The vulnerability arises from the GitHub Action creating a CSV file without sanitizing the output, which can lead to CSV injection when the file is opened in a spreadsheet program. This is not due to a specific configuration but rather a lack of proper output handling in the code.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the `csv` library, which does not sanitize the output of the APIs, allowing for potential code injection. The issue is mitigated by switching to the `defusedcsv` library in version `v1` or later, indicating that the choice of library is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability arises from the GitHub Action's incorrect handling of CSV output, where it fails to sanitize data from the GitHub Advanced Security API, leading to potential CSV injection attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of API output, where the CSV file is not sanitized, leading to potential execution of malicious code in a spreadsheet program.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed reusable workflow component ('run-terraform') from the kartverket/github-workflows repo, which is a configuration choice. Users can choose to upgrade to a secure version or review PRs to mitigate the issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a reusable workflow that contains a code injection flaw, and users can choose to use or not use this workflow. Upgrading to a newer version or reviewing pull requests for malicious payloads can mitigate the issue.


The vulnerability is due to a specific version of the `run-terraform` reusable workflow containing a code injection flaw. Users have the choice to upgrade to a secure version, making it a configuration-based vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `run-terraform` workflow and pull requests from external users, allowing for code injection.


The vulnerability is a memory overflow issue present in all versions of OpenEXR-viewer prior to 0.6.1, and it does not depend on any specific configuration or interaction. It is a flaw in the software itself, not caused by configuration.


The vulnerability is a memory overflow issue that exists in the OpenEXR-viewer software itself, prior to version 0.6.1, and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system. It can be exploited simply by opening a malicious OpenEXR file with the vulnerable viewer.


The vulnerability is due to a memory overflow issue in the OpenEXR-viewer software itself, which is a component of the system. The flaw is inherent in the software's design or implementation, and using this specific version (prior to 0.6.1) is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is a memory overflow issue that is present by default in all typical deployments of the OpenEXR-viewer and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by the configuration cache being enabled in the Gradle Build Tool, which is a specific configuration choice. If the configuration cache is not enabled, the vulnerability does not manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by the configuration cache being enabled in the Gradle Build Action, which allows secrets to be persisted into the GitHub Actions cache and potentially exposed. This is an example of an improper configuration, as the default configuration of the Gradle Build Action does not enable the configuration cache, but users may opt-in to using it. The vulnerability can be mitigated by disabling the configuration cache or upgrading to a version of the Gradle Build Action that does not save sensitive data.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Gradle Build Tool and the GitHub Actions cache when the configuration cache is enabled. This specific interaction, where environment variables are recorded and persisted into the cache, introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Gradle Build Tool and the GitHub Actions cache, where environment variables containing secrets are persisted into the cache, making them accessible in an untrusted context.


The vulnerability arises from the insecure use of the 'github.head_ref' parameter, which is a configuration choice in the GitHub Action. The issue is not with the default configuration but with how the parameter is handled, leading to potential code execution and secret exfiltration.


The vulnerability is caused by the github-slug-action using the github.head_ref parameter in an insecure way, which is a design or implementation flaw in the action itself. The fact that the action can be updated to a patched version (4.4.1) to fix the issue suggests that including the flawed component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `github.head_ref` parameter and the GitHub Action, which is used insecurely. This specific interaction between components is what introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `github.head_ref` parameter, which is not properly sanitized or validated before use.


The vulnerability is due to the use of world writable permissions (777) on the Kubectl binary, which is a weak default setting that allows privilege escalation. The default permissions should be more restrictive to prevent unauthorized modifications.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting of 777 permissions on the Kubectl binary, which is insecure and allows any local user to replace the binary. This default setting is changed to 755 permissions in version v3 and later, which fixes the issue.


The vulnerability is caused by the default setting of file permissions being set to 777, which is insecure. Changing this default to a more secure setting (755) resolves the issue.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of file permissions, specifically setting the Kubectl binary to world-writable (777).


The vulnerability is caused by the specific configuration of the GitHub Action to trigger on 'pull_request_target', which allows an attacker to craft a pull request that exposes the GITHUB_TOKEN. This configuration choice is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration of the check-spelling action, which triggers on pull_request_target or schedule, allowing an attacker to send a crafted Pull Request and expose the GITHUB_TOKEN. This can be mitigated by changing the workflow permissions or disabling the workflow. The issue arises from a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements, making it an improper configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `check-spelling` GitHub Action and the `pull_request_target` event, which allows an attacker to exploit the `GITHUB_TOKEN`.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the check-spelling action and the `pull_request_target` event, which allows an attacker to craft a Pull Request that exposes the `GITHUB_TOKEN`.


The vulnerability arises from the possibility of a compromised repository allowing duplicate charts, which can be exploited if the index file is modified during a MITM attack on a non-SSL connection. This indicates an improper configuration where secure communication (SSL/TLS) is not enforced, allowing the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the lack of secure communication (non-SSL connection) and the potential for a compromised repository to contain duplicate charts, which can be exploited by an attacker. This situation can be prevented by configuring the system to use secure channels of communication (such as TLS) and by implementing additional security measures like manually reviewing the index file or verifying chart signatures.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Helm repository's handling of duplicate charts and the potential for a compromised repository, which lowers the security requirements for an attacker to inject a malicious chart.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Helm client and the repository, where the client does not properly handle duplicate charts, allowing an attacker to inject a malicious chart if they have write access to the index file.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the redirect URL validation, where HTML encoded whitespace characters are not properly interpreted, allowing bypass of security checks.


The vulnerability is caused by the proxy's incorrect handling of HTML encoded whitespace characters in the redirect URL, allowing the validation to be bypassed. This is an issue with how the proxy interprets and validates the redirect URL, rather than a configuration issue per se.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters, specifically the validation of redirect URLs. The proxy fails to properly interpret or validate HTML encoded whitespace characters in the redirect URL, allowing bypass of security checks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of HTML encoded whitespace characters in the redirect URL validation logic.


The vulnerability is caused by specific configurations: setting the log output to JSON and the consensus logging module to 'debug', or exposing the 'dump_consensus_state' RPC endpoint to the public internet. These configurations lead to a deadlock, which can be avoided by changing the settings.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration, where the log output format is set to JSON and the consensus logging module is set to 'debug' level, or when the `dump_consensus_state` RPC endpoint is exposed to the public internet. Changing these configurations can prevent the deadlock. This is an example of an improper configuration, as the default or typical configurations are not secure.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the logging configuration and the RPC `dump_consensus_state` function, which introduces a deadlock when specific conditions are met.


The vulnerability arises from specific configuration settings that, while valid, lead to a deadlock. These settings include logging at the 'debug' level with JSON output and exposing the `dump_consensus_state` RPC endpoint to the public internet.


The vulnerability is due to a weak default setting where the template engine did not have autoescape enabled by default, leading to potential XSS attacks. The issue was mitigated by changing the default to enable autoescape.


The vulnerability is caused by the template engine's default setting of autoescape being set to false, which allows for XSS attacks. The vulnerability is mitigated by changing the default setting to autoescape being set to true.


The vulnerability is due to the default setting of the template engine having autoescape set to `false`, which is insecure. Changing this default to `true` mitigates the risk of XSS attacks.


The vulnerability was caused by a default setting (autoescape set to `false`) that is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the Import Certificate feature allowing arbitrary file writes due to improper validation of user input paths, which is a flaw in handling configuration parameters.


The vulnerability is caused by the lack of validation and sanitization of user-provided input for the ssl_certificate_path and ssl_certificate_key_path parameters, allowing an attacker to write arbitrary files to the system. This is an example of an unprotected parameter, as the parameter is not properly restricted or validated, enabling exploitation.


The vulnerability arises because the Import Certificate feature allows arbitrary write operations to the file system without proper validation of the input paths. The parameters `ssl_certificate_path` and `ssl_certificate_key_path` are not adequately protected, allowing an attacker to specify any path, including sensitive system files.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of user-provided paths and content in the Import Certificate feature, allowing arbitrary file writes.


