The vulnerability is caused by the incorrect handling of user login responses, where the response time varies based on whether the user exists, allowing for user enumeration.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration as it is present by default in the Jupyter Server's handling of API requests, and no specific configuration is required to manifest it. The issue is inherent in the server's error handling mechanism, which includes traceback information in error responses.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of error responses, where traceback information including path details is unnecessarily included, potentially revealing sensitive information. However, given that this occurs in an authenticated context where the user already has significant permissions, the sensitivity of the revealed paths is considered limited.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of error responses, where traceback information is included in JSON error responses. This is a misinterpretation or mishandling of how error information should be presented.


The vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments and does not require any specific configuration to be exploitable. It is a result of the default behavior of the Jupyter Server when handling unhandled errors.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration as it is present in all typical deployments of mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below when used to protect an HTTP/1 service. The issue is inherent to the software version and not dependent on a specific configuration setting.


The vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments of mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below, and no special arrangement or configuration is required for it to manifest. It is a flaw in the way mitmproxy handles HTTP requests, rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between mitmproxy and HTTP/1 services, where a malicious client or server can exploit the proxy's handling of HTTP messages to perform request smuggling. This specific interaction between components is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between mitmproxy and the HTTP/1 service, where a malicious client or server can smuggle requests through mitmproxy, leading to multiple requests being seen by the target server.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of contract addresses when calling an external contract with no return value, leading to potential double evaluation of side effects.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a specific language feature (calling an external contract with no return value) in Vyper, which is a configuration choice. The issue is inherent to the language's design or implementation prior to version 0.3.4, but including or relying on this flawed behavior is itself a configuration choice, as developers can choose to use a different version of the language or implement workarounds.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of contract addresses, where the address is evaluated twice due to the way it is accessed in the code. This is a misinterpretation of how contract addresses should be handled when they have side effects.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of contract addresses in the Vyper language, where the contract address is evaluated twice, potentially leading to double evaluation of side effects.


The vulnerability is present in all affected versions and does not depend on any specific configuration or interaction between components. It is a flaw in the code that allows an authenticated user to perform a Denial of Service attack, and it is not caused by any configuration setting or choice.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the `polymorphic/task.rb` model, which is a component of the Fat Free CRM system. The patch provided fixes this flaw, indicating that the issue is with the component itself, rather than with how it is configured or interacted with.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of configuration parameters, specifically the validation of bucket access. The code incorrectly allows access to buckets that should be restricted, leading to a Denial of Service attack.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the 'bucket' parameter, which can lead to a Denial of Service if not properly validated.


The vulnerability arises from the inappropriate evaluation of untrusted input in the manipulate! method, which is a code handling issue rather than a configuration issue. The vulnerability is present by default and does not depend on a specific configuration to be exploited.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of the CarrierWave::RMagick module, which contains an inherent design flaw in its #manipulate! method. This flaw allows for code injection, but the inclusion of this module is a configuration choice, as the application developer can choose to use or not use it.


The vulnerability is due to the use of the CarrierWave library, which contains a design flaw in its `#manipulate!` method. The flaw is inherent to the library, but using the library with untrusted inputs is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed component (CarrierWave) that inappropriately evals user input, leading to code injection. The vulnerability can be mitigated by upgrading to a fixed version or by not using the flawed component.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration but by an inherent flaw in the yajl library's handling of large inputs, specifically on 32-bit platforms. This flaw is present by default and does not require a specific configuration to be exploited.


The vulnerability is caused by an integer overflow in the YAJL library, which is a design or implementation flaw that is present by default in all typical deployments, and no special arrangement or configuration is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent flaw in the `yajl` library's handling of integer overflow, which is a design or implementation issue within the library itself. The use of `size_t` for buffer size calculations on 32-bit platforms leads to the vulnerability, and the choice to use this library is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability is caused by a design or implementation flaw in the YAJL JSON parsing library, specifically in the reallocation logic. The flaw is present in the library and can be exploited if the library is used with large inputs, making it an insecure part of the system.


The vulnerability is caused by enabling the diagnostics feature, which is off by default. This is a weak-default configuration issue because the default setting is secure, but changing it to enable diagnostics introduces the vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration choice, namely enabling the diagnostics feature, which is not enabled by default. This choice introduces a security flaw, making it an improper configuration. The fact that disabling MessageBus::Diagnostics mitigates the issue further supports this classification.


The vulnerability is due to the diagnostics feature being enabled by default, which is insecure. Disabling this feature mitigates the vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting (diagnostics features) that is insecure and must be disabled for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises because the CSRF authenticity token check is disabled for a specific feature (questionnaire templates preview), which is a configuration choice. Disabling this check is an improper configuration that exposes sensitive information.


The CSRF authenticity token check is disabled for the questionnaire templates preview, which is a configuration choice that fails to meet necessary security requirements. This allows attackers to potentially gain access to information not meant to be public.


The CSRF authenticity token check is disabled by default for the questionnaire templates preview, which is a configuration oversight that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the CSRF authenticity token check for the questionnaire templates preview, which is disabled by default.


The vulnerability is caused by the 'devise_invitable' gem not respecting the 'invite_for' expiry period, which is a configuration parameter set by Decidim to '2.weeks'. This incorrect handling of the configuration parameter allows invitations to be accepted indefinitely, bypassing the intended expiration period.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the `devise_invitable` gem, which is a component used by the Decidim framework. The gem's code fails to check if the pending invitation is still valid, allowing users to accept invitations after the expiry period. This is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the gem, making it an insecure part. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it, which falls under "insecure-part".


The vulnerability is due to the use of a specific version of the `devise_invitable` gem that contains a flaw. The flaw is inherent in the gem's design or implementation, and the decision to use this version is a configuration choice. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed version, or with a fixed version, making it a configuration-based vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by the `devise_invitable` gem, which contains a flaw in its implementation of the invitation expiry check. This flaw is present in the gem and can be included in Decidim, making it an insecure part of the system.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the 'rails_multisite' gem and Rails' signed/encrypted cookies, allowing cookie re-use across different sites within a multi-site application.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the `rails_multisite` gem, which is a configuration choice. The gem itself contains a flaw that allows an attacker to re-use cookies on different sites within a multi-site Rails application. The fact that the issue is patched in v4 of the gem and that this upgrade will invalidate all previous signed/encrypted cookies suggests that the vulnerability is inherent to the gem and not a result of incorrect configuration or interaction.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `rails_multisite` and Rails' signed/encrypted cookies, which introduces a security flaw when used together in a multi-site Rails application.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `rails_multisite` and Rails' signed/encrypted cookies, allowing an attacker to reuse cookies across different sites within a multi-site application.


The vulnerability is present in all affected versions of Action Text by default and does not require any specific configuration to manifest. It is a flaw in the handling of HTML content within the rich_text_area tag, leading to potential XSS issues.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of unsanitized HTML in ActionText::Attachable::ContentAttachment, which is a component used within the rich_text_area tag. This component's flaw is inherent to its design or implementation, and its inclusion is a configuration choice, albeit a common one in Rails applications.


The vulnerability is due to the inclusion of ActionText::Attachable::ContentAttachment, which contains unsanitized HTML. This is a configuration choice as users can decide whether to use this component within a rich_text_area tag.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of unsanitized HTML within ActionText::Attachable::ContentAttachment, leading to potential cross-site scripting (XSS).


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the parser_apache2 plugin, which is a configuration choice. Users can choose not to use this plugin or apply a patched version, indicating that the vulnerability is not inherent to all deployments but depends on the configuration choice of using this specific plugin.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the parser_apache2 plugin, which is a component that can be included or excluded from the Fluentd configuration. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, or a patched version can be used, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to the parser_apache2 plugin, which is a component that can be configured to be used or not. The issue is inherent to this specific plugin version, and the system can be configured to avoid using it, thus making it a configuration-based vulnerability.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific component (parser_apache2 plugin) that contains a design or implementation flaw (ReDoS vulnerability). The system can be configured to avoid using this component or to use a patched version.


