.80 & 2.983 & a3998 & 0.0889 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2325.3 - 1207 & 23 25 20.1 & -12 07 40 & 1.016@xmath2480.059 & 0.44@xmath2480.05 & 322 & 2.50 & 9.100@xmath250 & 20.60 & 6.365 & a2597 & 0.0852 & 8 & 3 + rxcj2326.2 - 2406 & 23 26 16.0 & -24 06 13 & 0.105@xmath2480.023 & 0.73@xmath2480.26 & 185 & 1.82 & 2.888@xmath249 & 2.06 & 0.692 & apmcc895 & 0.0880 & 14 & ? + rxcj2331.1 - 3630 & 23 31 11.3 & -36 30 22 & 0.562@xmath2480.124 & 0.54@xmath2480.17 & 51 & 1.44 & 6.005@xmath249 & 11.00 & 4.279 & a4010 & 0.0954 & 8 & 8 + rxcj2336.2 - 3135 & 23 36 14.9 & -31 35 55 & 0.448@xmath2480.057 & 0.16@xmath2480.19 & 125 & 1.18 & 3.712@xmath249 & 8.67 & 1.320 & s1136 & 0.0594 & 26,27 & 2 + rxcj2337.6 + 0016 & 23 37 40.9 & + 00 16 34 & 0.169@xmath2480.033 & 0.55@xmath2480.15 & 378 & 3.85 & 8.948@xmath249 & 3.56 & 11.264 & a2631 & 0.2753 & 6 & 1 + rxcj2338.2 - 4944 & 23 38 12.7 & -49 44 43 & 0.094@xmath2480.024 & 0.75@xmath2480.28 & 175 & 1.89 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.87 & & & & & + rxcj2341.2 - 0901 & 23 41 17.3 & -09 01 34 & 0.168@xmath2480.044 & 0.95@xmath2480.16 & 346 & 2.55 & 8.182@xmath249 & 3.41 & 9.067 & a2645 & 0.2517 & 8 & 5 + rxcj2344.2 - 0422 & 23 44 16.2 & -04 22 07 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.69@xmath2480.07 & 335 & 3.54 & 4.691@xmath249 & 8.81 & 2.340 & & 0.0786 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2344.4 - 2153 & 23 44 28.9 & -21 53 34 & 0.115@xmath2480.028 & 0.61@xmath2480.23 & 198 & 1.88 & 3.603@xmath249 & 2.27 & 1.234 & a2655 & 0.1122 & 1 & 3 + rxcj2346.7 - 1028 & 23 46 42.4 & -10 28 11 & 0.129@xmath2480.024 & 0.38@xmath2480.20 & 340 & 2.78 & 5.872@xmath249 & 2.63 & 4.093 & a2661 & 0.1911 & 3 & 2 + rxcj2347.4 - 0218 & 23 47 24.5 & -02 18 49 & 0.180@xmath2480.070 & 1.22@xmath2480.23 & 343 & 3.62 & 1.197@xmath249 & 3.08 & 0.065 & hcg 97 & 0.0221 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2347.7 - 2808 & 23 47 43.2 & -28 08 32 & 2.546@xmath2480.097 & 0.35@xmath2480.03 & 310 & 1.55 & 4.250@xmath249 & 49.90 & 1.843 & a4038 & 0.0293 & 8 & 44 + rxcj2348.2 - 2849 & 23 48 13.0 & -28 49 01 & 0.103@xmath2480.021 & 0.09@xmath2480.16 & 309 & 1.45 & 6.077@xmath249 & 2.03 & 4.408 & a4041/s1151 dc & 0.2260 & 18 & ? + rxcj2350.1 - 0339 & 23 50 09.1 & -03 39 10 & 0.125@xmath2480.026 & 1.00@xmath2480.23 & 340 & 3.65 & 4.733@xmath249 & 2.60 & 2.399 & a2664 & 0.1466 & 6 & 2 + rxcj2351.6 - 2605 & 23 51 40.5 & -26 05 09 & 0.468@xmath2480.047 & 0.48@xmath2480.07 & 308 & 1.66 & 11.318@xmath249 & 9.29 & 19.901 & a2667 & 0.2264 & 1 & 1 + rxcj2354.2 - 1024 & 23 54 13.5 & -10 24 53 & 0.473@xmath2480.057 & 0.68@xmath2480.08 & 310 & 2.92 & 3.900@xmath250 & 9.62 & 2.403 & a2670 & 0.0761 & 8 & 220 + rxcj2355.1 - 2834 & 23 55 08.6 & -28 34 27 & 0.082@xmath2480.020 & -.09@xmath2480.16 & 300 & 1.49 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.61 & & a4054 & & & + rxcj2356.0 - 0129 & 23 56 02.4 & -01 29 43 & 0.160@xmath2480.028 & -.01@xmath2480.13 & 367 & 3.58 & 5.000@xmath249 & 3.32 & & & & & + rxcj2357.0 - 3445 & 23 57 02.4 & -34 45 45 & 1.688@xmath2480.093 & 0.30@xmath2480.05 & 255 & 1.10 & 