The vulnerability arises from Argo CD not validating the content type of requests, allowing attackers to bypass CORS checks by using a non-sensitive content type. This is an incorrect handling of configuration parameters related to content type validation.


The vulnerability is caused by Argo CD's failure to validate the correct content type header in requests, allowing an attacker to bypass the browser's CORS check by setting the content type to a non-sensitive type such as 'text/plain'. This is an example of incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from Argo CD's incorrect handling of the Content-Type header, where it failed to validate that requests contained the correct content type, allowing attackers to bypass CORS checks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of content type headers in API requests, allowing attackers to bypass CORS checks.


The vulnerability arises from the use of an external identity provider, which is a configuration choice. The issue does not occur when FlyteAdmin is used as the OAuth2 Authorization Server, indicating that the interaction with the external identity provider introduces the flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the system's failure to properly invalidate expired Access Tokens and ID Tokens for authenticated users using an external identity provider, which is a configuration-related issue. This can be considered an improper configuration as it fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the default behavior of allowing expired tokens to be used, which is insecure. Changing this default behavior by rotating signing keys mitigates the issue.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of expired Access Tokens and ID Tokens, allowing authenticated users to continue using them even after they have expired.


The vulnerability arises from the default configuration of the IPv6 stack, where the 'accept_ra' sysctl is set to 1, allowing the host to accept router advertisements and potentially redirect traffic. This default setting is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by the default setting of /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf//accept_ra == 1, which allows the host to accept router advertisements and configure the IPv6 stack using them. This default setting is insecure and can be exploited by an attacker. Weave Net version 2.6.3 fixes this by disabling the accept_ra option on the veth devices it creates.


The vulnerability is caused by the default configuration of the system accepting router advertisements (accept_ra = 1) and the potential for IPv6 forwarding to be enabled, which can be exploited by an attacker. This default setting is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the default configuration of the host's IPv6 settings, which allows the host to accept router advertisements and can be exploited by an attacker to reconfigure the host's IPv6 traffic.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by a flaw in the handling of HTML content within the Text plugin of Grafana, which is present by default in affected versions. The exploitation requires specific user interactions but does not depend on a particular configuration setting.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of React's render cycle, which passes through unsanitized HTML code, and the core plugin 'Text' that allows users to include JavaScript. This is a design or implementation flaw in a component (the Text plugin) that is a configuration choice, as the plugin can be used or not used. However, in this case, the Text plugin is a core plugin, and the vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments, but the fact that it's a specific plugin and not a universal flaw in the system makes it more related to 'insecure-part'.


The vulnerability arises from a specific interaction between the Grafana Text plugin and React's render cycle, which allows unsanitized HTML to be temporarily processed and executed. This interaction is a configuration choice, as it depends on the roles and actions of users within the system.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the React render cycle and the Grafana core plugin 'Text', where unsanitized HTML is passed through and can be exploited if specific user interactions occur.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of an old API stub that transitively imports a flawed component, which can be avoided by refactoring the code to use a new API that does not include the flawed server component.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the old API stubs at `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap` which transitively imports the flawed `github.com/ipfs/go-libipfs/bitswap/server` component. Users can choose to use the new split API at `github.com/ipfs/boxo/bitswap/client` to avoid this vulnerability, indicating that the inclusion of the flawed component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to the inclusion of a specific component (the Bitswap server) that contains a design flaw allowing arbitrary memory allocation. The flaw is inherent to the component, but its use is a configuration choice, as users can opt to use a different API that does not include the server.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Bitswap server and untrusted clients, where the server does not properly handle or limit the number of `WANT_BLOCK` and `WANT_HAVE` requests, leading to unbounded memory allocation.


The vulnerability is caused by a weak default configuration where a hardcoded JWT signing key 'not so secret' is used if the random key generation fails during the initial startup. This weak default key allows for authentication bypass until the system is restarted.


The vulnerability is caused by a hardcoded default key 'not so secret' used for signing JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) when the randomly generated key cannot be retrieved during initialization. This default key is insecure and allows for authentication bypass. The issue is not present after the first restart, as the random key is loaded and used instead.


The vulnerability is caused by a hardcoded default key 'not so secret' used for JWT validation, which is insecure. This default setting must be changed (by restarting the service) to secure the system.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the JWT key during the initialization process, where the authentication module initializes before the key generation module, leading to the use of a hardcoded key.


The vulnerability is due to the /api/v1/settings endpoint being accessible without authentication, which is a configuration issue where access control is not properly enforced.


The vulnerability allows unauthorized access to sensitive settings without authentication, indicating that the default setting for authentication is insecure. The fact that all sensitive settings are hidden except for 'passwordPattern' suggests that the default configuration does not properly protect sensitive information.


The vulnerability arises from the improper configuration of the /api/v1/settings endpoint, which exposes sensitive settings without requiring authentication. This is not due to a specific interaction, component flaw, or incorrect handling of parameters, but rather a failure to properly secure the endpoint.


The /api/v1/settings endpoint exposes a sensitive parameter (passwordPattern) without requiring authentication, which should be protected.


The vulnerability is caused by the incorrect handling of permissions during the migration process when RBAC is enabled. The migration does not correctly preserve the Admin-only permissions, leading to unintended permissions for Editors and Viewers.


The vulnerability occurs when RBAC is enabled and then disabled, leaving behind incorrect permissions on folders/dashboards with only Admin permissions. This is a result of the system's configuration not being properly updated after the change in RBAC status, which is a valid but insecure arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from the improper handling of RBAC migrations, which fail to account for folders with only Admin permissions, leading to privilege escalation. This is a configuration issue as it depends on the specific setup where RBAC was enabled and then disabled.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of legacy folder permissions when RBAC is enabled, leading to the addition of unnecessary permissions for Editors and Viewers.


The vulnerability is caused by the `lookup` function in Helm templates, which allows unauthorized access to cluster resources during `helm template` operations. This is an inherent design flaw in the `lookup` function, which is a part of Helm's configuration and can be exploited by a malicious chart author. The system can be deployed without using the `lookup` function, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the `lookup` function in Helm 3 connecting to the cluster even during `helm template` and `helm install|update|delete|rollback --dry-run`, which is not the expected behavior and can lead to information disclosure. This is due to an improper configuration where the `lookup` function is used in a way that circumvents the documented restriction of not attaching to a remote cluster during `helm template`. The user is not notified of this behavior, and a malicious chart author can exploit this.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `lookup` function and the `helm template` command, which is not supposed to connect to a cluster. This interaction is a configuration choice that enables the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `lookup` function and the `helm template` command, which unexpectedly connects to the cluster and discloses information.


The vulnerability is due to improper handling of HTTP methods, which can be mitigated by configuring the system to restrict the path prefix to the 'GET' method. This indicates that the vulnerability arises from an incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability is caused by the improper handling of HTTP methods, which can be mitigated by restricting the path prefix to the 'GET' method, indicating a configuration issue. The default configuration allows for memory exhaustion, but this can be changed by modifying the configuration to only allow 'GET' methods.


The vulnerability arises from improper handling of HTTP methods, which leads to memory exhaustion. This is a configuration issue where the handling of valid configuration parameters (HTTP methods) is incorrect.


The vulnerability is caused by improper handling of HTTP methods, leading to memory exhaustion. The issue can be mitigated by restricting the path prefix to the 'GET' method.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of Gateway API HTTPRoutes and GRPCRoutes, where request headers are matched before request methods, contrary to the specification. This is an issue of incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters, as the system does not respect the intended precedence of request methods over headers.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect interpretation of the match precedence specified in the Gateway API specification, where request headers are matched before request methods. This incorrect handling of configuration parameters leads to unexpected behavior and potential security issues.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect interpretation of configuration parameters, specifically the precedence of request headers over request methods, which contradicts the Gateway API specification.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of request headers and methods in the Gateway API, leading to unexpected behavior and potential security issues.