The vulnerability is due to a parsing bug in the server's code for recognizing special '/meta/*' channels, which allows clients to bypass authentication checks by appending extra segments to the message channel. This is an inherent design flaw in the server's implementation of channel recognition, not a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by the server's incorrect handling of meta channel names, where it treats prefix-matches as exact matches, allowing clients to bypass authentication checks by appending extra segments to the message channel.


The vulnerability arises from the server's incorrect handling of message channels, where it incorrectly interprets channels that are prefix-matches for special meta channels as exact matches, leading to authentication bypass.


The vulnerability is caused by the server's incorrect handling of message channels, specifically the way it processes and matches meta channels. The server fails to enforce the correct channel matching logic, leading to authentication bypass.


The vulnerability arises from how checkout permitted attributes are structured, allowing address changes without triggering validations. This is an example of incorrect handling of configuration parameters, as the system fails to enforce constraints on address changes during checkout.


The vulnerability arises from how checkout permitted attributes are structured, specifically having a single list of attributes permitted across the whole checkout. This is a design or implementation flaw in a component (the checkout system) that is a configuration choice, as the system can be built or deployed with alternative checkout configurations. However, in this case, the flaw is inherent to the Solidus checkout system's design before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2.


The vulnerability arises from how checkout permitted attributes are structured, allowing changes to the order address without triggering necessary validations. This is an incorrect interpretation or handling of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of checkout permitted attributes, allowing an attacker to change the order address without triggering address validations.


The vulnerability is due to the gem being published with world-writable file permissions, which is a weak default setting that should be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by the default file permissions being set to world-writeable (-rw-rw-rw- or 0666) instead of the more secure rw-r--r-- (0644), which allows unauthorized modification of the gem's files. This is a case of a weak default setting that must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is due to the default file permissions being set to 0666, which is insecure. This default setting must be changed to secure the system.


The vulnerability is caused by the incorrect handling of file permissions during the packaging of the gem, leading to world-writable files.


The vulnerability is due to a regression that changed the logging level from 'debug' to 'info', causing sensitive information to be exposed by default. This is a weak default setting because the default logging level is insecure and exposes sensitive data.


The vulnerability is caused by a change in the default logging level from 'debug' to 'info' in Kitchen-Terraform v7.0.0, which results in sensitive values being printed to the terminal by default. This is a weak default setting as it exposes sensitive information without requiring any specific configuration or interaction.


The vulnerability is due to a change in the default logging level from `debug` to `info`, which exposes sensitive values. This is a weak-default issue because the insecure behavior is introduced by a default setting that needs to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by the incorrect handling of logging levels, where sensitive values are printed at the `info` level instead of the `debug` level.


The vulnerability is due to incorrect parsing of HTTP headers, which is an implementation flaw in the Puma server's code, not a configuration issue. It affects all users of the affected versions by default, without requiring any specific configuration to be vulnerable.


The vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments of Puma prior to versions 6.3.1 and 5.6.7, and no special arrangement or configuration is required for the vulnerability to manifest. The issue is with the parsing of chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers, which is a flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect parsing of valid HTTP headers, which is a misinterpretation of configuration parameters (chunked transfer encoding bodies and Content-Length headers).


The vulnerability is due to incorrect parsing of chunked transfer encoding bodies and zero-length Content-Length headers, which is an issue in how the server handles these specific configurations.


The vulnerability is inherent to the Loofah library's use of recursion for sanitizing CDATA sections, which is a design flaw in the library itself. Users can choose to mitigate the issue by limiting string lengths, but the flaw exists in the library's implementation, not in a specific configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by a design flaw in the Loofah library, specifically its use of recursion for sanitizing CDATA sections, which leads to stack exhaustion. This flaw is inherent to the library itself and is not a result of user configuration or interaction.


The vulnerability is due to the inherent design flaw in Loofah versions >= 2.2.0 and < 2.19.1, which uses recursion for sanitizing CDATA sections. This flaw is present in the library itself, and using this version of the library is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (Loofah) that uses recursion for sanitizing CDATA sections, leading to stack exhaustion. This is a configuration choice to include or use this specific version of Loofah.


The vulnerability is inherent in the terminal emulator's handling of escape sequences, which is a design flaw rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default and does not require a specific configuration to be exploited.


The vulnerability arises from the terminal emulator's incorrect handling of a certain character escape sequence, which allows an attacker to modify the window title and potentially execute arbitrary commands. This is a case of incorrect interpretation or handling of valid input.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the terminal emulator and the character escape sequence, which allows an attacker to modify the window title and execute arbitrary commands. This specific interaction between components is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of escape sequences in the terminal emulator, which allows an attacker to manipulate the window title and insert it back into the command line.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a specific function, `Data.init(base32Encoded:)`, which is a configuration choice by the application developers. Vapor itself does not use this function, so the vulnerability only affects applications that choose to use this function directly or through dependencies.


The vulnerability is caused by a bug in the `Data.init(base32Encoded:)` function, which is a component of the Vapor framework. However, Vapor itself does not use this function, and the vulnerability only affects applications that choose to use this function directly or through other dependencies, making it a configuration choice to include or rely on this flawed component.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the `Data.init(base32Encoded:)` function, which is a component that applications may choose to use. The flaw is inherent in the function itself, and the vulnerability manifests when an application includes or relies on this flawed component.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (the `Data.init(base32Encoded:)` function) that can be included or used in the application, but is not used by default in Vapor.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of FileMiddleware, which is a configuration choice. Disabling FileMiddleware or using a CDN mitigates the issue, indicating that the vulnerability is due to an insecure interaction between the middleware and the application.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of FileMiddleware, which is a configuration choice. The middleware itself contains an inherent design or implementation flaw that leads to an integer overflow when given invalid range headers. The system can be built or deployed without the flawed FileMiddleware, as evidenced by the workaround of disabling it and serving via a Content Delivery Network.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the FileMiddleware and the handling of range headers, which is a specific configuration of components within the Vapor framework.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the FileMiddleware and the handling of invalid range headers, which can lead to an integer overflow and a denial of service.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of FileMiddleware, which is a configuration choice. Applications not using FileMiddleware are not affected, indicating that the vulnerability is not present by default in all deployments.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of FileMiddleware, which is a configuration choice. The system can be built or deployed without this middleware, and the flaw is specific to its inclusion.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the application and `FileMiddleware`, which allows access to arbitrary filesystem paths. This specific interaction is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the application and the `FileMiddleware`, allowing attackers to access arbitrary filesystem paths.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration as it is present by default in all typical deployments of Leafkit prior to version 1.3.0. The issue arises from Leafkit not escaping strings passed to variable tags, which is a flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by the templating language Leaf not escaping strings passed to tags as variables, which is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the Leaf component. However, including or relying on this flawed component is itself a configuration choice, as users can choose to sanitize input or update to a patched version.


The vulnerability arises from Leaf's incorrect handling of unsanitized data passed to its variable tags, failing to escape strings properly.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of unsanitized input in Leaf's variable tags, which leads to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks.


The vulnerability is caused by bootstrapping a metrics backend, which is a configuration choice. The issue arises from the interaction between the metrics system and the handling of undefined routes, leading to a DoS condition.