3.500@xmath250 & 32.60 & 3.404 & a4059 & 0.0492 & 1 & 2 + rxcj2359.9 - 3928 & 23 59 56.8 & -39 28 53 & 0.258@xmath2480.047 & 0.56@xmath2480.20 & 152 & 1.33 & 4.595@xmath249 & 5.03 & 2.229 & a4068 & 0.1016 & 8 & 2 + rxcj0000.4 - 0237 & 00 00 24.7 & -02 37 30 & 0.092@xmath2480.019 & 1.00@xmath2480.37 & 372 & 3.56 & 1.460@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.110 & & 0.0379 & 24 & 1 + rxcj0001.6 - 1540 & 00 01 39.0 & -15 40 52 & 0.116@xmath2480.021 & 1.00@xmath2480.27 & 337 & 2.24 & 3.960@xmath249 & 2.32 & 1.552 & & 0.1246 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0003.1 - 3555 & 00 03 11.1 & -35 55 21 & 0.400@xmath2480.071 & 0.29@xmath2480.14 & 142 & 1.11 & 3.046@xmath249 & 7.70 & 0.799 & a2717 & 0.0490 & 3 & 56 + rxcj0003.2 - 0605 & 00 03 12.0 & -06 05 12 & 0.218@xmath2480.027 & 0.71@xmath2480.14 & 350 & 3.16 & 8.577@xmath249 & 4.50 & 10.167 & a2697 & 0.2320 & 2 & ? + rxcj0003.8 + 0203 & 00 03 50.9 & + 02 03 45 & 0.205@xmath2480.039 & 0.83@xmath2480.12 & 362 & 3.00 & 4.185@xmath249 & 4.18 & 1.776 & a2700 & 0.0994 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0006.0 - 3443 & 00 06 04.8 & -34 43 26 & 0.301@xmath2480.041 & 0.23@xmath2480.13 & 226 & 1.16 & 5.381@xmath249 & 5.86 & 3.276 & a2721 & 0.1143 & 8 & 72 + rxcj0007.4 - 2809 & 00 07 25.3 & -28 09 21 & 0.103@xmath2480.022 & 0.43@xmath2480.27 & 313 & 1.77 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.04 & & a2726 & & & + rxcj0011.3 - 2851 & 00 11 19.5 & -28 51 41 & 0.612@xmath2480.055 & 0.39@xmath2480.09 & 254 & 1.84 & 4.426@xmath249 & 12.10 & 2.034 & a2734 & 0.0625 & 3 & 80 + rxcj0012.9 - 0853 & 00 12 54.7 & -08 53 03 & 0.090@xmath2480.020 & 0.32@xmath2480.17 & 336 & 3.32 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.86 & & & & & + rxcj0013.6 - 1930 & 00 13 38.2 & -19 30 08 & 0.306@xmath2480.035 & 0.48@xmath2480.11 & 313 & 2.04 & 4.699@xmath249 & 6.09 & 2.355 & a13 & 0.0949 & 1 & 4 + rxcj0014.3 - 3022 & 00 14 20.1 & -30 22 33 & 0.250@xmath2480.047 & 0.23@xmath2480.15 & 122 & 1.65 & 11.184@xmath249 & 4.96 & 19.331 & a2744 & 0.3067 & 8 & 34 + rxcj0015.5 - 2346 & 00 15 31.8 & -23 46 13 & 0.175@xmath2480.032 & 0.36@xmath2480.19 & 277 & 2.45 & 2.814@xmath249 & 3.48 & 0.647 & a14 & 0.0655 & 3 & 9 + rxcj0016.3 - 3121 & 00 16 19.8 & -31 21 55 & 0.178@xmath2480.032 & 0.00@xmath2480.14 & 296 & 1.88 & 3.292@xmath249 & 3.50 & 0.981 & a2751 & 0.0805 & 20 & 1 + rxcj0017.5 - 3511 & 00 17 34.9 & -35 11 09 & 0.166@xmath2480.033 & 0.28@xmath2480.17 & 354 & 1.31 & 3.686@xmath249 & 3.22 & 1.304 & a2755 & 0.0969 & 8 & 18 + rxcj0019.0 - 2026 & 00 19 03.9 & -20 26 17 & 0.147@xmath2480.027 & 0.42@xmath2480.17 & 322 & 1.78 & 8.314@xmath249 & 2.93 & 9.432 & s26 & 0.2773 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0020.5 - 4913 & 00 20 34.1 & -49 13 40 & 0.124@xmath2480.030 & 0.77@xmath2480.25 & 151 & 2.12 & 2.620@xmath249 & 2.44 & 0.536 & a2764 & 0.0711 & 3 & 19 + rxcj0020.7 - 2542 & 00 20 43.3 & -25 42 53 & 0.289@xmath2480.035 & 0.48@xmath2480.12 & 281 & 2.26 & 6.360@xmath249 & 5.81 & 4.921 & a22 & 0.1410 & 3 & 3 + rxcj0024.0 - 1704 & 00 24 03.6 & -17 04 32 & 0.088@xmath2480.019 & 0.63@xmath2480.24 & 314 & 2.00 & 4.956@xmath249 & 1.75 & 2.680 & a2768 & 0.1890 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0025.5 - 3302 & 00 25 32.2 & -33 02 53 & 0.460@xmath2480.045 & 0.37@xmath2480.09 & 328 & 1.69 & 3.215@xmath249 & 9.00 & 0.921 & s41 & 0.0487 & 8 & 2 + rxcj0028.6 - 2338 & 00 28 39.5 & -23 38 27 & 0.245@xmath2480.033 & 0.55@xmath2480.13 & 294 & 1.82 & 4.933@xmath249 & 4.85 & 2.650 & a42 & 0.1129 & 8 & 5 + rxcj0030.6 - 2410 & 00 30 37.6 & -24 10 53 & 0.094@xmath2480.019 & 0.60@xmath2480.22 & 314 & 1.51 & 3.927@xmath249 & 1.84 & 1.516 & a47 & 0.1382 & 3 & 1 + rxcj0033.8 - 0750 & 00 33 51.6 & -07 50 29 & 0.087@xmath2480.021 & 0.56@xmath2480.24 & 270 & 3.50 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.80 & & a56 & & & + rxcj0034.2 - 0204 & 00 34 13.9 & -02 04 31 & 0.412@xmath2480.033 & 0.67@xmath2480.11 & 597 & 2.82 & 4.763@xmath249 & 8.38 & 2.433 & sh518 & 0.0822 & 11 & 1 + rxcj0035.6 + 0138 & 00 35 36.3 & + 01 38 20 & 0.105@xmath2480.022 & 0.75@xmath2480.23 & 291 & 2.66 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.13 & & & & & + rxcj0037.4 - 2831 & 00 37 27.0 & -28 31 52 & 0.113@xmath2480.023 & 0.39@xmath2480.21 & 326 & 1.73 & 3.387@xmath249 & 2.22 & 1.057 & a2798 & 0.1050 & 3 & 20 + rxcj0041.8 - 0918 & 00 41 50.0 & -09 18 12 & 3.554@xmath2480.114 & 0.63@xmath2480.03 & 328 & 3.58 & 6.200@xmath250 & 74.00 & 9.810 & a85 & 0.0556 & 12 & 116 + rxcj0042.1 - 2832 & 00 42 08.8 & -28 32 12 & 0.498@xmath2480.049 & 0.28@xmath2480.07 & 325 & 1.49 & 6.768@xmath249 & 9.82 & 5.726 & a2811 & 0.1170 & 8 & 32 + rxcj0043.5 - 0443 & 00 43 34.6 & -04 43 06 & 0.119@xmath2480.018 & 0.64@xmath2480.13 & 446 & 3.63 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.48 & & & & & + rxcj0048.6 - 2114 & 00 48 38.0 & -21 14 50 & 0.217@xmath2480.032 & 0.09@xmath2480.13 & 339 & 1.52 & 2.759@xmath249 & 4.20 & 0.614 & a2824 & 0.0581 & 17 & 7 + rxcj0049.3 - 2931 & 00 49 23.8 & -29 31 27 & 0.265@xmath2480.042 & 0.40@xmath2480.13 & 323 & 1.80 & 5.172@xmath249 & 5.25 & 2.974 & s84 & 0.1150 & 8 & 20 + rxcj0051.1 - 4833 & 00 51 11.2 & -48 33 35 & 0.123@xmath2480.027 & 0.63@xmath2480.24 & 204 & 2.12 & 5.646@xmath249 & 2.46 & 3.684 & a2830 & 0.1873 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0051.3 - 2831 & 00 51 19.2 & -28 31 10 & 0.127@xmath2480.023 & 0.40@xmath2480.16 & 324 & 1.63 & 3.750@xmath249 & 2.49 & 1.359 & a2829 & 0.1125 & 13 & 6 + rxcj0056.0 - 3732 & 00 56 01.0 & -37 32 45 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.55@xmath2480.21 & 351 & 2.59 & 8.538@xmath249 & 8.65 & 10.102 & & 0.1663 & 2 & 11 + rxcj0056.3 - 0112 & 00 56 18.3 & -01 12 53 & 1.644@xmath2480.087 & 0.74@xmath2480.06 & 321 & 3.10 & 5.100@xmath250 & 33.70 & 2.855 & a119 & 0.0444 & 17 & 23 + rxcj0058.4 - 1425 & 00 58 28.2 & -14 25 39 & 0.108@xmath2480.018 & 0.17@xmath2480.15 & 492 & 1.87 & 3.105@xmath249 & 2.12 & 0.840 & a123 & 0.0957 & 5 & 2 + rxcj0102.7 - 2152 & 01 02 42.3 & -21 52 46 & 0.970@xmath2480.065 & 0.33@xmath2480.06 & 268 & 1.48 & 3.800@xmath250 & 18.90 & 2.574 & a133 & 0.0562 & 8 & 9 + rxcj0104.5 - 2400 & 01 04 35.0 & -24 00 00 & 0.119@xmath2480.021 & 0.64@xmath2480.19 & 335 & 1.61 & 4.672@xmath249 & 2.34 & 2.322 & a140 & 0.1520 & 8 & 12 + rxcj0105.5 - 2439 & 01 05 35.4 & -24 39 33 & 0.196@xmath2480.031 & 0.32@xmath2480.12 & 326 & 1.61 & 8.018@xmath249 & 3.88 & 8.635 & a141 & 0.2300 & 8 & 1 + rxcj0106.8 - 0229 & 01 06 51.5 & -02 29 18 & 0.152@xmath2480.032 & 0.91@xmath2480.23 & 423 & 4.10 & 6.386@xmath249 & 3.21 & 4.972 & a145 & 0.1909 & 5 & 1 + rxcj0107.8 - 3643 & 01 07 49.4 & -36 43 44 & 0.180@xmath2480.024 & 0.82@xmath2480.16 & 378 & 1.94 & 4.642@xmath249 & 3.57 & 2.285 & a2871 & 0.1221 & 2 & 11 + rxcj0108.2 + 0210 & 01 08 12.8 & + 02 10 48 & 0.230@xmath2480.037 & 0.59@xmath2480.15 & 415 & 3.01 & 2.342@xmath249 & 4.60 & 0.398 & a147 & 0.0447 & 3 & 11 + rxcj0108.5 - 4021 & 01 08 33.2 & -40 21 00 & 0.150@xmath2480.035 & 0.40@xmath2480.23 & 377 & 3.04 & 4.898@xmath249 & 3.07 & 2.610 & a2874 & 0.1408 & 13 & 6 + rxcj0108.8 - 1524 & 01 08 49.3 & -15 24 30 & 0.358@xmath2480.035 & 0.29@xmath2480.08 & 446 & 1.69 & 3.149@xmath249 & 7.00 & 0.872 & a151 & 0.0537 & 8 & 37 + rxcj0108.9 - 1537 & 01 08 55.5 & -15 37 42 & 0.189@xmath2480.029 & 0.46@xmath2480.09 & 437 & 1.69 & 3.954@xmath249 & 3.72 & 1.541 & & 0.0981 & 4,19 & 9 + rxcj0110.0 - 4555 & 01 10 00.7 & -45 55 24 & 0.756@xmath2480.060 & 0.26@xmath2480.08 & 301 & 2.10 & 3.500@xmath250 & 15.00 & 0.404 & a2877 & 0.0250 & 8 & 109 + rxcj0113.9 - 3145 & 01 13 54.2 & -31 45 07 & 0.080@xmath2480.017 & 0.58@xmath2480.24 & 333 & 2.40 & 1.000@xmath249 & 1.21 & 0.018 & s141 & 0.0184 & 8 & 18 + rxcj0114.7 - 2118 & 01 14 47.3 & -21 18 02 & 0.082@xmath2480.018 & 0.56@xmath2480.24 & 346 & 1.49 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.61 & & & & & + rxcj0114.9 + 0024 & 01 14 57.5 & + 00 24 20 & 0.520@xmath2480.048 & 0.47@xmath2480.09 & 406 & 3.32 & 2.600@xmath250 & 10.60 & 1.043 & a168 & 0.0477 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0116.1 - 1555 & 01 16 11.8 & -15 55 24 & 0.130@xmath2480.023 & 0.23@xmath2480.17 & 394 & 1.69 & 1.862@xmath249 & 2.46 & 0.214 & scg 16 & 0.0448 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0118.1 - 2658 & 01 18 10.2 & -26 58 18 & 0.193@xmath2480.027 & 0.54@xmath2480.14 & 366 & 1.47 & 7.987@xmath249 & 3.81 & 8.554 & a2895 & 0.2310 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0120.9 - 1351 & 01 20 57.9 & -13 51 19 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.30@xmath2480.07 & 344 & 1.73 & 3.240@xmath249 & 8.33 & 0.939 & cid 10 & 0.0511 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0121.8 - 2022 & 01 21 48.1 & -20 22 34 & 0.110@xmath2480.020 & 0.70@xmath2480.28 & 465 & 1.45 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.16 & & a2902 & & & + rxcj0122.2 - 2131 & 01 22 12.4 & -21 31 04 & 0.097@xmath2480.020 & 0.05@xmath2480.17 & 494 & 1.39 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.90 & & a185 & & & + rxcj0122.9 - 1245 & 01 22 55.1 & -12 45 50 & 0.096@xmath2480.018 & 0.87@xmath2480.25 & 391 & 1.68 & 3.598@xmath249 & 1.88 & 1.229 & a188 & 0.1230 & 3 & 2 + rxcj0125.4 + 0145 & 01 25 29.9 & + 01 45 46 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.77@xmath2480.15 & 413 & 3.08 & 1.446@xmath249 & 8.03 & 0.107 & ngc 533 & 0.0176 & 2 & 4 + rxcj0125.6 - 0125 & 01 25 38.0 & -01 25 03 & 0.610@xmath2480.086 & 0.84@xmath2480.14 & 431 & 3.56 & 1.900@xmath250 & 12.20 & 0.176 & a194 & 0.0183 & 8 & 81 + rxcj0126.0 - 3758 & 01 26 04.6 & -37 58 36 & 0.105@xmath2480.019 & 0.76@xmath2480.23 & 351 & 1.68 & 2.703@xmath249 & 2.04 & 0.581 & a2911 & 0.0810 & 4 & 31 + rxcj0126.7 - 1810 & 01 26 44.4 & -18 10 20 & 0.103@xmath2480.025 & 0.32@xmath2480.21 & 328 & 1.62 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.03 & & a197 & & & + rxcj0127.2 - 1746 & 01 27 13.9 & -17 46 17 & 0.109@xmath2480.021 & 0.28@xmath2480.19 & 351 & 1.52 & 4.358@xmath249 & 2.14 & 1.960 & a199 & 0.1459 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0131.7 + 0033 & 01 31 42.4 & + 00 33 43 & 0.088@xmath2480.017 & 0.26@xmath2480.18 & 432 & 2.92 & 2.535@xmath249 & 1.77 & 0.490 & a208 & 0.0798 & 3 & ? + rxcj0131.8 - 1336 & 01 31 53.5 & -13 36 27 & 0.277@xmath2480.029 & 0.33@xmath2480.10 & 453 & 2.27 & 8.513@xmath249 & 5.59 & 9.982 & a209 & 0.2060 & 3 & 2 + rxcj0137.2 - 0912 & 01 37 15.3 & -09 12 10 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.68@xmath2480.08 & 444 & 2.75 & 2.672@xmath249 & 8.50 & 0.564 & & 0.0392 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0137.4 - 1259 & 01 37 29.2 & -12 59 10 & 0.088@xmath2480.016 & 0.55@xmath2480.18 & 458 & 2.45 & 5.503@xmath249 & 1.78 & 3.462 & a222 & 0.2134 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0137.9 - 1248 & 01 37 56.4 & -12 48 01 & 0.115@xmath2480.018 & 0.60@xmath2480.20 & 454 & 1.84 & 5.935@xmath249 & 2.28 & 4.160 & a223 & 0.2070 & 8 & 4 + rxcj0139.1 - 1915 & 01 39 10.1 & -19 15 34 & 0.083@xmath2480.015 & 0.28@xmath2480.20 & 479 & 1.45 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.63 & & & & & + rxcj0139.9 - 0555 & 01 39 59.7 & -05 55 23 & 0.084@xmath2480.018 & 0.43@xmath2480.20 & 441 & 2.85 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj0143.4 - 4614 & 01 43 29.8 & -46 14 20 & 0.082@xmath2480.017 & 0.41@xmath2480.25 & 455 & 2.30 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.65 & & a2937 & & & + rxcj0144.6 - 2213 & 01 44 41.8 & -22 13 43 & 0.097@xmath2480.015 & 0.25@xmath2480.13 & 494 & 1.18 & 6.991@xmath249 & 1.90 & 6.196 & a2938 & 0.2781 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0148.2 - 3155 & 01 48 14.8 & -31 55 08 & 0.105@xmath2480.016 & 0.37@xmath2480.17 & 521 & 1.53 & 3.400@xmath250 & 2.05 & & a2943 & & & + rxcj0148.3 - 0406 & 01 48 22.2 & -04 06 13 & 0.104@xmath2480.024 & 0.25@xmath2480.19 & 255 & 2.59 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.10 & & & & & + rxcj0152.5 - 2853 & 01 52 32.8 & -28 53 32 & 0.084@xmath2480.016 & 0.16@xmath2480.16 & 391 & 1.51 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.65 & & & & & + rxcj0152.7 + 0100 & 01 52 43.6 & + 01 00 58 & 0.151@xmath2480.022 & 0.42@xmath2480.13 & 407 & 2.84 & 7.309@xmath249 & 3.09 & 6.900 & a267 dc & 0.2300 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0152.9 - 1345 & 01 52 59.8 & -13 45 07 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.25@xmath2480.13 & 462 & 1.69 & 1.000@xmath249 & 6.30 & 0.009 & ngc 720 & 0.0057 & 15 & 1 + rxcj0153.5 - 0118 & 01 53 32.0 & -01 