The vulnerability is inherent to the function readUvarint in the xz library, which may not terminate a loop when given malicious input. This is a flaw in the library itself and not due to any specific configuration or interaction, as it affects all users of the library unless they update to the fixed version.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the readUvarint function, which is a part of the xz library. The library can be updated or used in a way that avoids this vulnerability, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the 'readUvarint' function within the xz library, which is a component of the system. The issue is inherent to the library's implementation, and using this library is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the function readUvarint not correctly handling malicious input, leading to a potential infinite loop.


The vulnerability arises when a persistent session store like Redis or a database is used, which is a configuration choice. The default cookie store does not have this vulnerability, indicating that the issue is due to an improper configuration of the session store.


The vulnerability occurs when a persistent session store, such as Redis or a database, is used for Plug.Session, which is a configuration choice that fails to meet necessary security requirements. The use of a cookie store, which is the default in most Phoenix apps, does not have this vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `Plug.Session` and a persistent session store like Redis or a database, which introduces a session fixation attack vector. This specific interaction is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `Pow.Plug.Session` and a persistent session store like Redis or a database, which can lead to session fixation attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a specific component, `Pow.Store.Backend.MnesiaCache`, which fails to invalidate expired keys correctly on startup. This is a flaw in the component itself, and using this component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of `Pow.Store.Backend.MnesiaCache`, which is a configuration choice that introduces a security flaw. The flawed component is the MnesiaCache backend, which fails to invalidate expired keys correctly.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of expired keys during startup, where the system fails to invalidate them properly, leading to potential session hijacking.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of expired keys in the `Pow.Store.Backend.MnesiaCache` component, leading to session hijacking if the cache instances are shut down for a period longer than the keys' remaining TTL.


The vulnerability is due to an incorrect handling of input parameters in the synchronization configuration feature, allowing permission checks to be bypassed.


The vulnerability exists because the system fails to correctly handle user input, specifically allowing users to craft requests that bypass permission checks. This indicates an issue with how the system interprets or validates configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of input parameters in the synchronization configuration feature, allowing users to bypass permission checks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of input parameters, allowing users to bypass permission checks and modify namespaces without the necessary permissions.


The vulnerability is due to an XML External Entity (XXE) attack vector present in the SDL style handling, which is a part of the system's implementation and not a configuration issue. The vulnerability is present in all versions before 3.24, indicating it is not dependent on a specific configuration but rather on the version of the software used.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the mapfish-print library, which is a component used by the system. The fact that the vulnerability can be fixed by updating to version 3.24 or later suggests that the issue is with the library itself, rather than with how it is configured or used. However, the system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, or at least with a different version of it, which makes it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the mapfish-print library's handling of SDL styles, which is a component that can be included or excluded as part of the system's configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed component (the SDL style parser) that allows for XXE attacks. The vulnerability can be mitigated by updating to a version that fixes the issue.


The vulnerability arises from the presence of old document versions that retain exploitable code even after an upgrade, which is a result of improper handling of document version history during upgrades. This is not a default setting but rather an oversight in managing document versions.


The vulnerability is caused by the fact that old revisions of documents are not properly restricted after an upgrade, allowing exploitation of previously fixed vulnerabilities. This is an example of an improper configuration, as the system fails to meet necessary security requirements by not restricting access to old revisions.


The vulnerability arises from the configuration of document revisions in XWiki, where old revisions containing vulnerabilities are not properly restricted or deleted after an upgrade. This configuration oversight allows exploitation even after a fix is applied.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of old document revisions, which are not properly restricted or deleted, allowing exploitation of fixed vulnerabilities.


The vulnerability is caused by the ability to execute arbitrary wiki content due to a flaw in the IconThemeSheet, which is a configuration choice. The system can be secured by modifying the IconThemesCode.IconThemeSheet page, indicating that the vulnerability is due to improper configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed component, specifically the ability to execute wiki content with the right of IconThemeSheet author, which is a configuration choice. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the IconThemeSheet author rights and the ability to execute Groovy code through icon theme content. This specific interaction, when enabled, introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the icon theme creation feature and the wiki content execution, allowing unauthorized users to execute arbitrary code.


The vulnerability is due to an incorrect handling of the S3 object keys, which are attacker-controlled, allowing for partial-path traversal. The issue arises from insufficient validation logic in the `downloadDirectory` method, specifically in the `leavesRoot` function, which fails to properly handle path traversal attempts.


The vulnerability is caused by the insufficient protection against partial-path traversal in the `leavesRoot` method, which incorrectly handles the validation logic for the key name, allowing a knowledgeable actor to bypass the validation logic by including a UNIX double-dot in the bucket key.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of path validation logic in the `downloadDirectory` method, specifically due to insufficient protection against partial-path traversal.


The vulnerability is caused by incorrect handling of the S3 object key in the `downloadDirectory` method, which fails to properly validate and enforce constraints on the key name.


The vulnerability is due to a weak default configuration where HTTPS hostname verification is disabled by default, which is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting in Opencast that disables HTTPS hostname verification, which is insecure and allows for man-in-the-middle attacks. This setting must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is due to a default setting in Opencast that disables HTTPS hostname verification, which is insecure by default and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the improper configuration of the HTTP client, which disables HTTPS hostname verification, leading to potential man-in-the-middle attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between multiple nodes in a Graylog cluster, where each node maintains its own cache of user sessions. This interaction allows a session to remain valid on some nodes even after a user logs out, due to the lack of synchronization between node caches and the database. Exploitation depends on this specific multi-node interaction being configured.


The vulnerability arises from the way Graylog handles user sessions in a multi-node cluster, specifically how each node maintains its own cache of sessions and how these are updated or invalidated upon user logout. This issue is not inherent to the components themselves but rather how the system is configured to manage sessions across nodes, making it a configuration-related vulnerability. The fact that the session remains valid on other nodes after a user logs out, due to the caching mechanism and the specific handling of session updates, points to an improper configuration of the session management system.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between nodes in a multi-node Graylog cluster, where each node maintains an isolated session cache. The issue is that after a user logs out, other nodes continue to use the cached session until it expires, allowing potential unauthorized API requests.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between multiple nodes in a Graylog cluster, where each node maintains an isolated cache of user sessions. This interaction allows a session to remain valid on some nodes even after the user has logged out.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a weak default signing key (application startup time) for session data, which is insecure and unsuitable for production use. This default setting can be changed to a more secure option, indicating a weak-default configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by the default signing key being the application startup time, which is insecure and can be determined by an attacker. This is a weak default setting that must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is due to a default setting where the application startup time is used as the signing key, which is insecure. This default can be changed to a more secure setting, as recommended in the documentation.


The default configuration uses the application startup time as the signing key, which is insecure and can be exploited if the startup time is known. This default setting is unsuitable for production use and should be changed.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by a flaw in the Live Data macro that allows users without script rights to introduce stored XSS. This issue is present by default and does not require a specific configuration to be exploited.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the Live Data macro, which is a valid component of the XWiki Platform, but its inclusion and configuration allow for stored cross-site scripting. The macro itself contains an inherent design or implementation flaw that enables the security issue when used in a specific way.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Live Data macro and the system's handling of user input, which allows a user without script rights to introduce stored XSS.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of user-provided data in the Live Data macro, which allows for stored XSS.


The vulnerability is due to a weak default configuration where the system accepts an unbounded number of connections, leading to resource exhaustion. The issue is mitigated by introducing a 'maxConnections' parameter with a default limit, which was previously absent.


The vulnerability is caused by the default behavior of blaze-core accepting connections unconditionally, leading to file handle exhaustion. The issue is fixed by adding a 'maxConnections' parameter with a default value of 512, which limits the number of concurrent connections. This indicates that the default setting was insecure and needed to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting in blaze-core that allows unbounded connection acceptance, leading to file handle exhaustion. This is mitigated by introducing a 'maxConnections' parameter with a default value of 512, which must be configured for secure operation.


The default setting for the maximum number of connections is unbounded, which can lead to file handle exhaustion and service degradation. The default value was changed to 512 in the fix, indicating that the default configuration was insecure.