The vulnerability arises from bootstrapping a metrics backend without proper configuration to handle unlimited requests, leading to a DoS attack. This can be mitigated by not bootstrapping a metrics system or upgrading to a patched version, indicating the issue is with how the system is configured or set up rather than an inherent flaw in the code itself.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Vapor app's metrics backend and the handling of undefined route paths, which leads to the creation of unlimited counters and timers.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of undefined route paths, which leads to the creation of unlimited counters and timers, causing a DoS condition.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but is present in all versions of PostgresNIO prior to 1.14.2 when connecting to servers with TLS enabled. It is a flaw in the implementation of the client that allows a man-in-the-middle attack despite TLS being used.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the PostgresNIO client and the PostgreSQL server when TLS is enabled, allowing a man-in-the-middle attacker to inject false responses. This is a specific arrangement of components (client and server with TLS) that introduces a security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between PostgresNIO and PostgreSQL servers with TLS enabled, where specific configurations (trust authentication with a clientcert requirement or cert authentication) allow an attacker to exploit the interaction.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the PostgresNIO client and the PostgreSQL server, where a man-in-the-middle attacker can inject false responses despite TLS being enabled.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of automatic content decoding, which can be disabled as a workaround, indicating that the vulnerability is due to an improper configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of the URLEncodedFormDecoder, which is a valid component of the Vapor framework, but contains an inherent design or implementation flaw that allows for unbounded stack growth. The user has a choice to disable this decoder or use alternative decoders, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to the use of the URLEncodedFormDecoder in Vapor, which is a component that can be configured or omitted. The issue arises from the way this decoder handles certain inputs, leading to stack overflow. The vulnerability can be mitigated by disabling the automatic content decoding for URLEncodedForm data, indicating that its use is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the request body during automatic content decoding, leading to unbounded stack growth and a potential crash.


The vulnerability is due to the handling of unknown QUIC frames, which is a flaw in the implementation of the protocol, not a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the quinn-proto state machine, which is a component of the system. The fact that the problem has been fixed in specific maintenance releases suggests that the flawed component was a configuration choice, as the system can be built or deployed with or without the fix.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the quinn-proto library, which is a component of the system. The flaw is inherent in the design or implementation of the library, and using this library is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of unknown QUIC frames, leading to a panic. This is a flaw in how the system processes or interprets the configuration parameters (in this case, the unknown frames).


The vulnerability arises from the ability to redirect a Tauri window to an external website, which can be due to a feature allowing arbitrary website visits or a bug. This interaction between the Tauri application and external websites introduces a security flaw, as it allows access to the IPC layer.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific arrangement where an application implements a feature for users to visit arbitrary websites or due to a bug allowing an open redirect, which bypasses the usual isolation of the Tauri IPC from external websites. This can be mitigated by preventing arbitrary input in redirect features and/or only allowing trusted websites access to the IPC, indicating a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Tauri IPC and external websites, which can be exploited by redirecting a Tauri window to an external site. This interaction is a configuration choice, as it depends on the application's feature allowing users to visit arbitrary websites or a bug enabling open redirects.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Tauri application and external websites, where a redirect feature or a bug allows an external website to access the IPC layer, which is normally isolated.


The vulnerability is due to an incorrect assumption in the implementation of the bounded channel in the crossbeam-channel library, which is a design flaw in the library itself. This flaw is present in all deployments using the affected version of the library, and no specific configuration is required to trigger it.


The vulnerability is caused by an inherent design or implementation flaw in the `bounded` channel of the crossbeam-channel crate, which incorrectly assumes the allocated capacity of `Vec::from_iter`. This flaw is not universal and the system can be built or deployed without it by using a different version of the crate.


The vulnerability is due to the inherent design flaw in the `bounded` channel's handling of `Vec::from_iter`, which is a component of the crossbeam-channel library. The flaw exists because of how the library interprets the capacity of `Vec::from_iter`, and users can choose to use this specific version of the library.


The vulnerability is caused by an inherent design or implementation flaw in the `bounded` channel component, which incorrectly handles memory allocation and deallocation.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration as it affects the parsing of RPC results universally in both release and debug builds, without requiring any specific configuration to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the Frontier's Ethereum compatibility layer, specifically in the parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion. This flaw is inherent to the component and its inclusion is a configuration choice, as the system can be built or deployed without this component or with an alternative. However, in this case, the component is used for Ethereum compatibility, which is a valid arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect parsing of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion, which is a misinterpretation of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect parsing and handling of the RPC result of the exit reason in case of EVM reversion.


The vulnerability is due to the tough library not properly sanitizing target names, which is an inherent design flaw in the library itself. This flaw is present in all deployments using the affected versions of the library, and no specific configuration is required to exploit it.


The vulnerability is caused by the tough library's failure to properly sanitize target names, which is an incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters. This allows files to be overwritten with arbitrary content anywhere on the system.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of target names when caching or saving files, leading to potential arbitrary file overwrites.


The vulnerability arises from the library's failure to properly sanitize target names, leading to potential file overwrites. This is an issue in how the library handles configuration parameters (target names) and not due to a specific configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent flaw in the tough library's implementation of cryptographic signature verification, which does not require any specific configuration to manifest. It is present by default in all deployments of the library prior to version 0.7.1.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the tough library, which is a component that can be included or excluded from a system. The fact that a fix is available in version 0.7.1 suggests that the library can be updated or replaced, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the tough library, which is a component that can be chosen or excluded as part of the system's configuration. The flaw is inherent in the library's design or implementation, but using the library is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the library's incorrect handling of the uniqueness of cryptographic signatures, allowing an attacker to duplicate a valid signature to circumvent the threshold requirement.


The vulnerability is present in all versions of the Lucet runtime and is not dependent on any specific configuration or interaction between components. It is a flaw in the implementation of the InstanceHandle destructor, which is a core part of the runtime's memory management. Therefore, it is not caused by configuration but is an inherent flaw in the software.


The vulnerability is present in all releases of Lucet and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a bug in the code that allows a use-after-free in an Instance object, which can result in memory corruption, data race, or other related issues. The vulnerability is not caused by configuration, but rather by a flaw in the implementation of the Instance object's destructor.


The vulnerability is due to a design flaw in the `lucet-runtime` component, which is a configuration choice since users can choose to upgrade to a different branch or version. The flaw is inherent in the component itself, and the vulnerability manifests when this component is used.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the `Instance` object's destructor in the `lucet-runtime` component, which is a configuration choice to use this specific runtime.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the Ursa CL-Signatures library, which is a component that can be replaced with a non-flawed version. This makes it an 'insecure-part' as the system can be configured to use a different, secure library.


The vulnerability exists due to a flaw in the Ursa CL-Signatures implementation, which is a component used in the AnonCreds verifiable credential model. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component by using the corrected Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures library instead.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a flawed component (Ursa CL-Signatures library) that contains an inherent design flaw. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component by using the correct implementation from the Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures repository.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (the Ursa CL-Signatures implementation) that can be replaced with a secure alternative (Hyperledger AnonCreds CL-Signatures).


The vulnerability is due to improper handling of user input in the search feature, which allowed cross-site scripting attacks. This is not caused by configuration but by a lack of proper input validation and escaping in the code.


The vulnerability is a cross-site scripting issue that exists in the search feature of mdBook due to a lack of proper escaping of the search query, and it is not caused by a specific configuration arrangement, but rather by a flaw in the implementation of the search feature itself.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of search queries, where the input was not properly escaped, allowing for cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of user input in the search feature, which fails to properly escape the search query, leading to a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but is inherent in the way Cargo handles compressed archives, allowing for a zip bomb attack. This issue is present in all versions of Cargo and does not depend on any specific configuration settings.


The vulnerability is caused by a design flaw in Cargo, which allows arbitrary code execution at build time due to build scripts and procedural macros. This flaw is inherent to the component (Cargo) and is not a result of a specific configuration or interaction. However, the fact that Cargo allows code execution at build time makes it an insecure part, as including or relying on this component is a configuration choice that can lead to security flaws.