18 44 & 0.123@xmath2480.030 & 0.54@xmath2480.17 & 433 & 2.66 & 7.025@xmath249 & 2.50 & 6.277 & & 0.2438 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0157.5 - 0549 & 01 57 30.5 & -05 49 32 & 0.164@xmath2480.024 & 0.55@xmath2480.19 & 414 & 2.31 & 4.681@xmath249 & 3.29 & 2.332 & a281 dc & 0.1285 & 2 & 2 + rxcj0158.4 - 0146 & 01 58 28.4 & -01 46 51 & 0.116@xmath2480.020 & 0.48@xmath2480.17 & 406 & 2.55 & 4.948@xmath249 & 2.34 & 2.672 & a286 & 0.1632 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0201.7 - 0211 & 02 01 44.3 & -02 11 58 & 0.209@xmath2480.024 & 0.52@xmath2480.11 & 406 & 2.57 & 7.327@xmath249 & 4.25 & 6.941 & a291 & 0.1965 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0202.3 - 4447 & 02 02 18.8 & -44 47 37 & 0.124@xmath2480.020 & 0.31@xmath2480.18 & 465 & 2.70 & 2.359@xmath249 & 2.46 & 0.405 & & 0.0616 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0202.3 - 0107 & 02 02 20.6 & -01 07 06 & 0.191@xmath2480.026 & 0.22@xmath2480.13 & 405 & 2.58 & 2.103@xmath249 & 3.76 & 0.298 & a295 & 0.0428 & 5 & 3 + rxcj0206.4 - 1453 & 02 06 29.9 & -14 53 37 & 0.149@xmath2480.027 & 0.52@xmath2480.16 & 274 & 2.45 & 5.192@xmath249 & 3.00 & 3.003 & a305 & 0.1529 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0208.0 - 1537 & 02 08 00.2 & -15 37 05 & 0.085@xmath2480.019 & 0.92@xmath2480.24 & 286 & 2.38 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.71 & & & & & + rxcj0211.4 - 4017 & 02 11 25.2 & -40 17 09 & 0.166@xmath2480.019 & 0.54@xmath2480.14 & 583 & 1.43 & 3.859@xmath249 & 3.24 & 1.457 & a2984 & 0.1022 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0212.8 - 4707 & 02 12 53.9 & -47 07 58 & 0.197@xmath2480.026 & 0.35@xmath2480.18 & 517 & 2.12 & 4.598@xmath249 & 3.93 & 2.232 & a2988 & 0.1150 & 25 & ? + rxcj0213.9 - 0253 & 02 13 56.6 & -02 53 53 & 0.101@xmath2480.022 & 0.46@xmath2480.20 & 350 & 2.16 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.02 & & & & & + rxcj0214.6 - 0433 & 02 14 41.1 & -04 33 48 & 0.106@xmath2480.021 & 0.68@xmath2480.30 & 357 & 2.21 & 4.181@xmath249 & 2.12 & 1.772 & a329 & 0.1393 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0216.3 - 4816 & 02 16 19.1 & -48 16 23 & 0.140@xmath2480.019 & 0.85@xmath2480.23 & 542 & 2.95 & 5.573@xmath249 & 2.86 & 3.568 & a2998 & 0.1709 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0216.7 - 4749 & 02 16 43.3 & -47 49 31 & 0.180@xmath2480.030 & 0.89@xmath2480.28 & 523 & 2.95 & 2.809@xmath249 & 3.63 & 0.644 & s239 & 0.0640 & 23 & 1 + rxcj0218.3 - 3141 & 02 18 19.6 & -31 41 34 & 0.099@xmath2480.016 & 0.28@xmath2480.14 & 486 & 1.87 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.96 & & & & & + rxcj0219.1 - 1724 & 02 19 08.3 & -17 24 40 & 0.085@xmath2480.016 & 0.82@xmath2480.23 & 390 & 2.99 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.74 & & & & & + rxcj0220.9 - 3829 & 02 20 56.8 & -38 29 02 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.74@xmath2480.17 & 558 & 1.85 & 10.965@xmath249 & 8.48 & 18.532 & & 0.2287 & 2 & 6 + rxcj0225.1 - 2928 & 02 25 10.2 & -29 28 23 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.63@xmath2480.15 & 445 & 1.70 & 3.710@xmath249 & 8.35 & 1.327 & & 0.0607 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0225.8 - 4154 & 02 25 53.7 & -41 54 19 & 0.258@xmath2480.029 & 0.29@xmath2480.10 & 460 & 2.14 & 8.693@xmath249 & 5.19 & 10.503 & a3017 & 0.2195 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0227.2 - 2851 & 02 27 12.6 & -28 51 18 & 0.071@xmath2480.018 & 0.59@xmath2480.21 & 343 & 1.55 & 5.003@xmath249 & 1.40 & 2.743 & edcc651 & 0.2138 & 2 & ? + rxcj0229.3 - 3332 & 02 29 22.3 & -33 32 13 & 0.198@xmath2480.026 & 0.34@xmath2480.12 & 471 & 2.07 & 3.352@xmath249 & 3.92 & 1.029 & apmcc269 & 0.0779 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0229.9 - 1316 & 02 29 56.4 & -13 16 12 & 0.127@xmath2480.026 & 0.25@xmath2480.20 & 312 & 2.04 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.53 & & & & & + rxcj0230.8 - 3305 & 02 30 51.2 & -33 05 49 & 0.166@xmath2480.026 & 0.71@xmath2480.24 & 456 & 1.96 & 3.116@xmath249 & 3.27 & 0.848 & a3027 & 0.0774 & 13 & 4 + rxcj0231.7 - 0451 & 02 31 47.3 & -04 51 21 & 0.124@xmath2480.033 & 0.55@xmath2480.24 & 125 & 2.55 & 5.619@xmath249 & 2.51 & 3.640 & a362 & 0.1843 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0231.9 + 0114 & 02 31 57.5 & + 01 14 38 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.97@xmath2480.26 & 227 & 2.56 & 1.714@xmath249 & 8.12 & 0.171 & & 0.0221 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0232.2 - 4420 & 02 32 17.2 & -44 20 43 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 0.14@xmath2480.09 & 369 & 2.61 & 13.183@xmath249 & 8.66 & 28.933 & & 0.2836 & 1 & 2 + rxcj0236.6 - 1923 & 02 36 39.6 & -19 23 05 & 0.171@xmath2480.025 & 0.57@xmath2480.19 & 349 & 2.65 & 4.100@xmath250 & 3.45 & 1.179 & a367 & 0.0891 & 17 & 3 + rxcj0237.4 - 2630 & 02 37 29.0 & -26 30 13 & 0.156@xmath2480.024 & 0.43@xmath2480.16 & 325 & 1.56 & 7.042@xmath249 & 3.08 & 6.305 & a368 & 0.2200 & 2 & 1 + rxcj0241.3 - 2839 & 02 41 20.9 & -28 39 27 & 0.130@xmath2480.021 & 0.10@xmath2480.13 & 423 & 1.56 & 4.300@xmath250 & 2.55 & 5.942 & a3041 & 0.2323 & 1 & 3 + rxcj0244.1 - 2611 & 02 44 06.3 & -26 11 07 & 0.152@xmath2480.027 & 0.79@xmath2480.25 & 286 & 1.74 & 4.726@xmath249 & 3.00 & 2.389 & & 0.1362 & 4,19 & 6 + rxcj0245.2 - 4627 & 02 45 12.6 & -46 27 14 & 0.114@xmath2480.017 & 0.66@xmath2480.22 & 539 & 3.15 & 2.986@xmath249 & 2.32 & 0.757 & a3047 & 0.0868 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0248.0 - 0332 & 02 48 02.6 & -03 32 09 & 0.229@xmath2480.042 & 0.49@xmath2480.16 & 224 & 4.12 & 7.521@xmath249 & 4.85 & 7.396 & a383 & 0.1899 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0248.2 - 0216 & 02 48 16.3 & -02 16 44 & 0.220@xmath2480.033 & 0.66@xmath2480.22 & 117 & 3.65 & 8.748@xmath249 & 4.60 & 10.743 & a384 & 0.2360 & 2 & ? + rxcj0249.6 - 3111 & 02 49 36.9 & -31 11 19 & 0.469@xmath2480.040 & 1.31@xmath2480.27 & 419 & 1.80 & 1.837@xmath249 & 8.89 & 0.206 & s301 & 0.0232 & 8 & 34 + rxcj0251.4 - 2456 & 02 51 28.8 & -24 56 58 & 0.144@xmath2480.023 & 0.04@xmath2480.12 & 365 & 1.90 & 4.500@xmath250 & 2.85 & 1.511 & a389 & 0.1111 & 8 & 6 + rxcj0251.7 - 4109 & 02 51 42.3 & -41 09 00 & 0.102@xmath2480.018 & 0.00@xmath2480.17 & 496 & 1.86 