The vulnerability is due to the Java-WebSocket Client not performing SSL hostname validation, which is an inherent flaw in the library's implementation. Users can choose to use a different library that performs proper hostname validation, making this a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the Java-WebSocket Client's inherent design flaw of not performing hostname verification, which is a configuration choice to include or rely on this flawed component. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it.


The vulnerability is due to the Java-WebSocket Client's inherent design flaw of not performing hostname verification, which is a configuration choice since users can choose to use or not use this library.


The vulnerability is caused by the Java-WebSocket Client library, which contains an inherent design flaw by not performing SSL hostname validation. This flaw is present in the library and can be exploited if the library is used in a project.


The vulnerability arises from a missing permissions check, which is a flaw in the handling of access control rather than a configuration issue. The exploitation does not depend on a specific configuration setting but rather on the absence of a security mechanism.


The vulnerability is caused by a missing permissions check, which is a configuration issue that fails to meet necessary security requirements. The system's security depends on the specifics of the configuration, such as whether an API key is the only form of security.


The vulnerability arises from a missing permissions check, which is a configuration oversight. The issue is not inherent to the software itself but rather due to how the permissions are configured, allowing unauthorized access if certain conditions are met.


The vulnerability is due to a missing permissions check, which is an incorrect handling of the authentication and authorization logic.


The vulnerability is due to a non-standard role 'ROLE_COURSE_ADMIN' being present in the security configuration, which allows unexpected user creation. This role is not documented or intended for such use, indicating a misconfiguration in the security setup.


The vulnerability is caused by a default security configuration that allows users with the ROLE_COURSE_ADMIN role to create new users, which is an insecure setting. This is considered a weak default because the default configuration is insecure and needs to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from a security configuration that allows users with the `ROLE_COURSE_ADMIN` role to create new users, which is not expected behavior. This issue is resolved by updating the security configuration, indicating it is a configuration-based vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from a non-standard role `ROLE_COURSE_ADMIN` being incorrectly configured in the security settings, allowing users with this role to create new users. This is a configuration issue that can be fixed by removing or adjusting the role in the security configuration.


The vulnerability is present in the default configuration of the XWiki platform and affects all users who have not upgraded to a patched version. There is no indication that a specific configuration setting or arrangement is required for the vulnerability to manifest, nor is there a workaround other than upgrading.


The vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments of XWiki Platform starting from version 5.0-milestone-1 and prior to versions 14.4.8, 14.10.4, and 15.0-rc-1, and no special arrangement or configuration is required for it to manifest. It is a flaw in the tags API that leaks information about non-viewable pages, which is not dependent on any specific configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the tags API leaking information about non-viewable pages, which indicates a failure to properly configure access controls or privacy settings within the application.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of tags from non-viewable pages, which are leaked by the tags API.


The vulnerability is due to a weak default configuration where any logged-in user can edit the `Mail.MailConfig` by default, which is insecure. This default setting allows unauthorized users to access sensitive mail configuration settings.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting that allows any logged-in user to edit the Mail.MailConfig page, which is insecure. This can be changed by manually updating the rights of the page or by applying a patch that grants rights to a trusted group by default.


The vulnerability arises because the `Mail.MailConfig` page is editable by any logged-in user by default, which is a weak default configuration that needs to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises because the default configuration allows any logged-in user to edit the `Mail.MailConfig` page, which includes sensitive information. This default setting is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by an insecure interaction between Ktor and a proxy that does not handle Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers properly, or uses \n as a header separator, leading to request smuggling.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between Ktor and a proxy that doesn't handle Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding properly, or doesn't handle
 as a headers separator, which is a specific arrangement of components.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between Ktor and a proxy that does not handle Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding properly, or does not handle \n as a headers separator. This specific interaction between components is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between Ktor and a proxy that mishandles certain HTTP headers, leading to request smuggling.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration as it is present in all versions of Opencast prior to 9.6 and does not depend on any specific configuration setting. It is an inherent flaw in the XML parsing logic that allows the billion laughs attack, which is a universal issue in the affected versions.


The vulnerability is caused by the XML parser in Opencast, which is a component that can be updated or configured. The fact that the parser limits the expansion to 100,000 times suggests that it is a design or implementation flaw in this component. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but in this case, the user chooses a build/deployment option with it, making it an insecure-part vulnerability.


The vulnerability is due to the use of an XML parser that is inherently vulnerable to the billion laughs attack. The choice to use this parser is a configuration decision, as the system can be configured to use a different parser that is not susceptible to this attack.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of XML entities, leading to excessive memory consumption and a denial of service. The XML parser does not properly limit the expansion of entities, allowing an attacker to exploit this flaw.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration choice where the new backend is explicitly selected in versions prior to 0.73, or by using the default settings in version 0.73. This configuration choice leads to a sign-extension bug that can be exploited under certain conditions, such as specific heap size and memory layout configurations.


The vulnerability is caused by a bug in the Cranelift x64 backend, which is a component used by Lucet and Wasmtime. The bug can be exploited under specific circumstances, and the impact of the vulnerability is highly dependent on the heap implementation and configuration. The fact that the new backend was not the default prior to version 0.73.0 and that prior versions with an explicit build flag to select the new backend are vulnerable suggests that the inclusion of this flawed component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a specific version (0.73.0) of the Cranelift x64 backend, which contains a bug. The use of this backend is a configuration choice, as prior versions or different backends do not exhibit this vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific component (the new backend in Cranelift) that contains a design or implementation flaw. The flaw is present only when this backend is used, which is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is present in all OpenC3 COSMOS Editions and does not depend on any specific configuration setting or arrangement. It is a flaw in the implementation of the open_local_file method, which is universally exploitable given the right permissions.


The vulnerability is caused by the incorrect handling of file paths in the open_local_file method, allowing an authenticated user to download any.txt file via path traversal. This is an example of incorrect interpretation or handling of valid configuration parameters, specifically file paths.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of file paths in the `open_local_file` method, allowing path traversal attacks.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of file paths in the `open_local_file` method, allowing path traversal.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a flawed algorithm (Γ-signatures) in Biscuit specification version 1, which is a design flaw in the component itself. Users can choose to migrate to version 2, which uses a different algorithm and is not affected, indicating that the use of the flawed component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed algorithm (Γ-signatures) in Biscuit specification version 1, which is a configuration choice as the system can be built or deployed with a different algorithm (as seen in version 2).


The vulnerability is due to the use of a specific version (v1) of the Biscuit specification, which contains a flawed algorithm. The flaw is inherent in the design of the v1 specification, and using this version is a configuration choice. The v2 specification, which does not have this flaw, is available as an alternative.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed algorithm (Γ-signatures) in Biscuit v1. The flaw is inherent to the algorithm, and using this algorithm is a configuration choice that can be avoided by using Biscuit v2.


The vulnerability is due to storing user passwords unencrypted in LocalStorage, which is a weak default setting that exposes sensitive information to potential exfiltration via XSS attacks.


The vulnerability is caused by the default behavior of storing user passwords unencrypted in the LocalStorage of a web browser, which is an insecure setting. This is a default setting that must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises because OpenC3 COSMOS uses a default setting that stores passwords unencrypted in LocalStorage, which is insecure by default and requires changing for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of user passwords, which are stored unencrypted in the LocalStorage of a web browser.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the core undo/redo functionality and other APIs and plugins of TinyMCE, which is a design or implementation flaw in the component itself. This flaw is present in the default configuration and does not require any specific configuration to be exploited.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in TinyMCE's core undo/redo functionality and other APIs and plugins, which is a component of the system. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it. Upgrading to a patched version of TinyMCE removes the vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between TinyMCE's core undo/redo functionality and other APIs/plugins, where text nodes are not properly escaped, allowing for mXSS attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of text nodes during serialization, which allows for the creation of malicious snippets that can trigger XSS.


The vulnerability is due to the use of vulnerable regular expressions in the jquery-validation library, which is an inherent flaw in the component itself. Users can choose not to use this library or update to a fixed version, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed component (the jQuery Validation Plugin with vulnerable regular expressions) which is a configuration choice, as the system can be built or deployed without this plugin or with a different version of it.