The vulnerability is due to Cargo's default behavior of not limiting the amount of data extracted from compressed archives, which can be exploited by uploading a 'zip bomb' to an alternate registry. This is a weak-default issue because the default setting is insecure and needs to be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from Cargo's incorrect handling of compressed archives, specifically failing to limit the amount of data extracted, which can lead to disk space exhaustion.


The vulnerability arises from the software accepting forwarded room keys without verifying the source device, which is an incorrect handling of the key forwarding process.


The vulnerability arises because the software fails to correctly validate the source of a forwarded room key, allowing a malicious homeserver to insert keys of questionable validity. This is an example of incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters, specifically the handling of key forwards and device verification.


The vulnerability arises from the software's incorrect handling of room key forwards, where it fails to verify the origin of the forwarded key, leading to potential impersonation attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the client and the homeserver, where the client accepts room keys without verifying the source, leading to potential impersonation attacks.


The vulnerability is due to certain FFI operations not correctly checking for permissions, which is an implementation flaw in the Deno runtime itself, not a result of configuration choices.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the FFI operations within the Deno runtime, which is a component of the system. This flaw allows malicious actors to bypass permission checks, but it's not a configuration issue per se, rather an issue with how a specific part (FFI operations) of the system is implemented. The fact that it can be fixed by upgrading to a version where this issue is patched suggests it's related to the inclusion of a flawed component (the vulnerable FFI operations) in the system.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of permissions in FFI operations, where the code fails to correctly check for permissions, allowing bypass of permission checks.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of FFI operations, which failed to enforce permission checks properly.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the network permission allow list (`--allow-net`) when using the built-in `node:http` or `node:https` modules, leading to unauthorized outbound HTTP requests.


The vulnerability arises from the use of built-in modules (`node:http` or `node:https`) that do not properly check against the network permission allow list, and this flaw is inherent in the implementation of these modules in the affected Deno versions. The choice to use these modules is a configuration choice, as users could potentially avoid the vulnerability by not using these modules or by updating to a patched version.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters, specifically the failure to check outbound HTTP requests against the network permission allow list (`--allow-net`).


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the network permission allow list (`--allow-net`) for outbound HTTP requests using the built-in `node:http` or `node:https` modules.


The vulnerability arises from the lack of a key correctness proof in the specification, which is a design flaw in the cryptographic component (CL Signatures) used by the system. This flaw allows a malicious issuer to create a custom implementation with weakened keys, but the choice to use this flawed component is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability arises from a malicious issuer creating a custom CL Signature implementation that uses weakened private keys, which is a configuration choice to include a flawed component. The Ursa and AnonCreds implementations themselves always generate sufficient private keys, but the lack of a key correctness proof allows for the potential inclusion of a weakened key generation component.


The vulnerability arises from the use of the Ursa and AnonCreds implementations, which inherently lack a key correctness proof. This flaw is part of the component itself, and while the system can be configured to use these components, the flaw is intrinsic to them.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a flawed component (the CL-Signatures implementation) that does not enforce the generation of sufficiently strong private keys. This flaw can be exploited if a malicious issuer creates a custom implementation with weakened private keys.


The vulnerability is caused by enabling subscriptions in the YAML configuration, which are disabled by default. This configuration choice is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest, as it requires subscriptions to be enabled for the DoS condition to occur.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific combination of configuration settings, including enabling subscriptions and having a subscription type with root-fields defined in the Supergraph schema, which is not a default or universal setting. Disabling subscriptions or upgrading to a patched version can mitigate the risk.


The vulnerability arises from a specific interaction between the enabled GraphQL Subscriptions, the presence of a `subscription` type in the Supergraph schema, and the receipt of an anonymous subscription operation. These conditions together create a security flaw.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration that fails to meet necessary security requirements, specifically enabling subscriptions in the YAML configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by an insecure interaction between hyper as an HTTP server and an upstream HTTP proxy that interprets transfer-encoding headers differently, leading to request smuggling attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between hyper's HTTP server code and an upstream HTTP proxy that understands request payload boundaries differently, allowing for request smuggling or desync attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between hyper's HTTP server code and an upstream HTTP proxy that interprets the request payload boundary differently, enabling a request smuggling attack.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between hyper and an upstream HTTP proxy, where both components interpret the `transfer-encoding` headers differently, leading to a desync attack.


The vulnerability arises from an inherent design flaw in the `evm` crate where the `JUMPI` opcode's condition is checked after the destination validity check, which is incorrect according to Ethereum standards. This flaw is present in all deployments using the affected versions of the crate, and no specific configuration is required to manifest the vulnerability. It is a universal issue with the crate itself, not dependent on any particular configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed implementation of the Ethereum Virtual Machine in the `evm` crate, which is a configuration choice when building or deploying a blockchain. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a specific version of the `evm` crate, which contains an inherent flaw in the handling of the `JUMPI` opcode. The flaw is present in versions `< 0.31.0`, and using a version `0.31.0` or later resolves the issue. The choice to use a specific version of the `evm` crate is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `JUMPI` opcode's condition check, which should occur before the destination validity check according to the standard implementation.


The vulnerability arises from the http-client library incorrectly handling HTTP redirects by passing authorization headers to a different domain, which is an incorrect handling of the redirect scenario.


The vulnerability occurs due to the interaction between the http-client and the redirect mechanism, where the authorization header is passed to another domain in certain redirect scenarios. This is a valid arrangement in which two or more components (http-client and redirect) interact in a way that introduces a security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the HTTP client making a request with an authorization header and the subsequent redirect to a different domain, which leads to the disclosure of the header. This specific interaction is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the http-client and the server during a redirect, where the authorization header is incorrectly passed to a different domain.


The vulnerability arises from the improper handling of the 'translateOptions.tld' parameter, which is not sanitized before being used in a URL, allowing an attacker to manipulate it for SSRF attacks.


The vulnerability is caused by the `translateOptions.tld` field not being properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to set a malicious `tld` and send requests within internal networks and the local host. This is an example of an unprotected parameter, as the `tld` field should be restricted or validated to prevent such exploitation.


The vulnerability arises because the `translateOptions.tld` parameter is exposed to the end user without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to manipulate it to perform SSRF attacks.


The vulnerability arises from the improper sanitization of the `translateOptions.tld` parameter, which allows an attacker to set a malicious value and cause the application to generate unsafe URLs.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by the behavior of the application when the incoming body is not consumed. This is a flaw in the implementation of the HTTP client, not a result of a particular configuration setting.


The vulnerability is present by default in all typical deployments of the Undici HTTP/1.1 client and does not require a specific configuration arrangement to manifest. It is a design or implementation flaw that occurs when the incoming body is not consumed, which is not a configuration choice but rather a usage issue.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the incoming body when using `fetch(url)`. The code does not properly manage the body consumption, leading to a memory leak.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the incoming body in the `fetch` function, leading to a memory leak if the body is not consumed or is consumed very slowly.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the slp-validate package itself, which is a component that can be updated or replaced. The issue is not due to a specific configuration but rather an inherent flaw in the package version used.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the slp-validate npm package, which is a component used in the system. The fact that versions prior to 1.0.1 are vulnerable and can be upgraded to a patched version indicates that including this flawed component is a configuration choice.

source-code
configuration-code
npm package


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the `slp-validate` npm package versions prior to 1.0.1, which is a component that can be chosen or updated as part of the system's configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of Bitcoin scripts, leading to a discrepancy between the specified SLP consensus rules and the validation result.


The vulnerability arises from the ability to craft a custom Scaffolder template with a specific action and source path, which is a configuration choice. The attack requires the attacker to have access to create and register templates, indicating a configuration aspect.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the custom Scaffolder template and the `github:publish:pull-request` action, which allows an attacker to read sensitive files from the environment. This specific interaction is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Scaffolder template and the `github:publish:pull-request` action, which allows sensitive files to be included in a pull request. This specific interaction is a configuration choice that introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Scaffolder template and the environment where tasks are run, allowing sensitive files to be read and included in a pull request.