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.02 & & & & & + rxcj0252.8 - 0116 & 02 52 50.1 & -01 16 28 & 0.425@xmath2480.034 & 1.34@xmath2480.23 & 135 & 5.25 & 1.833@xmath249 & 8.84 & 0.205 & ngc 1132 & 0.0232 & 10 & 1 + rxcj0258.2 - 2105 & 02 58 15.0 & -21 05 29 & 0.114@xmath2480.023 & 0.57@xmath2480.21 & 287 & 1.92 & 3.859@xmath249 & 2.25 & 1.458 & a3073 & 0.1226 & 1 & 1 + rxcj0303.2 - 2735 & 03 03 14.8 & -27 35 59 & 0.122@xmath2480.028 & 0.25@xmath2480.20 & 266 & 1.55 & 5.000@xmath249 & 2.40 & & a3082 & & & + rxcj0303.3 + 0155 & 03 03 21.3 & + 01 55 35 & 0.219@xmath2480.033 & 0.83@xmath2480.15 & 222 & 7.82 & 6.421@xmath249 & 5.08 & 5.062 & a409 & 0.1530 & 9 & 1 + rxcj0304.0 - 3656 & 03 04 06.0 & -36 56 32 & 0.151@xmath2480.023 & 0.76@xmath2480.23 & 384 & 1.95 & 6.958@xmath249 & 3.01 & 6.120 & a3084 & 0.2192 & 2 & ? + rxcj0307.0 - 2840 & 03 07 04.0 & -28 40 15 & 0.197@xmath2480.034 & 0.38@xmath2480.15 & 237 & 1.36 & 8.674@xmath249 & 3.88 & 10.434 & a3088 & 0.2534 & 7 & ? + rxcj0311.4 - 2654 & 03 11 25.3 & -26 54 00 & 0.154@xmath2480.078 & 0.52@xmath2480.22 & 210 & 1.56 & 2.722@xmath249 & 2.98 & 0.593 & a3094/edcc736 dc & 0.0677 & 3 & 67 + rxcj0313.6 - 3817 & 03 13 38.0 & -38 17 55 & 0.119@xmath2480.023 & 0.20@xmath2480.22 & 321 & 2.03 & 2.905@xmath249 & 2.34 & 0.704 & a3098 & 0.0833 & 3 & 6 + rxcj0314.3 - 4525 & 03 14 19.6 & -45 25 24 & 0.401@xmath2480.038 & 0.45@xmath2480.10 & 313 & 3.57 & 4.252@xmath249 & 8.31 & 1.845 & a3104 & 0.0718 & 2 & 4 + rxcj0317.7 - 4848 & 03 17 46.4 & -48 48 42 & 0.097@xmath2480.016 & 0.56@xmath2480.23 & 487 & 2.06 & 5.000@xmath249 & 1.93 & & a3113 & & & + rxcj0317.9 - 4414 & 03 17 58.2 & -44 14 16 & 1.447@xmath2480.056 & 0.30@xmath2480.04 & 481 & 2.53 & 4.100@xmath250 & 29.10 & 7.130 & a3112 & 0.0754 & 1 & 2 +
Abstract:

Answer: a field of 1.013 ster in the rosat all - sky survey ( rass ) , centered on the south galactic pole ( sgp ) , has been searched in a systematic , objective manner for clusters of galaxies . the procedure relied on a correlation of the x - ray positions and properties of rosat sources in the field with the distribution of galaxies in the cosmos digitised data base , which was obtained from scanning the plates of the uk schmidt iiia - j optical survey of the southern sky . the study used the second rosat survey data base ( rass-2 ) and included several optical observing campaigns to measure cluster redshifts . the search , which is a precursor to the larger reflex survey encompassing the whole southern sky , reached the detection limits of both the rass and the cosmos data , and yielded a catalog of 186 clusters in which the lowest flux is @xmath0 in the @xmath1 band . of these 157 have measured redshifts . using a flux limit of @xmath2 a complete subset of 112 clusters was obtained , of which 110 have measured redshifts . the spatial distribution of the x - ray clusters out to a redshift of @xmath3 shows an extension of the local supercluster to the pisces - cetus supercluster @xmath4 , and an orthogonal structure at higher redshift @xmath5 . this result is consistent with large - scale structure suggested by optical surveys .