The vulnerability is due to inherent flaws in the regular expressions within the jquery-validation library, which is a component that users can choose to include in their projects. The flaw is not dependent on specific configurations or interactions but rather on the use of the flawed component itself.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (the regular expressions) within the jQuery Validation Plugin. The presence of these regular expressions introduces a ReDoS vulnerability, and the issue is fixed by updating the component.


The vulnerability arises from a specific configuration in the Vite guide that leads to the exposure of sensitive keys. This is a case of improper-configuration because the configuration example provided in the documentation is insecure and needs to be changed to prevent the vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by a misconfiguration in the Tauri project's `vite.config.ts` file, where the `envPrefix` setting includes `TAURI_`, leading to the bundling of sensitive keys into the Vite frontend code. This is an example of an improper configuration, as the default or recommended configuration in the Tauri documentation was insecure.


The vulnerability arises from a misconfiguration in the `vite.config.ts` file, where an insecure example configuration was used, leading to the potential exposure of sensitive keys. This is not due to an inherent flaw in the components themselves but rather an incorrect setup that fails to meet security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from a misconfiguration in the `vite.config.ts` file, where the `envPrefix` setting includes both `VITE_` and `TAURI_`, leading to the inclusion of sensitive variables in the frontend code.


The vulnerability arises from the default file permissions set by `File.createTempFile(..)` on Unix-like systems, which are insecure and allow other users to read the temporary files. This is a weak default setting that can be mitigated by changing the `java.io.tmpdir` to a more secure directory.


The vulnerability is caused by the default permissions of temporary files created by MPXJ, which allows other users to read the contents of these files. This is a case of a weak default setting, as the default permissions are insecure and need to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the default file permissions set by `File.createTempFile(..)` on Unix-like systems, which are insecure. Changing the default temporary directory via `java.io.tmpdir` to a more secure location is necessary to mitigate the issue.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of temporary file permissions, which are set to `-rw-r--r--` by default, allowing any user on the system to read the contents of these files.


The vulnerability arises from using built-in redirection strategies in fluture-node 4.0.0 or 4.0.1, which do not redact confidential headers when redirecting to a different origin. This is a design flaw in the component, and users can choose to use a custom redirection strategy to mitigate the issue, indicating a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of flawed redirection strategies in fluture-node versions 4.0.0 and 4.0.1, which can be considered a configuration choice as users can opt for a custom redirection strategy or update to version 4.0.2 with the fixed strategies.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` functions and the redirection strategies when handling requests with confidential headers. This specific interaction, if configured, leads to the exposure of sensitive information.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` functions and the handling of confidential headers during redirects. This specific interaction exposes the headers to third-party domains or unencrypted HTTP.


The vulnerability is caused by the configuration of subgraphs where fields can be resolved by multiple subgraphs, leading to complex queries that can trigger the issue. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements, as it allows for a denial-of-service condition due to unbounded memory consumption.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific arrangement of subgraphs and fields, where a field can be resolved by multiple subgraphs, leading to an infinite loop and denial-of-service. This is a configuration issue, as the problem arises from how the subgraphs are set up and interact with each other, rather than a flaw in the code itself. The issue can be avoided by ensuring that there are no fields resolvable from multiple subgraphs, which is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the @apollo/query-planner library, which is a configuration choice. The issue arises when fields are resolvable by multiple subgraphs, which is a configuration decision in how the subgraphs are set up.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between multiple subgraphs where fields can be resolved by more than one subgraph, leading to an infinite loop and unbounded memory consumption.


The vulnerability can be mitigated by enabling specific configuration settings such as 'Unattended Install' or IP restrictions, indicating that the default configuration is insecure.


The vulnerability can be mitigated by enabling specific configuration settings such as the Unattended Install feature or IP restrictions, indicating that the issue arises from a particular arrangement or lack of security configuration rather than an inherent flaw in the code itself.


The vulnerability arises from a specific configuration state that allows unauthorized access upon restart, which is not inherently secure. The issue is not due to a specific interaction, part, or parameter, but rather a failure to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from a specific interaction during the restart of Umbraco, which can lead to unauthorized users gaining admin-level permissions.


The vulnerability is inherent to the design of the Wire serialization format, which allows malicious payloads to manipulate type information during deserialization. This is a flaw in the component itself, similar to the .NET BinaryFormatter issue, and not due to a specific configuration choice.


The vulnerability exists due to the inherent design or implementation flaw in the Wire serialization format, which is a component used in the system. The fact that it's also present in a fork (AkkaDotNet/Hyperion) and compared to.NET BinaryFormatter suggests it's a flaw in the component itself, rather than how it's used or configured.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent flaw in the Wire library's handling of type information during serialization, which is a design or implementation issue within the component itself. The use of Wire is a configuration choice, and the flaw exists regardless of how it is configured.


The vulnerability arises from the deserialization component of Wire, which can be exploited to create arbitrary types. This is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the deserialization process.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of cached tokens in the AuthenticationService, leading to a use-after-free condition. This is due to the improper implementation of token and user relation enforcement, which is a flaw in how the system handles valid configuration parameters (tokens and users).


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of cached tokens in the AuthenticationService, specifically the failure to properly manage the lifetime of cached tokens and their relationship with users, leading to a use-after-free scenario.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of cached tokens and users, leading to a use-after-free condition. The issue is due to the improper management of the lifetime of cached tokens, which should have been cleared after the request was handled.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of cached tokens and users, leading to a use-after-free condition when the token expires and is removed from the cache.


The vulnerability arises from the use of the MessagePack library to deserialize untrusted data, which can lead to hash collisions and stack overflow. This is not a default behavior and requires specific configuration to handle untrusted data securely, such as enabling 'UntrustedData' mode and using secure hash algorithms.


The vulnerability exists due to the default settings of the MessagePack library, which can lead to a denial of service attack when deserializing untrusted data. The library's default mode does not provide sufficient security mitigations, such as hash collision resistance and stack overflow protection, making it vulnerable to attacks. Upgrading to a patched version or configuring the library to use a more secure mode, such as the 'UntrustedData' mode, can mitigate this risk.


The vulnerability is due to inherent flaws in the MessagePack library's handling of untrusted data, specifically hash collisions and stack overflow risks. The library itself is a component whose inclusion and configuration in a project is a choice, and the vulnerability can be mitigated by upgrading the library or configuring it to handle untrusted data securely.

source-code configuration-file command-line-parameter environment-variable


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed component (the MessagePack library) that can be configured to handle untrusted data securely, but the default configuration is insecure.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'destinationDirectory' parameter, where it is not enforced to end with a slash, leading to potential path traversal issues.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the destinationDirectory path, specifically the lack of enforcement that fullDestinationDirectoryPath ends with a slash, leading to potential partial path traversal. This is a case of incorrect interpretation or handling of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the destination directory path, specifically the failure to enforce that the fullDestinationDirectoryPath ends with a slash. This oversight allows for path traversal under certain conditions.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the destination directory path, specifically the lack of enforcement that the path ends with a slash, leading to potential path traversal.


The vulnerability is due to an incorrect handling of session expiration, where the user interface indicates a logout before the server session actually expires. This is a flaw in how the session timeout is managed and communicated to the user.


The issue arises from the default session expiration settings, which cause the Backoffice to display a logout page before the server session has fully expired, leading to a potential security flaw. This is a case of a default setting being insecure and needing to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of session expiration timing, where the Backoffice prematurely displays a logout message before the server session has actually expired.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of session expiration, where the logout message is displayed prematurely, leading to a mismatch between the user's perception and the actual session state.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a non-cryptographically secure random number generator for generating private keys during the X25519 key exchange, which is an inherent design flaw in the library's implementation. This flaw is present in the library itself and not due to a specific configuration choice by the user.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed component, System.Random, which is not a cryptographically secure random number generator. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it, making it an insecure-part classification.