The vulnerability arises from the use of ECDSA functions that accept a single 'bytes' argument, which allows for signature malleability. This is a design flaw in the library's implementation, not a configuration issue, as it affects all deployments using these functions by default.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a specific library function (ECDSA.recover and ECDSA.tryRecover) that accepts EIP-2098 compact signatures, which is a configuration choice. The issue is not present in all deployments, but rather in those that implement signature reuse or replay protection in a particular way.


The vulnerability arises from the inclusion of the `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` functions in the OpenZeppelin Contracts library, which accept EIP-2098 compact signatures. This is a design choice in the library, and users can choose to use a version of the library that does not include these vulnerable functions.


The vulnerability is caused by the inclusion of a flawed component (the ECDSA functions) that accepts both EIP-2098 compact signatures and traditional 65 byte signatures, leading to signature malleability.


The vulnerability arises from the lack of timestamp validation in the code, which is an implementation flaw rather than a configuration issue. The vulnerability is present by default and does not depend on any specific configuration settings.


The vulnerability arises from the code's failure to properly check the current timestamp against the NotOnOrAfter time in the LogoutRequest XML, allowing for the reuse of expired requests. This indicates an incorrect handling of valid configuration parameters.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the current timestamp in the validation process, where the code fails to check if the current time is past the 'NotOnOrAfter' timestamp, allowing expired LogoutRequests to be reused.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the current timestamp in the LogoutRequest validation process, allowing reuse of expired requests.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the implementation of the SLPJS library, which leads to false-negative validation outcomes for MINT transactions. This is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the library itself, and not due to any specific configuration choice by the user.


The vulnerability is caused by a poorly implemented SLP wallet, which is a component (library) that contains an inherent design or implementation flaw. The system can be built or deployed without this flawed component, but the user chooses a build/deployment option with it, making it an insecure-part category.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of validation for MINT transaction operations, leading to false-negative outcomes.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of MINT transaction operations, leading to false-negative validation outcomes.


The vulnerability can be mitigated by ensuring a Content Security Policy is in place, indicating that the issue arises from improper configuration of security policies.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the posthog-js library, which is a component that can be included or excluded from a project. Upgrading to a patched version or using an alternative tracking method can mitigate the issue, indicating that the choice of library version is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the `posthog-js` library itself, which is a component that users can choose to include in their projects. The flaw is inherent in the library's design or implementation, and upgrading to a patched version resolves the issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific component (posthog-js) that contains a cross-site scripting flaw. The vulnerability can be mitigated by upgrading the component or ensuring a Content Security Policy is in place.


The vulnerability is due to an inefficient regular expression in the code, which is a design flaw in the library itself and not dependent on any specific configuration or interaction.


The vulnerability is caused by an inefficient regular expression in the `headerValueNormalize()` utility function, which is a part of the Undici library. This flaw is inherent to the library and can be avoided by not using the vulnerable version of the library, making it a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent design flaw in the `headerValueNormalize()` utility function within the Undici library, which is a component of the system. The use of an inefficient regular expression is a flaw in the component itself, and the decision to use this component is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by an inefficient regular expression in the `headerValueNormalize()` utility function, which is a part of the library. This flaw is inherent to the component and can be exploited if the component is used.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a specific version range of the auth0.js library, which improperly includes sensitive user information in error objects. This is a flaw in the library itself, and using this flawed version is a configuration choice.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (auth0.js version between 8.0.0 and 9.13.1) that contains an inherent design or implementation flaw, specifically returning the original request with plaintext password in the error object. However, including or relying on that flawed component is itself a configuration choice, as developers can choose to upgrade to a secure version or implement a temporary fix.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the auth0.js library, which is a component that can be included or excluded as part of the application's configuration. The issue is not present by default in all deployments, as it depends on the specific version of the library being used.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of error objects, which include sensitive user data (plaintext passwords) that should not be exposed or logged.


The vulnerability arises from not specifying the 'algorithms' parameter in the express-jwt configuration, which is a valid configuration parameter that should be protected or restricted. Without specifying it, the system is vulnerable to authorization bypass.


The vulnerability is caused by a default setting where the algorithms entry is not enforced in the configuration, leading to potential authorization bypass when used with jwks-rsa. This can be fixed by specifying the algorithms in the express-jwt configuration, making the default setting insecure by default.


The vulnerability arises because the default configuration does not enforce the specification of the 'algorithms' entry, which is insecure by default. Specifying 'algorithms' in the configuration is necessary for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'algorithms' configuration parameter, which is not enforced by the library, leading to potential authorization bypass.


The vulnerability is inherent to the Electron framework's handling of IPC messages and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement by the user. It affects all applications using certain IPC methods, regardless of configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the main process and subframes in the renderer process, where IPC messages can be delivered to the wrong frame under certain conditions, such as when using the remote module, webContents.sendToFrame, or event.reply in IPC message handlers.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the main process and the renderer process in Electron, specifically through the use of `webContents.sendToFrame`, `event.reply`, or the `remote` module. The issue is not inherent to any single component but rather to how these components interact.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the main process and subframes in the renderer process, where IPC messages can be delivered to the wrong frame.


The vulnerability arises because the '/content-manager/relations' route does not properly handle private fields, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive information if a user has configure view permissions. This is an example of incorrect handling of configuration parameters, as the system fails to enforce constraints on what can be accessed based on permissions.


The vulnerability is caused by a specific configuration where the configure view permission is granted to a non-admin user, allowing them to access and exploit the reset password token. This is an example of an improper configuration, as the default configuration should not allow non-admin users to have such permissions.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the configure view permissions and the /content-manager/relations route, which allows unauthorized access to reset password tokens.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of private fields in the `/content-manager/relations` route, which fails to remove or protect sensitive data such as reset password tokens.


The vulnerability is due to the use of a specific version of the auth0 npm package that fails to sanitize the Authorization header, which is a flaw in the component itself. Users can choose to upgrade to a version that does not have this flaw, indicating that the vulnerability is related to the inclusion of a flawed component.


The vulnerability is caused by the use of a specific version of the auth0 npm package that contains a flawed implementation of sanitizing the request object. The package's DenyList of specific keys to be sanitized does not include the Authorization header key, leading to potential exposure of bearer tokens. This is a configuration choice, as the user can choose to use a different version of the package or an alternative package altogether.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of configuration parameters, specifically the failure to sanitize the Authorization header key from the error object, which leads to the exposure of a bearer token.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the Authorization header, which is not properly sanitized from the error object, leading to potential exposure of bearer tokens.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the Content-Type header, where the fastify-reply-from plugin does not trim the header value, leading to misinterpretation and potential security bypass. This is a flaw in how the configuration parameter (Content-Type) is handled.


The vulnerability arises from the use of a specific component (`@fastify/reply-from`) that does not unify the parsing of Content-Type with the main Fastify repository, leading to a security flaw. This component is a valid part of the system, but its inclusion and specific implementation introduce the vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `@fastify/reply-from` plugin and the way it handles the `Content-Type` header, which differs from the main Fastify repo's handling. This specific interaction between components leads to the security flaw.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the Content-Type header, where the plugin does not trim the header value as expected, leading to potential security bypass.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the 'chainId' when a user changes chains during the connection flow, leading to potential incorrect data derivation and transactions.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the `@web3-react` framework, specifically in the handling of the `chainId` when the user changes chains. This flaw is inherent to the component and can be avoided by upgrading to a patched version or choosing a different implementation. The issue is not with the configuration itself, but with the library's behavior under certain conditions.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `chainId` parameter when a user changes chains, leading to outdated or incorrect values being used in the application.


The vulnerability arises from the incorrect handling of the `chainId` when the user changes chains during the connection flow, leading to potential incorrect data derivation and incorrect fund transfers.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `slp-validate` package, which allows a specially crafted Bitcoin script to bypass validation. This flaw is inherent to the package itself and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design of the wagtail-2fa module, allowing bypass of 2FA by manipulating the URL. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the `lookup` function in Helm v3, which interacts with a remote cluster during `helm template` and `helm install|update|delete|rollback --dry-run` operations, contrary to the documented behavior. This specific interaction introduces a security flaw by allowing unannounced lookups against the cluster.


The vulnerability is caused by a bug in the server's code for recognizing special `/meta/*` channels, which is a universal flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability is inherent in the library's handling of HTTP redirects and authorization headers, and it is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a flaw in the library's default behavior, which is fixed in a later version.


The vulnerability arises from a flawed implementation in the Java-WebSocket Client library, specifically the lack of SSL hostname validation. This flaw is inherent to the library, and using this library in a project introduces the vulnerability.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of HTML encoded whitespace characters in the redirect URL validation process, allowing the validation to be bypassed.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the implementation of the SLPJS package, specifically in the validation logic for MINT transactions. This flaw is inherent to the package itself and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability arises from the improper configuration of IPv6 settings on the host, specifically the acceptance of router advertisements and the default state of IPv6 forwarding. This configuration allows an attacker to exploit the system by sending rogue router advertisements.


The vulnerability arises when the 'algorithms' parameter is not specified in the express-jwt configuration, which is a valid but insecure arrangement. This configuration oversight allows for potential authorization bypass.


The vulnerability is due to an inherent flaw in the library's implementation of cryptographic signature verification, which is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a universal issue in the library prior to version 0.7.1.


The vulnerability is inherent in the cryptographic message authentication code (HMAC-SHA1) implementation and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is present by default in all typical deployments of the affected TYPO3 CMS versions.


The vulnerability arises from the improper configuration of Django's session storage, which leads to the storage of user passwords in clear text. The severity of the issue depends on the type of session storage configured (database, signed cookie, or cache). Changing the session storage configuration can mitigate the impact, but the root cause is the insecure configuration of session storage.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design of the checkout permitted attributes structure, which is a universal flaw in the affected versions of Solidus. It does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from a specific component (the auth0 npm package) that fails to properly sanitize the Authorization header in certain error scenarios. This flaw is inherent to the component, and the vulnerability manifests when this specific component is used in a particular configuration (Machine to Machine application authorized to use Auth0's management API).


The vulnerability is related to a flaw in the formkey protection mechanism in the Admin Interface, which is a design or implementation issue rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between Helm and its repository, where duplicate charts can be exploited if the repository is compromised. This specific interaction is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is present only when the `FileMiddleware` component is used, which is a configuration choice. If the application is built or deployed without this component, the vulnerability does not exist.


The vulnerability is an XML External Entity (XXE) attack, which is a flaw in the way the software processes XML input. This is an inherent issue in the software's handling of XML data, not a result of any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by an incorrect assumption in the implementation of the `bounded` channel in the crossbeam-channel crate, specifically related to memory allocation and deallocation. This is an inherent flaw in the code rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises because Opencast disables HTTPS hostname verification by default, which is an insecure setting. This default behavior allows man-in-the-middle attacks unless explicitly changed by the user.


The vulnerability is inherent in the Electron framework's handling of IPC messages and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It affects all applications using the mentioned functions regardless of their configuration.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the search feature's implementation, specifically the lack of proper escaping of the search query. This is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the software itself, not a result of any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `Plug.Session` in `Pow.Plug.Session` and persistent session stores like Redis or a database, which introduces a session fixation attack vector. This specific interaction is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between Ktor and a proxy that improperly handles Content-Length and Transfer-Encoding headers or uses \n as a header separator. This specific interaction is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises because the default value for `sylius_channel.debug` is not properly resolved and cast to boolean, enabling a debug feature in production environments even when `kernel.debug` is set to false. This insecure default setting must be explicitly changed to `false` for secure operation.


The vulnerability arises from an improper security configuration that grants the non-standard role `ROLE_COURSE_ADMIN` the ability to create new users, which is not expected behavior based on the role's name and documentation. This issue is resolved by updating the default security configuration.


The vulnerability arises when the MessagePack library is not configured to handle untrusted data securely, specifically by not enabling the `UntrustedData` mode. This mode is necessary to mitigate hash collisions and stack overflow risks during deserialization.


The vulnerability arises from a flaw in the auth0.js library where error objects include sensitive user data. Using this flawed version of the library is a configuration choice, as developers can choose to upgrade to a fixed version or implement a workaround.


The vulnerability is due to a flaw in the library's implementation of token validation, which incorrectly treats all incoming tokens as bearer tokens regardless of their specified subject confirmation method. This flaw is inherent to the library's design and is not dependent on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is inherent in the code and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is exploitable by any authenticated backend user with the `cms.manage_assets` permission, regardless of the system's configuration.


The vulnerability arises because the /login and /change endpoints are not properly configured to protect against CSRF attacks, allowing authentication tokens to be exposed in GET requests. This is a configuration issue as it involves the arrangement of security settings for these endpoints.


The vulnerability is due to flawed regular expressions within the jquery-validation library. Including this library in a project is a configuration choice, and the vulnerability can be avoided by not using the library or by updating to a secure version.


The vulnerability arises because the default behavior of the Blaze library is to accept connections unconditionally, leading to file handle exhaustion. The fix introduces a `maxConnections` parameter with a default value of 512, indicating that the previous default behavior was insecure.


The vulnerability manifests due to a specific interaction between hyper as an HTTP server and an upstream HTTP proxy that incorrectly handles transfer-encoding headers. This interaction is necessary for the desync attack to succeed.


The vulnerability is caused by a code injection flaw in the `#manipulate!` method of the CarrierWave::RMagick module, which inappropriately evals untrusted input. This is an inherent design flaw in the code itself, not a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design of the Vapor framework and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It affects all typical deployments by default.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the error handling mechanism of TYPO3, which leads to recursive calls and resource exhaustion. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises because the default signing key (application startup time) is insecure and must be changed for secure operation. The default configuration is unsuitable for production use, and a securely randomly generated value is recommended.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the readUvarint function within the xz library, which does not terminate a loop when provided with malicious input. This is an inherent implementation flaw in the library itself and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability is inherent in how Wire handles type information in its serialization format, and it is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a design flaw present in the default behavior of the library.


The vulnerability is inherent in the XML parsing mechanism of Opencast and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a universal flaw in the software's handling of XML entities, present by default in all typical deployments.


The vulnerability is caused by a bug in the Cranelift x64 backend that performs a sign-extend instead of a zero-extend under specific circumstances. This is an inherent flaw in the code generation logic and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. The issue exists by default in the affected versions of Cranelift and does not require any particular configuration to be exploitable.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the check-spelling GitHub Action and the `pull_request_target` event, which allows an attacker to craft a Pull Request that exposes the `GITHUB_TOKEN`. This specific interaction is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed function (`Data.init(base32Encoded:)`) in the Vapor framework. While Vapor itself does not use this function, applications that choose to use it directly or through dependencies are affected. The use of this flawed function is a configuration choice, as alternatives are available.


The vulnerability is inherent in the Leafkit templating language's handling of variable tags, which does not escape strings by default. This flaw is present in all typical deployments of versions prior to 1.3.0 and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by a coding error in the implementation of `tf.raw_ops.BoostedTreesCreateEnsemble`, specifically a use-after-free issue due to incorrect handling of a smart pointer. This is a software defect and not related to any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the destinationDirectory path, specifically failing to enforce that it ends with a slash, which allows partial path traversal.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the library's handling of target names, which is a universal issue in all typical deployments of the library prior to version 0.12.0. No specific configuration or arrangement is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability arises from a flaw in the implementation of the Scaffolder Tasks, allowing sensitive file access when a malicious template is executed. This is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement but is instead an inherent issue in the code.