The vulnerability arises from the use of `System.Random` for generating cryptographic keys, which is inherently insecure. The choice to use this component for cryptographic purposes is a configuration decision, as the library can be configured to use a different, secure random number generator.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a weak random number generator (`System.Random`) in the SSH.NET library, which is a configuration choice to include or rely on this flawed component.


The vulnerability arises from the ability to upload SVG files with scripts, which can be mitigated by implementing server-side file validation or serving media from a different host. This indicates an improper configuration where security measures are not enforced by default.


The vulnerability arises from the ability to upload SVG files with scripts and the lack of server-side file validation or proper media hosting configuration, which is a configuration issue that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the ability to upload SVG files and the execution of scripts when these files are loaded in a browser. This specific interaction between components (file upload and script execution) introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the backoffice user and the media files, where SVG files with embedded scripts can be uploaded and executed if loaded directly in a browser.


The vulnerability is inherent in the ImageSharp library's Gif decoder, which processes specially crafted files leading to excessive memory usage. This flaw is present in the library itself and does not depend on any specific configuration or interaction between components.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the Gif decoder component of the ImageSharp library, which is a valid arrangement that contains an inherent design or implementation flaw. The fact that users can upgrade to a patched version or use a workaround by enforcing a limit on image dimensions before decoding suggests that the flawed component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the ImageSharp library's Gif decoder, which is a component that users can choose to include in their projects. The flaw is inherent in the library, but its exploitation depends on the configuration choice to use this specific library version.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the Gif decoder component of the ImageSharp library, which can be exploited by processing specially crafted files. The flaw is inherent to the component and can be mitigated by upgrading to a patched version.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of Saml2 tokens, where the library treats all tokens as bearer tokens regardless of their actual subject confirmation method. This is an incorrect interpretation of the token's configuration parameters.


The Sustainsys.Saml2 library incorrectly treats all incoming tokens as bearer tokens, even though they have another subject confirmation method specified, which is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the library. However, including or relying on this flawed component is itself a configuration choice, as the library can be updated or replaced.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect interpretation of valid configuration parameters, specifically the handling of subject confirmation methods in Saml2 tokens. The library fails to correctly process tokens with non-bearer subject confirmation methods.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of Saml2 tokens, where the library treats all tokens as bearer tokens regardless of their specified subject confirmation method.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of permissions where users can bypass restrictions by modifying the request body, indicating a flaw in how the system interprets or enforces configuration parameters related to user permissions.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'Send for Approval' request, where the system fails to properly enforce the permission restrictions, allowing users to bypass the publish permission by modifying the request body.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of permissions in the request body, allowing users with 'send for approval' permission to bypass restrictions and publish content.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'Send for Approval' request, allowing users to bypass the intended permission checks.


The vulnerability arises from the use of the user's TEMP folder instead of the system TEMP folder when the bundle is not run as admin, allowing DLL redirection attacks. This is an improper configuration as it fails to meet necessary security requirements by not using a secure location for temporary files.


The vulnerability arises from the WiX toolset's use of the user's TEMP folder when not run as admin, allowing for DLL redirection attacks. This is a configuration issue, as the toolset's behavior in this regard is a design choice that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the WiX toolset's handling of the .be TEMP folder and the system's DLL redirection mechanism, which allows an attacker to escalate privileges by placing a malicious DLL in a specific folder.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the WiX installer and the Windows TEMP folder, where a malicious DLL can be placed and loaded during the elevation process.


The vulnerability arises from an improper configuration where SMTP is not set up correctly, leading to different error messages that allow user enumeration.


The vulnerability occurs when SMTP is not set up correctly and reset password is enabled, indicating a configuration issue that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the SMTP configuration and the reset password functionality, where incorrect error messages are displayed based on user existence.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of error messages when the SMTP is not set up correctly, leading to user enumeration.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration setting, as it occurs even when the debug mode is disabled, which is a typical deployment setting. The issue is inherent to the Management API endpoints themselves.


The vulnerability is caused by the default behavior of the Management API endpoints returning stack trace information even when Umbraco is not in debug mode, which is an insecure default setting.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters related to debug mode, where stack traces are improperly exposed even when debug mode is disabled.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of error responses, where stack trace information is returned even when the debug mode is disabled.


The vulnerability arises when the sandbox is disabled globally and specific conditions are met, indicating an improper configuration that fails to enforce necessary security checks.


The vulnerability occurs when the sandbox is disabled globally and a specific sequence of events happens, indicating that the issue arises from a configuration that fails to meet necessary security requirements. The fact that the sandbox can be disabled globally and that templates can be loaded in a non-sandbox context suggests a configuration issue rather than an inherent flaw in the code itself.


The vulnerability arises from a specific interaction between the sandbox being disabled globally and the use of a sandboxed `include()` function referencing a template name, which allows user-contributed templates to bypass sandbox restrictions.


The vulnerability arises from a specific interaction between the sandbox configuration and the template inclusion mechanism, which allows bypassing security checks.


The vulnerability arises because the 'cms.safe_mode' setting, which is intended to prevent execution of arbitrary PHP code by users with certain permissions, can be bypassed. This indicates a failure in enforcing the security constraints of a configuration parameter, which aligns with 'incorrect-handling'.


The vulnerability exists because the `cms.safe_mode` is enabled, relying on it to restrict users with certain permissions from executing arbitrary PHP, but the Twig sandbox can be escaped. This indicates a configuration that fails to meet necessary security requirements, as the safe mode is not effectively preventing the execution of arbitrary PHP. The issue is not with the components themselves but with how the system is configured to trust certain permissions and modes to enforce security.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `cms.safe_mode` configuration parameter, which is intended to prevent execution of arbitrary PHP but can be bypassed through specific Twig code.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `cms.safe_mode` configuration parameter, allowing users to escape the Twig sandbox and execute arbitrary PHP code.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by the exposure of the encryptionKey or the ability to generate a valid HMAC-SHA1, which are not configuration issues. The vulnerability exists due to a flaw in the software that allows arbitrary file retrieval if certain conditions are met, such as the exposure of the encryptionKey.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed cryptographic component (HMAC-SHA1) which can be exploited if an attacker manages to generate a valid message authentication code, either by using a different existing vulnerability or if the internal encryptionKey was exposed. This suggests that including or relying on this flawed component is itself a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to the inclusion of a flawed cryptographic component (HMAC-SHA1) that can be exploited if the encryptionKey is exposed. The system can be configured to use a different cryptographic method, making this a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the cryptographic message authentication code (HMAC-SHA1) and the file retrieval mechanism, allowing an attacker to exploit this interaction to retrieve sensitive files.


The vulnerability is due to the `LESS` parser allowing path traversal through a custom `LESS` setting, which is a configuration choice. The system can be deployed without this vulnerability by not using the flawed `LESS` parser or by securing admin accounts and file permissions.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a flawed `LESS` parser, which is a valid component that can be used in the system, but its inclusion and configuration make it a security risk. The system can be built or deployed without this vulnerability by not using the custom `LESS` setting or by upgrading to a version with a patched `LESS` parser.


The vulnerability arises because the `LESS` parser allows an absolute path to be specified in a custom setting, which is not adequately protected or restricted, enabling path traversal attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of user-provided paths in the `LESS` parser, allowing path traversal attacks.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the formkey protection mechanism in the Admin Interface, which is a part of the system's configuration. This flaw allows attackers to bypass security measures, leading to an increased risk of CSRF attacks.


The vulnerability is related to a specific issue in the code (circumventing formkey protection) that is not dependent on a particular configuration or arrangement, but rather a flaw in the implementation that is present by default in all typical deployments.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the formkey protection mechanism, which is intended to prevent Cross Site Request Forgery attacks. The issue is not due to a specific configuration but rather how the formkey is processed or validated.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of formkey protection in the Admin Interface, which allows attackers to circumvent this protection and increase the attack surface for Cross Site Request Forgery attacks.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but is a flaw in the password recovery functionality where existing sessions are not revoked upon password reset. This is a universal issue in the affected versions and not dependent on any specific configuration setting.