The vulnerability is due to an implementation flaw in the `evm` crate where the `JUMPI` opcode's condition check is performed in the wrong order. This flaw is inherent to the library and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability is caused by a flawed component (parser_apache2 plugin) that can be avoided by not using it or by replacing it with a patched version. The choice to include this plugin is a configuration decision.


The vulnerability is caused by a missing validation in the checkpoints loading infrastructure, which is a design flaw in the code itself rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between `rails_multisite` and Rails' signed/encrypted cookies, allowing cookies to be reused across different sites within a multi-site Rails application. This specific interaction is a necessary condition for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by a use-after-free bug in the `lucet-runtime` that is present in all versions and is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a fundamental flaw in the implementation of the `Instance` object's destructor.


The vulnerability arises when the diagnostics feature is enabled, which is a configuration choice. Disabling this feature mitigates the issue, indicating that the vulnerability is due to an improper configuration.


The vulnerability arises because the Content Security Policy (CSP) cannot be configured for individual pages, which is a necessary security requirement for websites using JavaScript or external resources. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is inherent in the terminal emulator's handling of escape sequences and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It is a flaw in the implementation itself, present by default in all typical deployments.


The vulnerability is a flaw in the session management logic of TYPO3, where existing sessions are not revoked upon password reset. This is a universal issue in the affected versions and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability is caused by an inherent flaw in the Loofah library's implementation of recursion for sanitizing CDATA sections, which is present by default in all typical deployments. No specific configuration is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of `AssignOp` in TensorFlow, which does not check if the right-hand side of the assignment is initialized. This is an inherent design or implementation flaw in the code itself, not a result of any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by a memory leak in the implementation of `ImmutableExecutorState::Initialize` due to improper handling of a pointer. This is an inherent flaw in the code and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the `followRedirects` or `followRedirectsWith` functions and the redirection strategies, which fail to properly handle confidential headers during cross-origin redirects. This specific interaction introduces the security flaw.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design or implementation of mitmproxy and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement. It affects all typical deployments of mitmproxy 7.0.4 and below by default.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of FFI operations in Deno, which did not correctly check for permissions. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments of the affected versions and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by an integer overflow in the YAJL library's reallocation logic, which is an inherent implementation flaw. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration but by a flaw in the implementation of the `fromData` method in certain plugins. It is not dependent on any specific configuration setting or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from improper handling of HTTP methods, which can be mitigated by restricting the path prefix to the 'GET' method. This indicates a configuration issue where the system fails to meet necessary security requirements by default.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the `ContentsManager.allow_hidden = False` configuration, which fails to properly restrict access to hidden files and directories.


The vulnerability arises from the use of `System.Random`, a non-cryptographically secure random number generator, for generating private keys during the X25519 key exchange. This is a design flaw in the component, and the system can be configured to avoid this issue by disabling the affected key exchange algorithms.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the Vyper language's handling of external contract calls, which is a universal issue in versions prior to 0.3.4 and not dependent on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from an integer overflow in the FileMiddleware component, which is a specific part of the Vapor framework. The flaw is inherent to this component, and the vulnerability can be mitigated by disabling or not using FileMiddleware.


The vulnerability is caused by an inherent flaw in the URLEncodedFormDecoder's handling of deeply nested arrays, which leads to unbounded stack growth and a crash. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability stems from a design flaw in the Hyperledger AnonCreds specification and its implementation in Ursa and AnonCreds, where the Issuer does not publish a key correctness proof. This flaw is inherent to the specification and its implementations, not a result of any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises because the export functionality does not properly restrict access to database columns, which is a configuration issue. The solution involves denying access to this functionality for regular users, indicating a misconfiguration in access controls.


The vulnerability is inherent in the Biscuit specification version 1 due to the use of a flawed algorithm (Γ-signatures). It is not caused by any specific configuration or arrangement, as the flaw exists by default in all typical deployments of Biscuit v1. Migrating to Biscuit v2, which uses a different algorithm, is the only solution.


The vulnerability is caused by incorrect file permissions set during the packaging of the gem, which is a flaw in the build process rather than a configuration issue. It is not dependent on any specific configuration of the system where the gem is installed.


The vulnerability is not caused by a specific configuration but rather by a flaw in the handling of expired tokens in the FlyteAdmin software itself. This issue is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any particular configuration setting.


The vulnerability is due to an implementation flaw in the `downloadDirectory` method of the AWS SDK for Java, specifically in the validation logic for the key name. This flaw allows a knowledgeable actor to bypass the validation logic using a UNIX double-dot in the bucket key. The issue is inherent to the method's implementation and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability is inherent in the implementation of the `ECDSA.recover` and `ECDSA.tryRecover` functions, which accept EIP-2098 compact signatures. This flaw is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system, but rather on the design of these functions themselves.


The vulnerability is caused by a bug in the parsing logic of the RPC result in the Frontier codebase, which is not dependent on any specific configuration. It is a universal flaw in the implementation that affects all deployments.


The vulnerability arises from a specific configuration scenario where RBAC is disabled and then enabled, leading to improper handling of folder permissions. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is inherent in Cargo's handling of compressed archives and is present in all versions of Cargo. It does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system, but rather on a flaw in the software itself.


The vulnerability is caused by a lack of output sanitization in the code, which is a universal flaw in the affected versions of the GitHub Action. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design of the software's key handling mechanism, not dependent on any specific configuration. It is a flaw in the implementation that allows a malicious homeserver to insert room keys without proper validation.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the code that allows an authenticated user to perform a Denial of Service attack. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system, but rather a universal issue in the affected versions of the software.


The vulnerability is a code injection issue in the `run-terraform` reusable workflow, which is present by default in all typical deployments. No specific configuration is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is caused by an undefined behavior in the type conversion from `char` to `bool` within the TensorFlow codebase, which is a fundamental implementation flaw rather than a configuration issue.


The vulnerability arises from the default permissions set on temporary files created by MPXJ on Unix-like systems, which are too permissive. This is a configuration issue because the security of the system depends on the proper configuration of file permissions, which is not adequately enforced by default.


The vulnerability arises from a specific configuration where multiple session cookies are used alongside certain session handlers, which allows an attacker to escalate privileges by accessing pages requiring a different session cookie. This is an improper configuration because it fails to meet necessary security requirements by not properly isolating session contexts.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the React render cycle within the core 'Text' plugin, which is not dependent on any specific configuration. It is a universal issue in the affected versions of Grafana.


The vulnerability is caused by an insecure implementation of file permissions in the code, which is not dependent on any specific configuration. It is a universal flaw in versions before v3, and upgrading to v3 or later fixes the issue.


The vulnerability is due to an inefficient regular expression in the `headerValueNormalize()` utility function, which is a code implementation flaw rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by an inherent flaw in the Bitswap server's handling of connections and memory allocation, which is present by default in all typical deployments. No specific configuration or arrangement is required for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is inherent in the XWiki Platform's handling of wiki content execution rights, specifically within the IconThemeSheet functionality. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement but rather a flaw in the platform's design or implementation.


The vulnerability is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) issue in the Live Data macro of XWiki Platform, which allows a user without script rights to inject malicious scripts. This flaw is inherent in the implementation of the Live Data macro and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement of the system.


The vulnerability arises because the custom `LESS` setting allows an attacker to specify an absolute path to sensitive files, which the `LESS` parser then reads. This setting should be protected or restricted to prevent such exploitation.


The vulnerability arises from the insecure handling of the `github.head_ref` parameter, which is directly substituted without proper validation or sanitization, leading to potential code execution.


The vulnerability is due to a missing permissions check in the code, which is a design flaw rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `useWeb3React()` function, which does not correctly update the `chainId` when a user changes chains. This is an inherent issue in the code and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability is caused by a regression in the code that changes the logging level of sensitive values from 'debug' to 'info'. This is a universal flaw in the software itself, not a result of any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from the improper configuration of the Gradle Build Tool with the configuration cache enabled, which leads to the exposure of secrets via the GitHub Actions cache. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises from the interaction between the Tauri IPC and external websites, which can be exploited by redirecting a Tauri window to an external site. This specific interaction is necessary for the vulnerability to manifest.


The vulnerability is inherent in the implementation of PostgresNIO when connecting to servers with TLS enabled, and it is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. The flaw exists by default in all typical deployments of the affected versions of PostgresNIO.


The vulnerability is a cross-site scripting issue inherent in the library itself, not dependent on any specific configuration. It is present by default in all typical deployments of the affected versions.


The vulnerability arises from specific configuration settings (enabling JSON Web Tokens or the local password database) that allow deactivated users to log in under certain conditions. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `node:http` and `node:https` modules in Deno, where network permissions are not correctly enforced. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments of the affected versions and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability manifests due to specific logging and RPC endpoint configurations, such as setting the log output to 'json' and exposing the `dump_consensus_state` RPC endpoint to the public internet. These configurations are necessary for the vulnerability to be exploited, and changing them mitigates the issue.


The vulnerability arises because the default configuration allows any logged-in user to edit the `Mail.MailConfig` page, which includes sensitive mail sending configuration. This default setting is insecure and must be changed for secure operation.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the tags API implementation that leaks information about non-viewable pages. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments of the affected versions and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is not caused by configuration but rather by the way XWiki handles document revisions during upgrades. It affects the system by allowing exploitation of old, vulnerable revisions of documents even after fixes are applied. This issue is inherent to the document versioning mechanism and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is inherent in the design of the `/content-manager/relations` route, which does not properly remove private fields or ensure they cannot be selected. This flaw exists by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the key parameter in the CryptKey constructor, where the key is exposed in an exception message when passed as a string without a valid pass phrase.


The vulnerability arises from a specific condition during a restart of Umbraco, which can be mitigated by enabling certain features or applying IP restrictions, indicating a configuration issue.


The vulnerability is caused by incorrect parsing logic within the Puma web server itself, which is a fundamental implementation flaw rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability is due to a missing timestamp check in the code, which is a design flaw rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises due to the interaction between multiple nodes in a Graylog cluster, where each node maintains an isolated cache of user sessions. This interaction allows a session to remain valid on some nodes even after the user has logged out, due to the caching mechanism and the use of the `X-Graylog-No-Session-Extension:true` header.


The vulnerability manifests only when specific configuration settings are enabled (subscriptions enabled in the YAML configuration) and a particular schema condition is met (subscription type with root-fields defined). This indicates an improper configuration that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is inherent in the implementation of the `BaseUser.login` method, which leaks information about valid users due to timing discrepancies. This flaw is present by default in all typical deployments of Piccolo versions 0.120.0 and prior, and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises from the use of `Pow.Store.Backend.MnesiaCache`, which has an inherent flaw in handling expired keys on startup. The flaw is specific to this component, and the system can be configured to use a different cache backend to avoid the issue.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the state machine implementation of the QUIC transport protocol, which leads to a panic when receiving unknown QUIC frames. This issue is inherent to the code and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises because the `cms.safe_mode` setting, which is intended to restrict PHP code execution, is improperly configured and can be bypassed by specific Twig code. This indicates a failure in meeting necessary security requirements through configuration.


The vulnerability arises from insufficient access-level checks on the Wiki redirection page, which is a configuration issue that fails to meet necessary security requirements. Disabling wiki integration (`$g_wiki_enable = OFF;`) is suggested as a workaround, indicating that the issue is related to the configuration of the system.


The vulnerability is caused by a flaw in the implementation of the `AuthenticationService` in Bunkum 4.0, specifically in how it handles caching of tokens and users. This flaw is inherent to the code and not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. The issue is present by default in all typical deployments of Bunkum 4.0 and is fixed in version 4.2.1 by modifying the code to wipe the token cache after handling a request.


The vulnerability arises from an insecure example configuration in the Tauri documentation, specifically the `envPrefix` setting in `vite.config.ts`, which leads to the leakage of sensitive keys. This is a valid arrangement that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability arises because the CSRF authenticity token check is disabled for the questionnaire templates preview, which is a configuration choice that fails to meet necessary security requirements.


The vulnerability is inherent in the core functionality of TinyMCE's undo/redo feature and other APIs/plugins, and it is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement. The issue arises from a flaw in the code that handles text nodes and serialization, which is present by default in all typical deployments.


The vulnerability arises because the `devise_invitable` gem incorrectly handles the `invite_for` expiry period, failing to enforce the configured 2-week validity period for invitations. This is a case of incorrect interpretation or handling of a valid configuration parameter.


The vulnerability arises from incorrect handling of the request body in the 'Send for Approval' process, allowing users to bypass publish restrictions.


The vulnerability arises because the `translateOptions.tld` parameter is exposed to the end user without proper sanitization, allowing an attacker to inject malicious values. This parameter should be protected or restricted to prevent such exploitation.


The vulnerability is due to unhandled errors in API requests that include traceback information, which is a code implementation issue rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises when SMTP is not set up correctly, but the reset password functionality is enabled, leading to user enumeration. This is a case of improper configuration because the system fails to meet necessary security requirements by allowing different error messages based on user existence when SMTP is misconfigured.


The vulnerability arises because the system does not enforce server-side file validation for SVG files by default, and media is served from the same host as the Umbraco CMS. These are configuration choices that can be adjusted to mitigate the issue.


The vulnerability is a memory overflow issue in the OpenEXR-viewer software, which is a fundamental flaw in the implementation rather than a configuration issue. It is present by default in all typical deployments and does not depend on any specific configuration.


The vulnerability arises because the system defaults to using a hardcoded JWT key ('not so secret') if the random key generation fails during initialization. This insecure default is only in effect until the first restart, after which a secure random key is used.


The vulnerability arises because `fastify-reply-from` does not use the `fast-content-type-parse` library to parse the Content-Type header, leading to misinterpretation of the incoming body. This is a configuration choice as the system could be built or deployed with the correct library to avoid the flaw.


The vulnerability stems from a flaw in the CL-Signatures implementation within the Ursa library, which is a component that can be replaced or updated. The flaw is not universal across all configurations but exists in specific versions of the library, making it a configuration-based issue.


The vulnerability arises because the template engine defaults to having autoescape set to `false`, which is an insecure default setting. This allows for the execution of malicious scripts in users' browsers when rendering user-supplied data. The patch changes this default to `true`, mitigating the risk.


The vulnerability arises because Argo CD incorrectly handles the Content-Type header in API requests, allowing attackers to bypass CORS checks by setting a non-sensitive content type like 'text/plain'.


The vulnerability is due to inadequate input sanitization in the code, which is a universal flaw in the affected versions of Nautobot. It is not dependent on any specific configuration or arrangement.


The vulnerability arises because the Import Certificate feature does not properly validate or restrict user-provided paths, allowing arbitrary file writes. This is a case of an unprotected parameter where user-controllable input (file paths) is not sufficiently safeguarded.


The vulnerability is caused by a memory leak in the Undici HTTP/1.1 client when the incoming body is not consumed or consumed very slowly. This is an inherent flaw in the implementation of the `fetch(url)` function and does not depend on any specific configuration or arrangement.