The vulnerability exists due to a flaw in the password recovery functionality, which fails to revoke existing sessions upon password reset. This issue is not caused by a specific configuration, but rather by the inherent behavior of the system. The solution involves updating to a patched version, indicating that the vulnerability is not configuration-based.


The vulnerability arises from the system's failure to revoke existing sessions upon password reset, which is a necessary security requirement not being met. This issue is not due to an inherent flaw in a component or incorrect handling of configuration parameters, but rather a missing security measure in the system's configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of session revocation during the password reset process.


The vulnerability is due to a weak default setting where the export functionality does not limit the result set to allowed columns, allowing authenticated users to export internal details. The default configuration allows this insecure behavior, which can be mitigated by updating to a fixed version or changing the configuration to restrict export access.


The vulnerability exists because the export functionality is not properly restricted by default, allowing authenticated users to export internal details of database tables. The default setting can be changed by updating to a fixed version or by manually setting the User TSconfig option 'options.impexp.enableExportForNonAdminUser' to restrict access.


The vulnerability arises because the export functionality exposes internal details of database tables due to a lack of restriction on the result set. The issue is mitigated by a configuration setting that controls access to the export functionality, indicating that the parameter controlling this access is unprotected.


The vulnerability arises from the export functionality failing to correctly handle and limit the result set to allowed columns, allowing authenticated users to export internal details of database tables.


The vulnerability is a cross-site scripting (XSS) issue in the content management feature of baserCMS, which is a flaw in the software itself and not dependent on any specific configuration. It is present in all typical deployments of the affected versions.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the content management feature of baserCMS, which is a component of the framework. Updating to the latest version fixes the issue, implying that the flawed component can be replaced or updated, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is a cross-site scripting (XSS) issue inherent in the content management feature of baserCMS versions 5.0.8 and earlier. It is not caused by a specific configuration or arrangement but rather by a flaw in the software itself that is present by default in these versions.


The vulnerability is a cross-site scripting (XSS) issue that is present by default in all typical deployments of baserCMS 5.0.8 and earlier. No specific configuration is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by the page error handler retrieving content from another page, leading to recursive calls and server overload. This is an inherent design flaw in the error handling mechanism, not a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises from the application's default behavior of recursively calling itself when encountering invalid or non-existing resources, leading to amplification of the initial attack impact until the web server limits are exceeded. This suggests a configuration or design flaw that fails to meet necessary security requirements, rather than an issue with a specific component or interaction.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of invalid or non-existing resource requests, leading to recursive calls and amplification of the attack. This is due to the error handler's improper interpretation or handling of such requests.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the page error handler and the content retrieval mechanism, leading to recursive calls and resource exhaustion.


The vulnerability arises from the use of multiple session cookies in conjunction with specific session handlers, which creates an insecure interaction between these components. Exploitation depends on this specific interaction being configured.


The vulnerability arises from a specific arrangement of using multiple session cookies with certain session handlers, which is a configuration choice that fails to meet necessary security requirements. This is not a default setting but rather a particular setup that introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between using multiple session cookies and specific session handlers (`DatabaseHandler`, `MemcachedHandler`, or `RedisHandler`). This specific configuration enables the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between multiple session cookies and specific session handlers, which allows an attacker to leverage one session cookie to access pages requiring another session cookie.


The vulnerability is due to a broken access control check caused by an unhandled RedirectResponse, which is a flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the sf_event_mgt extension, which is a configuration choice in the TYPO3 CMS. The issue arose from an update to the extension, indicating that the vulnerability is related to the inclusion of a flawed component.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `RedirectResponse` from the `$this->redirect()` function, which was not properly managed during the update process.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `RedirectResponse` from the `$this->redirect()` function, which breaks the access control check.


The vulnerability is caused by insufficient access-level checks on the Wiki redirection page, which is a flaw in the handling of access permissions. The workaround involves disabling the wiki integration, indicating that the vulnerability is related to improper configuration of access controls.


The vulnerability is caused by insufficient access-level checks on the Wiki redirection page, which can be considered a configuration issue. The fact that disabling wiki integration (by setting `$g_wiki_enable = OFF;`) is offered as a workaround suggests that the vulnerability is related to the configuration of the wiki integration feature.


The vulnerability arises from the lack of necessary access-level checks on the Wiki redirection page, which is a configuration issue. The system's configuration does not enforce the required security checks, allowing unauthorized access to private project names.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of access-level checks on the Wiki redirection page, allowing unauthorized users to reveal private project names.


The vulnerability is caused by the requirement of a specific permission ('cms.manage_assets') for exploitation, which is a configuration choice regarding user permissions.


The vulnerability is only exploitable by an authenticated backend user with the `cms.manage_assets` permission, indicating that the issue arises from a specific configuration of user permissions and access control, rather than an inherent flaw in the code itself. This suggests that the vulnerability is a result of an improper configuration that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific component (OctoberCMS) that contains a flaw exploitable by users with certain permissions. The flaw is inherent to the component, but its exploitation depends on the configuration of user permissions.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the authenticated backend user with the `cms.manage_assets` permission and the file reading functionality, which allows the user to read local files.


The vulnerability arises when the key is passed as a string instead of a file path, which is a configuration choice. This incorrect handling of the configuration parameter leads to the exposure of the key in exception messages.


The vulnerability occurs when the key is passed as a string instead of a file path, and no valid pass phrase is provided, which is an incorrect configuration choice. This can be avoided by passing the key as a file or upgrading to a patched version.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters, specifically the way keys are passed to the CryptKey constructor. The issue is that the key is exposed in an exception message when passed as a string without a valid passphrase, which is a misinterpretation of the configuration parameter.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the key when passed as a string to the CryptKey constructor, leading to the key being exposed in a LogicException message.


The vulnerability arises from the failure to explicitly set the 'sylius_channel.debug' configuration parameter, leading to an incorrect default behavior in production environments.


The vulnerability is caused by a default configuration setting where the debug feature is enabled in production environments if sylius_channel.debug is not explicitly set, even if kernel.debug is set to false. This is an example of a weak default setting that must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the configuration parameter `sylius_channel.debug`, where the default value `%kernel.debug%` is not resolved and cast to boolean, leading to unintended behavior.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `sylius_channel.debug` configuration parameter, which is not properly resolved and cast to a boolean, leading to the debug feature being enabled even when it should not be.


The vulnerability is caused by plugins that expose the 'fromData' method as a public interface, which is a configuration choice by the developer. This is not present in vanilla installations, indicating that the vulnerability arises from an insecure interaction between the plugin and the CMS.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific arrangement where plugins expose the `October
ain.Database	ach/File::fromData` method as a public interface, allowing users to specify their own filename and enabling remote code execution. This is a configuration choice, as vanilla installations of October CMS are not affected since this method is not exposed or used by the system internally or externally.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a specific method (`fromData`) in plugins that expose it as a public interface. This is a configuration choice, as the method is not used by default in vanilla installations of October CMS.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `fromData` method and user-provided filenames, which can lead to remote code execution if the method is exposed by a plugin.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather a flaw in the implementation of the 2FA mechanism that allows URL manipulation to bypass security checks. This issue is present in all deployments of the affected version and does not depend on a specific configuration setting.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the login credentials and the 2FA check, where an attacker can bypass the 2FA check by changing the URL and adding a new device. This specific interaction is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the login process and the URL manipulation, which allows bypassing the 2FA check. This specific interaction is a configuration choice that enables the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the URL manipulation and the 2FA mechanism, allowing an attacker to bypass the 2FA check by changing the URL.


The vulnerability arises from an undefined behavior in typecasting from 'char' to 'bool', which is a flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue. It affects all deployments using the affected versions of TensorFlow, regardless of configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by a design flaw in the TensorFlow library, specifically in the way it handles conversions from `char` to `bool` when printing tensors. This flaw is inherent to the library and is not dependent on any specific configuration or user input.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of type conversion from `char` to `bool`, which is undefined behavior if the `char` is not `0` or `1`. This is a misinterpretation of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of `char` to `bool` conversion when printing a tensor, leading to undefined behavior and potential crashes.


The vulnerability is due to a memory leak caused by an implementation flaw in the TensorFlow code, specifically in the handling of graph nodes. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or interaction between components, but rather on the code logic itself.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of `ImmutableExecutorState::Initialize`, which is a part of the TensorFlow framework. The memory leak occurs when an invalid graph node is encountered, and the `item->kernel` pointer is set to `nullptr` without properly deallocating the previously allocated memory.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the TensorFlow library's handling of `OpKernel*` pointers, which is an inherent design or implementation flaw within the component itself. The issue arises from how TensorFlow manages memory allocation for invalid graph nodes, making it a configuration-based vulnerability as users can choose to use or not use the affected versions.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of a memory allocation and deallocation in the `ImmutableExecutorState::Initialize` function, leading to a memory leak.


The vulnerability arises from missing validation for invalid file formats in the checkpoints loading infrastructure, which is a design flaw in the component itself, not a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a missing validation for invalid file formats in the checkpoints loading infrastructure, which is a component of the TensorFlow system. This flaw is inherent to the component and can be considered a configuration choice to include or rely on this flawed component.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters related to checkpoint loading, specifically the lack of validation for invalid file formats.


The vulnerability arises from the checkpoints loading infrastructure failing to validate file formats correctly, leading to undefined behavior, integer overflows, segfaults, and `CHECK`-fail crashes.


The vulnerability arises from an incorrect handling of file paths during the extraction process, where the mitigation against Zip Slip attacks is improperly implemented and can be bypassed.


The vulnerability is caused by the improper implementation of the measure intended to prevent Zip Slip attacks, specifically the non-recursive replacement of directory traversal sequences, which allows an attacker to extract files to any desired location within the server running MobSF.


The vulnerability arises from the improper handling of file paths during the extraction process, where the implemented measure to prevent Zip Slip attacks is not recursive, allowing path traversal.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of file paths during the extraction of .a files, which allows an attacker to bypass the intended Zip Slip prevention mechanism.


The vulnerability is due to the /login and /change endpoints returning authentication tokens in response to GET requests, which are not protected by CSRF tokens. This is a design flaw in the Flask-Security-Too package, and not due to a specific configuration choice by the user.


The vulnerability exists because the default behavior of the /login and /change endpoints in Flask-Security-Too is to return the authenticated user's authentication token in response to a GET request, which is insecure. This can be mitigated by changing the default setting of SECURITY_TOKEN_MAX_AGE to 0, which makes the token unusable.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the /login and /change endpoints and the GET request method, which is not protected by a CSRF token, allowing a malicious site to acquire the authentication token.


The vulnerability arises because the SECURITY_TOKEN_MAX_AGE parameter, which controls the lifespan of the authentication token, is not properly protected or restricted. Setting this parameter to '0' can mitigate the issue, indicating that the parameter is exposed and can be configured in a way that affects security.


The vulnerability is due to a use-after-free error caused by a refactoring change from a naked pointer to a smart pointer, which is a coding error rather than a configuration issue. It does not depend on any specific configuration setting or arrangement to be exploited.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `tf.raw_ops.BoostedTreesCreateEnsemble` operation, specifically in the handling of reference counted resources and smart pointers, which is not related to any configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent flaw in the implementation of `tf.raw_ops.BoostedTreesCreateEnsemble`, specifically related to the transition from a naked pointer to a smart pointer, which is a design choice in the TensorFlow library.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of a reference-counted resource, leading to a use-after-free error when the resource is freed twice.


The vulnerability is caused by the configuration of the session storage type in Django. Depending on whether the database, cache, or signed cookies are used for session storage, the severity of the vulnerability changes. This indicates that the configuration choice of session storage is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by the way the session storage is configured in Django, which can lead to passwords being stored in clear text. The severity of the issue depends on the type of session storage used, and switching to a different storage method (such as signed cookies) can lessen the impact, but the issue is ultimately caused by the configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the use of Django's session storage mechanism, which is a configuration choice. The issue is not inherent to Django itself but depends on the specific session storage configuration chosen by the user (e.g., database, cache, or signed cookies).


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the user's password in the session, where it is stored in clear text. This incorrect handling is a configuration issue that can be mitigated by changing the session storage mechanism.


The vulnerability is due to inadequate input sanitization in user-editable fields that support Markdown rendering, which is a flaw in the handling of input data.


The vulnerability is caused by inadequate input sanitization in user-editable fields that support Markdown rendering, which is a design or implementation flaw in the Markdown rendering component. This component is a valid part of the system, but its inclusion and configuration make it a security risk.


The vulnerability arises from inadequate input sanitization, which is an incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters that support Markdown rendering.


The vulnerability is due to inadequate input sanitization, which is an incorrect handling of user-editable fields that support Markdown rendering.


The vulnerability is due to a missing check in the implementation of `AssignOp`, which is a flaw in the code itself rather than a configuration issue. The vulnerability is present in the default implementation and does not depend on any specific configuration settings.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `AssignOp` component, which is a valid part of the TensorFlow framework. The issue arises from the lack of a check for initialization on the right-hand side of the assignment, which is an inherent design or implementation flaw in this component.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters, specifically the failure to check if the right-hand side of an assignment is initialized, leading to undefined behavior.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of uninitialized data in the `AssignOp` implementation, leading to undefined behavior.


The vulnerability is caused by specific configuration settings that allow deactivated users to log in, such as enabling JSON Web Tokens or updating passwords via an admin API after deactivation. These configurations are not typical and require specific settings to be enabled, indicating an improper configuration.


The vulnerability occurs when specific configurations are enabled, such as JSON Web Tokens for login or the local password database with a user's password updated after deactivation, which are not typical security settings and can lead to a deactivated user being able to login. This indicates a failure to meet necessary security requirements due to the specific arrangement of settings.


The vulnerability is caused by the default configuration of the local password database being enabled, which is insecure by default. This setting must be changed to secure the system.


The vulnerability arises from specific configuration settings that, when combined, allow deactivated users to log in. This is not a default configuration and requires specific settings to be enabled or modified.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'ContentsManager.allow_hidden' configuration parameter, which fails to enforce the intended restriction on accessing hidden files, allowing authenticated users to access them if their names are guessable.


The vulnerability arises from a configuration where `ContentsManager.allow_hidden = False` only hides but does not prevent access to hidden files or files in hidden directories, potentially allowing authenticated access to sensitive files if their names are guessable. This is an improper configuration because it fails to meet necessary security requirements by not properly restricting access to sensitive files.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `ContentsManager.allow_hidden` configuration parameter, which fails to properly restrict access to hidden files and directories.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `ContentsManager.allow_hidden` configuration parameter, where hidden files are not properly restricted despite the setting being configured to prevent listing hidden directories.


The vulnerability arises because the Content Security Policy (CSP) cannot be configured for individual pages, which is a configuration issue. This limits the ability to harden the website according to specific needs, such as allowing certain scripts or external resources.


The vulnerability is caused by the lack of configurability of the Content Security Policy (CSP) for individual pages, which is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements. This is not a direct result of insecure interaction, insecure part, incorrect handling, unprotected parameter, or weak default, but rather a limitation in the configuration options provided by the application.


The vulnerability arises from the inability to configure the Content Security Policy (CSP) for individual pages, which is a necessary security requirement for websites using JavaScript or external resources. This lack of configurability leads to improper hardening of the website.


The issue arises from the inability to configure the Content Security Policy (CSP) for individual pages, leading to a lack of flexibility and security hardening for websites using JavaScript or external resources.


The vulnerability is due to the implementation of the `BaseUser.login` function, which leaks information based on response time discrepancies. This is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by the inherent design of the login function, which is present by default in all typical deployments of Piccolo ORM.


The vulnerability is caused by the implementation of `BaseUser.login` in the Piccolo library, which leaks information about valid users. This is an inherent design flaw in the library, but including or relying on this flawed component is a configuration choice, as the system can be built or deployed without it.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of login responses, where the response time varies based on whether a username exists, allowing a timing attack to enumerate valid usernames.